IRS urged by GAO to offer more cryptocurrency tax guidance – Accounting Today

The Internal Revenue Service could be doing more to help taxpayers who own Bitcoin and other forms of cryptocurrency to comply with their tax obligations, according to a new report from the Government Accountability Office.

The report, issued Wednesday by the GAO, acknowledged that the IRS has provided some guidance in 2014 and 2019 on what it refers to as virtual currency. In 2014, it issued Notice 2014-21, which said the IRS would treat Bitcoin and other virtual currencies as property for federal income tax purposes and offered some examples of how long-standing tax principles could be applied to transactions involving virtual currency. Despite dramatic increases, decreases and volatility in the prices of various forms of digital currency such as Bitcoin, it took another five years before the IRS responded to the demand for further guidance in the form of frequently answered questions on virtual currency transactions.

However, part of the 2019 FAQ guidance isnt considered authoritative because it was not published in the Internal Revenue Bulletin. The IRS has said that only guidance published in the IRB is its authoritative interpretation of the tax laws. The IRS didnt make it clear to taxpayers that this part of the guidance isnt authoritative and is subject to change.

The IRS has seen the need for taxpayers to report on their crypto trades and holdings, and for this tax season it added a question to the top of Schedule 1 of Form 1040 asking, At any time during 2019, did you receive, sell, send, exchange, or otherwise acquire any financial interest in any virtual currency?

The current IRS guidance says that using virtual currency can produce taxable capital gains, but the GAO report said the IRS could do more to help taxpayers comply. Financial institutions already report information about investment sales to the IRS and taxpayers, to make both aware of any taxable income. But while some cryptocurrency transactions are reported, far from all of them are.

Taxpayers are required to report and pay taxes on income from cryptocurrency use, but the IRS still has limited data on tax compliance for virtual currency. The information returns filed by third parties, such as financial institutions, generally dont require filers to indicate whether the income or transactions they report involved cryptocurrency. The IRS launched a virtual currency compliance campaign in 2018 and worked with other agencies on criminal investigations. Last July, the service started mailing more than 10,000 letters to taxpayers with cryptocurrency activity telling them about their potential tax obligations.

However, the IRS and the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network, also known as FinCEN, havent clearly and publicly explained when and if the requirements for reporting financial assets held in foreign countries apply to virtual currencies, the GAO pointed out. Clarifying and providing publicly available information about those requirements could improve the data available for tax enforcement and make it less likely that taxpayers will file reports that are not legally required.

The GAO recommended the IRS clarify that part of its 2019 guidance isnt authoritative and take steps to increase information reporting, and that FinCEN and the IRS address how foreign asset reporting laws apply to virtual currency. The IRS agreed with the GAOs recommendation on information reporting, but it disagreed with the other two suggestions, arguing that a disclaimer statement is unnecessary and its premature to address virtual currency foreign reporting.

We continue to engage a broad spectrum of external stakeholders for feedback on how the IRS might balance taxpayer service with proper regulatory enforcement of digital assets, including virtual currency, wrote Sunita Lough, deputy commissioner for services and enforcement at the IRS, in response to the report. The wide variety of currency exchanges and digital assets pose a challenge to issuing guidance on specific circumstances, but the guidance issued by the IRS to date illustrates how longstanding tax principles associated with the sale, exchange or disposition of property can apply to virtual currency.

For its part, the GAO said it believes a disclaimer would increase transparency and the IRS could clarify foreign reporting without waiting for future developments in the industry. FinCEN, however, agreed with the GAO's recommendation. FinCEN will coordinate with the IRS to determine the best approach to provide clarity to the public regarding the application of the Report of Foreign Bank and Financial Accounts to virtual currency, wrote FinCEN director Kenneth Blanco in response to the report. Currently, the FBAR regulations do not define virtual currency held in an offshore account as a type of reportable account.

The IRS recently removed wording from its FAQ page about the applicability of the rules to virtual currency used in games like Fortnite and Roblox, according to Bloomberg Tax, with an IRS official saying the inclusion of the in-game currency was an error.

Read the rest here:

IRS urged by GAO to offer more cryptocurrency tax guidance - Accounting Today

University of Wyoming Receives $500,000 Cryptocurrency Donation – laramielive.com

Today, Wyoming received a donation from IOHK, a leading international technology company, in the sum of $500,000 in Ada Cryptocurrency.

Along with this gift, the college was also excited to announce a partnership with IOHK, which will have a laboratory at the college in order to aid in the organization's research.James Caldwell, a Professor of computer science stated in an article from the university,This funding and partnership between IOHK and UW provide an unprecedented opportunity for the university and the state of Wyoming to establish ourselves on the leading edge of blockchain technology.

Blockchain is a system to store and track transactionsin bitcoin or other types of cryptocurrency in a digital ledger or permanent record. This technology has been transformative for industries such as banking, law, and identity.

Thanks to Wyoming blockchain legislation from 2018 and 2019, the state is an established leader at the forefront of this technology internationally.

Another focus of this partnership to create jobs in Wyoming. As the state has approved the legislature needed for these types of currency to exist, Charles Hoskinson, the CEO and founder of IOHK, feels that it is only right to thank them by providing the states with jobs in this field. Hoskinson has roots in Wyoming, with both his parents being from Gillette and his own family making its home in Northern Colorado. His hope is that through this program, he can hire the great minds of the university to work for his company after graduation, stating "We think it is an obligation that if you hire people you try to keep them at home."

For more information regarding IOHK and their work, please find their website here.

More:

University of Wyoming Receives $500,000 Cryptocurrency Donation - laramielive.com

Predicting the Cost of Cryptocurrency Hacks in 2020 – CircleID

The last few years have proven to be a crucial moment for cryptocurrency security. The more cryptocurrency has risen in popularity, the more high profile security breaches have occurred, and the more key institutions have been targeted.

The young cryptocurrency industry has always been brimming with opportunity, but with this comes risk, especially when there are lapses in security. Crypto security is especially important to crypto owners because one of the main points of cryptocurrencies like Bitcoin in the first place has been to prevent criminals from accessing your database to access your currency as easily as actual money.

There are two key hacks that shed light on such lapses:

In early 2018, bad agents targeted Coincheck Japan and succeeded in stealing over $500 million in NEM tokens. To this day, it is one of the largest and most notable crypto heists, standing shoulder to shoulder with hacks such as the notorious Mt. Gox attack a heist of roughly 800,000 BTC.

Even earlier, in 2016, Bangladesh Bank found itself in the crosshairs of ambitious and skilled hackers. Using fully authenticated transitions, thieves attempted to steal over $800 million across the SWIFT network. Although the thieves received a "meager" $101 million for their efforts, $81 million did eventually make its hands into beneficiaries in South Asia.

What is it that ties these examples together? The victims were sloppy. Both central banks and notable cryptocurrency exchanges had poorly managed security (such as login details) when it came to the transfer of cryptocurrency or fiat money.

Although the SWIFT network was at the center of the Bangladesh Bank heist and similar cybercrimes, the network itself was not hacked; the network's users were. Likewise, in both the Coincheck and Mt. Gox hack, the blockchains central to the hack were never compromised. Rather, the exchanges themselves, and the users were. The login usernames, passwords, and even the systems themselves had such poor security that hackers were essentially left an open door. A door they had no compunction about using.

Thankfully, greater cybersecurity controls were put in place by the SWIFT community. The weak links were quickly identified, and the hackers' go-to methods of attack were disseminated amongst the community.

Can the cryptocurrency industry claim at the enterprise level that it has done the same? Can it claim that it has learned from its own mistakes in an age where negative media coverage is one of the first things customers will often see online? It is difficult to say, but what is clear is that 2020 must see it come together and rise to face the growing risk of crypto threats.

Crypto has matured, but a lot of growth is still needed

The crypto industry's security has grown more robust over the last few years. The solutions presented by custodial and noncustodial wallet providers are increasingly resilient.

Powered by new multiparty protocols or hardware security, these enable secure asset transfers on a consistent basis. Given how popular crypto trading has become with multiple codes in both the EU and USA, these new tools are essential.

Both hardware and software-based multi-signature wallet access are being widely used by organizations. Operating environments are increasingly being encrypted, addresses are being whitelisted, and many other areas of security are being monitored and tightened. Additional improvements have been seen in wallet management systems.

The security community now discusses hacks as they happen, taking steps to patch holes in their security and blacklist any addresses that were party to the theft. However, as these attacks have repeatedly occurred in 2019, there is still much more work to be done.

Upgrading security technology is important, yes, but even more important are the steps taken to improve the risk management operations at the enterprise level. While technology is important, having efficient operations will make all security efforts far more productive and effective. Likewise, more rigorous checks on access to customer assets are key.

Customer investments must be secured, and the industry must adopt standard business practices when it comes to security, access, and any conflicts of interest. In other words, the industry has to start taking itself more seriously.

While no typical asset manager in the world has custody over their customer's assets, this is not the case in the crypto industry. This is a huge mistake. Without having the right principles in place, the industry will continue to deny itself the investment it needs investment it often needs to keep it from remaining vulnerable.

Security has become a huge concern not just for companies and exchanges but also for individuals who possess cryptocurrency. More and more people are looking to security measures such as using hardware wallets, two-factor authentication, and VPN services to keep their cryptocurrency wallets and transactions safe.

But if they see an industry that isn't doing the same, will they trust it? How long will it take the industry to realize that it needs to adopt the financial practices that have proven to work in traditional finance?

In the last year alone, countless foundations, exchanges, and funds have recognized that the crypto industry will never reach its full potential without mature business practices and complete transparency. These are the two things that incidentally protect the customers and their assets and are the elements that matter most. In an age where cybercrime seems to be hitting its stride, this is essential.

As the industry has started to shift towards transparency and best practices, it has increasingly seen enterprise-level solutions emerge to counter hacking risks. Machine learning, and AI, for instance, are cutting edge technologies that hackers struggle to counter. This has brought more willingness from insurance companies to cover third-party custodians who are using the right security technologies.

How will 2020 change the cryptocurrency industry?

For the cryptocurrency to evolve in the ways it needs to, there needs to be more awareness of security risks and a lot more education. Funds, foundations, exchanges, projects, and more must ensure that their processes are secure, transparent and follow best practices the practices that keep their customer's assets safe. Most players will correctly decide to outsource this important task to third party companies who specialize in these exact practices.

This will lead to a state of affairs that sees 2020 close with funds being more difficult to hack than ever. With more organization and collaboration between players and more adoption of enterprise-level security practices and principles, thieves will be far more discouraged from undertaking an attack on a crypto organization.

If the industry can manage to galvanize and make this happen, then the future of the cryptocurrency industry will be looking bright.

See the rest here:

Predicting the Cost of Cryptocurrency Hacks in 2020 - CircleID

Want to invest in the Cryptocurrency Market? Here’s what you need to know! – TheCryptoUpdates

With the exponential growth of the cryptocurrency market, it has become a popular investment option for people around the globe. Using the blockchain technology, cryptocurrency has the potential of changing the lives of people for the better. This is why Uzidatahas designed a platform for the blockchain community where they can stay updated with all the information & analytics of cryptocurrency. But investing in crypto is not such an easy task. Apart from the huge growth potential, there are other important factors that you need to consider before investing in cryptocurrency. Some of the important things to consider include:

Crypto-currencies are highly volatile as the values fluctuate between extreme ups and downs. While there can be an unimaginable rise in the value of cryptocurrency, there can also be extreme price drops just the other moment. The volatility of the market makes it more exciting and even offers opportunities to the traders to make good profits. Though the risks are high, having an effective risk management strategy can help in dealing with the situation better.

When you are planning to explore the cryptocurrency market and make investments, it is essential to spend some time in doing thorough research. Before investing your hard-earned money, it is wise to understand the meaning of cryptocurrency, blockchain, security measures, and more. Getting updated about technology, regulations, investment strategies, and other important aspects can help you understand the market better and make smart investments.

Knowing the amount to invest in cryptocurrency is another important factor to consider. Being a volatile market, the chances of gains, as well as losses, are very high. It is always advisable to invest money that you can afford to lose. Investing such amounts ensures that in case of a loss, your life will not be affected much. Making smart decisions not only avoids unwanted consequences but also helps in remaining in a profitable situation.

Before investing in the cryptocurrency market, it is also important to determine the total market cap of the particular cryptocurrency that you wish to invest in. Solely relying on the unit value for determining the growth potential is not the right way. Instead, analyze the total capitalization as well as the increase in capitalization of the cryptocurrency for better insights.

Investing in the cryptocurrency market can enable you to make money or lose money, or at times your investment remains constant. In such a situation, tracking your funds becomes important. While tracking seems to be complex and difficult, the tracking tools can help in making the task easier. With a wealth of information and reports, the tools help in easily tracking your investments in the cryptocurrency market.

While planning to invest in cryptocurrency, it is also important to choose a reliable and secure platform. Investing in any random platform without detailed research can increase the risk of your investment. In order to avoid potential scams or frauds, considering doing some good research and investing through a trustworthy cryptocurrency platform only.

Considering the above aspects can help in making good investments in the cryptocurrency market and making easy profits. With smart decisions, making the best investments in cryptocurrency becomes possible. But for taking the right decision and framing strategies, you need the correct and the most updated info. This is where platforms like Uzidatacome in, with their brilliant database. The aim is to deliver a safe ecosystem to the community where they can access all the updated info and even get engaged in the conversations regarding the various bitcoins.

Right from the first, they have been aiming to revolutionize the way people search for information when it comes to anything related to blockchain. What makes Uzidataso unique is the fact that it serves the community irrespective of the role you play in the industry. Here are some of the features that you can expect from Uzidata once you log in.

So if you want to be an expert on cryptocurrency before you start investing make sure to try out Uzidata first!

Read the original here:

Want to invest in the Cryptocurrency Market? Here's what you need to know! - TheCryptoUpdates

New Cryptocurrency Exchange Shutting Down After Hack Bitcoin (BTC), Ethereum (ETH) and Three Additional Altcoins Stolen – The Daily Hodl

Cryptocurrency exchange Altsbit is shutting down this May. The exchange made the announcement after reporting an alleged security breach earlier this month.

In a statement, Altsbit says a hack late last week led to the theft of nearly all of the exchanges Ethereum (ETH), Bitcoin (BTC), VersusCoin (VRSC), Komodo (KMD) and Pirate Chain (ARRR) holdings.

Unfortunately, we have to notify you with the fact that our exchange was hacked during the night, and almost all funds from BTC, ETH, ARRR, and VRSC were stolen. A small part of the funds are safe on cold wallets.

Altsbit says the hackers took roughly 6.929 BTC, 2.321 ETH, 3,924,082 ARRR, 414,154 VRSC and 1,066 KMD. The total amount of ETH and BTC lost was less than $70,000 and reportedly dealt a lethal blow to the nascent exchange.

The cryptocurrency exchange says affected users should apply for partial refunds and that remaining funds will be used to refund users until May 8th.

The company further advises users to be wary of anyone pretending to be Altsbit employees who are allegedly distributing refunds.

Just last year, hackers bagged approximately $282,617,000 in leading cryptocurrencies, including Bitcoin, Ethereum, XRP, Litecoin and Bitcoin Cash, from a wide variety of crypto exchanges.

Featured Image: Shutterstock/yGorodenkoff

See original here:

New Cryptocurrency Exchange Shutting Down After Hack Bitcoin (BTC), Ethereum (ETH) and Three Additional Altcoins Stolen - The Daily Hodl

Bitcoin Taxation Support Growing Industry Here are 5 Useful Cryptocurrency Tax Calculators – Bitcoin News

For crypto owners looking to estimate how much they owe in taxes, there are some platforms with a free crypto tax calculator. They integrate with major crypto exchanges and wallets, allowing you to import your crypto transaction data and start calculating your taxes for free. Some of them also integrate with leading tax filing software such as Turbotax.

Also read: Bitcoin, Tesla Stock, Tron: How Warren Buffett Got His First Bitcoin

As cryptocurrencies become more popular and their adoption rises, governments worldwide are ramping up their efforts to tax them. In the U.S., the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) has named cryptocurrency a top priority this year. Not only has the agency sent out over 10,000 letters to remind crypto owners they must pay taxes, but its main tax form used by over 150 million U.S. filers now includes a cryptocurrency question.

For crypto owners who want to calculate how much they owe in taxes, there are many tax preparation platforms with a crypto tax calculator to help them minimize their tax liabilities and claim all the deductions possible. Most online crypto tax calculators require you to import your transaction data from exchanges or wallets in order to calculate your tax obligations. They will also generate various reports to help you with tax reporting and filing. Some have even partnered with leading tax filing services such as Turbotax. Below are some popular platforms with a cryptocurrency tax calculator. For more options, see our post on 10 useful tax tools for crypto owners.

Crypto Trader Tax by Coin Ledger is a tax reporting platform with a built-in crypto tax calculator. It integrates with all major crypto exchanges, including Coinbase, Coinbase Pro, Bittrex, Bitstamp, Gemini, Poloniex, Binance, Kucoin, Kraken, Bitfinex, Huobi, Hitbtc, and Cash App. You can also import data from unsupported exchanges manually. Once you have imported your data, Crypto Trader Tax will calculate your tax obligations and generate tax reports.

The platforms crypto tax calculator is free to use. You only have to pay when you want to view and download your full report, its website details. The reports generated include an audit trail report, the IRS Form 8949, a short and long term gains report, and a crypto income report. The platform also offers international support. Your capital gains and losses can be calculated in every fiat currency and your tax reports used in any country that supports FIFO, LIFO, or specific identification methods.

Four pricing levels are available on Crypto Tax Trader: $49, $99, $199, and $299. The cheapest plan allows you to import up to 100 trades. All levels have Turbotax and Taxact integration to help you file your tax returns.

Koinly is also a popular platform with a crypto tax calculator, available in over 20 countries. Similar Crypto Trader Tax, to use Koinlys tax calculator, you need to import your data from crypto exchanges, wallets or public addresses. You can then review your transactions and generate your tax reports, which include capital gains, income and gifts, margin trades, options and futures trades, and audit logs. You can then export your transactions to tax filing platforms such as Turbotax, Taxact, and Xero.

It is also free to start using Koinlys crypto tax calculator. Start for free, pay only when you are ready to generate your reports, its website states. To generate tax reports for filing, Koinly offers three plans costing $79, $179, and $399. The cheapest level allows 300 transactions.

Cointracker has been advertising its free crypto tax calculator since January. Cryptocurrency users with up to 200 transactions in a given tax year can use Cointracker to calculate cryptocurrency taxes free of charge, the company wrote. This enables the majority of cryptocurrency users to seamlessly become and stay tax compliant as they transact and use cryptocurrency, all at zero cost.

The free level comes with portfolio tracking, capital gains tax calculation, and error reconciliation. The platform also offers a more heavy-duty plan which costs $179, allows up to 3,000 transactions, and comes with several more options. There is also an unlimited level for which you need to contact the company for a quote.

Zenledger describes itself as much more than just a free crypto tax calculator. It claims to be The most comprehensive cryptocurrency tax software on the market. The service aggregates your many ledgers, marks the transactions to market, and allows you to categorize each transaction by use. It also integrates with major crypto exchanges and has partnered with Turbotax. Reports it generates include completed tax forms and audit reports.

Besides a free tax estimate, Zenledger offers a variety of pricing options, starting at $69, $149, and $399. The lowest level allows up to 1000 transactions and $15,000 in total asset value. Product consulting and customization service is available as an add-on at $100 per hour.

Tokentax is another cryptocurrency tax software and accounting platform with a built-in crypto tax calculator. Similar to other platforms featured above, Tokentax integrates with major crypto exchanges and allows you to manually import your trade history from other exchanges. Once your transaction data has been imported, the platform will calculate your tax obligation and generate your tax reports, including the IRS Form 8949, an audit trail report, a crypto mining and income tax report, and an international gain and loss report. Tokentax has also partnered with Turbotax.

In order to use Tokentaxs crypto tax calculator, however, you will need to pay for one of the three plans which cost $65, $199, and $799. The basic plan only allows up to 500 transactions from Coinbase, Coinbase Pro and Binance. Level 2 supports every exchange and allows you to import up to 5,000 transactions. All three levels have Turbotax integration.

The list above is not exhaustive as there are many more companies with a crypto tax calculator. News.bitcoin.com has previously provided a list of 10 useful tax tools to help crypto owners with tax filing. Regardless of which tax software you use, the IRS has recently provided some tips which cryptocurrency owners should know before filing their tax returns.

Do you have a favorite crypto tax calculator? Share your thoughts with us in the comments section below.

Disclaimer: This article is for informational purposes only. It is not an offer or solicitation of an offer to buy or sell, or a recommendation, endorsement, or sponsorship of any products, services, or companies. Bitcoin.com does not provide investment, tax, legal, or accounting advice. Neither the company nor the author is responsible, directly or indirectly, for any damage or loss caused or alleged to be caused by or in connection with the use of or reliance on any content, goods or services mentioned in this article.

Images courtesy of Shutterstock.

Did you know you can buy and sell BCH privately using our noncustodial, peer-to-peer Local Bitcoin Cash trading platform? The local.Bitcoin.com marketplace has thousands of participants from all around the world trading BCH right now. And if you need a bitcoin wallet to securely store your coins, you can download one from us here.

A student of Austrian Economics, Kevin found Bitcoin in 2011 and has been an evangelist ever since. His interests lie in Bitcoin security, open-source systems, network effects and the intersection between economics and cryptography.

Go here to read the rest:

Bitcoin Taxation Support Growing Industry Here are 5 Useful Cryptocurrency Tax Calculators - Bitcoin News

Moonday Mornings: $4B OneCoin cryptocurrency scam to be made into TV drama – The Next Web

Welcome to Moonday Mornings, fellow Hard Forkers.

You know the drill, lets take a look at this weekends top cryptocurrency and blockchain headlines.

If you didnt get enough of the $4 billion OneCoin cryptocurrency scam then youre in luck. According to entertainment news website Deadline, the real-life drama is going to be made into a TV show.

In an allegedly intense bidding war, New Regency Television International beat the likes of 20th Century TV to win the screen rights to the popular BBC Sounds podcast, The Missing Crypto Queen. Its definitely worth a listen. Full details on the shows production are yet to be announced.

[Read: 2019s juiciest crypto drama: The saga of OneCoins $4B cryptocurrency scam]

A company offering a digital savings scheme, with fixed interest of 5%, has had to remove its adverts from London Underground train stations after coming under pressure from the UKs Financial Conduct Authority, The Telegraph reports.

According to the report, the billboards said interest rates were fixed and investors could remove their money whenever they pleased. What wasnt disclosed on the adverts though, was that investor money was used to buy cryptocurrency before being transferred to a financial services firm based in China.

The Australian government has finally released its blockchain roadmap that it says will help foster adoption in the country, The Block reports.

The 52-page document outlines a 12-step plan for the next five years, that will supposedly lead Australia to a blockchain empowered future, whatever that means. The Australian government announced its plans for blockchain last year, despite the latest document, were still waiting for anything tangible to develop.

The London-based cryptocurrency exchange LBX is facing compulsory liquidation, news.bitcoin.com reports. Despite the recent rise in cryptocurrency prices, the exchange hasnt been able to stay afloat.The company was issued a winding up order at the end of January for failing to pay creditors.

Court appointed liquidators are now working to reportedly resolve client concerns as soon as possible, including any money owed to them. It hasnt been mentioned how much money clients are owed.

And finally

A man from the US state of Michigan has been ordered to pay over $208,000 in restitution for his role in a cryptocurrency-based scam, according to a US Department of Justice release.

The individual, James Matthew Thomas, has also been sentenced to one year and one day in prison for defrauding two people from Missoula, Montana. The perpetrator pleaded guilty to wire fraud and money laundering last October.

According to the release, the Thomas solicited investments from his LinkedIn network, promising them large returns for investing in cryptocurrency. Only, he never paid his investors back. Where have we heard that before?

Well, there you have it. Now go get on with your week of watching Bitcoins price go up and down.

Published February 10, 2020 09:42 UTC

Go here to see the original:

Moonday Mornings: $4B OneCoin cryptocurrency scam to be made into TV drama - The Next Web

CryptoCompare Ranks Top 10 Bitcoin (BTC) and Cryptocurrency Exchanges – The Daily Hodl

February 12, 2020 London

The Benchmark ranks over 160 active spot exchanges globally to bring transparency and accountability to the cryptoasset exchange landscape by providing a framework for assessing risk. A grade is assigned to each exchange to help identify the lowest risk exchanges in the industry.

The analysis reveals a shift in the top five exchanges with itBit, the US and Japanese regulated exchange, taking the number 1 spot for the first time. It is followed by Gemini (2), Coinbase (3), Kraken (4), Bitstamp (5), Liquid (6), Bitfinex (7), OKEx (8), bitFlyer (9), and OKCoin (10).

CryptoCompares Exchange Benchmark plays an important role in providing institutional and retail investors with a secure, trusted marketplace. We encourage all initiatives that help to foster best practices among trading venues in this fast-growing industry, said Gabor Gurbacs, director, digital asset strategy at VanEck.

Charles Hayter, co-founder and CEO of CryptoCompare, commented,

The industry needs reliable metrics to evaluate the vast number of cryptocurrency exchanges globally and we have been extremely pleased with the response to our analysis since launch last year. Our cryptocurrency Exchange Benchmark aims to provide this transparency by assessing exchanges using a clear methodology to assess risk. The result is clear data on which exchanges are managing multiple risks in the most effective manner, improving decision-making for market participants.

CryptoCompare launched the Exchange Benchmark in June 2019 to evaluate cryptocurrency exchanges globally. Initially ranking over 100 exchanges, it now includes analysis of more than 165 crypto exchanges globally. It employs a qualitative (due diligence) and quantitative (market quality based on order book and trade data) approach and uses correlation-of-volume-to-volatility and standard-deviation-of-volume as inputs to the analysis.The Exchange Benchmark does not rely on aggregate volume data in its analysis due to concerns over volume manipulation, wash trading and trading incentives.

The ranking components include: geography; legal/regulatory; investment; team/company; data provision; trade surveillance; market quality and a penalty factor for negative events. Analysis is based on public information and detailed methodology is made freely available, underscoring CryptoCompares commitment to bringing greater transparency and improved decision-making to the cryptocurrency marketplace.

The full report can be found here.

Originally posted here:

CryptoCompare Ranks Top 10 Bitcoin (BTC) and Cryptocurrency Exchanges - The Daily Hodl

Dr. Huang Lin Explains Why Hes Developing the ZK-ConSNARK Privacy Protocol for Conducting Secure Cryptocurrency Transactions – Crowdfund Insider

The developers of the Suterusu protocol are presently working on a scalable, privacy-preserving second layer solution for secure digital asset management.

Any crypto-asset, including Bitcoin (BTC) and Ether (ETH), may soon be used to conduct fully anonymous transactions using the Suterusu protocol.

Suterusus technology, ZK-ConSNARK, allows users to perform very small and constant-size digital currency transactions and highly efcient verication. This solution is being developed by company chief technical officer Dr. Lin-Suterusu, who holds a Ph.D. in applied cryptography and privacy-preserving distributed systems.

Zhengpeng Hou, CEO at Suterusu, stated:

Today, everybody calls bitcoin and other altcoins crypto coins, but the majority dont have the attribute of privacy at all.

We recently caught up with Dr. Huang Lin who talked to us about the importance of financial privacy when conducting transactions using cryptocurrencies.

Dr. Lin: Most people think that cryptocurrencies are anonymous and maintain the users financial privacy by default. The reality is the opposite. When Bitcoin (BTC) initially launched, the intention was to have a decentralized ledger that is, practically, about transparency.

Every account or transaction can be found or accessed by anyone. And that information can be linked to the users identity. I believe nobody wants this in the conventional finance world.

Our account information is protected by the bank, transplantation is also the same. Unfortunately, cryptocurrencies today lack this privacy or at least the majority is missing this. Therefore, we believe privacy, and in particular financial privacy, are critical in the digital age.

Dr. Lin: Suterusu is registered in Singapore, so any business activities, including our day-to-day operations and ongoing development efforts abide by the laws of Singapore. Our goal is to advance the technology and make it more user-friendly. We hope that more people can access privacy-preserving solutions through our endeavor.

Dr. Lin: ZK-conSNARK is a setup-free, zero-knowledge proof scheme with almost constant proof size and efficient proof generation and verification. Our yellow paper has provided a scheme based on class groups of unknown order.

Here is the link: https://github.com/suterusu-team/Suter_yellowpaper.

In the case of a fully decentralized cryptocurrency, all the nodes in the blockchain network are supposed to verify the transaction and the zero-knowledge proof is included in the transaction. The smaller the size of zero-knowledge proof, the larger the transactions-per-second (TPS) or throughput is.

We also intend to keep both the proof generation and verification efficient in order to reduce the computation overhead for both the user and miners in the system. Currently, there are two types of zero-knowledge proofs in terms of its setup model, trusted setup and trustless setup, or setup-free.

The zero-knowledge proof scheme used in Zcash requires a trusted setup, which implies you could print an infinite amount of zcash without the possibility of being detected. Our ZK-conSnark is setup free and hence does not have this kind of security risk. In short, zk-conSNARK attains the perfect balance between security and efficiency.

Dr. Lin: They have done incredible work to bring privacy into finance, particularly in the crypto world, their work extends the crypto algorithms use case scenario. Because of their work, we have a certain level of privacy when performing cryptocurrency-based transactons, like stealth addresses and confidential payments. And now, people have more choices when trying to maintain financial privacy.

Dr. Lin:

In the short term, there are areas we are working on:

As far as research and development is concerned, we not only need to implement our existing solution but also need to keep working on our research for zk-ConSNARK to make it more optimal, have greater efficiency and low cost.

As a project, we also need to find out a good product-market fit. We are developing the algorithms and software development kids (SDK). We are also focused on creating financial products that meets the demands of the market.

In terms of ecosystem development and partnerships, we are a small team, and may expand our operations. We will keep on growing our business partners network and support the adoption of privacy-focused technologies.

We are also focusing on community growth. There are two types of communities, the user community, which will help in increasing the stability of our network, and the developers who will continue to work on our protocol.

Read the rest here:

Dr. Huang Lin Explains Why Hes Developing the ZK-ConSNARK Privacy Protocol for Conducting Secure Cryptocurrency Transactions - Crowdfund Insider

Bara Fans Will Be Able to Buy a Say in Decisions via Cryptocurrency – SportTechie

German soccer league Bundesliga has partnered with online esports tournament platform Battlefy to launch the Virtual Bundesliga International series, a new esports competition for the FIFA video game. The Bundesliga originally launched the VBL in 2012, which is directly integrated into the EA Sports FIFA series.

The series will kickoff in March, with regional online qualifier tournaments in 19 countries (Brazil, Colombia, Peru, Chile, Argentina, Mexico, Canada, the U.S., Japan, South Korea, Thailand, Malaysia, India, Brunei, the Philippines, Cambodia, Singapore, East Timor and Vietnam.)

STATE OF THE INDUSTRY:Make Sure Youre atthe Worlds Premier Sports Tech Event (March 2627 at Barclays Center in Brooklyn)

Winners from the regional tournaments will then compete in an in-person continental qualifier. Those locations have yet to be announced but the tournaments will be broadcasted by local broadcast partners and all competing gamers will receive a kit from the Bundesliga that represents the team theyre playing as. The final stage will be the VBL International Finals held in May in Germany. Qualified FIFA players will be flown to meet professional Bundesliga and professional VBL players and visit select Bundesliga clubs.

Combining the online and offline world of football, the VBL International Series merges the passions of a new generation of gamers and Bundesliga fans around the world, Andreas Heyden, EVP, Digital Innovations at DFL Group, said in a press release.

Heyden was recently interviewed as part of SportTechies Tech Talks series.

More here:

Bara Fans Will Be Able to Buy a Say in Decisions via Cryptocurrency - SportTechie

Elon Musk and SpaceX Could Finally Let You Own a Piece of the New Space Race – Motley Fool

Hey guys, guess what? Elon Musk did something pretty cool last week.

Wait, no, sorry. That's just Elon being Elon on Twitter, as usual.

The CEO of SpaceX had an extremely active day on Twitter on Feb. 6, tweeting about several things, including the silly sci-fi pulp magazine cover. But one thing he didn't tweet about that day -- which would've been of far greater interest to investors everywhere -- was SpaceX's announcement that it might someday spin off its Starlink satellite division.

A Starlink IPO would finally give investors a second way to invest in the unique genius of Elon Musk, while also expanding the rather limited opportunities currently available for investing in space-centric companies.

SpaceX is currently valued at roughly $33 billion on private markets, up from about $30.5 billion last year. However, Musk has been far more adamant about keeping his rockets away from Wall Street than he was with Tesla (NASDAQ:TSLA), which went public in 2010 at a market cap of roughly $2.2 billion, or SolarCity, which reached a market cap of nearly $1 billion after its 2012 IPO (SolarCity is now part of Tesla).

If SpaceX ever does go public, its valuation will likely be much higher than that $33 billion estimate. Musk has made clear that he doesn't want to IPO SpaceX until it has established a steady stream of crewed routes to Mars. A SpaceX that could make a Mars trip feel more like a JFK-to-Dulles shuttle flight could easily be worth more than Tesla is today, all before ever going public. But it also implies that SpaceX will be well established by the time it might IPO.

Starlink, on the other hand, has a lot of runway left.

Musk said he plans to launch anywhere from 12,000 to 42,000 Starlink satellites to create an orbiting scaffold of internet connectivity. No specific timeline was given for reaching this goal. There are perhaps 200 to 240 Starlink satellites now in orbit, and the FCC has already given Starlink a deadline of November 2027 to launch the "first" 12,000 of Musk's grand plan. If Starlink reaches Musk's stated targets, it would represent an increase of anywhere from 4,900% to 20,900% in the number of near-Earth internet hotspots under its control. That's a lot of growth potential.

A Starlink rocket launches, carrying satellites. Image source: SpaceX

There are currently two major publicly traded satellite internet providers: EchoStar's (NASDAQ:SATS) HughesNet and ViaSat (NASDAQ:VSAT). HughesNet caps subscriber data access at 50 gigabytes per month, at a cost of over $120 per month, according to BroadbandNow. ViaSat has an "unlimited-bandwidth" plan, but it costs $150 per month, and your download speed gets throttled after using about 100 gigabytes of data.

Between them, these two providers serve about 2 million subscribers with 13 orbiting satellites. Every SpaceX-Starlink launch places several times as many satellites into orbit as the combined fleets of EchoStar and ViaSat.

Last month, Starlink became the operator of the largest commercial satellite fleet in the world. Based on the Union of Concerned Scientists' latest count, Starlink now operates roughly 10% of all satellites orbiting the Earth, and roughly a third of all U.S.-operated commercial satellites. By the time it's done, Starlink satellites would vastly outnumber all other satellite fleets in orbit combined.

Other companies are planning to similarly seed the skies with bandwidth-beaming satellites in the near future.

OneWeb is part-owned by Softbank and operating a joint venture manufacturing subsidiary with Airbus called OneWeb Satellites. The company plans to put about 382 satellites into orbit by the end of 2020, according to Foolish aerospace specialist Rich Smith.

Amazon.com (NASDAQ:AMZN) has its own satellite broadband venture, Project Kuiper, with ambitions to connect most of the world with a network of 3,236 satellites.

Neither of these competitors seems to offer the same opportunities as a publicly traded Starlink. OneWeb offers, at best, limited and indirect opportunities to invest in its space race efforts. Amazon is likely to track Project Kuiper as just another line item on its expansive earnings reports.

Neither of these Starlink competitors has access to a dedicated fleet of launch rockets. SpaceX, on the other hand, has enough payload capacity that it's invited other satellite operators to hitch a ride on its own launches (for a price, of course).

A starlink rocket is shown taking off from a SpaceX facility. Image source: SpaceX

The only other pure-play space investment you can buy right now is Richard Branson's Virgin Galactic (NYSE:SPCE), which is currently unprofitable. While SpaceX isn't required to report financials, a 2017 report showed the company eking out a (narrow) profit on its space-launch operations.

Unlike SpaceX, Virgin Galactic is focused on "space tourism," offering rich folks the chance to reach near-Earth orbit for about $250,000 a pop.

Virgin Galactic's long-term play seems to be based on helping the wealthy get around the world faster with rockets, according to Fool analyst Travis Hoium. This has been tried before -- remember the Concorde? -- and it's always been a tough sell from a commercial and regulatory standpoint.

If we assume Virgin Galactic's market is limited to ultra-high-net-worth individuals with more than $30 million in assets, its total addressable market is about 265,000 people, and many of them may fly only once, just to say they did it. SpaceX's plans for affordable satellite-based internet connectivity could benefit millions, if not billions, of people worldwide.

There are anywhere from 24 million to 163 million people in the United States alone who can't currently use the internet at broadband speeds, according to conflicting reports from the FCC and Microsoft. Nearly four billion people worldwide have no regular internet access at all.

Providing even a fraction of this unconnected population with steady and speedy online access would easily be worth billions of dollars in annual subscription fees to Starlink.

These details make Starlink seem like an IPO worth getting into, especially if its public debut occurs sooner rather than later.

Read the original:

Elon Musk and SpaceX Could Finally Let You Own a Piece of the New Space Race - Motley Fool

Teslas Leaked Employee Handbook Is As Unconventional As Founder Elon Musk – Forbes

(AP Photo/Jae C. Hong, File)

Elon Musk, the founder and CEO of Tesla, is known for his iconoclastic, unconventional personality and management style. Tesla's employee handbook, which mirrors the style of Musk, was leaked and then published by Business Insider.

If you are a Tesla human resources professional or in-house counsel, the employee manual must cause great anxiety. For workers, it's amazing.

The handbook offers a disclaimer to all employees:

If youre looking for a traditional employee handbook filled with policies and rules, you wont find one. Policies and rules tell you where the bottom isthey tell you how poorly you can perform before you get shown the door. Thats not us.

Usually employee handbooks are long, boring, jargon-laden and written in an authoritarian tone. It's not clear if anyone in the history of corporations has ever completely read and understood their companys manual. The exception is when there is an issue, then you search for it, start reading and quickly give up because it's incomprehensible, dense and confusing.

Teslas handbook is like its founderno-nonsense, direct and to the point, holds people accountable and sets forth the requirements clearly and concisely.

Musk seeks out smart and motivated people and holds them accountable. He is open-minded as to a persons background, but requires people to show up on time and produce. Tesla has high expectations for its employees to live up to its standards of excellence.

According to Musk, it's not imperative that employees come from top-tier universities. He believes, If somebody graduated from a great university, that may be an indication that they will be capable of great things, but its not necessarily the case. If you look at, say, people like Bill Gates or Larry Ellison, Steve Jobs, these guys didnt graduate from college, but if you had a chance to hire them, of course that would be a good idea. Musk once tweeted, A PhD is definitely not required, and followed that statement up by saying, Dont care if you even graduated high school.

Musk seeks out individuals who demonstrate evidence of exceptional ability. And if there is a track record of exceptional achievement, then it is likely that that will continue into the future.

According to the handbook, trust is mission critical. The company offers its employees its full faith and trust and provides them with important responsibilities. It's believed that people who are imbued with respect and trust will rise up to the challenge and maintain the highest degree of professionalism.

The most important thing, according to the handbook, is that it's everyones job to help make the company successful. Each employee needs to act as if they are owners. This means that if they have a good idea on how things can be done differently or better, they should share it with the appropriate managers. Employees are free to go up the chain of command, including Musk himself, if they believe that they have something of value to offer. This edict empowers everyone to take ownership of their job, career and the future of Tesla.

One of the rules in the handbook is all about having fun at work. Employees are encouraged to make new friends, strive to be the best that they can be and take on new and exciting challenges. The company wants everyone to work hard, love what they do and enjoy themselves.

The forthright tone of the handbook is refreshing. You can almost hear Musks voice behind the manuals admonishment that arriving to work late every Monday morning because you stayed up late watching football is inexcusable because there are people depending on you. Traffic accidents happen, we get that, but they dont happen every Monday during football season.

There is an understanding that if youre sick, you stay home. Dont get the rest of us sick, the handbook states.

Our assumption will be that if you dont call and dont show up for work, youre a jerk.

Ironically, some of the companys requirements have been slightlyand at times flagrantlyignored by Musk himself. Over the years, he has transgressed some of Teslas own principles. This includes calling a scuba diving expert who was rescuing children from a cave in Thailand a pedo, a remark that landed him in court for defamation. (The jury ultimately ruled in Musks favor.) To be fair, it's not clear about name-calling in the handbook.

When the company was undergoing some difficult times, Musk claimed that he had buyers secured for the company at $420 per share, which was a substantial premium from where the stock price traded at that time. It was believed that he slightly exaggerated about the mysterious buyer. Some claim that he completely made up the story about the fictitious buyer. The stock price now trades at about $800 per share, so the critics have somewhat relented.

Musk drew attention when he drank whiskey and smoked pot on the popular Joe Rogan podcast, which was watched and listened to by millions of people. His antics were questioned by corporate ethics experts.

There is a contingency of short-sellers on Twitter that maintain Musk is a modern day P.T. Barnum who overhypes his company and its stock price. They contend that Tesla shares are valued higher than several of the largest automakers combined and that the price cant possibly remain at that premium and will ultimately crash. They allege that Tesla vehicle accidents, spontaneous fires and fatalities are caused by software that hasnt been perfected yet.

Musk allegedly hired investigators to hack an employees phone, spied on his messages and misled police about a potential mass shooting, according to Sean Gouthro, a former security manager at the companys Nevada Gigafactory. Musk claimed in an email that an employee attempted to engage in damaging sabotage to our operations, and accused Wall Street short-sellers, oil & gas companies or the multitude of big gas/diesel car company competitors may have been behind the activities.

While the handbook calls for safety and the company wants you to go home every day in the same condition you arrived, there have been allegations of violations of safety. Employees reportedly called 911 regularly, citing dangerous working conditions, such as head injuries from unsecured construction debris blowing off the roof in a windstorm and people falling through holes in the floor.

Tesla and Musk are an anomaly in the business world. Many loyal customers and investors love the company and its flamboyant CEO, who also exhibits humility at times. They steadfastly stand by Tesla and root for its continued success.

Their faith remains unshaken despite the many times its founder steps out of bounds. The handbook should probably contain a passage that permits Musk to partake in questionable behaviors as long as he keeps growing the company, increasing the value of Tesla for its shareholders and offers a great product for their customers.

Teslas human resources staff, corporate attorneys and board of directors will continue to have headaches and never-ending work to do in keeping up with their larger-than-life CEO.

Originally posted here:

Teslas Leaked Employee Handbook Is As Unconventional As Founder Elon Musk - Forbes

Elon Musks New Nemesis: Rivian Founder R.J. Scaringe Has A $3 Billion War Chest And Tesla In His Headlights – Forbes

Its 8 oclock on a January morning, and the temperature in Normal, Illinois, just a few hours south of Chicago, is well below freezing. The small pond in front of Rivian Automotives assembly plant has turned to ice, the grass is covered with frost and there is snow in the forecast. Its not much warmer inside the plant. Nearly the entire 2.6-million-square-foot facility is a construction zone, undergoing a massive $750 million renovation to prepare for the end of the year, when it expects to start rolling out battery-powered trucks, vans and SUVs. So minor details like heat are not exactly a top priority.

The only finished areaa second floor at the front of the building that overlooks the factoryis where the plants previous owner, Mitsubishi, had its executive offices. Back then, access to this floor was restricted to the suits. Now its a giant open workspace, accessible to all, with a cafeteria, polished concrete floors and lots of natural light, just like the floor plan at Rivians research and design center in Plymouth, Michigan. The concept for both offices was to merge industrial and outdoor aesthetics that mirror the companys brandan automaker that builds sustainable vehicles usable in off-road settings. Rivian, which was founded in 2009 but is finally releasing its first vehicle this year, also has operations in San Jose and Irvine, California, where it develops its technology and batteries.

When were done cleaning, painting and installing the equipment, says Rivians 37-year-old founder and CEO, Robert Joseph Scaringe (better known as just R.J.), we will eventually be able to produce 250,000 vehicles per year by mid-decade.

Starting an independent car company is not easy. Among the roadkill in automotive history are Preston Tucker, who challenged Detroit in the late 1940s, and John DeLorean, who failed to take the Motor City back to the future in the early 1980s. Producing a line of mass-market vehicles in the 21st century is even more difficult than it was for Tucker and DeLorean, and considerably more perilous in the EV category.

With the emergence of Rivian, the electric vehicle market is no longer a one-horseless-carriage race. Indeed, the 2020s are gearing up to be the decade of the EV. According to research at Oppenheimer, EVs and plug-in electric hybrids accounted for a mere 2.2 percent of all U.S. vehicles sold in the last quarter of 2019. And only a third of those were purely electric. But that is changing rapidly. While only 5.1 million electric cars were sold worldwide in 2018, that figure is expected to surge throughout the decade21 million units are projected to be sold in 2020, 98 million in 2025 and 253 million in 2030.

Building a new EV, however, requires investing in cutting-edge research into components like battery packs and powertrains. The only company that has been remotely successful is, of course, Teslaand even its had a rough go of it.

Ride and Seek: Rivians adventure SUV can accommodate seven people, and the company has also filed for a patent to adapt a seat for first responders.

We spent a lot of time looking at and understanding how different [automakers] were built, Scaringe says. And we spent a lot of time understanding the risks associated with how to build and scale a business, and the working capital thats [required]. Over the past 13 months, he and his team have raised $2.85 billion to fund Rivians future. First Amazon (and others) invested $700 million in February 2019. Then Ford ponied up $500 million two months later.

Cox Automotive, whose brands include Autotrader and Kelley Blue Book, came through with another $350 million in September. And if that werent enough to turbocharge Scaringes outsize ambitions, just before Christmas Eve, money management behemoth T. Rowe Price led yet another investment round worth more than $1.3 billion.

That early infusion of capitalon top of investments of nearly $500 million, including from JIMCO, the investment arm of Abdul Latif Jameel, a Saudi corporation that has bet big on energy and mobilityhas given Rivian a valuation just north of $5.5 billion. Scaringe is estimated to own slightly more than 20% of the company, making him the latest automotive billionaire. The funding has also allowed Scaringe to nearly triple the size of Rivians workforce, from around 700 in 2018 to more than 2,000 today, which is how he can scale production this year.

The question is: Even with $3 billion, does Rivian have enough to realize Scaringes electric dreams?

Until now, its been a far smoother road than the one Elon Musk faced with his first vehicle. Tesla raised around $100 million between 2003 and 2008 to produce the Roadster, which was soon abandoned in favor of the Model S, and the Model S required more than $350 million in funding (including a 2010 IPO that valued the company at $1.7 billion). The journey of the Model 3 was particularly rocky. Supply-chain issues and Musks desire to completely disrupt the manufacturing process led to a two year-plus delay delivering cars to customers and a slew of quality-control issues. The fallout from these problems reportedly cost the EV maker hundreds of millions of dollars. (Tesla did not respond to multiple requests for comment.) The company then took on estimated billions in debt as it scaled its production for the mass market.

So if the mighty Tesla has faced so many detours and potholes, what makes Scaringe think that Rivian, which hasnt made a single car, can have a smooth ride? He doesnt. Things will go wrong, admits the young CEO. And Scaringe, who comes across like a mild-mannered Clark Kent type compared to Musks manic Tony Stark, is confident he can overcome any perils or roadblocks. After all, Rivian is built for treacherous terrain.

R.J. Scaringe first dreamed of starting his own car company when he was in high school. But unlike most teenage gearheads with the same ambition, Scaringe backed it up by studying engineering. His vision changed in 2007 while he was attending MITs prestigious Sloan Automotive Lab, where he attained a doctorate in mechanical engineering and the skills he would need to build the vehicle he imagined in his head. As I became increasingly aware of how many problems were born out of the automobilegeopolitical, climate, air quality and moreit became a huge source of internal conflict for me, he recalls. So he scrapped his plan for a gas-powered sports car for one that was battery-powered, much like Teslas original Roadster.

After graduating with his doctorate in 2009, Scaringe returned home to Melbourne, Florida, where he founded the company that became Rivian. He and his team spent four years developing a speedster-like EV before Scaringe found what he thought was an obvious gap in electric vehicles and one that spoke to his outdoorsy interestsa truck and a luxury SUV.

Scaringe also spent nearly a decade developing its innovative skateboard platforma chassis that contains the battery pack, suspension, electric motors for propulsion and a computer to control it all. Finally, in November 2018, Rivian unveiled its two prototypes at the Los Angeles Auto Show: The R1S, an electric SUV that seats seven, and the R1T, an electric pickup truck. The so-called adventure vehicles look like the love children of a Range Roverrugged, capable and luxuriousand are packed with the latest amenities such as internet connectivity and a host of driver-assist safety features.

The company expects to deliver an ambitious 20,000 units (combined truck and SUV) in 2021 and 40,000 in 2022, which could translate to approximately $1.4 billion and $2.8 billion, respectively, if all goes according to plan. By comparison, Tesla sold 25,000 units of the Model X in 2016, its first full year of release.

Beyond its first two releases, Scaringe says there will be three more vehicles in the Rivian portfolio by 2024. Though he is cautious about providing details, Scaringe admits that one will be smaller in size and all will be considerably lower in price. Its a strategy akin to what Land Rover does with its Defender and top-of-the-line Range Roversi.e., the same base model with fewer amenities. And if Scaringe can truly keep the price below $50,000, it will cause far worse headaches for Musk than a broken shatterproof window on his Franken-vehicle, the Cybertruck.

Tesla, of course, now dominates the EV marketby one estimate it represents nearly 80% of sales in the United Statesand Rivian will face stiff competition in the luxury battery-powered SUV segment from other automakers. The R1S SUV will enter a market in the fall that includes the Mercedes-Benz EQC (starting at $67,900); the Audi e-tron SUV ($74,800); the Jaguar i-Pace ($69,500); and, of course, the Tesla Model X ($84,990). Other automakers such as Hyundai and Kia will offer more affordable options, such as the Kona EV and Niro EV, starting at $37,190 and $38,500, respectively.

Prime Opportunity: As part of Amazon's $700 million investment, Rivian will produce electric delivery vans, expected to go into service in 2021.

Rivian should be without real competition in the truck category, however. Despite Teslas highly public debut of the Cybertruck, its not expected to be produced until 2022. And both Ford and General Motors have promised to release electric pickups in the next few years.

The opportunities [in the EV market] are pretty substantial, says Ed Kim, a market analyst for AutoPacific, an automotive research and consulting firm based in California. If Rivian becomes a threat to Tesla dominance, it could energize the category and set up a true EV rivalry. Some experts have been predicting this for a while, and I think there are a few key factors happening now that [are leading to further] penetration of the EV, says Steven Low, a professor of computer science and electrical engineering at Caltech. One is that vehicle range is expanding. Another is the availability of more charging facilities. And the third element is price.

Rivian claims its R1S and R1T will offer outstanding performance, including a range of just over 400 miles, or nearly 75 miles more than any other existing EV. Both will be able to sprint from zero to 60 mph in about three seconds. Above all, Rivian promises genuine off-road capability. Try driving your Tesla on the beach or into the woods.

The company also plans to build out a charging infrastructure, much like Teslas Superchargers. We are developing them in parallel, Scaringe says. As for the cost, Rivians pickup will have a base price around $69,000, the SUV $72,500 (and both come with a federal tax incentive). Scaringe hints that these prices will come down closer to release but wouldnt reveal a precise figure

Much will depend on Rivians new deep-pocketed partners.

Having built a $3 billion war chest from Amazon, Ford and Cox in a short time is certainly an impressive start for Scaringe, but if Teslas history is an example, that wont be enough funding to scale production to compete with Musk. Then again, those brands see opportunity in Rivian that Tesla could never provide.

The partnerships Scaringe forged werent just about the cash. In Fords case, the two companies will also build an electric vehicle together. Were providing the platform, Scaringe says. They will provide the body and the interior. Although Scaringe is reticent in talking about the project, the vehicle will be a luxury SUV with Fords Lincoln brand.

Rivian hopes the Ford alliance will allow the company to grow beyond its own consumer electric vehicle offerings. For its part, Ford is seemingly doing it to keep the companys options open, as it often does, to pursue the best option with which to achieve its electrification goals: 40 electric vehicle models by the end of 2022. Besides the Lincoln with Rivian, Ford is working on the electric Mustang-inspired Mach-E SUV and both a hybrid and all-electric version of the Ford F-150, Americas bestselling vehicle. Ford is also working with Volkswagen to develop EVs on its new EV platform.

The New Normal: Rivians complex in Illinois was formerly a Mitsubishi factory, many of whose workers have returned.

Amazon, meanwhile, is looking to Rivian to develop a battery-powered delivery van as part of its pledge to be net-zero carbon across all its businesses by 2040 and use 100% renewable energy to power those businesses by 2030. Consequently, Amazon ordered 100,000 vans from Rivian. At least 10,000 should be on the road by late 2022, and all are expected to be operating in Amazons fleet by 2024. The vans will presumably become part of an end-to-end logistics network that Amazon has been working on since 2015. If so, expect more Rivian orders to come down the road.

But its the Cox partnership that could prove the most troubling for Musk. While Tesla has more than 100 service centers in 30 states, Cox handled more than 55 million service appointments in 2019 at its sprawling network of commercial and dealer partner service centers across the United States. If something goes wrong with an R1T or R1S, the idea, presumably, is that a customer will be able to take the vehicle to a Cox service center like Pivet to have it repaired correctly and in a timely fashion, something that Tesla has struggled with since its inception.

Cox is also playing the long game with Rivianas more vehicles come to market, it wants to control secondary sales. My hope is with the skills that we have, says Cox president Sandy Schwartz, and with all the things that were learning, that well be the chief wholesale remarketer for all Rivians someday.

Now they just have to build some.

The name of the Illinois town that Rivian calls home is the perfect adjective to describe Scaringe himself and differentiate him from Musk: Normal. Whereas Teslas cofounder is all bravado and showmanshiphe has weaponized his Twitter account and turned it into a de facto marketing divisionScaringe is soft-spoken and low-key. While Musk is photographed with models and pop stars, Scaringe is a family man, even if he rarely sees his family lately. These days, he lives out of a suitcase, spending five days a week traveling among the companys four offices to make sure things are on schedule. His wife, Meagan, and their three boys (all under 5) see him from Friday night to Sunday evening in their unassuming three-bedroom house near Irvine, California. On Sunday evening, he boards a plane to Michigan and repeats the process to ensure that his larger vision is being realized: thinking globally and acting locally.

When the Mitsubishi plant closed in July 2015, for example, the mood in Normal was decidedly funereal. It hurt, says Mayor Chris Koos. It left over 1,000 people out of work, which causes a ripple effect throughout the community.

Even after the plant was sold to Rivian for $16 million in 2017, residents remained skeptical. That negative sentiment soon changed, however. Rivian showed interest in the lifestyle of the community, the quality of education, affordable housing and access to transportation, Mayor Koos says. The company even had a preview day in Normal last summer to answer any questions from local residents. It made a big impact on Normals perception of Rivian and, not surprisingly, proved valuable when it came to recruiting employees.

With the town onboard, Scaringe is now on a mission to lead Rivian through its first production cycle and expand its line. Though its too early to tell who will win the EV wars, Rivian is one of just a couple of companies that has a strong chance not only to survive, but also thrive, according to Navigants Sam Abuelsamid. He thinks Rivian might even be in a better position going forward than Tesla: If youre talking about whos going to have potentially the most volume, getting more vehicles to market in the near- to mid-term, [Id say] probably Tesla. But from an actual business standpoint, Rivian is in the better position to succeed because of the nature of the products they have.

But first, the rubber has to hit the road.

Get Forbes daily top headlines straight to your inboxfor news on the worlds most important entrepreneurs and superstars, expert career advice and success secrets.

See original here:

Elon Musks New Nemesis: Rivian Founder R.J. Scaringe Has A $3 Billion War Chest And Tesla In His Headlights - Forbes

Why Jeff Bezos might run for president to spite Elon Musk and Donald Trump – The Next Web

Amazon CEO Jeff Bezos is suing Donald Trump over the Pentagons decision to award a lucrative military artificial intelligence and cloud services contract to Microsoft instead of his company. Normally these kinds of lawsuits are yawn-inducing, but this case has some interesting caveats.

And, if youll let me set the stage first, Ill explain why Im convinced the court case will lead to a successful presidential campaign for Jeff Bezos in 2024.

ICYMI: Amazon prepares to strike back after Microsoft wins $10B JEDI contract

The Pentagon started shopping for a partner to build a cloud services suite meant to work as anAI and weapons platform for drone deployment and other battlefield technologies a few years back and, naturally, Amazon was the immediate front-runner. Amazon Web Services is a core technology thats, arguably, far and away ahead of the competition. Nearly every tech expert on record figured the contract was tailor-made for Amazon.

In fact, Oracle sued the government for stacking the deck against everyone else as a response to both the stringent qualifications and the fact that its pretty stupid to use a single-provider cloud service for military infrastructure. Most companies that wanted the contract simply couldnt qualify for it, so everyone assumed Amazon would win.

But Amazon didnt win. And former Secretary James Mattis claims that this was because President Trump ordered him to screw Amazon out of the JEDI contract.

Now, as reported by CNBC on Monday, Amazons lawyers arent just suing the White House over what they consider an improper snub, they are demanding that Donald Trump and former Defense Secretary James Mattis be deposed in court. The big idea here is that Trumps personal vendetta against Jeff Bezos and Amazon is relevant and the Commander in Chief should be held accountable.

The alleged personal vendetta supposedly has a lot to do with The Washington Posts negative coverage of President Trump and, of course, Jeff Bezos owns the Post.

Bezos may not need a big government payout his company is among a handful of businesses valued at over a trillion dollars and hes one of the richest people in the world but he desperately wants one. Hes reportedly jealous of Elon Musks ability to talk the Trump administration and local governments around the US into big-ticket, huge budget deals and yearns to land one of his own.

The companys HQ2 project was supposed to provide that for Bezos and Amazon after drumming up excitement with a reality TV-style contest to see which city would host the new headquarters. Eventually New York and Virginia were to split the campus, but Amazons failure to court local politicians ultimately doomed the deal and Bezos, once again, failed to net the Muskian payout he apparently craves.

Read: Amazons negotiation strategy for HQ2 was called Fuck you. Were Amazon

And that brings us to this seemingly silly lawsuit thats attempting to get the president to sit down for a deposition.

Were this pipe-dream of a legal stipulation to occur, it would mean that President Trump would have to appear in person to answer questions about his alleged feud with Jeff Bezos.

Without spending too much time on legalese and jargon, the odds of a sitting president getting deposed in court in this kind of case are so close to zero as to make it pointless to speculate any further. Its not going to happen.

Trumps being accused of purposefully influencing a $10 billion Defense contract to satisfy a personal vendetta. Arguably, that would be high treason. At a minimum, its something a democratic country would consider illegal.

Amazons reasoning for the suit and the deposition request is, according to court documents, to protect the country from the kind of misuse and abuse of authority the president allegedly exercised in his oversight of the Project JEDI contract process.

A company spokesperson told CNBC:

President Trump has repeatedly demonstrated his willingness to use his position as President and Commander in Chief to interfere with government functions including federal procurements to advance his personal agenda. The preservation of public confidence in the nations procurement process requires discovery and supplementation of the administrative record, particularly in light of President Trumps order to screw Amazon.

The brass tacks that all this comes down to, however, is its either a flex by Amazon and Jeff Bezos just wants to tie up taxpayer dollars and waste President Trumps time (rather, his legal teams), or its a political move paving a path for a 2024 Bezos presidential run.

Okay thats wild speculation, but its not entirely unfeasible. Trumps the best friend that the one-percent has ever had. Simply put: if Bezos cant get a giant payout to throw in Musks face during Trumps second act, he may as well give it up. None of the Democrats running in 2020 are likely to be kind to big tech if theyre elected. And there certainly arent any Republicans in sight whod be chomping at the bit to get in bed with Amazon after the companys tried to depose the King.

As The Wires fictional Omar Little once quipped, You come at the King, you best not miss. And if Amazon thinks that screwing with Trump in court is going to get it any modicum of justice or payback, then the companys genius is severely over-rated. In this case, I think Bezos is smarter than that. Hes stirring up the hornets nest on purpose to prep the media and the public for his political coming out.

Instead of running against Trump in the 2020 race, hell run against Trumps phantom in 2024. Just like Trumps continued to vilify Hillary Clinton at every rally hes held since being elected the first time, Bezos could Trump his political rivals both Democrat and Republican by making his campaign all about Trump. Its a strategy thats worked extremely well for The Donald.

Well, that and digitally gerrymandering the election using Facebook, Twitter, and Cambridge Analytica. However, Jeff Bezos isnt exactly Hillary Clinton his tech savvy and resources might make a bigger difference than other democratic candidates assuming of course Bezos runs as a Dem. Im thinking he might try to pull a Ross Perot and resurrect the idea of a strong third-party candidate.

If Bezos spends the next four years drumming up his feud with Trump during speaking engagements and media appearances, well get the opportunity to see if the smartest person in the room can win against the biggest bully. It could set the stage for a Bezos versus the field election atmosphere in 2024.

And, in a world where hearts and minds are won online, itll be interesting to see how the CEO of one of the worlds largest AI companies does in that arena against the Tweeter in Chief.

Id say its about 50-50 whether Bezos runs. Trumps made the Emoluments Clause obsolete, so Bezos wouldnt have to lose money or divest, hed just stop being CEO of his companies for his term. And, lets not forget that alongside the Post and Amazon, Bezos owns a spaceship company called Blue Origin thats played second fiddle to Elon Musks SpaceX when it comes to government contracts. Theres plenty of incentive for the Amazon chief to take his shot in 2024.

Then again, Bezos has also gone on the record saying he was too happy with his life and running his companies to consider the presidency. So maybe its a scenario too outrageous even for US politics. Lets hope so.

Whats left of US democracy may not withstand the threat wed face with the head of the company that owns Ring and provides law enforcement with facial recognition software getting himself elected just to stick it to his enemies.

Youre here because you want to learn more about artificial intelligence. So do we. So this summer, were bringing Neural to TNW Conference 2020, where we will host a vibrant program dedicated exclusively to AI. With keynotes by experts from companies like Spotify, RSA, and Medium, our Neural track will take a deep dive into new innovations, ethical problems, and how AI can transform businesses. Get your early bird ticket and check out the full Neural track.

Published February 12, 2020 21:18 UTC

Here is the original post:

Why Jeff Bezos might run for president to spite Elon Musk and Donald Trump - The Next Web

Why Elon Musk’s SpaceX Is Thinking Bigger – The Motley Fool

In a world of big-thinking tech CEOs, Elon Musk thinks bigger than most.

Seemingly single-handedly, Musk first pioneered and then advanced the acceptance of electric cars as mass-market vehicles, solar power as an alternative to oil, and ... the possibility that Mars could be colonized.

But as revolutionary as all those ideas may sound, it's Elon Musk's plans for his space company SpaceX that could be the real earth-shaker.

Actual photo -- not an "artist's depiction" -- of SpaceX Starship MK1. Image source: SpaceX.

Specifically, his plans for the new "Starship" spacecraft that SpaceX is currently developing.

To refresh your memory, Starship is the new working title for the reusable rocket that SpaceX once called "BFR," and that it plans to test-fly later this year. It's designed to be built in two parts: Starship proper, which will carry up to 100 passengers, 100 tons of cargo, or a combination of the two, will stand 160 feet tall and have a diameter of 30 feet. Equipped with six Raptor engines, Starship will be able to launch from, land on, and travel between planets with low gravity -- even landing back on Earth.

Boosting Starship into orbit from Earth will be a SuperHeavy rocket that's even bigger -- 223 feet by 30. Powered by 37 Raptor engines, SuperHeavy will be the most powerful rocket in history (meaning it can carry more payload, and travel farther). In fact, with a liftoff thrust of 72 meganewtons, SuperHeavy will be twice as powerful as the Saturn V rocket that carried Americans to the moon.

Combined with Starship, the combined vessel will stand 20 feet taller than the Saturn V.

In a series of tweets published across Twitter last month, Musk laid out some big numbers for what he expects Starship to accomplish in the coming months and years.

Now, to be clear, Starship hasn't even launched yet, although an "MK1" version was assembled and stood up at SpaceX's Boca Chica, Texas, test site, and abbreviated versions of the craft dubbed "Starhoppers" have taken short "hop" test flights. But overlooking that minor detail, in January Musk tweeted out his hope that SpaceX will eventually be building as many as 100 reusable Starships per year, building toward a fleet numbering 1,000 Starships or more.

Now, if you read the rest of that tweet, you know that Musk also predicted that each of these reusable Starships will be designed to accomplish three flights to orbit (and back) per day on average, carrying up to 100 tons of cargo on each trip. The idea is to rapidly shuttle cargo from Earth to Earth orbit, there to be loaded aboard other Starships that will eventually travel from Earth to Mars caravan-style.

Thus, many of the Starships Musk wants to build will be parked in orbit, accepting and stowing away cargo from the shuttles flying to and fro beneath them, preparing for the day when the caravan departs Earth. The actual shuttling of cargo will be done by 10 or so workhorse Starships. (And about 10 years after all this begins, in what's sure to be one heck of a fireworks display, 1,000 Starships may launch over a period of just a few days, carrying up to 100,000 colonists who will accompany the supplies on a trip to colonize Mars.)

Let's put a pin in that Mars idea, though, which seems so ambitious that even tech fans like CNET say getting all the moving parts to work would verge on the "miraculous."

Consider just the more practical numbers:

100 Starships built per year. To wrap your head around how astounding that prediction is, last year every country on Earth, combined, built and launched only 103 rockets -- none anywhere near as big as Starship, and none, except those built by SpaceX, reusable.

Starships flying three times per day. Most space companies today (which is to say everyone other than SpaceX) build their rockets and throw them away after just one use.

Three flights per day ... for 20 to 30 years. In one final tweet, Musk revealed that SpaceX is designing Starship to have a 20- to 30-year lifespan -- "like aircraft."

Not to put too fine a point on it, but if even a fraction of what Musk is promising comes to pass, SpaceX is soon going to be entirely in a class by itself. With its operating costs reduced to essentially the cost of refueling his spaceships, "changing the oil, and rotating the tires" after each launch -- while everyone SpaceX is competing against has to build an entirely new spaceship for each and every launch -- no other company on Earth is going to be able to come close to competing with SpaceX on price.

So whether the future for SpaceX is "Mars colonization" or supplying a moon base for NASA, putting satellites into orbit cheaper, or even transporting people and cargo by rocketship from point to point on Earth, this company's costs are going to be pennies on the dollar compared to what everyone else has to charge.

If I were CEO of a company that competes with SpaceX today -- or of one even contemplating competing with SpaceX on any of these endeavors in the future -- right now, I'd be very nervous indeed.

Read this article:

Why Elon Musk's SpaceX Is Thinking Bigger - The Motley Fool

Elon Musk and Donald Trump Are on Their Way to a Moonstruck Bromance – The Daily Beast

President Donald Trump has been fretting about Boeing for some time. Its a very disappointing company, he said while at the Davos World Economic Forum last month. This is one of the greatest companies of the world, lets say as of a year ago, and all of a sudden things happened.

And they just keep happening.

We just learned that Boeings new Starliner space capsule designed to take U.S. astronauts to the International Space Station had flawed software that could have led to a catastrophic failure. This only emerged as NASA was investigating another flaw that in December sent an unmanned test flight off course and caused it to be curtailed without reaching deep space.

As first reported by Space News, the newly uncovered flaw was so serious that Paul Hill, a member of NASAs Safety Advisory Panel, said, The panel has a larger concern with the rigor of Boeings verification processes. Further, with confidence at risk for a spacecraft that is intended to carry humans in space, the panel recommends an even broader Boeing assessment of, and corrective actions in, the testing.

This is a pretty stunning development, since it was problems with new software that were at the heart of the biggest crisis ever to hit Boeing, following two crashes of the Boeing 737MAX jet that killed 346 peoplea crisis that has severely damaged the companys reputation and led to a grounding of the airplane that has so far cost it at least $16 billion.

Trump wants Americans back on the moon before the end of what he confidently expects to be his second term, by 2024.

What is particularly alarming about the new revelations is that the failures occurred in another and entirely separate Boeing division, the aerospace division contracted by NASA to provide a new generation of launch vehicles that ultimately are intended to return U.S. astronauts to the moon.

This suggests that the failure to detect flawed engineering that has a specific and direct bearing on safety, whether of airline passengers or astronauts, is endemic throughout Boeing, and not just the commercial airplane division.

And this is where Trumps disenchantment with Boeing becomes hugely consequential. He wants Americans back on the moon before the end of what he confidently expects to be his second term, by 2024. That deadline has put NASA under intense pressure. Until Trump set his own deadline they were not planning to be able to put boots on the Moon until at least 2026indeed, one anonymous NASA engineer said that all that they could deliver to the moon by 2024 was a pair of boots.

But as Boeings star falls in Trumps reckoning another has risen with the panache and confidence of a true disruptor: Elon Musk. In fact, be prepared for an unlikely bromance between Trump and Musk.

This was foreshadowed when the president, in an interview with CNBC, also at Davos, delivered a remarkable, if somewhat incoherent, encomium of Musk: He likes rockets. And he does good at rockets, too, by the way. I never saw where the engines come down with no wings, no anything, and theyre landing. I said Ive never seen that before. Hes one of the worlds great geniuses, we have to protect all of these people that came up with originally the light bulb and the wheel and all of these things. And hes one of our very smart people, and we want to cherish those people.

Musk has been getting the presidents attention because his SpaceX company is disrupting the conventional space launch business as much as his car company, Tesla, is disrupting the conventional auto industry. Boeings latest fiasco serves to show just how that contest is playing out.

Once NASA decided to outsource space launches to private industry, albeit under its own supervision, two groups were contracted to provide the booster rockets and the vehicles required for three things: to carry astronauts, to carry cargo, and to launch the next generation of government satellites. The two groups were the United Launch Alliance, ULA, combining Boeing and Lockheed Martinand SpaceX .

Musk decided to offer something the ULA could notbooster rockets that were reusable, rather than ending their only flight as pieces of junk falling into the ocean. So far SpaceX has done this 44 times, using some of the boosters as many as three times. Nobody else in the world has that ability. SpaceX has designed, built and launched three generations of rockets into orbit and is building a fourth, as well as launching 60 small satellites into orbit.

And while the Boeing Starliner capsule is now grounded awaiting fixes to its software, Musks rival Dragon capsule has already made a successful six-day unmanned test flight to the International Space Stationand demonstrated that in the event of an aborted launch because of a failed booster the capsule can self-eject and return the astronauts safely to earth. Its only a matter of months now before the SpaceX capsule will be ready to fly astronauts.

Patricia Sanders, head of the NASA Safety Review Panel, said last week that its assessment of the SpaceX program is at a point where there is not a question of whether they will be flying crew in the near term, but when, and under what risk conditions.

Boeings problems with NASA run deep. The flawed software governed the capsules critical re-entry into the earths atmosphere at the end of a mission. If undetected the flaws would have fired the wrong thrusters when the capsule separated from its service module (which remains in orbit while the capsule carrying the astronauts is put into a very precise trajectory for re-entry).

That would have caused a collision that, the NASA investigation showed, could have damaged the capsules heat shield and sent it tumbling into space, dooming the crew.

The discovery of this flaw was taken so seriously that NASA was forced to reassess its own oversight procedures. Our oversight was insufficient said Douglas Loverro, the associate administrator for human explorations. This problem echoes what happened with the 737MAX program, where the FAA had to admit that its oversight of Boeing had been far too lax. The message is clear: every new Boeing project has now to be closely watched by regulators.

Boeings problems with NASA run deep.

Boeing has already said it is taking a $419 million charge against earnings to cover the cost of having to make a second uncrewed flight with the capsule before it can advance to a manned flight. Boeing said it accepted the suggestions from the NASA panel as well as recommendations from a separate NASA review team.

Lets be clear. SpaceX is not solely the work of one of the worlds great geniuses. Musk is clearly a visionary but he is also the kind of leader who builds a successful company culture by giving other talents the chance to prove themselves. From its beginning SpaceX has been significantly steered by Gwynne Shotwell, who is now the president and chief operating officer and responsible for the quality of its engineers.

She told an investor conference last October: I think engineers think better when theyre pushed hardest to do great things in a very short period of time, with very few resources. She pointedly made the contrast between SpaceX and the industry behemoths that she competes with: Boeing and Lockheed like their cushy situation.

Trump needs all the help he can get if he is to fulfill his aim of returning American astronauts to the moon by 2024. Who else is there for him to turn toand to cherishbut a man he thinks might re-invent the wheel?

Read the original:

Elon Musk and Donald Trump Are on Their Way to a Moonstruck Bromance - The Daily Beast

Cuomo’s business czar says Tesla’s Buffalo site is ‘hustling and bustling’ – Times Union

ALBANY - Will Elon Musk's visit to Tesla's "Buffalo Billion" solar panel factory be as much of a flop as his Cybertruck fiasco?

New York state economic development officials are hoping it won't be.

Musk is personally planning to visit Tesla's so-called Gigafactory 2 at the RiverBend campus in Buffalo in April, the same month when the plant must meet a key employment goal or pay a $41.2 million penalty to the state.

Back in November, Tesla stock tanked more than five percent after the car maker's chief designer was able to smash the windows of the new Cybertruck that were supposed to be bullet-proof. Following the episode, Musk's personal fortune fell $768 million in one day due, or about as much as it cost the state to build Gigafactory 2.

RiverBend was part of Gov. Andrew Cuomo's so-called Buffalo Billion strategy that saw the state spend nearly a billion dollars to build the facility for Tesla in a project that was rife with corruption and led to the downfall of SUNY Polytechnic Institute founder Alain Kaloyeros and a Buffalo area developer.

April is an important month for the company, which is required under the terms of its lease with the state of New York to have 1,460 employees working at the solar panel factory by April 30.

Members of the Legislature grilled Empire State Development CEO Eric Gertler on Thursday at a state budget hearing, asking him whether he was prepared to fine Telsa the $41.2 million penalty should the company miss the deadline.

"Will you enforce this clawback and tell us how you are going to (verify) the 1,460 jobs?" Buffalo-area Democrat Assemblyman Robin Schimminger asked Gertler.

Gertler did not directly answer Schimminger's question.Instead, he said he had visited the RiverBend facility last week and liked what he saw.

"I was pleased to see the facility hustling and bustling," Gertler replied. "To see a facility that is focusing on the green economy, which is an industry of the future, was exciting to see."

Although Gertler said that as of last year the Telsa factory had 500 employees, he did not say how many people worked there now.

However, Buffalo Mayor Byron Brown has reportedly said that Tesla is now at 1,100 workers at RiverBend with two months to go to add 360 additional workers. Telsa officials couldn't immediately be reached to confirm its employment numbers at the Buffalo solar panel factory.

"I can tell you they are doing a lot of hiring," Gertler said. "They've hired individuals from some of the training centers in and around Buffalo. There was a lot of money that's been dedicated to that, and we're in the business of jobs. If by April 30, they do not reach the 1,460 jobs, then as you pointed out, we're going to move to enforce that penalty. ... The ESD team is focused on making sure they do that hiring."

Republican Assemblyman Christopher Friend, who is from the Southern Tier but attended school in Buffalo, quizzed Gertler also about the Tesla deal, asking him how much of the 1.2-million-square-foot RiverBend facility is being used by Tesla.

"From what I saw, it was being well-used," Gertler said. "They've added a lot of different lines."

One of the new lines is not a solar panel line but a Tesla car charging station production line. Telsa has also sublet some of the facility to Panasonic.

"They're doing other things," Gertler said about what he saw when he toured the facility last week. "Is the facility being used? It is. It seemed to be pretty full."

Link:

Cuomo's business czar says Tesla's Buffalo site is 'hustling and bustling' - Times Union

In theaters – Duluth News Tribune

"Blumhouse's Fantasy Island"

The enigmatic Mr. Roarke makes the secret dreams of his lucky guests come true at a luxurious but remote tropical resort, but when the fantasies turn into nightmares, the guests have to solve the island's mystery in order to escape with their lives. PG-13, 2:36, Premiere, Duluth 10, Lakes 10

"Downhill"

A woman starts to have second doubts about her husband after he runs away from an approaching avalanche, leaving her and their two sons behind. R, 1:26, Premiere

"The Photograph"

When famed photographer Christina Eames dies unexpectedly, her estranged daughter, Mae, finds a photograph tucked away. She soon finds herself delving into her mother's early life an investigation that leads to an unexpected romance with a rising journalist. PG-13, 1:46, Duluth 10

"Sonic the Hedgehog"

Sonic tries to navigate the complexities of life on Earth with his newfound best friend -- a human named Tom Wachowski. They must soon join forces to prevent the evil Dr. Robotnik from capturing Sonic and using his powers for world domination. PG, 1:40, Premiere, Duluth 10, Lakes 10

"Pocahontas"

This is the Disney animated tale of the romance between a young American Indian woman named Pocahontas (Irene Bedard) and Capt. John Smith (Mel Gibson). G, 1:31, screens Friday through Sunday only, Duluth 10.

Second annual Classic Horse Movie Night screens "The Man From Snowy River," 6:30 p.m. today, Feb. 13, Zeitgeist Teatro, 222 E. Superior St. Doors open at 5:30 p.m. with happy hour and silent auction. Tickets: $10 for adults, $5 for youth.

The director and executive producers of "The Hunter," a full-length narrative art film shot in Duluth and currently in post-producton, will be hosting a Cinematic Evening," with sample footage, 6:30 p.m. Saturday, Feb. 15, Zeitgeist Teatro Zuccone, 222 E. Superior St.

"1917"

During World War I, two British soldiers Lance Cpl. Schofield and Lance Cpl. Blake receive seemingly impossible orders. In a race against time, they must cross over into enemy territory to deliver a message that could potentially save 1,600 of their fellow comrades including Blake's own brother. R, 1:59, Premiere, Duluth 10, West, Lakes 10

"Bad Boys for Life"

Old-school cops Mike Lowery (Will Smith) and Marcus Burnett (Martin Lawrence) team up to take down the vicious leader of a Miami drug cartel. R, 2:04, Duluth 10, Lakes 10

"Bombshell"

When Gretchen Carlson slaps Fox News founder Roger Ailes with a lawsuit alleging sexual harassment, not a soul could predict what would happen next. Her decision leads to Fox News correspondent Megyn Kelly coming forward with her own story, as well as multiple other women, inciting a movement that reverberates around the world. R, 1:49, Zinema 2 Note: 7 p.m. Sunday, Feb. 16 screening offers open captioning.

"Doolittle"

Dr. John Dolittle (Robert Downey Jr.) lives in solitude behind the high walls of his lush manor in 19th-century England. His only companionship comes from an array of exotic animals that he speaks to on a daily basis. But when young Queen Victoria becomes gravely ill, the eccentric doctor and his furry friends embark on an epic adventure to a mythical island to find the cure. PG, 1:31, Premiere, Duluth 10, Lakes 10

"Frozen II"

Elsa the Snow Queen and her sister, Anna, embark on an adventure far away from the kingdom of Arendelle. They are joined by friends, Kristoff, Olaf and Sven. PG, 1:43, Lakes 10

"Gretel & Hansel"

A girl and her younger brother unwittingly stumble upon the house of an evil witch in the dark woods. PG-13, 1:27, Duluth 10

"Harley Quinn: Birds of Prey"

After splitting with the Joker, Harley Quinn joins superheroes Black Canary, Huntress and Renee Montoya to save a young girl from an evil crime lord, Black Mask in Gotham City. R, 1:49, Premiere, Duluth 10, Lakes 10

"Jumanji: The Next Level"

When Spencer goes back into the fantastical world of Jumanji, pals Martha, Fridge and Bethany re-enter the game to bring him home. But everything about Jumanji is about to change, as they soon discover more obstacles and more danger to overcome. PG-13, 2:03, Lakes 10

"Knives Out"

A detective and a trooper travel to a lush estate to interview the quirky relatives of a patriarch who died during his 85th birthday celebration. PG-13, 2:10, Zinema 2

"Little Women"

Following the lives of four sisters, Amy, Jo, Beth and Meg, as they come of age in America in the aftermath of the Civil War. Though all very different from each other, the March sisters stand by each other through difficult and changing times. PG, 2:15, Duluth 10

"Parasite"

Greed and class discrimination threaten the newly formed symbiotic relationship between the wealthy Park family and the destitute Kim clan. R, 2:12, Duluth 10, Zinema 2

"Star Wars: The Rise of Skywalker"

The surviving Resistance faces the First Order once more as Rey, Finn and Poe Dameron's journey continues. With the power and knowledge of generations behind them, the final battle commences. PG-13, 2:22, Duluth 10, Lakes 10

Summaries from IMDb and official movie websites.

Read more here:

In theaters - Duluth News Tribune

Dora Maars Surrealist Photography Eclipses Her Reputation as a Modernist Muse – ARTnews

Large-scale retrospective exhibitions at major venues generally serve to cement a leading artists place even more firmly in the canon, but they rarely change peoples minds. The recent Andy Warhol exhibition at the Whitney Museum of American Art in New York or the Joan Mir show at the Grand Palais in Paris, for example, basically gave a certain amount of shading and definition to a well-known body of work, while affirming for a wider audience the artists ongoing importance. Surveys of less familiar but still well-established figures like Francis Picabia or Simon Hanta (at the Museum of Modern Art, New York, and the Centre Pompidou, Paris, respectively) have taken pains to highlight unexpected facets of their oeuvres, so that we say, I didnt know they did that. And finally, certain monographic shows, driven by the efforts of an important critical thinkerscholar and curator Kirk Varnedoe on behalf of Gustave Caillebotte, for example, or biographer Hayden Herrera for Frida Kahlohave resulted in an artist long considered second-tier being vaulted into prominence, their work suddenly aligned with the contemporary zeitgeist.

The case of Dora Maar, however, is intriguingly different. The subject last summer of a full-scale Centre Pompidou survey that is now at Tate Modern in London (and travels this spring to the Getty Center in Los Angeles), Maar, for contemporary audiences, especially non-French ones, was until recently virtually unknown as an artist. If remembered at all, she was thought of as one of Picassos longer-lasting love interests, slotted in between Marie-Thrse Walter and Franoise Gilot, or maybe as the subject of Picassos famous 1937 series Weeping Woman, but scarcely as an important artist in her own right. Yet to see her simply as Picassos muse is to sell her seriously short.

The traveling exhibitiontitled simply Dora Maar and featuring well over four hundred works and documentsputs that error to right, offering an in-depth examination of a productive and multifaceted artist, a photographer and painter of real interest and complexity. In addition, the catalogue and various responding articles open up an expanded view of the Surrealist enterprise and of the French art world of the late 1920s through the 1940s. These texts bring into focus not just Maars considerable contributions but also those of a network of women friendsincluding Jacqueline Lamba, Nusch luard, Lee Miller, Claude Cahun, Rogi Andr, and Lise Deharmeall of whom were part of the Surrealist circle.

Maar (19071997) led a long and complex life. She was born Henriette Thodora Markovitch (Dora was a childhood nickname) in Paris to a French Catholic mother and a Croatian architect father who was quite possibly Jewishalthough Dora, a fervent Catholic from the mid-40s onward, denied it. She spent her early years in Buenos Aires, where her father went to practice. Fluent in both French and Spanish, she traveled back and forth between Paris and Buenos Aires, going to school in both places, until she returned to France permanently with her mother in 1920. In 1923 Markovitch (as she was then still known) began her art studies at the Union centrale des Arts dcoratifs, a school that prepared young women for careers in the decorative arts. There, she became involved in the citys cultural scene and met a lifelong friend, the painter Jacqueline Lamba, who was to become the second wife of Andr Breton, the acknowledged leader (and gatekeeper) of the Surrealists. Following graduation, Markovitch attended classes at the Acadmie Julian and at the atelier of painter Andr Lhote. At Lhotes studio, she got to know Henri Cartier-Bresson, then still determined to be a painter. Urged by her friend the art critic Marcel Zahar, Markovitch enrolled in the cole technique de photographie et de cinematographie. In 1927 she took the advice of Emmanuel Sougez, the photography director of the magazine LIllustration, and abandoned painting to pursue photography.

This was both a practical decision and an artistically fruitful one. Although she was to shift her focus away from photography in the later 30s to return to painting, the camera allowed Maar to fully hone her technical skills and develop the wide-ranging aesthetic that gives her work a strong claim on our attention today. Painters of any stripe had a hard time making a go of it in interwar Paris, and women faced additional obstacles. But photography, being a more multivalent enterprise in which the line between the artistic and the commercial was hazy, provided ambitious women a better chance of finding a place in the creative world and earning a living from their work. The medium scarcely challenged painting or sculpture for preeminence, and this enabled women photographers like Maar and her friends to get past the defenses of men who were artists themselves or who wrote about them. In addition, photography carried with it a strong sense of the fashionable and sexysomething that the Surrealists were especially keen to cultivate. In this exhibition, photographys relationship with Surrealism (seemingly obvious now, but not so earlier on) is clearly and thought-provokingly evident.

In the late 20s and 30s there were not the same clear-cut divisions between photographic disciplines that came later. Maar could, at roughly the same time, produce high-end fashion photographs, artful advertising pictures, flattering studio portraits, figure studies, soft-core pornography for a charm magazine, gritty street scenes, documentary shots, politically inflected images, rigorous formal compositions, and the complex, disturbing, and beautifully crafted Surrealist photomontages that are her most memorable creations. When she returned to art photography later in life, she investigated direct gestural manipulation of the negative, producing striking work that is entirely abstract.

Maar approached the craft of photography carefully and deliberately, picking up technical expertise and cultivating the sort of contacts that she would need. She met Brassa as he was starting out on his career in photography and shared a studio with him in Montparnasse. She also became friendly with Man Ray, who offered his help and advice, and with his then lover Lee Miller. She worked as the assistant to a successful fashion photographer, Harry Ossip Meerson, whose studio was on the same street as Rays. In 1931 she formed a professional partnership with Pierre Kfer, a film-set designer, and they opened a studio. At that point, she changed her professional name to Dora Maara shortening of Markovitchand for a number of years her photographs were stamped with Kfer-Dora Maar, although she likely did almost all the actual photography.

Maars fashion and advertising photography feels remarkably advanced, subordinating obvious glamour to Surrealist-inspired invention. Les annes vous guettent (The Years Lie in Wait for You), ca. 1935, probably used in an advertisement for an anti-aging cream, shows a spider in its web superimposed in white over the beautiful, pensive face of Maars close friend Nusch luard, wife of the Surrealist poet Paul luard. Nuschs face is placed above the centerline of the frame, and to the left, with the spider set directly between her eyes. The lighting (a specialty of Maars) is both soft and highly contrasted. It is a strange and compelling image, and if we were not aware that this was an advertising picture, we would see it as a successful artistic photograph in its own right.

The same might be said for Shampooing, or Femme aux cheveux avec savon (Shampoo, or Womans Hair with Soap), 1934, an elongated horizontal image, which consists of a womans head in profile, her hair whitened with soap and flying out straight in front of her. Hands push at the back of her scalp, seemingly setting the hair in motion. The image looks like a Greek or Roman bust, but an extraordinarily strange one.

Even the more straightforward fashion pictures, like a 1935 image of a model in a white satin dress, are imbued with individuality and invention. The photograph was shot from a low angle, the models body canted, her head in the corner of the frame, and her long gloved arm set at an angle to the bodys tilt. The photo features full Caravaggio-style chiaroscuro, and the models smoothly crimped blond hair and impassive face again bring to mind Classical statuary seen through a Surrealist lens. Moreover, the dress with its stiffened, vaguely fleur-de-lis bodice is odd but completely gorgeous. It is, of course, much easier to see these photographs as art when they are taken out of the context of advertisements, framed and printed on good paper, isolated and stripped of their utility and ready recognizability by both the passage of time and the removal of text.

Advertising photography at the time set its sights on the expanding womens market, promoting the idea of the modern woman as independent, adventurous, and athletic. This was largely an alluring commercial fiction. Most womenbound to the home, shop, or factorydid not enjoy that degree of liberty, but Maar and her friends actually lived such lives. And they put their exceptional autonomy to use. Even while Maar did work for hire that highlighted glamour and fashion, she was actively engaged with the political left, associating herself with the agitprop theater company Groupe Octobre, joining the anti-fascist group Contre-Attaque (founded by Georges Bataille and Breton), signing petitions, and participating in explicitly partisan exhibitions and projects. In line with her social convictions, she traveled to London and Barcelona to photograph, quite sensitively, working-class people.

Untitled (Blind street peddler, Barcelona), 1933, shows a man dressed in a white smock sitting on a chair in front of a closed, corrugated storefront gate, his head tilted slightly to the side and up. Impassive and unsmiling, he presents a kind of internal stare, cradling a rounded, cloth-wrapped object in his left arm while delicately gripping a white bowl in his right. His scuffed-up white cane is hooked over his left thigh and under his right. The subtle play of diagonalsthe angle of his head, the counterbalanced slant of his shoulders, the differing tilt of the objects he is holdingcreates an image that combines stillness with the potential for movement. More than anything, the pose evokes in the quietest of ways a Madonna and child or a piet.

Balancing the somber feeling of that photograph is the jolly picture of four laughing people at la Boquera, Barcelonas lively (and still active) food market. Caught in a geometric composition, they all apparently work at a charcuterie stand, amid a welter of hanging scales, meat on hooks, and assorted lights, chains, and wires. One of the women rubs or playfully covers one eye with her hand; another has placed a hand on her forehead. The four are clearly chummy, working hard but enjoying themselves. Maars photographs of laborers, the unemployed, and the marginalized are never sentimental or condescending, and never overtly ideological. Taken in the midst of the Depression, the pictures capture, above all, their subjects humanity. In the process Maar creates images of real compositional and tonal complexity, imbued with the same technical expertise and idiosyncratic formal sensibility that characterize her other photographic work.

Maars Surrealist photos, her best-known work, use the full range of her skillsespecially darkroom techniquescombined with the new freedom of imagination and the loosened expectation of logical causality that Surrealism allowed its practitioners. Most of the examples are collages, re-photographed to remove them from the realm of handiwork. This gives the pictures a smooth, distanced surface, drawing on photographys implied verisimilitude to convey a dreamlike uncanniness, a cognitive ambiguity.

One of Maars most affecting reshot photo-collages is Le Simulateur (The Pretender), 1935. To create it, she used one of her Barcelona street photos, which features three young boys hanging out on the street. One of thembent sharply backward, feet over head, but supported upright somehowseems to be walking up a wall. For the new photograph Maar excises this figure and places his feet on the ground in a torqued, claustrophobic stone hallway. The architectural structure is a detail from an old photographic print of the Palace of Versailles, and the mood evoked is one of barely contained hysteria. Hysteria is no longer used as a term for a specific psychiatric condition, but the Surrealists were especially fond of the conceptseeing it as a useful tool (rather like automatism or dreaming) and a portal to another state of reality. Hysteria was, for them, something to be cultivated rather than cured.

Maars single most famous Surrealist picture, Portrait dUbu (1936), is a straight photograph, but a deeply strange one. Softly lit, closely cropped, it depicts a not immediately recognizable creature (in all likelihood an armadillo or an armadillo fetus) set against a dark background. The subject is scaly, rubbery, and clawed, with a bulbous head, a long snout, and darkened partially hooded eyes (only one of which is turned to the lens). It gazes at us with indifference mingled with menace, and the image speaks of the irony-tinged cruelty that so fascinated the Surrealists. The title of the photograph is to the point. Pre Ubu, the kingly character created at the end of the nineteenth century by the playwright Alfred Jarry, was a favorite of the Surrealists (who also esteemed the Marquis de Sade). Ubu is funny, absurd, ridiculously arbitrary and impulsive, but also cowardly, cruel, grasping, and viciousa concoction of pure id.

In the mid-30s, Surrealism was well entrenched in the French cultural scene. Its combination of transgression, mystery, eroticism, and political engagement, along with a call for total personal freedom, proved irresistible to manyamong them, not surprisingly, Picasso. The Surrealists were a tightly knit group, so once he became associated with the movement, it was inevitable that he would cross paths with Maar. They first met, according to Brassa, in late 1935, and drew closer to each other in 1936. They became a couple, but their relationship was fatally damaged by Picassos affair with Franoise Gilot, whom he met in 1943 and became seriously involved with the following year. Maar and Picasso broke up completely in 1946.

But back when they originally got together, Picasso was already in his mid-fifties, more than twenty-five years older than Maar, and as renowned as any contemporary artist in France. Although he famously possessed a forceful character, Maar was a formidable and independent woman and could well hold her ownin the early part of their relationship, at least. Maar and Picasso worked closely together, she giving him technical advice and helping with photographically related prints, he inspiring her art.

Importantly, Maar documented the painting of Picassos mural Guernica, from May 11, 1937 (shortly after its beginning on May 1), to its completion on June 4. Photographing such a huge painting was a technically daunting job, made more difficult by the studios poor lighting, and required extensive darkroom work. The visual record was commissioned by Christian Zervos for his journal Cahiers dart. Maars eight pictures show a fascinating evolution, highlighting Picassos concentration on the interplay of light and dark and reinforcing the black-and-white paintings connection with photography. Not only was Picasso intimately involved with a photographer who was a darkroom expert and thus keenly aware of the emergence and control of tones, but the images of devastation that inspired the painting were black-and-white shots from newspapers and the newsreels that Picasso, a regular moviegoer, in all likelihood saw. While infused with a host of art historical references, Guernica, shown at the Spanish Pavilion of the 1937 Paris International Exposition and used to generate support for the embattled Republican government, was also intensely of its momentsomething that its photographic connection clearly reinforced.

In the summer of 1937, evidently under Picassos influence, Maar returned to painting. Her artistic production during their relationship was closely attuned to his. The lively, colorful Cubist work from the late 30s, seen to good effect in two nicely articulated pastel portraits of Picasso, is skillfully executed and well-composed, but the paintings of the war years, including various fully recognizable still lifes along with more abstracted images like La Cage (1943) and Les Quais de la Seine (1944), touch us more directly. Like Picassos works from the same period, they use a subdued and darkened palette and employ a limited set of objects and forms. They are quiet, somber works, imbued with the air of sadness and fear that pervaded occupied France.

In the immediate postwar years, Maar, although embarked on a promising painting career, withdrew from the world of exhibitions. She continued to work on her own, but the momentum was broken. Those times were difficult for Maar. She suffered a nervous breakdown in 1945, and was hospitalized and treated with electroshock therapy (by Jacques Lacan). In 1946, her old friend Nusch luard collapsed and died from a cerebral hemorrhage while they were having lunch together. Soon thereafter, her relationship with Picasso came to a definitive end. These were real blows, but Maar was, as ever, determined and resourceful. Fortified by her religious faith, she persevered. Before her split from Picasso, she hadwith his helpbought a house in the southern French town of Mnerbes, where she would spend part of the year for the rest of her life. She had many friends there, including the painter Nicolas de Stal, and maintained an active socialand, to a certain extent, professionallife in Paris and Provence for a number of years.

Maar continued painting, producing a wide range of works, from portraiture to semi-abstract landscapes to gestural works to complex geometric constructions. None of her postwar works remotely resembled Picassos. She also resumed her photographic investigations, moving away from easily read imagery to photograms and abstract manipulated prints and negatives. The late works are technically and conceptually adventurous, and in the case of some of the untitled hand-colored negatives from the 1980s, ravishingly beautiful. One particularly appealing image features a diagonal wave of color, rising from left to right, held in check by a transparent linear geometric form that picks up the swoop of the wave, but transforms its colors into bright reds, lavenders, and yellow-oranges.

Maars life and art encapsulate a most interesting set of concerns and problems. Chief among them is the place of a varied oeuvre. A wide-ranging practice is fine if you are, say, Gerhard Richter or Picassoartists not just of great material, stylistic, and formal variety, but of immense productivity. It has traditionally been a harder struggle, however, for women who have moved between mediums to convince the world that they are suitably focused and serious. Being associated, as Maar was, with a much better-known male artist (a vexed status shared with her contemporary, the brilliantly inventive Sophie Taeuber-Arp) makes that problem all the more difficult. Maars overall career amply illustrates the importance of luck, persistence, and a long-sustained presence in the art world. It also exposes the double-edged nature of fashionability (what is most au courantas certain aspects of Surrealism once wereinevitably falls quite out of favor in due time), as well as the iffy-ness of a career push offered by a romantic association with a powerful artista real plus (especially at the beginning) but one that comes at a high reputational price.

We are fortunate that the curatorstwo photography specialists from the Pompidou and one from the Gettyput this thorough and well-researched exhibition into play now. The times are ripe for a deepened appreciation of the role of photography in early to mid-twentieth-century art, particularly in relation to Surrealism, and it is now accepted that stylistic and material diversity in a larger oeuvre is not a negative. But most of all, there is a consensus, many years in the making, that women have been seriously underrepresented, that the history of modernism is not a closed book nor a zero-sum game, and that women need to be given their due. Maars well-deserved ascendance from obscurity to serious institutional acceptance does nothing to diminish the accomplishments of others, but rather gives added resonance to a period of great aesthetic, social, intellectual, and political interest, showing us in the process a very fine artist at work.

1 The ground for this retrospective was prepared by four smaller museum exhibitions that originated in Europe between 1997 and 2014. (See the Chronology section of Damarice Amao, Amanda Maddox, and Karolina Ziebinska-Lewandowska, eds, Dora Maar, Los Angeles, J. Paul Getty Museum, 2019, p. 191.) Previously, Maar was very much under the radar. When she died in 1997, her art was auctioned off, most of it in barely documented lots. The sale did generate a good deal of public interest, but only because it included several Picassos that Maar had owned.2 Having Jewish roots in France during the war put you at considerable risk. While Maar stayed in France with Picasso, her father returned to the safety of Buenos Aires shortly after France was occupied.3 Surrealist photographythat is, work that is Surrealist in itself rather than depicting Surrealist artoccupied a relatively small place in the movements major exhibitions, which concentrated on objects and paintings. Photography was more commonly included in publications connected to Surrealism. The current reevaluation of Surrealisms relation to photography started in earnest with Photographic Surrealism (1979) at the New Gallery (now the Museum) of Contemporary Art, Cleveland, and gathered momentum in the early 80s. Today it would be scarcely thinkable to have a broadly based Surrealist show without a sizable photographic presence.

This article appears under the title The Missing Surrealist in the February 2020 issue, pp. 4047.

Originally posted here:

Dora Maars Surrealist Photography Eclipses Her Reputation as a Modernist Muse - ARTnews

Jane Fonda Is Building an Army to Defend the Earth with Fire Drill Fridays Movement – IndieWire

Los Angeles City Hall was packed with hundreds of climate change activists and several celebrities Friday morning. Though their backgrounds were diverse speakers ranged from indigenous community leaders to actors Jane Fonda and Joaquin Phoenix they all shared a unifying message: Our house is on fire and the climate crisis must be confronted.

The participants congregated for the citys first Fire Drill Friday, an ongoing environmental activism movement that was spearheaded by Fonda and Greenpeace last year. Fonda, a lifelong activist who supported the Civil Rights Movement and opposed the Vietnam and Iraq wars, has dedicated much of the last few months to the movement; she moved to Washington D.C. and started protesting outside the Capitol every Friday to urge elected officials to address the planets ongoing climate crisis.

Though filming duties for Netflixs Grace and Frankie required Fonda to move back to Los Angeles, she brought Fire Drill Fridays with her, and the movement has continued to grow. The Los Angeles-based Fire Drill Fridays will only occur the first Friday of each month due to Fondas work schedule, but once Grace and Frankie filming wraps up, Fonda plans on touring the nation with Greenpeace and hosting local events, with the end goal being to make the 2020 presidential election more climate-focused.

RelatedRelated

Many news headlines regarding Fire Drill Fridays have focused on the arrests of its high-profile activists. The typical Fire Drill Friday event includes a variety of speakers, which leads to acts of nonviolent civil disobedience, usually for crowding or obstructing. Fonda was arrested five times during the Fire Drill Friday events in Washington D.C. (one of those arrests prevented her from accepting a British Academy Britannia Award in-person) and stressed that civil disobedience was a powerful political tool, particularly when used by celebrities with a strong public platform.

Every week you have the opportunity to put yourself on the line, Fonda said in an interview. Civil disobedience is not a first resort, but its a step up. Youve petitioned, marched, pleaded, and begged, and you havent been heard, so you take the next step. To align your body with your values is very empowering, and this offers that opportunity.

Civil disobedience is not a requisite of Fire Drill Friday events. Though Fonda still speaks during each gathering, she noted that she cannot participate in civil disobedience for three months due a court agreement stemming from her D.C. arrests.

Joaquin Phoenix participates in the Fire Drill Friday climate change rally.

ETIENNE LAURENT/EPA-EFE/Shutterstock

A Greenpeace spokesperson said that several dozen participants gathered at Maverick Natural Resources (a company that operates a large number of oil and gas wells in Southern California and the Central Valley) in an act of civil disobedience Friday afternoon. No arrests were made, per the spokesperson.

While the mainstream media and the cultural zeitgeist have begun paying more mind to climate-related issues in recent years, Fondas Fire Drill Fridays has enjoyed particularly rapid growth thanks to its high-profile participants. Celebrity activism is a key component, and the latest events other participating Hollywood workers included Joaquin Phoenix, Amber Valletta, Bonnie Wright, Brooklyn Decker, June Diane Raphael, and Norman Lear, though most of their speeches were intentionally brief and served to hype up the events primary speakers, who were all environmental activists or community organizers.

Fonda also led the movements teach-in events, where shed join prominent activists and climate change experts to discuss climates impact on subjects ranging from jobs, agriculture and the military, with the talks broadcast via Facebook Live.

While courting well-known individuals such as Phoenix who was arrested during a Fire Drill Friday event in Washington D.C. last month helps raise awareness about the movement, Fire Drill Fridays celebrity elements are primarily intended to provide a platform for more overlooked demographics to stress the importance of climate activism, according to Greenpeace executive director Annie Leonard.

The high-profile celebrities draw the spotlight, but understand that the real voices needing to be amplified arent theirs, Leonard said in an interview. The celebrities have the role of introducing the speakers, drawing the cameras, elevating the issue, and growing the audience. They create an incredible spotlight that we use to prioritize the voices that are marginalized in national conversations, such as women, youth, and indigenous people who often live at the forefront of climate change.

Fonda noted that the movement has expanded far more quickly than she anticipated. Fonda reached out to Leonard to discuss climate activism last September and the duo found that they were influenced by the same activists, namely Greta Thunberg hence the movements oft-repeated warning that our house is on fire and author Naomi Kleins On Fire: The Burning Case for a Green New Deal. The work of anti-apartheid activist Randall Robinson, who also practiced civil disobedience with well-known influencers, was another key influence and inspired the duo to get additional celebrities involved with their environmental movement. Other celebrities who have participated in prior Fire Drill Friday events include Martin Sheen, Ted Danson, Susan Sarandon, and Sam Waterston.

Fire Drill Fridays was created during a fraught period for environmental politics in America. President Donald Trump and many prominent Republican politicians reject the scientific consensus on climate change. Though Democrats have been more open to climate-oriented legislation, several Democrats rejected the Green New Deal, a much-discussed package of environmental legislation that the Fire Drill Fridays movement strongly supports. Fonda said that she met with senators to discuss how Fire Drill Fridays could promote environmental legislation last year. They told Fonda to build an army.

Were growing in numbers and want more people to be comfortable being out and demanding, Fonda said in an interview. We always focus on the science and the demands are: No new fossil fuel expansions, phasing out existing fossil fuels over 30 years, and supporting a Green New Deal.

Sign Up: Stay on top of the latest breaking film and TV news! Sign up for our Email Newsletters here.

View original post here:

Jane Fonda Is Building an Army to Defend the Earth with Fire Drill Fridays Movement - IndieWire