Scientists Made an Explanation of Why Time Cannot Be Reversed – Somag News

Scientists from Portugal conducted a study on the problem of not returning to the same starting point in running n-body simulations backwards. The researchers found that in the n-body simulation with three objects, the time symmetry was disrupted.

Most laws of physics do not care about moving time backwards or forwards in theoretical studies. The laws of physics work the same way, whether time is moved forward or backward. This is called time symmetry. However, when we come to the real universe, things are different.

A team of scientists, led by Tjarda Boekholt from the University of Aveiro in Portugal, observed that three objects acting with each others gravity distorted the symmetry of time, albeit for a very short moment.

In the article in which the study is explained, The quantitative relationship between the chaos in star dynamics systems and the irreversibility of time has been uncertain until now. In this study, we examine chaotic three-body systems in free fall, using the correct and precise n-body code Brutus, which goes beyond the standard double precision arithmetic.

The N-body problem is one of the famous problems of astrophysics. N-body problem occurs when more objects are added to a system that interacts with the gravitational effect. To explain the N-body problem, we can look at a simple example of Newtonian physics.

According to Newtons laws of motion and Newtons law of gravitation, the movements of two bodies moving in orbit around a central point can be mathematically estimated. However, when another object is added to the system, things become difficult. Objects begin to distort each others trajectories under the influence of gravity and add an element of chaos to the system. This interaction with Newtonian physics or general relativity theory cannot be fully explained under a single formula.

We can only estimate the movement of the Solar System, which we understand many features very well, for only a few million years. Chaos does not allow to guess more. Therefore, scientists think that chaos in the universe is not a mistake, but a feature.

Scientists can also run the simulation backwards when they create n-body simulations. However, the backwards-operated simulation never returns to its original starting point. The uncertainty that the simulation does not return to its original starting point is due to a problem in simulation or chaos, so far it has not been known.

Tjarda Boekholt and his team from Aveiro University prepared a new test to eliminate this uncertainty. Simon Portegies Zwart from Boekholt and Leiden University had written an n-body simulation code called Brutus to prevent numerical computational errors in such operations. Scientists used Brutus to test the time symmetry of a system with three objects.

The three objects in the simulation that scientists test are black holes. These black holes were tested in two separate simulation scenarios. In the first scenario, before one of the three black holes was expelled from the system, all black holes moved in each others complex trajectories. In the second scenario, the simulation was run backwards by moving from the end point of the first scenario.

When both tests were done, scientists found that simulation could not be undone in 5 percent of the trials. The researchers determined that this was due to a difference in value as small as the Plack constant.

Tjarda Boekholt said, The movement of the three black holes has shown that even something as small as the Plancks constant can cause a chaotic result to affect the movements. The size of the Planck constant has an exponential effect and breaks the time symmetry.

5 percent may not seem like a very large proportion. However, since it would not be known which of the simulations would be within five percent, the researchers concluded that n-body simulations were basically unpredictable.

In this way, they made sure that the problem was not caused by a problem in the simulations that the n-object simulations did not return to the original starting point when the run was run backwards.

Being unable to turn back time is not just a mathematical argument anymore, it is something hidden in the basic laws of nature, said researcher Simon Portegies Zwart. Three-body systems made up of planets or black holes can never escape the advancement of time.

Read the original:

Scientists Made an Explanation of Why Time Cannot Be Reversed - Somag News

With a glass of wine and a dry joke, Jim Young entertains at Sand Hollow Winery – The Newark Advocate

Buy Photo

Jim Young, vintner and owner of Sand Hollow Winery and Sand Hollow Speakeasy, opened Sand Hollow Winery in 2012.(Photo: Sara C. Tobias/The Advocate)

HEATH Sand Hollow Winery lies nestled on a quiet country lane, tucked in a small valley among 83 mostly wooded acres. Its easy to get that it-hardly-seems-like-Im-in-Licking-County feeling. Its an idyllic setting for wine and nature lovers alike.

Interestingly, however, owner and vintner Jim Young originally had a different idea when he bought the property. I was looking to get away from people, he (sort of) admitted, and ended up entertaining them. Go figure.

Young, by the way, is known for his dry sense of humor. Jims art of telling tales has endeared many a wine customer, noted his wife, Cindy Steen. Hes able to draw people into his stories even if hes talking about paint drying!

Speaking of drying paint, theres another, newer location for Sand Hollow Winery. This one is in downtown Newark, where you can take a step back in time to the prohibition era.Young (aka Mr. Speaks) likes to call it a speakeasy and you need a password to gain entry. (Check his web site to get the password, and dont tell anyone you dont trust!) Its all vintage Jim Young humor and creativity.

Sand Hollow Speakeasy offers whiskey, wine, and beer behind their bar in Newark.(Photo: Sara C. Tobias/The Advocate)

Now 68, Young grew up in Newark, graduated from Newark High School in 1969, went to Ohio State to study finance and then went to work for his father in his construction company.

The construction business, he said, gave me the knowledge that, if you start with a good foundation and build on that, you will have a good chance, not great, to be successful.

He switched gears when he started publishing niche newspapers in Newark 50 Plus and Our Town among them. In the midst of his publishing phase he started making wine. He opened Sand Hollow Winery in 2012.

The winery was just another chapter in my entrepreneurial book, he said, though he did add, A winery was my first foray into a retail business.

Q. What do you enjoy most about your job?

A. Meeting new customers that were recommended to us by old customers or our social medias 4.8 star rating. Being able to give that new customer an exceptional wine tasting experience that matches up to their expectations. Converting devoted sweet drinkers to our very drinkable dry white and red wines is an added bonus. If they smile or laugh during that process it makes my day.

Q. What are you most proud of about your career?

A. In the 8 years we have been open, definitely the returning customers and their recommendations to others to try us out.

A copy of a prescription for alcohol hangs in Sand Hollow Speakeasy in Newark. (Photo: Sara C. Tobias/The Advocate)

Q. What has been the biggest challenge in leading Sand Hollow Winery?

A. Fortunately the challenges have been few. Keeping up with the growth of the winery and speakeasy is definitely the biggest challenge. The exceptional staff from Andy, Char, Sam, Theresa, Tracie, my creative wife Cindy and one-of-a-kind customers that pitch in at crucial times make it all work!

Q. What would you like people to know about Sand Hollow Winery they may not know?

A. We have the best 5 cheese pizzas west of Italy to go along with our Italian style wines.

Q. How has Sand Hollow Winery changed through the years?

A. The biggest change was the addition of another winery, a 1920s style speakeasy in the newly restored downtown Newark area across from the historic jail. You walk up to a peek hole in the door, give the password and enter into the past, enjoying not only wine on draft, local craft beer and prohibition era whiskey and gin. You can also get your picture taken in a clawfoot gin tub with the appropriate props.

Q. What is your favorite movie?

A. Paint Your Wagon. Its a musical made in the late 60s with Lee Marvin and Clint Eastwood singing, not very good I might add, during the California gold rush era. Brainless entertainment but with a strong message about loyalty.

Q. What is your favorite TV show?

A. The Blacklist. Actor James Spader is an immoral criminal that does good. He has the best sense of humor while preparing to kill his victims.

Q. Whats your favorite type of music?

A.All genres.

Q. What is your favorite book, one youd recommend others read? And why?

A. Atlas Shrugged a 1957 novel by Ayn Rand. This fictional story about the struggles between socialism and capitalism could be very easily true today.

Q. What is your favorite sport or activity to participate in?

A. Hiking Just got back from a trip to the Grand Canyon and Red Rocks in Sedona.

Q. What is your favorite sport to watch?

A. OSU football, especially when they win.

Q. If you could have any superpower, what would it be?

A. Flying

Q. What is your favorite meal?

A. Turkey with homemade noodles piled on top of mash potatoes.

Q. Who is the person you most admire in your life, and why?

A. Gib Reese. He was always doing something to unselfishly help individuals or the residents of Licking County.

Q. Who is a public figure you most admire?

A. Ben Franklin

Q. Whats your dream vacation?

A. Anywhere, but away from a crowd of people.

Q. If you could be in any other job or profession, what would it be?

A. College professor

Sand Hollow Winery is located at 12558 Sand Hollow Road in Heath. The Sand Hollow Winery Speakeasy is located in downtown Newark at 57 S. 3rd St.For more information, call 740-323-3959 or log on http://www.sandhollowwine.com.

Read or Share this story: https://www.newarkadvocate.com/story/news/local/2020/03/20/glass-wine-and-joke-young-entertains-sand-hollow/4811711002/

The rest is here:

With a glass of wine and a dry joke, Jim Young entertains at Sand Hollow Winery - The Newark Advocate

Self-isolating? Hit the Calgary Public Library’s digital archive and challenge yourself to some long reads – Sarnia and Lambton County This Week

Pictured is the Central Library which along with all public libraries in Calgary has been closed to help limit the spread of COVID-19 on Monday, March 16, 2020. Azin Ghaffari/PostmediaAzin Ghaffari / Azin Ghaffari/Postmedia

Call it THE LIST.

Presumably, every avid reader has one.

That would be the books you have always meant to get around to but felt you didnt have the time. But as the world self-isolates and leisure activity that requires leaving the house is cancelled, ambitious readers may find themselves with time on their hands to do some serious reading.

The Calgary Public Library has an extensive list of eBooks and audiobooks up for the grabs digitally, including a whole category that has been dubbed Long Books Worth Reading.

So here are a few suggestions for brave bibliophiles looking for the opposite of light reading.

Moby Dick, by Herman MelvilleAvailable as eBook and audiobookMelvilles sprawling opus is renowned, or perhaps infamous, for its droning chapters that entail lengthy ruminations on the colour white or sleep-inducing descriptions of a whales tail. Still, the 1851 American novel is also considered one of the greatest works in English literature, which suggests a number of people have actually made their way through it. The plot follows the obsessive quest of Captain Ahab for revenge against a giant white sperm whale that bit off his leg.

Atlas Shrugged, by Ayn RandAvailable as eBook and audiobookIf this whole COVID-19 thing has somehow put you in the mood to read about the wonders of unchecked capitalism or virtues of selfishness, then Ayn Rands 1957 epic is for you. For many, the book is simply a lengthy diatribe wrapped in a multi-character, slightly dystopic tale. Still, many who subscribe to a certain right-leaning philosophy have deemed it life-changing. Even for those who dont, it may offer some interesting insight into the puzzling inner workings of young conservatives.

Ulysses, by James JoyceAvailable as eBook and audiobookAs a young English Literature student, I grumpily arrived at the theory that no one on Earth, including James Joyce himself, had actually read this bewildering 1922 stream-of-consciousness tome from start to finish. As I grew older, however, I discovered that many see it as equivalent to David Foster Wallaces Infinite Jest as the ultimate Ironman marathon of literary challenges. Constructed as a modern take on Homers Odyssey, the book takes place in 1904 Dublin over the course of one day and delves into human consciousness dialogue and is credited with forever disrupting the accepted norms of the novel. Good luck.

A Prayer for Owen Meany, by John IrvingAvailable as eBookCompared to the above titles, John Irvings 1989 masterpiece is fairly accessible and a good start for anyone curious about how the American author became one of modern literatures most beloved tellers of sprawling, multi-generational dark comedies. Accessible as it may be, its still a long journey. As with most of Irvings novels, it spans decades to tell the tale of two friends forever linked by a freak childhood accident. Dubbed Irvings Vietnam book, its a tragic but often laugh-out-loud epic exploring friendship, fate, faith, war and morality. Any of Irvings books (with the possible exception of the below-par Fourth Hand) are a great investment of your time, but A Prayer for Owen Meany has proven to be a sentimental favourite among the authors many admirers.

The Stand, by Stephen KingAvailable on eBook and audiobookOK, this one may be a little too on the nose given the circumstances and may actually ramp up your anxiety. Still, for fans of sci-fi and horror, Kings 1978 post-apocalyptic book remains one of popular literatures most compelling works that sits alongside It as the prolific authors take on serious literature (whatever that means.) Fear not, that doesnt mean its boring, even if it is lengthy. It tells the story of a virus dubbed Captain Trips that wipes out 99 per cent of mankind. The survivors form two factions that eventually come into conflict, pitting good against ultimate evil in a tale about survival, compassion and community.

Read more:

Self-isolating? Hit the Calgary Public Library's digital archive and challenge yourself to some long reads - Sarnia and Lambton County This Week

As Science And Business Go To War With Each Other, President Trump Pours Fuel On The Fire – Andover Leader

By Abram Brown with Chris Helman

In his corner of the Texas oil patch, Bud Brigham has kept things going as much as he can in the face of the coronavirus pandemic. Most of the employees at Brigham Minerals, which he founded and currently chairs, are working from home. Brigham is also the chairman of Atlas Sand, whose plants are still going full throttle, he says, processing the sand that gets sold to frackers.

As the name of that company hints, Brigham is a libertarian, and he once financed a movie trilogy of Ayn Rands Atlas Shrugged. I do wonder, are we overreacting? he says, doing his best Dagny Taggart imitation. Is the cure worse than the ailment?

That sentiment has spread widely in the last 48 hours. Tweets and email chains, many penned by desperate small-business owners, found their way to the Fox News punditry set. Just as the spread of coronavirus creates a curve of the number of people infected, this economic shutdown is creating a curve of the number of people affectedlosing their jobs, their homes, their businesses, Fox host Steve Hilton said Sunday night, asking viewers if they were familiar with that famous phrase: The cure is worse than the disease. It was then only a matter of time before the Tweeter-in-Chief weighed in. WE CANNOT LET THE CURE BE WORSE THAN THE PROBLEM, President Trump, caps lock emphatically on, wrote shortly before midnight Sunday. AT THE END OF THE 15 DAY PERIOD, WE WILL MAKE A DECISION AS TO WHICH WAY WE WANT TO GO. He doubled down yesterday morning, retweeting those who agreed with himand finished by retweeting his own late-night tweet.

By yesterday, Trumps notion had become a mainstream talking point, as prominent observers including Texas Lieutenant Governor Dan Patrick, Fox News Laura Ingraham and Brit Hume and Florida Governor Ron DeSantis all insisted that an economic crash will kill more people than the virus, and we should therefore let those who are purportedly less at riskthe young and middle-agedgo back to producing and consuming.

All of which has scientists, doctors and other health-care professionals aghast. Their consensus: Stay home and dont go within six feet of anyone. We have to hunker down, says Vincent Racaniello, who teaches microbiology and immunology at Columbia University. He doesnt think its safe to resume normal life until the country reports no more than 10 new cases in a day. (The U.S. is currently reporting thousands per day.) Look at all the people dying in huge numbers on a daily basis in Italy, he adds. We need to prevent that. When Dr. Anthony Fauci, the governments leading expert on infectious diseases, didnt appear at yesterdays circus-like press briefing, Trump was asked if Fauci agreed with him on the need to ease social distancing to speed the reopening of the economy. No, he doesnt not agree, the president responded, his use of a double negative only muddying the waters further.

Does this standoff represent yet another culture war, this one with hundreds of thousands of lives and hundreds of billions of dollars on the line? This is probably unprecedented, says Greg Wawro, chair of Columbias political science department. It is bleak. Its bleak.

Both sides come armed with statistics. The science-first side argues in terms of sickness and mortality, citing a worst-case scenario that projects 160 million to 214 million Americans infected with COVID-19 and a death toll of 200,000 to 1.7 million. These models factor in the past few weeks in Europemodels that in fact seem optimistic given the pathetic state of testing in the U.S. so far, as well as government mandates far less draconian, even in New York and California, than in Italy and Spain.

The business-first side, meanwhile, cites lost dollars. On the positive end of things, Bank of America thinks the economy will slide 12% in the second quarter; Deutsche Bank predicts 12.9%. This would represent collapse, BofA economists wrote in a recent research report. Goldman Sachs forecasts a 24% drop. Global recession in 2020 is now our base case, Morgan Stanleys chief economist, Chetan Ahya, concluded in a recent report. Those estimates would likely translate to between 5 million and 8 million vaporized jobs. One Federal Reserve official, Mercer Bullard, said yesterday that unemployment could reach 30%, the highest in American history. (During the Great Depression, joblessness peaked at 24.9% in 1933.) These numbers feel like an almost self-inflicted wound given that just four weeks ago, the economy seemed headed to another year of healthy growth amid the longest expansion in American history.

I would love to see life going back to normal, says Luciana Borio, a physician who served on Trumps National Security Council. However, I do not think thats going to be by the end of this week.

To the science side, economic speculation is irrelevant. The most important thing here is to save peoples lives, and there is no value you can put on a persons life, right? says Columbias Racaniello. Especially if its someone who means something to you. Recognizing the potency of this argument, the business-first types have cobbled together dubious estimates of the lives taken by recession and poverty.

Theyre also trying to compare potential coronavirus deaths to those from heart disease (650,000 deaths annually), cancer (600,000) or automobile crashes (1.3 million), knowing that no one would advocate shutting the economy to stop such losses. Negative effects on the economy create lots of misery for people, says Harvard professor Jeffrey Miron, a former fellow at the libertarian Cato Institute. Adds David Friedman, a retired Santa Clara University professor and son of free-market apostle Milton Friedman: The government shutting down the economy or freezing the economy or printing $2 trillion to give to people doesnt make a whole lot of sense.

But the winning argument, on economic terms, belongs to the scientists. The idea that economy versus lives is a zero-sum game is false. The most vexing potential problem with COVID-19 isnt the death rate. Its the risk of a surge that collapses the U.S. health-care system, with most cities already preparing for triage and carnage on a scale never seen in peacetime America. That alone would cripple both the biggest player in the American economy and undermine whatever consumer and corporate confidence could be imbued with a business-as-usual attitude. Its why even President Trump was imploring everyone to flatten the curveat least until this weekend.

I would love to see life going back to normal, says Luciana Borio, a physician and the former chief scientist at the FDA, who served on Trumps National Security Council, planning for worst-case scenarios like these until she left when the president dismantled the groups team of health experts. I think we should try to do everything we can to bring it back to normal as soon as is feasible and responsible to do so. We shouldnt sit and wait a second longer than its needed. However, I do not think thats going to be by the end of this week.

Or next Monday. March 30 looms large, as Trump began urging distancing on March 15, for a suggested 15 days. Despite all the friendly PSAs, though, only a handful of states have imposed the kind of stay-at-home mandates that could actually stem this scourge. Most of the country is still congregating, which means most of the country will start getting sick only on or around March 30when the death counts in places like New York, judging by the experience of Europe, will start to become staggering.

Its all a false dichotomy. Business and science arent zero-sum, the same way that solving climate change should be viewed as an extraordinary investment opportunity rather than a cost. Great science blossoms under entrepreneurial capitalism. Great business is based on reason and data.

Data, or lack thereof, is the biggest culprit behind this catastrophe. Americas inability to amass enough test kitsmuch less masks and ventilators to protect health-care workersmeans were flying blind. Thats the biggest difference between the United States and a coronavirus role model like South Korea, which opened 600 testing centers and is now producing 100,000 testing kits per day.

It might be reasonable to gambleand try to restart thingsif you actually understand [the scope of the problem], says Borio. We dont.

View original post here:

As Science And Business Go To War With Each Other, President Trump Pours Fuel On The Fire - Andover Leader

Threshold Resurrects the Angry, Ambitious Young Man – The New York Times

When it comes to reading in an emergency, in a moment of crisis and uncertainty, comfort seems to be the order of the day old favorites, regressive pleasures, cozy classics.

What happens if they fail you? Mine have (et tu, Wodehouse?), so I am here to champion the opposite: the enlivening, more absorbing distractions of disagreement, argument and pure pique, of being profitably at odds with what you are reading; the deep diversion of a good, cleansing quarrel, especially with a book that is game and gleefully provocative. Threshold, a nettlesome new novel surly, ambitious, frequently annoying has been my treasured companion of late.

Zachary Leaders biography of Saul Bellow contained the indelible fact that one of Bellows trusty modes of seduction was to read aloud to women from his own work for hours at a time (horrified italics mine). Its the sort of detail that can inspire smug pity for the past: Who would attempt such a gesture now? What woman would tolerate it?

I had yet to meet Rob Doyle.

Rob the loafer and the mope, the impressively successful Lothario and pretentious little troll is the protagonist of this book, which could be called autofiction (the author is also named Rob Doyle), anti-woke polemic or obsessive riff. It isnt much interested in classification in fact, it would rather like to annihilate pointless distinctions outright, much like the character himself, who is on a fervent spiritual quest with the aid of acid, meditation, magic mushrooms and ayahuasca.

The idea was that, by gaining access to the weirder potentialities of consciousness, my basic stance towards existence would be altered: shorn of the tedium and banality, Rob tells us. I hoped I could come to experience consciousness itself.

Or at least shirk work for a long spell, and run from his roots: a charmless childhood in Ireland, which he depicts with characteristic delicacy as a backwater of banal, misshapen people. Rob drifts, from Paris to Thailand, Croatia and Sicily. He overdoses on ketamine in New Delhi and smokes DMT in Ireland, which inspires his most delirious visions. DMT is a psychedelic that condenses a six-hour ayahuasca trip into 10 mind-melting minutes. (You can still be an atheist up to 40 milligrams, Doyle writes.)

Every time his passport is stamped, a new girlfriend, another pliant, unnamed creature materializes at his side, endlessly willing to loiter with him at the graves of his literary heroes (the usual suspects: Cioran, Bataille) and let him drone on about his despair and indecision. Shall he write the great Berlin Techno novel? The great backpacker dropout novel? A novel of sex, death and clubbing in post-Bataclan Paris?

Are you wincing with irritation yet? Good; irritation is this narrators specialty. Hed like to be a hate figure, a Shylock, but he wonders if he has the nerve. For a time he used social media as a pressure valve, raining scorn on the trendy sentiments and masturbatory indignations that cascaded so risibly down my screen. He suppurates with rage, especially at those who have reduced art to a variety of social work. Painfully woke fare had left me craving art whose intentions were purely corrosive, art that went against democracy and virtue, glorified evil, wallowed in destruction and chaos, art whose only dictate was hostility to the notion that art should ameliorate, edify, mold better citizens.

Rob is a relic of sorts, the kind of character youd once reliably encounter in a Martin Amis novel, the angry, ambitious young man whose literary and sexual ambitions are coiled together, the type of character Henry Miller made famous and who now just as often appears as a figure of gentle satire (as in Adelle Waldmans The Love Affairs of Nathaniel P or Andrew Martins Early Work). Doyle enjoys poking fun at Doyle, his habit of making sure his books are stocked at various bookstores, his dour pomposity. At one point, Rob embarks on a sadomasochistic relationship with a woman; for a safe word, they settle on creative nonfiction.

Speaking of Miller, there is a character in Tropic of Cancer, a writer who is notorious in his circle for concealing what he is reading, lest his friends figure out his influences. Doyle, the novelist, has the opposite problem. Large swaths of Threshold the would-be writer making pilgrimage to the homes of his heroes, in order to do anything but write feel beholden to Out of Sheer Rage, Geoff Dyers affectionate tribute to procrastination, via an attempted biography of D. H. Lawrence. Sections in which Rob haunts museums hoping for an aesthetically meaningful experience feel heavily indebted to Ben Lerners novels, in one of which a character is tormented that he is incapable of a profound experience of art. At another point, it is one of Karl Ove Knausgaards most famous passages that is channeled as Rob scribbles in his notebook about how civilization forbids me from acting on my violent urges (I smile, shake hands), so my instincts wither inside me, making me unhealthy. Still other scenes recall Milan Kundera.

For all Robs bluster and desire to shock, his pilgrims progress brings him to a place of calm; age proves more effective than drugs in challenging his premises: how safe it is to sneer, how much more risky to create. He begins to regard his cynicism and jadedness as a kind of defeat, a death in life without dignity or valor. We leave this creature of posturing and alienation at books end surrounded by friends, wildly euphoric (courtesy of DMT). There was an ease in thinking nothing matters, the whole Western nihilism rap, Doyle writes. Its so much scarier to think that everything matters, every little thing is of the utmost consequence.

Read this article:

Threshold Resurrects the Angry, Ambitious Young Man - The New York Times

9 dystopian apocalyptic films that capture our current mood – i-D

Still from Melancholia.

With a global pandemic underway, the ongoing struggle of empathetic, left-leaning political movements to gain a foothold in places like the UK and US, and climate change still raging, its understandable that many people are turning to film for pure escapism and relief. But -- for better or worse -- the last few decades have proven something of a golden age for apocalyptic and dystopian filmmaking, as brilliant directors like Michael Haneke, Lizzie Borden and Kinji Fukasaku explore life either fundamentally remade or in the midst of being reshaped for the worse.

Not all of these movies feature a world-ending cataclysmic event, but many of them grapple with the effects of nihilism and apathy that can emerge when we think about the existential threats to both our planet and our society at large. Even the more action-packed flicks like Battle Royale and 10 Cloverfield Lane can easily be linked to contemporary problems like intergenerational conflict and gaslighting.

Below are nine films that offer lessons, warnings or parables that can be applied to many of the hardships were enduring on a global scale, and potentially help us figure out a way forward -- or at least to be more mindful. Who needs escapism after all?

First ReformedWhile were constantly bombarded with the perils of climate change, the horror of an irreversibly damaged, eventually uninhabitable planet is so vast and terrifying as to be basically incomprehensible. Paul Schraders First Reformed filters that existential dread into a character study of Ethan Hawkes Reverend Ernst Toller, the pastor at a sparsely attended church in upstate New York. When a parishioner confides in him that her husband wants her to abort her pregnancy due to climate change, Toller enters into a full-on crisis of faith. First Reformed deals carefully with how we reimagine foundational concepts like religion and childbirth in the face of an existential threat. The films ending, though hardly uplifting, does offer a brief moment of relief from a grim present and an even bleaker future.

Battle RoyaleA masterpiece of youth-in-revolt cinema, Battle Royale focuses on the bitter divide between Japans young people and a totalitarian government that rose to power in the wake of a major recession. Kinji Fukasakus final film is something of a lightning rod for its pervasive violence, but it is most affecting as both a depiction of typical teenage melodrama with trumped up, life-or-death consequences, and as a portrait of the kind of intergenerational conflict we see in societies around the globe. All over, we see young people rallying together for things like climate change, LGBT+ rights, and a widespread social safety net, but struggling against the inertia of Boomers and Gen Xers and the cruelty inherent in global capitalism. The youth of Battle Royale ultimately earn a pyrrhic victory at the films conclusion, which also feels dispiritingly like what so many young activists are facing today.

10 Cloverfield LaneAs an alien invasion movie, 10 Cloverfield Lane is so-so, with an extremely modest budget and pretty boilerplate action. But as a story of gaslighting, extremism, and the distorted relationship between gender and power, the film is efficient and disturbing. We spend much of Dan Trachtenbergs movie wondering if theres even an invasion going on at all, or if John Goodmans Howard -- played with an Alex Jones-ian verve for the apocalyptic and a chilling manipulative streak -- has simply captured Mary Elizabeth Winsteads Michelle using the idea of an alien attack as a false flag. The movie also speaks to the franchisification of modern cinema, as 10 Cloverfield Lane was originally written as a lean indie horror flick called The Cellar that had nothing to do with Matt Reeves 2008 monster movie. The strongest and most frightening parts of the movie have little to do with CGI aliens, and everything to do with humanitys capacity for cruelty in the name of their warped beliefs.

NocturamaBertrand Bonellos film offers a decidedly bleak portrait of modern youth, following the actions and subsequent fallout from a group of young Parisians carrying out a series of coordinated terrorist attacks around the city. The lack of a given motivation for the protagonists actions makes it difficult to find Nocturamas moral center, though as the AV Club notes, Bonello draws the line at violence, which is always abrupt and sobering. As the extremists hole up in an empty department store following the attacks, the film also highlights the hollowness of consumerist comforts in the face of true horror. The characters play with and discard expensive makeup, stereo equipment, and clothing. With memorable and eclectic needle drops of Shirley Bassey, Chief Keef and Willow Smith, Nocturama also highlights the power of music as a salve for trauma, though in this case the listeners are the perpetrators, not the victims.

I Think Were Alone NowThough slow and plagued by shoddy chemistry between its leads, Reed Moranos I Think Were Alone Now is a thoughtful flick that deals with ideas often eschewed in splashy, big budget apocalyptic cinema. Through Peter Dinklages Del, Morano highlights both the importance of work and routine, as well as the tedium that persists, even in an empty world. As the film goes on, Elle Fannings Grace appears and I Think Were Alone Now reckons with the best way to move forward after trauma, a question that will affect countless people in the wake of the coronavirus epidemic.

Time of the WolfMichael Hanekes 2003 apocalypse flick picks up well after the world has ended, and offers a snapshot of a family trying to hold together and maintain their dignity and decency in increasingly dire straits. As the world grapples with pandemic conditions and people struggle with the fearful impulse to hoard vs. the altruistic impulse to help, Time of the Wolf is a somber reminder of what happens when our basic social fabric erodes. Even beyond our present frightening circumstances, Time of the Wolf offers a message worth heeding. As The New York Times noted back in 2004, the constant hardships endured by Isabelle Huppert and her family are not dissimilar from the daily reality faced by so many.

Born in FlamesMore dystopian than apocalyptic, Lizzie Bordens Born in Flames is a powerful collage that shows how even a theoretical socialist America can still be rife with problems. Told largely through faux documentary footage and radio broadcasts, Born in Flames features a pair of feminist revolutionary groups, combatting rampant sexism on the New York City streets through a mix of direct action and community organizing -- in the wake of a purported socialist revolution. And in a bit of eerie prescience, the 1983 movie shows a shoddy police conspiracy related to the death of a black woman in custody, conjuring up memories of recent situations like the deaths of Diamond Ross and Sandra Bland. As far-left youth movements continue to grow in the U.S. and U.K., Born in Flames is a crucial reminder that a revolution that leaves some people behind will ultimately perpetuate many of the problems that made one so essential in the first place.

MonosThere is an outside world in Alejandro Lanes Monos. Its where the movies teenage militia soldiers get their orders and where their prisoner -- an American engineer -- came from. But for 100 incendiary minutes, we watch a makeshift society cooperate, bicker and eventually crumble as its careful military structure is turned on its head. The superb cast of mostly unknowns functions like a group of apocalyptic survivors, as tempers flare, power struggles ensue, and school-age crushes come and go. Like Nocturama and Battle Royale, the stakes are made all the greater by the groups isolation and its survivalist tone, but the human drama is what makes this very alien story so emotionally resonant.

MelancholiaIn addition to being one Bernie Sanders favorite films, Lars Von Triers Melancholia is a hypnotic exploration of how depression corresponds to the world around us. Featuring an all-time performance from Kirsten Dunst as Justine, and an effectively cast-against-type Charlotte Gainsbourg as her sister Claire, Melancholia explores the differences between depression and despair, as well as the ripple effects of mental health. Though there isnt a colossal planet on course to collide with the Earth, it does feel like the world is ending several times per month, and if Melancholia isnt exactly a blueprint for how to behave, it does offer an intimate character study of one such situation.

Visit link:

9 dystopian apocalyptic films that capture our current mood - i-D

Trump Toys With a Let-Them-Die Response to the Pandemic – The Nation

The Nation believes that helping readers stay informed about the impact of the coronavirus crisis is a form of public service. For that reason, this article, and all of our coronavirus coverage, is now free. Please subscribe to support our writers and staff, and stay healthy. (Patrick Semansky / AP Photo)

Subscribe now for as little as $2 a month!

On Sunday night, 10 minutes before midnight eastern time, Donald Trump tweeted, WE CANNOT LET THE CURE BE WORSE THAN THE PROBLEM ITSELF. AT THE END OF THE 15 DAY PERIOD, WE WILL MAKE A DECISION AS TO WHICH WAY WE WANT TO GO! As so often, the exegetical mystery of Trumps comments can be clarified by returning to the most important source of his worldview, Fox News. Earlier in the evening, Fox News Host Steve Hilton ranted against Trumps medical adviser Dr. Anthony Fauci, who advocated draconian social distancing measures to slow the spread of the coronavirus until the medical system can be strengthened to deal with it.Ad Policy

Hilton argued that these measures would cause more damage than the coronavirus itself. You know that famous phrase, The cure is the worse than the disease? Hilton asked. That is exactly the territory we are hurtling towards.

The push for social distancing measures, including closing schools and restaurants, is relatively new. Closure of these institutions was only announced in New York on March 15. Yet there are signs that many on the political rightand even centrist business leadersare already sick of the public health emergency. They want the economy to go back to normal and are promoting fringe ideas in an attempt to discredit mainstream epidemiologists.

Its unclear whether Trump can actually roll back any of the existing quarantine measures, which are set by governors and mayors. But Trump can certainly affect the behavior of his supporters. If millions of Trump fans think that quarantines arent worth the aggravation, they are much more likely to violate them. Thats the most likely danger of Trumps tweet and his potential shift in policy. MORE FROM Jeet Heer

Fox News has already helped poison policy on the pandemic. The network was a major promoter of the idea that warnings about a pandemic were a hoax designed to derail Trumps presidency. Trump initially went along with that until he was persuaded by a dissident in the Fox ranks, Tucker Carlson, to take the pandemic seriously.

But its clear that an influential faction at Fox still believes the coronavirus threat is oversold. On Friday, a bevy of Fox personalities, including Laura Ingraham and Brit Hume, were hawking on twitter a Medium post by Republican operative Aaron Ginn arguing that the government was over-reacting to the coronavirus. Ginn is not an epidemiologist, and his post was riddled with analytical errors. It was quickly taken down by Medium, but not before being seen by millions

On Thursday, The Wall Street Journal published an editorial arguing, If this government-ordered shutdown continues for much more than another week or two, the human cost of job losses and bankruptcies will exceed what most Americans imagine. This wont be popular to read in some quarters, but federal and state officials need to start adjusting their anti-virus strategy now to avoid an economic recession that will dwarf the harm from 2008-2009.Current Issue

Subscribe today and Save up to $129.

In the United Kingdom, Boris Johnsons government initially followed a hands-off strategy along this line, with the idea that it might be best to let the coronavirus spread quickly in order to minimize social disruption. This idea was abandoned once Johnsons government came to realize the dangers of overwhelming the health care system.

Its not just the far-right that is talking like this. Former Goldman Sachs CEO and Hillary Clinton supporter Lloyd Blankfein tweeted out on Sunday night, Extreme measures to flatten the virus curve is sensiblefor a timeto stretch out the strain on health infrastructure. But crushing the economy, jobs and morale is also a health issue-and beyond. Within a very few weeks let those with a lower risk to the disease return to work.

The problem with these arguments is twofold: They underestimate the dangers of scuttling social distancing programs too soon; they also disregard the tools needed to return to cushion the economic shock. As evident from the examples of both China and Italy, extreme measures are needed to slow the spread of the virus or it will overwhelm the health care system, leaving a potential death toll in the United States in excess of 10 million. If the virus is slowed down, theres a real chance that the health care system can get the medical equipment (ICU beds and ventilators) needed to keep the death count to a minimum. Giving up on social distancing too early will doom countless Americans to a painful and unnecessary death.

The economic costs of the coronavirus are real, but they can be dealt with through robust intervention: a combination of universal basic income, mortgage, and rent forgiveness, bailouts for small business and a Keynesian booster shot at the end of the pandemic.

If you like this article, please give today to help fund The Nations work.

The problem is that the political right, along with centrists like Blankfein, dont want such a heavy intervention in the economy. As a result, they indulge in a truly grotesque display of self-interested reasoning and argue that there can be a quick and easy end to quarantines, shutdowns, and social distancing campaigns.

What they are arguing for goes beyond Social Darwinism and is, in fact, a kind of cult capitalism. The existing system is viewed as so sacred that it is worth sacrificing innumerable human lives to keep it going. Even nonrevolutionary changes to the system are anathema.

Economics and medicine have always been intertwined, sometimes in strange ways. Under the surface of economic ideas, there are often metaphors taken from medicine and psychology: We talk about curing a depression, which can refer to both a person and an economy.

There flourished in Vienna from 1850 to 1870 a school of medicine some historians have dubbed therapeutic nihilism. This school held that most medical interventions did more damage than good and advocated that doctors simply oversee the natural process of recovery. There was some logic to this: It was the era of quack remedies.

Therapeutic nihilism had a curious afterlife. As William Johnson notes in The Austrian Mind: An Intellectual and Social History, 1848-1938 (1972), therapeutic nihilism lived on even past the 1870s in the pessimism of many Austrian thinkers, ranging from Freud to Wittgenstein. Therapeutic nihilism was also an influence on the Austrian economics of Ludwig von Mises and F. A. Hayek, the foundational thinkers of the modern libertarian right. In his book The Viennese Students of Civilization (2016), intellectual historian Erwin Dekker makes a compelling case that von Mises and Hayeks opposition to government interventions in the economy was a manifestation of therapeutic nihilism.

Von Mises and Hayek were major opponents of John Maynard Keynes, who believed that economic depressions shouldnt just be allowed to run their course but could be shortened by active government measures.

As in the great disputes between the Austrian school and the Keynesians, we now face a fundamental divide in both medicine and economics. Do we embrace therapeutic nihilism and just shrug our shoulders in the face of a pandemic, hoping that it will quickly extinguish itself? Or do we believe that human ingenuity and social cooperation can work together for solutions, ones that involve real sacrificesbut that can also help limit human misery?

Follow this link:

Trump Toys With a Let-Them-Die Response to the Pandemic - The Nation

It’s Absolutely OK to Dump Someone Over Their Awful Pandemic Behavior – VICE UK

Its stupid at this point to play the remember one month ago!?!? game, but, for these purposes, its worthwhile: One month ago, your partners rugged individualism and unwillingness to read an entire article before weighing in were charming personality quirks; the kind of stuff thats either endearing or aggravating, depending on your mood.

But now, in the midst of the coronavirus pandemic, you might be viewing those traits in an entirely different light. Alexs individuality and and fuck it, lets party!!! nihilism isnt just Alex doing Alex when were talking about social distancing and other necessary precautions. Seemingly personal choices are now a literal matter of life and death, and could reveal a significant difference in values within your relationship, making you wonder if this person is the right match for you. (So many people are facing similar dilemmas, theres an entire website dedicated to documenting quarantine partner drama.)

Maybe you were considering breaking up before you got stuck in an apartment with your partner for the foreseeable future, or maybe being stuck with them has made you realize this isnt working for you. While the ongoing pandemic has slowed (or completely halted) most parts of our lives, this one particular thing doesnt have to be put on hold. You can still end a relationship, provided you can do so safely (more on that later).

Conventional wisdom tells us to not make any big, life-changing decisions during times of increased stress, the idea being that our little brains cant think clearly when were processing intense emotions. But the nature of this unprecedented situation may actually provide necessary clarity. There might be no better way to learn how you want to live your life and who you want to share it with than staring down your own mortality.

Rosara Torrisi, a certified sex therapist based in New York, told VICE that this moment is essentially a compatibility test for a lot of couples, old and new. The coronavirus pandemic is going to reveal not just how they respond to this specific situation, but also how they might deal with other rough life moments. Being in a high-stress moment for a long period of time in a relationship thats gonna happen, Torrisi said. Whether its COVID[-19], or someone getting really sick, losing money, or losing a job, theres a million ways that you will be stressed in a long-term relationship. This is one of those moments.

The way individuals react to a stressful situation and react to each others reactions is a fairly big part of their overall long-term compatibility. And if those responses are drastically different perhaps you skew more doomsday prepper, while your partner is more Margaritaville-chillin, stocking up only on weed and video games and telling you to calm down and lead to problems, thats important information to have. Are you cool being with someone who will never be freaking out along with you, or who you think is constantly overreacting?

Alternatively, Torrisi points out that extremely similar ways of coping might be just as bad. Lets say two partners are together and theyre exceptionally anxious and following the news, just kind of amping each other up; thats not really helpful, either, she said. That can be harder to spot, because it typically feels good when someone agrees with you and eggs you on. But if youre getting a nagging sense that the person youre with is not bringing out the best in you, its worth paying attention to that feeling.

The actual logistics of managing a break up right now are where things get a little trickier. If your partner is simply a pain in the ass who you no longer want to be with but can tolerate for a while longer, and youre already secure in your pandemic bunker, Torrisi said you may just want to stay put. If your safety is still intact, you always have to prioritise that, she said.

For the actual breakup, its important to try maintaining the peace in your pandemic bunker. To do that, Torrisi recommended having a radically empathetic conversation. Even if you find your partners behavior to be batshit and wrong, trying to understand it will lead to a calmer conversation than holding up an empty box of rigatoni and screaming, HOW DID YOU ALREADY EAT ALL OF OUR PASTA, YOU FREAK, THIS IS EXACTLY WHY WE CANT BE TOGETHER!!!!

Even if you disagree, you might have a better understanding of where they are coming from, Torrisi said. And then you can say, OK, I understand why, I can empathize with it, but I completely disagree with it. It makes it really clear for me that your decision making is not something I can get on board with, or that I want to be a part of long term.

If youre currently sharing a space and youre worried your partner may harm you if you try to break up with them, but you cant currently go to a shelter or family members house, an appropriate alternative would be to find a friend who lives within walking distance, and will agree to hunker down with you for the foreseeable future. Otherwise, resources like the National Domestic Violence Hotline are equipped to help you, even during a pandemic when theres limited mobility.

The TL;DR here is this pandemic sucks hard enough without adding the unnecessary pressure to stay in a bad relationship into the mix. DTMFA, and soothe your pains with one of your favourite rations.

@hannahsmothers

This article originally appeared on VICE US.

Read the original:

It's Absolutely OK to Dump Someone Over Their Awful Pandemic Behavior - VICE UK

Nihilistic journalism and the shunning of alternative voices in media – IOL

By Thabo Makwakwa Mar 19, 2020

Share this article:

Nihilistic journalism, scheming and shunning of alternative voices by some dominant media houses, cozying up to the powerful politicians and influential business people is not doing justice to a country struggling with widespread cheating and corruption, a country failing to hold leaders accountable.

The society relies heavily on media houses to access news that is ethical, unbiased and uncensored. It poses a great concern when media houses in pursuit of profits, by legal or illegal means, suspend their moral compass, accept donations from private funders and increasingly engage in unprincipled news reporting which favour and protect certain individuals while attack everybody else who criticise or differ with them.

Daily Mavericks attitude towards other media houses, journalists, news contributors and politicians, does not only exhibit toxic competition for audience but also the deadening journalistic-nihilism suffocating the breath out of every person with opposing views.

The oppressive practice of shunning other voices through brutal smear campaigns and fake news reporting delegitimizing the majority of black journalists and politicians, is increasingly creating discomfort to news readers and ordinary people who have entrusted media houses with a responsibility to shape public opinion and strengthen the society.

Daily Mavericks exaggerated obsession with political factions has spared no one who dares to have an opposing view about anybody in their receiving end of consistent smear campaigns. The shocking suppression of others right to freedom of speech by Daily Maverick has seen many individuals referred to as "fight-back faction", and SANEF has done very little if nothing to knock ethics into the heads of the editors of this publication.

The quest to dominate and lead the national narrative is overwhelmingly violent. One example is the disillusionment created by nihilistic journalists and editors in the payroll of arrogant big business and abusive politicians, with an aim to delegitimize ones reputation; campaign for the death of other voices in media and bring up any trash against the target by any means necessary. Journalists and editors have succumbed to what they deem necessary demons to possess in order to survive through tight competition. Serious commitment to ethical and truthful news reporting is replaced with simplistic and superficial reportage.

Erosion of vibrant quality reporters and alternative perspectives is betrayal to the commitment to fight for freedom of speech. Bullying of other perspectives will certainly result in many people choosing not to speak of the true depths of horrors of the powerful capital and its political representatives.

Unprincipled scheming journalists and unethical editors who have voluntarily surrendered their principles to the amusement of their political handlers and private funders, threaten the entire press community willing to speak painful truths to the public about real challenges such as wealth and power; misinformation by elites; white collar crime; political and corporate related corruption. The capture of news reporters and media houses means that the very last voice of ordinary people is silenced, and only the voice of those with money can be listened to.

The people of South Africa deserve to know the truth about the degenerating reportage. We must know the drive for wealth and power is the sole reason journalists have become the voice and spokespersons of few powerful individuals instead of being the voice of the masses. It should not come as a shock when veteran and respected journalists disintegrate from their neutral position and slide into dirty political battles where money is a determining variable. The thirst for a funded comfortable life has eaten the souls of press reportage and triggered war between obedient and disobedient voices.

It is true that everything ends. The destructive nihilistic journalism is now in the open for everyone to see, and like every other propaganda, it too shall fall into its own sword.

One of the crucial tasks for news readers and other media houses is to expose bias news reports displaying favouritism and news fixing by news people towards other news reporters, politicians, businesses and other media houses. The people must be confronted and call out these propagandists for what they are, because no one should be subjected to captured media houses spreading false stories and paying individuals to write false stories about certain political opponents.

* Thabo Makwakwa is a f reelance author and social commentator.

** The views expressed here are not necessarily those of Independent Media.

Read the original:

Nihilistic journalism and the shunning of alternative voices in media - IOL

‘Bad Boys For Life’ Digital Release Coming This Month, Blu-ray in April – /FILM

The surprisingly good (maybe even great?)Bad Boys For Life is about to come home. The sequel is due to hit digital at the end of March, almost a full month before its Blu-ray release. This somewhat early digital release is likely meant to coincide with several other big titles that have scored early releases in the wake of the coronavirus. Movie theaters are shut down, people are stuck home, and studios are scrambling to fill the void.

You can score Bad Boys For Life on digital starting March 31, and then on4K Ultra HD, Blu-ray & DVD April 21. Theres usually a gap between digital and physical releases, but its traditionally not a nearly month-long gap. Sony is likely hoping to get in on the early digital release trend that several other films have been adopting in the wake of the coronavirus, includingThe Hunt,The Invisible Man,Birds of Prey,The Way Back, and more.

Ill be honest: I had very low expectations forBad Boys For Life. But the movie was a pleasant surprise, abandoning a lot of the cruel nihilism of the second film while letting the characters grow a little. As I wrote in my review:

But its the unexpected amount of heart that ends up makingBad Boys for Lifea pleasant surprise. In the previous two films, one gets the distinct sense that Mike and Marcus really dont give that much of a shit about each other or anyone else. Sure, theysaythey ride together, die together but its hard to buy it in those movies. Smiths Mike Lowery in particular often comes across as a borderline psychopath in those first two movies someone who only cares about his own image. Mike starts like that in this film as well, but as the story races on, he softens a bit. He may not want to admit it we learn hes started dying his goatee but hes getting older now. And some people mellow out when they get older. They slow down, and they realize theyve been taking certain things for granted. If theBad Boysfranchise of all damn things can have actual emotional growth there might be hope yet for all of us.

And oh yeah, the villain of the film is awitch I feel like not enough people appreciated that fact. InBad Boys For Life, Mike Lowry (Will Smith) and Marcus Burnett (Martin Lawrence), are back. After a string of assassinations and an attempt on Mikes life, he convinces a hesitant Marcus to hold off retirement and partner one last time. Together, they team up with AMMO, the new hotshot division of the Miami PD, to take down the merciless head of the Aretas Cartel.

Here are the special features included with the home media releases:

4K ULTRA HD, BLU-RAY AND DIGITAL BONUS MATERIALS

DVD BONUS MATERIALS

See the original post here:

'Bad Boys For Life' Digital Release Coming This Month, Blu-ray in April - /FILM

Editor’s Column: Viruses don’t care, we have to – Rio Blanco Herald Times

No, we dont get to be excluded from a pandemic. As nice as it would be to have a free pass to avoid everything associated with the coronavirus situation, there is no such pass.

We can feel sorry for ourselves that a stupid virus has upended our lives temporarily (permanently, for the unfortunate ones it kills and their families). We can be angry and stomp and yell and throw things (wine glasses shatter very nicely, by the way). We can yield to sorrow and depression and nihilism. We can stubbornly refuse to comply with guidance from experts and rail against government efforts to control the speed with which this thing spreads as attacks on our personal freedoms, and we can deny not only scientific facts but real-time data from other countries around the world who are also dealing with this. We can do all those things. None of them are helpful.

A virus doesnt care if youre a Republican or a Democrat. A virus doesnt care if you had a vacation planned or a wedding or tickets to a concert or graduation or any other human event scheduled. Viruses simply dont have the capacity to care, and because they dont, we must.

We must care for one another by taking precautions and protecting the most vulnerable among us, by supporting our local business owners and our displaced workers in whatever way we can, by looking after our neighbors and friends if this thing drags on, which its likely to do, given what were seeing in other nations.

This is going to leave a mark, much like the events of 9/11 left a mark, and possibly a much larger one. What did we do in the face of that enemy? We came together as a nation to defend one another, to do what was necessary for the greater good. Will we do that again, when the enemy is invisible and already among us? For all our sakes, I hope so.

Do your part.

By Niki Turner | editor@ht1885.com

Continued here:

Editor's Column: Viruses don't care, we have to - Rio Blanco Herald Times

This Is No Zombie Apocalypse Novel, Author Says But We Can Learn From Them – WBUR

I work in a neighborhood building above a chocolate shop that usually smells so good it evokes a predictable wave of nostalgia even patriotism, I guess.

It's an all-American street, with no less than three different places to grab a cup of coffee. Most days, there are kids on skateboards doing tricks in the parking lot behind the bank. Toddlers stop and stare every time the bright-red fire truck cranks up its sirens and lumbers out of its cave to save the day.

That's the kind of street where I work. Youve seen it a thousand times.

But now, the candy shop is closed. It's scentless. No kids on skateboards. There's still coffee to be had, but the coffee shop patrons grab their drinks and make their way back onto the empty sidewalks, using their elbows or the knuckles to open the door.

All of this is new and surreal. At the same time, all of this is also strangely familiar.

You see, I've seen all this before. I wrote this.

Nearly 10 years ago, I published a novel that garnered a bit of notoriety. It featured zombies and viral pandemics, and so the story was riddled with empty and ravaged cities. Zombies were particularly fashionable back then.

In the screenplay version of my story, written by the late George Romero himself, the opening scene shows sidewalks empty of people, littered with unread newspapers, headlines caught in the eddies of the whistling breeze.

George often reminded me that every story was derivative. If youre telling a story about a pandemic, and my novel was exactly that, certain signifiers must be present.

In our current pandemic, these signifiers are rearing their eerie heads. Of course most are absent. We certainly aren't and will not be anywhere near burning cars. There are no gangs of bandits on motorcycles. There are no broken windows. But there are uncollected newspapers, piling up at the entrance to the office building where I've been virtually meeting with patients through the wonders of sterile technology.

Lately, people keep asking me about my book. People seem to think I might have a particular angle on the psychology surrounding our current pandemic. After all, they remind me, I spent a lot of time imagining a world where this sort of thing could happen. I even feel a little guilty. I wrote an entire novel that indulged in a kind of salacious, infectious foreboding.

In fact, I have lots of angles. My first is that I'd much prefer all of this to have remained in the movies. We watch these disaster films in part so we can leave the theater and revel in the normalcy of the off-screen world.

My second angle is that we are not in a disaster movie. What we see in the movies is a lot worse, a whole lot worse, than the unsettling emptiness on the street where I work. That's important to remember. Film scholars have noted that we tend to over-interpret familiar cinematic images when we encounter these images outside of the movies.

Thats the trap of our current predicament, and therein lies the most important lesson from my novel, indeed from all novels and movies and stories that feature the eerie and unnatural trappings of apocalyptic landscapes: We are not in an apocalypse. We are in the midst of a public health crisis that will without question end, and life will go back to normal.

This is not to say that things won't be pretty strange for a while. This is going to be tough. But this isn't about zombies. This is about the cautionary tale of the zombie trope.

My book featured characters who grew bored and frustrated with one another. Ennui was at least as dangerous as the pandemic itself. This very ennui, the lonely, one-note chords that empty streets and closed shops play in our pattern-prone brains, is the sentiment we have to guard most stringently against.

This ain't no zombie novel, but the zombie novels can teach us a thing or two. In the zombie stories, the humans nearly always end up fighting. That's the trap, and we know better.

We tend to defend ourselves by adopting the attributes of our enemies. This is problematic, because a virus literally has no attributes. It doesn't think or feel or love. The cautionary themes of every zombie film feature these tropes. Exactly when we need each other most, we start acting like zombies. And this is not the time for microbial nihilism.

Now, I must apologize. As a psychiatrist, I am going to offer clichs. Clichs are clichs, after all, because they are true. Oddly enough, we tend to ignore clichs when things get weird. I am arguing, therefore, that these clichs are currently especially important.

Play music. Tell stories. Go for a walk. Check in on your neighbor and tip your hat to a stranger. These gestures, so boring, so ordinary, are to my mind right now extraordinarily important. They preserve normalcy even as we hunker down for what looks like a long and unfamiliar haul.

We do not, as a rule, tolerate uncertainty with grace. Current research suggests that in the face of uncertainty, we generalize we decide that everything is foggy and out of focus. But there are constants of humanity, and we need to keep these in mind.We need to live in the moment even as we plan for the future. We need to keep up with routines as best we can. We need to sing and to play.

We got this. It's going to be hard, but we got this. This ain't no zombie novel, but the zombie novels can teach us a thing or two. In the zombie stories, the humans nearly always end up fighting. That's the trap and we know better.

Let's stick together, and we'll get through it.

Dr. Steve Schlozman isan assistant professor of psychiatry at Harvard Medical School and a practicing child and adolescent psychiatrist.

Read more from the original source:

This Is No Zombie Apocalypse Novel, Author Says But We Can Learn From Them - WBUR

Who won what? Here’s the rundown of the Class of 2020’s award winners – The South End

For medical students nationwide, Match Day 2020 is the culmination of years of hard work, the day when thousands learn what residency program they matched with to begin their career as physicians after graduation.

On March 20, at exactly noon EST, our nearly 300 Warrior MDs received an email from the National Resident Matching Program that included the name of the institution they 'matched' with to begin their post-graduation residency in their chosen specialty. We shared in their joy by posting all the Match Day details at med.wayne.edu/match-day.

The Wayne State University School of Medicines traditional Match Day celebration looked different this year. Like so many medical schools participating in this years residency match event, WSU may has been forced to cancel its traditional gathering of faculty, students, family and friends on March 20. However, we were still determined as ever to cheer and celebrate with the M.D. Class of 2020.

The following Class of 2020 award winners, and faculty members, were recognized via video at the Class of 2020 Match Day virtual celebration March 20.

Herman and Eva Blum Endowed Award:Jedidiah Bell

Runner-Ups:

Amelia Stone

Anum Naseem

David Gelovani

Ellen Murphy

Jay Jarodiya

Nikita Desai

Raven Batshon

Herbert Mendelson Enthusiasm for Medicine Endowed Scholarship:David Gelovani

Leonard Tow Humanism in Medicine Award Student: Jedidiah Bell

Leonard Tow Humanism in Medicine Award Faculty: Richard Bryce, M.D.

Medical Alumni Senior Scholarship Award: Andrew Bacyinski

Class Marshal: Barbara Bosch, Ph.D.

Distinguished Leadership Awards:

Madeline Berschback

Serina Beydoun

Amanda Dooley

Joseph Friedli

Jay Llaniguez

Anum Naseem

Amelia Stone

Voluntary Faculty Award:Richard Bryce, M.D.

Penfil-Tischler Award:Diana Kakos

Superlative Awards:

Read the original here:

Who won what? Here's the rundown of the Class of 2020's award winners - The South End

Impunity in the Time of Corona(virus) – Modern Diplomacy

Globalgovernance has increasingly become common sense within the political-economicsphere in the context of preaching for accountability and transparency. Thereis,however, a grey space that claims questions of what the end goal of suchcoherence is called for and who it seeks to serve. This paper shalldescriptively delve into the need for Global Governance in todays world whileenumerating its corresponding challenges and criticisms.

International solidarity is not an act ofcharity, it is an act of unity between allies fighting on different terrainstowards the same objective. The foremost of these objectives is to aid thedevelopment of humanity to the highest level possible. Samora Machel

Theinternational arena in the 21st century requires a catalyst to unify the worldbeyond borders and to build global institutions that can combat disparagementof the idea of globalisation. The resolution to this conundrum is the dilationand legitimisation of global governance. Global Governance is essentially aframework that proposes global relationship and a knit playing fieldintegrating all spheres of a society including social, economic, political,cultural, and environmental sectors to revolve issues with a collectiveconsciousness[1] as liberalistswould preach.

This ishowever unachievable without all actors in the system including, states,political figures and leaders, quasi state actors, corporate sector and institutions,NGOs,MNCs and the financial system collaborate to form a coherent structure thatcan vastly influence the grassroots of the system. This is parallel to the ideaof mega diplomacy proposed by Parag Khana, a profound specialist in internationalrelations. As Parag Khana stated, Were moving into a post Westphalian world,a world which is populated where the authoritative actors are not justgovernments. They are companies.[2] He explains howdiplomacy has widened as a tool into diverse spheres such as private mercenaryarmies, AI and technology, humanitarian agencies and non-governmentalorganizations, the educational sector; schools and universities, religiousinstitutions and organisations and much more. He believes that diplomacystretches beyond multilateral institutions such as the United Nations and theWorld bank or bilateral relations between nation states themselves. This ismore efficient as it uplifts the accountability held by state and non-stateactors. It propagates a sense of global order and global citizenship in aninterdependent world as an aftermath of proactively embracing globalisation.

While thereis no universally accepted definition of Governance, TheCommission of Global governance defines the same as the sum of the many waysindividuals and institutions, public and private, manage their common affairs.It has posited that governance is a continuing process through whichconflicting and diverse interests may be accommodated and cooperative actionmay be taken.[3] The concept ofGlobal Governance is viewed narrowly as a movement to address todays issueswhile it is fundamentally much more. As Whitman (2009:8)[4] stated,it is an instrument to help independent states reach out for help in the faceof emerging international issues and come together to create the envisagedworld of peace and harmony. This stems out of the inefficiency and the failureof global institutions. For instance, humanitarian relief having been sent toRwanda in 1994 during the genocide by the UN enforcing the Tusi military couldhave deterred the massacre at its grassroots.

Globalisationbacklash may be seen as a growing hindrance to the expansion of GlobalGovernance as states are reluctant ant towards embracing the rapidinterdependence often leading to circumstances and conflicts that arise out ofintervention. Kofi Annan, Secretary General of the United Nations rightfullystated while addressing the assembly that theCentral challenge we face today is to ensure that globalization becomes a positiveforce for all the worlds people, instead of leaving billions of them insqualor.[5] Whilean ambitious concept, it may serve to be counterproductive in nature. The shifttowards abandoning globalisation in neither desirable nor pragmatic. Revokingthe systemic change, it has brought about for more than a decade now wouldbring along multifaceted problems hand in hand. It goes unrecognised, that theissue isnt globalisation, but how we work around it and how it is managed. Asrightly pointed out by Stiglitz, the macroscopic problem lies in the hands ofthe global financial institutions such as the World Trade Organisation (WTO),World Bank and The International Monetary Fund (IMF). They go beyond theirmandates to ideally sere the best interest of the developed nations as opposedto the developing unindustrialised nations.

Need for GlobalGovernance

Transnationalpolicy challenges influencing nation states on an individual level see the needfor cooperative global approaches within the contemporary world. This wouldrequire re-building of the mechanisms of global governance and its constantexpansion to address global issues that are on the rise. Globalisation, beingthe epicentre of the framework, is array of opportunities alongside challenges.While the debate on pollution persists, issues such as terrorism, drugs abuse,arms proliferation, climate change, and data security have crossed nationalborders in search of global solutions. These while picked up within thedomestic affairs of individual states within their political agendas,require integrated policy change in the international arena to be dealt with inan effective and constructive manner.

While viewedas transnational, the effects of global governance have a direct influencewithin the domestic there of each individual state. As Halabi (2004:23)[6] stated,that the framework of global governance is best suited to manipulateglobalisations forces, control its detrimental negative effects and recognisesthat globalization cannot lead to global governance like cooperationcorrespondingly may not be facilitated by the anarchy that prevails in theinternational system. In the anarchic system, the challenge stands as statesseek authority, power and control. While this collective consciousness isimperative for change, the thirst for power breaks down the cooperation andleads to violations in search for a state of hegemony. While offensive realistswould argue that this is natural, this state of neutrality is least beneficialfor the scale of change that meets the eye. A multilateral approach istherefore the only possible explanation which not only levels the playing fieldfor all but also doesnt compromising on valuing the voices of each of itsstake holders from time to time.

While the framework sounds equitable, it is impossibleto isolate domestic values in a multilateral setting. Deliberation and debatemay still lead to decision making that isnt convincingly adhered to by allstates. Hence, policy development needs to be holistic in nature.

Challenges

One of themain challenges to Global Governance is state sovereignty. Stemming from thewidely accepted grassroots of the Westphalian system that today UN carriesforward in its mandate stated, theconcept of nation-state sovereignty based on two principles: territoriality andthe exclusion of external actors from domestic authority structures .[7] GlobalGovernance can be maximised in the state of absence of state governments and acollective sense of shared sovereignty to create a cohesive internationalcommunity.

The abilityfor nations to contribute to change may diversely vary corresponding to theirstanding and their state capabilities. As Halabi (2004:24)[8]recognises,while global governance seeks to resolve disputes and issues, it does notrestrict states in continuing to pursue wealth within the created structure oftheir own. Hence, we need a global interface that can pool in these independentcapabilities and empower international actors to foster change.

Dominationand subordination of states hinders the process of global governance. Aspointed out by Mehta (2007:4)[9], the idea ofinternational is often perceived as the G8 or the G20. The G8[10], whileprimarily focusing on economic issues are seen to represent and speak for theentire international community as they guide the forces of response to globalissues and challenges. From an economic lens, the G8 as one might multilateralinstitution concentrates the power to manipulate the procedures of worldeconomics. This prevailing hierarchy in the system therefore deters thecomprehensive bridge between the rich and poor states, further breaking downthe cooperation.

Limits of GlobalGovernance

Some of thefundamental limits to the idea go Global Governance includes the forcesability to comply with international rules, to maintain transparency, to beable to create win-win resolutions that are mutually beneficial in interstatedisputes, and its ability to empower international organisations to deliverrequired international aid in terms of services and public goods for allnations to thrive in an equitable system. All nations have an intrinsic need tojoin these international organisations and institutions to prove theirinternational legitimacy within the global community.

Thesechallenges have been witnessed prominently in many spheres of transnationalissues. The United States non-cooperation in the environmentalprotect through the implementation of the targets to reduce CO2 emissions thatwould help curbing global warming in accordance to the Kyoto protocol[11] is anapt example of the same. The target of global poverty reduction has promptedinternational economic institutions such as the International Monetary Fund andthe World Bank to strengthen their policies through the launch of CDF(Comprehensive Development Framework) and PRSPs (Poverty Reduction StrategyPapers). Yet, the need for radical reformation persists. A report by the IFIAC,also known as the Maltzer Commission[12] deduces theinefficiency of the World Bank by pointing out the inconsistency in itsassistance provided to the social programs for the rural as its administrativework overlaps significantly with the domestic and regional developmental bankshence leading to low performance of the institution as a unit. The commissioncalled for a privatisation of the World Banks lending operations leading toits conversion into a World Development Agency.

The field ofhuman rights has been widely debated due to the lack of coherence andinconsistencies in policies that are adapted to the domestic affairs of eachstate. Human rights for the moral compass for global governance as violationproliferate across the globe. The asymmetry of information enables institutionsand states to exercise policies that impede several rights that individuals arefundamentally entitles to. The use of policing, coercion and torture violaterights including their rights to food, health care, housing and many more. Theconundrum of capital punishment and its violation to the fundamental right tolife has been debated for decades. The implementation and an ability to upholdand maintain this moral compass of human rights is a test of the potential ofGlobal Governance.

The breakdownof trade agreements highlights the over reliance and dependance of developingnations on the export of commodities that carry the brunt of collapsing prices.Such disputes and inequities within investment and trade may also be seen amonglarge and advanced nations that seek to uphold leverage against one anothersuch as the persisting trade conflict between USA and China. The shift in focusis therefore now on the diversification of exports that may be facilitated ifGlobal Governance can effectively manage the forces of globalisation andstreamline it through new international agreements supporting the price ofcommodities.

Last but notthe least, the uprise of civil society conflicts and revolutions are grosslymismanaged. The recent measures taken by the United Nation of disputes such asthe ongoing Syrian Civil War and unrest have led to questioning the legitimacyof the proposals passed through the Security Council and the body itself. Whilefunding for the institution is always constituted as a fundamental issue, noconstructive measure to rectify the same has been collectively formed by themember states of the international organisation.

Conclusion

While GlobalGovernance seeks to benefit all, it is over ambitious and idealistic. There areseveral reforms that are imperative to its efficient implementation. Firstly,it is important to modify how states perceive state sovereignty and dismiss thethreat that global governance poses to it. It is crucial to sustain herepresentation of state governments to retain the democratisation of globalinstitutions. With that said, the international community has a heavy relianceon national governments as opposed to weakening them. Weak states carrying acontrasting perception are not only a threat to themselves but also to theframework of Global governance. Weak legitimacy in nations that may categorisedas rogue states, fake democracies or quasi authoritarian states have a highdegree of threat on their efficiency and potential. This is however enhanced instates that exercise more liberty and freedom, where the civil societyrepresentation is high.

Secondly,global governance requires an accountable and moral structure. These twoelements must be universally recognised as backbones of the framework that areessential and uncontested. Subsequently, regional governance and domesticaffairs must be trusted and respected to maintain development and management ofstate infrastructure and the preservation of natural resources. Emergingregional powers must refrain from dominating the playing field and facilitatetrade and regional agreements to foster global governance by mobilising people,boosting imports and exports, and effectively managing resources.

Correspondingly,the needs to be an urgent democratisation of international economicinstitutions such as the UN, World Bank, WTO and IMF to filter and check theviability of proposals and measures taken. There needs to be a reiterated callfor conformity of these revolutionary and policy making bodies with the causeof strengthening global governance, enabling them to efficiently respond tocurrent and emerging global challenges. There needs to be an expansion of theSecurity Council that restricts the veto power in the hand of a few elitistnations and a reformation of the mandate of the UN enabling it to target shortterm goals making it more effective.

Lastly, thelegal structure require reform. The international judiciary and legal system needto be strengthened adhering to the globalised relationships between states thatsupersede domestic dynamics of legal frameworks within states. Internationalcourts such as the ICJ and the ICC must take cognizance of the changing worldthat the seek to serve.

The globalcommunity must in tandem minis the unilateral rule and isolate the quest forhegemony to create a system of cooperation and enable the upliftment ofsubordinated sections of societies such as women, children, indigenous people,underprivileged, refugees and many more. The structure should encompass allstate and non-state actors to help developing nations in the society meet theMillennium Developmental Goals to ensure peace, harmony, uphold human rights,reduce the detrimental effect of global warning on climate change, combatterrorism, curb migration and nuclear proliferation alongside fostering growthin the international, regional and individual state level. Global Governance isthere a vital instrument that seeks to intertwine global interests and lookbeyond domestic foreign policies to form a global knit community that envisagesa world of peace and harmony. Yet the question prevails, is global governancean answer to the echoing anarchy or a mere euphemism of a global government?

[1](n.d.). Retrieved from http://csmt.uchicago.edu/glossary2004/collectiveconsciousness.htm.

[2]Bigthinkeditor. (2018, October 5). ParagKhanna on the Rise of Mega Diplomacy. Retrieved fromhttps://bigthink.com/big-think-edge/parag-khanna-on-the-rise-of-mega-diplomacy.

[3]Hgel, P. (2011). GlobalGovernance. Oxford Bibliographies Online Datasets. doi:10.1093/obo/9780199743292-0015

[4]Whitman, J. (2009). Conclusion: The globalGovernance Prospect. Palgrave Advances in Global Governance, 189203.

[5]Speeches. (2019, February 13). Retrieved fromhttps://www.kofiannanfoundation.org/topics/speeches/.

[6]Halabi, Y. (2004). The Expansion of GlobalGovernance into the Third World: Altruism, Realism, or Constructivism?International Studies Review, 6(1), 2148.

[7]Timberman, T., & Timberman, T. (n.d.).The Peace of Westphalia and its 4 Principles for Interstate Relations IsntFailing. Retrieved fromhttps://smallwarsjournal.com/jrnl/art/the-peace-of-westphalia-and-its-4-principles-for-interstate-relations-isnt-failing.

[8]Halabi, Y. (2004). The Expansion of GlobalGovernance into the Third World: Altruism, Realism, or Constructivism?International Studies Review, 6(1), 2148.

[9]Mehta, M. D. (2007). Good Governance.Encyclopedia of Governance.

[10]Canada, France, Germany, Italy, Japan,Russia (suspended), the United Kingdom and the United States.

[11]What is the Kyoto Protocol? (n.d.).Retrieved from https://unfccc.int/kyoto_protocol.

[12]International Financial Institution AdvisoryCommission. (2016, December 23). Retrieved from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/International_Financial_Institution_Advisory_Commission.

Related

Read the rest here:

Impunity in the Time of Corona(virus) - Modern Diplomacy

Its time to stop fake political correctness and artificial harmony – The CEO Magazine

Political correctness has been around for half a century and throughout that time the world has witnessed many great changes; the end of apartheid, Australias first female Prime Minister and the passing of the same-sex marriage bill.

The term describes an avoidance of actions and language that offends or marginalises groups, particularly those that have historically been discriminated against.

Yes, political correctness has a powerful place in society, but in our increasingly diverse workplaces, PC culture has stifled curiosity, understanding, and our ability to empathise.

Australia is a proudly multicultural nation. Because of this, many believe our diversity rates and inclusive behaviours are ahead of the pack. In reality, we are not as progressive as we think. Working with global organisations from Shanghai, Japan, Pakistan, Malaysia and Silicon Valley taught me that Australias relationship with diversity and inclusion is fraught and no-one wants to talk about why theyre uncomfortable.

The smile-and-nod mentality is futile; on the surface workplaces are agreeing, while deep-down theyre not buying in. There is an artificial harmony between the politically correct way to embrace diversity and inclusion, and the real feelings, concerns and questions we have about the practical implications of change.

We must do better, and if that means being politically incorrect for the greater good of true progress, then so be it.

Humans are organically wired to be exclusive creatures; we gravitate towards similarity and comfort, and often we find that in reflections of ourselves. When asked to not only support, but prioritise difference, its a common reaction to feel uncomfortable or threatened.

This needs to be acknowledged, and that begins by proactively inviting dissent. Everyone has a bias be that unconscious or otherwise that informs their understanding of what diversity and inclusion is.

We use three fluid classifications to categorise individuals level of awareness on the subject:

Of all groups, rarely do we encounter anyone that wants to openly discriminate, rather its misinformation that fosters resistance.

Creating psychologically safe spaces to be politically incorrect and ask taboo questions without fear of judgement is the way to having honest and effective conversations.

The one size fits all approach rigid workplace policies or lectures on the issue only moralises workers, rather than actively engaging them in what they think diversity and inclusion means. This has the potential to create a culture of blind acceptance by suppressing curiosity and real understanding.

Acknowledging resistance is the first step to dropping the false pretence of artificial harmony. We are often told about the benefits of diversity and inclusion; the increased performance results; diversified skill sets; expanded talent pool; increased innovation the list goes on. But little attention is paid to the myths and challenges associated with implementing change.

A common myth is that women and minority groups are promoted or given special treatment over men, sparking all sorts of heated debate around the role of meritocracy. In reality, diversity and inclusion is not about superiorising women and minorities, its about adopting and learning an alternate view of what success, skills, experience and potential looks like when it encompasses a greater portion of society.

Another common misconception is that all people want to be treated equally, that the goal of diversity and inclusion is to see no distinction between men, women, and minority groups. But the dream is not equality; its equity.

Treating everyone with equity is part of the reason why diversity and inclusion is challenging, not only to implement but to maintain.

As a leader, it takes more money, time, resources and work to authentically manage individualism. Yet within many organisations, theres a sense that once the right boxes are ticked, the job is done.

Diversity and inclusion create friction that can proactively encourage dissent, but the belief that creating change is easy discourages the hard work behind progress and the benefits that come with it.

Its politically incorrect to openly acknowledge the difficulties of diversity and inclusion, but until we start to accept that its okay to imperfectly participate in conversation and be honest about the complexities that making real progress brings, we will continue to cultivate artificial harmony by wavering on the precipice of change.

Sarah Liu is the founder and director of The Dream Collective, Australias most influential network of high-calibre young women. Through this networking platform, The Dream Collective has been responsible for empowering and equipping thousands of professional women into leadership roles through leadership training and mentoring opportunities. She is also the co-founder of Gemini3 and has lead branding strategies for some of the worlds most recognised brands including Revlon, Olay and Coca-Cola.

Read next: Do you really need more inclusive language in the workplace?

Read more from the original source:

Its time to stop fake political correctness and artificial harmony - The CEO Magazine

Heres the data that shows Americans who rage against political correctness are the most xenophobic and most likely to vote Trump – AlterNet

Though Trump has previously raged against political correctness explicitly, and indeed, campaigned on it in 2016, when it comes to this recent COVID-19 labeling campaign, other far-Right thought-leaders have been doing this for him. For example, in a March 14th interview on Fox News, Arkansas Republican SenatorTom Cottonstated, Anyone who complains that its racist or xenophobic to call this virus the Chinese coronavirus or the Wuhan virus is a politically correct fool, and they ought not to be listened to about anything.

And March 20th, Former Fox News hostBill OReillytold Glenn Beck: The worst thing in this pandemic virus outside of the actual illness itself of course is the political [sic] correct media still, still peddling garbage that hurts the American people. Quoting an ABC News reporter, OReilly said in a whiny, mocking voice, A lot of people think its racist if you call it the Chinese Virus.Its sickening.

But survey data confirm that white Americanslike President Trump, Senator Tom Cotton, Bill OReilly, or their followerswho attack politically correct language as the enemy are in fact the most likely to hold racist or xenophobic views.In a nationally representative survey fielded in February 2020, we asked Americans to indicate how much they agreed with statements about using politically correct language. We also asked Americans for their views on refugees from the Middle East and Americas control over its Southern border.

In the first figure [left], we see that, as Americans agreement with the statement Too many people are easily offended these days over language increases, the more likely they are to believe that the federal government should do more to secure the Southern border and that Middle Eastern refugees pose a terrorist threat.

In the second figure [below, right], we see a similar trend, but in the opposite direction. The more strongly Americansdisagreewith the statement People need to be more careful with language to avoid offending people, the more likely they are to hold xenophobic views about refugees from the Middle East and to want stricter border control.

In sum: both figures show that white Americans who voice the strongest opinions against politically correct language also hold the strongest anti-immigrant attitudes.

Just as important, they are also the group most likely to plan on voting Trump in 2020.

The last figure [left] shows the percentage of white Americans who indicate they plan on voting Trump in 2020 by their level of agreement with our two statements regarding politically correct language. Nearly 80% of white Americans who strongly disagree that People need to be more careful with language to avoid offending people, or who strongly agree that Too many people are easily offended these days over language, intend to vote for Trump in November.

Seen in light of these data, Trumps dual strategy is clear. By unapologetically referring to COVID-19 as the Chinese Virus, Trump is first able to signal to his white base that he too is disdainful of scheming, disease-ridden outsiders. But he can also intentionally provoke a backlash against his hurtful and xenophobic language, which he and his followers can dismiss as leftist political correctness. Trump shores up support against both a perceived external threat (immigrants) and an internal threat (liberals) with a single dangerous and offensive swipe.

Read more from the original source:

Heres the data that shows Americans who rage against political correctness are the most xenophobic and most likely to vote Trump - AlterNet

PC and the Virus – The SandPaper

Letters

By Gail Travers | on March 25, 2020

To the Editor:

One would think that politically correct is such an innocent term. How can anyone be against something so friendly, something supposed to encourage harmony and peace between all people? Think again.

This movement calledpolitical correctness has ignited controversy across the land. And although the movement arises from the desire to sweep away the debris of racism, sexism and hatred, itonly has intensified it by replacingold prejudices with new ones.

Racism is a fire that the political class cant put out. Intentionally or not, politicians, the media and academics are all stoking the fire of racism. When all else fails, bring out the race card. Liberal progressives know that certain words can hurt you when you talk about your rights and liberties.

The latest weapon in their arsenal is the word xenophobia, defined as the fear and hatred of strangers or foreigners.The liberal American media would have you believe that if you refer to COVID-19, commonly referred to as coronavirus, as the Chinese virus, that would be xenophobic or racist.The far left wing of the Democratic Party has done a good job of manipulating the language. You would think the conservatives would be the ones to fight all this nonsense, yet their voices are quiet. The PC brigade has them on the run because they are so frightened of being branded as racist.

Art Mooney

Little Egg Harbor

Original post:

PC and the Virus - The SandPaper

DUNN: Trump is making the right moves – The News Herald

The spread of coronavirus has hit America hard, infecting thousands and causing significant disruptions to daily life. In such difficult times, citizens turn to their elected leaders for guidance and aid.

President Trump has risen to the moment in admirable fashion, delivering timely and crucial federal assistance to those affected by the outbreak and taking every measure necessary to protect the health and safety of the American people.

The Trump administration has coordinated an unprecedented, aggressive, and whole-of-government approach to fighting coronavirus. President Trump instituted travel bans to protect our borders, first making the bold call to ban travel from China, a life-saving decision made ahead of the curve and prompting other countries to follow his lead. Even far-left New York Mayor Bill De Blasio described the ban as in many ways, warranted.

Then came the tough decision to cut off travel from Europe. This decision proved prescient when days later Europe was deemed the epicenter of the coronavirus pandemic. With a disregard for political correctness, President Trump made strong decisions that directly mitigated the spread of coronavirus within our borders.

President Trump has also directed the Small Business Administration (SBA) to provide financial relief to businesses and workers affected by the outbreakmuch-needed federal assistance in an uncertain time. This is being followed by a fight to secure an $850 billion stimulus package.

Finally, President Trump has directed Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin to pursue the prospect of direct cash payments to Americans, proof that the Trump Administration will explore every possibilityhowever creative or unprecedentedto safeguard the health, safety, and incomes of the American people.

Here in Florida, weve received over $27 million in federal aid, as well as thousands of coronavirus test kits each capable of testing dozens to hundreds of patients that will be immediately employed to fight the outbreak.

This response is led by President Trumps world-class Coronavirus Task Force, headed by Vice President Mike Pence and comprised of the most qualified group of experts in the world working around the clock to fight the virus on every front.

The Task Force has worked in a transparent and aggressive manner on many fronts. They are holding regular press conferences and announcing new CDC guidelines with steps Americans can take in their daily lives to keep their families safe and stem the outbreaks spread. The President and his Task Force have also led the negotiations to enact crucial legislation that will cut red tape and allow Americans to be tested for the virus without cost.

In addition to working with partners in government, President Trump is also working with the private sector to combat COVID-19, which allows for a more comprehensive and accelerated effort to tackle the spread of the virus. Examples of innovative private-sector solutions include tech giants like Facebook and Google using smartphone location data to track the spread and make sure Americans are isolating themselves.

By cutting red tape and using private sector resources, he empowered medical professionals to expand access to telehealth services thereby allowing patients to consult with their physicians without having to leave their homes.

The success and dedication of the Trump administrations efforts is perhaps best exemplified by bipartisan plaudits for President Trumps response. Prominent Democrats Gov. Andrew Cuomo of New York and Gov. Gavin Newsom of California, longtime Trump critics, through Monday described the President as very creative and energetic in fighting the outbreak and that every single thing [Trump] said [the administration] followed through on. CNN analyst Dana Bash praised President Trump as the kind of leader people need.

Its clear that President Trump has led an aggressive, transparent, effective, and timely response to the SARS-CoVID-19 epidemic. Its my hope that Democrats in Florida and around the country stop politicizing this threat, and work with the President to protect the health and safety of all Americans.

Neal Dunn, a Republican, is the U.S. Representative for Floridas 2nd Congressional District.

More here:

DUNN: Trump is making the right moves - The News Herald

With Wuhan virus, political correctness is being monetized for the first time ever – OpIndia

Let us be clear on this. This pandemic is Chinas fault.

China, this is on you! YOU are responsible for thousands of deaths across the world. YOU are responsible for the global economic crisis and recession which is coming. YOU are responsible for what could be hundreds of millions of people losing their livelihoods.

China had the first case on Nov 17. They didnt tell the world anything. They hid it all. By mid December, several Chinese labs had found evidence of a mystery virus. But China destroyed the samples, stopped the tests and covered up the news.

- article continues after ad -- article resumes -

Even when the news filtered to the world, China kept feeding us nonsense news. Here is the World Health Organization on Jan 14, reporting what they had been told by Chinese authorities.

No evidence of human to human transmission? Really?

Why do we need to keep repeating this is Chinas fault? Doesnteveryone know by now has heard that the virus began in Wuhan in Hubei province in China?

Well, yeah. But history is an ever changing thing. Public memory is short. China has hit the propaganda gamehardto stave off the PR nightmare.

Just two months ago, it was acceptable and totally commonplace to refer to this as the Chinese virus.

By mid-March, opinions published on CNN had shifted.

In fact, liberal media was now publicly challenging Trump on why he and other Republicans were calling it Chinese virus. Suddenly the term that everyone was using just two months ago had been declared racist.

You know whats coming. They will scrub it all clean. That tweet from CNN may disappear some day. Any website containing any reference to that term might be scrubbed clean. Algorithms of social media giants might start identifying the expression Chinese virus as hate speech and start auto deleting any post with those words.

Nothing is secure, except the thoughts in our head. They know human memory is perishable and they will work non stop to make us forget. See if you notice the game being played in this tweet.

That man is an Associate Professor of Government at Harvard University.

Did you catch that? Did you see how cleverly he framed the sentence? He tried to misdirect us like a street magician. The really relevant part of that sentence is in the first part (which you are likely to miss), not the second (which you are likely to remember). Cleverly and wickedly, Prof. Wang has sown the idea that there is some debate over where the virus came from!

Thats how it starts. Now they will say we must teach the controversy over where the virus came from.

Nothing is safe, except for the thoughts that we can hold on to in our heads. And the thoughts we can pass around to those we know. The future generations must know what the world suffered because of the fault of the Chinese government.

With the Chinese virus pandemic, we are seeing something new and terrifying. For decades now, the network of political correctness has been laid all across the free world. But like many tech startups that later became giants, the revenue model for this was not immediately obvious. A lot of liberals got highly paid jobs working for this startup.

But, ultimately, the funding was coming from something resembling venture capital. A vast network for manipulating public opinion was being created, but it was not immediately clear how it would be monetized.

Well, now we know who would be willing to pay big $$$ for access to this network. Right now, the Chinese government wants history wiped clean. And liberals can help. Liberals can use their vast network to declare this or that as politically incorrect. And once something is declared politically incorrect, it is as good as banned!

Thats exactly what China wants. Thats exactly what China is getting right now.

The Chinese govt does not want the world to remember that the pandemic is their fault. Liberals have declared the term Chinese virus as racist, thus effectively banning it.

We all suspected that political correctness was a veiled form of fascism. And for the first time, we are literally seeing political correctness being made into a tool for serving dictators. Be very certain that this tool will be used again and again.

Read the original here:

With Wuhan virus, political correctness is being monetized for the first time ever - OpIndia

Stop using the term people of color | Opinions – The Mass Media

UMass Boston and its professors stick to a very distinct set of politically correct terminology, both in and out of the classroom. Although I am generally skeptical of political correctness and its ramifications regarding the regulation of free speech, I almost always stick to the politically correct terms surrounding gender and race. If someone requests that I call them a certain pronoun, I always try to remember that pronoun in order to ensure that person is comfortable when I am conversing with them. I do this because I am a civil person in a civil society, and I do my best to respect peoples personal choices, as long as those personal choices do not influence me or anyone else.

Apart from politically correct terminology surrounding gender, PC, or people of color, culture arises in another place: race. When I am describing myself, I always like to specify my race. As Coptic Evangelical Egyptian and Palestinian American, my race is intertwined with my identity as a Christian from the Middle East. However, oftentimes my peers, white or black, use the term, person of color to describe anyone not white. As a person who is not white, I have adopted this term to describe myself to be in line with modern, politically correct terminology. I may have even described myself as a person of color in previous articles. Upon further investigation of this term, I am less inclined to use the term to describe my non-white peers, given the historical connotation of the term. Furthermore, I find the use of the term to describe anyone who is not white fundamentally and academically lazy.

I hear the following statements thrown around a lot: We need more people of color in government, or Women of color are especially marginalized. While these statements might be well-intentioned, they fundamentally ignore the nuances between races. Is someone who appears White from the Middle East or Latin America considered a person of color? Are there any fundamental racial or ethnic differences between an African-American person whose family has been in the United States for seven generations and an African immigrant, even though they may physically appear the same? These are important questions that question the nature of a term such as person of color.

During Jim Crow, the term colored people was used on bathrooms, tables, and water fountains to segregate Black and White people. All of sudden, in the 21st century, the term is used commonly to describe non-white. Personally, while I am not offended by the term, I do find the widespread and lazy usage of the word problematic for the advancement of non-white people. While in colloquial conversation, this umbrella term is very acceptable, but the usage of this term in academic circles presents issues.

According to the United States Census Bureau, Asians have the highest Real Median Household Income. At $81,331, Asians have more than double the lowest racial group, Black individuals at $40,258. Racial income inequality is only one way to differentiate different races, but according to the term person of color, those two racial groups are under the same umbrella term. Also according to this statistic presented by the Census Bureau, the White, non-Hispanic Real Median Household income is $68,145, substantially less than Asian Household income. (1)

The nuances of race in the United States must not be overlooked. In no other nation, can people of all different races come together and be called one race: American. Our different racial backgrounds are key to identity and must not be overlooked or oversimplified. I would encourage my white and non-white peers to analyze the differences in race and not use oversimplified language to describe race. Race itself is one of the most complex and historically significant aspects of human history.

In Asia, Chinese, Koreans and Japanese have had a long and brutal war-filled relationship. Within Africa are hundreds of different racial and language groups. In Europe exist different types of Europeans. Prior to the formation of the European Union, these countries were often at war. In Latin America, differences in color have formed variations in culture and language. In the Middle East, the invasion of Islam has formed lots of different types of races, each linked specifically to a religion. In the subcontinent of India, differences in religion created Muslim India and Hindu India (according to the British) which formed modern-day Pakistan and modern-day India, respectively. Race is incredibly complex, and boiling down thousands of ethnicities to a two-letter phrase is lazy, irresponsible, and careless.

https://www.census.gov/content/dam/Census/library/visualizations/2018/demo/p60-263/figure1.pdf

Read more:

Stop using the term people of color | Opinions - The Mass Media