About the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO)

The North Atlantic Treaty Organization is a military alliance of countries from Europe and North America promising collective defense. Currently numbering 29 nations, NATO was formed initially to counter the communist East and has searched for a new identity in the post-Cold War world.

In the aftermath of the Second World War, with ideologically opposed Soviet armies occupying much of Eastern Europe and fears still high over German aggression, the nations of Western Europe searched for a new form of military alliance to protect themselves. In March 1948 the Brussels Pact was signed between France, Britain, Holland, Belgium and Luxembourg, creating a defence alliance called the Western European Union, but there was a feeling that any effective alliance would have to include the US and Canada.

In the US there was widespread concern about both the spread of Communism in Europe strong Communist parties had formed in France and Italy - and potential aggression from Soviet armies, leading the US to seek talks about an Atlantic alliance with the west of Europe. The perceived need for a new defensive unit to rival the Eastern bloc was exacerbated by the Berlin Blockade of 1949, leading to an agreement that same year with many nations from Europe. Some nations opposed membership and still do, e.g. Sweden, Ireland.

NATO was created by the North Atlantic Treaty, also called the Washington Treaty, which was signed on April 5th 1949. There were twelve signatories, including the United States, Canada and Britain (full list below). The head of NATO's military operations is the Supreme Allied Commander Europe, a position always held by an American so their troops dont come under foreign command, answering to the North Atlantic Council of ambassadors from member nations, which is led by the Secretary General of NATO, who is always European. The centrepiece of the NATO treaty is Article 5, promising collective security:

"an armed attack against one or more of them in Europe or North America shall be considered an attack against them all; and consequently they agree that, if such an armed attack occurs, each of them, in exercise of the right of individual or collective self-defense recognized by Article 51 of the Charter of the United Nations, will assist the Party or Parties so attacked by taking forthwith, individually and in concert with the other Parties, such action as it deems necessary, including the use of armed force, to restore and maintain the security of the North Atlantic area."

The NATO treaty also allowed for the alliances expansion among European nations, and one of the earliest debates among NATO members was the German question: should West Germany (the East was under rival Soviet control) be re-armed and allowed to join NATO. There was opposition, invoking the recent German aggression which caused World War Two, but in May 1955 Germany was allowed to join, a move which caused upset in Russia and led to the formation of the rival Warsaw Pact alliance of Eastern communist nations.

NATO had, in many ways, been formed to secure West Europe against the threat of Soviet Russia, and the Cold War of 1945 to 1991 saw an often tense military standoff between NATO on one side and the Warsaw Pact nations on the other. However, there was never a direct military engagement, thanks in part to the threat of nuclear war; as part of NATO agreements nuclear weapons were stationed in Europe. There were tensions within NATO itself, and in 1966 France withdrew from the military command established in 1949. Nevertheless, there was never a Russian incursion into the western democracies, in large part due to the NATO alliance. Europe was very familiar with an aggressor taking one country after another thanks for the late 1930s and did not let it happen again.

The end of the Cold War in 1991 led to three major developments: the expansion of NATO to include new nations from the former Eastern bloc (full list below), the re-imagining of NATO as a co-operative security alliance able to deal with European conflicts not involving member nations and the first use of NATO forces in combat. This first occurred during the Wars of the Former Yugoslavia, when NATO used air-strikes first against Bosnian-Serb positions in 1995, and again in 1999 against Serbia, plus the creation of a 60,000 peace keeping force in the region.

NATO also created the Partnership for Peace initiative in 1994, aimed at engaging and building trust with ex-Warsaw Pact nations in Eastern Europe and the former Soviet Union, and later the nations from the Former Yugoslavia. Other 30 countries have so far joined, and ten have become full members of NATO.

The conflict in the former Yugoslavia had not involved a NATO member state, and the famous clause 5 was first and unanimously - invoked in 2001 after terrorist attacks on the United States, leading to NATO forces running peace-keeping operations in Afghanistan. NATO has also created the Allied Rapid Reaction Force (ARRF) for faster responses. However, NATO has come under pressure in recent years from people arguing it should be scaled down, or left to Europe, despite the increase in Russian aggression in the same period. NATO might still be searching for a role, but it played a huge role in maintaining the status quo in the Cold War, and has potential in a world where Cold War aftershocks keep happening.

1949 Founder Members: Belgium, Canada, Denmark, France (withdrew from military structure 1966), Iceland, Italy, Luxembourg, The Netherlands, Norway, Portugal, United Kingdom, United States1952: Greece (withdrew from military command 1974 80), Turkey1955: West Germany (With East Germany as reunified Germany from 1990)1982: Spain1999: Czech Republic, Hungary, Poland2004: Bulgaria, Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania, Romania, Slovakia, Slovenia2009: Albania, Croatia2017: Montenegro

Continue reading here:

About the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO)

NATO: Definition, Purpose, History, Members

The North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) is an alliance of 28 countries that border the North Atlantic Ocean. The Alliance includesthe United States, most European Union members, Canada, and Turkey.

The United States contributes three-fourths of NATO's budget. During the2016 presidential campaign, Donald Trump said other NATO members should spend more on their military. Only four countries reach the targeted spending of 2% of gross domestic product. They are the United States, the United Kingdom, Greece, and Estonia.

At the July 11, 2018, NATO summit, President Trump requested that NATO nations increase their defense spending to 4% of their gross domestic product (GDP). To illustrate, the United States spent 4.5% GDP in 2017. That's $886 billion in military spending divided by $20 trillion in U.S. GDP.

Trump also criticized Germany for asking the United States to protect it from Russia while importing billions in natural gas from that supplier. He has accused NATO of being obsolete. He argued that the organization focuses on defending Europe against Russia instead of combating terrorism.Member countries worry that Trump's criticism of NATO and praise of Russia's leader, Vladimir Putin, mean they can no longer rely on the United States as an ally in case of attack.

NATO's mission is to protect the freedom of its members. Its targets includeweapons of mass destruction, terrorism, and cyber-attacks.

At its July 11, 2018, meeting, NATO approvednew steps to contain Russia. These include two new military commands and expanded efforts against cyber warfare and counterterrorism. It also contains a new plan to deter Russian aggression against Poland and the Baltic States. Trump agreed to these measures.

On July 8, 2016,NATO announced it would send up to 4,000 troops to the Baltic states and eastern Poland. It increased air and sea patrols to shore up its eastern front afterRussia attacked Ukraine.

On November 16, 2015, NATO responded to theterrorist attacks in Paris. It called for a unified approach with the European Union, France, and NATO members. France did notinvoke NATO'sArticle 5. That would be a formal declaration of war uponthe Islamic State group. France preferred to launch airstrikes on its own. Article 5 states, "an armed attack upon one... shall be considered an attack upon them all."

NATO responded to U.S. requests for help in theWar in Afghanistan. It took the leadfrom August 2003 to December 2014. At its peak, it deployed 130,000 troops. In 2015, it ended its combat role and began supporting Afghan troops.

NATO's protection does not extend to members' civil wars or internal coups. On July 15, 2016, the Turkish military announced it seized control of the government in a coup. But Turkish President Recep Erdogan announced early on July 16 that the coup had failed. As a NATO member, Turkey would receive its allies' support in the case of an attack. But in case of a coup, the country will not get allied help.

NATO's secondary purpose is to protect the stability of the region.

If the stability is threatened, NATO will defend non-members. On August 28,2014, NATO announcedit had photos proving that Russiainvaded Ukraine. Although Ukraine is not a member, it had worked with NATO over the years. Russia's invasion of Ukraine threatenednearby NATO members. They worried other former USSR satellite countries would be next.

As a result, NATO'sSeptember 2014 summitfocused on Russia's aggression. President Putin vowed to create a "NewRussia" out of Ukraine's eastern region.President Obamapledged to defend countries such as Latvia, Lithuania, and Estonia.

NATO itself admits that "Peacekeeping has become at least as difficult as peacemaking." As a result, NATO is strengthening alliances throughout the world. In the age of globalization, transatlantic peace has become a worldwide effort. Itextends beyond military might alone.

NATO's 28 members are Albania, Belgium, Bulgaria, Canada, Croatia, Czech Republic, Denmark, Estonia, France, Germany, Greece, Hungary,Iceland, Italy, Latvia, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Netherlands, Norway, Poland, Portugal, Romania, Slovakia, Slovenia, Spain, Turkey, United Kingdom, and the United States.

Each member designates an ambassador to NATO. They supply officials to serve on NATO committees and send the appropriate officials to discuss NATO business. These designees could include a countrys president, prime minister, foreign affairs minister, or the department of defense head.

On December 1, 2015, NATO announced its first expansion since 2009. It offered membership to Montenegro. Russia responded by calling the move a strategic threat to its national security. Its worried by the number of Balkan countries along its border that have joined NATO.

NATO participates in three alliances that expand its influence beyond its 28 member countries. The first is the Euro-Atlantic Partnership Council, which helps partners become NATO members.Itincludes 23 non-NATO countries that support NATO's purpose. It beganin 1991.

The Mediterranean Dialogue seeks to stabilize the Middle East. Its non-NATO members include Algeria, Egypt, Israel, Jordan, Mauritania, Morocco, and Tunisia. It began in1994.

The Istanbul Cooperation Initiativeworks forpeace throughout the larger Middle East region.It includes four members of theGulf Cooperation Council. They are Bahrain, Kuwait, Qatar, and the United Arab Emirates. It began in 2004.

NATO also cooperates with eight other countries in joint security issues. There are five Asian countries, which include Australia,Japan, the Republic of Korea, Mongolia, and New Zealand. There are two cooperative countries in the Middle East: Afghanistan and Pakistan.

NATO'sprimary purpose was to defend member nations from threats by communist countries. The United States also wanted to maintain a presence in Europe. It soughtto prevent a resurgence of aggressive nationalism and foster political union. In this way, NATO made the formation of the European Union possible.U.S. military protection gave European nations the safety needed to rebuild after World War II's devastation.

During the Cold War, NATO's mission expanded to prevent nuclear war.

After West Germany joined NATO, thecommunistcountriesformed theWarsaw Pact alliance. That included the USSR, Bulgaria, Hungary, Romania, Poland, Czechoslovakia, and EastGermany. In response, NATO adopted the "Massive Retaliation" policy. It promised to usenuclear weaponsif the Pact attacked. NATO'sdeterrence policy allowed Europe to focus oneconomic development. It didn't have to build large conventional armies.

The Soviet Union continued to build its military presence. By the end of theCold War, it was spending three times what the United Stateswas with only one-third of the economic power. When theBerlin Wallfell in 1989, it was due to economic as well as ideological reasons.

After the USSR dissolved in the late 1980s, NATO's relationship with Russia thawed. In 1997, they signed the NATO-Russia Founding Act to build bilateral cooperation. In 2002, they formed the NATO-Russia Council to partner on shared security issues.

The collapse of the USSR led to unrest in its former satellite states. NATO got involved when Yugoslavia's civil war becamegenocide. NATO's initial support of aUnited Nationsnaval embargo led to the enforcement of ano-fly zone. Violations then led to a few airstrikes until September 1999. That's when NATO conducted a nine-day air campaign that ended the war. By December of that year, NATO deployed a peacekeeping force of 60,000 soldiers. That ended in 2004 when NATO transferred this function to theEuropean Union.

Protecting democratic freedom among its 28-member nations remains NATOS core purpose. As a political and military alliance, the coalitions value to global security continues to be paramount.

Its longevity, since its inception in 1949, is attributed to its members shared values championing democracy, freedom, and free-market economies.NATO has remained Americas most important Alliance.

Read the original here:

NATO: Definition, Purpose, History, Members

Coronavirus response: NATO Allies, Partners, NGOs and local business work together to deliver medical assistance to Bosnia and Herzegovina – NATO HQ

On 7 May 2020, U.S. Embassy Sarajevos Civil Military Support Element team and NATO provided critical supplies and disinfection equipment to the Armed Forces and Community Health Centers in eastern Mostar, western Mostar and Nevesinje. These Community Health Centers and their members are at the forefront of the Bosnia and Herzegovinas fight against COVID-19. The donation was made possible through support from the non-governmental organization Spirit of America and local BiH businesses.

Todays delivery follows a request for assistance from Bosnia and Herzegovina to NATOs Euro-Atlantic Disaster Response Coordination Centre (EADRCC). The EADRCC is NATOs principal disaster response mechanism. The Centre operates on a 24/7 basis, coordinating requests from NATO Allies and partners, as well as offers of assistance to cope with the consequences of major crises such as the COVID-19 pandemic.As another demonstration of Euro-Atlantic solidarity in the COVID 19 crisis, NATO Partner Austria also delivered much needed medical assistance to Bosnia and Herzegovina earlier this week. A first shipment of 1.500 blankets, 1.000 bedding sets, 250.000 pieces of examination gloves left Vienna on 30 April and arrived in Bosnia and Herzegovina on 4 May 2020. A second shipment from Vienna is in preparation and will reach Bosnia and Herzegovina in the coming days.In addition, in April, Bosnia and Herzegovina together with other NATO Allies and partners in the Balkans region received medical supplies provided by the United States, Hungary, Slovenia and Turkey. These included masks, overalls, and test kits.

The rest is here:

Coronavirus response: NATO Allies, Partners, NGOs and local business work together to deliver medical assistance to Bosnia and Herzegovina - NATO HQ

Greek General to NATO: "There will be an accident if Turkey continues its actions" – Greek City Times

Greek General Konstantinos Floros held two teleconferences with NATO officials in which he made it clear that Turkeys provocations in the Aegean and at Evros on the Greek-Turkish land border, will lead with mathematical precision to an accident with unforeseen consequences.

Turkeys daily aggression against Greece are obviously well known in NATO, which systematically covers it up and protects them from international scrutiny.

The danger of an accident caused by the Turkish violations in the Aegean and more broadly by Ankaras attitude towards Greece, was pointed out by Floros when he said the risk of an accident and the serious consequences that such a thing will bring is real.

More specifically, Floros held two teleconferences on Thursday.

One was at the request of the Chairman of the NATO Military Committee, Sir Stuart Peach, as part of the forthcoming meeting of the NATO Military Committee to be held on May 14, 2020.

The other was with the Deputy Commander of the Allied Powers in Europe, General Tim Radford, at his request and in the context of his recent assumption of office.

A number of issues were raised, such as the coronavirus and military issues.

Floros referred to the recent escalation caused by the immigration crisis in Evros and in the Aegean, that was orchestrated by Turkey.

He also discussed with the two NATO heads about Turkeys delinquent behaviour in the Aegean and the Eastern Mediterranean, as seen by the daily air traffic violations of Greeces national airspace, including overflights at Evros and on the islands, as well as the illegal marine surveys and drilling in Greeces maritime space, and the violation of the UN-imposed arms embargo on Libya, in addition to other provocative actions.

Floros also referred to the harassment of a Greek helicopter by Turkey, which was transporting him and Minister of Defence, Nikos Panagiotopoulos, as reported by Greek City Times.

See the article here:

Greek General to NATO: "There will be an accident if Turkey continues its actions" - Greek City Times

Coronavirus response: NATO supports practical scientific cooperation with Allies and partners to enhance COVID-19 diagnosis – NATO HQ

NATO is launching a practical scientific project to develop new tools for a rapid and accurate diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 infection.

This multi-year project is launched within the framework of NATOs Science for Peace and Security (SPS) Programme, and is led by scientists on the frontline of COVID-19 research from Italys Istituto Superiore di Sanit (National Health Institute) and Tor Vergata University Hospital together with the University Hospital of Basel University in Switzerland. This 24-month initiative aims to enhance the speed and efficiency of COVID-19 diagnosis through a multidisciplinary approach, by bringing together experts in the field of immunology, virology and molecular biology.

This project supports NATOs efforts to enhance resilience and civil preparedness of Allied and partner nations, and highlights the Alliances commitment to further enhance research and development efforts to combat COVID-19. This SPS project is an excellent example of the research communitys global effort to fight against COVID-19. said Dr. Antonio Missiroli, NATOs Assistant Secretary General for Emerging Security Challenges. This project also stresses the dedication of Allies to support each other, as well as partners, in times of crisis; and while the expected results of this project are extremely relevant to the situation the world currently finds itself in, we look forward to the long-term impact it will have on the international response to naturally occurring and man-made viruses and pathogens, he added.

Italy has been actively engaged in the SPS Programme since the beginning; not only by laying its very foundations with the contribution of Gaetano Martino, one of the three wise men, but also by steadily contributing to streamlining its decision-making, and by promoting more sophisticated projects through the active involvement of Italys scientific and academic community, said Ambassador Francesco M. Tal, Italian Permanent Representative to NATO. The launch of this project is yet another brilliant example of the political nature of this Alliance, he highlighted.

The speed and the scale of the COVID-19 virus is unprecedented and all types of disruptions it has caused are unparalleled. As daunting as it may seem, we will get back to some sort of normality only when effective means to prevent the spread of COVID-19 will be identified, said Ambassador Philippe Brandt, Ambassador of Switzerland to the Kingdom of Belgium and Head of the Swiss Mission to NATO. For Switzerland, being associated to NATO Partnership for Peace means sharing capacities to improve security in a multilateral framework. With several top-ranked universities and programmes, scientific academies and moreover a strong relationship between private sector and scientific research, Switzerland is well positioned to join the international community efforts to combat COVID-19. Academics and researchers working within Swiss institutions have been associated to various projects conducted by NATO through the Science for Peace and Security programme (SPS), he pointed out.

Professor Silvio Brusaferro, President of the National Health Institute and Professor of General and Applied Hygiene at the University of Udine (Italy) remarked on the role played by the National Health Institute. "The National Health Institute is fully committed to dealing with the COVID-19 pandemic, he said. This project is very important, especially in the context of new indispensable tools that we will have to deal with the second phase of the health emergency, he added.

The results foreseen from this project are extremely relevant to the current pandemic, and they are expected to have a long-term impact on the international response to the spread of viruses on a large scale. The contributions to the improvement of risk management and public health measures will be significant. This project will also represent a model for quick measures to counteract epidemics.

The NATO SPS Programme supports security-relevant civil science and technology addressing a set of Allied-approved priorities. In addition to this innovative project, several other SPS activities are also supporting the development of new technologies and capabilities relevant to the fight against COVID-19. These are mainly in the fields of telemedicine, emergency response coordination, and the detection of biological threats.

Continued here:

Coronavirus response: NATO supports practical scientific cooperation with Allies and partners to enhance COVID-19 diagnosis - NATO HQ

NATO, not the EU, is the protector of Europe – New Europe

Much has been said of the need to tackle the threat from Russia and China in recent weeks. In particular, when they spread lies, misinformation, and bullying around Europe in relation to the Coronavirus. Even trying baselessly to cast the blame on our American and British allies.

The European Union has so far failed to stand up and tackle the issue of misinformation in an appropriate way, showing constantly this weakness which her foes look for. I had to write to High Representative Borrell to demand answers in relation to allegations that they had allowed the Chinese Communists to alter phrasing in a report on the matter. His answers in the Foreign Affairs Committee were weak and instead accused the press of using racial stereotypes rather than directly addressing the issue. Days later, the EU Delegation in Beijing bowed again to pressure from the authorities of the Chinese Communist Party to amend an open letter that removed references to Chinas responsibility for the pandemic.

Thankfully, NATO has been doing better. Showing a firm stance and resolution in the defence of our actual Allies in the world. Whilst the European External Actions Service has more or less passively and timidly reported on the spread of Russian and Chinese propaganda. NATO, by contrast, has been using its resources to counter the threat from misinformation. They have been working hard to create reliable fact sheets for the press to point out disinformation as they find it. At the same time, their public diplomacy division has been working in overdrive to produce content directly aimed at demonstrating the cohesion between member states.

They have been fast to demonstrate that their airlift capacity is being used to bring vital supplies of medical equipment across borders. My own country of Spain has received such deliveries from friends and allies in Eastern Europe in a diligent manner in stark contrast with the disastrous record in crisis management of the leftist government in Madrid. Foreign, local and private help could not save Spain of being catastrophically hit both by coronavirus and the Socialist-Communist government which will have to respond to Justice for the highest death rate per million inhabitants and the highest number of infected medical workers due to lack of equipment.

NATO has shown its true strength during this crisis as an international organisation that can deliver for its members and its allies. All the talk in past years about difficulties in coordination among countries and soul searching inside NATO disappeared. And there we had effectiveness when we needed as we needed. NATO demonstrated again that it stands not just for the protection of its members during conflicts but also in other times of struggle. It is because of NATOs strength that Russia and China have an interest in trying to undermine it.

And theyre messaging is targeted. Both Russia and China aim their propaganda claiming that NATO is divided at those on the left and on the collectivist-right. It is these people who share our enemies desire to undermine NATO making them useful idiots or remunerated fellows in the campaign to weaken the west. For what I call the social democratic mainstream it is a matter of not just undermining or destroying NATO but replacing it with the fanciful dream of a European Army controlled by the council. It looks more moderate but it is not. Because every European defence force not fully integrated into NATO would ultimately be a useless force in defending our nations in the same way first and foremost because we would no longer have the decisive and essential support of the Americans, British or Canadians.

Of course, there is much more that NATO could be doing. And the new constellation after Coronavirus and the foreseeable polarisation will put the Chinese threat and expansionism on the NATO agenda. On the eastern border and the southeast with its new members, Northern Macedonia and Montenegro, NATO is fulfilling its duty of blocking Russias ambitions, while at the same time expanding the freedom of countries like Georgia, Ukraine and others who continue to live under in the shadow of Moscow.

A NATO partnership in Latin America with regional actors such as Brazil and Colombia, maybe Bolivia and Ecuador now in transition to democracy, could create inroads for aid and humanitarian work to help Venezuelans who are fleeing a communist regime backed by Russia and China. A partnership with Brazil and other Latin American countries could spur a combined international effort to combat organised crime and drug cartels that have filled the power vacuum in a region that has failed because of collectivism.

And in this sense, we should insist on one subject that has to be dealt with because it is a moral imperative for the Western democracies freedom for Cuba and the end of generations-old Communist tyranny. The dictatorship in Havana is nowadays the command and control centre for international organized crime, terrorism, drug trafficking, laundering and political subversion in democracies. It is feasible and necessary to eliminate this 60 years old hyperactive epicentre of evil on the American continent.

Equally, they could take a more active role in stopping the traffic of illegal immigrants and cracking down on the bases of the trafficking gangs and militias in Libya and the whole North African coast on the Mediterranean. The EU has shown a complete lack of competence when it comes to managing the defence of the borders and returns of illegal immigrants and I have no doubt that a NATO mission there would be far more robust especially as it would not have to listen to every petty complaint from those out of touch voices on the left mainstream in the European Parliament.

NATO is in far better shape than many thought and even desired. With President Donald Trump in the White House, discussions have been more outspoken and sometimes harsh but far more effective. And many countries are complying like never before with their promises. NATO has proven for the last 71 years, in very difficult times from the start of the Cold War, the Berlin Crisis or the Double Decision on Deployment of Cruise and Pershing to the intervention on the Balkans.

NATO is the only true and credible military defender of our way of life and has proven itself a model for international cooperation among free nations in the face of adversity. We should continue to place our full trust and support behind it for years to come.

Read this article:

NATO, not the EU, is the protector of Europe - New Europe

New Director of NATO Advisory and Liaison Team starts his tenure – NATO HQ

Pristina (29 April 2020) Today, Brigadier General Frank BEST (German Air Force) assumed his duties as new Director of the NATO Advisory and Liaison Team (NALT) from Brigadier General Michael G. OBERNEYER (German Army), at a transfer of authority ceremony held at Camp Film City, headquarters of the NATO-led Kosovo Force (KFOR).

During the ceremony, Brigadier General Oberneyer remarked: We have continued to build on the excellent working relationship developed over the course of the years with our colleagues in the new civilian structure overseeing the Kosovo Security Force and the Kosovo Security Force, in an environment of mutual respect, trust and transparency. Within our respective mandates, we have worked together for a common goal: a professional Kosovo Security Force, with representation from all communities, working together for the benefit of all citizens in Kosovo. Brigadier General Oberneyer leaves the NALT in the capable hands of his colleague Brigadier General Best, who has built an impressive career in the German Air Force since joining in 1983. Most recently, he served as the Branch Head for Forces Policy in the German Ministry of Defence in Bonn.

The NATO Advisory and Liaison Team was set up in August 2016. Its mission is to support the further development of the security organisations in Kosovo which includes providing advice and support with a focus on capacity-building, education and training coordination.

See the rest here:

New Director of NATO Advisory and Liaison Team starts his tenure - NATO HQ

Reaction.life: strengthen NATO, help Georgia, defend the West – Agenda.ge

Karol Karski, a Polish member of the European Parliament has written an article for the British publication Reaction.life, in which he writes that in the European neighborhood, democracy and freedom remain a shining city on the hill", for Georgians and that the country is determined to pursue a pro-Western, pro-NATO path.

Sandwiched between Russia and Iran, its current government is nevertheless determined to pursue a pro-western, pro-NATO path. Prime Minister Giorgi Gakharia, from the ruling Georgian Dream party, has made clear public statements that the government desires to join both NATO and the EU. Over 80 per cent of the Georgian public supports this goal according to the latest polling, writes Karski.

Karski mentions that Georgia is already the largest per capita contributor to NATO missions in Afghanistan, and it has recently become only the second non-NATO country (after Finland) to join the NATO cybersecurity platform, known as MISP.

The Georgian Dream government has also implemented a pro-market economic revolution: taxes and regulations have been cut, corruption has been ruthlessly targeted, and investment has been unleashed. As a result, poverty rate has been cut in half in just over a decade; the World Bank now ranks Georgia the second-best country in the world to start a business; and the country lies in the 12th position in the Heritage Economic Freedom Index, above the USA and most of the EU member states, reads the article.

The member of European Parliament also mentions the global crisis caused by COVID-19, after which the world will be different. Most jarringly, we will all be poorer, he says.

The world will not magically become safer and happier when COVID-19 recedes. It is for the Western powers to make it so, and the newly-independent UK must commit to a central role in that effort.

Karski believes that the European Parliament should support Georgia, especially now, when economic challenges exist as a result of COVID-19 crisis.

Read the full article here.

Originally posted here:

Reaction.life: strengthen NATO, help Georgia, defend the West - Agenda.ge

Air Force B-1B strategic bombers arrive in the Baltics for NATO training – Stars and Stripes

Two B-1B Lancers arrived in the Baltics to work with NATO allies this week, marking the heavy bombers first flights to Europe in about 18 months.

After crossing the Atlantic, the Ellsworth Air Force Base, S.D.-based bombers flew with Danish F-16s over Bornholm Island, east of mainland Denmark, and worked with Estonian ground forces to provide close air support training, U.S. Air Forces in Europe Air Forces Africa said in a statement Wednesday.

The training also included overflights of Lithuania and Latvia.

Integrating bomber missions with our NATO allies and partners build enduring relationships that are capable of confronting a broad range of global challenges, said Gen. Jeff Harrigian, USAFE-AFAFRICA commander.

The strategic bombers participated in the Spring Storm military exercise, the Estonian Defense Ministry said in a statement.

It is important that our allies understand that security cannot be put on pause for the duration of the pandemic, Estonian Defense Minister Juri Luik said Tuesday, the Baltic Times newspaper reported.

The Lancers were last in Europe in November 2018 supporting NATOs Trident Juncture exercise.

Strategic bomber deployments to Europe have become more frequent in recent years, amid U.S. and European concerns about potential Russian aggression. In March, a flight of B-2 stealth bombers participated in a series of training operations on the Continent. And last August, the Air Force deployed a similar B-2 bomber task force to Europe.

The Air Force did not say how long the Lancers would remain in Europe.

The Europe mission for the variable-wing Rockwell jets came just after B-1B bombers from Texas flew to the Western Pacific region.

Four B-1Bs from Dyess Air Force Base arrived in Guam on Friday to conduct training and operations with allies and partners, the Air Force said.

svan.jennifer@stripes.comTwitter: @stripesktown

A B-1B Lancer from the 28th Bomb Wing out of Ellsworth Air Force Base, S.D., receives fuel from a KC-135 Stratotanker from the 100th Air Refueling Wing, RAF Mildenhall, England, May 5, 2020.KELLY O'CONNOR/U.S. AIR FORCE

View post:

Air Force B-1B strategic bombers arrive in the Baltics for NATO training - Stars and Stripes

The Pentagon Should Train for and Not Just Talk About Great-Power Competition – War on the Rocks

The Pentagon has committed to competing with China and Russia but its not training that way. If the United States is to be truly prepared for great-power competition, its forces need to train as they expect to operate in theater. The U.S. Cold War experience offers valuable lessons, positive and negative, about how best to equip the joint force to handle near-peer adversaries. Relearning the mechanics of great-power competition will require changing exercises and experimentation, and the Pentagon should emphasize joint exercises to draw on the collective capabilities of its services.

Focusing on joint exercises conjures a back-to-the-future feeling. For decades during the Cold War, major overseas training exercises featured prominently in the U.S. militarys playbook, and with good reason. Big exercises training thousands of troops across services, domains, and sometimes nations enhance joint force readiness by improving interoperability and building command, control, and communications among services and coalition members; demonstrate the value of relationships with allies and partners; and send a range of messages to adversaries.

To update the joint force for the challenge of China and Russia, the United States should build on these Cold War lessons by ensuring that its large-scale joint exercises also test U.S. forces ability to operate in multiple domains against gray-zone threats.

Pretend Jointness

Regaining the muscle memory to compete against China and Russia after counter-insurgency operations in Iraq and Afghanistan is no small task. The pivot from counter-insurgency to great-power competition is moving slowly for two reasons. First, there is widespread confusion as to what accurately constitutes a joint experiment or exercise. To be clear: a joint exercise entails significant personnel participation from each of the services that are integrated into a single joint force executing the will of the joint force commander. It is not a Navy corpsman going to the field with the Marine infantry unit; it is not an Air Force Joint Tactical Air Control Party supporting an Army rotation at the National Training Center; and it is not Marine Corps fixed-wing aviation deploying aboard aircraft carriers. No, these are joint operations with a little j activities that the services routinely conducted a half-century ago. Today, these little j events, overly focused on service sustainment training, do little to advance 21st-century concept experimentation and joint force integration in preparation for major conflict.

Jointness with a big J, on the other hand, is a deployable joint headquarters that is fully integrated with experts from across all the warfighting functions and services. The headquarters should be commanded by a flag officer and tasked by a combatant commander with cradle-to-grave execution of large-scale exercises that agnostically integrate kinetic and non-kinetic effects across the air, land, sea, cyber, and space domains, as well as the electronic spectrum. Although talk of jointness abounds across the Department of Defense, the force seldom walks the big J walk. To quote Winston Churchill, perhaps we have been guilty of some terminological inexactitude.

A second factor is that planners across the combatant commands are consumed with repeating the same named annual exercises even though most of them to be precise are demonstrations or service-centric sustainment training. These exercises drain scarce resources and compound legitimate challenges to expanding jointness to include tracking and coordinating service-specific concept development, sustaining a reasonable operations tempo, complying with headquarters-mandated reductions, and reducing overhead costs. Decreasing the number of annual combatant command events to accommodate a joint force commanders higher-quality experimentation plan and credible big J exercises is therefore an imperative that can no longer be ignored. Victory on tomorrows battlefield against peer adversaries requires that the United States transform how it prepares for war.

The Past as Prologue (Kinda)

Large-scale Cold War exercises ensured that combat formations remained tactically proficient, and officers gave serious thought to the likely chaos and uncertainty that major conflict between nuclear powers would create. But these exercises also played a critical political-military role, signaling a strong U.S. commitment to allies and partners whose forces routinely operated with the United States in combined maneuvers designed, in part, to help improve coalition interoperability and bolster readiness.

Such exercises did not only serve as a signal to allies and partners, though. Their value as a showcase for U.S. resolve and global power-projection capabilities was significant. Large exercises like REFORGER (Return of Forces to Germany) and TEAM SPIRIT in South Korea were essential to maintaining credible conventional deterrence of both the Soviet Union and North Korea. As intended, the latter two belligerent states often perceived such exercises as war-plan rehearsals and as possible (but still ambiguous) forward posturing for potential operations.

Large, multiple-theater exercises diminished after the Cold War. The Pentagon focused on reducing operating costs, confronting terrorism, and fighting simultaneous wars in Iraq and Afghanistan. But the rise of China and renewed focus on Russia means large-scale overseas exercises should again play a key role in sustaining readiness and demonstrating U.S. preparedness to deploy and conduct multi-domain operations.

But the complexity of todays security environment is not defined solely by conventional peer-versus-peer or even proxy conflicts. China and Russia rely on gray-zone operations below the traditional thresholds for conflict competing with the United States without provoking a conventional response. Future joint and combined exercises should go beyond the traditional air, land, and sea domains to include cyberwarfare, space, the electromagnetic spectrum all integrated into a holistic and coherent operational design that includes features of irregular warfare. Jointly considering and exercising responses to gray-zone threats will pay dividends across the force.

Soviet Exercises during the Cold War

The Soviet Union attracted U.S. attention by using large-scale exercises as operational rehearsals and as signaling tools. The Okean global naval exercise series in the 1970s demonstrated the transformation of the Soviets coastal defensive navy to a blue-water force under Adm. Sergey Gorshkov. In April 1970, multi-fleet maneuvers across many oceans under a unified command from Moscow shocked the U.S. Navy and its NATO allies, who identified them as a challenge to U.S. maritime supremacy.

In April 1975, Soviet news agency TASS reported an even larger naval exercise Okean 75, the largest to date in the Cold War involving over 220 Soviet ships of all types conducting maritime maneuvers by the Northern, Baltic, Black Sea, and Pacific fleets. Land-based aircraft joined this massive power-projection display, with Tupolov-35s flying from Central Asian bases to the Arabian Sea, while surface units in the Indian Ocean indicated Soviet anti-convoy capabilities in a new theater. Meanwhile, maritime task forces conducting antiaircraft carrier operations near Sardinia highlighted a potential Soviet threat to western merchant shipping and NATO naval activities at Tyrrhenian Sea choke points. In a particularly pointed signal, submarines and surface ships set up a barrier between Iceland, the Norwegian Sea, and the North Atlantic to rehearse extending the Soviet maritime defensive perimeter away from the Barents Sea to keep U.S. aircraft carriers out of range of military and industrial targets. Significant command and control capabilities enabled simultaneous Soviet strike missions, highlighting the maturation of Gorshkovs long-discussed battle of the first salvo concept.

The massive scale of Okean 1975 was impressive for the times and elicited a sharp reaction from the United States. Navy Secretary J. William Middendorf II publicly admitted, [the exercise] clearly demonstrates the fact that the Soviet navy is capable of operating effectively in all the oceans of the world with a fleet that had twice the number of major combatants and submarines as the U.S. Navy. Okean was a wake-up call for the United States, which was preoccupied with evacuating Vietnam. Rattled Pentagon leaders commissioned a series of studies to better understand the new geopolitical landscape that was shaping the Cold War. The unambiguous message sent by the Okean exercises of the 1970s was that the Soviet Union had developed a robust navy to back its claim as a global military superpower.

Learning from the Bear

During the 1980s, Pentagon planners recognized that large exercises could play a useful role in demonstrating U.S. power-projection capabilities while offsetting the Soviet Union conventional military advantages. Accordingly, the United States implemented annual REFORGER exercises to practice rapidly deploying multiple divisions from the United States to reinforce NATO. As one 1988 observer noted, REFORGERs impressiveness stemmed not only from its size (125,000 personnel deployed across the Atlantic in 10 days) but also its critically important military and civilian mobilization and preparedness when U.S. forces reached Europe. REFORGER exercises were also complemented with annual air and sea deployments of U.S. Marines to Norway. Collectively, they broadcasted to friends and adversaries alike Americas ability to rapidly project credible combat power across the globe.

Other U.S. and NATO naval exercises in the 1980s were designed to prod Soviet decision-makers and expose Soviet wartime responses for U.S. planners. Virtually the entire U.S. attack submarine force was deployed at top speed from U.S. ports to the high North Atlantic on at least three separate occasions, sending the message to the Soviets (among others) that the United States could reach the Barents Sea before Soviet subs could sortie out of their bastions. In the Atlantic, Ocean Venture 1981 encompassed 120,000 personnel, 1,000 aircraft, and 250 ships from 15 allied nations. The apparently shocked Soviet navy dispatched unprecedented numbers of surveillance and strike aircraft, submarines, and surface ships to shadow the exercise, offering the United States and NATO valuable insights into Soviet formations and operational procedures.

Not all signals sent during Cold War exercises were received as intended. The 1983 NATO ABLE ARCHER exercise contributed to a Kremlin war scare and nearly initiated nuclear war. Nonetheless, NATO judged the exercises strategic insights as invaluable. Then-Supreme Allied Commander Gen. John R. Galvin observed, There was a failure to understand the absolute requirement for coordination and common purpose among the civilian, political, diplomatic, governmental, and military aspects of every endeavor.

On the other side of the globe, U.S. and South Korean forces conducted exercise TEAM SPIRIT each spring from 1978 to 1993 to broadcast credible defensive preparations of the peninsula to North Korea. TEAM SPIRIT peaked at 200,000 personnel in 1989, but its importance lay in its impact on North Korean perceptions. President Kim Il-sung reacted to the exercise by mobilizing his reservists and repositioning air, naval, and land forces annually at significant economic and political costs to the regime, making TEAM SPIRIT both a carrot and a stick for Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty negotiations and North Koreas inspections compliance. By revealing certain strengths through REFORGER and TEAM SPIRIT, U.S. planners enhanced deterrence and forced adversaries to divert resources into more expensive defense programs or alter key aspects of their overall strategies.

Operate and Train as You Plan to Fight

Treating peacetime exercises as real-world operations like the United States did with REFORGER and TEAM SPIRIT provides the joint force with a number of advantages. Across the force, a heightened warfighting mentality will help improve overall readiness. Such an approach will imbue training events with a heightened sense of realism, compelling forces to replicate many actions they will have to execute in conflict.

Imagine a scenario where Army and Marine High-Mobility Artillery Rocket System (HIMARS) units deploy with little notice to remote overseas islands and establish secure communications with a joint task force headquarters theater fires cell. The cell then receives targetable information from real-world sensors, provided by space or training drones. This allows the HIMARS unit to engage a hostile moving target (being simulated by a self-piloted garbage barge) once non-kinetic effects have neutralized onboard emitters replicating the ships countermeasure system. This cradle-to-grave kill chain scenario requires sophisticated multi-domain effects to be integrated across the joint force. If, for technical or political reasons, this type of realism is impractical, augmenting live exercises with high-quality virtual capabilities can help servicemembers master essential skills. This is especially important at the joint/combined level because those senior headquarters that are not forward deployed should be required to deploy to overseas exercise locations to flex their command and control responsibilities.

Second, dynamically planned operations can be used to temporarily increase U.S. force posture and presence overseas. Deploying additional brigades, air defense units, and fleet assets to key European and Pacific theater locations will not go unnoticed by Beijing, Moscow, and Pyongyang. More importantly, these events can serve as pre-crisis, flexible deterrent options. Before the outbreak of COVID-19, the exercise DEFENDER-Europe 20 would have been the largest deployment of U.S.-based forces to Europe in more than 25 years. Carrying out similar future exercises will also allow the United States and its NATO allies to address long-standing interoperability, mobility, and command and control challenges.

Third, operations can be used to stress test existing practices against new concepts. In particular, the logistical concepts that underpin major war plans can be tested by requiring forward-deployed units to actually perform such real-world sustainment functions as drawing live ammunition out of storage bunkers, transporting different fuel types between theaters, and commencing operations with planned shortages of major classes of supplies. These critical sustainment events are too often ignored or simulated in traditional exercises, which allows the joint force to cheat at solitaire in other words, to take expedient shortcuts.

New exercises can also stress test familiar operations at unfamiliar scales. One such exercise might test special operations and conventional forces ability to enforce a blockade with the simultaneous boarding of multiple adversary-leased commercial vessels. Simultaneous ship seizures by special operations forces and conventional Navy-Marine units trained to conduct complex visit, board, search, and seizure missions would signal mastery of all-domain coordination. Moreover, it would afford at tightly integrated rehearsal with multiple coalition partners who could provide the leased ships safe anchorage until the mock naval blockade ends.

Fourth, new large-scale exercises will allow the joint/combined force to experiment with concepts that are widely discussed in many military journals, such as multi-domain or all-domain operations, but that are too infrequently practiced. As Andrew F. Krepinevich, Jr. has noted, properly designed and conducted field exercises are a great source of competitive advantage that can reduce uncertainty about emerging threats, determine the right mix of new and legacy systems, enable development and evaluation of broad capabilities and new, relevant forms of operation, and uncover practical problems in new operation and force structure development.

Fifth, large training exercises can be effective vehicles for sending signals to potential adversaries about U.S. intentions and capabilities. For example, they might reveal the capability of U.S. forces to launch surprise drone swarm attacks simultaneously against multiple naval targets. U.S. vessels could be designated a naval opposing force being pursued by blue surface and subsurface naval assets. Opposing force ships could then come under swarm drone attack from shore-based land forces (American or allied) that release waves of inexpensive, sea-skimming, short-range drones. Obviously, the risks and opportunities associated with revealing certain capabilities and sending specific messages should be calculated in advance. The United States should carefully consider any ambiguities that U.S. adversaries could misunderstand, thus resulting in spiraling tensions and unwanted escalation. Tracking and recording both adversary and ally responses to exercises should be required, and post-exercise analyses should gauge the overall impact of messaging.

Looking Ahead

The joint staff and geographic combatant commanders need to revise their annual experimentation and exercise programs to be more relevant to todays great-power competition. They cannot merely fall back on large-scale exercises like REFORGER and TEAM SPIRIT, designed for another era, in the hope that they continue to be successful models for todays deterrence and force posture. Exercises of yesteryear should be refined and repurposed as real-world operations. They should thoughtfully reveal credible kinetic and carefully selected non-kinetic warfighting capabilities to U.S. adversaries. Additionally, a sophisticated global strategic communications campaign that pushes back on adversary propaganda and disinformation in real time delegitimizing such activities in frontline states under a bright international spotlight should be central to all operations.

To truly disincentivize Russian and Chinese gray-zone operations, the United States should effectively use recurring and realistic big J operations to display credible American military force. A critical by-product of this approach is that joint force commanders will be able to integrate and shape the disparate service warfighting approaches.

Tom Greenwood, USMC (Ret.), is a research staff member in the Joint Advanced Warfighting Division at the Institute for Defense Analyses. He was an infantryman with subsequent assignments in the Pentagon and on the National Security Council staff.

Owen Daniels is a research associate in the Joint Advanced Warfighting Division at the Institute for Defense Analyses.

The views, opinions, and findings expressed in this paper should not be construed as representing the official position of either the Institute for Defense Analyses or the Department of Defense.

Image: U.S. Naval Forces Europe-Africa/U.S. Sixth Fleet (Photo courtesy of LPhot Dan Rosenbaum, HMS Kent, Royal Navy)

More:

The Pentagon Should Train for and Not Just Talk About Great-Power Competition - War on the Rocks

Michael Jordan – Wife, Stats & Age – Biography

Who Is Michael Jordan?

Michael Jeffrey Jordan is a former professional American basketball player, Olympic athlete, businessperson and actor. Considered one of the best basketball players ever, he dominated the sport from the mid-1980s to the late 1990s.

Jordan led the Chicago Bulls to six National Basketball Association championships and earned the NBA's Most Valuable Player Award five times. With five regular-season MVPs and three All-Star MVPs, Jordan became the most decorated player in the NBA.

Jordan was born on February 17, 1963, in Brooklyn, New York. Growing up in Wilmington, North Carolina, Jordan developed a competitive edge at an early age. He wanted to win every game he played.

Jordan grew up with a stable family life. His mother, Delores, was a bank teller who has since written several books. His father, James, was a maintenance worker turned manager at General Electric.Jordan had four siblings: Larry, Deloris, Roslyn and James Jr.

Jordan's father,James, introduced him to baseball and built a basketball court in their backyard. James was murdered in the summer of 1993 when two teenagers shot him in his car in an apparent robbery as he was driving from Charlotte to Wilmington,North Carolina. He went missing for 11 days until hisbody was found in a swamp in McColl, South Carolina. The teens were later tried and convicted of the crime and received life sentences for first-degree murder.

Jordan enrolled at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill in 1981 and soon became an important member of the school's basketball team. UNC won the NCAA Division I championship in 1982, with Jordan scoring the final basket needed to defeat Georgetown University. He was also singled out as the NCAA College Player of the Year in 1983 and in 1984.

Jordan left college after his junior year to join the NBA in 1984. In 1985, Jordan finished his bachelor's degree in geography as he continued to play basketball professionally.

Jordan began his professional basketball career when he was drafted by the Chicago Bulls in 1984. He was the third overall pick, behind Hakeem Olajuwon, who was selected first by the Houston Rockets, and Sam Bowie, taken by thePortland Trail Blazers; the draft also featured legendary players John Stocktonand Charles Barkley.

Jordan soon proved himself on the court. He helped the team make the playoffs and scored an average of 28.2 points per game that season. For his efforts, Jordan received the NBA Rookie of the Year Award and was selected for the All-Star Game.

While his second season was marred by injury, he was breaking new ground on the court during the 1986-87 season. He became the first player since Wilt Chamberlain to score more than 3,000 points in a single season.

By the late 1980s, the Chicago Bulls were quickly becoming a force to be reckoned with, and Jordan was an instrumental part of the team's success.

The Bulls made it to the Eastern Conference Finals in 1990 and won their first NBA championship the following year by defeating the Los Angeles Lakers. Jordan was well known by then for his superior athleticism on the court and for his leadership abilities.

In 1992, the Chicago Bulls beat the Portland Trail Blazers to win their second NBA championship. The team took their third championship the following year, dominating in the basketball world.

Following a short stint in minor league baseball, in March 1995 Jordan returned to the basketball court for the Chicago Bulls. He came back even stronger the following year, averaging 30.4 points per game to lead the Bulls to a then-record 72 regular-season wins before they defeated the Seattle SuperSonics for the NBA championship.

Chicago nearly matched the previous year's record with 69 wins in 1996-97, a season that ended with a six-game win over the Utah Jazz in the NBA Finals. The two teams faced each other again for the championship in 1998, with Jordan sinking the winning shot in Game 6 to claim his sixth NBA title.

Michael Jordan takes a layup against the New York Knicks during the NBA game at Madison Square Garden on April 19, 1997, in New York City, New York.

Photo: Nathaniel S. Butler/NBAE 1997 via Getty Images

After his second retirement from basketball in 1999, Jordan joined the Washington Wizards in 2000 as a part owner and as president of basketball operations.

In the fall of 2001, Jordan relinquished these roles to return to the court once more. He played for the Wizards for two seasons before retiring for good in 2003.

During the summer of 1984, Jordan made his first appearance at the Olympic Games as a member of the U.S. Olympic basketball team. The team won the gold at the games that year, which were held in Los Angeles.

Jordan later helped the American team bring home the gold medal at the 1992 Olympic Games, held in Barcelona, Spain.

Over the 19 years since beginning his professional basketball career, Jordan retired from the sport three times. He first retired in 1993 and again in 1998, then finally hung up his jersey for good in 2003.

DOWNLOAD BIOGRAPHY'S MICHAEL JORDAN FACT CARD

In a move that shocked many, after the end of the 1992-93 basketball season, Jordan announced his retirement from basketball to pursue baseball. For one year, in 1994, Jordan played for a minor league team, the Birmingham Barons, as an outfielder.

This decision came shortly following the murder of Jordan's father, who always wanted him to play baseball. He had last played baseball as a high school senior, in 1981.

"You tell me I can't do something, and I'm going to do it," Jordan said.

During his short career in baseball, which many fans considered a whim, Jordan had a rather dismal .202 batting average. However many of the people who worked with him at the time said he was an extremely dedicated player with potential.

"He had it all. Ability, aptitude, work ethic. He was always so respectful of what we were doing and considerate of his teammates. Granted, he had a lot to learn,"said former Barons manager Terry Francona. "I do think with another 1,000 at-bats, he would've made it. But there's something else that people miss about that season. Baseball wasn't the only thing he picked up. I truly believe that he rediscovered himself, his joy for competition. We made him want to play basketball again."

After his season with the Barons, Jordan wentto the Arizona Fall League to play for the Scottsdale Scorpions. After hitting .252 and naming himself the team's "worst player," he returned to the NBA in March 1995 with a two-word press release: "I'm back."

Outside of his career in basketball, Jordan has been involved in a number of profitable business and commercial ventures.Between his profitable Nike partnership and his ownership of the Charlotte Hornets, Forbes estimated Jordan's net worth to be over $1 billion in2018.

Jordan signed his first deal with Nike in 1984, and hecurrently serves on the Nike Inc. board of directors.

Nike launched the signature Air Jordan basketball sneakers in 1985.In its initial contract, Nike gave Jordan a generous 25 percent in royalties.

The Air Jordan quickly proved very popular, and it continues to be a best-seller for the apparel maker more than 30 years later. The collaboration mints money for Nike and Jordan, with Nike reporting nearly $2.9 billionin revenue for the Air Jordan line in 2018.

Over the years, Jordan has signed a number of other endorsement deals with brands including Hanes, Upper Deck, Gatorade, Coca-Cola, McDonald's, Chevrolet and Wheaties.

Jordan made a big splash in film as the star of the 1996 movie Space Jam. The film mixed live action and animation and paired Jordan with cartoon legends Bugs Bunny and Daffy Duck on screen.

Michael Jordan in 'Space Jam'

Photo: Warner Bros/Everett

In 2006, Jordan bought a share of the Charlotte Hornets (formerly known as the Bobcats) and joined the team's executive ranks as its managing member of basketball operations. In 2010, he became the majority owner of the Charlotte Hornets and serves as the team's chairman.

Improving the team's less-than-stellar record seemed to be Jordan's priority. He told ESPN in November 2012 that "I don't anticipate getting out of this business. My competitive nature is I want to succeed. It's always been said that when I can't find a way to do anything, I will find a way to do it." While the Hornets' on-court record isn't hugely successful, the organization has grown from a $175 million valuation in 2006 to$1.05 billion in 2018.

In 1998, Jordan launched into the restaurant business as the owner of Michael Jordans The Steak House N.Y.C. Designed to reflect Jordans tastes and style, this typical steakhouse seated 150 and 60 at the bar, occupying 7,000 square feet in Grand Central Terminal, before closing in late 2018. Jordan also opened restaurants in Chicago, at the Mohegan Sun casino in Uncasville, Connecticut, and at the Ilani Casino Resort in Ridgefield, Washington.

From 2001 through 2014, Jordan hosted an annual charity golf event known as the Michael Jordan Celebrity Invitational, with proceeds benefiting foundations including Make-A-Wish, Cats Care, the James R. Jordan Foundation, Keep Memory Alive and Opportunity Village.

The four-day tournament and celebration attracted celebrity participants including Wayne Gretzky, Michael Phelps, Chevy Chase, Samuel L. Jackson and Mark Wahlberg.

Jordan received his first Most Valuable Player Award from the NBA in 1988an honor he would earn four more times, in 1991, 1992, 1996 and 1998.

In April 2009, Jordan received one of basketball's greatest honors: He was inducted into the Naismith Memorial Basketball Hall of Fame. Attending the induction ceremony was a bittersweet affair for Jordan because being at the event meant "your basketball career is completely over," he explained.

In 2016, Jordan was presented with the Presidential Medal of Freedom by PresidentBarack Obama.

48 inches

In 1989, Jordan married Juanita Vanoy. The couple had three children together: Jeffrey, Marcus and Jasmine. After 17 years of marriage, they divorced in December 2006.

On April 27, 2013, Jordan married 35-year-old Cuban American model Yvette Prieto in Palm Beach, Florida. Tiger Woods, Spike Lee and Patrick Ewing, among other celebrities, reportedly attended the wedding ceremony. The couple welcomed twin daughters, Victoria and Ysabel, in February 2014.

Jordan and Juanita's two sons, Jeffrey and Marcus, both played basketball in college and had dreams of making it to the NBA.

Jeffrey joined the basketball team at the University of Illinois in 2007. Both Jordan and his ex-wife Juanita supported their son and tried to help him deal with playing in the shadow of an NBA legend.

"The thing that we have tried to tell Jeff is that you set your own expectations. By no means in this world can you ever live up to someone else's expectations of who you are," Jordan said during an appearance on the Today show.

Jeffrey played for the University of Illinois for three seasons, from 2007 to 2010. He then played for the University of Southern Florida for one season, from 2011 to 2012, before retiring from basketball. He later entered a management training program at Nike.

Jordan's younger son Marcus also played basketball for the UCF Knights, for three seasons from 2009 to 2012. He went on to open a basketball shoe and apparel store in Florida.

"They wanted to be like their dad. What boy doesn't? But they both got to a point where they said, 'We're not going to the NBA'," said Juanita in 2013.

After the 2019-20 NBA season was halted by the coronavirus pandemic, ESPN's spring 2020 airing of The Last Dance, a 10-part documentary about the Jordan-led 1997-98 Bulls, became must-watch viewing for basketball fans. Along with featuring archival footage of Jordan and interviews with teammates and opponents, The Last Danceexplored the tension between the Bulls' front office and its peerless superstar over his final triumphant year with the team.

Read this article:

Michael Jordan - Wife, Stats & Age - Biography

Air Jordans | Stadium Goods

Thirteen years. It's been that long since Michael Jeffrey Jordan last graced a NBA floor, and yet his name will be forever mentioned with reverence thanks to Air Jordan and Jordan shoes. The Wilmington, North Carolina, natives legacy in professional basketball is cemented; the same can be said about his Air Jordan line singlehandedly the most influential signature sneaker line ever. The story begins in 1985, when Nike released the Air Jordan 1. Designed by Peter Moore, inspired by the Dunk silhouette, Jordans inaugural shoes reign on top was shorter than Leprechauns. Banned. That was the NBAs mandate, citing the black and red colorway as reprehensible by the leagues standard of players outfitted in simple black or white shoes. Its Italian-made successor, the Air Jordan 2, saw better results. But it wasnt until 1988, when Nike designer Tinker Hatfield jumped on board to create the elephant-print clad Air Jordan 3, that the Air Jordan story really came together. Director Spike Lee was commissioned to make the kicks larger than life in an iconic run of television spots. During this time, MJs star was rising, as the Chicago Bulls proved to be viable NBA championship contenders. Things changed with the arrival of the 90s. Michael and the Bulls won three straight NBA titles; he retired in 1993 after the tragic death of his father to chase a career playing baseball; he returned to the game mid-season in 1995, winning another three consecutive championships between the 95-96 and 97-98 seasons. And while this was happening, Hatfield was there, creating the footwear Jordan wore each night pushing the needle one innovative silhouette at a time. A cannon of sneakers that pushed the boundaries of design and branding, one that continues to embrace this generation's athletes under the Jordan Brand umbrella. Air Jordan is synonymous with innovation. From 1985 'til infinity.

Excerpt from:

Air Jordans | Stadium Goods

Urban Dictionary: Jordan

A boy unlike any other. One you can truly see yourself being with for the rest of your life. He is the boy you'd die for. You look at him, and your heart will just.. melt. Everything you thought you knew about 'love' changes into something you never could have imagined because of this boy. Once you were broken, and now you are fixed. You can almost feel the emotion in his texts, you can HEAR the truth in his words, you can listen to the rhythmic sounds of love in every single one of his heart beats. You'll want to marry this boy. I promise you. His smile could make the strongest of hearts melt. His laugh could give you so many butterflies that they'll fill your entire stomach and send them flying out of your toes. You'll instantly fall in love with him. Nothing else matters but him. Your head is filled with thoughts of him. Everything reminds you of him. A minute feels like a lifetime with him not around. The memories with a Jordan could pierce the soul. You could never bring yourself to leave him. Never. No matter what he did, when you know that you're all his.. it doesn't ever matter. You spend days with him, and when he leaves, it feels as though it's been 5 minutes. You feel like, in order to feel whole, you need to be around him. To see those amazing eyes and have him hold you in his arms. You love him. You love him always.. Having a Jordan in your life is not always a privilege, but the one i have is surely #1, and i never want to lose my Jordan.

More:

Urban Dictionary: Jordan

Michael Jordan’s The Last Dance: Air Jordan 1 ‘Chicago’ prices double – Insider – INSIDER

Sunday's most recent episodes of ESPN's 10-part Michael Jordan documentary "The Last Dance" focused heavily on Jordan's relationship with Nike.

Since, resale prices for the Air Jordan 1 "Chicago" have doubled, according to Highsnobiety.

Released in September 1985, the red, white, and black sneakers are one of Air Jordan's most iconic and recognizable products. Originally sold at a price of just $65, the most recent release of the sneakers, which came in 2015, sell for an average of $836, according to StockX.

As of Sunday, pairs have started to sell foras much as $1,700.

CNN reports that since the first episode of The Last Dance aired on April 19, the average resale price for a pair of Chicagos has been $1,241.

"That sneaker started a revolution, it sparked a fire that even 35 years later still burns bright," Paul Barber, a sneaker artist and collector from the UK told CNN. "The Jordan 1 is symbolic."

"People see you in that sneaker and they know instantly that you're into your kicks. You'll see people check out your sneakers and they'll give you a little nod of the head of appreciation."

In Russ Bengtson's 2018Slam Online article titled "Change the Game: How The Air Jordan 1 Transformed Sneaker Culture," he wrote: "If it's hard to separate the Air Jordan 1 from sneaker culture, it's because most of what we know as 'sneaker culture' sprung up around the Air Jordan 1 itself."

Jordans in general are proving popular right now, with the shoes making up four of the top five "most popular" shoes listed on StockX as of Wednesday morning.

StockX's most popular sneakers as of Wednesday morning. StockX

Sunday's new episodes shed light on Jordan's initial reticence to partner with Nike in his early career, with the future GOAT favoring Adidas. Jordan said he was forced by his parents to listen to Nike's offer, and the rest is history.

"My mother said, 'You're going to go listen. You may not like it, but you're going to go listen,'" Jordan said. "She made me get on that plane and go listen."

Read more:

Where Michael Jordan, Scottie Pippen, and Dennis Rodman's interviews were filmed in 'The Last Dance'

Michael Jordan has made $1.3 billion from his 36-year partnership with Nike. He originally wanted to sign with Adidas before his parents made him listen to Nike's offer.

Director of 'The Last Dance' says he had to 'work hard' to get insight from Kobe Bryant about Michael Jordan

View post:

Michael Jordan's The Last Dance: Air Jordan 1 'Chicago' prices double - Insider - INSIDER

McCarthy embraces ex-rival Jordan as the top partisan fighter – POLITICO

"Donald Trump had a no more ferocious partisan defender than Jim Jordan throughout the impeachment proceedings in the House," said Raskin, who also tangled publicly with Jordan recently over the issue of whether members should wear face masks during the coronavirus pandemic. "He's a man of real talent but where does the Constitution fit in, where does the public interest fit in? It's not clear to me."

"You shouldn't make a career out of defending people who abuse their power," Raskin added.

But for many Republicans, Jordan is a battle-tested warrior who knows how to push an aggressive message. He played a starring role in the Houses impeachment battle last year as a temporary member of the Intelligence Committee a move that was encouraged by Trump, but enabled by McCarthy.

Earlier this year, GOP lawmakers with McCarthys blessing elected Jordan to serve as ranking Republican on the Judiciary Committee, hoping to put Trumps fiercest defender on the front lines of combating Democratic oversight efforts.

Former Rep. Mark Meadows (R-N.C.), meanwhile, was tapped to be the ranking member on Oversight. When Meadows resigned from Congress to become Trumps chief of staff in March, Jordan took back the reins on Oversight. And with the coronavirus pandemic keeping lawmakers away from the Capitol, there are no immediate plans to replace Jordan, leaving him as the top Republican on two key panels.

Jordan has earned leaderships trust and is seen as a team player, a dramatic reversal from how he was seen just a short time ago. The Ohio Republican first elected to Congress in 2006 was a thorn in the side of GOP leadership when they were in the majority.

Jordan and Meadows used the hard-line conservative House Freedom Caucus to go after McCarthy and other party leaders, often wrecking top Republicans plans on spending bills or other measures. After Trump was elected, the pair would go over leaderships head to pitch their plans directly to the president, playing to his most antagonistic instincts on high-profile issues. Jordan and Meadows helped push Trump to engage in the disastrous 2018 government shutdown, for instance, despite heavy opposition from McCarthy and Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.).

McCarthys newfound alliance with Jordan is sure to earn him plaudits with conservatives down the road, support the California Republican may need if the GOP doesnt win back the House in November.

This is all about internal Republican politics, griped one GOP lawmaker. Appease the hard right at all costs.

Yet Republicans repeatedly described Jordan's ability to help boost the profile of younger members as one reason he's fostered fierce loyalty among his colleagues. Rep. Matt Gaetz of Florida said Jordan has made a concerted effort to mentor junior lawmakers including himself, as well as Reps. Elise Stefanik of New York and Kelly Armstrong of New Dakota to become more effective in high profile hearings. Rep. Jamie Comer (R-Ky.) said Jordan allows less senior members to take starring roles in committee hearings that feature issues they care about and know well.

Another huge plus for Jordan is that his growing national profile as a Trump ally has turned him into a fundraising power house. Jordan has $2.6 million cash on hand and has fundraised for dozens of his GOP colleagues.

Multiple lawmakers also credited McCarthy with being willing to set aside his adversarial relationship with Jordan for the good of the Republican Conference.

"It says a lot about McCarthy too that he's secure enough to use the guy who ran against him for speaker. They both get along great now," Comer said. "They're stronger working together than fighting each other.

Comer recalled Jordan allying with McCarthy a few weeks ago to pass a bipartisan bill updating federal surveillance laws that had been panned by the Freedom Caucus. Comer said Jordan stood up against his longtime allies to help make the case for the bill.

Jim is an excellent investigator and has an excellent team, said Rep. Andy Biggs (R-Ariz.), a conservative hard-liner who serves on the Judiciary panel and is the new chief of the Freedom Caucus. He is dogged in his pursuit for truth, and so I think hes a perfect choice.

Jim is our most talented member, and Jim is our hardest working member. Kevin is our most likable member. Together, they've made a great team, added Gaetz.

Both [McCarthy and Jordan] recognize their own strengths and weaknesses and both have realized that they work together as a team, he said. I don't think that realization would have occurred in the norms of Washington absent the crucible of impeachment.

More here:

McCarthy embraces ex-rival Jordan as the top partisan fighter - POLITICO

Jordan: Authorities must allow urgent medical care for displaced Syrians in Rukban during COVID-19 – Amnesty International

A lack of basic medical care along the Syria-Jordan Rukban crossing, in the area known as the berm, is putting thousands of lives at risk during the COVID-19 pandemic, Amnesty International has warned.

The organization is particularly concerned by a lack of maternal health care, which means pregnant women in need of caesarean section are being forced to travel to give birth in territory controlled by the Syrian government. These women are then prevented by Syrian security forces from returning to their families in the camp.

In early 2015, tens of thousands of Syrians displaced by the conflict were trapped in the area in desperate living conditions. At the time of writing, at least 10,000 people remain there, with no access to sanitization and other materials to protect against the spread of COVID-19. The camps only medical centre has no doctors, a few nurses and one midwife.

Pregnant women and other patients in urgent need of care have nowhere to turn to

A UNICEF-run medical centre in the camp, where residents could receive essential treatment, was closed in mid-March due to the COVID-19 pandemic. The last humanitarian convoy allowed into the berm by the Syrian government dates back to September 2019.

While the Jordanian authorities are right in seeking to protect the population living in Jordan from COVID-19, they must not put others lives at risk while doing so, said Lynn Maalouf, Amnesty Internationals Middle East Research Director.

The one medical centre remaining in the berm is simply not equipped for emergency care or specialized treatment. Pregnant women and other patients in urgent need of care have nowhere to turn to.

The Jordanian authorities must allow those seeking medical treatment to access facilities in Jordan, and also allow humanitarian aid and essential services to reach the area.

In March, Jordan announced it would not allow relief aid to pass through its territory to deliver assistance and medical equipment to the camp, citing COVID-19 concerns.

People in the berm have been lacking food, drinkable water and medicines for more than four years, and increasingly so in the past two years. Both the Syrian and Jordanian governments must urgently ensure unfettered access to humanitarian aid, said Lynn Maalouf.

Background

In early 2015, tens of thousands of people seeking safety from the conflict in Syria ended up stranded in the no-mans land known as the berm, between the Jordan and Syria border, near the Rukban and Hadalat crossings. An estimated 75 per cent of the berms population have returned to Syria since mid-2015, according to the UN. Amnesty International has previously documented concerns around access to humanitarian aid, including health and sanitation inside the berm.

Jordan hosts about 650,000 Syrian refugees, which amounts to 10 per cent of its population. Amnesty International continues to call on the international community to take a fair share of responsibility for supporting Syrian refugees, and alleviate the financial burden that has disproportionately fallen on neighbouring countries.

Original post:

Jordan: Authorities must allow urgent medical care for displaced Syrians in Rukban during COVID-19 - Amnesty International

Kobe Bryant-Michael Jordan connection: What ‘The Last Dance’ doesn’t tell you about their relationship – CBS Sports

Moments before the 1998 All-Star Game tipped off, then-NBC announcer Bob Costas introduced Kobe Bryant as "the man many have dubbed 'the next Michael Jordan.'" Bryant was 19 years old, starting for the Western Conference even though he was still coming off the bench for the Los Angeles Lakers. Jordan was representing the Chicago Bulls in the event for the last time.

The fifth episode of "The Last Dance," the 10-part ESPN/Netflix documentary, begins with a dedication: "IN LOVING MEMORY OF KOBE BRYANT." It features highlights of Jordan and Bryant going at each other at Madison Square Garden and behind-the-scenes footage of Jordan and his Eastern Conference teammates talking about Bryant.

Before his death, Bryant was interviewed for the documentary. In the middle of the All-Star sequence, he looks back on that time and speaks reverentially about Jordan.

"It was a rough couple of years for me coming into the league," Bryant says. "'Cause at the time the league was so much older. It's not as young as is is today. So nobody was really thinking much of me. I was the kid that shot a bunch of airballs, you know what I mean? And at that point Michael provided a lot of guidance for me. Like, I had a question about shooting his turnaround shot, so I asked him about it. And he gave me a great, detailed answer. But on top of that he said, 'If you never need anything, give me a call.'

"He's like my big brother. I truly hate having discussions about who would win one-on-one, or fans saying, 'Hey, Kob', you'd beat Michael one-on-one.' I feel like, yo, what you get from me is from him. I don't get five championships here without him because he guided me so much and gave me so much great advice."

There was some tension back then, however. In the locker room at MSG, Jordan says, "That little Laker boy's going to take everybody one-on-one."

"I know, right?" Tim Hardaway replies.

"He don't let the game come to him," Jordan says. "He just go out there and take it. 'I'm going to make this s--- happen. I'm going to make this a one-on-one game.'"

Off-camera, another All-Star says he figured Bryant would chill after his first four attempts.

"After his first four attempts?" Jordan says. "If I was his teammates I wouldn't pass him the f---in' ball. You want this ball again, brother, you better rebound."

Here's what "The Last Dance" doesn't tell you about that night and the relationship between Jordan and Bryant.

There is a brief exchange between Jordan and Eastern Conference coach Larry Bird at the team photoshoot, in which Bird says, 'So, you're feeling all right, huh?" The documentary does not explain, however, that Jordan had the flu leading up to the All-Star Game. He missed practice and was listed as questionable before the game.

Bird told Newsday's Mike Gavin in 2015 that Jordan was clearly still sick on the bus to the arena, but Bryant got him going: "Kobe was trying to go after Michael early. And Michael started going back at him."

During the game, Ahmad Rashad interviewed Jordan on the bench. "He's being very, very aggressive," Jordan said on the broadcast. "If I knew someone was sick, certainly the first thing I'd do, I'd go after someone. But I've gotta defend myself. You know, he's gotta play defense just like I gotta play defense." He also said that he hadn't been near a basketball for three or four days.

Jordan finished with a game-high 23 points on 10 for 18 shooting, plus eight assists, six rebounds, three steals and his third All-Star Game MVP award. Bryant had 18 points, the most of any West player, on 7 for 16 shooting, plus one assist, three rebounds and two steals.

"I really didn't expect to come in here and win the MVP award," Jordan said that night. "I just wanted to make sure Kobe didn't dominate me.

"It was a good battle. It was fun. He attacked. The hype was me vs. him. I knew I wasn't 100 percent and he was, and he was biting at the bit. I'm just glad that I was able to fight him off."

The Michael vs. Kobe storyline started before the game did, even though one of them was near his 35th birthday and the other only 19 years old. In the press, Bryant downplayed it, per "Showboat: The Life of Kobe Bryant," by Roland Lazenby:

The dominant question, repeated often, was a request for Bryant to compare himself with Jordan. "There aren't any similarities," the teenager replied, "other than we're both six-six and we rely on athletic ability. I mean, he's Michael Jordan."

...

"I wanted eventually to be one of the best players in the league," Bryant would say, looking back two years later. "I just didn't know that other people would urge me to be that right away. Everybody was expecting me to be the next Michael. I thought I was going to sneak through the back door."

Bryant did not act so humble on the court. He famously waved off a screen from Karl Malone, angering the veteran, and Western Conference coach George Karl kept Bryant on the bench for the entire fourth quarter.

"It's a team game," Karl told reporters, via Lazenby. "Kobe made some great plays, but Michael and the East made better basketball decisions. Kobe will probably have the opportunity to come back here and add more 'simple' to what he's doing."

Bryant used the benching as motivation when facing Karl's Denver Nuggets in the 2008, 2009 and 2012 playoffs, he told Darius Miles and Quentin Richardson on the Knuckleheads podcast last September.

As "The Last Dance" illustrates, Bryant was unafraid to be competitive with Jordan right away, but there was always mutual respect. Bryant modeled his game after Jordan's and leaned on him as a mentor. Jordan talked about this during his teary, unforgettable speech at Bryant's memorial:

"He wanted to be the best basketball player that he could be," Jordan said that day at Staples Center. "And as I got to know him, I wanted to be the best big brother that I could be. To do that, you have to put up with the aggravation, the late-night calls or the dumb questions. I took great pride, as I got to know Kobe Bryant, that he was just trying to be a better person, a better basketball player. We talked about business, we talked about family, we talked about everything."

In the documentary, when Bryant mentions asking Jordan about his turnaround jumper and Jordan saying he can call anytime, he is referring to a game in December of his second season, a couple of months before that All-Star Game at MSG. Bryant scored 33 points off the bench and Jordan had 36 in the Bulls' 104-83 victory. Scottie Pippen and Shaquille O'Neal were both out with injuries, adding to the Michael-against-Kobe vibe.

"In the fourth quarter of that game, he asked me about my post-up move, in terms of, 'Do you keep your legs wide? Or do you keep your legs tight?' It was kind of shocking," Jordan said, via Lazenby. "I felt like an old guy when he asked me that. I told him on the offensive end you always try to feel and see where the defensive player is. In the post-up on my turnaround jump shot, I always use my legs to feel where the defense is playing so I can react to the defense."

He might have been dispensing advice, but, just like at the All-Star Game, Jordan wanted the world to know he was the best player on the planet.

"Michael loves this stuff," Bulls guard Ron Harper said, via Lazenby. "[Kobe] is a very young player who someday may take his throne, but I don't think Michael's ready to give up his throne yet. He came out to show everybody that he's Air Jordan still."

Bryant told ESPN's Jackie MacMullan in 2016 that he peppered Jordan with questions about post defense when the next season was delayed by a lockout: "Speaking to M.J. was like getting my own college education at the highest level."

The endless comparisons, however, made the relationship more complex than it seems in "The Last Dance." Yes, Bryant copied "damn near 100 percent" of Jordan's technique, Bryant told Bleacher Report's Howard Beck in 2017, but in a 2014 story from the same outlet, Kevin Ding wrote that there was a time when asking him about Jordan might elicit an eye roll.

"The thing that I always bristled at was the notion that I learned everything that I know from Michael," Bryant told Ding. "That's just not true. Hakeem Olajuwon deserves a lot of credit; Jerry West deserves a lot of credit. Oscar Robertson deserves a lot of credit. I really was a student of the game and watched everybody."

In 2010, Bryant told Adrian Wojnarowski that he got his mentality from Michael Jackson, not Jordan. In an ESPN column after Bryant's death, Wojnarowski wrote that Bryant had felt slighted because Jordan had left him off "some sort of list of great players."

The first time Bryant noticed Jordan, he hadn't turned six yet. Jordan was playing for the United States' national team in 1984, preparing for the Olympics with a series of games against pros.

"This guy dribbles on the fast break and took off -- I think it was over Magic -- and dunked and flew past Magic," Bryant said, via Lazenby. "That's not supposed to happen. Who was this kid? I don't like this kid 'cause Magic was my guy. I think that's the first time I saw him."

As strange as it sounds given how Bryant's game developed, Lazenby wrote that "the unquestioned star of the Bryant household during Kobe's young life was Magic Johnson."

In the same biography, however, legendary shoe executive Sonny Vaccaro recalls recruiting Bryant for Adidas and noticing that Bryant was adopting Jordan's mannerisms. Bryant shaved his head and even sounded more like Jordan when he talked. Adidas' message was that he would be the next Jordan, and it had apparently sunk in.

Vaccaro also recalled Bryant saying, "I'm going to be better than he is."

Bryant was studying and mimicking Jordan, but Peter Moore, then Adidas' creative director, said he made it known that "wanted to be his own icon," even before he played an NBA game.

In a January 2000 game against the Nuggets, Bryant hit his first eight shots and scored 27 points in the first half with Jordan watching from a suite. Bryant told reporters that he knew Jordan was in attendance, but when asked if he raised his game because of it, smiled and said, "Nope." Phil Jackson arranged a meeting between the two of them, and later said in an interview on Fox Sports Live that the first thing Bryant said was, "I could kick your ass one-on-one."

In his interview with Ding, Bryant categorized that as "mythology" and said that whenever he and Jordan talked trash, Jordan initiated it. But this could very well be the same meeting Jordan described at Bryant's memorial, in which he walked into the room and Bryant immediately asked if he'd brought his basketball shoes with him.

In Michael Leahy's book "When Nothing Else Matters," Jordan is described as vacillating "between the roles of mentor and rival for Bryant." Jordan counseled him about the triangle offense on Jackson's behalf, but could get irritated with reporters who asked him about Bryant, particularly if he perceived that they were implying the two were on the same level in their respective primes.

As a Washington Wizards executive, Jordan was frustrated by the way the league's new stars were being discussed. In an interview with Leahy that foreshadowed his comeback, he directly mentioned Bryant:

He betrayed the anxiety of a deity who worried about his legend slowly receding. "I don't want to sound bitter or old or whatever," he muttered. "I'm just saying that when Michael Jordan is not playing --" He abruptly stopped himself, only then seeing where he wanted to go with this, thinking of the buzz surrounding the Los Angeles Lakers superstar Kobe Bryant. "If a guy -- for instance, the other night, Kobe Bryant scores 51 points. Now that is a huge story. And then comparisons start to be made to Michael Jordan. But people tend to forget that Michael Jordan scored 50-plus points three games in a row. You understand my whole point? ... People tend to migrate to the [current] player because two years have elapsed from seeing Michael Jordan on the basketball court."

And then there was this story, leaked by Jordan's camp:

Jordan had much the same kind of relationship with Kobe Bryant that he had with many young stars, giving advice when asked. For a long while, Bryant had ravenously absorbed every suggestion. But given each man's nature, it was inevitable, as Bryant matured and needed Jordan's pointers less, that something said by one would sometimes push the competitive buttons of the other. Bryant had listened coolly once, during Jordan's executive days, when the mentor lectured him on defensive techniques. It was a day when Jordan bantered lightly about the fantasy of playing again. Chuckling, Bryant responded, "Stay upstairs, old man. You'll have more fun upstairs."

Jordan and Bryant's final matchup was In March 2003, near the end of Jordan's actual last dance. Bryant scored 55 points against Jordan's Wizards, including 42 in the first half:

According to Gilbert Arenas, Bryant was trying to prove a point. On the No Chill podcast, Arenas said that, following Washington's win against Los Angeles earlier in the season, Jordan told Bryant that he could put Jordan's shoes on, but would never fill them.

There was a time, however, when Bryant wanted to play for the Wizards because of Jordan's presence. They were never going to be teammates, but in 2015 Michael Lee, then of the Washington Post, reported that Bryant had told Jordan multiple times that he wanted to join the team after Jordan retired for good. (This was back when Bryant was feuding with Shaquille O'Neal and everybody assumed Jordan would return to his former role in D.C.)

"I've always been very big on having mentors, on having muses and I've been really, really big on that," Bryant told Lee. "Being around guys who have done it before and done it at a high level and always tried to pick their brains and always tried to absorb knowledge. Obviously, being in that situation [with the Wizards], it would've helped having to be around him every day and so on."

Bryant said he was certain they would have won titles together. And according to a source close to Jordan, had he been running the team in 2004, Jordan was confident that Bryant would have signed with Washington as a free agent.

Read the rest here:

Kobe Bryant-Michael Jordan connection: What 'The Last Dance' doesn't tell you about their relationship - CBS Sports

Michael Jordan on the Mavericks? Mark Cuban tried to make it happen – Yahoo Sports

Michael Jordans return to the NBA in 2001 was not a glorious one.

He remained a productive player at the end of his career as he averaged more than 20 points in each of his two seasons with the Washington Wizards.

But at 38 and 39 years old, he had devolved into a volume shooter playing on bad basketball teams that failed to eclipse 37 wins.

What if Jordan instead had joined a contender that had prime talent and deployed his leadership and limited skillset in a more surgical fashion?

Mark Cuban tried to make that happen.

The Dallas Mavericks owner told Dallas 105.3 The Fan on Tuesday (h/t @ Mike Fisher) that he tried to talk Jordan and his agent David Falk out of signing with the Wizards in 2001. He had just bought his majority stake of the Mavericks a year prior.

The day he signed with the Washington Wizards to come back, David Falk thats right when I was buying the Mavs said why dont you go meet him? Cuban said. So I went to David Falks office and all the papers were right there. And I was trying to convince MJ to not sign them and to do something with the Mavs.

What would the Mavericks have looked like with Jordan from 2001-03? Pretty strong.

The 01-02 Mavs featured Michael Finley, Steve Nash and a 23-year-old Dirk Nowitzki just coming into his prime. They finished 57-25 and lost in the second round of the playoffs to Chris Webbers Sacramento Kings.

Steve Nash was still in Dallas the next season as the same core led the Mavericks to a 60-22 record and a Western Conference finals loss to the eventual champion San Antonio Spurs.

Could Jordan in a limited but more precise role have helped the Mavericks over the hump to cut short the Shaq-Kobe dynasty in 2002 or steal a title from Tim Duncans Spurs in 2003?

Would Jordan have accepted anything but a starring role?

Its all moot, of course. There was no chance Jordans comeback was going to land anywhere but in Washington. He orchestrated his own return to the court as the part owner and president of basketball operationsof the Wizards in 2000. There was a reason former Chicago Bulls head coach Doug Collins was on the Wizards sideline.

Story continues

But Jordan on the early 00s Mavs makes for a fascinating what-if.

More from Yahoo Sports:

Read more from the original source:

Michael Jordan on the Mavericks? Mark Cuban tried to make it happen - Yahoo Sports

Heres what happened to the $2 million Michael Jordan donated in 2016 – The Undefeated

On July 25, 2016, following the police-involved shootings of two black men, Philando Castile and Alton Sterling, and the fatal shooting of five Dallas police officers at a protest, Charlotte Hornets owner Michael Jordan donated $1 million each to two organizations in an effort to foster greater understanding, positive change and create a more peaceful world for ourselves, our children, our families and our communities, he wrote in a letter that appeared on The Undefeated.

Those donations to the NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund, Inc. (LDF) and International Association of Chiefs of Police (IACP) were notable, not just because of the size of the grants, but also because of the notable reputation of Jordan.

Throughout his 15-year NBA career, Jordan was a global marketing superstar, with endorsement deals from the likes of Nike, Hanes, Gatorade, McDonalds and Coca-Cola. He was able to captivate the entire country by the sheer force of his charisma and basketball talent over a six-season stretch, Jordan averaged 33 points a game, which is insane to type but also his general ability to not offend the masses. Jordan reportedly once said, Republicans buy sneakers, too, a claim he never admitted to until the recent release of ESPNs The Last Dance documentary.

So, when Jordan announced he would be donating $2 million on July 25, 2016, as a way of furthering social change, society took notice.

Four years later, heres what happened to all that money.

In 2016, Sherrilyn Ifill, president and director-counsel of the LDF, and Chief Terrence M. Cunningham of the IACP appeared on the July 10 episode of the CBS program Face the Nation. They were there to discuss the distance between law enforcement and African American communities across the country. Two weeks later, Jordans people called.

Our executive director got an email out of the blue on a Sunday evening at 7 oclock, where they said that they had a donor that wanted to make a million-dollar donation to the IACP, Cunningham told The Undefeated.

Jordan announced the grants the next day and said he chose the LDF, which separated from the NAACP in 1957, and IACP because he believed the two organizations could make a positive difference while the country reeled from the recent acts of violence against African Americans and police officers.

Ifill believes the LDF was chosen because of its prioritization of constitutional protections for black people and its ability to directly engage with law enforcement.

We understood that Mr. Jordan was deeply concerned about what he saw what all Americans were seeing at that time police killings of unarmed African Americans and a total disconnect in most instances between the way community members and civil rights groups were talking about the issue and the way law enforcement was talking about it, Ifill said via email.

Cunningham, a retired Wellesley, Massachusetts, police chief and current deputy executive director of the IACP, said his organizations ability to change its policy likely made it an attractive law enforcement organization for Jordan. That same year, the IACP had organized a meeting of 17 law enforcement organizations that developed a national consensus use-of-force policy for officers.

I think it was the breadth and the reach of IACP that the Jordan folks saw when they vetted us, Cunningham said. And then you combine that with the power of our relationship with the legal defense fund, theres a real opportunity for change there.

With the $1 million grant, the LDF was able to further employ staff attorneys, researchers and organizers to assist with the work of the campaign in critical cities that have dealt with community-police issues in recent years: from monitoring consent decrees between the Justice Department and the cities of Baltimore and Ferguson, Missouri to working with community members in Tulsa, Oklahoma, and North Charleston, South Carolina, following the respective shooting deaths of Terence Crutcher and Walter Scott by police officers.

Jordans donation, Ifill says, was also instrumental in supporting the LDFs Race and Policing Reform Campaign, created in 2018 to promote unbiased and responsible policing policies and practices at the national, state and local levels, according to the LDF website. The funds were used to support staffing hires, travel, community initiatives and convenings, as well as strategic communications, including research and publications.

Ifill said an association with Jordan has allowed the LDF to attract other donors. That directly has provided financing to allow the organization to track the federal funding of police departments and make sure the departments are in compliance with Title VI of the 1964 Civil Rights Act, which forbids discrimination on the basis of race, color, and national origin.

It has allowed us to respond quickly when terrible police killings of unarmed black people occur, but its also allowed us to anticipate issues and intervene to amplify community voices, or to use our own voices in direct communication with law enforcement, Ifill said.

For the IACP, Cunningham and his colleagues stressed using the grant for substantive programming that could make a difference rather than what Cunningham called bulls. Jordans donation, along with other federal grants, has helped grow the IACPs Institute for Community-Police Relations, whose mission is to advance a culture of cohesion and trust between police and the communities they serve.

The grant covered: two 15-week courses at Howard University, a historically black college and university in Washington, that sought to build a relationship between the police and African Americans (each class was open to 15 students and 15 law enforcement leaders); a postsecondary academic curriculum centered on engaging conversations between law enforcement and communities at George Mason University (in which 15 students and 15 law enforcement leaders participated); another class at the University of Denver (where 40 students and police officers participated); youth-centered programming; task force training; and the organizations Trust Initiative, a campaign aimed at [inspiring] law enforcement officials across the world to join members of their communities in healing and building trust, according to a 53-page document the IACP sent Jordans team this year documenting how the grant was used that Cunningham shared with The Undefeated.

We said, Look, this is like a once-in-a-lifetime opportunity for us to really try to make a change and do things differently and change the profession, Cunningham said.

The grant also provided training and educational material for departments when speaking with disenfranchised groups, which a lot of them had never done before.

You start telling a young white cop, particularly from a privileged police department, that when you stop an African American person for speeding, there are two different lenses there, Cunningham said. Youre looking through the lens of, Hey, Im just stopping another car. Theyre looking through the lens of, Oh, my God, whats going to happen? Are they going to shoot me? Are they going to hurt me? Are they gonna kill me?

Both Ifill and Cunningham said they have seen some improvements in the criminal justice system.

Ifill points to the term progressive prosecutor entering the lexicon in recent years as a sign of progress. There has been a wave of elected prosecutors in recent years who have taken more liberal stances on criminal justice, including decriminalizing marijuana and criticizing police conduct.

As a part of the Trust Initiative, Cunningham and his colleagues met with community members in Ferguson; Albany, New York; Sacramento, California; and Fort Collins, Colorado, to build healthier relationships between black communities and law enforcement. He says police departments need to reflect the community better in their ranks and better educate officers about implicit biases and how those biases can manifest when a white officer comes into contact with a black civilian.

At some point, we became very insular and thought that, Hey, well develop the policies and then well let you know what they are and then were going to enforce them. It doesnt work like that. Theres no legitimacy in policing if thats the way to do it, Cunningham said.

While Ifill and Cunningham represent opposite sides on most issues surrounding criminal justice and policing, the two admire each other. Cunningham said he faced pushback from his organization for trying to work with the other, but the two leaders agreed on two things: recruitment and retention.

Cunningham explained that while chiefs of police across the country likely want to root out bad actors, due to laws and the police officers rights, its not as easy as waving a magic wand. But both agree on more accountability and transparency when it comes to police misconduct.

It turns out that police chiefs, on the whole, would like to recruit individuals who have the maturity, intellect, sensitivity and integrity to take on police work, Ifill said. And responsible chiefs want to figure out how to retain competent, trustworthy and experienced officers.

That being said, neither Ifill nor Cunningham were naive to believe $2 million would fundamentally change what Ifill calls a dysfunctional relationship between African Americans and law enforcement that dates to the post-Reconstruction era and the turn of the 20th century.

I tell people we didnt get to where we are in this relationship between the police and minority communities in a year or 10 years; its been decades, centuries to get here, Cunningham said. Its going to take us a while to turn this around.

Ifill said change starts at the top.

What I have believed is that improvement begins with changing the behavior of those with the most power the police and strengthening the voice of those with the least power the black community, she said.

You are now subscribed!

It is critical especially given the abdication by the U.S. Department of Justice of this work that LDF has been able to bring our resources to continuing the momentum towards reform. We have no intention of turning away from this work, which is imperative now more than ever.

On Oct. 17, 2016, speaking at an IACP conference in San Diego, Cunningham formally apologized on behalf of law enforcement for the actions of the past and the role our profession has played in societys historical mistreatment of communities of color.

Cunningham points to that apology (and subsequent apologies by police chiefs in Georgia and Louisiana), his ongoing relationship with Ifill and the LDF, and the mere fact law enforcement is willing to sit down and have a conversation as steps taken to make change.

Cunningham doesnt believe his profession is inherently broke. The profession needed to change and it needed to evolve, he said.

Running while black: Ahmaud Arberys killing reveals runners shared fears of profilingRead nowLeBron James, Coco Gauff, other athletes react to fatal shooting of Ahmaud ArberyRead nowThe power of UFC heavyweights Francis Ngannou and Jairzinho RozenstruikRead now

A change Jordan has helped continue.

There are plenty of people that have needs and like to sit on the sidelines and say, Hey, there are things that need to change. You need to change them. But for Michael Jordan to actually step up and do what he did, it was amazing, Cunningham said.

And I think its transformed the profession.

Martenzie is an associate editor for The Undefeated. His favorite cinematic moment is when Django said "Y'all want to see somethin?"

See original here:

Heres what happened to the $2 million Michael Jordan donated in 2016 - The Undefeated

Who Are the Best Teams Michael Jordan and the Bulls Kept From Winning a Title? – Sports Illustrated

Perhaps the truest mark of any all-time great is the teams he left in his wake. Bill Russell and the Celtics buried Jerry West and the Lakers throughout the 1960s, and LeBron James has no shortage of Eastern Conference foes decimated throughout the 2010s. But no superstar in history has dispatched a generation of elite players and teams quite like Michael Jordan.

Jordans hit count in the 1990s is iconic. He ended the Bad Boy Pistons, shut down Clyde Drexlers Blazers and out-dueled Charles Barkley en route to a trio of Finals, and that was before his first retirement. Seattles best season of the Gary Payton era came to a bitter end against Jordan. The Jazz got a double dose of Jordan in MJs last two titles. And thats just the Finals. Jordan silenced Madison Square five (!) times. He fought past Indiana on his last legs. Imagining the NBA Finals of the 1990s without Jordan is an interesting parlor game.

So which squads that Jordan dismissed are actually the top teams of the 1990s? We at The Crossover ranked the best squads Jordan kept from seizing that elusive Larry OBrien Trophy.

You could quibble with which Jazz squad deserves the nod here, and both Stockton and Malone squads made Jordan sweat in the Finals. But the 199697 team won more games and had a better offensive rating and defensive rating than Utahs 199798 team, giving them a slight edge.

Perhaps the late-90s Jazz werent stacked with stars, but they were exceptionally deep, playing 12 players over 10 minutes per game in 199697. Jeff Hornacek was still near his prime, and Karl Malone was named MVP. Utah swept the Clippers and dispatched the Lakers in five games in the first two rounds, and Jerry Sloans team then exacted revenge over the Rockets two years after the Mario Elie shot. The title was firmly in reach, but Jordan had other ideas. The Jazz are still awaiting their first title in franchise history.

Charles Barkley & Co. squeaked through to the Finals, needing five games to defeat the Lakers in the first round and seven games to defeat the Sonics in the Western Conference finals. But dont mistake playoff struggles for anything less than dominance for much of 199293. Phoenix ripped off 62 wins before the postseason, and it posted a league-leading 113.3 offensive rating. Barkley came to Phoenix after eight years in Philadelphia and subsequently won MVP. Some may attribute Barkleys honor to Jordan fatigue, but theres no denying Barkleys excellence in his first year with the Suns.

Barkley wasnt a one-man band by any stretch of the imagination. Kevin Johnson remained an electric point guard in 199192though he did struggle in the Finalswhile sharpshooter Dan Majerle led the league in threes. Phoenixs Finals squad was a true offensive juggernaut, and one well suited for the modern era. But Michael Jordan is considered the GOAT for a reason. Jordan averaged 41 points per game in the Finals (on 40% from three), including a 55-point explosion in Game 4. Barkley held his own, but nobody could challenge Jordan at his peak as Chicago sealed the three-peat.

George Karl averaged 59.5 wins in his six full seasons with the SuperSonics, and the 199596 squad was likely his best. Seattle was the leagues No. 2 defense and No. 8 offense, sprinting to the No. 1 seed in the Western Conference with 64 wins. And a quick peek at the roster quickly explains the Sonics success.

Both Shawn Kemp and Gary Payton finished in the top 10 of the MVP race, and Detlef Schrempf was still cruising as an impact scorer in 199697. Seattle sported significant stretch with the Schrempf, Sam Perkins and Hershey Hawkins trio.

The Sonics ended the Rockets three-peat bid with a sweep in the second round, then outlasted Utah in a seven-game thriller to reach the Finals. But the Finals ended quicker than the series tally suggests. Chicago won the first three games of the series, then won Game 6 at home by double-digits. Payton and Kemp were a menacing two-man combo in 199596. Yet they stood little chance against a rejuvenated Michael Jordan.

Barkleys Suns would likely thrive in the modern era. Patrick Ewings Knicks? Not so much. New York averaged ranked No. 22 in offensive rating in 199293, and the roster wasnt exactly filled with scoring punch. Ronaldo Blackman was on his last legs by the time he got to New York, and Doc Rivers and Greg Anthony werent exactly scoring dynamos. But after years during which Ewing was largely on his own, 199293 marked the emergence of a dynamic duo.

John Starks had been in New York for two seasons entering 199293, though he was largely a complementary player, failing to enter the starting lineup in a single game in 199192. Starkss third season with New York marked a turning point. He jumped to 17.5 points per game, earning All-Defensive team honors as he started 51 games. New York won 30 of its last 37 contests amid Starkss rise, and the Knicks cruised past Indiana and Charlotte en route to the Eastern Conference finals. Starks held his own against Chicago, including a 25-point performance in Game 1. But Jordan and the Bulls ripped off four straight after falling in a 20 deficit, marking just one of many heartbreaks for the Knicks in the 1990s.

Dethroning Detroit in 1991 remains one of Jordans top career accomplishments, an achievement that was chronicled at length in The Last Dance. The Pistons battered and bruised Jordan for years, continually keeping him out of the esteemed company of Larry Bird and Magic Johnson. Defeating the Pistons represented Jordan finally getting over the hump. But while Detroit remained a sturdy Finals contender as the 80s ended, the 199091 team is by no means the franchises best.

Detroit won 50 games in 199091, a nine-win dip from the previous season. Both Vinny Johnson and Mark Aguirre were near the end of their careers, as was interior enforcer Bill Laimbeer. This isnt to say that Detroit was some sort of paper Tiger. Isaiah Thomas and Joe Dumars finished in the top 15 of the MVP voting, and Thomas frankly should have fared better than his No. 13 finish. But champions always run out of gas sooner or later, and 1991 marked the end of Detroits golden era. The 199091 run ended in a sweep against Chicago, and it took 11 years for the Pistons to win a playoff series after their loss to the Bulls. The peak Isaiah Pistons could have beaten any team on this list. The 199091 squad ran out of juice with plenty of miles on the odometer.

Portland was well positioned to hoist the Larry OBrien Trophy in 199192 as Clyde Drexler finished behind only Jordan in the MVP voting. The Blazers won 57 games in the regular season and dropped just three playoffs contests en route to the Finals, and it appeared as though Jordan could have his hands full as he eyed back-to-back championships. The prognosticators were quickly proven wrong.

Jordan banged home six first-half threes in Game 1 of the Finalsleading to the famous shrugfinishing the night with 39 points in a 33-point win. And MJ continued to dominate through the Finals. He scored 39 again in Game 2 and an outrageous 46 in Game 5, giving the Bulls a 32 series edge as it returned to Chicago. Portland kept it close in Game 6, but Chicago outscored the Blazers by 19 in the fourth quarter to seal the victory. Portland has yet to return to the Finals after Drexler was shredded by His Airness.

Tim Boyle/AP

Penny and Shaq defeated Jordans Bulls in the second round of the 1995 playoffs, and back-to-back Finals appearances was certainly in play entering the 1996 Eastern Conference finals. The Magic won 60 games in the regular season, then won seven of their first eight playoff games. They quickly ran into a buzzsaw.

Jordan didnt do much heavy lifting in a four-game sweep of Orlando. Dennis Rodman controlled the paint with 13 points and 21 rebounds in Game 1, and Scottie Pippen led Chicago with 27 points in Game 3. But with a sweep in sight, Jordan smelled blood, dropping 45 points in a five-point victory. ONeal left for Los Angeles that summer, stopping what could have been the leagues premier duo in its tracks. Orlando wouldnt reach the Eastern Conference finals for another 13 years.

Indiana reached the Eastern Conference finals in 1998 and 1999, then broke through to the reach the Finals in 2000. But the 199798 squad was perhaps the best Pacers team of the Reggie Miller era. The sharpshooting guard canned 42.9% of triples, and Miller was surrounded by a dominant defensive core. Dale and Antonio Davis packed a serious punch in the middle of Indianas defense, and Rik Smits logged his lone All-Star campaign. And it looked for a second like the Pacers were ready to dethrone the Bulls.

Indiana clawed back from a 20 series deficit with nail-biter wins in Game 3 and 4, and the Pacers pulled off a three-point win in Game 6. Chicago faced a dogfight in Game 7. Jordan made just nine of 25 shots, and Chicago missed 17 free throws while shooting 38.2% from the field. But Indiana scored just four points in the final 5:50 of regulation, sending the Bulls to their sixth straight Finals. Miller would have to wait two more seasons to seize the Eastern Conference crown.

The rest is here:

Who Are the Best Teams Michael Jordan and the Bulls Kept From Winning a Title? - Sports Illustrated