The Chase for Immortality: MJs ever-evolving motivation fueled the Bulls first three-peat – Sir Charles In Charge

Chicago Bulls Michael Jordan ( MIKE NELSON/AFP via Getty Images)

The Chase for Immortality: MJs ever-evolving motivation fueled the Bulls first three-peat

Michael Jordan had morphed into an illuminated superstar before he ever won his first championship with the Chicago Bulls. Prior to the rings, he was known as the talented young gun on the block that had every lethal death bullet in his barrel.

He had grace, explosive athleticism, a lethal first step, and an array of finishing moves around the rack. Jordan was the ultimate prominent young basketball player in the NBA prime and ready to take the throne from star players of his present time. The only dilemma was that his abundant talent couldnt officially collect the ultimate team goal; a World Championship.

Michael finally got over his title drought when he eclipsed the aging, but legendary Magic Johnson in a five-game series win during the 1991 NBA Finals. It was the ultimate title coronation as his last two victims during his path to obtaining a conference title and a league title were arguable two of the three giants of the 1980s: Isiah Thomas of the Detroit Pistons and Johnson of the Los Angeles Lakers.

His Conference Finals performance against the Pistons in 1991 was a sweeping demolition that saw his effortless scoring output (29.8 PPG), his emergence as a playmaker (7.0 APG), and a defensive masterpiece on the perimeter (2.3 SPG) and around the basket (1.8 BPG). However, Jordans First NBA Final performance was a culmination of his complete stardom.

His assist average peaked at an all-time high vs the Lakers (11.5 APG) and his scoring prowess only outdid itself when the stakes were higher finishing with a series-high 31.5 points per game average. He was finally able to fulfill head coach Phil Jacksons implore of becoming a team-first basketball player in the biggest series of the NBA Playoffs.

From there, Jordans sky became a limitless roof.

The following rings Jordan won were driven by competition against the fading present-day legendary careers of Larry Bird, Magic, and Isiah. They were able to continue league success after getting to the mountain top by going through the championship ringer again and coming out as champs. So, for Jordan, he was only as good as the next wave of success meaning being a repeat championship offender wasnt a goal, it was the expectation.

Episode 5 and 6 ESPNs The Last Dance touch bases on the extended championship run of the Chicago Bulls from 1991-93. The teams first three-peat squad consisted of the well-known duo of Jordan and Pippen, but a talented Hall of Fame Third wheel in Horace Grant.

Charles Barkley spoke on the dominance of the Bulls first three-peat team being because of Grants basketball ability. In comparing the third wheel of Grant in Chicagos first three-peat to the third wheel of Dennis Rodman in the Bulls second three-peat, Barkley said this:

Dennis Rodman was a great rebounder and a great defender, but Horace Grant was the better basketball player.

Grant averaged double digits in points and high single-digit rebound averages during the Bulls three-year playoff run. He was the teams interior scorer within the triangle offense that kept defenses honest and unwilling to fully load up the perimeter and zero in on Jordan and Pippen.

Yet, in the finals, it was all about the superhuman ability of Jordan on both ends of the floor, the two-way ability of wingman Scottie Pippen, and unsung hero John Paxon that ultimately propelled the Bulls into repeat title defenders.

Jordan averaged 35 points on 53 percent shooting from the field in a competitive six-game series versus the talented but erratic Portland Trail Blazers. His memorable game one 1992 Finals performance consisted of a first-half six 3-pointer onslaught in his head-to-head duel with Blazers star Clyde Drexler to prove his dominance as the leagues best two-guard.

Game 5 vs. the Blazers was a 46-point clinic on 14-23 shooting assisted by Pippens 24-point, 11-rebound, and 9-assist performance that nearly amounted to a triple-double. The twos 70-point onslaught as a duo assisted by John Paxsons 6-11, 12-point gem supplied the Bulls 81 of the teams 119 points to push the series ahead 3-2 en route to their second consecutive title.

The scoring leaders in the Blazers series were the known co-stars in Jordan and Pippen, but John Paxson averaged over 10 points per game as well on 52 percent shooting. His championship services would come through in the clutch once again in next years NBA Finals series versus the Phoenix Suns.

The three-peat was what Jordan identified as being the separating factor from his aging contemporaries on the pedestal of Mount Rushmore. While Bird and Magic obtained multiple titles throughout their careers in three and five respectively, none of them amassed a three-peat as champions.

In fact, no one in the league did. Because of this, another motivating factor was born and ignited Jordan in the 1993 season that drove him to be an eventual champion.The road itself wasnt easy and contained backlash from the media and competition alike. His casino trip after a game one finals loss versus the Knicks in the conference final had reporters assuming Jordan possessed a gambling addiction.

The aftermath of the trip was a Game 2 defeat to the Knicks that had the Bulls behind the eight ball in the series facing a glaring 0-2 deficit. Jordan reacted to the vitriol by ghosting the media for a two-week span letting his on-court performance do the talking. It worked to the tune of four straight victories versus New York to claim the East in 1993 for the third straight season.

Jordan had a 54-point clinic in Game 4 to even the series and participated in the ultimate straight jacket defensive possession versus Knicks big man Charles Smith in the waning moments of Game 5 to prevent a potential Knick go-ahead basket. This made the series jump ahead 3-2 ultimately cementing a third straight finals appearance.

Jordans matchup with Charles Barkley and the Suns in the 1993 NBA Finals was a bout against the leagues best team and a league MVP, a title he claimed almost annually. In the documentary, Jordan alluded that Barkleys MVP award was an individual accolade he felt he deserved and admitted it fueled him in the NBA Finals series.

The box score throughout the Finals matchup showed that. Attacking the Suns lack of defensive activity and continuity, Jordan averaged 41 points on 50 percent shooting from the field and 40 percent from distance. Pippen averaged 21 points, 9 boards, and 7 assists along with two steals further cementing his claim as arguably the best small forward in basketball, while Horace Grant further buffered Barkleys claim as the best third wheel out of the Bulls two three-peat teams averaging a double-double (11. 2 PPG, 10.3 RPG) while protecting the paint above the rim (1.5 BPG) and below the belt (1.5 SPG).

As good as the trio played vs. the Suns in their six-game series, John Paxson ultimately avoided the series from going to a road Game 7. Paxons clutch open try helped the Bulls crack double-digits as a team in the fourth quarter. This bucket off of a great find from Grant down low cemented a three-peat for the Bulls and for Jordan the beginning of immortality after a rigorous three-year title defense.

See original here:

The Chase for Immortality: MJs ever-evolving motivation fueled the Bulls first three-peat - Sir Charles In Charge

Legends of Tomorrow Is About to Go Full-On Shaun of the Dead – CBR – Comic Book Resources

The Legends find themselves in the middle of a London-based zombie outbreak in an upcoming episode of Legends of Tomorrow.

As DC's Legends of Tomorrow Season 5 moves closer to its finale, the Arrowverse series is about to take cues from British zombie films like Shaun of the Dead and 28 Days Later.

The CW has released the synopsis for the season's 13th episode, titled "I Am Legends," poking fun at its zombie apocalypse premise. The episode has the team stranded in John Constantine's London home, with the British capital in the midst of a zombie outbreak.

RELATED:Legends of Tomorrow: Matt Ryan Explains Constantine's Relationship With Lucifer

STICKING TOGETHER After drinking from Chalice, the Legends have immortality for 24 hours, which gives them time get to the Waverider and use the Loom of Fate. However, they quickly discover that the sisters have stolen the Waverider and they are stuck at Constantines (Matt Ryan) house in the middle of nowhere in London during a Zombie Apocalypse. Meanwhile, Gary (guest star Adam Tsekham) is left on the ship and once he discovers what is going on, he takes something important to the sisters. Caity Lotz, Dominic Purcell, Nick Zano, Maisie Richardson-Sellers, Jes Macallan, Tala Ashe and Olivia Swann also star. Andrew Kasch directed the episode written by Keah Poulliot & Emily Cheever (#513). Original airdate 5/19/2020.

The second half of Season 5 has seen the season's true overarching villainLachesis surface, with the Loom of Fate to rewrite humanity's past, present and future. While the Legends have gained temporary immortality, they might find themselves with their hands full during a full-on zombie apocalypse.

RELATED:Matt Ryan Explains Why He Loves Playing Constantine

Airing Tuesdays at 9 p.m. ET/PT on The CW, DCs Legends of Tomorrow stars Caity Lotz, Dominic Purcell, Nick Zano, Maisie Richardson-Sellers, Tala Ashe, Matt Ryan and Jes Macallan.

Legends of Tomorrow: Matt Ryan Explains Constantine's Relationship With Lucifer

Sam Stone is a 10th level pop culture guru living just outside of Washington, DC who knows an unreasonable amount about The Beatles. You can read his work in the pages of Image+, follow him on Twitter @samstoneshow, and listen to his podcast Geek Out Show on iTunes and Google Play.

Excerpt from:

Legends of Tomorrow Is About to Go Full-On Shaun of the Dead - CBR - Comic Book Resources

On This Day: Goalkeeper Jimmy Glass scored the most dramatic of late goals to save Carlisle from relegation – inews

SportFootball8 May 1999: Carlisle were surely on the verge of relegation when an on-loan hero made a 90-yard run into the box and scored.

Friday, 8th May 2020, 7:00 am

If ever a career was distilled into one moment, it was Jimmy Glasss. But what a moment. When the ball dropped to him in the 94th minute, five yards from goal, he dispatched it with a minimum of fuss Carlisle were safe from relegation and Glass had achieved goalkeeping immortality with one swing of his right boot.

Although Glass had just run 100 yards to score, the finish a shot into the bottom corner was arguably the least extraordinary aspect of Carlisles miraculous escape from relegation from the Football League, 21 years ago today.

There was quite a cast at Brunton Park that day in 1999. Nigel Pearson, in his first managerial job, passed the brandy bottle around the dressing room before kick off to try to calm the nerves of his Carlisle players.

i's fantasy football tipsnewsletter: get ahead

i's fantasy football tipsnewsletter: get ahead

Watching from the stands was Michael Knighton, the chairman. To say he was unpopular with the bulk of the 7,599 crowd would be an understatement. The club was profitable but seemingly about to topple into the abyss.

In those pre-January window days, the transfer deadline fell in late March. It was under Knightons stewardship that Carlisle decided to sell their goalkeeper, Tony Caig, on deadline day and bring in Richard Knight on loan. When Knight was recalled by Derby, Carlisle had to beg the Football League for an emergency loan. Hartlepool protested but, little imagining what might transpire, the League agreed.Thus it was that 25-year-old Glass, who played as a striker at any opportunity in training, arrived from Swindon for the final three games. Carlisle drew the first two but then Scarborough won their game in hand also against Plymouth to move off the bottom.

It was a hot day. Plymouth defender Paul Gibbs broke his leg and the match was delayed, with profound consequences. Lee Phillips put Argyle ahead after half-time, before defender David Brightwell equalised with 28 minutes left.

Scarboroughs game against Peterborough ended 1-1 and they waited on the pitch for 10 minutes for news. They were safe until Carlisle won a corner and Glass sprinted forward. As he recalled: Scott Dobie managed to get a header on target and the goalkeeper parried it straight out. As I arrived into the six-yard box, I was the only one in there. The ball fell to me perfectly. I blasted it in.

Cue pandemonium. Plymouth barely had time to kick off. Glass never played for Carlisle again, though, and two years later, he retired. He gambled heavily and played Sunday League football - as a free-scoring striker.

It took Eddie Howe, a former team-mate, to bring him back into the game in 2016 as a player liaison officer with Bournemouth. One moment ensures he will not be forgotten. It wasnt my goal, it was footballs goal, he said. I just happened to be in the middle of it.

On This Day in sport

Go here to read the rest:

On This Day: Goalkeeper Jimmy Glass scored the most dramatic of late goals to save Carlisle from relegation - inews

Ready Player One: A Futuristic Blockbuster With One Eye Firmly Fixed on the Past – 25YearsLaterSite.com

Nowadays almost all the blockbusters that we ingest find themselves firmly rooted within the realms of the graphic novel/comic book adaptation. The two juggernauts at the head of that movement are the fine folks over at Marvel and DC, respectively. Even though I count myself among the hordes of fervent fans of those two giants, it is always good for not just the fan base but also the industry when something of an equal magnitude springs from a fresh well of inspiration.

The spring in question sprouts up so aptly like the oasis at the center of its own story. The one to lead us to this haven of sorts is none other than the master of the blockbuster himself, Steven Spielberg. In this 2018 outing, Spielberg would go about adapting the 2011 sci-fi novel Ready Player One written by Ernest Cline; Cline also co-wrote the screenplay for the adaptation with Zak Penn.

Just like the source material, the story is set in 2045 where much of humanity has disappeared into the virtual world known as the OASIS. This is a form of escapism that many of us know all too well. I consider myself a massive gamer and there is just something so alluring about removing yourself from the real and taking your consciousness on a journey into a whole new world. When you live a life that is a little more mundane than you want, then why not step back through time or explore an alien world?

We are living in the age of digital discovery and electronic exploration where anyone can be anything at any time. This is the same liberation that our characters thirst for so much, hence them taking refuge in the OASIS. In this VR world, they can take any form, they can traverse any world, they can do combat, go in search of artifacts, or seek out immortality (in a manner of speaking). That immortality they lust for comes in the quest for three keys that were hidden somewhere throughout the vast digital realm by its late creator James Halliday (Mark Rylance), who created the OASIS alongside his partner Ogden Morrow (Simon Pegg.)

Whoever discovers those said keys will become the sole proprietor of the OASIS and hold its future firmly in their hands. In this pursuit of such a lofty prize, there are two opposing sides, on one side Tye Sheridan as our protagonist Wade Watts/Parzival and on the other Ben Mendelson as the villainous Nolan Sorrento / IOI-655321. The two could not be any more polar opposites. Watts is a gaming purist, he believes in the challenge of the game, the grind, the work it out, beat it down, and break it wide open of it all.

Wade is the truest form of that aforementioned digital discoverer, always seeking out the hidden layer just beneath any gaming experiences surface. He seeks not just what others cant find but what most dont even know is there to look for. When youre a gamer, there are few things more appealing than discovering the previously undiscoverable, to know the unknown. The search for Hallidays keys is the epitome of this desire from all who have ever ventured into the realms of the unreal.

Whereas Wade Watts is the living breathing embodiment of the gamer within all if not most of us, on the other hand, Nolan Sorrento is emblematic of all that is wrong with the world of gaming. He is the symbol of big business. A mouth breathing, advert soliciting, soulless suit, he is a walking, talking microtransaction. He is the kind of person that does not use this limitless medium to create narratives and worlds beyond the imagining but instead just seeks the creation of wealth.

These are the kinds of people that have taken some of the shine from the industry with continuously releasing unfinished products that are riddled with in-game charges if one wishes to progress, giving the wealthy an advantage over the less fortunate but oftentimes more skilled. Sorrento does not view the OASIS as an escape; he sees it as unconquered territory, as a digital world where he can be King, one that he can craft into existence in his own image.

He is a corporate shill with nothing but the almighty buck as his motivator. This is no better exemplified than when he speaks about his vision for the OASIS and about how he plans to infest the world with in-game advertising, bringing the player to a near seizure while force-feeding them unwanted content. This is, unfortunately, something that we are becoming all too aware of as time goes by: formerly free and less invasive places such as online media have given in to corporate pressure and allowed advertisers to run rampant on their platforms.

This type of greed takes on another guise in the narrative of Ready Player One. The so-called loyalty centers are more than a little reminiscent of the click farms that plague online gaming. Less fortunate people are left to toil away in sweatshop-like conditions as the more affluent account holders go about their lives, arriving home at the end of the day to benefit from their ill-gotten gains. Just like in the real world of discovery, some see an opportunity for exploration whereas others just see it as a chance for exploitation.

This is more proof that no matter if the world is real or virtual it is human nature that dictates the shape it takes. This is something that Wade Watts saw more clearly than mostif you allow the same people to control the unreal, then it will just become an extension of the real instead of the enhancement that it was intended to be in the first place. He, like many people who step through their digital doorway to endless worlds, just wants to get lost and go wherever the road takes him.

It is impossible to immerse oneself and get lost in far off places if you are constantly being tethered to reality by the money-grubbing hand of the execs who often think it below them to take a voyage into those very same worlds. This capitalist interventionism is not the only through-line that runs along with the core of Ready Player One. The film is also filled with so much nostalgia for a simpler time. The whole movie is rife with 80s and 90s pop culture references; the creator of the OASIS longs for times gone by.

To me, it seems that the sense of nostalgia that James Halliday feels may be a reflection of the director Steven Spielbergs longing for the way things used to be. The legendary filmmaker has been very vocal about his views on the change in how we digest our content. He has been more than a little derisive on his opinions of streaming services like Netflix, saying that the way they release content is hurting the theatrical experience.

You can feel Spielbergs yearning for yesteryear through his characters. They look back and want so much for what seems like a less complex time. I think this is a human flaw that we all share. Looking back seems less frightening and simpler than guessing whats yet to come. We have a tendency to gaze back through time with rose-colored glasses. Oftentimes, forgetting that the past too was filled with its own complexities and may not be as simplistic as we like to remember it.

I think this was a common complaint made about Ready Player One upon its release, that it was too backward viewing in its narrative, that we have this futuristic world filled with brilliant young people and all they do is focus on the past. They seemed like a generation void of its own popular culture that they just leeched from what has come before. On the other hand, you could say that the central protagonist Wade Watts/Parzival is lacking in his own identity and he is just trying to emulate his hero James Halliday.

Then we see as the story progresses that he learns he needs to create his own sense of self and shake free of the past. This is no better exemplified than when he completes the final challenge and takes control of the OASIS himself. He decides to close the virtual world for two days every week, on Tuesdays and Thursdays. Wade does this to allow not just himself but the entire population of the OASIS and the wider world a chance to breathe.

He comes to this realization when he finds love in the OASIS with Art3mis and her avatars controller Samantha (Olivia Cooke) in the real world. It is like Wade said, he just went there to escape, but he found something much bigger than himself. He found his friends. He found love, and now people have lost their lives. This is when it hits home for Wade that the OASIS is not the only world that needs saving, the real world does too. He can no longer just lose himself in the digital realm, and Wade Watts life is every bit as important as Parzivals.

This is a reminder to us all that while it is good and should be encouraged to escape from time to time, it is so important not to lose yourself entirely. Even though it is so much fun to go to these far off and vast worlds, we should not ignore the vast world that is all around us. It too lies waiting to be discovered if we can be brave enough to go out and explore it for ourselves.

Ready Player One shows us that one needs to explore both worlds with the same sense of freedom and vigor. It tells us that we need to have a dual thirst for virtual and real exploration. Through this duality, we will discover not just new places but new people that we may never have encountered otherwise.

Go here to read the rest:

Ready Player One: A Futuristic Blockbuster With One Eye Firmly Fixed on the Past - 25YearsLaterSite.com

David Andrews: Patriots don’t need to have a Superman – 247Sports

For the New England Patriots, there's a major problem with how great legendary quarterback Tom Brady was: His apotheosis into football immortality was such that, in an abstract sense, he almost became bigger than the Patriots. And because of that, it is almost as if the Patriots aren't the Patriots without him.

And yet, when they finally get back to the practice field, the New England Patriots will begin living and playing in the post-Tom Brady era. While their longtime quarterback tries to continue his career with the Tampa Bay Buccaneers, the other stars of the Patriots - like center David Andrews, back after blood clots forced him to miss the entire 2019 season - will be back in Foxboro trying to determine how to fill the leadership role that Brady's persona and credentials commanded for nearly 20 years.

But in true Patriots fashion, Andrews stated during a conference call with local media that he didn't believe that anyone needed to force it or do "anything out of the ordinary."

"I think (with) leadership, sometimes you can see through it if there's some BS in it. Be who you are, do what got you here. Just do it better and do it more," said Andrews. "It is what it is, it's being in the NFL - It's part of this business. There doesn't need to be a Superman anywhere, we just need to go out there and do our jobs as collectively as a group, provide good leadership even if he was here or he wasn't here, whoever was here. That's our job and that's what we'll try to do."

For Andrews and every other player on the Patriots, there is indeed a life to be had after Tom Brady as well as an AFC East title to defend. Still, it isn't as though Brady won't be missed within the building. Particularly not by Andrews, who went from going undrafted out of Georgia in 2015 to snapping the ball to Brady in three Super Bowls, winning two.

"Obviously Tommy is who Tommy is, and what a great experience it was to get to play with him," said Andrews. "Appreciative of him and our friendship that we have. It was kind of the longest quarterback (& center relationship) I've ever played with in any stages of my football career. It's always a special bond, and we'll remain friends for life."

Exactly who the next quarterback Andrews plays with will be is a matter of great intrigue both in the New England region and around the league. Andrews believes he is in a fortunate position, as he has worked with second-year quarterback Jarrett Stidham, seemingly the frontrunner for the job, as well as backup quarterback Brian Hoyer.

However, the Patriots' lack of star power at quarterback - at least to this point in the offseason - has resulted in plenty writing off the Patriots as being their usual, contending selves in 2020. All of which is nothing more than noise to Andrews, who prefers to let New England's destiny be decided by how they respond to the challenge ahead.

"There's always a new challenge in the NFL," said Andrews. "... It's just part of this business, part of this league. All this stuff about whatever anyone has to say - Everybody has an opinion. All we can do is go out there and control what we can control. ... Make the most out of each day, kind of put your head down and look up where you are later."

More:

David Andrews: Patriots don't need to have a Superman - 247Sports

Fantasy Football Podcast: The immortal Frank Gore, Best Ball draft recap, and is AG the new CMC? – Yahoo Sports

Subscribe to The Yahoo Fantasy Football Podcast

The year is 3042. In a future incredibly different from our present, Frank Gore rushes for another touchdown.

Okay so hes not that old, but his longevity does make one wonder about Gores potential immortality, as it was announced that he would be signing with the New York Jets.

Matt Harmon is joined by Dalton Del Don to discuss that signing and much more in the latest fantasy football podcast.

[Create or join a 2020 Yahoo Fantasy Football League for free today]

Now that Gore is a member of Gang Green, should we as fantasy players be worried about LeVeon Bell? (02:30)

Speaking of running backs, Washington head coach Ron Rivera made quite the statement recently, saying rookie Antonio Gibson has a skill set like Christian McCaffrey. Soon, well find out that Antonio Gibson is already in the best shape of his life, has lost 20 pounds, and has put on 30 pounds of muscle. (06:41)

Elsewhere in the NFL, the fifth-year option wheel began to turn, as both the Bears and Titans declined to pick up the options of Mitchell Trubisky and Corey Davis, respectively. (10:37)

Oh, and Andy Dalton signed with the Dallas Cowboys like we all suspected he would. (23:15)

To wrap things up this episode, our experts recap what they learned recently from a 10-team Best Ball draft. (27:33)

Fun fact: Frank Gore was considered injury prone early in his NFL career.

Please remember to rate, review, and subscribe on your podcast provider of choice and send us your questions for future episodes on Twitter@YahooFantasy.

Follow Dalton @DaltonDelDon

Follow Matt@MattHarmon_BYB

Check out the rest of the Yahoo Sports Podcast family athttps://apple.co/2Abi8jkor atyahoosports.com/podcasts

Here is the original post:

Fantasy Football Podcast: The immortal Frank Gore, Best Ball draft recap, and is AG the new CMC? - Yahoo Sports

Yes, Destiny 2s Antaeus Wards Should Be Nerfed For The Sake Of Everyones Sanity – Forbes

Destiny 2

Yesterday, the annoyance over the Antaeus Wards exotic in Destiny 2 reached a fever pitch. Clan Redeem, which is often one that finds exploits or glitches with exotics, leading to them being disabled, pretended to find a high-damage, immortality glitch with Antaeus Wards, complete with doctored test footage.

Other than setting off a five-alarm fire at Bungie on a Sunday for a few hours, no doubt, the questionable joke does raise the issue that yes, its probably time to address Antaeus Wards for real at this point.

Antaeus Wards were an exotic in the Forsaken era that flew under the radar until recently where something was altered about the way the Titan boots reflect damage. When they were first introduced, they seemed like a gimmick. A properly timed slide could reflect something like a super or a tank shell or a rocket.

But the recent change made Antaeus Wards better able to reflect normal gun damage, and now we have legions of perma-sliding Titans that reflect shotgun shots and fusion rifle blasts directly back at the user, along with following up with one of their own for instant, often unavoidable kills.

In practice, this is nothing short of a nightmare to play against in the Crucible, especially now that Trials of Osiris is here, and often on its small, tight maps, shotgun duels are the name of the game. Theres very little you can do against Antaeus Wards expect keep enemies as far away as possible, though with shotgun aping, thats often not in the cards.

Antaeus now often feels pretty much mandatory if youre running a Titan in high level PvP content, and the problem with a class-specific exotic being overpowered is that its not like a weapon, and the other classes are at a distinct disadvantage. When Hard Light was fully broken, it was terrible, but at least everyone could use it and counter Hard Lights with other Hard Lights. But with this, only Titans have access to Antaeus.

An additional problem is just how bad this feels generally. Yes, One-Eyed Mask was a big problem in Crucible for ages, with its regen and overshield and damage boost and wallhacks. But Antaeus feels different, because it essentially compounds the existing Bad Thing in Destiny where often it feels like your shots dont connect with a shotgun. Now, Antaeus replicates that effect on purpose, but also damages you and opens you up to be insta-killed by the wearer.

Destiny 2

Utilizing sliding has always been a PvP movement skill that separates a good player from a bad one, as it disorients opponents and messes with auto-aim. Shotgun sliding has been around long before Antaeus, but now with the damage-reflect/immunity, it has made it exponentially worse.

I just dont think Antaeus was ever supposed to work like this. I think it was supposed to be more of a gimmick exotic, reflecting things like supers or rockets on special occasions when you could time it just right. I dont think it was meant to make all shotgun/fusion fights against other classes completely one-sided, which is whats happening now.

We are in the unusual situation of the community banding together to agree on a nerf for once, for the most part, which almost never happens. I dont know if well see one before the end of this season, which is over in a month, but I would be amazed if nothing was altered about Antaeus for the next one, even if it cant one-shot Riven through Synthoceps switching.

Follow meon Twitter,FacebookandInstagram. Pick up my new sci-fi novelHerokiller, and read my first series,The Earthborn Trilogy, which is also onaudiobook.

Read the rest here:

Yes, Destiny 2s Antaeus Wards Should Be Nerfed For The Sake Of Everyones Sanity - Forbes

Doctor Who’s Timeless Child Retcon Rewrites the 20th Anniversary Special – Screen Rant

Doctor Who's Timeless Child retcon has subtly rewritten the 20th anniversary special, "The Five Doctors," adding a new layer of irony to the plot.

Doctor Who's Timeless Child retcon actually rewrites the 20th anniversary special. CurrentDoctor Who showrunner Chris Chibnall promised season 12 would change everything, and he wasn't understating the case. The season 12 finale revealed the Doctor is not a Time Lord at all, but rather is the "Timeless Child," a being who may well predate the universe itself.

The retcon works surprisingly well with elements of classicDoctor Who, particularly some Tom Baker stories and the plans of script editor Andrew Cartmel in the 1980s. Yet, it causes a number of major continuity problems when it comes the modern relaunch, clashing with stories from the Matt Smith and Peter Capaldi era. As a result, the fanbase is rather divided about whether the Timeless Child is a good idea or not; it's probably best toreserve judgment and see what Chibnall builds on this foundation.

Related:Frozen 2's Elsa Twist Has The Same Problem As Doctor Who's Timeless Child

The Timeless Child retcon also subtly rewritesDoctor Who's 20th anniversary story, "The Five Doctors." This was a multi-Doctor adventure unitingRichard Hurndall's version of the First Doctor, Patrick Troughton's Second Doctor, Jon Pertwee's Third Doctor, and Peter Davison's Fifth Doctor; production sleight of hand also allowed the show to incorporate Tom Baker's Fourth Doctor. The concept was a simple one: the Doctors, some of their key allies, and their oldest enemies had all been scooped out of time in order to participate in the so-called "Game of Rassilon." The man behind at all was Borusa, the Doctor's old teacher and Lord President of Gallifrey, who sought the prize of "perpetual bodily regeneration", i.e. immortality. In the end, it turned out this was all a trap set by Rassilon to identify any Time Lord psychopathic enough to believe they deserved eternal life.

"The Five Doctors" is widely regarded as one of the bestDoctor Who stories of all time; although the script is stepped in fan-service, it all serves a purpose, and the overarching narrative works perfectly. Curiously, though, the Timeless Child retcon adds another dimension to it. According toDoctor Who season 12, the Timeless Child has an unlimited number of regenerations, and it became the base genetic code for the entire Time Lord race. These proto-Time Lords - presumably including Rassilon - believed immortality was too dangerous, and they artificially imposed a cap on the number of regenerations a Time Lord could go through.

Viewed through the lens of the Timeless Child retcon, the entire Game of Rassilon is a deliberate trick on Rassilon's part. He believed future Time Lords could still seek immortality; they could potentially unlock this either by studying the Timeless Child or editing their own genes. The legend of the Game of Rassilon would distract any Time Lord who sought eternal life, leading them away from the Timeless Child, and thus into Rassilon's trap.

Here, of course, is the irony: when Borusa decided to claim the prize of immortality, he chose the Doctor as his pawn. He had unwittingly singled out the Timeless Child himself, the one being who possessed the secret of unlimited regenerations. Had he but looked at the Doctor, rather than at the Game of Rassilon, then Borusa may well have achieved his goal.

More:Classic Doctor Who May Have Revealed The Timeless Child's Fate

Bruceploitation Explained: Every Bruce Lee Ripoff (Including Jackie Chan)

Tom Bacon is one of Screen Rant's staff writers, and he's frankly amused that his childhood is back - and this time it's cool. Tom's focus tends to be on the various superhero franchises, as well as Star Wars, Doctor Who, and Star Trek; he's also an avid comic book reader. Over the years, Tom has built a strong relationship with aspects of the various fan communities, and is a Moderator on some of Facebook's largest MCU and X-Men groups. Previously, he's written entertainment news and articles for Movie Pilot.A graduate of Edge Hill University in the United Kingdom, Tom is still strongly connected with his alma mater; in fact, in his spare time he's a voluntary chaplain there. He's heavily involved with his local church, and anyone who checks him out on Twitter will quickly learn that he's interested in British politics as well.

Read more here:

Doctor Who's Timeless Child Retcon Rewrites the 20th Anniversary Special - Screen Rant

Southern Europe Could Lose $22 Billion Fighting Deadly Olive Tree Disease – OPB News

Federico Manni first noticed something was wrong with his familys olive trees about six yearsago.

It was summer, the cicadas were singing, and Manni and his father, Enzo, were weaving through their olive groves in Puglia, the southern region forming the heel of Italysboot.

They noticed some trees lookedburnt.

Dead branches, brown leaves, Manni says. Terrible, reallyterrible.

They pruned and washed the trees but it didnt help. Soon more trees shriveled. Today nearly all aredead.

The Mannis now call the field worked by generations of their family an olive-treecemetery.

These olive trees survived wars and bad weather. They almost gave us a sense of immortality, Enzo says. Now I hold back my tears when I see these extraordinary beauties replaced by lifelesstrunks.

The tree-killer is a bacterium called xylella fastidiosa. Since 2013, it has killed millions of olive trees in Italy and is now threatening those in Spain and Greece. Together, these countries produce 95% of Europes olive oil. A recent study projects that southern Europe, already crushed by the coronavirus pandemic, could lose at least $22 billion over the next 50 years, if xylellaspreads.

There is no cure, says Maria Saponari, a plant virologist at the Institute for Sustainable Plant Protection in Italy, and the disease spreadsquickly.

Saponari compares xylella to the coronavirus. Just as COVID-19 keeps oxygen from reaching our vital organs, she says, xylella clogs the inside of olive trees so they cant absorbwater.

On the outside, you see the leaves desiccate, you see the wood turn gray or brown, and the tree dies, shesays.

Saponari, who has studied xylella for years, says the bacterium came to Italy from the Americas, where it ravaged citrus trees and vineyards. She says Italy likely imported ornamental coffee plants infected with xylella. Because it flourishes in warm weather, unfortunately it found a very suitable condition to establish here, shesays.

The pathogen is spread by sap-sucking insects like the spittlebug. Because theres no cure, Saponari says farmers must focus on prevention, which includes keeping spittlebugs away from trees. One method involves weeding and tilling olive groves to kill insect larvae. Scientists have also suggested trying insect-repellingclays.

Olive farmers in Puglia have tried it all. They have cleaned infected branches with copper sulphate and fertilized the soil with cow manure. They have quarantined sick trees and uprooted healthy onesnearby.

But Gianni Cantele, a winemaker, who is part of the local farmers association, says the supply of olive oil has nearly rundry.

The production in this area is no more than 10% of the original, hesays.

Cantele says that the disease has also hurt local tourism built around those olivetrees.

We lost a huge historical and cultural treasure, he says. Olive trees define the landscapehere.

In Spain, xylella has mainly affected almond trees and vineyards. But Blanca Landa, a plant pathologist at the Spanish National Research Councils Institute for Sustainable Agriculture, warns Spains olive farmers to stayvigilant.

You never know what can happen, she says, if farmers import unvetted plants and introduce something that can be really dangerous and destroy completely the economy of acountry.

If I drive through Andalusia (in southern Spain), I cannot imagine not seeing olive trees there, she says. Olive oil is on every table. Olives are offered to visitors in everyhome.

Xylella has so far spared Greece. But we are all on high alert, says Antonis Marakakis, head agronomist for olive farmers at Terra Creta, an olive-oil company on the island ofCrete.

He tells farmers to call him immediately if their trees looksick.

I tell them to get samples from the trees so they can be tested right away for signs of xylella, he says. We have to catch it before itspreads.

Back in southern Italy, Federico and Enzo Manni are now struggling to farm potatoes during apandemic.

Federico shares old videos of the family harvesting and pressing olives into earthy, slightly spicy olive oil, before xylella turned their trees into scorched-graycorpses.

When we lost the trees, he says, its like we lost ourhouse.

He says he hasnt given up on olives justyet.

Xylella infects the two best-known olive varieties in Puglia Cellina di Nard and Ogliarola salentina but scientists believe other varieties might be resistant to thedisease.

Manni wants to try farmingthose.

If we plant 20% of what we lost, its a good number, he says. Olives are our story here, and this story is not over.

Explore Nearby Adventures

View original post here:

Southern Europe Could Lose $22 Billion Fighting Deadly Olive Tree Disease - OPB News

Want a Gigantic Pile of Cookies in Your Home? 1,000 People Are Being Asked to Hoard Fortune Cookies as Part of an Ambitious Global Art Show – artnet…

Craving snacks during the long months of self-isolation? A never-endingpile of fortune cookies from the late Cuban American artistFlix Gonzlez-Torresmight be coming soon to a location near you.

Most of the worlds art galleries are closed, but David Zwirner and Andrea Rosen are forging ahead with an ambitious and outside-the-box exhibition of Gonzlez-Torress 1990 work Untitled (Fortune Cookie Corner). It is the first work in the artists Candy seriesthe rest feature wrapped candiesmeant invoke both the experience of loss and a sense of immortality.

Theres no telling where you might encounter the mound of Chinese desserts, all free for the taking. Rosen, who is curating the show, has asked 1,000 peoplearound the world to install the work in a location of their choosinghomes, art institutions, and public spaces are all fair game.

This may sound unconventional, butGonzlez-Torress work isnt bound by the same restrictions as that of other artists. The owner needs to follow specific but open-ended parameters in manifesting the work, which can be installed in more than one place at a timemaking it perfect for our current moment, when much of the world is under indefinite lockdown.

This is one of the only works in the world that can travel and be accessible right now, Rosen told Artnet News. Theres so many people right now trying to do incredible online projects. Felix can actually afford people aphysical experience with an artworkand not just looking at it, but thinking about it, and their involvement and what it means to them.

Theres also an undeniable poignancy to staging the work right now, givenGonzlez-Torress activism against AIDS, the disease that claimed his life in 1996. But perhaps more importantly, sharing the experience of manifesting the work, normally reserved for the owner and select curators, aims to help combat the sense of loneliness and isolation that so many are feeling at this time.

What is important about this moment is how global it is, Rosen added. It make people acknowledge that significant criseswhether that be a war, a genocide, or the AIDS epidemichave often been depersonalized for those people who are not affected. This moment is an opportunity to realize what it feels like to be one site, one globe, oneworldeverything thats happening affects us all.

Felix Gonzalez-Torres, Untitled (USA Today) (1990). Candies individually wrapped in red, silver, and blue cellophane, endless supply. Installation view of Felix Gonzalez-Torres: Specific Objects without Specific Form, Museum Fr Moderne Kunst, Frankfurt, Germany, 2011. The Felix Gonzalez-Torres Foundation, courtesy of Andrea Rosen Gallery, New York.

In 2017, Rosen closed her gallerys physical spaceto focus on representing the Gonzlez-Torres estateher very first show, back in 1990, featured the artists workteaming up with Zwirner to do so.The new exhibition will open two days after theFlix Gonzlez-Torres Foundation debuts a new website.

Rosen has inviteda diverse group of participants to take part, including friends of Gonzlez-Torres, artists, curators, colleagues, and even the author of this piece.Each participant has received a detailed set of instructions explaining how to install the work, which is on loan from a private collection. The piles are to feature between 240 and 1,000 fortune cookies. (The original installation was approximately 10,000 cookies.) Each participant is responsible for sourcing their ownyou can buy 350 cookies on Amazon for less than $30and is asked to buy enough to completely replenish the pile once during the duration of the show.

One of the specific choices, Rosen explained, is that halfway through, everyone has to regenerate it to the original size. So everyone has the opportunity to experience both the potential loss within the piece, and also the notions of rebuilding and regeneration that is a very important part of the work.

Some may find their pile unchanged over the course of the show. For others, perhaps not a single cookie will remain. There will be very different representations of how it shifts and changes in size and shape every day, Rosen said. But regardless, at the exhibitions end, the cookies will cease to be considered a work of art (and some participants will be left with an extremely large supply of fortune cookies to munch on).

Participants are also instructed to document the manifestation of the work in photo and video, from the installation process to interactions with the work over the exhibitions six-week run.

The piece is never stagnant. Its never in the past. Its always the present, said Rosen. Its alive.

Flix Gonzlez-Torres: Untitled (Fortune Cookie Corner) will be on view at 1,000 to-be-announced locations across the world, May 25July 5, 2020.

See the rest here:

Want a Gigantic Pile of Cookies in Your Home? 1,000 People Are Being Asked to Hoard Fortune Cookies as Part of an Ambitious Global Art Show - artnet...

Wider cost-benefit analysis will determine if WFH is a success – Livemint

NEW DELHI :The bandwagon of opinion that work-from-home is the amrit (nectar of immortality) that the covid manthan (churning) has yielded is growing and speeding down an implementation path that is long on profit-and-loss benefit and short on people-centricity. Corporates love the cost savings, but a fuller analysis will show that it is a double-edged sword to be handled with care, quickly accruing quantifiable savings for companies, but risking slowly accumulating costs for employees and organizations, perhaps not quantifiable early on but not un-measurable. Implement work from home (WFH) by all means, but after data-driven weighing of costs and benefits all around. We would like to see an equivalent level of discussion on the people dimension as we are seeing on cost savings.

Decision-makers, likely older, with older children, better paid, hence living in larger houses with better quality household help, are deciding on WFH from their own contexts, oblivious of employee contexts of smaller homes shared by more family members now also having to double as work spaces, small children demanding attention when they see a parent, and lower quality household help. As for it being a working womans dream, ask them and you will find not all women can manage expected productivity and WFHdisturbing her is the default option if she is at home (surprising how problems resolve themselves when you are at the office !)

People-centricity requires data from the other side and acceptance that there are segments and, so, a one-size policy doesnt fit all. Implicitly assuming that something is workable because it works for the five people who said it to me, or for the mancom, or even worse, that if it has worked in crisis times, it must work all the time, is irresponsible.

So, before jumping to the WFH saves rental cost and delights employees" conclusion and rushing to implement, we suggest a pause to get data on peoples home environments, family demographics, the pain points of WFH and, even more simply, an anonymous employee vote on the matter. Also needed is for HR to develop sound conceptual models on what improves or hampers WFH productivity based on the nature of work of employees in different grades and in different roles and to devise a whole new way of managing productivity.

Neuroscience shows that the chemical balance of the brain shifts when in isolation leading to lower feelings of psychological safety, affecting creativity and openness to change. Social interactions have more to them than video meeting the way they are currently done. Neuroscience theory of mirror neurons" suggests positive benefits of social interaction for teamwork, another holy grail of business leaders (The Star Factor, William Seidman et al and The Tell Tale Brain, V.S. Ramachandran).

Finally, it is also a business leaders responsibility to think about the implicit contract that employers have with employees to provide a work place" that is geared to work needs" (where you do not do meetings with your spouse, mother-in-law or toddler in attendance ). Also, work identity" is a very strong builder of self esteem and social standing, especially in India. Thats why money was spent in the first place on well-designed offices in specific locations that people feel proud to go to. WFH takes these away. Signalling caring for employees cannot be done while ignoring what WFH of the chief wage-earner does to the very structure of the family dynamics.

Rama Bijapurkar is an independent market strategy consultant, and Smita Affinwalla is founder of Illuminos HR Consulting.

See more here:

Wider cost-benefit analysis will determine if WFH is a success - Livemint

Review: Big, Bad & Bobby offers a fun, behind-the-scenes look at a legendary team – Stanley Cup of Chowder

This Sunday marks the 50th anniversary of one of the most famous goals in hockey history, the one thats memorialized on the walls of countless bars, bedrooms, and offices in Boston and beyond.

It was on May 10, 1970 that Bobby Orr scored the goal, the one that saw him fly through the air and into sporting immortality, the one that gave the Bruins their fourth Stanley Cup, their first in nearly 30 years.

The NHL Networks latest original production, The 1970 Bruins: Big, Bad & Bobby, tells the story of that team through the eyes of the players, coaches, and fans who lived it.

If you grew up in New England and werent old enough to live it, youve heard the stories. You may have heard them from your father or mother, grandfather or grandmother. Regardless of who was telling the stories, we all remember hearing about the big, bad Bruins.

It was these Bruins teams that earned that moniker, one that still lives with the franchise to this day.

In a fun, hour-long documentary, the NHL Network tells the story of how that team came together, why they were so good, and how the team revolutionized hockey in Massachusetts and created a bond with the city that has never been broken.

The highlights of the documentary are the comments and insights from the players themselves. Guys like Orr, Gerry Cheevers, Phil Esposito, Ken Hodge, Derek Sanderson, and Harry Sinden clearly have such strong memories of those years, and that really comes to life in their stories.

In fact, the best moments of the documentary occur as Esposito, Cheevers, Orr, and Sanderson sit around a table and talk with each other. No moderator, no on-screen prompts, just some hockey legends shooting the breeze.

The documentary has its cliche Boston moments, but mostly focuses on the players who were there and the personalities who came of age loving these Bruins teams.

Jackie MacMullan, who has made her name as a basketball writer, has a ton of great anecdotes about growing up cheering for these teams, and tells a story that is familiar to a lot of lucky kids of that era: how Sunday night Bruins games became her thing with her father.

Another great line comes from Charlestown native and NFL Hall-of-Famer Howie Long, who says that when he was growing up, he dreamed of being a hockey player, not a football player.

The documentary is filled with footage from the games of the 60s and 70s, and I dont know what the NHL Network did to restore it, but it looks fantastic. The colors are bright, the images are clear, and you feel like youre right back there watching along.

1970 begins by telling the story of the hapless Bruins teams of the pre-Orr era, describing how the Bruins were little more than a laughingstock before Orr came around. We then follow the team through their couple of kicks at the can that came up short before the famed 1969-1970 campaign.

The perfect summary of the Bruins teams of that era comes from Orr, who, prior to one of his early seasons in Boston, said (paraphrasing) that this year, no guy on our team is going to get in a fight alone.

That spirit still lives on in many Bruins fans to this day, with plenty of people pining for the return of those big, bad days. Still, nothing will compare to these squads, loaded with Hall of Famers and playing with the support of a city that embraced hockey like never before.

Its a fun ride for fans both young and old. Whether you were there to witness it or have only heard the stories, 1970 is a must-watch item for Bruins fans.

Sandersons bad boy ways. Orr effortlessly carving up NHL defenses. Cheevers iconic mask. Esposito piling up goals.

The Bruins of the 60s and 70s inspired connections with the city and their fans that live on to this day.

1970 does a great job bringing those connections to a whole new generation.

The 1970 Bruins: Big, Bad & Bobby premiers Sunday night at 8 PM on NHL Network. In Canada, it will be simulcast on Sportsnet. You can watch the trailer below.

Read the original:

Review: Big, Bad & Bobby offers a fun, behind-the-scenes look at a legendary team - Stanley Cup of Chowder

Milwaukee Bucks: 3 biggest what ifs during the Bucks 1970s run – Behind The Bucks Pass

Use your (arrows) to browse

MILWAUKEE, WISCONSIN FEBRUARY 22: (Photo by Stacy Revere/Getty Images)

When people think of the Milwaukee Bucks historically, its hard not to immediately go to the early years of their life in the NBA.

The heights that the Bucks reached during this golden era have yet to be seen again in the subsequent years and decades that have passed, though recent history has been far kinder to the Bucks in this sense.

Still, this is still a Bucks run, which featured all-time greats such as Kareem Abdul-Jabbar, Oscar Robertson and Bob Dandridge, that only had one NBA title to show for it.

Considering how those Milwaukee teams were viewed at the time, that would have been considered a massive disappointment under todays prism.

Leave it to Robertson to say what he thought of the Bucks falling short more often than they won titles, as he said this to On Milwaukee back in June of 2014:

Three or four rings (in that era), look, youve got play when the games on the line. You cant play 40 years later.

Ive played a lot of games in high school, a lot in college, a lot in the pros. I love to win but its a game of basketball. You cant always go back and recapture the thing. When people get into you life youve got to live today and tomorrow. You cant go back and recapture anything. Id love to do it sometime. A lot of things I think I couldve done better, but it happened.

Of course, we often take for granted the perpetual climb to simply be on the cusp of glory and reach that level of immortality, as even the slightest or overlooked moves and decisions can sink a teams championship aspirations or even lead to its eventual undoing.

So without further ado, lets run through the three biggest what if questions that hung over the Bucks glory days throughout the early 1970s.

Use your (arrows) to browse

See the original post here:

Milwaukee Bucks: 3 biggest what ifs during the Bucks 1970s run - Behind The Bucks Pass

What Jesus Really Said About Heaven and Hell – TIME

None of us likes thinking about death, but there are times when we have little choice. The virus spreads, hospitals fill, and systems become overwhelmed. Our greatest concerns, personal and national, are for survival. But for many people even the otherwise healthy the crisis has unexpectedly raised the specter of death itself, our constant companion even if, most of the time, we do our best to ignore it. Or, in more normal times, try to laugh it off. The most recent and memorable effort was NBCs smash hit comedy series The Good Place; but the humor even there was rooted precisely in terror, as Eleanor Shellstrop and her companions desperately worked to avoid the afterlife they deserved in the Bad Place and its eternal torments.

The fear is as ancient as civilizations oldest surviving records. The hero of the Epic of Gilgamesh writhes in agony at the prospect of spending eternity groveling in dust being eaten by worms. Few people today may share Gilgameshs terror of consciously living forever in the dirt. Plenty, however, tremble before the possibility of eternal misery. Possibly this is a good time to help people realize that it simply will not be that way.

There are over two billion Christians in the world, the vast majority of whom believe in heaven and hell. You die and your soul goes either to everlasting bliss or torment (or purgatory en route). This is true even in the land of increasing nones: Americans continue to anticipate a version of the alternatives portrayed in The Good Place: regardless of religious persuasion, 72% believe in a literal heaven, 58% in a literal hell.

The vast majority of these people naturally assume this is what Jesus himself taught. But that is not true. Neither Jesus, nor the Hebrew Bible he interpreted, endorsed the view that departed souls go to paradise or everlasting pain.

Unlike most Greeks, ancient Jews traditionally did not believe the soul could exist at all apart from the body. On the contrary, for them, the soul was more like the breath. The first human God created, Adam, began as a lump of clay; then God breathed life into him (Genesis 2: 7). Adam remained alive until he stopped breathing. Then it was dust to dust, ashes to ashes.

Ancient Jews thought that was true of us all. When we stop breathing, our breath doesnt go anywhere. It just stops. So too the soul doesnt continue on outside the body, subject to postmortem pleasure or pain. It doesnt exist any longer.

The Hebrew Bible itself assumes that the dead are simply deadthat their body lies in the grave, and there is no consciousness, ever again. It is true that some poetic authors, for example in the Psalms, use the mysterious term Sheol to describe a persons new location. But in most instances Sheol is simply a synonym for tomb or grave. Its not a place where someone actually goes.

And so, traditional Israelites did not believe in life after death, only death after death. That is what made death so mournful: nothing could make an afterlife existence sweet, since there was no life at all, and thus no family, friends, conversations, food, drink no communion even with God. God would forget the person and the person could not even worship. The most one could hope for was a good and particularly long life here and now.

But Jews began to change their view over time, although it too never involved imagining a heaven or hell. About two hundred years before Jesus, Jewish thinkers began to believe that there had to be something beyond deatha kind of justice to come. Jews had long believed that God was lord of the entire world and all people, both the living and the dead. But the problems with that thinking were palpable: Gods own people Israel continually, painfully, and frustratingly suffered, from natural disaster, political crises, and, most notably, military defeat. If God loves his people and is sovereign over all the world why do his people experience so much tragedy?

Some thinkers came up with a solution that explained how God would bring about justice, but again one that didnt involve perpetual bliss in a heaven above or perpetual torment in a hell below. This new idea maintained that there are evil forces in the world aligned against God and determined to afflict his people. Even though God is the ultimate ruler over all, he has temporarily relinquished control of this world for some mysterious reason. But the forces of evil have little time left. God is soon to intervene in earthly affairs to destroy everything and everyone that opposes him and to bring in a new realm for his true followers, a Kingdom of God, a paradise on earth. Most important, this new earthly kingdom will come not only to those alive at the time, but also to those who have died. Indeed, God will breathe life back into the dead, restoring them to an earthly existence. And God will bring all the dead back to life, not just the righteous. The multitude who had been opposed to God will also be raised, but for a different reason: to see the errors of their ways and be judged. Once they are shocked and filled with regret but too late they will permanently be wiped out of existence.

This view of the coming resurrection dominated the view of Jewish thought in the days of Jesus. It was also the view he himself embraced and proclaimed. The end of time is coming soon. The earthly Kingdom of God is at hand (Mark 1:15). God will soon destroy everything and everyone opposed to him and establish a new order on earth. Those who enter this kingdom will enjoy a utopian existence for all time. All others will be annihilated.

But Jesus put his own twist on the idea. Contrary to what other Jewish leaders taught, Jesus preached that no one will inherit the glorious future kingdom by stringently observing all the Jewish laws in their most intimate details; or by meticulously following the rules of worship involving sacrifice, prayer, and observance of holy days; or by pursuing ones own purity through escaping the vile world and the tainting influence of sinful others. Instead, for Jesus, the earthly utopia will come to those who are fully dedicated to the most pervasive and dominant teachings of Gods law. Put most simply, that involves loving God above all things despite personal hardship, and working diligently for the welfare of others, even when it is exceedingly difficult. People who have not been living lives of complete unselfish love need to repent and return to the two greatest commandments of Jewish Scripture: deep love of God (Deuteronomy 6:4-6) and committed love of neighbor (Leviticus 19:18).

This may be simple, but it is not easy. Since your neighbor is anyone you know, see, or hear about, as in the parable of the Good Samaritan, true love means helping everyone in need, not just those in your preferred social circles. Jesus was concerned principally for the poor, the outcasts, the foreigners, the marginalized, and even the most hated enemies. Few people are. Especially those with good lives and abundant resources. No wonder its easier to push a camel through the eye of a needle than for the rich to enter the kingdom.

Most people today would be surprised to learn that Jesus believed in a bodily eternal life here on earth, instead of eternal bliss for souls, but even more that he did not believe in hell as a place of eternal torment.

In traditional English versions, he does occasionally seem to speak of Hell for example, in his warnings in the Sermon on the Mount: anyone who calls another a fool, or who allows their right eye or hand to sin, will be cast into hell (Matthew 5:22, 29-30). But these passages are not actually referring to hell. The word Jesus uses is Gehenna. The term does not refer to a place of eternal torment but to a notorious valley just outside the walls of Jerusalem, believed by many Jews at the time to be the most unholy, god-forsaken place on earth. It was where, according to the Old Testament, ancient Israelites practiced child sacrifice to foreign gods. The God of Israel had condemned and forsaken the place.

In the ancient world (whether Greek, Roman, or Jewish), the worst punishment a person could experience after death was to be denied a decent burial. Jesus developed this view into a repugnant scenario: corpses of those excluded from the kingdom would be unceremoniously tossed into the most desecrated dumping ground on the planet. Jesus did not say souls would be tortured there. They simply would no longer exist.

Jesus stress on the absolute annihilation of sinners appears throughout his teachings. At one point he says there are two gates that people pass through (Matthew 7:13-14). One is narrow and requires a difficult path, but leads to life. Few go that way. The other is broad and easy, and therefore commonly taken. But it leads to destruction. It is an important word. The wrong path does not lead to torture.

So too Jesus says the future kingdom is like a fisherman who hauls in a large net (Matthew 13:47-50). After sorting through the fish, he keeps the good ones and throws the others out. He doesnt torture them. They just die. Or the kingdom is like a person who gathers up the plants that have grown in his field (Matthew 13:36-43). He keeps the good grain, but tosses the weeds into a fiery furnace. These dont burn forever. They are consumed by fire and then are no more.

Still other passages may seem to suggest that Jesus believe in hell. Most notably Jesus speaks of all nations coming for the last judgment (Matthew 25:31-46). Some are said to be sheep, and the others goats. The (good) sheep are those who have helped those in need the hungry, the sick, the poor, the foreigner. These are welcomed into the kingdom prepared for you from the foundation of the world. The (wicked) goats, however, have refused to help those in need, and so are sent to eternal fire prepared for the devil and his angels. At first blush, that certainly sounds like the hell of popular imagination.

But when Jesus summarizes his point, he explains that the contrasting fates are eternal life and eternal punishment. They are not eternal pleasure and eternal pain. The opposite of life is death, not torture. So the punishment is annihilation. But why does it involve eternal fire? Because the fire never goes out. The flames, not the torments, go on forever. And why is the punishment called eternal? Because it will never end. These people will be annihilated forever. That is not pleasant to think about, but it will not hurt once its finished.

And so, Jesus stood in a very long line of serious thinkers who have refused to believe that a good God would torture his creatures for eternity. The idea of eternal hell was very much a late comer on the Christian scene, developed decades after Jesus death and honed to a fine pitch in the preaching of fire and brimstone that later followers sometimes attributed to Jesus himself. But the torments of hell were not preached by either Jesus or his original Jewish followers; they emerged among later gentile converts who did not hold to the Jewish notion of a future resurrection of the dead. These later Christians came out of Greek culture and its belief that souls were immortal and would survive death.

From at least the time of Socrates, many Greek thinkers had subscribed to the idea of the immortality of the soul. Even though the human body dies, the human soul both will not and cannot. Later Christians who came out of gentile circles adopted this view for themselves, and reasoned that if souls are built to last forever, their ultimate fates will do so as well. It will be either eternal bliss or eternal torment.

This innovation represents an unhappy amalgamation of Jesus Jewish views and those found in parts of the Greek philosophical tradition. It was a strange hybrid, a view held neither by the original Christians nor by ancient Greek intelligentsia before them.

Still, in one interesting and comforting way, Jesus own views of either eternal reward or complete annihilation do resemble Greek notions propagated over four centuries earlier. Socrates himself expressed the idea most memorably when on trial before an Athenian jury on capital charges. His Apology (that is, Legal Defense) can still be read today, recorded by his most famous pupil, Plato. Socrates openly declares that he sees no reason to fear the death sentence. On the contrary, he is rather energized by the idea of passing on from this life.

For Socrates, death will be one of two things. On one hand, it may entail the longest, most untroubled, deep sleep that could be imagined. And who doesnt enjoy a good sleep? On the other hand, it may involve a conscious existence. That too would be good, even better. It would mean carrying on with life and all its pleasures but none of its pain. For Socrates, the classical worlds most famous pursuer of truth, it would mean endless conversations about deep subjects with well-known thinkers of his past. And so the afterlife presents no bad choices, only good ones. Death was not a source of terror or even dread.

Twenty-four centuries later, with all our advances in understanding our world and human life within it, surely we can think that that both Jesus and Socrates had a lot of things right. Jesus taught that in this short life we have, we should devote ourselves to the welfare of others, the poor, the needy, the sick, the oppressed, the outcast, the alien. We should listen to him.

But Socrates was almost certainly right as well. None of us, of course, knows what will happen when we pass from this world of transience. But his two options are still the most viable. On one hand, we may lose our consciousness with no longer a worry in this world. Jesus saw this as permanent annihilation; Socrates as a pleasant deep sleep. In either scenario, there will be no more pain. On the other hand, there may be more yet to come, a happier place, a good place. And so, in this, the greatest teacher of the Greeks and the founder of Christianity agreed to this extent: when, in the end, we pass from this earthly realm, we may indeed have something to hope for, but we have absolutely nothing to fear.

Ehrmans new book, from which this essay is adapted, is Heaven and Hell: A History of the Afterlife.

Thank you! For your security, we've sent a confirmation email to the address you entered. Click the link to confirm your subscription and begin receiving our newsletters. If you don't get the confirmation within 10 minutes, please check your spam folder.

Contact us at editors@time.com.

Read more:

What Jesus Really Said About Heaven and Hell - TIME

Travel the World With 11 of Our Favorite Far-Flung TV Shows – Atlas Obscura

After weeks of social distancing, you may want to distance yourself from your own house. Luckily, weve got just the thing to help you do that. We asked Atlas Obscura staff to share TV recommendations that showcase weird and wondrous settings, from 1920s Berlin to 19th-century Malacca to a futuristic, pessimistic So Paulo. Lose yourself in these 11 global shows that you can watch now.

Park Saeroyi is a teenager when his father is killed in a hit-and-run accident, setting off a chain of events that pits him against South Koreas most powerful food company. What follows is a slow burn of revenge and redemption set in Itaewon, Seouls hip international district, where Park Saeroyi starts a food company of his own. Itaewon Class is a dramatic, sensory experience: The superbly dressed cast moves through the narrow, neon-lit streets of Itaewon to a memorable K-pop soundtrack. They also eat incredibly well. I found myself coveting (and attempting to make) their soft tofu stew, stir-fried pork, and kimchi.Cecily Wong, Senior Writer

This dark and stylish neo-noir, based on a series of novels by Volker Kutscher, will take you on a riveting ride through Germanys capital at the end of the Roaring Twenties. In the waning years of the Weimar Republic, a World War I veteran named Gereon Rath joins the murder department of the Berlin police. As it turns out, he cant investigate suspicious deaths without uncovering all kinds of other suspicious activities, from a local extortion ring to police shootings of Communist protesters. Meanwhile, Charlotte Ritter, a flapper from the tenements of Neuklln, rises through the ranks of the male-dominated police force, leading a double life that gives her access to the citys underbelly. Babylon Berlins creators have a long history in German cinema: Their filmography includes Run Lola Run (Lola rennt) and Good Bye, Lenin! Their newest project is as edgy and eye-popping as it is mysterious and morally complex.Daniel A. Gross, Senior Associate Editor

A quartet of precocious kids, a supernatural threat, a charming cop with a mustache whos raising an adolescent girl by himselfstop me if youve heard this one. Typewriter has the same kind of horror pastiche that made Stranger Things so much fun, but this time with a malevolent, shape-shifting ghost instead of a faceless eldritch horror. It shows off the tropical, colonial, eclectic state of Goa, as well as some inventive, multilingual swearing. Its a bit like a roller coaster missing the last section of track, but its still a goofy, fitfully frightening ride. Samir S. Patel, Editorial Director

A friend convinced me to watch this British show by describing it as like Twin Peaks, but in the Arctic. Fortitude is the name of the show as well as its setting, a fictional town inspired by Svalbard, Norway. A man is found on a snowy beach in the jaws of a polar bearbut we soon discover he was tied up and left as bait. Stanley Tucci plays the investigator and finds the murder to be the first of many strange goings-on in this remote settlement. The show weaves themes of loneliness and community into an engaging and psychological thrill, and the drama unfolds against a bleak and beautiful backdrop. Nicola Beuscher, Software Engineer

Set in late 19th-century Malacca, this Netflix original series revolves around a young woman named Pang Li Lan, who is asked to become a ghost bride for a familys recently deceased son. While she weighs this decision, which could save her family from financial ruin, she finds herself deeply embroiled in a murder mystery that may implicate her childhood flame, an otherworldly entity, and even Li Lan herself. To find answers, she must venture into the afterlife.

The Ghost Bride crafts funny, tragic, and well-written characters, but even more, it captures fascinating details of 19th-century Malaccaparticularly the colorful Peranakan culture, an intermingling of Chinese and Malay cultures in Malaysia. Light, delicate, and intricate kebayas are on full display; the camera often lingers on the dining table, panning over brightly colored kuih desserts. Even though the show is primarily in Mandarin with subtitles, the show captures the diversity of Malaysia with little flashes of the Malay language and different dialects. As someone who grew up in Malaysia, I felt transported to a mesmerizing place that also looks and sounds familiar. Samantha Chong, Senior Audience Development Manager

When a high-strung business type from South Korea survives a parachute accident during a freak storm, she tumbles across the demilitarized zone and ultimately falls for a North Korean soldier. I was skeptical about watching this Korean romantic dramathe genre isnt usually my cup of sojubut Im glad that I did. Crash Landing On You is one of the highest-rated Korean dramas in cable television history, and its writing team includes a North Korean defector, which creates a realistic peephole into a hidden world in the midst of an absurd, fanciful show. Larissa Hayden, Associate Director of Community Hosted Experiences

Strange things are happening in the fictional town of Winden, Germany. When children start disappearing next to the towns nuclear power plant, secrets about four local families begin to materialize. With an undertone of mystery and Cold War-era nuclear anxiety, Dark also ventures through Germanys moss-covered, fairy-tale forestsand even the fabric of time. The shows meticulously crafted storylines will send you racing to solve its puzzles alongside its characters.Jeanette Moreland, Supervising Producer, Video

This short-lived comedy from NBC is loosely based on the life of Greg Poehler, the creator of the show and the brother of comedian Amy Poehler. He plays an American accountant who meets a Swedish woman, falls in love, and moves to her homeland. Assimilating into everyday Swedish life proves a bit more challenging than expected. He struggles with everything from the language and customs to the sense of humorwhich makes for some hilarious viewing while you get to see and appreciate parts of Stockholm. Alexa Harrison, PR Manager

In this fiction anthology, a small, nondescript diner in Tokyo becomes an entry point into the lives of the citys characters. Each episode explores the backstories of patrons through the dishes they order. You wont see too much of Tokyo itself, but youll learn an awful lot about the citys comfort food. Alexa Harrison, PR Manager

Why not escape one dystopian world for another? 3% is a Brazilian post-apocalyptic thriller set in an unspecified future So Paulo, where most of the population lives in poverty. When young people come of age, they get one chance to pass a series of tests called the Process, and the top three percent get to live in a paradise called the Offshore. (Its like The Hunger Games, but with less teen romance.) The first season focuses on the journey of a main character, Michele, and the wild twists, challenges, and corruption she encounters along the way. As a huge fan of dystopian and post-apocalyptic narratives, I liked seeing a familiar genre from another cultures perspectiveand how no matter where its set, many of its elements remain the same. Ashley Wolfgang, Newsletter Editor

The Grandmaster of Demonic Cultivation, an online Chinese novel that was serialized in 2015 and 2016, is something of a phenomenon: It has inspired an animated series, heaps of merchandise, a line of Cornetto ice cream flavors, and finally The Untamed, a 50-episode television series thats now streaming on Netflix. The show is an introduction to Chinese fantasy genre xianxia, which generally means magical weapons, characters seeking immortality, and monsters. And dont forget about the undead: The main character, Wei Wuxian, might best be described as a manic pixie dream necromancer.

The Untamed begins with Wei Wuxians death and resurrection, then launches into a 30-plus episode explanation of how he died in the first place. You may find yourself humming the theme song for weeks. (There are a lot of plot-relevant flute solos.) The show will transport you to a high-fantasy version of China. Though the series can be heavy-handed with CGI, settings such as the Cloud Recesses and Lotus Pier, which are based in the real-life Chinese regions of Jiangsu and Hubei, are as pretty as they sound.Anne Ewbank, Gastro Obscura Associate Editor

Read more from the original source:

Travel the World With 11 of Our Favorite Far-Flung TV Shows - Atlas Obscura

Finding joy – The Oak Leaf

Camille Kantor, Special to the Oak LeafMay 2, 2020

I went to a store today. For the first time in a week, I went to a store and low and behold I ran into a friend. This wasnt even a good friend of mine and yet we instantly recognized each other from the eyes up. I was struck by that and distracted by the heat and breath that circulated inside my N95 mask as I spoke. We attempted normalcy and exchanged pleasantries, Hey! How are you all holding up? How big is the baby now? and Yes, I know time goes by so fast with two.

I would have liked to photograph that moment. Two people standing about six feet apart, but probably more like 4, gesturing with our hands more than normal because our facial expressions are no use. Except our eyes. Its the eyes I would want to zoom in on. Squinting to smile, extra wide to show interest, or eyebrows pinched in concern accented by a slight head tilt to empathize. And we are all concerned right now, arent we? Concerned for each other and people we dont know who are higher risk and concerned for the future of our own lives.

I am concerned for the preservation of joy. I dont mean that right now joy doesnt exist. I mean that I find it excessive; I find it every day and needle-point concentrate on it, video tape it and document it; share it with my friends. I feel stuck in an allegory for immortality where everything that brings joy normally is a little less sweet. Of course, there is stress and there are reminders all around us of our mortality, but there is something about being home, unable to work and live our normal lives, that takes the joy out of the little passions and hobbies we used to crave. I used to have to carve out special time to take a long bath and read, now since my husband is out of work and home I can do that in abundance. I should feel lucky! Instead I grieve at not coveting that time. Is joy a construct built from our desire to do something but not being able to? And once we are able it becomes less desirable?

I returned to my car shrouded in the ambivalence. I felt glad to see a friendly face, even if just half of it, but it was a sore reminder that human interaction outside of my husband and children will be weighted with the realities of new societal mores for the foreseeable future. I was relieved to pull off the mask and breath unfettered. The next step was to squirt a little bit of clear sanitizer in my palm and rub it all over my hands, steering wheel, phone, wallet and keys. I was most relieved that I could now scratch the corner of my right nostril, although then I had to sanitize my hands again.

A short drive across town and I was home. The tendrils of my cocoon peeled back and welcomed me inside. Here I am the master of my domain and am in control, here we are unchanged, except that we are always here. I saw our gardening projects waiting for me to delve back into and once I stepped out of the car I heard my boys laughing or crying, I dont remember which and often its both, inside the house. The weather was warm and breezy, the sunshine makes all the difference. I took a moment to breath deeply and remember that someday I will be able to visit with friends without masks on or by accidentally meeting at the store.

Read the original here:

Finding joy - The Oak Leaf

Bitcoin Cash DeFi Startup Raises $1 Million in Seed Round – Cointelegraph

The General Protocols startup is developing its Decentralized Finance (DeFi) vision on Bitcoin Cash after raising more than $1 million in a seed funding round.

This round of funding allows the Singapore-based team to develop their flagship product AnyHedge on Bitcoin Cash. Anyhedge is an open source derivatives tool that exchanges and OTC desks can embed allowing them to create new markets with smart contracts.

The funding came from investors including cryptocurrency trader Marc De Mesel and BCH thought leader Molecular, and the team includes two former Bitcoin.com employees and individuals who helped build the voluntary BCH Cash fundraising project Flipstarter.cash.

DeFi refers to digital assets and financial smart contracts, protocols and decentralized applications (DApps) built on various blockchains.

The President of General Protocols said:

We are delighted that aligned investors are supporting us in our vision to bring DeFi to Bitcoin Cash. We are building a team of dedicated supporters of peer to peer electronic cash here at General Protocols.

DeFi on Bitcoin Cash faces an uphill battle due to the network effects of Ethereum based projects. According to defiprime.com, of the 213 DeFi projects listed, 199 are built on Ethereum, with roughly 10% being supported by other platforms such as Bitcoin (BTC), EOS (EOS) or Tron (TRX).

In February this year, the amount locked in the Defi market hit an ATH of $1.24 billion in USD value before dropping back to $887 million (as of press time) with 99% of that on Ethereum. Bitcoins Lightning Network only has $9.3 million locked (1.05% of total value locked).

Total value locked in DeFi markets, May. 8. Source: defipulse.com

Last year Bitcoin Cash released their own version of a generic ERC-20 token via their Simple Ledger Protocol (SLP). While only 30 SLP tokens have been created to date, the largest stable coin Tether has launched on Bitcoin Cash.

More:

Bitcoin Cash DeFi Startup Raises $1 Million in Seed Round - Cointelegraph

The Crypto Daily Movers and Shakers -09/05/20 – FX Empire

Bitcoin fell by 1.88% on Friday. Partially reversing a 9.06% rally from Thursday, Bitcoin ended the day at $9,792.4.

A mixed start to the day saw Bitcoin rise to an early morning intraday high $10,025 before hitting reverse.

Falling short of the first major resistance level at $10,340.07 and 62% FIB of $10,034, Bitcoin slid to a mid-morning intraday low $9,705.0.

Steering clear of the first major support level at $9,324.07, Bitcoin bounced back to $10,000 levels before a late slide.

Falling short of the 62% FIB of $10,034, Bitcoin slid back to $9,700 levels to end the day in the red.

The near-term bearish trend, formed at late June 2019s swing hi $13,764.0, remained firmly intact, reaffirmed by the March swing lo $4,000.

For the bulls, Bitcoin would need to break out from $10,000 levels to form a near-term bullish trend.

Across the rest of the majors, it was a mixed day for the pack on Friday.

Bitcoin Cash ABC rose by 2.71% to lead the way.

Binance Coin (+0.53%), Bitcoin Cash SV (+0.91%), Cardanos ADA (+1.19%), Litecoin (+0.65%), Stellars Lumen (+0.41%), Tezos (+1.14%), and Trons TRX (+1.10%) also saw green.

It was a bearish day for the rest, however, with Moneros XMR sliding by 3.52% to lead the way down.

EOS (-0.64%), Ethereum (-0.43%), and Ripples XRP (-0.05%) also joined Bitcoin in the red.

Through the current week, the crypto total market cap rose from a Monday low $240.56bn to a Friday high $271.32bn. At the time of writing, the total market cap stood at $269.10bn.

Bitcoins dominance held onto 65% levels following Mondays modest loss, before the mid-week breakout that delivered 68% levels. At the time of writing, Bitcoins dominance stood at 67.5%.

24-hour trading volumes fell to a Tuesday current week low $145.07bn before jumping to a Friday high $205.18bn. At the time of writing, 24-hr volumes stood at $168.77bn.

The rest is here:

The Crypto Daily Movers and Shakers -09/05/20 - FX Empire

The Crypto Daily Movers and Shakers -08/05/20 – Yahoo Finance

Bitcoin rallied by 9.06% on Thursday. Following on from a 1.47% gain on Wednesday, Bitcoin ended the day at $9,979.6.

A mixed start to the day saw Bitcoin fall to an early morning intraday low $9,029.0 before making a move.

Steering clear of the first major support level at $8,904.73, Bitcoin rallied to a final hour intraday high $10,045.0.

Bitcoin broke through the first major resistance level at $9,409.13 and the second major resistance level at $9,666.77.

More significantly, Bitcoin tested resistance at the 62% FIB of $10,034 before easing back to sub-$10,000.

The near-term bearish trend, formed at late June 2019s swing hi $13,764.0, remained firmly intact, reaffirmed by the March swing lo $4,000.

For the bulls, Bitcoin would need to break out from $10,000 levels to form a near-term bullish trend.

Across the rest of the majors, it was a bullish day for the pack on Thursday.

Moneros XMR led the way, rallying by 12.33%.

Bitcoin Cash ABC (+5.59%), Cardanos ADA (+4.69%), EOS (+4.14%), Ethereum (+6.72%), Litecoin (+5.37%), and Stellars Lumen (+4.09%) also found strong support.

Binance Coin (+3.84%), Bitcoin Cash SV (+2.71%), Ripples XRP (+3.23%), Tezos (+2.39%), and Trons TRX (+3.83%) trailed the front runners.

Through the current week, the crypto total market cap rose from a Monday low $240.56bn to a Thursday high $270.61bn. At the time of writing, the total market cap stood at $269.25bn.

Bitcoins dominance held onto 65% levels following Mondays modest loss, before the mid-week breakout that delivered 68% levels. At the time of writing, Bitcoins dominance stood at 67.8%.

24-hour trading volumes fell to a Tuesday current week low $145.07bn before jumping to a Thursday high $195.08bn. At the time of writing, 24-hr volumes stood at $194.91bn.

At the time of writing, Bitcoin was down by 0.67% to $9,912.4. A mixed start to the day saw Bitcoin fall to an early morning low $9,857.1 before striking a high $10,025.0.

Bitcoin left the major support and resistance levels and the 62% FIB untested early on.

Elsewhere, it was another bullish start to the day for the rest of the majors.

Cardanos ADA led the way, rallying by 2.41%, with Bitcoin Cash SV up by 1.93%.

Bitcoin would need to move back through to $10,000 levels to bring the first major resistance level at $10,340.07 into play.

Support from the broader market would be needed, however, for Bitcoin to break out from the 62% FIB of $10,034.

Barring a broad-based crypto rally, the 62% FIB would likely leave Bitcoin short of the first major resistance level.

In the event of another breakout, $10,500 levels could come into play before any pullback.

Failure to move through to $10,200 levels could see Bitcoin fall deeper into the red.

A fall through back through to sub-$9,685 levels would bring the first major support level at $89,324.07 into play before any recovery.

Barring a crypto meltdown, however, Bitcoin should steer clear of sub-$9,700 levels.

This article was originally posted on FX Empire

Read the original here:

The Crypto Daily Movers and Shakers -08/05/20 - Yahoo Finance

What is an online bitcoin wallet? – iNVEZZ

Also known as a web wallet, an online wallet is a way ofstoring your bitcoinon the internet. In other words, its a wallet that runs on your browser, just like a website. Online wallets are regarded as more vulnerable to hacks than other types of wallet, but they are very convenient as you can access your wallet anywhere as long as you have an internet connection.

Web wallets are designed to be very user-friendly. You begin by signing up with your preferred provider, which is simple and quick. You will then access your account with a username and password. Sending or receivingbitcoinis easy because all you need is your wallet address (for receiving money) and the address you want to send bitcoin to (for transferring out).

Yes, online wallets are very much like online banking portals for bitcoin. Like online banking, you can log on with your password and carry out transactions, see your balance, and look at your transaction history on the website of your wallet provider.

When it comes to bitcoin wallets there are a number of options from which to choose:

Yes, online wallets are completely free. All you need to do is choose your preferred provider, sign up, and start using your wallet.

There are no additional fees that you have to pay to the provider in order to use your online wallet. However, theres a small transaction fee charged when you spend bitcoin (but not when you receive it). These transaction fees are to pay the miners who verify the movement of bitcoin on the blockchain. Typically these are very low, usually around 0.2mBTC (which means two thousandths of a bitcoin under 2). Most wallets will also give you an option of paying a higher amount in order to motivate miners to verify your transactions faster.

There are many different web wallet services to choose from, heres a small selection of some of the best known:

Yes, you will find online wallets, such as Blockchain, that support a variety of different cryptocurrencies includingEthereumand bitcoin cash. The widest variety of coins, however, will usually be able to be held in web wallets that have integrated exchanges, such as Coinbase.

In some cases, online wallets are exchanges. If you use an option such as Coinbase, you can not only store your coins, but also buy andtrade other cryptocurrenciesthat are then automatically held in the wallet. Other online wallets that hold multiple currencies will often allow you to transfer different currencies between each other (for instance changing bitcoin into litecoin) within the wallet.

Yes, but exactly how will depend on your chosen platform. As a web wallet is like an online account, each company will have security features that allow you to gain access in case you forget your password. Wallets such as Blockchain allow you to set up your recovery seed and enter the 12-word recovery phrase when you lose your password in order to create a new wallet with your balance. Others such as Coinbase have an option for resetting your password, where you get an email with a link to set up a new password. Just to be safe, its better you write down your password somewhere and keep it safe in case you ever forget it.

Setting up an online bitcoin wallet is much like registering for an account on any other online service. Every provider will be slightly different, but usually this is how it will go:

Web wallets are the least secure type of wallet and are not recommended for storing anything more than a small number of bitcoins. The major risks associated with them are being targeted by hackers, as their servers will hold the information of a lot of different bitcoin wallets. This isnt to be alarmist, all online wallet providers will have strong security, but the risks are there.

The main advantage is being able to access your bitcoin wallet anywhere and on any device, provided you have an internet access. Also, the fact that many online wallets are exchanges means you can change your coins into othercryptocurrenciesand react quickly to market fluctuations to cash in on the profits.

It depends. Yes, if you want to be accessing your coins quickly for the purpose of making payments and exchanging; no, if you are looking for a safer option to store a large amount of coins. If your goal is long-term investment, you are better off with a hardware or paper wallet. An online wallet is only recommended for holding a small amount of bitcoin.

Right here. We have reviewed all the options to help you narrow down to the best online wallet for your needs. Go ahead and read through our reviews to find your perfect web wallet. Or continue to the next lesson.

Originally posted here:

What is an online bitcoin wallet? - iNVEZZ