How does hypnosis really impact the brain? – Big Think

Although hypnosis has been around for hundreds of years, it is still something that even the brightest among us cannot fully understand. The earliest references to hypnosis date back to ancient Egypt and Greece. In fact, the word "hypnos" means "sleep" and refers to the Greek god who is the personification of sleep.

Our definition of hypnosis refers to a trance state that is characterized by extreme suggestibility, relaxation, and heightened imagination. Most often, hypnosis is compared to a sort of daydream state - you're fully conscious, but you have tuned out most of the stimuli around yourself and are focused intently on a particular subject, most of the time through the power of suggestion

Along the way, there have been many pioneers in the feild of hypnosis research.

Photo by Brian A Jackson on Shutterstock

The "modern father" of hypnosis was Austrian physician Franz Mesmer, who gave us the word "mesmerism", which can be another word referencing a hypnotic state. Mesmer had an idea for which he called "animal magnetism" - and the idea was that there are these kinds of natural energy sources that could be transferred between organisms and objects.

Along the way, hypnotism has had many other pioneers who have furthered the fascinating phenomenon. One of the most notable is James Braid, an eye doctor based in Scotland who became intrigued with the idea of hypnosis when he discovered a patient in his waiting room had fallen under something of a trance after staring at a lamp. He gave the patient come commands, and the patient obliged, remaining in a trace-like state the entire time.

Braid's fascination grew and through more tests, he determined that getting a patient to fixate on something was one of the most important components to hypnosis. He later would publish a book on what we now know as the discovery of modern hypnosis.

Later, James Esdaile, a British surgeon based in India during the mid-1800s established that this kind of trance hypnotic state was extremely useful in pain relief practices. He performed hundreds of major operations using hypnotism as his only anesthetic. When he returned to England in an attempt to convince the medical establishments of his findings, they paid no mind to his theory in favor of new chemical anesthetics such as morphine, which was relatively new at the time. This is where the use of hypnotics for medicinal purposes halted and much of the reason why hypnosis is considered an alternative approach to medicine in today's society.

Jumping forward to the 1900s, Frenchman Emile Cou moved away from the conventional approaches that had been pioneered with hypnotism and began his work with the use of auto-suggestion.

He is most famous for the phrase: "Day by day, in every way, I am getting better and better." This technique was one of the first instances where affirmation hypnosis was used and it has been growing through various counseling programs and therapy techniques ever since.

In modern times, one of the most recognized authorities on clinical hypnosis remains to be Milton Erikson, a well-known psychotherapist who did most of his work around 1950-1980. He was fascinated with human psychology and devised countless innovative ways to use hypnosis in his clinical practices.

Scientists scanned the brains of 57 people during a guided hypnosis session.

Image by vrx on Shutterstock

Changes found in three areas of the brain during hypnosis may suggest future alternative treatments for anxiety and pain management.

Over the years, hypnosis has gained a lot of traction and respectability within both the medical and psychotherapy professions. According to a 2016 Stanford University School of Medicine study, there are three areas of our brains that change during a state of hypnosis - and this could actually be used to benefit us.

Scientists scanned the brains of 57 people during a guided hypnosis session, similar to one that may be used to help treat anxiety, pain, or trauma.

First, there is a decrease in dorsal anterior cingulate activity.

This is part of the brain's salience network that is responsible for psychological functions like decision making, evaluation processes, and emotional regulation as well as physiological functions such as blood pressure and heart rate.

Next, there is an increase in the connection between the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex and the insula.

The dorsolateral prefrontal cortex is associated with executive functions such as working memory and self-control. The insula is a small region of the cerebral cortex that plays a significant role in pain perception, social engagements, emotions, and autonomic control.

This is described by the lead researcher of the study as a kind of "brain-body connection" that helps the brain process and control what's going on in the body.

Finally, there are reduced connections between the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex and the medial prefrontal cortex.

The dorsolateral prefrontal cortex becomes less connected to the medial prefrontal cortex and the posterior cingulate cortex, both of which are strongly associated with neural activity and cognitive tasks.

This decrease very likely correlates to the disconnect between someone's actions and their awareness of their actions, according to the lead researcher on the project.

How does this change the way we view hypnosis?

Understanding exactly which areas of the brain are impacted during hypnosis can pave the way for groundbreaking research into the use of hypnosis for medicinal purposes.

"Now that we know which brain regions are involved," says David Spiegel, MD, professor and researcher on the project, "we may be able to use this knowledge to alter someone's capacity to be hypnotized or the effectiveness of the hypnosis for problems such as pain control."

While more research is needed, the study is certainly a groundbreaking head-start in what could eventually be known as hypnotic treatments for things like anxiety, trauma and pain management.

"A treatment that combines brain stimulation with hypnosis could improve known analgesic effects of hypnosis and potentially even replace addictive and side-effect-laden painkillers and anti-anxiety medications," explains Spiegel.

From Your Site Articles

Related Articles Around the Web

See original here:

How does hypnosis really impact the brain? - Big Think

Shocking video emerges of boy, 10, ‘high on drugs’ as he parties with teenager – Mirror.co.uk

A shocking Snapchat video has emerged apparently showing two young boys high on drugs.

The disturbing scenes appear to show a teenager and the younger lad, aged just 10, showing clear symptoms of drug use, GrimsbyLive reports.

At one point the younger schoolboy seems to be gurning - chewing his jaw with wide eyes wide open - as he and the teen listen to music in a bedroom.

In another scene the older boy can be seen in a trance-like state with flickering eyes, an involuntary movement which is a hallmark of drug use.

No adults appear in the video and the boys seem to be alone with a third person taking pictures.

The dark video, along with images of the lads, have been met with horror after being posted on Facebook.

The video was posted on social media late on Monday morning with the message: What must go on in your sick heads to give a 10 year old pills.

It is widely suggested the boys had taken the illegal drug MDMA, commonly known as ecstasy.

GrimsbyLive report that the clips were seen by around 10,000 people before being removed from the social media platform.

Comments were almost overwhelmingly of anger and despair at the scenes with people calling for the involvement of police and social services.

Someone claiming to be the younger boys auntie responded to the post saying: Imagine waking up to see your 10-year-old nephew off his face. Who the **** gave them him? Im fuming. The kid is 10-years-old you sick b*******.

She later appealed to people to stop sharing the video, saying: Can everyone on my mates list stop sharing the video of my 10- year-old nephew now please its getting sorted.

GrimsbyLivehas masked the pictures of the children to protect their identity.

The teenage boy is named by some social media users in Grimsby and was subjected to a series of threats. He responded to a number of people with taunts.

Videos and pictures were removed from Facebook at around 10pm but not before more than 1,000 people had commented and shared the post.

GrimsbyLive has contacted Humberside Police and North East Lincolnshire Council Childrens Services for comment.

For help and advice about drug use and abuse for young people you can find more information at talktofrank.com.

See the original post here:

Shocking video emerges of boy, 10, 'high on drugs' as he parties with teenager - Mirror.co.uk

8 new songs from the indie marplatense that you have to listen to – Play Crazy Game

The city of Mar del Plata it has always been the cradle of great names of the music of argentina and the world. From the tango revolutionary Astor Piazzolla, going by the alternative rock Rosario Blfari, and coming dream pop avant-garde of Altocamet, the music remained as a constant and one of the pillars artistic coastal city.

During this time of quarantine, many artists mar del plata found ways to stay active. Some already had material prepared; others ventured to create with the tools they had at hand. Be that as it may, the confinement does not prevent the musicians to share their songs, and in this list we collect 8 new releases of MDQ.

Supported in the solitude of your keyboard, Juan Manuel Hernando sings from his gut: were everybody in the same. Averaging half of the track adds Flax Ezequiel Parodi on guitar and the song explodes in a trance futuristic of nostalgia. Recorded, mixed and produced in quarantine by Augustine Bonecco, the third single from the project motorized by Hernando positions it as one of the promises of pop this year.

Jeanne Passeri is a marplatense of 19 years, under the name of Shitstemis positioned as the reference number one rap city. Wachas it is a feminist manifesto of court city with a base of reggaeton on the one that raps about his reality. Of the school of Sara Hebe, and Miss Bolivia, Shitstem is a challenge to his generation to be empowered and raise your fist against the objectification of women in the music industry urban: Now the hip-hop also is one of the wachas.

The principle of the quarantine, found to Leo Ferro and company in full release Dialectfirst preview of what will be their sixth studio work titled Animal naked. The mar del plata continues his ceaseless search for new sounds, pointing now to the tribal rhythms and african from the perspective of electronic. During may we were also able to listen to the single Vortex, a song intimate and minimalist that develops between environments and ethereal vocal melodies deep. SLNT will publish a third progress during the month of June and promises the release of the album for the second half of the year.

Of the hand of Manu Tello and Gonza Perez Rojas Varese, Sheba Toyos premiered a track in the key of funk that manages to link the rhythms of the seventies with electronic sounds, which invite to put a rhythm to the days of running: dance becomes an obligation. The former Firpolar is another of the musicians of mar del plata located in the Federal Capital that has slowly established itself within the independent circuit in buenos aires.

If something was missing to Mar del Plata was the adrenaline of a band of surf rock that managed to musicalizar the afternoon of waves and wind on the beach. The brothers Cianciarulo came to time: in mid-2019 given entity Lost Marplas with the release of their debut EP. Some days ago they brought out the single The Parena along with the premiere of his first music video, all produced and released by themselves under the slogan DIY. In their songs, in addition to reflecting the culture surfer, Coco, Astor and Jay defend the rights of animals, militate veganism and the struggle for the beaches free of plastic garbage.

During 2019, the duo composed by Ignacio Bellusci and Lionel Quiroga took part in one of the editions of Sofar Mar del Plata with the participation of Ruben Montoya on violins and Linen Ezequiel Parodi on guitar. This intimate session was born Side BBa handful of songs, transformed to a format I live in where all the instrumentation and vocals are reproduced without additional amplification.

The trio of shoegaze from the spa town released few days ago In the arena, second preview of what will be their next album All the days are happy and that they plan to launch before the end of the year. In this track, Carina Monjeau, Ignacio Giobellina and Pedro Moscuzza Polish and deepen their sound is post-punk with gothic under the supervision of the English Graham Sutton in the role of producer. Accompanied the release with the premiere of a video clip diethylamide performed by Pearl audiovisual.

In this new single with video clip, the solo project of singer and guitarist from Forest Dystopia deepens his aesthetic of new wave that embraces the best of the eighties, while he builds a sonic landscape full of synths and lyrics that run through the human experiences. A descendant of Gus Dapperton and Connan Mockasin, Fede is one of the several musicians of mar del Plata that migrated to Buenos Aires in an effort to amplify your project, and to conquer new audiences.

Originally posted here:

8 new songs from the indie marplatense that you have to listen to - Play Crazy Game

Debt settlement: An effective way of reducing debt – AZ Big Media

Monetary debt can be difficult as it can cripple your fiscal freedom and bring you financial hardships. Furthermore, having debt can make it hard to buy a car or get a mortgage for your home. It can also harm your emotional and mental well-being because of stress.

There are numerous methods on how to reduce or get rid of debt; one of those options is through debt settlements. If you currently have considerable debt and looking for ways on how to improve your financial condition, you are in the perfect place. Read on to know about debt settlement.

Debt settlement, known as debt adjustment or debt relief, is a process of resolving debt for a lesser amount than what is owed initially. A substantial lump-sum payment that ranges from 10% to 50% of what is owed is used to resolve the previous debt.

A report from the American Fair Credit Council (AFCC) states that more than 90% of debt settlements result in debt reduction that is greater than the previous fees. Also, most of the participants reach agreements on their accounts within six months of starting the program.

Debt settlement has numerous benefits, which include some of the following.

One of the main advantages ofdebt settlementprograms is that the original amount you owe can be lowered to a more affordable amount. If you previously owe $10,000, it can be diminished to as much as $5,000.

Reducing your debt by up to 50% can be of great help, especially if you are currently experiencing extreme financial hardships.

When you declare bankruptcy, assets that you have may be claimed by the lender. These may include properties, land ownership, and cars, to name a few. Your financial troubles will also be a matter of public record, which could affect your employment options in the future. This is because most employers and companies evaluate their applicants credit histories.

Declaring bankruptcy may not be a good option for some individuals. Fortunately, debt settlement programs offer a practical alternative.

Talking to and dealing with creditors and collectors can be quite a hassle. It can also be humiliating because some people might find out that you are in debt and cant pay up.

These things can affect your self-confidence and self-esteem, which can hurt your emotional and mental wellness. Through debt settlement programs, you will be able to get debt collectors and creditors off your back.

Negotiating your debt with creditors can be tempting; the problem is you might mess things up and make the situation even worse. It would be best that you consult a debt settlement company to negotiate your financial issues on your behalf.

Debt settlement companies have the competence and experience to negotiate your settlement for you, helping you get a better deal in the process.

However, not all settlement companies in the market today are legitimate, which means you should be wary of companies that you consult and do transactions with. You can never go wrong in consulting settlement companies that are reliable and trusted.

Visit link:

Debt settlement: An effective way of reducing debt - AZ Big Media

Albania needs to strengthen protection of property rights, judicial effectiveness – Heritage Foundation – SeeNews

TIRANA (Albania), June 9 (SeeNews) -Albania has slightly slightly increased its overall economic freedom score in the global economic freedom chart prepared by The Heritage Foundation but has fallenfallen five spots to 57thposition in the index rankings,reflecting relatively better performanceby other countries, theU.S.-based think-tank said.

The country's overall score roseby 0.4points to66.9,mostly due toan improvement in the fiscal health, according to the 2020 Index of Economic Freedom report published by The Heritage Foundation.

Albania's government has improved its control of the budget deficit and has stabilised public debt, thus creating a more business-friendly environment. However, the country must improve its scoresfor property rights, judicial effectivenessand government integrity to improve its chances for eventual accession to the EU, The Heritage Foundation noted.

Albania is ranked 30th among 45 countries in the Europe region, and its overall score is below the regional average and above the world average. The country's score matches its highest so far, which was recorded in 2014.The economy is considered moderately free and continues to register a healthy economic growth, The Heritage Foundation said.

Protection of property rights remains weakand corruption remains a problem in real estate registration procedures and public administration. The judiciary is independent but subject to political pressure, intimidationand limited resources.

In terms of regulatory efficiency, despite some improvements, the enforcement of contracts remains problematic and unemployment is still high, as skilled labour continues to migrate outside of the country.

The Heritage Foundation also pointed to limits on foreign ownership, although progress has been made to modernise the investment regime.

The financial system remains relatively stable. The banking sector is well provisioned, but the share of nonperforming loans has been rising, the think-tank said.

Link:

Albania needs to strengthen protection of property rights, judicial effectiveness - Heritage Foundation - SeeNews

Lest we forget: 70 years of diplomacy, and why China trade in 5 minutes – shorelinemedia.net

The American economy and the country is huge. Countries normally operate in a coordinated fashion like a Navy flotilla. Huge ships take longer to turn like the flotilla of the German battleship, Bismarck. Flotillas work in synchrony, like a ballet or the Cirque du Soleil, for their mutual protection and benefit. Regardless of the political party in the oval office, there is generally much continuity in military, trade and foreign policy.

The U.S. wanted to leverage China in Vietnam negotiations. From 1952 through 1973, presidents Eisenhower, Kennedy, Johnson and Nixon were using Vietnam as a containment operation to buffer China from expansion. China and Vietnam were historical enemies. America wanted to drive a wedge between Russia and China. The Vietnam war ended with Nixons Paris Peace Accord in 1973. Then straddled with the Watergate break-in, he was impeached and resigned. As soon as Ford was sworn in, he addressed the nation and stated, My fellow Americans, our long national nightmare is over.

After President Carter gave China favored nation status in 1979, China trade started with Reagan in 1981. We had 12 years of accelerated Chinese trade growth and it continued its acceleration with four years of George H.W. Bush (Desert Storm). The Berlin Wall fell in November 1989. The USSR collapsed in December 1991.

Clintons economy grew unabated at 4% year over year starting in 1993. Impeached. Acquitted. China trade deficit grew about 20% year after year but was about 20% of what it is today. Clintons stock market performance exceeds Trumps excluding COVID-19 months. Many headed to Margaritaville with Jimmy Buffet.

Then the dandelions hit the fan. 9-11- 2001. The New York World Trade Center was targeted by Osama Bin Laden and laid smoldering on the ground.

George W. was not paying attention to China; he was too busy with Iraqi Freedom looking for A) oil or B) weapons of mass destruction of which there were none per Hans Blix, chief U.N. inspector. General Colin Powell knew what to do. He said to G.W. Bush, You break it, you bought it (The Pottery Barn Doctrine).

By 2004, President George W. Bushs trade imbalance graph with China looks like Evil Knievels ramp created to jump the Snake River canyon. Knievel needed a parachute. Our economy will need one too. Looking at the graph of trade deficits, corrections should have started about 2005. Blame it on focus in Iraq, the greed of American industry for increased profit margins? PAC money? American consumers wanting cheap stuff? Ship our environmental issue offshore? All the above? Mr. Trump, you can blame China trade issues on anyone but Obama and Biden.

Obama started with an economy in the tank in 2008 (the bank bailout), plus an ongoing Middle East conflict he inherited from G.W. Bush. The stock market went on an extended run increasing 113% from Obamas second month until the day Trump was elected, according to Forbes in June 2019. It was the longest run in US History.

Trumps first three years of China trade deficits are 7.76 % higher than Obama-Bidens last 3 years in office, according to the U.S. Census Bureau.

Theres been a trade imbalance with the Chinese since day one. American industry exported heavy machinery including farm products, steel, even rail maintenance equipment from Ludingtons Harsco Rail. In the early years, it kept Americans at work and leveled the economy and contained Russia. Most all Presidents were distracted by wars. You can only fight so many wars on so many fronts. Like the Bismarck, you need to make course corrections. Sometimes you get your rudder jammed.

No President spent more money on American defense than Barak Obama and Joe Bide, ever!, at $663.4 billion per year. (FY16_Green_Book.pdf) Budgets thru 2021. Obama and Biden built the military and the economy you and Trump live off today, according to the National Defense Budget estimates for fiscal year 2016.

Senate Intelligence Committee Chairman Richard Burr, R-N.C., said in a statement that his panel found no reason to dispute the U.S. intelligence communitys conclusions that Russia interfered in the 2016 presidential election to sow chaos, saying they reflected strong tradecraft and analytical reasoning. He said the agencies conclusion is that such election interference is the new normal.

Trumps continual vibrato of false tweets along with hidden agendas, and fake news and lies are killing us. It is just plain immoral. In todays world you need both oars in the water. Is there a doctor in the house?

When will we say our national nightmare is over?

See original here:

Lest we forget: 70 years of diplomacy, and why China trade in 5 minutes - shorelinemedia.net

"It never fails that in the national discourse people ignore those killed right here in DC by police while protesting police brutality and muder…

From Black Lives Matter DC:

Black people are allowed to be joyful or feel seen with DC renaming a street after Black Lives Matter. Its also our responsibility to let you know what we are fighting for, who has the power to change things and that power concedes nothing without demand.

-Kiki Green, a Core Organizer with Black Lives Matter DC

Today Black Lives Matter DC stands in solidarity with freedom fighters all over the world to honor the lives of George Floyd, Breonna Taylor, Tony McDade, Dreasjon Reed, and as always those we have lost to police here in DC:

Jeffery Price, age 22, was chased to his death in DC by the Metropolitan Police Department on May 4, 2018.

DQuan Young, age 24, was shot and killed in DC by the Metropolitan Police Department (MPD) on May 9, 2018.

Marqueese Alston, 22, was shot and killed in DC by the Metropolitan Police Department (MPD) June 12, 2018

Terrence Sterling, 31, was chased, shot and killed by DC by the Metropolitan Police Department (MPD) on September 11, 2016

Ralphael Briscoe age 18, as shot and killed in DC by the Metropolitan Police Department (MPD) on April 26, 2011

The names of more loved ones lost have been compiled here by Stop Police Terror Project DC.

These are the names of the people that performative Black Lives Matter street art leaves out. These are the names that fuel our commitment to #DefundPolice and #StopMPD. We know that for some DC is the seat of power and imperialism, the symbolic representation of harmful systems but it is also home to hundreds of thousands of Black people who are oppressed by the very systems people claim to be against. It never fails that in the national discourse people ignore those killed right here in DC by police while protesting police brutality and muder in our city.

We stand by our critique of the DC Mayor Muriel Bowser after the unveiling of the Black Lives Matter Mural and the renaming of Black Lives Matter Plaza. Black Lives Matter is a complete statement. There is no grey area or ambiguity. We hold that we have a duty to the loved ones named above to ensure that they are not forgotten and their deaths are not exploited for publicity, performance, or distraction. Mayor Muriel Bowser must be held accountable for the lip service she pays in making such a statement while she continues to intentionally underfund and cut services and programs that meet the basic survival needs of Black people in DC.

To chip away at the investments in communities that actually make us safer while proposing a $45 million dollar increase in funding for the Metropolitan Police Departments budget a few weeks ago is NOT making Black lives matter. Bowser justifies the over policing of Black bodies by pointing to the heartbreaking number of Black people who have died as a result of violence in our streets. Simultaneously she publicly admits that increased police presence has little effect on violent crimes, especially homicide. Homicides continue to increase despite the MPD budget growing every year and more and more officers on the streets. In a continuation of her intentional efforts to first not fund, then dissect, and now lie about implementing the Neighborhood Engagement Achieves Results Act (NEAR Act), that threats community violence as a public health issue, she just proposed to cut $800k from the Office of Neighborhood Safety and Engagement that the Act created and where the violence interruption program sits. Additionally, she still has not opened the stand alone Office of Violence Prevention also required by the Act. Stop Police Terror Project DC and Black Lives Matter DC were instrumental in the creation, passage, funding of the NEAR Act.

Although Black people make up 46% of D.C.s population, they remain the subjects of the vast majority of all stops, frisks, and uses of force in the District. A January 2018 D.C. Office of Police Complaints OPC report found that of the 2,224 total reported uses of force in Fiscal Year 2017 (October 1, 2016 through September 30, 2017), 89% involved a Black subject. A February 2018 investigative report from WUSA9 analyzed pre-NEAR Act data and found that approximately 80% of the stops involved a Black subject. Just this week OPC released its FY18 Annual Report that revealed officer misconduct complaints are up 78% since FY16, 780 complaints were received (the second consecutive year of receiving a record number of complaints), 501 new investigations were opened (more than any other year since OPCs

We actively reject the false narrative that policing is necessary or safe. That the system of the system of policing and the injustice system are not broken, they are operating exactly the way that they were designed.

Our anger and rage, our grief is justified. We rebuke the notion that we must celebrate crumbs the Mayor gives DC residents without engaging critically in why we settle for art but not housing, street signs but not investments in the actual things that keep communities safe. If our attempts to hold this administration accountable for what we believe are multiple failures of leadership turns people away then we will stand alone. We are clear in our commitment that liberation for all Black people and real change to the conditions that keep us locked up and out will not be swayed even if people disagree with our stance.

While people celebrate this Mayor, our lawsuit against Bowser this week resulted in the DC curfew being lifted. Thats not it. While we are both taking it to the streets with direct action and support, we are also suing President Donald Trump for ordering the use of violence against protestors who were speaking out against police brutality and the murder of Black people by police. We do this because we know that both the federal and local government are complicit in the violence against protestors.

While others may forget, we do not forget any of us. When we say Black Lives Matter, we mean ALL Black lives. We will work for the liberation of all Black people in DC when it is difficult, when we are attacked, when people are busy debating whether or not protestors are violent or peaceful, and until we are free.

Therefore WE DEMAND

Black Lives Matter DC is a member-based abolitionist organization centering Black people most at risk for state violence in DC, creating the conditions for Black Liberation through the abolition of systems and institutions of white supremacy, capitalism, patriarchy, and colonialism.

We are dedicated to promoting strategies that:

empower the most oppressed Black people;

do not reinforce or legitimize systems and institutions that harm Black people including police, prisons, mass incarceration, and modern slavery.

divest from people, institutions and systems that harm us and invest in the people, institutions, systems and other models that support our liberation and empowerment.

use a diversity of tactics to promote harm reduction, political education, and non-cooperation as strategic visions.

Read the original post:

"It never fails that in the national discourse people ignore those killed right here in DC by police while protesting police brutality and muder...

Is the Executive Office for Immigration Review incompetent or is Trump hiding something? | TheHill – The Hill

The Transactional Records Access Clearinghouse (TRAC) is a Syracuse University research center that collects and analyzes data on immigration court activities. It gets the data with Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) requests that it submits regularly to the Department of Justices Executive Office for Immigration Review (EOIR). The TRAC research center is a reliable source of objective, factual information that is supported by numerous foundations, such as the Rockefeller Family Fund, the New York Times Company Foundation, the Carnegie Foundation and the Ford Foundation.

EOIR is a Justice Department office that includes a 466-judge immigration court, a Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA), an Office of Information Technology, an Office of Policy, and a General Counsels office.

EOIR records data on the activities of the immigration court and makes the data available to the public pursuant to the requirements in section 552(a) of FOIA. This includes a large batch of anonymized data about immigration court cases that EOIR prepares for TRACs monthly FOIA request.

TRAC revealed in a report it issued on Oct. 31, 2019, that EOIR was removing court records from its data. TRACs efforts to persuade EOIR to stop doing this and to replace the missing data have been unsuccessful.

First letter to EOIR

In a letter dated, Nov. 4, 2019, TRAC asked EOIRs director, James McHenry, for a public acknowledgement that recent EOIR data releases were not complete and that thousands of records were missing.

A spokesperson for EOIR has claimed that EOIR does not delete records. According to the spokesperson, the missing records were withheld on the basis of a FOIA exemption.

But the missing records were included in previous releases. Moreover, when records are withheld because they are exempt from FOIA requests, EOIR is supposed to identify the information being removed and explain why it was exempt from disclosure, which EOIR did not do.

A comparison of the data in EOIRs September 2019 release to its August 2019 release revealed that more than 1,500 relief applications that were in the August release were missing from the September release.

The missing data includes 17 different types of relief applications, including applications for adjustment of status, suspension of deportation, and asylum.

According to a report TRAC issued on Dec. 18, 2019, McHenry did not respond to the letter, but an EOIR representative assured TRAC that in the future, EOIRs technology office would review immigration court data before it is released.

This was not the first time there has been a problem with EOIR immigration court data.

In 2002, the Supreme Court upheld the constitutionality of mandatory detention for criminal aliens on the basis of a record which included incorrect EOIR data that the Justice Department had submitted on how long criminal aliens were being detained. The fact that the Justice Department had submitted incorrect EOIR data to support its position wasnt discovered until 14 years later when the public obtained the underlying data through a FOIA request and identified the discrepancies.

On Aug. 26, 2016, the Solicitor General issued a formal letter to the Supreme Court apologizing for the submission of inaccurate data in the mandatory detention case.

Second letter to EOIR

In a letter dated Dec. 18, 2019, TRAC informed McHenry that the number of missing records was getting larger. Initially there were 1,507 missing relief applications in the September release; by December, there were 3,799.

TRAC asked McHenry to release the technology offices findings from its review of missing records and to describe the steps EOIR was taking to ensure that the public will be provided with accurate and reliable data in the future.

McHenry did not respond.

In a June 3, 2020 report, TRAC concludes that the data it has received on asylum and other applications for relief through April 2020 are too unreliable to be meaningful and it has stopped updating its public data on asylum. It also notes that data it has received and posted in recent months may not be accurate.

The number of relief applications that were included in the March 2020 data release but were missing in the April release rose to 68,282, and this is just the number of records that disappearedin a single month. It does not count the applications that disappeared previously.

EOIR's escalating data problems should raise grave concerns in Congress, among policymakers and in the public at large who put their faith in federal agencies to provide complete and accurate information about their work.

In the words of the TRAC report: The EOIR's apparent reckless deletion of potentially irretrievable court records raises urgent concerns that without immediate intervention the agency's sloppy data management practices could undermine its ability to manage itself, thwart external efforts at oversight, and leave the public in the dark about essential government activities.

Third letter to EOIR

In a letter dated June 3, 2020, TRAC told McHenry that the problem of disappearing records is approaching a crisis point. Month after month, more records are disappearing from EOIRs data releases.

The latest release, which covers records in EOIRs database as of the end of April 2020, is missing 68,282 relief applications that were in the March 2020 release. More relief application records disappeared in that single month than all of the asylum applications the agency reported receiving in fiscal 2015, or in any prior year.

Why is this happening?

EOIRs FOIA explanation is not persuasive.

The nine FOIA exemptions are listed in section 552(b), and it is apparent that they dont apply to the anonymized immigration court records that EOIR has been submitting to TRAC.

Moreover, if EOIR really thought the data they were withdrawing was exempt, why did they include it in previous releases?

In any case, I agree with TRACs conclusion in its June report that EOIR's apparently reckless deletion of potentially irretrievable court records raises urgent concerns.

The agency's failure to produce coherent data in response to regular (and expected) FOIA requests is inexplicable. Whats more, it makes it more difficult to identify and correct problems the immigration court is having, it prevents congress from conducting meaningful oversight, and it makes it impossible for the public to know how well the immigration court system is actually functioning.

Nolan Rappaportwas detailed to the House Judiciary Committee as an executive branch immigration law expert for three years. He subsequently served as an immigration counsel for the Subcommittee on Immigration, Border Security and Claims for four years. Prior to working on the Judiciary Committee, he wrote decisions for the Board of Immigration Appeals for 20 years. Follow him on Twitter@NolanR1or athttps://nolanrappaport.blogspot.com.

Read the original here:

Is the Executive Office for Immigration Review incompetent or is Trump hiding something? | TheHill - The Hill

UPDATE: Another death attributed to COVID-19 reported in Monterey County – Voices of Monterey Bay

Editors note: The following is a collection of breaking news updates, helpful informational sites and links to appropriate local institutions during the coronavirus pandemic. Send announcements to admin@voicesofmontereybay.org.

Another death attributed to COVID-19 reported in Monterey CountyJune 9 Monterey County health officials today reported an 11th person has died as a result of complications related to COVID-19.

News of the latest victim comes only in an additional death on an online chart updated daily by the Monterey County Health Department. The county health officer has steadfastly refused to provide the identifications or the city of residents of any of the fatalities in the county, citing patient privacy.

The death is the first since May 29, when two people from Monterey County reportedly expired.

The countys health officials also reported that 12 more people have tested positive for COVID-19 during the past 24 hours, bringing the total to 763 since the county started keeping track in late January. Of those cases, 621 patients identified themselves as Latino or Hispanic, 754 were from Salinas or South Monterey County and 300 worked in agriculture. Seventy-five patients in Monterey County have required hospitalizations because of the virus.

To date, a total of 12,429 Monterey County residents have been tested for COVID-19.

For comparative numbers, Santa Cruz County has reported 226 cases of COVID-19, with two deaths. A total of 9,867 people have been tested in that county. In California, 4,682 people have died as a result of the virus.

____________________________

Virtual town hall for Monterey County businesses set ThursdayJune 8 Two Monterey County supervisors will host a virtual town hall on Thursday to explain the next new phase of business reopenings, now involving personal care services.

Supervisors Mary Adams and Jane Parker will host the meeting from 5:30 to 7 p.m. During the meeting, operators of personal care service businesses can learn more about the requirements and guidelines in place that will allow the reopening on Friday.

The meeting will be held live via Zoom. The event can be followed athttps://montereycty.zoom.us/j/96306672642Phone access is through 1-669-900-6833, meeting code 96306672642#A Facebook livestream can be found at https://www.facebook.com/MontereyCoInfo

____________________________

Most Monterey County businesses can get back to business on FridayJune 7 Hotels, bars, wineries, museums and fitness gyms will be able to reopen in Monterey County on Friday, according to the countys health officer.

The order by Dr. Edward Moreno also applies to cardrooms, campgrounds and other recreational spots, as long as operators maintain safe environments for patrons and workers.

According to a written release from county officials released Sunday, Monterey County has not exceeded the threshold for maintaining hospital surge capacity and has not exceeded the threshold for maintaining the ability to protect those at high risk for COVID-19. Maintaining surge capacity and protecting vulnerable populations have been and continue to be top public health priorities during this pandemic.

The reopening of those businesses were authorized by Gov. Gavin Newsom last week, but the governor gave discretion to health officers in individual counties based on existing scenarios.

Thanks to countywide efforts to socially distance, cover faces, wash hands, clean and sterilize surfaces and stay at home as much as possible, we continue to slow the spread of COVID-19, said Moreno, in the written statement We are still in the middle of a pandemic and must continue to work together to protect our families, friends and fellow residents.

He said the county Health Department and state Department of Public health will continue to monitor local indicators. Future decisions to open additional businesses and activities will depend in part on how wellbusinesses implement sector guidelines and how well we all practice social distancing and other preventive measures, said Dr. Moreno.

____________________________

Santa Cruz County offers operational breaks to business ownersJune 2 Restaurant and other business owners in rural regions of Santa Cruz County will get leeway to reopen and operate under a plan adopted by the Board of Supervisors today.

Supervisors approved the plan to issue temporary permits to allow the businesses to expand into nearby parking lots so that physical distancing and health protocols under COVID-19 orders can be met. Applications and self-certification forms will be available online here. Permits issued electronically are good for 180 days, with the possibility of an extension. Permit fees will be waived through the remainder of 2020.

Restaurants offering outdoor alcoholic beverages will need to verify outdoor eligibility parameters and standards with the California Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control

The Planning Department will concurrently work on establishing temporary permit standards that could offer longer timeframes for modified operations, according to a written statement from the county. The Board of Supervisors also directed the departments of Public Works, Parks and Environmental Health to administer encroachment permits, licenses and other procedures in ways that would allow for outdoor dining and other commercial uses on public property, such as by using portions of public parking areas including lots or roadways.

____________________________

Variances approved in Monterey and Santa Cruz countiesMay 29 The state Department of Public Health today accepted variances for both Monterey and Santa Cruz counties, and the health officers in both counties have issued orders to allow dine-in restaurant services and the reopening of barbershops and hair salons. Both activities are allowed to resume immediately in Santa Cruz, as long as the guidelines are followed.

Prior to opening, businesses must implement social distancing protocols and design worksite-specific plans, train employees and implement control measures to prevent the spread of COVID-19, according to the local health officers. No further county approvals are needed before operations may resume.

Reopening guidance, including state guidelines for specific sectors, can be found here.

____________________________

Monterey County lists two new COVID-19 deathsMay 29 Monterey County health officials today reported two more deaths of county residents that they attribute to complications arising from COVID-19.

The new fatalities were reported through the countys coronavirus information website, with no other explanation. Health officials have not been releasing details about victims, including identities, their hometowns or their ages. The deaths increase the total number in Monterey County to 10, and they are the first to be reported since May 15. The announcement comes as the county is awaiting permission from state health authorities to ease restrictions on restaurant dining and to reopen other businesses.

As of today, Monterey County has confirmed 477 people have tested positive for COVID-19 since the end of January. Of those 57 have been hospitalized and 366 have recovered, according to the county. Also, 9,202 people have tested negative for the virus.

____________________________

Santa Cruz County sends variance plan to stateMay 29 Santa Cruz County has asked state officials for the variance that would allow at least some restoration of commerce soon.

With a unanimous vote, the Board of Supervisors today approved a Stage 2 variance application that would allow local restaurants, hair salons and barbershops to expand their services. The re-openings cant happen yet. The variance needs to be approved by the state and the county health officer must issue orders that establish guidelines.

The county has been in consultation with the state during the process, said Jason Hoppin, a county spokesman. Approval may take up to one week, though a response could come sooner.

____________________________

Monterey city administrators hope to avoid additional layoffsMay 27 Montereys city manager said today that none of the radical new proposals administrators are looking at to meet budget deficits would include additional layoffs.

Responding to a report published this morning, City Manager Hans Uslar told the City Council that the proposals he is submitting does not include a single layoff. Its possible that roles of some staff might change, but he said the propsal focuses on other operational adjustments in the citys operation.

The City Council last month agreed to eliminate 106 jobs after seeing a dramatic loss of tax revenue due to business closures resulting from the COVID-19 pandemic.

The City Council is meeting this afternoon in a study session to learn more about what city administrators say will be deficit of at least $31 million in the coming two years. Lauren Lai, the citys finance director, is presenting a smorgasborg of possible solutions, which would include hiring freezes, renegotiated labor contracts and contracting certain city services to private entities.

No decision will be made today.

Mayor Clyde Roberson said that the pending reopening of some businesses, approved by the county Board of Supervisors and awaiting state approval, is a welcome development. But those measures are contained in the countys Stage 2 request. Roberson pointed out that hotels wont be able to open to tourists until the county gets permission for Stage 3. And the citys conference center wont open until Stage 4.

The citys most severe financial hit is a result of a huge loss of transient occupancy taxes, also known as bed taxes imposed on overnight visitors, and sales taxes. Early estimates indicate that hotel occupancy rates are down up to 85 percent on the Monterey Peninsula. County and state restrictions only allow hotel rooms to be occupied by visitors who are performing essential services while they are in the county.

The study session is being broadcast on Facebook and is scheduled to continue through 6 p.m. today.

____________________________

Santa Cruz County supervisors to consider variance application FridayMay 27 The Santa Cruz County Board of Supervisors oon Friday could ask state officials for a late Stage 2 variance that would open the county to more business and larger gatherings.

The Board of Supervisors is holding a special hearing at 9 a.m. Friday to review and consider an application for the variance drawn up by Dr. Gail Newel, the countys public health officer. If approved by the State, the application would allow Newel to authorize operations for dining in at restaurants and to open barbershops and hair salons, with health and safety modifications.

The Board of Supervisors in Monterey County submitted a similar application on Tuesday.

If approved by the Board, State review may take up to one week.

The variance will not apply to prohibitions on operations like nail salons, tattoo parlors or other higher-risk personal services, none of which have been cleared by the state year. On Tuesday Newel issued an order aligning Santa Cruz County with the states Resilience Roadmap, so that any future state changes may be immediately implemented at the local level.

Since the start of the pandemic, Santa Cruz County has recorded 200 cases of COVID-19, with two deaths and 29 hospitalizations. Laboratories in the county have recorded 7,637 negative COVID-19 tests.

____________________________

Monterey city administrators: Budget hit is worse than they thoughtMay 26 Monterey administrators say the citys financial problems are even worse than they originally thought and they are suggesting radical changes to the way the city operates.

Officials are recommending the council adopt a go big, go broad, go simple approach to digging its way out of the citys financial hole.

They will be presenting dozens of options to the Monterey City Council on Wednesday during a study session scheduled specifically to discuss the devastation incurred in the city in the wake of the COVID-19 pandemic.

Virtually everything is on the table, according to Lauren Lai, the citys finance director, including ballot measures to raise tourism taxes, hiring freezes and farming out some of the citys high-profile operations to private companies or nonprofits. Lai released the gloomy outlook and the list of potential solutions in a 11-page report today.

Some of these suggestions will create a robust and, probably, adversarial discussions between interest groups and stakeholders, said Lai. In other words: we put everything on the table.

Last month, the council already agreed to eliminate more than 100 jobs in an effort to make up for a $10 million revenue loss city officials said they expected to sustain by the end of the fiscal year. Most of that deficit is due to the loss of tourism. Perhaps more than any other city in the county, Montereys operations are dependent on bed taxes imposed on hotels and sales tax generated in the hospitality industry.

Upon further review, Lai now says that the deficit will likely be about $13 million. And she expects the city will be in a $30 million hole over a two-year period.

Our city needs to be prepared to brace for a wide range of fiscal and economic damages, which are occurring and still unfolding, Lai said. Montereys economy, including our citys revenues, will bounce back. The recent Memorial Day weekend showed how popular the Monterey Peninsula is. However, for the foreseeable future the short-term and long-term impacts of COVID-19 continues to impact the speed of Montereys economic recovery.

The study session starts at 4 p.m. Wednesday. The council will not act on any of the proposals, but the meeting is meant to prepare councilmembers with the information to base future actions. Read the entire report here:

Monterey City Government's Financial Report

____________________________

Santa Cruz County eases restrictions on work, worship, shopping and protestMay 26 Let the protests resume in Santa Cruz County.

The countys public health officer, Dr. Gail Newel, issued a new health order today that allows Stage 2 activities to proceed and aligns the county with any future state announcements that remove restrictions under the statewide shelter-in-home order. The new order follows much of the loosened restrictions announced by Gov. Gavin Newsom during the past several days.

Among the activities expressly mentioned in Newels health order are outdoor activities, including protests. No included in the new order are in-restaurant dining, but Newel said she is seeking a state variance that will allow restaurants to open their dining halls.

It also includes resumption of office work, in-store retail, religious services and cultural ceremonies, manufacturing and limited personal services, effectively at midnight tonight. All businesses and operations must continue complying with social distancing protocols and order to wear face coverings, according to a written release issued by the county.

As we move forward with these changes, I want to caution everyone that COVID-19 is still present inour community, said Newel. Anyone who is 65 years old or older, as well as those who are medically vulnerable,should continue sheltering in place. I urge all members of our community to help thosewho need to shelter by continuing to offer help and check in.

She said she is encouraging telework working from home where possible, but in-office work is allowed under guidelines that can be found here.

Childcare is also now allowed for children of workers and volunteers in all sectors, not just essentialservices. Guidance on childcare facilities can be found here.

In-store retail operations should follow state guidance for retail establishments, found here.

Newel said political protests can also resume, as long as they are not staged in a crowded hall and they follow appropriate social-distancing protocols. See here for more details.

Beaches will remain closed between 11 a.m. and 5 p.m., with exceptions for surfers, walkers, runners or others who use local beaches for exercise. Restrictions still apply at hotels, motels and vacation rentals, which can only be available to people engaged in essential services.

____________________________

Monterey County delivers next-phase reopening plan to governorMay 26 The ball is now in Gov. Gavin Newsoms court.

The Board of Supervisors today asked the California governor for permission to move to the next level of reopening, to allow dine-in restaurant service, on-site retail and more freedom of movement in the county. The state has already opened up in-person religious services, full-service car washes and reopening of schools all with significant modifications. Also during the hearing, supervisors learned that Newsom announced a plan to reopen hair salons and barber shops in California.

Dr. Edward Moreno on Monday released the countys application to state health officers that, if approved by the state, would move the county further along Stage Two recovery of shelter-in-place restrictions caused by the COVID-19 pandemic. The of Supervisors endorsed that proposal today, and it will be transmitted to the governors office for approval.

The action was applauded by the small-business owners and business representatives who testified via live-streaming services during the meeting. Small businesses are struggling, said Carina Powers. They need to get back to business to make up the losses incurred during the closures, she said.

But Moreno and county supervisors warned the public to remain vigilant, to observe social distancing and to wear face covering. They say they are concerned that health officers may be forced to re-impose restrictions if the virus spreads at a high rate in the future because people are being careless.

Weve had low numbers in Monterey County and those low numbers are not an accident, said Charles McKee, the countys top administrative officer, referring to the general compliance of residents to shelter-in-place orders imposed during the past two months. But we dont want to have a backslide.

This is not the time to let your guard down, said Supervisor Chris Lopez, chairman of the board.

Supervisor Jane Parker called Morenos application a carefully thought-through plan, adding that it provides safeguards to protect people vulnerable to the virus.

This is a critical stage to get peoples lives back together (and) their businesses back together, said Supervisor John Phillips.

Newsom has swiftly approved many of the attestation variance applications submitted by other counties, sometimes as quickly as a day or two.

____________________________

Monterey County prepared to seek easing of restrictionsMay 25 Declaring that the curve has flattened in Monterey County, the Board of Supervisors appears poised to ask Gov. Gavin Newsom to ease restrictions that had been imposed by the spread of COVID-19.

The board will meet Tuesday to sign off on an application of attestation variance prepared by its public health officer, Dr. Edward Moreno. That 140-page form asserts that the county has maintained a stable or decreasing number of patients for greater than 2 weeks while the seven-day average of daily change in hospitalized patients has dropped by 0.2 percent.

The form also indicates the county has a strategy in place to monitor COVID-19 and is prepared to scale back activities if infections worsen.

The form was released today, the third day of the Memorial Day weekend during which countless numbers of people jammed beaches, tourist destinations and other hotspots, many of them in violation of existing shelter-in-place orders and social-distancing standards.

In a proposed letter to Newsom that the Board of Supervisors will be asked to approve Tuesday, the county says that Moreno and other county officials are actively monitoring infection through epidemiology, implementing alternative sheltering measures where necessary, offering a sufficient amount of testing and contact tracing, monitoring hospital capacity and plans for surge, and protecting vulnerable populations.

The Board believes that the shelter in place orders issued by Dr. Moreno since the Governors proclamation of a state of emergency on March 4, 2020, and the publics compliance with those orders, have helped to flatten the curve of the virus in the County, and have allowed Dr. Moreno to now execute the updated attestation.

Monterey County is one of the few counties in California that havent yet received a second stage phase-two variance from the state. Approval of the variance would allow more freedom among owners of retail, restaurants and hospitality services. Pebble Beach Co. is already taking reservations for accommodations starting June 15.

In supporting Dr. Morenos petition, the Board of Supervisors will also ask the state to include wineries and tasting rooms as businesses eligible for reopening in stage two. As you may know, the wine industry is an important sector of the countys economy, and there are numerous wineries and tasting rooms throughout our communities.

The board is holding a special session Tuesday specifically to move the request. The meeting is scheduled to begin at 9 a.m. and can be followed online. See the agenda here.

Read Dr. Edward Moreno's attestation application here

Read Monterey County Board of Supervisor's proposed letter of support

____________________________

Recent clusters in Santa Cruz County concern health officialsMay 22 Public health authorities report multiple clusters of COVID-19 cases involving family gathering in Santa Cruz County.

The county has boasted a relatively low number coronavirus cases, compared to its neighbors, but health officials issued a reminder this afternoon encouraging residents to maintain social distancing and follow shelter-in-place orders during the upcoming Memorial Day weekend following a spike in new cases.

See the original post here:

UPDATE: Another death attributed to COVID-19 reported in Monterey County - Voices of Monterey Bay

Will Merkel and massive Covid-19 recovery fund produce an EU miracle? – The Straits Times

Next month, and in the midst of an unprecedented crisis, Germany will take over the presidency of the Council of the European Union.

With a United States in economic and political disarray, and an increasingly intolerant China, maintaining the unity of Europe is the first order of the day.

"Thank God it's Merkel," observers in Brussels are saying, hailing the virtues of the German Chancellor.

In normal times, steering the EU tanker of 27 members is a herculean task. Now, it requires even more of what Dr Angela Merkel is known for: stamina, staying power and resilience.

One year before stepping down as chancellor, it also will be her last chance to put her stamp on her international legacy.

Dr Merkel seems utterly determined to achieve this.

Among other things, the Chancellor wants to keep the centrifugal forces within the EU in check.

Europe's leading economy will hold the rotating presidency for six months from July 1, and under the presidency of Germany, the character of the union might dramatically change.

When Germany takes over from current incumbent Croatia, the community of European states, originally set up as an alliance mainly promoting free trade, and which then morphed into a supranational pseudo-state, could end up being rid of many of its flaws.

One is the lack of assertiveness of the quasi-government, the European Commission, currently led by Merkel confidante Ursula von der Leyen.

This might be dealt with by using heaps of money. "Never waste a good crisis", a well-known saying goes - and this is exactly what the German EU presidency could set out to do: Use many billions of euros to achieve a much deeper integration of the member states.

The Covid-19 crisis has laid open the fragile financial state of many member states, with Greece, Italy and Portugal all indebted well above 100 per cent of gross domestic product (GDP), and Belgium, France, Spain and Cyprus above 90 per cent.

In 1992, in the Dutch city of Maastricht, the EU members agreed, among other things, to not exceed debt of 60 per cent.

But even Germany had a hard time meeting all the Maastricht criteria.

However, in March, amid the coronavirus crisis, the conditions were suspended, opening the doors to taking up new debt.

As the region faced its worst economic crisis since the 1930s, the EU last month announced plans to raise 750 billion (S$1.18 trillion) from the financial markets for a coronavirus recovery fund.

Disbursement is planned from next year to 2024, with the biggest share going to the ones who need it most, mainly Italy and Spain. Two-thirds of the money would be in the form of grants which do not have to be paid back.

The proposed rescue package, comprising loans as well as grants, will allow money to be transferred from the EU's richer members to the poorer ones. It will also allow member states to issue bonds in the name of the EU as a whole, which will help financially fragile states to benefit from the stellar credit rating of the better-off members.

Separately, Germany and France - the union's two biggest economies - have proposed that the EU borrow 500 billion on the financial markets to aid European economies worst hit by Covid-19.

Under the German-French proposal, the recipient states need not repay the cash. Rather, liability for the debt would be added to the EU budget, to which member states pay in varying amounts, depending on the size and state of their economies.

What's significant in these proposals is that Germany has abandoned two longstanding rules of its policy towards the EU: That there should be no common borrowing and no transfer union outside the existing EU budget.

Germany, long known for its frugality, changed course in favour of spending, to save the collective.

The euro zone economy is expected to shrink between 8 per cent and 12 per cent this year. As Dr Merkel noted recently, "because of the unusual nature of the crisis, we are choosing an unusual path".

The 27 European Council members are scheduled to hold a videoconference on June 19 to thrash out elements of the proposals. The negotiations are likely to be over issues such as the size of the transfers and what conditions will be attached to them.

Hungary and Poland are reportedly opposed to any attempt to make access to the funds contingent on keeping to certain standards of rule of law.

Both countries are run by populist governments which have drawn flak for measures that undermine press freedom and judicial independence.

Thorny implementation issues aside, there is the broader question of whether establishing a transfer union needs more democratic legitimacy. If the taxpayers of the richer countries have to step in should the poorer ones fail to meet their obligations, they should at least be asked.

This, at least for the time being, is not on the cards. With the next election of the EU Parliament four years away, voters will not have a say for a long time.

They will also painfully remember how the current European Commission chair, Dr von der Leyen, came into this position.

Previously Defence Minister in Dr Merkel's Cabinet, her name was not on the ballot, and she was promoted in a backdoor deal by powerful heads of state, in the process sidelining the leading contenders: the Netherlands' Frans Timmermans and fellow German politician Manfred Weber.

This horse-trading - which, in particular, French President Emmanuel Macron had a hand in - was a huge blow to the EU's democratic legitimacy.

However, despite the question marks over the coronavirus rescue proposals, the gigantic disbursements with strings attached might allow Brussels to emerge a winner in this crisis.

One of the birth defects of the EU has been the lack of instruments to discipline unruly members. The union, and even more, the euro zone, works only if all members subscribe to the common playbook, including the Maastricht Treaty.

So far, violations of the rules have had only minor consequences.

In the case of France, whose budget deficit has frequently exceeded the threshold of 3 per cent of GDP, fines were deferred or exemptions granted.

The same is true for other countries, including Portugal, Spain and Greece.

With rule-breakers unafraid of ramifications, the penalties carry little weight.

Mr Matteo Salvini, deputy prime minister of Italy in 2018 and last year, and a right-wing populist of the party Lega, openly flouted the treaties and basically said: "I take up debt as I see fit."

With the loans and grants handed out in the name of the EU, Brussels could now either stop payments if rules are violated, or even strip countries of voting rights.

If such a framework is worked out and agreed upon at an EU summit next month, Brussels, for the first time, would have a powerful toolbox at its disposal.

This could even pacify members who still struggle with the formation of a debt-and-transfer union, and hence a European superstate.

The so called "frugal four" - Denmark, the Netherlands, Austria and Sweden - believe that a joint and several liability situation is the wrong path. They have tabled a counterproposal advocating a one-off emergency fund, and are insisting that the recipients would have to display a "strong commitment to reforms and the fiscal framework".

Much tough bargaining lies ahead, and Dr Merkel will need to invest all her political capital to make the union change.

At the same time, she might be able to take advantage of the fact that one of the EU's key foot-draggers - the United Kingdom - is no longer part of it. London, always eager to rein in Brussels and limit the EU's power, is no longer an obstacle because of Brexit.

What the Chancellor also has going for her is the unprecedented nature of the Covid-19 situation that will help focus minds on the job of saving the EU from its most dire economic crisis yet, while coming to grips with some of its fundamental shortcomings as a regional grouping.

If in sync, Dr Merkel, Mr Macron and Dr von der Leyen can finally walk the talk on an ever closer union.

See original here:

Will Merkel and massive Covid-19 recovery fund produce an EU miracle? - The Straits Times

Former Trump campaign staffer hopes her $1.35M haul will help send her to Congress – Jewish Insider

South Carolina State Representative Nancy Mace likes to think of herself as a uniting force. Im a big believer in bringing people together, Mace, who is on Tuesdays ballot in the Republican primary for the states 1st congressional district, told Jewish Insider in a recent interview.

But Mace first has to unite the party behind her, and beat out three other candidates all vying to challenge first-term Rep. Joe Cunningham (D-SC) in November.

Mace is up against local town councilwoman and financial planner Kathy Landing, Bikers for Trump founder Chris Cox and affordable housing advocate Brad Mole. All are hoping to unseat Cunningham, who flipped the seat in 2018. Cunningham won the district, which the Cook Political Report has rated a toss-up, by less than 4,000 votes.

At a May 26 debate, Landing, Cox and Mole aimed their collective fire at Mace, calling her a party insider and accusing her of being fired from the Trump campaign in 2016. At points, Cox even attempted to hijack the debate, pulling out his own questions for Mace and interrupting the debate moderator to challenge the state lawmakers answers, prompting boos from the audience. Cox did not respond to an interview request.

In an interview with Jewish Insider, Mace said her opponents accusations are baseless. She says she left the campaign in August 2016, before being elected to the South Carolina House of Representatives in November. Im the only candidate that has a real campaign going, she added. Theyre all nice people, but weve raised almost $1.4 million If youre going to take on one of the top two seats in the nation in November, you better know how to fundraise.

Mace has raised $1.35 million, more than twice Landings haul to date. Cox and Mole both trail far behind. Mace is also leading in the polls an April poll by the Club for Growth, which is backing Mace, found her 29 points ahead of Landing, though it predicted she would still fall short of the 50% threshold needed to avoid a runoff.

Mace also seems to be the favorite of a number of GOP insiders. Shes in a higher level of the National Republican Congressional Committees Young Guns program than Landing, and has been endorsed by House Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy (R-CA). The White House has yet to make an endorsement in the race though Mace spent a year working as a field and coalition director on the Trump campaign but Vice President Mike Pence spoke favorably of the state representative during a February speech at military college The Citadel, Maces alma mater. Club for Growths PAC has also spent nearly $600,000 to boost her.

Landing, however, has the backing of the House Freedom Caucuss political arm and Rep. Jim Jordan (R-OH).

Despite the gap between Mace and Landing in primary polling, a recent poll of 500 likely voters in the district found both Mace and Landing in statistical ties with Cunningham in hypothetical head-to-head matchups.

While the two candidates are mostly aligned on policy issues, they both attempted to distinguish themselves on their prior experience.

I have the experience necessary to go up against an incumbent, Mace said. A lot of the legislation and issues that the Democrat incumbent talks about are things that Ive worked on, and had an impact in, and have the knowledge to be able to go toe-to-toe on the issues and policy.

She specifically pointed to her work on infrastructure, healthcare, taxes and environmental conservation, as well as a bill she introduced banning the shackling of pregnant inmates, which was recently signed into law. A lot of what I do is non-partisan, she said.

Mace also highlighted her time at The Citadel, where she was the schools first female graduate. She dropped out of high school at age 17, but eventually earned her diploma and looked to The Citadel as an opportunity for a second chance.

It was a real personal challenge, a personal journey, to prove to myself that I could go to a place where I would face enormous adversity, where I faced death threats, she said of her years at the premiere military college. That experience taught me so many valuable lessons about life. One, about the value of hard work But it also taught me about courage to stand up and speak out. Speak for yourself, but also speak out, be a voice for others, maybe those that dont have a voice And it gave me confidence.

Landing hopes to use her experiences as a financial planner and in local government to address fiscal issues. She emphasized that she has no interest in a career as a politician, and supports enacting congressional term limits. I dont need a new career, she said. I have a wonderful career and Im very successful at what I do. Im going to actually use my skill set to try to serve our community and America.

Both candidates also cast themselves as strong supporters of Israel.

I think that [the U.S.-Israel] relationship has become the strongest its been in a long time, Landing said, some might even argue ever, because President [Donald] Trump clearly understood the importance of focusing on things that had been sort of paid lip service for years.

In a position paper she submitted to AIPAC, Landing blamed Palestinian leadership for blocking a two-state solution. The Palestinian Authority is a defunct and internally divided organization Hamas has been the main reason for the erosion of PA legitimacy, she said. Until the Palestinians become serious about ending their use of violence and bellicose rhetoric as a tool in negotiations with Israel, expect the two-state solution to remain a distant dream.

Landing added that she believes representatives who promote boycotts against Israel do not belong in Congress. I just cannot believe those that are pushing BDS. Im just disgusted with that. I dont understand, she said. She also criticized Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-NY) for calling migrant detention camps along the southern border of the U.S. concentration camps.

Mace likewise believes the U.S. should throw its full support behind the Jewish state, and lists Stand with Israel among the top policy priorities on her website. I think Israel should be able to decide for herself when negotiating an agreement with the Palestinian Authority, she told JI. I would never presume to dictate the terms of any of that.

The rest is here:

Former Trump campaign staffer hopes her $1.35M haul will help send her to Congress - Jewish Insider

How The Right Pro-Growth Policies Can Restore The American Economy – The Federalist

During most of my time at the White House over the last year, America was experiencing one of the best labor markets ever.

The White House called it a blue-collar boom. And they were right.

Then the Wuhan Virus changed everything. As Americans became infected, the resulting fear brought the dynamic blue-collar boom to a frozen standstill. Examining the Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluations measure of mobility by state reveals that people started practicing social distancing well before state and local governments shut down society. Subsequently, official government-mandated shutdowns solidified the ensuing fear and economic destruction.

Its important to know where weve been in order to know how we should proceed.

The first thing to note is that we should never shut down the economy again. This should not be a precedent; it should be a lesson about how families, employers, and state and local governments must be better prepared to deal with these types of economic downturns in the future.

Where were we in February 2020, before this catastrophe happened?

The Bureau of Labor Statistics total nonfarm jobs data shows there was a fantastic monthly average of 216,000 new jobs created for the three months through February. In only two months, the U.S. economy added 465,000 jobs24,000 more jobs than the Congressional Budget Office projected for the entirety of 2020 in its final pre-2016 election forecast.

More than 7 million jobs had been added since the 2016 election5 million more than the CBOs pre-2016 projection. The robust job creation contributed to the unemployment rate dropping to just 3.5 percentthe lowest in 50 years. The last time unemployment was that low, Nixon was president, and the first man just landed on the moon. The lives of Americans have improved much in the last half-century.

During the boom, wages continued to rise faster than the general level of prices. And not only had income inequality declined, but wealth inequality was also declining, as the wealth of the bottom half increased three times faster than the top half.

After struggling through the Obama years, the manufacturing sector added more than 500,000 jobs during Trumps tenure. Construction jobs also increased substantially more than pundits and many economists thought possible.

This was before the Great Disruption of COVID-19 and the government shutdowns that unsettled our lives and ruined the livelihoods of millions of Americans.

Starting down the road to recovery begins with understanding how reached those earlier peaks.

During his time in office, President Trump implemented a barrage of pro-growth policies. Tax cuts, deregulation, energy abundance, and reformed trade deals unleashed the immense capabilities of American ingenuity. The result was a level of human flourishing not seen in most peoples lifetime.

Many claimed during the Obama administration that slow growth and declining opportunities were to be the new normal for the U.S. economy. Yet in just a short three years under Trump, those claims were proven wrong. In place of the economic malaise under Obama, came a new institutional framework supporting increased freedom and a genuine chance for all Americans to prosper.

Pro-growth policies that support free markets and free people will help us climb out of the economic despair were mired in. Instead, unexpected, unfortunate events sent many asking for handouts from taxpayers.

When you combine what was passed in legislation directly to people or programs with the amount authorized to the Federal Reserve to leverage for funding opportunities, Congress gave them plentyto the tune of more than $9 trillion. But this policy could very well lead to a deepening and extending of the economic downturn, similar to what we witnessed during the Great Depression and Great Recession of 2008.

Furthermore, we havent even spent it all. The Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget estimates that more than $5 trillion hasnt been allocated yet. Now is not the time to grant more requests for bailouts.

Research conducted by Casey Mulligan, Professor of Economics at the University of Chicago, shows that the costs of the pandemic and from the shutdowns have exceeded nearly $14,000 per household and the life years lost from increased unemployment and missed health care have been double those lost from COVID-19. Ultimately, the amount of fear Americans felt about the worrisome virus, along with the mixed signals from Congress, made the situation worse. We need to end the shutdowns before more damage is done.

If the pandemic hadnt hit, the nations 130 million private-sector workers could have generated $16 trillion of income in 2020. Large sectors of the economy are reelingfrom leisure and hospitality to retail, to manufacturing, to construction. Consider that if half of all private-sector workers and their employers are idled for three months, then $2 trillion in economic activity or 10% of GDP will be destroyed.

Unfortunately, most of the lost GDP will not be coming back, at least not very soon. It is reasonable to assume a return to a lower level of output and return to growth over time, in a check-shaped growth pattern as pent up demand and supply eventually get going again. But more importantly, the longer the shutdown lasts, the smaller the growth will be afterward as production will be inhibited with fewer employers in business and impacted supply chains.

This can change quickly, however, if we implement pro-growth policies. The path forward should consist of ways to get businesses operating and people back to work. One template for how to get this done is the recovery agenda advocated by the think tank I work for. By supporting the Workplace Recovery Act, suspending all payroll taxes, and permanently eliminating regulations that were suspended during the crisis, we can get the American economy roaring again.

For the sake of Americas future generations, we must get our fiscal house in order at all levels of government. We must impose strict fiscal rules that limit government spending, move to a less burdensome tax system, and reform welfare programs to build a system of opportunity and prosperity.

Ultimately, we need more freedom, not more government. Achieving this will allow us to soar back to the economic heights before this Great Disruption and much higher still. All we need is the political will to get it done.

Vance Ginn, Ph.D., is Chief Economist at the Texas Public Policy Foundation in Austin, Texas. He is the former Associate Director for Economic Policy of the Office of Management and Budget at the Executive Office of the President.

See the original post:

How The Right Pro-Growth Policies Can Restore The American Economy - The Federalist

Bitcoin Cash (BCH) Down $0.88 On 4 Hour Chart, Started Today Down 0.14%; in an Uptrend Over Past 14 Days – CFDTrading

Bitcoin Cash 4 Hour Price Update

Updated June 06, 2020 03:19 AM GMT (11:19 PM EST)

Bitcoin Cash came into the current 4 hour candle down 0.34% ($0.88) from the open of the previous 4 hours, marking the 2nd candle in a row it has gone down. Relative to other instruments in the Top Cryptos asset class, Bitcoin Cash ranked 4th since the previous 4 hours in terms of percentage price change.

The back and forth price flow continues for Bitcoin Cash, which started today off at 256.07 US dollars, down 0.14% ($0.37) from the previous day. The price move occurred on volume that was down 7.6% from the day prior, but up 33.96% from the same day the week before. On a relative basis, the previous day was pretty good: Bitcoin Cash bested all 5 of the assets in the Top Cryptos class The daily price chart of Bitcoin Cash below illustrates.

The first thing we should note is that the current price of Bitcoin Cash is sitting close to its 200 day moving averages; moving average crosses often indicate a change in momentum, so this may be worth keeping an eye on. Trend traders will want to observe that the strongest trend appears on the 14 day horizon; over that time period, price has been moving up. Also of note is that on a 30 day basis price appears to be forming a base which could the stage for it being a support/resistance level going forward. Or to view things another way, note that out of the past 30 days Bitcoin Cashs price has gone up 17 them. As for those who trade off of candlesticks, we should note that were seeing pin bar pattern appearing here.

Over on Twitter, here were the top tweets about Bitcoin Cash:

Suggestion for honest names:Department of Justice -> Department of PunishmentDepartment of Defense -> Department of WarBitcoin Cash SV -> Poopity Scoop

Ive given some bitcoin cash to basically everyone Ive ever met.Its fun.

@rogerkver @CNBCFastMoney @_BitcoinSV @BCHmeetups @CalvinAyre @Investingcom @MONEY @planetmoney @BitcoinCashFans To join your point of view, you should definitively take a look at @tixlcurrency, all your points on Bitcoin Cash are applicable to their #SecondLayerSolution : Fast, low Fee + Privacy ! $MTXLT and the #AutobahnNetwork will bring adoption by transforming BTC and BTCC into cash

As for a news story related to Bitcoin Cash getting some buzz:

Roger Ver Donates $10K in Bitcoin Cash to Casa de Amparo Childrens Shelter | Featured Bitcoin News

Your ad here by Jamie Redman Just recently Bitcoin.coms Roger Ver donated $10,000 worth of bitcoin cash to the charitable organization Casa de Amparo, a 501(c)(3) charity that helps children escape child abuse and neglect.On June 1, 2020, Bitcoin.coms Roger Ver donated $10,000 in bitcoin cash to Casa de Amparo.Vers gift of $10K worth of bitcoin cash to Casa de Amparo will go to children in need and kids who deserve shelter.A Number of Hong Kong Vending Machines Support Bitcoin Cash Payments Over BTC Just recently, cryptocurrency evangelist Roger Ver shared a video on Twitter that shows a number of vending machines in Hong Kong that accept bitcoin cash and ethereum, but not bitcoin.Crypto Firm Uquid Launches Marketplace- 30,000 Digital Products, Bitcoin Cash Support On May 28, 2020, the digital currency and blockchain company Uquid has announced that the Uquid Shop is now live and accepting cryptocurrencies like bitcoin cash for payments.

Go here to see the original:

Bitcoin Cash (BCH) Down $0.88 On 4 Hour Chart, Started Today Down 0.14%; in an Uptrend Over Past 14 Days - CFDTrading

Bitcoin Cash (BCH) Always Triumphs in the Value Factor Argument with Roger Ver Theory – The Cryptocurrency Analytics

Bitcoin Cash (BCH) continues to reinstate that there is only one Bitcoin and that it is they. While many things have changed over years, their theory concerning their superiority prophecy in the Bitcoin space has not changed. And, big things are indeed happening in their space. They seem to be living their theory and hard-selling, and they are doing a lot to market the idea of Bitcoin Cash as being real and the best money in the world.

Roger Ver recently tweeted: Savings is the primary function of money, but if you cant spend it, there is no reason to save it.

There were a lot of confused investors who were confused about the statement wondering if they are discussing divesting, negative interest rates, cashing out, burning cash, losing, bankruptcy, and a range of other stuff.

Several investors were perplexed and were wondering about what might be the term that can be used for the process of saving lots of Bitcoin Cash. Many of them told that they sold it during the first split.

A candid criticism read like: Roger Ver has saved a bunch of Bcash, if you see that Bcash is still at the top of coinmarketcap is because they dont have many people to sell that crap.

Sydney Ifergan, the crypto expert, tweeted: Opinions Differ. However, Bitcoin Cash (BCH) facilitates the idea of sending money globally for pennies. Any service that is available for pennies is indeed interesting.

Somebody else were trying to get back to the basics stating that the primary functions of money are to serve as a medium of exchange, store of value, and unit of account. Further, it is a medium of exchange, but to be a medium of exchange, it must hold value over time. Money must be predictably usable as a medium of exchange when savings are spent.

Many did not understand what the statement had to do with crypto derivatives vis-a-vis fiat currency.

Someone translated the concept of value in simple terms by stating that if there is a lot of demand and if it is accepted in the market, it adds to the value. It was further clarified that if there is no demand, and no one is accepting it in the market, there is no value for it.

Yet other clarifications read like if someone had money, they need to invest it rather than putting their savings in money. While reinstating that money is only a means of exchange for everyday life.

While the community were hard trying to decipher the Roger Ver Theory, someone reinvented the wheel by stating that it is easier and quicker to transact using BCH than with BTC.

See the article here:

Bitcoin Cash (BCH) Always Triumphs in the Value Factor Argument with Roger Ver Theory - The Cryptocurrency Analytics

The Lizard People Invented Bitcoin: Crypto is a Hotbed for Conspiracy Theories – Cointelegraph

In April 2020 Vin Armani packed up his family and got on the last flight to an obscure island in the middle of the Pacific.

The cryptocurrency influencer suggested to his 14,000 Twitter followers, many times, that the pandemic is being used to impose totalitarian tyranny on America. As the CTO of CoinText, he was worried that his outspoken views and links to the crypto industry meant he could be disappeared by the Gestapo. He now lives in Saipan, population 50,000.

This isnt the end of whats happening, he says, citing the historical precedent of the Jewish people fleeing Germany before World War II. Our ability to travel is going to be greatly restricted and youre going to be trapped. And its going to be at the points of transit where the undesirables get mopped up. The people who are on the list.

Totalitarianism always starts out of an emergency.

While many in the crypto community share his fears about the erosion of civil liberties during the pandemic, Armani has gone further than most. Six thousands miles further.

He doesnt see himself as a conspiracy theorist just someone questioning societys assumptions about money and power. Armani says the Bitcoin White Paper is often the catalyst that wakes people up and sets them on a journey of discovery.

I hate conspiracy theories, he says. Because you dont need a conspiracy, all you need is a perverse incentive. The world just works in a certain way. People act in their own self-interest. Lord Acton (said): Power tends to corrupt, and absolute power corrupts absolutely. I think that what you see in the crypto community is people who have read economic texts you see people who recognize what the government is, what the state is and who the people are in pursuit of state power.

Armani appears to have embraced what some call the paranoid style in American politics. He is a big fan of notorious English conspiracy theorist David Icke and interviewed him twice on his YouTube show. He credits Icke with waking me up when I first came across his work 15 years ago David has been absolutely spot on for 30 years.

Icke believes the world is run by a bunch of shape-shifting blood-drinking reptilian aliens from Alpha Draconis, one of whom is masquerading as the Queen.

Armani says Ickes views have evolved though Icke was recently booted off Facebook and YouTube for spreading 5G coronavirus conspiracy theories.

Another Bitcoiner interested in . unorthodox hypotheses is Caleb Chen, who works in content marketing for a popular VPN provider. Although hes undecided about most conspiracy theories, he still spends part of each day trawling through conspiracy forums on Reddit looking for alternative explanations for whats really going on in the world.

He says the crypto community was where he first encountered conspiracy theorists in the wild. The first Bitcoin meetup I went to was in 2013. And yeah, its right around there when I started running into these people, he says.

Id never met someone who didnt believe that the moon landing happened, or that believed in the flat earth conspiracy, until I started going to Bitcoin conferences and Bitcoin meetups.

Kirby Ferguson, the writer/director of documentary This Is Not A Conspiracy Theory says theres a definite strand of conspiratorial thinking within the crypto community, although price speculation and gossip are the major preoccupations.

There certainly is that subculture of conspiracy theory in there, he says. I feel like its a combination of anti-establishment spirit, that spirit of dissent that is in cryptocurrency, and the dubious media sources that are mixed in there.

The subculture is big enough to be noticeable.

Almost half a million people have watched Crypto Chicos YouTube video in which he explains a complicated crypto meets COVID-19 conspiracy theory titled Global Pandemic Planned.

When Bitcoin Ben isnt pumping the BTC price on YouTube and Twitter, he likes to post about QAnon which The Washington Post described as the idea there is a worldwide cabal of Satan-worshiping pedophiles who rule the world.

And that 5G stuff that one in eight people apparently now believe? You know, how the pandemic was faked to cover up the health impacts of 5G so that Bill Gates can microchip everyone with his vaccine? That whole story was dreamed up by a crypto-loving pastor from the small town of Luton in the UK; a guy who has advised African central banks on digital currencies.

Crypto publication Trustnodes has run with the theme, devoting large amounts of space in recent months to stories with headlines like America on the Verge of a Dictatorship that suggest lockdowns are about keeping humanity down, chained and enslaved.

One editorial said: No wonder people flock to the likes of Alex Jones

One possible reason the cryptocurrency space is so conducive to conspiracy theories is that there really are bad actors doing shady stuff in the space. There are whales out there manipulating the markets, which is why the SEC keeps knocking back Bitcoin ETFs.

The theory that Tether isnt actually backed 1:1 with US dollars has been shown in court to be correct. Many ICOs were elaborate fictions, constructed to fleece gullible investors of their cash. And there is so much doubt over the circumstances surrounding the death of Quadrigas CEO which left the exchange unable to access $145 million in crypto that there have been legal moves to exhume the body of Gerald Cotten. (Or Gerald Cotten, if you prefer.)

Every conspiracy theory, theres always some sort of truth behind it, some sort of fact hidden in it which makes it easier to believe, says filmmaker Torsten Hoffman, who covers the conspiracy theory swirling around Bitcoin development company Blockstream (replete with cartoon Lizard People) in his new documentary Cryptopia.

There are people in the Bitcoin Cash community who genuinely believe that Blockstream deliberately hobbled Bitcoin with a small block size limit as part of a grand plan to push people towards its scaling solutions, Lightning and Liquid. A sample post from Redditor BitAlien: Its not a conspiracy theory, its a conspiracy. Blockstream exists to cripple Bitcoin and allow the legacy banks to retain control over us. Seriously, WAKE UP SHEEPLE!

And for their part, some in the Bitcoin community believe that big block proponent Roger Ver set out to destroy Bitcoin to pump up the price of Bitcoin Cash.

Hoffman admits he disappeared down the rabbit hole on this conspiracy theory and spent far too long investigating inside information about Blockstream allegedly bribing various parties to get its own way. But in the end the truth appears to a lot more humdrum: the two communities just have genuine ideological differences about scaling the blockchain. In reality he says, it comes down to the question: Is it digital cash or is it digital gold? If you believe in one of those two then you have two different technical solutions.

Occams Razor, the idea that the simplest explanation is often the right one, helps explain away some of the theories. But it doesnt explain how some people arrive at the really out there conclusions, like Redditor ShadowOfHarbinger who suggested in r/btc this week that Blockstream is really a front for the CIA.

The CIA has been meddling in Bitcoin affairs since 2012-2013, he wrote blithely as if everyone knows that. It is all a government operation and government-sponsored opposition. He received 12 upvotes.

Its a riff on the theory the CIA invented Bitcoin. After all, the NSA created the SHA-256 hashing algorithm that Bitcoin uses and Satoshi Nakamoto means something vaguely like Central Intelligence in Japanese

Hoffman says its really not that surprising that some Bitcoiners hold unorthodox views.

Bitcoin started at the fringe and started to question the establishment, the economic rules and capitalism and everything the whole world. So these people question other things as well in our society and thats where maybe these conspiracy theories kind of slip in.

Crypto fans and conspiracy theorists share similar motivations: Both groups see themselves as warriors fighting against a corrupt elite whether its bankers or the Illuminati. Both groups are suspicious of institutions and are more open minded than most when it comes to leftfield ideas.

And given how opaque and incredibly complex the financial system is, its probably not surprising that some people go down some blind alleyways in their pursuit of the truth. David Golumbia, the author of The Politics of Bitcoin: Software as Right Wing Extremism, says that even the question what is money? defies easy answers.

Its very hard to get your head around even the experts cant really provide you with a terrific understanding, he says. I think a lot of people want a simple explanation. They want something that makes sense to them. I understand its frustrating when reality just doesnt conform to our desire to have things be simple. In this view, a conspiracy theory in this view is a neat and simple wrong answer to a complicated question.

In a similar vein, Horizen founder Rob Viglione says hes observed that some people, especially in the privacy coin sphere, are drawn to big ideas and grand narratives.

Theres this assumption of agency in the world, like big forces are being driven by some higher agent big forces, mystical forces are driving things, he said. And I think theres a lot of that for some people who come into Bitcoin. Its like were changing the world. There are really big ideas here you know and its easy to sometimes think theres agency behind just a whole bunch of random events.

A similar phenomenon has been observed in other parts of the financial world. Time Magazines Justin Fox wrote that Wall Street traders also love conspiracy theories, in a piece on alternative financial news source Zero Hedge (which was also recently banned from Twitter for spreading coronavirus misinformation).

Wall Street traders are among the most conspiracy-minded groups of people on the planet, he wrote. Thats because (a) some financial market conspiracies are real and (b) without theories of some sort to grasp on to, youre going to get completely lost in the chaos of the markets day-to-day movements.

The US Federal Reserve has long been an object of suspicion for Bitcoiners. It gives five unelected officials the power to change policies on the worlds reserve currency with impunity. And as Hoffman points out, the whole concept is weird: I mean, the Fed isnt a government body, its owned by private banks, he says (which is sort of true). And if you tell that to someone who doesnt know, it sounds like a conspiracy theory.

While they may be seen as a bunch of conspirators devaluing the currency and carrying out various schemes for nefarious reasons, Viglione says its much more likely theyre just blundering about, pulling levers in the hope that itll help the economy.

My background is in academic finance, Viglione says (he analyzed the Feds actions in detail for his PhD). I can say quite confidently: I dont think that they have any idea what theyre doing.

The further some people go down the rabbit hole of greedy bankers the more likely it is to lead them somewhere nasty.

A lot of that Anti-Fed stuff leads back to the Rothschilds and Jewish conspiracy theories and the Protocols of the Elders of Zion and all that crap, says Ferguson. Once you start questioning the Fed and where money comes from and all that stuff you can fall into a gravity well that leads you to thinking the Jews did it.

Lets not overstate it, but theres definitely some overlap. The crypto trading discussions on on 8chan were full of far right hatred and anti-Semitic memes right up until the site was taken down after its users carried out three mass shootings. It was resurrected as 8kun on the darknet thanks to Monero fork Loki. (For a taste, if you dare, visit 4chan.)

Neo Nazis, including Andrew weev Auernheimer, Stormfront and The Daily Stormer also stay afloat with Bitcoin donations. Many on the far-right were early adopters writes the Southern Poverty Law Centre on its page monitoring their known BTC addresses. And many cashed in as the currencys valuation skyrocketed.

Golumbia used to work on Wall Street and when Bitcoin began to emerge a few years ago he realized hed heard a lot of the same conspiracy theories already. They were the same conspiracy theories that I used to see floating around gold.

Gold bugs have a reputation for wacky ideas. Urban Dictionary defines them as: associated with paranoia, conspiracy theories, 9/11 truthers, survivalism, tax protesters, racism, anti-semitism, and the far right. As a gold bug, I can tell you that gold is REAL money, and worthless fiat paper money is a fraud.

Bitcoin narratives around hard money, fixed supply, inflation hedge, market manipulation and distaste for the Feds money printer, can all be traced back to gold bugs.

Everett Millman, Precious Metals Specialist at Gainesville Coins which is developing a gold backed crypto believes the idea of hard money comes hand in glove with a deep distrust of the financial world.

Such a viewpoint is steeped in the idea of conspiracy at its genesis: it characterizes the establishment of the Federal Reserve in 1913 as a coup against an honest system of money based on gold, he says.

So the whole premise is entangled with the notion of conspiracy from its start. Its fair to say that this does open a path for gold bugs to be exposed to many other kinds of conspiracy theories. When you believe youve been lied to about something as basic as how money works, it naturally leads to questioning other aspects of the world. Similar feelings animate the crypto community.

He says the strain of anti-Semitism that infects the fringes of the gold and crypto communities small though it may be contributes to them being pushed into the margins of mainstream financial discourse. He says this can become a self-fulfilling phenomenon.

When it seems the entire investment community is against you, grand conspiracies take on greater explanatory power.

Golumbia is no fan of Bitcoin and sees conspiratorial narratives in everything from the concept of middlemen (which he say recalls anti-Jewish tropes) to the hatred for the Fed. But he argues convincingly that Bitcoin was born out of the paranoia inherent in cypherpunk concerns about the impending surveillance state. As Ferguson points out:

Paranoia is at the heart of conspiratorial reasoning.

Golumbia details in his book how Bitcoin had its roots in Eric Hughes Cypherpunk mailing list. By 1994 the 700 cypherpunks included Blockstreams Adam Back, Satoshi-confidant Hal Finney, Bit Gold creator Nick Szabo and even Satoshi-claimant Craig Wright.

The cypherpunks were hyper-concerned with online privacy and the government monitoring their communications, and saw cryptography as a tool to carve out a space free from Big Brothers watchful eyes.

The problem they kept running into was money, Golumbia explains. How do we pay for stuff because theyre using our credit cards and our bank accounts to track what we do? Wouldnt it be great if we could pay each other and give each other funds without being trackable? So they started applying encryption technologies to a variety of money-like instruments.

Bitcoin is probably iteration five or six of these projects to build a currency that was outside of the states ability to regulate it, or stop it.

In this conception, the paranoid style is baked into Bitcoins technology and purpose. Horizen founder Viglione points out that one of those 700 cypherpunks was Zooko Wilcox OHearn, who went on to create the privacy coin Zcash, which was forked into Horizen.

These technologies come almost directly out of the cypherpunk movement, Viglione says. Big Brothers watching us, lets build something to stop that.

But just because youre paranoid doesnt mean theyre not after you, as Joseph Heller noted. And as Viglione remarked:

Probably the ultimate conspiracy theory is the idea of Big Brother or the NSA spying on everything we do which turns out to be true.

Despite the small, but noisy minority of the crypto community spreading 5G coronavirus conspiracy theories, Hoffman points out that many more crypto adherents were providing quality information and analysis about the coronavirus pandemic long before the mainstream media.

The information were getting from some of the good sources from crypto is far, far superior to what Im getting in the mainstream media, he says. Not trusting authority figures like journalists makes members of the crypto community take things into their own hands and say OK, I can report on this better, I can do a virus model and an update in my daily newsletter better than the Wall Street Journal.

Hoffman believes that unorthodox perspectives and a propensity to look further than the accepted narrative are among the crypto communitys greatest strengths.

Those investors who question commonly held beliefs, they are the ones that every decade spot things that nobody else sees, Hoffman says. Youre more likely to see a black swan event, youre more likely to add a unique solution to a problem that nobody else even knew existed like Satoshi did 11 years ago.

Read more here:

The Lizard People Invented Bitcoin: Crypto is a Hotbed for Conspiracy Theories - Cointelegraph

Brexit has reopened a divide within the Tories that cannot be bridged – Telegraph.co.uk

Moreover, if US chickens are sold here and are properly labelled, no one has to buy them. But price is important for many consumers. Free-range chickens can cost four or five times as much as a broiler sold in a cut-price supermarket. The American birds may be cheaper still. In any case, a deal with the US also opens a huge market for UK farmers whose higher quality and ethical standards will be a marketing advantage in pitching for the custom of better-off Americans.

Under the Agriculture Bill, farmers will continue to receive most of the support they were paid under the CAP until 2022 through a series of transition arrangements that will also protect the environment and ensure high production standards. But, they ask, what will be the point of these if they are then left to the mercies of cheap imports from the US and elsewhere? In addition, if there is no UK-EU trade deal by the end of the year, their exports to Europe will become more expensive.

Are we really looking at the possible extinction of British agriculture? Aside from the impact on the livelihoods of farmers and the countryside they manage, it would be a serious matter, given how vulnerable this country which imports 40 per cent of its food is to a breakdown in supply lines.

If the vaunted free trade deal with America looks like foundering over agriculture, which way will Boris Johnson jump? He needs to land this deal, especially as talks with the EU are not going well. But he faces the age-old choice for Tory prime ministers: farmers or consumers? It will be hard to placate both, as Peel discovered.

Here is the original post:

Brexit has reopened a divide within the Tories that cannot be bridged - Telegraph.co.uk

Britain wants to reinvent UK-China relations in the Brexit age – Quartz

In February 2016, when Boris Johnson was still mayor of London, he wrote in The Telegraph newspaper that if the UK voted to leave the European Union, its government would be embroiled for several years in a fiddly process of negotiating new arrangements on trade and business with other countries. As prime minister, Johnson has just made that process much harder for himself, by picking a very public fight with China, one his countrys largest economic partners.

Relations between Europe and China have soured over the last few years. Beijing and Brussels regularly butt heads over Hong Kong,Taiwan, and human rights violations in Xinjiang. Last year, the European Commission called Beijing a systemic rival in a strategic outlook paper (pdf, p. 1). With Covid-19, things have only gotten worse.

The UK mostly stayed out of the fray, having declared in 2015 a new golden era in relations with China. But with Johnson at its head, Downing Street has become more aggressive and vocal lately on at least two issues: Hong Kong and the Chinese technology giant Huawei. As Johnson attempts to restructure the Sino-British relationship in the wake of Brexit, its not clear what leverage he has, or who could step into the void if China chose to reducethe scale of its investments in the UK.

When Johnson was chosen to succeed Theresa May as prime minister, he said his government would be very pro-China.

Times have changed.

The first major turning point was the US-China trade war, and the accompanying pressure on Britain to choose a side. Economically, the choice is stark (pdf, p.6). In 2018, Washington and London traded 201.6 billion ($255 billion) worth of goods, while trade with China was worth 68.3 billion. Exports to the US represented 18.8% of the UKs total exports that year, compared to 3.6% for China. The US was the UKs top trade partner, and China was the fifth.

At first, it appeared like the UK was willing to defy Washington on at least one issue: Huawei. The US believes that Huawei is a security risk, and has threatened to withhold intelligence from countries that use the companys gear in their core 5G networks. But in spite of intense lobbying by American officials, in January, the UK government declined to ban Huawei from its network.

Then, the novel coronavirus started spreading around the globe. Evidence emerged that, when the first cases of Covid-19 were detected in Wuhan, Chinese officials covered them up, and later delayed releasing information about the virus to the World Health Organization. The pandemic shed light on how dependent the world is on Chinas factories, which produce up to 85% of the worlds supply of face masks. It also made clear that Beijing is willing to use its economic might as a political bargaining chip: After Australia called for an inquiry into the origin of the virus, Beijing slapped tariffs on its barleyandstopped buying meatfrom its major abattoirs.

As a result, anti-China sentiment has risen in Britain, where it was already quite high. According to a survey conducted by the British Foreign Policy Group (pdf, p. 6), only 18% of UK citizens trusted China to act responsibly in the world in May, down from roughly 21% in January.

Downing Street has also become more hawkish on China. Johnson is reportedly drawing up plans to cut Huawei out of the UKs 5G network entirely by 2023. And the government is attempting to speed up plans for a bill that would tighten controls over Chinese corporate takeovers, after British intelligencewarned lawmakers in April that they needed to restrict Chinese influence over strategic industries.

What weve seen is the UK being shaken out of its complacency, says Kerry Brown, director of the Lau China Institute at Kings College, London.

Another major turning point came in mid-April, when Beijing imposed a new security law on Hong Kong that restricts the citys independence. Setting itself apart from the EU, which simply issued a statement, the UK announced that it would create a pathway to citizenship for nearly 3 million eligible citizens of Hong Kong who were born before Britain handed the city over to China in 1997. A spokesperson for Chinas foreign ministry threatened countermeasures.

Some in the UK also find their governments move incomprehensible. Brown, who doesnt mince his words, qualified Johnsons decision to hand out passports like confetti in Hong Kong as fatuous, gestural grandstanding politics.

When he was campaigning for Brexit, Johnson sold his supporters a vision of a truly global Britain, which hinges on the countrys ability to deepen its financial ties with Beijing. Now, says Thomas des Garets Geddes, a junior analyst at the Mercator Institute for China Studies, the prospect of an imminent Sino-British free trade agreement already seems rather remote.

Last year, the UK was the second-largest recipient of Chinese FDI by volume. China also represents the worlds largest consumer market, with a middle class expected to grow to 550 million people by 2022, according to McKinsey.

That is a tough hole to fill. Johnson has previously expressed an interest in deepening economic ties with members of the Commonwealth, a 54-nation group of mostly former British colonies. But Brown argues that its not really very likely that the Commonwealth is going to be a coherent and cohesive market. Britains attempts to lay the foundation for a bilateral trade deal with India, the Commonwealths largest economy, have stalled in the past.

Peter Lu, an expert in mergers & acquisitions who leads Baker McKenzies China practice in London, represents Chinese investors wanting to buy or invest in European companies. He says recent developments in the UK-China relationship have given his clients pause. Its very hard for the key decision-maker to invest in a country which is not friendly, he explains, because faith is a very important factor in Chinese culture and they cant justify investing a lot of money in hostile countries.

Some argue Downing Streets newfound hawkishness is little more than a distraction from Johnsons domestic troubles over his widely-criticized handling of the pandemic and scandal-prone senior advisor, Dominic Cummings. But Geddes says the growing hawkishness vis--vis China that is emerging across the UKs political spectrum is very real and unlikely to disappear any time soon.

That, argues Brown, is a strategic mistake. The danger is that we shoot our mouths off now about Hong Kong and about all these other issues and back ourselves into a corner, he says. If the economy is as bad as it looks its going to be in a few months time, then the UK cant really be picking and choosing who it does business with.

Beggars, unfortunately, cant be choosers.

Link:

Britain wants to reinvent UK-China relations in the Brexit age - Quartz

Brexit deal now unlikely without extension, and time is running out – Verdict

Securing a full deal on Brexit within the required timeframe is looking increasingly unlikely, and with the deadline for an extension just weeks away, a no-deal Brexit is now a serious concern, according to a report published today by thinktank UK in a Changing Europe.

The report, The Brexit Negotiations: A Stocktake, has found that there are a number of what Jill Rutter, senior research fellow at the UK in a Changing Europe, describes as an entirely predictable set of stumbling blocks, including fishing, governance and a level playing field, with the two sides locked into completely incompatible positions. On some of these issues.

As a result, the organisation argues that an extension is currently the best option, however the deadline for asking for one is less than a month away.

June is clearly crucial. If were going to extend transition as a lot of organisations have asked, weve got to ask by the end of June, said Professor Catherine Barnard, senior fellow at the UK in a Changing Europe, speaking at a press conference on the launch of the report.

She added that while the EU was open to an extension, the UK was adamant that it would not be asking for one.

If we havent asked for an extension by next week or the week after, that is it for asking for an extension.

If the UK does decide to continue with negotiations in an attempt to secure a deal on Brexit the path that the UK in a Changing Europe expects it to take then it will face a very tight timescale to do this by.

Rutter highlighted that both sides have their own deadlines for when they need negotiations to be finished by. The UK has said it wants an agreement in place by the end of September, while the EU has given 31 October as its deadline so that it has time to ratify all aspects of the deal.

Its probably the EU deadline that matters more than the UK deadline, she said, adding that this created a Halloween II scenario, echoing the previous deadline the UK was working towards under Theresa Mays government.

This gives an extremely tight negotiating window to resolve the many sticking points still present,

Assuming the UK doesnt walk away, then we would be negotiating throughout the months of July, August, September, said Barnard.

If this isnt successful, a no-deal Brexit is the most likely scenario, which will see the UK default to trading on World Trade Organisation terms. This would, according to the UK in a Changing Europe, cause a GDP slump of up to 8-9% over the next decade.

Get the Verdict morning email

For businesses, this adds considerable uncertainty at a time when many industries can least afford it.

Whats missing from all this narrative is how on earth business is going to adapt, said Barnard.

Supply chains in particular are a key concern for many businesses, with Professor Jonathan Portes, senior fellow at the UK in a Changing Europe, warning that the UK might find itself excluded from supply chains and markets as it rebuilds.

There is also the issue of immigration, although Portes stressed that on this issue, it is not about whether we do a deal as immigration is generally not a key topic in the trade negotiations.

The UK is going to have a new system either way. Were going to need radical changes to immigration, he said.

If transition isnt extended, we need a new immigration system in January 2021, deal or no deal.

This is of particular concern to the UK technology industry, which relies heavily on talent from the EU, and which is being seen as a key driver of UK growth in the post-Brexit era.

There are also fears that bungling this could have severe reputational damage to the UK for years to come at a time when it is trying to portray itself as having a global, business-friendly mindset.

The thinktank also acknowledged that doing this during the coronavirus pandemic has created an additional unexpected complication, with many member states unwilling to engage heavily with the Brexit deal negotiations while they are fighting an unprecedented health crisis.

The EU is very irritated that the UK is insisting on doing this while member states have things that they think are much more important to deal with, said Rutter.

There are also competing schools of thought on whether dealing with Brexit during the pandemic is a good call.

While some see it as adding dangerous additional stresses to businesses and the economy at a time when they can least afford it, others believe that tackling the two at once will cause less overall damage than them being handled as separate incidents.

Our view is that on balance Covid-19 does make the economic risks of exiting transition without a trade deal in January even larger than they already are, said Portes, but there are a lot of uncertainties.

Read more: Absence of services sector from Brexit negotiations risks profound impact

View original post here:

Brexit deal now unlikely without extension, and time is running out - Verdict

The pandemic is being used as cover for a no-deal Brexit – The Guardian

Most of us who have followed Brexit closely believed coronavirus would soften the governments stance in trade talks with Europe. The economic shock triggered by the pandemic, and the fact Whitehall is so overwhelmed managing it, made it more likely the government would extend the transition period, due to expire at the end of this year, or strike a deal. It turns out that the opposite is true. Rather than encouraging a more flexible and pragmatic approach, Covid-19 has instead reinforced the case for no deal at the very top of government.

Perhaps the most important driver is the belief among ministers that the UK economy will be permanently reshaped by the crisis, as companies create new supply chains and reshore production to provide greater resilience in the future, not least in case of another pandemic. The government wants a free hand to facilitate this change, one that it believes would be constrained by the EUs demand that the UK remain tied to its labour and environmental standards and state aid rules.

On the other side of the same coin, there are growing fears in cabinet that maintaining close EU ties would lock the UK into the EUs post-Covid-19 economic measures designed for its 27 member states, with little regard for the UKs interests.This is nonsense, as theEUs rescue package unveiled last Wednesday assumes no UK financial contribution. But it is a powerful argument on the Eurosceptic backbenches and has scared many in cabinet.

Anotherargument popular with backbench Brexiteers, but now more prominent among ministers, is the belief that coronavirus presents the government with an opportunity to bury theloss of growth from no trade deal under the cover of the much more dramatic drop in GDP caused by coronavirus.

The politics of this are very juicy for the Vote Leave team in the driving seat in government. Not least because it is only really a no deal that fully delivers on their substantive divergence agenda, while anyversion of a deal with the EU, no matter how distant, will ultimately tie the UK into EU rules and regulations in some way, an idea they hate and are loth to accept.No deal alsofacilitates a trade deal with the US, and the symbolism of Global Britain is key for ministers far more important than the limited economic benefit a UK-US trade pact would bring.

Time is also running out. Despite three rounds of talks so far, no progress has been made and negotiators on both sides are downbeat about the likelihood of a breakthrough this week.Big gaps remain in the UK over whether and how far to align to EU standards, the role of the European court of justice and the EUs demands to fish in UK waters. Butthe government wont extend the transition period. Boris Johnson believes he would struggle to sell to voters the extra 10bn in financial contributions and further spell of EU control of UK laws that this would bring.

A political intervention on both sides will therefore be needed to move beyond the current stage. There will l be an opportunity this month, when Johnson meets the European commission president, Ursula von der Leyen, virtually, around the time of a long-planned EU leaders session in June to review progress.But the EU is unlikely to change its mandate and absent progress, ministers plan to make a judgment in September so they can give business clarity about the trading arrangements from 1 January. They may switch to assuming and preparing for no deal then.

Finally, the survival of Dominic Cummings, Johnsons closest adviser, despite allegations he broke the lockdown rules, also enhances the prospect of no deal. One reason why Brexiteer ministers and aides rallied behind him is that he sees it as his personal mission to prevent Johnson extending the transition period in June, and delivering a version of Brexit that lets the UK take back control. It would be wrong to underestimate his impact on the outcome of these negotiations.

Of course, this could all be tactics and bluster. Johnsonand his cheerleaders on the backbenches have convinced themselves that such brinkmanship worked during the withdrawal agreement talks, so it is no real surprise they intend to repeat the trick now. Especially as they believe, wrongly, that coronavirus will make the EU more desperate to conclude a deal and buckle at the last moment. But Downing Street is right that December is the real deadline.

Germanys role will be key. I say this not as a naive Brit, believing that Angela Merkel will ride to Britains rescue, but as someone who has spent more than two decades studying and working on EU affairs. With Germany at the head of Europes rotating presidency, and Merkel in the final throes of her chancellorship, she will find it very hard to sign off on no deal. Of all of the EUs member states, Germany has been the most focused on the longer-term, geopolitical risk of no deal, and the necessity for the UK and EU to maintain constructive ties.

But even Merkel cant and wont save the UK from itself, and will not agree to a deal at any price.If the net effect of Covid-19 is that ministers see more benefit than cost from no deal, with the dominant view in cabinet now opposed to extending the transitional period, then that will indeed be the outcome at the end of this year.

Mujtaba Rahman is the managing director for Europe at Eurasia Group, a political risk research and consulting firm

Read the original:

The pandemic is being used as cover for a no-deal Brexit - The Guardian

Brexit Britain has a much better alternative than the EU: Canzuk – Telegraph.co.uk

Brexit-watch.org recently interviewed former Australian deputy prime minister John Anderson, former leader of the government in the Australian Senate Eric Abetz, as well as Erin OToole - a candidate to be the next leader of the Canadian Conservative Party - on our YouTube channel.

All three spoke at length about the potential of Canzuk. For many commentators and politicians in Australia, Canada and New Zealand, closer ties between the three countries and Britain represents a perfect realignment for post-Brexit Britain. Canzuk also represents a perfect realignment for all four nations in a post-coronavirus world economy.

Today, the United States is starting to retreat from global leadership. Yet the Western alliance needs formalising and leading, while the EU will never fulfil that role. Canzuk - and the United States - already share Five Eyes and the UKUSA Agreement. Formalisation, after Brexit, of the economic and military ties between Canzuk would enable not just greater prosperity, but more geopolitical reach and military interoperability.

After Covid-19, we can assume Australia, Canada and New Zealand will not want to put all their eggs in one Sinocentric basket. Australia has been particularly vigorous in its response to China, while Canzuk parliamentarians recently joined forces over Hong Kong. Cross-pollinating the Canzuk economies would be a winning formula, given the desire to onshore critical industry and lessen reliance on China after Covid-19.

No one is suggesting Canzuk has a common currency. When trust and bonds are embedded, there is no need for EU-style bureaucracy. But whether in the realm of economics or security, Canzuk is a no-brainer. The EU, meanwhile, has showcased its divisions for the world to see. Italy is not to Germany what Australia is to Britain (and lets not even get started on the cultural Iron Curtain between central and eastern Europe on the one hand, and western Europe on the other). The bonds and trust exist between the Canzuk nations to do something far greater than what exists today.

Try as it might, this is something the EU can never replicate. This is also a moment where the Western world needs a united front but at a time when the US is (perhaps understandably) unwilling to carry the Western alliance. Geography has never mattered less but cultural proximity will always count. Canzuk would bring the best out of each country. Get Canzuk done!

More here:

Brexit Britain has a much better alternative than the EU: Canzuk - Telegraph.co.uk