Textbooks Still Misrepresent the Origin of Life – Discovery Institute

Editors note: The profoundest mystery and thus the deepest inspiration is life itself. Discovery Institute Press has just published a greatly expanded edition of the 1984 classic of intelligent design science literature,The Mystery of Lifes Origin. Below is an excerpt adapted from a brand new chapter. Dr. Wells, the author of the chapter, is a Senior Fellow with the Center for Science & Culture. He holds PhDs in Molecular and Cell Biology (U.C. Berkeley) and Religious Studies (Yale University).

The Miller-Urey experiment may well be called the poster child for origin-of-life research. Most modern biology students have seen some version of the drawing below, which represents an experimental apparatus used in 1952 by University of Chicago graduate student Stanley L. Miller. Because Miller performed his experiment under the supervision of Nobel laureate Harold C. Urey, and the results were published in 1953, it became known as the 1953 Miller-Urey experiment.

In 2000, I published a book titled Icons of Evolution: Why Much of What we Teach About Evolution is Wrong. I described and analyzed ten images (icons of evolution) commonly used in biology textbooks to teach high school and college students about evolutionary theory. I showed that all ten icons misrepresent the evidence and that some scientists had known this for decades.

After 2000, some textbooks were corrected, but in many cases the corrections were minor and the books continued to perpetuate the misrepresentations. This prompted me to publish another book in 2017, titled Zombie Science, which included six more icons of evolution that I didnt have room to include in my 2000 book. All sixteen icons misrepresented the evidence, but many were still being used in 2017. I called this zombie science, because although the icons were empirically dead they continued to stalk our classrooms and research institutions.

I argued that this was not due simply to laziness or a reluctance to give up an attractive theory. It revealed something much deeper: a dogmatic commitment to materialistic philosophy. Biology courses were being misused to indoctrinate students in materialism, the view that only material objects and the forces among them are real. In this view free will, spirit, intelligent design, and God are mere illusions.

One of the icons of evolution was the Miller-Urey experiment.

Read the rest inThe Mystery of Lifes Origin: The Continuing Controversy, from Discovery Institute Press.

Photo credit: In the Miller-Urey apparatus, a spark from two electrodes simulated lightning, shown above, by Griffinstorm / CC BY-SA.

Visit link:

Textbooks Still Misrepresent the Origin of Life - Discovery Institute

The Evolution of Defending in the Premier League: From Bruce to Van Dijk – beIN SPORTS MENA Breaking News

Aarran Summers

Steve Bruce and Gary Pallister each made fifty appearances for Manchester United in their first Premier League title-winning season in 1992/ 93. It was this defensive stability and ingenuity that allowed Alex Ferguson to win his first domestic title of many in England.

England's first division was now rebranded, income was flowing like never before, and new talent from abroad was arriving. The league was undergoing a new identity, and it was evident that the style of play, particularly defending, was going to change forever.

English football is famed for its aggressive defensive approach. It was all about intimidating the opponent without the ball, tackling hard when the opponent had the ball.

Bruce was known for his excellent heading ability, and he also able to go forward more often than players of today. Contrast that with Rio Ferdinand, arguably the most successful defender in United's history, a player once labelled by Ferguson as the best defender in the world.

Several English journalists regarded Ferdinand as one of country's best continental style defenders. His game featured on playing the football from out the back, instead of the route one style we rarely see today. The emphasis now shifted to retaining possession, starting from the back, instead of potentially losing it at the first opportune moment.

Ferdinand could also cope with playing against lower league sides in the FA Cup to playing against strong attack-minded teams in the UEFA Champions League, by merely adapting his game.

Tony Adams was also a Premier League winner and forged incredible partnerships with the likes of Lee Dixon and Martin Keown. Despite their dominance and persistent defending, they were unable to achieve what their teammates managed some four years after Arsenal secured their first Premier League title.

Arsenal's unbeaten season centred around their unique attacking play but also their dogged defensive approach. As football evolves the level of talent in a squad does not necessarily run parallel with that, as an unbeaten season should epitomise a defensive masterclass.

Liverpool's star defender, Virgil van Dijk, is a prime example of this. The Dutchman enjoyed one a run of not being dribbled past in 2019. His no-nonsense approach, however, is similar to that of Bruce some twenty-five years earlier.

There are more foreign players in the Premier League than there were in 1993, and every player has introduced their own culture to the competition. The evolution of defending goes hand in hand with the development of attacking. Where the pace of the striker has increased, so too has the defender.

There are always exciting debates as to whether Bruce or anyone from the 1990s could compete with players of today. The players are fitter like never before. The approach has certainly changed.

If Bruce were playing in his prime today, he probably would end up on his backside if Lionel Messi sprinted past him. However, the Argentine would undoubtedly know about it, if Bruce made contact, with his usual ruthless enthusiasm.

See the original post here:

The Evolution of Defending in the Premier League: From Bruce to Van Dijk - beIN SPORTS MENA Breaking News

How and why some frogs evolved extreme heads – Jill Lopez

Many frogs look like a water balloon with legs, but don't be fooled. Beneath slick skin, some species sport spines, spikes and other skeletal secrets.

While most frogs share a simple skull shape with a smooth surface, others have evolved fancier features, such as faux fangs, elaborate crests, helmet-like fortification and venom-delivering spikes. A new study is the first to take a close look at the evolution and function of these armored frog skulls.

Florida Museum of Natural History researchers used 3D data to study skull shape in 158 species representing all living frog families. Radically shaped skulls were often covered in intricate patterns of grooves, ridges and pits formed by extra layers of bone. The research team found that this trait, known as hyperossification, has evolved more than 25 times in frogs. Species with the same feeding habits or defenses tended to develop similarly shaped and patterned skulls, even if they were separated by millions of years of evolution.

"Superficially, frogs may look similar, but when you look at their skulls, you see drastic differences," said Daniel Paluh, the study's lead author and a University of Florida doctoral student. "Some of the weirdest skulls are found in frogs that eat birds and mammals, use their heads as a shield, or in a few rare cases, are venomous. Their skulls show how strange and diverse frogs can be."

The last comprehensive study of frog skulls was published in 1973. Since then, scientists have doubled the number of described frog species, updated our understanding of their evolutionary relationships and developed new analytical techniques with the help of CT scanning.

This enabled Paluh to use 36 landmarks on frog skulls, scanned and digitized as part of the National Science Foundation-fundedoVertproject, to analyze and compare shapes across the frog tree of life.

"Before we had methods to digitize specimens, really the only way to quantify shape was to take linear measurements of each skull," he said.

Not only do hyperossification and bizarre skull shapes tend to appear together, Paluh found, but they are often associated with frogs that eat either very large prey or use their heads for defense.

Frogs that eat other vertebrates - birds, reptiles, other frogs and mice - often have giant, roomy skulls, with a jaw joint near the back. This gives them a bigger gape with which to scoop up their prey, Paluh said, referencing Pacman frogs as one example. His analysis showed these species' skulls are stippled with tiny pits, which could provide extra strength and bite force.

Nearly all frogs lack teeth on their lower jaw, but some, such as Budgett's frogs, have evolved lower fanglike structures that allow them to inflict puncture wounds on their prey. One species, Guenther's marsupial frog, has true teeth on both jaws and can eat prey more than half its body length.

Other frogs use their heads to plug the entrance of their burrows as protection from predators. These species tend to have cavernous skulls overlaid with small spikes. A few, such as Bruno's casque-headed frog, were recently discovered to be venomous. When a predator rams the head of one these frogs, specialized spikes pierce venom glands just under the skin as a defense.

While the study showed a persistent overlap between hyperossification and fanciful skull shape, researchers aren't sure which came first. Did frogs start eating large prey and then evolve beefier skulls or vice versa?

"That's kind of a 'chicken or the egg' question," Paluh said.

The common ancestor of today's 7,000 frog species did not have an ornamented skull. But heavily fortified skulls do appear in even more ancient frog ancestors, said David Blackburn, Florida Museum curator ofherpetologyand study co-author.

"While the ancestor of all frogs did not have a hyperossified skull, that's how the skulls of quite ancient amphibian ancestors were built," he said. "These frogs might be using ancient developmental pathways to generate features that characterized their ancestors deep in the past."

Previous studies proposed that frogs evolved hyperossification to prevent water loss in dry environments, but Paluh's research found that habitat and hyperossification were not necessarily linked. The trait shows up in frogs that live underground, in trees, in water and on land.

But habitat does influence skull shape: Aquatic frogs tend to have long, flat skulls, while digging species often have short skulls with pointed snouts, a shape that also enables them to use their mouths like chopsticks to catch small, scurrying prey such as ants and termites, Paluh said. These species include the Mexican burrowing toad and the Australian tortoise frog - distant relatives that live in different parts of the world.

While the study sheds new light on frog skull shape, Blackburn said we still don't know much about the basic biology of frogs.

"Weirdly, it's easier for us to generate beautiful images of skulls than it is to know what these frogs eat," Blackburn said. "Natural history remains quite hard. Just because we know things exist doesn't mean we know anything about them."

The study will publish this week in theProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

The rest is here:

How and why some frogs evolved extreme heads - Jill Lopez

The evolution of Science Fiction – The New Indian Express

Express News Service

BENGALURU: The current coronavirus outbreak feels like something out of a Science Fiction (SF) novel to many fans of SF, who recall Dean Koonz having mentioned Wuhan-400 as the origin of a virus in his 1981 novel, The Eyes of Darkness. Neither Koonz nor his fellow SF writers have powers of prophecy. Their prescience is merely the result of their having used their imagination and creativity to extrapolate the cultural reality of their time into the future.

So, what is the genesis of this genre? Mary Shelleys Frankenstein in 1818 was the first true sci-fi novel in a genre that has historically been dominated by men (Isaac Asimov, Ray Bradbury, Aldous Huxley, Michael Crichton, Kurt Vonnegut, L Ron Hubbard etc). Kicking off modern SF in the 1940s and 1950s were writers like Asimov, Joseph Campbell and Robert Heinlein who reflected optimism and excitement about things like space travel and the power of technology to solve humanitys problems.

The New Wave in the 1960s and 1970s (Samuel Delany, Thomas Disch etc) saw more cynical and experimental explorations, while cyberpunk in the 1980s evoked even darker visions of a humanity enslaved to technology that exacerbated social inequity. By the turn of the century, SF became the visionary vehicle for many innovative ideas about nanotechnology, smart matter, virtual reality and so on. Kim Stanley Robinsons books on terraforming Mars spring to mind. In the past decade, SF by and about people of colour, women, and LGBTQIA+ persons have brought fresh perspectives to the genre.

Star Trek and Star Wars exposed me (and probably my entire generation) to SF. My favourites, Aldous Huxleys Brave New World and George Orwells 1984, are in the sub-genre of speculative fiction. Huxleys last novel, Island, a provocative counterpoint to Brave New World, depicts an ideal society on a remote island. In The Giver by Lois Lowry, a society that has eliminated pain and strife by converting to Sameness has also removed emotional depth from their lives. Douglas Adams The HitchhikersGuide to the Galaxy was probably was the first satire of fantasy fiction. Some books and movies attained cult status in India: 2001: A Space Odyssey directed by Stanley Kubrick, based on Arthur C Clarkes novella; Logans Run, Blade Runner, Soylent Green, and Andrei Tarkovskys masterpiece, Solaris.

While most SF was dominated by robot rebellion, apocalypse, or tyrannical governance, Dune, Foundation, Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep, Stranger in a Strange Land, Neuromancer, The Left Hand of Darkness, Ringworld, and Rendezvous with Rama offered intellectually challenging plots and philosophically imagined worlds. In India, the gentler, more narrative-driven world of Fantasy fiction and cinema, as exemplified in Lord of the Rings, Narnia, HarryPotter, the Dark Materials Trilogy, The Hunger Games, and the Game of Thrones, would eventually usurp the spot the great sci-fi novels once had.

Contemporary novels and short stories in the SF genre incorporate the tech world and faithfully depict it, but add a slight element of fiction a good example being the recent bestseller (now a movie) by Dave Eggers called The Circle, a techno-thriller of sorts. Cixin Lius recent success with The Three Body Problem is backed by solid scientific knowledge (physics, software engineering etc) and magnificent philosophical imagination.

The greatest challenge for SF writers is to explore the future in a realistic manner. As the best-selling author of Sapiens Professor Yuval Noah Harari says, Science Fiction shapes the understanding of the public on things like artificial intelligence and biotechnology, which are likely to change our lives and society more than anything else in the coming decades.The author is a technologist based in Silicon Valley who is gently mad about books.

See the rest here:

The evolution of Science Fiction - The New Indian Express

15 Photos That Show The Evolution Of Brock Lesnar | TheThings – TheThings

Brock Lesnars career in the WWE has ran nearly 20 years, give or take his break away from the company for his time in the UFC. He started with the WWE in 2000with OVW and by 2002 he was a WWE Champion, the youngest in company history. Over that time, Brock has been called many things, including the Next Big Thing, and he definitely earned that nickname. With Paul Heyman by his side, Brock has basically been the face of WWE for nearly two decades and is the most legit athlete the promotion has ever had.

His evolution from amateur wrestler to now current WWE Champion is simply amazing. All with Paul Heyman being his advocate, Lesnar is one of the most talented stars in WWE today and has evolved into a big box office name for the WWE, who only have him wrestle at the biggest events. Its why his contract is something everyone wants, where he wrestles with limited dates and gets millions of dollars. Here is Brocks evolution from rookie to champion.

Before joining WWE, Brock Lesnar was one of the best amateur wrestlers in the country as he won the 2000 NCAA Division 1 Heavyweight wrestling championship in his senior year at the University of Minnesota. He finished as a two-time NCAA All-American, two-time Big Ten Conference champion and had a record of 106-5 in four years.

When he signed with the WWE, he was sent to Ohio Valley Wrestling, which was WWEs developmental territory at the time. There he teamed with his University of Minnesota roommate Shelton Benjamin as a tag team known as the Minnesota Stretching Crew and they won the OVW Southern Tag Team Champions three different times.

Brock Lesnar made his debut right after WrestleMania, attacking Al Snow, Maven and Spike Dudley during their match. He was accompanied by Paul Heyman to the ring, which marks the first time they were paired together. Its here where he was dubbed by Heyman, The Next Big Thing and his first feud was with the Hardy Boyz.

Brock Lesnars push was accelerated as by June, he was in the King of the Ring tournament. On RAW, Brock defeated Bubba Ray Dudley and Booker T, and then at the Pay Per View, he defeated Test in his semi-final match and Rob Van Dam in the final. The winner was granted a WWE Undisputed Championship match at SummerSlam.

With Brock Lesnar winning the King of the Ring, he got a title shot against The Rock for the WWE Undisputed Championship. Brock would hit The Rock with an F-5 and win the championship, becoming the youngest person in WWE history to win the top title. It was also only just months after debuting.

Brock Lesnar would lose the title and start a feud with Big Show late in the year and he needed to win the Royal Rumble match in order to get a shot at Kurt Angle for the title. He would beat Big Show in a match for a spot in the Rumble and eliminate the Undertaker last to secure his spot in the main event of WrestleMania.

Brock Lesnar and Kurt Angle was a dream match of sorts because of their amateur wrestling background. Angle was walking in injured and Brock injured himself when he tried to perform a shooting star press, a move he used in OVW but never used on the main roster. He would pin Angle and regain the title.

Brock Lesnar would leave WWE in 2004 and tried his like at football. But he eventually went to Japan and in his debut match, he defeated Kazuyuki Fujita and Masahiro Chono for the IWGP Heavyweight Championship. New Japan would strip Lesnar of the title months later for not defending it due to visa issues.

Brock Lesnar would now turn his attention to mixed martial arts and specifically, the UFC. He lost his first match to Frank Mir but was granted a UFC Heavyweight championship match at UFC 91 against Randy Couture. Lesnar won in the second round to become the new champion in just his fourth MMA fight.

After time in the UFC, Brock Lesnar returned to the WWE in 2012 and faced John Cena. He was brought in to bring legitimacy back to the WWE, as they were capitalizing off his success in MMA. Very quickly, Paul Heyman was brought back as Lesnars advocate to do all his speaking for him leading up to matches.

The biggest win in WWE history belongs to Brock Lesnar, who at WrestleMania 30, ended the Undertakers undefeated streak at 21 wins. It was a complete shock to everyone in attendance, as Brock hit multiple F-5s on the Undertaker, who had to go to the hospital after the match. It started a long feud between the two.

Related:20 Little Known Facts About Brock Lesnar's Private Life

The victory over Undertaker sparked a very dangerous Brock Lesnar as he was booked to be ruthless. In his first title match back, Brock delivered 16 suplexes to John Cena at SummerSlam and two F-5s, while Cena got in very little offense. He pinned Cena to become the WWE World Heavyweight champion.

When the WWE brought in the Universal Championship, Brock Lesnar won the title after beat Goldberg in a WrestleMania match, avenging his Survivor Series loss in 86 seconds to the man who now holds the title. Brock pinned him and held the title for 504 days, the sixth-longest world championship reign in WWE history.

At Money in the Bank, Brock Lesnar replaced Sami Zayn in the match and quickly climbed the ladder to win the briefcase, giving him a shot at any title he wanted. It started a small comedy time for Brock, who often put the briefcase up to his shoulder like a boombox and said it was a Brock party. He would cash it in on Seth Rollins at Extreme Rules to win the title again.

When WWE moved Smackdown to FOX, Brock Lesnar was given a title shot against Kofi Kingston for the WWE Championship. Brock won the match in seconds to win his fifth WWE Championship. This also marked Lesnars first television match in 15 years, as Brock only fought on pay per views until then.

Next:8 Wrestlers That Are Banned From Working With Brock (And 8 He'd Wrestle Any Day)

Next8 Former WCW Stars That Became Successful Without WWE (And 7 That Struggled)

Read the original here:

15 Photos That Show The Evolution Of Brock Lesnar | TheThings - TheThings

United States Steel Corporation (X) is primed for evolution with the beta value of 2.87 – The InvestChronicle

United States Steel Corporation (X) is priced at $6.39 after the most recent trading session. At the very opening of the session, the stock price was $6.11 and reached a high price of $7.18, prior to closing the session it reached the value of $6.31. The stock touched a low price of $5.98.

United States Steel Corporation had a pretty Dodgy run when it comes to the market performance. The 1-year high price for the companys stock is recorded $20.53 on 04/03/19, with the lowest value was $4.54 for the same time period, recorded on 03/16/20.

Price records that include history of low and high prices in the period of 52 weeks can tell a lot about the stocks existing status and the future performance. Presently, United States Steel Corporation shares are logging -68.87% during the 52-week period from high price, and 40.75% higher than the lowest price point for the same timeframe. The stocks price range for the 52-week period managed to maintain the performance between $4.54 and $20.53.

The companys shares, operating in the sector of basic materials managed to top a trading volume set approximately around 30.2 million for the day, which was evidently higher, when compared to the average daily volumes of the shares.

When it comes to the year-to-date metrics, the United States Steel Corporation (X) recorded performance in the market was -44.00%, having the revenues showcasing -44.00% on a quarterly basis in comparison with the same period year before. At the time of this writing, the total market value of the company is set at 1.15B, as it employees total of 27500 workers.

During the last month, 0 analysts gave the United States Steel Corporation a BUY rating, 0 of the polled analysts branded the stock as an OVERWEIGHT, 9 analysts were recommending to HOLD this stock, 1 of them gave the stock UNDERWEIGHT rating, and 5 of the polled analysts provided SELL rating.

According to the data provided on Barchart.com, the moving average of the company in the 100-day period was set at 10.11, with a change in the price was noted -6.45. In a similar fashion, United States Steel Corporation posted a movement of -50.23% for the period of last 100 days, recording 15,737,568 in trading volumes.

Total Debt to Equity Ratio (D/E) can also provide valuable insight into the companys financial health and market status. The debt to equity ratio can be calculated by dividing the present total liabilities of a company by shareholders equity. Debt to Equity thus makes a valuable metrics that describes the debt, company is using in order to support assets, correlating with the value of shareholders equity. The total Debt to Equity ratio for X is recording 0.89 at the time of this writing. In addition, long term Debt to Equity ratio is set at 0.89.

Raw Stochastic average of United States Steel Corporation in the period of last 50 days is set at 33.70%. The result represents downgrade in oppose to Raw Stochastic average for the period of the last 20 days, recording 53.62%. In the last 20 days, the companys Stochastic %K was 45.10% and its Stochastic %D was recorded 38.77%.

If we look into the earlier routines of United States Steel Corporation, multiple moving trends are noted. Year-to-date Price performance of the companys stock appears to be encouraging, given the fact the metric is recording -44.00%. Additionally, trading for the stock in the period of the last six months notably deteriorated by -46.44%, alongside a downfall of -67.94% for the period of the last 12 months. The shares increased approximately by 15.88% in the 7-day charts and went up by 8.86% in the period of the last 30 days. Common stock shares were lifted by -44.00% during last recorded quarter.

Read this article:

United States Steel Corporation (X) is primed for evolution with the beta value of 2.87 - The InvestChronicle

Interview: How to participate in the next evolution of sports – GamingStreet

The exponential growth of esports presents new opportunities for the gaming community. In a recent interview, professional investor Marin Katusa sat down with Adrian Montgomery, CEO of Enthusiast Gaming (TSX:EGLX) (our parent company) to discuss the esports and video game potential golden moment during this global shutdown.

As most traditional sports events around the world are being cancelled, were seeing a rapid adaptation towards online, from the star F-1 driver to the NFL superstar firing up a live stream from his living room. The clear winners are Youtube and Twitch, taking over spaces where the old medium of TV and the likes of ESPN. Gaming continues to be a social phenomenon that transcends generations and gender, dwarfing Hollywood and poised to displace traditional sports. The trajectory were on is very exciting, and booming during these challenging times as more people stay home.

Its a 28 minute interview on the evolution of media and worth a watch. You can also download the full report and interview.

Read more:

Interview: How to participate in the next evolution of sports - GamingStreet

When to evolve Pokemon to keep them within the Ultra League CP limit – Dexerto

Trainers are currently participating in the Ultra League section of GO Battle League, which means no Pokemon over 2,500 CP. Prior to the actual battling, players will need to build a team of species within the confines of the Ultra League limit. To do so you'll need to know when to evolve certain Pokemon to keep them under 2,500 CP. Here's a list of the more commonly seen species and their evolution limits.

Adhering to the limit seems simple enough but when you do not know what CP a Pokemon will become when evolving it, it can become tricky. You'll need to know the maximum CP a particular Pokemon can be before evolving it.

One mistake and you may have a Pokemon that isn't eligible. Even worse, it's more than likely that Pokemon will be too weak to compete in Master League, too.

Experienced Pokemon Go trainer will know that species increase CP at different rates. For example, evoling Caterpie into Metapod won't increase its CP by much. Conversely, evolving Feebas into Milotic sees a drastic CP increase.

Fortunately there are Pokemon Go evolution calculators out there. Any Pokemon at any given CP can have a wide range of IVs, which means a definitive CP it will evolve into can't be shared. Therefore these calculators provide a range of the CP that it can evolve into.

Now, there's a balance between getting as close to the 2,500 CP limit and going past it. Ideally, you don't want to have to use too much precious Stardust to power it up to that limit.

On the other hand, going past it is disastrous. As such it is always better to evolve the Pokemon before powering it up. This way you get to see its moveset too. We've also made a list for the Great League CP evolution limits, too.

Courtesy of PokeAssistant, here are the CP ranges you should be looking for for some of the most frequently seen Pokemon in Ultra League:

Here are a selection of effective but slightly less popular Pokemon for Ultra League:

To be clear these are ranges, so if you want to guarantee you won't break the 2,500 CP limit you'll need to evolve them at lower CP than listed. Getting your Pokemon right on the Ultra League limit will no doubt cost you a lot of hard-earned Stardust, so try not to make any mistakes!

See the article here:

When to evolve Pokemon to keep them within the Ultra League CP limit - Dexerto

The Demo For Soldat 2 Is Now Free On The Steam Platform – Happy Gamer

The original Soldat was highly regarded at the time of its release during the 2000s. Players flocked to the title to get their multiplayer combat action on. It set the stage for a lot of similar games and will go down as one of the better 2.5D combat games to date.

It has been nearly 18 years since the original released, so naturally, fans have anxiously waited for a sequel. Finally, the wait is about to end as Soldat 2 hits the market during the second quarter of this year. So much time has passed, but not enough to make fans forget about the incredible combat action.

Even better, theres a demo right now for Soldat 2 on Steam. It doesnt have all of the features that will be available at launch, but theres definitely enough to get your beak wet. Transhuman Design appears to be keeping the buzz going leading up to this highly anticipated sequels release.

It looks like the developer is keeping some successful elements found in the original, and expanding upon them in all of the right ways for this pending sequel. For example, Soldat 2 will have many more customizeable options. Players will have access to a stage editor, where theyll be able to shape the grounds on which they play. That includes changing the rules, structures, weapons, and aspects of gameplay.

The added customization options should take the Soldat franchise to new heights and attract a new wave of fans whove never had the pleasure of playing the original. As far as what specifically will be available in the demo, players can look forward to online multiplayer with dedicated servers. There will also be procedurally generated levels that should keep each match different from the next.

Whats also important to note is the mod tools that players can access will be user-friendly. You dont have to be a modding wizard to have success out of the gate. Rather, the controls and systems will be pretty approachable. That should give rise to unique matches and limitless hours of fun.

If all of this action sounds like your cup of tea, then head on over to Steam today. In addition to checking out Soldat 2s free demo, you can also go back to the original Soldat. Its also available for no charge on the Steam platform. The developer is doing a solid by giving fans these free experiences, and it should help the sequel gain more attention heading into its release later in the year.

Original post:

The Demo For Soldat 2 Is Now Free On The Steam Platform - Happy Gamer

Letter to the Editor – Douglas County Herald

Letter to the Editor:

It was just last week, March 19, 2020, when the most cogent, most concise examination of our societys response to the drug problem that I have read in any newspaper appeared in the Douglas County Herald.

Tom Kara, from Norwood, Missouri, took the time to construct, polish, and submit for publication a truly excellent Letter to the Editor: that touched upon just about every important aspect of the War On Drugs.

Every paragraph provides useful beginning for conversations that address that War from the deplorable lack of attention paid to more serious problems we face every day, to the irrational business model that actually encourages penal incarceration as a private sector revenue generator.

I feel confident that the Publisher will submit Tom Karas Letter to the Editor for some sort of award that newspapers must surely present to those civilians who take the time to enhance our periodicals with letters such as this one.

Tom Karas letter critiquing our War On Drugs and the Letter to the Editor below it from Blue Barringer writing to the question How can I be of use? in reference to the coronavirus thing are examples of the ideas that local residents can submit for publication in the Douglas County Herald.

As is the case with so many other subscribers, we look for the Letter to the Editor section as soon as we get our hands on the paper. There are so many good ideas and so much talent here among local residents that it is a mystery why so few letters show up. It is a fact that the Herald will print just about any letter that is decently expressed and signed. We look forward to the time when the section in the Douglas County Herald called Letter to the Editor becomes Letters to the Editor on a regular basis. Why not contribute your two cents? Tom Kara and Blue Barringer have.

Wayne William Cipriano

Douglas County

Related

Continued here:

Letter to the Editor - Douglas County Herald

Commentary: Trump fights a two-front war on the coronavirus – CNA

SINGAPORE: Presidents such as Abraham Lincoln and Franklin Roosevelt achieved greatness leading the US in war.

Maybe thats why so many other US presidents describe their actions in militaristic terms.

President Lyndon Johnson declared a "war on poverty" in 1964.

Seven years later, President Richard Nixon did the same with a "war on drugs".

In the aftermath of 9/11, President George W Bush declared a war on terror.

But, when the enemy cannot be found on a battlefield, uniting the nation to your cause becomes much more difficult, legally and politically.

These wars had varying degrees of success.

Johnson used his war on poverty as a lever to pass social welfare legislation that may have otherwise been blocked by Congress. Today, the poverty rate is roughly 12 per cent, down from the 19 per cent when Johnson made his declaration. A good result, but far from total victory.

Nixons war on drugs had some elements of success, such as the creation of the Drug Enforcement Agency. The on-going opioid crisis, however, shows that war continues to rage.

While there have been no foreign terror attacks in the US since 2001, the war on terror has no end in sight.

Now, US President Donald Trump describes the COVID-19 pandemic as our big war.

The United States must achieve a better result in this war than in the ones against poverty, drugs and terror.

It will take a blend of war time and peace time leadership from the president to do so most effectively.

SINGAPORES SLOGAN FOR FIGHTING ITS WAR: #SGUNITED

No comparison between Singapore and the US works in the context of fighting this pandemic.

With less than 6 million people, medical resources which can be easily concentrated and the ability to essentially close off its borders, Singapore can better contain COVID-19 than can even just New York City.

Still, the language of Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong in bringing Singapore together would work in the United States.

What makes Singapore different from other countries is that we have confidence in each other, we feel that we are all in this together, and we do not leave anyone behind. This is SG United, we are SG United.

Donald Trump can learn from Prime Minister Lee in how to unite a country in fighting this war.

WAR EXPANDS A PRESIDENTS AUTHORITY

The US Constitution checks the authority of the president.

In times of war, greater powers are granted to the president, though one of the countrys Founding Fathers, James Madison, warned,war is in fact the true nurse of executive aggrandisement, so even then, the powers are not absolute.

In World War II, President Franklin Roosevelt united the country population with his speeches (a date which will live in infamy) coupled with wartime powers to achieve that victory.

As part of the all-out war effort, GM converted all of its factories to produce US$12 billion worth of airplanes, trucks, tanks, guns and shells for the US military in the largest commercial-to-military war production effort in American history.

The entire country united in fighting Nazi Germany and Imperial Japan.

WARTIME AUTHORITY LESS WHEN NO ENEMY TO SURRENDER

Much of the modern emergency authority President Trump can wield derives from the vast authority granted to Roosevelt during World War II.

At nearly every turn since, those grants have been tempered by Congress and the Supreme Court to reflect the constitutional balance of powers.

Indeed, during the Cold War, the Supreme Court drew a sharp distinction between the severity of the threat faced during WWII as opposed to the Korean War and curtailed an attempt by President Truman to force steel industry activity during a work stoppage.

Towards the end of the Vietnam War, Congress sought to restore the balance of power even in times of war and regain congressional authority to declare war with the War Powers Act in 1973.

The clear lesson of these refinements in presidential emergency powers bears significant relevance as President Trump leads the country to defeat the novel coronavirus.

Now, the strength to act decisively will be greatest when bipartisan support exists in Washington DC, and state and local leaders across the nation are treated as equal members of the war council.

TRUMPS COVID-19 WAR ACTIONS

There have been no complaints when President Trump uses his executive authority to lead the battle against the coronavirus. All of his actions have been supported.

He invoked the Defense Production Act to order GM to speed up production of ventilators in one of its auto plants.

The Pentagon dispatched its two Navy hospital ships, one each in New York and Los Angeles, and deployed Army hospital units to other locations.

Trump also ordered some former service members to return to active duty to assist in the coronavirus response.

But there are limits to the presidents authority.

Members of Congress plus state and local officials have autonomous powers needed to win this war.

For the president to lead them, they have to want to follow him.

DEMOCRATS NOT WELCOME IN THE OVAL OFFICE

Only Congress can provide funding for this war effort.

Without their appropriation, the President has no money to spend.

The Democratic-led House of Representatives and the Republican-controlled Senate worked together to pass the US$2 trillion coronavirus relief bill, believed to be the largest in US history.

For every glimmer of hope like the recently passed aid package, there are conflicting signals bipartisanship will not be celebrated such as when President Trump signed the bill into law, he did not invite a single Democrat for the Oval Office ceremony while hosting multiple Republicans.

Celebrating only with members of his own party highlights he does not fully grasp the importance of his leading all of the country.

More importantly, President Trump also set up a potential battle with Democrats over his desire to exercise unilateral authority over key oversight provisions in the law.

Moreover, this stimulus will not be enough. He needs to work with Congress on the next one to win this war, and possibly another after.

After Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi declared that, the presidents denial at the beginning was deadly, the President described her as a sick puppy.

Washington needs to be #DCUnited on both ends of Pennsylvania Avenue.

GOVERNORS ARE THEIR OWN GENERALS

The president serves as the nations Commander-in-Chief.

But what happens when the enemy is a virus within the country and the army fighting the battle is not the US military?

Those leading todays war are the governors of each state. And these generals do not report to the president.

Before Trump announced the extension of the social distancing guidelines to Apr 30, Maryland's Republican Governor Larry Hogan said he was prepared to ignore President Trump if he reverted to his "very harmful" message of reopening large sections of the economy by Easter.

The president and the governors need to work together. They need to be consulted before actions are contemplated or mused about to the public.

Yet, President Trump proclaims he will not work with those he deems unworthy.

For example, he accused Democratic governor of Washington State, Jay Inslee, of not being appreciative of his coronavirus efforts and said he had directed Vice-President Mike Pence not to call him.

He did the same with regard to Michigan GovernorGretchen Whitmer, also a Democrat when he said: Dont call the woman in Michigan.

THE COUNTRY WANTS TO BE UNITED

Americans unite behind presidents when victory is a national imperative.

The war against the coronavirus must be won. And it will. But when? And at what cost?

President Trump discussed how certain parts of the country could re-open for business by Easter.

That leads to questions about the presidents total commitment to the cause.He also continues to favour his party.

Elements of his language seemed to change at his press briefing on Sunday (Mar 29).

In announcing his extension of the social distancing measures to Apr 30, he said: Nothing would be worse than declaring victory before the victory is won.

Will that approach remain? Will his rhetoric follow?

Imagine if President Trump acts upon the mission set forth for his country by Prime Minister Lee: We do not leave anyone behind.

Leave no one behind. A universal tradition. And one needed now more than ever.

Downloadourappor subscribe to our Telegram channel for the latest updates on the coronavirus outbreak:https://cna.asia/telegram

Steven R Okun and Thurgood Marshall Jr served in the Clinton administration as Deputy General Counsel at the Department of Transportation and White House Cabinet Secretary, respectively. Mr Okun serves as senior adviser for global strategic consultancy McLarty Associates in Singapore. Mr Marshall practices law in Washington.

Continue reading here:

Commentary: Trump fights a two-front war on the coronavirus - CNA

The Fury and the Folly: We Need a Vaccine to Stop Endless War – Common Dreams

What if the vaccine thats eventually developed is so large in scope it includes the words of UN Secretary-General Antnio Guterres and Pope Francis?

I revisitGuterres words of a week ago: The fury of the virus illustrates the folly of war. That is why today, I am calling for an immediate global ceasefire in all corners of the world. It is time to put armed conflict on lockdown and focus together on the true fight of our lives. We must, he said, silence the guns; stop the artillery; end the airstrikes . . . to help create corridors for life-saving aid. To open precious windows for diplomacy.

And several days later,the pope, delivering his weekly blessing not from St. Peters Square but from the papal library, called on the world to stop every form of bellicose hostility and to favor the creation of corridors for humanitarian help, diplomatic efforts and attention to those who find themselves in situations of great vulnerability.

"What if war and xenophobia were understood to be not business as usual, the equivalent of self-defense and always necessary (at least when we do it) and thus something to be funded without questionyear after year, decade after decade, century after centurybut rather, the Pandemic That Doesnt End?"

My heart, hearing such pleas, cries: what if . . . what if . . .what if?

What if idealism were the essence of human politics, not its scapegoat? What if war and xenophobia were understood to be not business as usual, the equivalent of self-defense and always necessary (at least when we do it) and thus something to be funded without questionyear after year, decade after decade, century after centurybut rather, the Pandemic That Doesnt End?

Just to clarify the matter, I would make a slight amendment to the words of Pope Francis and Secretary-General Guterres: We need a global ceasefire right now not merely so that we can address, and halt, the spread of COVID-19 after which we can go back to murder, torture, sanctions and such . . . the business of teaching our enemies their lessons and/or simply eliminating them but rather, we need a global ceasefire because this is what we have always needed.

I would make a further clarification. Ceasefire sounds like a temporary halt. We need a permanent halt: to war, xenophobia, the false divisiveness of national borders. And this will not happen merely by political authorization, any more than the coronavirus can be ordered by some powerful leader to cease and desist its destructive impact on the human race. Just as much as we need medical vaccines, we need social vaccines.

And even as we talk about waging war on COVID-19, that is not what is going to work. Remember all the wars weve waged over the last half century or so? Weve waged a war on drugs, cancer, crime and poverty even obesity, for Gods sake. And, oh yes, terror. Indeed, evil itself. How did those wars turn out?

In America in my lifetime, war has not been a vehicle for positive outcomes, but for normalizing a particular kind of process in which a White Houses caprices and a populaces complacency expand indefinitely,Adam Weinsteinwrote recently at The New Republic. He makes note of Joe Bidens dismissal, in his latest debate with Bernie Sanders, of Medicare for All as crucial in dealing with COVID-19.

SCROLL TO CONTINUE WITH CONTENT

Get our best delivered to your inbox.

It has nothing to do with Medicare for All, Biden declared. That would not solve the problem at all. Were at war with the virus. Were at war with the virus. It has nothing to do with co-pays or anything. . . . People are looking for results, not a revolution.

Weinstein writes: This argument was couched as common sensedeal with the problem in front of youbut it was the opposite. Rather than lay out an achievable but ambitious long-term goal to protect Americans, Biden is focused on an impossible and open-ended mission: victory over a virus. Affordable health care for all? Theres no time for that malarkey now, jack. Havent you noticed theres a war going on?

In other words, Biden was calling for the opposite of a ceasefire. He seemed to be revving up all that war requires of us, whatever that might be. His declaration of war against a virus sounded excruciatingly like George W. Bushs declaration of war against evil, and the axis thereof. Well take it out with some shock-and-awe bombing. What could be simpler?

And this, precisely, is the problem with war. Before its a realityfire and blood, severed limbs and collapsing infrastructure, anguish, death and hell (for some)its a declaration, a call for national unity against, ta tum, THE ENEMY. This mixes ever so nicely with politics. A leaders job is a lot easier if he or she has a good enemy to rally his constituents against.

In President Donald Trumps Oval Office address yesterday about the threats of the novel coronavirus, he went out of his way to label it a foreign virus,Ben Zimmerwrites at The Atlantic, pointing out that members of the Trump administration have routinely called it the Wuhan virus or Chinese coronavirus.

When it comes to the popular naming of infectious diseases, xenophobia has long played a prominent role, he writes, quoting Susan Sontag that there is a link between imagining disease and imagining foreignness. It lies perhaps in the very concept of wrong, which is archaically identical with the non-us, the alien.

Another twist on this is that members of Team Trump, including Secretary of State Mike Pompeo, have been pushing, according to theNew York Times, for aggressive new action against Iran and its proxy forces and see an opportunity to try to destroy Iranian-backed militia groups in Iraq as leaders in Iran are distracted by the pandemic crisis in their country.

The irony here is savage. The calls for ceasefire are not coming from those in command of armies, who instead are looking for whatever opportunity might exist in the current crisis. Yet when I think of what will save humanity from the looming pandemicand from everything else that endangers them, including themselvesI can see this much: Developing a vaccine requires studying andunderstandingthe virus, not waging war against it.

See the rest here:

The Fury and the Folly: We Need a Vaccine to Stop Endless War - Common Dreams

Trump says US stockpile of protective equipment nearly gone amid coronavirus – The Guardian

Donald Trump has admitted the US governments emergency stockpile of protective equipment is nearly exhausted because of the extraordinary demands of the coronavirus pandemic.

The shortage was first reported by the Washington Post, which said the supply of respirator masks, gloves and other medical supplies was running low.

Trump, who has been criticised for a lack of central planning, confirmed on Wednesday: It is, because were sending it directly to hospitals. We dont want it to come to the stockpile because then we have to take it, after it arrives, and bring it to various states and hospitals.

The president had urged states to make a deal and buy personal protective equipment (PPE) directly from manufacturers, he added. Weve asked states where they have large manufacturers of different types of equipment to use those local factories, those local plants and have it made directly, ship it right into the hospitals.

Trump continued: Were shipping things right in. We have, as you know, almost 10,000 ventilators which we need for flexibility. Its sounds like a lot but its not.

The national guard had been authorised to move equipment into hospitals when necessary, he added.

Citing officials at the Department of Homeland Security, the Post reported that the depletion of the national stockpile left the White House and states competing for PPE in a freewheeling global marketplace rife with profiteering and price-gouging.

The Federal Emergency Management Agency (Fema) had shipped or delivered 11.6m N95 respirators, 26m surgical masks, 5.2m face shields, 4.3m surgical gowns, 22m gloves, and 8,100 ventilators, the White House said on 28 March.

But Andrew Cuomo, the governor of New York, has complained that Fema contributes to a bidding war between states for ventilators, likening the situation to eBay. Other state governors and city mayors have complained of a chronic lack of test kits, masks and ventilators.

Wednesdays White House coronavirus taskforce briefing made an unusual start as Trump was first joined by the attorney general, William Barr; the secretary of defense, Mark Esper; and top military officials, who did not seem concerned with physical distancing.

And with America still digesting predictions that up to 240,000 people could die from the pandemic, the president instead focused on drug cartels a familiar applause line at his campaign rallies.

The president announced the sending of navy ships toward Venezuela as the US intensifies counter-narcotics operations in the Caribbean and eastern Pacific following a drug indictment against Nicols Maduro, who still controls the country.

Trump said: As governments and nations focus on the coronavirus, there is a growing threat that cartels, criminals, terrorists and other malign actors will try to exploit the situation for their own gain. We must not let that happen.

Esper added: The Venezuelan people continue to suffer tremendously due to Maduro and his criminal control over the country, and drug traffickers are seizing on this lawlessness.

The link to the coronavirus seemed tenuous at best. Gen Mark Milley, the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, told reporters: We came upon some intelligence some time ago that the drug cartels as a result of Covid-19 were going to try to take advantage of the situation and try to infiltrate additional drugs into our country.

As we know, 70,000 Americans die on an average annual basis to drugs. Thats unacceptable. Were at war with Covid-19, were at war with terrorists, and we are at war with the drug cartels, as well. This is the United States military. You will not penetrate this country. You will not get past Jump Street. You are not going to come in here and kill additional Americans.

The president was asked about reports that China had undercounted its coronavirus cases. He said: Their numbers seem to be a little bit on the light side, and Im being nice when I say that ... As to whether or not their numbers are accurate, Im not an accountant from China.

Some viewers dismissed the Venezuela announcement as another Trump stunt. Joe Lockhart, a former White House press secretary, tweeted: Turning this off now. This is just completely ridiculous and dishonest. But its what weve come to expect from Trump and his Administration.

Eventually the defence officials left the podium and were replaced by Trumps health experts Deborah Birx and Anthony Fauci. The president against defended his preparations for the pandemic and denied he was at fault for a slow start in testing, claiming he inherited a very broken system. He praised healthcare workers as warriors.

Trump predicted a fast recovery for the economy once the virus had passed and expressed hope that Congresss next emergency relief bill will including spending on infrastructure.

And the president, who had sought on Tuesday to prepare the nation for unfathomable loss of life, nevertheless could not resist some levity. He said of Fauci: He was a great basketball player, and mused: I have hundreds of millions of people. Number one on Facebook ... Did you know? I just found out. When a Fox News reporter asked him a tough question, the president snapped: What are you, working for CNN?

Excerpt from:

Trump says US stockpile of protective equipment nearly gone amid coronavirus - The Guardian

Unban the sale of alcohol and cigarettes! – South African Drug Policy Initiative – CapeTalk

The road to hell is paved with good intentions. Govt must repeal the ban on alcohol and cigarettes, says Prof JP Van Niekerk.

The government must unban the sale of alcohol and cigarettes while South Africa is in lockdown, says the South African Drug Policy Initiative.

Despite the good intention of the ban, it fails to consider the harm that its application will cause to addicts.

In the case of alcohol, an addict cannot simply stop drinking without risking a host of detrimental health effects such as psychosis, seizures or even death.

Kieno Kammies interviewed Prof JP Van Niekerk of the South African Drug Policy Initiative.

The South African Drug Policy Initiative is a group of experts that came together to provide the government with evidence-based policies to reduce the harms of drug use

Evidence shows that the War on Drugs caused more problems than it did good

Its highly discriminatory. The vast majority of the population are unable to stock up

For more detail, listen to the interview in the audio below.

Visit link:

Unban the sale of alcohol and cigarettes! - South African Drug Policy Initiative - CapeTalk

[OPINION] A reflection on Kap Mena, Estero de San Miguel, and the coronavirus – Rappler

The following is a reflection by social anthropologist Mary Racelis on a first-person account by Barangay Captain Filomena Cinco on the state of her community during the coronavirus crisis.

This is Part 2 of a two-part series. You can read Part 1, Captain Cinco's account, here.

It is clear that with almost military precision the word has gone down from the Department of Interior and Local Government that the impending health crisis must be dealt with as yet another War. Millions have been placed under lockdown for the good of all. The barangay officials mobilize to put a surveillance system in place and enforce discipline with police and military standing by. However, even as government expects the citizenry to listen to it, the opposite does not seem to apply unless the Barangay Captain is someone like Kap Mena, as she is fondly called.

Having organized the communitys Peoples Organization many years ago, initially to resist distant relocation in favor of onsite upgrading or nearby relocation, she and the women leaders have seen the years of struggle bear fruit. Nagkakaisang Mamamayan ng Legarda has successfully negotiated with the national government for decent housing onsite and nearby. Its largely women members have become a powerful force in urban poor communities, speaking up for themselves in local and national government meetings.

It was Kap Menas accountability to the community while fulfilling her role as barangay official that highlighted her distinctive leadership. Urged to run for election as Barangay Captain, she did and won. She serves not only her informal settler neighbors but the entire constituency of low- to middle- to high-income families, business establishments, and colleges that make up her Sampaloc constituency. Filomena G. Cinco is now serving her third term. Her active, highly-organized community has been recognized by the City of Manila by twice awarding Barangay 412 the title of Most Outstanding Barangay (All Category-level) 2015-2016 and 2016-2017. Peoples participation is Kap Menas strength and the communitys pride.

The Estero de San Miguel and its overflow population soon to move to the nearby Jesse M. Robredo Village close to Malacaang are known to be among the most dynamic in Metro Manila. In confronting national and local officials, their Peoples Plan in hand, they have successfully won the concessions sought. In the War on Drugs, Kapitana Cinco and her Councilors made an agreement with the Station Commander that any tokhang raiders would have to go through her first. A late night notification would, therefore, alert her and her team to ring a bell arousing the community. Designated committees would accompany the police to the house of the alleged drug user. With people watching, no nanlaban episode occurred. Upon the arrest of the individual, the police leader would sign documents testifying that the suspect had left the barangay alive and in his custody. Kapitana Cinco and the community are proud to say that not a single EJK happened on their watch. (READ: 4 out of 5 Filipinos worry over extrajudicial killings SWS)

She now reiterates her constituents cry that COVID-19, while meriting concern and preparation, is not really the peoples immediate worry. Rather, it is the widespread loss of daily incomes and jobs of thousands of informal sector earners resulting from the sudden lockdown. Tricycle and jeepney drivers now sit idly by their vehicles, parked unused in the alley. A wife selling vegetables in the Legarda market can no longer get there to bargain with her suki (favored customers). Gone from the sidewalks are the university belt students stopping to buy the cheap homemade bead bracelets or decorated combs an enterprising young Estero woman has made at home. Nor can her teenaged brother standing close by continue to ladle out fishball meriendas. All that is gone. Most have no savings. And they are asking, where will we get money to buy food? (READ: [OPINION] Lets not forget the poor during the coronavirus pandemic)

Food packs are on their way, people are told. They dutifully get on a line that snakes back and forth in the community, longer than usual because of the one meter physical distancing order. The recently passed RA 11469 Bayan to Heal as One law offers hope, but will their P5,000-P8,000 emergency cash come soon enough to stave off hunger? Might the government flush with money push aside the timely and helpful assistance provided from the beginning by civil society partners? Should the 4Ps recipients, the poorest with many children, worry because of the rumors that they may not be eligible for the Bayan to Heal subsidies since they already receive in some cases as much as P2,000 a month?

In the meantime, must a mother borrow from the 5:6 lender or sell her small TV? Should her kumadre next door pawn the treasured earrings that she inherited from her grandmother? These anguished questions are raised again and again. How will they manage until the money arrives? How long must the money be made to last? And then what? When can they start working again? Will they still have jobs once the lockdown is lifted?

The issue, Kapitan Cinco makes clear, is not that people dont believe COVID-19 is a serious threat. They know it is. So they are doing what government says they should to minimize its impact. She has relied on the trust built up around her leadership to make that happen. What appalls her constituents is how little recognition appeared to have been given beforehand to the impact of the lockdown on the urban poor. Why did the authorities not work out plans to protect the thousands of daily wage informal sector worker families with virtually no savings? Why doesn't the government even now organize the same kind of systematic priority attention to the economic threats facing the urban poor as it gives the impending health threat? They fear that when the surge of COVID-19 cases zooms upwards, their all-around vulnerability will disproportionately appear in the death statistics.

With her long experience in community organizing and effective governance in urban poor communities, Barangay Kapitan Cinco believes that people can help weather the COVID-19 onslaught if the city and national authorities listen to them, welcome their participation in planning and implementation, and draw on their innate humanitarian values. They want officials to act quickly and effectively because as they have appealed to the President, We will not die from COVID-19 but from hunger! Rappler.com

Mary Racelis is a social anthropologist who teaches at the Ateneo de Manila University and the University of the Philippines. She is Board member of Urban Poor Associates.

Go here to read the rest:

[OPINION] A reflection on Kap Mena, Estero de San Miguel, and the coronavirus - Rappler

Rick and Morty returns May 3, new trailer teases return of Tammy and Snuffles – SYFY WIRE

Hot off the heels of that anime and manga-inspired short over the weekend, Rick and Morty announced the premiere date for the second half of its fourth season with a brand new trailer. The hit animated sci-fi series will return to Adult Swim on Sunday, May 3 at 11:30 p.m. EST.

Theteaser trailer promises a litany of even moreoutrageous and meta adventures for the show's titular duo (both of whom are voiced by co-creator Justin Roiland). Not only that, but the new footage signals the return of two familiar characters: Snuffles (Rob Paulsen) and TammyGuetermann (Cassie Steele), but more on them later.

First, you must watch the teaser (set to Thin Lizzy's "The Boys Are Back in Town") below:

Snuffles, who dates all the way back to the second episode of Season 1 ("Lawnmower Dog"),was once the Smith family dog before gaining hyper-intelligence and leaving Earth to form a utopia of super-smart canines. As you see in the trailer, he's now got a genius feline problem on his robotic hands.

Tammy, on the other hand, was Summer's high school friend who fell in love with Birdperson (voiced by Roiland's fellowco-creator Dan Harmon), only to reveal herself as an agent of the Galactic Federation. She murdered Birdperson at their wedding in the Season 2 finale ("The Wedding Squanchers")and laterbrought him back to life asPhoenixperson. Since we haven't seen either of them since the post-credits seen of the Season 3premiere ("The Rickshank Redemption"), it'll be interesting to see what kind of conflict Tammy brings to the table for Season 4.

Lastly, the presence of multiple Ricks in the teaser suggests a return ofthe Citadel, which is ruled by Evil Morty, who was elected president of the place in Season 3's "The Ricklantis Mixup."

Chris Parnell (Jerry Smith, Morty's father),Spencer Grammer (Summer Smith, Morty's older sister),Sarah Chalke (Beth Smith, Rick's daughter) make up the rest of Rick and Morty's principal voice cast.

Visit link:

Rick and Morty returns May 3, new trailer teases return of Tammy and Snuffles - SYFY WIRE

Who Says You Cant Give Tony Awards in an Abbreviated Season? – The New York Times

GREEN The creators of musicals really offered a sampler of ways to respond to the jukebox problem. Jagged Little Pill, built on the Alanis Morissette catalog, made the smart choice of abjuring biography and instead attaching her songs to a new plot (by Diablo Cody) that grew out of the same concerns and vocabulary. Or perhaps I should say new plots, because it is not shy with them. There are at least eight story lines.

BRANTLEY To be honest, this was the show that gave me a headache, because it was so insistently earnest in its topicality and, even when it was trying to be funny, humorless. So, of the new musicals (and we havent touched on The Lightning Thief, your personal favorite) what would you give the premature Tony to?

GREEN The one that wouldnt be eligible: American Utopia. Joy and sadness bound to each other through David Byrnes music and Annie-B Parsons movement: What else do you want from a musical, even if its just a concert?

BRANTLEY I loved American Utopia. I think, though, Id have to go with Girl From the North Country, but I wouldnt have predicted that after seeing it in London two years ago. I find more in it every time I revisit it.

GREEN Despite all the Best Musical possibilities this truncated season, only one, The Lightning Thief, had a new score. Yet most of the offerings sounded new anyway, the result of terrific arrangements and orchestrations. Im thinking especially of Justin Levines magpie-on-Ecstasy song collages for Moulin Rouge!, Tom Kitts theatricalization of post-grunge pop for Jagged Little Pill and Simon Hales excavation of the deeply layered Americana in Dylans catalog for Girl.

BRANTLEY Here, Id have to say its a tie between Girl and Moulin Rouge!, each a remarkable accomplishment in a very different way. As for best revival, the undisputed winner is Ivo van Hoves divisive revival of West Side Story, but thats because it is, remarkably, the only musical revival so far.

GREEN I liked West Side Story better than you did, Ben, perhaps because I wasnt reviewing it. I lapped up the new things it wanted to show me (while also hunting for the old things it wanted to hide from me) and didnt worry about the elements that laid an egg. (Gee, Officer Krupke.) Its evocation of innocence and hopelessness felt more like real life now than Ive experienced in previous revivals.

Read more from the original source:

Who Says You Cant Give Tony Awards in an Abbreviated Season? - The New York Times

Young Consumers Willing To Spend More On Meat-Free & Sustainably-Packaged Products, New Survey Shows – Green Queen Media

A new survey by German sustainable development company Utopia confirms that younger consumers are more willing to spend on eco-friendly products and are becoming increasingly critical of unsustainable mass consumption. With the majority of younger shoppers opting for meat-free and sustainably packaged products more than ever before to reduce their individual footprint, companies will find it increasingly difficult to ignore what is quickly becoming mainstream demand and must begin greening their operations.

The survey, which was conducted as a part of the firms 2019 study A Question of Attitude, is showing a rising conscious consumerism trend, particularly amongst young consumers aged 18 to 24. According to the research, 53% of consumers within the age group in Germany have already given up eating meat, and 60% of them are preparing to limit their consumption of meat in order to minimise their carbon footprint.

Utopias study also finds that younger shoppers want to spend on environmentally-friendly products that are plastic-free and are sustainably packaged, with 73% willing to abstain from products that do not fit into their ethical and environmental standards. The overwhelming majority of the demographic 94% said that they prefer to buy fewer items that are durable, instead of constantly purchasing single-use or products that are quickly thrown away.

Over 14,000 people took part in the survey, and over 8,800 questionnaires were evaluated for the overall study. For the analysis, Utopia collaborated with Dr. Brigitte Holzhauer, who is involved with regular environmental awareness studies for the Federal Environment Ministry of Germany.

Commenting on these findings, managing director of Utopia Dr. Meike Gebhard said: Where the journey is headed can already be seen today in the attitudes and behavior of conscious consumers. They are seismographs for the consumption of the future.

Previous studies on consumer trends have found similar results. Last year, research from New York Universitys Center for Sustainable Business (CSB) found that consumers are now purchasing more sustainable products across every product category. In another report by Indian multinational corporation Mahindra, the majority of Indian consumers want to make sustainable lifestyle choices as much as possible, and are seeking plastic-free alternatives in particular.

Other reports have also concluded that younger generations have been at the forefront of driving demand for sustainable products. A BSG-Altagamma report found that over 50% of Gen-Zs the generation taking to the streets on Fridays to demand climate action from governments and businesses are purchasing secondhand clothing more than ever. Generation Alphas are bound to reinforce the movement, with over two-thirds of current 6-9 year olds declaring that saving the planet will be the central career mission in the future, according to a 2019 analysis by Wunderman Thompson Commerce.

What all these studies show is that companies and institutions must begin greening their operations if they havent already if they are to stay relevant in the long-term especially when younger generations begin to overtake the majority of the market share. Gebhard says that Utopias findings should create a basis for future decisions for companies, organisations and politics.

Without responding to changing consumer tastes in favour of sustainability, companies that are not purpose-driven will inevitably lose market share in the long-term.

Lead image courtesy of iStock.

Visit link:

Young Consumers Willing To Spend More On Meat-Free & Sustainably-Packaged Products, New Survey Shows - Green Queen Media

The new digital world and the Holodeck – ZDNet

John Kao, founder and chairman of the Institute for Large Scale Innovation

The EconomistcalledJohn Kao "Mr. Creativity" and a "serial innovator" and CNN the "innovation maven." He is a thought leader, practitioner, and activist, who has played a leading role in the fields of innovation and business creativity for over 30 years. His knowledge is eclectic and blends the perspectives of former Harvard Business School professor, serial entrepreneur, musician, master facilitator, former CEO, Harvard-trained psychiatrist, best-selling author, and Tony-nominated producer of film and stage. Yamaha Music Corporation named him their first "innovation artist." He is a trusted advisor to leaders of companies, startups, and nations that are on the hot seat to deliver meaningful innovation strategies and action agendas.

I first met John Kao when we both spoke at a higher education technology summit. We then collaborated to advise a blockchain startup CEO on the importance of data ownership and privacy. Kao was also a brilliant guest on my weekly video podcast DisrupTV, which I co-host with Ray Wang, CEO and founder of Constellation Research.

Kao is also an incredible innovation expert and storyteller, often working on projects to improve the state of society and education. The innovation manifesto by Kao is a must-read.

I have written about how 2020 will be the year that redefined distance learning, telemedicine, remote work, ecommerce, and accelerated adoption of several new emerging technologies. It will also be the year that created an entirely new set of new business models based on aggressive digital transformation imperatives. I asked John Kao to share his thoughts on the COVID-19 pandemic and future of leadership and innovation.

Here are Kao's thoughts:

We will look back on the black swan of COVID-19 as a milestone in our transition from the old digital world to a new one. It is forcing innovation in how we work, play, learn, care for ourselves and connect.

Certainly, the virtual domain has been a factor at least since Alexander Graham Bell's words "Watson come here" projected human intention through cyberspace. The notion of virtual work has been around at least since 1972 when the term "telecommuting" was coined by NASA scientist Jack Nilles.

But the current pandemic has challenged us to evolve our digital selves in new ways. Examples: A Fortune 500 CEO recently organized a virtual town hall for 50,000 employees. Which begs the question of what is leadership in the virtual domain as Slack, Microsoft Teams, Salesforce Chatter, Zoom, and other business-oriented collaboration platforms become the new work culture we inhabit. Then there is education. A high school student told me recently that transitioning to all online/remote learning wasn't nearly as good as being in school because continually staring at a screen "felt like doing homework all day." E-health is booming as people clamor for advice about coronavirus via telemedicine channels, while the questions of who and what to trust remains greater than ever. We hope that our politicians will ponder the challenges and opportunities inherent in the virtual for political campaigns and election security. And we hang out in new ways now - virtual yoga and wellness classes, concerts (thank you Yo-yo Ma), dramatic performances, meditation sessions, and even sex. Necessity, it would seem, is the mother of invention.

Star Trek and the Holodeck

All this is happening while the technology to support our lives continues to advance.Star Trek raised our expectations with the Holodeck, which presaged highly realistic, virtual environments that supported a wide range of activity. Now Microsoft has announced a hair-raising technology that is in a sense the opposite - an augmented reality system called Holoportation that allows people to embody themselves virtually in real, shared environments. Science fact is becoming stranger than science fiction.

But there are real challenges on the road to a digital utopia.

Personal identity and trust remain high on the to-do list. If I can "meet" you in a digital environment that is fully realistic with the exception of touch (and that problem is being worked on as well) how can I trust that you are you? How will I know that what you say about yourself and your qualifications is true? There are related issues of security and "hack-proofing." In an era in which the conventional password has become almost useless, what kind of access do you allow into privileged digital environments? Will the internet continue to devolve into a network of walled gardens as a consequence?

And then there is the human side of the equation. How much intimacy is possible, especially when the new tools become a rich-enough medium to address, if not entirely satisfy, the human need for nuance and connection? What happens to digital addiction when screens are the primary medium of exchange. What kinds of new mental health issues will emerge in the era of social distancing?

On the upside, how can our new technologies foster collaborative creativity? How will they spur activism as those with skills can be matched with increasing precision to those with needs via AI activated market spaces and increasingly intelligent agents? How can new technologies offer more efficient and secure voting? How will they increase the efficiency of learning and health care?

Meanwhile, we have more immediate matters to attend to. COVID-19 has placed each of us into a personal virtual laboratory that calls us to experiment with how we define our identity and tastes, how we stay connected and participate, and how we access the resources we need. The times are challenging us to raise our digital literacy to new and uncharted levels.

Technology visionary Marshall McLuhan would probably not recognize the "global village" we inhabit today. But he would stand firm with his assertion that the "medium is the message." Today we have a lot to figure out because in McLuhan's words, "We shape our tools and afterward our tools shape us." Welcome to the new world.

This article was co-authored by John Kao, chairman of the Institute for Large Scale Innovation and a former Harvard Business School professor. You can contact him via email at john@largescaleinnovation.org.

The rest is here:

The new digital world and the Holodeck - ZDNet

Searching for the Lost Horizon of Shangri-La – HowStuffWorks

Advertisement

James Hilton was simply dreaming of a place that humans have yearned for since they first learned to yearn. A heaven of sorts. A paradise. Utopia. Xanadu. The Garden of Eden. Shambhala.

Hilton, a popular English writer in the first half of the 20th century, named his happy place Shangri-La, and he made it wondrous and spiritual, tucking it high into the mountains in an exotic part of northwest Tibet. It was the setting of his 1933 adventure novel "Lost Horizon," which instantly became a worldwide bestseller. It was also made into a major Hollywood film the legendary Frank Capra directed and Ronald Colman and Jane Wyatt starred in 1937.

From the moment "Lost Horizon" hit bookstore shelves, Shangri-La became synonymous with Utopia. Back then, it was an ideal, a place to escape to during a time when the real world had just been through a global war and the Great Depression. Since then, the simple idea of the place has sparked countless pilgrimages to Tibet, journeys of faith and perseverance, of hope and distant promise, of supposed enlightenment and, sometimes, disappointment.

It's kind of an amazing phenomenon, considering that the place doesn't exist. And it never has.

Well, until recently, that is.

Hilton reportedly did most of the research for his novel in the British Museum Library, not far from his home in the northeastern part of London. He never actually went to Tibet. Instead, he took inspiration for Shangri-La from another utopian dream, a place known for centuries as Shambhala.

"There was one sort of very, very garbled version of the Shambhala myth that Hilton read in one of the Catholic explorer's writings. But it wasn't at all clear," says Ed Bernbaum, who lectures on comparative religion and mythology and wrote "The Way To Shambhala" in 1980. "It is this sort of universal theme. And at that time, Tibet was pretty much unexplored. So, if you're going to look for a hidden utopia, that was an ideal place to do it."

Shambhala is a Tibetan Buddhist legend about a utopian paradise far in the northern mountains of Asia. It is a spiritual place where people of all religions and backgrounds live together in harmony. It's also said to be the place from which, when war and evil engulf the rest of the world, a leader will emerge to defeat the forces of chaos and usher in a new age of peace and happiness.

Shambhala grows out of the Buddhist teaching of Kalachakra, or the Wheel of Time, which states that the center of the universe is Mount Meru (sometimes called Mount Sumeru), said to be well north of Tibet.

"People sort of looked at Tibet as this mysterious, Utopian kind of place," Bernbaum says, "and the Tibetans themselves looked even farther north for that Utopia, Shambhala."

If Hilton (who died in 1954) was indeed modeling Shangri-La after the Buddhist teachings of Shambhala, it would probably pain him to learn what has happened to his imaginary wonderland.

It has become real. Too real.

In 2001, the Chinese government which has controlled Tibet since the late 1950s changed the name of Zhondian county to Shangri-La for a simple purpose: to cash in on tourist dollars. Many areas in China had been vying for the right to change their names to Shangri-La and it took nearly a decade to decide on a winner. Zhondian won in what The Guardian called in 2006 "one of the most audacious rebranding exercises in history."

Now, the larger area of Shangri-La boasts a Shangri-La Resort, a Hilton Garden Inn Shangri-La, and an airport with daily flights to Beijing, Shanghai and Lhasa (the capital of China's Tibet Autonomous Region, in the heart of what Westerners know as Tibet). Visitors can tour the largest Tibetan Buddhist monastery in Yunnan province. And when they're done, they can quaff down a brew at the Shangri-La Beer Bar ("Beer Made in Heaven.")

Tibet and the newly named Shangri-La are a draw for reasons other than the tourist traps, of course. Tibet is known, after all, as the "Roof of the World." It shares the highest peak in the world, Mount Everest, with neighboring Nepal (though that's a long way from Shangri-La). The area's natural beauty is breathtaking, which makes it a destination for outdoor lovers that is especially popular with Chinese tourists. (It's harder for Westerners to secure visas to get there.)

But is this the Shangri-La that James Hilton envisioned? Is it what modern travelers expect?

That, it seems, is probably up to the pilgrim.

"There are different ways of going to Shambhala," Bernbaum says. "To me, what I found most interesting was the symbolism of it. It sort of reflects an inner journey."

Go here to see the original:

Searching for the Lost Horizon of Shangri-La - HowStuffWorks