Mike Hertzendorf on leadership: The number 1 job is to develop future leaders – syracuse.com

Mike Hertzendorf retired from the U.S. Army in October 2018. He spent 29 years as a helicopter pilot, nearly all of it with the 160th Special Operations Aviation Regiment, perhaps better known by its nickname Night Stalkers. In 2014, as a colonel, he became the regiment commander.

After Sept. 11, 2001, he spent part of every year in Afghanistan through 2016, with the exception of 2007, and a number of years in Iraq and other places.

In his last years in the Army, he was commander of the Night Stalkers, then chief of staff of the 82nd Airborne Division, and finally deputy to the chief of staff of the Armys 18th Airborne Corps.

The chance to be near family was one draw for moving back to Upstate New York. It also gave him the opportunity to become NUAIRs president and CEO. NUAIR controls the 50-mile corridor between Syracuse and Rome to develop systems for pilot-less craft (drones) to fly beyond visual line of sight.

NUAIR is an acronym for Northeast UAS Airspace Integration Research Alliance Inc. UAS stands for unmanned aerial systems.

Tell me about a time you feel your leadership was tested and how you met that test.

It wasnt one seminal event. You're being tested at every level as you progress in the Army. Obviously, in combat, you're always being tested. The stakes are obviously higher. But, really, the basis for success was no different. You had to establish trust with your subordinates and listen to them and take in a lot of opinions. You show that you're human, just like them, and that you have a positive attitude.

What do you wish you had known about leadership before you became a leader?

The Army does prepare you well through formal education. I think I really got the essence of leadership later on in my career. Even as I was progressing up, I was still concerned a little bit about myself.

The Army is a meritocracy, right? I mean, you have to perform to continue to move up. The work I'm doing for everyone else is going to eventually get me promoted, which gives me the ability to do more work at a higher level.

The danger in that and we all have egos is that you're doing the right things for the right reasons, but you're still thinking about yourself and your own advancement in some way.

It's somewhat of a double-edge sword because it is a meritocracy and yet you're really doing the work it takes to advance for the benefit of the team. How you balance that is a challenge.

As we talk about it, there may have been a seminal event.

There was a point after one specific mission that it really clicked for me. We did something that was very important to the nation. And it made me realize that if my career ended that day, I would be OK. That's very freeing in some respect because you get to that point where you're willing to take on more risk informed risk but you're also willing to truly sacrifice yourself for others. You've achieved some point where continuing to go on to higher rank doesn't really matter,

What was that mission?

It was just a mission. Units like the 160th have been continually engaged every night from 9/11 till today hundreds of thousands of missions night after night in Iraq, Syria, Afghanistan. It was just a mission, and there have been many more like it, and there'll be many more. So, it's just not important.

What's important is we often don't realize that tonight, last night, tomorrow night, there are still soldiers going down range for our country. After 18 years, it's often forgotten, and it shouldn't be.

Leadership is a lifelong journey, so were you in leadership roles growing up?

I absolutely agree it is lifelong. You're always going to continue to grow as a leader.

I think most of my early roles were as a member of the team. That's where you really learn the basis of leadership being a member of a team.

I played a lot in sports and scouting, but I wasn't the captain of the high school soccer team or anything like that (at Scotia-Glenville High School, class of 1985). But I was a good team player. You cant be a good leader if you are not a good follower.

That really gets to empowerment. We often think about empowerment as a one-way street, that the leader empowers their subordinates. They give them broad guidance. That subordinate feels like: Hey, my boss trusts me. I can take initiative. He's not micromanaging me.

But I think empowerment works two ways. The follower has to look up and say, Hey, you know, what can I do to best support my boss? What can I best do to support the broad efforts of the team?

Being on a team, you learn empowerment both ways. You have to think up. What are the challenges that my boss has? How can I solve one of his or her problems that allows them to continue to look up? At the same time, it'll build trust with me.

Being on teams at early ages builds a lot of characteristics that I think are the basis for leadership.

How does being on a team at an early age build those characteristics?

You have to learn to listen. You have to accept and try to think about the other person's position and why they're doing things and then help them out. Obviously, if there are ways you think things could be done better, you have to be able to approach that person and have a conversation.

Teamwork builds basic communication skills. Your ability to listen, your ability to understand and see things from a different perspective. Those critical skills can be developed in an early age.

Tell me about college and what you studied.

I was a business management major at Ithaca College (Class of 1989). I had always thought about the military. It was the Reagan years, the big buildup years, and theyre offering scholarships. I went off to ROTC basic and earned a scholarship. The Army seemed to be a fit. In ROTC, I was branched aviation and went to flight school for about a year after college.

Tell me about an influential leader in college or early in your career.

Some of my first leaders really had an influence. One was when I got to my first assignment in Korea. His name was CW3 (Chief Warrant Officer 3) Mike Gann. He had been in the Army about 20 years.

Technically, in the rank structure, he was a subordinate. But obviously, thats one of the great challenges in the Army. They pump you out as a second lieutenant. Its your first assignment, and virtually everybody there has more experience in the Army than you do. Thats really where you have to learn to learn.

This warrant officer took me under his wing. He taught me everything about aviation maintenance, training, management, flying. He taught me about leadership and how to lead the warrant officers, how to lead the enlisted, how to communicate with my boss.

He was probably the first, but the Army's business is leadership. Aviation was how I got my job done, but leadership is your business. The Army does a very good job at all levels, formally and informally, training people in leadership.

Every leader's job in the Army is to develop their subordinates. You coach, teach, mentor, and counsel.

You have to really develop your subordinate to take your job. I take that same approach here. You know, a leader's number one job is to develop future leaders.

What's your advice to be effective as a leader?

You have to be willing to listen. You have to be willing to learn. You have to show other people that you care.

You don't need to have all the answers. You need to be able to find them.

I mentioned earlier you need to be team oriented and build that shared consciousness. People talk about situational awareness, situational understanding, but it's really a shared consciousness.

If you look at a lot of the problems today, they're chaotic, complex, dynamic situations. The leader's not going to have all the answers. They're not going to be the technical experts. They have to work as a team with all of the people in the organization to understand the environment, chart a path, and then be able to lead toward a goal.

You have to make sure everybody's moving in the same direction. They have that understanding. That's shared consciousness.

You're the one facilitating the people you serve as a leader. It gets into servant leadership. I think that is important. You have to understand your role is not about the title. It's about the actions. People too often think leadership is that I'm-in-charge-now idea.

There can be a myth, especially about the military, that leadership means barking commands

That could not be further from the truth.

Tell me about that.

I don't know that I ever actually issued a command.

You know, once again, it's really no different than the civilian world. If I walk out the door from this conference room, they know Im the CEO, right?

There's a difference between being in charge and being in control.

Whats the difference?

Being in charge could just be a title. Being in control is having the ability to influence the organization. That could be at any level.

As the leader, you have to garner all those smart people that have their own views, and you all have to look at things through a common lens. Then you have to figure out approaches and Im not saying solutions. We all face problems in today's fast-paced, global, dynamic, volatile world use whatever adjectives you want.

You have to continually evaluate your position and direction. You have to understand the environment. One persons view is not going to be able to fully understand the complexities of the environment. That's where it takes everyone on a team to understand what's out there and to develop those paths.

So, I don't think I ever barked an order, a command.

People knew I was the leader. The leader's responsibility is for mission success. That responsibility is to take care of your soldiers. Taking care of them meant training them so they could survive in combat and progress in their careers. It was not complex, but it was hard.

What qualities do you see in effective leadership, in leaders you admire?

I think the most important leadership characteristic is humility.

A modest view of one's importance.

Leaders are there to serve.

Obviously that humility has to be bounded by confidence.

The other one is kindness and that has to be balanced by toughness.

So, I think it's humility bounded by confidence, kindness bounded by toughness.

There are often times and I loved my soldiers but you love them like a parent. Sometimes you have to make tough calls if they did something wrong.

I generally believe all people are good and want to do good. And when somebody made a mistake, they probably didn't do it from malice. You have to be able to look at them and say: Hey, I know you didn't mean to do this, but here's what happened. How are we going to fix it?

Obviously, there are number of characteristics that at any one time are going to be important. How you communicate. Tact. Loyalty. Perseverance.

I actually think humility is the number one most important leadership characteristic.

What attributes do you see in poor leaders?

People that are self-serving. As a general rule, you have to show your support and that you care about the people youre leading, that you are in it for their good and the greater good of the overall mission.

The one characteristic that will make leaders fail is a feeling of self-importance or arrogance or self-serving. That's just not the point of being a leader. It's to serve others.

John C. Maxwell has great quotes about great leadership. He says: People don't care how much you know until they know how much you care.

That is absolutely true. When you develop personal relationships with people and this was very much so in the Army that builds trust. Trust is that keystone to leadership.

You can pick numbers of adjectives to describe trust: competence, reliability, motivation, integrity.

People have to believe that you have the ability to do what you say you're going to do, repeatedly for the right reasons in the right way.

I don't think you're going to trust someone if they're not in it for you. Youre not willing to assume personal risk for someone who's not willing to assume personal risk for you. That gets to trust.

It's not hard. It's stuff we learned in kindergarten: Be nice. Be kind. Be humble. Work hard.

What advice do you have for overcoming obstacles and setbacks?

Persistence never quit. I spent the majority of my Army career in a unit whose motto was Night Stalkers Dont Quit. That mentality transfers to all aspects of life. Things will always look better in the morning. Be optimistic, have a great attitude, seek the advice, mentorship, and help of others, and you will create your opportunities.

The weekly CNY Conversation" features Q&A interviews about leadership, success, and innovation. The conversations are condensed and edited. To suggest a leader for a Conversation, contact Stan Linhorst at StanLinhorst@gmail.com. Last week featured Sarah Reckess, director of the Center for Court Innovation.

View original post here:

Mike Hertzendorf on leadership: The number 1 job is to develop future leaders - syracuse.com

Natura &Co Announces Appointment of Three New Members to its Board of Directors – Yahoo Finance

Natura &Co announced yesterday that three new members will join its Board of Directors following the closing of the acquisition of Avon Products, Inc., which is expected in the first quarter of 2020, as part of a new corporate governance structure to lead the worlds fourth-largest pure-play beauty group.

With the designation of the three new members, who are currently part of Avons Board, Natura &Cos Board of Directors will count 13 members, nine of them independent, with broad experience and industry expertise. Natura &Cos 10 other members of its Board of Directors will be the current Board of Directors of Natura Cosmeticos.

The new directors are:

Chan Galbato, Non-Executive Chairman of Avon said: "It was a pleasure being part of Avon Products, Inc. in such a transformative time for the company. We have been focused on delivering the best representative experience, improving our cost structure, increasing financial flexibility, and ultimately Opening Up Avon, positioning the company for long-term growth and success. The Board is confident that the combination with Natura represents a huge opportunity for all stakeholders."

Roberto Marques, Executive Chairman of Natura &Co declared: "With todays announcement, we are taking another decisive step to bring together four iconic beauty companies, united by a better way of living and doing business. I am delighted to welcome the new members of the Board to the Natura &Co family, and I am sure their broad experience and deep knowledge of Avon will empower our entrepreneurs and associates, while helping to grow our high-touch, high-tech direct to consumer businesses. It will be a pleasure to work with such a talented and diverse team to drive further sustainable growth."

About Natura &Co

Natura &Co is a global purpose-driven, multi-channel and multi-brand cosmetics group that is home to Natura, Aesop and The Body Shop, each a trailblazer in the beauty industry. Natura &Co posted net revenues of R$ 13.4 billion in 2018. The three companies are unique in mission and spirit but connected by a common goal of shaping a better world through positive economic, social and environmental impact. Founded in 1969, Natura is a leading Brazilian multinational brand in the cosmetics and personal care sector, and the leader in direct sales. For the past eight years, Natura has been recognized as one of the most ethical companies in the world by Ethisphere Institute, the global leader in defining and developing ethical standards for business conduct. Founded in 1976 by Dame Anita Roddick, in Brighton, England, The Body Shop was created with a vision of being a force for social and environmental good. Australian beauty brand, Aesop, was founded in 1987 with a passion for design, literature, and meticulous attention to detail, efficacy and sensory pleasure.

About Avon Products Inc.

For more than 130 years Avon has stood for women: providing innovative, quality beauty products which are primarily sold to women, through women. Millions of independent sales Representatives across the world sell iconic Avon brands such as Avon Color and ANEW through their social networks, building their own beauty businesses on a full- or part-time basis. Avon supports women's empowerment, entrepreneurship and well-being and has donated over $1 billion to women's causes through Avon and the Avon Foundation. Learn more about Avon and its products at http://www.avonworldwide.com. #stand4her

CAUTION ABOUT FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

Statements in this communication (or in the documents it incorporates by reference) that are not historical facts or information may be forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Among other things, these forward looking statements may include statements regarding the proposed transaction involving Natura and Avon; beliefs relating to value creation as a result of a proposed transaction involving Natura and Avon; the expected timetable for completing the transaction; benefits and synergies of the transaction; future opportunities for the combined company; and any other statements regarding Avons and Naturas future beliefs, expectations, plans, intentions, financial condition or performance. In some cases, words such as "estimate," "project," "forecast," "plan," "believe," "may," "expect," "anticipate," "intend," "planned," "potential," "can," "expectation," "could," "will," "would" and similar expressions, or the negative of those expressions, may identify forward-looking statements. These forward-looking statements are based on Naturas and Avons expectations and beliefs concerning future events and involve risks and uncertainties that may cause actual results to differ materially from current expectations. These factors are difficult to predict accurately and may be beyond Naturas and Avons control. Forward-looking statements in this communication or elsewhere speak only as of the date made. New uncertainties and risks arise from time to time, and it is impossible for Natura or Avon to predict these events or how they may affect Natura or Avon. Therefore, you should not rely on any of these forward-looking statements as predictors of future events. Except as required by law, neither Natura nor Avon has any duty to, and does not intend to, update or revise the forward-looking statements in this communication or elsewhere after the date this communication is issued. In light of these risks and uncertainties, investors should keep in mind that results, events or developments discussed in any forward-looking statement made in this communication may not occur. Uncertainties and risk factors that could affect Naturas and/or Avons future performance and cause results to differ from the forward-looking statements in this communication include, but are not limited to, (a) the parties ability to consummate the transaction or satisfy the conditions to the completion of the transaction, including the receipt of regulatory approvals required for the transaction on the terms expected or on the anticipated schedule; (b) the parties ability to meet expectations regarding the timing, completion and accounting and tax treatments of the transaction; (c) the possibility that any of the anticipated benefits of the proposed transaction will not be realized or will not be realized within the expected time period; (d) the risk that integration of Avons operations with those of Natura will be materially delayed or will be more costly or difficult than expected; (e) the failure of the proposed transaction to close for any other reason; (f) the effect of the announcement of the transaction on customer and consultant relationships and operating results (including, without limitation, difficulties in maintaining relationships with employees or customers); (g) dilution caused by Naturas issuance of additional shares of its common stock in connection with the transaction; (h) the possibility that the transaction may be more expensive to complete than anticipated, including as a result of unexpected factors or events; (i) the diversion of management time on transaction-related issues; (j) the possibility that the intended accounting and tax treatments of the proposed transactions are not achieved; (k) those risks described in Section 4 of Naturas Reference Form for 2018, version 15, which was filed with the Brazilian Securities Commission on April 24, 2019; and (l) those risks described in Item 1A of Avons most recently filed Annual Report on Form 10-K and subsequent reports on Forms 10-Q and 8-K.

View source version on businesswire.com: https://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20191217005861/en/

Contacts

Media Gabriela Kivitzgkivitz@brunswickgroup.com + 55 11 3076-7620

Originally posted here:

Natura &Co Announces Appointment of Three New Members to its Board of Directors - Yahoo Finance

Don’t blame Corbyn or Brexit: Labour failed to rage against the hated political system – Open Democracy

The war in the Labour Party has begun. For one side, Jeremy Corbyn is to blame. For the other, If it wasnt for Brexit.... Fortunately for them, both sides can agree that more tactical voting could have saved the day.

All of these responses to last nights devastating result fail to interrogate the thing they criticise. All treat their preferred scapegoat as an ephemeral phenomenon, as though it can just be herded away, dismissed.

The idea that Corbyns personal popularity was the problem, just like the idea that Ed Milibands personal popularity was the problem, or that Gordon Browns was, fails to take account of how public opinion is formed.

Any Labour leader running against the powerful institutions of the country would be pilloried by the media. The outlets that mocked the Jewish Ed Milliband for looking weird (read foreign) when eating a bacon sandwich, and smeared his refugee father as hating the country, didnt skip a beat when they smelt a whiff of an anti-Semitism scandal around his succesor.

This idea that the solutions to Labours problems lie in a new leader has been prevalent in Scotland for twenty years. Scottish Labour has been through nine in that time, but is yet to stumble upon its Moses.

Of course Corbyn has to resign. Of course, there are things wrong with him: he ended up as leader because he was the last person standing on the only wing of the party that had serious solutions to the problems of the world. Blairism had actively discouraged a younger generation of thinkers and leaders on the left from joining the parliamentary Labour Party, and so Corbyn with his well-rehearsed flaws stepped up when the moment emerged.

A Bernie Sanders would have been better: someone with more charisma and the ability to communicate a core message at every opportunity. But anyone who thinks Blairism would have allowed such a leader to emerge hasnt paid attention to two decades of British politics.

Yes, many people raised Corbyn as the reason they wouldnt vote Labour, just as many raised Miliband and Brown before him. But citing these objections is meaningless if we dont think about the structures of power and culture which shaped them. After all, anyone who has seen David Miliband give a speech knows it is laughable to suggest that he would have been any better than his brother.

Sometimes, if it wasnt for Corbyn really means if Labour wasnt so left wing. This ignores the facts that polls show most Labour policies are outrageously popular and that the 2017 manifesto was widely seen as a hit. The success rate of the much-promoted centrist parties of the era ChangeUK, the Lib Dems, Hillary Clintons Democrats does nothing to back up that argument either.

A more serious way of putting the point would be: If Labour hadnt run against the institutions of power in the country, they might have allowed the party into government. If Labour hadnt pledged to go after the oligarchs who own our media, perhaps they wouldnt have been so harried by them.

Perhaps. But at a time of climate emergency, drastic inequality and soaring poverty, failing to take on big oil, big money and billionaire power means failing. And in any case, this strategy has only worked in moments like 1997 when the Tories were no longer a viable vehicle for the aspirations of the mega-rich.

Corbynism was the English expression of a phenomenon which swept the Western world after the financial crisis. His victory in Labours leadership election was a response to the blatant failures of the free market, post-imperial wars and the staid ideology that had infected the whole ruling class. It was a response to deep feelings of alienation and immiseration.

Brexit was also an English response to this multi-headed crisis. Specifically, it was a rage against the alienation produced by the Blair and Cameron years, by the leave it to us politics of technocracy.

It was a demand for empowerment and it came from the region of Europe with the most centralised government and most privatised economies: that is, as Anthony Barnett has argued, England without London.

When my friends on the left of the Labour Party argue today that they would have won if it wasnt for Brexit, they imply that Brexit is a one-off event, a unique set of circumstances that can be set aside and discounted for the future. Thats a bit like the comforting notions that Labour would have won in 1983 if it wasnt for the Falklands war, or in 2015 if Cameron hadnt whipped up fear of the Scottish National Party. These arguments may even be true, but what they amount to is Labour would have won if it wasnt for Anglo-British nationalism. Which is essentially saying: Labour would have won if it wasnt for the main reason the Tories normally win.

At the root of this nationalism is a deep yearning for collective agency. It is in part a toxic backlash of a nation bitter about losing its empire, in part the legitimate demands of people to have control over their lives.

This alienation was mobilised by the right, who drew firm borders around the national collective and promised Brexit would allow us to take back control. The response from the left should have been to offer genuine collective agency, through a political revolution.

I argued yesterday that Labour struggled because people didnt believe that our political system would deliver the partys manifesto. As I travelled around the north of England interviewing people about the election, I discovered something new had happened. Where people used to often say, Theyre all the same, in a resigned way, the most common reply now is, I dont trust any of them! usually snapped with fury.

In 2014 in Scotland and 2016 across the UK, the Yes campaign and the Leave campaign were able to mobilise sentiment against the political system behind them. In this election campaign, it became clear as I travelled the country that Labour had failed to do this looking to too many like technocrats offering nice things in order to trick you into voting for them.

Its no coincidence that, by my sums, 88% of Tory gains were in seats where turnout was down.

At the core of all of this is the debate about Labours Brexit position, which appears in hindsight to have been the worst of both worlds. By remaining essentially neutral on Brexit over the past three years, Labour allowed Lib Dems and Blairites and other technocrats from the previous era to shape what Remain meant, presenting it as the status-quo option, opposed to the change people are desperate for.

Had Labour consistently argued that a Tory Brexit would be part of the system, highlighting again and again the oligarchs who funded the campaign, the desire to drag the UK towards the US and the race to the bottom this implies; had they used the opportunity to fight for radical change to the British state, the debate now would be very different.

At core, the problem was not Corbyn. Without him and his ideas, Labour would be squabbling with the Lib Dems over a minuscule pool of voters trapped in 2005. Nor was the problem Brexit, because Brexit is just the latest expression of English alienation.

The problem was that Labour ran a campaign with a retail offer when voters wanted empowerment. They asked people to trust the political system to transform their lives after the Tories had been waging war on trust in the political system. They failed to drive a debate about radical change to the British state, to rage against a system designed to ensure elite rule. And so huge numbers didnt believe theyd deliver their otherwise popular policies. Because they have no faith in politics.

Rather than fighting to rip up the rules of our broken politics and hand power to the people, pro-Labour groups spent a huge amount of money reminding people of one broken part of our system, and then telling them to suck it up. I spent much of the election monitoring the various non-party campaign pages.

Leave pages and Leave.EU in particular focussed on political messages, designed to convince, persuade, troll and infame: to drive debate. Leave.EU has spent just 2,000 on Facebook and Instagram ads since October, and has had 822,000 interactions on posts from its page in the past seven days.

Remain pages focussed on tactical voting. The pro-EU campaign Best for Britain has spent nearly 900,000 on Facebook and Instagram ads since October, mostly promoting tactical voting. But it had only 290,000 interactions with posts from its page in the past seven days (not counting 'dark' ads). And its not clear its adverts helped: the main message was that the voting system is broken, but voters just have to accept it. It changed politics from a deep debate about our futures together to an infomercial about arithmetic.

Labours proposals could be summarised as a core argument: we will use politics to make your life better. But if people dont believe in the political system, they wont trust you. Corbyn should have raged against elite rule, and promised a new democracy, by the people, for the people. He should have tapped into the anti-systemic energy. It should have been 'by the many'. He could have won.

Originally posted here:

Don't blame Corbyn or Brexit: Labour failed to rage against the hated political system - Open Democracy

Dove and The CROWN Coalition Announce The Passing Of Legislation To End Hair Discrimination in New Jersey – PRNewswire

The passing of The CROWN Act in New Jersey will ensure that young students like Andrew Johnson, the 16-year old wrestler from Buena Regional High School in Buena, New Jersey, will not be forced to make a decision of having his locs cut, or forfeiting an earned match, like Andrew was asked to do during the infamous December 19, 2018 incident in which the freedom to wear his hair in a natural protective hairstyle was denied for no justifiable reason.

"In 2019, it is unfortunate we have to pass legislation to further expand the definition of discrimination, to include something as natural and organic as how our hair grows from our heads," said Senator B. Cunningham, District 31, NJ. "This legislation is necessary; it will serve as a protection for those who feel helpless in any situation where they are forced to choose between being employed, and/or being allowed to participate in a sporting event (like our own New Jersey resident Andrew Johnson), or changing their identity to make others feel comfortable."

"This is so exciting that we are really this close to making sure no one in New Jersey will ever legally experience having to cut their hair or change their hair texture in order to play a sport or work at a particular place. I'm so proud of my state for moving this bill along so quickly, " said New Jersey Assemblywoman Angela McKnight (D-Hudson). "The fact that this bill passed the General Assembly overwhelmingly with bipartisan support proves that this isn't a partisan issue, but rather a human rights issue that we can all agree upon. I commend my colleagues across the table for standing up for civil rights."

"As the legislative year comes to a close, New Jersey has been hard at work reforming our criminal justice system so that it will treat incarcerated women with dignity, restore voting rights for formerly incarcerated individuals, and put a stop to hair discrimination. All New Jerseyans deserve to be treated with decency and respect, and each of these measures will end unequitable and disenfranchising realities that too many have been facing," stated Senator Cory Booker. "Today's passage of the CROWN Act marks a historic step in banning a culture of discrimination against black hair. Hair discrimination is a civil rights violation and we must stop reinforcing racism and biases against Black hair."

"It is our mission at Dove to champion individual beauty and ensure all beauty is respected and welcome in our society. For too long, narrow beauty standards have perpetuated unfair scrutiny and injustice for hairstyles and textures inherent to Black identity. On the anniversary of the infamous and painful wrestling incident, I am proud that New Jersey has passed The CROWN Act to put an end to hair discrimination," said Esi Eggleston Bracey, Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer of North America Beauty and Personal Care at Unilever, the New Jersey-based parent company of Dove.

"The National Urban League is behind this mission and areiscommitted to making an impact with the CROWN Coalition," said Marc Morial, CEO of the National Urban League. "Hair discrimination, whether in schools or in the workforce should simply not be allowed and we will continue to rally policy-makers and our communities to end discriminatory practices that disproportionately affect communities of color. Senator Cunningham and the state of New Jersey have our support to turn this legislation into law."

"Color Of Change is excited to be a part of this movement to end hair discrimination in our nation," said Janaya "Future" Khan, Program Director, Media, Culture and Economic Justice for Color Of Change. "It's incredible to believe that in 2019 we have to fight for legislation that addresses grooming policies that directly affect our people in the workplace and in schools. As members of the CROWN Coalition we will continue to work to put an end to issues that oppress Black people unfairly."

Senator Cory Booker (NJ) and Congressman Cedric Richmond (LA) introduced The CROWN Act of 2019 in both chambers of the U.S. Congress December 5, 2019. Twelve additional states have pre-filed legislation for early 2020.

Jointhe movementthat'screating realchangeand aiding in the efforts to ensureBlack men, women and children feel confident in expressing themselves. Sign the petition atwww.TheCROWNAct.comto help us end discrimination and learn howyou can get involved in bringing anti-hair discrimination legislation to your state.

About The CROWN CoalitionThe CROWN Coalition is a national alliance founded by Dove, National Urban League, Color Of Change, Western Center on Law & Poverty.

The CROWN Coalition is proud to sponsor and/or support the following bills in California, New York, and New Jersey:

These bills address unjust grooming policies that have a disparate impact on Black women, men and children and have drawn attention to cultural and racial discrimination taking place within workplaces and public schools. The CROWN Coalition members believe diversity and inclusion are key drivers of educational, social and economic success.

The CROWN Coalition and The CROWN Act are supported by the following organizations: National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP); NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund, Inc.; Delta Sigma Theta Sorority Inc.; Alpha Kappa Alpha Sorority, Inc.; The Links, Inc.; Jack and Jill of America, Inc.; National Black Caucus of State Legislators (NBCSL); National Organization of Black Elected Legislative Women (NOBEL Women); African American Mayors Association (AAMA); National Action Network (NAN); Service Employees International Union (SEIU); Black Women's Agenda; National Council of Negro Women (NCNW); Black Women's Roundtable, National Women's Law Center, Black Women Organized for Political Action, National Action Network, National Black MBA Association, Inc., National Black Child Development Institute, Inc., The National Association of Black Psychologists (ABPsi); U. S. Black Chambers, Inc.; Black Business Association; Black Women for Wellness Action Project; Greater Sacramento Urban League; National Coalition of 100 Black Women-Sacramento Chapter; EMERGE: Natural Beauty Industry Alliance; Beauty and Barber Empowerment Center; Ujima, Inc.; Hip Hop Sisters Foundation; Alliance for Boys and Men of Color; Equal Rights Advocates; Public Health Advocates; American Academy of Pediatrics; Courage Campaign; Greenlining Institute; Anti-Defamation League; Women in Public Policy, Inc.; Professional Beauty Association; California Black Health Network; Black American Political Association of California; California Black Chamber of Commerce; Women's Foundation of California; National Association of Social Workers-California Chapter; California Employment Lawyers Association; California Civil Liberties Advocacy; California Teachers Association; AFSCME California American Federation of State; County and Municipal Employees; ACLU New Jersey; ACLU California; ACLU of Northern California; ACLU of Southern California; ACLU of San Diego & Imperial Counties; Berkeley City Council; National Lawyers Guild Sacramento Chapter; Los Angeles County Office of Education; Los Angeles Community College District; City and County of San Francisco Department on the Status of Women.

About DoveDove started its life in 1957 in the US, with launch of the Beauty Bar, with its patented blend of mild cleansers and moisturizing cream. Dove's heritage is based on moisturization proof not promises grew Dove from a Beauty Bar into one of the world's most beloved beauty brands.

Women have always been our inspiration and since the beginning, we have been wholly committed to providing superior care to all women and to championing real beauty in our advertising. Dove believes that beauty is for everyone. That beauty should be a source of confidence and not anxiety. Dove's mission is to inspire women everywhere to develop a positive relationship with the way they look and realize their personal potential for beauty.

For 60 years, Dove has been committed to broadening the narrow definition of beauty in the work they do. With the 'Dove Real Beauty Pledge,' Dove vows to:

About Unilever North AmericaUnilever is one of the world's leading suppliers of Beauty & Personal Care, Home Care, and Foods & Refreshment products with sales in over 190 countries and reaching 2.5 billion consumers a day. In the United States and Canada, the portfolio includes brand icons such as: Axe, Ben & Jerry's, Breyers, Degree, Dollar Shave Club, Dove, Hellmann's, Klondike, Knorr, Lever 2000, Lipton, Love Beauty and Planet, Magnum, Nexxus, Noxzema, Pond's, Popsicle, Pure Leaf, Q-tips, Seventh Generation, Simple, Sir Kensington's, St. Ives, Suave, Talenti Gelato & Sorbetto, TAZO, TIGI, TRESemm and Vaseline. All of the preceding brand names are trademarks or registered trademarks of the Unilever Group of Companies.

Unilever's Sustainable Living Plan (USLP) underpins the company's strategy and commits to:

The USLP creates value by driving growth and trust, eliminating costs and reducing risks. In 2018, the company's Sustainable Living Brands grew 69% faster than the rest of the business, compared to 46% in 2017.

Since 2010 we have been taking action through the Unilever Sustainable Living Plan to help more than a billion people improve their health and well-being, halve our environmental footprint and enhance the livelihoods of millions of people as we grow our business. We have already made significant progress and continue to expand our ambition most recently committing to ensure 100% of our plastic packaging is fully reusable, recyclable or compostable by 2025. While there is still more to do, we are proud to have been recognized in 2018 as sector leader in the Dow Jones Sustainability Index and as the top ranked company in the GlobeScan/SustainAbility Global Corporate Sustainability Leaders survey, for the eighth-consecutive year.

For more information on Unilever U.S. and its brands visit: http://www.unileverusa.comFor more information on the USLP: http://www.unilever.com/sustainable-living/

About National Urban LeagueThe National Urban League is a historic civil rights organization dedicated to economic empowerment in order to elevate the standard of living in historically underserved urban communities. The National Urban League spearheads the efforts of its 90 local affiliates through the development of programs, public policy research and advocacy, providing direct services that impact and improve the lives of more than 2 million people annually nationwide. Visit http://www.nul.org and follow us on Twitter and Instagram: @NatUrbanLeague.

About Color Of ChangeColor Of Change is the nation's largest online racial justice organization. We help people respond effectively to injustice in the world around us. As a national online force driven by more than 1.4 million members, we move decision-makers in corporations and government to create a more human and less hostile world for Black people and our allies in America. Our campaigns and initiatives win changes that matter. By designing strategies powerful enough to fight racism and injusticein politics and culture, in the work place and the economy, in criminal justice and community life, and wherever they existwe are changing both the written and unwritten rules of society. We mobilize our members to end practices and systems that unfairly hold Black people back, and champion solutions that move us all forward.

About Western Center on Law & PovertyWestern Center fights for justice and system-wide change to secure housing, health care, racial justice and a strong safety net for low-income Californians. Western Center attains real-world policy solutions for our clients through litigation, legislative and policy advocacy, and technical assistance and legal support for the state's legal aid programs. Western Center is California's oldest and largest legal services support center. Visitwclp.org.

http://www.thecrownact.com

CONTACTS:Marcy Polancomarcy@joycollective.com 202.885.5527

SOURCE The CROWN Coalition

http://www.thecrownact.com

See more here:

Dove and The CROWN Coalition Announce The Passing Of Legislation To End Hair Discrimination in New Jersey - PRNewswire

NIM, the First Members-Only Dating App for Muslims, Banks on Commitment – HYPEBAE

As the online dating market and its perpetuation of the chat-meets-ghost cycle reaches a saturation point, NIM ventures into uncharted territory as the first-ever exclusive, members-only appcatered to the single Muslim community. Traditional dating apps such as Tinder pose myriad challenges for observers of a faith that stipulates various rules and restrictions including limited physical contact before marriage and an emphasis on parental approval of a partner. Though its not difficult to stand apart from Tinder and its free-for-all approach, NIM goes much further than even pre-existing Muslim dating apps, such as the similarly named Minder, by leaving no proverbial stone unturned Sharia-compliant, or Halal, features allow users friends and family to discuss potential matches, suggest prospects and even chaperone a chat. NIMs application committee hand-selects a user base of individuals who display some indicators of commitment, be it a side project or a line of study.

We dont go by specifics on financial status or job title, said NIM Founder Snaullah Niazi, whose past tech initiatives include Wieldata Group and virtual learning platform Stud-E-Buddies. Despite a vague explanation of NIMs acceptance process posted to the apps website perhaps emulating the modus-operandi of fellow members-only dating app Raya Niazi is happy to elaborate on the approach to accepting members. Prospective singles submit basic information on age and gender, at least one social media account (Instagram, Facebook or LinkedIn) and then undergo a Google search to determine additional information. Overall, were looking for an individual who is committed who has been committed to something in the past, who has done something more than just [his or her] nine to five job. Departing from other so-called exclusive dating apps, NIM readily accepts student members, as pursuing an education counts as commitment to Niazi. Its not just career-based, its also aboutpursuing more than your average joe, he explained.

NIM, which stands for half in Farsi, was born out of Niazis personal frustrations with dating, as well as those voiced by his fellow Muslim friends and family. Its always been a topic brought up multiple times at gatherings, he said. Friends and family members who have been on dating apps expressed frustration with hours of pointless of swiping, hours not finding the right individual not even looks-wise, but more so their standards not being met, he explained.

Niazi hopes to solve the expectations-reality gap with a series of features facilitating Halal dating, such as the aforementioned option to include friends and family in the match process. A member can invite trusted friends and family, single or non-single, to a limited version of NIM. Once they accept the invite, they can chaperone a view-only version of the members chat, see a members matches, suggest matches and then discuss those matches in a group chat. Vetting a potential parter through community is an integral part of traditional Muslim dating, which often sees family members or fellow Mosque members handpick prospects.

Additionally, NIM caters to its female users by requiring them to start a conversation first. That gives them the upper hand, Niazi said. Its the empowerment and control that they deserve in a relationship or the start of something serious. Similar to Bumble, the choice weeds out unsolicited messages that can often verge into inappropriate territory.

Though NIM launched less than 24 hours ago in an impressive roster of locations (U.S., UK, Canada, France, Quatar, Saudi, Dubai, Turkey, Singapore and Malaysia), Niazi already has big plans in store for the future. In-person events for NIM members are on the horizon word of mouth and members who recommend or invite others will be key to growth, he explained as well as a professional networking platform built into the app. Notably, NIM is open to members of all religions. Though the apps faith-specific features cater only to Muslim users, Niazi specifies that, if interest emerges, we are more than happy to follow up and provide for them as well.

When asked about Raya, a seeming competitor (and perhaps the inspiration for NIMs logo), Niazi demurs. Were obviously not going to compete with Raya; were totally different markets, he said. However, he admitted that several design members expressed interest in some of Rayas processes: Weve adapted a few, and theres no shame about thatyou can consider us a Raya, for the Muslim market, he said in a final remark on the subject.

NIM is available now on theApple Store in select countries. Once accepted, members pay $9.99 USD a month or $34.99 USD every six months. NIMs first 100 accepted members will receive their first month free.

Link:

NIM, the First Members-Only Dating App for Muslims, Banks on Commitment - HYPEBAE

Finland, World Leader – The Globalist

Finland is a small country. It has a population of 5.5 million, roughly of the size of the U.S. state of Minnesota. And yet, it serves as a powerful example for the entire United States.

The five political parties that are represented in Finlands current coalition government are all headed by women. But it gets more interesting. Whats more, four out of five of these party leaders are women under 35 years of age. And the newly appointed Prime Minister, Sanna Marin, is 34 years old.

Compare that to the leadership of the U.S. legislative and executive branches on both sides of the political aisle.

It is filled with (predominantly male) septuagenarians and even octogenarians. This includes the President and his three major rivals among the field of potential Democratic nominees (but hey, at least, one of them is a woman).

In other words, the people who currently govern the United States of America still long for their record players, probably dont know how to change settings on their iPhones, grew up when segregation was normal and for most of their lives thought that climate change had something to do with different seasons.

The female political leadership in Finland is the result of a narrowing gender gap. This has been made possible by generous parental leave programs and universal daycare.

As a result of these long-standing policies, it has even been reported that Finnish men are the only men worldwide who spend more time with their children than women.

In the annual Global Gender Gap Index published by the World Economic Forum in 2018 and measured along four sub-indices (economic participation and opportunity; educational attainment; health and survival; political empowerment), Finland ranks 4th, the United States a horrible 51st. That puts the United States below Mexico but, hey, above Peru.

Of course, unlike Finland, the United States does not have universal daycare or parental leave programs. It should also be mentioned that even the best performers such as Finland have not closed the gender gap.

Finland also ranks first in the annual index of 156 countries covered in the World Happiness Report. The United States is 19th. In fact, in the 2019 report on happiness, an entire chapter is dedicated to the United States entitled: The Sad State of Happiness in the United States and the Role of Digital Media.

So, why on earth are Finns so happy? After all, during the countrys long winter, Finns barely get a glimpse at the sun, while many of the far more fortunate Americans, as far as daylight is concerned, suffer from Seasonal Affective Disorder or SAD. This is a type of depression that begins when the days get shorter and only ends when they are once again long and sunny.

Good health is part of personal happiness. The 130-year old Finnish healthcare system covers everybody in Finland, including legal immigrants. It does all that at half the costs of the U.S. system. It is taxpayer-funded and otherwise virtually free for all.

88% of Finns are satisfied with the quality of the system. Consequently, Finland has the sixth-lowest infant mortality among 223 countries and territories. The United States, despite its vast wealth, is 54th.

Finlands life expectancy in 2018 stood at 81.7 years, compared to Americas 78.9 years. Good reasons for Finnish happiness, not so much for Americans.

As for the American Dream, the idea is that you can achieve anything, wherever you come from. The OECD measured in 2016 how many generations it would take country-by-country to rise from low-income families to reach their nations median income. This concept is also referred to as social mobility.

It was shown that it takes all but two generations in Finland to make that move, but five generations in the country of the (presumed) American Dream, the United States.

So, compared to their Finnish brethren, most low-income Americans feel forever trapped, while Finns actually see light at the end of the tunnel.

In fact, the new Finnish Prime Minister came from a low-income family, was raised in a same sex relationship and became the first person in her family to attend university. Happiness spreads when you see a future for yourself.

This takes us to U.S. Republicans favorite issue: Taxes. Of course, Finland has higher effective income taxes than the United States. But fair comparisons of tax rates have always been difficult.

In the United States, you have multiple layers of taxes: Federal, state and local taxes on income; state sales taxes and local property taxes. Many other countries, such as Finland, just collect few local taxes and their vast collection of tax revenue occurs at the federal level.

Finlands fiscal deficit averaged just 2% of GDP between 2009 and 2018. This compares to a U.S. deficit averaging 5.4% of GDP during the same time period.

While it is true that a large part of this average U.S. deficit is the result of the aftermath of the Great Recession, Finland experienced that crisis too. It just went into a smarter deficit spending mode that required fewer resources.

More importantly, contrary to the United States, Finland reduced its deficit to 0.7% in 2018, while the U.S. fiscal deficit under Trump rose after a brief recovery and sharply so to 3.8% in 2018.

Unsurprisingly, Finnish government debt to GDP stands at 58.9% in 2018 compared to U.S. debt of 106.1%.

Add all that up better economic indicators, happy, healthy, educated and socially well-protected people, as well as a young, democratic leadership (rather than a stale and out-of-touch two-party system run by the old and entrenched) and the Finnish laboratory looks like a gem.

In fact, if Finland were Americas 51st state, the famous words of U.S. Supreme Court Justice Louis Brandeis written in a 1932 opinion would apply. Brandeis then held that a state may, if its citizens choose, serve as a laboratory; and try novel social and economic experiments without risk to the rest of the country.

If only the United States could act so wisely. Then we Americans might all live a better, longer, healthier and happier life. Go Finland! Mene Suomeen!

Link:

Finland, World Leader - The Globalist

Squirrel AI Learning Shines at the IEEE/IROS 2019 Conference: The Era of AI + Education has Arrived – PRNewswire

Dr. Wei Cui, Chief Scientist of Squirrel AI Learning, was invited to attend the IROS 2019 conference and delivered a wonderful speech. Speakers on the same stage also included Toshio Fukuda, General Chairman of IEEE2020, Founder of IROS, Kristen Grauman, AI Research Scientist of Facebook, Professor of Computer Science Department at the University of Texas at Austin, etc.

At the conference, he shared with the top scholars all over the world the technical advantages and achievements in technology driven landing application of Squirrel AI Learning intelligent adaptive teaching system, showed everyone the outstanding achievements made by Chinese enterprises in the field of AI adaptive education, and also allowed the participants know about the development and application of artificial intelligence in the field of education, which attracted great attention from famous experts and scholars in the international industry.

This conference is jointly organized by IEEE, IEEE Robotics and Automation Society (RAS) and IEEE Industrial Electronics Society (IES), etc. It has attracted more than 4,000 professionals and representatives of top research teams in artificial intelligence and other fields around the world.

Squirrel AI Learning is the first artificial intelligence company in China to apply AI adaptive learning technology to the field of K12 education. Squirrel AI Learning has successfully developed the first AI adaptive learning engine with complete independent intellectual property rights and advanced algorithms as the core in China.

Squirrel AI Learning intelligent adaptive learning system is a student-centered intelligent and personalized education, it applies artificial intelligence technology in the process of assessment, learning, practicing, testing and questioning, to achieve the purpose of surpassing the human teaching on the basis of simulating excellent teachers. The product has a high cost-effectiveness performance. It adopts the mode of artificial intelligence + human teachers to teach students according to their aptitude, which can effectively solve the problems of high class cost, few famous teacher resources and low learning efficiency of traditional education.

At the conference, Dr. Wei Cui said: "Artificial intelligence will bring personalized education to every student. Through technical means, we hope that every student in China can enjoy the charm of personalized education that taught according to their aptitude."

IROS 2019 is jointly organized by IEEE, IEEE Robotics and Automation Society (RAS), IEEE Industrial Electronics Society (IES), Robotics Society of Japan (RSJ), Society of Instrument and Control Engineers (SICE) and New Technology Foundation (NTF).

The conference attracted more than 4,000 professionals, representatives of top research teams and business people from all over the world in robotics, automation systems, artificial intelligence and other fields to participate in the exchange, jointly explore the cutting-edge technologies in the field of intelligent robots and systems, share and discuss the latest progress in related fields.

Dr. Wei Cui, who was invited to attend the IROS 2019 conference, is the Chief Scientist of Squirrel AI Learning, and is also the earliest promoter of adaptive education in China. He was selected as the winner of MIT Technology Review 35 under 35 by MIT Technology Review, and is a recognized senior engineer with Shanghai AI senior professional title in 2019, which can be described as a young talent. Through his own efforts, Dr. Wei Cui is working hard to make AI technology change the pattern of education development in China.

Squirrel AI Learning: Intelligent Adaptive Education Technology Changes Education Pattern

At this IROS 2019 conference, Dr. Wei Cui introduced in detail to the participants how the Squirrel AI Learningintelligent adaptive education system can make its own contribution to the industrialization of education through the empowerment of AI technology.

At the technical level, Squirrel AI Learningfully uses more than ten kinds of artificial intelligence algorithm technologies, such as knowledge space theory, Bayesian theory, logistic regression, genetic algorithms and deep learning, and initiates the nanoscale knowledge point decomposition, the decomposition of MCM system (Model of Thinking, Capacity and Methodology), and the deep decomposition of knowledge points, clearly and accurately penetrates the students' knowledge loopholes/weaknesses; the nanoscale knowledge point splitting created originally by Squirrel AI Learning splits the knowledge points in the disciplines into nanoscale knowledge point splitting.

Through the correlation between knowledge points, students' user portraits can be visualized, so as to have a clearer understanding on the grasp of students' knowledge points and accurately detect the weak points of students' knowledge points. On the basis of nanoscale knowledge point decomposition, the learning abilities and learning methods of Squirrel AI Learning for students are split into measurable and teachable learning ability models.

On this basis, Squirrel AI Learningintelligent adaptive learning system can accurately detect the weak points of learning knowledge, accurately give the most suitable learning path for each child, so as to achieve personalized learning program. The association concept algorithms of non-associated knowledge points created by Squirrel AI Learningnot only establishes the relevance of knowledge points based on the knowledge map theory, tracing the source to present, but also establishes the association probability on the non-associated knowledge points, so that the test efficiency and learning efficiency can be improved by 3-10 times respectively than the knowledge map theoretical model of similar products.

It is worth mentioning that Squirrel AI Learningis the first one in the world to put forward the concept of reconstructing knowledge map of fault causes. It sums up the mistakes of every student's knowledge points so as to find the root of problems. And this is also the basis of achieving a real personalized learning program.

In the past, in order to cover the blind area of knowledge points, students often had to carry out the excessive assignments tactics to eliminate illiteracy. Squirrel AI Learningscans the students' knowledge map to accurately locate the blind area of their knowledge. Students do not need to consolidate their knowledge in hundreds of thousands of exam questions. The system will help students quickly according to their weak points of knowledge, so that students' learning efficiency can be maximized, and their performance can be ensured to be improved steadily.

Dr. Wei Cui introduced that at present, in terms of technical characteristics, Squirrel AI Learningis mainly applied to several major AI technologies:

First, evolutionary algorithms, logistic regression and neural networks. The algorithm model takes into account the learning objectives and knowledge state of students, and dynamically adjusts the learning path. The system will gradually draw students' learning habits, interests, methods and other multi-directional student portraits, and continuously optimize the content recommendation logic automatically.

Second, machine learning, deep learning and natural language processing technology. The technology can recommend the most suitable learning content according to different students' personal preferences, learning habits and learning styles. Different students have different degrees of adaptation to different learning atmospheres and difficulties, using natural language processing technology to automatically generate learning content labels; using deep learning technology to analyze student portrait and learning content, and automatically select the suitable learning content for students.

Third, Bayesian theory and Bayesian networks. Look at problems dynamically based on experience and information. The system will render the knowledge points and probability distribution, and predict the learning ability of learners. By comparing the correlation between different knowledge points and the learning degree of students on knowledge points, Squirrel AI Learning intelligent adaptive learning system can infer the correlation between knowledge points without logical relationship.

Fourth, graph theory, knowledge space theory and information entropy theory. Squirrel AI Learning distinguishes between knowledge points according to difficulty, importance and cognitive level, models knowledge system, builds "Knowledge Map", and combs the logic and cognitive correlations between knowledge points.

From the perspective of measurement, information can be quantified. By using the theory of information entropy, we can quickly approach the level of students' knowledge state by detecting some important knowledge points, and then make repeated refined calculations around this basic level, so as to effectively and accurately diagnose students' knowledge loopholes and states.

Fifth, knowledge tracing theory. The system will evaluate the ability level of students at each knowledge point, and analyze the ability level of knowledge points and related knowledge points successively, and finally accurate to the grasp of each nanoscale knowledge point, and update the ability value changes of students in real time after learning, so as to accurately push the most suitable learning path and learning content for the current situation of students. It can not only understand the degree of mastery of students' current knowledge points, but also reflect students' potentiality, which is a kind of prediction.

Sixth, education data mining and learning analysis technology. Education data mining refers to the quantitative analysis of learning process and learning behavior, and collect the learning data of students in the process of learning, including learning time, residence time and test accuracy, etc. Through the processing and analysis of data, different students' learning models are established. Learning analysis technology is mainly used to predict and monitor students' test results, which can provide teachers with detailed student data and information for the system and teachers to improve teaching methods.

Seventh, it is under research that user interaction driven by Dialog-based HUI and VPA engine in the form of dialogue realizes real-time voice interaction between virtual teachers and students. The main technologies are natural language processing, voice recognition and semantic analysis. In the process of learning, students can ask virtual teachers about their learning situation and learning tasks at any time, and give feedback on questions.

Eighth, MIBA is another project working with both SRI and CMU. MIBA refers to the Multi-modal Integrated Behavior Analysis. It collects students' physiological data and behavioral data through cameras, brainwaves measuring rings and other devices, including facial expression data, blood change data under the skin, body movement data and brain wave data. Combined with the learning data generated during the learning process, it analyzes the learning state of students, including the degree of students' concentration and learning input. The teacher terminal system used by teachers can receive early warning signals, and can timely implement personalized intervention to make learning more effective.

Dr. Wei Cui said that just because of the integration of technology, at present, Squirrel AI Learning has established laboratories in cooperation with several top AI research institutes around the world such as CMU, SRI, etc. Squirrel AI Learningintelligent adaptive learning system has opened more than 2,300 learning centers in more than 700 cities and counties in more than 20 provinces, with a total of nearly 2 million registered students.

After understanding the practical application effect of leading algorithms, model and intelligent adaptation technology of Squirrel AI Learning, experts and scholars and participants on site highly praised the achievements of Squirrel AI Learningin research and development and the application of AI technology in the field of education, as well as the behavior that it is committed to bringing fair, efficient and personalized education to every child.

At last, Dr. Wei Cui said that traditional education currently faces many deep-rooted problems: the development of education resources is uneven, high-quality education resources tend to developed areas, while in the underdeveloped areas, the quality of teachers is uneven. Squirrel AI Learning by Yixue Group hopes to achieve the education concept that we have been advocating since ancient times through the empowerment of AI technology: teaching students according to their aptitude, to reform and innovate traditional education.

SOURCE Squirrel AI Learning

More here:

Squirrel AI Learning Shines at the IEEE/IROS 2019 Conference: The Era of AI + Education has Arrived - PRNewswire

Interview with Mr. Johan Thijs, Chief Executive Officer of KBC Group – International Banker

Mr. Simon Hughes of International Banker travels to Belgium to interview Mr. Johan Thijs, Chief Executive Officer, KBC Group, on the banks ongoing digital transformation, the innovation that drives that transformation and KBCs wider role in society.

Today, International Banker is in Belgium and joined by Johan Thijs, CEO of KBC Group, to discuss the banks ongoing digital transformation, the innovation which drives that transformation and KBCs wider role in society. Really good to be here. Nice to see you.

Pleasure to meet you as well.

Now, youve previously described KBCs digital transformation as an offering which combines human-to-human advice with digital methods and artificial intelligence. What does that actually mean in practice? And do you have any examples to support this statement?

Yes, indeed. Actually, something very, very particular, and its driven by, the starting point of everything is the change of customer behavior. What we do see in the outside world is that customers are massively changing their behavior. Which means, they are inspired by what they experience by the Googles and the Facebooks of this world. And they, I mean, they all tend to evolve in the same direction. They expect from financial institutions, like amongst others, KBC, to do exactly the same thing. Now, traditionally, we were organized by bank branches or insurance agencies, but that shift now is happening to service the customer more proactively, and, you know, we prefer also to have digital, a digital approach, as well. Digital applications, like mobile apps and so on and so forth. And thats what we currently are doing. Now, what is extremely important is that we do see a massive shift in our customers by using the mobile applications. But on the proactive approach, a lot of financial institutions still have to do a lot of work. And now comes the interaction between human, human-human and the machine. Lets call it AI. Human is obviously the servicing of customers via bank branches or call centers. And machine is, Lets try to proactively anticipate what the customer really needs so that we can offer him as of the moment that we approach him, or as of the moment he or she approaches us, the solution which is tailored to his needs. And in order to do so, the machine will start to interfere with the human being. And then, ultimately, its the customer going to decide who is she going to use? The digital channel, or the human channel? Or both? Why not?

But that choice is an important element of that.

I mean, this is the driver. At KBC, we have explicitly chosen to follow the change of customer behavior. So, not the other way around. We are not intending to push our opinion on what the customer should use in terms of our distribution channels. So, in this perspective, its indeed the customer who is going to decide.

OK, well, given this kind of increasingly rapid rate of development of banking products and services, how challenging is it to ensure that KBC remains consistently at the forefront of that kind of innovation?

You know, I mean, in terms of offering it to the client and definitely what the customer sees as such, thats not the challenge. You know, we can launch apps every month if we need to. But that is not the real importance. The real importance is that we as an institution, which is there already for 75 or more years, we have obviously a huge legacy system. And we have to take into account also other elements, like, for instance, regulatory requests and so on and so forth. So, servicing the customer on his, on the front end, on what he or she sees on his device, is the starting point. And the real challenge is not launching the app, but the real challenge is to make that app go straight through our processes in order to create convenience for the ultimate customer. And that is, given the fact that we all have legacy systems, the real, I mean, thereal, real challenge for us as a financial institution. Thats also where we spend the most money, and that is: How are we going to make the experience of the customer super convenient? But at the same time, also take care of the fact that in our processes, we can go straight throughback to back, end to endto the customer.

And, now, I understand also that KBCs digital transformation extends to covering its risk-management capabilities. What are the most innovative solutions being devised or already operating in this area?

Where do you want me to start, because we have been doing a lot of stuff? Let me take you, perhaps, also, and what we see today is quite important in the markets, let me take one of the examples, which is quite new. We do it in a very particular way, and it has some great results. And Im talking about the compliance area. So, the financial industry, obviously, has to take care of a lot of regulation and definitely on the terms of, in terms of, the anti-money-laundering requests, things the bar has been constantly raised. So, also KBC has been investing quite a lot of money into that, not only in the recent past but also in the last 10, 15 years. What we now are doing is to invest more in that domain but no longer via purely human beingsmaking an analysis of transactions of customers or making analysis on the know-your-customer part. But we are investing massively in artificial intelligence. So, innovative technologies. And in this respect, we have been completely changing the approach, where it was in the past a rule-based approach, into a more holistic view, where we use internal/external data and hereby new technology. And Im definitely referring to artificial intelligence; it is extremely helpful and extremely powerful. If I look at the results, at the output, of those systems built, then what we can see is that the output delivered by the machine compared to the previous approach is times seven better than what it used to be.

So, a powerful tool in your arsenal.

Thats an understatement.

Now, earlier, you mentioned KBC Mobile. And it has a vast array of services available that enable customers to go beyond banking, including those related to mobility, access-to-service checks, meal and eco checks. Which particular non-banking service in this area do customers seem to value the most?

You know, when we launched that a couple of years ago, we thought, lets introduce all those elements which go beyond banking or beyond insurance, which have what I call a high-frequency rate. If a customer is using stuff in the outside world on a regular basis, for which he needs to pay, lets introduce it into our app as an additional service. Andyou already mentioned a couple of them in your questionthe one they prefer most and which they use most today is anything which is related to public transport. Its massively used. It goes beyond our expectations. And its because of convenience. Its because of safetiness. I mean, when they pay via the KBC app, they are sure about the transaction. And to give you an example, we have about 150,000 customers who are using this almost every day, which is more than 10 percent of our mobile-banking customers. Now, thats after three-months launch. So, we are in the early stage of the process, and it has massively paid off. And on top of that, we get a lot of sympathy from our customers because of the public systems, which are doing exactly the same thing. If you go to the train station, you have to buy a ticket on the public machines, which most of the time dont work. But, you know, theres an alternative, and when the alternative is created, they choose the easiest one and the most convenient one. And that appears to be the KBC app. Now, this is for our customers, but we recently launched, actually a week ago, the same possibility for non-customers. Now, its really going to pick up.

Now, you mentioned earlier not forcing things on your customers. And part of your digital transformation places a really heavy focus on developing an omnichannel strategy, which allows the customers themselves to decide how they contact you. Which particular channel are you seeing the greatest levels of kind of increasing customer contact?

You know, mobile has been picking up tremendously. I mean, if you would have asked me five years ago, how much customers and percentage-wise would pick for the mobile channel, probably I would have given you a number which is today completely wrong. Underestimated, at that time. And in this respect, this continues to grow. What is true is that mobile is the preferred channel by customers. But at the same time, and it all depends on the product which they want to be serviced in, they make a switch between all mobile or mobile and human. And with human, you have the different interfaces. You can go to a bank branch. But also you can go to a call center, which we call in our case KBC Live. So, what we see today is that, actually, its most of the time for a lot of customers a combination, depending, so a combination of different channels, depending on what type of product or service. For straightforward payments, its mobile, clear. For other, more complex products, they prefer to have the mobile transaction guided by, for instance, a call to the call center, KBC Live. So, if you ask me which is the preferred one, I would say its mobile, but its also mobile and the call center.

Now, weve talked about innovation quite a lot. Does it mean something different, then, when applied to KBCs banking business strategy, vis--vis its insurance business strategy?

No, intrinsically, its the same. We have the same approach, the same starting position, so its about customer servicing, and its about paying attention to what the customer wants in a proactive manner. That is for both entities exactly the same, purely 100 percent identical. But the business type is a little bit different. Whereas on the banking side, I call it the aftermath, the after-sale. Its quasi non-existent, you know. On the insurance side, definitely on the non-life part, the P and C {property and casualty} part, its fundamental. So from that perspective, we have a starting position which is the same, but the implicit and the explicit implementation of that is a little bit different on the banking and the insurance side.

Now, during KBCs digital-transformation journey, which attributes of your digital offerings have you found clients consider the most important? For example, is it speed or simplicity? And if what they consider to be the most important is consistently changing over time, how do you ensure KBC remains sufficiently adaptable to meet those changing needs?

Its an interesting question. Also, a very difficult one to answer, because I think that its evolving over time. I mean, if you were to ask me, you have only one possible answer, I would say, convenience. Now, perhaps thats, I mean, its an easy answer, because its actually an umbrella which I have given you as an answer. Because convenience is triggered by what? It can be triggered by speed. It can be triggered by the easiness of your process. It can be triggered by dah dah dah. So, honestly, its about convenience. Your customer is triggered sometimes by speed. If he wants to have a mortgage instantly, he needs to get an answer as soon as possible. But sometimes for the same mortgage, it doesnt matter how fast the answer comes, but the process itself, the hassle which is normally involved in the mortgage process, he doesnt want to be bothered with that. So, let me be straightforward. What is triggering the customers most is convenience, and I think that answer will be valid for the next coming years as well. And thats a real challenge for us as a company because we constantly need to balance between what the customer needs, and that need can depend on the type of product he wants to be serviced with. And thats the ultimate challenge for us.

Now, if Im not mistaken, for the third year running, you have been voted into the top 10 in the Harvard Business Review top 100 CEOs in the world list. So, I want to say, immediately, many congratulations for that. Secondly, what do you consider to be the most important personal trait in order to be a successful CEO?

You know, first of all, being in that ranking is, indeed, quite an honor, and its obviously not my merit. I have 42,000 people which are servicing our customers in a perfect manner. And the output of that, the end result of that, is appreciated, indeed, by the HBR, Harvard Business Review, to be quite good. And in that perspective, Im ultimately, as the CEO, the one who is featured in the ranking. But not to play it down entirelyobviously, I have a role to play as well. And, you know, for us its quite important. The starting position which we have defined as the ultimate strategy of KBC is very simple in its concept. We only, our strategy is only five words. We have introduced simplicity in this perspective into the company, get a clear vision, this is what were doing. This is your role as our employee, which we try to give as much empowerment as possible. And this is what we are heading for. And I have to admit, this is particularly my role. I have to admit that our people picked it up quite well. And the end result is that, you know, were doing not too badly. So, we have been nominated a couple of times, amongst others, by your magazine as being, as doing well, in certain domains. And the most, and the prize which I liked most was Best Customer Service in Western Europe. Which is the ultimate goal. Obviously, the end results for our shareholders as well in the return they receive, but everything starts with great customer experience. So, in this perspective, yes, its the success of KBC Group. Its triggered by a lot of people. And Ive played a role in that as well.

And thinking about that kind of empowerment that youre giving people, back in May 2019, KBC announced the executive committee had started a group-wide internal exercise to further optimize and simplify the governance model at management level and the decision-making processes. For what reason has this been undertaken? And hows it going?

For us, and definitely also from a personal perspective, I think we have 42,000 people in this group. We have a lot of smart people. A lot of people who know a lot of stuff. They know the markets, they know the needs of the customers, and so on and so forth. To release that potential, in order to release that, you empower your people. Hierarchy could be the killer game. Hierarchy could be indeed bringing down that creativity, too, because the boss decides, First you have to pacify me before you can launch that idea. And, you know, in a certain perspective, I came, together with my management committee, to the conclusion that we have just too much management layers, which is delaying the process. As such, thats also something which you dont like. But anyway, whats far more important is, it also hampers the usage of the creativity and the innovation and then of the spirit of our people and our staff. And in order to get that, to bring that more to the forefront, we said, Lets take out another management layer. Which enables more empowerment. Groups become bigger, which enables more, I mean, streaming through ideas, which enables us to be more effective in servicing customers better. And for that reason, we introduced it in May. Now, the next step was immediately set in September, because we are now driving that through the whole organization. So, its not only stopping at management layers; its stopping actually at all leadership levels across the group.

And also in September, along with several other leading banks, KBC signed the Collective Commitment to Climate Action, an initiative of the United Nations Environment Programme Finance Initiative. What impact is this initiative expected to have? And looking forward, what do you consider to be the single most important action that KBC and the banking industry in general can take to reduce the impact of climate change?

You know, when we talk about the disruption ongoing in the financial industry, most of the time, people speak about the digital impact, you know, and then also obviously they refer to the fintechs, or they refer to the big techs, which is all true. I would add one particular element next to those as well, and that is, indeed, disruption created by what you just described in your question. Amongst others, the environmental impact and the role we have to play into that. I think this is the next big thing. And with next, I mean today. Its already happening. If I look at what is currently in the pipeline of a lot of regulatory institutions, amongst others the European Commission, then, indeed, we as banks have a role to play. I think that most of the time, they also look at the banks to actually help implementregulators, supervisorsthat kind of solutions to the issue, for instance, climate change as well. Thats one side. The other side, I think that we as financial institutions have indeed a role to play. We have a role to play in society. We have a role to play in all those elements that influence that society. And one of them is the environmental impact. As a financial institution, granting a lot of loans and billions of billions of loans, we can indeed influence that impact by considering whom we are granting a loan to. And, you know, I consider this to be a societal role for an institution like ours. And for that reason, KBC has not only signed those agreements but also is implementing them already for many, many years in our institution. And we will be, you know, indeed on the forefront of the implementation of all those, all those new ways of thinking.

Now, weve talked about KBCs wider role in society and, in particular, climate change, for example. Also, beyond banking. But the group states its involved through initiatives relating to entrepreneurship as well. Which initiatives are these specifically?

You know, when the group was founded, lets say, 100 years ago, the, actually, the people who did that were entrepreneurs. And, so, those elements, these are the real roots of our group. And when we started to think 10 years ago, or, what, eight, nine years ago, about how can we play an important role in our society, we actually just went back to our roots. That is, lets foster and lets stimulate that entrepreneurship in all the countries where we are present. We started in Flanders, but were now obviously building that in all the countries where we currently are present. And in concreto, what it means is, we started up an initiative, and we use the name in every country where we are active, which is called Start it @ KBC. Which means that KBC facilitates youngsters, entrepreneurs, people with a bright idea on a product, on a service which they want to develop. But, I mean, theyre bothered with all of the hassle around it: the accounting part, the IT part, the, you name it, administrative part. And that particular part we take out of their hands. So, they can keep themselves, with all of their energy, busy in developing their ideas around the new product which they want to bring to the market. Now, with those facilities created, we take into account not only financially but also organization-wide. And thats what we have established group-wide. Next to that, we have, meanwhile, facilitated all the other elements which are necessary to make the next step. Ill give you two examples. We have created KBC Vendor, which is a kind of Tinder of KBC, where entrepreneurs with bright ideas which could help other entrepreneurs can actually come to a platform and say, Listen, I have a solution for you. Who is interested? Let me know. I will share my ideas on how you as an entrepreneur can make the next step. And then the last one, I call it, its called KBC Match. They call it the dating site of KBC, where we bring together entrepreneurs who have a current activity, who want for one or another reasonfor instance, they have no successorsto sell that company but dont have the immediate partner in the near environment. We created a platform where they can bring that proposal on the table. We will assess all our entrepreneurs of the entrepreneur community to see if they are interested. And we bring them together, and then they can potentially do a deal. So, this is all facilitating from the origination till the very end, and everything in between, things which are related to entrepreneurship.

So, its very people-focused. And thinking about the kind of skills and training, how do you ensure that the training you offer your folks remains up to date, especially so they can deal competently with the kind of ever-changing technology that theyre facing?

Thats a huge challenge. And thats, I mean, its a very, very, very difficult one as well. I think intrinsically, we have plenty of skills in our community, but not necessarily the same skills which you need to be future-proven in the area that you are currently working in within the company. So, we have a double challenge. The first one is with the people which we have, with the skills which we need to have tomorrow, how can we match them? And if they are not matching, how can we train those people in order to make them indeed future-proof with their skills? And if theyre not available in the company, where can we find them out there, outside the company? Now, what we currently are doing is, indeed, to create what I just said into kind of a platform where you bring into account all the skills people have. Also, the skills we dont know. So, you have the possibility of entering their own skills into the system. We knew, or we know better, what we are going to need in the near future, what kind of skills you need to have to do Job X in, let me say something, five years. And then we have a fully AI-driven platform, which brings the two together. People with skills, which need a little bit more training, will be triggered by the system in order to follow trainings, which we then provide to them. Either ourselves, either by universities or whatever it takes. And then last but not least, if we then indeed come to the conclusion, we dont find them, the same application is able to go via our external systems to look on the outside market. But, this, everything combined, is a huge challenge. And not only for financial institutions. I think for the market as a whole. For the next five to ten years.

Now, with more and more forecasts of a continued economic slowdown, or even perhaps a recession, here in the eurozone, how much of a concern is this to you? And would you say that KBC is adequately prepared for such a scenario?

Yeah, you know, we have a lot of challenges. We have, indeed, been talking so far amongst others about digitization and the impact of customers on our business model. But I think, indeed, the intrinsic underlying drivers which are crucial for a financial institutionamongst others, the interest rates, the financial markets as a wholehave a big impact. And, last but not least, economic growth is in that perspective, indeed, a very important parameter. So far, and I think also going forward and as I said in the nearby future, up so far, we have been doing great, and that is something which we can continue to do. But it goes without saying that the current interest-rate environment is indeed having an impact on and putting pressure on our results. KBC has been always performing in the high teens, ROEs, but given the circumstances, that is today a real challenge. On top of that, I would add also that obviously because of the, I mean, further evolution of the ECB and the further evolution of regulationthat in itself, Im not saying not for good reason on the contrary, is having an impact on financial institutions as well. But if, if all of that is combined, personally, and I can speak for KBC but will not speak about financial institutions in general, we are very well prepared to face the challenges of the future. And, obviously, I hope also that supervisors continue to do what they have been doing in a very balanced way, taking into account you have supervision, you have regulation, but you have also to build your future as well.

And, finally, what do you consider to be KBCs biggest priority in 2020?

The major priorityI would put forward that it is to constantly anticipate changing customer behavior. Now, it is easy said, but it is a huge challenge because it entails all the different elements which we are confronted with. It means, indeed, what does a customer need, how do you anticipate that? Others are dealing with that as well, and others do not necessarily need to be the incumbents. I am talking about now the fintechs. But Im definitely talking about the big techs, which are doing exactly the same thing and which are looking more and more to what we in the financial industry are doing. For instance, payment services. That eat part of our profit there. And so on and so forth. So, thats part of that as well. But the change in customer behavior has an immediate impact on the way we are organized. As such it has nothing to do with pure, I mean, pure profit generation in sales. It has to do with the way we are organized. Straight-through processing in that perspective is something which is of utmost importance, and that is a challenge for all the incumbents in the financial industry. And if you put it all together, I would say, Listen. Anticipating the change of customer behavior going forward is the big impact, is the most important part. And it entails a lot of things which you do not see at the surface.

Well, thank you very much for your time today.

Its a great pleasure.

Original post:

Interview with Mr. Johan Thijs, Chief Executive Officer of KBC Group - International Banker

Verge Crashes Over 15% Ahead of Scheduled Hard Fork – Bitcoinist

Verge (XVG) is backtracking, erasing more than 15% of its price on Tuesday. XVG fell to $0.004, moving away from a recent spike.

The Verge market price sank significantly on Tuesday, despite the still expected scheduled hard fork. The asset sank after a week of hiking higher, moving up by as much as 30% on a weekly basis.

The sharp decline, however, matched the downturn in the entire market, as Bitcoin (BTC) also looked shaky. XVG traded around 57 Satoshi, as most of its valuation hinges on the price of BTC.

The price of XVG is seen as a short-term speculation opportunity as it hovers near rock-bottom prices. The recently announced hard fork had only a temporary effect on the price. The recent sell-off may be a sign that investors are losing faith in a bullish recovery and exiting now before the decline worsens.

The Verge team reminds users to update to the new version ahead of the coming hard fork:

The hard fork itself is expected at block 3,700,000, which should arrive by December 15.

Other bullish news for Verge by the end of the year will include the launch of XVG on the Abra app. So far, the asset is only available for limited wallets, but Abra announced plans to include the asset internationally by the end of December.

Verge is one of the few coins that has an almost exclusively BTC-based market, with more than 95% of volumes in the crypto-to-crypto pair. Hence, XVG is tied to BTC price risk, with the possibility of Satoshi-based speculation. XVG is capable of relatively large rallies, but its price also crashes as traders return to BTC positions.

Verge is also highly active on Binance, which carries 54% of the volumes, and is also widely traded on HitBTC. But the coin is yet to regain its influence, after the spectacular pump-and-dump about two years ago. XVG spiked to as high as $0.21 on December 24, 2017, after a promotion by John McAfee. The rapid unraveling afterward however, angered traders as Verge led to extreme losses.

The other blows against Verge was the potential for double-spending, as well as an under-appreciated Pornhub announcement, and a rogue mining attack which produced blocks on an accelerated schedule and gave the attacker a disproportionate share of the rewards.

What do you think about the XVG hard fork? Share your thoughts in the comments section below!

Images via Shutterstock, Twitter @Cabrasmanuel @vergeliever @vergecryptourrency

Read the original here:

Verge Crashes Over 15% Ahead of Scheduled Hard Fork - Bitcoinist

Federal Reserve Ramping Up Repo Operations In Early 2020 Will Prove A Strong Case For Bitcoin – ZyCrypto

In mid-September, the Federal Reserve announced that it would inject billions into repo markets in order for banks to satisfy their liquidity needs. During the same week of repo operations, the Fed cut interest rates to a target range of between 1.5% and 1.75%.

Now, to further secure the market, the Fed will be injecting an additional $425 billion into the economy within a month. Evidently, these operations fuel the bitcoin narrative because as a decentralized asset, it is immune to such fiscal irresponsibility.

According to an announcement published on December 11, the Fed will be conducting repo operations from December 13 to January 14, 2020. In accordance with the most recent FOMC directive, the Desk will conduct repo operations to ensure that the supply of reserves remains ample and to mitigate the risk of money market pressures around year-end that could adversely affect policy implementation, the Fed noted.

These repo operations are expected to amount to roughly $150 billion on December 31 and January 2 and by January 14, the Fed hopes to have printed a total of at least $425 billion.

As if that werent enough, the US national debt crossed the $23 trillion mark last month for the first time in history. It now stands at around $23.12 trillion, after having skyrocketed by more than $1.4 trillion this year alone.

Besides building a strong case for bitcoin, the Fed has drawn criticism for these apparent failures with some in the crypto community arguing that it should be scrapped completely.

Crypto observer Rhythm Trader recently drew attention to the return of these repo operations. He opined that the $425 billion in repo operations is three times the size of the entire market cap of bitcoin.

Since Bitcoin came into existence in 2009, it has been hailed as the beginning of a new financial era. Enthusiasts posited that it would help the many unbanked people all over the world and also break people from the shackles of capitalism.

The greatest advantage of bitcoin is that it lacks a centralized authority that can alter its supply. This is mainly the reason why most people deem bitcoin as the perfect solution to dovish policies.

Not to mention the fact that bitcoin has appreciated by more than 4,000 percent within the past five years and in the last one year it has soared by nearly 130 percent. This, according to crypto pundit John McAfee, gives bitcoin an edge over fiat.

He tweeted yesterday, In 5 years BTC is up 4082.52%, in last 52 weeks its up 129.10%, in the last month its up 10.33% & last 5 days its up 1.71%. Fuck FIAT.

Indeed, repo operations will likely lead to further distrust of the traditional financial system and intensify the demand for bitcoin.

Get Daily Crypto News On Facebook | Twitter | Telegram | Instagram

See more here:

Federal Reserve Ramping Up Repo Operations In Early 2020 Will Prove A Strong Case For Bitcoin - ZyCrypto

The Agitator #307: Judges and our faith in the Constitution – MDJOnline.com

I dont recall in my lifetime a period where federal judges at all levels have been under attack, both direct and indirect. Any media report of a decision worthy of national attention invariably includes which president appointed the deciding judge, and/or the makeup of a panel of judges identifying the president or political party the judges can be traced back to.

The obvious implication is that judges are biased---unless they rule your way. We have lost trust in our judiciary, something that can only undermine our commitment to support the Constitution. For 230 years, the Civil War excepted, Americans have willingly or grudgingly supported the Constitution and observed the rule of law knowing that it is the glue that holds our society together.

Today we have a president who attacks judges when they dont go his way. Probably the most notorious example was referring to Judge Gonzalo Curiel as Mexican, Hispanic, and Spanish when Curiel presided over the class action fraud suit against Trump University. As it turns out, Curiel is American born, but his nationality or ethnicity should never have been in question. At other times related to Trumps travel ban on Muslims entering the U.S. from certain countries, Trump identified the judge(s) by the president who appointed them to infer he wasnt being treated fairly, earning a rebuke from U.S. Supreme Court Justice John Roberts.

President Barack Obama in his 2010 State of the Union address, slammed the five justices (not by name) who voted to overturn longtime precedent related to campaign finance laws. It was inappropriate and indefensible, and while not minimizing it, it was the decision he criticized versus singling out any one or several judges for a personal attack.

The first person who doesnt hold political, religious, or other beliefs that shape who we are has yet to be born. I suspect people forget that when they judge our judges and other professionals of every variety who work in government. But by definition a professional can set aside these biases and do their job effectively keeping in mind the oath they took to their profession or the Constitution.

Judges at every level take an oath to support, defend and preserve the Constitution and the laws of the land. As human beings, they will naturally disagree with some interpretations of the Constitution that have been handed down, and they will disagree with various laws passed by legislative bodies. They are expected, though, to adhere to various rules and procedures in following precedent and in interpreting laws as applied to difficult factual scenarios that are not black and white obvious.

If interpretation was so clear, we would need only one justice on the Supreme Court, and one judge on each appellate court. Then again, perhaps we wouldnt need appellate courts at all if trial courts had mathematical formulas in which to decide every case correctly.

Just a few examples illustrate my point. Where does the language of the First Amendment limit someone from shouting fire in a crowded theater? Where does the Second Amendment allow the ban of all convicted felons, which includes nonviolent offenders, from possessing a firearm to defend himself? Where the Fourth Amendment does mention expectation of privacy concerning the issuance of search warrants, a standard we accept today, it was for a much longer period of time based only on physical trespass.

The president under our Constitution gets to nominate all federal judges with the advice and consent of the Senate. Its become a messy process. Both parties are carrying it to new extremes, although I would argue that Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell has brought it to new heights. Either way, this is not good for America. We cant have a country that is divided over trust in our courts just because judges are appointed by one party or the other.

I, like every American, differ with any number of decisions emanating from the courts at all levels, especially the Supreme Court. There are plenty of examples to choose from. But overriding my differences is that social contract, that we as Americans will fall in line and obey the law in order to live in peace with our neighbor. The processes to overturn decisions we disagree with, to include legislation or constitutional amendments, is no doubt difficult. But it has been done, and that it has been done for more than two centuries is proof that our system works.

Dissent is as American as apple pie, and disagreeing with judicial decisions is perfectly legitimate. Personal attacks on judges because of their political, ethnic, religious or other affiliations, without evidence of intentional bias to ignore the law, is not legitimate. The Constitution will become a relic of better days that have come and gone if we only support it and our government when it is aligned with our views.

Read more here:

The Agitator #307: Judges and our faith in the Constitution - MDJOnline.com

The Other Access To Justice Rulings That Mattered In 2019 – Law360

As the top legal arena in the country, the U.S. Supreme Court tends to hog the publics attention to legal news. But decisions by state courts and federal appellate courts often have an even greater impact on the ways the justice system directly affects people.

Sometimes, a high court ruling calls for input from the lower courts, as happened in February, when the Supreme Courts Indiana v. Timbs ruling extended constitutional protections from excessive fines, but left it to the Indiana Supreme Court to develop a procedure by which excessiveness should be determined.

Other times, a high court ruling is only the most recent development in a dispute thats been bubbling for decades, as exemplified by this summers Flowers v. Mississippi decision. Justice Brett Kavanaughs opinion on racially motivated jury selection generated reams of headlines, but the underlying prosecutorial misconduct was first identified by the state Supreme Court nearly two decades ago.

This year, Law360 rounded up four key, non-U.S. Supreme Court decisions that could shape battles over topics like indigent defense, juvenile sentencing, police misconduct and more for years to come.

Indiana Outlines Excessive Test

In Februarys Indiana v. Timbs ruling, the U.S. Supreme Court unanimously held that state governments must follow the constitutional bar on excessive fines, a part of the Bill of Rights that had not previously been incorporated against the states.

But the high courts landmark decision stopped short of outlining how a court should determine how much is too much when it comes to fines, fees and, in the case at hand, civil forfeitures.

That task was left to the Indiana Supreme Court, which ruled in October that fines should be proportional to both an underlying offense and an offenders economic situation.

To hold the opposite would generate a new fiction: that taking away the same piece of property from a billionaire and from someone who owns nothing else punishes each person equally, the majority opinion by Chief Justice Loretta Rush stated.

The Oct. 28 decision emerged from a long-running legal dispute over the Land Rover that Indiana authorities seized from Tyson Timbs after he pled guilty to drug crimes. The seizure was achieved through civil forfeiture, a controversial legal proceeding in which law enforcement can take someones property after alleging it was used in a crime. In Timbs case, hed used the Land Rover to transport heroin.

Civil forfeiture has generated controversy in recent years after reports that many defendants mostly people of color lose their property without any underlying criminal charges ever being filed. Since 2014, 33 states plus Washington, D.C., have reformed their civil forfeiture laws. North Carolina, New Mexico and Nebraska have abolished the practice entirely, relegating seizures to criminal courtrooms, where indigent defendants have the right to counsel.

The Indiana Supreme Courts ruling in Timbs did not ultimately declare whether taking Timbs car worth more than four times as much as the maximum fine associated with his crimes was excessive under the Constitution, instead outlining the criteria to be considered and leaving it to a lower court to apply its test.

According to Lisa Foster, co-founder of the Fines and Fees Justice Center, the tests focus on proportionality is a big win for reformers who hope to change the way other punitive economic sanctions are meted out.

As an example, she cited a flat surcharge that is imposed on every New York traffic ticket, misdemeanor or felony.

Its hard to argue that its anything other than punitive, because why is that money being assessed in the justice system and not against all New Yorkers? she said. Well, because we are punishing people in the justice system.

Going forward, she said Indianas test for excessiveness could be applied to such charges.

Its a recognition of how one needs to look at money in the justice system and that is, through a proportionality lens, both the economic consequences and the underlying nature of the offense, Foster added.

Ninth Circuit Details How to Consider Youth

A Supreme Court case involving the notorious D.C. Sniper Lee Boyd Malvo brought juvenile life sentences into national headlines in October.

But while the pending decision could lead to the resentencing of nearly a dozen Virginia lifers who were sentenced for crimes that occurred before they were 18 years old, another recent decision out of the 9th Circuit could have a potentially greater impact.

Issued en banc on July 9, USA v. Briones clarified the process by which sentencing courts must consider the unique social and psychological characteristics of juvenile offenders, as required by two landmark Supreme Court decisions, Miller v. Louisiana and Montgomery v. Alabama .

Miller, issued in 2012, held that life sentences cannot be mandatory for juveniles because hallmark features of youth like susceptibility to peer pressure, underdeveloped brains and increased likelihood of rehabilitation reduce the justification for incarcerating them until they die. Four years later, the high courts Montgomery ruling made Millers requirement retroactive and ordered the resentencing of an estimated 2,800 teen lifers.

One of those lifers was Riley Briones Jr., a man sentenced in 1997 at age 17 for his role as the getaway driver in a robbery that proved fatal. After Montgomery, Briones had a shot at resentencing, but U.S. District Judge Douglas L. Rayes reimposed a life sentence on the grounds that some decisions have lifelong consequences.

His ruling noted that he considered Briones youth, immaturity [and] his adolescent brain at the time of the murder as mitigating factors, but Rayes emphasized the leadership role that Briones played in organizing the crime.

An appellate panel affirmed the reissued life sentence, but an en banc Ninth Circuit vacated it after finding that the judge had failed to prioritize Briones transformation over the past two decades.

The district courts sentencing remarks focused on the punishment warranted by the terrible crime Briones participated in, rather than whether Briones was irredeemable, the en banc ruling states.

According to Marsha Levick, a founder and chief legal officer of the Juvenile Law Center, the July 9 decision clarified that, when resentencing men and women who received juvenile life without parole sentences, the facts and circumstances of the crime must take a back seat to the offenders youthful characteristics, capacity for change and rehabilitation, and whether their crime reflected transient immaturity.

The principle that must guide resentencing in these cases is that youth are different, and even those who commit heinous murders are constitutionally ineligible for a life without parole sentence unless they are permanently incorrigible and incapable of rehabilitation, Levick said.

The Department of Justice has asked the Supreme Court to take up the Briones case, pending a decision in Malvos case. If the petition is granted, the ensuing arguments could shape the framework for resentencing hundreds of juvenile lifers who still await their court-mandated hearings.

Qualified Immunity Saves Police From Theft Allegations

Few legal doctrines generate as much bipartisan opposition as qualified immunity, a controversial concept that holds law enforcement and other government officials to be immune from legal liability for civil rights violations as long as no previous court case on the same context and conduct exists.

Libertarian groups like the Cato Institute and The Institute for Justice have joined forces with the likes of the American Civil Liberties Union in repeated attempts to convince the Supreme Court that the doctrine needs rethinking and may be worth abolishing altogether.

In September, the Ninth Circuit drew attention to the ways in which qualified immunity can counter common sense in its Jessop v. Fresno decision. Brought by two California residents whose properties were searched during an investigation into illegal gambling, the case involved allegations that Fresno police officers seized $225,000 more than they reported to their superiors while carrying out a warrant.

Siding with the police, the appellate court held that, even assuming the allegations were true, there was no case law on the matter.

Whether the theft of property covered by the terms of a search warrant, and seized pursuant to that warrant, violates the Fourth Amendment is a different question from whether theft is morally wrong, the opinion states. We recognize that theft is morally wrong ... that principle does not, however, answer the legal question presented in this case.

According to Clark Neily, vice president at the Cato Institute, the decision really grabs the publics attention.

The more outrageous the conduct, the less likely youll find a preexisting case with sufficiently similar facts and the more likely the police will get away with it, he said.

Justice Elena Kagan has extended the time within which the residents must file a petition to the Supreme Court, giving them until Feb. 14 to appeal the Ninth Circuits ruling. Neily noted that the justices may seek to stack up several qualified immunity challenges in order to handle them all at once.

Veterans Get Class Action Status

For decades, there was no court for veterans to appeal the denial of government benefits theyd been promised for their service. And even after the Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims was created in 1989, veterans could not join together to bring class actions in the court every case had to proceed on an individual basis.

That all changed in August 2018, when the CAVC announced it would begin entertaining class actions after the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit said there was no reason not to do so.

In June, the CAVC made good on its promise by granting class action status to veterans alleging the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs violates their due process rights by delaying appeals over denied benefits for an average of three years.

The CAVC also granted class action status in another suit three months later, ordering the VA to pay out up to $6.5 billion to thousands of veterans who were wrongly denied medical reimbursements for non-VA hospital emergency care.

Together, the first two grants of class action status mark a massive improvement in access to justice for veterans, according to Bart Stichman, a founder of the National Veterans Legal Services Program who helped litigate both cases. He said veterans can now obtain relief without having to initiate a case themselves.

These are not lawyers these are disabled veterans, he told Law360. A lot of them are not going to appeal things like denied reimbursements because they dont know theres a legal infirmity in the VAs decision.

Having the right to file and participate in class action litigation over benefits is particularly important for veterans. Due to the odd ramifications of Civil War-era statute that barred egregiously high legal fees then considered to be anything more than $10 veterans have long struggled to get representation.

The 1862 law became an economic bar on attorneys. Although specialists from organizations like the American Legion and the Disabled American Veterans stepped in to fill the gap with nonlawyers, more than 8,500 veterans had no representation at all in handling their benefits claims in fiscal year 2018.

Have a story idea for Access to Justice? Reach us at accesstojustice@law360.com.

--Editing by Katherine Rautenberg.

See the rest here:

The Other Access To Justice Rulings That Mattered In 2019 - Law360

Who Is Missing In Action After IG Horowitzs FISA Abuse Findings? The FISA Court. – Sara A. Carter

The most important voice regarding the extensive Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Application (FISA) abuse revealed by Department of Justice Inspector General Michael Horowitz is missing in action. Its the very secretive Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court.

The court was founded in 1978, under the enactment of the U.S. Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act. It was created to authorize the most intrusive surveillance techniques modern technology allows and many contend it conflicts with the basic tenants of the Fourth Amendment, noted criminal defense and civil rights attorney David Schoen.

The FISA court power is so great that many civil libertarians and lawmakers have called for it to be either dismantled or completely reformed. Those calls to reform or end the FISA court have grown greater since Horowitz released his 435 page report this week, revealing 17 gross violations, which included withholding exculpatory information, altering documents and basically lying to the court happened in the case of Trump foreign policy campaign advisor Carter Page.

Those violations against Page were initiated by former FBI Director James Comeys Crossfire Hurricane Team and Horowitzs scathing report on the team was reminiscent of the J. Edgar Hoover era, where the bureaus spying on American citizens was rampant.

Pages life was turned upside down when the Crossfire Hurricane team. Other FBI agents and sources associated with the FISA against Page, leaked erroneous stories about the Trump campaign volunteer to the media, in an effort to create a narrative that the Trump campaign conspired with Russia. It, of course, was all based on a foundation of lies.

What has been missing say civil libertarians and legal scholars is accountability at the court level. In March, 2020 FISA will be back up for reauthorization. It is expected to face scrutiny from both Republicans and Democrats with the intelligence community lobbying for its necessity in the war against terror and enemy state actors.

However, with the IG report making clear that the system was abused to surveil Page. The bigger question is was Page the only one? Or is Page one of possibly many that had their rights abused or were used to weaponize the system against opponents by federal authorities.

The next step, should be a full investigation of FISA applications submitted to the court. It must be a deep dive into what appears to be incredible malfeasance by the FBI.

The Court itself has been far too silent, said Schoen. What action will it now take, given the IGs finding concerning the abuses of the process that occurred here. There is a FISA Court of Review that also was created in 1978 and it was created expressly to review the actions of the lower FISA Court. The Court has the power on its own to convene hearings into the violation of its rules and to take actions against transgressors. But will it take action, remains the question.

Horowitz identified in his report, 51 Woods procedure violations from the FISA application that was submitted from the FBI on Page beginning in October 2016.

Supporting document shows that the factual assertion isinaccurate, said the Horowitz report regarding nine of the violations. Basically, theFBI lied nine times to the court in the applications to get permission to spy on Page.

Ranking member of the House Intelligence Committee Devin Nunes, R-CA, warned that the breach of trust with the American people is so great that the FISA courts very survival is in peril if the Justices dont take action soon.

They ran people into Trumpcampaign officials over andover and over again and so whenyou hear [former FBI director]James Comey talk abouthis mosaic, thats what it was, Nunes told Fox News. It was the Democrats dirtfollowed by fake news, followedby spies that they ran againstTrump campaign officials andthen they decided, even thoughthere was exculpatory evidence,not to turn it over to the [FISA] court.

The FISA court has to eitherbe shut down in its entirety orthey have to take action andsoon, Nunes added.

Glenn Greenwald, with The Intercept, put it this way for those who believe that there was no wrongdoing by FBI officials in their quest to target the Trump campaign.

In this case, no rational person should allow standard partisan bickering to distort or hide this severe FBI corruption. The IG Report leaves no doubt about it. Its brimming with proof of FBI subterfuge and deceit, all in service of persuading a FISA court of something that was not true: that U.S. citizen and former Trump campaign official Carter Page was an agent of the Russian government and therefore needed to have his communications surveilled.

Horowitzs report is clear what the FBI did to Page and its failure to be truthful and candid to the FISC leaves little room for doubt that the bureaus targeting of the Trump campaign was filled with corruption.

IG Report:we identified multiple instances in which factual assertions relied upon in the first FISA application were inaccurate, incomplete, or unsupported by appropriate documentation, based upon information the FBI had in its possession at the time the application was filed.

The court operates in secret and its decisions as to whether to authorize the government to intrude on our most private activities are based exclusively on representations of facts unilaterally submitted to the court in secret by a government official with an agenda. The potential for abuse is limited only by ones imaginations. It is past time for Congress, working with judicial branch officials and civil libertarians, to reform the process, Schoen added.

Hes not the only one. Many senior lawmakers are now calling for the FISA court to speak out, and if not for there to be a reformation of the court or have it dismantled all-together.

But there are checks already in place right now in the Courts Rules of Procedure, all of which were well known the officials who were involved in the Carter Page application and related applications.

Those checks, however, depend entirely on the integrity of the government officials making the application or supervising those who made them. In the so-called Russia collusion investigation it appears that all involved simply chose to ignore the Courts rules and have faced no penalty for doing so, said Schoen.

For example, Rule 13 of the FISC Rules expressly requires the immediate correction of any misstatement or omission of any material fact presented to the court by the government. The officials involved here simply ignored the courts rules. They must be held accountable, he added.

Rule 13. Correction of Misstatement or Omission; Disclosure of Non-Compliance. (a) Correction of Material Facts. If the government discovers that a submission to the Court contained a misstatement or omission of material fact, the government, in writing, must immediately inform the Judge to whom the submission was made of: (1) the misstatement or omission; (2) any necessary correction; (3) the facts and circumstances relevant to the misstatement or omission; ( 4) any modifications the government has made or proposes to make in how it will implement any authority or approval granted by the Court; and (5) how the government proposes to dispose of or treat any information obtained as a result of the misstatement or omission. (b) Disclosure of Non-Compliance. If the government discovers that any authority or approval granted by the Court has been implemented in a manner that did not comply with the Courts authorization or approval or with applicable law, the government, in writing, must immediately inform the Judge to whom the submission was made of: (1) the non-compliance; (2) the facts and circumstances relevant to the non-compliance; (3) any modifications the government has made or proposes to make in how it will implement any authority or approval granted by the Court; and ( 4) how the government proposes to dispose of or treat any information obtained as a result of the non-compliance.

Go here to see the original:

Who Is Missing In Action After IG Horowitzs FISA Abuse Findings? The FISA Court. - Sara A. Carter

Trump involved in marathon session of his own on Twitter – NBCNews.com

NBC News

4d ago / 2:34 AM UTC

The day is still not over, but as of 9:30 p.m., Trump has tweeted or retweeted 115 times on Thursday most of them centered on impeachment.

Its been a prolific last few days for the president's thumbs. OnSunday, he tweeted and retweeted 105 times.

NBC News

4d ago / 2:05 AM UTC

After the fifth amendment was voted down, Nadler announced a half-hour recess.

Rebecca Shabad

4d ago / 2:20 AM UTC

After roughly two hours of debate, the Judiciary Committee defeated the GOPs fifth amendment to the articles of impeachment in another 23-17 party-line vote.

The amendment from Rep. Jim Jordan, R-Ohio, would have removed the last eight lines of both articles of impeachment, which both end with language about how Trump has demonstrated that he will remain a threat to national security and the Constitution if allowed to remain in office and has acted in a manner grossly incompatible with self-governance and the rule of law.

In response, it says that Trump warrants impeachment and trial, and removal from office.

Dartunorro Clark

4d ago / 6:35 AM UTC

As we approach the 12th hour of this debate, a frustrated Rep.Tom McClintock, R-Calif., had somewhat of a breaking-the-fourth-wall moment and said what many are thinking: Does anyone have anything new to say?

The same talking points have been repeated over and over againad nauseam by both sides, he said. "Repeating a fact over and over doesn't make it true and denying a fact over and over doesn't make it false - everybody knows this, everybody watching knows this."

He added: "This hearing's been enough of an institutional embarrassment without putting it on an endless loop so if I could if could just offer a modest suggestion if no one has anything new to add that they resist the temptation to inflict what we already heard over and over again."

NBC News

4d ago / 3:05 AM UTC

At the congressional ballmentioned earlier,President Trump made brief remarks while the Judiciary Committee members continued to debate the articles of impeachment.

He began by calling it a very exciting month in Washington, D.C., to laughter.

Our country is doing really great, he said, while touting the stock market records andthanking the Pences and the first lady.

He said his family calls the White House a home, but some presidents called it a house and some called it much worse.

'Were going to have a fantastic year, he said. The best year in decades.

Dartunorro Clark

4d ago / 1:01 AM UTC

Rep. Jim Jordan, R-Ohio, introduced a fifth amendment aiming to strike the last eight lines of both articles of impeachment.

Both articles have the same language: "Wherefore President Trump, by such conduct, has demonstrated that he will remain a threat to national security and the Constitution if allowed to remain in office and has acted in a manner grossly incompatible with self-governance and the rule of law. President Trump thus warrants impeachment and trial, removal from office, and disqualification to hold and enjoy any office of honor, trust, or profit under the United States."

The other four amendments introduced by Republicans have each failed with a party-line vote.

Dartunorro Clark

4d ago / 1:02 AM UTC

The fourth GOP amendment was killed in another party-line 23-17 vote. The three other amendments introduced by Republicans were also killed after lengthy debates.

The fourth amendment was introduced by Rep. Guy Reschenthaler, R-Penn., to strike the entire second article of impeachment: obstruction of Congress.

Alex Moe

4d ago / 12:12 AM UTC

If things continue to come together on schedule, we are looking at votes Tuesday on appropriations, Wednesday on impeachment, and Thursday on USMCA. With again, a caveat this could all change.

NBC News

4d ago / 11:58 PM UTC

Dartunorro Clark and Alex Moe

4d ago / 11:02 PM UTC

The fourth GOP amendment has been introduced by Rep. Guy Reschenthaler, R-Penn., to strike the entire second article of impeachment: obstruction of Congress.

The three other amendments introduced by Republicans have been killed along party lines by a vote of 23-17.

Rebecca Shabad

4d ago / 10:26 PM UTC

The committee voted 23-17 along party lines against the third GOP amendment, which was offered by Rep. Andy Biggs, R-Ariz., chairman of the House Freedom Caucus.

The amendment would have inserted language into the articles for impeachment that says the U.S. aid to Ukraine that was held up over the summer was eventually released.

The rest is here:

Trump involved in marathon session of his own on Twitter - NBCNews.com

Amazon’s holiday gift to Orlando’s sci-fi fans is a revitalized season of ‘The Expanse’ – Orlando Weekly

Say what you want about Jeff Bezos not too loudly, Alexa is listening but the man has decent taste in science fiction. The Amazon founder and CEO has peppered his career with Star Trek references, hired Snow Crash writer Neal Stephenson to work at his space exploration company, Blue Origin, and last year took it upon himself to personally announce that Amazon was going to rescue the critically acclaimed former SyFy Channel space drama The Expanse from cancellation. Amazon's Christmas gift to sci-fi fans returns to the airwaves netwaves? this week after a year of production and reminds us why The Expanse captured the attention of so many in the first place.

Those wondering how the sudden influx of Amazon-level money would affect the show need not worry. The CGI may be sharper and the look of the show may be more cinematic, but the show feels essentially the same at the core. We get some new sets, but the heart of the show politics in space remains intact.

Of those new locations, the planet of Ilus the one demanded by the plot of the book upon which the season is based is intentionally desolate, reflecting the hardscrabble survivalism of the Belter refugees who have settled there. Their presence ruffles the feathers of an Earth-based corporation with a mining charter, however, resulting in a political tinderbox that's primed to blow at any moment. U.N. Secretary-General Chrisjen Avasarala (played with gleefully foul-mouthed zeal by the great Shohreh Aghdashloo) sends James Holden (Steven Strait) and the crew of the Rocinante to keep the peace and investigate alien superstructures dotting the surface of the planet, no big deal.

While Holden along with drawling Martian pilot Alex Kamal (Cas Anvar), Belter engineer Naomi Nagata (Dominique Tipper) and weirdly sympathetic psychopath Amos Burton (Wes Chatham) dips his toes into that hornet's nest, we get our first extended look under the domes of the Martian Congressional Republic as recon marine Bobbie Draper (Frankie Adams) gets involved with the rise of a criminal element in the shadow of a planetwide economic recession, brought about in part by the cessation of hostilities between Earth and Mars. The Expanse has always had a strong sense of realpolitik, and in this season it acknowledges that "peace" is just a different set of problems.

While we don't get much in the way of character-building in the first six episodes of the 10-episode season, season standouts include Wes Chatham's Amos along with Burn Gorman's (Game of Thrones, Torchwood) take on the season's villain, Adolphus Murtry. Amos, the Rocinante crew's muscle, carries the same sense of cold practicality to his sex life, we discover, as he does to applying violence wherever necessary. The situation with his new sex-interest, Chandra Wei (Jess Salgueiro, Letterkenny), is complicated by the fact that she's Murtry's second-in-command.

Cibola Burn, the book on which the new season is based, is often cited as a low point in the series by James S.A. Corey (a collaborative pen name of writers Daniel Abraham and Ty Franck). Amazon seems confident that the showrunners can overcome the book's faults and the decision to give Avasarala and Bobbie plenty of screen time is a good start. The show has been renewed for a fifth season, already in production. For once, passionate fans get to relax, take a breath and rest easy knowing that their show is in good hands.

This story appears in the Dec. 11, 2019, print issue of Orlando Weekly. Stay on top of Central Florida news and views with our weekly Headlines newsletter.

Read the original:

Amazon's holiday gift to Orlando's sci-fi fans is a revitalized season of 'The Expanse' - Orlando Weekly

Lie of the Year: Trump’s claim whistleblower got it wrong – PolitiFact

President Donald Trump started the morning of Sept. 20 dismissing headlines about someone who blew the whistle on a phone call he had with the president of Ukraine. The call, he tweeted, was "pitch perfect."

Later that morning, Trump and first lady Melania opened the White House for a day of ceremony with Australias prime minister and his wife. Before their dinner of sunchoke ravioli and Dover sole, the four sat in the Oval Office as reporters asked Trump about the whistleblowers account.

"Its a ridiculous story. Its a partisan whistleblower," Trump said, though he added he didnt know who it was and hadnt read the complaint.

Since the Sept. 26 release of the whistleblower complaint about his call with Ukraine President Volodymyr Zelensky, Trump has insisted more than 80 times that the whistleblowers account is fake, fraudulent, incorrect, "total fiction," "made up," and "sooo wrong."

On Oct. 5 he tweeted that the "second hand information Whistleblower got my phone conversation almost completely wrong."

"Everything he wrote in that report, almost, was a lie," Trump told reporters Nov. 8.

"The whistleblower defrauded our country, because the whistleblower wrote something that was totally untrue," he said to the approval of supporters at a rally Dec. 10 in Hershey, Pa.

Despite what Trump claims, the whistleblower got the call "almost completely" right.

RELATED:10 things Donald Trump got wrong about impeachment in 2019, fact-checked

We know this from the very record of the call the president released. We know this from testimony under oath from career diplomats and other officials. And the president and his allies have told reporters that Trump did what the whistleblower suggested urged the Ukrainian president to investigate political rival Joe Biden. Their argument is that there was nothing inappropriate or unreasonable about it. Trump on Oct. 3 asked China to look at Biden and his son, Hunter, too.

Every year, PolitiFact editors review the years most flagrant inaccuracies in search of a significant false claim that can be elevated to Lie of the Year.

The distinction is awarded to a statement that is more than ridiculous and wrong. The Lie of the Year the only time PolitiFact uses the word "lie" speaks to a falsehood that proves to be of real consequence and gets repeated in a virtual campaign to undermine an accurate narrative.

The whistleblower, who to Trumps consternation remains unidentified, raised the concern that the presidents actions leading up to and on that phone call amount to interference in the coming presidential election. Agree or disagree with the conclusion, or whether the presidents conduct warrants impeachment, the actions described in the complaint stand up to factual scrutiny.

The claim that the whistleblower got his phone call "almost completely wrong" is PolitiFacts 2019 Lie of the Year.

At the heart of the whistleblower complaint: an historic phone call

The whistleblower filed the now famous complaint on Aug. 12. It is nine pages long. The description of a July 25 phone call between Trump and Zelensky takes up two pages. That section is the backbone (though not the entirety) of the impeachment inquiry of the president.

Trump started the call after 9 a.m. from the residence of the White House. The purpose for the leaders phone call, as suggested by the National Security Council, was for Trump to congratulate Zelensky on his political party winning control of Ukraines parliament.

The call started with pleasantries and lasted half an hour. The whistleblower was not listening in but cited "multiple White House officials with direct knowledge of the call." The complaint says Trump "pressured" Zelensky to:

investigate Biden and his son, Hunter Biden;

look into allegations that interference in the 2016 election, attributed to Russia, originated with Ukraine and a Democratic server; and,

speak with Rudy Giuliani and Attorney General William Barr about those issues.

The day before the whistleblowers complaint was public, the White House released a memo about the conversation that serves as a rough transcript of the call. Over the ensuing 80 days, the nation has watched Trump and his allies dispute the meaning of the core concerns, even as three officials who were listening have confirmed and elaborated on what was said in congressional testimony.

Those officials are Lt. Col. Alexander Vindman of the National Security Council; Jennifer Williams, adviser on Russia and Europe for Vice President Mike Pence; and Tim Morrison, who resigned his post as the top Russia expert on the National Security Council in October.

Investigate Biden and his son, Hunter Biden

While Joe Biden was vice president, his son, Hunter, accepted a directorship on the board of Ukrainian energy company Burisma Holdings.

The whistleblower said Trump wanted Zelensky to "initiate or continue an investigation into the activities of former Vice President Joseph Biden and his son, Hunter Biden."

Confirmed. Page 4 of the White House partial transcript quotes Trump as saying, "The other thing, theres a lot of talk about Bidens son, that Biden stopped the prosecution and a lot of people want to find out about that so whatever you can do with the Attorney General would be great. Biden went around bragging that he stopped the prosecution so if you can look into it... It sounds horrible to me."

The readout is supported by firsthand accounts of officials listening from the Situation Room. Vindman told House members he was concerned by the request of a foreign government to scrutinize a U.S. citizen.

"I realized that if Ukraine pursued an investigation into the Bidens and Burisma, it would likely be interpreted as a partisan play, which would undoubtedly result in Ukraine losing the bipartisan support it has thus far maintained," he said in his deposition before the House Intelligence Committee on Oct. 29. "This would all undermine U.S. national security."

Both Vindman, the security councils top expert on Ukraine, and Williams said their notes show Zelensky brought up "Burisma" by name, even though it does not appear in the call record.

RELATED: Fact-checking Joe Biden, Hunter Biden, and Ukraine

Investigate Ukrainian interference

The whistleblower claimed Trump urged Zelensky to "assist in purportedly uncovering that allegations of Russian interference in the 2016 U.S. presidential election originated in Ukraine, with a specific request that the Ukrainian leader locate and turn over servers used by the Democratic National Committee (DNC) and examined by the U.S. cyber security firm Crowdstrike, which initially reported that Russian hackers had penetrated the DNCs networks in 2016."

This is confirmed on page 3 of the White House call record. It quotes Trump as saying, "I would like you to do us a favor though because our country has been through a lot and Ukraine knows a lot about it. I would like you to find out what happened with this whole situation, they say Crowdstrike I guess you have one of your wealthy people The server, they say Ukraine has it. There are a lot of things that went on, the whole situation. I think youre surrounding yourself with some of the same people. I would like to have the Attorney General call you or your people and I would like you to get to the bottom of it. As you saw yesterday, that whole nonsense ended with a very poor performance by a man named Robert Mueller, an incompetent performance, but they say a lot of it started with Ukraine. Whatever you can do, its very important that you do it if thats possible."

The officials who testified confirmed this, too.

To Williams, the CrowdStrike reference was "noteworthy" because she had never heard of it before.

To others, it was a red flag. The president was raising a theory that had been discredited.

Morrison, Vindmans former boss, testified that hearing Trumps mention a server reminded him that his predecessor at the National Security Council, Fiona Hill, had warned him to stay away from those pushing for investigations of the Bidens and a server. Hill later testified that theories about Ukraine election interference were a "fictional narrative that has been perpetrated and propagated by the Russian security services themselves."

RELATED: Trump mentioned the Crowdstrike conspiracy during his call with Ukraine. Heres what that means

Speak with Rudy Giuliani, William Barr

The whistleblower said Trump told Zelensky to "meet or speak with two people the President named explicitly as his personal envoys on these matters, Mr. Giuliani and Attorney General Barr, to whom the President referred multiple times in tandem."

Trump dropped their names multiple times, and with particular endorsement for meeting with Giuliani. This from the White Houses transcript: "Mr. Giuliani is a highly respected man. He was the mayor of New York City, a great mayor, and I would like him to call you. I will ask him to call you along with the Attorney General. Rudy very much knows whats happening and he is a very capable guy. If you could speak to him that would be great."

The rest of the complaint details events that came before the call and some that followed, concluding with a brief mention of a sudden hold on military aid to Ukraine. The hold had "come directly from the President," and White House budget staff didnt know why.

That would become central to the Democrats impeachment inquiry.

Facts are facts. Politics are politics

Where the complaint and the president veer apart is on what the events mean. The whistleblower writes: Trump "is using the power of his office to solicit interference from a foreign country in the 2020 U.S. election." Thats also how House Democrats have framed it in the first article of impeachment.

Republicans dispute that interpretation of Trumps call. They point out that there is no explicit mention of either 2020 or the re-election campaign in the White House summary of the Trump-Zelensky call. They say the whistleblower made a sensational leap in word choice (none more so than "Trump pressured") that unfairly shaped media coverage of Trumps handling of Ukraine.

Given the history of corruption in Ukraine and Hunter Bidens involvement there, Trump asking about it was legitimate.

Said Vindman in his deposition: "I guess, look, it doesn't take a rocket scientist to see where the gain would be for the president in investigating the son of a political opponent."

This month Trump and Republicans have expanded their argument that the presidents language on the call has been mischaracterized.

RELATED: See the previous 10 Lies of the Year

"When I said, in my phone call to the President of Ukraine, I would like you to do US a favor though because our country has been through a lot and Ukraine knows a lot about it. With the word us I am referring to the United States, our Country," Trump tweeted Dec. 4.

Trump has not let up on his attacks of the whistleblower, asking repeatedly about the persons whereabouts and saying he wants to uncover the identities of those who spoke with the person. Trump says he deserves the right to question his accuser.

"I wouldn't mind a long process, because Id like to see the whistleblower, whos a fraud," he said Dec. 13 of a Senate impeachment trial.

U.S. Rep. Val Demings, a Florida Democrat on the House Intelligence and Judiciary committees, questioned the value of the whistleblowers testimony at this point.

"Its a very strange thing thats going on here right now," Demings said. "The whistleblower complaint has been corroborated multiple, multiple, multiple times."

Do the motivations of the complaint matter?

"The whistleblower can have the worst possible motives in the world. The whistleblower can hate their boss. And the law doesnt really take that into account," said Dan Meyer, an attorney who was executive director for Intelligence Community Whistleblowing and Source Protection from 2013 to 2017.

No matter the motivations or the political outcome, testimony from the whistleblower would not change the underlying facts of what Trump said. The whistleblowers account is verified by the same set of facts supplied by Vindman, Williams and Morrison, and others who were in the know.

And one more source: Trump.

RELATED:PolitiFact's Trump-Ukraine-Biden coverage in one place

See more here:

Lie of the Year: Trump's claim whistleblower got it wrong - PolitiFact

Trumps Bad. Sadly, Hes Not Alone. – The New York Times

The inspector generals report about the F.B.I.s Russia investigation offered a hideous Dorian Gray portrait of the once-vaunted law enforcement agency. As Charlie Savage wrote in The Times, the report uncovered a staggeringly dysfunctional and error-ridden process. The F.B.I. run by Comey and McCabe was sloppy, deceitful and cherry-picking relying on nonsense spread by Christopher Steele.

With the stunning and sad Afghanistan Papers, The Washington Post revealed what we knew in our hearts: We have spent 18 years and a trillion dollars in Afghanistan, with generals lying and hiding evidence that the war was unwinnable, just as the generals did in Vietnam. As one general conceded, they did not understand Afghanistan and didnt have the foggiest notion of what they were doing.

Even as President Barack Obama escalated the war, poured in more billions and promised to crack down on corruption, The Post said, the United States looked away and let its allies the Afghan president, warlords, drug traffickers and defense contractors wallow in fraud, corruption and dark money.

Then theres The Report, streaming on Amazon, the heroic saga of Daniel Jones, played by Adam Driver. Jones is working for Dianne Feinstein on the Senate Intelligence Committee and spends years compiling a report documenting the C.I.A.s use of waterboarding and other forms of torture in secret prisons, a barbaric, un-American and ineffective system designed by two creepy psychologists who were paid about $81 million by the C.I.A.

The movie is not kind to Barack Obama and Denis McDonough, suggesting that they protected the C.I.A. and tried to bury grisly details from the report to fend off criticism that Obama was weak on terrorism. It is also a harsh portrayal of Brennan, MSNBCs Voice-of-Morality, who, as C.I.A. director, fought the Senate inquiry so hard that his operatives even clandestinely hacked into the computer network of committee staff members to figure out how they were getting their information.

If this werent enough institutional perfidy for one week, we had the Boeing hearing in Congress: An F.A.A. analysis done after the first deadly crash off the coast of Indonesia showed that the agency knew that if it did not act, the Boeing 737 Max was likely to crash 15 times in the 45 years it was expected to fly, theoretically killing more than 2,900 people. But that wasnt enough to immediately ground it. The government is supposed to protect us from the greedy capitalists, not the other way around.

Unfortunately, this climate of confusion and cynicism allows Trump to prosper. He did not come to Washington to clean up the tainted system; he came to bathe in it.

The Times is committed to publishing a diversity of letters to the editor. Wed like to hear what you think about this or any of our articles. Here are some tips. And heres our email: letters@nytimes.com.

Follow The New York Times Opinion section on Facebook, Twitter (@NYTopinion) and Instagram.

Read more from the original source:

Trumps Bad. Sadly, Hes Not Alone. - The New York Times

Cutting a deal with Trump on free trade will not win a single vote for Democrats – The Guardian

Since the day of Donald Trumps inauguration, there has always been a strain of aspirational thinking within the Resistance that maybe, just maybe, his vague and mostly fictional populist sensibilities could be harnessed for good. The man is a deranged fascist, yes, the thinking goes, but perhaps he will do something nice for all the laid-off manufacturing workers and such purely to spite the Republican establishment that made fun of him. Trump offers just enough unpredictability that forces whose most fervent desire is for things to just get back to normal can imagine that his racist rightwing populism might be nudged over into progressive populism, without him noticing. Hope springs eternal, for those willing to ignore reality indefinitely.

Some would call this maintaining a positive attitude. Others would call it, more accurately, maintaining a gullible attitude. Either way, this brand of thought has preoccupied certain Democratic constituencies enough to make their opposition to this administration perfunctory, rather than passionate. It is hard to maintain an appropriately obsessive focus on throwing the bastard out if you are always harboring the dream of striking a deal with him.

Nothing embodies this better than the newly agreed-upon USMCA the Trump administrations updated Nafta trade deal that has already become a receptacle of both Republican and Democratic political fantasies. The actual text of the deal has not yet been released, but from what we know so far, it seems to be rather meh on substance. It contains provisions that are unduly favorable to big tech, but Democrats succeeded in axing a handout to big pharma; it improves on labor conditions for Mexican workers, but fails to address the fundamental cross-border inequalities that have sucked millions of manufacturing jobs out of America since the original Nafta was passed a quarter-century ago; environmentalists have branded the deal a failure; the highest praise that the labor-friendly Economic Policy Center could muster was to say that the USMCA is the best of a set of bad choices; and for all of the crowing from the White House, the real macroeconomic impact of the deal is expected to be close to nil. It is fair to say that the deal is better than the original Nafta, which was bad, and is better than having our nihilist president simply tear up our trade agreements with little alternative, which is also bad, but it is not, you know, good, if were being honest. That fact has not prevented Nancy Pelosi from swaggering about like a conquering hero, swaddled in the wacky fantasy that there are actual living, breathing Americans who will now decide to vote Democratic because the party has proven that it can govern during impeachment. (Sadly, the last American swing voter concerned with bipartisan trade deal negotiating ability died in 2001, at the age of 99.)

The most disturbing aspect of this entire saga is not even the content of the deal. It is the political capital expended on it by those who are supposed to be protecting us from the predations of the Republicans. In particular, organized labor a group that is engaged in a bitter existential struggle for survival due to a decades-long assault by the Republican party, and that should be the spearhead of powerful resistance to Trump and his priorities has spent a frightful amount of time and energy securing this deal. Richard Trumka, the head of the 12.5 million-member AFL-CIO, has long made the USMCA his top public priority, and his support was vital to the agreements success, notwithstanding the mixed feelings of several individual unions. Ask yourself: is the renegotiation of this trade deal the most important thing for the United States labor movement, at a time when union membership has declined to only one in 10 workers, and the billionaires are hoarding all of the economic gains, and the white nationalists are running the White House? The problem is not that Trumka was involved in a trade deal; nor is it that Democrats did not get every last thing they wanted in the trade deal; the problem is that we are living in a time of incipient fascism and grotesque inequality when the millions of working people who most desperately need the protection of unions are being everywhere underpaid, disempowered and deported, and the person who represents the movement that should be kicking down doors and rushing to their rescue is, instead, focused on cutting a trade deal with Donald Trump.

We dont need clever little bureaucrats pursuing minor policy tweaks in an effort to recapture the good old days

Perspective: it is important to have it.

The Democratic establishments wrongest and most dearly held belief about the 2016 election is that all we need to do is to win back some of those mythical White Working Class Voters who defected to Trump, and all will be well again. It is this view one that ignores the deep, structural inequalities that led us here and the deep shit we are now in that drives leaders like Nancy Pelosi and Richard Trumka to prize the USMCA so much. It is a flag that they can wave to that single demographic group that they believe holds the key to regaining power. Unfortunately for them, their thesis is all wrong. We dont need clever little bureaucrats pursuing minor policy tweaks in an effort to recapture the good old days. We need fire-breathing warriors, rallying those who have been bulldozed by the plutocracy. The future of the labor movement is not Trump-voting midwestern whites, but young people and immigrants and women and minorities, all of whom are being constantly oppressed by those in power today. And the future of the Democratic party is not going to be secured by ostentatiously finding common ground with the current president. If you think this trade deal is good, imagine what we might get if we waited a year or two, and negotiated it under President Bernie Sanders.

Read the original here:

Cutting a deal with Trump on free trade will not win a single vote for Democrats - The Guardian

State media claims that President Donald Trump is an "agent" of Russia – Salon

In the wake ofRussian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrovs visit to the Oval Office last week, Russian state TVaired a segmenttitledPuppet Master and AgentHow to Understand Lavrovs Meeting With Trump and characterized the visit as an example of President Trump being subservient to Russian interests.

As The Daily Beasts Julia Davis points out, President Vladimir Putins propaganda brigades enjoy watching the heightened divisions in the United States, and how it hurts relations between the U.S. and Ukraine.

That enjoyment manifested itself in the segment, which aired on the Russian Sunday news showVesti Nedeli, wherehost Vladimir Soloviev quipped that Trump would have to seek refuge in Russia once hes out of office.

"State-television news shows use every opportunity to demoralize the Ukrainians with a set of talking points based on the U.S. presidents distaste for their beleaguered country, Davis writes before citing another state-funded TV show where the host boasted about the meeting between Trump and Lavrov to a Ukrainian panelist.

There are no disagreements or contradictions between Trump and Russia, saidValery Korovin, director of the Center for Geopolitical Expertise, appearing on the state-television channel Rossiya-24.

The Kremlin is even promoting the work of Trumps personal lawyer, Rudy Giuliani. After Giulianis return to US from his evidence gathering trip to Ukraine, Russian state TV began airing clips of hisOAN (One America News Network) documentary, which claims to provide evidence that Ukraine meddled in the 2016 US election and thatformer Ambassador Marie Yovanovitch of lied under oath to Congress to whitewash [Joe] Bidens corruption.

Giulianis efforts on behalf of President Trump are bound to pay propaganda dividends for the Kremlin, Davis writes.

Putin has expressed undisguised delight with the crusade led by Trump and Giuliani to whitewash Moscows interference in the U.S. elections and pin the blame on Kyiv, he continued.

According to Davis, the emerging narrative from Russia propaganda outlets puts the hypocrisy of the Republicans on full display.

The Kremlin, having argued for years that democracy is a sham and the West is devoid of morals and principles, can now showcase the GOP as its Exhibit A.'

Originally posted here:

State media claims that President Donald Trump is an "agent" of Russia - Salon

Trump and Stephen Miller capitalize on white America’s fear its racial identity is losing value – NBC News

At a recent rally in Florida, President Donald Trump got cheers from his supporters as he positioned himself and his administration as an important line of defense in the supposed War on Thanksgiving, an evocative image of the threat posed by progressives to Americas cherished cultural traditions, as they wish to include a more inclusive narrative of the holidays history.

An even clearer example of the racially divisive attitudes harbored and perhaps even enabled by this administration is represented by White House adviser, Stephen Miller. Miller was recently found to have written hundreds of emails demonstrating his support for white nationalist ideology. Although some Democrats have called for Millers resignation, one of the main architects of Trumps hardline immigration policies has so far faced zero consequences.

As a sociologist who studies race relations, I argue that feelings of racial identity threat are behind this tolerance.

Whether spinning wild conspiracy theories about Thanksgiving or pushing xenophobic policy proposals, Trump officials have done little to foster racial and socioeconomic solidarity. So why are such extremist views tolerated in America including at the highest branches of government?

As a sociologist who studies race relations, I argue that feelings of racial identity threat are behind this tolerance. These feelings are not limited to white people but occur among both those in the cultural majority and those on the cultural margins as they work to hold onto and attain cultural citizenship.

Get the think newsletter.

Cultural citizenship is the achievement of full, unabridged membership in a social group. These days, many white people sense their claim to cultural citizenship which has long been assumed to be automatic is slipping away. And yet at the same time, people of color strive for, but rarely achieve, cultural citizenship because it has historically been based on a narrow definition of whiteness. These seem like competing, even antagonistic, efforts. But both the holding onto and the striving for a claim to cultural citizenship are driven by similar fears.

In the United States, whiteness sits at the heart of the cultural mainstream. Though whites still get to write the cultural rules, the idea that their dominant position is under threat has taken hold in the white imagination with the rise in globalism and the impending demographic transition of the country to a majority-minority. As ideas, people, and finances are increasingly shared across national borders, the ensuing diversity ultimately threaten to change the automatic association of Americanness with whiteness.

Unlike during the Cold War, when white Americans felt threatened by foreign nations, a post-1965 immigration boom and perceptions of preferential treatment from Civil Rights legislation have shifted the locus to within. Racial identity threat is now reflected in public sentiments about people of color taking jobs and spots in college away from white Americans.

Trumps appeal to white voters, especially rural white men and women without college degrees, rests on his perceived power to narrowly define cultural citizenship. Physically, he is trying to build a wall. Legally, he has attempted to cancel DACA. Symbolically, he proclaimed November National American History and Founders Month in addition to Native American Heritage Month. While Trump didnt replace Native American Heritage Month, as some originally believed, the addition of Founders Month felt like a slap in the face to indigenous communities.

Trumps appeal to white voters, especially rural white men and women without college degrees, rests on his perceived power to narrowly define cultural citizenship.

Perhaps it is already abundantly clear, with these multipronged assaults, that people of color also feel a sense of racial identity threat. My sociological research in rural New England demonstrates how striving for, but not achieving, cultural citizenship acts as a steady assault on dignity.

A Muslim American woman I interviewed described how she feels constantly judged when she is out in public. I prefer to go to a place that does Black hair, she told me, because every single time I sit with a white person, its like: Tell me about your family. When did you come to the U.S.? When I sit with a Black woman, its like: How are you? How was your day? I dont have to prove Im normal or my culture is normal. Its just an automatic acceptance. Because her racial identity is different from the norm, every social interaction becomes a test. The judgement is subtle and yet still quite harmful.

White people in these rural towns regularly, if unknowingly, signal their belief that racial minority identity is different and therefore less valuable. Sometimes such actions are intended to be helpful or friendly. And yet, asking people of color to assimilate to a white identity is neither. Further, denying cultural citizenship to people of color effectively protects white people from feeling racial identity threat and allows their cultural dominance to go unchallenged.

Forcing people to choose between assimilation and perpetual marginalization is no choice at all. Instead, a multiethnic democracy like the United States should mean one can simultaneously claim cultural distinctiveness and be treated as an equal. To be different should not mean relegation to a second class of citizenship. Thinking in a racially expansive way making the whole cultural citizenship pie bigger may also help lessen the anxiety many whites have about their shrinking piece.

Multiculturalism refers to the process of valuing diverse identities and their unique contributions to a broader definition of cultural citizenship. As a belief, multiculturalism implies that a legitimate way to be a loyal American is to be a proud Asian American or Mexican American or Muslim American. As a political practice, however, multiculturalism is hard to implement because people often view social status as a zero-sum competition, where one groups gains come at anothers losses. Anxiety over falling white birth rates is a common trope in the white nationalist community. Indeed, in Stephen Millers email cache, a common theme was how immigrants threaten Western (read: white) civilization. Donald Trump also understands this calculus and has leveraged whites fears of status loss to his political gain.

Beyond politics, what might it look like in our daily lives to be racially expansive in our definition of cultural citizenship? We must model multiculturalism in every interaction, establishing connections and trust between neighbors, coworkers, teachers, students and friends. So, rather than asking someone who is phenotypically different where they are from, ask them about their day. If you go on to develop a friendship with this person, then you can and should build the trust necessary to learn more about their experiences as a racial minority.

Racial identity threat is at the heart of racial division in this country, as whites strive to hold on to a narrow definition of cultural citizenship and people of color strive to broaden it. If we can expand the notion of what fitting in means, maybe we can reduce the anxiety people of all races feel about having and holding onto their piece of the pie.

Emily Walton

Emily Walton is an associate professor of sociology atDartmouthCollege and a public voices fellow with the OpEd Project.

See the original post here:

Trump and Stephen Miller capitalize on white America's fear its racial identity is losing value - NBC News