Proponents of euthanasia and physician-assisted suicide (PAS) contend that terminally ill people should have the right to end their suffering with a quick, dignified, and compassionate death. They argue that the right to die is protected by the same constitutional safeguards that guarantee such rights as marriage, procreation, and the refusal or termination of life-saving medical treatment.
Opponents of euthanasia and physician-assisted suicide contend that doctors have a moral responsibility to keep their patients alive as reflected by the Hippocratic Oath. They argue there may be a "slippery slope" from euthanasia to murder, and that legalizing euthanasia will unfairly target the poor and disabled and create incentives for insurance companies to terminate lives in order to save money.
PROS & CONS BY CATEGORY
CORE QUESTION
Definitions
Euthanasia in Practice
Legal Right and End-of-Life Documents
American Healthcare System
Physician Involvement in Euthanasia and PAS
Moral Differences in Forms of Assisted Dying
Historical Issues
Opponents of euthanasia and physician-assisted suicide contend that doctors have a moral responsibility to keep their patients alive as reflected by the Hippocratic Oath. They argue there may be a "slippery slope" from euthanasia to murder, and that legalizing euthanasia will unfairly target the poor and disabled and create incentives for insurance companies to terminate lives in order to save money.
PROS & CONS BY CATEGORY
CORE QUESTION
Definitions
Euthanasia in Practice
Legal Right and End-of-Life Documents
American Healthcare System
Physician Involvement in Euthanasia and PAS
Moral Differences in Forms of Assisted Dying
Historical Issues
Read this article: