‘Change the dynamics’: Dawoud Bey on photography, place, and history – 48 Hills

On February 15, the San Francisco Museum of Modern Art opened An American Project, a retrospective, of the work of multi-award-winning photographer and teacher Dawoud Bey. The show was supposed to run through May 25, before traveling to other museums, including the co-organizer of the show, New Yorks Whitney Museum of American Art. But due to the COVID- 19 pandemic, the SFMOMA and other museums, closed temporarily in March. Recently the museum put up a short video of Bey talking about visualizing history, and he took over the museums Instagram account the week of March 30.

Bey came out to San Francisco for An American Project, and at a preview had a conversation with Corey Keller, (who curated the show along with the Whitneys Elisabeth Sherman), in which he talked about going to see protests of the widely criticized 1969 exhibit at the Metropolitan Museum of Art,Harlem on My Mind, which mostly excluded African American artists.There was no protest that day, and Bey ended up going into the show, which made him think seriously about being a photographer.

An American Project includes Beys first show, Harlem USA, along with The Birmingham Project, commemorating the 1963 dynamiting of the 16th Street Baptist Church in that city which killed four girls; Night Coming Tenderly, Blackabout the Underground Railroad; and Class Pictures, portraits of high school students accompanied by their words.

Bey sat down with 48 Hills and talked about changing from wanting his photos to show people in a positive light to just making honest photos; how for The Birmingham Project, photographing children the age of the ones who were killed makes history more specific; and the way the darkness and positioning of the photographs in Night Coming Tenderly, Blackpull viewers into the experience of being on the Underground Railroad and running for their lives.

48 HILLS Your godmother gave you a camera when you were 15. When did you start using it?

DAWOUD BEY When I got the camera, and it was a very basic Argus C3 Rangefinder camera, I had no idea how to use it. I was more fascinated by the camera itselfthe fact that the lens came off, and I began to figure out when you turn this dial the shutter would open slowly. I had no background in photography, and I didnt any think of it in terms of what would my subject matter be. So I just started walking around with this camera. I never made any memorable photos with that camera, but I did start to notice photography magazines like, Oh, theres actually magazines about this stuff. So it got me engaged with photography, and I started looking at photography books and magazines, and then the possibilities of what one might do with a camera opened up.

I guess the pivotal thing that happened was the following year when I was 16 and I went to see Harlem on my Mind at the Met. I actually took the camera with me, and I did take a picture of the banner in front of the Met.It was seeing that exhibition that began to expand for me considerably the notion of what the subject of photographs might be. Even though Harlem on My Mind was not an art exhibition, clearly the photographs were not that ones I saw in everyday newspapers and magazine, which up to that point was my only frame of reference for what photographs were.Seeing that exhibition and thinking about my familys history in Harlem, because my mother and father met in Harlem, and beginning to realize one has to have a kind of nominal subject around which to wrap their picture making, that allowed me to begin making photographs.

48H So that led to your first show, Harlem USA.

DB Yes. They were photographs of everyday people in Harlem in the public and semi public spaces of Harlem, largely in the streets, and a few in churches and in barber shops and greasy spoon luncheonette restaurants. Those were very much in the tradition of other pictures I had been looking ata lot from photographers of the WPA and Farm Security Administrator. Walker Evans became an early influence and Roy DeCarava.I started looking at the lot of photographs, trying to get a sense of how photos are made and what good photographs look like.

48H With that show, Harlem USA, what kind of photos did you want to make?

DB When I started out, I guess I wanted to make photographs that in some significant way contested the stereotypical notions of Black urban communities like Harlem, which are often described through a lens of some form of social pathology. So when I started out, I probably would have said I wanted to make photographs that represented the people of Harlem in a more positive light. But as I continued on, I couldnt quite figure out what a positive light looks like. This was merely people in the act of living their lives.

I eventually came to this notion of wanting to make an honest representation of everyday people in Harlem. It allowed me to let me let go of this binary notion of positive and negative, and just try and describe clearly the people in front of me without trying to put them in a box. Just allow them space to breathe, and I realized that was enough.

48H You have talked about showing your work in the communities where you took the photos and how the act of being seen is political.

DB I thought it was very important that the work I was making in that community be shown in that communitythat the people who were the subjects of the work would have access to the work. Certainly a number of these photographs are made in places very different from where theyre shown, but theyre first shown where they were made, from my first show at the Studio Museum in Harlem in 1979. It gave me a very clear and intentional way of thinking about the institution as a place of display. Not just the end point for the work, but to use the space of the museum to set up a series of particular relationships: between the museum and the community in which it sits, and trying to use the work in a way that a piece of community is in the work. It creates a different relationship between museum and the community, where they are aware theyre being exhibited in this space, which makes them more likely to want to have access to that space.

I think it changes the dynamics. Certainly at the Studio Museum in Harlem, its a very different set of circumstances because that place is set up in order to have a place for art objects within the African American community. I wanted my photographs in Harlem to extend that conversation. Usually the first showing of the work is in the place in which the work is made. The Birmingham Project was first shown in Birmingham because it has a very particular relationship with that history. The Class Pictures project was made in several different communities around the country, but each piece first shown in the city in which it was made.

48H Why did you decide to have the students you photographed in Class Pictures write something to go along with their portraits?

I thought it was necessary because I wanted a very dimensional representation of those young people. Im always acutely aware of the limitation of photographs because photographs dont do a lot more than they do. Theyre mute visual objects that present a particular piece of information. But all the information that lies out of the frame, which is a lot of information, tends not to be what the work is about.

In terms of making a contemporary portrait of young people in America, I thought it was important they not only be visualized in my photographs, but that they have a place of self representation and talk about their own lives in a way that the photograph is not capable of. That the two thingsmy portrait of them and the textcould add up to something more than either alone can represent. In that project I though it was really important to give them a literal voice in the construction of the image.

48H You talked about your work having a through line? What is it?

DB A sense of history and place. Theres always been a kind of close looking at a place. Photographs become history the moment that theyre made. They begin to recede into the past as soon as they are made. Its about bringing all of that into the conversation through my work. To have them become a part of the conversation from which theyve been largely excluded.

48H You said you went to Birmingham for years getting to know the city before deciding what you wanted to photograph to commemorate the bombing the 16th Street Baptist Church by white supremacists.How did you decide on young people the same age as the children who were killed in a diptych with someone who would have been their age if they lived?

DB I didnt want to just photograph young people in BirminghamI wanted them to be those specific ages. The girls were 11 and 14, and the two boys killed that afternoon were 13 and 16. I wanted them to be that age because for me, the work resonated more deeply in terms of what does an 11-year-old Black girl look like, because one of the girls who was killed in the dynamiting of the church was 11. Not just what does a young girl look like, but what does an 11-year-old African American girl look like.

Its a way of making that history less mythic and more specific.History as time passes tends to become very gauzy. The four little girls. It almost sounds like a girls singing group. Like what is that? I wanted to very specifically give you a sense of what a 14-year-old African American girl looks like, a 13-year-old African American boy. I want them to be that age as a way of invoking their presence in the work, not a presence, but their presence through those young people.And through the adults who were the same age they would have been if they had not been murdered.

48H The photos in your Underground Railroad series, Night Coming Tenderly, Black, are very dark. Why did you want them to look like that?

DB I wanted the viewer to think about moving through that landscape under cover of necessary darkness, as they moved, in that case, toward Lake Erie. I wanted to make photos that evoked that particular sensation. It kind of allowed the viewer to momentarily, through the photograph, inhabit that space under those circumstances, to imagine oneself moving though that terrain under threat of death.

The positionality of all of them is eye level and meant to be experienced as if one were the person moving through that landscape. I wanted it to be a heightened physical and psychological experience.

I had a very interesting experience at the Art Institute of Chicago when I showed them for the first time. I came into the gallery and two women had just finished looking at the work and they looked disoriented and they said to me, Youre the one who made these photographs, right? I said yes. But you made them now, right? Obviously you didnt go back, but why am I feeling Im someplace Im not? It kind of pulled them back. I really want the work to pull you into the experience, so its not just a space of the imagination, which it is, but that it resonates as experience.

See the rest here:

'Change the dynamics': Dawoud Bey on photography, place, and history - 48 Hills

Remaining Staff at The (Cleveland) Plain Dealer Prohibited from Covering Cleveland – Subscription Insider

Wait, what? You read that headline correctly. Just daysafter The (Cleveland) Plain Dealer, Ohioslargest newspaper, laid off 22 newsroom employees, the remaining 14 employeesreceived more bad news. They have been prohibited from reporting on Cleveland,Cuyahoga County and Summit County, as well as any statewide news, reportsCleveScene.com. Those regions will now be covered by sister publication,Cleveland.com, a non-union shop. If the remaining newsroom employees want tokeep their jobs, they will be restricted to covering Geauga, Lake, Lorain,Medina and Portage Counties, other counties in northeast Ohio, instead of beatstheyve covered for years.

The Plain Dealer Newspaper Guild, representing the union, spokeout on Facebook on April 7 about this latest blow to a once-respected mediaoutlet. The post received 634 reactions, 274 comments and 770 shares, as of 8:30p.m. Eastern yesterday. Here is an excerpt:

The Plain Dealer newsroom will no longer be coveringCleveland, Cuyahoga County or the state of Ohio.

Editor Tim Warsinskey announced Monday to the 14 remainingstaff members that the newsroom would, with a few exceptions, become a bureaucovering five outlying counties: Geauga, Lake, Lorain, Medina and Portage.

The move would bar most of the reporters from coveringstories in Cuyahoga and Summit counties, as well as statewide issues, wherethey have developed expertise and have institutional knowledge.

This latest announcement comes as the newsroom has workedceaselessly in covering this unprecedented pandemic, putting aside their ownpersonal family and financial situations to cover the news and tell the storiesof health care workers and the community

Warsinskey called the move a company-wide strategydecision. He did not say which company.

The Plain Dealer, which is owned by Advance Publications,consistently has maintained that The Plain Dealer and Advance Local, areseparate companies. Advance Local operates the nonunion Cleveland.com newsroom,which has not announced layoffs.

The two-newsroom operation was never going to becometenable or permanent, Warsinskey told staffers.

In effect, he is admitting that this decision is part of abroader move to eliminate The Plain Dealer and its staff altogether and not anattempt to provide meaningful coverage on areas the company has stoppedreporting on in any depth for years. The announcement comes three days afterThe Plain Dealer laid off 22 people in the newsroom, including 18Guild-represented journalists and four nonunion managers.

Its clear that the company doesnt value the expertise ofits veteran reporters and it doesnt think the community does either, said thepost. Readthe complete post on Facebook.

In another interesting move, last night, there were nostories on The Plain Dealers website. There were scrolling photos, but noarticles. A Google search directed us to Cleveland.com/plaindealer,but there was no link to that site from PlainDealer.com that we could find.

It is not clear if this move was intentional, or perhaps atechnical glitch. It seems to foreshadow what is coming. Cleveland.com willtake over news reporting for what used to be the biggest paper in the state.Meanwhile, Cleveland.com looked like this. It contained Cleveland-based storieswith bylines from Cleveland.com reporters.

The Plain Dealers editor TimWarsinskey shared The Plain Dealers position with News 5 Cleveland on thechanges:

There are two separate, but related, newsrooms inCleveland, and two outstanding news products The Plain Dealer andcleveland.com. Together, they serve the market well with The Plain Dealerstories appearing online at cleveland.com and cleveland.com stories appearingin print in The Plain Dealer, an approach that has been in place since separatenewsrooms were established in 2013.

By design, this approach helps provide thoughtful, impactfulcoverage in the most efficient way possible and ensures that Greater Clevelandhas more access to local journalism via digital platforms as demand for thoseplatforms continues to grow.

Today, there are 77 journalists and content creators inthese newsrooms covering Greater Cleveland, doing outstanding reporting,writing stories and creating content that our readers want and deserve. Thisnumber is comparable to the staffs in similarly-sized metro areas in Ohio andacross the country. But its not just about the numbers of journalists we haveon hand. Its how they are deployed to create a broad base of coverage for allof the communities we serve in Greater Cleveland.

On Monday, The Plain Dealer shared a new reporting focuswith the members of its newsroom, one that offers to bring high quality localjournalism to five counties in Greater Cleveland, and the nearly 1 millionpeople who live in them. Lake, Geauga, Portage, Medina and Lorain counties havebeen underserved by media in this market for years despite making up a largepercentage of The Plain Dealers subscription base.

The Plain Dealer, along with our sister companyCleveland.com, has an opportunity to change that with The Plain Dealers newfocus on these five nearby counties. This broadening of our coverage area isespecially important in the midst of the COVID-19 pandemic, a time when all ofour readers, regardless of where they live, deserve to know how the virus isaffecting their local communities and how their local communities areresponding, Warsinskey said. Readthe full statement on News 5 Cleveland.

Cutting staff at a time when local journalism is more importantthan ever seems ludicrous, even if financially necessary. This latest move, however,makes absolutely no sense. Why would a media organization take skilledreporters with well-honed beats and move them to a bureau-type operation thatno longer reports news from the newspapers largest coverage area? It is almostunfathomable. We understand the guilds frustration and can only imagine how newspapersubscribers feel. It seems like Warsinskey and Advance Publications are notgiving the full story here. From the outside, it looks like they are cutting unionstaff and hoping the remaining staff will hate their plight so much that theywill leave voluntarily without a buyout or a mass firing. That would free thecompany up to transition to a digital model with non-union staff.

Read this article:

Remaining Staff at The (Cleveland) Plain Dealer Prohibited from Covering Cleveland - Subscription Insider

Stop calling coronavirus pandemic a ‘war’ – The Conversation UK

In speeches, commentaries and conversations about the coronavirus pandemic, we keep hearing war-like metaphors being deployed. It happens explicitly (we are at war, blitz spirit, war cabinet) and implicitly (threat, invisible enemy, frontline, duty).

This, after all, helps project an interpretation of the extraordinary reality facing us which is readily understandable. It helps convey a sense of exceptional mobilisation and offers to decision-makers an opportunity to rise up as heroic commanders.

It is also true that the language of biomedicine and epidemiology is already heavily militarised. We battle a virus, and our body has defence mechanisms against the pathogens that invade it.

But the coronavirus crisis is an international, pan-human challenge. It certainly requires exceptional collective mobilisation, but no real weapons, no intentional killing of fellow human beings, and no casting of people as dehumanised others. Militarised language is unnecessary.

Explaining and encouraging community resilience and togetherness in the face of adversity by evoking images of war conjures up distorted myths and narratives of heroic past national glory and military campaigns. This might function as a cognitive shortcut to evoke collective effort, but the narrow narratives it reproduces are open to exploitation by opportunistic politicians.

We could just as much favour analysis of the evolving situation in calmer scientific and medical terms. You dont need ideas about war to tell a story of the human race naturally coming together when faced by a common danger.

Indeed, one striking phenomenon has been the huge proliferation of organic networks of mutual aid. From street-level up, and often with the help of social media, a huge number of people have been organising solidarity networks to help each other and especially the most vulnerable.

People have come together and organised within neighbourhoods, cities and regions but also across nations to help each other without needing to call it a war or military duty. The language of mutual aid and solidarity works just as well.

Anyone interested in political theory and ideologies must be watching all this with some intellectual curiosity. Different perspectives come with different assumptions about human nature, the role of the state compared to other institutions, and so on.

War is the business of the state par excellence. Some argue it was war-making that actually made the modern state. Framing the response to COVID-19 in military language will reinforce such statist thinking and the statist project itself. It will reinforce the state and its power.

It is of course true that, given the political architecture in place as the crisis hit, states do hold much organisational capacity and power. They have a crucial role to play in tackling the current emergency. But other political entities matter too, from spontaneous bottom-up networks and municipalities to regional organisations and the World Health Organization. Military metaphors, however, either conceal their contributions or co-opt them by describing their efforts in military terms.

One could just as much pitch the crisis as being about medicine, health workers and human communities across the globe. One could analyse events around particular socio-economic classes, such as supermarket workers, delivery workers and essential equipment manufacturers, in every country affected by the virus. Looking at socio-economic classes across borders could also set up more searching discussions about homelessness, refugee camps, working conditions and universal healthcare.

An analysis based on class or social justice is just as appropriate as one revolving around military metaphors. But instead of reinforcing statist and military thinking, it would explain the crisis in anarchist, Marxist, feminist, or liberal internationalist terms, for example.

Language matters. It helps frame particular stories, interpretations and conversations while at the same time closing off alternative perspectives. It reinforces particular theories about how the world works, and sidelines others.

Framing political issues in the language of war both illustrates the prevalence of militarised thinking and further enables it. The more we use military language, the more we normalise the mobilisation of the military and the more we entrench military hierarchies. When the next international crisis arrives, rather than examining the deeper structural problems that caused them, we jump again to heroic narratives of national militarised mobilisation.

Who benefits from this? Politicians can project an image of decisive generals protecting their lot. Agents of state coercion can project themselves as dutiful and robust but popular administrators of the public will. They can then mobilise this (typically masculine) brand for their own political agenda later on. If you are Trump, perhaps you can even egg up some anti-Chinese patriotism.

Missed is the opportunity to develop a more nuanced understanding of human capabilities not restricted to national boundaries. Yet this international solidarity and these pan-human capabilities might be what we need to tackle other problems of international scale, such as the climate crisis.

When a crisis of global proportions gives rise to organic expressions of mutual aid, our imagination has grown so restricted that we find ourselves framing the challenge in statist and national terms. Instead of seeing the whole of humanity rising to the challenge together and observing the multi-layered outpouring of mutual aid, our imagination is restricted into encasing this in military language.

But that does not capture the full story. The human race will come out of COVID wiser if it does not frame its understanding of its response to it in narrow military language.

Read more here:

Stop calling coronavirus pandemic a 'war' - The Conversation UK

Campuses Might Still Be Closed in the Fall. How Should… – Diverse: Issues in Higher Education

April 7, 2020 | :

After varying amounts of struggle, universities across the country moved online for the spring semester in response to the coronavirus pandemic. But now the question is, whats next?

While some hope campuses will re-open come fall, no one knows for certain. In the meantime, university leaders are girding themselves for the possibility theyll have to offer another semester online and asking themselves how to best prepare for more long-term remote learning.

Many are thinking outside the box and outside the (virtual) classroom about what resources students will need if online classes continue next year.

Over spring break, most campuses didnt have the time to build the highest quality online programs as they scurried to open their virtual doors, but fall may hold new possibilities.

Clare McCann, deputy director for federal higher education policy at the think tank New America, stressed the importance of not only intentional instructional design but online student support now that schools have a small (albeit very small) extra amount of time to prepare, she wrote in an email.

Dr. Alison Davis-Blake, president of Bentley University, is working to create a true virtual campus, not just online courses, she said, to offer as much of the campus experience as possible online.

For example, the school held an online career fair and continues to offer remote career counseling. Groups of 40 students virtually meet with a student affairs representative for weekly check-ins and coaches continue to touch base with their athletes, even though they cant play. Student government is up and running, alongside fraternities, sororities and other student groups that continue to virtually meet.

The university plans to look at student and faculty surveys this summer to assess its online education this spring, and most importantly, what could be improved in the fall if remote classes continue. The hope is to offer more experiential learning opportunities and to make more on-campus services remotely available.

But as Davis-Blake pointed out, an online fall semester would pose a new challenge: on-boarding a first-year class amidst the pandemic.

University leaders are asking themselves, How do you orient students when youre not face to face? she said. What can you do over the summer to bring students in?

Shes thinking through a number of options virtual tours, group chats for new students, or even small regional group gatherings, if theyre safe when the semester starts.

Preparing for the possibility of a fall semester online, its almost as if youre building a university from the ground up, Davis-Blake said. For colleges, the key is thinking about what is an important part of your campus experience? And [then] trying to bring that forward.

Its a question Dr. Wayne A.I. Frederick, president of Howard University, is contending with as well. The historically Black college (HBCU) is known for its family dynamic, he said, so hes considering what that means and what that looks like if students remain online in the fall.

The camaraderie students feel at an HBCU is difficult to create in a distance learning environment, he said. We do have to start thinking, What are our values, what are our traditions, and how do we uphold those in the middle of a crisis such as this?

For all universities, but particularly schools like Howard, which serve high percentages of low-income students, the possible continuation of online learning comes with another worry retention rates.

Frederick is concerned that students financially impacted by the coronavirus may not come back to campus next year, so continuing online options in the fall even if on-campus classes are safe might help students who need to work and might otherwise struggle to return, he said. In the meantime, part of the schools preparation for fall is carefully monitoring students and reaching out to those who may need help with their finances.

Frederick finds that the crisis, and the accompanying shift online, is impacting his students in diverse ways, with Black communities disproportionately affected by the coronavirus. Some need mentorship, others need devices to just to get online, and as a student survey found, many need quiet spaces to study at home.

So, as time goes on, he wants to continue tailoring services to their individual needs. For example, if places like libraries reopen before campuses next semester, Howard University might create a guide to finding safe, local study spots.

In preparing for the fall, we need to ask our students what they need rather than be proscriptive, he said.

Though everyone hopes for more normalcy in the next academic year, Davis-Blake thinks the process of making emergency plans for fall might actually help universities understand and address their students needs better. Campuses may find that some supports actually reach more students more effectively online, while others require an in-person touch.

I really believe this is a period not just to hunker down and say, Well, how do we get through? she said. This is a time for creativity. Even if we come back to campus and were all face to face, there are things were learning and will keep learning about how to deliver education even better through virtual and in-person activities. In every calamity, there is a possibility and an opportunity for innovation, for growth, for the human spirit to really rise.

Sara Weissman can be reached at sweissman@diverseeducation.com.

Visit link:

Campuses Might Still Be Closed in the Fall. How Should... - Diverse: Issues in Higher Education

Dr. Marvel of Medicine to the rescue – Pike County News Watchman

ZZZWAP! Take that COVID-19. Dr. Marvel of Medicine, Amy Acton, is front and center in the fight against the coronavirus in Ohio. Her cape, a white lab coat, represents her mission to conquer the mayhem of planet pandemic. Committed. Calm. Composed.

"I have the honor of wearing this white coat, which I know has become a little bit iconic. But it became very clear to me that I'm wearing a symbol of all my friends and colleagues and your family members who are out on the front lines," Acton said at a recent press conference in Columbus, Ohio. "I'm thinking about you a lot more than I can express because I've spent many years on the front lines and sometimes feel frustrated that I can't just come in there and work alongside of you in doing this bigger picture planning. But this white coat represents all of you.

Even with my back against the wall I dont give up! This quote by Captain Marvel (female superhero) sounds a lot like what Dr. Acton would assert.

Marvels superhero action sci-fi, set in the mid-1990s, follows the story of Carol Danvers (Brie Larson), a former U.S. Air Force fighter pilot, as she turns into a galaxy hero and joins Starforce, an elite Kree military team, before returning home with new questions about her past and identity when the Earth is caught in the center of an intergalactic conflict between two alien races.

Dr. Marvel of Medicine, an avenger to the virus villain, uses her knowledge, words, and experience to educate Ohioans. THWAPP! Take that COVID-19.

Amy Acton, M.D., MPH was appointed director of health for the Ohio Department of Health by Governor Mike DeWine in February 2019 the first woman to hold the position of Director of Ohio's Public Health Department. Go Amy! A licensed physician in preventive medicine with a Masters Degree in Public Health, Dr. Acton has more than 30 years of experience in medical practice, government and community service, healthcare policy and advocacy, academic and nonprofit administration, consulting, teaching, and data analysis.

Posts on Twitter, Reddit, and Instagram speak to her leadership. The Dr. Amy Acton Fan Club Facebook group has mucho members. Shes a modern fan-fave.

Kudos to Dr. Marvel of Medicine and Governor Mighty Mike the dynamic duo fighting germ warfare and keeping Ohioans safe.

Fear is not a choice. What you do with it is. Captain Marvel

Melissa Martin, Ph.D., is an author, columnist, educator, and therapist. She lives in Southern Ohio. Contact her at melissamcolumnist@gmail.com

See more here:

Dr. Marvel of Medicine to the rescue - Pike County News Watchman

Canary in the Bioweapon Coal Mine: The lessons of Covid 19 pandemic – Economic Times

By Prakash Chandra

In recorded history, theres never been a worse time to catch a cold, as Covid-19 devastates populations and economies. Efforts to arrest the outbreak are hamstrung by the absence of definitive diagnostic tools as clinical symptoms like high fever, aches, and dry cough could also indicate other illnesses.

Pandemics usually occur every 20-30 years, the time it takes for a flu strain to change its genetic makeup so dramatically that people -- with little immunity built up from earlier bouts of flu -- would be most vulnerable. After the 1968 Hong Kong flu epidemic and the H5N1 bird flu in 1997, the last major outbreak was the Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome (Sars) -- whose causative germ shares more than 80% of its genome with Covid-19 -- in 2003.

So Covid-19 ties in with this strange timeline. That scientists managed to shut out the coronaviruses behind Sars and the 2012 Middle East Respiratory Syndrome (Mers) gives hope, although Covid-19 is much more infectious than either.

So, could this lethal microbe be a bioweapon? Some contend it is an experimental germ that accidently escaped from a Chinese lab. The Chinese, in any case, owe a big apology to the world for having kept a dark secret like Covid-19 for too long, making it too late for other nations to batten down their hatches. Others argue it is the handiwork of the worlds most powerful military, which used the planets most populated country as proving grounds for a new bioweapon.

Military experts, however, dismiss these concerns as conspiracy theories or propaganda in the absence of incontrovertible evidence. But one thing is certain: this is a grim reminder of the threat of weaponised pathogens and the pressing need to revise the 1975 Biological Weapons Convention (BWC).

BWC was written to outlaw biological weapons and prohibited the production or stockpiling of biological agents that have no justification for prophylactic, protective or other peaceful purposes. Ironically, militaries do not consider lab-created pandemic pathogens as good bioweapons, as their high transmissibility would also cripple the attackers.

BWC has failed the world on two counts. One is the absence of a monitoring mechanism and its dependence on signatory states having their own legal biosecurity safeguards. Voluntary adherence never works for international agreements, and BWC is no exception.

BWCs other omission is its silence on regulating academic research on bio-agents. The line dividing academic research (aimed at public health) and the development of bioweapons is thin. And even if most of such research is not aimed at building offensive bioweapons, it still leaves the field open for germ warfare science to develop dual use capabilities.

Many believe the odds of lab-created pathogens being accidentally released triggering a pandemic are actually higher than that of a natural pandemic. The double jeopardy here is that researchers who produce potentially pandemic pathogens seldom give the bioweaponry risk of their work top priority, and BWC cannot monitor the dual-use nature of such data to assess their public health benefits.

No wonder countries like the US, China and Russia have exploited this loophole to run their bioweapons programmes, often in the guise of civilian biotech research. There have been at least 15 reported instances in the last 40 years when germ warfare was actually used, and ten accidental releases of pathogens from biosafety level four (BSL)4 labs the highest level of biosecurity controls in the last 30 years.

In that sense, Covid 19 is the canary in the coal mine, warning humanity against trying to harness the destructive power of pathogens whose lethal nature is simply the consequence of their evolution. It is only when we mess with their natural design to fashion weapons that horrors visit the world.

Having let the germ war genie out of the bottle, none of the big powers can now disown responsibility. The least they can do is sit together and revise BWC, or write a new disarmament treaty with a global mechanism for verifying and ensuring strict compliance, including sanctions against violators.

Exemplifying the current chaos, the US Justice Department, last month, acknowledged Covid-19s potential for being weaponised and warned of action against anyone attempting it. There is even a private $20 trillion lawsuit in the US against China for allegedly releasing Covid-19 as part of a bioweapons project. Undoubtedly, a strong BWC is the need of the hour.

With a BWC review scheduled for next year, India has excellent credentials for steering the discussions on framing a new convention. Having never pursued an active bioweapons programme, Indias biodefence effort, which began in the early-1970s, is transparent and supported by its remarkable biotech infrastructure.

The time has come for a new world order that eschews bioweapons, where countries develop protective equipment, vaccines and pharmaceuticals all within the legal landscape of a robust global treaty that effectively addresses biosecurity concerns.

DISCLAIMER : Views expressed above are the author's own.

See the rest here:

Canary in the Bioweapon Coal Mine: The lessons of Covid 19 pandemic - Economic Times

I Watched 5 Pandemic Movies so You Don’t Have To – Inkstick

Though I have spent all of my adult life working in various areas related to foreign policy and consider myself a bona fide national security nerd, my secret dream is to have a career as a film critic. What possible better job could there be than to get paid to watch movies and tell people what you think about them? And so, since the New York Times and Washington Post arent calling about vacancies in their entertainment sections, I thought Id take a look at some films about pandemics and see how art does or doesnt imitate life.

First, a word about methodology. I consulted various lists online for recommended pandemic-related movies. I also crowd-sourced my Facebook friends for recommendations. The universe, depending on how you define pandemic-related, is rather large, so I had to narrow the field a bit. I looked for films that dealt with some kind of disease that hits a society recognizable as our own because what I am most interested in is how characters created by Hollywood would cope with that crisis, and how that might differ for good or ill with our own response. I eliminated a lot of post-apocalyptic films because while they pose a lot of interesting moral dilemmas and my family and I love gaming out what we would do in those situations, were not there yet. I also eliminated the entire zombie genre. I should note that World War Z, based on the book by Max Brooks, has a lot of insights and in fact Brooks has become quite an expert on pandemics, even lecturing at West Point. His interview on NPR with Terry Gross is well worth your time. But zombies, while often having their origins in some kind of virus, pose a different set of challenges from ones the CDC might deal with. Finally, a spoiler alert. I recommend watching the movies before you read this and making your own observations. Then compare yours with mine. Let me know if you think Hollywood can or cant teach us something about the predicament were in.

So without further adieu, going in chronological order, roll em (see Ive got the film critic lingo down. Are you listening NYT?).

THE ANDROMEDA STRAIN, 1971

This classic of the genre is based on the novel by Michael Crichton. In this story, a satellite lands on earth carrying a deadly pathogen that wipes out a small town in New Mexico. Only two people, the town drunk and an infant, miraculously survive. The film is introduced as a sort of pseudo-documentary of a heretofore top secret story of how the government beat the bug. The bulk of the film centers on a team of scientists working in a high-tech government lab created for just this purpose to figure out a way to beat the germ. While the military was in charge during the initial stages, scientists have now been pulled from civilian life to work the problem. As with every film I see with any military element, I had to suspend some of my disbelief regarding the uniform and haircut errors.

The key to defeating the virus, as it turns out, is finding what the drunk and the baby have in common that led to their survival. Along the way, the scientists discover that the pathogen may not have been an inadvertent passenger on the satellite but an effort by the military to retrieve potential biological weapons from space.

Two elements of the film seem relevant to todays situation. One is that the government in the movie, in contrast to our own, is pretty well prepared when the pathogen arrives. The key scientists in the civilian world have already been identified and are quickly retrieved by the military. The facility the scientists work in has been specifically designed for this eventuality. Much of the film shows the scientists going through extensive decontamination procedures just to get in the place to work. Some background is provided to show that building the facility was not a cheap endeavor, and again, very different from our current experience, there are no resource shortages. The other element which seems to be prescient is the tension between what the scientists recommend and what the politicians order be done. The president never appears on screen but the two forces are embodied in his scientific advisor and his chief of staff, and the tension between them. While the chief of staff openly states his distrust of the scientists and their sometimes contradictory advice, the president is ultimately persuaded to follow their recommended course. The film ends with the head scientist testifying before Congress and leaving us with the question, what do we do next time?

The biggest takeaway I found was preparation. When scientists and doctors were well prepared, things went better. Not just in terms of having sufficient resources and supplies but also knowing how to approach the problem and what questions to ask.

OUTBREAK, 1995

This film features an all-star cast including Dustin Hoffman, Morgan Freeman, Donald Sutherland, Cuba Gooding Jr., and Rene Russo. The story is very loosely based on the book The Hot Zone by Richard Preston, which tells the true story of a case of an Ebola virus outbreak at an animal lab in Reston, Virginia. In 2019, a non-fiction docudrama that closely adheres to the book aired on the National Geographic channel. But Outbreak is far more fiction than fact and, other than being about an Ebola-like virus and having a monkey play a major role, differs significantly from the book. Considering what really happened in Reston, Im not sure the film is scarier than actual events.

The film tells the story of a type of hemorrhagic fever, similar to Ebola, which breaks out in a small California town. Note that not all films show us to be lucky with just small towns being hit. In this film, the military is very much in charge from the outset. Dustin Hoffman plays a doctor and colonel working for the US Army Medical Research Institute of Infectious Diseases (USAMRID) tasked with battling the outbreak and racing for a cure. His ex-wife, played by Russo, who becomes infected, is also a doctor who works at the CDC but she only recently left USAMRID and her marriage to Hoffman. The haircut and uniform errors are less evident in this film, though Gooding plays an Army major scientist who is somehow also an excellent combat helicopter pilot.

In this film, the central tension isnt so much between scientists and politicians but between scientists and the military. Sutherland plays the senior military officer in charge and like in The Andromeda Strain, this outbreak is not unrelated to a biological warfare effort that he, and Freeman, were intimately involved in. While Hoffman crisscrosses California, in a stolen Army helicopter piloted by Gooding, in search of the monkey host with antibodies for the cure, Sutherland just wants to blow the town up for the greater good. The tension plays out with Freeman as the officer subordinate to Sutherland but senior to Hoffman. Torn between the two perspectives, Freeman must decide which direction to go. After much back and forth, Freeman ultimately backs Hoffman. The film serves to highlight a question that we are asking ourselves today: Which is worse, the disease or the methods we employ to control it? Like in The Andromeda Strain, the government personnel are well prepared and supremely competent. An element that shows up in this film is the reaction of the public to the sometimes heavy-handed efforts by the military to control the outbreak. While we might be upset with those who refuse to social distance today, the townspeople in this film riot and even attack the military and police.

CONTAGION, 2011

Like Outbreak, this film features some pretty big names. Gwyneth Paltrow, Kate Winslet, Matt Damon, Laurence Fishburne, Elliot Gould, and Jude Law. This film postulates a worldwide pandemic similar to the flu that has a devastating mortality rate. In a case of life possibly imitating art, we eventually learn that the bug originated with bats, spreading to pigs and then jumping to humans in the so-called Wet Markets of China. Paltrow plays patient zero in the US after coming back from a business trip in Asia. Damon plays an ordinary guy married to Paltrow who watches her die along with one of his children. Fishburne and Winslet work for the CDC and seek to track the virus and work on a cure. Gould plays an independent scientist who finds a way to grow the virus in order to develop a vaccine though in violation of CDC rules, perhaps foreshadowing questions about whether or not our own FDA rules have hindered vaccine or test development. We hear and learn technical terms from Winslet and Fishburne, including Winslets detailed explanation of how the R naught number is a measure of how infectious a disease is, and Fishburnes recommendation of social distancing. A quarantine of Chicago also occurs, though Fishburne uses his inside knowledge to get a loved one out before the gates close.

Jude Laws character introduces a new element not seen in the other films, but one that we see today: the snake oil salesman with a miracle cure. Law plays a blogger/journalist who cuts a secret deal with a hedge fund and hawks a so-called cure that people panic buy. Today, we see attorneys general sending cease and desist orders to those selling cures for Coronavirus on TV. Similar to both The Andromeda Strain and Outbreak, the government scientists are supremely competent and heroic. Winslet and another female CDC scientist risk their lives to find a vaccine. Also similar to Outbreak, when order begins to break down we see looting and rioting and some of the uglier sides of human behavior. Damon has to chase away his daughters boyfriend with a shotgun to avoid exposure.

THE FLU, 2013

This really well done South Korean film tells a similar story to Outbreak, except in this case a flu-like virus hits a suburb of Seoul with a population of half a million people. Again, some blame is leveled at China as the disease is brought by illegals smuggled into the city. Like the monkey in Outbreak, one of the illegals is a carrier with antibodies who must be found to develop a cure. Control measures get progressively harsher as the military seals off the city and then establishes camps to quarantine the sick. Mass graves are dug and the populace begins to panic, which escalates into defiance of the military-enforced quarantine. The heroes of the story are a South Korean doctor and an emergency worker who has a crush on her, who through a series of coincidences, end up having to find and save the doctors daughter, who also has the antibodies needed to save the city.This film does a great job of illustrating the tension between measures to control the disease and the economic damage caused to the city. When the scientists first recommend the quarantine, the politicians balk and one even expresses concern over what it will do to his re-election prospects. Similar to Outbreak, a decision must be made to destroy the city or continue to find the cure. While the film is Korean, the ultimate confrontation comes between the president of Korea trying to save his people and an undefined American civilian official standing in for the top US General in South Korea, who can sometimes exercise control of South Korean forces, and who possesses the authority to overrule the president and order the bombing of the city. Ultimately the Korean president wins out and the American official backs down. I have to admit I was a bit frustrated by this element of the story. Though the American military in wartime might exercise command over South Korean forces, the whole notion of an American civilian overruling the Korean president in a situation like this I found a bit unrealistic. But then again, this wasnt a documentary and it did make for added drama. In Outbreak and this film, and in real life, the virus originated in China, and this one takes a stab at the Americans as well. Nationalism is an ever present reality on screen and in our world.

One other interesting element was the notion of disinformation. The Korean government shuts down the cell phone network fairly early to avoid the spreading of rumors and false information, which make various appearances in the film. This is no small feat in South Korea since the film accurately depicts what I witnessed while stationed there in 2002: everyone over the age of three has a cell phone.

VIRUS, 2019

Though I went in chronological order, ending with this film is appropriate. Virus is a dramatization of a real-life outbreak of Nipah virus in Kerala state, India, in 2018. It is not too strong to say that this film should be mandatory viewing for any personnel involved in dealing with any sort of public health crisis. In this film, nearly everybody does everything right, and it is non-fiction. Despite relatively poor resources and hospital conditions, the medical personnel quickly recognize that they have a serious problem and contact the appropriate authorities for help so that they can employ effective control measures. A medical detective is sent out to track down contacts and find the source. CCTV footage and cell phone records are examined to figure out who exactly had contact with whom and who might have been exposed. When more resources are needed, the private sector jumps in to provide additional personal protective gear. When drivers tasked with transporting bodies get nervous, medical personnel calmly explain the risk to them and how vital their work is.

The most powerful performance in the film is the actress Asha Kelunni Nair, who plays the health ministerC. K. Prameela. Prameela was based on Minister K. K. Shailaja Teacher, the minister for health who was the senior official in charge of the effort in real life. What is most telling is that she spends most of the movie in silence, sitting in a series of meetings calmly listening to what the scientists and doctors are telling her and only occasionally asking highly pertinent questions. In one instance, the townspeople are complaining that they want to be able to bury their dead rather than cremate them in accordance with the religious tenants of this predominantly Muslim conservative and deeply religious society in this part of India. Some local officials want to let them but Nair, known by her stage name Revathi, asks the scientists if this can be done safely. When one relays how deep burials were safe in another country fighting Nipah and gave the data to prove it, she does let the burials, under strict supervision, go forward.

In every instance when officials are confronted with various challenges, they take a calm, deliberate, and data-driven approach to the problem. In one case, the police want to move a crowd that is blocking a vehicle carrying contaminated bodies, but the officials stop the police from using force. In another instance, some defense ministry personnel and media figures suggest that the virus might be a biological warfare attack. Rather than simply dismissing these conspiracy theories, the doctors, scientists, and investigators search for data and evidence and prove the natural origins of the virus, again in a bat.The film is a dramatization and some poetic license may have been taken with the course of events depicted. Given what we are witnessing today, some might find it hard to believe that in this instance so many people consistently made such good decisions. But the proof is in the pudding. This Nipah outbreak lasted barely a month and led to only 16 deaths.

SO WHAT DID WE LEARN?

Films are reflections of reality, not reality itself, so we cannot see them necessarily as indicative of what to do and not do when confronted with a pandemic. I do think Virus is very instructive, and if it were up to me Id airlift Keralas officials to the US and put them in charge tomorrow. But I still think using the more fictional stories as a mirror can be useful. The biggest takeaway I found was preparation. When scientists and doctors were well prepared, things went better. Not just in terms of having sufficient resources and supplies but also knowing how to approach the problem and what questions to ask. Eisenhowers adage Peace-time plans are of no particular value, but peace-time planning is indispensable, seems true for pandemics.

The other key lesson for me was the similarity between decisions in war and decisions in a pandemic. In most areas of public policy, whether you have chosen the best policy is often not readily apparent. It can take years to see if some policy or program achieved the desired effect. But in war and pandemics, the feedback loop timeline is very short and the consequences of bad choices will be paid for in blood. Leaders will likely always make some bad choices, but they should quickly recognize when they have and pivot as soon as possible. Waiting is costly. And along those lines, leaders need to listen to the experts and know their own limitations. The experts are the ones who can interpret the data and who are familiar with what happened in the past. They wont always be right, but they are in touch with those feedback loops and know how to realize quickly when they are wrong. In the end, both on screen and probably in the world we live in, it appears that science and data-driven decisions provide the most likely path to success.

Rob Levinson is a retired Lt. Col in the US Air Force with over 20 years of service as an intelligence officer. He is a graduate of the Air Force Academy and served in Latin America, the Middle East and South Korea as an intelligence officer, foreign area officer, commander and politico-military affairs officer.

More:

I Watched 5 Pandemic Movies so You Don't Have To - Inkstick

Dr. Marvel of medicine comes to the rescue – The Tribune – Ironton Tribune

ZZZWAP! Take that COVID-19.

Dr. Marvel of Medicine, Amy Acton, is front and center in the fight against the coronavirus in Ohio.

Her cape, a white lab coat, represents her mission to conquer the mayhem of planet pandemic. Committed. Calm. Composed.

I have the honor of wearing this white coat, which I know has become a little bit iconic. But it became very clear to me that Im wearing a symbol of all my friends and colleagues and your family members who are out on the front lines, Acton stated at a recent press conference in Columbus, Ohio. Im thinking about you a lot more than I can express because Ive spent many years on the front lines and sometimes feel frustrated that I cant just come in there and work alongside of you in doing this bigger picture planning. But this white coat represents all of you.

Even with my back against the wall I dont give up! This quote by Captain Marvel (female superhero) sounds a lot like what Dr. Acton would assert.

Marvels superhero action sci-fi, set in the mid-1990s, follows the story of Carol Danvers (Brie Larson), a former U.S. Air Force fighter pilot, as she turns into a galaxy hero and joins Starforce, an elite Kree military team, before returning home with new questions about her past and identity when the Earth is caught in the center of an intergalactic conflict between two alien races.

Dr. Marvel of Medicine, an avenger to the virus villain, uses her knowledge, words and experience to educate Ohioans.

Amy Acton, MD, was appointed director of health for the Ohio Department of Health by Governor Mike DeWine in February 2019the first woman to hold the position of Director of Ohios Public Health Department. Go Amy! A licensed physician in preventive medicine with a masters degree in public health, Dr. Acton has more than 30 years of experience in medical practice, government and community service, healthcare policy and advocacy, academic and nonprofit administration, consulting, teaching and data analysis.

Posts on Twitter, Reddit and Instagram speak to her leadership. The Dr. Amy Acton Fan Club Facebook group has mucho members. Shes a modern fan-fave.

Kudos to Dr. Marvel of Medicine and Governor Mighty Mike the dynamic duo fighting germ warfare and keeping Ohioans safe.

Fear is not a choice. What you do with it is. Captain Marvel

Melissa Martin, Ph.D. is an author, columnist, educator, and therapist. She lives in Southern Ohio. Contact her at melissamcolumnist@gmail.com.

Here is the original post:

Dr. Marvel of medicine comes to the rescue - The Tribune - Ironton Tribune

Plagues and wars alter economic policies: but not for ever – The Guardian

As a classical scholar, our prime minister will be all too aware of some uncanny parallels between the onset of coronavirus and the plague that beset Athens in 430BC.

The immortal historian Thucydides wrote: At the beginning the doctors were quite incapable of treating the disease because of their ignorance of the right methods In fact, mortality among the doctors was the highest of all since they came more frequently in contact with the sick.

Again: Among the symptoms were sneezing and hoarseness of voice, and before long the pain settled on the chest and was accompanied by coughing.

Sound familiar? The plague struck just after the Athenians leader, Pericles, delivered his great funeral oration over the dead from the war against Sparta. Alas, Pericles himself died of the plague, and not long after Athenss glory was in decline.

Most historians would no doubt say that Britains glory days began their decline after the second world war. But one of the lessons from that war was that, well before it ended, the coalition government under Conservative prime minister Winston Churchill and Labour deputy prime minister Clement Attlee was planning for the aftermath.

One of the main things on Attlees mind was that the poor social conditions of the interwar years should not be experienced again. Central to postwar planning was the formation of the NHS under the first Attlee administration of 1945-50, which was set up, amid fierce resistance from the medical profession, by Aneurin Bevan in 1948.

There was no NHS in ancient Athens, and there is no NHS in the United States. To put it another way: we have a health service, they have a health sector. That is an important reason why, for all the well-publicised mishandling of this crisis in the UK, the US, still the mightiest economy in the world, seems to be in for an even bigger shock from the virus than we are experiencing.

At this point as one who was born a year before the outbreak of the 1939-45 war I hope readers will forgive me if I point to an important difference in the dangers to the general public between then and now. Thus I confess that my initial inclination when asked what I felt personally about the virus as opposed to thoughts about the disturbing political and economic implications was to say something like: This is nothing like watching flying bombs overhead, listening as their engines switched off, and hoping they didnt land on you. In fact one did land on the church at the end of our road and shattered our windows while we were safe in the Anderson shelter in the garden.

The end of capitalism? I doubt it. The Tories suddenly becoming fully paid-up Keynesians? For how long, I wonder

The awful thing about this plague is that it is more like the Athenian one 2,500 years ago or the Spanish flu of 1918. It doesnt fly in or explode, it just hits people unawares that is to say, we are aware of the danger, but dont know if or when it will hit. A timely reminder of the horrors of germ warfare.

In common with most of the population, I feel as if I am under house arrest. But when I hear and read so many comments about draconian conditions, my classical background comes back to me. There is a breed of historians who say that the common understanding of the epithet draconian is a misrepresentation, and that Draco wasnt that bad: he merely codified existing civic practices.

On the other hand, lets face it: in ancient Athens, Draco prescribed the death penalty for petty theft even of cabbages, if you please. According to Plutarch, this produced the memorable comment that his laws were written not in ink but in blood.

So frankly, in the circumstances, I do not regard being asked to take precautions about the threat to my own and other peoples health indeed, lives as draconian.

But back to the economy. The unemployment and bankruptcy news is horrendous, and likely to get worse before it gets better.

There will be plenty of time in the coming months to examine the implications. But at this stage I should just issue a health warning (sorry) against taking some of the instant conclusions too seriously. The end of capitalism? I doubt it. The Conservative and Brexit party suddenly repenting of 10 years of austerity and becoming fully paid-up Keynesians? For how long, I wonder.

Finally, why are we in this mess? Could it possibly be anything to do with the fact that during 10 years of austerity, public spending on health was budgeted to rise by 1% a year at most (in real terms that is, after inflation) whereas all the professionals knew that it needed to rise by 4% a year merely to cope with the pressures of an ageing population and, especially, the cost of technological advance?

And could it also possibly be because this governments crazed obsession with Brexit means that it shut itself out of the joint ordering of vital medical supplies with the 27 members of the European Union? I merely ask.

Visit link:

Plagues and wars alter economic policies: but not for ever - The Guardian

Mad Man Modly: The Secretary of the Navy Gets the Boot – Antiwar.com

Mea culpa. In "Coronavirus Lays Low the Military" (Antiwar.com, Apr. 2), I wrote that "its taken the military several weeks to realize whats going on" with Covid-19, and that "judging from the mixed messages sent by Secretary of Defense Mark Esper, it still hasnt figured it all out."

This was way too kind since it implies that Esper was honestly wrestling with the problem when, as is now clear, hes not honestly wrestling with anything at all. Along with Secretary of State Mike Pompeo and National Security Adviser Robert C. OBrien, rather, hes part of a spooky cabal that is in full-scale denial about Covid-19 and, whats worse, sees it as an opportunity to take out longtime foes. In recent weeks, these mini-Dr. Strangeloves have:

In the 1340s, Mongols used catapults to hurl diseased cadavers into the besieged Crimean city of Caffa, now known as Feodosia, in order to spread bubonic plague. Today, the US blocks money for ventilators and prevents the import of lifesaving pharmaceuticals in order to spread Covid-19.

Strangelovian as all this is, we now have the curious example of an attack dog in human form named Thomas Modly, who has just gotten the ax for calling an aircraft-carrier skipper "stupid" and "nave" for trying to safeguard the health of his crew. A former Pentagon business consultant who was named acting Navy secretary last November, Modley is the best example in years of why the scariest people among us are not the toughest but the most cowardly. A relentless self-promoter, he was reportedly terrified of suffering the same fate as his predecessor, Richard V. Spencer, who wound up on the sidewalk after daring to oppose Trumps decision to let accused Navy SEAL murderer Eddie Gallagher off with a slap on the wrist. So when it came to a skipper who didnt mind sticking his neck out in behalf of his crew, Modly figured that the only way to deal with him was to go after him the way Trump would, only worse.

So he pilloried Brett Crozier, captain of the USS Theodore Roosevelt, as "too naive or too stupid to be the commanding officer of a ship like this" because he didnt realize that a four-page memo he wrote calling for quarantining the crew to combat a corona outbreak would likely be leaked. He called him disloyal for blabbing to the press, even though theres no evidence that Crozier sought to do so. And he described him as self-promoting even though theres zero evidence of that as well.

"I understand you love the guy," Modly acknowledged in the course of an unhinged fifteen-minute rant over the TR intercom on Monday. "Its good that you love him." But Crozier was guilty of a "betrayal" because he allowed his concerns to be "put it in the publics forum, and its now become a big controversy in Washington, DC, and across the country about a martyr CO [i.e. commanding officer] who wasnt getting the help he needed."

"I expect you never to do that to your shipmates either," he went on, "the ones on the shore right now who told me that when Captain Croziers email made it to the San Francisco Chronicle after working fifteen-hour days, they were demoralized because they knew what they had been doing for you guys since the 25th of March to get you guys what you need."

So thousands of sailors shown cheering Crozier in videos that quickly went viral werent cheering him at all, you see. All that lusty applause aside, they were actually complaining that that he was throwing them overboard and that real heroes like Modly werent getting the thanks they deserved.

"If I could offer you a glimpse of the level of hatred and pure evil that has been thrown my way, my familys way, over this decision [to fire Crozier]," the Navy secretary said, "I would. But it doesnt matter. Its not about me."

No, of course not, even though Modly or "Moldy," as hes known onboard the TR was really trying to save the day.

This is pure stomach-turning nonsense, of course, which is why Modly deserved the Order of the Boot more than anyone in recent history. But before we allow this creep to slink off into the sunset, we should give his Apr. 6 comments a bit more attention because of what they say about the uber-hawks who now dominate foreign policy.

One is that they dont just regard the press as biased, but as an outright hostile force. As Modly put it: "the media has an agenda. And the agenda that they have depends on which side of the political aisle they sit. And Im sorry thats the way the country is now, but its the truth. And so they use it to divide us. They use it to embarrass the Navy. They use it to embarrass you."

Which suggests what? That the press is the enemy, that the military and the media are on opposite sides of the battlefield, and that one will have to suppress the other if a real emergency arises, like the one were in now?

A second is that anti-Chinese rhetoric has reached levels that are truly dangerous. "One of the things about his [Croziers] email that bothered me the most was saying that we are not at war," Modly declared. "Well, were not technically at war. But let me tell you something. The only reason we are dealing with this right now is because a big authoritarian regime called China was not forthcoming about what was happening with this virus. And they put the world at risk to protect themselves and to protect their reputations."

So were not at war, except that Chinas behavior is so derelict that we might as well be. A seemingly passing comment about hypersonic missiles suggest that Pentagon fears about growing Chinese military prowess is not the least bit theoretical or abstract. "I tell you something," Modly said at one point, "if this ship was in combat and there were hypersonic missiles coming at it, youd be pretty fucking scared too." It was a Freudian slip that suggests that top brass is indeed "pretty fucking scared" about the threat that such weapons pose, especially to Americas eleven aircraft carriers, which are now as obsolete as a World War I-era dreadnought.

Finally, theres the suggestion that merely by disclosing a problem, Crozier "compromised critical information about your status intentionally to draw greater attention to your situation."

This is pure authoritarianism. Its the belief that merely airing a problem is disloyal because it provides the enemy with information he shouldnt have. "Loose lips sink ships" may be warranted in wartime. But thats not the case now, as Crozier pointed out in his Mar. 30 memo, and any suggestion to the contrary represents an effort to impose strict martial values in a time of peace.

This should be reason to pour yourself another scotch. Modly deserves to get the ax since hes a danger not only to the crew of the Teddy Roosevelt but to US naval personnel in general. But Pompeo, Esper, and other latter-day advocates of germ warfare are threats to the world at large and should not only be canned, but forced to stand before an international tribunal for crimes against humanity. As for Trump, not only has he thoroughly blown the anti-corona effort here in the US, but hes now pushing the same misbegotten policies on other countries as well. The world has a problem, and its not Covid-19. Its the United States.

Daniel Lazare is the author of The Frozen Republic: How the Constitution Is Paralyzing Democracy (Harcourt Brace, 1996) and other books about American politics. He writes a weekly column for Antiwar.com. He has written for a wide variety of publications from The Nation to Le Monde Diplomatique and blogs about the Constitution and related matters at Daniellazare.com.

Read the original:

Mad Man Modly: The Secretary of the Navy Gets the Boot - Antiwar.com

The decade of transformation: Remaking international relations – NationofChange

The coronavirus pandemic is magnifying the cruelty of U.S. foreign policy. The economic collapse is showing the failure of neoliberalism and how the empire-economy is not working for the people of the world, including the United States.

The U.S. is losing its global dominance as it demonstrates its own incompetence in response to the pandemic and its viciousness in the midst of this crisis. Other countries are showing leadership and solidarity while the U.S. is escalating its attacks.

This is an opportunity to change direction. What seemed impossible in the recent past is now possible. We must seize the opportunity to create change that ensures the necessities of the people are met and the planet is protected. COVID-19 is one immediate crisis, but the climate crisis, nuclear war and economic insecurity all require solidarity between the people of the world.

No country can fully recover from COVID-19 or the economic collapse unless these crises are resolved for the whole world. Both the economy and pandemic are global and interconnected as are the looming crises of climate chaos and nuclear war.Rather than showing solidarity with other nations in the midst of the crises, the U.S. is escalating economic sanctions and threatening war while undermining a global response to climate and increasing the risks of nuclear war.

Black Alliance for Peace points out:The brutality and criminality of the colonial/capitalist system of state violence is reflected most graphically by the illegal and immoral policy of sanctions imposed on 39 nations by the U.S. and its Western allies.Venezuela, Iran and other nations are being denied the ability to import medicines and medical equipment to protect their populations from the COVID-19 pandemic.

On March 23, theU.N. General Secretary Antnio Guterrescalled for an immediate global ceasefire in all corners of the world sayingnations should focus together on the true fight of our lives the#COVID19pandemic.Fifty-three countriesimmediately agreed.Instead of heeding this call, the U.S. has threatened Iran and Venezuela with military attacks and continued the war with Yemen whileeliminating the majority of humanitarian assistance to Yemen.These actions were wrong before the pandemic, but in the midst of the pandemic, they are obscene.

China is sending medical supplies and assistance to 89 countries so far as part of itsHealth Silk Road.It is ignoring U.S. sanctions bysendingdrugs, test kits, and supplies to Iran and Venezuela. Hard-hit Italy noted thatthe other EU nations ignored their desperate plea for medical equipment while China responded. China is building positive relationships by providingessential equipment and expertisewhile theU.S. is tryingand failing to get other nations to sign on to a statement blaming COVID-19 on China.

Cuba hassentbrigades of doctors and nurses to Italy, as well as Venezuela, Nicaragua, Jamaica, Suriname, and Grenada. Russia has also sent medical supplies to hard-hit countries like Italy.Even Venezuela, suffering from a U.S. economic blockade and threats of a military attack, issending aid to its neighbors, including Ecuador and Colombia even though Colombia has joined the U.S. in threatening Venezuela.The U.S. blocked a shipment of coronavirus aidfor Cuba from Chinas richest man, Jack Ma, including 100,000 facemasks and 10 COVID-19 diagnostic kits, along with other supplies.

Europe is starting to break with the United States. The EU finally sent aid to Iran ignoring U.S. sanctions.France, Germany, and Britain have sentmedical goods to Iran through INSTEX a workaround to export goods to Iran that bypasses U.S.sanctions. This development could have major implications for the ability of the U.S. to unilaterally sanction nations as it provides a way for countries to trade without the U.S. financial system.Europe, led by Germany, also backed out of war gamesagainst Russia, which would have included a practice nuclear attack, due to the COVID-19 virus.

President Rouhani of Iran sent an open letterto the people of the United States saying, the war on this virus can only be successful if all nations can win this war together, and no affected nation is left behind. He urged us to change the direction of the U.S. government, writing, Future generations will judge the American people based on the actions of their government.

The zig-zagging incompetence of U.S. policy is evident.During the three months when the Trump administration did not take the virus seriously, the Interceptreportsthe United States allowed exports of medical supplies and equipment. After examining vessel manifests, the Intercept found medical equipment needed to treat the coronavirus [was] being shipped abroad as recently as March 17. This has led to a persistent lack of medical supplies in the U.S.

Now, the U.S. has angered allies by diverting medical supplies to the U.S.The Washington Post reportsthat Berlin expressed outrageover what they said was the diversion to the United States of 200,000 masks that were en route from China, while officials in Brazil and France complained that the United States was outbidding them in the global marketplace for critical medical supplies. They report the U.S. is also stopping the export of masks to Canada and Latin America.

Even worse, Trump took time from his daily press conference on COVID-19 to escalate threats against Venezuela bysending U.S. naval vesselsnear Venezuelas borders.AP reportsThe deployment is one of the largest U.S. military operations in the region since the 1989 invasion of Panama It involves assets like Navy warships, AWACS surveillance aircraft and on-ground special forces seldom seen before in the region.

This followed aphony indictment of President Maduroand other Venezuelan leaders foralleged narcotraffickingthat included a $15 million bounty on Maduro. President Maduro wrote an open letterto the people of the world that decried the indictment as illegal and part of a U.S. coup attempt writing, the U.S. government, instead of focusing on policies of global cooperation in health and prevention, has increased unilateral coercive measures, has rejected requests from the international community to lift or make flexible the illegal sanctions that prevent Venezuela from accessing medicines, medical equipment, and food.The indictment was announced after Venezuela prevented weapons financed by the U.S. from being sent into Venezuela from Colombia for another coup attempt.

Venezuelans in the U.S. who want to fly back to Venezuela to escape the economic and health crises here are not being allowed to charter flights from Florida.The escalation against Venezuela also included the US-controlledIMF blocking a COVID-19 emergency loanto Venezuela.Venezuela has taken aggressive actions to stop the spreadof the virus and has been more effective than the U.S.

The U.S. also shows disregard for its own people, including those in the military, byfiring aU.S. Navy Capt. Brett Crozierafter he sought help for sailors on the U.S.S. Roosevelt aircraft carrier. Crozierwrote his superiors about hundreds of COVID-19 cases and when the letter was leaked, he was fired. As he left the ship,the crew cheered himfor standing up for their health and risking his career. The first government official fired over the virus was one trying to protect people from illness. The U.S. has also directed that reports onCOVID-19 in the military be kept secret.

The actions of the U.S. are leading tothe reshaping of global leadership.Patrick Coburn describesCOVID-19 as aChernobyl momentand concludes nobody is today looking to Washington for a solution to the crisis.

The people of the United States have been sold a false definition of national security. The pandemic shows that mass military spending on bombs, weapons, bases, and troops does not provide security. The coronavirus is expected to kill between 100,000 to 240,000 people in the United States if our response goes well and could be more than one million if it is inadequate. Deaths have already passed 9/11 and Pearl Harbor and could exceed the Vietnam War and World War 1.

We need to redefine national security.David Swanson calls for a real Department of Defensethat would prioritize the twin dangers of nuclear and climate apocalypse, and the accompanying spin-offs like coronavirus. He points out it would be less expensive to providefinancial security and top medical care to everyone on the globe than to fight wars.

Gareth Porter writes,For decades, the military-industrial-congressional complex has force-fed the American public a warped conception of U.S. national security-focused entirely around perpetuating warfare. The cynical conflation of national security with waging war on designated enemies around the globe effectively stifled public awareness of the clear and present danger posed to its survival by the global pandemic. As a result, Congress was simply not called upon to fund the vitally important equipment that doctors and nurses needed for the Covid-19 crisis.

The Pentagon was well aware of the threat of a pandemic and anticipated the lack of ventilators, face masks, and hospital beds, according to a2017 Pentagon plan.Intelligence agencieswarned about the threat from influenza viruses for two decades at least and warned about coronaviruses for at least five years.Luciana Borio, director of medical and biodefense preparednessat the National Security Council in May 2018warned that aflu pandemicwas the countrys number one health security threat and that the U.S. was unprepared.

In January 2017, Anthony S. Fauci, MD, director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, saidthere is no doubtDonald Trump will be confronted with a surprise infectious diseaseoutbreak during his presidency. In 2019, HHSorganizeda month-long simulation involving multiple federal offices that demonstrated the U.S. was seriously unprepared to cope with a pandemic. Despite all of this,the president claimedthe virus surprised the whole world, and nobody knew thered be a pandemic or an epidemic of this proportion.

The White House created a National Security Council office on pandemics, but in 2018 that wasdisbanded by Trump. The Trump administration also ignored apandemic playbookthat would have ensured a more effective response. The Strategic National Stockpile has not been maintained for years, as it competes with the military budget, whichshoveled $15 trillion into wars. The unreplenished stockpile is one reason the U.S. does not have sufficient ventilators and other necessary equipment. The U.S. is also weakened by theshortcomings of the for-profit health systemincludingthe closing of hospitals.

First and foremost, the U.S. must cease its drive to be the dominant power in the world and recognize we are part of a community of nations that must cooperate to take on the many crises that will define the 2020s. This means ending military aggression and regime change efforts by respecting the sovereignty and integrity of other countries, large and small. It means ending our occupation of other nations in the form of hundreds of military bases and outposts and ending our support for other occupiers such as Israel until it stops its colonization of Palestine. Instead of international war games, we could hold international exercises on disaster responses to save lives. And it means respecting and obeying international law and joining the International Criminal Court. The U.S. must stop behaving with impunity.

Second, the U.S. must scale down the military to what is required for protection, an actual defensive approach rather than being offensive. This means cutting the military budget by at least 50% and converting all production of military equipment, supplies, and weapons into public entities to remove the profit motive that drives conflict around the world. These resources can be used for social uplift instead of causing death in a peace economy.

Third, the U.S. must move quickly to eliminate threats to human extinction.TheBulletin of the Atomic Scientistsreset the Doomsday Clock to100 secondsto midnight, putting the world closer to destruction than at any point since the clock was created in 1947. As Alice Slaterwrites, we have avirus of nuclear proliferation asnuclear arms control agreements collapse. The U.S. is spending more than a trillion dollars to upgrade nuclear weaponswhile placing low-yield nuclear weapons on submarines.

Its not only superpowers that are engaged in a nuclear arms race, countries like North Korea, which is threatened by the U.S., and allies likeGermany and Saudi Arabiabelieve they need their own nuclear weapons.The U.S. must commit to the rapid disarmament of all nuclear weapons in cooperation with other nuclear nations and disband the Space Force, which violates the treaty that makes space a global commons.

While COVID-19 isalmost certainly a zoonotic disease,David Swanson points outat least some diseases, such asLyme Diseaseand Anthrax, have been spread by military labs.Germ warfare is a criminal enterpriseand so labs disguised as being for our defense but that create bioweapons need to be closed.

Foreign policy includes trade, which has been designed for corporate profit since NAFTA. The coronavirus collapse shows corporate trade creates weak supply lines. It also hollowed out U.S. manufacturing for cheap labor in Mexico, China, and other nations, creating economic insecurity and leaving us ill-prepared for a crisis. Trade must be remade into fair trade that serves the people and planet, supports industry at home, ends factory farming andcreates a balance with naturethat will help prevent future animal-based viruses.

A new foreign policy must also confront the climate crisis. This is a global challenge and nations of the world must work together to confront it. The U.S. has been playing a counterproductive role by building fossil fuel infrastructure, becoming a leading oil and gas producer, and holding back global climate treaties.Next week, in our series on The Decade of Transformation, we will focus on the environment.

The global economic collapse and COVID-19 pandemic are causing widespread suffering and death but will result in change. What that change looks like, positive or negative, is up to us.We must create the new normal that provides for the necessities of the people and protection of the planet. The world must unite in solidarity to confront not only COVID-19 but other crises too.

We applaud countries that are beginning to stand up to U.S. sanctions and work around the U.S. financial system to help countries like Iran and Venezuela. These are positive steps to end U.S. hegemony. We agree with President Rouhani of Iran, it is our responsibility to remake the government so it reflects the best of us.

An immediate step is to end U.S. sanctions.Join us inthe Sanctions Kill campaignwhere the coalition will be organizing webinars and other events to end illegal unilateral coercive measures. There will be aninternational week of action against imperialism and sanctions from May 25 to 31. We will need to be especially creative to build an effective campaign with tactics that work in this time of physical distancing.

We must alsotake action now to stop the war on Venezuela. Join the webinar with Carlos Ron, vice foreign minister of Venezuela on Monday night at 6:00 pm Eastern.Click here for information. Sign ontothis demandthat the U.S. drop its charges against President Maduro and other Venezuelan officials who have been falsely charged with narco-trafficking. We must be ready to mobilize quickly if the U.S. moves to attack Venezuela, or Iran or any country for that matter while the government believes we are distracted by the pandemic.

We are living in a time of crisis and that can be unnerving. But we have the power to get through this if we mobilize together with a clear vision of the world we wish to create and show our solidarity with each other through our actions. We are one human community and we need each other to get through the rough times ahead.

FALL FUNDRAISER

If you liked this article, please donate $5 to keep NationofChange online through November.

Visit link:

The decade of transformation: Remaking international relations - NationofChange

U.S. Created Coronavirus to Target Islamic Nations! (And Other Conspiracy Theories) | News and Politics – PJ Media

Iraqi researcher Jomaa Al-Atwani has it all figured out. He said recently on Iraqs Al-Nujaba (that's Nujaba, not Notjobba) TV that Trump and other American officials ridicule anyone who says that this virus was produced in the American biological labs, as part of a biological war, but thats exactly what it is, a biological war against the peoples of the region. Al-Atwani is not alone: the world, particularly the Islamic world, is rife with conspiracy theories about where the coronavirus comes from and what it was designed to do and yes, the Great Satan and the Little Satan, that is, the United States and Israel, are usually the culprits.

Al-Atwani explained: The problem is that everyone believes in germ warfare, including America, which talks about this kind of war being the next war, but, at the same time, are not ready to accept [that this is] such a war. You are now waging a war against the whole world. You are waging a war against all the Islamic nations.How is this any different from a biological war? Ultimately, it should not come as a surprise that we claim America is waging a biological war against the peoples of the region.

Of course! How could we have missed this? Ultimately, Al-Atwani continued, the means are many but the goal is one: Killing the people, keeping them in a state of extreme poverty, and instigating war among the countries of the region on a sectarian, racial, and ethnic basis. If America fails to do so with this war, it will surely find other ways to kill and massacre the Arab and Islamic peoples. For us, there is no difference between a direct or proxy military war by America, and the biological war that the people of the region are now suffering.

Irans Supreme Leader, the Ayatollah Khamenei, meanwhile, explained Irans rejection of an American offer of help with the coronavirus pandemic on the basis of his own conspiracy theory. I do not know how real this accusation is but when it exists, who in their right mind would trust you to bring them medication? said Khamenei. Possibly your medicine is a way to spread the virus more. The coronavirus, he added, is specifically built for Iran using the genetic data of Iranians which they have obtained through different means.

In Nigeria, similarly, according to the Nigerian publication Punch, the leader of Izala Muslim sect in Plateau State, Sheikh Sani Jingir, claims coronavirus is Western conspiracy to stop Muslims from performing their religious rites. The Islamic leader in a sermon on an Izala TV monitored in Kaduna on Tuesday insisted that coronavirus was not real.Jingir said any Muslims who believed in Trump and stopped praying at the Holy Mosque in Mecca should seek for Gods forgiveness.

Meanwhile, the Yemeni Islamic scholar Ibrahim Al-Ubeidi is not as concerned as Al-Atwani, Khamenei or Jingir are about the American role in spreading the coronavirus. For him, its all the fault of, you guessed it, the Jews, and heres a novel twist their stooges in Riyadh. It turns out that the House of Saud, according to Al-Ubeidi, is a Jewish family par excellence. It was placed in power in Arabia in order to seize control of Mecca and Medina from the Muslims and put them under Jewish control.

In the same vein, albeit with a different spin, the Egyptian Dr. Makram El Nabrawy said in connection with the coronavirus: Through my readings of the situation and the realization of what I read in the past about conspiracies that are carried out today in full detail, which were mentioned in the book Protocols of the Elders of Zion. Another article in Al Watan stated: The hypothesis that the Corona crisis is related to the Deal of the Century, which was announced by US President Donald Trump in the presence of representatives of the Organization of the Elders of Zion and Zionism in conjunction with the spread of the virus in the Chinese state of Wuhan and the transmission of infection to the rest of the world, and I think that this hypothesis is the strongest and most explanatory of this crisis.

Why, of course. What other explanation could there be? And imagine how much progress could be made if all these conspiracy theorists devoted their intellectual energy to mitigating the novel coronavirus crisis than to finding novel ways to blame the usual suspects.

Robert Spencer is the director of Jihad Watch and a Shillman Fellow at the David Horowitz Freedom Center. He is author of 19 books, including the New York Times bestsellers The Politically Incorrect Guide to Islam (and the Crusades) and The Truth About Muhammad. His latest book isThe Palestinian Delusion: The Catastrophic History of the Middle East Peace Process. Follow him on Twitterhere. Like him on Facebookhere.

Read the rest here:

U.S. Created Coronavirus to Target Islamic Nations! (And Other Conspiracy Theories) | News and Politics - PJ Media

Terrifying Simulation Shows How Viruses Spread When You Cough – Futurism

A new 3D-rendered simulation by Finnish researchers shows how aerosol particles coughed out by a person in an indoor environment can spread terrifyingly far.

The research aims to determine how the coronavirus can spread through the air, and found that aerosol particles carrying the virus can remain in the air longer than was originally thought, so it is important to avoid busy public indoor spaces, according to a statement.

The 3D environment is trying to provide an analogue for the average grocery store with run-of-the-mill ventilation.

In the 3D model, a person coughs in a corridor bounded by shelves under representative indoor ventilation air flow conditions, reads the video. As a result of coughing, an aerosol cloud travels in the air to the corridor. It takes up several minutes for the cloud to spread and disperse.

Someone infected by the coronavirus, can cough and walk away, but then leave behind extremely small aerosol particles carrying the coronavirus, explained Aalto University assistant professor Ville Vuorinen in the statement. These particles could then end up in the respiratory tract of others in the vicinity.

Aerosol particles from a dry cough a common symptom of COVID-19 are so small (less than 15 micrometers) that they float through the air rather than sinking to the floor. Air currents can help them spread. According to the researchers, previous studies have shown that influenza A viruses can be found in even smaller particles less than five micrometers.

The model underlines that avoiding crowded places or nodal points could be an effective way to curb the spread of the virus.

Masks have also proven to be an extremely effective way to curb the spread through aerosol particles and droplets that is, if a recent study published in the prestigious scientific journal Nature is to be believed.

View original post here:

Terrifying Simulation Shows How Viruses Spread When You Cough - Futurism

The Earth is Standing Still During the Pandemic. Literally. – Futurism

Standing Still

Flights are grounded. Fewer trains are running. Rush hour is gone. The world particularly in cities is looking drastically different during the ongoing coronavirus pandemic.

According to seismologists, that drastic reduction in human hustle and bustle is causing the Earth to move substantially less. Both literally and figuratively, the planet is standing still.

Thomas Lecocq, a geologist and seismologist at the Royal Observatory in Belgium, noticed that the countrys capital Brussels is experiencing a 30 to 50 percent reduction in ambient seismic noise since the lockdowns began, as CNN reports.

That means data collected by seismologists is becoming more accurate, capable of detecting even the smallest tremors despite the fact that many of the scientific instruments in use today are near city centers.

Youll get a signal with less noise on top, allowing you to squeeze a little more information out of those events, Andy Frassetto, a seismologist at the Incorporated Research Institutions for Seismology in Washington DC told Nature.

Researchers in Los Angeles and in West London, UK noticed a similar trend.

But seismologists collecting data from remote stations far away from human civilization might not see a change at all, according to Nature.

Regardless, a significant drop in seismic noise also shows that were at least doing one thing right during the current pandemic: staying in the safety of our own homes as we wait for the virus to run its course.

READ MORE: The coronavirus pandemic is making Earth shake less [CNN]

More on the pandemic: New App Attempts to Detect Signs of COVID-19 Using Voice Analysis

Read the original:

The Earth is Standing Still During the Pandemic. Literally. - Futurism

The World’s First Cyborgs: Humanity’s Next Evolutionary Phase Is Here – Futurism

In a small dark experiment room, Bill, a wheel-chair bound tetraplegic, stares intently at a simulated arm on a computer screen. Two tentacle-like cables protrude from his skull and hook into a nearby computer, which sends messages to electrodes implanted in his arm and hand. If the experiment is successful, Bill will move his limbs again.

This early scene from Futurisms newly released documentary I AM HUMAN sets the stage for jaw-dropping revelations to come. With this technology, Bill may someday be able to move other things with his brain signals. You know, telekinesis. Welcome to the future.

Though Bill doesnt resemble the cyborgs were used to seeing in movies, the image is just as compelling, and representative of a much larger real-world phenomenon. In fact, Bill is one of many first wave pioneers ushering in a biotechnological revolutionpresently, more than 200,000 people in the world have digital chip technology implanted in their brains.

Most of these people are Parkinsons patients, who undergo deep brain stimulation (DBS) surgery with the hope of ameliorating tremor and other symptoms. DBS has been a course of treatment for decades now, and opened the door for further trials into brain implants for a host of other ailments, including obesity, addiction, obsessive compulsive disorder, and depression.

In the film, we see firsthand the dramatic impact of this technology on Anne, an artist struggling with Parkinsons. We also meet Stephen, a blind retiree who undergoes a retinal prosthesis surgery (in sci-fi fashion, the implant is known as the Argus II.) As one of several hundred blind patients with bionic vision, the technology currently only offers the ability to see outlines and edges of objects. Progress however, is unbounded and accelerating. Within a few years, greater definition and infrared, heat-mapping vision will be just a software upgrade away.

For Bill, Anne, and Stephen three ordinary people robbed of basic function risking their brains is a brave effort to preserve their humanity but their decisions mark thrilling implications for us all. What happens when anyone can upgrade their bodies? What aspects of our humanity will we change? Who will decide who goes forth into our species next evolutionary phase, and who gets left behind?

You can imagine scientists, investors, and ethicists have quite a debate on their hands. While I AM HUMAN acknowledges concerns about playing God, it challenges fear-driven narratives surrounding human-machine evolution with unflinching optimism, grounded in the real-life stories of people whose lives may directly benefit from such scientific breakthroughs.

Watch I AM HUMAN now on your favorite streaming platform.

Disclaimer: I AM HUMAN was produced by Futurism Studios. Futurism has a financial interest in the film.

The rest is here:

The World's First Cyborgs: Humanity's Next Evolutionary Phase Is Here - Futurism

Here’s What It Would Be Like to Drive on Different Planets – Futurism

April 6th 20__Jon Christian__Filed Under: Advanced Transport

YouTube science channel The Action Lab had a fun idea: use the physics-heavy driving simulator BeamNG.drive to show what it would be like to drive on various heavenly bodies.

Heres the Earth, for a baseline:

And heres the simulation with gravity set to that of the Moon, making it difficult to even get traction:

Then the YouTubers went hard by flipping on Jupiters gravity, which immediately crushed their simulated truck into the ground:

Things go completely off the rails when they set the gravity to that of the Sun, instantly crushing the test vehicle:

They also try a bunch of other parameters, including lifting the truck up and then dropping it with various gravity settings. The whole thing is worth a watch!

More on gravity: We May Finally Understand the Speed of Gravity

<<< Self-Driving Car Company Lays Off All Its Human Safety Drivers__Previously

Read this article:

Here's What It Would Be Like to Drive on Different Planets - Futurism

The Pandemic Stranded Them in the Worst Place: Antarctica – Futurism

Homeward Bound

As the coronavirus pandemic made it difficult and ill-advised to travel, one group found itself trapped in a particularly inhospitable environment: Antarctica.

The members of the British Antarctic Survey (BAS) staff were working at research stations when the pandemic hit. And while plans have been made to bring just about everyone stationed there home, BBC News reports, it was a harrowing endeavor to arrange travel in the midst of a global crisis.

Thecurrent plan is to get BAS workers on a ferry to the Falkland Islands, off the coast of South America, and then fly them home to the U.K. But the BAS is also commissioning a cruise ship, BBC News reports, to accommodate everyone until the ferry arrives and to help keep everyone separated.

The situation has been changing every day, BAS director Jane Francis told BBC News. You think youve got something in place to bring everyone home and then something happens.

Once everyone is home, the next problem is figuring out how to keep Antarctica coronavirus-free when scientists inevitably head back to continue their work.

Were working very hard to do that, Francis told BBC News. Were trying to make sure that anybody that goes to Antarctica is virus-free. So, theyve either not been anywhere where theres been the virus or theyve been in isolation. But that will be our challenge for the forthcoming season, I think.

READ MORE: Coronavirus complicates journeys home from Antarctica [BBC News]

More on COVID-19: Researchers Announce Promising Coronavirus Vaccine Candidate

Read the original here:

The Pandemic Stranded Them in the Worst Place: Antarctica - Futurism

Trump Threatens to Pull Funding for the World Health Organization – Futurism

U.S. President Donald Trump is now trying to place the blame for the coronavirus pandemic on the World Health Organization (WHO).

Trump directed his ire at the WHO during Tuesdays coronavirus task force briefing, during which he threatened to place a very powerful hold on the funds that the U.S. contributes to the international organization, The Guardian reports.

Trump, arguably searching for a scapegoat for his own administrations myriad failures, accused the WHO of bungling the global coronavirus response and withholding crucial information from the world, according to The Guardian. However, the WHO actually sounded the alarm and declared the coronavirus outbreak a global crisis more than a month before Trump declared a state of national emergency.

They called it wrong, they called it wrong, Trump said of the WHO. They missed the call. They could have called it months earlier. They would have known and they should have known and they probably did know. So well be looking into that very carefully and were going to put a hold on money spent to the WHO.

That puts the WHO among the ranks of the Obama administration, his own government agencies, Democrats, the media, and China, all of which Trump has previously blamed for the ongoing global crisis.

A few minutes after he first threatened to withhold his funding, a reporter challenged Trumps decision to defund the WHO during a global pandemic. In response, The Guardian reports that Trump denied that he had done so and immediately backtracked his comments.

Im not saying Im going to do it but were going to look at [it], Trump then said about pulling financial support.

The rest is here:

Trump Threatens to Pull Funding for the World Health Organization - Futurism

‘Tales from the Loop,’ Amazon’s sci-fi anthology, makes sense for our current alternative universe – theday.com

The eight-episode Amazon Studios series Tales from the Loop is a gentle slow-burner ideal for our alternative pandemic universe. Its a moving, determinedly solemn adaptation of Swedish author/artist Simon Stalenhags lavishly illustrated book, published in 2014 after his retro-futurist visions of a 1980s Sweden became an online sensation.

Comparisons have been made to grabbier shows that do all the work for you, such as Stranger Things, but theyll only mislead. The pilot introduces us to Russ Willard, portrayed by Jonathan Pryce. Watching his face in extended close-up, with those devilish eyebrows suggesting a visionary who knows more than hes about to tell us, we hear a little about the Mercer Center for Experimental Physics, Willards underground facility on the outskirts of Mercer, Ohio. (The Swedish setting of the source material peeks through in sly ways; at one point, a movie marquee announces a revival of Ingmar Bergmans Summer with Monika.)

So its Ohio, but in Tales from the Loop (series creator Nathaniel Halpern wrote all eight episodes), Ohio means black holes coexist with giant robots and hovercraft-style tractors, with surprising restraint. At heart, the show delves into childhood grief and resentment, all-too-ordinary fears of death, and unrequited adult love. The loneliness and the spaces between the characters set the tone and rhythm here.

The underground lab, a brutalist hunk of architecture, employs seemingly the entire town. The forlorn security guard Gaddis (Ato Essandoh) bids the occasional hello to passing workers. Halls character, Loretta, is married to George (Paul Schneider), outfitted with a impressive bionic arm. They live in quiet, split-level surroundings with their sons Jakob (Daniel Zolghadri) and, crucial in episode four, Cole, played by a terrific young actor named Duncan Joiner.

That fourth installment, Echo Sphere, scores with a simple, profound notion. Russ takes grandson Cole to explore a big, round, hollow metal structure. If you shout into it, the number of echoes you hear tell you how long you have to live. The rest of the episode charts Russs final chapter, and how it affects everyone in a life preoccupied by work. Jane Alexander adds one grace note after another as Klara, his wife, and you wont see a truer, more subtle performance anywhere right now.

The title Tales from the Loop refers to the beating black heart of a wondrous black orb known as The Eclipse,the innermost secret of the clandestine underground physics project. The three directors of the three previewed episodes treat these secrets in contrasting ways. Mark Romeneks pilot recalls the steady chill and precision of his earlier work, particularly Never Let Me Go. The theme of doubles and mirror images threads all three stories together. In the pilot, which gets a mite pokey, Halls dramatic instincts pull us through.

Andrew Stanton, co-writer and director of the miracle that wasWall-E, makes Echo Sphere a spare beauty with a light touch. The sixth installment in this anthology, Parallel, comes from director Charlie McDowell. The security guard weve met, briefly, takes center stage with the most Twilight Zone-y of the episodes, in which lonely Gaddis slips into an alt-universe version of his closeted gay life. There he meets a replica of himself, complete with long-term relationship with a hunky woodworker of uncertain fidelity.

Theres humor in these Tales, but its sparing and usually sidelined by the serious emotions. At times the storytelling just sort of floats, like the snow that magically falls upward in one segment. Those who need more, and coarser, can stream Hunters, I guess. This is the kind of show where silence matters. In minute 42 of the first episode, theres a startling close-up of Rebecca Halls character responding non-verbally to a harsh comment made by a young, motherless girl played by Abby Ryder Fortson. It lasts three or four seconds. And its a thunderbolt.

Follow this link:

'Tales from the Loop,' Amazon's sci-fi anthology, makes sense for our current alternative universe - theday.com

Coronavirus Conspiracy Theorists Are Setting 5G Towers on Fire – Futurism

5G Virus

At least three 5G wireless communication towers have been set on fire in three British cities, according to the BBC as discredited conspiracy theories spread on social media claiming theres a link between the technology and the coronavirus outbreak.

UK cabinet office minister Michael Gove calledthe conspiracy theories nonsense, dangerous nonsense as well during a government briefing, as quoted by the BBC.

According to videos uploaded to social media, workers putting up 5G infrastructure were even getting harassed by conspiracy nuts on the streets. In Birmingham, a tower not even capable of providing 5G services was still set on fire, The Verge reports.

This is now a matter of national security, Vodafone UK CEO Nick Jeffery wrote in a statement. Police and counter terrorism authorities are investigating.

Misleading information and conspiracy theories have abounded online during the ongoing COVID-19 crisis, many claiming that home remedies and illegal drugs could magically give them immunity.

One theory even claimed that cocaine protects you against the coronavirus a fact that had to be refuted by the French ministry of health on Twitter last month.

READ MORE: British 5G towers are being set on fire because of coronavirus conspiracy theories [The Verge]

More on conspiracy theories: French Government: No, Cocaine Doesnt Cure Coronavirus

Original post:

Coronavirus Conspiracy Theorists Are Setting 5G Towers on Fire - Futurism