Why Brandel Chamblee thinks the PGA Tour shutdown will benefit Jordan Spieth – Golf.com

By: Zephyr Melton June 9, 2020

Jordan Spieth looks to get back to his old winning ways this week at Colonial.

Getty Images

After the 13-week break from pro golf the longest such stretch since World War II there are many questions about how the players will be affected. In a game where there is virtually no offseason, an extended break like this is far from the norm.

But are there particular players that are better equipped to handle the layoff? The answer is yes, according to Golf Channel analyst Brandel Chamblee, who thinks Jordan Spieth is the type of player who will come out of the lockdown with a sharper game than before.

Spieths fall from the top of his game is well documented just before the shutdown he fell out of the top 50 in the World Ranking but despite these struggles, Chamblee is convinced the break could be beneficial. Specifically, Spieths time away from swing coach Cameron McCormick might be just what he needs.

I think Jordan Spieth perhapscould come out of this the best of anybody, Chamblee said in a call witha contingent of golf reporters ahead of the Charles Schwab Challenge. Ibelieve that theres intellectual power in solitude.

Chamblee explained his theory thatcurrent players lean too heavily on their swing coaches, something that can bea hinderance to their games. He made the argument that without exception,players are impoverished by helicopter teachers and that the time away fromthe constant eye of their instructors will be hugely beneficial.

He pointed to World No. 1 Rory McIlroy as an example of someone who had come to this conclusion on his own, long before the lockdown. McIlroy is tutored by Michael Bannon, though the instructor rarely makes an appearance at Tour events hovering over his pupil.

He talks to his coach, but hetries to figure it out on his own, Chamblee said.

Although Spieth has been withMcCormick for his entire pro career, Chamblee is not convinced that theinstructor is integral to the three-time major winners success.

Its his genius that I thinkmade him the player he was, with a little help from a coach, Chambleesaid. And when I see the interaction between Jordan Spieth and his coachon driving ranges, it looks frantic. So perhaps 13 weeks off would have givenhim some time to sort of clear up his mind.

While it remains to be seen if thetime away from the grind of Tour life will be the thing that springboardsSpieth back to the upper echelon of the game, Colonial would be an appropriateplace to break out of his slump. Spieth won the event in 2016 and has fiveother top-15 finishes in seven starts at the Fort Worth track.

The Charles Schwab Challenge gets started Thursday morning and will be aired on the Golf Channel and PGA Tour Live.

Zephyr Melton is an assistant editor for GOLF.com.

Here is the original post:

Why Brandel Chamblee thinks the PGA Tour shutdown will benefit Jordan Spieth - Golf.com

Artist Jordan Eagles Calls for Queer Blood to Help Save the Sick – Vulture

Jordan Eagles, American Carnage 6/14-III-IN-ACTION (detail), 2018. Photo: Kris Graves

One of the ways that people who have survived COVID-19 have been able to help those who are having a rougher time with it is through convalescent-plasma donation. Antibody-filled blood is in dire need and is saving lives. But just dont try to help if youre a man who has sex with men: The U.S. Food and Drug Administrations policy essentially refuses blood donations from gay and bisexual men unless theyve been celibate for three months.Artist Jordan Eagles confronts this refusal in a work titled Can You Save Superman? on the Leslie-Lohman Museum of Arts new website. The project is based on a 1971 Superman comic book, Attack of the Micro-Murderer, in which all the citizens of Metropolis are called on to save their superhero, who had contracted a super-virus, by donating blood. Eagles takes the comic books cover and sprays it with the blood of a gay man on PrEP, a daily pre-exposure drug to prevent HIV.

Eagles has been working with blood as an artistic medium since the late 1990s. In 2015, when the FDA first eased its lifetime ban on queer-blood donations to a one-year celibacy requirement (lowered to three monthsbecause of the pandemic, in April), Eagles made Blood Mirror (201416) an actual mirror that showed the reflection of the onlooker through the blood of 59 gay, bi, and trans donors. Though some groups lauded the step in the right direction, to Eagles, the new policy felt even more discriminatory in effect saying, Yes, you can donate blood, just as long as you dont do what makes you gay. The concept Eagles calls blood equality permeates his work today.

Using this blood for art-making instead of transfusions or treatments, Eagles says, is an utter waste. This is blood that could have been used for lifesaving purposes if the governments policy of blood donation was fair, Eagles told the Cut in 2018 in a video interview about Blood Mirror. My whole body of work addresses blood as a life force.

Part of the museums Pride Month programming, the show opens June 10, just ahead of World Blood Donor Day. Here, a preview of Can You Save Superman?

American Carnage 6/14, 2018. Photo: Jordan Eagles Studio

In American Carnage 6/14 (2018), Eagles has scanned and blown up the cover image to make a large-form black-and-white print. Blood pools most where it first struck the Dibond aluminum panel, then rolls in an unnatural diagonal toward the ailing Superman. The doctor, almost entirely obscured with blood, says in a speech bubble to a waiting crowd that stretches into the distance, I warn you donors, as we begin the transfusion, your blood will save Superman or kill him!

Untitled, 2018. Photo: Kris Graves.

Untitled, 2018. Photo: Kris Graves.

In Untitled (2018), against the black fabric of a delicate display, theres an original issue of the 1971 comic book itself splattered with blood. Recoiling from the comic book, a needle. IV tubing leads down to a blood bag, mostly full.

Will You Save Superman?, 2018. Photo: Kris Graves

Will You Save Superman? (2018) fixates on Supermans head leaning back on an operating table. His cape is his pillow. With his eyes closed and brow knit, its clear he is unable to save himself. Surrounding his portrait, latex medical gloves with all but their middle fingers turned down crowd the work. Its unusable blood; theyre hands that wont help. Were letting Superman die.

More:

Artist Jordan Eagles Calls for Queer Blood to Help Save the Sick - Vulture

An All-Black Air Jordan 6 Is Coming This Holiday For Women – Sneaker News

The Air Jordan 6 has been on a hot streak lately following the resurrection of its iconic DMP as it has since dropped its Hare option overseas today, in addition to revealing Carmine reissues and more to be released in 2021. And now the classic retro model is getting prepared to build up its 2020 repertoire with another entry, although this time tailoring to more towards its womens audience. In-hand and/or official images have yet to emerge, but we do have knowledge that these will be offered with a Triple Black motif. There is also a chance that these can be feature premium materials on the upper, but that still remains to be seen. Stay tuned as we receive more information regarding its official release on Nike.com, and expect them to arrive sometime during the holiday season later this year for $210.

In other Jumpman-related news, heres a first look at the upcoming Oregon Jordan 5s.

Air Jordan 6 Retro SDRelease Date: Holiday 2020$210Color: Black/Black/BlackStyle Code: DB9818-001

Source: SHOF

Excerpt from:

An All-Black Air Jordan 6 Is Coming This Holiday For Women - Sneaker News

Jordan Kuwait Bank Adapts to New Normal With Citrix – Business Wire

FORT LAUDERDALE, Fla.--(BUSINESS WIRE)--COVID-19 continues to change the way companies do business in the Middle East. And one of the largest banks in Jordan is using solutions from Citrix Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CTXS) to adapt. Jordan Kuwait Bank (JKB) has implemented Citrix Virtual Apps and Desktops across its 64 branches throughout Jordan and Cyprus, which has allowed it to remain operational and offer financial services to its SME and corporate customers to manage critical imports and continue trading seamlessly while the country is in lockdown.

Seeing global events unfold, and recognizing that a majority of its employees would need to work from home, JKB moved quickly to implement Citrix Virtual Apps and Desktops alongside its Citrix Application Delivery Controller (ADC) infrastructure to ensure they could do so in a secure and reliable manner and continue to support the banks retail, private and corporate customers.

With the help of Citrix Gold Partner PRO TECHnology, the implementation of Citrix Virtual Apps and desktops was completed across all staff members responsible for getting critical functions to work remotely.

Every organization needs to develop a business continuity plan to ensure its business operations can continue, no matter the disruption and that users remain productive while maintaining the necessary level of security, said Khalid Al Rashdan, CEO, PRO TECHnology. With Citrix solutions, we have empowered IT to deliver on-demand apps and desktops to any device and enable remote work as a long-term solution for a radically different future.

Jordan Kuwait Bank now plans to extend Citrix remote working solutions to all HQ departments staff, as it is fully aware that remote working is a new kind of normal that will likely persist beyond the pandemic.

Our call centre employees need to be able to provide customers with real time, uninterrupted updates on the latest news from Jordans Central Bank, Alaa Qaddoumi, Information Security and Business Continuity Manager, Jordan Kuwait Bank said. And even in these most challenging times with employees working remotely, all customer calls were answered. That was a major differentiator for the Citrix solution.

Ibraheem Jaser, IT Infrastructure Manager, Jordan Kuwait Bank added, We knew we needed to make remote working a priority, and for that reason we adopted Citrix solutions. We have worked with Citrix since 2017 and, now more than ever, we believe that their solution can transform how we serve our customers during these unprecedented times.

Citrix provides a complete range of digital workspace solutions that empower employees to do their very best work in a safe and secure manner anywhere, anytime, using any device. Click here to learn more about these solutions and how your organization can use them to gain the agility, speed and efficiency required to manage resources in the dynamic way that unpredictable environments demand and position your business for future success.

About Citrix

Citrix (NASDAQ:CTXS) is powering a better way to work with unified workspace, networking, and analytics solutions that help organizations unlock innovation, engage customers, and boost productivity, without sacrificing security. With Citrix, users get a seamless work experience and IT has a unified platform to secure, manage, and monitor diverse technologies in complex cloud environments. Citrix solutions are in use by more than 400,000 organizations including 98 percent of the Fortune 500. Learn more at http://www.citrix.com.

For Citrix Investors:

This release contains forward-looking statements which are made pursuant to the safe harbor provisions of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 and of Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. The forward-looking statements in this release do not constitute guarantees of future performance. Those statements involve a number of factors that could cause actual results to differ materially, including risks associated with the impact of the global economy and uncertainty in the IT spending environment, revenue growth and recognition of revenue, products and services, their development and distribution, product demand and pipeline, economic and competitive factors, the Company's key strategic relationships, acquisition and related integration risks as well as other risks detailed in the Company's filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Citrix assumes no obligation to update any forward-looking information contained in this press release or with respect to the announcements described herein. The development, release and timing of any features or functionality described for our products remains at our sole discretion and is subject to change without notice or consultation. The information provided is for informational purposes only and is not a commitment, promise or legal obligation to deliver any material, code or functionality and should not be relied upon in making purchasing decisions or incorporated into any contract.

2020 Citrix Systems, Inc. Citrix, the Citrix logo, and other marks appearing herein are the property of Citrix Systems, Inc. and may be registered with the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office and in other countries. All other marks are the property of their respective owners.

See the article here:

Jordan Kuwait Bank Adapts to New Normal With Citrix - Business Wire

Someone has used a chainsaw to cut down a tree in Garden City which blocked Welsh Road – Deeside.com

A large tree has been felled in Welsh Road Park in what looks to be a random act of vandalism.

The 40ft tree (as seen on Google Streetview below) appears to have been attacked with a chainsaw early on Sunday morning.

The tree crashed over the park fencing and onto Welsh Road blocking it both ways.

Cat told us the incident happened at around 4am.

According a post on Facebook, one person spotted loads of police on Welsh Road at 5.45am.

By 8am Flintshire Council operatives had cut the tree into smaller sections and moved it to the side of the road.

Sealand Councillor, Christine Jones said: I am so angry. If anyone has any information in regards to this incident, please contact the police. It was a despicable action.

Wayne sent us this picture, he said, some idiot has cut down a tree in welsh road park in garden city why?

Spotted something? Got a story? Send a Facebook Message | A direct message on Twitter | Email: News@Deeside.com

Read this article:

Someone has used a chainsaw to cut down a tree in Garden City which blocked Welsh Road - Deeside.com

Transtopianism | Prometheism Transhumanism Post Humanism

Transtopianism. A radical new way of thinking, and which seems to fit many of my own life principles quite nicely.

Intro.

Were at a crossroads. For thousands of years mankind has been the dominant species on earth, the pinnacle of evolution. Now, as we enter the 21st century, this is about to change. A new and radically diffferent chapter of evolution is about to begin, for, as Vernor Vinge put it at the 1993 NASA VISION-21 Symposium:

`Within thirty years, we will have the technological means to create superhuman intelligence. Shortly after, the human era will be ended.

This event, the relatively sudden emergence of superintelligence (SI), is often referred to as the Singularity in Transhuman circles. The longer definition is:

SINGULARITY: the postulated point or short period in our future when our self-guided evolutionary development accelerates enormously (powered by nanotech, neuroscience, AI, and perhaps uploading) so that nothing beyond that time can reliably be conceived. [Vernor Vinge, 1986] (Lextropicon).

Whether these new, Posthuman beings (aka SIs, Powers or PSEs Post-Singularity Entities) will be augmented humans, artificial intelligences (AIs) or some hybrid form, they will no doubt change life as we know it rapidly and profoundly. For better or for worse; what happens to those who are left behind in this burst of self-directed hyperevolution is by definition unknown, unknowable even, but extinction is definitely one of the more realistic options.

Here is the home page

http://meltingpot.fortunecity.com/kuwait/557/index.html

Here are their stated principles

http://meltingpot.fortunecity.com/kuwait/557/principles.html

And if you dont want to read all that, there is quite a bit, then here is my summary. Ive taken essentially the first paragraph from each of the principles; there is a lot more interesting detail on the site.

Rationalism. Rational thinking is practical; it is the most reliable way to find solutions to problems. Because we are such frail, imperfect creatures, we need science and technology, the fruits of reason, to conquer death, disease and other biological shortcomings, and thus achieve the most rational of goals: a pleasant, eternal existence.

Memetic Evolution. Transtopianism is a continuously evolving philosophy, a logical consequence of the search for perfection which lies at its core. We need to avoid stale, impractical dogmas while at the same time preserving those values that are clearly reasonable and helpful in improving our condition, or at least arent detrimental to this goal.

Intelligent Hedonism. Finding true happiness and fulfillment may not be as difficult as many seem to think; its all in the chemicals. Not very surprising really, we are merely biological machines, after all.

Transhumanism. The belief that we can, and should, try to overcome our biological limits by means of reason, science and technology. Transhumanists seek things like intelligence augmentation, increased strength and beauty, extreme life extension, sustainable mood enhancement and the capability to get offplanet and explore the universe.

Singularitarianism. Vernor Vinge defined the Singularity in 1986 as the postulated point or short period in our future when our self-guided evolutionary development accelerates enormously (powered by nanotech, neuroscience, AI, and perhaps uploading) so that nothing beyond that time can reliably be conceived. More specifically, it is the moment when superhuman intelligence emerges, either as a result of conscious AI, advanced computer/human interfaces, genetic engineering or mind uploading.

Atheism. Transtopianism rejects religious dogma and belief in the supernatural. The rational approach to these things is that they are mere figments of the imagination until proven otherwise. Or, as Occams Razor puts it: one should not increase, beyond what is necessary, the number of entities required to explain anything.

Egoism. There are two primary forms of Egoism, namely 1) Psychological Egoism, which is descriptive and claims that everyone acts in their own self-interest, i.e. everyone is an Egoist at heart, and 2) Ethical Egoism, which is normative and claims that everyone ought to act in their own self-interest.

There are all sorts of excellent arguments both for and against the psychological form, but the best model is probably that of man as an essentially self-serving (egoistic) creature that is hampered by short-sighted, potentially harmful/lethal hedonistic and altruistic urges, caused by a combination of nature and nurture, i.e. genes and environment. Obviously, there are rather significant variations among individuals; but the basic model is presumably the same for all normal human beings, and likely most animals as well.

Regardless of the accuracy of the above psychological model, there is no room for doubt regarding the validity of Ethical Egoism within the Transtopian philosophy; self-interest is the highest good, because pleasure and happiness are the least arbitrary meaning of life (see Intelligent Hedonism). Even if one doesnt believe this to be the case, one must at the very least be alive to seek the true meaning of life. Needless to say, this could very well be an open-ended search. In order to survive indefinitely, one must overcome hard-wired or learned (seriously) harmful behavior, especially altruism, idealism and guilt. Lets start with the latter:

Tough Liberalism (not to be confused with bleeding-heart or leftist Liberalism). Anything goes as long as it doesnt (seriously) harm the others within ones contract group (= a group which people voluntarily join/form to achieve common goals, like surviving the Singularity for example).

Mental, Physical & Financial Empowerment. To quote from Five Things You Can Do To Fight Entropy Now by Romana Machado: To be prepared for a future that may be full of difficult changes, and survive in an entropic world, take personal responsibility for your security. If you are good at self-defense, you need not regard yourself as a powerless victim. Self-defense encourages your sense of autonomy and personal power. Following a course of study in martial arts may help you to develop the proper attitude towards the use of force in self-defense. Learn the proper use of devices and techniques that can protect you from harm. Needless to say, a pacifistic or meek attitude is definitely not compatible with the Transtopian spirit.

No Procreation. Transtopians dont [plan to] have offspring. The (practical) reason is that, assuming that you want to be a good parent, children are a serious drain in terms of time and resources, increase stress, make you more vulnerable, more altruistic, less flexible, and generally more settled and conservative (bourgeois, if you will). When people become parents, they implicitly (and duly) accept that their fun days are over, and that its time to get responsible. Well, screw that! Only a fool would give up his life like that. Better to stay young at heart and unbound forever. The only real value of offspring in modern (Western) societies is enjoyment (hedonistic motive), but due to the significant drawbacks of parenthood it cant be considered intelligent hedonism, and should thus be avoided.

Dynamic Pessimism, aka Cynical Optimism. Though Transtopians have no doubts about mans enormous potential to overcome his biological and social limits, they are generally less optimistic than regular Transhumanists about the future. The chances that our advanced technologies will accidentally or intentionally cause unparalled destruction are, given our historical precedents, much too great to ignore.

Cryonics, aka applied immortalism. Cryonic suspension is an experimental procedure whereby patients who no longer can be kept alive with todays medical abilities are preserved at low temperature for treatment in the future.

The rest is here:

Transtopianism | Sciforums

Split long article

Might this longish entry be better presented as a series of pages? JasonS 03:34 Jan 13, 2003 (UTC)

Dnagod 20:56, 9 Feb 2005 (UTC)

In the interest of ensuring transhuman is NPOV: Who decides what the definition of transhumanism is?

This element of humanism, is that from huxley or someone else?

Does the man who invented the word, Julian Huxley decide the definition of Transhumanism, does one in modern times who publically states the definition decide or does the World Transhumanism Association decide?

I would like clarity as to who ultimately determines what transhumanism means because the definition used by the WTA and other groups differs. More importantly, what gives one authority or the command to be able to define in an undisputed what transhumanism is, so that other POVs can be excluded?

For instance I have reviewed the entire transtopia.org, euvolution.com/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism and cosmotheism.net site, and I cant seem to figure out how you could label it as disputed in the links section?

What is to say the world transhumanism association isnt disputed?

I can see how one might label cosmotheism as white racial separatist, but euvolution.com/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism and transtopia.org I would like more discussion as to why it is disputed as a transhumanism group. And why is Cosmotheism a disputed offshoot? Cosmotheism was developed in the 1960s and 1970s which came before extropy and WTA, so why is it an offshoot? I thought offshoot meant, that something existed and a branch or seed came off that plant. Can you please define offshoot and explain who decides what is or is not transhumanism?

More on this humanism element of Transhumanism, is that from huxley or someone else? Thanks.

Why does the link to cosmotheism keep getting deleted? Just because that article had a banned user associated w it doesnt make it any less relevent. Sam [Spade] 20:56, 4 Aug 2004 (UTC)

Id like to incorporate a mention of the Human Cognome Project into this article, as it is relevent to human brain augmentation and AI research. Any suggestions? Dave User:Sydhart

Why is transtopia.org, euvolution.com/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism and cosmotheism.net labelled pseudotranshuman organizations? To me that represents bias as to why those web sites would be labelled pseudo, what makes a web site pseudo?

On the front page of euvolution.com/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism it states the following

(Prometheism is) The First Sovereign Transtopian & Neo-Eugenic Libertarian Religious-State.

In the principles sections of prometheism it states

Our Promethean Species embraces Conscious Evolution

Our immediate aim is to create a neo-eugenically enhanced race that will eventually become a new, superior species with whatever scientific means are available at the present time. In the short-term, this will be achieved via neo-eugenics, ie. voluntary positive eugenics, human cloning, germ-line engineering, gene therapy and genetic engineering.

In the long-term, when the science becomes available we intend to utilize transhuman technologies: nanotechnology, mind uploading, A/I and other variations of ultra exo-tech.

Our goal is to enable total and unlimited self-transformation, consciousness and expansion across the universe of our species.

It also states note the key words Transhuman Technologies and the embracing of transhumanism and extropy.

We Define neo-eugenics as conscious evolution (these words are interchangeable). Purposefully directed evolution via voluntary positive neo-eugenics (including voluntary selective breeding), cloning, genetic engineering and ultimately any and all transhuman technologies. Neo-Eugenics means harnessing all science, technology and knowledge available now or in the future, guiding it with spirituality, ethical considerations and higher consciousness, ultimately towards achieving total and unlimited self transformation. The term Neo-Eugenics embodies the sciences and philosophies involved in Biotechnology, Extropy and Transhumanism all merged in a philosophy of spiritual Conscious Evolution.

http://euvolution.com/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism/principles.htm

I believe removing prometheism from this page, will be cause to bring this issue to arbitration to confirm that the individual who keeps removing it obviously is biased and lacks an understanding of what transhumanism. NPOV. thats your problem brian NPOV and blatant bias.

Dnagod 22:22, 7 Feb 2005 (UTC)

Extropy and a lot of the other sites listed under manifestos are linked else where in the article, so I felt it important to also include these manifestos

Please do not revert to childish insults, and a biased personal agenda removing these links, they belong their and represent Principles which I dare say are some of the most interesting, fascinating and creative principles.

Dont abuse your privileges here and force your agenda on this topic of transhumanism, all perspectives are welcome here whether you like it or not.

Dnagod 17:26, 8 Feb 2005 (UTC)

What makes you think transtopianism (transtopia.org) is not secular?

STOP removing these links, you are biased, emotional, unfair, unbalanced and lacking in neutrality.

These links are to stay, and you have no right to remove them. They are valid and legit links, Do not abuse your privileges on this project or you will be revoked.

Dnagod 02:55, 9 Feb 2005 (UTC)

The man who invented the word Transhumanism (Huxley), was an open, avid and published advocate of state sponsored coercive eugenics, selective breeding, and elitist eugenic communities. Therefore you are wrong, and thus the specific issue of VOLUNTARY eugenics does NOT violate in anyway, shape or form, being part of transhumanism. You are wrong, biased, unfair, unbalanced, and lacking in neutrality. Transtopia.org and euvolution.com/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism DO NOT SUPPORT COERCIVE EUGENICS in their PRINCIPLES, THEY SUPPORT VOLUNTARY EUGENICS READ VOLUNTARY. Forgive the capitalization, but I do that for emphasis, not to scream.

please stop removing these links, you are biased, emotional, unfair, unbalanced and lacking in neutrality. These are not personal attacks, these are stated facts that you have not read the euvolution.com/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism web site.

These links are to stay, and you have no right to remove them. They are valid and legit links, Do not abuse your privileges on this project.

I ask you to bring arbitration and discussion on this fact. Your censorship, bias and personal agenda will not win. Go to euvolution.com/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism right now and find one place on this site that says prometheism supports COERCIVE EUGENICS. you will not find it anywhere. Prometheism.net clearly states that it only supports voluntary eugenics. Read the sworn oath on euvolution.com/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism

The Sworn Oath of Prometheism (front page of euvolution.com/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism)

We Prometheans are voluntarily coming together to purposefully direct the creation of a new post-human species. A species with higher intellect, creativity, consciousness and love of ones people. A communion of intellect and beauty, for the simple reason that it can be done. This creation is what gives us purpose and meaning. No other justification is required for this program to advance our Promethean species.

Next I want you to read the Principles of prometheism https://www.euvolution.com/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism/principles.htm

2. Our Promethean Species embraces Conscious Evolution

Our immediate aim is to create a neo-eugenically enhanced race that will eventually become a new, superior species with whatever scientific means are available at the present time. In the short-term, this will be achieved via neo-eugenics, ie. voluntary positive eugenics, human cloning, germ-line engineering, gene therapy and genetic engineering.

5. Total Freedom, Liberty and Self-Determination

Our Libertarian religious nation is founded on the principles of total freedom of speech (including offensive language and language which hurts peoples feelings), freedom of thought, the right to bear arms, liberty, progress, productivity and the pursuit of individual happiness.

nation is VOLUNTARY ONLY. We REJECT all totalitarianism and believe COERCIVE neo-eugenics is counter to the ideal of individual freedom. The promethean governments sole purpose is to protect the rights of the individual. We DO NOT wish to STERILIZE anyone or FORCE anyone to practice neo-eugenics.

DNA or genetic capital is the most valuable commodity in the universe. Our primary goal is to promote positive and voluntary neo-eugenics by channeling national resources to the best, brightest and most creative.

We Define neo-eugenics as conscious evolution (these words are interchangeable). Purposefully directed evolution via voluntary positive neo-eugenics (including voluntary selective breeding), cloning, genetic engineering and ultimately any and all transhuman technologies. Neo-Eugenics means harnessing all science, technology and knowledge available now or in the future, guiding it with spirituality, ethical considerations and higher consciousness, ultimately towards achieving total and unlimited self transformation. The term Neo-Eugenics embodies the sciences and philosophies involved in Biotechnology, Extropy and Transhumanism all merged in a philosophy of spiritual Conscious Evolution.

This is from the principles of euvolution.com/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism Last Updated: 3/13/03 this means that prometheism is NOT FRINGE, it does not support the fringe philosophy of FORCED COERCIVE EUGENICS. Again the capitalization is not screaming, its meant to provide emphasis. Also my comments about you not being very knowledgeable about euvolution.com/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism and transtopia.org are not meant as personal insults or personal attacks, but as an observation.

Dnagod 20:06, 9 Feb 2005 (UTC)

Read more here:

Talk:Transhumanism/Archive 2 Wikipedia

Visit link:

Transtopianism | Futurist Transhuman News Blog

More here:

Transtopianism | Prometheism.net

. Bookmark the

.

See more here:

Transtopianism | Prometheism.net | Futurist Transhuman ...

Visit link:

Transtopianism | Prometheism Transhumanism Post Humanism

Ricky Gervais Says Liberals Only Claim He’s "Alt-Right" Because His Jokes Have a "Target They Defend" – Decider

Ricky Gervais has some thoughts about his newly-acquired alt-right label. In a new episode of The Daily Beasts The Last Laughpodcast, Gervais sounded off on his steadfast commitment to free speech, which has earned him praise from right-wing pundits and Twitter users. While the After Lifestar appreciates his new fans, he admitted that its only left-leaning users who consider him a fascist, as hes making jokes about things they love. People love the idea of free speech until they hear something they dont like, said Gervais.

Gervais is the first to admit that hes a liberal, but in recent months, his takedown of the Hollywood eliteand woke stars has made him a popular figure within right-wing circles. After his controversial Golden Globes monologue, Fox News host Greg Gutfield praised Gervais for saying everything youve ever wanted to say to that self-obsessed pile of pulsating flesh known as Hollywood and applauded his commitment to freedom from the hypocrisy of the intolerant woke.

When asked about his viral tweets about free speech and his embrace by the alt-right community, Gervais said that only left-wing Twitter users actually believe hes conservative. Whats weird about that is it was actually the left on social media that once again said, Oh, hes alt-right now,' he toldThe Last Laughhost Matt Wilstein. What could be less right-wing than going after the biggest, richest corporations in the world?

Gervais went on to say that its interesting that people consider him alt-right for endorsing free speech, when the alt-right were the ones, the fascists were the ones that were closing down free speech in the past. He insisted that people advocate for free speech until someone says something they dislike, therefore turning it into a selfish thing. People try and justify it, as well, said Gervais. They go, Im all for freedom of speech, but you know, thats the one thing you shouldnt joke about. Oh, you mean the one thing that you care about?

Its odd, he added, noting that even the right knows hes a liberal. People pretend they dont like a joke, for some reason. But you know what? They just dont like the joke having the target that they defend. Thats the bottom line.

You liked it when I made the joke about the thing you dont like. You didnt like it when I made the joke about the thing you do like. Just admit it, he continued. I dont care if people like all the jokes. But dont pretend youve weighed it up and youre being the fair one. You just dont like that joke and thats fine.

Listen to Ricky Gervais entire interview onThe Last Laughpodcast on Apple Podcasts.

Link:

Ricky Gervais Says Liberals Only Claim He's "Alt-Right" Because His Jokes Have a "Target They Defend" - Decider

Alt-Right Trolls Are Trying to Sabotage Black Lives Matter Chatrooms – Mother Jones

For indispensable reporting on the coronavirus crisis and more, subscribe to Mother Jones' newsletters.

As mass protests against police brutality and racial injustice continue across the country, 4chan, a notorious alt-right troll hub online, is trying to meddle in protesters online operations.

On Sunday night, users of 4chan made several highly trafficked posts with links to dozens of Black Lives Matter channels on Telegram, a privacy-oriented, encrypted messaging app that has been used for organizing protests across the country. Users on 4chan encouraged others to post disinformation in the groups, find incriminating information that they can pass to law enforcement, and trawl the channels for as much personal, identifying, and organizational information as they can about people in the groups.

Some have already posted the phone numbers of volunteers organizing food and water for protesters, and phone numbers for jail support for arrested protesters. The 4chan posts didnt include instructions for what to do with the numbers, but based on 4channers normal behavior, its possible that the implication is to harass the person on the other end of the line. In some cases, users in the threads are also doxxing what they believe to be Antifa safehouses by posting addresses of these homes.

The central focus on the 4chan posts so far, though, hasnt been to impede the current protests, but rather to compile doxxing information on the activists behind the protests. BE STEALTHY DONT TROLL, RIGHT NOW THE MOST VALUABLE THING WE CAN GET IS INFO, one user posted.

A lot of these retards have identifying info on their telegram profiles, instagram, personal website, real name, phone number, etc. get that, another wrote, urging other 4channers to store what they found on internet archive sites like Archive.is and Pastebin (links on Pastebin arent accessible, suggesting that the site may have taken moderation action). Others encouraged people to share their findings with trustworthy public sources and right wing journalists.

Its unclear to what extent 4chan posters have followed through on their plans, and if the threads have led to any offline harassment. Many of the Black Lives Matter channels dont let anyone without authorization post. And administrators of some of the channels seem to be aware of the people trying to infiltrate. One of the larger protest Telegram channels, The BLM Revolution of 2020 with roughly 8,740 subscribers, posted an open letter to to the fascist how are watching this channel, on Sunday night. Im going to be honest with you all, the path that you have picked is only going to bring more suffering, and solidify the system that youve set out to fight against. Your fight is going to end up with more people in your situation. Lost, lonely, and unsure where to go, the person behind the Telegram channel wrote, encouraging right-wingers to reach out if they wanted to anonymously talk.

4channers arent the only group monitoring Black Lives Matter Telegram channels. Extremist groups that label themselves as various brands of fascists and white supremacists have compiled lists of Black Lives Matter channels on their own Telegram channels, and frequently repost content from BLM organizers on their pages.

White supremacists and far-right extremists on Telegram have been a recurring problem that the platform has been unwilling to handle. The encrypted messaging service took action against public ISIS channels, but has been unwilling to do the same with far-right extremists, leaving up channels that compile lists of Jewish people, and others that encourage white supremacist violence.

Read the rest here:

Alt-Right Trolls Are Trying to Sabotage Black Lives Matter Chatrooms - Mother Jones

What’s Antifa and its role in Black Lives Matter protests? – TRT World

Anti-fascist leftist movement, Antifa, has dominated US politics during the weekslong protests over the death of unarmed black man, George Floyd, in police custody. US President Trump is holding the group accountable for the ongoing violence.

In the years since US President Donald Trump's election in 2016, a previously almost dormant far-left, anti-fascist group has re-emerged ostensibly in response to a rise in racism and white supremacy.

Now several top officials in the Trump administration from the president to the US attorney general are blaming the anti-fascist group, called Antifa, for taking over protests triggered by black man George Floyd's death in police custody.

Floyd, cuffed and unarmed, was pinned to the ground by Minneapolis policeman Derek Chauvin, who is white, using his knee. His knee was on Floyds neck for eight minutes and 46 seconds, according to a New York Time's reconstruction.

The following protests, which started peacefully, were marred by more brutality and show of force by law enforcement and looting and violence. The press and experts have flipflopped in the blame for both between instigators and protesters.

Here's a look at the group Trump and Attorney General William Barr are blaming for fanning violence:

The Antifa

Antifa is an unstructured, decentralised, leaderless group of far-left anti-fascist activists. The movement's name is a shortened version of the term anti-fascist.

The movement first started in Nazi Germany to fight European fascism before the Second World War and reached the US in the 1970s against Neo-Nazism and alt-right groups.

The movement consists of various groups without any central leadership, the earliest formalised group with this name dates to 2007 in the US. It was mostly inactive until the election of Donald Trump and the concurrent rise of white supremacy in the US.

There is no hierarchical structure to Antifa or universal set of tactics that makes its presence immediately recognisable, though members tend to espouse revolutionary and anti-authoritarian views, said Mark Bray, a historian at Rutgers University and author of Antifa: The Anti-Fascist Handbook.

They do different things at different times in different ways, some of which there is evidence of them breaking the law. Other times there is not, Bray, also a scholar of Spanish radicalism, said.

Antifascists also want to stop any fascist movement before it can grow, even if those they target appear small and inconsequential, said Bray in 2017.

Is there an Antifa 'type'?

There is no official roster of Antifa members, making it near impossible to quantify its size, age range or racial formulation. In every area, Antifa is formed by autonomous local units.

People associated with Antifa have been present for significant demonstrations and counter-demonstrations over the last three years, sometimes involving brawls and property damage.

In February 2017, hours before then editor of the far-right Breitbart News Milo Yiannopoulos was to give a speech at UC Berkeley, anti-fascist protesters tossed metal barricades and rocks through the buildings windows and set a light generator on fire near the entrance. Later, Berkeley said 150 masked protesters were responsible for the violence at the mostly peaceful 1,500-strong protest against the far-right editor.

The movement does not have any known affiliates but some members are known to be parts of Occupy and Black Lives Matter movements.

They mobilised against a white supremacist march in Charlottesville, Virginia, in August 2017 and have clashed repeatedly with far-right groups in Portland, Oregon, including at a protest and counter-demonstration last summer that resulted in arrests and the seizure of shields, poles and other weapons.

The members are known to dress in head-to-toe black and cover their faces as they believe it helps in defending against the police.

Use of violence

Their proactive approach of using violence to stop racist or totalitarian movements from spreading or to protect vulnerable groups distinguishes them from other non-violent leftists groups.

The movement sees the use of violence as self-defence and does not consider damaging property as a form of brutality.

Literature from the Antifa movement encourages followers to pursue lawful protest activity as well as more confrontational acts, according to a 2018 Congressional Research Service report.

The members do not abstain from involving in direct physical confrontations, also followers monitor the activities of white supremacist groups, publicise online the personal information of perceived enemies, develop self-defence training regimens and compel outside organisations to cancel any speakers or events with a fascist bent such as the Yiannopoulos speech at Berkeley.

US administration on Antifa

Trump and members of his administration have singled out Antifa for driving the violence at Black Lives Matters protests.

White House press secretary Kayleigh McEnany told reporters on Monday that Antifa is a big element of this protest," though she deferred to the Department of Justice on the question of how one could be identified as a member.

And it's unclear how big its actual involvement is. And whether some of its apparent involvement is driven by instigators.

Twitter said it suspended two fake Antifa accounts, one of which was run by people with ties to a white supremacist group.

There's also a growing presence of Boogalo Bois, a gun-toting, Hawaiian shirt-wearing anti-government group, often misrepresented as a straightforward white supremacist group, at the Black Lives Matter protests. They have been accused of fomenting some of the violence blamed on Antifa by the Trump administration.

Boogalo Bois, or their other iterations, openly called for people to join them in raising militias against the Minneapolis police after the black man's death, Bellingcat reported.

Trump on Antifa

At a White House appearance, Trump blamed Antifa by name for the violence, along with violent mobs, arsonists and looters.

Trump tweeted that the US will designate the movement as a terrorist organisation.

It's not the first time he's endorsed that approach. Trump expressed a similar sentiment last summer, joining some Republican lawmakers in calling for Antifa to be designated as a terror organisation after the skirmishes in Portland.

In a pair of statements over the weekend, Attorney General William Barr described Antifa-like tactics" by out-of-state agitators and said Antifa was instigating violence and engaging in domestic terrorism" and would be dealt with accordingly.

Is Turkey supporting Trump's Antifa stance?

Technically, Turkey is asking the Trump administration to extend the same designation to the YPG, the terror group the US used to fight the Daesh in Syria.

Many YPG sympathisers come from the US to fight in Syria, attracted by the group which Turkey designated as a terror group along with its parent group the PKK and its so-called leftist selling points.

Some believe Antifa's leftist ideology attracts young people to volunteer with the YPG in Syria, after some foreign fighters were linked to the anti-fascists.

Can Trump describe Antifa as a terror group?

As Antifa is not a discrete or centralised group, it remains unclear if it is possible to designate it as a terrorist organisation.

Since Antifa in the US is a domestic entity, it is as such not a candidate for inclusion on the Department of State's list of foreign terror groups. Those groups, which include Daesh and other such groups and the Real Irish Republican Army, are based overseas rather than in the US.

That designation matters for a variety of legal reasons, not least of which is that anyone in the United States who lends material support to an organisation on the terror list is subject to terrorism-related charges.

Even if Antifa is not designated as a terror group, FBI Director Chris Wray has made clear that its on the radar of federal law enforcement.

He has said while the FBI does not investigate on the basis of ideology, agents have pursued investigations across the country against people motivated to commit crimes and acts of violence "on kind of an Antifa ideology."

It is unclear whether the Trump administration is seriously pursuing the designation through formal channels. Experts say Trump lacks the legal authority to do so.

"Terrorism is an inherently political label, easily abused and misused," said ACLU National Security Project Director Hina Shamsi.

Mary McCord, a former senior DoJ official, said, "no current legal authority exists for designating domestic organisations as terrorist organisations."

"Any attempt at such a designation would raise significant First Amendment concerns," added McCord, who previously served in the Trump administration.

Source: TRTWorld and agencies

Go here to see the original:

What's Antifa and its role in Black Lives Matter protests? - TRT World

What is Pizzagate, and why is the fake news scandal trending on Twitter again? – Sussex Express

A new Sky documentary that investigates some of the most mind-boggling conspiracy theories of recent years has been shining a new light on some of the most baffling fake news stories to come out of the US.

After Truth: Disinformation and the Cost of Fake News aired earlier this month, and surveys the effects of disinformation campaigns on social media and the impacts of well known conspiracy theories.

One of those theories is that of Pizzagate, and the film follows the growth of the story onforums like Redditand4chan, how it was fomented by thealt-rightandAlex Jones, and then translated into a real-life dangerous situation.

Heres everything you need to know:

What was Pizzagate?

Pizzagate was a widely discredited news story which linked Hilary Clintons presidential campaign with a fictional human trafficking ring.

Its so-called because the alleged headquarters of the operation wastheComet Ping Pongpizzeria in Washington, D.C, which according to the conspiracy was also a meeting ground forSatanic ritual abuse.

It all began inMarch 2016, when the personal email account ofJohn Podesta, Clinton'scampaign manager, was hacked.

WikiLeakspublishedthe emailslater that year; conspiracy theoristsclaimed the emails contained coded messages that alluded to human traffickingand a child sexring.

The emails contained multiple references to pizza and pizza restaurants, but there is no evidence that they are code or refer to anything else.

Had the claims been true, it would have implicated a number of high-rankingDemocratic Partyofficials.

How was the story debunked?

The story has been widely debunked by a number of fact checking a news organisations from across the political spectrum evenFox News has said the story is completely false.

Theorists claimed that similarities between Comet Ping Pongs logocontained symbols linked toSatanismand paedophilia; the New York Times noted these similarities could be found in thelogos of completely unrelated companies, if you looked hard enough.

Claims of a secret underground network beneath Comet Ping Pong were disproven by the fact the establishment has no basement, and evidence that John Podesta played a part in the kidnapping of Madeleine McCannwere simply sketches of a suspect taken from the descriptions of two eyewitnesses.

No alleged victims have come forward and no physical evidence has been found.

What happened?

Despite the theory having zero evidence to support it, that didnt stop those who opposed Hilary Clinton believing the story wholesale.

That includedgunman Edgar Maddison Welch, who travelled down from South Carolina to confront the owners of Comet Ping Pong.

He entered the pizza restaurant in Washington D.C. packed with families on a Sunday afternoon and fired an automatic rifle.

Thankfully, no one was injured in the disturbance; Mr Welch told police he had driven from South Carolina to investigate the restaurant after reading online reports.

Why is Comet Ping Pong back in the news?

Though its been four years since the height of the Pizzagate story, the owners still have to deal with death threats and abuse.

As employees continue to search for a new rhythm [during the coronavirus pandemic], say the Washington Post,they still field calls from Pizzagate obsessors.

A few weeks ago, someone jammed the phone line for an entire day, frustrating customers who struggled to place orders. [Comet] has received almost 70 Pizzagate messages in recent weeks.

There also seems to be a renewed interest in the false story in the wake of news that US prosecutors want a face-to-face interview with Prince Andrew over the Jeffrey Epstein scandal.

The story has been trending on Twitter again, despite remaining completely untrue, with theorists linking Epsteins private jet the Lolita Express and his private Epstein Island with the restaurant.

There is no evidence to suggest any of it is true.

Go here to see the original:

What is Pizzagate, and why is the fake news scandal trending on Twitter again? - Sussex Express

Who are the Boogaloo Bois and what do they want? – Lexington County Chronicle

Charles Manson and his followers called it "helter skelter" in the 1960s and 70s,

Their aim was to foment a racial civil war in America.

Law enforcement sources say the Boogaloo Bois are a far right hate group with similar goals.

Along with white supremists and neo-Nazis, they plan to bring down the government and take controlof America.

What they envision may be similar to Adolf Hitler's Nazi Germany in the 1930s and 40s.

Although they share similar violent motives with far left Antifa groups, theright wingconsiders the left their enemy,

This Chronicle specialreport by Editor Jerry Bellune is based on digital research into these groups, their methods and motives since2 possible members have been arrested in the Saturday, May 30, violence in downtown Columbia,

We have asked the Lexington County Sheriff's Department and the Lexington Police Department for any additional informatiuin they can share.

According to theSouthern Poverty Law Center,the term Boogaloo ...began as a shorthand for civil unrest following potential local or federal firearms confiscation and has been embraced by anti-government and white nationalists.

The word hasbeen embraced by alt-right extremists, some involved in the George Floyd demonstrations.

3 things to know about them:

1. Boogaloo Bois Have Been Charged With Domestic Terrorism

People shout slogans and hold placards, on June 1, 2020, in downtown Las Vegas, as they take part in a Black Lives Matterresponse to the Minneapolis police killing of George Floyd.

3men who identify as Boogaloo Bois and who are all former members of the military, according toBusiness Insider, were charged with domestic terrorism, conspiracy to damage and destroy by using fire and explosives, and possession of an unregistered firearm, Las Vegas police reported.

Andrew Lynam Jr. 23, Stephen Parshall, 35, and William Loomis, 40, are each being held on a $1 million bond.

J.J. MacNab of George Washington Universitys Program on Extremism, toldThe Associated Press that she has seen Boogaloo Bois in crowds of George Floyd protestors wearing tactical gear and carrying high-powered rifles.

They want to co-opt themto start their war," McNab told the AP. They see themselves as being on the side of protesters and that the protesters themselves are useful in causing anarchy.

According to theAnti-Defamation League, a2018Reddit post carried a 2012 photo of California Gov. Gavin Newsome in which hetalkedabout coming for private owners' guns.

The post included the words, Civil War 2: Electric Boogaloo.

That was believed to meanarms seizureswould set off a civil war.

Gun-rights enthusiasts shortened the term to Boogaloo.

White nationalists, neo-Nazis and members of the alt-right exchange insluts with counter-protestersduring the Unite the Right rally August 12, 2017 in Charlottesville, Virginia.

Accelerationists arewhite supremacists who want to see Americans at war against each other,

According to theTheBrookingsInstitution, a research and public policy group in Washington:

Accelerationism is the idea that white supremacists should try to increase civil disorder accelerate it to foster polarization that will tear apart the current political orderAccelerationists hope to set off a series of chain reactions, with violence fomenting violence, and in the ensuing cycle more and more people join the fray. When confronted with extremes, so the theory goes, those in the middle will be forced off the fence and go to the side of the white supremacists. If violence can be increased sufficiently, the system will run out of lackeys and collapse, and the race war will commence.

Brookings reported thatneo-NaziJames Masoncame into his ideologies in the 1960s.

TheSPLCsaid that Mason believed, that only the full collapse of American democracy and society will bring conditions sufficient to bring order through Nazism.

Mason was a fan of Charles Manson, according to the SPLC.

All the groups that want a civil war do not have the same ideologies.

The use of the term Boogaloo is not exclusive to white supremacists.

It is used by others who think law enforcement and the government should be overthrown.

Experts say groups will jump into causes that are not really their ownto try to create disorder and to invoke police or other law enforcement to respond with violence.

Alex Friedfeld, an investigative researcher at the ADL Center on Extremism in Chicago said:

I think for a lot of boogaloo-ers, their primary interest is resisting the state, what they believe to be state tyranny. They have this hostility towards law enforcement. They oppose these [pandemic] directives. Theyre upset about no-knock raids, police brutality. The George Floyd case ... is an example of police brutality, this willingness of the state to execute those who disobey so its not surprising that they showed up to protest.

On a Boogaloo Facebook Page called Big Igloo Boys with nearly 34,000 followers, the administratorwroteMay 30:

Protest for support and solidarity of Minneapolisand the George Floyd protesters. Mr Floyd was murdered in Minneapolis ... by the Minneapolis Police Department.We must set aside our differences, and unite against a common enemy in the police state.Wear your PPE. Come in peace, prepare for ... violence. Departments around the country have shown that theyre ready to agitate a crowd to illicit a violent response. This gives them an excuse to react with greater violence towards otherwise peaceful protesters. The media then uses the violence to discredit an entire event.

The group disdains what they call Alphabet Boys, meaning the FBI, ATF, CIA and the like.

Inan open letter to law enforcement on the Big IglooFacebook page, the group calls for an end to no-knock raids.

Inseems to refer to Breonna Taylor, a 26-year-old African American EMT was shot and killed by police who raided the wrong home in the night while the Taylor was asleep with her boyfriend.

Taylors boyfriend fired at the officers thinking they were intruders,andpolice shot back, hitting Breonna 8 times.

TheApril 7 postsays:

This is, essentially, an open letter to all LE departments across the nation. If I could, Id tag every single one of you. However, since Im positive were being monitored ... Ill have to hope this is enough.

I am asking you, and your agencies, to put an end to the practice of no knock raids. Once again we hear of the wrong house being entered, a man trying to defend himself from a home invasionand having his girlfriend murdered by the police.

Absolutely nothing constructive, meaningful, or worthwhile comes of this practice. What we get are ... innocent people being murdered by botched police work. Stop yourselves long enough to take stock of what youre doing. Youre murdering citizens in their homes. You all swore an oath to the constitution. Which part of the oath, or the document mentions murdering citizens in the dark of night?

Armed protesters demonstrateoutside the Michigan State Capitol in Lansing May 20, 2020. The group is protesting Michigan Governor Gretchen Whitmers mandatory closure to curtail the corona virus pandemic.

Reports of protesters in Hawaiian shirts carrying guns started coming out this spring as people demonstrated their dissatisfaction with government directives to close much of the country amid the corona virus pandemic.

The Hawaiian shirts apparently come from off-shoots of the word Boogaloo, which began popping up online.

Words like big igloo and big luau which sound somewhat like Boogaloo became terminology for those in the know and Hawaiian shirts became an identifier of its members.

Boogaloo is an umbrella term meaning a 2nd civil war,

TheADL wrotein April of men showing up at corona virus protests in Hawaiian shirts at the behest of Matt Marshall, a leader of the3 Percenters, a wing of the anti-government militia movement

The event was advertised by theOath Keepers, another anti-government organization.

Marshall encouraged participants to wear Hawaiian shirts, referringto the Big Luau.

Read more:

Who are the Boogaloo Bois and what do they want? - Lexington County Chronicle

#BlackLivesMatter and India: Right-Wing Allies with White Supremacists with Ominous Signs at Home – NewsClick

Protests against the death of George Floyd, a 46-year-old African-American man, in police custody, have intensified across the United States. In solidarity with the US protestors, people have turned out in large numbers from cities like Amsterdam and Paris, where they have questioned their own countrys treatment of minorities and its systemic racial abuse. In India too, citizens put up #BlackLivesMatter on their social media as a gesture of their support for the protests. Rather unsurprising, however still curious, is the response of the Indian right-wing. Platforms with the support of the RSS-BJP were seen lampooning and criticising the protests, and the #BlackLivesMatter theme in particular.

This article, for instance, in an infamous right-leaning web portal, put the word protests within quotes, to raise doubts about the legitimacy of the movement demanding justice for George Floyd. While the article is understandably primarily concerned with the ramifications of those protests in India given the trends #MuslimLivesMatters and #DalitLivesMatter, it has broadly insinuated that the protests are mindless acts of vandalism, discounting the innumerable peaceful protests against institutional racism in the US.

The position that this website takes is identical to that of the Alt-right and supporters of President Donald Trump, both of whom have sought to focus exclusively on the violence, and downplay or ignore the excessive force used by the police and the US National Guard (similar to the RAF and other paramilitary forces in India). In another article, the same portal sought to link the protests with the anti-CAA protests in India, and further denigrate Muslims by hinting that it is an Islamic fundamentalist conspiracy at play in the US. The portal has also made it a point to target Antifa, the decentralised group opposed to white supremacy in the US, calling it a radical far left group, another fillip to the heady cocktail of McCarthyism and anti-Muslim rhetoric on display.

This article, in another portal, recognises that the killing of Floyd was due to police brutality, and even goes on to say that anti-racism protests should not be abhorred. However, at the same time, it seeks to label protests in the US as an excuse for anti-social elements to wreak havoc across the United States under the shroud of anti-racism protests (sic). The primary thrust of the article, however, is Europe, where the protests that have taken place in solidarity, also question the state of race-relations in the respective countries. The intent of the article is to question the very foundation of multiculturalism, an idea that has shaped institutions like the European Union, and which allowed for a mildly compassionate response to the refugee crisis of the Middle East in 2015.

The opposition to multiculturalism and immigration, has been, in a sense, the raison d'etre of right-wing formations that sprung up in Europe and the Western hemisphere since the financial crisis of 2008. Now, the Indian right-wing has joined in, discounting the irony that millions of Indians migrate to these very countries. The article also focuses on the flouting of social distancing norms, an admirable stance, probably coloured by the inability of the writer to see that President Trump was dead against a lockdown and wanted people to return to work amid mounting COVID-19 cases. In a Facebook Post by the same platform, the protests in the US are shown as an opportunity for Trump to polarise voters by looking to be tough on rioting, and doing well at the impending Presidential elections in November.

The Indian right has had a rather complex stand on foreign policy, which has been, for the most part, guided by political expediency at home. I remember seeing articles from the RSS Hindi weekly, Panchajanya, praising the Israeli state for tackling the insurgent movement for the liberation of Palestine, as far back as the 1970s. The stand was self explanatory, in lieu of the common enemy being Muslims, but that never translated into any outpouring of support which might have also reflected in policy, whenever the right-wing came to power. It was in fact Atal Bihari Vajpayee as External Affairs minister in the Janata Party government of the late 1970s, who led the re-establishment of diplomatic relations with the Peoples Republic of China, after years of belligerence following the war in 1962. The Nehruvian tinge to foreign policy continued during the first NDA government (1998-2004) which Vajpayee led. He shot down the request of his foreign minister, Jaswant Singh, to join the post 9/11 US led war on terror. India not only refused to participate in the allied invasion of Iraq, but at least officially deplored war, even as it can be argued that India had effectively become a strategic ally of the US by that time. In its official rhetoric, India, under the first NDA regime, continued to be seen as pro-Palestinian, with Vajpayee supporting a Palestinian state in no uncertain terms.

The Modi led regime has, like many other things, dispensed with a lot of such niceties regarding foreign policy, and in continuation with their amplified rhetoric against all things associated with the first Prime Minister of India, made it a point to showcase their foreign policy shifts such as Indias repeated abstention on UN Human Rights Commission resolutions condemning the Israeli excesses, and the refusal of Mr. Modi to visit the Palestinian Authority while being the first Indian Prime Minister to visit Israel in 2017 (though he did visit Ramallah one year later, separately). It is a fact that the Indian right-wing can be much more open about its allies and foes internationally, now that it has acquired not just unbridled power, but a wide and deep hegemony in substantial aspects. Hence, it can confidently dismiss pro-Black protestors and ally with the US Alt-right. It all started with the open embrace of Trump, who endeared himself with his anti-Muslim diatribes when the community was increasingly on the Hindu nationalist radar at home. The all too publicised scenes of an extra parliamentary Hindu far right group conducting a hawan for the victory of Trump, represents widespread praise for not just the man, but implicitly his white supremacist views as well.

The alignment with the Alt-right and white supremacist thought represents a metamorphosis which has involved the jettisoning of the entire anti-colonial legacy and sympathy with anti-imperialist struggles, which extended to the Civil Rights Movement in the US.

One of the more understandable reasons for the Hindu right-wing to denounce #BlackLivesMatter is a perception that Muslims sympathise with the campaign. Scenes of militant protests in the US are just enough to touch a raw nerve with the Indian right due to protests against the controversial Citizenship (Amendment) Act, which saw massive participation of Muslims for months.

However, evidence suggests that Muslims might not be the only scapegoats. The right-wing influence on government means that it is difficult not to see even aspects of lip service paid to the shared legacy of anti-oppression struggles being eroded. The unambiguous positions taken by the RSS, or at least platforms which lean towards it, has significance within India itself. Traditional bias towards fairness has been quite pronounced in mythology, equating it with goodness, while dark skin is a refrain for everything gone awry. The importance of fairness creams in our society is another reminder of how not-so-subtle symbolism affects mindsets. India has seen regular cases of violence and abuse directed at students from Africa, which can only worsen if the Indian right-wing leans closer to ideological anti-Black prejudice elsewhere.

With a complicated geographical, social and linguistic diversity with a past history of contentions, implicit race prejudice being given sanction by ideology, posits a challenge. The southern states history of tensions with the north, are one such example. There were deeply disturbing instances of hate-mongering when the state of Kerala went through its worst floods in decades. There were organised campaigns directed at discouraging relief donations since the Malayalees did not conform to the image of a society best in tune with how the RSS, influenced heavily by its Indo-Gangetic social base, sees it. The concept of Unity in Diversity, so cherished and central to the idea of Indian federalism, cannot profit out of a reinforcement of the idea of white supremacy borrowed from the US and Europe.

There is a corollary to the shared stance of the Indian and American right on #BlackLivesMatter- China. Ever since Trump called the pandemic a Chinese Virus, and accused the country of deliberately concealing facts to abet its spread to the US, dozens of columns and op-ed pieces have appeared in Indian right-wing platforms in support of the stance. An obvious correlation might be made to the very recent symbolic campaign of uninstalling Chinese-invented mobile applications. More significant was an incident in the national capital when a Manipuri student was spat on by a passer-by and referred to as Corona.

The writer is a PhD student at Centre for Media Studies, Jawaharlal Nehru University. The views are personal.

Read more here:

#BlackLivesMatter and India: Right-Wing Allies with White Supremacists with Ominous Signs at Home - NewsClick

N.J. mayor clashes with protesters over his brothers police record – NJ.com

After protesters marched through the borough of Carteret in support of the Black Lives Matter movement last week, a group of more than 100 ended up outside Mayor Daniel Reimans home, demanding answers about why his brother is still on the police force.

Joseph Reiman was charged by authorities in 2017 with brutalizing a black teenager after a brief car chase. He was acquitted by a jury in May 2019 and has remained with the borough police department.

As the mayor tried to enter his home, he was flanked by police who cleared the crowd as protesters chanted, Vote him out. One woman called the longtime mayor f---ing nasty, according to a video taken by a protester.

Reiman responded on the video: Are you on drugs again?

He then went into his home without addressing the large crowd, according to several people, as protesters stayed out front for hours.

The mayor said in a statement that the woman was screaming racially offensive and homophobic comments at the Police and myself all day and was clearly not there to support the Black Lives Matter movement."

It appeared to me that she was on some sort of substance and she should have expected to be called out, he said.

Earlier in the day at the middle school, where the protest was set to kick off, Reiman had made the same comment about drug use as he was questioned by two men regarding his brother, according to another video.

He shouldnt be on the street with a badge and a gun brutalizing black teens, said one of the men. Another man held a sign with pictures of Monte Stewart, the teenager Reimans brother repeatedly punched after a brief car chase in 2017.

So we know for a fact you are a heroin addict, Reiman responded on the video.

Jon Salonis, a spokesman for the borough, said the man, is an alt-right agitator who regularly appears at public meetings making derogatory and downright slanderous remarks about the Mayor.

The Mayor was not about to abide his attempted highjacking of what was to be a peaceful walk. And so the mayor called him out for exactly what he is, Salonis said.

Shortly thereafter the exchange, Salonis said outside agitators began shouting down the mayor and the designated speakers, preventing them from addressing the crowd as they had planned too.

The mayor said in a statement that he did not partake in the protest because it took a different route than what was planned and because (protesters) did not want me there. In one video taken before the protest, Mayor Reiman said police should be held to a higher standard and said he was at the event to support the Black Lives Matter movement.

Those who attended the protest described the mayors actions as unprofessional, saying they showed a lack of empathy and leadership during a critical time in American history.

This is the first thing you say while there are protesters outside your home? asked Dominique Cortesiano, a 20-year Carteret resident who took the video of Reiman asking the woman outside of his home if she were back on drugs. He doesnt want to create a dialogue.

The protest was organized after the death of George Floyd at the hands of the Minneapolis police in May, but some who attended the protest said it was just as much about police misconduct in the borough.

You are perpetuating the issue here with your brother, Josef Sanders said of the mayor.

People are angry with (the mayor) and have every right to be, said Lauren Jones, a college student and lifelong resident who organized the protest. ... You cant leave when things get uncomfortable. Part of the uncomfortability is caused by you.

After serving multiple tours as a Marine in Afghanistan and Iraq, Joseph Reiman joined the Carteret police force in July 2015 and quickly became known as an aggressive and forceful police officer in the borough, according to previous reporting by NJ Advance Media.

During a 23-month stretch after he became a Carteret cop, Reiman accounted for more than 20% of all arrests involving force by an officer recorded by the department, according to NJ Advance Media investigation.

Reimans record became public when NJ Advance Media reported a teens account of his arrest after leading police on a brief chase in 2017.

The arrest was captured on dashcam video and showed Reiman climbing on top of the teen and punching him more than a dozen times.

Reimans defense attorney argued at the trial that the officer used the appropriate amount of force consistent with police training when apprehending the teenager.

The mayor said in a statement after his brothers acquittal that the investigation by the Middlesex County Prosecutors Office was corrupt.

Joseph Reiman did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

This story has been updated with additional comment from Mayor Daniel Reiman.

Our journalism needs your support. Please subscribe today to NJ.com.

Joe Atmonavage may be reached at jatmonavage@njadvancemedia.com. Tell us your coronavirus story or send a tip here.

Read the original post:

N.J. mayor clashes with protesters over his brothers police record - NJ.com

American Racism: We’ve Got So Very Far to Go – The Dispatch

Today lets dive into one of the toughest questions of our religious, cultural, and political lives. While we write and print millions of words about race in America, why is it still so hard to have a truly respectful, decent, and humble dialogue about perhaps the most complicated and contentious issue in American life? Its a huge topic, but lets start with what I believe is a true principle of human nature, a maxim called Miless law: Where you stand depends on where you sit.

While originating as an explanation for behavior of people in bureaucracies, Miless law has a much broader application. It speaks to the overwhelming influence of our own social, religious, and cultural experience over our viewpoint. Our different political cultures not only live different lives, they speak different languages. They apply different definitions to the same words and phrasesand those definitions are not self-evident.

Take systemic racism, for example. I daresay that only a vanishingly small number of Americans know that this is a term with an academic meaning thats not entirely obvious from the words themselves. Heres one definitionstructural or systemic racism is:

A system in which public policies, institutional practices, cultural representations, and other norms work in various, often reinforcing ways to perpetuate racial group inequity. It identifies dimensions of our history and culture that have allowed privileges associated with whiteness and disadvantages associated with color to endure and adapt over time. Structural racism is not something that a few people or institutions choose to practice. Instead it has been a feature of the social, economic and political systems in which we all exist.

Yet millions of Americans read the accusation that America is beset with systemic racism and hear a simpler and more direct meaning of the termyoure saying our systems (and by implication the people in them) are racist. But thats completely contrary to their experience. They think, How can it be that the system is racist when I just left a corporate diversity training seminar, I work at an equal opportunity/affirmative action employer, my sons college professors are constantly telling him to check his privilege, and no one I know is a bigot? It seems to me that the most powerful actors in the system are saying the same thingsdont be racist.

Then, when you go online or turn on the television, youre hardly persuaded to change your mind. If youre conservative, chances are your social media feed is full of images of rioting and looting. There are viral videos (including one the president retweeted Saturday) that declare George Floyd was not a good person and the fact that he has been held up as a martyr sickens me. There is the constant repetition of statistics about black-on-black crime, and posts and pieces arguing that police racism and brutality are overblown are shared across the length and breadth of social media.

Even a well-meaning person subject to this barrage of messaging is then apt to look at clear racist injusticeslike the murder of Ahmaud Arbery, where the killer allegedly used a racial slur after he fired the fatal shotand say, Sure, there are racists still in this world, but theyre not part of any system I know. Moreover, compounding the problem, those voices who are most loudly condemning American racism are also the voices he or she trusts the least on other issuessuch as abortion, religious liberty, economics, or health care. Something in the conservative mind and heart rebels, I cant join with them, can I?

We each like to think were not unduly influenced by our immediate environment and culture. Thats a phenomenon that affects other people, we believe. Im the kind of person who has carefully considered both sides and has arrived at my positions through the force of reason and logic. Sure, Ive got biases, but that only matters at the edges. The core of my beliefs are rooted in reason, conviction, and faith.

Maybe that describes you, but I now realize it didnt describe me. I freely confess that to some extent where I stood on American racial issues was dictated by where I sat my entire life. I always deplored racismthose values were instilled in me from birthbut I was also someone who recoiled at words like systemic racism. I looked at the strides wed made since slavery and Jim Crow and said, Look how far weve come. I was less apt to say, and look how much farther we have to go.

Then, where I sit changed, dramatically. I just didnt know it at the time. I went from being the father of two white, blonde-haired, blue-eyed kids to the father of three kidsone of them a beautiful little girl from Ethiopia. When Naomi arrived, our experiences changed. Strange incidents started to happen.

There was the white woman who demanded that Naomithe only black girl in our neighborhood poolpoint out her parents, in spite of the fact that she was clearly wearing the colored bracelet showing she was permitted to swim.

There was the time a police officer approached her at a department store and questioned her about who she was with and what she was shopping for. That never happened to my oldest daughter.

There was the classmate who told Naomi that she couldnt come to our house for a play date because, My dad says its dangerous to go black peoples neighborhoods.

I could go on, andsuresome of the incidents could have a benign explanation, but as they multiplied, and it was clear that Naomis experience was clearly different from her siblings, it became increasingly implausible that all the explanations were benign.

Then the Trump campaign happened, the alt-right rallied to his banner, and our lives truly changed. In October 2016, I wrote a piece describing what happened. It began like this:

I distinctly remember the first time I saw a picture of my then-seven-year-old daughters face in a gas chamber. It was the evening of September 17, 2015. I had just posted a short item to the Corner calling out notorious Trump ally Ann Coulter for aping the white-nationalist language and rhetoric of the so-called alt-right. Within minutes, the tweets came flooding in. My youngest daughter is African American, adopted from Ethiopia, and in alt-right circles thats an unforgivable sin. Its called race-cucking or raising the enemy.

I saw images of my daughters face in gas chambers, with a smiling Trump in a Nazi uniform preparing to press a button and kill her. I saw her face photo-shopped into images of slaves. She was called a niglet and a dindu. The alt-right unleashed on my wife, Nancy, claiming that she had slept with black men while I was deployed to Iraq, and that I loved to watch while she had sex with black bucks. People sent her pornographic images of black men having sex with white women, with someone photoshopped to look like me, watching.

The attacks got worse and some became overtly threatening, including posting image after image of dead and dying African-Americans in the comments section of my wifes blog. Suddenly, my understanding that weve come so far in American race relations was replaced by the shocking, personal realization that weve got so far to go.

All this was happening as I had already grown alarmed at the sheer vehemence of conservative defensiveness on matters of race. Before the backlash I received for opposing Trump, the piece that generated the most personal anger from conservatives was a 2012 essay in Commentary called Conservatives and the Trayvon Martin Case where I critiqued the conservative medias seeming rooting interest in George Zimmermans innocence, and I critiqued George Zimmermans decision to arm himself and pursue a teen whose only crime was walking to his fathers girlfriends house after dark. I did not judge Zimmerman guilty, but I did signal that conservatives should not reflexively defend the police:

[C]onservatives should not be inclined to trust without question the actions of local law enforcement. There is no evidence that a single national conservative commentator knew the first thing about the competence or character of the individuals who made the initial decision not to charge Zimmerman. They dont know whether those local officials are wise, foolish, or free from racist taint. But they do know, or should know, that public officials (even public-safety officers) make mistakes even when they have the best of intentions, and they should also understand the need not only for constitutional constraints on police actions but also for public accountability.

This is when I began to learn about conservative political correctness. If politically correct progressives are often guilty of over-racializing American public discourse, and they are, politically correct conservatives commit the opposite sinand they filter out or angrily reject all the information that contradicts their thesis.

For example, if youre a conservative, youre likely quite aware that the Obama Department of Justice decisively debunked the hands-up, dont-shoot narrative of the Michael Brown shooting in Ferguson, Missouri. Youre less likely to remember that there was a second Ferguson report, one that found Fergusons police department was focused on raising revenue more than increasing public safety, and it used its poor, disproportionately black citizens as virtual ATMs, raising money through traffic stops, citations, and even arrest warrants. It painted a shocking picture of abuse of power.

If youre a conservative, you may well be aware of the research cataloged by Heather Mac Donald rebutting claims of systemic racial bias in fatal police shootings. You may be less aware of the recent New York Times report indicating that African Americans make up 19 percent of the population of Minneapolis, 9 percent of the police force and an incredible 58 percent of subjects of police use of force.

But again, I hear the objection in my head, the sentiment of good friends and thoughtful peopleIf racism is this bad, and if the experiences of black Americans are this negative, why dont I ever see it?

Lets perform a thought experiment (I did this on our Dispatch Live event this week, so I apologize to readers whove already heard it.) Lets optimistically imagine that only one out of 10 white Americans is actually racist. Lets also recognize thatespecially in educated quarters of white Americaracism is condemned and stigmatized. If this is the reality, when will you ever hear racist sentiments in your daily life? The vast majority of people you encounter arent racist, and the minority who are will remain silent lest they lose social standing.

But imagine youre African American. That means 10 percent of the white people you encounter are going to hate you or think less of you because of the color of your skin. You dont know in advance who they are or how theyll react to you, but theyll be present enough to be at best a persistent source of pain and at worst a source of actual danger. So you know youll be pulled over more, and in some of those encounters the officer will be strangely hostile. The store clerk sometimes follows you when you shop. A demeaning comment will taint an otherwise-benign conversation. Your white friends described in the paragraph above may never see these things, but its an inescapable part of the fabric of your life.

This is how we live in a world where a white person can say of racism, Where is it? and a black person can say, How can you not see?

So now I sit in a different place. But where do I stand? I believe the following things to be true:

Slavery was legal and defended morally and (ultimately) militarily from 1619 to 1865.

After slavery, racial discrimination was lawful and defended morally (and often violently) from 1865 to 1964.

The Civil Rights Act of 1964 did not end illegal discrimination or racism, it mainly gave black Americans the legal tools to fight back against legal injustices.

It is unreasonable to believe that social structures and cultural attitudes that were constructed over a period of 345 years will disappear in 56.

Moreover, the consequences of 345 years of legal and cultural discrimination, are going to be dire, deep-seated, complex, and extraordinarily difficult to comprehensively ameliorate.

Its hard even to begin to describe all the ramifications of 345 years of legalized oppression and 56 years of contentious change, but we can say two things at onceyes, we have made great strides (and we should acknowledge that fact and remember the men and women who made it possible), but the central and salient consideration of American racial politics shouldnt center around pride in how far weve come, but in humble realization of how much farther we have to go.

Moreover, taking the next steps down that road will have to mean shedding our partisan baggage. It means acknowledging and understanding that the person who is wrong on abortion and health care may be right about police brutality. It means being less outraged at a knee on football turf than at a knee on a mans neck. And it means declaring that even though we may not agree on everything about race and American life, we can agree on some things, and we can unite where we agree.

For example, heres a thoughtyou dont have to be a critical race theorist, agree with arguments about implicit bias, or buy into the radical social platform of Black Lives Matter to reach consensus on some changes that can make a difference. Ill call this tweet, from my progressive friend at Vox, Jane Coaston, the Coaston plan, and I endorse each prong:

A journey of a thousand miles continues step-by-step, and you dont have to agree on the entire travel plan to put the next foot forward.

Oh, and as we do it, be better than me. Remember, I had to change where I sat before I could change where I stood. If you first change where you stand, then the next generation will sit in a very different and better place.

One last thing ...

Weve seen too many images of violence from this weeks protests. Weve seen police violence. Weve seen riots. We havent seen enough moments like the short clip below. It comes from one of my favorite cities (Memphis), its my favorite hymn, and it touched my soul:

Photograph by Brent Stirton/Getty Images.

Read this article:

American Racism: We've Got So Very Far to Go - The Dispatch

The Crypto Daily Movers and Shakers -06/06/20 – Yahoo Finance

Bitcoin fell by 1.74% on Friday. Reversing a 1.17% gain from Thursday, Bitcoin ended the day at $9,620.4.

It was another mixed start to the day. Bitcoin rose to a late morning intraday high $9,865.8 before hitting reverse.

Falling short of the first major resistance level at $9,961.53, Bitcoin slid to a late morning low $9,624.1.

Steering clear of the major support levels, Bitcoin recovered to $9,700 levels before falling to a final hour intraday low $9,620.4.

In spite of the late pullback, Bitcoin steered clear of the first major support level at $9,540.43.

The near-term bullish trend remained intact, in spite of Fridays pullback.

For the bears, Bitcoin would need to slide through the 62% FIB of $6,400 to form a near-term bearish trend.

Across the rest of the majors, it was another mixed day for the majors on Friday.

Binance Coin and EOS bucked the trend on the day, with gains of 0.97% and 3.43% respectively.

It was a bearish day for the rest of the majors.

Cardanos ADA slid by 4.12% to lead the way down.

Litecoin (-1.43%), Ethereum (-1.29%), Stellars Lumen (-2.75%), and Tezos (-2.10%) also struggled.

Bitcoin Cash ABC (-0.07%), Bitcoin Cash SV (-0.44%), Moneros XMR (-0.95%), Ripples XRP (-0.81%) saw relatively modest losses on the day.

Through the current week, the crypto total market cap rose to a Monday high $285.71bn before sliding to a Tuesday low $255.98bn. At the time of writing, the total market cap stood at $268.23bn.

At the start of the week, Bitcoins rose to a Monday high 67.13% before falling to a Thursday low 65.61%. At the time of writing, Bitcoins dominance stood at 65.77%.

At the time of writing, Bitcoin was down by 0.24% to $9,597.0. A bearish start to the day saw Bitcoin fall from an early morning high $9,620.4 to a low $9,552.6.

Bitcoin left the major support and resistance levels untested early on.

Elsewhere, it was a mixed start to the day.

Cardanos ADA found early support, rising by 2.08%. EOS (+0.37%), Ethereum (+0.12%), and Ripples XRP (+0.17%) also saw green early on.

It was a bearish start to the day for the rest of the majors, however.

At the time of writing, Trons TRX was down by 1.10% to lead the way down.

Bitcoin would need to move through to $9,700 levels to bring the first major resistance level at $9,784.0 into play.

Support from the broader market would be needed, however, for Bitcoin to break out from the morning high $9,620.4.

Barring a broad-based crypto rally, the first major resistance level would likely limit any upside.

In the event of an extended crypto rally, Bitcoin could eye the second major resistance level at $9,947.6 before any pullback.

Failure to move through to $9,700 levels could see Bitcoin struggle on the day.

A fall back through the morning low $9,552.6 would bring the first major support level at $9,538.6 into play.

Barring an extended crypto sell-off, however, Bitcoin should steer clear of the second major support level at $9,456.8.

This article was originally posted on FX Empire

Original post:

The Crypto Daily Movers and Shakers -06/06/20 - Yahoo Finance

Bitcoin and Altcoins Look Set For The Next Crucial Break – Cryptonews

In the past few days, bitcoin price struggled to gain traction above the USD 9,850 resistance. BTC is currently (08:30 UTC) trading above USD 9,650 and holding the key USD 9,550 support zone. It seems like the price looks set to make the next major move either above USD 10,000 or back towards USD 9,000.

Similarly, most major altcoins are stuck in a range and preparing for the next move, including ethereum, XRP, litecoin, bitcoin cash, BNB, EOS, TRX, ADA, and XLM. ETH/USD must break the USD 250 resistance to start a strong increase, and XRP/USD must settle above USD 0.210 for a sustained upward move.

Total market capitalization

After a few attempts to clear USD 9,850, bitcoin price started trading in a range. BTC remained well bid above the USD 9,650 and USD 9,550 support levels. On the upside, the first hurdle for the bulls is near the USD 9,850 level. The main resistance is still near the USD 10,000 level, above which the price could break to the upside and rally to USD 10,400 or USD 10,500.If there is no upside break, the price is likely to start a major decline below the USD 9,650 and USD 9,550 support levels in the near term.

Ethereum price is also facing a major hurdle near the USD 250 level. To start a strong upward move, ETH price must settle above the USD 250 barrier. The next key resistance is seen near the USD 265 level. On the other hand, there is a risk of a bearish break below the USD 240 and USD 238 support levels. The next major support is near the USD 230 level.

Bitcoin cash price is consolidating above a crucial support area at USD 250. It seems like BCH is setting up for the next major move. If there is an upside break above the USD 250 level, there are chances of a sustained upward move. Conversely, the price could start a major decline towards the USD 220 level.Litecoin is holding the key uptrend support at the USD 45.00 level, but it is also struggling to clear the USD 48.50 resistance. Therefore, the price could either start a major upward move above USD 48.50 or it might start a major decline below the USD 45.00 level.XRP price is holding the main USD 0.200 support zone. On the upside, the bulls are struggling to gain strength above the USD 0.205 resistance. If they succeed, the price could rise steadily above the USD 0.210 level. If not, it might dive towards the USD 0.192 and USD 0.190 support levels.

In the past three sessions, a few smaller altcoins gained more than 5%, including KNC, LEND, XVG, ZRX, CKB, GNT, ENJ, and BTS. Out of these, KNC rallied nearly 15% and broke the USD 0.80 resistance zone, and LEND surged around 14%.

Overall, bitcoin price is likely preparing for the next major move either above the USD 9,850 resistance or below the USD 9,550 support. The chances to the upside are high unless there is another major rejection near USD 9,850 or USD 10,000._____

Read the rest here:

Bitcoin and Altcoins Look Set For The Next Crucial Break - Cryptonews

US Regulators Target Bitcoin ATMs: 88% of the Funds Exit the Country via Machines | News – Bitcoin News

Bitcoin automated teller machines (BATMs) will become the next target for regulators, as world governments tighten screws on money laundering.

According to Ciphertrace CTO John Jeffries, crypto-cash machines will attract greaterregulatory focus in a bid to rein-in alleged cross-border illicit financial transfers.

Jeffries urged the need for more uniform regulatory enforcement and compliance as governments start to crack down on crypto-infused automated teller machines.

This comes as Ciphertrace released a report showing that cross-border transactions accounted for 74% of bitcoin moved between exchanges in 2019. Of this, 88% of funds leaving the United States through bitcoin ATMs were sent to cryptocurrency exchanges abroad mostly to high-risk platforms.

The amount of money wired to overseas exchanges at high-risk has grown rapidly, doubling every year since 2017, said the crypto intelligence firm, in the report published on June 2, 2020. The report did not provide specific figures on the extent of capital leaving via BATMs.

High-risk exchanges are nefarious exchanges known for facilitating criminal activities and money laundering, according to Ciphertrace. These types of exchanges may not be inherently criminal, but illicit transfers through the platforms are cause for concern, it said.

Until now, bitcoin-facilitating machines which total about 8,000 worldwide have appeared to operate outside national anti-money laundering (AML) laws, attracting users keen on privacy the wrong crowd, in governments eyes.

In Canada, regulators have become stricter on bitcoin ATM transactions, recently passing a law that compels operators to report all deals above 10,000 Canadian dollars (about $7,400), as part of measures to prevent money laundering and terrorism financing.

Germany, Spain and the United States are all cracking down on bitcoin ATMs, both for tax and AML purposes. The crypto teller machines allow users to buy and sell cryptocurrency. They can also work in remittances, allowing transactions between two fiat currencies, underpinned by bitcoin.

What do you think about regulators going after Bitcoin ATMs? Let us know in the comments section below.

Image Credits: Shutterstock, Pixabay, Wiki Commons

Go here to see the original:

US Regulators Target Bitcoin ATMs: 88% of the Funds Exit the Country via Machines | News - Bitcoin News

Life support tech company helping pave way for future of space exploration – FirstCoastNews.com WTLV-WJXX

Paragon Space Development creates systems to support human life in space's extreme conditions. They're working with NASA and SpaceX to sustain humans longer space.

Though SpaceX launched just a couple of weeks ago, the mission has only just begun.

Grant Andersonis the president and CEO of Paragon Space Development. His company, headquartered in Tucson, Arizona, works with NASA, SpaceX, Boeing and other companies, providing vital life-sustaining technology for astronauts.

With the successful launch of SpaceX, his team is opening a whole new chapter on space exploration and how to sustain humans on longer missions.

Exploration is human, its in our DNA, said Anderson.

Now that the U.S. is beginning a new space frontier, Anderson and his team are helping make it all possible.

Though Anderson says many don't ask, how come I dont hear about life support," in space, he says though it's vital, it's because "its hard to make it sexy.

In order to send astronauts like Doug Hurley and Robert Behnken to space and beyond, they need technology to help them live and breathe in space. Anderson says without life support technology, there simply is no mission.

This isn't your ordinary life support measures found on Earth. Paragon creates life support in extreme environments, and space is the ultimate extreme environment.

Our job is to make it so the astronauts are always comfortable, Anderson said.

Paragon has several life-sustaining systems for space.

One system includes a new spacesuit that gives astronauts an extra hour of oxygen and more mobility. Another system converts water, carbon monoxide and carbon dioxide creating recyclable oxygen.

Overall the systems work collectively to make breathing, sleeping, living, working and even going to the bathroom in space possible. Thats important when astronauts could be in space for days, months, even years.

With the success of SpaceX, it opens the door for the next realm to explore that Paragon will be working on with NASA.

Space is just one big ocean and were ready to go out and see whats out there, Anderson said.

There's a goal of creating a sustained human presence on the moon by 2024, then going even further, sending astronauts to Mars, marking another giant leap for mankind.

Read more here:

Life support tech company helping pave way for future of space exploration - FirstCoastNews.com WTLV-WJXX

Space exploration is about adventure, but also responsibility – The National

I never look at the Moon without being reminded of Neil Armstrong and Buzz Aldrin and of the day, July 20, 1969, when they left their first footprints on its dusty surface. The exploit seems even more heroic in retrospect, when we realise how primitive the technology was: Nasas entire suite of computers was less powerful than a single smartphone today.

Apollo 11 was only 12 years after the USSRs first Sputnik satellite launched into orbit around the Earth. Had the pace of missions been sustained in the subsequent half-century, there would surely have been footprints on Mars long before today.

But this has not happened.

The reason, of course, is that Apollo was motivated by the US strategic imperative to beat the Russians; it consumed up to four per cent of the US federal budget. Once US primacy was achieved, continuing gargantuan levels of funding was not justifiable, and the Apollo Programme ended in 1972 with the safe return of Apollo 17.

Hundreds more people have ventured into space in the ensuing decades, but anti-climactically they have done no more than circle the Earth in low orbit, mostly in the International Space Station.

Space technology has nonetheless burgeoned. There is participation from more than 70 nations, as well as the commercial sector. We routinely depend on orbiting satellites for communication, navigation, environmental monitoring, surveillance and weather forecasting. And space technology offers a huge boost to astronomers, lifting telescopes into orbits far above the blurring and absorptive effects of Earths atmosphere.

The sector has been energised by private companies, such as Elon Musks SpaceX and Jeff Bezoss Blue Origin. These ventures bring a can-do Silicon Valley culture into a domain long dominated by Nasa and a few aerospace conglomerates. They have developed the techniques to recover and reuse the main launch rocket, presaging real cost savings.

Machine learning is advancing quickly, as is sensor technology. In coming decades, the entire solar system planets, moons, and asteroids will be explored by fleets of tiny, automated probes interacting with one another like a flock of birds.

Giant robotic fabricators will construct, in space, solar energy collectors, telescopes and other giant structures. Indeed, much industrial production could eventually happen away from Earth.

Ever more capable instruments have been sent to Mars to orbit around the red planet or land on its surface. They will be joined next year by the UAEs Hope spacecraft to study the Martian climate hopefully a pathfinder for other projects, both inspirational and practical, from the Middle East.

But the extra cost of sending humans and returning them safely remains significant. So will humans once again venture into what we call deep space, rather than simply orbiting the Earth?

Nasa astronauts Doug Hurley, foreground, and Bob Behnken call down to mission controllers for a report on their second flight day onboard the SpaceX Crew Dragon spacecraft on Nasa's SpaceX Demo-2 mission approaching to dock to the International Space Station (ISS). Nasa TV / EPA

SpaceX's Crew Dragon spacecraft approaches to dock to ISS. Nasa TV / EPA

SpaceX's Crew Dragon spacecraft approaches to dock to ISS. Nasa TV / EPA

SpaceX's Crew Dragon spacecraft approaches to dock to ISS. Nasa TV / EPA

The SpaceX Dragon crew capsule, with Nasa astronauts Doug Hurley and Robert Behnken aboard, docks with the International Space Station. Nasa TV / AP

The SpaceX Dragon crew capsule, with Nasa astronauts Doug Hurley and Robert Behnken aboard, docks with the International Space Station. Nasa TV / AP

The SpaceX Dragon crew capsule, with Nasa astronauts Doug Hurley and Robert Behnken aboard, docks with the International Space Station. Nasa TV / AP

SpaceX Crew Dragon is seen from the International Space Station during the spacecraft's approach to the orbiting laboratory. Nasa TV / EPA

SpaceX Falcon 9 rocket carrying the company's Crew Dragon spacecraft launched from Launch Complex 39A on Nasas SpaceX Demo-2 mission to the International Space Station with Nasa astronauts Robert Behnken and Douglas Hurley onboard, at Nasa's Kennedy Space Centre in Florida. Nasa / AFP

To todays young people, the Apollo programme is ancient history. It was all over long before they were ever born. Of the 12 men who walked on the moon, only three are still living. We could be nearing a time when no human has a first-hand memory of standing on another world.

Along with millions of others, I would be saddened if human exploration of deep space faded into history.

Mars is a more alluring target than the Moon, albeit more remote. I hope that some people alive today will walk on the red planets surface as an adventure, and as a step towards the stars.

Nasas Space Shuttle, when it was operational, was launched more than 130 times. Its two crashes were national traumas because it had been promoted unwisely as a safe vehicle for civilians (and because a schoolteacher, Christa McAuliffe, was one of the casualties). Test pilots and adventurers would readily accept much more risk than the two per cent implicit in the experience of the Space Shuttle programme.

China has the resources, the dirigisme and maybe even the willingness to undertake an Apollo-style programme. It already achieved a first by landing on the far side of the Moon, and will surely follow this up with a manned Lunar base. But a clearer-cut great leap forward in Chinese space exploration would involve footprints on Mars, not just on the Moon.

Looking further ahead, the UAE envisages that, by 2117, there could be a real "city" on Mars, and it is welcome to have this inspirational goal to inspire interest among the next generation and inspire innovation in the region.

I think the future of manned spaceflight also lies with privately funded adventurers who are prepared to participate in a cut-price programme far riskier than the kind Nasa has been able to impose upon its astronauts thus far.

The phrase space tourism should be avoided. It lulls people into believing that such ventures are genuinely safe. And if that is the perception, the inevitable accidents will be as traumatic as those of the Shuttle. These exploits must be sold, so to speak, as dangerous sports, or intrepid exploration.

So I hope that adventurers and thrill-seekers later this century might establish a fragile base on Mars. But do not ever expect mass emigration from Earth. And here I disagree with Mr Musk and with my late Cambridge colleague Stephen Hawking, who enthuse about a rapid build-up of large-scale Martian communities.

Space does not offer an escape from all of Earths problems. We have got to solve these here. Coping with climate change may seem daunting, but it is simple compared to terraforming Mars. No place in our solar system offers an environment as clement as even the Antarctic, or the top of Everest. There is no Planet B for ordinary, risk-averse people. We must cherish our Earthly home and our global heritage but continue to seek inspiration from the stars.

Martin Rees is the UKs Astronomer Royal and the author of On the Future: Prospects for Humanity

Updated: June 8, 2020 03:31 PM

See the original post here:

Space exploration is about adventure, but also responsibility - The National

A new era: The Space Age is making a comeback, but it’s cheaper this time with SpaceX. – USA TODAY

Glenn Harlan Reynolds, Opinion columnist Published 11:32 a.m. ET June 3, 2020

This is huge, but in a sense nothing new: We were launching people into orbit over 50 years ago, after all. But SpaceX is doing it for much less, and thats revolutionary.

Though the news is filled with stories of riots and a pandemic, the most transformative things going on at present are in a totally different sphere.One of those things is pretty obvious, the other less so.

The obvious transformation involves SpaceXs successful launch of a human crew into orbit, the first such launch involving an American spacecraft in nearly a decade, and the first such launch everby a commercial spacecraft.

At the John F. Kennedy Space Center in Cape Canaveral, Florida, on May 30, 2020.(Photo: Craig Bailey/FLORIDA TODAY)

This is huge, but in a sense, nothing new:We were launching people into orbit over 50 years ago, after all. SpaceXs Crew Dragoncapsule is bigger and fancier than a Gemini, but the mission profile is not all that different.And of course, our last mission to orbit, on board a space shuttle, was basically old hat itself.

But SpaceX is doing it for much less, and thats revolutionary.To get a kilogram into orbit on the space shuttle costs $54,500. To do the same thing with SpaceXs newest rocket, the Falcon 9, costs $2,720. Thats basically a twenty-fold reduction in cost.

Lots of things that are too expensive to do at $54,500 become doable at $2,720.And SpaceX isnt standing still.Its Starship reusable rocket, under development now, is to cost a mere $2 million per launch, and Elon Musk says its cost per kilogram to orbit will be at least 10 times lower than the Falcon 9.There are a lot more things that become doable at $272 per kilogram.At those prices, things like space tourism, space hotels, lunar minesand asteroid mining become feasible.

As Robert Heinlein once said, once you get to Earth orbit, you're halfway to anywhere in the solar system.

Editorial Board: SpaceX, launching to space station, rockets to new age of entrepreneurial orbital flight

Which brings me to the second, less obvious transformation of this spring: President Donald Trumps opening outer space for business. "The executive order, Encouraging International Support for the Recovery and Use of Space Resources, is meant to createa new industry: the extraction and processing of resources from the moon and asteroids toward thesettlement of the solar system," as I wrote in April.

Theres a lot of wealth in spaceas I wrote back in 2013, "A 79-foot-wide M-type (metallic) asteroid could hold 33,000 tons of extractable metals, including $50 million in platinum alone. A 23-foot-diameter C-type (carbonaceous) asteroid can hold 24,000 gallons of water, useful for generating fuel and oxygen.Larger asteroids could be worth as much as the GDP of a superpower. Asteroid 1986 DA is a metallic asteroid made up of iron, nickel, gold and platinum. Estimates of its value range between $6 and $7 trillion. Something that size won't be retrieved anytime soon, but the figure gives some idea of just how much wealth is out there."

People have been talking about asteroid mining for awhileand even started companies with that in mind, but theyve been slowed down by two problems:The expense of getting into outer space, and the legal uncertainties around extracting lunar and asteroid resources.Musk is addressing the expense; Trump is addressing the legal uncertainty.

The executive order makes clear that Americarejects the failed 1979 Moon Treaty which the United Statesnever joined, and which banned private property rights in space and that it will recognize and defend the rights of its citizens in developing space resources.

Martha McSally: The COVID-19 pandemic is misery, but we'll come out stronger in the end

In doing so, its pretty bipartisan:In 2015, President Barck Obama signed the U.S. Commercial Space Launch Competitiveness Act, which provides that a U.S. citizen engaged in the commercial recovery of an asteroidresource or a space resource ...shall be entitled to ...possess, own, transport, use, and sell the asteroid resource or space resource obtained in accordance with applicable law, including the international obligations of the United States.

Trumps order ensures that international obligations will be supportive and not destructive of such efforts.

Rather than the Moon Treaty, the administration is working on a new set of agreements with other spacefaring nations, known as the Artemis Accords, in which participants will agree to respect each others rights in outer space. Theres already interest from other nations, though the Russians, whose space-launch business has collapsed in the face of competition from SpaceX, arent happy.

At any rate, it may well be that future historians will remember 2020 much more for being the second beginning of a wave of human expansion into space, than for the grubby earthbound problems that occupy the news on a daily basis. I certainly hope so.

Glenn Harlan Reynolds, a University of Tennessee law professor and the author of "The New School: How the Information Age Will Save American Education from Itself," is a member of USA TODAY's Board of Contributors.

Autoplay

Show Thumbnails

Show Captions

Read or Share this story: https://www.usatoday.com/story/opinion/2020/06/03/united-states-returns-space-exploration-elon-musk-spacex-column/5312410002/

Read this article:

A new era: The Space Age is making a comeback, but it's cheaper this time with SpaceX. - USA TODAY