How the coronavirus could hit the tourism and travel sector – HalifaxToday.ca

This article, written byMarion Joppe, University of Guelph, originally appeared on The Conversation and has been republished here with permission:

The spread of infectious diseases is invariably linked to travel. Today, tourism is a huge global business that accounts for 10.4 per cent of global Gross Domestic Product (GDP) and 10 per cent of global employment.

Nothing seems to slow its growth as year-over-year increases outpace the economy. The United Nations World Tourism Organization is predicting further growth of three per cent to four per cent in international tourist arrivals for 2020, with international departures worldwide particularly strong in the first quarter of this year.

But that was before a new coronavirus (formally known as 2019-nCoV) hit China and then very rapidly started spreading to the rest of the world with 20 countries and counting isolating cases.

Officials in China and those in the rest of world have been much quicker to take more drastic action after learning bitter lessons from the SARS outbreak in 2003, which also started in China.

The impact on travel to and from China of this new coronavirus, however, has been devastating. Airlines, including Air Canada, have cancelled all flights or significantly reduced the number of flights in and out of China. Russia closed its land border to passenger travel with China and Hong Kong shut down its borders, cross-border ferries and railways.

How does the impact of 2019-nCoV differ from that of SARS, which also affected tourism dramatically?

SARS has higher death toll so far

The World Health Organization confirmed 8,096 cases and 774 deaths in 26 countries as a result of the SARS coronavirus. First detected in late February 2003, it had run its course five months later.

The coronavirus first appeared in December 2019 but has already surpassed the total number of SARS cases in just two months, albeit with a much lower death rate. Infectious disease experts expect it to last for several months yet with tens of thousands afflicted before it runs its course.

SARS accounted for a drop in international tourist arrivals of almost 9.4 million and a loss of between US$30 billion and $50 billion. But in 2002, Chinas role as both a travel destination and a source country was relatively minor, receiving fewer than 38 million tourists and sending about 17 million tourists abroad.

Compare that to 2019 when it is estimated China received 142 million inbound tourists and the Chinese made 134 million trips abroad and 5.5 billion trips domestically.

The severe travel restrictions imposed by the Chinese government on its citizens and the stern warnings from Foreign Affairs offices, including Canadas, to avoid all non-essential travel to China and all travel to Hubei province (Wuhan is its capital and largest city) means that the economic impact of this coronvirus will be felt in every corner of the world and almost every sector of the economy.

The market response has been swift, with share prices of major airlines, cruise lines and tourism companies dropping several percentage points.

With the World Health Organization declaring the coronavirus a public health emergency of global concern, Gloria Guevara, president and CEO of the World Travel and Tourism Council (WTTC) fears that this escalation could have a damaging and lasting economic impact on the sector. Shes expressed serious concerns that airport closures, flight cancellations and shuttered borders often have a greater economic impact than the outbreak itself.

Hundreds of thousands die from seasonal flus

These concerns are well justified when one considers that between 291,000 and 646,000 people worldwide die from seasonal influenza-related respiratory illnesses each year, which does not lead to any of these warnings or drastic measures.

Canada saw 251 SARS cases and 43 deaths, but it cost the Canadian economy an estimated $5.25 billion and 28,000 jobs. At the time, China was a Canadian tourism market of less than 100,000 visitors annually; that dropped by 25 per cent due to SARS.

Today, China is Canadas second-largest overseas market, accounting for close to 800,000 arrivals, and its highest spending market with more than$2,800 per trip.

Depending on how long the restrictions and warnings are in place, losses could easily double of those in 2003. The pain will be felt in every industry as tourisms supply chain involves everything from agriculture and fishing to banking and insurance. The hardest hit will be its core industries of accommodation, food and beverage services, recreation and entertainment, transportation and travel services.

While Air Canada will refund fares for cancelled flights to and from China, other airlines may only extend change fee waivers or provide credit towards future flights.

But this may not be the case for connecting flights from Beijing or Shanghai, the cities most commonly served by North American airlines.

A growing number of hotels are also waiving changes and cancellation fees for bookings in China scheduled for the next few weeks. But many travellers to or passing through China may not be able to recover all their money, even if they bought insurance. Thats because most basic travel insurance plans do not cover epidemics as a reason for cancellation.

Marion Joppe, Professor, Law and Economics of Tourism, University of Guelph

This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article.

Read more:

How the coronavirus could hit the tourism and travel sector - HalifaxToday.ca

Travel round the world with Teessiders who’ve taken their Gazette on tour – Gazette Live

A surefire way to get your picture in the Gazette is to send a picture of yourself reading it.

And the more exotic the location you pick to enjoy it, the better.

We loved featuring your favourite holiday snaps - as long as the paper was in them too!

And like Alan Whicker, The Gazette has got pretty much everywhere.

The 118 advert was a popular fancy dress choice as we rolled into the 2010s, and we particularly loved a picture from Lee Griffiths' stag do with best man Andy Hudson and his mates in, you guessed it, Benidorm.

Year 8 and Year 9 students from what was then Hall Garth School in Acklam represented the paper abroad - taking it to Disneyland in Paris.

And it looked like Alan and Karen Merser has a great time on the West Bank in Luxor, Egypt.

It was a beautiful day 4,500 feet up in the Southern Alps in Queenstown, New Zealand, when George and Sandra Graham were perusing a paper which reported speculation that Boro were after signing Leon Best.

Taffy Boyle Junior's bachelor party in Las Vegas looked enjoyable in 2008, as we reported on plans for Middlesbrough's super-casino.

And we hope Denis Bell, from Cleveland Twinning Association, enjoyed a few tipples at the Warsteiner Brewery at Troisdorf, Germany - Redcar and Cleveland's twin borough.

Read this article:

Travel round the world with Teessiders who've taken their Gazette on tour - Gazette Live

Time to Reverse ‘Citizens United’ and Corporate Constitutional Rights – The Nation

Representative Pramila Jayapal of Washington States 7th Congressional District listens at a press conference. (Elaine Thompson / AP Photo)

Subscribe now for as little as $2 a month!

This past fall, Amazon challenged the proudly progressive character of my home city, Seattle, pouring $1.5 million into its City Council elections.Ad Policy

In doing so, Amazon placed not just a thumb but also a fistful of cash on the scales of our democracy. Thanks to immediate organizing on the ground and the speaking out of elected officials, the cynical and last-minute corporate spending on elections backfired: Nearly all of the Amazon-backed candidates lost their races.

However, on this 10th anniversary of the US Supreme Court ruling in Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission that catalyzed our current era of super PACs and corporate power, the clear danger posed by money in politics is real. Citizens United vastly expanded the rights of corporate entities and the super-wealthy to spend or invest their money to influence political elections and deepened the corrupting electoral influence of big money.

In the 10 years since Citizens United, weve seen newly created super PACs and dark money political nonprofits spend staggering sums, taking in unlimited donations without having to disclose them. While they cannot coordinate their spending with specific candidate campaigns, they can spend on political attack ads and other forms of political influence. From 2010 to 2018, super PACs spent roughly $2.9 billion on federal elections while dark-money spending rose from $129 million in the period from 2000 to 2008 to $964 million from 2010 to 2018.

It is important to note that Citizens United was not the first time political money in elections has been equated with free speech and corporations have been equated with people with constitutionally protected rights. The claim that corporate entities are legal persons with constitutional rights has been around for over a century.

Political money as free speech originated in the 1976 Buckley v. Valeo decision, while corporate political free speech rights began with the 1978 First National Bank v. Bellotti ruling.

But corporate constitutional rights extend beyond First Amendment free speech rights. Corporate constitutional rights began in the 1880s when Supreme Court Justices hijacked the Bill of Rights and the 14th Amendmentintended to guarantee equal protections for black Americansclaiming the rights of people also applied to corporate entities. Courts also interpreted sections of the original Constitution to protect corporate rights over those of people and communities, even though corporate entities are not mentioned anywhere in our Constitution.Current Issue

Subscribe today and Save up to $129.

The collective consequences of this have been devastating.

The corporate First Amendment right not to speak means that consumers may end up knowing less about whats in the food they eat. The corporate First Amendment religious right granted in the 2014 Hobby Lobby decision gives a for-profit corporation the right to deny reproductive health care coverage based on religious belief.

The corporate Fourth Amendment search and seizure rights prevents warrantless inspections of many businesses to ensure safe working and environmental protections.

The corporate Fifth Amendment takings rights defines certain corporate regulations that protect private land as a taking, with the corporation being justly compensated for lost current and/or future profits.

If you like this article, please give today to help fund The Nations work.

Therefore, any full remedy to the questions of money into elections must address not only the immediate effects of Citizens United but also the entirety of corporate constitutional rights.

That is why in 2019, I introduced House Resolution 48, the We the People Amendment calling for ending all corporate constitutional rightsas well as political money as free speech.

The flood of money into elections following Citizens United and other court decisions has eroded public trust in our elected leaders to seriously address issues like health care, climate change, wealth inequality, guns, and infrastructure. Only by ending all of these corporate constitutional rights and the corrupting influence of political money as free speech can we have a government that represents all of us rather than only the interests of the super-wealthy.

The We the People Amendment (HJR 48), co-sponsored by 67 of my House colleagues, enjoys widespread support with the American public. The national group Move to Amend has been educating and organizing citizens across the country, building an authentic, grassroots movement seeking a systemic solution to address the harms of Citizens United.

The American people urgently want us to return our government back to the people instead of the highest bidders. Its up to all of us to make that happen.

Go here to read the rest:

Time to Reverse 'Citizens United' and Corporate Constitutional Rights - The Nation

Court To Cop: We Don’t Need On-Point Precedent To Deny You Immunity For Killing A Dog That Couldn’t Hurt You – Techdirt

from the Officer-Cure-of-Millhaven dept

Cops kill dogs. And they do it at a rate even the Justice Department is concerned about it. This comes from pro-cop site PoliceOne, so if there's any bias in this article, it's for cops rather than timcushinghatescops.com.

No one keeps records on how many privately owned dogs are shot and killed each year by American law enforcement officers so there are no hard figures. But a perusal of the Web and social media will tell you it's a lot.

Laurel Matthews, a supervisory program specialist with the Department of Justice's Community Oriented Policing Services (DOJ COPS) office, says it's an awful lot. She calls fatal police vs. dogs encounters an "epidemic" and estimates that 25 to 30 pet dogs are killed each day by law enforcement officers.

If that estimate is even close to accurate, that's nearly 10,000 dogs killed by cops per year. While it's true a number of these dogs may be strays, there's no ignoring the fact that dogs make cops act like bunnies with handguns whenever they're anywhere nearby. If a dog acts like a dog around a cop (i.e., barking at someone it doesn't recognize, etc.), it has a good chance of ending up dead.

Six of eleven circuits have declared the unjustified killing of a family dog is a violation of Fourth Amendment rights. People are protected against "unreasonable seizures" of their property, and the ultimate "seizing" is the summary execution of pets they own.

But courts are inconsistent in the application of this principle, so cops continue to kill dogs at an alarming rate and are only stripped of their qualified immunity at an equally alarmingly low rate. In one case, a cop kept his immunity despite missing the non-threatening dog he was trying to kill and wounding a nearby child instead. In other cases, cops have killed dogs while entering houses without a warrant, raiding a house over an unpaid gas bill, and while responding to a burglar alarm accidentally tripped by a family member entering the house.

Here's a little bit of good news -- both for dogs and the Fourth Amendment -- from the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals. (h/t Gabriel Malor)

A cop who killed a non-threatening dog has had his immunity stripped and will have to face a lawsuit over his unjustified actions. Here are the events that led up to the pet's killing, as recounted by the court [PDF].

On September 24, 2017, [Officer Michael] Roane drove to Rays property to assist with an arrest warrant that was being served on Ray for domestic abuse. When Roane arrived on Rays property, four other officers were already present and parked in the driveway. Rays doga 150-pound German Shepard named Jaxwas secured by a zip-lead attached to two trees that allowed the animal limited movement within a play area of the yard. Rather than park in the driveway like the other officers, Roane parked his truck within the dogs play area...

Reading this complaint in the light most favorable to common sense, Officer Roane placed himself in danger and then tried to use his self-inflicted peril to justify shooting the family's dog. Pretty tough to do when you're surrounded by actually "reasonable" officers.

prompting the other officers on scene to shout and gesture toward Roane, indicating that he should [w]ait and [l]et [Ray] get her dog.

Roane did not do this. He did not wait. He did not allow anyone to secure the dog. Instead, he "exited his vehicle and started walking towards the house."

Things then happened that anyone -- including Officer Roane -- would have expected to happen. Roane advanced towards the house. The dog advanced to the end of its zip line. The dog was forced to de-escalate because it had run out of line and was being called back by its owner. Officer Roane had no such restraints and was unwilling to listen to the other officers' attempt to rein him in. But it does appear from the allegations made in the lawsuit Roane knew he was not in danger.

As Roane emerged from his vehicle, Jax began barking at and approaching Roane. Roane responded by backing away from the dog and drawing his firearm, while Ray ran to the zip-lead and began shouting Jaxs name. In a short moment, Jax reached the end of the zip-lead and could not get any closer to Roane. Roane observed that the dog could not reach him, and further observed that Ray was now holding onto Jaxs fully-extended lead and continuing to call Jaxs name. Roane therefore stopped backing up.

Roane's decision to end his retreat signalled he knew he was able to avoid any contact with the dog whose area he had entered and proceeded into over the protests of other law enforcement officers. That should have been the end of it.

Instead, this was the end of it.

Roane took a step forward, positioning himself over Jax, and fired his weapon into the dogs head. The dog died from the wound.

Instead of being stripped of his "Human Race Participation Card," Officer Roane will only be stripped of his immunity for his apparent cold-blooded killing of an animal he recognized posed no threat to him as long as he remained outside of the zip-line's reach.

Unimaginably, the lower court said this was all fine and reasonable.

On September 20, 2018, the district court dismissed Rays federal claim for unlawful seizure of Jax and declined to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over the remaining two state-law claims. In so doing, the district court concluded Roanes actions had been reasonable under the totality of the circumstances and he would be entitled to qualified immunity.

Oh absolutely not, says the Fourth Circuit. Taking the allegations in favor of the complainant, there's plenty that's not settled here and it's certainly fucking not settled when it comes to Roane's actions once he moved out of harm's way. Stepping back in to kill a dog that could not reach him isn't reasonable by any stretch of the imagination.

Officer Roane tried the old QI trick: state that no precedent exactly on point exists. In other words, no other cop killed a 150-lb German Shepard named "Jax" in this backyard, in this jurisdiction, at this time of day, etc. QI has become "Steamed Hams" and every apparently unjustified rights violation can't be a cop's fault because the rapidly-evolving situation is the Aurora Borealis localized entirely in this part of the country at this time of year etc.

The court declines to swing at this bad pitch. QI isn't just about point-by-point precedent. It's also about the reasonableness of the officer's actions. And it doesn't see anything reasonable about Officer Roane's decision to shoot a leashed dog in the head after ensuring he could safely do so.

Viewing all facts in the complaint and inferences arising therefrom in Rays favor, it is clear that Roane shot Jax at a time when he could not have held a reasonable belief that the dog posed a threat to himself or others. Accepting these facts, we hold that a reasonable police officer would have understood that killing Jax under such circumstances would constitute an unreasonable seizure of Rays property under the Fourth Amendment.

Roane's wish to have his novel dog-killing recognized as novel by the Appeals Court fails. "Reasonable" still means "reasonable," even if this officer found a new way to kill someone's pet:

Viewing all facts in the complaint and inferences arising therefrom in Rays favor, it is clear that Roane shot Jax at a time when he could not have held a reasonable belief that the dog posed a threat to himself or others. Accepting these facts, we hold that a reasonable police officer would have understood that killing Jax under such circumstances would constitute an unreasonable seizure of Rays property under the Fourth Amendment.

The court says that even if the cop found a cool new way to kill dogs, it's not going to hand out immunity without a fuller examination of the facts.

We acknowledge that there is no directly on-point, binding authority in this circuit that establishes the principle we adopt today. Booker, 855 F.3d at 543. Until now, we have never had the occasion to hold that it is unreasonable for a police officer to shoot a privately owned animal when it does not pose an immediate threat to the officer or others.

Gun down a defenseless dog and, well, have fun defending yourself in court, "on-point" precedent notwithstanding.

In Altman, we held that privately owned dogs are protected under the Fourth Amendment, and further established that the reasonableness of the seizure of a dog depends on whether the governmental interest in safety outweighs the private interest in a particular case. 330 F.3d at 20305. Based on these broader principles alone, it would have been manifestly apparent to a reasonable officer in Roanes position that shooting a privately owned dog, in the absence of any safety rationale at all, is unreasonable.

No immunity for Officer Roane. The case goes back to the trial court that failed so badly the first time around. If an officer can avoid interacting with a dog they perceive as threatening and still accomplish their objectives (i.e., arrest a suspect), then they should do so. Anything else is objectively (and subjectively) unreasonable. Roane placed himself in harm's way, ignored other officers' advice to not place himself in the dogs' play area, and killed a dog only after it had reached the end of its lead and no longer posed a threat to him. Fuck this guy. He deserves whatever the plaintiff can extract from him.

Filed Under: dog, police, qualified immunity

See original here:

Court To Cop: We Don't Need On-Point Precedent To Deny You Immunity For Killing A Dog That Couldn't Hurt You - Techdirt

Facial Recognition Has Its Eye on the U.K. – Lawfare

In the United Kingdom, there is an eye in the sky surveilling people on the streetand soon it may know their names. Human rights organizations such as Big Brother Watch and Liberty, as well as British parliamentarians, are challenging what appears to be a silent rollout of facial surveillance across the United Kingdom. For Americans concerned about a developing Big Brother at home, recent judicial and regulatory developments on facial recognition technology in the U.K. may provide a glimpse into a potential future.

As the U.S. government and the U.S. public consider the potential future use and regulation of facial surveillance, the debate in the U.K. can help to inform the U.S. discussion, particularly in terms of how law enforcement may use, and can abuse, the technology. It can also offer a window into the types of legal arguments (albeit in the British context) that might be used to challenge police usage and preview potential models for the regulation of facial surveillance.

State-operated surveillance is hardly a novel phenomenon in the U.K. The first closed-circuit TV (CCTV) system in the United Kingdom was set up in 1953 in London, for the Queens coronation. By the 1960s, permanent CCTV began to cover certain London streets. Since then, the reach of CCTV surveillance has expanded in sporadic bursts, with many cameras installed in response to the 1990s IRA attacks and then again after 9/11 and the London Underground bombing. Now, there are more than 6 million CCTV cameras in the United Kingdom, more per citizen than in any country except China.

The British government argues that CCTV serves four purposes: the detection of crime and emergency incidents, the recording of events for investigations and evidence, direct surveillance of suspects, and the deterrence of crime. However, critics argue there is little evidence to support the proposition that its use has reduced levels of crime. An internal report by Londons Metropolitan Police noted that only one camera out of every 1,000 had been involved in solving a crime.

While CCTV has traditionally consisted of fixed-point, video-recording capabilities, in recent years, new technologies have greatly expanded the capabilities of surveillance. Automatic license plate readers, police body cameras and drone surveillance have created a more flexible, mobile and intelligent surveillance apparatus in the U.K.

In recent years, however, facial surveillance, or automated facial recognition (AFR), has emerged as one of the most desired surveillance tools for law enforcement. Facial recognition offers a solution to problems that have plagued police use of CCTV. In the past, successful use of CCTV had been limited because the police did not have the systems or staff to review and utilize footage. With facial recognition technology, algorithms can automatically identify and notify police of certain individuals in footage. Police could use this capability to aid traditional policing, like identifying an individual before or after an arrest or tracking the historical location of a criminal suspect. But police can also use facial recognition for more novel surveillance tactics, like real-time observation of suspects.

Facial recognition technology has been used by police in the U.K. since 1998, but its effectiveness in controlled environments has increased significantly in the past few years thanks to the significant increase in the availability of labeled facial images from social media and a new generation of computers with increased processing power. That improved recognition ability has led the Metropolitan Police and the South Wales Police to run several tests of real-time use of facial recognition within CCTV, or AFR.

Yet, in practice, facial recognition is a deeply flawed tool for policing. Despite the apparent accuracy of facial recognition in a laboratory setting, police tests in the U.K. appear to indicate that, in a live setting, the technology is anything but accurate. In 2018 and 2019, the civil liberties organization Big Brother Watch submitted a series of freedom of information requests to both the Metropolitan Police and the South Wales Police. By Big Brother Watchs analysis, the Metropolitan Police use of AFR has a false-positive rate of 98 percent. Out of the 104 times the police system matched a person to an image of a wanted criminal, 102 of the matches identified the wrong person. Only two people were identified correctly: One of the two had been erroneously placed on the wanted criminal list, and the other was on a mental-health-related watchlist.

The information provided by the South Wales Police painted a similarly stark picture of the inaccuracies of police use of facial recognition. The South Wales Police system had a false-positive rate of 91 percent. The system made 2,451 incorrect identifications and only 234 correct ones out of the 2,685 times the system matched a face to a name on the watchlist. On the basis of those false positives, South Wales Police staged interventions for 31 innocent citizens, in which they stopped individuals and asked them to provide proof of their identity.

An independent study undertaken by the University of Essex, commissioned by the Metropolitan Police, paints a slightly rosier picture, if only barely. By the reports accounting of the Metropolitan Polices tests, the system made 42 matches. Across all tests, the facial recognition matches were verifiably correct only eight times, representing 19 percent of all matches. Despite this low accuracy, and the groundless police stops it triggers, the Metropolitan Police characterized these tests as legal and successful in finding wanted offenders and said that they would continue to implement trials. Due to a lack of data on how frequently the Metropolitan Police currently undertake police stops without reasonable suspicion, it is difficult to identify whether AFR increases the rate of suspicionless stops by police. Activists are concerned that, when AFR is fully operationalized, such high rates of false positives will prompt police to undertake more stops and searches of citizens without any reasonable suspicion.

Activists also worry that facial surveillance could become an instrument of police abuse. In East London, the Metropolitan Police tested facial surveillance on citizens in a public square by attaching facial recognition-enabled cameras to an unmarked van on the street. Citizens largely passed by the cameras without remark, either not noticing or not caring. One man, however, after seeing Big Brother Watch placards about the covert test, pulled the opening of his sweater over his mouth. As he passed by the cameras, his face partially obscured, officers detained him and began to question him about why he was covering his face. Ultimately, he was releasedbut not before police photographed his face and fined him $115 for disorderly conduct.

These failures in real-time and investigatory surveillance are all the more concerning due to the lack of clarity regarding which authorities are responsible for oversight. There is no legislation in the U.K. specifically authorizing or regulating the use of AFR. Instead, the regulation of facial recognition relies on a collection of bureaucratic entities tasked with monitoring different aspects of the state surveillance apparatus.

The regulation of surveillance camera systems is controlled largely by the Protection of Freedoms Act (POFA) of 2012, the Regulation of Investigatory Powers Act (RIPA) of 2000 and the Data Protection Act (DPA) of 2018. The surveillance camera commissioner, an independent official appointed by the secretary of state, counsels the secretary and other relevant authorities on proper compliance with the surveillance camera provisions of the POFA. The biometrics commissioner, another independent official appointed by the secretary of state, regulates the use and retention of biometric data by the government, including approving police applications to retain certain biometric data. Meanwhile, the RIPA is administered by the investigatory powers commissioner, an independent appointee of the secretary of state; and the DPA is administered by the information commissioner, an independent official appointed by and reporting directly to Parliament.

Not unsurprisingly, in 2016, the surveillance camera commissioner expressed confusion about which commissioner was responsible for oversight of AFR. Most recently, this ambiguity has led to a confrontation between the surveillance camera commissioner and the information commissioner over whether AFRrequires the government to issue a new code of conduct to police, to regulate how they deploy the technology.

Since Lawfares last coverage of AFR in the U.K., British civil liberties organizations have launched multiple campaigns to resist the police use of AFR and to press for sufficient assurances of legal and ethical protections of civil liberties.

An important recent High Court case largely ended favorably for the police. With the help of the human rights organization Liberty, Ed Bridgesa former Cardiff city councillor concerned about a facial recognition camera that surveilled him while he shopped for his lunchtime sandwich and attended a peaceful protestlevied a suit challenging the legality of police surveillance. Bridges brought his suit against the South Wales Police, the home secretary, the information commissioner and the surveillance commissioner.

Bridges brought three claims against the parties. First, he alleged that the use of AFR interfered with his privacy rights under European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR) Articles 8(1) and Article 8(2) (these ECHR rights are codified in British law by the U.K. Human Rights Act of 1998), which provide a

right to respect for private and family life, home, and correspondence [without] interference by a public authority except such as is in accordance with law and is necessary ... in the interest of national security, public safety, or the economic well-being of the country, for the prevention of disorder or crime, for the protection of health or morals, or for the protection of the rights or freedoms of others.

Second, Bridges alleged that the use of AFR did not comply with the 1998 Data Protection Act, which requires personal data be processed lawfully and fairly, and with the first data protection principle of the 2018 Data Protection Act, which requires law enforcement to acquire consent or determine that the collection of sensitive data is strictly necessary to effect a law enforcement task. The suit alleged that uses of AFR did not comply with requirements under the 2018 act to assess the potential impact on personal data when a type of processing is likely to result in a high risk to the rights and freedoms of individuals.

Third, Bridgess suit alleged that the use of AFR would be likely to disproportionately misidentify, and as a result discriminate against, women and minority individuals. Bridges pointed to studies in the United States that demonstrated that facial recognition algorithms have high error rates for identification of women and ethnic minorities because of a lack of diversity in training data. Bridges argued that facial recognition algorithms in the U.K. are likely similarly biased and would likewise disproportionately misidentify women and ethnic minorities, in violation of the Public sector equality duty (149) of the Equality Act of 2010.

In its September 2019 judgment, however, the High Court did not find any such privacy violation. First, the court recognized that facial surveillance was not a superficial search and thus engaged with Article 8(1) privacy rights, but found that AFR was sufficiently authorized and regulated by police internal policies and existing common law legislation (including the 2018 DPA and the Surveillance Camera Code of Practice, issued pursuant to POFA Section 33). The court also held that AFRs interference in citizens privacy rights was sufficiently justified by the objective of identifying people of interest to the South Wales Police, its use was rationally connected to the objective, a less intrusive measure could not be substituted, and its use fairly balanced the rights of the individual and the interests of the community. Second, after analyzing the interaction of AFR with Article 8 rights, the court found that the use of AFR was being processed lawfully and fairly under the 1998 DPA. The court also held that the use of AFR was strictly necessary for identifying individuals on a watchlist and necessary for the common law duty of preventing and detecting crime. The court held that there was not sufficient evidence to suggest that the AFR tool demonstrated any discrimination or bias and that the South Wales Police had sufficiently complied with its Equality Act requirements. While the court suggested that internal policy guidelines for using AFR were likely not sufficient to ensure sensitive data processing compliant with the 2018 DPA, it did not hold that the guidelines failed to meet the compliance document requirements in Section 42(2) of the 2018 DPA. Instead, it recommended that the South Wales Police reconsider their guidelines with the direction from the information commissioner. On the basis of these analyses, Bridgess challenge was dismissed on all grounds.

On the surface, the court appeared to address many of the legal grounds for challenging facial surveillance, suggesting that U.K. police can begin to adopt facial surveillance without fear of legal reproach. However, the courts opinion is concerned primarily with the specific kind and use of AFR that Bridges challenged. The court specified that the surveillance against Bridges was minimally intrusive because it was used for only a limited time, covered a limited space, and was engaged for targeted identification. While the case could provide a valuable precedent for police departments that plan to use AFR in a similar way, the decision does not appear to authorize the form of dragnet surveillance that critics fear pervasive AFR can provide, as the court only held that the described minimally intrusive usage of AFR to date has complied with the Human Rights Act and data protection requirements. Bridges has been granted leave to appeal the judgment.

Shortly after the courts ruling, the information commissioner declared her disagreement with the High Courts decision and struck out a harsh stance against unchecked use of AFR. In May 2018, her office opened an investigation into the use of AFR by the Metropolitan Police and the South Wales Police. Her office concluded that the government should introduce a binding statutory code of practice to guide when and how AFR will be deployed. Subsequent to the Bridges decision, the information commissioner also issued a nonbinding advisory opinion on AFR that clearly disagrees with the High Court judgment and aims to mitigate its impact, specifically stating to police departments that the High Court judgement should not be seen as a blanket authorization for police forces to use [AFR] systems in all circumstances. When [AFR] is used, my opinion should be followed. At present, the Office of the Information Commissioner has stated that it is coordinating with the Home Office, the investigatory powers commissioner, the biometrics commissioner, the surveillance camera commissioner, and the police on developing an AFR code of conduct.

Against this contentious debate within government, Big Brother Watch has forged ahead with its resistance campaign. On June 13, 2018, Big Brother Watch and Baroness Jenny Jones sent pre-action letters to the Metropolitan Police and the home secretary. In the letters, Jones expressed her concerns that the police use of AFR could identify and thus interfere with confidential meetings with whistleblowers and campaigners with whom she meets regularly as part of her Parliamentary duties and that she would need to modify her conduct to avoid meeting certain individuals in an area where AFR would or might be used. She also expressed concern about the sources of images used to construct AFR watchlists, including whether images are sourced from police protest surveillance, the internet or social media.

Big Brother Watch and Jones argue that the use of AFR violates Articles 8, 10 and 11 of the ECHR. Article 8, as mentioned earlier, enumerates certain privacy rights. Articles 10 and 11 declare the individual rights to freedom of expression and freedom of peaceful assembly and association, which mirror the First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution. The letters allege that use of AFR interferes with these rights by retaining sensitive biometric data and location information for an indeterminate period of time (police reports have varied on that subject).

In July 2019, the Metropolitan Police announced that it had completed its trials of AFR and was considering potential implementation. Big Brother Watch chose to stay its challenge, to see if the Metropolitan Police would voluntarily end or restrict its usage. The Metropolitan Police has now chosen to begin operational usage of AFR, targeted at serious crime like serious violence, gun and knife crime, [and] child sexual exploitation. In response, Big Brother Watch declared that it will continue its legal challenge. It is also likely to continue its work with Lord Clement-Jones, chair of the House of Lords Artificial Intelligence Committee, to propose a bill that would place a moratorium on the use of AFR in public places and require the secretary of state to undertake a review of the use of AFR in public places.

The state of facial surveillance in the United Kingdom can give Americans a glimpse of how AFR might be implemented and used in the United States. The adjudication of the Big Brother Watch challenge, much like the Bridges decision, might provide some new perspective on what kinds of uses of AFR do or dont match up to legal standards for privacy (albeit European ones). At this time, despite the U.S. Supreme Courts comments in Jones and Carpenter that individuals hold some privacy interest in the sum of their movements in public, the Fourth Amendment does not appear to regulate the use of AFR. If U.S. courts refrain from extending Fourth Amendment protections to particular uses of AFR, the regulatory regime that emerges in the United Kingdom could provide helpful inspiration for regulating the use of AFR in the United States.

See the original post:

Facial Recognition Has Its Eye on the U.K. - Lawfare

Facebook adds itself to the list of companies demanding Clearview cease scraping its websites – TechSpot

A hot potato: Clearview AI has found itself in a sticky legal situation by allowing law enforcement access to a facial recognition database full of images it has scraped from the internet. Tech companies are distancing themselves from the service by demanding the company stop collecting data from their websites.

Facebook has become the latest company to "demand" that Clearview AI stop scraping its platforms for its facial recognition database. The social media giant has sent the company several letters asking it to stop using user data from Facebook and Instagram but has not yet issued a formal cease and desist letter.

"Scraping people's information violates our policies," a spokesperson for Facebook told CBSNews on Thursday. "Which is why we've demanded that Clearview stop accessing or using information from Facebook or Instagram."

Facebook has not decided whether to take its demand to the next level yet, but other companies already have. Twitter sent Clearview a C&D letter in January. YouTube and Google have also issued legal warnings to the startup earlier this week.

Clearview's database contains more than three billion images obtained from the internet. Its intended purpose is to aid law enforcement in identifying suspects in crimes or other "persons of interest."

The company maintains that it is above-board on the data that it collects. Clearview AI CEO Hoan Tan-That said in an interview, "If it's public, you know, and it's out there, it could be inside Google search engine, it can be inside ours as well."

As Google pointed out, there is a big difference between indexing websites, which it does with the website owner's permission, and scraping images and information on private individuals without their consent.

"Comparisons to Google Search are inaccurate. Most websites want to be included in Google Search, and we give webmasters control over what information from their site is included in our search results, including the option to opt-out entirely. Clearview secretly collected image data of individuals without their consent and in violation of rules explicitly forbidding them from doing so."

Tan-That also claims his company's practices are protected by the First Amendment, a claim that he will likely have to prove in court if the situation escalates.

It is easy to forget that the Bill of Rights is a set of restrictions placed on the government to protect the people. The First Amendment restricts the government from enacting laws or taking action that infringes on the individual's freedom of speech. It does not mention any other types of impediments, such as a company adding restrictions to the language used on its premises or platform.

In this case, Clearview collects data without the individual's knowledge or permission, and it ultimately ends up in the hands of the government (law enforcement). One could easily argue the company's data collection is a violation of a person's Fourth Amendment right to privacy and protection from illegal search and seizure.

If Clearview AI persists, it will very likely end up in court with a very shaky Constitutional defense. ZDNet notes, the startup is already facing a class-action lawsuit in Illinois for violating the state's Biometric Information Privacy Act. We'll have to wait and see just how many legal challenges the company is willing or able to withstand.

Editorial credit: Frederic Legrand - COMEO via Shutterstock

Here is the original post:

Facebook adds itself to the list of companies demanding Clearview cease scraping its websites - TechSpot

Mans death after encounter with Etowah Sheriffs Department is call to action on mental health – AL.com

This is an opinion column.

Christopher Shane McKinney may not have known exactly what he wanted when he went to the Etowah County Sheriffs office in Gadsden on January 24, 2018. I need some help, he told officers, according to a lawsuit filed against the Sheriffs department last December in Northern District Court. I just need some help.

He believed people were trying to hurt him, the suit says. Maybe even kill him.

He certainly did not come to the sheriffs office to die.

Yet he did--after a physical encounter in which he was tased, handcuffed and wrestled to the ground by Etowah County Sheriff deputies and officers, hitting his head on the ground at least once, the lawsuit contends.

Sheriffs department employees illegally detained him, rifled his pockets, attempted to handcuff him, subdued him by force, and ultimately killed him by deploying tasers into sensitive areas of his upper body, according to the lawsuit, filed in December.

McKinney, who is African American, died on the concrete outside Etowah County Sheriffs Department as its employee laughed and complained about having to use unwarranted force upon a person who had committed no crime, had no weapon, the suit says. (According to reports, McKinney was taken to a Gadsden hospital, where he was declared dead.)

McKinney was 39 and a father of three, according to his obituary.

In January, the Etowah sheriffs department filed a motion to dismiss a portion, but not all of the complaint, which was filed by James McKinney, Christophers brother, on behalf of the estate. The motion, in part, states the sheriffs department is not a legal entity subject to suit."

Christopher McKinney possessed a mental illness that affected one or more major life activities, including, but not limited to, thinking, working and communicating with others, the suit alleges.

On that fateful day, Jamie Capes, an Etowah County Sheriffs employee, allegedly noticed McKinney pacing the parking lot as she walked to her car. She then saw him walk up and down the entrance stairs, the lawsuit states.

She returned inside and told Deputy Anthony Davis and Sgt. William Langdale what she saw, and both went outside to investigate, the complaint says.

Davis and Langdale asked McKinney to come inside the office, which he did, then asked his name.

I just need some help, McKinney declared. People have been hurting me.

McKinney declined to give his name and said, Thats OK, according to the complaint.

Then McKinney attempted to leave the Sheriffs Office, sliding his body out of the door as Langdale was blocking the entryway, according to the complaint. (The defendants, in a January filing, deny this.)

Langdale asked McKinney if he had identification. When McKinney said he did, Langdale grabbed McKinneys arm in one hand and grabbed McKinneys wallet out of his back pocket, then twisted McKinneys arm in an attempt to handcuff him, the lawsuit says. (Defendants deny these descriptions of the encounter.)

I didnt do anything, McKinney said. Please help me.

What happened in the next few moments was chaoticand deadly.

Langsdale pulled away and tased McKinney, who, according to the suit, attempted to pull the Taser leads out of his [upper torso].

Langsdale and Davis both converged on McKinney trying to wrestle him to the ground, the suit says.

Davis deployed his Taser at close rage into McKinneys torso and again directly into McKinneys abdomen, according to the suit. (Defendants admit a Taser was used on McKinney.)

Other officers are alleged to have joined the melee, including Corrections Officers Brandon Hare and Logan Page, says the suit. Deputies called out on the radio for additional help.

Hare allegedly tased McKinney, who falls face down on the ground, after which Page tased McKinney again. Davis then double handcuffed the now prone and inert McKinney and left [him] face down on the concrete while a crowd of Sheriffs Department employees gathered. (Defendants admit two pair (sic) of handcuffs were linked together to handcuff McKinney.)

One officer is alleged to have declared he had wasted $100.00 worth of [Taser] cartridges on [McKinney]. Another claimed his sunglasses were broken in the scuffle. (Defendants admit both things occurred.)

After a long delay, the Sheriffs deputies decided to roll the now silent McKinney onto his back, allowing his head to hit the concrete with an audible thud, the complaint reads.

Officers discussed the incident, accused McKinney of being high on drugs, according to the suit.

For the first several minutes, no Sheriffs Department employee rendered any aid, other than to walk near McKinneys body and declare that he was still breathing.

Until he died. On the concrete. With no outstanding arrest warrants, no weapon, and no, it was later discerned, according to the complaint, illegal drugs in his system.

Christopher Shane McKinney almost certainly did not come to the Etowah County Sheriffs office that day to die face down on the concrete.

James McKinney alleges Langdale, Davis, Hare and Page subjected [Christopher] McKinney to physical abuse and did so without a warrant, violating McKinneys Fourth Amendment right to be free from arrest without probable cause and/or to be free from unreasonable seizure.

McKinney, the suit says was harmless, that he had a mental illness

[Officers] knew or should have known that McKinney is a person with a disability because it was obvious and they were alerted to that fact by their co-worker, the suit says. [And] failed to reasonably accommodate that disability

McKinney died at the hands of these officers as a result of their failure to reasonably accommodate his disability.

The suit also alleges the department has not implemented any relevant policies or trained its employees on the application of the [Americans with] Disabilities Act or the Rehabilitation Act to the interactions with citizens who seek help ...

The estate, according to the suit, requests unspecified compensatory and punitive damages, plus reasonable attorneys fees, injunctive relief and such other relief as this Court deems just and proper.

The defendants denied 25 of the allegations outlined in the complaint, including that officers left McKinney face down on the concrete while a crowd of Sheriffs Department employees gathered.

On Friday afternoon, February 7, the case is set for a telephone conference before Judge Corey L. Maze.

In his obituary, it says McKinney graduated from Gadsden High School, worked for UPS for 15 years and was a member of Mount Calvary Baptist Church.

Among the items to be considered during the 2020 state legislative session, which began Tuesday, is providing the states too-long-neglected Department of Mental Health with $18 million to build three crisis centers.

A center that could have perhaps provided Christopher McKinney with a place to gosomeplace where he might have been able to get the help he asked for.

Someplace where he may not have been tased, wrestled to the floor, double handcuffed, and died.

A voice for whats right and wrong in Birmingham, Alabama (and beyond), Roys column appears in The Birmingham News and AL.com, as well as in the Huntsville Times, the Mobile Register. Reach him at rjohnson@al.com and follow him at twitter.com/roysj

Originally posted here:

Mans death after encounter with Etowah Sheriffs Department is call to action on mental health - AL.com

Is Teledyne Technologies (TDY) Outperforming Other Aerospace Stocks This Year? – Yahoo Finance

Investors focused on the Aerospace space have likely heard of Teledyne Technologies (TDY), but is the stock performing well in comparison to the rest of its sector peers? Let's take a closer look at the stock's year-to-date performance to find out.

Teledyne Technologies is one of 34 companies in the Aerospace group. The Aerospace group currently sits at #13 within the Zacks Sector Rank. The Zacks Sector Rank includes 16 different groups and is listed in order from best to worst in terms of the average Zacks Rank of the individual companies within each of these sectors.

The Zacks Rank emphasizes earnings estimates and estimate revisions to find stocks with improving earnings outlooks. This system has a long record of success, and these stocks tend to be on track to beat the market over the next one to three months. TDY is currently sporting a Zacks Rank of #2 (Buy).

Over the past three months, the Zacks Consensus Estimate for TDY's full-year earnings has moved 0.44% higher. This shows that analyst sentiment has improved and the company's earnings outlook is stronger.

Based on the latest available data, TDY has gained about 9.08% so far this year. At the same time, Aerospace stocks have gained an average of 4.74%. This means that Teledyne Technologies is performing better than its sector in terms of year-to-date returns.

To break things down more, TDY belongs to the Aerospace - Defense Equipment industry, a group that includes 19 individual companies and currently sits at #191 in the Zacks Industry Rank. This group has gained an average of 6.11% so far this year, so TDY is performing better in this area.

Investors in the Aerospace sector will want to keep a close eye on TDY as it attempts to continue its solid performance.

Want the latest recommendations from Zacks Investment Research? Today, you can download 7 Best Stocks for the Next 30 Days. Click to get this free reportTeledyne Technologies Incorporated (TDY) : Free Stock Analysis ReportTo read this article on Zacks.com click here.

View original post here:

Is Teledyne Technologies (TDY) Outperforming Other Aerospace Stocks This Year? - Yahoo Finance

Aerospace industry needs talent to stay put | Aviation – Gulf News

It used to be that aerospace industry could always rely on the best STEM graduates choosing careers in it. But the advent of Big Tech is changing that. File picture of a US Air Force C-17 Globemaster III cargo jet. Image for illustrative purposes only. Image Credit: AP

Innovation remains fundamentally important for the aerospace and defence (A&D) sector, especially when it comes to competing with other industries to attract the worlds brightest talent. Within this sector, the Middle Easts aerospace sector will see around 8 per cent year-on-year growth in 2020.

But as the UAE, in particular, prepares toward the next 50 years, the aerospace industry will need to inspire the youth to advance the industry for decades to come. Today, there is tremendous pressure on the aerospace industrys workforce. There are a large number of retirements on the horizon, from pilots to engineers to people working on the assembly line and in maintenance, repair and overhaul (MRO).

Looking at the level of science, technology, engineering, mathematics (STEM) graduates entering the marketplace in Europe and North America, there simply are not enough to meet demand. The shortage of STEM graduates is a key trend driving disruption in aerospace.

Events such as the Global Aerospace Summit bring the industry together to discuss pertinent topics such as innovation and advancing our ecosystem, offering the ideal platform to discuss trends and challenges affecting our industry.

Talent moves around

Technology has blurred the lines between industry sectors, ultimately creating new competition to attract a talented workforce from a receding pool. STEM graduates that the aerospace industry in particular depend on are now gravitating toward non-traditional big tech companies.

For instance, an aerospace engineer can graduate from the University of Washington in Seattle with a strong possibility they would go on to pursue a career at Boeing. Today, that same student has the option to work downtown at Amazon.

Need for nurture

A major focus for the A&D industry needs to be on how we develop our talent, including how we plan for succession and different roles. There are a number of tools and technologies being deployed in the industry that help businesses do just that. For example, companies from within the aerospace industry and beyond sponsor the Advanced Manufacturing Research Centre in Sheffield, which brings together technologies and demonstrates their capabilities.

It helps us understand how these technologies integrate within the ecosystem, while training talent on these new, cutting-edge developments.

This is particularly important as many aerospace companies still carry out digitization intermittently rather than on a sustained end-to-end basis as part of a digital roadmap.

This is a key reason, I believe, why we see that less than 20 per cent of companies agree that they are getting a return on their technology investments.

Technology is impacting both professional and manual jobs within the aerospace industry. With this in mind, the need for re-skilling the workforce remains a priority that ensures companies can keep pace with rapid technological developments that are shaping the industry.

According to our research, the future workforce will have to adjust to increasingly rapid changes in technology, requiring them to be more adaptable and flexible.

Ultimately, success will come to companies that are able to successfully combine the powers of their human workforce with new technologies in the office and on the shop floor.

- John Schmidt is Managing Director and Global Aerospace and Defence Lead at Accenture.

Read more:

Aerospace industry needs talent to stay put | Aviation - Gulf News

PPG to Showcase Innovative Aerospace Products, Services at Singapore Airshow – Yahoo Finance

New industry offerings include lightweight, sustainable aircraft products

PPG (NYSE:PPG) today announced that it will highlight its full range of aerospace products and services at the Singapore Airshow at Changi Exhibition Centre in Singapore, Feb. 11-16, 2020.

The PPG booth (D79) will showcase an array of innovative industry offerings, including coatings, sealants, transparencies, packaging and application systems, engineered materials and transparent armor, as well as chemical management and other services.

In addition to its broad range of lightweight and sustainable products, the company will feature its PPG SOLARON BLUE PROTECTION UV+ blocking technology for aircraft windows. This recent technology helps protect aircrews, passengers and aircraft interiors from solar radiation.

Held biannually at Changi Exhibition Centre in Singapore, the Singapore Airshow is Asias largest aerospace and defense event.

PPG is investing in a new 38,750-square-foot (3,600-square-meter) application support center (ASC) at Seletar Aerospace Park near the Seletar Airport in Singapore. The project is the companys largest investment to date in Southeast Asia, at approximately $15 million.

Scheduled for completion in mid-2020, the ASC will accommodate increased demand for aerospace sealants, adhesives, coatings, transparencies, chemical management services and the packaging of third-party products.

For more information on PPGs aerospace products and services, visit http://www.ppgaerospace.com. For more information on the Singapore Airshow, visit http://www.singaporeairshow.com.

PPG: WE PROTECT AND BEAUTIFY THE WORLD

At PPG (NYSE:PPG), we work every day to develop and deliver the paints, coatings and specialty materials that our customers have trusted for more than 135 years. Through dedication and creativity, we solve our customers biggest challenges, collaborating closely to find the right path forward. With headquarters in Pittsburgh, we operate and innovate in more than 70 countries and reported net sales of $15.1 billion in 2019. We serve customers in construction, consumer products, industrial and transportation markets and aftermarkets. To learn more, visit http://www.ppg.com.

We protect and beautify the world and Solaron Blue Protection are trademarks and the PPG Logo is a registered trademark of PPG Industries Ohio, Inc.

CATEGORY Aerospace

View source version on businesswire.com: https://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20200203005611/en/

Contacts

PPG Media Contacts: Lynne EvosevichAerospace878-208-2804evosevich@ppg.com http://www.ppg.com

See original here:

PPG to Showcase Innovative Aerospace Products, Services at Singapore Airshow - Yahoo Finance

Universal Stainless to Present at Cowen and Company 41st Annual Aerospace/Defense & Industrials Conference on February 12th – EnerCom Inc.

Universal Stainless to Present at Cowen and Company 41st Annual Aerospace/Defense & Industrials Conference on February 12th

BRIDGEVILLE, Pa., Feb. 07, 2020 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- Universal Stainless & Alloy Products, Inc. (Nasdaq: USAP) announced today that Dennis M. Oates, Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer, will speak at the Cowen and Company 41st Annual Aerospace/Defense & Industrials Conference on February 12th, from 2:05 to 2:45 PM (Eastern).

The Company will post the slide presentation for this conference in the investor relations section of its website at http://www.univstainless.com. Cowen and Company will host a live webcast of the Companys presentation, which can be accessed at http://wsw.com/webcast/cowen58/usap/and in the investor relations section of the Universal Stainless website. A replay of the event will be available on the Companys web site approximately three hours after the live event and accessible for ninety days.

About Universal Stainless & Alloy Products, Inc.

Universal Stainless & Alloy Products, Inc., established in 1994 and headquartered in Bridgeville, PA, manufactures and markets semi-finished and finished specialty steels, including stainless steel, nickel alloys, tool steel and certain other alloyed steels. The Company's products are used in a variety of industries, including aerospace, power generation, oil and gas, and heavy equipment manufacturing. More information is available at http://www.univstainless.com.

Forward-Looking Information Safe Harbor

Except for historical information contained herein, the statements in this release are forward-looking statements that are made pursuant to the safe harbor provision of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Forward-looking statements involve known and unknown risks and uncertainties that may cause the Company's actual results in future periods to differ materially from forecasted results. Those risks include, among others, the Companys ability to maintain its relationships with its significant customers and market segments; the Companys response to competitive factors in its industry that may adversely affect the market for finished products manufactured by the Company or its customers; uncertainty regarding the return to service of the Boeing 737 MAX aircraft; the Companys ability to compete successfully with domestic and foreign producers of specialty steel products and products fashioned from alternative materials; the demand for the Companys products and the prices at which the Company is able to sell its products in the aerospace industry, from which a substantial amount of our sales is derived; the Companys ability to develop, commercialize, market and sell new applications and new products; the receipt, pricing and timing of future customer orders; the impact of changes in the Companys product mix on the Companys profitability; the Companys ability to maintain the availability of raw materials and operating supplies with acceptable pricing; the availability and pricing of electricity, natural gas and other sources of energy that the Company needs for the manufacturing of its products; risks related to property, plant and equipment, including the Companys reliance on the continuing operation of critical manufacturing equipment; the Companys success in timely concluding collective bargaining agreements and avoiding strikes or work stoppages; the Companys ability to attract and retain key personnel; the Companys ongoing requirement for continued compliance with laws and regulations, including applicable safety and environmental regulations; the ultimate outcome of the Companys current and future litigation matters; the Companys ability to meet its debt service requirements and to comply with applicable financial covenants; risks associated with conducting business with suppliers and customers in foreign countries; risks related to acquisitions that the Company may make; the Companys ability to protect its information technology infrastructure against service interruptions, data corruption, cyber-based attacks or network security breaches; the impact on the Companys effective tax rates from changes in tax rules, regulations and interpretations in the United States and other countries where it does business; and the impact of various economic, credit and market risk uncertainties. Many of these factors are not within the Companys control and involve known and unknown risks and uncertainties that may cause the Companys actual results in future periods to be materially different from any future performance suggested herein. Any unfavorable change in the foregoing or other factors could have a material adverse effect on the Companys business, financial condition and results of operations. Further, the Company operates in an industry sector where securities values may be volatile and may be influenced by economic and other factors beyond the Companys control. Certain of these risks and other risks are described in the Company's filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) over the last 12 months, copies of which are available from the SEC or may be obtained upon request from the Company.

News by QuoteMediawww.quotemedia.com

See the rest here:

Universal Stainless to Present at Cowen and Company 41st Annual Aerospace/Defense & Industrials Conference on February 12th - EnerCom Inc.

WATCH: Eastern Florida State Will Host Aerospace Program Information Session on February 25 | – SpaceCoastDaily.com

The event will be held on the EFSC Cocoa Campus in Building 14, Room 129

ABOVE VIDEO: Eastern Florida State College will host an Information Session to highlight its Aerospace Technology Program on Tuesday, February 25 from 5-6 p.m.

BREVARD COUNTY COCOA, FLORIDA Eastern Florida State College will host an Information Session to highlight its Aerospace Technology Program on Tuesday, February 25 from 5-6 p.m.

The event will be held on the EFSC Cocoa Campus in Building 14, Room 129. The Cocoa Campus is located at 1519 Clearlake Road, Cocoa, FL 32922.

Aerospace Technology Program graduates earn an Associate in Science Degree in an exciting field of study that prepares them for entry-level positions in the aerospace and aeronautics industry.

Graduates will also qualify for many applied technology jobs such as testing, fabrication, assembly, repair and manufacturing.

Those interested in attending a session are encouraged to register in advance, CLICK HERE.

For more information about the Aerospace Information sessions, contact Philip Sweeney at sweeneyp@easternflorida.edu or (321) 433-5771.

CLICK HERE FOR BREVARD COUNTY NEWS

Click here to contribute your news or announcements Free

See more here:

WATCH: Eastern Florida State Will Host Aerospace Program Information Session on February 25 | - SpaceCoastDaily.com

Airbus, Adani Defence join hands to explore aerospace and aircraft services sector – The Hindu

Airbus India and Adani Defence signed an agreement on Thursday to leverage synergies in aerospace and aircraft services, a fast-growing sector that is estimated to generate annual business worth USD 6.3 billion in the country by 2025.

The Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) was signed by Anand Stanley, president and managing director of Airbus India and South Asia, and Ashish Rajvanshi, the head of Adani Defence and Aerospace.

Airbus and Adani Defence will explore opportunities for collaboration in the area of aircraft services for Indian and South Asian market, the Airbus said after signing of the pact at the DefExpo2020 in Lucknow.

Airbus global services forecast envisages the Indian aircraft services market to grow to USD 6.3 billion by 2025.

Airbus is not only the worlds leading civil aviation company, but also a major innovator and provider of aircraft services. This MoU demonstrates our commitment to support the development of India as a world-class services hub for aerospace products, Mr. Stanley said.

With Adanis recent foray into airports, this potential collaboration will leverage the synergies between the product and services excellence of Airbus and infrastructure, engineering and mega-project execution capabilities of Adani, the Airbus said.

India is at the cusp of transformational growth in aircraft services market, Mr. Rajvanshi said. Our collaboration with Airbus is aligned to our vision of nation building and to indigenise critical technologies and services, thus creating a vibrant ecosystem in aerospace capabilities in India.

The Airbus showcased its best-in-class military products and cutting-edge defence technologies at the expo. Models of the highly-versatile C295 aircraft, as well as the H145M and the H225M helicopters, were among its top exhibits.

You have reached your limit for free articles this month.

Register to The Hindu for free and get unlimited access for 30 days.

Find mobile-friendly version of articles from the day's newspaper in one easy-to-read list.

Enjoy reading as many articles as you wish without any limitations.

A select list of articles that match your interests and tastes.

Move smoothly between articles as our pages load instantly.

A one-stop-shop for seeing the latest updates, and managing your preferences.

We brief you on the latest and most important developments, three times a day.

Not convinced? Know why you should pay for news.

*Our Digital Subscription plans do not currently include the e-paper ,crossword, iPhone, iPad mobile applications and print. Our plans enhance your reading experience.

Read this article:

Airbus, Adani Defence join hands to explore aerospace and aircraft services sector - The Hindu

Carbon Fiber in the Aerospace and Defense Market Expected to Grow with a CAGR of 4.2% During the Forecast Period, 2020-2025 – ResearchAndMarkets.com -…

The "Carbon Fiber in the Aerospace and Defense Market Report: Trends, Forecast and Competitive Analysis" report has been added to ResearchAndMarkets.com's offering.

The carbon fiber in aerospace and defense market is expected to reach an estimated $1.56 billion by 2025 with a CAGR of 4.2% from 2020 to 2025.

The future of the carbon fiber in aerospace and defense market looks attractive with opportunities in the commercial aircraft, regional aircraft, general aviation, helicopter, UAV and Others. The major drivers for the carbon fiber in aerospace and defense market are the increasing demand for advanced high-performance lightweight materials and growing end use industries, growth of aircraft with high carbon fiber penetration such B787, A350WXB, and A380.

Emerging trends, which have a direct impact on the dynamics of the industry, include the Increasing demand of continuous fiber reinforced thermoplastics and growing initiatives for recycling of carbon fiber.

North America is expected to remain the largest region during the forecast period. The growth of carbon fiber in North American aerospace & defense market is driven by increasing carbon fiber content and growth of aircraft deliveries of B787 and B777.

Some of the features of Carbon Fiber in the Aerospace and Defense Market Report: Trends, Forecast and Competitive Analysis include:

This report answers following 11 key questions:

Q.1. How big are the opportunities in the carbon fiber market in aerospace and defense industry by aircraft, by precursor type, by tow size, by modulus, and region?

Q.2. Which product segments will grow at a faster pace and why?

Q.3. Which region will grow at a faster pace and why?

Q.4. What are the key factors affecting market dynamics? What are the drivers, challenges, and business risks of carbon fiber in the aerospace and defense market?

Q.5. What are the business risks and competitive threats of carbon fiber in the aerospace and defense market?

Q.6. What are the emerging trends of carbon fiber in the aerospace and defense market and the reasons behind them?

Q.7. What are some of the changing demands of customers for carbon fiber in the aerospace and defense market?

Q.8. What are the new developments of carbon fiber in the aerospace and defense market and which companies are leading these developments?

Q.9. Who are the major players of carbon fiber in the aerospace and defense market? What strategic initiatives are being taken by key companies for business growth?

Q.10. What are some of the competing products for carbon fiber in the aerospace and defense market and how big of a threat do they pose for loss of market share by product substitution?

Q.11. What M&A activity has occurred in the last have years and what has its impact been of carbon fiber in the aerospace and defense industry?

Key Topics Covered:

1. Executive Summary

2. Market Background and Classifications

2.1: Introduction, Background, and Classification

2.2: Supply Chain

2.3: Industry Drivers and Challenges

3. Market Trends and Forecast Analysis from 2014 to 2025

3.1: Macroeconomic Trends and Forecast

3.2: Carbon Fiber in the Aerospace and Defense Market Trends and Forecast

3.3: Carbon Fiber in the Aerospace and Defense Market by Aircraft Type

3.4: Carbon Fiber in the Aerospace and Defense Market by Component

3.5: Carbon Fiber in the Aerospace and Defense Market by Precursor Type

3.6: Carbon Fiber in the Aerospace and Defense Market by TOW Size

3.7: Carbon Fiber in the Aerospace and Defense Market by Modulus

4. Market Trends and Forecast Analysis by Region

4.1: Carbon Fiber in the Aerospace and Defense Market by Region

4.2: North American Carbon Fiber in the Aerospace and Defense Market

4.3: European Carbon Fiber in Aerospace and Defense market

4.4: ROW (Including APAC) Carbon Fiber in the Aerospace and Defense Market

5. Competitor Analysis

5.1: Market Share Analysis

5.2: Operational Integration

5.3: Geographical Reach

5.4: Porter's Five Forces Analysis

6. Growth Opportunities and Strategic Analysis

6.1: Growth Opportunity Analysis

6.2: Emerging Trends of Carbon Fiber in the Aerospace and Defense Market

6.3: Strategic Analysis

7. Company Profiles of Leading Players

7.1: Toray Industries Inc.

7.2: Hexcel Corporation

7.3: Mitsubishi Rayon Corporation Limited

7.4: Cytec Solvay Group

7.5: SGL Carbon Group

7.6: Teijin Limited

For more information about this report visit https://www.researchandmarkets.com/r/4gzer8

View source version on businesswire.com: https://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20200203005444/en/

Contacts

ResearchAndMarkets.comLaura Wood, Senior Press Managerpress@researchandmarkets.com

For E.S.T Office Hours Call 1-917-300-0470For U.S./CAN Toll Free Call 1-800-526-8630For GMT Office Hours Call +353-1-416-8900

Read more from the original source:

Carbon Fiber in the Aerospace and Defense Market Expected to Grow with a CAGR of 4.2% During the Forecast Period, 2020-2025 - ResearchAndMarkets.com -...

JEC World 2020: SGL Carbon Presents New Solutions For Automotive, Aerospace And Industrial Sector – Textile World Magazine

WIESBADEN, Germany February 7, 2020 Tailor-made large-scale fabrics production at SGL Carbon, ideally suited for highly efficient realization of rather plane components such as battery enclosures and many more.

At this years JEC World, the largest trade fair for composites held from March 3-5, 2020 in Paris, SGL Carbon will focus on the topic of serial production for the automotive, aerospace and industrial sectors. The key is customized solutions with individual component designs combined with tailored materials and production processes ready for large scale production. Under the motto The Solution Provider, the company will present selective innovative component solutions from all three areas in Hall 6, Booth D25.

Thanks to our integrated value chain, from fibers to finished components, our Lightweight and Application Center, and our increasing portfolio of realized series-ready concepts, we offer our customers smart, tailor-made solutions all from a single source. In the future, we will increasingly apply our comprehensive expertise and highly efficient materials from the automotive industry into the aerospace and industrial sectors too, explains Dr. Andreas Wginger, Head of Technology of the Composites Fibers & Materials business unit at SGL Carbon.

In the field of automotiveapplications, SGL Carbon will present at the JEC World composite battery enclosures as a promising new application driven by increasing demand for electric vehicles and the resulting new flexible chassis platforms. The company demonstrates a prototype of a battery enclosure based on carbon fibers. However, hybrid composites with a mixture of glass and carbon fibers are also possible. In early January, SGL Carbon received a major order from a North American automotive manufacturer for the serial production of top and bottom layers for battery enclosures, with production to begin at the end of 2020.

In addition, SGL Carbon showcases for the first time a new leaf spring generation made of glass fiber composite that is used as a longitudinal leaf spring for the rear axle of the Ford Transit. In comparison to conventional leaf springs, the innovative composite leaf spring weighs up to 50 percent less while offering increased security standards and supporting a one-to-one compatibility with standard springs. The Ford leaf spring complements SGL Carbons large-scale production of transversal leaf springs for a great variety of Volvo models and the Mercedes Sprinter. In total, SGL Carbon has delivered more than 1.5 million leaf springs.

In the aerospacesector, SGL Carbon is also expanding its portfolio of realized projects and expertise relying on the trend to use more efficient materials and processes in this industry too.

In the area of primary structure components, the company will present a demo exhibit for the door frame of a passenger airplane realized in collaboration with external partners and based on 50k carbon fiber from the SGL Carbon, which is suitable for serial production. To further speed up its growth in the sector, the company entered into a development cooperation with Solvay at the end of last year to bring fiber materials for primary structural components based on large-tow carbon fibers to the market for the first time. Today, SGL Carbon already offers a wide range of semi-finished products for non-structural aerospace applications such as interior elements.

Additional submarkets in aerospace emerge for composite applications in small aircrafts, helicopters and air taxis. Here, SGL Carbon offers the full range of services, from engineering to finished components. On display at the JEC World is a carbon fiber-based concept for an innovative rotor arm for urban air mobility applications (air taxis) made with an innovative manufacturing technology. At the beginning of the year, the company started serial production of landing gears made of braided carbon fiber material, which will be used around the world in air taxis of an international manufacturer over the course of the next two years.

As an example for industrial applications, SGL Carbon will showcase at the JEC world a crossbeam made of carbon fiber reinforced plastics (CFRP) used in automated Schuler press lines. Besides weight savings of up to 40 percent compared with conventional materials, the crossbeam made of composites features a high rigidity and strength, as well as a low thermal expansion and especially good damping performance, which in turn minimizes machine vibrations. The use of CFRP not only boosts the production efficiency of the system, it also increases lifetime, due to lower wear and tear expectancy.

On all three exhibition days, visitors to the SGL Carbon booth (Hall 6, Booth D25) can experience live how their ideas can be implemented both sustainably and cost-effectively in composites thanks to simulations. Experts from the companys own Lightweight and Application Center demonstrate the path from the concept to virtual prototypes using simulation software, with the result visible either to the entire audience or just individual visitors. To prepare, interested parties can contact the team now at the following link: https://www.sglcarbon.com/anmeldung-jec.

On March 4, 2020, the SGL Carbon stand will host its traditional get-together for customers and friends starting at 4 p.m. no registration necessary.

Posted February 7, 2020

Source: SGL CARBON SE

Read more:

JEC World 2020: SGL Carbon Presents New Solutions For Automotive, Aerospace And Industrial Sector - Textile World Magazine

TP Aerospace Expands In Orlando – Aviation Week

TP Aerospace commenced operation at its new MRO facility in Orlando, Florida in late 2019 in a move to add further capacity and better position it to service customers in Central and Latin America as well as the U.S. east coast.

The 60,000 sq. ft hangar is around six miles from Orlando International Airport, was given the greenlight by the city authorities in late 2019. Its primary functions will be in wheel and brake repairs and overhauls, in addition to acting as a location to storeserviceable wheel and brake inventory for trading for aircraft ranging from ATR 42 regional aircraft to Boeing 777 widebodies.

We had a previous location already located in Orlando which was small and outdated, so this new facility is an upgrade from our previous location with more room and modern equipment, says Chris Carter, COO of TP Aerospaces Americas business. Orlando is a strategic location because we can service the entire East Coast as well as the Caribbean and Latin American countries.

The Orlando facility will also serve as Denmark-based TP Aerospaces Americas headquarters. In the U.S., it also operates a repair center in Las Vegas.

Carter says that during the building of the facility, it worked closely along the FAA regulator. Everything from storage racks, to work station layout and final inspection plans were provided in real time as we were going through it, he says. Feedback was taken into consideration along the way, so when it came to final approval there were no surprises.

TP Aerospace operates in 12 locations across the world, 10 of which are MRO workshops. It has embarked on a growth plan, which most recently saw approval for a new facility in Moscow, Russia last month.

The expansion follows the addition of its first UK MRO center close to East Midlands Airport near Derby in April 2019. The facility has volume for 10,000 units of repair and overhaul on aircraft wheels and brakes.

See the article here:

TP Aerospace Expands In Orlando - Aviation Week

Ball Aerospace To Hire 1000 Workers As Business Continues To Rocket – Aviation Week

Ball Aerospace To Hire 1,000 Workers As Business Continues To Rocket | Aviation Week Network

/themes/custom/particle/dist/app-drupal/assets/awn-logo.svg

Ball Aerospace To Hire 1,000 Workers As Business Continues To Rocket is part of our Aerospace Daily & Defense Reportsubscription.

Subscribe now to read this article, plus receive full coverage of what's next in the aerospace and defense community.

Already a subscriber to Aerospace Daily & Defense Report or a content package that includes Aerospace Daily & Defense Report? Login

Did you know? Aviation Week has won top honors multiple times in the Jesse H. Neal National Business Journalism Awards, the business-to-business media equivalent of the Pulitzer Prizes.

Aerospace and defense leaders in industry and government, including those in Congress, the Pentagon, and their global counterparts, rely on Aerospace Daily & Defense Report for the latest, critical intelligence on programs, budgets and policies in defense, as well as military and civil space.

Credit: NASA

Ball Aerospace expects to hire around 1,000 new employees in 2020, following similar annual increases in recent years, executives said Feb. 6.

As a subscriber to one of Aviation Week Networks market briefings, your searches only provide you with access to articles from within that product.

To find out about obtaining additional data including the most comprehensive details on organizations, fleets, personnel and programs click here or call +1.561.279.4661.

As a subscriber to one of Aviation Week Networks market briefings, your searches only provide you with access to articles from within that product.

To find out about obtaining additional data including the most comprehensive details on organizations, fleets, personnel and programs click here or call +1.561.279.4661.

As a subscriber to one of Aviation Week Networks market briefings, your searches only provide you with access to articles from within that product.

To find out about obtaining additional data including the most comprehensive details on organizations, fleets, personnel and programs click here or call +1.561.279.4661.

As a subscriber to one of Aviation Week Networks market briefings, your searches only provide you with access to articles from within that product.

To find out about obtaining additional data including the most comprehensive details on organizations, fleets, personnel and programs click here or call +1.561.279.4661.

Read the original here:

Ball Aerospace To Hire 1000 Workers As Business Continues To Rocket - Aviation Week

Key supplier to aerospace industry has 75% revenue increase – Aerospace Manufacturing

Zoro announced that it has increased its revenue by more than 75% during 2019, delivering more than 360,000 items during last year.

The company offers a one-stop-shop for over 300,000 products in industrial consumables and equipment with free next day delivery throughout the UK mainland on many of its lines.

From launching its trade accounts in summer 2018 to the engineering industry, Zoro has rapidly increased its business customer base.

Marcus Nelson, managing director of Zoro UK, said: If you are an engineer or are working in an industrial SME and need that critical tool the next day, then Zoro will deliver it to you. And its not just tools we have over 300,000 products, from stationery to beverages which the small engineering company needs.

We are really excited to be able to offer such a wide product range to the aerospace supply chain. So, try us out you wont find anyone more competitive on pricing, delivery or expert knowledge.

Almost 50% of Zoros customers are now businesses, rather than sole traders, and the company is using digital innovation to save companies time and money.

During 2019, Zoro launched an automatic replenishment service for the engineering industry. This feature reduces the amount of time spent manually reordering products, minimising human error, which ensures smooth production.

When purchasing through Zoros order subscription service, customers can decide how frequently they would like to receive products by selecting a monthly, weekly or bi-weekly option. Customers can also set a start and end date for their subscription, or schedule a single order on a specific date of their choice.

http://www.zoro.co.uk

Michael Tyrrell

Digital Coordinator

Subscribe to our FREE Newsletter

Read more:

Key supplier to aerospace industry has 75% revenue increase - Aerospace Manufacturing

Industry Analysis: Should You Buy Raytheon Company (RTN) in Aerospace & Defense? – InvestorsObserver

Raytheon Company (RTN) is near the top in its industry group according to InvestorsObserver. RTN gets an overall rating of 75. That means it scores higher than 75 percent of stocks. Raytheon Company gets a 86 rank in the Aerospace & Defense industry. Aerospace & Defense is number 43 out of 148 industries.

Click Here to get the full Stock Score Report on Raytheon Company (RTN) Stock.

Analyzing stocks can be hard. There are tons of numbers and ratios, and it can be hard to remember what they all mean and what counts as good for a given value. InvestorsObserver ranks stocks on eight different metrics. We percentile rank most of our scores to make it easy for investors to understand. A score of 75 means the stock is more attractive than 75 percent of stocks.

These scores are not only easy to understand, but it is easy to compare stocks to each other. You can find the best stock in an industry, or look for the sector that has the highest average score. The overall score is a combination of technical and fundamental factors that serves as a good starting point when analyzing a stock. Traders and investors with different goals may have different goals and will want to consider other factors than just the headline number before making any investment decisions.

Raytheon Company (RTN) stock has gained 0.78% while the S&P 500 is down -0.54% as of 2:43 PM on Friday, Feb 7. RTN is higher by $1.78 from the previous closing price of $228.53 on volume of 1,576,416 shares. Over the past year the S&P 500 is higher by 22.97% while RTN is higher by 30.80%. RTN earned $11.93 a per share in the over the last 12 months, giving it a price-to-earnings ratio of 19.31.

To see the top 5 stocks in Aerospace & Defense click here.

More:

Industry Analysis: Should You Buy Raytheon Company (RTN) in Aerospace & Defense? - InvestorsObserver

Coronavirus Impacts Aerospace Manufacturing In China – Aviation Week

Coronavirus Impacts Aerospace Manufacturing In China | Aviation Week Network

/themes/custom/particle/dist/app-drupal/assets/awn-logo.svg

Credit: Airbus

FRANKFURTThe coronavirus outbreak is beginning to affect aerospace manufacturing with several Western manufacturers temporarily closing down facilities in China.

Most importantly, Airbus decided to extend the Chinese New Year holidays for workers in its Tianjin plant and therefore has stopped final assembly of A320 family aircraft at the site. Tianjin is currently producing six aircraft per month, 10% of Airbus global monthly single-aisle production rate of 60.

Airbus China is observing Chinese government requirements for staff to work from home and is facilitating with IT equipment so employees from all locations, including Tianjin, do not need to travel to work where possible, the company said in a statement. With regards to the business impact, China domestic and worldwide travel restrictions are posing some logistical challenges. The Tianjin Final Assembly Line facility is currently closed. Airbus is constantly evaluating the situation and monitoring any potential knock on effects to production and deliveries and will try to mitigate via alternative plans where necessary.

The disruption could not come at a worse time for Airbus as it is still far from having recovered from production delays incurred at its main single-aisle site in Hamburg, Germany. Wizz Air CEO Jzsef Vradi told Aviation Daily that its A321neos are routinely arriving six months behind schedule as a result, severely impacting the airlines network planning. Airbus CEO Guillaume Faury said in late 2019 that it will take Airbus into 2021 to get back onto a reliable schedule.

Airbus plans to increase output at its Mobile, Alabama assembly line to seven per month in 2021 and global production to 63 at the same time.

Safran Group is also affected. The company has extended vacations for its 2,500 workers in China until the beginning of next week, for now. Boeing has a 737-completion center in Zhoushan, but that is already impacted by the MAX production halt.

Based in Frankfurt, Germany, Jens leads Aviation Weeks global commercial coverage. He covers program updates and developments at Airbus, and as a frequent long-haul traveler, he often writes in-depth airline profiles worldwide.

As a subscriber to one of Aviation Week Networks market briefings, your searches only provide you with access to articles from within that product.

To find out about obtaining additional data including the most comprehensive details on organizations, fleets, personnel and programs click here or call +1.561.279.4661.

As a subscriber to one of Aviation Week Networks market briefings, your searches only provide you with access to articles from within that product.

To find out about obtaining additional data including the most comprehensive details on organizations, fleets, personnel and programs click here or call +1.561.279.4661.

As a subscriber to one of Aviation Week Networks market briefings, your searches only provide you with access to articles from within that product.

To find out about obtaining additional data including the most comprehensive details on organizations, fleets, personnel and programs click here or call +1.561.279.4661.

As a subscriber to one of Aviation Week Networks market briefings, your searches only provide you with access to articles from within that product.

To find out about obtaining additional data including the most comprehensive details on organizations, fleets, personnel and programs click here or call +1.561.279.4661.

Here is the original post:

Coronavirus Impacts Aerospace Manufacturing In China - Aviation Week