Exploring Apollo 13 at the Cradle of Aviation museum in New York – Space.com

GARDEN CITY, N.Y. Incredible moments from Apollo 13 live on in a hidden gem museum in New York.

Space.com recently visited the Cradle of Aviation Museum on Long Island, New York, where exhibits highlight moments in aviation history ranging from the peak of the Pan Am airline to NASA's Apollo program. There, we spoke to curator Joshua Stoff who took us through some of the most incredible pieces saved from Apollo, specifically the Apollo 13 mission.

First, Stoff showed us a lunar module simulator in which Apollo astronauts once trained to fly down to the lunar surface. "It's basically the inside of the ascent stage, and this was at Cape Kennedy, and this is what all the astronauts trained on for every lunar landing," Stoff said. "It's opened up like a clamshell, it would've been closed up with projectors and cameras and screens behind the windows so when they worked the controls it would simulate coming down and landing on the moon."

Video: Space Traveler: Apollo missions at the Cradle of Aviation MuseumRelated: Apollo 13 in Real Time website offers new insight into mission

Now, while the Apollo 13 astronauts did train in this piece of equipment, they never used it to land on the moon and instead crammed inside of the actual lunar module to use it as a "life raft" around the moon.

Inside the simulator, you can even see the lithium hydroxide canisters which filter carbon dioxide out of the air in the lunar module. During the troubled Apollo 13 mission, the crew had to grab extra canisters out of the command module the "mothership" that stays in lunar orbit while the lunar module goes to the surface and alter them with duct tape and plastic bags to make them fit in the lunar module so they could keep breathing the air.

The Apollo 13 crew had to get creative in the lunar module because the three astronauts were using the craft, which was built for only two astronauts, as a "life raft." After the oxygen tank explosion which forever changed the course of the mission, the crew shut the power down on the command module and all squeezed into the lunar module. But, with one extra person breathing the air carbon dioxide levels started to rise. So, since the extra canisters from the command module didn't fit, to create a functioning air filtration system they had to get creative and alter them to fit the lunar module.

The museum also features a number of other pieces of Apollo history. There is a parachute that traveled to the moon and back with Apollo 17 and lunar module 13, which was built for the Apollo 19 mission but never made it to the moon. Apollo 19 was supposed to launch to the moon in 1973, but it never flew after NASA canceled the Apollo program. Lunar module 13 is one of only three original lunar modules still on our planet.

There is even a mockup of an old Northrop Grumman cleanroom in the museum, which holds lunar module test article 1, or LTA1, the first lunar module ever built. "It never had the outer skin put on it or the legs," Stoff said, adding that "this is where they worked out all their techniques for building the spacecraft and ran all pressure tests, electrical tests. So it's basically a real lunar module without the skin on it, which is really cool because people can see the inside."

The cleanroom additionally pays homage to some of the researchers and workers who helped to bring these spacecraft to fruition, some of whom currently volunteer at the museum, teaching the public about the time working at NASA on these historic technologies.

While you can't check out the museum's incredible collection of historic spaceflight items in person right now because of travel restrictions imposed to slow the spread of the novel coronavirus, the museum has a free virtual tour which you can take online here.

So virtually take yourself, your friends and your family to the museum and explore the history of human space exploration.

Follow Chelsea Gohd on Twitter @chelsea_gohd. Follow us on Twitter @Spacedotcom and on Facebook.

Originally posted here:

Exploring Apollo 13 at the Cradle of Aviation museum in New York - Space.com

Sting headlines virtual ‘Space Songs’ concert by the Smithsonian National Air and Space Museum tonight! – Space.com

Sting, space and music will collide online tonight (April 30) when the rock icon headlines a free virtual concert "Space Songs: Through the Distance" for the Smithsonian National Air and Space Museum

Tested's Adam Savage, whom fans will remember from his role on the iconic television series "Mythbusters," will host the free, virtual concert. Beloved musician Sting, who first made major headlines with the 80s hit-machine "the Police," will headline the show. He will share the virtual stage with surf rockers, emo heartthrobs and even smaller, independent acts.

The concert will stream live here on YouTube, starting at 8 p.m. EDT (0000 GMT).

Related: Best Space Music Videos Ever: A Rockin' Chart Countdown

Sting will share the virtual stage with Clipping, Bethany Cosentino from the band Best Coast, Dan Deacon, Ben Gibbard from the band Death Cab for Cutie, Valerie June, Lukas Nelson, Grace Potter, John Roderick and Vagabon.

During the concert, musicians will film themselves performing at home as they socially distance along with most of the world to reduce the spread of the novel coronavirus. "Space Songs" is being produced by the museum in collaboration with Grammy award-winning graphic designer and art director Lawrence Azerrad and BYT (Brightest Young Things) media.

This concert will highlight the talent and creativity of these musicians while shining a spotlight on "the creativity and community that can be found in distance and isolation, in both music and spaceflight," the museum said in a press statement.

"Space exploration is an extraordinary expression of humanity and an illustration of how extreme circumstances can bring out the very best in us all, as individuals and as a community," Ellen Stofan, the director of the museum, said in the same statement. "Although our locations in Washington and Virginia are temporarily closed, we wanted to continue our mission to engage the public with stories of people doing their very best work, wherever they are on Earth or off of it."

So, if you're a space fan looking to get inspired and jam along to some incredible musicians, be sure to tune in tomorrow night for "Space Songs."

Visit Space.com Thursday for a live simulcast of "Space Songs" from the Smithsonian National Air and Space Museum.

Follow Chelsea Gohd on Twitter @chelsea_gohd. Follow us on Twitter @Spacedotcom and on Facebook.

See original here:

Sting headlines virtual 'Space Songs' concert by the Smithsonian National Air and Space Museum tonight! - Space.com

Kids can travel to outer space with Peoply and Rocket Lab – Chicago Daily Herald

As kids all over Chicago are adjusting to social distancing at home, their learning environments have been impacted and the way that they socialise has changed. More and more parents are looking online to support their child's education.

Rocket Lab and Peoply have come together to help kids learn and connect. The two companies have partnered to create the online program, Rocket Lab Explorers, that introduces rocket science and the space industry to kids, age 8-12.

Each week, kids delve into a different topic that fosters curiosity and interest in the natural world through exploration and play.

Students join classes by jumping into a live "classroom" with up to six other students around the country. Each class has a "coach" who facilitates, inspires and supports students. Kids get to explore topics such as building and launching real life rockets, Rocket Lab missions, the future of space, jobs in space and even space entrepreneurship.

"Space is something that captures the imagination of so many kids all over the world, and Rocket Lab Explorers fosters this curiosity and discovery. Kids are exposed to the cutting edge innovation that Rocket Lab is doing in space in a way that they can understand and engage with" Peoply founder 21-year-old Matt Strawbridge, says.

Experiential learning is used throughout classes, and teaches kids how satellites monitor herd migration across the world, how space exploration can help the environment and what space travel might look like in the future. Kids also get to learn fun facts like how to tell the difference between a star, a planet and a satellite when you look up into the sky at night.

Peoply classes are based on the principle, "they may forget what you said, but they will never forget how you made them feel," building confidence and empowering kids is at the core of what Peoply does.

Entrepreneurship and thinking differently are also themes that run throughout, so that kids realise that they can become entrepreneurs, and that anything is possible. "The program is something that I would have loved to participate in growing up," Strawbridge shared.

When kids need space more than ever, Peoply and Rocket Lab are sending their imagination to the stars.

Rocket Lab Explorers is a seven-week program, with the second intake starting the week May 11.

Head to http://www.peoply.co to sign up or learn more.

Read the rest here:

Kids can travel to outer space with Peoply and Rocket Lab - Chicago Daily Herald

Taking Action! – A Group Of Students Aims To Set Space On The Global Agenda – SDG 18 – SpaceWatch.Global

Project team, courtesy: Corvin Illgner

On 4 October 1957, humanity managed the first successful orbital launch of Sputnik 1, the very first satellite. This was the beginning of a new era, the era of space exploration. Since then, humanity has ventured to the moon, sent multiple probes to other bodies of the solar system, found new possible habitable exo-planets within our universe, and is now even planning the colonisation of Mars. Space exploration and its research have given humanity many advantages, not only in terms of technology and economic opportunities, but also to understand more about ourselves and our origin as part of a bigger system. Since the interest in space will only continue to rise, this topic needs to be addressed globally!

The Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) were decided on at the United Nations (UN) Conference on Sustainable Development in Rio de Janeiro in 2012, as a continuation of the Millennium Goals Agenda. They go deeper into our responsibility as humans toward a sustainable planet by setting multiple universal goals for 2030 that meet the urgent political, economic, and environmental challenges facing our world. However, these global goals seem to understand planet Earth as an isolated entity, and they forget our dependence on and responsibility towards the system we are a part of. Since the lack of the protection of outer space can have a huge impact on all of us, it is important that more awareness is given to this, in order to tackle all of the problems we currently face, which will hinder our development in the future.

Therefore, we have decided to take action. Our names are Lise Selles, Chiara Moenter, Luca Ike, and Corvin Illgner (see photo, from left to right) and we are students from Windesheim Honours College in Zwolle, the Netherlands. Our goal is to get the UN to incorporate outer space in their SDG Agenda. This idea was given to us by one of our lecturers, Mara Garcia Alvarez, who already saw the necessity for action quite some time ago. One year ago, she started a campaign for a new SDG goal, SDG 18: Life in Space. We all strongly believed this goal needed even more attention, and after many hours of research, brainstorm sessions and reaching out to experts, our initiative was born.

Many different organisations from all over the world see the importance of space protection and/or are already working on ways to use space to support the already existing SDGs. This is why we find it incredibly important to connect all these different voices that are working on our common goal. In order to do this, and as part of the celebration of the United Nations 75th Anniversary, we will host our own UN75 Dialogue. Different global challenges will be discussed in different UN75 Dialogues around the world to inspire and generate solutions. The ideas and thoughts developed during these discussions in different countries will be presented to UN Member States and senior officials during the 75th UN General Assembly in New York coming September.

We want to connect people from different fields to work together to get space on a global agenda! Our globe does not stand alone in the universe. So, join us on the 11th of May and ask any questions you may have. Please register here!

For more information you can also visit our website: sdgspace.org.

See the article here:

Taking Action! - A Group Of Students Aims To Set Space On The Global Agenda - SDG 18 - SpaceWatch.Global

Trump EO: The Moon and Other Celestial Bodies Should Be Open to Private Resource Development – Cato Institute

Legal Clarification Needed

Needed now is aspecific legal code to cover commercial activities in space. What is the legal status of areas used for mining, experiments, or other activities? How to sort out disputes over territories claimed? To what resources can companies gain title? What contract law applies to transactions involving space? And to agreements concluded in space? How about criminal law covering participants in agradually expanding space presence?

A new international framework also is needed. Existing agreements do not suffice.

The Moon Treaty restricted use of the Moon (and other celestial bodies) exclusively for peaceful purposes. The prohibition on military activities is broad, though obviously unenforceable: Any threat or use of force or any other hostile act or threat of hostile act on the Moon is prohibited. It is likewise prohibited to use the Moon in order to commit any such act or to engage in any such threat in relation to the Earth, the Moon, spacecraft, the personnel of spacecraft or manmade space objects.

This pact included along list of unobjectionable, even obvious, admonitions: consider the interests of future generations, be guided by the principle of cooperation and mutual assistance, alert other countries to conflicting uses, consider making Moon materials collected available to other states, dont disrupt the environment, and adopt all practicable measures to safeguard the life and health of persons on the Moon.

Commercialization in Space

What about commercialization? The agreement offered little guidance but appeared hostile. It was adopted when the redistributionist New Economic Order was being pushed by the longgone Group of 77 at the UN, which represented largely socialist dictatorships which sought to guilt the West into transferring vast resources to their treasuries. Indeed, the Moon Treaty embodied many of the same principles behind the Law of the Sea Treatys section governing seabed mining. The latter emerged when the prospect of trillions of dollars worth of minerals littering the ocean floor bedazzled big spending, highly indebted Third World governments. Naturally, they demanded their share of the action.

Years of negotiation yielded an almost comical Rube Goldberg system, in which the least capable states would rule. The Authority would control seabed mining. The Enterprise would mine the common heritage of mankind on behalf of the worlds most corrupt, least developed, and largely undemocratic regimes. Rules were established to limit mining, transfer technology, and redistribute wealth. The Soviet Union was granted three seats, the U.S. only one. There was no veto for America. High on the agenda of the two UN conferences developing the treaty which Iattended was constant maneuvering by conference leaders hoping to grab postratification jobs at The Authoritylater headquartered in Jamaica but without much to do since seabed mining never took off.

The Moon Treaty similarly declared that the Moon and other celestial bodies would be the common heritage of mankind. There would be no security of property or tenure: Neither the surface nor the subsurface of the Moon, nor any part thereof or natural resources in place, shall become property of any State, international intergovernmental or nongovernmental organization, national organization or nongovernmental entity or of any natural person.

Those who ratified the document pledged to undertake to establish an international regime to govern the exploitation of the natural resources of the Moon. Such an entity, imagine aheavenly version of The Authority, would be directed to ensure orderly development and rational management of resources and of course an equitable sharing by all, by which the interests and needs of the developing countries would be given special consideration. Meaning interlunar, and perhaps even interstellar or intergalactic income redistribution.

Obviously, an outer space LOST would be avery bad idea. Although the Moon Treaty hangs over space development, it can be easily ignored, having received but 18 ratifications, none by states capable of exploring space. America, China, and Russia neither signed nor ratified the agreement. India signed but did not ratify. The only European nations to ratify are Austria, Belgium, and the Netherlands. None of them appears ready to go to the Moon, let alone beyond.

The Outer Space Treaty

The Outer Space Treaty, in contrast, has been ratified by 109 countries, including all of the major potential players in space. However, the pact primarily covers two issues. First, it is adisarmament agreement, banning deployment of nuclear weapons in space and reserving the Moon and other celestial bodies for peaceful uses. There are to be no military bases, weapons testing, or military maneuvers.

Second, the treaty encourages safe, responsible action as states explore the heavens. It blesses exploration, scientific investigation, and international cooperation, and forbids countries from claiming sovereignty over celestial bodies. States the treaty: outer space, including the Moon and other celestial bodies, is not subject to national appropriation by claim of sovereignty, by means of use or occupation, or by any other means.

Nevertheless, sovereignty is retained over objects launched into space. Moreover, the treaty declares that:

Read the original:

Trump EO: The Moon and Other Celestial Bodies Should Be Open to Private Resource Development - Cato Institute

Why its good to be bored – The Guardian

I remember my first experience of boredom as vividly as my first kiss. The recollection is so clear I thought I must have been at least seven years old. Actually, my mother tells me, I was only three or four, which makes being bored my earliest memory. My sister and I were sitting in our family car, parked outside Mums friends house, into which she had disappeared. Wont be long, shed said. That had been 15 minutes earlier. I could do nothing but wait, but I wanted, strongly, to do anything else. I felt the bind on a physical level, the confines of the car consistent with the constraints on me. This was boredom, and I was appalled by it.

Neither the car radio nor my baby sister offered any relief. Then my gaze landed on a small hole in the velour lining of the car roof. One of the defining characteristics of boredom is that time seems to drag minutes pass as hours. The inverse is also true: when we are highly engaged in what we are doing, we lose track. So I cannot tell you how long I had been happily at work on that hole when mum finally returned to the car to find the back seat, and both of her children, coated with foam.

I was in trouble, of course but I was not convinced that Id done anything wrong. Instead it was as though, in putting an end to that desperate boredom, I had narrowly escaped falling off some kind of precipice and I knew I would do whatever it took to avoid going over the edge in future.

I did not understand then two decades before my first conference call or doctors waiting room that boredom was a fact of life no more avoidable than any other mental state, good or bad. At times, it may even be a dominant experience. Studies show boredom levels rise through childhood, peak in early adulthood, and then decline, hitting the floor in ones 50s. But though boredom may be less prominent in middle life, it is still present evidence suggests it comes creeping back in your 60s, especially among women.

It is a familiar feeling and very common. Indeed, the coronavirus pandemic has been described as a boom time for boredom. Most of us are poorly equipped to cope with being shut in our homes indefinitely, even with the internet to distract us.

But we should not fear being bored, say psychologists James Danckert and John D Eastwood, the authors of Out of My Skull: The Psychology of Boredom. Their research has revealed boredom to be widely misunderstood, perhaps even unfairly maligned. Boredom evolved to help us, says Danckert. It signals that we are unengaged, in need of an activity to satisfy us. I think thats a good thing, in a lot of ways. How we respond to it is up to us. I think you can minimise it. But do you want to totally eliminate it? I dont think you do.

Danckert and Eastwood contend that boredom can steer us towards realising our potential and living full, meaningful lives. They say it communicates an important message that in trying to outrun it my entire life I had been refusing to heed.

What if I stopped and listened?

Danckert is an Australian cognitive neuroscientist now based at the University of Waterloo in Ontario. He began studying boredom 15 years ago, a case of physician, heal thyself, he says. As a kid, and still into my adult years, I experience boredom, and whenever I do, I hate it. I find it a very frustrating, agitating experience.

This isnt a new phenomenon. To quote from Boredom: A Lively History, by the classicist Peter Toohey, the Roman Stoic philosopher Seneca wrote in disgust: How long the same things? Surely I will yawn, I will sleep, I will eat, I will be thirsty, I will be cold, I will be hot. Is there no end? In the Middle Ages monks complained of the noonday demon: the personification of acedia torpor, alongside agitation provoked by the constraints and repetition of their daily lives. And though one could already be a bore, it was Dickens who was the first to term it boredom in Bleak House in 1852. Lady Dedlock complains of being bored to death of herself, more than a century before Bruce Springsteen would express the same restless dissatisfaction in Dancing in the Dark. His characterisation of boredom as a frustrated hunger (Im just about starving tonight) evokes Tolstoys definition in Anna Karenina of the feeling as the desire for desires.

Boredom is such a fascinating topic, with tentacles that spread into philosophy, anthropology, literature, religion, theology, says Eastwood, who is head of the Boredom Lab at York University in Toronto. There researchers study boredom from social, clinical and cognitive perspectives from shoring up the link with creativity and improving outcomes in education, to better understanding the subjective experience of mental exertion and attention with a view to applying their findings in the real world. But as a scientist, I wasnt convinced that everybody was using the term in the same way.

Eastwood became interested in boredom 20 years ago, after observing a seeming crisis of agency among young men he saw in his private psychotherapy practice. They were disengaged, under-achieving, perhaps abusing marijuana or struggling with depression, he says. Eastwood characterises their circumstance as a failure to launch into life, which these men told him they experienced as being chronically bored. But what was being bored, exactly? I thought: what is this?

In Out of My Skull, he and Danckert define boredom as the uncomfortable feeling of wanting to do something, but not wanting to do anything. It is not an emotion, as such, but an ongoing cognitive process where we wish to engage our minds, but nothing seems to satisfy. It is neither daydreaming, which we might find highly absorbing, nor, necessarily, vegging out on the sofa.

It is this particular combination of lethargy and restlessness that distinguishes boredom from frustration (where a specific desire has been thwarted) and apathy (where there is no desire at all). And though boredom seems to be a risk factor for depression, it is not the same. To be bored is often thought of as a character flaw, reflecting laziness or lack of curiosity. Only boring people get bored, goes the aphorism. Im highly motivated to prove its not true, jokes Danckert.

It is when we fail to act on the signal, or succumb to distractions, that the feeling of boredom becomes protracted and causes us misery. As the Booker prize winner Anne Enright wrote recently: Boredom is a productive state, so long as you dont let it go sour on you. It is striking that the predisposition to it is negatively perceived in a way that other personality traits arent. Complaints of Im bored are often seen as uniquely provoking, Eastwood notes. There is this impulse in us to say, Theres something wrong with you, you should not be bored. But to simply judge them, I think, misses the point. They know theres things to do but they cant bring their desires in the moment in line with whats there.

Some people are better equipped to cope than others. In Out of My Skull, the psychologists compare two astronauts who responded very differently to the constraints and monotony of space exploration. Russias Valentin Lebedev, who spent 211 days in space in the early 1980s, failed to be satisfied by the busy work dictated by ground control and, after five months, did not even want to look out of a porthole. As commander of the International Space Station in 2013, Canadian Chris Hadfield found purpose even in plumbing repairs. The psychologists suggest it was Hadfields intrinsic motivation to find meaning in what he was doing, and to occupy and challenge himself within the confines of his environment, that set the two astronauts apart. Hadfield claims to never be bored but, Danckert says, its more that he just deals with it really very well.

In the years after I tore apart Mums car, I got better at not being bored, even in testing conditions. My parents are enthusiastic sailors and most of my school holidays were spent in the close confines of their yacht, without television or internet, during sometimes long passages at sea.

On those trips I read every book on board, regardless of interest (a dictionary; a medical encyclopaedia) or age appropriateness (pulpy Dick Francis thrillers, replete with rumpy-pumpy); and when I ran out of other peoples stories, I wrote my own. I spent long periods listening to the same music. At a push, I could be alone with my thoughts, observing them with slight indifference, as though they were a TV show that had not yet hooked me.

I considered this evidence of my extreme aversion to boredom. In fact, according to Danckert and Eastwood, I may just have developed a good response to it. Though it has not been substantiated by research, they suggest that boredom has been the push for much creativity, innovation and growth while simultaneously a source of distress for many.

The mistake many people make is seeking to escape the uncomfortable feeling, instead of interrogating what it is trying to tell them, says Eastwood. They may distract themselves with social media, or worse: boredom has also been shown to be a factor in unhealthy eating, as well as use of cigarettes, alcohol and drugs.

In relying on external solutions, we undermine our sense of ourselves as the authors of our own lives, and the problem may become chronic. In young people, boredom is associated with higher than average risk-taking; in the elderly, it can speed up the degenerative process of ageing. Both groups are at particular risk of depression, for which boredom is a precursor.

Boredom-prone people also experience higher levels of anger, aggression and hostility and may be driven to look for meaning in extreme political views, or tribalism. To Danckert, that means boredom may be one part of our ever more polarised politics and public discourse. When youre in the midst of an overload of information, one response is to shout louder, he says. Sociologist Orrin Klapp, writing in 1986, called it ego-screaming and that perfectly captures Twitter trolling, says Danckert.

The fact that our response to boredom is often destructive, adversarial or otherwise problematic speaks to just how deeply uncomfortable we find the sensation. A 2014 study found that many people chose to administer painful electric shocks to themselves rather than being left alone with their thoughts. One man shocked himself 190 times in 15 minutes.

All too often when were bored, we see ourselves as passive, empty vessels to fill we look for stimuli that will get rid of the bad feeling in the short term, says Eastwood. But it doesnt foster and grow our capacity for agency and thats exactly what we need to be free from boredom and its negative consequences.

Danckert and Eastwood are reluctant to blame the present problem on our preoccupation with technology alone. But it is true that tech presents us with a powerful distraction. If the goal is to simply avoid being bored, it may be easier now than ever, what with the infinite scroll of social media, endless hours of entertainment on Netflix and Spotify, and all our friends always available.

But this over-abundance of things to do itself can exacerbate boredom. Eastwood evokes the paradox of choice, saying options are not necessarily freeing and do not necessarily make us happy. Seeking relief on the internet can feel like trying to drink from a fire hose Danckert and Eastwood write. Not only that, in hijacking our attention, technology may, over time, compound the issue it seems to alleviate. It takes time and attention to scroll through Instagram or play Candy Crush, but at the end of it, youre not satisfied, because you didnt do the harder work of figuring out: What do I really want to do? Its a vicious cycle: you got some engagement, but it wasnt the thing you needed, says Danckert. That is the challenge that boredom lays down, he says: to figure out what is going to be meaningful and useful to you in your life.

Becoming better attuned to our own inner states can allay the discomfort and illuminate a satisfying course of action. Mindfulness, which fosters a non-judgmental response to ones thoughts (as I now know I practised on my parents boat), has been linked to lower levels of boredom. Danckert lets his mind wander on his three-mile walk to work , thinking of the dumbest things but it is engaging to just follow those threads and see where they lead you.

Eastwoods own ritual is making time to sit and think, with a cup of tea a period of constructive internal reflection, during which he connects with his internal compass. Uncomfortable feelings steer us for the better, he says. Just as its good that we have the capacity for pain, to keep us safe, its good that we have the capacity for boredom, because it saves us from the ruin of stagnation. It keeps us moving forward and searching for a better way of applying ourselves, for engaging in the world.

Received in that spirit, boredom can be a call to action but many of us choose not to hear it. Wincing, I admit to Danckert that I have opened Twitter, scrolled for a while, become bored with scrolling, closed Twitter, then immediately opened Twitter again, almost instinctively. I do this embarrassingly often, I tell him its just easier to push through boredom on the internet, rather than taking it as a cue to log off.

Danckert reiterates, not without sympathy, I think, that at moments like that it is better to just do something. It does not necessarily have to align with some higher purpose in life simply putting down my phone will break the cycle of unsatisfying engagement, and reinforce my own sense of my autonomy.

Within weeks of our interview, a global pandemic takes hold, and I count myself lucky to just be bored. Confined to my home, I spend more time alone with my thoughts, wondering about what I might want to do once all this is over. I spend less time on my phone. I read my flatmates books that have rested on our communal shelf for years without ever piquing my curiosity. I bake, for the first time since childhood. Constraints that might have been boring are in fact oddly motivational.

As Danckert and Eastwood write in Out of My Skull, when we are constantly carried along by a fast-moving stream, we can forget how to swim for ourselves. It is this that boredom seeks to remind us of, they suggest that we are the authors of our lives, even now theyve been derailed.

1. Dont fight the feeling. Boredom is uncomfortable, but you make it worse by layering suffering on top. Think of when you twist your ankle you feel pain without berating yourself for being clumsy, or fretting about a chronic injury. Feeling bored is unavoidable, but it is not a judgment on your character or ability.

2. Create a new routine. Boredom flourishes within constraints. In the absence of ordinary routines and busyness, it may feel like you are stagnating. Try to find another gear one that may not be as high-energy, or productive, but is full at the same time.

3. Find purpose. Boredom is not an absence of things to do, it is the struggle to find value in any of the options available to you. Being able to connect with a reason why for doing something (including quarantine) can make it less boring. Instead of agitating for anything to do, try to determine whats really important whether right now, or for the future.

4. Avoid passive consumption. It is all too easy to binge Netflix or scroll social media. If youre enjoying yourself, theres no problem, but treating yourself as a passive consumer may mean you are more likely to feel bored. You need to feel engaged.

Out of My Skull (Harvard University Press, 22.95) is out in June. Preorder a copy for 19.74 from guardianbookshop.com

See the original post here:

Why its good to be bored - The Guardian

In times of health crisis, women lead | Columnists – Denton Record Chronicle

In the current pandemic, too few women are visible as leaders despite the huge roles they play on the front lines of this extraordinary crisis.

Consider health care. Nationwide, women still make up the vast majority of the nursing workforce. Nurses play a vital role in the management of this outbreak, not only making critical real-time decisions in chaotic and uncertain circumstances but filling a key health communication and education role for patients and the public. They also take on personal health risks for the sake of providing lifesaving care and protecting public health.

Even outside the front lines of ERs and ICUs, professions staffed primarily by women bear the brunt of adapting to the challenges associated with this disease and are reacting remarkably quickly to come up with new modes of work and community-building. Teachers are working fast to provide resources for their students through online tools. Senior care workers are developing extra precautions to protect the vulnerable population they serve. And lets not forget the moms working hard to make sure their children are healthy, educated and occupied, often while also working their own jobs.

I dont see women in these roles in the public dialogue around COVID-19 represented enough.

Why does it matter that women take on leadership roles? To answer, let me tell you a story about Texas Womans University, where I serve as chancellor. A little over a year ago, a team of five students entered for the first time ever into the Texas Space Consortiums Design Challenge, organized by NASA. Our diverse team of women and men working together won in three of the four categories, including the top prize. But how did a university that has no engineering program take home the top prize in a competition built around NASA research objectives?

The answer: Our students had a different way of thinking about the NASA design challenge. Space exploration is not only the vehicles and chemical reactions that propel humans into space its also about sustaining human lives. Our students used their expertise in kinesiology, in textiles and in collaborative skills built across disciplines to solve a hard problem that no one else wanted to tackle, creating a product that addresses the physiological stresses experienced by astronauts.

Women are skilled at this kind of creative, cross-disciplinary thinking, and their experiences often build perspectives that can make them uniquely valuable in addressing complex challenges. During the most pressing health crisis in a century, its time for women to roll up their sleeves and claim a place at the table. Lets hear from the women who are serving as health care, education and community leaders and learn from wisdom built on the front lines.

Long term, we must ensure that we train women to be leaders to step forward and claim space in critical dialogues like the current response to COVID-19. At Texas Womans University, we pride ourselves on providing students with the resources and mentorship they need to envision and enact novel, important forms of leadership. TWUs Jane Nelson Institute for Womens Leadership supports our students leadership development. This institutes mission is to cultivate in women the skills to lead in important dialogues across all sectors public, private, nonprofit, community.

As a university that trains a significant number of our students for futures in health care, we have asked ourselves how we are best able to make a contribution toward the current challenges we face. In response to this crisis, we are committed to advancing a new focus on womens leadership in health care, ensuring that we inculcate in the next generation of health care leaders in nursing and allied health fields the skills to be public resources and leaders for future challenges.

CARINE M. FEYTEN is chancellor and president of Texas Womans University.

Read more:

In times of health crisis, women lead | Columnists - Denton Record Chronicle

This Stream Is Tonight: The Smithsonian’s ‘Space Songs: Through the Distance’ – Vanyaland

Editors Note: We have tweaked ourThis Show Is Tonightseries to reflect the recent phenomenon of live music livestreaming in the age of social distancing.

***

Todays a pretty decent day for livestreams and digital events, from Diet Cigs listening party to Tim Burgess tweet fest over New Orders Lowlife, but one specific stream is certified galactic: The Smithsonian National Air and Space Museums Space Songs: Through the Distance.

The YouTube concert goes down tonight (April 30) at 8 p.m. ET, featuring musicians sharing songs about space and isolation to celebrate how extreme situations can bring out the very best in us all and why theres no challenge we cant face together, according to the event description.

The event is hosted by Testeds Adam Savage, with performances by Ben Gibbard of Death Cab for Cutie, Best Coasts Bethany Cosentino, clipping, Dan Deacon, Grace Potter, and more. Oh, and Sting!

We know that people love space, writes the Smithsonian. And its not just because of moon rocks and pretty pictures of the cosmos. Space exploration is an extraordinary expression of humanity and can inspire us like nothing else. Naturally, there are a lot of great songs about spaceships and astronauts about ordinary people in extraordinary circumstances And many artists use solitude to fuel creativity and experimentation. We could all use a little bit of that inspiration right now. So while our museum remains closed to the public, we want to share some songs that inspire us with viewers at home.

Sounds like a blast.

Continue reading here:

This Stream Is Tonight: The Smithsonian's 'Space Songs: Through the Distance' - Vanyaland

Latest Bitcoin Cash price and analysis (BCH to USD) – Coin Rivet

Bitcoin Cash has failed to break above the daily 200 moving average in spite of a wider rally across the cryptocurrency market.

While Bitcoin and Ethereum both enjoyed staggering surges to the upside, Bitcoin Cash struggled to make progress after suffering a brutal rejection 200MA.

Even though it momentarily rallied to $276 Bitcoin Cash soon lost momentum before falling back down to the $255 level of support.

The failure to form a crucial lower high signals a distinct lack of optimism from investors and traders, with the potential of a correction now becoming increasingly likely.

Downside price targets continue to emerge at both $238 and $200, although a re-test of the low at $142 may also come into fruition if Bitcoin Cash continues to struggle on lower time frames.

When compared against its BTC trading pair BCH is 40.68% down since February 14 which demonstrates how far it has fallen in such a small space of time.

In order for Bitcoin Cash to invalidate its bearish forecast it needs to begin closing daily candles above the daily 200MA, which is currently in confluence with the $269 level of resistance.

Following on from that it would need to trade back above $282 as this was the point the sell-off began in early March.

For more news, guides and cryptocurrency analysis, click here.

Current live BCH pricing information and interactive charts are available on our site 24 hours a day. The ticker bar at the bottom of every page on our site has the latest BCH price. Pricing is also available in a range of different currency equivalents:

US Dollar BCHtoUSD

British Pound Sterling BCHtoGBP

Japanese Yen BCHtoJPY

Euro BCHtoEUR

Australian Dollar BCHtoAUD

Russian Rouble BCHtoRUB

Bitcoin BCHtoBTC

Bitcoin Cash was born out of the idea of making Bitcoin more practical for small, day-to-day payments. In May 2017, Bitcoin payments took about four days unless a fee was paid, which was proportionately too large for small transactions. A change to the code was implemented and Bitcoin Cash was born on 1st August 2017.

If you want to find out more information about Bitcoin Cash orcryptocurrenciesin general, then use the search box at the top of this page. Heres an article to get you started:

https://coinrivet.com/roger-ver-to-launch-crypto-exchange-on-bitcoin-com/

As with any investment, it pays to do some homework before you part with your money. The prices of cryptocurrencies are volatile and go up and down quickly. This page is not recommending a particular currency or whether you should invest or not.

You may be interested in our range ofcryptocurrency guidesalong with the latest cryptocurrencynews.

Continued here:

Latest Bitcoin Cash price and analysis (BCH to USD) - Coin Rivet

Bitcoin Cash News Today – Bitcoin Cash BCH Moves Above the $250 Level Before Downside Correction Kicks In – May 2nd, 2020 – Smartereum

Bitcoin Cash BCH News Today Bitcoin Cash BCH joined Bitcoin and the rest of the cryptocurrency market in the bull run during the week. The token moved to the $280 level before or faced resistance. Thankfully, the bears resumed control of the market as the bulls were unable to sustain their grip against the USD. The price of Bitcoin Cash BCH fell as low as $250 before the uptrend resumed again driving the price as high as $256 against the USD. Strong support was set at the 250 level.

With strong support firmly at the $250 Level, it is possible that the bulls havent lost their momentum. Moving higher against the USD will see the price of Bitcoin Cash retest the $280 level which it tested last week. If the bulls can move above this $280 level which now serves as strong resistance, higher highs to the $350 level will be possible. The next key resistance levels after this would be $440, $480 and $520. Otherwise, if the support at $250 is lost, there is a high possibility that the token will fall as low as $200 eventually. Apart from this crucial support, there are other key support levels at $160 and $120.

Bitcoin Cash (BCH) Price Today BCH / USD

The price of Bitcoin Cash BCH is currently below the 80% daily stochastic indicator. This proves that even though the bears are exhausting their momentum, there is still a fight between the bears and the bulls. The bulls are strong around the $250 level and would most likely support higher highs near-term. At the time of writing, the price of Bitcoin Cash BCH was $256.66. It is down by 0.89% against the USD and down by 0.79% against the price of Bitcoin BTC. The trading volume over a 24 hour period is $3,156,941,123 and the market capitalization is $4,721,447,103.

It is important to note that the price of the BCH token is correcting lower along with the price of Bitcoin BTC and many other top cryptocurrencies on CoinMarketCap. Bitcoin BTC was unable to test the $9000 level despite the bullish pressure during the week. It is still holding strong at $8,883.22 and would hold this level as long as the bears dont put too much pressure on the market.

Max writes about blockchain projects and regulation with a special focus on United States and China. He joined Smarterum after years of writing for various media outlets.

Read more here:

Bitcoin Cash News Today - Bitcoin Cash BCH Moves Above the $250 Level Before Downside Correction Kicks In - May 2nd, 2020 - Smartereum

The Crypto Daily Movers and Shakers -03/05/20 – Yahoo Finance

Bitcoin rose by 1.81% on Saturday. Following on from a 2.23% gain on Friday, Bitcoin ended the day at $8,982.3

A mixed start to the day saw Bitcoin fall to an early morning intraday low $8,756.2 before making a move.

Steering clear of the first major support level at $8,609.53, Bitcoin rallied to a late afternoon intraday high $9,004.0.

Falling short of the first major resistance level at $9,053.03, Bitcoin briefly slid to sub-$8,900 levels and into the red.

Finding late support, however, Bitcoin broke back through to $8,900 levels to wrap up the day in the green.

The near-term bearish trend, formed at late June 2019s swing hi $13,764.0, remained firmly intact, reaffirmed by the March swing lo $4,000.

For the bulls, Bitcoin would need to break out from $10,000 levels to form a near-term bullish trend.

Across the rest of the majors, it was a bullish day for the pack on Saturday.

Litecoin, Stellars Lumen, and Tron TRX led the way, with gains of 4.56%, 3.92%, and 3.05% respectively.

Bitcoin Cash ABC (+2.27%), EOS (+2.52%), Ethereum (+1.02%), Moneros XMR (+1.93%), Ripples XRP (+2.80%), and Tezos (+1.16%) also found strong support.

Binance Coin and Bitcoin Cash SV trailed the back with more modest gains of 0.46% and 0.84% respectively.

Following a 7.17% breakout on Friday, Cardanos ADA slipped by 0.08%, however, to buck the trend on the day.

Through the current week, the crypto total market cap rose from a Monday low $220.56bn to a Thursday high $263.29bn. At the time of writing, the total market cap stood at $255.17bn.

Bitcoins dominance recovered to 64% levels following Wednesdays breakout before breaking through to 65% levels. At the time of writing, Bitcoins dominance stood at 65.6%.

24-hour trading volumes rose from sub-$130bn levels to a Thursday high $253.89bn before sliding back. At the time of writing, 24-hr volumes stood at $145.81bn.

At the time of writing, Bitcoin was up by 1.87% to $9,150.0. A bullish start to the day saw Bitcoin rally from an early morning low $8,944.6 to a high $9,198.0.

Steering clear of the major resistance levels, Bitcoin broke through the first major resistance level at $9,072.13 and second major resistance level at $9,161.97.

Elsewhere, it was a bullish start to the day for the majors.

Bitcoin Cash ABC (+1.19%), Bitcoin Cash SV (+1.45%), Cardanos ADA (+1.02%), EOS (+1.50%), Ethereum (+1.53%), and Tezos (+1.08%) led the way early on.

Bitcoin would need to break back through the second major resistance level at $9,161.07 to bring $9,400 levels back into play.

Support from the broader market would be needed, however, for Bitcoin to break out from the morning high $9,198.0.

Barring an extended crypto rally, the second major resistance level and resistance at $9,200 would likely pin Bitcoin back on the day.

In the event of another breakout, the third major resistance level at $9,409.77 would come into play.

Failure to break back through the second major resistance level could see Bitcoin struggle later in the day.

A fall back through to sub-$8,920 levels would bring the first major support level at $8,824.33 into play.

Barring a crypto meltdown, however, Bitcoin should clear of sub-$9,000 levels on the day.

This article was originally posted on FX Empire

Follow this link:

The Crypto Daily Movers and Shakers -03/05/20 - Yahoo Finance

The Crypto Daily Movers and Shakers -02/05/20 – Yahoo Finance

Bitcoin rose by 2.23% on Friday. Reversing a 1.71% fall from Thursday, Bitcoin ended the day at $8,822.8.

A bullish start to the day saw Bitcoin rally from an early morning intraday low $8,626.5 to a late morning intraday high $9,070.0.

Falling short of the first major resistance level at $9,243.80, Bitcoin fell back to sub-$8,700 levels.

Steering clear of the major support levels, Bitcoin recovered to $8,800 levels to wrap up the day in the green.

The near-term bearish trend, formed at late June 2019s swing hi $13,764.0, remained firmly intact, reaffirmed by the March swing lo $4,000.

For the bulls, Bitcoin would need to break out from $10,000 levels to form a near-term bullish trend.

Across the rest of the majors, it was a bullish day for the pack on Friday.

Cardanos ADA and Stellars Lumen rallied by 7.17% and by 6.37% to lead the way.

Binance Coin (+3.07%), Ethereum (+2.85%), and Trons TRX (+4.22%) also found strong support.

Bitcoin Cash ABC (+1.62%), Bitcoin Cash SV (+1.70%), EOS (+1.53%), Litecoin (+1.55%) Moneros XMR (+1.62%), Ripples XRP (+2.94%), and Tezos (+1.58%) saw more modest gains on the day.

Through the current week, the crypto total market cap rose from a Monday low $220.56bn to a Thursday high $263.29bn. At the time of writing, the total market cap stood at $249.47bn.

While Bitcoins dominance recovered to 64% levels following Wednesdays breakout before breaking through to 65% levels. At the time of writing, Bitcoins dominance stood at 65.4%.

24-hour trading volumes rose from sub-$130bn levels to a Thursday high $253.89bn before easing back. At the time of writing, 24-hr volumes stood at $152.80bn.

At the time of writing, Bitcoin was up by 0.19% to $8,840.0. A mixed start to the day saw Bitcoin fall to an early morning low $8,764.5 before striking a high $8,843.7.

Bitcoin left the major support and resistance levels untested early on.

Elsewhere, it was a mixed start to the day for the majors.

Bitcoin Cash ABC (-0.26%), Bitcoin Cash SV (-0.06%), Cardanos ADA (-0.22%) and Trons TRX (-0.49%) saw red early on.

Tezos and Moneros XMR led the way, however, with gains of 1.00% and 0.99% respectively.

Bitcoin would need to move through to $8,850 levels to support a run at the first major resistance level at $9,053.03.

Support from the broader market would be needed, however, for Bitcoin to break back through to $9,000 levels.

Barring an extended crypto rally, the first major resistance level and Fridays high $9,070.0 would likely limit any upside on the day.

In the event of another breakout, the second major resistance level at $9,283.27 would come into play.

Failure to move through to $8,850 levels could see Bitcoin struggle later in the day.

A fall back through to sub-$8,800 levels would bring the first major support level at $8,609.53 into play.

Barring a crypto meltdown, however, Bitcoin should steer of the second major support level at $8,396.27.

This article was originally posted on FX Empire

Continued here:

The Crypto Daily Movers and Shakers -02/05/20 - Yahoo Finance

Bitcoin Cash (BCH) Up $1.52 On 4 Hour Chart, Started Today Up 1.89%; Price Base in Formation Over Past 30 Days – CFDTrading

Bitcoin Cash 4 Hour Price Update

Updated May 02, 2020 11:17 AM GMT (07:17 AM EST)

254.63 (USD) was the opening price of the four-hour candle for Bitcoin Cash, resulting in the previous 4 hours being one in which price moved up 0.6% ($1.52) from the previous 4 hours. Relative to other instruments in the Top Cryptos asset class, Bitcoin Cash ranked 3rd since the previous 4 hours in terms of percentage price change.

254.87 (USD) was the opening price of the day for Bitcoin Cash, resulting in the day prior being one in which price moved up 1.89% ($4.72) from the day prior. The change in price came along side change in volume that was down 69.27% from previous day, but up 18.78% from the Friday of last week. Out of the 5 instruments in the Top Cryptos asset class, Bitcoin Cash ended up ranking 4th for the day in terms of price change relative to the day prior. The daily price chart of Bitcoin Cash below illustrates.

Trend traders will want to observe that the strongest trend appears on the 14 day horizon; over that time period, price has been moving up. Also of note is that on a 30 day basis price appears to be forming a base which could the stage for it being a support/resistance level going forward. For another vantage point, consider that Bitcoin Cashs price has gone up 17 of the previous 30 trading days.

Over on Twitter, here were the top tweets about Bitcoin Cash:

Need more of the Bitcoin Cash community following this account#Followback #BitcoinCash #BCH

URGENT!!!!#Bitcoin cash stock to flow model suggests value of 90 000 usd by the end of 2020!!!

@zebpay @eth_us @Xerksis1 Zebpay is crediting bitcoin cash BCH after 10 confirmations to Zebpay wallet. It way too much wait for traders.

Original post:

Bitcoin Cash (BCH) Up $1.52 On 4 Hour Chart, Started Today Up 1.89%; Price Base in Formation Over Past 30 Days - CFDTrading

Nexo Revolutionizing the World of Finance Supporting HODL Bitcoin and NEXO – The Cryptocurrency Analytics

Nexo celebrated its birthday on April 30, 2020. In 2 years, they are feeling good about 700,000 users +. They are confident in that they will revolutionize the world of finance.

Nexo tweeted, Volatility tilts favor towards Bitcoin. Crypto is down only about 5% in 2020 vs. almost 22% for S&P500. For the nascent crypto, its also an indication of a transition toward gold-like adoption. Stay in the know. Make the most of your #BTC with Nexo.

Nexo has helped several investors make the crypto work for them. It is the only insured account that permits borrowing instantly in 45 plus fiat currencies, thus making it possible for a daily interest on the idle interest of users.

Being licensed and regulated and providing $100 Million Insurance on Custodial assets sets them apart from other lenders. The Nexo Instant Crypto Credit Line works very instantly.

Sydney Ifergan, the crypto expert, tweeted: Nexo has a reason to be happy about anything that leads to Bitcoin (BTC) growth and betterment, because they are focused on facilitating instant loans that get backed with Bitcoin.

Nexo is also excited about anything like Bitcoin, because they recently expressed that following clients feedback, NEXO is pleased to announce that BCH gets facilitated as a repayment option for their Instant Crypto Credit Lines. Thus they have already expanded the benefits of using Nano_io, but are contributing to enriching BCHs adoption and utilization. It is good that Bitcoin Cash is now available as a repayment method for the BCH community.

Coinmarket Cap recently covered the fact that Nexo Finance have evolved to have grown their global brand to reach out to a highly engaged audience and acknowledges the substantial customer growth with their advertising campaign.

CoinmarketCap tweeted: See how NexoFinance grew its global brand to reach a highly engaged audience, and experienced substantial customer growth with CoinMarketCaps advertising campaigns!

Making money apart, NEXO have contributed to a good cause. They expressed that they were feeling proud to be matching $10k worth in crypto donations to Savethechildrens noble cause with SavewithStories initiative!

At a point in time when investors are looking towards safe-havens, Nexo opines that it would be good for investors to make use of the potential of probably the best store of value. They have introduced a credit line process where it is possible for customers to borrow against tokenized gold when they need liquidity rather than selling it. Typically, relatable to pawn broking Token Broking.

Excerpt from:

Nexo Revolutionizing the World of Finance Supporting HODL Bitcoin and NEXO - The Cryptocurrency Analytics

Bitcoin And Altcoins Correcting Strong Gains – Cryptonews

In the past two days, there were strong bullish moves in bitcoin above USD 7,550. BTC/USD surged around 20% and surpassed many key hurdles such as USD 8,000, USD 8,500, and USD 9,000. It traded to a new monthly high close to USD 9,500 and it is currently correcting gains.Similarly, there was a steady rise in most major altcoins, including ethereum, XRP, litecoin, bitcoin cash, BNB, EOS, TRX, ADA, and XLM. ETH/USD extended its rally above the USD 220 level and it traded close the USD 230 resistance. XRP/USD also rallied more than 10% and tested the USD 0.235 resistance zone.

Total market capitalization

After a successful close above USD 8,000, bitcoin price gained bullish momentum. BTC/USD surged around 20% and broke many resistances near USD 9,000. It even traded above the USD 9,200 resistance and tested the USD 9,500 hurdle. The price is currently (08:30 UTC) correcting gains and it could retest the USD 9,050 and USD 9,000 support levels.On the upside, the price is likely to face a strong selling interest near USD 9,450 and USD 9,500. If there is another show of strength, the price could surge towards the USD 10,000 level.

Ethereum price extended its rally above the USD 205 and USD 220 resistance levels. ETH/USD even surpassed USD 225 and traded close to USD 228. It is currently correcting lower and approaching the USD 220 support. If there are more losses, the price may perhaps test the USD 212 support.On the upside, the USD 225, USD 228 and USD 230 levels are key hurdles. A successful break above USD 230 might lead the price towards USD 250.

Bitcoin cash price gained more than 10% and it broke the USD 245 and USD 250 resistance levels. BCH/USD even climbed above USD 265 and tested the USD 275 zone. It is currently correcting lower to USD 265, below which the bears are likely to aim a test of the USD 250 level.Litecoin succeeded in gaining traction above the USD 46.50 and USD 48.50 resistance levels. LTC/USD tagged the USD 50.00 barrier and it is currently correcting lower. On the downside, the USD 48.50 level is likely to act as a strong support. On the upside, the USD 50.00 and USD 50.50 are short term hurdles, followed by USD 52.00.XRP price extended its rise above the USD 0.212 and USD 0.220 resistance levels. The price even climbed above USD 0.232 and tested the USD 0.235 resistance. The price is currently retreating lower and it seems like it could test the USD 0.224 support zone.

In the past three sessions, many smaller altcoins rallied more than 10%, including DATA, SC, OMG, HYN, MONA, BCD, CKB, OKB, NRG, CRO, BSV, BCN, MAID, BTG, BTT, and FTT. Out of these, DATA rallied 54%.

Overall, bitcoin is surging before the upcoming halving event and it is now trading above USD 9,000. In the short term, there could be a downside correction, but BTC/USD still might continue moving higher towards USD 9,800 and USD 10,000._____

View post:

Bitcoin And Altcoins Correcting Strong Gains - Cryptonews

Gambling for a good cause CryptoSlots donates all proceeds from new slot to the fight against coronavirus – Cryptopolitan

CryptoSlots released their newest slot, Micro Monsters, a game filled with bonus extras to beat the reels viral critters. The biggest bonus, though, is that every bet made on the slot will be donated by the crypto casino to Direct Relief, a charity supporting health workers and patients during this pandemic.

Take part now and spin with a 100% match bonus on your deposit: bonus code FIGHTCOVID100, valid until May 15, 2020. *

Direct Relief focuses on providing personal protective equipment to those most at risk around the world. In the U.S., they are coordinating with health organizations and businesses to deliver essential medical items and critical care medications. Follow CryptoSlots on Facebook to track the amount raised by players.

Micro Monsters is one of the Mega Matrix slots, a group of games made notable by being wackier and more unusual than conventional slots games. Wins can start anywhere on a payline in this circular game. There is also an expanded Double Wild on the middle reel and Mystery Multipliers. Bet from $0.60 $4.80 to spin and your bets (minus wins) will be donated to charity.

Hopefully this contribution will make a difference to those on the front line, said casino manager Michael Hilary, as well as providing entertainment to those doing their part by staying at home.

Launched in 2018, CryptoSlots quickly found success as a prime destination for online crypto players. Slots make up the majority of the games at this bitcoin casino, along with video poker and keno. All games are provably fair and mobile friendly. Bitcoin, Litecoin, Bitcoin Cash & Monero are all accepted payment methods.

*Valid for deposits of $25 $250. General terms & conditions apply.

See the original post here:

Gambling for a good cause CryptoSlots donates all proceeds from new slot to the fight against coronavirus - Cryptopolitan

NeuroOne Medical Technologies Corp. Appoints Vanessa Tolosa to Scientific Advisory Board: Leading Researcher in Neurotech to Guide Further Development…

NeuroOne Medical Technologies Corporation (OTCQB: NMTC; NeuroOne), a medical technology company focused on improving surgical care options and outcomes for patients suffering from neurological disorders, announces today the appointment of Vanessa Tolosa to its Scientific Advisory Board. Tolosa, one of the founding members of Neuralink Corp., a company started by Elon Musk to build a complete Brain-Machine Interface, brings specialized expertise that the company believes will help expedite its further development of thin-film electrodes that provide long-term stimulation for treatment of neurological applications, such as epilepsy, Parkinsons disease, failed back surgery syndrome and other neurological applications that may benefit from high-density thin film electrode technology.

"We are pleased to have such a distinguished, highly regarded scientific leader and pioneer as Vanessa on our advisory board," says Dave Rosa, president and CEO, NeuroOne. "Vanessa has over 10 years of specialized experience developing implantable neural devices. She shares our passion in transitioning these technologies from the bench top and bringing them to patients who are in desperate need. Her exceptional experience in this field will contribute greatly to NeuroOnes vision, goals and future direction."

Most recently at Neuralink, Tolosa worked to develop a Brain Machine Interface for medical use and beyond. As director of neural interfaces, she directed the design, prototyping, development and testing of technologies related to implantable microelectrodes, electronics micro-assembly and hermetic packaging. Previously, at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratories (LLNL), Tolosa led all implantable neurotechnology efforts, including high-density electrode technology.

Among her credits, Tolosa won the 2019 Gold Electrode Researcher of the Year Award from Neurotech Reports, the 2015 LLNL Early-Mid Career Researcher Award and the 2015 DARPA Riser Award. She holds eight issued patents with five pending applications in this field. Tolosa earned a B.S. in Chemical Engineering from the University of Florida and a Ph.D. in Chemical Engineering from the University of California, Los Angeles.

Tolosa states, "NeuroOne is bringing unique thin-film electrodes to the marketplace, and I look forward to helping them refine their implantable neural technology that addresses chronic treatments, as well as making enhancements to its FDA-cleared Evo cortical electrode line."

About NeuroOne

NeuroOne Medical Technologies Corporation is a developmental stage company committed to providing minimally invasive and hi-definition solutions for EEG recording, brain stimulation and ablation solutions for patients suffering from epilepsy, Parkinson's disease, essential tremors and other related neurological disorders that may improve patient outcomes and reduce procedural costs. Visit https://www.n1mtc.com/.

Forward Looking Statements

This press release may include forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. Except for statements of historical fact, any information contained in this presentation may be a forwardlooking statement that reflects the Company's current views about future events and are subject to known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors that may cause our actual results, levels of activity, performance or achievements to be materially different from the information expressed or implied by these forward-looking statements. In some cases, you can identify forwardlooking statements by the words "may," "might," "will," "could," "would," "should," "expect," "intend," "plan," "objective," "anticipate," "believe," "estimate," "predict," "project," "potential," "target," "seek," "contemplate," "continue" and "ongoing," or the negative of these terms, or other comparable terminology intended to identify statements about the future. Forwardlooking statements may include statements regarding the Company's regulatory submissions, potential regulatory approval, commercialization of the technology, business strategy, market size, potential growth opportunities, plans for product applications and product development, future operations, future efficiencies, and other financial and operating information. Although the Company believes that we have a reasonable basis for each forward-looking statement, we caution you that these statements are based on a combination of facts and factors currently known by us and our expectations of the future, about which we cannot be certain. Our actual future results may be materially different from what we expect due to factors largely outside our control, including our ability to raise additional funds, uncertainties inherent in the development process of our technology, changes in regulatory requirements or decisions of regulatory authorities, the size and growth potential of the markets for our technology, our ability to serve those markets, the rate and degree of market acceptance of our products, clinical trial patient enrollment, the results of clinical trials, future competition, the actions of third-party clinical research organizations, suppliers and manufacturers, our ability to protect our intellectual property rights and other risks, uncertainties and assumptions, including those described under the heading "Risk Factors" in our filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission. These forwardlooking statements speak only as of the date of this press release and the Company undertakes no obligation to revise or update any forwardlooking statements for any reason, even if new information becomes available in the future.

"Caution: Federal law restricts this device to sale by or on the order of a physician"

View source version on businesswire.com: https://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20200428005038/en/

Contacts

Media:Brittany TedescoCPR Communicationsbtedesco@cpronline.com 201.641.1911 x 14

Investor Relations:Leah NoaeillSr. Director of MarketingNeuroOne Medical Technologies Corporationleahn@n1mtc.com

Continued here:

NeuroOne Medical Technologies Corp. Appoints Vanessa Tolosa to Scientific Advisory Board: Leading Researcher in Neurotech to Guide Further Development...

Neurotechnology overview: Why we need a treaty to regulate weapons controlled by thinking – Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists

Neurotechnology could help people with disabilities use their thoughts to control devices in the physical world. It may also be useful in weapons systems. Private companies, militaries, and other organizations are funding neurotechnology research. Credit: US Army.

Elon Musks newest venture, Neuralink, is attempting to wire brains directly to computers. The start-ups vision is to insert thousands of tiny threads into the neurons of your brain. The other ends of the threads are attached to chips, embedded under the skin on your head and wirelessly connected to a detachable Bluetooth pod behind your ear, enabling you to control a phone or another device with your thoughts. Sound far-fetched? The company has already successfully tested the technology in monkeys and aims to start testing it in humans later this year.

Neuralinks brain-machine interface could potentially help people with brain and spinal cord injuries who have lost the ability to move or sense, as Musk highlighted at the companys livestreamed launch event. Even more ambitiously, Musk said his long-term goal is to achieve a sort of symbiosis with [artificial intelligence]. He wants to build what he calls a digital superintelligence layer to complement the parts of the brain responsible for thinking and planning (the cerebral cortex) and for emotions and memory (the limbic system). In fact, he said, you already have this layer. It is your phone and your laptop. But you are limited by how quickly you can process what you see, and how quickly you can type a response. The answer, Musk says, is to increase the band-width of the brain-machine interface.

Neuralink is just one of the organizations developing cutting-edge neurotechnology, although others like teams at Carnegie Mellon, Rice University, and Battelle, are not proposing drilling through peoples skulls and inserting microscopic threads into their brains, opting instead for electromagnetics, light beams, and acoustic waves.

Its also not difficult to imagine neurotechnology being used for darker purposes, unrelated to the goals of the researchers developing it. A brain-machine interface could, for instance, be hacked and used to spy on or deliberately invade someones innermost thoughts. It could be used to implant new memories, or to extinguish existing ones. It could even be used to direct bionic soldiers, remotely pilot aircraft, operate robots in the field, or telepathically control swarms of artificial-intelligence-enabled drones.

In the case of biological, chemical, and nuclear technologies, international rules exist to ensure these are not used for developing weapons. There are also controls to ensure things like certain electronics, computers, software, sensors, or telecommunications technology are not used in conventional weapons. In all cases, the underlying technologies in question have useful and beneficial purposes. But these regulations do not directly apply to neurotechnologies. Of more relevance are discussions taking place at the United Nations on lethal autonomous weapons systems, particularly around aspects associated with human-machine interactions, the loss of human control, and accountability. While these are limited to weaponry, informal discussions at the United Nations are also examining broader issues around artificial intelligence and militarization, including military decision-making, intelligence-gathering, and command and control systems.

Yet, none of the international regimes or current discussions provide guidance for how people should consider the beneficial and harmful potential that neurotechnology holds, a growing area of research among scholars as militaries begin developing the technology.

Building on formative work by researchers like Jonathan Moreno, Malcolm Dando, James Giordano, and Diane DiEuliis, we talked to eight senior neurotechnologists from labs at established universities in the United States, the United Kingdom, and Australia about the risks they saw with the new technology and about who has responsibility for safely developing it. The interviews were part of a pilot project, in which participation was confidential and identifying information was removed from the data, as is usual practice in social science research.

In addition to brain-computer interfaces, the technologists were working on cutting-edge technologies like neuromorphic computing, a field with the goal of designing computer systems that mimic the form of the human brain, and cognitive robotics, an enterprise concerned with designing robots that can more seamlessly and empathetically interact with people. The technologists we talked to didnt see the potential for their particular technologies to be used as weapons or to pose security concerns. They saw themselves as being away from the front line. Yet, at the same time, six of the study technologists we talked to, from each of the three countries, had been previous recipients of direct or indirect Pentagon funding.

Some also said that technology they had created in the past had gone on to be used for entirely unexpected purposes that would have been impossible to predict. One, for instance, designed a component for airbags that eventually found its way into tech products like smartphones.

As neurotechnology advances and applications with potential military as well as civilian uses are developed, debates about the so-called dual-use risks it poses will become more acute.

Military neurotechnology and the definition of dual use. A common way to think about the concept of dual use relates to technology transfers between civilian and military organizations. Civilian and military research and development are thought to go hand-in-hand, where innovations, like the internet and GPS, can be maximized for the mutual benefit of both civilian and military stakeholders in a win-win scenario. Technologies are spun-in from basic research to military application or spun-out from military research to civilian application. The main drivers behind this form of dual use, however, are economic interests.

When the focus shifts to international security, the dual use concept becomes more complicated. Here, civilian and military uses stand in opposition to one another, and technology transfers between civilian and military applications are focused on restricting civilian technologies from migrating to foreign or non-aligned militaries. Under the export controls agreed on by the Australia Group, a group of many of the worlds major economies that have agreed to harmonize regulations to control the spread of technology that could be used in chemical or biological weapons, a company in the United States couldnt, for instance, export a 20-liter fermenter capable of growing bacteria without a license. A license would be denied if the company were exporting to a country suspected of having a biological weapons program, regardless of whether the recipient was explicitly a military entity or not. As such, there is not just a civilian versus military distinction to dual use, but also a distinction between what are considered legitimate and illegitimate uses.

International disarmament and nonproliferation treaties like the Biological Weapons Convention, the international agreement that bans bioweapons activities, introduce yet another distinction. They do not use the term dual use but instead differentiate between peaceful and non-peaceful purposes of research and development activities. Originally aimed at curtailing proliferation by states, since 9/11 the Biological Weapons Convention has broadened in scope to also encompass proliferation by non-state actors like terrorists and criminals. This trend has layered on the idea that dual use has to also be thought of in terms of the juxtaposition of benevolent and malevolent purposes.

The technologists we spoke to found these security concepts of dual use too abstract to relate to their own work. The problem is that whichever concept of dual use is appliedcivilian versus military, legitimate versus illegitimate, peaceful versus non-peaceful, benevolent versus malevolentthere is very little practical guidance for how to assess the risks of neurotechnology research being used for harm, or to determine the potential contribution of neurotechnologies to a military program. Its easy to understand how a fermenter that creates bacteria could be used in biological weapons. Countries have done that sort of thing before. Theres no such direct line between existing nuerotechnology and an already developed weapons system.

Developing clear guidance for neurotechnologies is increasingly urgent, because as it stands, militaries are already developing neurotechnology. The US Defense Departments research wing, the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA), is significantly expanding brain-machine interfaces for use in military applications. It is preparing for a future in which a combination of unmanned systems, artificial intelligence, and cyber operations may cause conflicts to play out on timelines that are too short for humans to effectively manage with current technology alone, Al Emondi, manager of DARPAs Next-Generation Nonsurgical Neurotechnology (N3) program, said.

The N3 program is pushing for a neural interface that enables fast, effective, and intuitive hands-free interaction with military systems by able-bodied warfighters, according to its funding brief, and the program is sponsored at approximately $120 million over four years. But DARPA also funds many other programs, as do military research and development units in other countries. These various programs are expanding the reach of neurotechnologies into military intelligence gathering, image analysis, and threat and deception detection, as well as developing technology to manipulate emotional states and to incapacitate adversaries.

The technologists we spoke to talked about the capabilities race they saw developing within countries and internationally, and that technological supremacy was at the forefront of many researchers minds. Despite this, none of the six technologists who had received DARPA funding believed their scientific work was being developed for military application. The other two neurotechnologists we talked to said they would refuse military funding on the grounds that they did not promote warfare and that such funding may instigate political tensions within their labsechoing the mixed perspectives on defense dollars from the synthetic biology field.

Of course, militaries arent the only organizations funding neurotechnology. Universities, major brain initiatives like the European Unions Human Brain Project, and national health funding schemes all fund projects, as well. But it is private funders that really get technologists excited. According to an article last year in the journal Brain Stimulation, the technologies may constitute a $12-billion-dollar annual market by 2021.

The pursuit of private capital led two of the neurotechnologists we spoke with to move to Silicon Valley in California, a place where, as one of them said, You dont even have to explain it. Half of the people we talked to had spinout companies, separate from their university research. These ventures may promote benefits by creating wider access to neurotechnology, but they also create privacy and other ethical dilemmas separate from concerns about whether a technology could be weaponized or not. For instance, as private companies potentially become gatekeepers of large amounts of personal brain data, they could choose to monetize it.

How can scientists and institutions account for the potential of misuse inherent in the development of neurotechnology? Boundaries are not always so obvious when people are crossing them, one of the technologists we spoke to said. It is only in hindsight that people think, yeah this is bad. Different people have different boundaries. Perceptions of beneficial technology can vary, too.

Often the benefits or potential harms associated with a technology are tightly wrapped up in a particular implementation. Even if technologists hold good intentions, later applications of their technology are not always within their control. Talking with neurotechnologists underscores that what is and isnt a dual-use technology is often in the eye of the beholder, even when militaries are paying to develop the products.

While no treaty regulates neurotechnology, safely developing this sci-fi like technology calls for a new framework that articulates specific harmful or undesirable uses of the technology in political, security, intelligence, and military domains. It would be better to develop the framework now, at the stage when many entrepreneurs are more focused on telepathically controlling smartphones than the weapons of the future.

The rest is here:

Neurotechnology overview: Why we need a treaty to regulate weapons controlled by thinking - Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists

Needham Reaffirms Their Hold Rating on Stryker (SYK) – Smarter Analyst

In a report released today, Michael Matson from Needham maintained a Hold rating on Stryker (SYK). The companys shares closed last Thursday at $186.43.

According to TipRanks.com, Matson is a 5-star analyst with an average return of 6.5% and a 57.4% success rate. Matson covers the Healthcare sector, focusing on stocks such as Axonics Modulation Technologies, Cardiovascular Systems, and Zimmer Biomet Holdings.

Currently, the analyst consensus on Stryker is a Moderate Buy with an average price target of $201.00.

See todays analyst top recommended stocks >>

The company has a one-year high of $226.31 and a one-year low of $124.54. Currently, Stryker has an average volume of 2.42M.

Based on the recent corporate insider activity of 65 insiders, corporate insider sentiment is positive on the stock. This means that over the past quarter there has been an increase of insiders buying their shares of SYK in relation to earlier this year. Most recently, in March 2020, Srikant Datar, a Director at SYK bought 1,000 shares for a total of $59,700.

TipRanks has tracked 36,000 company insiders and found that a few of them are better than others when it comes to timing their transactions. See which 3 stocks are most likely to make moves following their insider activities.

Stryker Corp. engages in providing medical technology products and services. It operates through the following segments: Orthopaedics, MedSurg and Neurotechnology and Spine. The Orthopaedics segment provides reconstructive and trauma implant systems. The Medsurg segment deals with surgical equipment and navigation systems, endoscopy, patient handling, and reprocessed medical devices. The Neurotechnology and Spine segment pertains to spinal implants and neurovascular products. The company was founded by Homer H. Stryker in 1941 and is headquartered in Kalamazoo, MI.

Continued here:

Needham Reaffirms Their Hold Rating on Stryker (SYK) - Smarter Analyst

Stryker (SYK) to Report Q1 Earnings: What’s in the Offing? – Yahoo Finance

Stryker Corporation SYK is scheduled to release first-quarter 2020 results on Apr 30 after the closing bell. In the last reported quarter, the company delivered a positive earnings surprise of 1.2%. Further, it has a trailing four-quarter positive earnings surprise of 1.5%, on average.

Q1 Estimates

The Zacks Consensus Estimate for first-quarter earnings per share is pegged at $1.85, indicating a decline of 1.6% from the year-ago quarter.

The same for revenues stands at $3.57 billion, suggesting growth of 1.7% from the prior-year quarter.

MedSurg in Focus

This segment comprises surgical instruments plus endoscopic and emergency medical equipment. Notably, it has been consistently driving Strykers top line.

The Zacks Consensus Estimate for the segments first-quarter revenues stands at $1.64 billion, suggesting an improvement of 6.4% year-ago reported figure.

Stryker Corporation Price and EPS Surprise

Stryker Corporation Price and EPS Surprise

Stryker Corporation price-eps-surprise | Stryker Corporation Quote

MedSurg has three subsegments Endoscopy, Instruments and Medical.

Growth across its aforementioned three subsegments is likely to have benefited MedSurgs first-quarter performance. The segment is anticipated to have witnessed considerable worldwide organic growth in the to-be-reported quarter driven by instruments.

Other Factors to Note

The companys first-quarter performance is likely to reflect broad-based strength across its divisions and regions. In fact, robust performance in emerging markets (except China) and Europe for the first two months of the to-be-reported quarter is likely to get reflected in the companys results. However, with the coronavirus outbreak intensifying around late February is likely to have affected the same.

Strykers Orthopaedics segment is likely to have witnessed strong organic growth on the back of solid performance at the Knee and Hips sub segments during the first two months of the quarter to be reported. However, the pandemic had an adverse impact on elective procedures since late February, which in turn might have weighed on the segments overall performance.

Sustained strong demand for Mako TKA (Total Knee Arthoplasty) platform or cementless knee and other 3D printed products for the first two months of the quarter is anticipated to get reflected in the segments first-quarter performance. Although it is important to note here that with the elective procedures taking a hit due to the coronavirus impact (since late February), the company is likely to have witnessed decline in the demand for Mako TKA. This, in turn, might have weighed on the companys performance in the to-be-reported quarter.

With respect to Neurotechnology & Spine segment, a bankable performance within the NeuroTech and Interventional Spine businesses is likely to have contributed to the companys first-quarter performance. For the upcoming quarterly announcement, the Zacks Consensus Estimate for the segments sales stands at $779 million, suggesting growth of 7.9% from the year-ago reported figure.

During fourth-quarter 2019, the company acquired Mobius Imaging a leader in point-of-care imaging technology along with its sister company Cardan Robotics in an all-cash transaction for $370 million upfront and up to $130 million of contingent payments related to development and commercial milestones. This transaction is likely to have aided Stryker Spine foray into the intra-operative Imaging segment apart from aligning with Stryker's implant and navigation offering. We expect this development to have positively impacted the companys first-quarter performance.

However, unfavorable pricing is likely to have affected Strykers first-quarter top line. Moreover, high debt might have put pressure on the margins.

What Our Quantitative Model Suggests

Per our proven model, the combination of a positive Earnings ESP and a Zacks Rank #1 (Strong Buy), 2 (Buy) or 3 (Hold) increases the chances of an earnings beat. This is not the case here as you will see.

Earnings ESP: Stryker has an Earnings ESP of -3.29%. You can uncover the best stocks to buy or sell before theyre reported with our Earnings ESP Filter.

Zacks Rank: Stryker carries a Zacks Rank #4 (Sell).

Stocks Worth a Look

Here are a few medical stocks worth considering as they have the right combination of elements to post an earnings beat this quarter.

Chemed Corporation CHE has an Earnings ESP of +0.42% and a Zacks Rank of 2. You can see the complete list of todays Zacks #1 Rank stocks here.

Haemonetics Corporation HAE has an Earnings ESP of +2.76% and a Zacks Rank of 3.

DexCom, Inc. DXCM has an Earnings ESP of +139.12% and a Zacks Rank of 2.

Story continues

Visit link:

Stryker (SYK) to Report Q1 Earnings: What's in the Offing? - Yahoo Finance