Marvel Just Revealed The DARKEST Sorcerer Supreme | Screen Rant – Screen Rant

This article contains spoilers forSavage Avengers #11.

Marvel Comics has just revealed the true story of Kulan Gath, their darkest Sorcerer Supreme. Gerry Duggan'sSavage Avengers has seen a classic villain return from beyond the dawn of time. Kulan Gath hails from the Hyborean Age, the time of Conan the Barbarian, before the advent of the last Ice Age.

Kulan Gath has proved to be a formidable foe. Even the combined might of Doctor Strange and Doctor Doom was barely enough to give him a contemporary defeat, and they accomplished this feat by cheating; Doctor Doom resorted to science rather than sorcery. Doom summoned his Infamous Iron Man armor for Strange,transforming him into the so-called "Iron Mage." Strange came up with an innovative use of the armor, reforming it around Kulan Gath and restraining him. That gave the time-displaced Conan the chance to stab him, and Kulan Gath teleported away.

Related:Why Doctor Strange Worshiped Spider-Man As A God (Yes, Really)

This week'sSavage Avengers #11 finally reveals the secret of Kulan Gath's power. Doctor Strange uses blood magic to send his astral form back through the millennia, observing Kulan Gath's history. He finds himself viewing the Earth as it looked twelve millennia ago, and he watches the slave boy Kulan Gath murder and supplant his master. Vowing never to be a victim again, he sought the secrets of magic, and he approached the Sorcerer Supreme of his time, Mekri Ra. Mekri Ra sensed the evil in Kulan Gath's heart and refused to train him.

Humiliated, Gath traveled the globe, searching out lesser sources and training with them. To Doctor Strange's horror, he learned the secrets of a dark form of blood magic; he became a cannibal, consuming a sorcerer's organs in order to attain their knowledge. There is knowledge and power in blood, and Kulan Gath learned to master it. He began to draw the life energy itself from his victims, extending his own life; that is the secret of Kulan Gath's immortality.

In the end, Kulan Gath became so powerful he returned to Mekri Ra - and defeated him. He drew the Sorcerer Supreme's death out as long as possible, a way of repaying him for the humiliation of being banished all those years ago. Ironically, that may well ultimately prove to be Kulan Gath's undoing; Mekri Ra sensed the astral presence of the watching Doctor Strange and passed on a mysterious message to him before Kulan Gath slit his throat. Kulan Gath thus became Mekri Ra's successor as Sorcerer Supreme - probably the evilest one of all time.

The story may be horrific, but it loses a little of its shock value because attentive readers already knew this; something's gone wrong with Marvel's publication strategy.Last month'sSavage Avengers annual is presumably set after this issue because it features Doctor Strange warning Magik that Kulan Gath will come for her - and that he's a cannibal.

Savage Avengers #11 is on sale now from Marvel Comics.

More:Infinity War Almost Had Doctor Strange In Iron Man Armor: How It Could Have Worked

Joker's New Girlfriend Punchline vs. Harley Quinn Confirmed

Tom Bacon is one of Screen Rant's staff writers, and he's frankly amused that his childhood is back - and this time it's cool. Tom's focus tends to be on the various superhero franchises, as well as Star Wars, Doctor Who, and Star Trek; he's also an avid comic book reader. Over the years, Tom has built a strong relationship with aspects of the various fan communities, and is a Moderator on some of Facebook's largest MCU and X-Men groups. Previously, he's written entertainment news and articles for Movie Pilot.A graduate of Edge Hill University in the United Kingdom, Tom is still strongly connected with his alma mater; in fact, in his spare time he's a voluntary chaplain there. He's heavily involved with his local church, and anyone who checks him out on Twitter will quickly learn that he's interested in British politics as well.

See the original post:

Marvel Just Revealed The DARKEST Sorcerer Supreme | Screen Rant - Screen Rant

Bitcoin Cash Community Supports Greater Privacy by Donating Over 100 BCH to Cashfusion Fundraiser – Bitcoin News

The Bitcoin Cash community is showing its support for greater privacy by putting its money where its mouth is and donating to Cashfusion. The recently launched fundraiser has already raised more than 100 BCH and achieved over 70% of its goal. Once the total hits $50,000, Bitcoin.com will double it to $100,000.

Also Read: Raising $100K for Cashfusions Security Audit, Bitcoin.com Matches Donations to Improve BCH Privacy

Cashfusion is an extension of the Cashshuffle coin mixing protocol for bitcoin cash and improves upon it by allowing people to fuse coins without requiring equal payment amounts. The privacy-enhancing technology is almost set to launch, but before that it will need to undergo an intensive security audit to ensure it is ready.

This complicated procedure will cost $50,000 and the bitcoin cash community has stepped up to help finance it. Users have already made more than 350 donations to the Cashfusion Security Audit Fund, raising over 100 BCH. At current prices this brings the total to more than 70% of the needed capital and the fundraiser is well on its way to reach its goal soon. Moreover, Bitcoin.com has announced that it will match the $50,000 in donations to help the team behind Cashfusion with ongoing development.

Cashshuffle is a powerful tool for obfuscating the origin of a coin. However, after shuffling a wallet, a user will inevitably wish to consolidate several coins, and for this another tool is needed, explained developers Jonald Fyookball and Mark B. Lundeberg. Cashfusion provides high levels of privacy via a flexible scheme that allows an arbitrary number of inputs and outputs of non-standard amounts. It provides anonymous, trustless coordination with usually zero-knowledge of linkages revealed to other players or the server.

This is your chance to take a stand and show that privacy matters. Donate here.

The right to privacy is widely recognized by many different legal traditions and schools of thought all around the world. The ability to keep your personal business to yourself is also crucial for the functioning of a free society and an open economy. Unfortunately, today this basic human concept and value is under attack like it has never been before.

New technologies such as big data and artificial intelligence allow corporations and governments to track us in various ways and erode our privacy. Our thoughts, our desires, our friendships, our communications, our physical locations and everything else that tech companies can get their hands on are being sold to unknown parties without our informed consent.

In the cryptosphere this is done by blockchain analysis companies that seek to link every wallet to the person behind it. This is usually performed in the name of security, under the guise of AML/KYC, but it can greatly hurt the whole digital asset ecosystem by turning off many people concerned about their privacy.

Even if you have never done anything out of the ordinary, would you want to use a system that tracks all your transactions and keeps a log forever visible to governments and corporations? This is a real risk in an ever-changing world. Additionally, money needs to be fungible for people to use it. The same is true for crypto.

What do you think about the bitcoin cash community donating to the Cashfusion fundraiser? Share your thoughts in the comments section below.

Images courtesy of Shutterstock.

Verify and track bitcoin cash transactions on our BCH Block Explorer, the best of its kind anywhere in the world. Also, keep up with your holdings, BCH and other coins, on our market charts at Bitcoin.com Markets, another original and free service from Bitcoin.com.

Avi Mizrahi is an economist and entrepreneur who has been covering Bitcoin as a journalist since 2013. He has spoken about the promise of cryptocurrency and blockchain technology at numerous financial conferences around the world, from London to Hong-Kong.

Go here to see the original:

Bitcoin Cash Community Supports Greater Privacy by Donating Over 100 BCH to Cashfusion Fundraiser - Bitcoin News

Bitcoin Cash to Avoid Chain Split Over Controversial Mining Tax – CryptoGlobe

The Bitcoin Cash blockchain is seemingly going to avoid a potential chain split that could have occurred over a controversial miner tax proposal that divided the cryptocurrency community.

The proposal was first made by the CEO of major cryptocurrency mining pool BTC.TOP, Jiang Zhuoer, and would see miners donate 12.5% of their block rewards to BCHs developers to grow its infrastructure. It added, however, that those who didnt donate would see their blocks get orphaned.

The communitys response to the proposal later saw the CEO of Bitcoin.com, Roger Ver, drop support for it over the risk of a chain split. Jiang Zhuoer himself, later on, dropped support for the proposal and said he would use his 3,500 PH/s of hashrate to vote against the proposal.

Bitcoin ABC, the dominant Bitcoin Cash node client, has however, added support for the proposed tax, which could be activated if miners representing a specific amount of the hashrate signal support for it.

For now, Support for the proposals appear to be low, but there is still a chain split risk of miners choose to vote for it. In response, developers created the Bitcoin Cash Node client, which is an initiative that will neutrally follow the longest Bitcoin Cash chain without contributing to the risk of a chain split.

Other nodes have claimed they will switch to Bitcoin Unlimited, another node client that hasnt added support for the proposal. As CryptoGlobe reported, an anonymous group of miners supposedly representing 1.6 EH/s of the hashrate threatened to launch a hash war that could have also led to a chain split over the tax.

The Bitcoin Cash network, its worth noting, is I a fork of the Bitcoin blockchain, and has endured a chain split in November 2018, when Bitcoin SV was created.

Featured image by David Shares on Unsplash.

Read more from the original source:

Bitcoin Cash to Avoid Chain Split Over Controversial Mining Tax - CryptoGlobe

Bitcoin Cash Price Analysis: Why this head-and-shoulders pattern is vital for the attack at $350? – FXStreet

Bitcoin Cash is in a bullish recovery phase after a gruesome dip to $300. Recovery has been lethargic but steady. On Thursday, BCH/USD is up 3.6% compared to Bitcoin (BTC)s 1.98% and Ethereum (ETH)s 1.46%.

The gains come after the formation of a head-and-shoulders pattern. Reaction to this pattern is likely to place Bitcoin Cash in the trajectory towards $350 and $400 respectively. In the meantime, BCH/USD is trading at $332 after reclaiming the support above $330.

Technical levels suggest that the bullish action could last throughout the European session. An up-trending RSI is almost crossing above the average (at 50). Further, advancement towards the overbought could encourage the bulls to increase their positions. The MACD also supports the bullish action as the signal line grinds into a bullish divergence.

Resistance 1: $341 Fibonacci 38.2% one-week.

Resistance two: $345 Fibo 161.8% one-day.

Support one: $331 Pivot point one-day resistance one.

Support two: $325 Previous low 1-hour and the Bollinger Band 4-hour middle

See the article here:

Bitcoin Cash Price Analysis: Why this head-and-shoulders pattern is vital for the attack at $350? - FXStreet

Now you can feed a flock of sheep with Bitcoin – Decrypt

In brief

On a small plot of land in the Czech Republic, Karel and Kamila Bhm have a small flock of small sheep. And these small sheep love crypto.

Of course, the way to a sheeps affections is through its stomach, so IT network engineer Karel has set up a crypto-powered interactive sheep feeder. Donations of Bitcoin and other cryptocurrency are converted into alfalfa pellets; the action is live-streamed on YouTube and Twitch, so donors can watch the antics of the sheep as they scramble for the feed.

Sheepish antics can be viewed from a variety of camera angles. (Image: Karel Bhm)

A donation of 50 Twitch bits ($0.60) paid for in Bitcoin (BTC), Ethereum (ETH) Bitcoin Cash (BCH), Litecoin (LTC), or Ripples XRP triggers the tap in the sheep shed to release the tasty morsels. Or users can contribute $0.50 in crypto directly by scanning a QR code on the livestream, or donating to one of the wallet addresses Bhm has supplied.

Bhm introduced the five popular cryptocurrencies last month, and has also set up payment with Bitcoins scaling solution, the Lightning Network (LN). If they have a Lightning wallet, users need only scan the QR code, speeding things up for both Bitcoin-loving humans and sheep.

The engineer told Decrypt that he started his crypto experiment in 2018 to help his wife care for the eight Ouessant sheep she adopted. But the project began with another cryptocurrency altogetherIota, which has been designed for the Internet of Things. It was originally dubbed the SheepTangle, after the network's distributed ledger, the Tangle.

Donors can activate an alarm to call the sheep in from the field to be fed. (Image: Karel Bhm)

However, when the Iota Foundation switched off the network in February following a hack, (its due to come back on next week) Bhm didnt want to abandon the experiment, so he cast his net wide.

But when asked which cryptocurrency brings in the most donations, he was coy. He said that the project hadnt been running for long enough to establish that, and users were currently only funding around 20 feeds a day. Pressed, he told Decrypt that ETH, LTC and BTC LN, were currently the cryptocurrencies most used.

Scene of the all the action: the sheep shed in the couple's back yard. (Image: Karel Bhm)

As well as feeding the sheep, users can also earn sheep points just by watching the live feed. And there are special bonuses for watch streaks and for participating in a raid on the sheep shed, when its cleaned out.

Not only that, donors can activate an alarm to call the sheep in from the field to be fed, and switch camera views to get the best angle on the ensuing scramble for alfalfa.

Bhm is now working on an apple drop feature, which sheep also love, he said. The sheep continue to eat their staples, hay and grass, so the additional food is a treat.

Bhm also adheres to strict sheep feeding hours, from 8-20 CET time, and said that the system is designed to deliver a maximum of 100 feed drops per day, before feeding is stopped.

There is limitation and [the] whole solution is designed for sheep safety, so theyre not overfed or fed during sleeping hours.

The sheep shed cant really be described as a farm. Ouessant sheep are some of the smallest in the world. The sheepVlnka, Pepinka, Paja, Mufi, Marii, Jannet, Kiki and Julianaprovide no milk, and little wool, so the couple make no money from the enterprise. They also look after five injured birds: three wild buzzards and two hawks.

The latter feed on chicks. Thankfully, Bhm has no plans to instal a live feed in their cage.

Read the original here:

Now you can feed a flock of sheep with Bitcoin - Decrypt

Bitcoin Cash (BCH) Is the Newer and Improved Version of Bitcoin (BTC) – The Cryptocurrency Analytics

Roger Ver, one of the first investors in Bitcoin startups, has dozens of coins and states that he wanted the cryptocurrency to undermine the power of the governments to be able to control peaceful people.

Roger Ver recently tweeted: I owned a pile of Bitcoin and BitcoinCom. I had more financial and philosophical motivation to see BTC succeed than just about any other human being on the planet. The censorship and full block policy by Core destroyed BTCs first-mover advantage.

Roger Ver spoke about how the governments are beginning to prosecute crypto privacy tools. He recollected how Wei Dai, when talking about it opined that there has never been a government that did not at one point in time or another try to reduce the freedom of the subjects to gain more control over them.

Dai, Further, opined that there would never be such a government. He further stated that it is important to develop the technology, which will make it impossible for the government to succeed rather than convincing the government.

Sydney Ifergan, the crypto expert, tweeted: I agree with Roger Ver about the idea that Peer to peer electronic cash is far more disruptive to the status quo than digital gold. BTC is the original cryptocurrency, and BCH is the newer and improved version of Bitcoin.

A typical Bitcoin Cash fan is looking to help in the process of building peer-to-peer electronic cash systems to facilitate more economic freedom in the world. However, Bitcoin maximalists need to see the rest of the shit coins destroyed.

Roger opines that utility is essential and that he wants to be utility maximalist than being a Bitcoin Maximalist. He also felt that when digital cash is provably scarce, there is no need to have something that is purely digital gold.

Roger firmly believes that Peer to Peer Electronic Cash enables More Economic Freedom enables More Economic Growth enables a better world for All.

The very purpose of Bitcoin was to make fiat currencies obsolete. However, those who are holding the Bitcoin are forever worried about how much in terms of fiat currencies is the value of their Bitcoin. Roger opines that Bitcoin cash supporters are building that network. However, those who are Bitcoin supporters state that Bitcoin supporters are those who are building the network. There seems to be a disagreement.

Following a hack, Ver Stated, The fact that hackers are willing to go and steal Bitcoin Cash means that its something worth stealing, that its something valuable. If it wasnt valuable, it wasnt worthwhile; hackers wouldnt be trying to steal it.

Read more from the original source:

Bitcoin Cash (BCH) Is the Newer and Improved Version of Bitcoin (BTC) - The Cryptocurrency Analytics

The Crypto Daily Movers and Shakers -07/03/20 – FX Empire

Bitcoin rose by 1.00% on Friday. Following on from a 3.44% rally on Thursday, Bitcoin ended the day at $9,180.6.

A bearish start to the day saw Bitcoin fall to an early morning intraday low $9,011.3 before finding support.

Steering clear of the first major support level at $8,857.43, Bitcoin rallied to a late morning intraday high $9,199.70.

Falling short of the first major resistance level at $9,255.33, Bitcoin fell back to sub-$9,100 levels.

Finding late support, however, Bitcoin bounced back to close out the day in positive territory.

The near-term bearish trend, formed at late Junes swing hi $13,764.0, remained firmly intact, with Bitcoin struggling to break out from $10,000 levels.

For the bulls, Bitcoin would need to break out from $11,000 levels to form a near-term bullish trend.

Across the rest of the top 10 cryptos, it was a bullish day for the crypto majors.

Ethereum led the way, rallying by 7.42%.

Binance Coin (+2.99%), Bitcoin Cash ABC (+3.42%), Bitcoin Cash SV (+2.60%), Litecoin (+2.09%), Ripples XRP (+2.43%), Stellars Lumen (+2.78%), Tezos (+3.03%), and Trons TRX (+2.41%) also saw solid gains.

Cardans ADA (+1.34%), EOS (+1.92%), and Moneros XMR (+0.72%) trailed the pack.

Through the current week, the crypto total market cap rose to a Friday high $263.56bn from a Monday low $243.1. At the time of writing, the total market cap stood at $263.18bn.

Bitcoins dominance fell back from 64% levels in the week as the broader market found support. At the time of writing, Bitcoins dominance stood at 63.2%.

Trading volumes hit an early Tuesday high $187.15bn before falling back to sub-$130bn levels. At the time of writing, 24-hr volumes stood at $137.34bn.

Continue reading here:

The Crypto Daily Movers and Shakers -07/03/20 - FX Empire

Bitcoin price surges and exchanges crash as India lifts two-year cryptocurrency ban – The Independent

The price of bitcoin has risen sharply and several exchanges have been overloaded after India's Supreme Court overturned a ban on cryptocurrency trading.

The ruling quashed an April 2018 order by the country's central bank that prohibited banks and financial institutionsfrom providing "any service in relation to virtual currencies".

Bitcoin's value rose by around 5 per cent following Wednesday's verdict and has since returned above $9,000 for the first time since last month.

Sharing the full story, not just the headlines

Other cryptocurrencies also received a boost, with ether (Ethereum), XRP(Ripple) and Bitcoin Cash all surging 4-7 per cent in price.

Cryptocurrency businesses and exchanges in the country welcomed the decision, despite some suffering difficulties as a result of their infrastructure being overwhelmed by a sudden increase in demand for their services.

On 3 January, 2009, the genesis block of bitcoin appeared. It came less than a year after the pseudonymous creator Satoshi Nakamoto detailed the cryptocurrency in a paper titled 'Bitcoin: A peer-to-Peer Electronic Cash System'

Reuters

On 22 May, 2010, the first ever real-world bitcoin transaction took place. Lazlo Hanyecz bought two pizzas for 10,000 bitcoins the equivalent of $90 million at today's prices

Lazlo Hanyecz

Bitcoin soon gained notoriety for its use on the dark web. The Silk Road marketplace, established in 2011, was the first of hundreds of sites to offer illegal drugs and services in exchange for bitcoin

On 29 October, 2013, the first ever bitcoin ATM was installed in a coffee shop in Vancouver, Canada. The machine allowed people to exchange bitcoins for cash

REUTERS/Dimitris Michalakis

The world's biggest bitcoin exchange, MtGox, filed for bankruptcy in February 2014 after losing almost 750,000 of its customers bitcoins. At the time, this was around 7 per cent of all bitcoins and the market inevitably crashed

Getty Images

In 2015, Australian police raided the home of Craig Wright after the entrepreneur claimed he was Satoshi Nakamoto. He later rescinded the claim

Getty Images

On 1 August, 2017, an unresolvable dispute within the bitcoin community saw the network split. The fork of bitcoin's underlying blockchain technology spawned a new cryptocurrency: Bitcoin cash

REUTERS

Towards the end of 2017, the price of bitcoin surged to almost $20,000. This represented a 1,300 per cent increase from its price at the start of the year

Reuters

On 3 January, 2009, the genesis block of bitcoin appeared. It came less than a year after the pseudonymous creator Satoshi Nakamoto detailed the cryptocurrency in a paper titled 'Bitcoin: A peer-to-Peer Electronic Cash System'

Reuters

On 22 May, 2010, the first ever real-world bitcoin transaction took place. Lazlo Hanyecz bought two pizzas for 10,000 bitcoins the equivalent of $90 million at today's prices

Lazlo Hanyecz

Bitcoin soon gained notoriety for its use on the dark web. The Silk Road marketplace, established in 2011, was the first of hundreds of sites to offer illegal drugs and services in exchange for bitcoin

On 29 October, 2013, the first ever bitcoin ATM was installed in a coffee shop in Vancouver, Canada. The machine allowed people to exchange bitcoins for cash

REUTERS/Dimitris Michalakis

The world's biggest bitcoin exchange, MtGox, filed for bankruptcy in February 2014 after losing almost 750,000 of its customers bitcoins. At the time, this was around 7 per cent of all bitcoins and the market inevitably crashed

Getty Images

In 2015, Australian police raided the home of Craig Wright after the entrepreneur claimed he was Satoshi Nakamoto. He later rescinded the claim

Getty Images

On 1 August, 2017, an unresolvable dispute within the bitcoin community saw the network split. The fork of bitcoin's underlying blockchain technology spawned a new cryptocurrency: Bitcoin cash

REUTERS

Towards the end of 2017, the price of bitcoin surged to almost $20,000. This represented a 1,300 per cent increase from its price at the start of the year

Reuters

Leading cryptocurrency exchange ZebPayannounced that its servers had shut down due to an overload ofnew users signing up in the hours after the ban was lifted.

"The volume of members and new members logging into ZebPayright now has exceeded our biggest estimates," the exchange wrote on Twitter. "Unfortunately, system is down temporarily while we add more resources."

Sumit Gupta, co-founder and CEO of CoinDCX, described the reversal of the ban as a "historic day, not just for the crypto community, but for the entire country".

Mr Gupta's company was one of four cryptocurrency exchanges in the country that petitioned the Supreme Court to overturn the two-year ban.

"The removal of the ban by the Supreme Court is going to open new opportunities for India in terms of investments, economic growth, financial inclusion, and market maturation," he said.

"We have always seen crypto as a potential to unlock Indias dream of becoming a $5 trillion economy and remain committed to carrying out the hard work which is necessary to make this dream come true."

Indian exchange platformWazirXdescribed the decision as long overdue. "Crypto has won in India," the firm's CEO wrote in ablog post. "Very rarely do we, as a nation, get an opportunity to participate in revolutionary technology".

Go here to see the original:

Bitcoin price surges and exchanges crash as India lifts two-year cryptocurrency ban - The Independent

Human Readability and Privacy: BCH Can Be Sent by Email With Tips Tool, No Usernames Required – Bitcoin News

Tips.Bitcoin.com allows users of crypto to tip BCH to friends and family via email address, arguably cutting out some of the inconvenience associated with standard bitcoin address formats. Unlike Coinbase Wallets new username option, which achieves similar ease for transactions, sending keys via email does not require a centralized database of usernames connected to crypto wallets. The tips method is a means for using bitcoin in this fashion, and there are hints the process will become even more streamlined in the future, enabling customizable QR code payments to be sent directly to email addresses.

Also read: Cryptocurrency Payment Gateway Gocrypto Onboards 1,000 Locations Worldwide

On February 26 Coinbase Wallet announced that Starting today, Coinbase Wallet users can send crypto using short human-friendly usernames instead of traditional long addresses. The benefit to users being they can send crypto to other wallets without having to deal with clunky and awkward-to-read strings of numbers and characters.

Every Coinbase Wallet user has a username (like @walletfan). You can now easily send to other Wallet users with just their username instead of their full-length crypto address, the announcement reads. While this method sounds very convenient, some issues are raised for those who value privacy.

The group that says We value your privacy is nonetheless subject to powerful financial and regulatory groups, such as the United States IRS, and has turned over private customer information in the past. As such, crypto enthusiasts wishing to send peer-to-peer cash in a more direct fashion, while maintaining the convenience of human readability, could leverage email and a wallet that does not connect individuals to wallets.

As lawyer and crypto business expert Daniel Kelman stated of the Bitcoin.com Wallet in a recent Youtube video:

Even if the IRS sent a letter demanding that we send over who owns what wallet, we couldnt tell them, cause we dont know.

Of course, an email provider may spy on or compromise user security as well, but the risk of an identifiable username associated with a proven data sharer like Coinbase could be mitigated. Especially if messages are encrypted. Like usernames, email addresses are easy to read, and making mistakes is much harder to do when sending to a friends email, instead of a scramble of characters.

The recently rebranded tips.Bitcoin.com is one way to send crypto via paper tickets or emailed links, with some interesting special features. Senders follow the simple prompts on the page, entering their own BCH refund address and designating an expiration time after which the tip will expire. Once the tip or tips (multiple tips can be created at once) are paid for, links appear which can be copied, pasted, and sent to recipients via email. Once clicked, the links allow recipients to enter their own BCH address and receive the funds.

If left unclaimed, rewards return non-custodially and automatically to the senders wallet after the designated cutoff time.

Some may wonder how this is preferable to other methods, as refund addresses and receiver addresses still need to be entered. That may seem like a lot of steps compared to username systems for sending crypto like that of Coinbase Wallet, but aside from the privacy benefits, there is talk of more streamlined versions coming down the pike.

Bitcoin.com Executive Chairman Roger Ver also hinted at a new iteration of this idea in the aforementioned Youtube video, saying Heres what were building. He then referenced the existing tips tool and taking it further: Its literally a private key, with money at that address, and if they dont claim it, the money can bounce back to you after 30 days. Totally non-custodially as well. So we can do the exact same thing, but with an email.

You just send an email of the private key to the person you want to send money to. They can scan it right from their email [via QR code] and claim the money, and if they dont, after however many days you decide in the beginning, the money bounces back to your wallet.

Of course, nothing is stopping anyone from generating their own private keys right now and using them to send crypto via email, but for the average user, tools like the Bitcoin Cash Tips generator can come in handy, especially with the customization and refund options. Theres no set date for the hinted-at QR code tools release, but in the meantime there are at least ways to send crypto without relying on copy/pasting a recipients bitcoin address. And perhaps most importantly, there are ways to send crypto that dont require unnecessary risk and loss of privacy.

What do you think is the best way to implement user-friendly addresses for bitcoin? Let us know in the comments section below.

Disclaimer: This article is for informational purposes only. It is not an offer or solicitation of an offer to buy or sell, or a recommendation, endorsement, or sponsorship of any products, services, or companies. Neither the company nor the author is responsible, directly or indirectly, for any damage or loss caused or alleged to be caused by or in connection with the use of or reliance on any content, goods or services mentioned in this article.

Images courtesy of Shutterstock, fair use.

Did you know you can verify any unconfirmed Bitcoin transaction with our Bitcoin Block Explorer tool? Simply complete a Bitcoin address search to view it on the blockchain. Plus, visit our Bitcoin Charts to see whats happening in the industry.

Graham Smith is an American expat living in Japan, and the founder of Voluntary Japanan initiative dedicated to spreading the philosophies of unschooling, individual self-ownership, and economic freedom in the land of the rising sun.

Visit link:

Human Readability and Privacy: BCH Can Be Sent by Email With Tips Tool, No Usernames Required - Bitcoin News

Bitcoin and Altcoins Sighting Crucial Bullish Break – Cryptonews

In the past three sessions, there was an increase in the positive sentiment for bitcoin above USD 8,650 and USD 8,700. BTC/USD broke the USD 8,850 resistance area and it is currently (09:00 UTC) making an attempt to climb higher above the USD 9,000 resistance.Similarly, most major altcoins are trading near key breakout levels, including ethereum, XRP, litecoin, bitcoin cash, BNB, EOS, TRX, ADA, and XLM. ETH/USD is facing a couple of key hurdles near the USD 230 and USD 232 levels. On the other hand, XRP/USD is trading above USD 0.235 and it could rise towards the USD 0.242 resistance area.

Total market capitalization

The current bitcoin price action is positive and suggesting more upsides above USD 8,950 and USD 9,000 in the near term. BTC/USD broke the USD 8,850 resistance level, opening the doors for a steady increase. If the price closes above USD 9,000, it could start a decent increase. The next key resistances are seen near the USD 9,250 level.If the price fails to clear the USD 9,000 resistance area, it could decline again. An initial support is now near the USD 8,720 level, below which the price might revisit the USD 8,550 support.

Ethereum price is facing a strong selling interest near the USD 230 and USD 232 levels. However, the bulls need to gain momentum above the USD 235 barrier to start a solid upward move towards the USD 248 and USD 250 levels.Conversely, the price might slide further below USD 225. The main support is near the USD 220 level, below which there are chances of a test of the key USD 210 support.

Bitcoin cash price is rising again and it is trading above the USD 325 and USD 330 levels. BCH/USD might continue higher towards the USD 340 and USD 350 resistance levels. On the downside, the USD 320 level is now a strong support, below which the bears are likely to aim a test of the USD 300 handle.Litecoin is gaining bullish momentum above USD 60.00 and USD 61.00. If LTC/USD surpasses the USD 62.50 resistance, it could extend its rise towards the USD 65.00 resistance. Conversely, the price may perhaps start a fresh decline and it might decline towards the key USD 58.50 support area.XRP price is showing a few positive signs above the USD 0.232 and USD 0.235 levels. If the bulls gain momentum above USD 0.238, the price may even surge above the USD 0.242 resistance level. The next set of hurdles is seen near the USD 0.250 level. On the downside, the main supports are USD 0.232 and USD 0.230.

In the past three sessions, a few small-capitalization altcoins gained more than 8%, including NRG, ABBC, BTG, XTZ, BCN, ZRX, NEXO and RLC. Besides, SXP, ARDR, KNC, and STX are also gaining bullish momentum.

Overall, bitcoin price is trading above the USD 8,850 level, but it must settle above the USD 9,000 barrier to continue higher. If the bulls fail to gain pace, there is a risk of a downside break in the near term towards USD 8,550._____

Read this article:

Bitcoin and Altcoins Sighting Crucial Bullish Break - Cryptonews

Bitcoin Returns Above USD 9,000, Tezos Leads the Rally – Cryptonews

Source: iStock/chaofann

The most popular cryptocurrency, bitcoin (BTC) has returned above the USD 9,000 mark on Thursday, while tezos (XTZ), the 10th most valuable cryptoasset by market capitalization, is again seeing double-digit gains today following an improvement in overall sentiment in the broader crypto market.

At pixel time (12:10 PM UTC), BTC trades at c. USD 9,134 and is up 4.5% in a day and 2% in a week, almost erasing its monthly losses. Last time BTC was above the USD 9,000 level is February 26. Also, only three coins are in green against BTC today - bitcoin cash (BCH) (+1.3%), binance coin (BNB) (+3%), and XTZ (+8%).

Against USD, tezos is up by 13% in the past 24 hours to a price of USD 3.17, making it todays best performer among the top 10 cryptoassets.

Top 10 cryptoassets:

The most recent gain comes after tezos saw a strong sell-off on Monday and Tuesday last week, which brought the asset down 20% in just two days. However, the massive sell-off ended with a rally on Thursday the same week, which ran counter to the negative sentiment in the broader market.

From a technical analysis perspective, todays strong move appears to have been fuelled by a breakout through the technical resistance at the USD 3 mark, which paved the way for even higher prices.

The resistance was most visible on the 4-hour chart, which is a popular timeframe used by many mid-term crypto traders. Having moved past this level, the road to the USD 3.5-3.6 area appears more or less wide open, with further gains likely as soon as those levels are breached.

On the whole, tezos has been one of the strongest performers among the top cryptoassets this year, having recently made its way into the top 10 list by market capitalization. The gains are believed to have been partly fuelled by developments surrounding the coins staking mechanism, including the fact that crypto exchanges Kraken and Coinbase, as well as hardware wallet maker Ledger, have all added staking support for XTZ holders, making it easier for a large number of users to take part in XTZs staking economy in return for rewards.____

Watch the latest reports by Block TV.

Learn more: Tezos Soars on These 3 Strengths

Read the original post:

Bitcoin Returns Above USD 9,000, Tezos Leads the Rally - Cryptonews

The Algorithms That Control the Cryptocurrency Market – Bitcoin News

Algorithms are at the heart of 21st century life, invisibly controlling many of the systems we use and take for granted on a daily basis. Pervasive algorithms determine the entertainment we consume (Netflix, Spotify), the information we read (Google), and the chatter we hear (Facebook, Twitter). Its no different in crypto, where complex and ever-evolving algorithms silently govern core processes.

Also read: How to Mix Your Bitcoins Using Coinjoin for Greater Privacy

Algorithmic stablecoin projects have come to the fore in recent years, although fiat-backed stablecoins such as Tether (USDT), USD Coin (USDC), and True USD (TUSD) capture most of the volume. While the concept of dollar-pegged stablecoins is easy to grasp, algorithmic stablecoins are a little more complex. Essentially, they are cryptocurrencies which attain price stability by algorithmically expanding the coins circulating supply to reflect market behavior.

Take Timvi (TMV), for example, an ERC20 token whose algorithm and collateralized algo-stablecoin targets a $1 price to mitigate volatility and breed investor confidence. The security token relies on ETH deposits by participants in the ecosystem, and proprietary financial instruments such as Tbox (an analogue of an interest-free collateral loan), Tbond and Leverage let users earn interest during both bull and bear markets. Timvis algorithm is designed so that the creation of a new Tbox (a blockchain-based account which converts ETH to TMV) does not cause a decrease of the global collateral below the target value.

What if ETHs price drops and impacts the collateral in Tbox, you might wonder. In this circumstance, the Tbox owner must recapitalize by depositing ETH or TMV. If they fail to do so, the Tbox is deemed toxic and other users can step in and do the honors, recapitalizing while earning an ETH commission of 1-6% of the pledged amount.

Reserve is another much-hyped algorithmic stablecoin, backed by high-profile investors such as Coinbase, Peter Thiel and DCG. Messari dubbed Reserve one of their top projects to watch in 2020. Like Timvi, the stablecoin system employs algorithms to manipulate supply and maintain its price ($1), striking a neat balance between stability, decentralization and profitability. Reserve is staffed by a team of 20 including Google and OpenAI veterans, and is advised by Patomak Global Advisors, led by former SEC Commissioner Paul Atkins. Algorithms can also be seen at work regulating ecosystems such as Makerdao, to control its dai issuance and collateralization, and to adjust the supply of Sagas SGA token.

In the old days, traders congregated on the floor of exchanges, barking into phone receivers and making elaborate hand signals. With the advent of electronic markets, however, trades could be executed with algorithms rather than humans, taking much emotion and impulse out of the equation. Such algorithms enabled traders to trigger trades at the optimal price, accounting for factors such as trade size, time of day and market status.

High-frequency trading (HFT) is as popular a strategy in the cryptosphere as it is on the stock market. A subset of algorithmic trading, this high-speed process sees traders utilize algorithmic programs to exploit modest price discrepancies in the markets. Oftentimes, HFT firms will go so far as to situate their trading servers in close proximity to exchanges matching engines to win an edge in speed and make off with handsome profits on arbitrage. This can even be facilitated by the exchange in question, at no extra charge; last year, Singapore platform Huobi began offering this arrangement known as colocation to high-frequency traders, who could expect to make trades 70 to 100 times faster than other users. Gemini and Erisx also offer colocation, hoping it will mean traders choose to do business with them rather than competitors.

Of course, algorithmic trading encompasses a vast range of strategies from time-weighted average price (TWAP), wherein crypto traders seek to buy or sell a fixed amount of an asset gradually over a period of time, to iceberg, where they buy/sell large orders of an asset without revealing the orders true size to the rest of the market. It is difficult to imagine a modern financial market operating without algorithms.

Crypto forensics firms such as Chainalysis utilize proprietary algorithms to monitor and flag suspicious or fraudulent transactions on exchanges, as well as to identify certain individuals operating in the cryptosphere on behalf of hawkish lawmakers and legislators. One software, Chainalysis KYT (Know Your Transaction), tracks transactions made on exchanges using digital assets such as bitcoin, litecoin, ethereum, bitcoin cash, and TUSD.

Firms like Chainalysis are increasingly being tapped up to help crypto platforms achieve regulatory compliance, particularly pertaining to Anti-Money Laundering (AML) processes. They are also employed by government agencies including the Department of Homeland Security, the Drug Enforcement Agency, and Europol, all of whom are desperate to de-anonymize crypto users often with little justification. Its little wonder pro-privacy advocates are concerned about the long-term effects of such incursions. By all accounts Chainalysiss algorithms are incredibly effective, which is why you might want to think about using a coin-mixing service to preserve your privacy.

Fittingly, privacy advocates are hitting back with algorithms of their own; Samourai is developing a tool called Solomon, a smart UTXO selection algorithm that takes the past history of UTXOs as well as user initiated tags into account when composing transactions. It will automatically choose the best UTXOs to combine for optimizing each transaction. As privacy proponent and bitcoiner Lauren MT explains:

Solomon is based on the observation that the cat and mouse game between bitcoin wallets and chain analysis tools is highly asymmetric. CA tools have an almost perfect memory (the blockchain) while wallets are mostly amnesic when it comes to coin selection the first goal of Solomon is to give a memory to the UTXOs controlled by the wallet.

To the developers, this memory provides a more formal tool for reasoning about the benefits/limitations of a specific coin selection algorithm. To the users, it provides useful feedback about the wallet (for manual coin selection, etc) and for the wallet itself, it provides information that can be used by the coin selection algorithm.

The future is algorithmically controlled.

What other algorithms control key parts of the cryptosphere? Let us know in the comments section below.

Images courtesy of Shutterstock.

Did you know you can verify any unconfirmed Bitcoin transaction with our Bitcoin Block Explorer tool? Simply complete a Bitcoin address search to view it on the blockchain. Plus, visit our Bitcoin Charts to see whats happening in the industry.

Kai's been manipulating words for a living since 2009 and bought his first bitcoin at $12. It's long gone. He specializes in writing about darknet markets, onchain privacy, and counter-surveillance in the digital age.

See the original post here:

The Algorithms That Control the Cryptocurrency Market - Bitcoin News

Ethereums ProgPOW Debate Is About Much More Than Mining – CoinDesk – Coindesk

What do we talk about when we talk about progressive proof-of-work (ProgPoW) on Ethereum?

On the surface, ProgPoW is a proposed update to the mining algorithm of the worlds second-largest blockchain by market cap that would theoretically favor less well-resourced miners.

At its core, though, ProgPoW has become a flashpoint for how Ethereum makes big decisions. The developers have effectively become the legislative body of the decentralized nation-state that is Ethereum. And if they make a decision that makes enough miners angry, it could split the chain (again).

The ProgPoW debate reignited on Friday, Feb. 21 in the Ethereum Core Developers call when Ethereum Improvement Proposal (EIP) 1057 the code change involving ProgPoW moved forward, surprising many in the greater Ethereum world, such that Vitalik Buterin himself called it "ninja re-approved."

ProgPoW could drive a split on Ethereum if it goes forward, potentially similar to what happened after the DAO hack in 2016, which led to the creation of ethereum classic (ETC). But ethereum (and its native currency, ETH) is worth vastly more now than it was then. Much more is at stake.

The next big decision regarding ProgPoW will be made at the Ethereum Core Developers meeting on Friday at 14:00 UTC (those interested can watch it live on YouTube; well be there). If the developers who preside over the blockchain decide to move ProgPoW forward, it won't happen for weeks, however.

The current plan is to allocate a whole hour to ProgPoW, according to the final agenda for tomorrow's call, with spokespeople from both sides making their case.

ProgPoW revisited

The Ethereum ecosystem has been talking about ProgPoW for a long time. In January 2019 it looked close to happening and then fell apart. Least Authority, a cloud storage company founded by Zcash's Zooko Wilcox that has a sideline in security audits, was one of the auditors that found ProgPoW did what it billed itself as doing.

Nevertheless, the proposal didn't move.

Which brings us back to the core question: How does Ethereum make big decisions?

Theoretically, Ethereum governance comes down to the miners. The people running mining rigs can run whatever code they want and when enough miners are on a given fork of Ethereum code, that's the official code.

But heres the catch: The code comes from the core developers, but the core developers have no power to force that code on miners. On the other hand, the miners are unlikely to ever be coordinated well enough to tell the developers what to do. So developers have all the writing power and miners have all the execution power.

Except, there are many barely relevant blockchains out there that are mined and don't have much value. It takes more than mining to give a chain value. It takes adoption. So in that way, people businesses and individuals using Ethereum to track intellectual property rights, raise funds in a distributed way and make piles of asset-backed loans have the final say.

Case in point: Ethereum Classic is the original chain of Ethereum and yet Ethereum dwarfs it in real value. Thats because the community voted with its feet and made Ethereum the legitimate chain after the two split in summer 2016.

So it isn't really the miners who have final say, because they are only going to keep working on the chain that has value. And the people give it value. (Well, sort of the people. More on that below.)

So who is really in charge of Ethereum? It's tough to say! Decision-making is quite distributed, and the question is whether or not that distribution has yielded stability or stasis.

"I think this is more kind of a referendum on the Ethereum governance process," Spencer Noon, an investor at DTC Capital and a ProgPoW opponent, told CoinDesk. "Frankly, contentious issues like this, contentious anything, this is how you harden your governance. If it didn't happen with ProgPoW this would have come up with some other issue."

How EIPs work

Ethereum developers have a process for deciding what to add to the blockchains official codebase (for mining and other things as well). Its called the "EIP process."

Basically, the core developers decide by consensus whether or not to go forward with major and minor changes and then it becomes real when the miners implement it.

Hudson Jameson, who serves as an interface between the core devs and all of Ethereum's many fans wrote on Reddit recently, "We rely on the core developers to be altruistic and listen to the community. I consider my role as a developer-community liaison who helps the protocol devs know what the community is thinking."

Developers never really meant to get in the middle of the philosophical questions, and yet that's where they are. The EIP process as written on the Ethereum Foundation website actually addresses this:

"The EIPs process and AllCoreDevs call were not designed to address contentious non-technical issues, but, due to the lack of other ways to address these, often end up entangled in them.

Eric Conner of Gnosis wrote an evaluation of the decision-making process and suggested there should be an official way of discussing these matters.

To that end, Jameson told CoinDesk key stakeholders are working on an updated EIP process that will incorporate more kinds of input, which may enable more people to get heard.

What is a fork and how does it happen?

A fork happens when there's no consensus between miners about which chain to mine on a blockchain. Little forks happen all the time when two miners think they've both found a block, but pretty soon the network will coalesce around the work of one miner and the miner working on the other block will have just wasted some time.

Too bad for the losing miner but also no big deal. That miner will quit and join everyone else. The world will not notice, because they will stop mining that forked chain. When miners don't coalesce around one chain, though, that becomes a contentious fork.

Code updates can engender such forks.

When a new set of code gets released, if some miners upgrade to it and some refuse to, the group that refuses will create a new copy of the chain. Now every wallet has become two wallets. Your private key will work in two places!

Crypto has been through this tumult a bunch of times now, so all the big players know the drill. But still, it engenders unexpected work, vitriol, confused oracles (see DeFi below) and general market chaos.

Is there any significant precedent for a minority of miners bringing users with them?

Bitcoin had this brutal debate about "block size" which culminated in 2017. No need to go into it here, but it resulted in a fork that led to the creation of bitcoin cash (BCH). Not wanting to see two currencies, Coinbase, for example, did not acknowledge the bitcoin cash fork for several months.

But other exchanges did acknowledge bitcoin cash, and while it never became "bitcoin" it did end up proving to have more value than many expected it would have, which left Coinbase users feeling as though they had been penalized for using Coinbase.

So Coinbase eventually relented and listed BCH, which meant BTC users on the app got a nice airdrop by the time it showed up. So in that way, exchanges legitimize chain splits. So now you've got two chains! What does that matter? More on that below.

Either way, there's discussion underway in terms of how to better reflect the various stakeholders' views in a given debate, especially a contentious one.

Any choice that's made about the "officialness" of given discussion could limit voices, however, because some channels may not be active or might even be blocked in some parts of the world. What language is used to have official Ethereum conversation? What time are the discussions? These are all important questions for global software and decentralized governance.

And, of course, increasing complexity is also going to implicitly advantage one constituency: the status quo. The more people get involved with overseeing any process the easier it becomes to just leave everything as it is.

What is the point of the ProgPoW upgrade?

Preventing centralization.

Under Ethereums current Ethash algorithm, application-specific integrated circuit (ASICs) are very powerful, meaning they mine ETH at a lower price than graphics processing units (GPUs).

Ethereum-specialized ASICs, which have been around since 2018, are very expensive. Deep-pocketed organizations are the ones most likely to run them, threatening a concentration of hash power that could lead to questions about the trustworthiness of the chain.

Kristy-Leigh Minehan, a developer who specializes in software for hardware, is one of three developers who put together the ProgPoW code, and the only one not working pseudonymously. She spoke to CoinDesk and said there are several hacks against Ethash, several of which are also described in Least Authority's audit.

Minehan is quick to point out the term "ASIC" isn't super helpful, because in a way every computing device is an ASIC of one kind or another. Minehan contends that software should be designed for the hardware you want to favor, not against hardware you don't like.

ProgPoW is designed to use all the capabilities of GPUs, which are machines that can do several things (rather than Ethereum-specific ASICs, which can only mine ETH).

Basically, Minehan wrote early in the debate, Ethereum can be more decentralized if it favors GPUs because GPU owners have options.

Here's the reasoning: When there are many devices in the world that can do many different things (such as GPUs), that situation better decentralizes Ethereum because those machines can switch back and forth to contributing to the security of the network. They will contribute when their owners deem that it makes sense for them to do so. But they can also do other things with those devices. This is key.

When the network starts to be dominated by big rigs that can only do one thing, there won't be this network that can switch in and out of working for Ethereum when and if it makes sense.

The concern is that one day there could be enough Ethereum ASICs out there that people stop mining with GPUs, which would probably mean Ethereum would have a higher hash rate but fewer players, and it's the number of players that increases the security from the whims of centralization, not the hash rate.

But aren't ASICs inevitable?

Minehan argues that the key difference here is that prior algorithms have not been designed with GPU hardware in mind, as mentioned above. ASICs gain efficiency by stripping things out.

The heart and soul of the next generation of Ethereum is proof-of-stake (PoS) and ProgPoW is all about PoW.

But when PoS kicks in, a PoW chain will still run as a shard, for at least a couple more years. Judging by the way everything else goes on Ethereum (especially as the chain becomes more valuable) a few more years could become "many more years."

The first objection most opponents make to ProgPoW is that the imminence of Eth 2.0 mitigates the need. "That was the same excuse used in March 2018," Minehan told CoinDesk. "We cannot tie Eth 1.0 features to Eth 2.0 features. These are separate teams."

Miners will continue to earn fresh ETH on the PoW chain as long as that shard runs, but then again, they won't be as powerful. So maybe centralization wouldn't matter as much?

Unless it would. Don't you envy the core devs?

But will Eth 2.0 ever actually happen?

Probably. Last summer it was expected to go live this quarter, then it became July 2020 but who can say?

Stakeholders get very touchy about this question when asked. Nothing ever comes out on time, after all, and thats usually OK.

"Here's where I think the real debate is, it's not miners versus dapps. It's really Eth 1.0 versus Eth 2.0," Minehan said.

Why not just give GPU miners what they want in the meantime? What's the fear?

Decentralized finance is big. As we've previously reported, there's roughly $1 billion in crypto assets locked up in various DeFi projects. When there's a contentious fork, it creates two of everything, bringing us back to the two-chain question. Just as every ETH becomes two ETH on two chains, a hard fork would copy every smart contract (and the balances in them!) at the block where the fork happened. So, as an example, every loan on Compound would become two loans on two different chains.

Two chains might really screw with oracles, the eyeballs on the network that help DeFi software know what to do. Oracle shenanigans were a problem very recently.

The real issue, though, is for something like USDC, which promises one real dollar for each USDC ERC-20 token. What does it do when there are two chains with two copies of all those tokens?

That said, Dragonfly Capital's Haseeb Qureshi wrote a post with crypto veteran Leland Lee arguing that Ethereum is now unforkable. The piece argues that big players in DeFi, especially MakerDAO, will have the power to pick the chain that has value after a fork.

In other words, there will never really be a fork because companies like MakerDAO and Circle (which runs CENTRE with Coinbase, and CENTRE runs USDC) will always be able to say this is the real chain and that one isn't. In fact, MakerDAO can hit its emergency eject button on the unwanted chains copied smart contracts and force everything to liquidate. Well call this the distributed-ledger equivalent of taking your smart-contract ball and going home to the preferred chain.

"If you imagine the movie version of this saga, the minority chain looks like an abandoned metropolis," Qureshi and Lee wrote.

If one chain lives and the other pretty much dies, what's the harm?

CoinDesk has to be honest here: That's not super clear.

After all, if DeFi rallies to one chain and not the other, it's less likely that a company like Coinbase (to return to our example from bitcoin cash's split from bitcoin) would actually need to deal with the second chain.

So there could be a contentious fork, but then it's possible that so few adherents would remain on the lesser fork that even they would abandon it.

For what it's worth, Ethereum Classic has already considered ProgPoW and decided not to pursue it.

Who wants ProgPoW anyway?

This seems to be the split: The mining hash power on Ethereum voted overwhelmingly for ProgPoW but they aren't talking about it publicly much, other than these guys. Recently there have also been some proponents on GitHub, too.

The entrepreneurs, who are vocal, do not want ProgPoW, because they fear the consequences of a contentious split. The EthHub podcast did a great job representing this view.

Our own podcast, The Breakdown, also did a great analysis of the online conversation last week, concluding that Ethereum has entered a conservative era.

OK, but which side is Vitalik on?

For all intents and purposes, ethereums creator seems to be against it (though he hasnt said definitively). He did, however, scold core developers for bringing the issue back, because the sudden return, he tweeted, "did *not* help make people trust the governance or feel safe.

The dispute seems to have taken the core developers somewhat by surprise.

Ethereums hard fork coordinator, James Hancock, said on the Feb. 21 dev call, "I have not seen any evidence that there is an ideological [rift] or people willing to step up to actually have a network split and if I'm wrong about that I'll resign as hard fork coordinator.

Despite all the controversy, Hancock could still be right. None of the vocal opponents of ProgPoW are miners, and it takes miners to split the chain.

Nevertheless, as of this writing, online sentiment seems to lean toward a Biden nomination... I mean ProgPoW stalling again. So Hancock was right but not in the way he meant.

To wade even deeper into this topic, Jameson wrote a more detailed explainer focused on game-theoretical and technical elements. For his part, Jameson comes down against ProgPoW in the end.

In sum

To recap: If developers are Ethereum's reluctant legislators, then miners are its distributed, decentralized executive branch.

Unlike in a real nation-state, Ethereum's executive arm can split itself and make a new chunk of land with copies of all the houses (wallets) and cities (smart contracts) that make this country great. They can do that at any time.

The denizens of Ethereum can choose to simultaneously live on both virtual landmasses, too, but there's a decent chance that the leaders of the cities (entrepreneurs) are powerful enough in the DeFi era that they can persuade citizens to only live on one.

It's fair to say, though, that most of these entrepreneurs would rather just not have to deal with it. CoinDesk will be on the call Friday and will report back as soon as its over.

The leader in blockchain news, CoinDesk is a media outlet that strives for the highest journalistic standards and abides by a strict set of editorial policies. CoinDesk is an independent operating subsidiary of Digital Currency Group, which invests in cryptocurrencies and blockchain startups.

See more here:

Ethereums ProgPOW Debate Is About Much More Than Mining - CoinDesk - Coindesk

Cryptocurrency Airdrops and Giveaways: What They Are and What’s Next – Bitcoin News

There are a number of ways people can obtain cryptocurrencies and one of them is through airdrops, a type of distribution where creators send free coins to numerous crypto wallet addresses in order to drive adoption. Airdrops have been leveraged for years and token distributors believe that its a great way to disburse coins fairly and to raise awareness. New airdrops are announced nearly every month that allow people to obtain free digital tokens.

Also read: $65M Investment Fuels Natural Gas Providers Behind-the-Meter Bitcoin Mining Operation

In the world of cryptocurrency, airdrop defines a type of crypto distribution where free coins are sent to multiple digital wallets. Sometimes people have to engage in community building efforts like retweeting a project or completing a survey in order to gain the tokens. The idea is to distribute airdropped assets so people become aware of the tokens as they are dispersed far and wide. Some airdrops that have been released over the years have gone from zero to gathering real-world value when measured in other digital currencies like BTC, BCH, or ETH.

One of the oldest and most popular airdrops in history was auroracoin (AUR) which was meant to be a cryptocurrency designated for Icelands citizens. The term airdrop started floating around the crypto scene when the creators of auroracoin announced the issuance period that started March 25, 2014. Icelandic residents with a permanent resident ID could register on the website to receive 31.8 AUR which at the time was worth $385. Today each AUR is only worth $0.07 per coin and that initial airdrop dubbed the cryptocurrency for Iceland would only be worth $2.17.

After AUR, many other famous airdrops followed the distribution scheme, giving away cryptos for free. Furthermore, projects that launched and established themselves years prior have airdropped coins as well. Decred airdropped 258,000 DCR in 2016 and in 2017 Stellar (XLM) gave away 19% of their total token supply to people who owned BTC. A number of airdrop projects use the concept of attempting to leverage an existing and established network effect of users from other blockchains.

More recently, initial coin offering (ICO) projects and token application creators have leveraged airdrops in order to establish themselves within the cryptoconomy. Airdrops have been fueled by established projects with token standards operating on networks like Ethereum and Bitcoin Cash. Since the inception of the Simple Ledger Protocol (SLP) token standard, airdrops have become part of the BCH community. Now people can randomly airdrop SLP tokens to numerous public BCH addresses any time they want.

For instance, individuals and organizations can leverage Bitcoin.coms SLP Dividend Calculator to airdrop SLP tokens to a valid token ID. In order to use the platform, simply visit the tools webpage and enter the token ID of the SLP coin you wish to airdrop. After that, you will need to enter the receivers SLP token ID, the total number of SLP tokens to airdrop (dividend payment), and then build the transaction. After the transaction is built, a QR-based payment invoice will be made available to complete the airdrop.

If you are not into making your own tokens and distributing an airdrop yourself, you can always search the net for any upcoming airdrops. For example, the website airdrops.io is an online resource that discloses which airdrops are coming out next.

The site shows the hottest airdrops, latest airdrops, exclusive airdrops, Telegram channels with airdrops, Twitter airdrops, and basically every coin giveaway under the sun. Airdrops.io verifies and aggregates airdrops and bounties daily to bring you the most recent and profitable earning opportunities. Choose an airdrop and follow the instructions provided to claim free crypto tokens, the website notes.

A few airdrops advertised on the website include coin giveaways from Bitcoin Rhodium, Pointpay, Simbcoin, Escher, Daps, and Binance Jex. For each airdrop, the website explains the giveaway details and how to get involved. Theres a bunch of other airdrop-guide and review websites as well like airdropter.com, coinairdrops.com, and airdropalert.com.

Usually, there are two ways airdrops are distributed by their creators, which is selecting recipients at random or letting people know on social media, forums, and websites like airdrops.io. In the crypto world, some users could care less about airdrops and think they are garbage with negligible value.

However, other crypto enthusiasts comb the internet daily in search of these free coin giveaways with hopes of catching some free money. It is worth noting, though, that government tax agencies have taken notice of airdropped coins and you could get taxed for receiving them. Entities like the IRS have issued guidance in regard to airdropped cryptocurrencies. The U.S. tax agencys airdrop guidance, however, is confusing and organizations including lawmakers want better clarification. As long as cryptocurrency exists, airdrops will likely continue and distributors will take advantage of the crypto communitys powerful network effects.

What do you think about airdrops and the numerous amounts of cryptocurrency giveaways in the cryptoconomy? Do you search for airdrops or do you think they are a waste of time? Let us know what you think about this topic in the comments section below.

Disclaimer: This article is for informational purposes only. It is not an offer or solicitation of an offer to buy or sell, or a recommendation, endorsement, or sponsorship of any products, services, or companies. None of the aforementioned airdrops or airdrop recommendation/review sites are endorsed by our website. The data is strictly for informational purposes and research, as all readers should use due diligence with any crypto project within this ecosystem. Bitcoin.com does not provide investment, tax, legal, or accounting advice. Neither the company nor the author is responsible, directly or indirectly, for any damage or loss caused or alleged to be caused by or in connection with the use of or reliance on any content, goods or services mentioned in this article.

Image credits: Shutterstock, airdropter.com, coinairdrops.com, airdropalert.com, airdrops.io, auroracoin (AUR), Blockchain.com, Stellar (XLM), Fair Use, Wiki Commons, and Pixabay.

Did you know you can buy and sell BCH privately using our noncustodial, peer-to-peer Local Bitcoin Cash trading platform? The local.Bitcoin.com marketplace has thousands of participants from all around the world trading BCH right now. And if you need a bitcoin wallet to securely store your coins, you can download one from us here.

Jamie Redman is a financial tech journalist living in Florida. Redman has been an active member of the cryptocurrency community since 2011. He has a passion for Bitcoin, open source code, and decentralized applications. Redman has written thousands of articles for news.Bitcoin.com about the disruptive protocols emerging today.

Read the rest here:

Cryptocurrency Airdrops and Giveaways: What They Are and What's Next - Bitcoin News

Review: Going Dark The Secret Social Lives of Extremists by Julia Ebner – PoliticsHome.com

Julia Ebner was deservedly praised for her first book, The Rage The Vicious Circle of Islamist and Far-Right Extremism, which shone a light on the interdependence of apparently viscerally opposed groups. Thus one groups actions justify the others narrative of victimhood that then provokes them to act in response, which in turn further reinforces the first groups sense of grievance leading them to take yet more extreme action and so on.

But for her second book, Going Dark The Secret Social Lives of Extremists, Julia Ebner deserves a medal a medal for bravery. In it she describes her experiences going undercover to join a series of extremist groupings, such as Trad Wives and MuslimTec, attending neo-Nazi rock festivals, and participating in closed online forums plotting ISIS cyberattacks on American infrastructure and orchestrating the extreme-right presence at Charlottesville.

In doing so, she exposes how extremist thinking whether alt-right or Islamist is propagated, how neophytes are drawn in and how ideology is turned into violent action. The attitudes she describes within the groups she infiltrated are scary not least in the medieval attitudes to women that were displayed.

The approach in all of the groups she penetrated was similar: create a social bubble where those participating feel secure, where the most extreme ideologies can be normalised and where those within the groups can be emboldened to spread the word or take direct action outside.

All of the groups were skilled in the use of social media to get their messages out not only to each other but more widely. Their aim is to spread divisive content to such an extent that the mainstream media (a term of abuse used by both the extreme right and the extreme left to undermine traditional journalism) has no choice but to cover it. They want to provoke and to polarise: no-one can sit on the fence, they have to take sides. The prize is to shift the Overton Window the range of ideas that are deemed acceptable in public discourse so that ideas that were once regarded as extreme and unacceptable become apparently reasonable points of view.

Julia Ebners descriptions of life within the groups she visited under a string of aliases are chilling. However, what is even more disturbing is to watch the techniques they promote surfacing in the wider political world. She writes about the 4Ds tactic: DISMISS the opponent; DISTORT the facts; DISTRACT from the central issue; and DISMAY the audience. If we look around, we see these tactics being deployed within mainstream politics.

Just the last few weeks have seen an advisor appointed to Downing Street who had espoused eugenics and racist theories of intelligence. He has since resigned, but his views were not initially repudiated, suggesting that the Overton Window has indeed been moved so as to include such ideology in the realm of the normal and acceptable.

Julia Ebners investigations show that what is going on within the extremist bubbles must be taken seriously. The groups have a sophisticated grasp of how to use propaganda and how to manipulate social media and the internet to promote their ideas. They have access to advanced hacking skills and are happy to contemplate using those skills to wreak havoc on the systems that underpin our critical infrastructure. And they already use their networks to plot and coordinate violent attacks and disorder.

Lord Harris of Haringey is a Labour peer

Read more from the original source:

Review: Going Dark The Secret Social Lives of Extremists by Julia Ebner - PoliticsHome.com

How Kevin DeAnna Orchestrated the Alt-Right’s Approach to Conservative Institutions – Southern Poverty Law Center

When WorldNetDaily (WND) named Trump Man of the Year in an unbylined article penned by DeAnna that he sent to his then-girlfriend Katie McHugh with the subject line My Tribute to the God-Emperor, the future president wrote in a Jan. 1, 2016, tweet: Thank you so much to WND.com for naming me the 2015 Man of the Year. This is indeed a great honor for me!

The God-Emperor as some on the alt-right called Trump had honored DeAnna with a digital homage.

President Donald Trump was named WorldNetDaily's "Man of the Year" in 2016, inspiring Kevin DeAnna to refer to him as "the God-Emperor." (Screenshot via WorldNetDaily.)

DeAnna, a longtime white nationalist activist and blogger who had kept his more extremist affiliations veiled to hold down his job at WND, boosted then-candidate Trump from the safety of various pseudonyms.

As Gregory Hood, DeAnna contributed to a variety of sites that would become crucial to the alt-rights rise, including the National Policy Institutes Radix Journal, Counter-Currents, and American Renaissance; meanwhile, as James Kirkpatrick, DeAnna served as a frequent contributor to the white nationalist, anti-immigration site VDARE. His connections to these pen names were unveiled by a trove of emails from former Breitbart editor Katie McHugh who also dated DeAnna from 2013 to 2016, and, again, briefly in 2017 that were leaked to Hatewatch. (McHugh, once a part of this world, has since denounced her ties to white nationalism.) Throughout the course of their relationship, DeAnna often asked McHugh to edit his essays under the Kirkpatrick and Hood bylines, as well as sent her links to published articles.

DeAnna was an earlier Trump booster under both pen names as well. Writing as Gregory Hood for white nationalist publicationRadix Journal in July 2015, he implored his fellow extremists to support Trump, arguing that the future leader had shifted the Overton window in the movements favor.

But Trumps tweet was important for another reason: it was evidence that DeAnna, a longtime white nationalist, had managed to hide in plain sight. DeAnnas political cleverness permitted him to cycle between extremist movements and his various positions within the conservative mainstream. This allowed him to form a youth movement, the Youth for Western Civilization (YWC), that would provide the basis for the budding alt-right and radicalize some of its most prominent leaders while nestled safely in the conservative machine.

DeAnnas own career trajectory which has led him from one of the most powerful right-wing political institutions into the belly of the alt-right illuminates how devout white nationalists creep into some of the same institutions that pride themselves on the myth that William F. Buckley and other conservative stalwarts purged antisemites and racists from the conservative movement.

Neither DeAnna nor his various editors and coworkers throughout the years including American Renaissances Jared Taylor, WorldNetDailys Joseph Farah, the National Policy Institutes Richard Spencer and Counter-Currents Gregory Johnson responded to repeated requests for comment via email.

DeAnnas career as one of the most prominent, pseudonymous thinkers on the alt-right was no accident. In fact, it fits with his previous work as a youth organizer. He plunged into the world of far-right organizing in the early 2000s while a student at the College of William & Mary in Williamsburg, Virginia.

DeAnnas foray into campus activism began with his involvement with the libertarian-leaning student paper, The Remnant, in 2001. He and fellow student Marcus Epstein served as managing editor and editor-in-chief, respectively, in 2003 using their platform to bring far-right academic Paul Gottfried to campus for a speech slamming Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. The event was sponsored by the Rockford Institute, an ultra-conservative institution founded in 1976. For decades, it was best known for publishing the conservative magazineChronicles, which featured writing from an array of far-right figures, including Pat Buchanan, as well as white nationalist-connected essayist Sam Francis and The Social Contract editor Wayne Lutton.

Epstein wasnt the only person DeAnna found through campus activities who became involved with YWC. In 2005, DeAnna met Craig Burgers after he started blogging for the website Smash Left-Wing Scum. Burgers and DeAnna were affiliated with their schools respective branches of the right-wing, libertarian-leaning Young Americans for Freedom DeAnna as a group leader on his campus and Burgers as a member at Michigan State University.

After graduation, DeAnna was hired at the right-wing Leadership Institute (LI) as a field representative. The institute, founded in 1979, has been home to a number of prominent politicians and activists on the American right, including Sen. Mitch McConnell, R-Ky., Americans for Tax Reform president Grover Norquist and conservative provocateur James OKeefe.

YWC was founded shortly thereafter in 2006. Whether LI staff were aware of DeAnnas views is unclear. When Hatewatch first reported on the connections between LI and DeAnnas activities with the YWC in 2011, the Leadership Institute declined to comment. LI founder Morton C. Blackwell told NBC News in a report published May 12, 2011, There is no formal connection between the two groups, emphasizing that it was one of the smallest of the more than 1,400 conservative campus groups that receive organizational help and training from the institute.

The Leadership Institute did not respond to requests for comment for this article.

But DeAnna, at least, seemed to view the two as connected. A satirical autobiography, which DeAnna told McHugh he wrote while he was at the institute in 2010, sent to her by DeAnna in 2014, illustrated how he viewed his role.

April 10, 2014, 2:26 PM: DeAnna . . . was told he must travel to the capitol of the Empire, a land of marble and Negroes. There he would form an alliance with the Conservative Movement a mighty force that had harnessed all those who still cared about the fate of their nation into a great political coalition. . . .

Upon arriving, he found that he was enlisted in a far different enterprise than he had once thought. He found that the movement only had three goals tax cuts for millionaires, cheap labor for corporations, and never ending warfare on behalf of a far away land known as Zion. . . .

He grew in wisdom and experience each word let [sic] to another word, each deed to another deed. Soon, he found he could lead these students in greater causes. No campus was safe from the beauty of his words and the power of his charisma, no idiotic conservative idea could not be co-opted, no homely female college Republican chair could resist his patented technique of getting her really drunk and bragging he had a free hotel room. Comrades came and went, many betrayed and many proved their loyalty. In time, a movement began to be formed.

In the completely logical location of Lynchburg, VA, a small group of Odinic warriors adopted the half breed German into their midst. . . . DeAnna proclaimed the birth of a new organization, Youth for Western Civilization, which would realize the lost promise of the conservative movement and reclaim Vinland once and for all. Under the banner of the warhammer, YWC forces spread out across the content [sic], lacking in weapons but mighty in willpower. Sure of his destiny, but not of how he would pay the rent, DeAnna fights every day to achieve his destiny of total Aryan victory and somehow getting out of debt.

DeAnnas declaration that his goal of total Aryan victory contradicted his efforts in articles published by NBC News and elsewhere to downplay YWCs racialist overtones.

DeAnna spoke to McHugh candidly about how he believed the more mainstream conservatives at the institute perceived his politics. Writing to McHugh in September 2017, a few weeks after the Unite the Right rally in Charlottesville, he expressed surprise that LI employees had been dismayed by McHughs anti-Muslim tweets. These same tweets resulted in McHughs firing from Breitbart in May 2017.

McHugh, Sept. 8, 2017, 4:26 pm: LI staffers were furious at me over some tweets about Muslim immigration after I gave a speech there. . . .

DeAnna, Sept. 8, 2017, 4:40 pm: Thats utterly bizarre. I was just talking to LI staff[.] I jokingly said I was Alt Right before there was an Alt Right, they all did the old oh, thats our Kevin laugh and then we talked about campus programming and they said how good it was to see me. . . . What did they do, send an email saying you arent welcome? I dont think they are even allowed to ban you from programs. Maybe as faculty, but for Gods sake, even Matt Heimbach is a YLS [Youth Leadership School a two-day training for young activists sponsored by LI] graduate.

Tim Dionisopoulos, former Youth for Western Civilization member. (Photo via Facebook)

DeAnna wasnt the only YWC member to settle at LI. Tim Dionisopoulos, the groups former Providence-based headof the regions unofficial YWC chapter, wrote for LIs Campus Reform blog until he left for a job at the conservative Media Research Center in early 2014. Likewise, as Hatewatch reported in 2011, Epstein also allegedly held an internship at the institute. Others including Heimbach, who founded YWCs Towson University chapter, and Devin Saucier took part in institute training.

They trained this entire next generation of white nationalists, Heimbach toldLuke OBrien at HuffPost in 2016.

DeAnnas position at the institute gave him time to take part in other far-right activities. In 2006, Epstein and DeAnna co-founded the ultra-conservative discussion group, the Robert A. Taft Club, alongside Richard Spencer, then an editor at The American Conservative. The club served as a discussion group for like-minded far-right personalities, and it featured a plethora of speakers throughout the years including more mainstream figures such as Rep. Ron Paul, R-Texas. It also provided a space for extremists to gather, socialize and strategize in a manner that was publicly frowned upon by the conservative mainstream.

But LI was far from the only mainstream conservative institution that made YWCs growth possible. The groups presence at the annual Conservative Political Action Conference, or CPAC, provided it with a large platform.

In 2011, DeAnna came to CPAC for a panel called Will Immigration Kill the GOP? Jared Taylor, head of the white nationalist think tank American Renaissance, praised the event as one of the most pointed discussions of immigration at an event that often tried to avoid the subject.

The same April 2011 issue of American Renaissances now-defunct print newsletter that included Taylors report on CPAC contained an appeal to subscribers to donate to YWC. DeAnna, Taylor wrote, was an eloquent and distinguished young man who knows how important our cultural identity is. Despite YWCs almost studious avoidance of describing the Western civilization that it sought to protect as a white one, Taylors reference to our cultural identity clearly had one group in mind: white Americans.

DeAnnas departure from the YWC to, in his words, move onto different things coincided with his blossoming career as a pseudonymous white nationalist blogger under the pen names Gregory Hood and James Kirkpatrick. He also took a new job at Joseph Farahs ultra-conservative online publication, WorldNetDaily.

WND was one of the primary conduits for conservative conspiracy theories, including the birther theorythat President Obama was not born in the United States. Its unclear whether WND was aware of DeAnnas side gig as a blogger for several white nationalist websites. Recent reportingon Paul Kersey, aka WND marketing coordinator Michael Thompson, demonstrates he was not the only one. On May 25, 2012, WND published a lengthy response to an article in the SPLCs Intelligence Report on the 30 most prominent activistsin the radical right. Titled 4 from WND on Most Dangerous List,the piece highlighted DeAnna and Farah, among others, for their presence on the list.

In emails, Farahs relationship with DeAnna seems amicable and Farah seems either unaware or willing to overlook some of DeAnnas more radical connections perhaps because DeAnna attracted minimal attention otherwise. Most of his contributions to the site where he worked from 2012 to sometime in 2018, with a brief break starting in late 2013 and extending into part of 2014 lacked a byline, and articles he wrote under his own name up until 2013 were par for the course for WND. Among them was an interview with an authorwho called conspiracies around the Bilderberg Group a reality; an op-ed that posited without evidencethat mass Islamic immigration is transforming the Western character of [Europe]; and a defense of Russias crackdownon the dissident punk rock group Pussy Riot.

According to a BuzzFeed profile on McHugh published in May 2019, DeAnna and McHugh started dating in 2013, after the two met at a party in Virginia. A few months later, in December 2013, DeAnna made a reference to McHugh that he had ended his employment with WND. He tried to continue contributing to the website on at least one occasion. Im not sure why WND wont publish me anymore. Probably because I up and quit, DeAnna wrote to McHugh on Dec. 30, 2013, attaching a column on Duck Dynasty that he hoped the Daily Caller then McHughs employer could publish.

That same year, DeAnna began to push forward on a plan to join the U.S. Marine Corps. While living in Lynchburg, Virginia, DeAnna used his newfound free time to prepare for boot camp.

DeAnna, Jan. 16, 2014, 4:30 pm: When I came to Lynchburg, all I wanted was quiet training to get ready for the USMC, not a million things and new commitments. Once I get a ship date in stone I may just have to tell everyone in politics to shut up and leave me alone, as the USMC comes first.

Writing again to McHugh in early June 2014 not long before he was supposed to head to boot camp he noted:

I already have the kind of Prince of the Alt Right type life as a backup the USMC is a way for me to break into the mainstream at least somewhat, which has greater returns, at least economically.

But in the end, it was DeAnnas Prince of the Alt Right life that won out. The specifics of DeAnna and what happened with the Marines are unclear.

His work with Farahs site, combined with his growing responsibilities as a freelancer for several white nationalist publications, took a toll. Between salvaging VDARE crap, WND articles, and actually trying to fit in some important work, he wrote in a Jan. 12, 2016, email to McHugh.

Still, working at WND had its perks.

DeAnna could push his white nationalist work into the mainstream. In a March 15, 2016, email, American Renaissances Jared Taylor implored WND and Breitbart to boost an updated version of his organizations Color of Crime report:

We are about to release the updated Color of Crime and I thought you might want to look at an advanced copy. . . [I]t would, of course, be great if WND or Breitbart could mention it.

This is all based on very sober analysis of government statistics, and I think the data and conclusions are bullet proof. The report is by New Century Foundation and doesnt say AmRen on it anywhere, though the link to us is easy to find.

I think its damn good and I just wish it could break into the mainstream.

Alongside McHugh and DeAnna, Taylor messaged DeAnnas WND coworker, Michael Thompson, who worked in marketing. Thompson had been writing for American Renaissance and other white nationalist publications under the pseudonym Paul Kersey.

One of DeAnnas biggest successes at WNDaside from getting the God-Emperors attention, of coursewas publishing a nearly-100-page report on the dangers of anti-fascism. The unbylined report, titled Antifa: What Americans Need to Know About the Alt-Left, was released Sept. 25, 2017. DeAnna sent excerpts of an early draft for friends, including McHugh, to review.

The introduction painted antifascists as members of Americas most dangerous domestic terrorist group. DeAnna argued that Antifa didnt arise in opposition to the fascists; rather, it was there first.

Antifa arent the real fascists or the real racists. They arent militant Hillary Clinton supporters or Nazis in disguise. Nor are they anything new. They are simply the same leftists who have drowned the world in blood under the cover of egalitarian slogans since the days of Lenin.

To understand what happened in Charlottesville, whats happening in the United States today, and what is going to happen to our country in the near future, its time for all Americans to see these violent extremists as they really are, in their own words.

While none of these talking points were out of step with the conservative machines hyperbolic coverage of left-wing activism, DeAnna made at least one goal clear in a Sept. 1, 2017, email to McHugh:

Incidentally, I pretty much defend fascism in chapter 3. But then again, so did [Austrian economist Ludwig von] Mises.

DeAnnas invocation of Mises likely refers to the thinkers proclamation in 1927 six years before Hitler seized control of the Reichstag that it cannot be denied that Fascism and similar movements aiming at the establishment of dictatorships are full of the best intentions and that their intervention has, for the moment, saved European civilization.

DeAnna boosted his own work under the safety of his pseudonyms. Writing as James Kirkpatrick, he reviewed the report for VDARE, observing that the book oddly lists no author. Furthermore, Kirkpatrick contended, Antifa demonstrates that anti-fascism is not merely Left Totalitarianism, but now [also] deeply anti-white.

The fact that such a report, Kirkpatrick concluded, was published by WND demonstrates that mainstream conservatives are finally waking up to the terrifying reality of the American Lefts paramilitaries.

Most works focused on the rise of the alt-right have zeroed in on the work of far-right academic Paul Gottfried, whose 2008 address at the H.L. Mencken Clubs first annual meeting lay out an early vision for the alternative right. Gottfrieds vision of a conservative movement distinct from the hegemony of the neoconservative establishment was, in some ways, actualized in YWC long before he emerged on the scene.

Kevin DeAnna speaks at a 2009 conference of the H.L. Mencken Club. (Photo via Facebook)

Gottfried arguedthat the new right that the H.L. Mencken Club sought to embolden had youth and exuberance on our side. These youthful post-paleos were well-educated young professionals, who consider themselves to be on the right, but not of the current conservative movement. But while Gottfried argued in favor of seizing control of conservative institutions, he did not elaborate on how these young professionals ought to interact with the conservative establishment in detail.

YWC, which arguably represented the most viable option for bridging the chasm between the extreme, white nationalist right and the mainstream, officially disintegrated in 2013, and its members took various paths. Some, such as Heimbach, leaning into accusations that YWCs racial chauvinism was too extreme. As journalist Vegas Tenold documented in his book "Everything You Love Will Burn: Inside the Rebirth of White Nationalism in America," Heimbach, who met DeAnna in 2010 at CPAC, was almost instantly engrossed by the latters project. YWC served as the basis for Heimbachs White Student Union at Towson University and, later, his Traditionalist Youth Network, which was explicit in its white nationalist tendencies.

But others, such as DeAnna, sought refuge in the conservative establishment while keeping their white nationalist views veiled.

DeAnna, for example, did not take kindly to Heimbachs grandiose displays. Writing to McHugh on Feb. 26, 2015, he referred to Heimbach, then head of TYN, as an anti-activist the sort of person who self-discredits all his own ideas.

Unlike Heimbach, DeAnna and his peers traveled in both circles. YWCs ties to the mainstream conservative world had prepared its most active participants well for these dual identities. As DeAnna observed in a 2009 Takis Magazine articletitled The Alternative Right, YWC was not outside of the mainstream it just took what the GOP was saying to its natural conclusion. YWC, he wrote, merely echo[ed] standard conservative rhetoric on immigration, multiculturalism, and American identity. The main distinction between YWC and the mainstream GOP, he continued, was that we actually back it up.

And this extended to their personal lives. As Rosie Gray observedin BuzzFeeds May 2019 profile of McHugh, the circle she and DeAnna ran in was seemingly unremarkable. Surrounding McHugh was a tight, insular group of friends . . . living and working in DC one not dissimilar to other groups of 20- and 30-somethings in media and politics,Gray continued, except [that] some of them were committed extremists. Their friendships served as networks of trust. After all, extremist groups are insular.

Still, those within DeAnnas social circle were not simply extremists, they were white nationalists with years of experience organizing from within the conservative movement.

Former Daily Caller editor Scott Greer. (Photo via Facebook)

One thread from 2014 about CPAC between former YWCers Dionisopoulos, Burgers, Saucier, and DeAnna and then-Daily Caller editor Scott Greer, sheds light on this connection. Not only does it show just how comfortable some members of the the alt-right were in navigating mainstream conservative circles in its early days, but it also demonstrates how these friendships shaped the trajectory of the movement by building networks of trust and cooperation.

Burgers, Feb. 17, 2014, 12:08 pm: What are your plans, if any, for CPAC? I assume DeAnna will be manning the Heathens for Economic Freedom booth, but other than that? . . .

Dionisopoulos, Feb. 17, 2014, 12:16 pm: Ill be there for the MRC [Media Research Center], but no concrete plans as to what Im actually asked with doing. I think its sort of a wander around the media area and hang out type of thing . . .

Burgers, Feb. 20, 2014, 8:41 pm: Alright, I guess I will plan on attending as well then. I assume Katie, Tim, and Scott are covered by work, but are you registering[,] Devin and Kevin? I have to figure out whether or not I should.

Also, I found out today Chulski [of Americans for Prosperity] will be hosting a well-funded open bar party on behalf of Michigan AFP. Well have VIP treatment there should we choose to attend.

Saucier, Feb. 20, 2014, 11:25 pm: I probably wont register, but will be there to help Richard.

Saucier appears to be referring to Richard Spencer. Another email from Saucier on March 6, 2014 the first day of CPAC alerted the group that Jared, presumably Jared Taylor, would be at the conference.

Amid innocuous dinner plans and vineyard excursions, the group organized a gaggle of invite-only white nationalist gatherings in the heart of D.C. Epstein hosted one series, known as the Alt-Right Toastmasters, that brought together journalists, open white nationalists, anti-immigrant stalwarts and a former DHS official for discussions related to the far right. The meetings, which have been reported on by The Atlantic, BuzzFeed and Splinter, served as a vehicle for bringing together the broader D.C. circle DeAnna was a part of. Though Epstein usually blind-copied all participants, the list of invitees to a June 6, 2016, get-together discussing, among other things, The Pros and Cons of Anonymity, includes an array of extremists.

At times, their affiliations were barely veiled. A July 2015 email from Saucier introduces the prospect of inviting Evan Osnos, a reporter for The New Yorker who first reported on the alt-rights loose coalition for Trump in 2015, to a private gathering. Osnos would be wearing a conspicuous name tag and had sworn not to give away any names or specific details about each person, wrote Saucier. While Saucier noted he intended to be conscientious of attendees security concerns, inviting an outsider in would, he continued, be a good opportunity to give this guy an impression of who we are.

Their shared beliefs and mutual concerns about expressing their more radical views held DeAnnas circle together after the collapse of YWC. Without the aura of respectability provided by YWC, however, group members scattered.

We want to have people spread as widely as possible, DeAnna wrote on a March 14, 2016, thread. Of those on the thread which included Epstein, Thompson, McHugh, Dionisopoulos, Greer and Saucier only two, DeAnna and Thompson, worked at the same organization at that time.

Having white nationalists spread across the Beltway wasnt just pragmatic in the sense that it allowed the movement to establish connections with as many institutions as possible it was practical for everyone involved. Said DeAnna in one email: Its a kind of insurance policy for each other.

Photo illustration by SPLC. (Original photo by Jeff Malet)

Read more from the original source:

How Kevin DeAnna Orchestrated the Alt-Right's Approach to Conservative Institutions - Southern Poverty Law Center

FIVE PIECES OF PAPER Set For Matrix Theatre On Holocaust Remembrance Day – Broadway World

Honoring Holocaust Remembrance Day, writer/performer Moti Buchboot brings his solo show Five Pieces of Paper: Stories My Hungarian Grandmother Refused to Tell Me and Other Family Tales to the Matrix Theatre in Los Angeles on Saturday, March 7, at 8pm. The show received its world premiere (directed by Buchboot and Martha Gehman) in the 2019 Hollywood Fringe Festival. Five Pieces of Paper is set to return for five performances in the 2020 HFF this coming June.

The creation of Five Pieces of Paper: Stories My Hungarian Grandmother Refused to Tell Me and Other Family Tales was a direct reaction to the 2017 Charlottesville riots at the University of Virginia at which neo-Nazis, alt-right, neo-Confederates, neo-fascists, white nationalists, Klansmen, and other racist groups marched and attacked counter-protesters. It is a show about countering hate and intolerance, hope and love, remembering the horrors of the not-so-distant past, and giving the audience an emotional multi-sensory experience along the way.

Moti Buchboot is an Israeli artist who moved to Los Angeles in the early 1990s. The grandson of a Holocaust survivor, he shares lessons learned from his Hungarian grandmother who began her life's journey in a Hungarian village, survived the Holocaust, and eventually settled in a small town in Israel. Told as a personal love narrative, this emotional rollercoaster unfolds through acting, Yiddish song, puppetry, storytelling, and on-stage baking. This spiritual ritual is meant to reveal and heal the trauma of a horrifying past.

Buchboot was featured in the role of Giant Blunderbore in Jack and the Beanstalk, the Panto at Santa Barbara's Lobero Theatre. He has also been seen in Pieces of Eight at the Met Theatre (directed by Martha Gehman). He co-created Dialogos at the Unknown Theater and created and directed Love, Loss, Lust, and a Tango at the Barnsdall Theatre. He has toured the world teaching and performing Argentine Tango. He has appeared in national TV commercials as well as on the History Channel, PBS, and MTV. He wrote, directed, and starred in Soul Dance, a short film that made the independent film festival circuit. He is also an author and a photographer. Current projects include Money, the Musical directed by Michael Pollock at Second City Hollywood and Word, a puppet show directed by Roberto Ferreira at the LGBT Center's Davidson/Valentini Theatre. He also has two short films in post-production.

Tickets are $20 may be obtained online at http://www.fivepieces.org. The Matrix Theatre is located at 7657 Melrose Avenue in Los Angeles, 90038.

See the original post:

FIVE PIECES OF PAPER Set For Matrix Theatre On Holocaust Remembrance Day - Broadway World

Knowingly or Unknowingly, CIS Newsletters Promote the Work of White Nationalist Kevin DeAnna – Southern Poverty Law Center

But Hatewatchs analysis of CISs weekly email newsletters shows that for nearly a decade the centerhas been promoting material from Kevin DeAnna, one of the alt-rights most prolific propagandists. CIS newsletters from 2012 to present show the center has circulated at least 83 articles by DeAnna, former Youth for Western Civilization founder and current American Renaissance staff writer. A Hatewatch investigation revealed that DeAnna wrote for VDARE, a white nationalist website run by Peter Brimelow, beginning in 2011, under the pseudonym James Kirkpatrick. CIS circulated Kirkpatrick articles from The Social Contract, a journal established by CISs founder, John Tanton, in 1990. CIS cited Kirkpatricks work at both VDARE and The Social Contract.

Hatewatch reached out to both DeAnna and CIS for comment. DeAnna didnt respond, and CIS declined to comment.

Kevin DeAnna speaks at a 2010 conference of The Social Contract Press. (Screenshot via YouTube)

Hatewatch first detailed the proliferation of VDARE linksin CISs weekly newsletters in 2017, concluding that the anti-immigrant think tank had circulated over 1,700 VDARE articles over the course of 10 years. Krikorian arguedin The Washington Post in March 2017 that such findings were trivial. The center, he contended, linked to immigration commentary (from all sides) in its weekly email roundups; hence, it should come as no shock that some of the authors occasionally . . . turned out to be cranks.

In Kirkpatricks case however, the inclusion of material authored by DeAnna under a pseudonym bolsters already-existing evidence of the centers boosting of white nationalist talking points. DeAnna, under the pseudonym Gregory Hood, was a frequent and prolific contributor to a range of white nationalist sites, beginning in 2008.

CIS began including Kirkpatricks work in the think tanks newsletters in 2012. The number of times Kirkpatrick was cited rose, corresponding to DeAnnas growing involvement with Brimelows site, where he worked as both a writer and an editor. Hatewatch found CIS linked to Kirkpatricks stories three times in 2012; eight times in 2013; 11 times in 2014; 16 times in 2015; 11 times in 2016; eight times in 2017; 10 times in 2018; seven times in 2019; and at least twice in 2020. While most of these articles were focused on matters of immigration, Kirkpatricks role as a white nationalist scribe is barely veiled.

Many of the Kirkpatrick articles in CIS newsletters were riddled with common white nationalist tropes. Perhaps the most common theme involved the conspiracy of the great replacement. The concept originatedwith French far-right thinker Renaud Camus racist book of the same name, published in 2010. Though the term has, at times, been painted as a pseudo-intellectual version of the theory of white genocide, it has nevertheless inspired the same degree of racist violence, including at Christchurch, New Zealand, and El Paso, Texas, in 2019.

A 2018 English adaptation of Camuss original text titled You Will Not Replace Us referred to an ongoing genocide by substitution in both Europe and America. As an article in The Nationon Camus and the great replacement observed, Camus portrayed the so-called replacists that is, proponents of multiculturalism and immigration as soon to be devored [sic] by the replacees they invite in.

CIS linked to numerous pieces from Kirkpatrick that pushed replacement theory. At times, the articles named the racist conspiracy outright. One Sept. 7, 2015, newsletter links to an article titled The Great Replacement Is Killing The EU Long Live a Europe Of Nations! In it, Kirkpatrick refers to the ongoing immigrant invasion in Europe, implying that the continued existence of the European Union has made the replacement of European peoples possible.

In other places, Kirkpatricks references to replacement theory were subtler. CISs Feb. 13, 2016, newsletter promoted an article that blasted then-presidential candidate Marco Rubio for not being sufficiently anti-immigrant. DeAnna, writing as Kirkpatrick, bemoaned the sweeping demographic changes in Europe and the allegedly disastrous effect it would have on Western civilization. Another article, included in CISs Nov. 15, 2018, newsletter, penned by Kirkpatrick for Social Contract press referred to migration as punishment inflicted by a cadre of global elites.

On July 28, 2019, CIS linked to an article titled Say It, GOP! Or Just Give It Up: Open Borders Is TREASON! The Left Is ANTI-WHITE! In the piece, Kirkpatrick claimed the left had ensured that anyone who didnt want whites replaced in their own countries would be tarnished as far right. Furthermore, he noted, assertions that Native Americans or any other indigenous minority in Europe had a right to the land led to the logical conclusion that Westerners needed to be dispossessed. That sort of thinking culminates in genocide, Kirkpatrick told readers, implying the possibility of what white nationalists refer to as a white genocide.

Most of Kirkpatricks articles in CISs newsletter, however, focused on pushing the right to embrace more draconian restrictions on immigration. Like many other authors at VDARE, he lamented the power of what the site often referred as Conservatism, Inc. a stand-in for the right-wing media, think tank, and political establishment and blasted insufficiently anti-immigrant Republicans as traitors.

The first Kirkpatrick piece CIS linked to in its Jan. 27, 2012, newsletter titled South Carolina Shambles: Slippery Newt Massacres Milquetoast Mitt Agonizes Immigration Patriots blasted Newt Gingrich. In addition to supporting sanctions against apartheid South Africa during the Reagan years, Kirkpatrick contended that the Republican presidential candidate and former speaker of the Houses biggest moral failing was betraying whites.

Perhaps more than any other person in this country, Kirkpatrick argued, Newt Gingrich is responsible for the astonishing conservative retreat on racial preferences and the continued existence of an anti-white racial spoils system in jobs and education. Kirkpatricks rant linked to a 2011 VDARE article referring to affirmative action as anti-white quotas.

Another CIS newsletter from July 8, 2016, linked to a Kirkpatrick article, which referred to anti-Trump Republicans as RATs and traitors to the party. The conservative opposition to Trump, Kirkpatrick opined, were deserving of such a title due to their cooperation with the Lying Press. The term, as Kirkpatrick observed in a VDARE article from June 2016, is an English translation of the German term Lgenpresse, which has become popular among certain circles of the so-called alt-right. Though the term itself originated as a rhetorical cudgel in the mid-19th-century,the Nazis further popularized it.

While CIS executive director Mark Krikorian attempted to distance himself and the center from the extreme, racist far-right, he has, as recently as last February, asserted the importance of bringing pieces published on those sites to the attention of readers.

Mark Krikorian of the Center for Immigration Studies speaks at the Budapest Summit on Migration in March 2019. (Photo by Elekes Andor via Wikimedia Commons)

When asked by a caller on CSPANs Washington Journal about the continued inclusion of content from VDARE, Krikorian defended the decision.

We send out a weekly roundup of immigration commentary from all sides, including people we dont agree with, Krikorian told CSPAN, citing The New York Times editorials on immigration as an example. Though he acknowledged that the center linked to some sites that publish other material that he viewed as objectionable, he posited that such links were needed: If theyre important sites of immigration news, we include them because the whole point is [to] see the broad spectrum of views and judge for yourself.

Photo illustration by SPLC

Read more from the original source:

Knowingly or Unknowingly, CIS Newsletters Promote the Work of White Nationalist Kevin DeAnna - Southern Poverty Law Center

Billy Porter will play a powerful genderless fairy godmother in Cinderella and the alt-right must be shaking – PinkNews

Billy Porter's tuxedo gown designed by Christian Siriano. (Christian Siriano/Twitter)

Billy Porter is set to play a genderless version of the fairy godmother in an upcoming live-action remake of Cinderella, due for release in 2021.

Speaking to CBS News, Porter said it is a profound feeling to be playing the iconic character of the Fairy Godmother in Cinderella.

Magic has no gender, he said.

We are presenting this character as genderless at least thats how Im playing it. And its really powerful.

The Pose actor added: This is a classic fairytale for a new generation, and I think that the new generation is really ready. The kids are ready. Its the grown-ups that are slowing stuff down.

Porter shared the interview on Twitter and wrote: This Cinderella is a classic fairytale for a new generation. To be able to play this genderless, fabulous fairy godmother what a gift.

The upcoming Cinderella is being made by Sony and will also star pop star Camila Cabello and is directed by Key Cannon. The project is being described as a romantic musical comedy.

We are presenting this character as genderless at least thats how Im playing it. And its really powerful.

It will also star Idina Menzel of Wicked fame as the evil stepmother and Pierce Brosnan as the king. We can only hope he gets an opportunity to show off his incredible singing voice once again.

Porter has become a powerhouse in the LGBT+ community for his groundbreaking role on FX series Pose as well as for his incredible red-carpet looks.

The actor has also fought anti-LGBT+ discrimination at every turn. He recently faced backlash after it was announced that he would be guest starring on the upcoming season of Sesame Street in his iconic tuxedo dress.

Conservative Christian group One Million Moms started a petition to have his guest appearance cancelled, and Porter responded in the best possible way.

In a lengthy Instagram post, the actor said his slot on Sesame Street was one of the highlights of his life.

The emails, DMs, and messages of good will I received that day (and continue to receive) from parents and their children who have been bullied all over the world and desperately need to see someone like me, being their authentic selves on mainstream media, is far more important than anything #onemillionmoms could ever say.

Friendship, kindness and inclusivity shall triumph. And often, it simply starts by saying hi, he added.

Read more here:

Billy Porter will play a powerful genderless fairy godmother in Cinderella and the alt-right must be shaking - PinkNews

Darwinism, Jews, and White Nationalists – Discovery Institute

A right-wing Polish member of parliament, Janusz Korwin-Mikke, recently made waves with the astonishing claim that pogroms have been good for the Jewish people, allegedly because they acted as what biologists call selective pressure in the Darwinian struggle for existence. In common parlance, this means the pogroms weeded out the weak Jews, leaving the strong and robust ones to survive and reproduce.

The context for his remarks, incidentally, was a discussion of the coronavirus, which Korwin-Mikke also sees as a good thing, because he thinks it will help promote evolutionary progress by killing off the weak, leaving the superior specimens to propagate the species.

All of this may sound bizarre, but recently I have been learning that it is common today for white nationalists to rely on such Darwinian explanations to promote their racist, anti-Semitic perspective. In the past few months I have been working on a chapter (in a book on Darwinian Racism in the Nazi Worldview) on the Darwinian racism of white nationalists. Korwin-Mikkes comments are unfortunately not uncommon in those circles.

Indeed the evolutionary psychologist Kevin MacDonald, an emeritus professor at California State University, Long Beach, has published a trilogy of scholarly books that purportedly explains the behavior of Jews and anti-Semites as evolutionary strategies in the Darwinian struggle for existence. MacDonald is a member of the white nationalist or alt-right movement, and he is widely cited by other white nationalists. Darwinian racism and evolutionary psychology are both de rigueur among white nationalists today.

MacDonald is so committed to Darwinian explanations for human behavior, in fact, that he has popularized (at least among fellow white nationalists) the claim that opposition to Darwinism is a Jewish plot to subvert the white race. When the movie Expelled: No Intelligence Allowed came out over a decade ago, MacDonald explained that Ben Stein participated in order to further the interests of the Jews. Of course, just like most conspiracy theorists, MacDonald ignores many inconvenient facts, such as that most anti-Darwinists in the world are not Jews, and most Jews, especially secular Jews, accept Darwinism with alacrity.

Photo: Janusz Korwin-Mikke, by Adrian Grycuk / CC BY-SA 3.0 PL.

Read this article:

Darwinism, Jews, and White Nationalists - Discovery Institute