The 7 best secret beaches in the USA – Lonely Planet Travel News

Nothing beats a quiet day spent at the beach. Especially if you can find a stretch of silky sand that is not crowded. From a national park located on a remote island to a state park packed with driftwood to a cove known for its whale migration, here are some secluded beaches with ample elbow room.

Beaches that will blow your mind

At Big Talbot Island State Park, on an Atlantic Coast barrier island between Amelia Island and Fort George Island, youll find a beach that might not be what youd expect to see in Florida. About a half-hour drive fromJacksonville, Boneyard Beach (aka Black Rock Beach) is not your typical white sandy beach. Along the coastline and among the 30-foot bluffs, youll find massive driftwood trees. Climbing these beauties will make you feel like a kid again, and if you stick around for sunset, youre in for a treat. The driftwood makes for a lovely silhouette shot. Eventhe geological formations here are super unique only 3.5 percent of land in the U.S. has this type of black rock.

From sand dunes to sea cliffs, Michigan is full of natural wonders worthy of a quick escape. Talk to any Michigander for recommendationsand Sleeping Bear Dunes National Lakeshoreon South Manitou Island will surely come up. Trekking to the top is practically a rite of passage. If you take the Dunes Trail, the whole trip is about 3.5 miles and takes 2 to 4 hours depending on your fitness level and the weather.

The peaceful area is home to 35 miles of shoreline, so choosing your own spot is very simple. With bright blue water in the foreground and sand dunes behind, its serene to the nth degree. After beach lounging, hike among conifers and hardwoods. But remember, cougars sometimes roam around these parts.

With just 60,000 annual visitors, Dry Tortugas National Park is one of the least visited national parks in the nation. Known for its amazing coral reef system, historic fort and sea turtles,Dry Tortugas National Park, about 70 nautical miles west ofKey West, is a pretty special place to visit. Nearly 99 percent of the parks hundred square miles are submerged beneath the water where moray eels, Goliath grouper and nurse sharks flourish.

During the day, spend time snorkeling, kayaking and learning about when Ponce de Leon first stepped foot here in 1513. When the ferry boat leaves, if you camp on the beach here and youll have the island almost to yourself. Major bonus: its relatively bug-free because theres no freshwater to attract mosquitos.

Located across the Calibogue Sound from Hilton Head Island, this South Carolina island is surrounded by beautiful uncrowded beaches and ancient oaksdripping with Spanish moss. Theres no bridge to the mainland, so book a ferry ride or hop in your own boat to get there. Once you arrive, golf carts, bikes or your own two feet are the best way to explore. Take time to learn about the Gullah/Geechee influence, soak up therich art scene and sample the Lowcountry cuisine.

Gray Whale Cove State Beach in Half Moon Bay is one ofNorthern Californias under-the-radar beaches. Pack a picnic lunch (theres a picnic area on the bluff with a spectacular view) and if you are there during the Gray Whale migration (November to April) be on the lookout for the gentle giants. The whales often come fairly close to shore. When you venture down to the beach, just know that there is a nudist area on the north end. So, if you arent into that, go left at the bottom of the stairs.

Five gorgeous islands off the Southern California coast make up the remoteChannel Islands National Park. Arrive by small plane or boat or kayak to the 100-foot-wide Painted Cave, one of the largest sea caves in the world. And its not the only one: There are 30 sea caves dotting the islands and plenty of dramatic sea cliffs. Known as the Galapagos of North America, many come to see the endemic plants and wildlife.

On land, look for the endangered island barberry and the soft-leaved paintbrush plant. In the water, its common to see bright orange garibaldi fish, harbor seals, sea lions and giant sea kelp. If youre a hiker, visit Anacapa to see the lighthouse. Dont forget Santa Rosa IslandsLobo Canyon for sandstone formations, pygmy mammoth fossils and, if youre lucky, local island foxes.

From camping to the Carnegies,Cumberland Island sure is a special place. This nationalseashoreis a haven for wildlife. On the beach, youll find wild horses and loggerhead turtles. Hike through the islands interior, which is shaded by enormous oak tree canopies, for the chance to see armadillos, deer, hogs, rabbits, turkeys and raccoons. Except for the wildlife, its never crowded because the only way to get there is by boat or ferry ride, and once you are there, youve got 17 miles worth of sandy shores to choose from.

Unusual beaches you have to see to believe

Get more travel inspiration, tips and exclusive offers sent straight to your inbox with our weekly newsletter. Make sure you're ready for anything with travel insurance from our trusted partners.

See more here:

The 7 best secret beaches in the USA - Lonely Planet Travel News

Headed to the beach? You’ll see some big changes – WCVB Boston

Headed to the beach? You'll see some big changes

Updated: 10:28 AM EDT Jun 21, 2020

Hide TranscriptShow Transcript

WOLLASTON BEACH, JOSH SOME CHANGES FOR BEACH GOERS TODAY, . JOSH: IT IS 10:00 BUT IT IS ALREADY PRETTY WARM OUT HERE. SOME FAMILIES ARE OUT HERE ALREADY. THEY HAVE THEIR TENTS, SOME ARE WALKING ON THE SAN OBVIOUSLY AT THIS POINT, PEOPLE ARE ABLE TO DISTANCE GIVEN THE NUMBER OF PEOPLE ON THE BEACH. WHAT YOU WILL START TO SEE THAT IS DIFFERENT ARE THE LIFEGUARD CHAIRS BEING FILLED WITH THE GUARDS. THIS IS SOMETHING THE DCR HAS JUST ANNOUNCED. THIS WEEKEND, DCR, THE APARTMENT OF CONSERVATION -- DEPARTMENT OF CONSERVATION RECTORY AUCTIO -- RECREATION BEACHES. MAINTAINING 12 FEET BETWEEN GROUPS ON THE BEACH WHICH ARE NOT TO EXCEED 10 PEOPLE. THE BEACH GAMES, THEY ARE REALLY FUN. THEY ARE NOT ALLOWED. THAT INCLUDES VOLLEYBALL, SPIKE BALL AND OTHERS AS WELL. THIS IS GOING TO BE THE FOURTH STRAIGHT 90 DEGREE DAY FOR A LOT OF PLACES. I EXPECT MANY BEACHES TO FILL UP

Headed to the beach? You'll see some big changes

Updated: 10:28 AM EDT Jun 21, 2020

VIDEO: Leave the volleyball net at home. Beaches are reopening, but there will be some big changes in place.

VIDEO: Leave the volleyball net at home. Beaches are reopening, but there will be some big changes in place.

Here is the original post:

Headed to the beach? You'll see some big changes - WCVB Boston

Crowded beaches and lines for tobacco: What day one of Spains new normality looked like on Sunday – EL PAS in English

Spain was plunged into the so-called new normality on Sunday, after nearly 100 days under a state of alarm due to the coronavirus crisis. Subject to temperature checks, the obligatory use of masks, and supplied with liters and liters of hand sanitizer, passengers on a hundred or so flights landed in Spain from Schengen-area countries, with a total of 225 routes restarting a low number compared to a normal month of June.

El Prat airport in Barcelona, for example, was operating at 5% of capacity yesterday. The majority of arrivals were foreigners who work in Spain and who left the country during the lockdown. There were few tourists to be seen. Cristhie Mcfett is from South Africa and has worked in Barcelona in the digital music industry for the last two years. When the pandemic was declared I came home, but now that the situation there is worse, I have come back to carry on working, she explained.

Spains border with France opened on Sunday the frontier with Portugal remains closed and from the start of the day lines formed in Behobia, Irn, where French citizens were waiting to buy cheap tobacco, cosmetics and Spanish ham. Its been 90 days since I smoked, joked one young Frenchman on Sunday, who had been paying double for cigarettes during the lockdown given the higher taxes paid on the product in France.

Plenty of bathers came to the beaches of Cdiz, in southern Spain, where people had to be turned away in order to avoid overcrowding. Bolonia beach, in Tarifa, for example, was faced with the difficult combination of more bathers, lower capacity, and the same amount of sand as always, which is also subject to rising and falling tides. As a result, many of the access points to the beaches across the province had to be shut to avoid overcrowding.

The lifting of the state of alarm which means that citizens can move freely across the entire Spanish territory for the first time since March 14 was noted in tourist zones such as Xbia, in the eastern Mediterranean province of Alicante, where thousands of people have second residences. The arrival of tourists there was met with a mixture of relief given the effect it will have on the local economy and apprehension, due to the risk of new coronavirus outbreaks. Were calling on people to use common sense to avoid risky situations, said the mayor of Xbia, Jos Chulvi. We trust that everyone will act responsibly, we are not going to be marking out spaces on beaches, he added, in reference to the social-distancing measures that are being introduced in some of Spains coastline.

The countrys children, who were subject to one of the strictest lockdowns in the world at the start of the state of alarm, were greeted by the sight of play parks open for business once more, with the police tape being removed from swings and slides in cities such as Barcelona, Valencia, A Corua and Madrid. Seville and Bilbao will follow suit during the week. The authorities are trusting parents to clean their childrens hands with sanitizer after they play in the parks, and for social distancing to be observed not an easy task when it comes to the younger boys and girls.

With reporting by Jess A. Caas, Pedro Gorospe, Ignacio Zafra, Javier Martn-Arroyo.

Read more here:

Crowded beaches and lines for tobacco: What day one of Spains new normality looked like on Sunday - EL PAS in English

Daylight Beach Club returns to Mandalay Bay as an adult pool on the Las Vegas Strip. – Eater Vegas

Daylight Beach Club, the pool party at Mandalay Bay, returns on July 2 as an adult-only pool scene for those 21 and over, one day after the resort reopens on the south end of the Strip.

Pool parties and nightclubs were two of the first venues to close when the coronavirus pandemic started in Nevada in March. And while the Nevada Gaming Control Board says neither can return in their former form quite yet, that hasnt stopped resorts on the Las Vegas Strip from bringing toned down versions of the pool party and nightclubs back.

Parent company Play Management says the venue will offer music from local deejays instead of well-known names, along with bottle service, food, and frozen cocktails.

Customers need to make a reservation in advance for a daybed or cabana, and social distancing will keep the number of people at each limited.

Daylight plans to be open Thursdays through Sundays from 11 a.m. to 6 p.m.

Daylight joins Encore Beach Club at Encore Las Vegas and Marquee Dayclub at the Cosmopolitan of Las Vegas in changing from a pool party to an adult pool scene.

Gov. Steve Sisolak closed casinos on March 17 to curb the spread of COVID-19. The Nevada Gaming Control Board issued guidelines to resorts to reopen that include maintaining 50 percent capacity, masks on staff, cleaning protocols, and social distancing throughout the casino. Casinos were permitted to reopen across the state on June 4.

The Pool Party Returns to Las Vegas, Just a Little Tamer [ELV]

Nightclubs and Pool Parties Will Not Reopen When Casinos in Nevada Do [ELV]

How Coronavirus Is Affecting Las Vegas Food and Restaurants [ELV]

Sign up for our newsletter.

Go here to read the rest:

Daylight Beach Club returns to Mandalay Bay as an adult pool on the Las Vegas Strip. - Eater Vegas

Memorial Beach won’t get its summer dam this year – Sonoma West

Sonoma County Regional Parks announced last week that it wouldnt be installing the annual summer dam at the Healdsburg Veterans Memorial Beach. The primary reasons for not installing the summer dam include projections of reduced river flow and concerns about how to install the dam while following social distancing guidelines.

According to an announcement from Sonoma County Regional Parks, water managers are anticipating that river flow will be about two-thirds below what it usually is. With the reduced river flow, theres an increased need to preserve water storage for Lake Mendocino in order to support the fish habitat as the season progresses.

While the installation of the dam allows for the creation of a swimming area during summer months, the COVID-19 pandemic is making it so the beach wont have the same amount of lifeguard watch as it usually has.

In most summers, the county installs a temporary dam at the beach, just downstream from Healdsburgs Memorial Bridge, creating a swimming area from late June through early September. Due to the health emergency, Regional Parks does not have the seasonal staff to fully lifeguard the beach and enforce new social distancing and hygiene requirements, the announcement states. The beach will remain open without the dam and full-time lifeguards, with river conditions suitable for wading and more shoreline for visitors to spread out for sunbathing and picnicking. Roving lifeguard patrols will visit Memorial Beach and other river parks beginning in July.

Excerpt from:

Memorial Beach won't get its summer dam this year - Sonoma West

Mother, Son Rescued From Sand Collapse On Nauset Beach – CBS Boston

ORLEANS (CBS) There was a scare at Nauset Beach Friday afternoon when a mother and her teenage son became trapped under the sand after digging a hole. It happened in a remote part of the beach in the overland area where people drive their cars onto the sand.

Orleans Fire Chief Geof Deering said firefighters and seasonal EMTs stationed at the beach were called in to help.

The entire hole was about six feet deep and the male was sitting in the bottom of it when the sand collapsed and trapped him and also trapped the woman, Deering said.

The teen was buried up to his mid torso and his mother was up to her waist.

Its a very delicate process when it comes to sand, Deering said. We have to do it very carefully so it doesnt continue to collapse on those people.

It took the 11-person crew about 20 minutes to dig them out.

Today we were very lucky that these two people were not injured seriously and we were able to get to them quickly and remove them, Deering said. But it highlights something that is very innocent. Digging in the sand, playing on the beach is a pretty innocent thing, but really it can turn very dangerous very quickly.

Deering warned beachgoers never to dig holes beyond the height of the knees of the smallest person in the group.

More here:

Mother, Son Rescued From Sand Collapse On Nauset Beach - CBS Boston

This remote destination is home to one of Texas’ least crowded beaches – culturemap.com

Texas has hundreds of miles of coastline and dozens of great beach spots. Whatever your pleasure surfing, fishing, wildlife-watching, partying, sand-castle building theres a beach for that.

But right now, beach-goers want long, uncrowded stretches of sand where they can safely keep their distance from other visitors. Add in the music of wind, waves, and birds (with no shops, bars, or high-rises to block your view of the dunes and the water), andMatagorda Bay Nature Park is the place.

Located on the Gulf Coast, about midway between Galveston and Corpus Christi, Matagorda Bay is literally at the end of a long narrow road bounded by salty wetlands on one side and the last stretch of the Colorado River on the other.

The location may be remote about a six-hour journey from Fort Worth but this Lower Colorado River Authority (LCRA) park has everything you need to enjoy it: parking, picnic areas, fishing piers, and restrooms.

The visitor center sells coffee and ice cream and rents beach chairs, umbrellas, wagons, and even kayaks and stand-up paddleboards. It also houses a gift shop and educational exhibits on area habitat and wildlife, complete with fish and touch tanks.

An RV park has full hookups and a laundry room, and the park allows tent camping in RV sites, or you can pitch a tent on the sand and really rough it.

The best option for a no-hassle, high-comfort beach experience is renting one of the two onsite Airstreams. The sleek silver trailers have practically wall-to-wall windows, the better to enjoy their waterside setting. Each comes with a fully equipped kitchen, two TVs, a sound system, a stack of towels, and a surprising amount of storage space. Private patios sport an enormous outdoor grill, Yeti cooler, and a picnic table, plus a view of the Colorado and its opposite shore, nothing but a tangle of wild brush.

In the park, sit down beneath a rustling palm tree and watch as pelicans glide above the water or drift peacefully on its surface. In the reeds, stilt-legged herons stalk fish, and on the fishing pier, people with fishing poles do the same. Dont have fishing gear, or forgot to bring it? No worries: the park will lend you some and even hosts occasional activities to teach you the basics (free, but reservations are required).

The beach here, one of the widest in Texas hands-down, runs northeast from the Colorado River for 23 miles and is perfect for long walks, sandcastle building, beachcombing, or just sitting. Driving a car on the beach requires a $10 permit from the county, available at the park and good for the rest of the year, and four-wheel drive is recommended.

Skip the driving and put a kayak in the water right behind the Airstream to explore, or join one of the parks guided paddles. Paddle across the river to 35 more miles of beach, accessible only by watercraft, and thus even less trammeled than the park side.

For more exploring via water, check out the East Matagorda Bay kayak trails (ask for a map at the visitor center). For some land-based exploring, Thunder Horse Outfitters across from the visitor center offers horseback rides on the beach. And after the sun sets, the skies here are dark enough for some serious stargazing.

Beach experiences just dont get much better than this.

The park visitor fee is $5 per adult (13-64), $2 for seniors (65 and up), and kids are free. RV sites start at $50, and camping starts at $40.

Read the rest here:

This remote destination is home to one of Texas' least crowded beaches - culturemap.com

Why a Universal Basic Income is the solution to inequity – Women’s Agenda

Imagine society as a ladder. At the top, youll find wealth and status. At the bottom, poverty and discrimination.

Where we start life on the ladder is largely a function of the ovarian lottery.

For almost everyone, there are rungs above you representing people with more wealth and status. There are also almost always rungs below you too.

People on lower rungs might be willing to trade positions with you in a heartbeat if it was an option.

Some people climb the ladder of society toward wealth and status with ease. Others struggle just to stay in the same spot, fighting not to slip down several rungs.

Meritocracy believers would say people who progress up the ladder do so thanks to talent, hard work and their performance. Some will tell you poverty is a personality defect.

Those who say meritocracy is a myth suggest human biases and our personal networks play a significant role in any movement on that ladder. Theyre more inclined to say poverty comes from a lack of cash, not a lack of character.

Whichever your opinion, it turns out the length of that ladder the distance between the top and bottom rungs matters.

It impacts your happiness. And perhaps not in the way youd think.

You might suppose that the more rungs there are the larger the gap between the top and bottom the happier youd be if youre near the top.

After all, the top of a longer ladder means youre better off, relatively speaking, than more people. Surely thats a little buzz of satisfaction?

If were measured against the metaphorical top rung which by most metrics in Australia would be a white man then that demographic must be happy as pigs in the proverbial, right?

Nope. At least, not as happy as they could be.

It turns out the inverse is true. A bigger gap means less happiness, not more.

The gap between the top and bottom rungs of that metaphorical ladder represents equity.

The smaller the gap, the more equity citizens enjoy. As the gap widens, a society becomes less equitable. And everyone in that society is less happy as a result.

Thats right: inequity is making you unhappy. Yes, you. Whoever you are.

That may seem a bold claim, but I dont need to know you for this to be true. Its that universal.

Whether youre on the uppermost rung which tends to be occupied by members of majorities or clinging to the very bottom, the more inequity in your community, the less happy youll be.

Those at the top are probably happy, or at least more comfortable in their misery. But theyre still missing out, because they could be happier.

Happiness is not a finite resource there arent limited units of happiness in the world. If you become happier, I dont have to give up some of my happiness.

In short, a more equitable society is in everyones interests. We all stand to gain from it.

This is no small task.

Listening to the Black Lives Matter movement in recent weeks, I gather the answer may include:

In short, its clear its time for some big changes.

Even if some of us are in denial (Im looking at you, Mr There was no slavery in Australia Morrison) it seems inevitable that change must come.

Yet, I find myself sceptical that lasting change can be achieved because Western societys track record for such change isnt great.

I hope Im wrong, but my fears are not unfounded.

For example, its been more than half a century since the womens rights movement began, yet the gender pay gap is 22% where I live in Western Australia and the gender retirement gap was 52% in 2013/14 in Australia. Weve had at best glacial progress in recent years.

Then theres racial inequity. As a white woman, I might earn less on average than a man but Im still a heck of a lot better off than an Aboriginal woman in WA. She can expect to earn 30% less than me. And thats 12 years after Kevin Rudd said sorry.

She can also expect to earn 30% less than an Aboriginal man, as it turns out non-Indigenous women and Indigenous men have similar earning expectations in WA4. The gender gap applies regardless of race.

I take from this that systemic change is bloody hard, to achieve and to maintain.

Machiavelli captured why beautifully in The Prince:

It ought to be remembered that there is nothing more difficult to take in hand, more perilous to conduct, or more uncertain in its success, than to take the lead in the introduction of a new order of things.

Because the innovator has for enemies all those who have done well under the old conditions, and lukewarm defenders in those who may do well under the new.

This coolness arises partly from fear of the opponents, who have the laws on their side, and partly from the incredulity of men, who do not readily believe in new things until they have had a long experience of them.

But does that make it impossible?

No.

When faced with a massive obstacle, you can chip away at it slowly or you can blow it to pieces. The former takes a long time; the latter risks collateral damage.

or you can look for a lever.

If we want swift systemic change that improves equity without risking collateral damage, we need to find a lever: the smallest change we can make to have the biggest impact in the shortest time.

And I reckon that lever is universal basic income (UBI).

The concept of UBI is:

Thats right. No exclusion questions. No maze of paperwork to get it. No threat of it being withdrawn at short notice.

Automatic handouts based on your age and your citizenship.

The aim: no one falls below the poverty line.

In Australia, thats an income of $23,764 a year for a single adult. In theory, thats enough to afford basic housing and food even if you didnt go to work. If that doesnt sound like much, please remember its about what age pensioners live on right now.

Was your first thought

Chalk that up as a point for capitalist brainwashing, but its not true.

I wont regurgitate all of Rutger Bregmans collated research findings on UBI in Utopia for Realists here. Suffice to say its well worth a read. He found most people still continue to work and earn an income when a UBI is in place.

In summary, his other findings were:

If youre curious about the stats, read chapters two to four of Utopia for Realists.

The upshot is that the free market model we base our economy on has reached its limits. The marginal good more can do our citizens and country is diminishing.

Weve got enough wealth. Now we need to improve access to it.

Which is why some people like the exceptional Eva Cox prefer the term social contract to UBI. This is about progressing as a society so no one need live in poverty. In a country as rich as Australia, that seems a total no-brainer.

I reckon UBIs got massive flow-on potential for race and gender equity because when your basic living costs are covered, you dont have to choose between a roof over your head and your morals.

In short, you can afford not to put up with inequitable treatment.

For example, you can leave an employer who doesnt behave ethically. You may be able to escape an abusive relationship. You can report discrimination. Because you wont end up completely broke if someone with more relative power decides to cut off your money supply whether thats a wage, an allowance or through damage to your reputation.

If more people felt secure enough financially to do these things, might we not see societal change as a result? I think so.

Even if you can do all of the above already, UBI can still benefit you.

My basic income has meant:

I did it the capitalist way.

I saved, bought assets, and now derive income from them.

Which is the premise of the Financially Independent, Retiring Early (FIRE) movement.

Or Financially Independent, Time Rich (FITR) as I prefer to call it, because indefinitely retiring early turned out to be good in theory only.

Anyone aiming for FI is doing the same thing. Theyre putting a floor under their income. No matter where they are, no matter what theyre doing, their living costs are provided by their assets, not their wages.

Like a proper capitalist, Ive played the hand Ive got at the metaphorical poker table of life. I chose a high-paying profession so I could get to FI quicker, and I spent less than my mates to add further speed.

But I had to do it myself.

A basic income guarantee is like a socialist version of FIRE or FITR.

Instead of having to go through the process of earning, saving and investing to generate enough income to cover basic living costs, its a gimme.

This can help level the playing field from age 18 on, bringing us closer to an equitable society.

So, how much will this cost?

As of September 2019, Australias population included 19,754,496 adults, ages 18 or over. Lets call it 20 million.

The official poverty line is $23,764 lets call it $24k5.

$24kpa multiplied by 20 million people = $480 billion each year.

So yes, this is expensive.

But you dont actually fork out $480 billion a year to achieve it.

You use tax exemptions and deductions to deliver the UBI to those earning above that $24,000 limit. In practice, that means raising the tax-free threshold from $18,200 to $24,000. That portion of the UBI becomes foregone tax revenue as opposed to cash you have to find. Remember: most people keep working. Income from wages dropped less than 5% in one long-term UBI study6.

Anyone who earns less than $24,000 gets topped up to that level. Hence the idea of a guarantee.

And we havent yet counted cost savings, remembering that UBI has delivered a net economic gain in its experiments and case studies. Cash handed out is offset by:

There are many other benefits with long-term upside for society, such as high school completion rates rising and teen pregnancy rates dropping. For the full rundown, again I recommend chapters two to four of Utopia for Realists6.

Do we really believe COVID-19 is our last lockdown?

Do we really believe we wont need JobKeeper, JobSeeker, and early super access plans if another pandemic happens?

If everyone had a basic income guarantee before COVID-19, perhaps we wouldnt have needed economic stimulus of such magnitude. We might not have seen 1.3 million people taking money out of superannuation early.

You could see a UBI as mitigating future potential losses. The risk of such losses seems quite high at the moment.

UBI is an idea whose time has come. Will we have the guts to consider it? I hope so.

We wont be the first, but we can be next.

More:

Why a Universal Basic Income is the solution to inequity - Women's Agenda

Crypto Experts Reveal Thoughts: How Will Bitcoin Perform After the COVID-19 Crisis Has Passed? – PRNewswire

LONDON, June 22, 2020 /PRNewswire/ --To educate Crypto-enthusiasts and prepare them for upcoming market conditions, a group of well-respected crypto experts brought together by Investoo Group has expressed their thoughts on the recent COVID-19 crisis, and its effect on the global crypto markets.

The COVID-19 pandemic has had an unprecedented impact on our daily lives, our ability to interact and our financial structures and security. Blockchain technology has been around for over a decade, and there are now thousands of projects that seek to utilize its limitless potential to solve some of the world's most pressing issues.

Coin Journal has assembled a veteran team of experts in the field of cryptocurrency and financial technology, to gain some valuable insights into what the world may look like after the COVID-19 pandemic has passed. Globally, we can only hope that containment of this danger is now within our grasp, but we can only speculate to the long-term impact that it will leave in its wake.

Heavyweight Opinion

The panel is headed by Yoni Assia, the CEO of the world's largest social investment network, eToro. Yoni also brought his market analyst and renowned crypto expert, Simon Peters to the table. The next to join the team, Ciara Sun, is currently employed as the Head of Global Markets at Huobi Group, a global blockchain financial asset service provider.The panel also has the founder of virtual currency platform, Coincurve, and CEO of Interlapse, Wayne Chen. Finally, the panel would not be complete without the 15-year veteran of Wall Street technology and CEO of BSV blockchain service provider, TAAL; Mr. Jerry Chan.

They discuss the potential effects of unlimited quantitative easing, the need for a Universal Basic Income (UBI), and how blockchain technology can be a tool for research teams to interact with transparency on a global scale. The team reveals evidence that shows how cryptocurrency stands resilient against the economic downturn caused by social distancing measures and the closure of businesses that have succumbed to the strain.

Article Excerpts

Speaking exclusively to Coin Journalon the idea of Bitcoin as a 'safe haven' asset, eToro CEO Yoni Assia noted that crypto and fiat markets moved in tandem at the start of the COVID-19 panic. Market Analyst Simon Peters then noted a shift, which he describes below:

"Interestingly, this is backed-up by eToro's platform data, which shows a 77% increase in new registrants whose first action was to invest in Bitcoin. As the price of Bitcoin is traveling in the same direction as gold, you could argue investors view it as a safe haven asset."

Other areas of the article speak about the survival of market segments, and the implementation of blockchain technology, especially across supply chains. TAAL CEO Jerry Chan had thoughts relating to limiting the spread of COVID-19 using blockchain technology:

"Pharmaceutical companies have realised the potential application of a scalable version of Bitcoin blockchain, which can be used to track COVID-19 testing and vaccination records, cross-state and cross-borders, in a way which could be used to corroborate or validate statistics submitted to global health organisations."

The full interview is exclusive to Coin Journal, and interested readers can find the full article containing the detailed discussion of the expert panel here:https://coinjournal.net/news/how-will-bitcoin-perform-after-the-covid-19-crisis-has-passed

Media Contact Details

Contact Name: Chris Roper,Contact Role: Senior Cryptocurrency Editor,Investoo Group

Investoo Group is the source of this content. This Press Release is for informational purposes only. Virtual currency is not legal tender, is not backed by the government, and accounts and value balances are not subject to consumer protections. Cryptocurrencies and tokens are extremely volatile. There is no guarantee of a stable value, or of any value at all.

About Bitcoin PR Buzz:Bitcoin PR Buzz has been proudly serving the crypto press release distribution needs of blockchain start-ups for over 8 years. Get your Bitcoin Press Release Distributiontoday.

Related Images

image1.jpg

SOURCE Investoo Group

Read the original here:

Crypto Experts Reveal Thoughts: How Will Bitcoin Perform After the COVID-19 Crisis Has Passed? - PRNewswire

Interviews: Punks on Politics: Checking in with Mel Gagarin – Punknews.org

Last November, we spoke with Mel Gagarin, singer and guitarist of New York City punk band Scarboro about his run for congress in his hometown of Queens, New York. A lot has happened in the 8 months since that conversation, editor Samantha Barrett popped in to checked in with Mel on his run for congress ahead of the June 23rd New York Primary day.

We last spoke last November when you just started the Mel For Progress campaign to run for congress. A lot has happened since then. Covid-19 has hit New York City and especially your neighborhood in Queens hard. How has that affected what policies you are backing?COVID-19 brought to the fore the preexisting crises that were already ravaging our society. Income inequality, housing instability, lack of healthcare, and the aggravating factor racism plays in all of them. My platform already included Medicare For All, a Homes Guarantee, and UBI experiments. These policies have always been essential, but if there was a ever a moment for Medicare For All, it is one where tens of millions have lost employer sponsored health insurance.

You guys hit the ground running hard when we last spoke, knocking on doors and hearing from the folks you would like to serve. How has the pandemic affected your campaign?Because were a grassroots organization our winning factor was always going to be our ground game. Once COVID hit we immediately shifted our phone banking efforts towards community check-ins and ensuring that constituents were connected to resources.

Due to the pandemic, there has been a lot of xenophobia and hate that has been created. What kind of policies that you would like to enact to combat that?Rolling back the white supremacist and xenophobic policy of the Trump administration is a crucial step, as well as fighting for immigration, and a permenant stability for DACA and DAPA. More than that its acknowledging that xenophobic fears are stoked to divide people and to draw attention away from capitalistic system robbing the working class of basic dignities. We need to uplift all people in order to build a just society.

In more recent events, there has been a massive movement for Black Lives Matter. What is your take on Black Lives Matter activists and organizations like the DSA, who want to defund the police? What does defunding the police look like to you?Defunding the police looks like a massive diversion of funding and resources to education, housing, and community organizations in order to build safe, stable communities. Defunding the police is simply the first step in dismantling the racist carceral system that has destroyed so many lives and families.

Since we have been on PAUSE in NY. Besides working on your campaign. What have you been spending time on? Any new hobbies?My campaign has absorbed nearly every moment of my time, but I can always find a few minutes to noodle some riffs for the next Scarboro record.

Visit link:

Interviews: Punks on Politics: Checking in with Mel Gagarin - Punknews.org

COVID-19: UN agencies warn against rising hunger in Latin America and the Caribbean – UN News

The study by the UNs office for the region, known by the acronym ECLAC, and the Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO), proposes 10 measures to ward against increased hunger, including through an anti-hunger grant to support vulnerable people as well as food producers.

In Latin America, we may have a historic setback in the fight against hunger. In a matter of months, we may lose what we have achieved in fifteen years. Millions of people may end up going hungry. That is the gravity of the current problem, said Julio Berdegu, FAOs Regional Representative.

In English, the report is entitled Preventing the COVID-19 crisis from becoming a food crisis: Urgent measures against hunger in Latin America and the Caribbean.

The agencies said the pandemic follows seven years of slow economic growth in Latin America and the Caribbean, and could result in the biggest drop in regional Gross Domestic Product (GDP) in a century; a decline of -5.3 per cent.

This will push an additional 16 million more people into extreme poverty this year, in a region where nearly 54 million people were already experiencing severe food insecurity.

COVID-19 is also affecting food systems, with domestic food prices rising higher than other basic items. Increased unemployment means millions are unable to buy enough to eat, while many others are forced to find cheaper food that is less nutritious.

The major task we have ahead of us is to keep the health crisis from turning into a food crisis. That is why we are proposing complementing the Emergency Basic Income (EBI) with the provision of an Anti-Hunger Grant (AHG), said Alicia Brcena, ECLACs Executive Secretary.

The report recommends that the Anti-Hunger Grant could be given for six months to people living in extreme poverty.

The grant could be in the form of cash transfers, food baskets or vouchers, equivalent to 70 per cent of the regional extreme poverty line, or just under US $50 dollars per month, with an estimated overall cost of $23.5 billion.

The two UN agencies further propose that food producers should receive an increase of at least 20 per cent in the average credit portfolio from the last three years, for loans that would be financed by a special credit line from multilateral and development banks. Family farms should also receive a basic investment kit of $250, at a regional cost of roughly $1.7 billion.

The Anti-Hunger Grant is included in a series of 10 measures aimed at ensuring all households have access to the nutritious food they need, food companies can continue to carry out their work, and countries have enough food to guarantee supply at reasonable prices.

Other measures proposed include reinforcing school-based food programmes, supporting food assistance initiatives by civil society, and maintaining policies that have kept global food trade afloat.

Meanwhile, the World Food Programme (WFP) is calling for greater international solidarity to defeat COVID-19 in Latin America and the Caribbean and to protect the most vulnerable countries and communities.

WFP also warns against a hunger pandemic in a region where COVID-19 cases continue to rise, doubling to 1.6 million in the last week alone, according to the UN agency.

The warning applies to countries where WFP has a presence, such as Colombia, Honduras and Haiti, regional Director Miguel Barreto told journalists via videoconference on Tuesday. WFP does not operate in Argentina, Brazil, Chile, Mexico and Venezuela.

Our projection paints a stark picture. Our region already has problems related to economic and climate shocks, as well as insecurity and displacement. Another issue is that between 50 and 70 per cent of workers do so in the informal sector, making them more vulnerable because they cannot access to work due to lockdown in most of the countries of the region, he said.

Mr. Barreto reported that several Latin American and Caribbean countries have already increased social assistance to millions living in poverty.

We recommend governments expand their programmes to include more vulnerable people and groups, like informal workers and migrants, he added.

WFP has so far dispatched nearly 70 metric tonnes of supplies to 27 countries in the region via its humanitarian hub in Panama.

More cargo flights from its international hub in China are expected in the coming days.

Mr. Barreto said the first of many flights into the region will also bring critical health supplies into Ecuador from the World Health Organization (WHO) and the Pan American Health Organization (PAHO).

At a time when we are seeing the virus devastate our region, this support is absolutely crucial for people on the frontlines of the pandemic, and we look forward to the arrival of more supplies in the coming days and weeks, he said.

See the original post here:

COVID-19: UN agencies warn against rising hunger in Latin America and the Caribbean - UN News

Ayn Rand – – Biography

Who Was Ayn Rand?

Born in Russia in 1905, Ayn Rand moved to the United States in 1926 and tried to establish herself in Hollywood. Her first novel, We the Living (1936), championed her rejection of collectivist values in favor of individual self interest, a belief that became more explicit with her subsequent novels The Fountainhead (1943) and Atlas Shrugged (1957). Following the immense success of the latter, Rand promoted her philosophy of Objectivism through courses, lectures and literature. She died in New York City on March 6, 1982.

Ayn Rand was born Alissa Zinovievna Rosenbaum on February 2, 1905, in St. Petersburg, Russia. The oldest daughter of Jewish parents (and eventually an avowed atheist), she spent her early years in comfort thanks to her dad's success as a pharmacist, proving a brilliant student.

In 1917, her father's shop was suddenly seized by Bolshevik soldiers, forcing the family to resume life in poverty in the Crimea. The situation profoundly impacted young Alissa, who developed strong feelings toward government intrusion into individual livelihood. She returned to her city of birth to attend the University of Petrograd, graduating in 1924, and then enrolled at the State Institute for Cinema Arts to study screenwriting.

Granted a visa to visit relatives in Chicago, Alissa left for the United States in early 1926, never to look back. She took on her soon-to-be-famous pen name and, after a few months in Chicago, moved to Hollywood to become a screenwriter.

Following a chance encounter with Hollywood titan Cecil B. DeMille, Rand became an extra on the set of his 1927 film The King of Kings, where she met actor Frank O'Connor. They married in 1929, and she became an American citizen in 1931.

Rand landed a job as a clerk at RKO Pictures, eventually rising to head of the wardrobe department, and continued developing her craft as a writer. In 1932, she sold her screenplay Red Pawn, a Soviet romantic thriller, to Universal Studios. She soon completed a courtroom drama called Penthouse Legend, which featured the gimmick of audience members serving as the jury. In late 1934, Rand and her husband moved to New York City for its production, now renamed Night of January 16th.

Around this time, Rand also completed her first novel, We the Living. Published in 1936 after several rejections, We the Living championed the moral authority of the individual through its heroine's battles with a Soviet totalitarian state. Rand followed with the novella Anthem (1938), about a future collectivist dystopia in which "I" has been stamped out of the language.

In 1937, Rand began researching a new novel by working for New York architect Ely Jacques Kahn. The result, after years of writing and more rejections, was The Fountainhead. Underscoring Rands individualistic underpinnings, the books hero, architect Howard Roark, refuses to adhere to conventions, going so far as to blowing up one of his own creations. While not an immediate success, The Fountainhead eventually achieved strong sales, and at the end of the decade became a feature film, with Gary Cooper in the role of Roark.

Rand's ideas became even more explicit with the 1957 publication of Atlas Shrugged. A massive work of more than 1,000 pages, Atlas Shrugged portrays a future in which leading industrialists drop out of a collectivist society that exploits their talents, culminating with a notoriously lengthy speech by protagonist John Galt. The novel drew some harsh reviews, but became an immediate best seller.

Around 1950, Rand met with a college student named Nathan Blumenthal, who changed his name to Nathaniel Braden and became the author's designated heir. Along with his wife, Barbara, Braden formed a group that met at Rand's apartment to engage in intellectual discussions. The group, which included future Federal Reserve Chairman Alan Greenspan, called itself the Collective, or the Class of '43 (the publication year of The Fountainhead).

Rand soon honed her philosophy of what she termed "Objectivism": a belief in a concrete reality, from which individuals can discern existing truths, and the ultimate moral value of the pursuit of self interest. The development of this system essentially ended her career as a novelist: In 1958, the Nathaniel Branden Institute formed to spread her message through lectures, courses and literature, and in 1962, the author and her top disciple launched The Objectivist Newsletter. Her books during this period, including For the New Intellectual (1961) and Capitalism: The Unknown Ideal (1966), were primarily comprised of previously published essays and other works.

Following a public split with Braden, the author published The Romantic Manifesto (1969), a series of essays on the cultural importance of art, and repackaged her newsletter as The Ayn Rand Letter. She continued traveling to give lectures, though she was slowed by an operation for lung cancer. In 1979, she published a collection of articles in Introduction to Objectivist Epistemology, which included an essay from protg Leonard Peikoff.

Rand was working on a television adaptation of Atlas Shrugged when she died of heart failure at her home in New York City on March 6, 1982.

Although she weathered criticism for her perceived literary shortcomings and philosophical arguments, Rand undeniably left her mark on the Western culture she embraced. In 1985, Peikoff founded the Ayn Rand Institute to continue her teachings. The following year, Braden's ex-wife, Barbara, published a tell-all memoir, The Passion of Ayn Rand, which later was made into a movie starring Helen Mirren.

Interest in Rand's works resurfaced alongside the rise of the Tea Party movement during President Barack Obama's administration, with leading political proponents like Rand Paul and Ted Cruz proclaiming their admiration for the author. In 2010, the Ayn Rand Institute announced that more than 500,000 copies of Atlas Shrugged had been sold the previous year.

In 2017,Tony-winning director Ivo van Hove reintroduced The Fountainhead to the American public with a production at the Brooklyn Academy of Music. Having originated at Toneelgroep Amsterdam in the Netherlands, van Hove's version featured his performers speaking in Dutch, with their words projected onto a screen in English.

Link:

Ayn Rand - - Biography

When Tribal Journalists Try to ‘Cancel’ Ayn Rand (Part 2) – New Ideal

The New Republic article about Rand, which we looked at in Part 1, stood out not primarily because of what it said about her, but in how it conveyed its message. The article put a tribal prejudice toward Rand above facts and logic. That same mindset is on display, even more starkly, in Amanda Marcottes Salon article, Right-wingers finally got their Ayn Rand hero as president and its this guy.

Let me stress, again, that my goal is not to change your mind about Rand and her ideas, nor primarily to correct the many errors and misrepresentations in these articles (though Ill point out some of them along the way). Instead, the point is to explain how the two articles are fundamentally uninterested in convincing any active-minded reader. Their aim, rather, is to affirm a preset narrative about Rand. These are worse than mere smears, because their tribal mindset represents the abandonment of rational persuasion as the goal of intellectual discussion.

Marcottes point is captured in the subtitle: Conservatives finally have a leader who lives by Ayn Rands selfish philosophy, and hes an embarrassing clown, the clown being Donald Trump. But whatever you might think of Rand or of Trump, this is a claim thats far from self-evident. It requires a real argument. Marcottes article offers no argument. Its written for an audience that already partly or fully shares Marcottes preconceptions.

What would it take to build a case that Trump is the incarnation of Rands moral ideals? For a start, and at minimum, youd need to grasp what Rands view actually is, why she holds it, and how her radical view relates to, and contrasts with, existing views in morality. Rand once summarized her system of ideas by saying that My philosophy, in essence, is the concept of man as a heroic being, with his own happiness as the moral purpose of his life, with productive achievement as his noblest activity, and reason as his only absolute. Part of whats radical in Rands moral theory is that she argues for an individualist morality that is non-predatory.

Marcottes article offers no argument. Its written for an audience that already partly or fully shares Marcottes preconceptions.

Each individual, in her view, is responsible for achieving his own happiness by his own effort and the use of his own mind without sacrifices of anyone to anyone. That means a rational egoist neither surrenders his own values and goals to others, nor sacrifices others to himself. On Rands view, the egoist is someone guided by reason, pursuing creative achievement, building mutually beneficial relationships. It is nothing like the conventional view of a whim-driven brute who lies, cheats, and steals, walking over corpses to get his way.

From this brief indication of her view, it should be evident that what Rand means by selfishness is far different from what most people mean by that term. Regardless of whether one agrees with her conception, the fact is that Rand is saying something distinctive and new, and it takes work to understand it and think through what her morality does (and does not) look like in practice.

Marcotte, by contrast, evidently cannot imagine a moral ideal so dramatically at odds with conventional views. Apparently, the possibility of a non-predatory individualist is unreal to her, or else its pushed out of mind. Instead, Marcotte aims to patch together a narrative to affirm her prejudice against Rand. The goal is to portray Rand as a monster whose moral ideal, in practice, turns out to be a monster such as Trump.

To that end, Marcotte begins with a disturbing claim. Marcotte writes that Rand had a schoolgirl crush on a murderer, William Hickman, that she based a character on him in plans for an early story, and that she later reworked her idea of the individualistic, contemptuous hero into The Fountainhead and Atlas Shrugged.

Marcottes smear operates in part by omitting important facts.

Since Rands mature views reject any form of predation, her youthful interest in Hickman is strange enough that if you are going to raise it, it demands thoughtful exploration. A multitude of questions spring to mind: What was the nature of Rands curiosity in him? Where did she articulate it? When was this? How does it relate to her mature, principled advocacy of individual rights as sacrosanct?

READ ALSO: Discussing Marc Andreessens Rallying Cry to Build

None of these questions interests Marcotte, who slants the episode to smear Rand. Marcottes smear operates in part by omitting important facts. Let me indicate just five.

First, its a gross distortion to call Rands reaction a schoolgirl crush, which you can see for yourself in Rands own notes on the subject. She made those notes in her personal journals, which can be found in Journals of Ayn Rand, published long after her death. Across decades, Rand wrote voluminously in her journals to sketch ideas for characters, plays, stories, novels; to engage in thinking on paper for her own understanding; to distill lessons and conclusions from her experiences with people and events.

Second, she wrote these journal entries for an audience of exactly one herself. In her journals she was continually forming, revising, changing, clarifying her views. Nothing in them was ever meant for publication, so its ludicrous to treat her journals as definitive statements of her considered view.

Third, Marcotte hand-wavingly notes that fans are quick to argue that Rand didnt endorse the murder, but elides the fact that Rand herself, in her own journal notes, repudiates Hickmans abhorrent crime.

Fourth, a relevant fact for understanding Rands interest in Hickman is that she was a fiction writer, and she was sketching ideas for a story. She was curious about the character and psychology of individuals, about what ideas and attitudes motivated them, in part for the sake of depicting the motivation of fictional characters. This is an issue central to the craft of writing fiction, which Rand (at the time, aged 23) was striving to master.

Fifth, it is impossible to read Rands notes about Hickman and the story she was planning without observing the influence of the philosopher Friedrich Nietzsche on the young Rand. That influence is manifest in the premise of the story and the lead character she envisioned for it (Rand uses concepts borrowed from Nietzsche and quotes him in her notes). Rand never got far in planning that story and decided to abandon it. Why? The project was too alien to her deepest premises, writes David Harriman, editor of Journals of Ayn Rand, who points out (along with other scholars) that Rand went on to discard Nietzsches philosophic ideas and explicitly repudiated them.

For Marcotte, such facts are pushed aside in the dash to affirm a preconception about Rand. The next step in that process is to link this fictional Rand to conservatism and President Trump.

Marcotte wheels out the trope that Rand is the backbone of modern conservativism. This metaphor obscures a complicated reality, which I mentioned in Part 1, about the nature of Rands influence on conservatives and right-leaning folks. Moreover, there are abundant counterexamples that negate this trope. The aim of Marcottes article, however, is not to convince, but to reinforce preconceptions, and her intended audience is already primed to feel loathing at the mention of conservatism. Thats the emotional context Marcottes article works to activate.

Marcottes unwarranted lumping together of Rand with conservatism reflects a definite purpose. Rands philosophy, Marcotte writes, serves as a pseudo-intellectual rationalization, beloved by assorted Republicans, for a reactionary movement that rose up to reject the feminist and anti-racist movements of the 20th century. One giveaway here is the word reactionary.

In this mindset, its unimaginable that someone could have a view different from ones own that is grounded in reasonable argument.

Even if you reject conservatism (as I do), Marcottes characterization of it betrays, not a reasoned opposition, but a tribal opposition. Were there conservatives who were racist and misogynistic? Yes, and there still are. But the sweeping claim in Marcottes article is that conservatives were reactionary: meaning, they stubbornly opposed progress. They could have had no legitimate basis for their concerns about, for example, the growth of government regulations, or the cost of burgeoning welfare programs, or the budget. Regardless of whether you share those concerns, some conservative intellectuals actually did voice reasoned objections to these developments. But for Marcotte and her intended audience, these outsiders, members of an opposing tribe, can be nothing but wrong and evil. In this mindset, its unimaginable that someone could have a view different from ones own that is grounded in reasonable argument.

In linking Rand with conservatism, Marcotte is uninterested in the fact which contradicts her narrative that Rand wrote at length about her philosophic opposition to the conservative movement (see, for instance, the essay Conservatism: An Obituary). Whats more, nowhere in Marcottes article will you learn that Rand was a fierce opponent of racism. Nor will you learn about Rands distinctive, profound opposition to the conventional notion that a womans place is in the home; or that a woman is somehow intellectually or morally inferior to a man. Among Rands fictional heroes are two women, Kira Argounova (in We the Living) and Dagny Taggart (in Atlas Shrugged), who shatter stereotyped roles for women. Long before it was imaginable in our culture, Dagny Taggart took it for granted that she could run a vast railroad network, and she did so superlatively; it was at most an afterthought for her that anyone might object. Kira Argounova, fascinated by buildings and bridges, wanted to be an engineer, and her will to achieve her goals in life was indomitable.

READ ALSO: Analyzing the Conspiracist Firestorm over Notre Dame

All of this, and more, Marcotte must brush aside in order to shoehorn Rands ideas into the same category as the reactionary right, the opposing political tribe that Marcotte and many of her readers hate. Doing so, in defiance of the facts, is part of Marcottes larger effort to present Donald Trump as the full, perfect embodiment of Rands moral theory of selfishness. Linking Trump and Rand serves to smear each with the taken-for-granted evil of the other.

Whats the argument for that link? There is none and, tellingly, no attempt to engage with obvious objections or counterarguments. What Marcotte conveys is a disdain for the sheer possibility that anyone could hold a different view on the subject. Regardless of your assessment of President Trump, the claim that hes the embodiment of Ayn Rands moral ideas should give pause to anyone with even an elementary grasp of her outlook.

What leaps off the pages of Atlas Shrugged is not that Rand glamorizes all businesspeople, but rather that she draws a bright moral dividing line. On one side are productive business leaders, who use their minds to create real value, exchanging it in trade for mutual advantage. It is such producers who are the business heroes she valorizes for their achievements.

On the other side of that moral line are the businessmen who rely on political pull to handicap their competitors, who extort protections and corporate welfare, and who lie, cheat, and exploit others in their grubbing for unearned wealth. Such villains, in todays world, embody the scourge of cronyism.

Marcottes disdain for argument, for evidence, indeed, for the intellect of her readers is blatant in what she takes as a credible source on Rands ideas.

Just on the basis of this sketch of one aspect of Rands view, Donald Trump is far from an obvious manifestation of her moral theory. The evidence, in my view, is that his actions and statements contradict the virtue of selfishness; that, for instance, Trumps business career has relied on pull peddling and that, as president, he feeds that cronyism dynamic. My colleague Ben Bayer has argued convincingly that Trump negates Rands view of selfishness; and others still have pointed out ways in which Trump is actually more like an Ayn Rand villain.

But my aim here is not to convince you of either of those points. Rather its to indicate that any claim that Trump embodies Rands concept of selfishness would need to build an argument for that, and take seriously counterpoints and obvious objections if your goal is to convince.

Thats precisely what Marcotte disdains. I say disdain, because any reputable magazine would expect its writers to Google the topic theyre pitching, to see if anyones written on it before. Try it yourself; you should find at least two articles on the subject by my colleague Onkar Ghate. One evaluates the Trump phenomenon generally; the other considers what Rand might have thought of Trump. You might also find my article on how Trumps foreign policy clashes with Rands philosophy. And again, we at ARI are hardly the only ones to voice our perspective on this issue. Marcotte, however, does not even gesture toward engaging with these contrasting views; doing so would imply that there could be a credible view different from her preconception.

READ ALSO: Is Western Civilization Losing Its Identity?

Marcottes disdain for argument, for evidence, indeed, for the intellect of her readers is blatant in what she takes as a credible source on Rands ideas. For a credible third-party source, where does Marcotte turn? To one of a number of the established, published scholars of Rands ideas? No. To an expert on the field of ethics, who has some awareness of how Rands ideas relate to the intellectual landscape? No.

Who, then? Marcotte turns to a guy with a blog. She cites someone who posted blog entries while reading his way through Atlas Shrugged. To pretend that this blog is a credible source is journalistic malpractice. If a journalist wrote about, say, Marxs Das Kapital, or Darwins Origin of Species to take two influential works that defied conventional thinking and presented a random blogger with no evident expertise as an authority on the subject, it would be laughable.

What Marcottes article exhibits even more blatantly than Sammons piece in the New Republic is a tribalist mindset.

The tribal mind is insular and keen to stay that way. Outsiders are viewed with suspicion, often hostility. The sheer possibility that outsiders might have different views and beliefs, and hold them for good reasons, is simply alien. Thats largely because the tribalist himself has fastened onto his beliefs and pieties, not through a thoughtful weighing of the evidence and by following the logic, but through conformity with the group. Theres just what his own tribe believes. All else has to be wrong. Its beyond the pale, worthy only of contempt and disdain.

Theres an underlying commonality between a Trump rally and the Marcotte and Sammon articles: they put a tribal narrative above facts and logic.

We can observe two important consequences of this tribalist mindset on display in Marcottes article about Rand. One is Marcottes disdain for facts and logic. A tribalist sees no need to convince others of his views: why take the effort of trying to communicate with outsiders, who by virtue of being outside the tribe must be wrong? Besides, if he himself didnt need evidence and logic to swallow his groups beliefs and pieties, why would anyone else?

Second, the tribalist does feel a strong need to affirm and reinforce for himself and fellow tribe members that their ways and beliefs are right, and that outsiders are wrong, if not evil, too.

A critical reading of Marcottes and Sammons articles makes clear that a major, if not the prime, aim is to rally certain readers. To activate them emotionally, not cognitively. For those readers, the common takeaway is that, despite Rands distinctive views, she can be lumped in with the hated right-wing/conservative tribe.

These articles offer the reassurance that, despite Rands enduring prominence and ongoing cultural influence, she is unworthy of serious attention. That the Objectivist movement is nosediving. That Rand, finally, is canceled.

What the Marcotte and Sammon articles do to Rand in print, Donald Trump does to his enemies in speeches at loyalist rallies. The approach is the same. The president can spellbind the audience with innuendo, pseudo-facts, and arbitrary assertions, precisely because they reinforce a conclusion many already came in with: Trump is right, his opponents in the enemy tribe are victimizing him.

No attempt is made to convince anyone in the stands. The conclusions, so congenial to the tribe, are already known. The facts or rather, innuendo, insinuation, hints and arbitrary allegations are conjured up, trimmed, shorn of context, bent, distorted to affirm the tribes common prejudices against its enemies. Theres an underlying commonality between a Trump rally and the Marcotte and Sammon articles: they put a tribal narrative above facts and logic.

There are fascinating questions to explore about the impact of Ayn Rands ideas and their cultural influence. Such questions, however, are shoved to the wayside in the Marcotte and Sammon articles. The driving impulse to cancel Rand in the eyes of their tribal audience hardly original to these articles is its own kind of cultural indicator.

SUPPORT ARI: If you value the ideas presented here, please become an ARI Member today.

Share this article:

Originally posted here:

When Tribal Journalists Try to 'Cancel' Ayn Rand (Part 2) - New Ideal

The Jio-FB tie-up: Will it subliminally influence and monolpolise Indian minds? – Economic Times

According to technology experts and social scientists, by 2024, a capitalistic conglomerate that straddle media, telecom, entertainment, digital data and e-commerce can easily control a majority of Indian minds.

The recently inked Jio-Facebook deal may have grand-stated objectives of helping Indias small businesses and individuals get new opportunities in the post-corona world, but possible un-stated ones are what consumers, partners, competitors, civil society and government should be wary of That of data privacy, for instance.

Does the new partnership nurture a secret ambition to directly control Indian minds, through digital India? It is laudable that Reliance has been able to become debt-free now but why would it bet big on e-commerce, a business that has not yet proven profitable to even Amazon for years?

With about 300 million users in Facebook, 400 million in WhatsApp and 390 million Jio subscribers, this new partnership probably will have direct access to about 650 million Indian minds as of now, assuming some inactive or duplicate users across the three. Add to that the indirect and direct control across several competing media houses and content, diversionary net neutrality, tech infrastructure, and political backing from more-than-willing policy makers, and we may see the power to monopolise not just industries, but more critically, our minds! Will the Googles decision to take a stake in Vodafone-Idea and also the planned Amazon-Airtel tie-up ward off this threat?

Reliance was always known to avoid competition in various ways including re-drawing of level-playing fields. Wherever they couldnt, as in its initial telecom foray and retail, they struggled. Its strength lies in influencing policy-making and executing very large-scale projects from refineries to optical fibre networks. Remember the controversy when a hitherto non-existent Jio University was conferred with a specially created University of Eminence status by the government, overlooking many great institutions, to let it bypass educational regulators like AICTE?

While it has put a sense of urgency in the Indian government for data sovereignty, the big question is whether Indians will trust their data with a company having maximising shareholder value at its core over, say, a Tata Group whose values aim for shared growth. Heres an opportunity for it to stand for maximising shared values and push for data privacy more than data sovereignty, but will it?

Meek noises that Facebook makes and the muted tokenism it exhibits every time there is a charge of fake content or privacy breach should be cause of extreme concern for the enlightened. To be harmless is not part of FBs ethos and it is just another pure play capitalist beholden only to its shareholders. In the Indian context, this high-handedness can be of immense advantage to the agenda-driven news creators of the ruling dispensation. This augurs well for these two partners and the government they support, but not for most other stakeholders.

That the Jio customers had let the camel into the tent was the butt of many social media jokes. Some former, perhaps disgruntled, Reliance suppliers crib about long-day ordeals with several rounds of negotiations across levels, with long gaps in between. Most employees work beyond 5 pm and stress-related health issues are likely. The company made a huge donation to PM CARES but unilaterally denied salaries to groups of employees in the Covid-19 crisis. Maximising shared value is not a part of its mission and it is great at tax avoidance. It is one of the top CSR taxpayers by statute but most of that is routed to in-house Trust (The government should not allow companies to route CSR funds to own Trusts which denies genuine NGOs like ours the much-needed funds, and stifle real developments on ground). Competitors talk of multiple levels of tactics to inconvenience them and squeeze their resources: From flooding high-cost but mediocre talent to lobbying policy makers/regulators (eg: IUC-interconnect usage charges abolition, data sovereignty). All these may be accusations by competitors but are critical events in our time-zero framework for predicting the future.

Monopolising informatics and digital communication will lead to monopolising minds, and if unregulated, could be the biggest fallout of this new venture. With media and content control, censoring and muting adverse content, development of new tech to know our thinking while we read a message, big data analytics and AI to know what we do at any point of time and predict our responses, and the ability to change minds with subliminal messaging, this behemoth can be a Frankenstein. We have already seen how quickly Indian minds can be diverted in the last few years. The stories that went viral for balcony clapping and diya lighting during lockdown are legends in the making! With a deeper knowledge of people than they themselves know, it is pretty easy to influence their minds.

Confederation of All India Traders (CAIT), with its 70 million traders and 40,000 trade associations, has expressed its concerned about the use of consumer data. According to CAIT, Facebook has been known to violate domestic laws and the government should ensure that the data they already have should not be used for this new venture. They point out that it will be a total betrayal after having expressed reservations on this by the same government in the last term.

With data comes the power to create new products and services, and that is clearly an undue competitive advantage that will be created by this alliance, and it is surprising that the government shut an eye to this while granting FDI approval. The question is whether the government gives auto-approval for everything Reliance. How come the paranoia that was manifested in the case of suspect Chinese takeover of India was completely absent when it came to this FDI? Lets hope the government will show the same enthusiasm to speedily approve both Google and Amazon FDI proposals. Remember how the government treated Amazon founder in his last trip to India with big investment plans?

Without a strong civil society, a bold Fourth Estate, a determined opposition, impartial constitutional authorities, a sound justice system, and a coalition of competitors from related industries coming together, the threats of data privacy breach and net non-neutrality, and creation of monopolies will not be averted. Why are competitors, civil society and clean politicians not pushing for stringent data privacy laws and lobbying against cross-ownership in competing media houses that infringe on news neutrality?

Given the global forces that are at play, the business ecosystem will brave the turmoil to some extent but many competitors will fade away as we have seen in the telecom sector post Jio launch. The indicators are for a duopoly as we see in most developed economies in various sectors from telecom to healthcare and e-commerce. Smaller players will be marginalised to special niches.

We can postulate with reasonable accuracy that this covert take-over of the Indian minds will be eventually replicated in countless other realms: infrastructure, thriving public sector entities, entertainment, defence, etc. A willing government will always find subversive partners but they also will do well to remember that such a monopoly can make or break governments too. Ayn Rand couldnt have known todays conglomerates when she had written on how the soul of capitalism was dead, but it is the perfect opportunity for Reliance, as a leader, to prove her wrong by delighting not just its shareholders.

DISCLAIMER : Views expressed above are the author's own.

Read the original here:

The Jio-FB tie-up: Will it subliminally influence and monolpolise Indian minds? - Economic Times

Shockingly, Law School Named For Affirmative Action Opponent Bad At Race And Diversity – Above the Law

(Photo via Facedbook)

As law schools put together their responses to what has clearly become an historic juncture in the countrys long, ignominious history with race, its worth remembering that a law school at a public university went out of its way to rename itself after a guy who thought the Voting Rights Act was a perpetuation of racial entitlement and cited debunked theories about black people needing slower-track school from the bench. At a moment when most institutions are taking a hard look at their role in the wider landscape of racial injustice, its safe to say that ASSLaw is not.

ASSLaw, of course, is the George Mason University School of Law, which renamed itself the Antonin Scalia School of Law at the behest of a wealthy donor under admittedly shady circumstances without taking a second to consider the truly fitting acronym theyd bestowed upon themselves. They attempted to rebrand as the Antonin Scalia Law School, but by then wed all embraced the ASSLaw moniker.

And it seems that the school is content to follow their namesakes lead when it comes to race and diversity.

The school is a mere 2 percent black, an eye-popping number for a public school in Virginia. On a recent conference call discussing the issue, the Dean of Admissions cited the old canard of high academic standards as the reason why the school does not have more black students. Its a justification that would be news to UVA (5.7 percent), Georgetown (9.2 percent), and George Washington (7.8 percent), all demonstrably superior academic institutions that seem to have no problem finding black law students.

In fairness, part of the schools problem is the name itself. When the school made the shift to align itself ideologically with a jurist who spent his tenure pushing racist, sexist, and homophobic tropes onto the national stage we all knew it would create a self-selection diversity problem as minority students inched away from the barely top 50 program when so many alternatives exist. George Masons president, Angel Cabrera, defended the name change at the time with words that were either tragically ironic or nakedly cynical, We must ensure that George Mason University remains an example of diversity of thought, a place where multiple perspectives can be dissected, confronted, and debated for the benefit and progress of society at large. What he got was a school systematically erasing actual diversity. But more conservative professors whose scholarship might not land them work elsewhere get to call the school home and thats a kind of diversity, if a racist one.

But even if the name greatly diminished the pool of black applicants, the attempt to pin the lack of diversity on high academic standards hits at the core of the schools philosophical problem. Its not just that the school doesnt seem to care about diversity, its that they are quick to blame their own institutional shortcomings on black people themselves. As they see it, ASSLaw hasnt failed to recruit students the students failed to be good enough for ASSLaw. Its an exercise in victim blaming that guarantees the school will remain mired at the bottom of diversity rankings until it undergoes a fundamental mindset shift.

For the minority students still braving the ASSLaw ranks, the school isnt performing much better. With Eugene Volokh tossing around racial slurs and throwing tantrums when hes called out for it, you can imagine what a faculty built around Volokh Conspiracy bloggers can get up to. In response to complaints about both professors and students saying unconscionable stuff in class, the school formed a Classroom Dialogue Committee. That certainly sounds like a step in the right direction, but were hearing that many of the professors on the committee have complaints against them for inappropriate comments. Its like letting the inmates run the Ayn Rand School for Objectivist Studies.

And since ASSLaw is just Fosters Home For Right-Wing Troll Friends, the school that cant find any way to admit more black people did manage to bring in Ginni Thomass infamous aide Crystal Clanton who we last caught up with when she was texting co-workers that:

I HATE BLACK PEOPLE. Like fuck them all ... I hate blacks. End of story.

Despite this being a well-known incident that led to even Turning Point USA distancing themselves from her, ASSLaw admitted Clanton in another display of the schools deep commitment to promoting an inclusive atmosphere for professional education.

But Clanton has learned to like Clarence Thomas so I guess racism is solved.

At the end of the day, ASSLaw is now the conservative ideology factory that we thought it would be. But George Mason isnt a private school. A public school that cant muster a black student body of more than 2 percent in a state thats roughly 19 percent black is objectively failing at its mission to serve the people of Virginia.

There are definitely bigger issues in Virginia right now than law school administration, but thats no excuse for continued inaction. Someone in state government needs to step in and be the adult in the room because the stunted adolescence of libertarianism certainly isnt producing any leadership from within the school. This is the largest public research university in the state! And yet the law school seems more focused on providing a mill for conservative academics to publish hot takes than building the profession.

Fix it.

Joe Patriceis a senior editor at Above the Law and co-host of Thinking Like A Lawyer. Feel free toemail any tips, questions, or comments. Follow him onTwitterif youre interested in law, politics, and a healthy dose of college sports news. Joe also serves as a Managing Director at RPN Executive Search.

Read more from the original source:

Shockingly, Law School Named For Affirmative Action Opponent Bad At Race And Diversity - Above the Law

Superior Skin Clearance Observed With Risankizumab in Head-to-Head Psoriasis Study – Monthly Prescribing Reference

New data from a head-to-head study comparing risankizumab-rzaa to secukinumab in patients with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis were recently presented online at the American Academy of Dermatology virtual annual meeting.

In this 52-week, phase 3b, open-label, active-comparator study, patients were randomized to receive risankizumab 150mg subcutaneously (n=164) at baseline, week 4, then every 12 weeks thereafter, or secukinumab 300mg subcutaneously at baseline, weeks 1, 2, 3, and 4, then every 4 weeks thereafter. The co-primary end points were the proportion of patients with a 90% reduction in the Psoriasis Area and Severity Index score (PASI 90 response) at week 16 (noninferiority) and at week 52 (superiority) from baseline.

Results showed that the study met both primary end points of noninferiority and superiority. A greater proportion of patients treated with risankizumab achieved a PASI 90 response at week 16 (74% vs 66%) and at week 52 (87% vs 57%; P <.001) compared with secukinumab.

Risankizumab also met key secondary end points including a superior rate of complete skin clearance (PASI 100 response) at week 52 compared with secukinumab (66% vs 40%; P <.001). Moreover, 88% of patients treated with risankizumab achieved a static Physician Global Assessment (sPGA) score of clear (0) or almost clear (1) at week 52 compared with 58% of patients treated with secukinumab (P <.001).

Risankizumab and secukinumab demonstrated comparable rates of adverse reactions. The most common were nasopharyngitis, upper respiratory tract infection, headache, arthralgia and diarrhea.

Risankizumab, an interleukin-23 antagonist, is marketed under the trade name Skyrizi and is indicated for the treatment of moderate to severe plaque psoriasis in adults who are candidates for systemic therapy or phototherapy.

Secukinumab, an interleukin-17A antagonist, is marketed under the trade name Cosentyx and is indicated for the treatment of moderate to severe plaque psoriasis in adults who are candidates for systemic therapy or phototherapy. It is also approved for the treatment of active psoriatic arthritis or ankylosing spondylitis in adults.

For more information visit abbvie.com.

See original here:

Superior Skin Clearance Observed With Risankizumab in Head-to-Head Psoriasis Study - Monthly Prescribing Reference

The Bidirectional Association Between Psoriasis & OSA – Physician’s Weekly

With psoriasis and obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) sharing various comorbidities and having a common pathogenesis of inflammatory and immune imbalance, many studies have examined the association between the two conditions. However, the results of these studies have differed. In order to evaluate the evidence on the bidirectional association of psoriasis and OSA, Ching-Chi Chi, MD, MMS, DPhil, Tzong-Yun Ger, MD, and Yun Fu, MD, conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of case-control, cross-sectional, and cohort studies in the MEDLINE and Embase databases.

Exploring the Data

The researchers used the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale to evaluate the risk of bias of included studies and performed random-effects model meta-analysis to calculate pooled odds ratio (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for case-control and cross-sectional studies as well as pooled incidence rate ratio (IRR) with 95% CIs for cohort studies in association between psoriasis and OSA. Four case-control or cross-sectional studies and three cohort studies with a total of 5.8 million subjects were included.

Increased risk of OSA among patients with psoriasis was found in one cohort study, one cross-sectional study, and two case-control studies. Meta-analysis of the latter three showed a significant association of psoriasis with OSA among nearly 300,000 study subjects, with a pooled OR of 2.60, indicated that patients with psoriasis are 2.6-fold more likely to develop OSA when compared with patients without psoriasis, adds Dr. Ger (Figure 1). Although these three studies had considerable statistical heterogeneity, all had consistently positive results. In the cohort study, patients with mild psoriasis had a consistently increased risk of OSA (adjusted IRR, 1.36), as did those with severe psoriasis (adjusted IRR, 1.53) and psoriatic arthritis (adjusted IRR, 1.98).

Conversely, a consistent increase in psoriasis among patients with OSA was found across three cohort studies and one case-control study. A meta-analysis of the cohort studies showed a significant association of OSA with psoriasis (polled IRR, 2.52) across more than 5.5 million study subjects, with no statistical heterogeneity within the studies (Figure 2). After excluding one study with a high risk of bias in the representativeness of the exposed cohortall were nursesthe association of OSA with psoriasis remained positive (pooled IRR, 2.47). A significantly increased odds for psoriasis in relation to OSA was seen in the one case-control study (adjusted OR, 13.31).

Looking Ahead

Drs. Ger and Chi note the need for future research investigating the relationship between OSA and psoriasis in patients with varying races/ethnicities and from various regions, as well as the need for studies to confirm the mechanism(s) behind the relationship between the two conditions.

In the meantime, Dr. Ger suggests that all patients with psoriasis be made aware of their increased risk for OSA as a comorbidity that should not be overlooked. This patient population should be asked about sleep quality, and those with snoring at night, daytime sleepiness, and insomnia should be considered for polysomnography, consultation with a pulmonologists, or both. On the other hand, physicians should inquire about skin problems with their patients with OSA. Those suspected of having psoriasis should be referred to a dermatologist for further evaluation and treatment.

Bidirectional Association Between Psoriasis and Obstructive Sleep Apnea: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysishttps://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-020-62834-x

See the article here:

The Bidirectional Association Between Psoriasis & OSA - Physician's Weekly

Psoriasis Treatment Market Presents an Overall Analysis, Trends and Forecast to 2025 – 3rd Watch News

Global Psoriasis Treatment Industry Market, 2020-2025 Research Report provides crucial statistics on the market status of the Global Psoriasis Treatment Industry manufacturers and is a respected source of guidance and direction for companies and individuals interested in the industry.

This Psoriasis Treatment Industry market research study is a collection of insights that translate into a gist of this industry. It is explained in terms of a plethora of factors, some of which include the present scenario of this marketplace in tandem with the industry scenario over the forecast timeframe.

Request a sample Report of Psoriasis Treatment Industry Market at:https://www.marketstudyreport.com/request-a-sample/2728907

The report is also inclusive of some of the major development trends that characterize the Psoriasis Treatment Industry market. A comprehensive document in itself, the Psoriasis Treatment Industry market research study also contains numerous other pointers such as the current industry policies in conjunction with the topographical industry layout characteristics. Also, the Psoriasis Treatment Industry market study is comprised of parameters such as the impact of the current market scenario on investors.

The pros and cons of the enterprise products, a detailed scientific analysis pertaining to the raw material as well as industry downstream buyers, in conjunction with a gist of the enterprise competition trends are some of the other aspects included in this report.

How has the competitive landscape of this industry been categorized?

Regional landscape: How will the details provided in the report help prominent stakeholders?

Ask for Discount on Psoriasis Treatment Industry Market Report at:https://www.marketstudyreport.com/check-for-discount/2728907

Other pivotal aspects encompassed in the Psoriasis Treatment Industry market study:

For More Details On this Report: https://www.marketstudyreport.com/reports/covid-19-outbreak-global-psoriasis-treatment-industry-market-report-development-trends-threats-opportunities-and-competitive-landscape-in-2020

Related Reports:

1. COVID-19 Outbreak-Global Transplant Diagnostic Industry Market Report-Development Trends, Threats, Opportunities and Competitive Landscape in 2020Read More: https://www.marketstudyreport.com/reports/covid-19-outbreak-global-transplant-diagnostic-industry-market-report-development-trends-threats-opportunities-and-competitive-landscape-in-2020

2. COVID-19 Outbreak-Global Cloud Kitchen Foodservice Industry Market Report-Development Trends, Threats, Opportunities and Competitive Landscape in 2020Read More: https://www.marketstudyreport.com/reports/covid-19-outbreak-global-cloud-kitchen-foodservice-industry-market-report-development-trends-threats-opportunities-and-competitive-landscape-in-2020

Contact Us:Corporate Sales,Market Study Report LLCPhone: 1-302-273-0910Toll Free: 1-866-764-2150 Email: [emailprotected]

Read more:

Psoriasis Treatment Market Presents an Overall Analysis, Trends and Forecast to 2025 - 3rd Watch News

Global Psoriasis Drugs Industry Market Overview, Cost Structure Analysis, Growth Opportunities and Forecast to 2027 – 3rd Watch News

With having published myriads of reports, Psoriasis Drugs Market Research imparts its stalwartness to clients existing all over the globe. Our dedicated team of experts delivers reports with accurate data extracted from trusted sources. We ride the wave of digitalization facilitate clients with the changing trends in various industries, regions and consumers. As customer satisfaction is our top priority, our analysts are available to provide custom-made business solutions to the clients.

In this new business intelligence report, Psoriasis Drugs Market Research serves a bunch of market forecast, structure, potential, and socioeconomic impacts associated with the global Psoriasis Drugs market. With Porters Five Forces and DROT analyses, the research study incorporates a comprehensive evaluation of the positive and negative factors, as well as the opportunities regarding the Psoriasis Drugs market.

Get Free sample copy of this report, @https://www.globalmarketers.biz/report/life-sciences/2015-2027-global-psoriasis-drugs-industry-market-research-report,-segment-by-player,-type,-application,-marketing-channel,-and-region/148089#request_sample

The Psoriasis Drugs market report has been fragmented into important regions that showcase worthwhile growth to the vendors. Each geographic segment has been measured based on supply-demand status, distribution, and pricing. Further, the study brings information about the local distributors with which the market players could create collaborations in a bid to sustain production footprint.

The following manufacturers are covered:

Takeda PharmaceuticalJanssen BiotechMerckUCBBiogenAbbvieCelgene CorporationEli Lilly & CompanyAmgenAbbVieJohnson & JohnsonAstraZenecaNovartis AGStiefel LaboratoriesPfizer

Segment by Regions

North America

Europe

China

Japan

Southeast Asia

India

Market Segmentation based on Type:

Tumor Necrosis Factor InhibitorInterleukin InhibitorsOthers

Market Segmentation based on Application:

Plaque PsoriasisGuttate PsoriasisInverse PsoriasisPustular PsoriasisErythrodermic Psoriasis

Get Your Copy at a Discounted Rate!!!

Ask For Discount https://www.globalmarketers.biz/discount_inquiry/discount/148089

Segmentation of the Psoriasis Drugs market to target the growth outlook and trends affecting these segments.

Make An Enquiry About This Report @What does the Psoriasis Drugs market report contain?

https://www.globalmarketers.biz/report/life-sciences/2015-2027-global-psoriasis-drugs-industry-market-research-report,-segment-by-player,-type,-application,-marketing-channel,-and-region/148089#inquiry_before_buying

Readers can get the answers of the following questions while going through the Psoriasis Drugs market report:

Browse the complete report @https://www.globalmarketers.biz/report/life-sciences/2015-2027-global-psoriasis-drugs-industry-market-research-report,-segment-by-player,-type,-application,-marketing-channel,-and-region/148089#table_of_contents

See the original post here:

Global Psoriasis Drugs Industry Market Overview, Cost Structure Analysis, Growth Opportunities and Forecast to 2027 - 3rd Watch News

UCB flashes the data behind its positive psoriasis readouts. Can it compete in a crowded field? – Endpoints News

Eight months after UCB announced that a little-watched drug candidate outperformed J&Js blockbuster Stelara, the Belgian pharma is out with full data that one investigator calls remarkable.

In the Phase III trial, 58.6% of patients who took UCBs IL-17 blocker bimekizumab were completely cleared of skin lesions after 16 weeks, compared to 20.9% of patients on Stelara. The UCB drug also outperformed Stelara at how many patients were clear after one year and at lesser benchmarks for plaque clearance, with more than 8 out of 10 patients showing 90% improvement, compared to roughly half on Stelara.

In a second study, first announced positive in November, bimekizumab was compared to placebo. In that one, 68% of patients on the treatment arm saw their skin completely clear and over 90% saw a 90% improvement. For placebo that number was 1.2%.

It really showed some quite impressive, remarkable I dont know how you want to say it, but extremely high level of responses, Kenneth Gordon, lead investigator on the placebo-controlled study, told Endpoints News.

Gordon singled out a couple distinct characteristics about the responses that stood out. Those included how sweepingly the drug alleviated symptoms, how quick it did so, and how long it lasted.

If you compare it to other clinical trials programs, both the speed and magnitude of the responses were around the highest weve seen, Gordon said.

Researchers often caution against comparing different clinical trials, such comparisons will be crucial for a drug like bimekizumab. The plaque psoriasis is a highly competitive market, suffuse with approved biologics from some of the worlds biggest drugmakers. Stelara is just one of several options patients can currently choose from.

The new data were released in abstracts for the annual American Academy of Dermatology meeting. On Friday afternoon, AbbVie also released abstracts from its open-label Phase III trial testing Skyrizi, an IL-23 inhibitor approved last year for psoriasis, against Novartis Cosentyx.

While trouncing Cosentyx, Skyrizi showed a virtually identical ability as UCBs drug to clear plaque psoriasis after one year: 66%. In addition, Eli Lillys IL-17 inhibitor beat J&J Tremfya last year in a head to head trial on psoriasis. UCB also beat AbbVies Humira last year, although results have yet to be announced.

From a medical perspective, though, Gordon suggested that asking which one is best might not be the best approach. Instead, prescribing decisions may come down to matching individual patients to the best drug.

Bimekizumab blocks multiple cytokines involved in plaque psoriasis, IL-17a and IL-17f. Because IL-17f exists in greater quantities in plaques, but IL-17a is more active, it had been an open question whether it was best to blockade both or if you could just target one and have the same effect.

Though cautioning no trial has been completed, Gordon said the latest data seem to resolve that debate. He argued the new insight, along with some of the other new molecules, represented a capstone on the progress the field has made since the chemotherapy drug methotrexate was first given to modest effect in the 1950s.

This might be culminating biologic molecule for psoriasis we have in the near future, he said. Now the question is how can we best apply each of our medications.

Read this article:

UCB flashes the data behind its positive psoriasis readouts. Can it compete in a crowded field? - Endpoints News