Bitcoin Offshoots: Bitcoin Cash, Bitcoin Gold and Bitcoin Private – Crypto News

As the original cryptocurrency, Bitcoin was the inspiration for hundreds of others, including little brother Litecoin and Ethereum.

But some of these blockchainsincluding Bitcoin Cash, Bitcoin Gold, and Bitcoin Diamondare direct forks of Bitcoin and share most of their DNA with the leading cryptocurrency.

In total, there are over 40 bitcoin offshoots resulting from people deciding to fork the Bitcoin blockchain to create their own cryptocurrency. Here are three of the most popular:

Fork date: 1st August 2017

Bitcoin Cashalso known as Bcashis the most famous fork of Bitcoin.

This cryptocurrency born in August 2017 was the result of ideological differences between those who thought of bitcoin as more of a store of value, like digital gold, and those who maintained that it should be thought of as a peer-to-peer currency.

This led to disagreement over how the network should most effectively be scaled. Bitcoin Cash supporters thought that increasing the block size was the answer to accommodating more transactions, and the rest of the community thought that SegWit provided a better solution.

Bitcoin Cash supporters like Roger Ver said the bigger block scaling method would let Bitcoin stay true to Satoshis original vision of a peer-to-peer digital currency, but his opponents argued that the big blocks would only provide temporary relief and that the SegWit scaling method was better over the long-term.

This led to heated debate within the space, and eventually, a group of activists and developerspushed for a hard fork that would increase the Bitcoin block size.

Fork date: 24th October 2017

Just over two months after Bitcoin Cash came another fork, this one proposing to help Bitcoin become more decentralized by using GPU mining rather than ASIC mining.

This change to the mining algorithm meant that Bitcoin Gold could be mined using anyones spare computing power without having to invest in specialized mining equipment, just like in the early days of Bitcoin.

The fork was driven by a few enthusiasts who believed that the original Bitcoin mining system had become monopolized by a handful of mining companies, making it too centralized and vulnerable to attack.

Fork date: 3rd March 2018

Bitcoin Private. This cryptocurrency aims to bring together the benefits of bitcoin and the privacy features of Zcashspecifically zk-SNARKS, of which the zk stands for zero-knowledge.

But instead of being forked directly from bitcoin, as was the case with popular cryptocurrencies like Bitcoin Cash and Bitcoin Gold, Bitcoin Private was created from a copy of a digital currency known as Zclassic which is itself a fork of ZCash, and ZCash itself was a fork of the original bitcoin.

Complicated? Thats why Bitcoin Private has come to be known as a spork, rather than a fork!

Each of these cryptocurrencies is the result of a change to the rules governing the Bitcoin network.

As a decentralized network, no single party has control over Bitcoin. Instead, the blockchain is kept ticking over by algorithms based on certain rules. These algorithms facilitate transactions, prevent people from spending the same bitcoin twice and regulate the flow of freshly mined bitcoins into the network.

If someone wants to change the rules, and the people running Bitcoin nodes maintaining the bitcoin network can agree that the new rules will make bitcoin better, then they can be implemented with no issue through either a soft fork, which happens when the proposed changes are backwards compatible or a hard fork when the proposed changes are not backwards compatible and a new chain and cryptocurrency must be created.

With an agreement that a fork will take place, the people running the nodes agree on a certain block number when a new chain will be created bound by the new rules.

When this block is mined, another blockchain is created. So we have one chain that follows the old rules, and one that follows the new rules. Both share the same past blockchain, but the new blocks are different in each chainIt has forked.

If you are holding Bitcoin at the time of the fork, then you will also receive the cryptocurrency associated with the new chain. This is why the price of a cryptocurrency will often rise before the date of a hard fork as buyers stock up to make the most of the opportunity to get more funds.

But just because the numbers of coins you have doubles, the value of those coins is still based on market forces and many forks of Bitcoin have become almost worthless.

Read the original post:

Bitcoin Offshoots: Bitcoin Cash, Bitcoin Gold and Bitcoin Private - Crypto News

The Crypto Daily Movers and Shakers -07/06/20 – Yahoo Finance

Bitcoin rose by 0.50% on Saturday. Partially reversing a 1.74% fall from Friday, Bitcoin ended the day at $9,668.4.

It was another mixed start to the day. Bitcoin fell to an early morning intraday low $9,552.6 before making a move.

Steering clear of the first major support level at $9,538.6, Bitcoin rallied to a midday intraday high $9,742.3 before hitting reverse.

Falling short of the first major resistance level at $9,784.0, Bitcoin slid back to sub-$9,600 levels before briefly revisiting $9,700 levels.

Resistance at $9,700 ultimately pinned Bitcoin back late in the day to limit the upside on the day.

The near-term bullish trend remained intact, in spite of the mixed week.

For the bears, Bitcoin would need to slide through the 62% FIB of $6,400 to form a near-term bearish trend.

Across the rest of the majors, it was another mixed day for the majors on Saturday.

Stellars Lumen rose by 1.64% to lead the way on the day.

Cardanos ADA (+0.40%), Ethereum (+0.81%), Moneros XMR (+0.79%), Ripples XRP (+0.57%), and Trons TRX (+0.94%) also avoided the red.

It was a bearish day for the rest of the majors. Bitcoin Cash ABC fell by 1.32% to lead the way down.

Binance Coin (-0.74%), Bitcoin Cash SV (-0.28%), EOS (-0.53%), and Tezos (-0.24%) also saw red, while Litecoin ended the day flat.

Through the current week, the crypto total market cap rose to a Monday high $285.71bn before sliding to a Tuesday low $255.98bn. At the time of writing, the total market cap stood at $270.22bn.

In the week, Bitcoins rose to a Monday high 67.13% before falling to a Thursday low 65.58%. At the time of writing, Bitcoins dominance stood at 65.81%.

At the time of writing, Bitcoin was down by 0.12% to $9,657.0. A bearish start to the day saw Bitcoin fall from an early morning high $9,668.5 to a low $9,619.4.

Bitcoin left the major support and resistance levels untested early on.

The rest of the majors saw another mixed start to the day.

Ethereum (-0.09%), Moneros XRM (-0.19%), and Tezos (-0.13%) joined Bitcoin in the red.

The rest of the majors were in the green at the time of writing, with Bitcoin Cash SV up by 0.44% to lead the way.

Bitcoin would need to move through to $9,760 levels to bring the first major resistance level at $9,756.27 into play.

Support from the broader market would be needed, however, for Bitcoin to break out from Saturdays high $9,742.3.

Barring another broad-based crypto rally, the first major resistance level and Saturdays high would likely limit any upside.

In the event of an extended crypto rally, Bitcoin could eye the second major resistance level at $9,844.13 before any pullback.

Failure to move through to $9,760 levels could see Bitcoin struggle on the day, however.

A fall back through the morning low to sub-$9,600 levels would bring the first major support level at $9,566.57 into play.

Barring an extended crypto sell-off, however, Bitcoin should steer clear of the second major support level at $9,464.73.

This article was originally posted on FX Empire

Originally posted here:

The Crypto Daily Movers and Shakers -07/06/20 - Yahoo Finance

Cryptocurrency Quotes and Forecasts: Last Updates on Cryptocurrencies – FinSMEs

In order to profitably trade in a highly volatile market like cryptocurrency trading, the trades have to be on top of all the expert quotes and forecasts they can find on a daily basis.

Cryptocurrencies are the revolutionary digital alternatives to the physical currencies regulated by the central banks around the world. Unlike traditional currencies like dollars, pounds, or euros, cryptocurrencies cant be converted to cash. However, they can be bought, exchanged, and traded on specialist platforms available online. The currencies themselves only exist digitally, with all the ownership information stored in encrypted ledgers.

The first successful cryptocurrency is Bitcoin and it was launched back in 2009. Within a couple of years, a few other cryptocurrencies were introduced, making the possibility of exchanging the digital currencies with one another. It works similarly to the traditional stock and forex markets and requires the use of a cryptocurrency exchange. On some platforms, you can also exchange or trade cryptocurrencies against dollars.

Trading and Exchanging Cryptocurrencies

Between 2017 to 2018, major cryptocurrencies such asBitcoin, Ethereum, Ripple, Litecoin, Bitcoin Cash, etc. saw a massive surge ininterests from investors, which eventually pushed the Bitcoin value to as highas $20,000 each. It came down to $3,000 level in the following year, and now,experiencing a slow but steady upturn.

As you can see, cryptocurrencies are highly volatile assets. Their value goes up and down on a massive scale and is prone to speculative news and information. Therefore, traders in the cryptocurrency market need to be very careful. There are a number of technical analysis tools available, with many daily resources to learn about the latest quotes and forecasts.

Latest Forecasts on Major Cryptocurrencies

At the time of writing, Bitcoin (BTC) the most important cryptocurrency in terms of value is moving in the $9,000 marks, while Ethereum (ETH) is moving in and around $200. So, borsainside.com, tells us what lies ahead for the top three digital currencies in terms of value.

Bitcoin (BTC/USD)

After the halving in the second week of May this year, Bitcoin prices are experiencing some optimism from the investors. The price is moving just above $9,000 levels. With some analysts predicting a nine percent chance for the price to reach an all-time high, investors should be looking at the $10,050 level, breaking through which may lead to a consistent upward movement for a few days.

Ethereum (ETH/USD)

In light of Bitcoin halving and the launching possibility of Ethereum 2.0; analysts are mainly bullish about this coins value. If it holds the $190 level, and push upwards, all the technical signs suggest for the value to reach between $330 to $360, the level previously seen in 2019.

Ripple (XRP/USD)

December last year saw the value of XRP drop by amammoth 13%. While it somewhat recovered at the beginning of this year, thevalue continues to move around $0.15 $0.20. Analysts see some more downwardmovements, which may turn bullish only if it reaches $0.28 mark.

Go here to read the rest:

Cryptocurrency Quotes and Forecasts: Last Updates on Cryptocurrencies - FinSMEs

Swiss bank includes Bitcoin, Ethereum and XRP in its portfolio – Crypto News Flash

Maerki Baumann & Co AG is a privately managed Swiss bank that has been supporting the organization of Initial Coin Offerings (ICOs) and Security Token Offerings (STOs) in the greater Zurich area for more than 11 years. Blockchain companies can also open an account with the bank to start their business activities directly from the Blockchain Hub in Zurich. The bank has now announced that it will expand its portfolio of services to include Bitcoin, Ethereum, Bitcoin Cash and XRP.

From June 2020, the bank will start the next phase of its crypto strategy and will offer not only a custody service for the cryptocurrencies mentioned above, but also direct trading. The Swiss Financial Market Supervisory Authority (FINMA) of Switzerland recently granted Maerki Baumann approval for this.

The bank is thus pursuing its goal of beating traditional private banking with the new emerging world of digital assets such as BTC and XRP. Dr. Stephan A. Zwahlen, Chief Executive Officer, describes how this step will enable the bank to expand its portfolio and core business in key areas and to tap into new client segments:

By trading and custody of digital assets, we are not only opening up a new business segment, but also creating additional investment opportunities in our core business. This will benefit younger, technology-oriented client segments, as well as private clients and institutional investors who are looking for new opportunities for returns on digital assets or who want to diversify their portfolios more broadly.

The storage cryptocurrencies is solved via a multi-level security procedure to protect the assets from digital cyber attacks. Under Swiss law, the regulated bank fulfills all the requirements for secure innovative security solutions required by legal and regulatory provisions.

Most recently, Arab Bank and Sygnum Bank had also added XRP to their portfolio, thus giving Swiss investors the opportunity to buy XRP easily and without major detours. Maerki Baumann believes that cryptocurrencies are changing the financial world and that banks will play a decisive role in further adaptation.

Data analytics service WhaleAlert observed four large XRP transactions totaling 800 million XRP worth $162 million. In the first transaction, 200 million XRP were transferred from the Ripple OTC Distribution Wallet to an unknown wallet.

The second, third and fourth transactions were also sent from the Ripple OTC Distribution Wallet to an unknown wallet. The community notes that this wallet has now become active for the first time in 2020. There was also speculation whether an institutional investor is preparing to sell XRP or whether the account movements have a different objective.

Excerpt from:

Swiss bank includes Bitcoin, Ethereum and XRP in its portfolio - Crypto News Flash

Neurohacking, Brain Health and the Formula of the Future …

The word itself neurohacking sounds a little futuristic, a little too on-the-nose and ripped straight from the Matrix movies or an old sci-fi book.

And yet here we are, living at a time when the purposeful tweaking of brain functions is fast becoming an everyday practice for those eager to improve their mental and emotional well-being.

Neurohacking is, simply, a collection of practices intended to upgrade the mind and boost ones personal capacities, and it is not as outlandish as it first seems.

Lets take a commonplace example, say, having a cup of coffee. The chemical properties of caffeine affect your central nervous system and therefore your brain, increasing mental energy and focus. When you sip on that morning cup, youre ingesting a substance that enhances performance. So, in a way, youre hacking your consciousness.

RELATED:6 Supplements that Promise to Give you a Mental Edge

When a cluster of these cognitive enhancing bio-hacks are happening simultaneously, one can be said to be in a flow state, a concept that most of us are familiar with, and one that is widely used as an experiential and experimental benchmark in neurohacking.

Flow states, being in the zone, living in the moment. Weve all had those experiences.

An unflappable and quiet invincibility, done effortlessly without second thought or doubt, when time stands still and the outside world fades away, leaving nothing but a perfect state of you, where Being and Doing overlap, and then merge to become indistinguishable from each other. Stars align, vectors cross perfectly, stars align and we find ourselves incapable of doing wrong: knocking down a barrage of three-pointers, absolutely crushing the critical sales presentation, intrinsically grasping all of the subtleties of a subject during an intense study session.

While rare, we all yearn to experience these moments of transcendence again. Neurohacking, however, sees the flow state as the Holy Grail, and strives to create and then recreate those perfect conditions to be our most perfect self. Currently, the most researched and popular way to do so is through nootropics.

Another term pulled straight from the future, nootropics are also known as smart-drugs and cognitive enhancers, and are any drugs, supplements or substances that purport to improve cognitive functions, particularly focus, memory, creativity and motivation.

Do a quick online scan and youll see that a proliferation of nootropics has flooded the market recently. Some are clearly just riding the wave, while others are better-intentioned and better-designed.

One common problem across the spectrum of companies, however, is that they often fail to deliver a complete and well-rounded product; their nootropics are usually developed so narrowly as to only optimize or enhance one small aspect of cognition at the expense of others. For example, a nootropic may deliver on boosting your mental energy but fail to help you focus, so youll lack the calibration necessary to harness that energy and your efforts will scattershot.

[the_ad id=5676]

Clearly, it seems that what is missing is a more systemic, unified approach.

Enter the Neurohacker Collective, a group of scientists, intellectuals and researchers who are exploring the frontiers of bio-plasticity from a higher-order perspective, and working to develop and promote an overall and integrated strategy of complete care for the self.

By stressing the complexity and interdependence of all the factors that make up ones cognitive and emotional well-being, their lofty mission is no less than to upgrade our capacity as a species.

Diverging from the many other nootropic supplements that only focus on a single aspect of improving cognitive functioning, the Neurohacker Collective aims to address the entire body/mind interface and provide many of the tools necessary to enhance cognition.

The Neurohacker Collective seems to be one step ahead of the game, imagining not just a way to cultivate and extend flow states, but better yet, envisioning a future where that state is the new normal.

This future could very well be in Qualia, developed by the Neurohacker Collective, and one of the most comprehensive nootropics on the market that integrates the best available research on cognitive development into a complex, holistic product.

As a Goalcast reader, you can try Qualia for 15% off the regular price by using the discount code GOALCAST at checkout.[the_ad id=5676]

See the original post:

Neurohacking, Brain Health and the Formula of the Future ...

Virtual reality will be a big part of Boeing’s Starliner astronaut training – Space.com

Astronauts will get some next-gen training before they ride Boeing's next-gen spacecraft.

Crewmembers preparing to fly on Boeing's CST-100 Starliner capsule will train using virtual reality (VR) headsets provided by Finland-based Varjo, both companies announced today (June 11).

Varjo's VR-2 devices will allow astronauts to simulate, in high resolution and with high fidelity, every aspect of a Starliner mission to the International Space Station (ISS), Varjo and Boeing representatives said.

Related: Boeing's 1st Starliner flight test in photos

"We are proud to be delivering the technology that is pushing industrial training applications to their furthest reaches even to space," Varjo co-founder and CEO Niko Eiden said in a statement.

"With our devices, astronauts can see and virtually interact with the switches and control panels inside their Starliner capsule and read the real-time data on their crew displays," Eiden said. "Advancements like this have the potential to transform the way any pilot is trained."

Boeing has been developing Starliner with funding from NASA's Commercial Crew Program, most notably a $4.2 billion contract signed in 2014 that also covers six operational crewed missions to and from the ISS. SpaceX holds a similar deal, which Elon Musk's company will fulfill with its Crew Dragon capsule.

SpaceX just launched its first crewed mission, sending NASA astronauts Bob Behnken and Doug Hurley to the ISS on a test flight called Demo-2. Starliner should follow suit relatively soon; Boeing plans to launch its version of Demo-2, called Crew Flight Test (CFT), early next year.

The astronauts who will fly on CFT Boeing's Chris Ferguson and NASA's Mike Fincke and Nicole Mann have been training for their mission for a while now, using Starliner mockups in Houston and other tools. The VR headset will augment such work, Boeing representatives said.

"We're not looking to replace the physical simulators in Houston," Connie Miller, a Boeing Starliner software engineer, told Space.com. "But it will certainly enhance that training, to be able to do it from remote locations."

One such "remote location" is the launch site itself, Cape Canaveral Air Force Station in Florida. Astronauts will spend the two weeks immediately before liftoff in quarantine at NASA's nearby Kennedy Space Center, ensuring that they launch in good health and don't carry disease-causing germs to the ISS. With the new VR tool, Starliner crewmembers can continue in-depth training for their mission during this home stretch, Miller said.

In the next couple of weeks, Boeing plans to ship the VR hardware to Florida, where Ferguson, the CFT commander, can start working with it. The wheels for this move were first set in motion several months ago, but the rollout was halted by measures taken to combat the spread of the novel coronavirus, Miller said.

The pandemic's emergence highlights the need for the VR tech, she said.

"We had the vision," Miller said. "We didn't realize it would be a mandatory piece of things as quickly as it did."

Astronauts have used VR tools before; NASA astronauts commonly use such tech to prep for spacewalks, for example. But the Starliner training will break new ground in its extensive use of VR gear, which will help prep astronauts for every aspect of their mission, from liftoff to landing, Boeing representatives said.

Varjo, for its part, will apply the lessons learned from the Starliner work to other aspects of its business, such as pilot training, Eiden said. But the company is also getting something else out of the newly announced partnership.

"This is one of those passion things; we have a bit of space fever at Varjo at the moment as well," he told Space.com. "So, having the chance to be part of this Boeing program it's been just fantastic."

Mike Wall is the author of "Out There" (Grand Central Publishing, 2018; illustrated by Karl Tate), a book about the search for alien life. Follow him on Twitter @michaeldwall. Follow us on Twitter @Spacedotcom or Facebook.

Read more:

Virtual reality will be a big part of Boeing's Starliner astronaut training - Space.com

Gaganyaan’s first unmanned test flight won’t be happening this year – Business Insider India

The first unmanned test flight of Indian rocket Geosynchronous Satellite Launch Vehicle (GSLV), as part of the country's human space mission Gaganyaan, will not happen this year, said officials.

The Indian Space Research Organisation (ISRO) had planned the first of the two test flights later this year.

"The first flight of the rocket as part of Gaganyaan mission will not happen this year (2020)," a senior ISRO official, speaking on the condition of anonymity, told IANS.

Advertisement

In his address at the 70th Annual General Meeting and National Conference on "Recent Developments in Aerospace and Defence Technology" organised by Aeronautical Society of India in February, ISRO chief K. Sivan had said that the "design and engineering of the launch vehicle and orbital module system for India's human space flight has been completed. A series of tests have to be competed to validate the design and engineering of the systems in 2020".

As per the original plans, during the first test flight ISRO would send its humanoid Vyommitra.

Advertisement

Meanwhile, suspense continues on the revised date of launch of India's first Geo Imaging Satellite-1 (GISAT-1).

On March 4, a day before the scheduled launch GISAT-1 onboard the GSLV-F10 rocket and hours before the start of the launch countdown, ISRO announced postponement of the mission owing to some technical glitch.

Advertisement

SEE ALSO:A Russian rocket broke up in space above the Indian Ocean leaving dangerous debris in its wake

Chinas unmanned spacecraft makes a successful return to Earth racing ahead of India on the path to having a space station

Read the rest here:

Gaganyaan's first unmanned test flight won't be happening this year - Business Insider India

Photos: SpaceX’s first crewed mission launches from pad 39A – Spaceflight Now

This collection of images from NASA and SpaceX photographers shows the Crew Dragon spacecraft lifting off on top of a Falcon 9 rocket May 30.

Taking advantage of a break in the weather, the 215-foot-tall (65-meter) Falcon 9 rocket took off from the Kennedy Space Center at 3:22:45 p.m. EDT (1922:45 GMT) on May 30. Around 12 minutes later, the Falcon 9s upper stage deployed the Crew Dragon spaceship into orbit.

The launch marked the first time astronauts have flown into orbit from a U.S. spaceport since the last launch of NASAs space shuttle program July 8, 2011.

These photos show the Falcon 9 launching atop nine Merlin 1D engines, each consuming kerosene and liquid oxygen propellants, producing a combined 1.7 million pounds of thrust. The final photo in the series shows the Falcon 9s first stage booster landing on SpaceXs drone ship Of Course I Still Love You in the Atlantic Ocean for potential reuse on a future mission.

Email the author.

Follow Stephen Clark on Twitter: @StephenClark1.

Original post:

Photos: SpaceX's first crewed mission launches from pad 39A - Spaceflight Now

Staying Alive in Space – The Planetary Society

Keeping humans alive and well in space is hard enough. How will this be accomplished on a 3-year journey to Mars and back? Paragon President and CEO Grant Anderson shares the great progress weve made and the remaining challenges. Astronauts headed for the Red Planet may not need ice cream to stay alive, but will life be worth living without it? You may win a pint of Ben & Jerrys moooony new flavor and a Netflix Space Force spoon to eat it with in this weeks space trivia contest.

A coupon for a pint of Ben & Jerrys new flavor Boots on the Moooon, inspired by the Netflix original series Space Force. (Or any other flavor!) Also, a Space Force spoon.

What was the last flight or mission of an astronaut who had been in the Apollo program, and who was that astronaut?

What was the last two-person, orbital spaceflight launched from the United States?

The winner will be revealed next week.

Who is scheduled to be the first non-American astronaut to launch on a SpaceX Crew Dragon spacecraft?

Soichi Noguchi of the Japanese Space Agency is scheduled to be the first non-American astronaut to launch on a Spacex Crew Dragon spacecraft.

Mat Kaplan: Staying alive as you cross the expanse this week on Planetary Radio. Welcome. I'm Mat Kaplan of the Planetary Society with more of the human adventure across our solar system and beyond. We're back with another fascinating expert for you to meet. This time it's the leader of a company that is working toward keeping men and women alive and well as they make the long journey to Mars and back also to the moon.

Mat Kaplan: It's a big challenge possibly as big as any other we face if humans are going to reach the red planet. President and CEO Grant Anderson of Paragon Space Development Corporation will join us shortly. Ice cream may not be essential for life support on that mission but it would be nice and it's what you might win in the new what's up space trivia contest. I don't know if Bruce Betts will ever forgive me for the torture I'm about to inflict on him.

Mat Kaplan: We're back to headlines from the down lake this week where there is great news about the InSight mission. We don't want to become overconfident but it appears that the long-suffering mole heat-flow probe is finally under the surface of Mars. NASA and German Aerospace Center engineers have used the lander scoop to help the self-hammering instrument bury itself, maybe now it can get a grip and head down to several meters scientists have hoped for. Godspeed InSight.

Mat Kaplan: With its big Long March 5B rocket back on track, China has laid out a very ambitious schedule of launches to assemble its big modular space station. The work gets underway next year. Crew Dragon astronauts, Bob Behnken and Doug Hurley have settled into life aboard the International Space Station which may be their home for as long as four months. The Planetary Society has a terrific guide to their mission at planetary.org where you can also read about the Commercial Crew Program and the ways the ISS is helping us learn how humans will survive in deeper space.

Mat Kaplan: As always, you'll find the downlink at planetary.org/downlake. It offers much more than space headlines. For example, did you know that past Planetary Radio guest, Mae Jemison, filed a police complaint when her arm was twisted and she was thrown on the pavement during a traffic stop? This was four years after she became the first black woman in space.

Mat Kaplan: Let's face it, humans are ever so much more fragile than robots. It takes a lot to keep us alive in the not very friendly and nurturing environs of space and other worlds but we're learning, we're adapting. As you're about to hear, some of the advances are stunning. But Grant Anderson knows we have a long ways to go before we can travel the solar system or live on the moon as comfortably as we must. Grant is co-founder, president and CEO of Paragon Space Development Corporation. He used to be the company's VP of Engineering and chief engineer.

Mat Kaplan: You can tell his heart and soul are still in engineering. He holds several patents and he was the chief design engineer for development of the ISS solar arrays back when he worked at Lockheed Martin. We covered a wide range of challenges when we talked a few days ago and he left me feeling hopeful. Grant, it is great to get you back on Planetary Radio. It has been almost exactly three years since we talked. Long overdue for a conversation and my understanding is that there's some new stuff, some developments to talk about. But first, welcome back.

Grant Anderson: Well, thank you very much. It's really great to be back.

Mat Kaplan: Let me start with the question that may be uppermost in our space geek audiences mind. How confident are you now that we will before too long be able to keep some number of astronauts alive and well on a Mars mission lasting at least a year and a half, could be as long as three years?

Grant Anderson: Well, there's two parts to that. One, I'm confident it will happen, that it can be done, and the other part is that I know we're not there yet.

Mat Kaplan: Okay. In spite of these advances that I think we're going to talk about in a minute or two, I mean where are we lacking? What's left to be done to make this happen? I mean we know we can get rockets there and back but keeping people alive, that's the bigger challenge?

Grant Anderson: That's the part that we have no existence proof to show that we can do. We know we can navigate to Mars. We know we can land on Mars although probably lower amounts of mass than we need to for a human mission but we really don't know if the life-support system will function and function correctly for all that time. The space station has been a wonderful testbed and, of course, it's been supporting people but there's been a fair amount of failures and glitches and stuff like that that are that dangerous because we're 30 minutes from an escape to the ground from Earth and from orbit, but when you light the candle and you're on the way to Mars, that's a whole another ball of wax.

Mat Kaplan: Let me back up some and go back to the beginnings of this topic, life support systems, because they go back a lot further than when humans started going into space and Paragon is involved with some of this. I mean you make systems to support divers and do you have stuff on submarines?

Grant Anderson: We do not right at this moment. We actually have an active program on a submarine rescue system. I can't get too much into it but it's how to rescue people from a submarine that has been stranded below surface and, yes, people have been diving in valves and within suits for years now. It's interesting, it's related and it is in our field, which is life support in extreme environments and being 200 feet underwater is an extreme environment but things happen a lot faster with the altitude.

Grant Anderson: You change altitude in the sea and you get a multiple change of psi, its 14.7 pounds per square inch for every 33 feet of water. Of course, you don't have that happening in space but then you got to protect yourself from everything else. Generally, the ocean doesn't try to boil you or otherwise but it's still a matter of providing the right supplies that are required by a human at the right time and continuously until the mission is over.

Mat Kaplan: They make this look so easy on Star Trek even though periodically on the Starship Enterprise they would say life support is disabled and people would start to choke almost immediately it seemed. There's so much to this. I mean maybe we can break it down into some of the categories that you and Paragon actually work with beginning with the air that we breathe. I saw one of the sections on the website is air revitalization systems that you're doing some of this work for a spacecraft that Boeing hopes to put some humans in pretty soon.

Grant Anderson: Yeah. We supply the humidity control system and when humans breathe, really you can think of humans as one big chemical factory. We breathe in oxygen to use nitrogen as a buffer gas and we drink water, and then we expel all these things. We expel out the oxygen we don't use. In general, you breathe in nominal layer that has almost no carbon dioxide in it, about 21% oxygen. You breathe out about 16% oxygen and 5% CO2, and then the rest is still the nitrogen gas.

Grant Anderson: It's funny you mentioned about the Star Trek thing because, yeah, what always fascinates or frustrating to us in life support is nothing happens that fast. It's just as deadly but the life support is broken down and within a few minutes, a few seconds suddenly people are choking on their own CO2, that's not really true. It takes a little while to build up gases to noxious level or, at least, or even a toxic level. But I will say at the same time, the fans on a spacecraft in zero gravity or microgravity are life-critical because if you're not moving the air past your face, you're building up yourself in a bubble of CO2 just like a candle would build up a bubble of combustion products and it will eventually snuff out the candle and you have the same problem with humans.

Mat Kaplan: I read this once in a science fiction story and I wondered if that was seriously a problem because somebody actually does pass out in this story because the air is not circulating. I mean how in a space as complex and large as the International Space Station, how do we make sure that the air is constantly being refreshed in in every place that an astronaut might stick their head?

Grant Anderson: That is an issue and we've done that. We executed contracts way back in the early 2000s for what was then called Space [inaudible 00:09:04] because they had a module that went back in the shuttle and it went up to the space station and it was packed full of supplies and they would over a few days unpack the system. We had to analyze what would the airflow be like with it halfway unpacked or a third unpacked or three-quarters unpacked because very often the astronauts to try to, especially the ones that have been on the Space Station for a long time would escape to the module as sort of a place to be away from everybody else that's isolation while you're isolated from everybody on Earth, getting a few days away from the people you're stuck in a small can with is considered premium time.

Grant Anderson: We had to analyze, actually, how the airflow happened in different levels of unpacking. The other thing we've seen on Space Station is that there are times when they have to go behind the panels and either rotate down a rack or take off something and get into rack and they have had problems with astronauts getting headaches because the circulation isn't very good there, and so they try to limit that and they also have monitors and buddies to make sure that they're watching each other while it happens.

Grant Anderson: It is a concern for the Orion vehicle. We did the analysis on airflow. We generally have a requirement that when anywhere within the cabin, you have to have about a foot per second worth of air flow past a person's face in order to wash away the CO2 and bring fresh air in, and we do the analysis to show that, yes, that is the case that no matter where the person is in the vehicle and we model all of the different fans or all the different registers that are pushing out air and all the intakes, and then we move a human model around in a CFD analysis computational fluid dynamics model and we check to see whether the face velocities are correct. It's a very real concern and it's something we're doing with say the Moon lander.

Mat Kaplan: Absolutely fascinating. We're going to get back to that work that you're contributing to toward putting humans back on the moon as well. But we'll stick with CO2 for a moment. What do you do with it? I mean once you pull it back into a system, how do you control the level of CO2 to say nothing of making sure we're getting enough oxygen?

Grant Anderson: Well, there's a few ways to remove the CO2 from the air for short missions and we define missions in person day. So, in other words, if you have four people for two days, that's eight person's days or if you have 2 people for 10 days, that's 20-person days. In general, when you're below about 70 or 80-person days, we use what's called lithium hydroxide, which is a chemical that will combine with the CO2 and make a calcium product, calcium carbonate I think it is. I'm not a chemist so don't quote me on that. If you just lock it into that and then you throw away the canister when it's done.

Grant Anderson: However, when you get to something like Space Station or for these longer missions. You use either a molecular sieve. What they do is they preferentially pass oxygen faster than CO2 so you keep switching from one bed to the other and you let the oxygen wave go through and you end up with almost pure oxygen coming out the other side. Until such time as the CO2 starts to break through, then you switch over to the other bed which has now been cleaned, and while that one is doing the same process, the one you just switched from.

Grant Anderson: You vent the CO2 to space or in the case of some systems, we collect that CO2, bottle it up, and then we use it in another reaction called a Sabatier reaction where we react it with hydrogen and you end up getting out water as well as methane, and then figure out what to do with the methane and one of the things that many people have talked about including Robert Zubrin is then using the methane for fuel for returning say a rocket from Mars.

Mat Kaplan: The thing that sticks in my mind is when you're talking about these person days. I mean it could be 10,000 person days for a trip to Mars. That's a lot without being able to stop off to pick up more oxygen or fix your CO2 absorber.

Grant Anderson: Yeah. That depends on how many people. If it's a 5-year round-trip mission to Mars, you'll end up spending for each person about 1825 days. So, if you have 5 people, you're up to 9000 hours. When you get to that, you have to recycle it. Either you recycle it or you somehow pay the penalty of having to launch extra mass in order to replace the oxygen that goes out with the CO2. One problem with blowing the CO2 overboard is well that oxygen has been used by your body for energy and the CO2 is a byproduct you breathe out. Well, that means every time you vent that CO2 to space, you're losing that oxygen too. You have to bring it along to replace it.

Grant Anderson: Definitely for a longer mission on say to Mars, you want to recycle that. You want to break down the CO2 and there's one way, one technology we work on for that, it's called SOE, which stands for solid oxide electrolysis. If you think about your high school or even middle school experience, you put through wires in water and you get hydrogen coming off one wire and oxygen coming off the other. You can do pretty much an analogous thing with CO2 so that you end up back with, actually, with oxygen coming up one side and carbon monoxide coming off the other.

Grant Anderson: Then, you can crack the carbon monoxide to get the rest of the oxygen out and you end up with nothing but carbon and carbon dust. So, you have to be able to then recycle that oxygen back into the system. You'll still always have to replace them, you also, of course, metabolize oxygen, not only the CO2, but in the sugars that are used by your body and those go into building molecular systems for your body, and so you will end up using oxygen that is non-recoverable. So, there's always going to be a little bit of replenishment on a long trip.

Mat Kaplan: Is that fairly energy intensive cracking the CO2 to get the oxygen back?

Grant Anderson: Yes. It's not only energy intensive but it takes a pretty high temperature. Yes. So he has run at about 500 degrees centigrade or Celsius. Sorry. Yes. It takes a fair amount of energy. So, it takes electrical energy to rip the bonds apart because of carbon dioxide bond is pretty darn strong.

Mat Kaplan: We could spend the rest of our time just talking about the air we breathe but maybe I'll just leave it with one sidelight. You've already mentioned humidity, why is it so important to have a system to control the levels of humidity? What would happen on a closed system like the International Space Station or a spacecraft on its way to the Moon or Mars if you didn't have something to control humidity?

Grant Anderson: When you breathe out, you're not only breathing out carbon dioxide but you're breathing out moisture. In fact, most of the water you lose in your body say, I live here in the desert in Tucson, Arizona, if I'm out hiking, I may not be sweating that much but every time I breathe, I'm putting out moisture in my breath. If you're in a closed capsule and you're breathing, the humidity will quickly drum to 100%. So, if you've got four people in a small capsule it's a matter of minutes. It's not hours.

Grant Anderson: Well, when you get up to a certain level, anybody who's lived in Florida and had a glass of cold beer you know that there's a lot of water in the air that will condense on your glass and it's the same thing. Your spacecraft walls will be cool, most likely at least one wall, the wall that's not facing the Sun, depending on how you rotate and everything else but still it's going to be cooler. So, if you get the relative humidity up above what's the dew point as we call it, so what the dew point is say the air is at 75 degrees Fahrenheit, if your dew point though is 55, that means that if it touches a surface that's 55 degrees or less, the water will condense out of the air onto your surface.

Grant Anderson: Well, if people have seen the movie Apollo 13 and I think Swigert comments, well, it's like flying a toaster through a carwash is when you get all this condensation on the inside of the vehicle. That's really bad for electronics. You don't want to have a whole bunch of condensation. Also, condensation promotes mold growth and that's a big problem on long durations. Missions, the Space Station they go through a whole protocol of wiping down surfaces to keep mildew and mold from growing on surfaces, even though they have a good humidity control system but you have to be able to remove that water.

Grant Anderson: There's really two ways to do it. One is a condensing heat exchanger where you have a heat exchanger, you know it's colder than the dew point and you force water to be condensed out, and then sucked up and separated, and then you use the water for recycling, and then there's other ones like what Paragon supplied to Boeing which is a membrane based system that selectively passes water through and then just ejects water to the vacuum of space and that's good for short missions. Again, like the commercial crew programs like the one that's flying Space Station right now.

Mat Kaplan: Let's turn to the other end of what makes water so important particularly on, well, on any mission but particularly a long one and that's recovering enough, recycling enough that your astronauts have something to drink and maybe even grow food. When we talk three years ago, you told me that the system then on the International Space Station was maybe 65%, 70% efficient at recovering the water in that closed loop system. Are we doing much better now because I assume we're going to have to do a lot better to get to Mars?

Grant Anderson: Yes. We are. Yeah. That's true that 65%, 70% is when it's operating. If you take out over the whole lifespan of the system when it's not operating, of course, it's not producing anything. So, the efficiency of course those down, the calculations on efficiency. Yeah. Paragon actually develop a technology, again, using a sort of selective membrane that will recover 98% of the water especially that you urinate. So, yes, you are drinking your pee in the end but that will close the environment to 98%.

Grant Anderson: So, then really with our system, you end up with a bag of salt, which is the salts that are in your urine when you pee and that one is supposed to fly to space station early next year and start working and that will substantially reduce the amount of water they have to ship at the station by hundreds of kilograms a year. That's an experiment but it is necessary for sustainability on the Moon. So, we're very hopeful that once that experiment runs its course that will be baseline for the Moon missions also.

Mat Kaplan: Is 98% recovery? Is that good enough to get to Mars and back?

Grant Anderson: Yes. That is. We have worked and are working on a program right now for doing the same thing for feces or for poop, maybe some of your listeners will understand better. In fact, in the normal weird humor of the aerospace world, we actually call that program STOOLE, S-T-O-O-L-E. That's doing the same thing. It's desiccating the feces and taking the water out because that's the other part where water is lost over time.

Grant Anderson: But, yeah, at the 98% level, people will consume about 2 kilograms of water a day so you're only needing to provide a few ccs, cubic centimeters of water per day and that's something that you can carry with you. By the way, you want to carry with you because water is also a great radiation shield.

Mat Kaplan: Yeah. So, I've read. I think you should call it SCAP by the way and I guess that's important because you needed to fertilize your potatoes you're going to grow on Mars, right? Kidding. Just kidding. Much more of my conversation with Paragon's Grant Anderson is seconds away.

Bill Nye: Greetings. Bill Nye here, CEO of the Planetary Society. Even with everything going on in our world right now, I know that a positive future is ahead of us. Space exploration is an inherently optimistic enterprise, an active space program raises expectations and fosters collective hope. As part of the Planetary Society team, you can help kick-start the most exciting time for US space exploration since the Moon landings with the upcoming election only months away, our time to act is now.

Bill Nye: You can make a gift to support our work. Visit planetary.org/advocacy. Your financial contribution will help us tell the next administration and every member of Congress how the US space program benefits their constituents and the world. Then, you can sign the petitions to President Trump and presumptive nominee Biden and let them know that you vote for space exploration. Go to planetary.org/advocacy today. Thank you. Let's change the world.

Mat Kaplan: Thermal control. It's puzzling to some people why that is difficult to maintain on a spacecraft after all it's flying through something that's a medium that is not much above absolute zero and yet it is a challenge, isn't it?

Grant Anderson: Oh, it's a really big challenge. There's, again, a few things. You are a chemical factory, a human is. A human at rest just sitting there, not doing anything, not doing any vigorous exercise but thinking runs about 100, 120 watts. So, everybody in the world is bright because we're about the same power as a bright light bulb. So, if you have five people in a spacecraft that's built like a thermos bottle, by the way, because it's protecting from the outside. I'll talk about that in a second.

Grant Anderson: You'll build up heat just because five people will put out 500 watts. So, think of it as essentially starting an oven inside of your vehicle and you've got to get rid of that heat. Now, it is true that on average space, especially if you're in low Earth orbit, you've got this beautiful planet that's running at about 300 Kelvin or generally a little cooler than what we're used to. But the rest of the space is pretty bad. If you're looking away from the Sun, you're looking at a four Kelvin environment. It's sucking heat out of you, and then if you have the Sun on you, even with the good reflective clothing, you've got 1500 watts per meter squared hitting you.

Grant Anderson: So, you got to reflect that and not absorb that heat. Maintaining that thermal balance and you and, of course, there's no air to take the air way. It's not like your car, take the heat away. It's not like your car like you have a radiator that airs running through all the time and you're rejecting heat to the atmosphere. The only real way to get rid of heat external of the spacecraft is radiation and that's pretty inefficient. I won't go into the equations but you have to get the radiator, the hotter it is the faster it radiates heat but the hot, you also need to get it down to a temperature where that it's useful enough to then cool the equipment inside. It takes a real thermal balance and a lot of analysis to make sure that you're rejecting enough heat.

Mat Kaplan: This thermal control and these radiators, that's another area of expertise for Paragon, isn't it?

Grant Anderson: Yes. There's really two different areas for radiators. One is making sure you have what's called a turndown ratio. So, sometimes you want to reject a lot of heat when you're say approaching Space Station and you've got all of you computers running because you want to have your avionics both your primary and your backup and even your second backup running and they're all doing a lot of work to make sure that your rendezvous and you're docking correctly, you're putting out a lot of heat there and you're near the Earth and a few other things.

Grant Anderson: So you have a lot of trouble rejecting heat and you're producing a lot. Then, you'll say on the way from Earth to the Moon and you're out in the middle of nowhere. So, all you can really see is a four Kelvin environment. For those who are privy to Apollo, they actually had something called the BBQ roll they did where they rotated the spacecraft very slowly in order to make sure that all the sides were sort of heated up and cooled down and maintained a good overall temperature.

Grant Anderson: At that time, they also shut down a lot of systems because they weren't in launch mode or docking mode or anything else. So, you have low heat production and a really big good environment for rejecting heat. You can actually get too cold. One of the key technologies there is, again, what we call turn down ratio, which is how much can you turn down the radiator so that they don't reject too much heat and get you too cold when you're in that type of environment.

Grant Anderson: Paragon works a lot on different turndown technologies, shape-memory alloy radiators and what we call stagnating radiators, which is what Apollo used. Where generally you let certain lines freeze and not flow your coolant and other ones flow it, and then when you get back into a high heat environment or when you're trying to fire up your computer to getting the moon, it then melts those lines and you end up using your radiator again.

Grant Anderson: The other side is how you construct radiators. Traditionally, radiators, again, not Apollo but other ones like on space shuttle were a honeycomb face sheet material. So, there's an aluminum honeycomb with aluminum face sheets, and then a tube running through it. That has a lot of problems both because you're only using one side of your radiators very often. There you also have a bond line, the blue line between your tubes and your radiator and your radiating surface which then cuts down on the amount of heat you can transfer.

Grant Anderson: Paragon developed something about 10 years ago called ExRad technology and that's actually trademarked. What we do is we extrude the radiator and so it's all one piece and build the radiator out of these extrusions and there's two good things about that. One is that it's a very efficient radiator because there's no losses in bond lines but the other one is that we can change the design very quickly and not have to totally redo the tooling like you would have to do on a honeycomb radiator.

Mat Kaplan: That's a great segue into the next question I was going to ask you anyway. When you're describing a lot of systems, machines some of them fairly complex, what are the things that worry you the most about these systems when they have to keep running, it's truly a matter of life and death? I mean the seals, bearings, contamination. I mean what are things that keep you up at night when you think about keeping this running?

Grant Anderson: That's the big problem going to Mars right now. In the past, we've designed things for like the space station that it assumes you could have another one sent up from Earth in a few months. So, if a pump fails you could have a new pump. Well, when you're on your way to Mars, you can't have a new pump sent to you. So, what you need is two things. One is access to what you need to fix. So, you need to make sure that unlike modern cars today where you can hardly find the spark plugs anymore, you need to be able to make it so that the astronauts can get into the system and fix something. You have to have planned in advance for what you might have to fix.

Grant Anderson: One of the things we consistently do is the risk analysis of what is likely to break? So, like a resistor sitting there on a board is probably not going to go bad but now a microcontroller that said the radiation might. So, can you make it so you can replace the microcontroller? Are the pumps sealed? Very often I hear about taking a 3D printer to Mars and one of the problems with that is 3D printers only print certain materials. So, then you have to have the discipline all the way back in the design phase to say, "We will only make say O-rings out of this material because we know this 3D printer can build them," or if you don't trust the 3D printer because that, of course, it's something that can break down too. Then, what, you need two of them or three of them? How do you the spares into the 3D printer that might break?

Grant Anderson: The other option is to carry them with you, and then you've got to have a good analysis to say, "Okay. We're going to have, need at least 3 more O-rings but we won't need 10 more 0-rings. So, we're going to take seven." You've got to do that down to the last little iota of things that might go wrong and plan for it. There's got to be a paradigm shift in how we build stuff because, of course, engineers like to optimize. If this O-ring for this pump pumping this fluid at this pressure, the best O-ring is made out of say nitrile rubber. But then this O-ring over here for this pump the best O-ring because it's pumping a different fluid at a different pressure in a different way should be some other type of soft material.

Grant Anderson: Well, if you do that and every engineer optimizes there for one thing, you end up with 18 different types of material that you need to take with you or spares. So, you have to have a little discipline in saying, "Okay, engineers, you're only going to build seals out of nitrile rubber." Some engineer will say, "But that won't last that long." "Great. We're going to take spares but" Then, an engineer says, "But if you make it out of this rubber it will never break maybe."

Grant Anderson: Then, you have to have that push me pull you for a little bit until you have discipline on what you are building things out of and it's very hard for an engineer to be told you're going to have to sub-optimize in order to satisfy the maintainability and replacement requirements.

Mat Kaplan: I got to say, again, this is so fascinating. We talk a lot on this show about why it's so difficult to get humans to Mars and back and you are providing a terrific additional demonstration of that. Let's go to the Moon. NASA recently announced the three companies, Blue Origin, SpaceX, and Dynetics have been selected for further development of the Artemis Human Landing System. Basically, the 21st Century version of the lunar module.

Mat Kaplan: NASA still hopes it's going to get men and women up there in less than four years. What's Paragons role on one of these teams? You're working with Dynetics, right?

Grant Anderson: That's correct. We're on Dynetics team that was announced. Our role is the life support system of course.

Mat Kaplan: How important for your work is going to the Moon before we go to Mars? I mean we've had the International Space Station as a testbed. Is the moon an essential step to teach us how to get to the red planet?

Grant Anderson: Yeah. I do believe so and I know that some people in the space community disagree with it but like I said there's no existence proof that says that we can build a life-support system and go to Mars. The Moon is a good midway place where you can test out systems, do a little bit of what I was talking about with the discipline of how you design and see what works and what doesn't work where you can at least get home in a few days, which is doable and you stick the extra things on you need, whether it's lithium hydroxide like I talked about four CO2 in case something breaks down.

Grant Anderson: But there's operationally an issue also. One thing that a lot of people I don't think realize is, but they do maybe now because of coronavirus. If you've been on a Zoom call and you're not running video or you can't see people and somebody pauses for one second too long to say something, people start jumping on top of each other. Well, we have this problem and it takes training going the Moon, you've got one and a half seconds for the light to go in either direction so you have to have this three second pregnant pause every time you say something and that's not accounting for when people have to think about something before they talk.

Grant Anderson: Really when you get like three or four or five light seconds away from Earth, which is only a few days into the mission going to Mars, you're no longer really able to discuss things with the ground. You can do video clips back and forth or vlogs in a way or podcasts but you really can't carry on a conversation. It may seem like I've gone far away from what we do is life support but say you're trying to repair something, if you don't have the materials and the instructions and the training and you need to call home to figure out how to do something, it's not like Joe mechanic in Nevada that built the system down here on Earth can walk you through it.

Grant Anderson: It's going to have to be something where they send you up with a manual or whatever else. But going back to the technology itself, there are certain absolutes. When you're maybe not so much with HLS, which is the human landing system but with the HALO, the human orbiter system around moon. I see that is absolutely the testbed for Mars missions. Because you're far away enough from Earth that you need to pay attention to P's and Q's. You don't have an immediate escape. It also has to operate for long, long periods of time and sometimes have quiescent periods, which we may also need where you launch it and it doesn't operate for a bunch of years until you get the crew on and go.

Grant Anderson: You've got to make sure that the system will survive and started up afterwards. All that will be tested on the HALO and what they call Gateway. I would be really reluctant to look the spouse and children of an astronaut in the eye and say, "I'm confident that we've done everything to keep your spouse alive all the way to Mars and back until we've tested it to that degree in an environment like around the Moon."

Mat Kaplan: I have become a convert to your way of thinking largely because of talking to people like you about this topic. I got just one more question that's sort of about the physical challenges. We know pretty well that the dirt on the surface of Mars wants to kill us. Moon dust maybe even more so. Is this something that you're already taken into account and have to take into account as you design the system that may be keeping people alive when they land this Dynetics lander on our satellite, the Moon?

Grant Anderson: Oh you bet. Yes. It keeps me up at night. There's a joke in the industry that there's two types of people. Those who thinks the Moon dust is a problem but we can fix it. The other one think that Moon dust means the sky is falling. Don't mind me coining the phrase for what we're talking about. I'm more on the sky is falling side of it. At least, with the Moon, the morphology of the Moon dust, the regolith is unlike anything, not only on Earth but that we can even simulate on Earth because when you've had something bombarded for four billion years by my micro meteorites in a 10 to the negative 12 or very, very low pressure environment, it just does not have any of the characteristics that were used to of dealing with say Moon simulants on the ground, which have interstitial air which is a great lubricant by the way.

Grant Anderson: So, Moon dust, it will harm seals. The astronauts that went to the Moon in Apollo said that zippers were falling apart. Their gloves were falling apart. The dust got under, in their fingernails, went straight in their fingernails and didn't come out for weeks after they got home and they pretty much have to wait for their fingernails to grow out. It's pretty nasty stuff. Seals and seals that will work with that are a concern.

Grant Anderson: I will say that Paragon recognizes two decades ago but we think we have the right materials that will survive exposure to this dust but it's really not a known. One of the things we'd love to do is as part of the Klipsch program, which is a commercial lunar payload program that NASA is running to plunk down a few testers on the Moon that will test rotating seals and static seals and see how they will survive the lunar dust, and then one other very important part is that as one element of going to the Moon that is not translatable to Mars.

Grant Anderson: The dust on Mars is a very different thing than the dust on the Moon. We may find all the ways to mitigate dust and prevent it from harming our equipment and everything on the Moon, and then we get to Mars and none of that is applicable anymore and we have to rediscover over again. So, what I'd love to do again is those same experiments we punk down on the Moon and test before we do the final build of the Moon lander, I'd love to be able to stick that same device on a Martian Lander and test it in Martian dust and see if the types of seals we think will work will actually work.

Grant Anderson: Lunar dust is a real issue. There's requirements within our spec that are no surprise. A lot of filtering systems, HEPA filters as we call them. The high efficiency filters but knowing that those will actually work is a problem. The Apollo program spent millions of dollars on dust mitigation and as far as I know, none of them worked. John Young used to say that to me and some of the others. I haven't talked to Harrison Smith a little while but I know that dust is an issue in their minds.

Mat Kaplan: Well, I hope that within a year or two, you may be able to start sending some of those seals and devices up there on some of those [CLPS 00:38:02] landers. Wish them luck. On a slightly different direction here, before we wrap up, Paragon is a great example of the thousands of subcontractors who you may not build rockets or spacecraft but you make it possible for other companies, the Boeings, SpaceXes of the world [inaudible 00:38:20]. Can you talk about that the role, the role that is played by these literally thousands of companies that makes it possible for us to do things in space?

Grant Anderson: Sure. They're a necessary part of the ecosystem, of course. I run a company so I have to say I'm a necessary part of the ecosystem but it's true. If you look today in an industry as mature as the airline industry. Well, they have been consolidating. The good thing about having multiple tier one, tier two, tier three suppliers is that you spread the risk.

Grant Anderson: One of the issues that I think SpaceX is going to run into and maybe Blue Origin to a lesser degree, if they want to do it all themselves. They want to have in-house environmental control, in-house propulsion, in-house structures everything like that. The problem is is that works for the first generation of vehicle and you can actually push the envelope in a lot of different areas but when you're working on the second or third or fourth generation of vehicle, the expense starts going up.

Grant Anderson: Boeing right now or Airbus does not foot the whole bill for developing a new aircraft. They spread the risk among these other big suppliers and other tier, what we call tier one, tier two or tier three suppliers. Those suppliers know their part of the business really well, whether it's avionics or the air pressure control system or the landing gear or the elevons or whatever on the aircraft. It's equivalent in space too.

Grant Anderson: What I see is this ecosystem of the suppliers. What we're doing is we're advancing our state of the art and our technology, we're putting the money into it. We have the best visibility into what might be needed, what might work. Sure, the big primes can come down and say, "Hey, we have this challenge but we're probably in a better place to discover the solution or we may already have a solution, we just haven't told you about it yet.

Grant Anderson: So, if you really want the whole commercial space industry to thrive, making sure that these sub-suppliers that specialize is really important to make sure that you end up with the best of the best really.

Mat Kaplan: You got to forgive me. I stupidly forgot that SpaceX does try to do as much as they can on their own. It seems to me and confirm this for me if you can, that another advantage of having all these subcontractors like Paragon is that you're in competition with other companies that are roughly the size of yours and are trying to get contracts to create the same kinds of devices, and that competitive pressure just as there is among the prime contractors, that might just be I'm sorry if you might prefer to do without it but it probably drives innovation and keeps costs down, doesn't it?

Grant Anderson: Oh, yeah. No. I will say that we do a little special dance when we win a job in direct competition with our competitors. That's the free market way. It's a good way of coming up with the best that way and it does keep us on our toes. Our job is to stay ahead of the curve in innovation and if you really want to distill Paragon down into one thing is we are a company of innovation that does life support, and part of our business model is actually that innovation is very applicable to say the outside world and non-space stuff.

Grant Anderson: So, we work actively with our patents and with our licensing and even in joint ventures or spin-offs to take that technology out to benefit a lot broader community than just the commercial space sector or the government space sector. It's definitely a sporty game, which is the name of a book that came out in the '80s about the airline industry but it applies still today. It keeps us all on our toes. That's for sure.

Mat Kaplan: I got just one more for you, Grant. Do you still spend a lot of time on your bike?

Grant Anderson: Yes, I do. I do. I tend to bike every weekend. Every two years I do an epic trip. Last year I did London to Glasgow which is about 540 miles, which didn't go all according to plan. I crashed one day and broke a rib but I did complete the last 280 miles with a broken rib, and then I came home and got fixed. One of the things that I think really makes Paragon unique is we really do pay attention to work/life balance.

Grant Anderson: The old saying is nobody on their deathbed said, "Gee, I wish I spent more time at the office." We want to make sure that people go out and live their lives while we are mission driven and we have a mission that is critical for the future of humanity we feel. You've got to also remember that we are human beings with 80 plus or minus 10 or 20 years on this planet. Life's too short to give up everything.

Grant Anderson: What I do is get out and bike. It satisfies two things. One is it keeps me in shape because if even if I'm not on the bike ride, I'm preparing for a bike ride. So, when I want to have that second doughnut, I refrain. But it also allows me to meet new people and go to new places and I'm a people person, I'll admit. I like to meet new people.

Mat Kaplan: That's apparent. Ever been out there pedaling along and come up with a solution that you weren't able to come up with sitting at your desk?

Grant Anderson: If you were to ask me, I don't know if I could point to one, but I can tell you that most of my best ideas are in the shower in the morning.

View original post here:

Staying Alive in Space - The Planetary Society

Zilliqa, the fast-rising cryptocurrency that has gained more than 845% since March – Nairametrics

MoneyGram recently reported a growth rate of over 100% of the year to year digital transactionson its platforms in Q1 2020, thanks to its recent partnership with Ripple (a leading cryptocurrency platform).

MoneyGram is afast-growingplatform for cross-border P2P payments and money transfers around many countries.

Last year, MoneyGram received $20 million in funding from Ripple to enhance its payment solutions through a partnership system with many leading financial institutions.

The funding by Ripple completes its $50 million offerings for about 15% stake in MoneyGram to run its experimental program for testing the effectiveness of the digital token XRP.

This deal would definitely give MoneyGrams arch-rival,Western Union,a run for its money.Reports from different private sources, seen by Nairametrics showthatWestern Union is now bent on buyingMoneyGramto scaleonitsrobustgrowth experienced lately.

READ MORE: Bitcoin: Nigerias new goldmine

Recall that XRP(Ripple),the fourth most widely used crypto-asset behind Bitcoin, Ethereum, andTether, had recently gotten the attention of the worlds biggest economy for money remittance.

U.S Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, which plays a major role in protecting Americas consumers in the financial sector,recently acknowledged Ripple by sayingthatitwouldseekcontinued growth and expanding partnershipsof companies such as Ripple.

READ ALSO: Bitcoin loses $1500 in 3 mins, pigs get slaughtered in BTC market

Im excited to report that our strong digital growth continued to accelerate in May, highlighting yet again the incredible progress weve made as an organization to focus on our strategy to lead the industry in digitizing the movement of money, AlexHolmes MoneyGram Chairman and CEO said.

Our digital business growth in May is particularly notable as we not only increased our active digital customer base but also continued to see these new digital customers return and transact more frequently due to our seamless customer experience and global platform, Holmes added.

The organic growth of MoneyGrams transactionsalsodeepensits hold on money transfersin 200 countries (70 countries enjoying the digital services).

Read more:

Zilliqa, the fast-rising cryptocurrency that has gained more than 845% since March - Nairametrics

Someone paid $2.6 million in fees to move $134 worth of crypto and oops – Mashable

There are typos, and then there are typos.

Someone appears to have made a mistake this morning when transferring the cryptocurrency ether (ETH), the younger sibling to bitcoin, from one digital wallet to another. After all, when moving around $134 dollars worth of digital currency, it hardly seems like anyone would intentionally pay a $2.6 million fee and yet that's exactly what happened.

That's right. Someone paid 10,668.73185 ETH, worth approximately $2.6 million at the time, to move 0.55 ETH from one wallet to another. The transaction, in all its painful glory, is visible on Etherscan a tool for viewing and searching ETH transactions.

While the internet loves a good conspiracy, and many on Twitter are speculating that this is evidence of some elaborate form of money laundering, a much simpler explanation is likely: a mistake.

Ethereum users can dictate the terms of their transactions, setting both the amount of ETH they want to send and the amount of fees they are willing to pay. The higher the fee, the thinking goes, the more likely their transaction will be included on the next block i.e. it will go through more quickly. It's possible, therefore, that someone attempted to send $2.6 million worth of ETH with $134 in fees and simply reversed the two fields.

Which, yeah. Oops.

Of course, we are talking about cryptocurrency, so some kind of convoluted scam is always a possibility. However, this wouldn't be the first time that an unusually large fee has been paid on an otherwise small transaction. In February of 2019, someone accidentally paid 2,100 ETH in fees to move .1 ETH.

Coindesk reported at the time that the South Korean blockchain firm behind the error admitted to the mistake, contacted the mining pool that had benefitted, and worked out a deal where the firm got half of the accidentally sent ETH returned. Notably, that partial happy ending 100 percent relied on the goodwill of the mining pool, as ETH transactions are non-reversible by design.

SEE ALSO: Not above the law: Steven Seagal's shady crypto past under siege by SEC

Is that what happened this time around? It's impossible to know for sure with the information that's publicly available at the moment, but either way, the next time you fat-finger a text message or make an embarrassing typo just keep in mind that it could be worse. Like, $2.6 million worse.

Read more:

Someone paid $2.6 million in fees to move $134 worth of crypto and oops - Mashable

80% of US and European Institutional Investors Find Cryptocurrency Appealing: Survey – Bitcoin News

A new survey of about 800 institutional investors in the U.S. and Europe shows strong cryptocurrency adoption, particularly bitcoin. About 80% of institutions said they find cryptocurrency appealing, and 60% believe cryptocurrencies have a place in their portfolios.

Fidelity Digital Assets, the cryptocurrency arm of Fidelity Investments, announced Tuesday the results of a survey to better understand institutional interest and adoption of cryptocurrencies as well as key barriers to investing in them. It was conducted from November 2019 to March 2020. Fidelity Digital Assets offers a full-service, enterprise-grade platform for securing, trading and supporting cryptocurrencies.

A total of 774 institutional investors participated in the survey, 393 of which were in the U.S. while 381 were in Europe. Respondents include financial advisors, family offices, pensions, crypto and traditional hedge funds, high net worth investors, endowments, and foundations. This is the second consecutive year Fidelity has surveyed U.S. institutions but it is the first time it surveyed European investors. According to the results:

Almost 80% of institutional investors find something appealing about digital assets.

Breaking down the number, 74% of U.S. institutional investors find cryptocurrency appealing, while 82% of European investors do. A notable contrast is that 25% of European investors find the fact that certain digital assets are free from government intervention to be appealing, whereas only 10% of investors in the U.S. feel this way, the report further reads.

Moreover, 36% of respondents 27% in the U.S. and 45% in Europe revealed that they are currently invested in digital assets. Bitcoin continues to be the cryptocurrency of choice with over a quarter of respondents holding BTC while 11% have exposure to ETH. Looking out five years, 91% of respondents who are open to exposure to digital assets in a portfolio expect to have at least 0.5% of their portfolio allocated to digital assets, the report adds.

Three characteristics of cryptocurrencies are most compelling to both U.S. and European institutional investors. 36% of respondents said uncorrelated to other asset classes, 34% are compelled by innovative technology, and 33% by the high upside potential. The report notes:

The majority of institutional investors (6 in 10) feel digital assets have a place in their portfolio, though opinions vary on precisely where.

Despite growing interest among institutions, obstacles remain to cryptocurrency adoption. 53% of respondents cited price volatility as the main reason, 47% said market manipulation, and 45% said lack of fundamentals to gauge appropriate value.

Fidelity Digital Assets president Tom Jessop commented on the survey findings: These results confirm a trend we are seeing in the market towards greater interest in and acceptance of digital assets as a new investable asset class. This is evident in the evolving composition of our client pipeline, which spans from crypto native funds to pensions.

What do you think about institutional interest in cryptocurrency? Let us know in the comments section below.

Image Credits: Shutterstock, Pixabay, Wiki Commons

Disclaimer: This article is for informational purposes only. It is not a direct offer or solicitation of an offer to buy or sell, or a recommendation or endorsement of any products, services, or companies. Bitcoin.com does not provide investment, tax, legal, or accounting advice. Neither the company nor the author is responsible, directly or indirectly, for any damage or loss caused or alleged to be caused by or in connection with the use of or reliance on any content, goods or services mentioned in this article.

Read disclaimer

Read more:

80% of US and European Institutional Investors Find Cryptocurrency Appealing: Survey - Bitcoin News

Cryptocurrency misappropriation, hacking, theft and fraud on target for banner year – JD Supra

According to one blockchain and cryptocurrency security firm, this year is on pace to be the second highest in cryptocurrency theft, hacking and fraud, with January through May 2020 already seeing $1.36 billion stolen in crypto crimes.

CipherTraces Spring Cryptocurrency Crime and Anti-Money Laundering Report (Report) released on June 2, 2020, revealed that 74% of bitcoin that moved in exchange-to-exchange transactions was cross borderhighlighting the need for compliance and regulation. In particular, the Report noted the need for global implementation of the Travel Rule, which applies to all US banks and Money Services Businesses (MSB), including crypto exchange and custodial wallet providers, for transactions of $3,000 and more. The Travel Rule requires banks and MSBs to share the names, geographical addresses and account numbers of both the originators and beneficiaries tied to payments of $3,000 or more with the next financial institution in line to handle the funds. The rule is a blow to the pseudo anonymity associated with cryptocurrencies.

The Report also noted an expected greater scrutiny of US Bitcoin ATMs (BATMs), as users sent more funds to high-risk exchanges than low-risk exchanges in 2019 through BATMs. High-risk exchanges are more likely to be used for money laundering schemes, such as the one run by Kunal Kalra, who pleaded guilty last year for operating a virtual currency exchange business where he exchanged US dollars for bitcoin, including proceeds of criminal activity, such as the sale of narcotics on the Darknet. At the time, the case was believed to be the first of its kind charging an unlicensed money remitting business that used a bitcoin kiosk. But with the percentage of funds being sent to high-risk exchanges doubling each yearso far this year, up to eight percent of all BATM payments are sent directly to high-risk exchangesregulation of, and enforcement actions involving, these exchanges are likely to increase.

Enforcement actions are already starting to materialize. Earlier this year, the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC) issued a cease and desist order to a US-based bank in New York for failing to fully vet its cryptocurrency customers and transactions in high-risk jurisdictions.

The cease and desist order noted insufficient Anti-Money Laundering (AML) controls, including opening accounts for Digital Asset Customers without sufficient customer due diligence and a lack of adequate monitoring and investigating of suspicious transactions linked to these customers. These deficiencies, in turn, prevented the bank from effectively identifying and investigating suspicious activity linked to crypto-related accounts, which prevented the bank from submitting Suspicious Activity Reports (SARs) to the US Department of Treasurys Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN). Importantly, the bank in question was required to implement measures to update its AML and Bank Secrecy Act (BSA) compliance programs involving digital assets.

The Report also found that the global average of criminal funds sent directly to exchanges overall dropped 47% in 2019, suggesting that criminals are finding it harder to offload illicit proceeds directly into cryptocurrency exchanges. While this suggests more effective implementation of AML measures, the downside may be that criminals are getting smarter about concealing the origins of their stolen funds prior to cashing out on exchanges.

In 2019, blockchain hacks, frauds and thefts totaled $4.5 billion, with the vast majority of that amount attributed to fraud and misappropriation versus hacks and thefts.

This year, the trend remains the same, with scams related to COVID-19 contributing to the losses. These scams take the form of impersonation of legitimate organizations and entities (i.e., the Red Cross) in order to obtain personal information and payment in cryptocurrency, applications claiming to support victims but, which are actually spying on users and the sale of PPE supposed treatments, testing kits, and phishing kits that never materialize.

The Report identified Finnish, Russian and UK exchanges as the top three global destinations for criminal funds last year. The Report reiterated that earlier this year, the Financial Action Task Force (FATF), often referred to as a global AML and counter-terrorism financing watchdog, found that the United States is largely compliant when it comes to regulations relating to cryptocurrencies and virtual assets.

Given the pace at which bitcoin fraud, misappropriation, theft and hacking appears to be occurring this year, as well as the latest criminal cases and enforcement actions, banks and MSBs are best advised to examine the robustness of their AML and BSA compliance programs, particularly in light of the Travel Rule, in order to avoid an enforcement action, losses associated with cryptocurrency fraud or, worse yet, a criminal case.

[View source.]

View post:

Cryptocurrency misappropriation, hacking, theft and fraud on target for banner year - JD Supra

Cryptocurrency Market News: Bitcoin drops to $9,100, the rest of the market follows suit – FXStreet

Here is what you need to know on Thursday, June 11, 2020

BTC/USD rejection from yesterday was continued today down to $9,100 but has recovered a little now and its trading at $9,350.

ETH/USD suffered a 9% drop today down to $226.2 holding the daily 26-EMA but losing the 12-EMA.

XRP/USD had one of the worst crashes today sliding below $0.20 and currently trading at around $0.191 although the low of the day was $0.184.

A lot of bearish action today in the market after yesterdays failed attempt to break $10,000 by Bitcoin. What initially looked like a mild rejection has turned into a significant crash but not everything is lost and some bullish sentiment is still active.

Bullish news from the United States, President Trump head of OCC seems to be a bitcoin bull according to a recent interview conducted by Forbes. Brian Brooks has recently become the new top banking regulator and is working for the Trump administration. Donald Trump is known for his strong stance against Bitcoin and cryptocurrencies in general.

A digital dollar might be closer than ever as the recent stimulus payments due to the COVID-19 have been quite disappointing. According to Christopher Giancarlo, co-founder of the Digital Dollar Project, digital dollars could help the financial system and make it really simple and accessible.

Binance, the most popular exchange by trading volume has just added a new Bitcoin Futures quarterly contract. Binance customers will be able to use 125x leverage on Bitcoin and benefit from 30 days of maker fee rebates and 0.02% taker fees until July 10.

Blockchain has potential to connect up, in a decentralized network, all kinds of data. It has the ability to create large, friction-free, decentralized networks of people. There is huge and great promise in blockchain and crypto.

Brian Brooks

Read the original here:

Cryptocurrency Market News: Bitcoin drops to $9,100, the rest of the market follows suit - FXStreet

Watch | What is crypto-jacking? – The Hindu

A cryptocurrency is a digital asset stored on computerised databases. These digital coins are recorded in digital ledgers using strong cryptography to keep them secure.

The ledgers are distributed globally, and each transaction made using cryptocurrencies are codified as blocks. And multiple blocks linking each other forms a blockchain on the distributed ledger.

There are estimated to be more than 47 million cryptocurrency users around the world.

These cryptocurrencies are created through a process called mining. To mine digital coins, miners need to use high-end processors that will consume a lot of electricity.

These minted digital assets are decentralised, unlike physical cash that is regulated by each countrys central bank. The ownership of these digital assets is cryptographically coded, and the blockchain system enables transfer of ownership.

Also read: Notes on a digital currency plan, made in China

But, to ensure it is used only by one entity, the distributed ledger accepts transaction performed by the first user, rejecting all other blocks. This way, the same cryptocurrency cant be used by two different entities, making a fool-proof financial system.

However, there are other ways in which a security breach can happen in this world of cryptocurrency. Crypto-jacking is what some digital coin miners do to illegally gain access to many computers. The miners stealthily drop malware in an unsuspecting users pc.

Once installed, the crypto mining code runs surreptitiously and turns devices into cryptocurrency-mining botnets. The mined digital assets are then stored in digital ledgers with unique codes.

Unlike most other types of malware, crypto-jacking scripts do not use the victims data. But they drain the CPUs resources, which slows down the system, increases electricity usage, and causes irreparable damage to the hardware.

Hackers tend to prefer anonymous cryptocurrencies like Monero and Zcash, over the more popular Bitcoin as it is harder to track illegal activity back to them on these platforms.

The practice of crypto-jacking is currently on the rise as the price of the asset is falling, according to Palo Alto Networks. So, to reduce costs associated with mining, hackers resort to crypto-jacking.

Continued here:

Watch | What is crypto-jacking? - The Hindu

Meet ZCash, the cryptocurrency that protects your privacy better than Bitcoin – Nairametrics

MoneyGram recently reported a growth rate of over 100% of the year to year digital transactionson its platforms in Q1 2020, thanks to its recent partnership with Ripple (a leading cryptocurrency platform).

MoneyGram is afast-growingplatform for cross-border P2P payments and money transfers around many countries.

Last year, MoneyGram received $20 million in funding from Ripple to enhance its payment solutions through a partnership system with many leading financial institutions.

The funding by Ripple completes its $50 million offerings for about 15% stake in MoneyGram to run its experimental program for testing the effectiveness of the digital token XRP.

This deal would definitely give MoneyGrams arch-rival,Western Union,a run for its money.Reports from different private sources, seen by Nairametrics showthatWestern Union is now bent on buyingMoneyGramto scaleonitsrobustgrowth experienced lately.

READ MORE: Bitcoin: Nigerias new goldmine

Recall that XRP(Ripple),the fourth most widely used crypto-asset behind Bitcoin, Ethereum, andTether, had recently gotten the attention of the worlds biggest economy for money remittance.

U.S Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, which plays a major role in protecting Americas consumers in the financial sector,recently acknowledged Ripple by sayingthatitwouldseekcontinued growth and expanding partnershipsof companies such as Ripple.

READ ALSO: Bitcoin loses $1500 in 3 mins, pigs get slaughtered in BTC market

Im excited to report that our strong digital growth continued to accelerate in May, highlighting yet again the incredible progress weve made as an organization to focus on our strategy to lead the industry in digitizing the movement of money, AlexHolmes MoneyGram Chairman and CEO said.

Our digital business growth in May is particularly notable as we not only increased our active digital customer base but also continued to see these new digital customers return and transact more frequently due to our seamless customer experience and global platform, Holmes added.

The organic growth of MoneyGrams transactionsalsodeepensits hold on money transfersin 200 countries (70 countries enjoying the digital services).

Go here to see the original:

Meet ZCash, the cryptocurrency that protects your privacy better than Bitcoin - Nairametrics

Europol busts $17 million illegal Netflix site that used cryptocurrency – Decrypt

European authorities have seized a bootleg streaming service frequented by over 2 million users. The platform, which came decked out with its very own customer service team, ran a tight shipearning over 15 million ($17 million) via bank transfers and cryptocurrency.

Accused of pirating over 40,000 movies, documentaries, and TV programs from Netflix, Amazon, and the likes, the criminal operation ran for over five years before being captured by Europol, Bloomberg reports.

Discovered among the ill-gotten plunder were exotic cars, property, and approximately 4.8 million ($5.4 million) in cryptocurrencies. Additionally, officials froze a further 1.1 million ($1.2 million) in various bank accounts.

The bust comes as millions seek refuge online amid coronavirus lockdownsbolstering the bottom lines of entertainment services. Legitimate streaming service Netflix added 15 million subscribers in Q1 2020 alone as a result.

The coronavirus also prompted a rampant rise in piracy. According to anti-piracy firm, Muso, come March, visits to illegal piracy sites had spiked by more than 40% in the US.

In response to unabated content swiping, streaming services may choose to up their costs, say experts.

The background threat of piracy means that the subscription video-on-demand services will have the ongoing threat of piracy as a pricing factor, Midia Research analyst Tim Mulligan told Bloomberg.

Ironically, price hikes may initiate a vicious cycle, leading more people to seek cheaperand in some casesillegal alternatives.

Nevertheless, blockchain may hold the answer. As reported by Decrypt, several ventures are applying blockchain's immutable faculties to anti-piracy systems. This includes the Content Blockchain Project, which harnesses an open standard via a decentralized blockchain ecosystem to crackdown on pirated content. But in the meantime, this raid will be quite the setback.

The rest is here:

Europol busts $17 million illegal Netflix site that used cryptocurrency - Decrypt

Cryptocurrency and Capital Gains: The Sources of Vermont Candidates’ Wealth – Seven Days

The leading candidates for governor of Vermont earned between $190,000 and $400,000, according to their most recent tax returns well in excess of the state's average income. But none came close to lieutenant gubernatorial candidate Scott Milne, who reported making more than $2 million in 2018.

The Pomfret Republican took more than $256,000 in profits from Milne Travel and drew a salary close to $101,000, according to a tax return filed with the Secretary of State's Office. Milne owns a 49 percent stake in the travel agency cofounded by his late parents and nowmajority-owned by Altour.

But the vast majority of the candidate's 2018 income came not from plane tickets or cruise ship reservations but fromthe sale of cryptocurrency. Milne's tax return shows capital gains of more than $1.7 million, most of which he said was attributable to sale of the Ethereumand Ethereum Classic digital currencies.

"These investments are one of the cleanest ways of investing in the promise blockchain can bring to society, which I believe is immense and potentially transformational," he said. Milne declined to discuss the details of the transactions, but during his 2016 race for the U.S. Senate, he reported owning between $300,000 and $600,000 of the two currencies. The price of both spiked in 2018 and has since retreated.

"I had some investments that were very strong that year, had a business that was very strong that year," Milne said. "Obviously I've had a lot of years that were not like that."

Milne's success in 2018 evidently did not inspire a turn to philanthropy. He said he donated just $4,885 to charitable causes that year about two-tenths of 1 percent of his income. "I gave north of half a million dollars to the federal government," he explained. "So that was money that went to support our common good."

Since the 2018 election, candidates for the state legislature have been required to submit financial disclosure forms when petitioning to get on the ballot. Those running for statewide office must also submit a copy of their most recent tax return. (Because Tax Day was delayed until July this year due to the coronavirus pandemic, some candidates provided their 2018 returns, while others did so for 2019.)

The documents do not include a list of assets or reveal a candidate's net worth, but they do provide a glimpse of a candidate's most recent earnings. The latest batch shows that several top candidates made far more than Vermont's median household income of roughly $60,000 a year.

Democratic gubernatorial candidate Rebecca Holcombe, a former state education secretary from Norwich, reported that she and her spouse made nearly $403,000 in 2019. Republican Gov. Phil Scott and his spouse made close to $293,000 in 2018. Patrick Winburn, a Democratic gubernatorial candidate and Bennington lawyer, earned more than $235,000 with his spouse that year. And Lt. Gov. David Zuckerman, an organic farmer from Hinesburg who is also seeking the Democratic gubernatorial nomination, reported with his spouse more than $191,000 in income in 2019.

Holcombe and her husband, ProPublica investigative reporter James Bandler,reported more than $138,000 in wages that year. For the first few months of 2019, Holcombe worked as an adjunct professor at Boston College. Thecouple also co-own with four others the Highland Lodge, an inn in Greensboro.

In addition to their salaries, Holcombe and Bandler reported nearly $97,000 in dividends and more than $165,000 in capital gains.

Holcombe said she came into an inheritance in early 2019 and opted to sell or give away some of the stocks she acquired. "Primarily, the gains you see on the return were associated with divestment from fossil fuels and [the pharmaceutical industry], as well as some technology," she said.

According to Holcombe, she and Bandler made nearly $197,000 in charitable contributions that year, largely in the form of stocks. Only about $133,000 of that was deductible, she said.

Holcombe, who has promised to fight for low-income Vermonters, said her personal finances helped illustrate inequities within the economic system."It's a really good case study of how our current economy doesn't work for most Americans," she said. "What you see in my tax returns is that the strength of the stock market is unconnected with the strength of the broader economy and particularly the well-being of lower earners."

According to Zuckerman, most of his $58,000 worth of deductions that year were the result of stock gifts to climate education organizations.

Zuckerman, who co-owns Hinesburg's Full Moon Farm with wife, Rachel Nevitt, reported $99,000 in wages in 2019. That included Zuckerman's $67,000 salary as lieutenant governor and Nevitt's pay from the farm.

The couple also reported nearly $106,000 worth of losses, which Zuckerman attributed to a tough year on the farm. A droughtthe previous summer and fall led to a small harvest and reduced sales over the winter, he said. The farm then invested in new infrastructure and a hemp crop that was initially unprofitable. "Serving as lieutenant governor has impacted the profitability of the farm," he said.

Though Zuckerman said he considered himself fortunate, he argued that the 2019 tax year was an aberration.

"Sometimes a single snapshot in time doesn't always tell the whole story," he said. "Ultimately, I've been very lucky to not have college debt and to have been able to start a business, but the recent economic bump is due to the unfortunate circumstance of my mom passing away."

"This is the most I've ever made in any job I've ever had, so this is a blip on the screen in some respects," Scott said of his gubernatorial gig. "Everything I did for 30 years was to keep reinvesting in [DuBois] and not taking a lot out."

Winburn, who has contributed more than $105,000 to his own campaign, had $188,000 in earnings from his law practice in 2018, according to his tax return. His wife, Kim Winburn, made another $45,000 as his office manager.

The remaining candidates for governor Douglas Cavett, Ralph Corbo, Cris Ericson, John Klar, Bernard Peters, Emily Peyton and Boots Wardinski all reported far more modest earnings or failed to file a tax return. The same was true for many of Milne's competitors for lieutenant governor.

Among the leading contenders for the Democratic nomination for lieutenant governor, Assistant Attorney General Molly Gray reported close to $80,000 in earnings in 2019, Senate President Tim Ashe (D/P-Chittenden) made $47,000in 2018 and activist Brenda Siegel earned just more than $8,000in 2018.

Like Holcombe and Zuckerman, Ingram attributed her wealth to an inheritance. "It just so happens it's the most income I've ever made in my whole life," she said. "The focus of my politics has been on everyday Vermonters who don't make a lot of money and making sure we protect the vulnerable in our society. So I don't want to come across as somebody who's out of touch. I'm not."

Disclosure: Tim Ashe is the domestic partner of Seven Days publisher and coeditor Paula Routly. Find our conflict-of-interest policy here: sevendaysvt.com/disclosure.

Read more:

Cryptocurrency and Capital Gains: The Sources of Vermont Candidates' Wealth - Seven Days

Trio of Analysts Bullish on Ethereum (ETH) As Cryptocurrency Shows Robust Fundamentals – The Daily Hodl

A number of crypto strategists predict that Ethereum is about to regain its bullish momentum just as the second-largest cryptocurrency is making strides in terms of fundamental development.

A pseudonymous crypto analyst named Crypto Mocho tells his 123,000 Twitter followers that he believes Ethereum is a strong buy on dips as the cryptocurrency forms a solid base around $236.

Trader Crypto Michal echoes Crypto Mochos sentiments.

He expects ETH to move through a short-term retracement before marching higher. The trader sees Ethereum climbing as high as $331 in August.

Meanwhile, trader Galaxy sees Ethereum rising in tandem with Bitcoin this month after the leading cryptocurrencys impressive performance in May. The move highlights the inherent risk of trading altcoins, which tend to rise and fall based on the direction of BTC.

Highest monthly close [of] BTC in over 7 months. Im expecting nothing less than: 11,000 BTC, $300 ETH in June.

The emerging bullish sentiment in ETH among traders comes amid the cryptocurrencys growth in a number of on-chain metrics.

Crypto intelligence platform Glassnode reports that the number of addresses holding Ethereum has soared to over 72.25 million in May, representing an increase of more than 144% on a year-over-year basis.

Ethereum users are not simply hodling. Glassnode co-founder Rafael Schultze-Kraft says that the second-largest cryptocurrencys usage is also skyrocketing.

The number of new addresses involved in more than one ETH transfer has grown significantly this year. New daily addresses with:

The smart contract blockchain is scheduled to roll out phase 0 of Ethereum 2.0 sometime this year, in part of a long-planned and delayed transition from a proof-of-work to a proof-of-stake model to deal with scalability issues.

Ethereum is trading at $243.50 at time of writing according to CoinMarketCap.

Read the original:

Trio of Analysts Bullish on Ethereum (ETH) As Cryptocurrency Shows Robust Fundamentals - The Daily Hodl

Cryptocurrency Market Update: IOTA rockets to the moon Bitcoin, Ripple and Ethereum in consolidation – FXStreet

IOTA is the only bull in a sloth of bears. The digital asset has rocketed towards the moon, leaving a gust of wind and smoke, currently suffocating the rest of the cryptocurrency market. The cryptoasset is up 3.4% on the day after correcting from the opening value of $0.24081 to $0.24875 (prevailing value). The European session has seen IOTA briefly step above $0.25 hurdle.

The daily chart shows that IOT/USD is poised for more action upwards. The price is dancing above the Ichimoku Kinko Hyo, signaling that bulls have the upper hand. Moreover, IOTA is also above the moving averages. Both the MACD and the RSI are horizontal in movement, suggesting that if a breakout fails then consolidation would take over. An ascending trendline is in line to offer support above the 50 SMA and the 200 SMA.

The largest cryptocurrency has been able to hold above the support at $9,600 after losing ground from levels close to $10,000 last weekend. Resistance at $9,900 is a hard nut crack, leaving the bulls with no choice but to play defense at $9,600. At the time of writing BTC/USD is trading at $9,674 after a 1.1% loss on the day.

Ethereum is one of the best-performing cryptocurrencies in the industry this year partly due to the upcoming upgrade, Ethereum 2.0. The launch date for this massive upgrade of the network is yet to be revealed but reports indicate that investors are already stocking up on the coins in readiness for the staking feature.

At the moment, Ethereum is trading at $243. It has contained losses above $240 since the rejection from $255 last week. The consolidation is likely to give way for gains past $250 while aiming for $280 in the medium-term.

Ripple has recently lost the third position to the largest and oldest stablecoin in the market, Tether (USDT). XRPs performance has continued to dwindle in spite of the recovery from March lows at $0.11. Recently, Peter Brandt referred to the cryptoasset as a manipulated token. Note that, Ripple as a company owns the majority of XRP total supply soldmonthly to large volume buyers. Some people believe the sales only flood the market, affecting the performance of XRP.

Meanwhile, XRP is trading at $0.2025 after a subtle 0.84% loss on the day. Support is seen at $0.20 while the upside is capped first at $0.2050 and then at $0.21. Other resistance zones include $0.25 and $0.30.

Read more:Ripple Technical Analysis: XRP/USD impending triangle breakout could rally to $0.25

See the article here:

Cryptocurrency Market Update: IOTA rockets to the moon Bitcoin, Ripple and Ethereum in consolidation - FXStreet