Coronavirus vaccine will not be silver bullet to end pandemic: Expert – The Straits Times

When the Covid-19 vaccine finally comes, it will be no silver bullet to end the pandemic, said world-renowned virus-hunter Peter Piot.

The head of the London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine warned that it is unlikely for the vaccine to get to billions of people in the next few months, or be 100 per cent protective, and there remain questions on whether it will confer lifelong immunity.

The Belgian was a guest speaker in the Thursday episode of a webinar series hosted by the National University of Singapore Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine.

He said it seems unlikely there will be a vaccine ready for hundreds of millions of people in a few months' time. Vaccine development takes time and is difficult, with the success rate, in general, being far less than 10 per cent, he added.

"You can't take shortcuts... You need to demonstrate that it protects and that requires randomised control trials in a population where the incidence of new infections is high enough to come to meaningful conclusions. And that takes time," said Professor Piot.

"The question that is not being discussed enough is, will this vaccine... prevent acquisition of the virus or is it only going to prevent severe disease and death... and will it be as effective in elderly people, because that's where, often, the effectiveness of vaccines is lower if you're over 80, or even 70," he said.

Then, there is the safety issue to contend with. "This is a vaccine that will probably be needed by billions of people and so we need to make sure we are injecting absolutely safe biological material in these people," he said.

There may be hiccups along the way - the vaccine may not protect as much as expected, it can fail, or it can produce an undesirable side effect.

The world does not have the manufacturing capacity for billions of doses at the moment, neither are there enough glass vials available.

"When you hear some politicians or public health figures say, okay, we need to do all this and next year we'll have a vaccine, and we'll go back to normal. I think, forget it, a vaccine is not going to be a silver bullet," he said.

"If we have a 70 per cent effective vaccine, I think I would consider that a big success.''

Then, there is the issue - likely a major geopolitical one - of which nation will have access to it.

Professor Peter Piotwas one of the disco-verers of the Ebola virus in Zaire in 1976, when he was 27.

He has led research on Aids and was the founding executive director of the Joint United Nations Programme on HIV/Aids and the undersecretary-general of the United Nations from 1995 until 2008.

The Belgian microbiologist became the director of the London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine in 2010.

In May, he was appointed the special Covid-19 adviser to European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen.

In the role, he will advise the commission on supporting and steering research and innovation in the global fight against the coronavirus pandemic.

In his message for the Coronavirus Global Response initiative upon his appointment, he had said that the brightest minds in different fields need to come together to fight the virus as "the pandemic is not going to be over anywhere, until it is over everywhere".

He and his wife, Professor Heidi Larson, an anthropologist and the founding director of The Vaccine Confidence Project at the school, live in London.

Just this week, the United States said it had secured nearly all of the next three months' projected production of remdesivir - the only anti-viral drug that has been shown to be relatively effective in treating Covid-19.

"There are agreements with some generic manufacturers in India to produce it, but this is really the worst possible scenario... That's the kind of scenario we need to avoid when it comes to vaccines."

Prof Piot said people will need to embrace a new normal.

"We'll probably have to go to what we call an HIV combination prevention strategy; we will have to continue to do certain things like social distancing, wear masks and all that."

Combination prevention is a package of prevention interventions tailored to national and local needs. In HIV prevention, there is no single strategy.

Prof Piot, who was in the team that discovered Ebola and led global fights against HIV unscathed, experienced the wrath of the coronavirus first-hand.

The 71-year-old caught the coronavirus in March. He had a headache and felt feverish on March 19 and then suffered from extreme exhaustion - and it has taken him three months to recover.

He can now go jogging, an activity he could not do just two weeks ago, he said on the webinar.

He was hospitalised for about a week. When he was discharged, he had thought he just needed to rest.

"But then I developed organising pneumonia... It was only then that I became short of breath," he said. It was a delayed immune reaction that would have killed him if it had happened when he was acutely ill with Covid-19, he had said previously.

Although he is nearly fully recovered, some of the effects of the illness remain.

"I had atrial fibrillation and some cardiac problems... That seems to be okay now. I probably have a bit of fibrosis in the lungs and so on, but you can live with that."

By sharing his story, he wanted to show that the virus cannot be underestimated as it can probably affect all the organs in the body. The illness has taught him that Covid-19 is "much more than either a bit of a flu or a serious flu", or an illness where just 1 per cent of infected persons die.

Covid-19 patients may have to deal with a lot of chronic conditions as a result of the illness, he said.

While many have mild illnesses, some can spend weeks in ill health.

Around the world, coronavirus cases continue to rise.

World Health Organisation director-general Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus said this week that some countries face a long, hard road ahead by taking a fragmented approach.

He said Italy and Spain - the epicentres of the pandemic in March - had brought their epidemics under control with leadership, humility, active participation by every member of society and implementing a comprehensive approach.

Continued here:

Coronavirus vaccine will not be silver bullet to end pandemic: Expert - The Straits Times

US reports world’s largest ever daily increase in coronavirus cases – The Straits Times

WASHINGTON The United States reported more than 55,000 new Covid-19 cases on Thursday, a new daily global record for the coronavirus pandemic, as infections rose in a majority of states.

A surge in coronavirus cases over the past week has put President Donald Trump's handling of the crisis under the microscope and led several state governors to halt plans to reopen their economies after strict lockdowns.

The daily US tally stood at 55,274 late on Thursday, topping the previous single-day record of 54,771 set by Brazil on June 19.

Coronavirus cases are rising in 37 out of 50 US states including Florida, which confirmed more than 10,000 new cases on Thursday. That marked the state's largest daily spike so far and a level that exceeded single-day tallies from any European country at the height of the outbreak there.

California, another epicentre, saw positive tests climb 37 per cent with hospitalisations up 56 per cent over the past two weeks.

Texas Governor Greg Abbott, a Republican who has previously resisted calls to make face masks mandatory, on Thursday ordered them to be worn in all counties with over 20 coronavirus cases. He also barred people from gathering in groups larger than 10.

"In the past few weeks, there has been a swift and substantial spike in coronavirus cases," Mr Abbott said in a video message. "We need to refocus on slowing the spread. But, this time, we want to do it without closing down Texas again."

Texas recorded its second-worst day of the pandemic with 7,915 new cases, according to state health department data on Thursday.

Virus-related hospitalisations expanded by 6.9 per cent to 7,382, the data showed, with medical facilities in Houston and elsewhere showing increasing signs of strain.

The US has now recorded over 131,000 deaths, almost a quarter of the known global total.

The wave of new cases has several governors halting or back-pedalling on plans to reopen their states after months of strict lockdowns, closing beaches and cancelling fireworks displays over the July 4 holiday weekend.

"We are not out of this crisis. We are still in the first wave of this crisis. It requires some level of personal responsibility," California Governor Gavin Newsom, a Democrat, said at a daily briefing on the pandemic.

The sweeping business shutdowns earlier in the pandemic devastated the US economy and threw millions of Americans out of work, leaving governors reluctant to take such draconian steps again, even if the lifting of restrictions likely touched off the new outbreak.

A Labour Department report out on Thursday showed the re-openings had a dramatic impact on hiring, with the US creating jobs at a record pace in June. However, employment remains 14.7 million jobs below pre-pandemic levels.

"Today's announcement proves that our economy is roaring back," Mr Trump told reporters at the White House.

But the latest batch of high-frequency data assembled by Federal Reserve officials, economists and private companies suggests that economic activity stalled in recent days during new clampdowns.

"More than ever, we're concerned about the worsening health situation and its impact on the burgeoning recovery," wrote Oxford Economics analyst Gregory Daco.

"Rebounding mobility and poor use of protective equipment will make for a dangerous summer cocktail," the analyst wrote.

Meanwhile Mr Trump headed to Mount Rushmore yesterday for an early Independence Day celebration with thousands of guests who would not be required to wear masks or observe social distancing.

The show will feature a military flyover and the first fireworks in more than a decade at the mountain in the Black Hills region of South Dakota which is carved with the visages of four American presidents.

"We've going to have a tremendous evening," Mr Trump said on Thursday at the White House. "It's going to be a fireworks display like few people have seen."

Coronavirus cases are rising in 37 out of 50 US states including Florida, which confirmed more than 10,000 new cases on Thursday. That marked the state's largest daily spike so far and a level that exceeded single-day tallies from any European country at the height of the outbreak there.

The mass gathering - which is expected to include about 7,500 ticketed guests - comes as members of Mr Trump's coronavirus task force are pleading with Americans to wear masks and practise social distancing.

Health officials around the country have urged Americans to scale back their holiday plans and celebrate at home. In Los Angeles County, California, the health department ordered beaches closed and fireworks shows cancelled.

"The most patriotic thing they can do this year is to stay at home," said Dr Peter Beilenson, the director of Sacramento County's Department of Health Services, of revellers planning to float on rafts along the American River.

REUTERS, BLOOMBERG, NYTIMES

Read more:

US reports world's largest ever daily increase in coronavirus cases - The Straits Times

Who Is Ayn Rand? – The Objective Standard

Ayn Rand (19051982) was an American novelist and philosopher, and the creator of Objectivism, which she called a philosophy for living on earth.

Rands most widely read novels are The Fountainhead, a story about an independent and uncompromising architect; and Atlas Shrugged, a story about the role of the mind in human life and about what happens to the world when the thinkers and producers mysteriously disappear. Her most popular nonfiction books are The Virtue of Selfishness, a series of essays about the foundations and principles of the morality of self-interest; and Capitalism: The Unknown Ideal, a series of essays about what capitalism is and why it is the only moral social system.

Rand was born in Russia, where she attended grade school and university; studied history, philosophy, and screenwriting; and witnessed the Bolshevik Revolution and the birth of the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics. In 1925, she left the burgeoning communist state, telling Soviet authorities she was going for a brief visit with relatives in America, and never returned.

She soon made her way to Hollywood, where she worked as a screenwriter, married actor Frank OConnor, and wrote her first novel, We The Living. She then moved to New York City, where she wrote Anthem (a novelette), The Fountainhead, Atlas Shrugged, numerous articles and essays, and several nonfiction books in which she defined and elaborated the principles of Objectivism.

Rands staunch advocacy of reason (as against faith and whim), self-interest (as against self-sacrifice), individualism and individual rights (as against collectivism and group rights), and capitalism (as against all forms of statism) make her both the most controversial and most important philosopher of the 20th century.

Describing Objectivism, Rand wrote: My philosophy, in essence, is the concept of man as a heroic being, with his own happiness as the moral purpose of his life, with productive achievement as his noblest activity, and reason as his only absolute.

For a good biography of Rand, see Jeffery Brittings Ayn Rand or Scott McConnells 100 Voices: An Oral History of Ayn Rand. For a brief presentation of the principles of Objectivism, see What is Objectivism? For the application of these principles to cultural and political issues of the day, subscribe to The Objective Standard, the preeminent source for commentary from an Objectivist perspective.

Read more:

Who Is Ayn Rand? - The Objective Standard

What’s Wrong With Ayn Rand’s Philosophy? – The Objective …

Many articles have been written about whats wrong with Ayn Rands philosophy. But, to my knowledge, none of them presents her ideas accurately. So I thought it would be helpful to write one that does.

Heres whats wrong with Rands ideas:

Rand held that existence exists, that reality is real, that there is a world out there, and that we are conscious of it. She held that everything in existence is something specific; everything has a nature; a thing is what it is. (A snake is a snake. A woman is a woman. A pillar of salt is a pillar of salt.) She held that a thing can act only in accordance with its nature. (A snake can slither; it cannot speak. A woman can speak; she cant become a pillar of salt.) And Rand held that there is only one reality: the one we perceive, the one we experience, the one in which we live.1

Where to start with all of the problems in just that one paragraph?

To begin with, the idea that existence exists excludes the idea that existence doesnt exist. It denies the subjectivist, pragmatist, postmodernist view that reality is an illusion, a mental construct, a social convention. Obviously, people who insist that reality is not real are not going to buy in to a philosophy that says it is real.

So thats one huge problem with Rands philosophy.

Now consider her view that only one reality exists. This excludes the notion that a second reality exists; it excludes the idea of a supernatural realm, the realm of God. Likewise, her view that everything has a specific nature, that a thing is what it is, excludes the possibility that some things are not what they are. For instance, it excludes the possibility that a dead person can be alive (life after death), the possibility that wine can be blood or that bread can be flesh (transubstantiation), and the possibility that the Earth came into existence hundreds of thousands of years after the first Homo sapiens roamed it. Similarly, the idea that things can act only in accordance with their nature excludes the possibility of miraclesso: no Immaculate Conception, no virgin birth (of Jesus), no living inside a whale for three days, no walking on water, no faith healing, and so on.

Needless to say, people who insist on the existence of God, life after death, creationism, and miracles will not buy in to a philosophy that leaves no room for such things.

The problems with Rands philosophy are mounting rapidlyand weve just begun.

Another major problem is Rands view that man acquires knowledge by means of reason, the faculty that identifies and integrates the material provided by his senses. According to Rand, insofar as a person observes reality via his senses; integrates his observations into concepts, generalizations, and principles; checks his thinking for contradictions; and checks his conclusions for consistency with his ever-expanding network of observation-based integrationshe can acquire knowledge. Indeed, according to Rand human beings have acquired massive amounts of knowledge, which is why science has advanced so far and man has accomplished so much.2

Well, that view will not go over well with skeptics, pragmatists, and postmodernists who argue that man cannot acquire knowledgeat least not knowledge of reality. Because mans sensory apparatuses process all incoming data before it reaches consciousness, these skeptics argue, man is conscious not of an external reality or a world out there, but rather of internal modifications or distortions.

No human being has ever experienced an objective world, or even a world at all, writes Sam Harris. The sights and sounds and pulsings that you experience are consequences of processed datadata that has been structured, edited, or amplified by the nervous system. Thus, The world that you see and hear is nothing more than a modification of your consciousness.3

This fashionable view is rooted in the ideas of Immanuel Kant, who wrote: What objects may be in themselves, and apart from all this receptivity of our sensibility [i.e., perception], remains completely unknown to us. Once we understand this, Kant says, we realise that not only are the drops of rain mere appearances, but that even their round shape, nay even the space in which they fall, are nothing in themselves, but merely modifications within consciousness. In principle, Kant says, the actual objectthe object as it really isremains unknown to us.4

Indeed, says Kant, it is an error even to regard external objects as things-in-themselves, which exist independently of us and of our sensibility, and which are therefore outside us. The truth, he says, is that external objects are mere appearances or species of [internal] representations, and the things we perceive are something only through these representations. Apart from them they are nothing.5

When philosophers or intellectuals claim that we cannot know reality because our sensory apparatuses distort the data before it reaches consciousness, they may sound profound or impressive (at least to each other). But, then, along comes Ayn Rand, who points out that such claims amount to the view that man is blind, because he has eyesdeaf, because he has earsdeluded, because he has a mindand the things he perceives do not exist, because he perceives them.6

As you might imagine, such straightforward clarifications, which abound in Rands works, can make skeptics feel as ignorant as they claim to be. So thats another problem with Rands philosophy.

Further, Rand holds that reason is mans only means of gaining knowledge.7 This excludes the possibility that revelation, faith, feelings, or extrasensory perception (ESP) is a means of knowledge. On her view, to embrace ideas not supported by evidence is to err. Thus Rand sees all forms of mysticismall claims to a non-sensory, non-rational means of knowledgeas baseless, arbitrary, illegitimate.

That, of course, will not fly with religionists, subjectivists, psychics, or others who claim to acquire knowledge through non-sensory, non-rational means.

And then there are the myriad problems posed by Rands conception of free will.

Rand holds that people do indeed possess free willand that it resides in a fundamental choice: to think or not to think, to focus ones mind or not to do so, to go by facts or to go by feelings.8 The problems with this idea manifest on several levels.

For starters, if people have free will, then not only are their choices their responsibility, so too are the consequences of their choices. If a person characteristically chooses to think, and if his thinking guides him to build a business and make a lot of money, then the business and the money are his achievements. Likewise, if a person characteristically chooses not to think, and if his non-thinking renders him poor and miserable, then his poverty and misery are his fault.

Well, egalitarians, socialists, communists, and the like are not going to accept that for a minute. People who want to organize society in a way that ignores or denies personal responsibility will not accept a philosophy that upholds the very principle that gives rise to and necessitates personal responsibility.

Nor will Rands conception of free will jibe with Jews, Christians, or Muslims who take their religion seriously. If people truly choose to think or not to think, then the notion of an omnipotent, omniscient God goes out the window. Think about it: If people are free to think or not to think, then whatever powers an alleged God is said to possess, he cant know in advance which alternative people are going to choose. If God existed and knew in advance how people were going to choose, then their choices would be preordainedthus they wouldnt be genuine choices. Likewise, if people are free to think or not to think, then God cant make them choose to think. Nor can he make them choose not to think. You see the problem.

In short, Rands view of free will leaves no room for the existence of an all-knowing, all-powerful God. This will not sit well with anyone who insists that such a God exists.

And thats still just the tip of Rands free-will iceberg. Her view of volition leads to a whole host of additional problems. Consider a few more.

If people choose to think or not to think, then they choose all of their actions that are governed by that fundamental choice as well. For instance, on Rands view, a person can choose to be honest or dishonest. He can refuse to pretend that facts are other than they areor he can choose to engage in such pretense.9 Importantly, Rands views on honesty and dishonesty are not merely about telling the truth versus lying. Rand holds that if a person knows something to be true but pretends that he doesnt know it, then even if he doesnt lie about iteven if he maintains the pretense only in his own mindhe is being dishonest. For instance, on Rands view, if a person knows that a friend has acted unjustly but pretends that he doesnt know it, hes being dishonest. And if a person knows that he owes someone an apology but doesnt extend it, hes being dishonest. In such cases, although the person has not lied, he nevertheless is pretending that facts are other than they are.

Well, people who choose occasionally to pretend that they dont know what they do knowand who want to continue in this fashionwill not embrace a philosophy that says they are able to stop deluding themselves and morally corrupt if they dont. (Of course, they might pretend to embrace it, but thats another matter.)

Likewise, on Rands view, a person can choose to think for himself, or he can turn to others and expect them to think for him. In other words, he can engage in independent thinking or in what Rand termed second-handedness.10 (An example of independent thinking would be someone reading a philosophers works and deciding for himself whether they make sense. An example of second-handedness would be someone turning to others to see what they say he should think about the philosophers ideas.) Rands insistence that people should face reality and think for themselves as a matter of unwavering principle is a problembecause many people are afraid to think for themselves. Many people prefer to avoid that effort, to shirk that responsibility, and to passively accept the ideas of their group, their leader, their tribe. Such people will not embrace a philosophy that upholds independent thinking as a fundamental virtue.

This brings us to the mother lode of problems with Ayn Rands philosophyand to the point of the whole thing.

Rands aforementioned principles calling for people to uphold reason, to be honest, and to think for themselves are part and parcel of the moral code she called rational egoism or rational self-interest. This moral code holds that the objective standard of moral value is mans lifeby which Rand means the requirements of human life given the kind of being that humans are. On her view, because humans are rational beingsbeings whose basic means of survival is the use of reasonthat which sustains and furthers the life of a rational being is good (or moral), and that which harms or destroys the life of a rational being is bad (or evil).11

Further, because Rand sees human beings as individualseach with his own body, his own mind, his own lifeshe holds that each individuals own life is properly his own ultimate value. She holds that each individual should choose and pursue his own life-serving values, and that he should never surrender a greater value for the sake of a lesser valuehe should never commit a sacrifice. As she puts it:

Manevery manis an end in himself, not the means to the ends of others. He must exist for his own sake, neither sacrificing himself to others nor sacrificing others to himself. The pursuit of his own rational self-interest and of his own happiness is the highest moral purpose of his life.12

Well, such a moral code clearly will not fly with people who want to maintain the traditional notion that people have a moral duty to sacrifice themselves or their values for the sake of others (i.e., altruism). Nor will it fly with people who feel that they have a moral right to sacrifice other people as they see fit (predation).

Not only does Rand regard both self-sacrifice and the sacrifice of others as immoral; she also regards the use of any form or degree of initiatory physical force against human beings as properly illegal. In her words, the essential characteristics of a civilized society are that men deal with one another, not as victims and executioners, nor as masters and slaves, but as traders, by free, voluntary exchange to mutual benefit; and that no man may obtain any values from others by resorting to physical force, and no man may initiate the use of physical force against others.13

Needless to say, Rands staunch advocacy of voluntary exchange to mutual benefit and her moral opposition to the use of force as a means of obtaining values from people will not fly with people or governments that want to use force to obtain values from people. Criminals who want to steal peoples belongings, commit fraud, rape people, or violate rights in other ways will not embrace a moral code that forbids them to do so. Likewise, governments that want to force people to serve the common good or the community or the master race or some other master will not recognize or uphold a morality that forbids them to initiate physical force against people. And pull-peddling businessmen who want government to forcibly control, regulate, or cripple their competitors will not recognize or uphold a moral code that forbids such coercion either.

This problemRands moral opposition to the use of physical force against human beingslies at the very base of her political theory, where it serves as a bridge between her moral code and her political views. This is where Rands theory of rights comes into the picture. As she put it:

Rights are a moral conceptthe concept that provides a logical transition from the principles guiding an individuals actions to the principles guiding his relationship with othersthe concept that preserves and protects individual morality in a social contextthe link between the moral code of a man and the legal code of a society, between ethics and politics. Individual rights are the means of subordinating society to moral law.14

Rand sees individual rights as the governing principle of a civilized society because she sees rights as deriving from mans nature and as requirements of his life in a social context. She elaborates:

A right is a moral principle defining and sanctioning a mans freedom of action in a social context. There is only one fundamental right (all the others are its consequences or corollaries): a mans right to his own life. Life is a process of self-sustaining and self-generated action; the right to life means the right to engage in self-sustaining and self-generated actionwhich means: the freedom to take all the actions required by the nature of a rational being for the support, the furtherance, the fulfillment and the enjoyment of his own life. (Such is the meaning of the right to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness.)15

According to Rand, the only proper purpose of government is to protect individual rights by banning physical force from social relationshipsand by using force only in retaliation and only against those who initiate its use.16

Clearly, no one who wants government to do more than that will embrace Rands philosophy. No one who wants government to forcibly redistribute wealth, or to forbid certain kinds of speech, or to forbid certain kinds of consensual adult sex, or to restrict freedom in any other way will embrace a philosophy that demands principled recognition and absolute protection of individual rights.

A final problem worth mentioning about Rand and her philosophy is that she wrote in plain, intelligible English and defined her terms clearly as a matter of course, so that anyone who wants to understand her ideas can do so with relative ease. Toward this end, in addition to presenting her ideas in various nonfiction works, she dramatized them in spellbinding fictionsuch as her novels The Fountainhead and Atlas Shruggedthus enabling people to see her ideas in practice. Well, this will not go over well with modern philosophers or academics who insist that philosophy must be written in academese, technical jargon, or impenetrable fog. Nor will it pass muster with anyone who feels that dramatizing or concretizing ideas in fiction somehow disqualifies them.

We could go on. Rands philosophy involves many additional problems. But the foregoing is a concise indication of the trouble it causes.

So, next time the subject of whats wrong with Ayn Rands ideas comes up, be sure to share this brief sketch of the kinds of problems involved. Its better for people to learn whats wrong with Rands actual ideas than to waste time contemplating takedowns of straw men.

Here is the original post:

What's Wrong With Ayn Rand's Philosophy? - The Objective ...

B Magazine: Holly Rehder interview with B Magazine (7/3/20) – Southeast Missourian

Holly Rehder stands for a photo on the back porch of her home overlooking the Thebes bridge on the Mississippi River.

Aaron Eisenhower ~ B Magazine

There are a number of important political races in our area this year, a few, because of term limits, pitting talented individuals against each other in districts without an incumbent. The following interview is with State Rep. Holly Rehder (R-Sikeston), who is running for Senate District 27. The district encompasses all of the counties of Bollinger, Cape Girardeau, Madison, Mississippi, Perry and Scott. Rehder answered questions from B Magazine and provided a three-sentence self-introduction. To read interviews with other candidates profiled in B Magazine, click here.

Rehder: I first got involved in government because as a business owner, I saw how often the government hurt small businesses and workers; I wanted to see people with skin in the game represent the people. As a mother, wife and grandmother, I wanted to preserve freedom for future generations and to make a better life for those in my life. As a representative, I am proud of my work in fighting bloated government, in protecting our 2nd-Amendment rights and in speaking up for the unborn.

Rehder: I was 13 when I started working as a landscaper for my mother's boyfriend at the time. He had a lot of yards each week to take care of, so I talked him into hiring me. I was excited to earn money and very much appreciated the opportunity to work.

Rehder: I was 15 and pregnant, sleeping at a friend's place and needing a job so I could get on my feet. I was tremendously thankful to find a job as a nanny for two small children. However, when I was interviewed, I felt I had to lie about my age to get the job. I was pregnant, so I'm sure they never even considered I may be as young as I was. I was desperate for work to support myself and my child that was on the way. I told them I was 18. I got the job, and after two weeks grappling with the guilt I had over what I had done, I called up the mother and told her I had lied about my age to get the job, and I apologized profusely for it. The family decided that I was doing a good job and graciously kept me on as their nanny.

From that moment, I knew regardless of the outcome, I had to be myself in all things. Honest, hardworking, and at that point 15, pregnant and a high school dropout. Be me and trust God to provide the rest. And he always has.

Rehder: My college education was anything but standard. First, I had to work to get my GED. Once I had earned that, I was so excited to start college. I went to Southeast Missouri State University starting with a Pell Grant to help cover costs. I worked part-time to pay for the rest. However, after starting out as a full-time, non-traditional student, I found that I could not support my family and go to college full-time. I dropped out of college and went back to work full-time. In the meantime, I would take college classes as I could, nights, weekends, etc., paying out of pocket as I went.

It took me 17 years of this process to finally get my college degree. I earned my Bachelor's in mass communications and a double minor in political science and communications for legal professionals from SEMO. It certainly wasn't easy, but I knew how important it is to have your education, so I worked to earn it.

Join the B Magazine newsletter

The weekly newsletter focused on the business of Southeast Missouri.

Rehder: Well, like I mentioned above, I worked full-time to support my family while I also tried to earn a college degree. I started at Galaxy Cablevision, working in the mail room and earning $4.25 an hour. I worked hard and was very thankful for my job.

As different jobs opened up at the company, I would apply for them. Some I would get, some I would not. In any job, I resolved to be the first one there and the last one to leave. I wanted to prove that I was an employee who could be trusted with what she was given, stay out of other people's business and be the best worker in the building.

After years at the company, I had worked my way up to director of government affairs, working on cable franchises throughout 13 states. In that position, the Missouri Cable Association asked me to represent the cable industry's interests in Jefferson City because I knew the cable industry inside and out, and I was good at my job. I served on the board of directors for the association and worked as an advocate and discovered that oftentimes the government would presume how to run businesses better than the businessowners themselves; not just in our industry, but for industries around the state. It was this frustration with how the government tried to bloat itself that planted the idea in my head to get involved in politics.

After 14 years, I left Galaxy Cablevision and went to work for the Cable Association full time helping to fight and protect the industry, as well as our own personal business that we had started in 2004, Integrity Communications. Ray and I learned fast that it isn't easy running our own small business, especially when there's so much government red tape.

After three years with the Cable Association, I went to work for then-Congresswoman Jo Ann Emerson, where I learned firsthand how to take care of constituents and how to fight for our region. I learned from Jo Ann what it takes to represent people. I decided to run for representative in 2012 to finally be more of a voice for small businesses dealing with the government. To be a voice for people who grew up like me and have found that our many government social programs often hinder people from ever rising to their potential -- even though they are started as a means to help upward mobility.

I've been working since then to help the people and protect their rights and businesses.

Rehder: One book that has been very influential has been Ayn Rand's "Atlas Shrugged." I certainly don't agree with Rand's philosophy on everything, but in her novel, she just seemed to capture the destructive mindset of those in government who try and control everything. The novel shows what happens when the mantra of "social good" is used as a cover to grow government to exorbitant size and how corporate welfare ends up corrupting society. The book shows that when the government aligns itself with big corporations, it leads to racketeering and corruption that holds society back and degrades the work people do. It spoke to me as a business owner why it is important to not be beholden to the government.

Rehder: I am a very Type-A personality. I am a hands-on, go-getter type that puts everything I have into the job and do it with honesty and integrity. With that being said, one thing I have learned is that you cannot micromanage and expect your business to thrive; one huge aspect of leadership is being able to delegate. I believe in hiring the right people for the job, people who will do the job with honesty, integrity and determination. I love allowing people to do their jobs and to do them well, to give them a goal and to allow them to come up with the way to accomplish that goal, in their own style. We all learn from each other.

Rehder: Above all, a public servant must be available to the people. Be responsive to constituents, take the calls, help them in any way you can. Turn over every stone for them. As a representative, I am often the liaison to the people, helping them cut through government red tape. I take that very seriously. As a legislator, I think we need a smaller, more efficient government. We cannot waste the people's money on ridiculous schemes and then demand more from the people. A public servant should help make the government more accountable and transparent to the people.

Rehder: I would say my colleagues would consider my persistence and determination my biggest strength. I never give up, I don't back down, and I don't quit. I stand on principle and will fight for what I believe is right. On the flip side, I would say my colleagues would also consider that to be my biggest weakness! I will frustrate colleagues when I continue to stand on principle when they want me to compromise. Sometimes compromise works and is the right solution. But when it's not the right solution, it's just not.

Rehder: When I was 16, my husband and I moved us to Mississippi for a job at a chicken plant. Our only option was to move into a crowded house in Mississippi; my daughter, Raychel, was almost a year old. It was just us and a few others only a few years older than me. The house had no heat, and we had little money to feed us until my husband's first check.

The other people living in the house were not working -- their choice -- but I knew I couldn't allow their needs to take from the little we had for Raychel. I walked to the store daily and got four cans of vienna sausages for $1 and rationed those out to me and Raychel, and we relied on a $15 space heater in our room to keep us from freezing.

I learned that I have to stand my ground, regardless of who it upsets. I had a child counting on me to get it right. I needed to do the responsible thing and take care of her, my child who fully relied on me, even though that meant it made others angry. I knew they had the power to change their situation but weren't. We were trying to change ours. I was only 16 and weighed about 100 pounds, but I found out I could be a bear if I needed to be, and at that point, my daughter needed me to be. I stand for what is right.

Rehder: We need to have a Department of Revenue that is responsive to business owners and works with them, not against them. We need less bureaucratic red tape and to make it easier for people to run their businesses. Businesses shouldn't have to hire attorneys just to argue to the government that they paid their taxes and the mistake is on the Department's end. I've seen this over and over. The money wasted on bureaucratic concerns is money that does not go back into the business or to employees. We need to continue to cut restrictions and regulations and to unleash the power of Missouri businesses.

As a business owner, I've also seen the devastating affect the opioid epidemic has had on our workers, on our families. We need to continue finding solutions to help those entrapped in this crisis get out and get back to a healthy, happy lifestyle.

Rehder: I want to serve as Senator right now because we are constantly fighting against a government that wants to explode. We need people with backbone ready to push back against government expansion and corporate welfare.

President Trump ran to stand up against an entrenched political establishment that got too comfortable in their positions. I'm running to challenge Jefferson City to be accountable to the people and respect their rights. I got tired of waiting for someone to serve with a backbone, someone to stay in the fight and be responsive to the people -- then I realized it was me I was waiting on.

Those are my qualities -- a fighter for the people. Someone you can't break. I want to protect our rights which are at stake, including our cherished 2nd-Amendment rights. I will stand up for the Constitutional rights of the people, be a loud voice, and I want to serve as senator to protect our liberty.

Rehder: Find the field you want to work in and get a job. Any job. It could be low pay or a non-paid internship, just work it. You are building real-world experience and relationships with people who will help you later on. Your education matters, so don't give up. An impressive resume and credentials help, but relationships are key. If an employer knows you, knows your character and trusts you, they will speak for you and help you. Be the person who says, "Teach me, and I'll be the hardest worker you got," and that will open doors for you like nothing else can. Work hard, be happy in your task, give the glory to God, and he will open doors for you.

Read the rest here:

B Magazine: Holly Rehder interview with B Magazine (7/3/20) - Southeast Missourian

What’s the deal with Twitter competitor Parler? – Slate

Maybe a Parler logo on your screen next?Denis Charlet/Getty Images This article is part of the Free Speech Project, a collaboration between Future Tense and the Tech, Law, & Security Program at American University Washington College of Law that examines the ways technology is influencing how we think about speech.

The basic idea of Parler is an awful lot like Twitter. But instead of tweets, users post Parleys; instead of retweets, there are echoes. And upon registering, the suggested accounts to follow include Breitbart, the Epoch Times, and the Daily Caller, as well as Rand Paul, Mark Levin, and Team Trump.

In June, right-wing users started flocking to this alt-Twitter, whose main selling point is that it vows to champion free speech. As mainstream platforms banned more far-right accounts, removed hate speech with newfound vigor, and attached warning labels to a few of President Donald Trumps tweets, Parler became, for many, an attractive solution to Twitters supposed ills. Now, its the second most popular app in the App Store, and last week it was estimated to have reached more than 1.5 million daily users, snagging somehigh-profile newbies: Sen. Ted Cruz, Rep. Elise Stefanik, Rep. Jim Jordan, Donald Trump Jr., and Eric Trump. What led to Parlers founding in August 2018 was, predictably, disillusionment with the likes of the Silicon Valley giants. Henderson, Nevadabased software engineers Jared Thomson and John Matze created the platform, according to Parlers website, [a]fter being exhausted with a lack of transparency in big tech, ideological suppresssion [sic] and privacy abuse.

Yet while the platform is being billed as the big free speech alternative to Twitter, it isnt exactly unique. Nor is it as uncensored as it claims to be. Parler is just the latest in a long line of rival social networks that have appeared (and, often, disappeared) in the past decade as alternatives to Big Tech. And, if the past is any indicator, its unlikely that Parler will become anything more than a fringe platform in the near future.

Some of the platforms to emerge as alternatives to the major social networks have taken a hard line on data privacy. Ello, for example, was founded in 2014 as an ad-free network that promised never to sell user data to advertisers. (After being dubbed a Facebook killer, the site was overwhelmed with new users and crashed frequently; it could never scale up and instead became a community for digital artists.) MeWe, another Facebook rival, offers the industrys first Privacy Bill of Rights. (It also takes a laissez-faire approach to content moderation.) And while its 8 million users are dwarfed by Facebooks 2.6 billion, MeWe is one of the few successful alternative networks in that its continued to grow since its founding in 2016.

Matze, Parlers CEO who counts Ayn Rand and conservative economist Thomas Sowell among his influences, fancies his platform a sort of free-speech utopia: Were a community town square, an open town square, with no censorship, Matze told CNBC. If you can say it on the street of New York, you can say it on Parler. And while Parler says it is unbiasedMatze is offering a $20,000 progressive bounty for a popular liberal pundit to joinits evidently become an unofficial home to the far right, which has long claimed to be mistreated by mainstream platforms. When alt-right celebrities, such as Milo Yiannopoulos and Laura Loomer, are banned from Twitter, Parler is their next step. (Loomer announced last week that she has become the first person whose Parler following572,000exceeds her pre-ban Twitter following.)

In this regard, Parler is most similar to Gab, the free speechdriven platform launched in 2017 thats known as a haven for extremists. [F]ar angrier and uglier than Parler, Gab quickly became a breeding ground for anti-Semitism and neo-Nazism, where posts calling for terrorist attacks and violence against minorities circulate. Gabs fate, however, represents one iteration of the circle of life for platforms of its ilk: After it was connected to an instance of terrorism in 2018, when the suspect in the Pittsburgh synagogue shooting posted about his intentions to act just before he killed 11 people, Gab never quite recovered. Its server, GoDaddy, dropped it, and though it eventually found another home online, its popularity waned following the shooting and the period offline. In 2019, a software engineer for Gabs web hosting company said that the platform probably had a few tens of thousands of users at mostrather than the 835,000 that Gab claimedthough the hosting company later denied that.

But Parler doesnt quite have Gabs teeth. (Andrew Torba, Gabs founder, has referred to Parler as a network for Z-list Maga celebrities.) While even Gab has limits to free speech, since its content policy purports to ban extremism, Parler is stricter. It goes far beyond what you might expect from a platform whose entire ethos is freedom of expression. Matze listed a few of the basic rules in a Parley on Tuesday:

As the top Twitter comment points out, Twitter allows four of the five things that Parler censors. Parlers thorough community guidelines also prohibit spam, terrorist activity, defamation, fighting words, and obscenity, among other kinds of speech. And Parlers user agreement includes clauses that may seem antithetical to its mission. The platform may remove any content and terminate your access to the Services at any time and for any reason or no reason, it states. But perhaps most surprising is this:

17. You agree to defend and indemnify Parler, as well as any of its officers, directors, employees, and agents, from and against any and all claims, actions, damages, obligations, losses, liabilities, costs or debt, and expenses (including but not limited to all attorneys fees) arising from or relating to your access to and use of the Services. Parler will have the right to conduct its own defense, at your expense, in any action or proceeding covered by this indemnity.

The indemnity provision means that if Parler faces a lawsuit for something you post, you pay. Basically, youre free to say whatever you wantas long as it falls within the community guidelines, and as long as youre willing to take the risk.

That Parler has been reportedly banning users en masse this week only further illuminates the faade of free speech on the platform; but regardless of the extent to which one can or cannot Parley whatever they want, the fact remains that the platform is becoming an important space for the American far right. Its worth considering, then, what its members might do with it. Part of the concern over polarized platforms is that they can lead to radicalization: In general, theyre seen as part of the pipeline to extremism. First, extremist movements find a foothold in mainstream platforms, where they present their norms in a slightly more palatable way, explained Jeremy Blackburn, a computer science professor at Binghamton University who researches fringe and extremist web communities. Then they gain ground in platforms like Parler that straddle the fringe and mainstream. Once you remove any question of there being an echo chamber, theres just obvious consequences, Blackburn said.

While this may be cause for concern, Amarnath Amarasingam, an extremism researcher and professor at Queens University, is skeptical that Parler will really galvanize the right. I think part of what animates the rightand the left to some extentand particularly the far right, is the ability to argue with the other, Amarasingam said. Interacting (and fighting) with the left reinforces the far rights identity, giving it meaning and purpose, he said, and from studying similar platforms like Gab, Amarasingam has found that talking to yourself in the dark corners of the internet is actually not that satisfying. And while he believes it might lead to the radicalization of certain individuals within the far right, the platform itself wont necessarily further the ideologies of extremist right-wing groups.

What Parler could do, Amarasingam believes, is serve as a kind of sounding board for the far right, a place for fringe movements to try out and refine different arguments. Essentially, it could be a factory of sorts, churning out ideas before theyre deployed into the mainstream. Maybe one day, at leastfor now, a good portion of the conversation of Parler is about how fantastic the platform is and how dumb the old tech giants are. Amarasingam acknowledged this. [W]hat that indicates to me is that they actually are just using Parler to vent their anger of being suspended from what really matters, which has been more mainstream platform, he said. And so I think theyll very much try to get back into wherever the conversation is happening.

Theres also the matter of growth. Normally, these networks just dont get that big. Theyre considered fringe platforms for a reason, and theres rarely a solid business model behind them. In Parlers case, the network was started with angel funding, and Matze hasnt devised a clear business plan since. Currently, his tentative model is to match conservative influencers with advertisers, and have Parler take a cut of the influencer fee. But given brands recent reluctance to advertise on Facebook, this plan seems far from foolproof. With only 30 employees, Parlers ability to handle more users will be tested. It might growespecially if Trump does decide to join after allbut, as Amarasingam put it, if youre not in the mainstream, youre not in the mainstream.

Generally speaking, what I expect to see in these sites is they hit a certain threshold of users, just like any other social networking platform, said Blackburn. And then for these types of platforms that are explicitly attracting these certain types of users, probably one of them will do something stupid, then they get shut down or deplatformed, and the next one pops up.

Future Tense is a partnership of Slate, New America, and Arizona State University that examines emerging technologies, public policy, and society.

Original post:

What's the deal with Twitter competitor Parler? - Slate

Bolstering Separation of Money and State Following the 244th Independence Day – Bitcoin News

With the fourth of July approaching, many Americans will have to contemplate whether or not the holiday is an empty affair. After the last thirteen weeks of Covid-19 lockdowns, business shutdowns, and police brutality, the lack of liberty and freedoms in the U.S. has never been more apparent. With ideas like bitcoin and concepts that bolster secession, the day is coming when money is completely removed from the state, just as the state was separated from the church centuries ago.

Roughly six days prior to the empty holiday, as I read the letters of Independence pronouncement adopted in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, on July 4, 1776, I say to myself Americans are not free. The majority in the United States have surrendered their freedoms and civil liberties to the collective mob. Many individualists are quite certain that most Americans dont believe in those declarations of independence, and the 27 grievances against tyranny written hundreds of years ago.

One reason that validates this opinion as truth, is because the U.S. government has transgressed upon the citizenry. They have quite literally violated every one of the 27 grievances. Yet the majority of U.S. citizens are too comfortable and too lost in the sea of distraction to even notice.

One thing I will be promoting on July 4, 2020, is real independence and the use of counter-economics, in order to separate finance from the state. The separation of money and state is the ideal solution for striking the root. The New Ideal author, Onkar Ghate, describes it very well in an April 2019 essay.

The essay explains how Thomas Jefferson, John Locke, and James Madison all vowed to separate the church from state, as this was a fundamental right of sovereign individuals. However, the philosophy can easily be applied to finance too, as Ghate and many others have argued for economic freedom for many decades.

The arguments for intellectual freedom and economic freedom share the same root: the requirements of the rational mind to guide the individual, Ghates essay details.

Ghates explains how the well known novelist, Ayn Rand, took the individualist ideas from Jefferson, Madison, and Locke and extended it to all human actions like education, scientific research, the arts, and especially finance. Rand argued that governmental schools, governmental funding of scientific research, and governmental funding of the arts violate the individuals right to intellectual freedom, Ghates essay highlights. The author also adds:

Intellectual freedom cannot exist without political freedom; political freedom cannot exist without economic freedom; a free mind and a free market are corollaries.

The founder of Shapeshift, Erik Voorhees, said in March 2015 at the Texas Bitcoin Conference, the reason he has bolstered the idea of bitcoin is because he wants to separate finance from the state.

It is that narrative of human development under which I believe that we now have other fights to fight, and I would say in the realm of bitcoin it is mainly the separation of money and state, Voorhees explained on stage. The Shapeshift CEO added:

Money is absolutely as fundamental to our lives as religion, and for many people it is far more fundamental to their lives as religion. It affects how your life unfolds. The choices that you make about money dictate the ramifications of your life and those around you. And so, to have an institution like money so controlled by a central entity by a monopoly is absurd. It is immoral. We should get rid of it.

Similarly, the American populace has the right to separate themselves, and dissolve the political bands which have connected them with another, and to assume among the powers of the earth, the separate and equal station to which the Laws of Nature and of Natures God entitle them. This is clearly stated on the Declaration of Independence parchment.

Essentially, the letters of Independence highlight that Americans, but more importantly all sovereign earthlings, should simply declare the separation. A decent respect to the opinions of mankind requires that they should declare the causes which impel them to the separation, the transcription of the stone engraving of the parchment Declaration of Independence stresses. All sovereign individuals have a right to separate their finances from the state, just as they have the right to separate religious beliefs from government affairs.

By leveraging precious metals, cryptocurrencies like bitcoin (BTC), bitcoin cash (BCH), dash (DASH), litecoin (LTC), monero (XMR) ethereum (ETH) and many others, while also practicing barter and trade techniques, it will help strengthen the counter-economy. The counter-economy, at some point, will grow so large that it eclipses the fraudulent and manipulated economy created by the oligarchs and status quo.

Without funding, the state will not be able to continue the endless wars. Without the participation of people using the oligarchs promissory notes, taxation will take place less and less. Even Edward Snowden, the famous U.S. whistleblower explained in an interview published by the American Civil Liberties Union in 2018, that bitcoin would help cushion financial liberties. Snowden also once said on Twitter that new technologies raise the possibility of unstoppable tax protests.

I like Bitcoin transactions in that they are impartial They cant really be stopped or reversed, without the explicit, voluntary participation by the people involved, Snowden said during the interview. Lets say Bank of America doesnt want to process a payment for someone like me. In the old financial system, theyve got an enormous amount of clout, as do their peers, and can make that happen. If a teenager in Venezuela wants to get paid in hard currency for a web development gig they did for someone in Paris, something prohibited by local currency controls, cryptocurrencies can make it possible. Snowden continued by adding:

Bitcoin may not yet really be private money, but it is the first free money.

On July 4, 2020, and just like every Independence Day Ive celebrated in the past decade, I will let people know that the freedom they honor every year is lacking. In fact, freedom, at least going by the American writings written in the 1700s, is barely existent. The only way to separate ourselves from the beast of government is to separate money from it immediately.

Essentially, the state wont have a choice and even right now, government fiat must compete with a $250 billion dollar free market filled with over 5,000 cryptocurrencies. During the 2015 Texas Bitcoin Conference, Vorhees further explained that people leveraging bitcoin will help bolster the need for change.

It seems crazy to say this, but perhaps we should permit competition in money, permit competition in financial structures, just as we permit competition in religion, Vorhees concluded. We allow multiple churches to exist. Why do we do that? And why dont we do that with money? I think its a hypocrisy that our children will someday look back on and realize, Wow, that was really obvious. And Bitcoin is what will bring that change about.

If Americans truly believe in the letters of independence, then they should separate themselves from the very government that transgresses against them. Right now, believers of the non-aggression axiom have lots of choices to make and many forms of human action can help fulfill decentralized goals.

There is no doubt, cryptocurrency and Satoshis vision was founded with the ideals of separation of state and money. Instead of focusing on red white and blue paper plates and patriotic t-shirts from Walmart, maybe Americans should invoke the revolutionary spirit they once held, and actually do something about this tyrannical beast who has devoured their freedoms.

If you are interested in learning about the many methods of crypto anarchy and the myriad of ways to opt-out and vacate the state Check out these essays below.

What do you think about separating money from state? Let us know what you think about this subject in the comments section below.

Image Credits: Shutterstock, Pixabay, Wiki Commons

Disclaimer: This article is for informational purposes only. It is not a direct offer or solicitation of an offer to buy or sell, or a recommendation or endorsement of any products, services, or companies. Bitcoin.com does not provide investment, tax, legal, or accounting advice. Neither the company nor the author is responsible, directly or indirectly, for any damage or loss caused or alleged to be caused by or in connection with the use of or reliance on any content, goods or services mentioned in this article.

Read disclaimer

Go here to read the rest:

Bolstering Separation of Money and State Following the 244th Independence Day - Bitcoin News

LETTERS TO THE EDITOR: Fail to condemn evil | On personal liberties | Give D.C.’s land back – Northwest Arkansas Democrat-Gazette

Fail to condemn evil

This is a message for all the "good" cops that are supposed to be out there: The blue wall must be breached!

You cannot consider yourself a "good" cop when you do not react to what you see around you. You cannot consider yourself a "good" cop when you hear things and do not react to them. You cannot consider yourself a "good" cop when you do not speak up.

See no evil. Hear no evil. Speak no evil.

You are responsible for allowing the "bad apples" to remain behind the blue wall. You are not a "good" cop unless you take action against the "bad" cops.

FRED FISHER

Conway

On personal liberties

Unlike many of those who write to your publication complaining of Arkansas' lack of mask-wearing, I for one applaud our state government for educating us about how wearing a mask in public is an effective way to slow down the transmission of the covid-19 virus. What's more, the CDC tells us that the mask benefits those around the wearer even more than the person wearing the mask. Kudos as well for the stance taken by our state government in not making or enforcing any requirements that people wear masks in public places, and moreover discouraging cities from making and enforcing their own rules.

Individuals should absolutely be able to exercise their fundamental right to choose whether they want to wear a mask or not. It is our right as citizens to choose whether we want to take a chance on infecting ourselves (and in this case, others).

Once the state goes down the slippery slope of making and enforcing public health requirements like mask-wearing in public, what's next? Why, the next thing you know they'll be imposing penalties on us if we choose to run red lights, take opiates when we feel like it, or decide not to wear clothes when we go shopping at Home Depot.

Ayn Rand would roll over in her grave at the very thought of such intrusions on our personal liberty.

CONNIE MESKIMEN

Hot Springs

Persuasive argument

My assignment for a building project was to take long boards and make them into short ones of a specified length. I had the miter saw located in a good spot close to the building site, but then a lady who was with the Safety Department told me that I needed to set up somewhere else because some heavy machinery was coming through. Facetiously I said to her: "But I was here first." Her reply was: "I'll write that on your tombstone."

Persuasive argument. I moved forthwith.

It is puzzling to me why people resent being required to do something which may very well save their lives. Wearing a mask when in close proximity to others may not be 100 percent effective, but then, what is?

There is a way for those who are determined to go unmasked in public to protect themselves and others while out there. Just don't breathe.

LEE WADDELL

Clinton

Give D.C.'s land back

If the city of Washington, D.C., is no longer needed in its entirety, then the unneeded portion along with its population should be returned to its original parent state of Maryland. Maryland, with Virginia, ceded approximately 100 square miles of land to the federal government for use as a federal capital city, not to reserve as some future new state (Virginia's land was returned in 1846).

The D.C. land area, about 70 square miles, is sufficient to support the status of a county in a fully functioning state such as Virginia, but is not of sufficient size to allow the development of a state. It does not have adequate space or natural resources to develop into a self-supporting state capable of providing all the functions needed by its citizens (roads, sewers, health, police, etc.). It can only grow vertically and become more and more crowded without the jobs to support itself. It will eventually devolve into a slum area that will become a welfare drag upon the rest of the nation and harbor a discontented population.

The D.C. citizens' complaints of not having representation in the federal government and not having enough independence in their local city government could be fully satisfied by re-ceding the area to Maryland, the state from whence it came. They would have all the rights, privileges, and capabilities of any citizen anywhere in the USA. Why should we make such a small area into a state when the same thing can be accomplished by converting the area into a county in an existing well-established state?

JAMES PROCTOR

North Little Rock

Seems appropriate ...

As the mob goes about the country indiscriminately pulling down statues (Ulysses S. Grant--seriously?) and vilifying anyone who had the misfortune of living in centuries past, perhaps they should in their place erect a statue of Madame Defarge.

STEPHEN HOFFMAN

Little Rock

If the military does it

There has been much conversation about voting by mail, both positive and negative comments.

Just a few items to add to the conversation: 1. There are absentee ballots for stated reasons; 2. 150,000 mail-in votes in 1864 election due to the Civil War; 3. every war saw mail-in votes: World Wars I and II, as well as the Korean and Vietnam conflicts; 4. all military personnel stationed overseas will vote by mail.

I would bet most members of Congress, as well as the very rich, vote by mail.

An important aside: Your vote can't be hacked.

EDITH SEAMAN

Lakeview

See the original post:

LETTERS TO THE EDITOR: Fail to condemn evil | On personal liberties | Give D.C.'s land back - Northwest Arkansas Democrat-Gazette

Guest Opinion: Socialism is about government control – Opinion – The Intelligencer

Replacing the insurance company middleman with the government middleman is not removing the middleman. It is removing free enterprise in favor of giving more power to government.

Here in a nutshell is the complete essence of socialism disguised as freedom. It was contained within an April 16 guest opinion by a candidate for public office.

"The truth is that single-payer Medicare for All is real freedom it eliminates the insurance middlemen, allowing you to see any doctors you want and the government to make direct payments to them."

But replacing the insurance company middleman with the government middleman is not removing the middleman. It is removing free enterprise in favor of giving more power to government for which the primary attribute is force. Government can simply force people to do what it commands which is why the colonies went into revolt in 1776. Free medical care is simply one of the latest strategies of Americas leftists. They would be wise to remember: "Theres No Such Thing As A Free Lunch".

George Washington said: "Government Is Not Reason, It Is Not Eloquence It Is Force." Government collects money through taxation which is collection backed by force. Force is the opposite of freedom.

Socialized medicine does not provide medical care by government. Government does not produce doctors. It seeks to establish control over them and their work. Canadians who have socialized medicine simply travel to America and pay when they want better medical care.

Medical care is a product. Most products have different levels. You can buy a small inexpensive car or a luxurious expensive model. Those are minimums and maximums. Its the same for medical care. Doctors are not foolish. They will not provide expensive care unless they get paid to do it. Medicare on the other hand is government-paid and government-rationed medical care and it has limits. If you are not happy with getting limited care you are free to pay for better care or pay for insurance. These are your three choices. Either rely on your neighbors to provide you with medical care, called Medicare; pay for insurance to provide it or pay for it yourself.

Medical care is a product and there are no free products. Someone pays for everything or it doesnt get done. Medical professionals know that in the case of "free" medical care some professionals use "Sit Care". Sit there until we decide to treat you or get disgusted and leave.

Ayn Rand asked in her essay "What is capitalism?": "Is man a sovereign individual who owns his own person, his mind, his life, his work and its product or is he the property of the tribe, the state, the society, the collective that may dispose of him in any way it pleases, that may dictate his convictions, prescribe the course of his life, control his work and expropriate his products?" Socialists believe each person must always act for the benefit of society.

The guest opinion writer/candidate has considered the "welfare" of patients with no thought or comment about the doctors who must provide the actual medical care. That a doctor should have any right, desire or choice in the matter was not brought up. We should consider the attitude of pompous smugness of the people who assert their right to enslave doctors; to control their work and to force them to work only for the government. Perhaps we should let them discover the kind of doctors that their system would produce. Let them discover in their non-free operating rooms and hospital wards that its dangerous to place their lives in the hands of a doctor whose pay scale they have controlled. Its not safe if the doctor is the sort of person who resents it and even less safe if they are the sort who doesnt.

Bill O'Neill lives in Holland.

Continued here:

Guest Opinion: Socialism is about government control - Opinion - The Intelligencer

Learning to Live Sustainably on the Red Planet: Habitat Mars – Universe Today

Theres quite a bit of buzz these days about how humanity could become a multiplanetary species. This is understandable considering that space agencies and aerospace companies from around the world are planning on conducting missions to Low Earth Orbit (LEO), the Moon, and Mars in the coming years, not to mention establishing a permanent human presence there and beyond.

To do this, humanity needs to develop the necessary strategies for sustainable living in hostile environments and enclosed spaces. To prepare humans for this kind of experience, groups like Habitat Marte (Mars Habitat) and others are dedicated to conducting simulated missions in analog environments. The lessons learned will not only prepare people to live and work in space but foster ideas for sustainable living here on Earth.

Habitat Marte was founded in 2017 by Julio Francisco Dantas de Rezende, the professor of sustainability in the Department of Product Engineering at the Federal University of Rio Grande do Norte (UFRN) and the Director of Innovation with the State Foundation to Research Support (FAPERN). He is also the Coordinator of Habitat Marte and Mars Society Brazil.

Prof. Rezende was inspired to bring the Mars Society to Brazil after attending their 2016 convention in Washington DC, where famed scientists and founder Robert Zubrin spoke of their mission. These include conducting simulated missions at their analog environments located in Utah (the Desert Mars Research Station) and Nunavut, Canada (the Flashline Mars Arctic Research Station).

Inspired by this work, Prof. Rezende returned to Brazil and dedicated his own resources to launch similar initiatives. The result was the Mars Society Brazil and the creation of its Habitat Marte training environment. As a location, they chose the semi-arid region of Caiara do Rio do Vento about 100 km (62 mi) west of Natal a rugged region that receives rainfall only a few times a year, making it a good approximation to Mars.

At present, this training environment remains the only Mars analog station operating in the southern hemisphere and, like its counterparts in other countries, is dedicated to developing the skills and technologies necessary to live sustainably on Mars and other planets. As Prof Julio Rezende explained to Universe Today via email:

[W]e are interested in designing systems that collaborate to have a self-sustainable/circular system in which the energy itself is generated, the waste generated is recycled and the food itself is produced. At Habitat Marte we are committed to the development of social technologies such as greenhouses, solar oven, cisterns, aquaponics, water filters, and greenhouses. Our challenge is to develop technologies that are applied both to space and in arid and semi-arid regions, or other regions threatened by water scarcity and droughts.

Between December of 2017 and 2020, Habitat Marte has conducted 42 missions with more than 150 participants, totaling almost 1300 hours (98 days) of mission time. As Prof. Rezende indicated, these activities have generated large volumes of data that has resulted in a variety of scientific studies and publications. For each mission, applicants spend time in the simulated habitat and conducting the following activities:

In terms of food, the crews grow all the fruits and vegetables they will need, which has included eggplant, lettuce, bananas, tomatoes, peppers, and sweet potatoes in the past apologies to Mark Watney for the lack of redskins, russets, purple, and other potatoes! For the sake of protein, the crews also farmed tilapia fish, and grew basil and cilantro for flavor and added nutrition.

Theyve even cultivated trees for the sake of reforestation at home (and possibly terraforming on Mars!) When not working inside, the teams would conduct extra-vehicular activity (EVA) walks outdoors while wearing spacesuits. In one instance, a team conducted an EVA to Pico do Cabugi (Cabugi Peak), an extinct volcano located about 40 km (25 mi) from the training grounds that stands 590 meters (1935 ft) in height (shown below).

While there, the team took rock samples which they will examine with the help of the geology labs in UFRN. Prof. Rezende and his colleagues also hope to use finely ground rock samples to develop a Mars soil simulant, which they will use to test the viability of growing Earth crops in Martian soil. For this research, they will be collaborating with Prof. Wieger Wamelink of the Wageningen University & Research Center in the Netherlands.

For loyal readers of Universe Today (or fans of MarsOne), Dr. Wamelink ought to be a familiar name. A few years ago, Dr. Wamelink and colleagues from Wageningen University conducted a series of agricultural studies in conjunction with MarsOne. This involved growing different types of crops in Lunar and Martian soil simulants to see which would germinate, grow, and be safe for consumption.

Between 2013 and 2015, they confirmed that a total of ten crops (including rye, radishes, garden cress, peas, green beans, tomatoes and potatoes) could all grow in Martian soil. They further found that seeds produced from these crops were able to germinate as well, thus ensuring successive harvests, and that the plants did not retain harmful levels of heavy metals (which are common in lunar and Martian soil).

Due to the coronavirus epidemic, these missions have been temporarily suspended but will resume soon. The last mission took place on March 14th, 2020, In the meantime, Prof. Rezende and his colleagues have carried on with virtual simulations, which is what the last 6 missions have been. As he described them:

In virtual missions, participants are invited to participate in remote activities related to the Habitat Marte protocols and research themes that associate space and sustainability, observing how Habitat Marte can contribute to solutions related to isolation during the coronavirus period. We realized that the actions of Habitat Marte may present guidelines for this challenging moment.

This is a common theme among researchers, scientists, and advocates that are dedicated to finding solutions to the problem of living in space. For example, Vera Mulyani (Vera Mars) recently stated how this years Mars City Design competition which is focused on Urban Farming has drawn inspiration from the pandemic and the need for social isolation.

In this time of crisis, envisioning how to live abundantly on another planet seems to be a far-off predicament, she said. However, this critical time can also offer a new perspective, a change that in the long term, is necessary for the sake of our existence and evolution as human beings. This initiative can also lead to technological discoveries and innovations. Pursuing a vision of tomorrow may save today before it is too late!

Another common element is the way research into living sustainability on other planets can have positive consequences here on Earth. In the past, efforts to send astronauts to space and the Moon (the Apollo Program) resulted in countless applications here on Earth, ranging from respirators, heart monitors, and microwave ovens to GPS, satellite communications, microchips, and solar panels.

It is therefore easy to see how Project Artemis, missions to Mars, and other plans to go interplanetary will help address problems here at home. With the global population expected to reach 10 billion by mid-century, and the way climate change will disrupt the natural systems we depend upon to live, knowing how to do more with less resources (and produce less waste) is vital to our survival.

Prof. Rezende himself expressed how this connection between Earth and exploring/living off-world is at the heart of Habitat Martes mission:

We are interested in creating a new generation of people interested in science and technology, seeing knowledge as a tool to collaborate for sustainable development. We believe that the experience at Habitat Mars is motivating for its participants to empower themselves and expand their vision, based on a spatial experience, which can change the world, collaborating for a more prosperous world.

[We are] also committed to presenting solutions for semiarid regions in Brazil. Mainly based in social technologies. Some also possibly adapted to space habitats. We have two pillars: space and arid/ semiarid regions. Because I consider that areas affected by climate change will become more. Our initiatives are connected with the 17 Sustainable Development Goals.

These goals were set by the UN in 2015 to act as a blueprint to achieve a better and more sustainable future for all. In addition to the elimination of all forms of inequality, the SDGs call for the elimination of poverty and hunger, as well as action on climate change, the provision of clean water and sanitation, and the development of sustainable cities and communities by 2030.

Key to accomplishing these goals is the development of technologies and methods that allow human beings to use local resources more wisely and sustainability and minimize their impact on the local environment. In this respect, the work being conducted by Habitat Marte, The Mars Society, HI-SEAS, and groups like Mars City Design and Stellar Amenities will have implications that go far beyond space!

To learn more about Habitat Marte, check out their website and their page at the United Nations Office of Outer Space Affairs (UNOOSA). You can also find testimonials recorded by people who have participated in their missions here.

Further Reading: Habitat Marte

Like Loading...

View post:

Learning to Live Sustainably on the Red Planet: Habitat Mars - Universe Today

Litecoin price prediction 2020: can it become the best …

Only 10 years ago, no one knew what a blockchain was. Today, there are hundreds of well-established and emerging cryptocurrencies using blockchain technology to supplant traditional fiat money and change the way we live.

Litecoin (LTC) has drawn a lot of investor interest after hitting the headlines in December 2017. Then, the cryptocurrency reached its record high of $375, an 8,200 per cent increase year-on-year, hitting a total LTC market cap of $19.5 billion.

However, following the latest crypto market news where prices have fallen across the board, many now wonder: will Litecoin go up once again? Can it fully recover and set some new records after the bumpy ride of the second half of 2019?

While this year is about to come to an end, closing the first decade of cryptos existence, analysts are split in their Litecoin price predictions. Some experts say that its current all-time high could be just a drop in the bucket and predict the coin to hit an overwhelming $595 by 2030. Others take a bearish stance, believing that another crypto winter is yet to come, with Litecoin future price dropping as low as $1.5 by the end of 2024.

So, if you are wondering, should I invest in Litecoin or not? we have you covered. In this article, we try to find the truth by taking a closer look at what factors influence this cryptocurrency, reviewing its recent performance, analysing the latest developments and checking out the Litecoin price prediction for 2020 and beyond.

Before we delve deep into the Litecoin price predictions, lets do a quick review on what LTC is.

On October 7, 2011, Litecoin (LTC) was created by Charlie Lee, an ex-Google employee and former Engineering Director at Coinbase. Designed as a peer-to-peer network with the same-name native cryptocurrency, it was launched to complement Bitcoin by solving issues like concentrated mining pools and transaction timings, as well as to make the crypto world more accessible.

Truth be told, these two do share a lot in common. However, there are still some substantial advantages that Litecoin boasts of. These include, among others, improved capacity, faster block generation and higher supply limits.

On the other hand, as Litecoins purpose initially was to be silver to Bitcoin gold, some sceptics call into question whether it will ever be able to become anything more than its main rival. While Litecoin technically has a superior algorithm, it may be rather irrelevant since Bitcoins popularity has cemented it as the gold standard for old and new crypto traders. Moreover, the next-gen altcoins are emerging almost daily, taking the industry's competition to a whole other level.

After its launch, Litecoin was fast to get the attention of the small yet growing crypto community of the time. Nonetheless, its value had remained rather low around $3 for quite a long time. It was only in November 2013 when the market finally saw the first significant price movements. On November 28, LTC value almost doubled within one day and reached the price of $50 per coin.

However, such a substantial jump was short-lived. In April 2014, Litecoin dropped to $10 and further to a little over $1 in February 2015. The crypto was then traded in the range of $1-$4 for the next two years.

In March 2017, Litecoin announced the launch date of their Segregated Witness (SegWit) protocol upgrade. The statement had a positive impact on the coins rate, with its value rising to $16. In May, the protocol changes were finally implemented, making LTC the first of the top five cryptocurrencies to adopt SegWit and pushing its price to $30.

Meanwhile, the dev team implemented the Lightning Network, attracting a lot of attention from the crypto enthusiasts. By September, LTC reached $70. With the whole market being bullish, sending Bitcoin and altcoins to set new price records, Litecoin hit its all-time high of $375 in mid-December.

For the most part of 2018, Litecoin was in a bearish trend. Despite its well-established position in the industry, the coin was affected by the overall descending dynamic of the market. The downward Litecoin trend only changed a couple of times: in February and April. All-in-all, the coins price decreased almost five times over the course of the year.

At the end of 2018, things started getting better, and Litecoin managed to stabilise, finally gaining an upside momentum.

At the beginning of 2019, Litecoin continued its price growth. During the first half of the year, LTC price increased four times from $31.02 to $138.4. The reason for such a significant price hike was the upcoming Litecoin halving, which happened on August 5.

However, the event was followed by the much-expected correction, with the price of Litecoin dropping as low as $68 by mid-September. Throughout the rest of the year, the coin remained in the downward trend. At the time of writing, on December 20, LTC traded at $40.

Back in the days, Litecoin was at the forefront of modern and relevant technologies. Its early implementation of SegWit protocol and Atomic swaps has revolutionised the sphere of the cryptocurrency payments.

However, Litecoin has been recently struggling with many difficulties. Now that Bitcoin also introduced SegWit, the altcoin lacks one of its crucial competitive advantages.

Joe DiPasquale, CEO of cryptocurrency hedge fund manager BitBull Capital, said: Litecoin's price action has historically followed Bitcoin's, but currently it is facing negativity on multiple fronts. In the absence of new capital flow, transaction volumes have remained tame and the August halving has failed to push the price higher.

He also added: In fact, miners have begun to abandon the network after the reward-reduction, which is why the hashrate is falling and concerns are being raised about the network's security.

Marouane Garcon, managing director of crypto-to-crypto derivatives platform Amulet, also weighed in, saying that Litecoin's recent price decline has more to do with the concerns about development and how they are going to be funded going forward.

Earlier this year, Charlie Lee reportedly told Franklyn Richards, director of Litecoin Foundation, that no one is interested in working on Litecoin protocol development work. After this information was disclosed, peoples perspective of Litecoin changed, continued Garcon. Litecoin has not been the same since that announcement, he added.

It threw everyone into a panic. If no one is willing to work on Litecoin and develop it then why should anyone invest in it?

Based on the latest study conducted by Sylvain Saurel, the potential of Litecoin is very limited. He explained that the coin peaked in 2017 as it was riding on Bitcoins wave of success, taking advantage of the increasing number of interested investors. Although Litecoin remains in the top 10 cryptocurrencies by market cap, this number is still too far from its record high of $19 billion.

Saurel claims: Litecoin will certainly remain in the top 10 of cryptocurrencies for some time to come, but its future is clearly not alongside Bitcoin that could revolutionise the monetary and financial system in the future.

Historic oil price dropDon't miss your trading opportunities

Litecoin has reported a decrease in its hashrate since mid-2019, reaching its lowest levels since 2018.

At the time of writing, its hashrate was 147.4 TH/s. If the fall is prolonged, it could negatively affect the future performance of Litecoin.

However, it is important to note that the network is now working on some major changes. According to the latest news, the Litecoin Foundation is currently cooperating with Steve Burkett, a developer of the Grin project, to implement MimbleWible in the Litecoin protocol. Once realised, Litecoin could move away from Bitcoin, creating a unique selling point. On the other hand, innovation will reduce fungibility, possibly making Litecoin susceptible to being blocked from important exchanges.

All in all, Litecoin has a great advantage to make improvements to itself much faster than Bitcoin does. However, with the rapid development of new crypto projects that have base codes that are already more fit for micro-transactions and scaling, has Litecoin missed its chance to stay on top?

It is no secret that the crypto market moves at a rapid pace, making it rather difficult to predict its future. We have made our own investigation to compile a list of the latest Litecoin forecasts from various sources.

Based on technical analysis, TradingBeasts.com, a popular crypto forecast website, predicted that by the end of next year, LTC price will be around $46.23; and only a bit higher in 2021 up to $67.23. By December 2022, Litecoin is expected to grow to an average of $82.68.

A more optimistic LTC price forecast is provided by Cryptoground.com. Based on an internal deep learning algorithm, it states that LTC will reach $88.30 in one year, rising almost 109.81 per cent. It is expected that the growth will continue, with the coin trading at $347.8 by the end of 2024.

According to the information provided by CoinFan.com, another famous online forecasting service, Litecoin future predictions look rather promising, with LTC prognosed to end 2020 at $276.4. Their long-term forecast suggests the coin will hit $506.8 by May 2025.

George Tung, a cryptocurrency analyst, has the most positive Litecoin projections, saying its price might rise as high as $1,500 towards the end of 2020.

Looking forward, DigitalCoinPrice.com states that Litecoin will have moderate price growth. The positive trend is expected to prevail, with the coin trading at $72 in December 2026.

Regarding the Litecoin price prediction 2030, the coin is expected to end the following decade at $251.44, according to CoinPriceForecast.com.

However, not everyone has taken a bullish stance. Walletinvestor.com, known for their pragmatic forecasts, refers to LTC as a bad, high-risk one-year investment option. According to their Litecoin predictions, the coin is expected to lose in value significantly, with its price falling to $4.5 by August 2020. However, it is expected to recover by fall and end next year at $36.8.

In five years, Wallet Investor estimates the coin to drop as low as $0.77 by the end of 2024.

The crypto market has experienced several ups and downs over this year. While all the talks revolve around digital money, there are still many questions to answer.

Will Litecoin rise and live up to the expectations of analysts? As you can understand, there is no definite answer to this question. It is very difficult to predict what the price of Litecoin could be in a few hours; and even harder to give long-term estimates. However, according to the forecasts mentioned above, LTC is mainly prognosed to move in a positive direction.

Is Litecoin a good investment for the long term? Well, many crypto enthusiasts believe that the project has the technological strengths that could help it to become even more popular in the crypto world.

When choosing what cryptocurrency to invest in, it is always crucial to consider the latest technical analysis, expert opinion and market trends. For that, we recommend you do as much research as possible.

If you think you are not ready to make long-term investment commitments, but still want to try to profit from the market volatility, you can do so through contracts for difference (CFD).

You can learn more about CFD trading with free online courses and find out how to trade Litecoin CFDs by reading our comprehensive guide. Always stay on top of the Litecoin latest news with Capital.com.

So, what do you think about the future of this digital coin? Will Litecoin go down or soar to hit new record highs? Do you have an LTC price prediction of your own?

Follow our live LTC/USD chart and make your own bets!

Ready to get started?

Download Capital.com

Original post:

Litecoin price prediction 2020: can it become the best ...

Litecoin, Stellars Lumen, and Trons TRX Daily Analysis July 2nd, 2020 – Yahoo Finance

Litecoin

Litecoin rose by 1.55% on Wednesday. Partially reversing a 1.70% slide from Tuesday, Litecoin ended the day at $41.80.

A bearish start to the day saw Litecoin fall to an early morning afternoon intraday low $40.96 before making a move.

Steering clear of the first major support level at $40.58, Litecoin rallied to a late afternoon intraday high $42.02.

Litecoin broke through the first major resistance level at $41.91 before falling back to sub-$41.60 levels.

Finding late support, Litecoin revisited $42 levels before easing back. The first major resistance level capped the upside on the day.

At the time of writing, Litecoin was down by 0.26% to $41.69. A mixed start to the day saw Litecoin rise to an early morning high $41.91 before falling to a low $41.66.

Litecoin left the major support and resistance levels untested early in the day.

Litecoin would need to avoid a fall through the $41.60 pivot to support a run at the first major resistance level at $42.23.

Support from the broader market would be needed, however, for Litecoin to break out from Wednesdays high $42.02.

Barring another crypto rally, the first major resistance level and Wednesdays high $42.02 would likely cap any upside.

Failure to avoid a fall through the $41.60 pivot could see Litecoin struggle on the day.

A fall back through to sub-$41.50 levels would bring the first major support level at $41.17 into play.

Barring an extended crypto sell-off, Litecoin should steer clear of sub-$40 levels. The second major support level at $40.53 should limit any downside.

Major Support Level: $41.17

Major Resistance Level: $42.23

23.6% FIB Retracement Level: $62

38.2% FIB Retracement Level: $78

62% FIB Retracement Level: $104

Stellars Lumen rose by 1.96% on Wednesday. Following on from a 2.85% rally on Tuesday, Stellars Lumen ended the day at $0.068009.

A bearish start to the day saw Stellars Lumen fall to an early morning intraday low $0.066166.

Steering clear of the first major support level at $0.06518, Stellars Lumen rallied to a late afternoon intraday high $0.069447.

Stellars Lumen broke through the first major resistance level at $0.06816 and the second major resistance level at $0.06816.

A late pullback saw Stellars Lumen fall back to sub-$0.068 levels before recovering to $0.068 levels. The first major resistance level at $0.06816 capped the upside late in the day.

At the time of writing, Stellars Lumen was up by 2.50% to $0.069707. A bullish start to the day saw Stellars Lumen rally from an early morning low $0.069377 to a high $0.069707.

Stellars Lumen left the major support and resistance levels untested early on.

Story continues

Stellars Lumen would need to avoid a fall through the $0.06790 pivot to support a run at the first major resistance level at $0.06958.

Support from the broader market would be needed, however, for Stellars Lumen to break out from the morning high $0.069707.

Barring another broad-based crypto rally, the first major resistance level would likely limit any upside.

A fall through the $0.06790 pivot could see Stellars Lumen struggle throughout the day.

A pullback through to sub-$0.067 levels would bring the first major support level at $0.06630 into play.

Barring an extended crypto sell-off, however, Stellars Lumen should steer clear of the second major support level at $0.06459.

Major Support Level: $0.06630

Major Resistance Level: $0.06958

23.6% FIB Retracement Level: $0.1051

38% FIB Retracement Level: $0.14336518

62% FIB Retracement Level: $0.2050

Trons TRX rallied by 3% on Wednesday. Following on from a 1.17% gain on Tuesday, Trons TRX ended the day at $0.016845.

A bearish start to the day saw Trons TRX fall to an early morning intraday low $0.016241 before making a move.

Steering clear of the first major support level at $0.01620, Trons TRX rallied to a late afternoon intraday high $0.017036.

Trons TRX broke through the first major resistance level at $0.01662 and the second major resistance level at $0.01684.

A late pullback saw Trons TRX fall back to sub-$0.01680 levels before revisiting $0.01695 levels.

The second major resistance level at $0.01684 pinned Trons TRX back late in the day.

At the time of writing, Trons TRX was up by 1.32% to $0.017068. A bullish start to the day saw Trons TRX rise from an early morning low 0.016901 to a high $0.017136.

Trons TRX left the major support and resistance levels untested early on.

Trons TRX would need to avoid a fall through the $0.01670 pivot to support a run at the first major resistance level at $0.01717.

Support from the broader market would be needed, however, for Trons TRX to break out from the morning high $0.017136.

Barring another broad-based crypto rally, the first major resistance level would likely cap any upside.

Failure to avoid a fall through the $0.01670 pivot would bring the first major support level at $0.01638 into play.

Barring another extended crypto sell-off, Trons TRX should steer clear of sub-$0.016 levels. The second major support level sits at $0.01591.

Major Support Level: $0.01638

Major Resistance Level: $0.01717

23.6% FIB Retracement Level: $0.0322

38.2% FIB Retracement Level: $0.0452

62% FIB Retracement Level: $0.0663

Please let us know what you think in the comments below

Thanks, Bob

This article was originally posted on FX Empire

Continued here:

Litecoin, Stellars Lumen, and Trons TRX Daily Analysis July 2nd, 2020 - Yahoo Finance

Cryptocurrencies Price Prediction: Bitcoin, Ethereum & Litecoin American Wrap 7/1/2020 – Benzinga

Bitcoin Technical Analysis: BTC/USD Eyes$9,300 After 1% Surge

Bitcoin has been fairly weak for the past month, especially after losing the daily uptrend. Bulls are now trying to climb and close above the daily 12-EMA, established at around $9,250. This is the first resistance level buyers need to beat, the next is located at $9,322, the daily 26-EMA.

We know that Ethereum outperformed Bitcoin during May by quite a lot. The digital asset was one of the few top coins to see a significant bull rally while everyone else was sleeping. ETH/USD managed to peak at $253.47 before entering a consolidation period. While Ethereum has been trading sideways for the past few weeks, the pair against Bitcoin has remained fairly strong.

Litecoin is currently under a lot of selling pressure, the small bullish breakout from Bitcoin is helping Litecoin but its certainly not enough. The daily downtrend is still here and bulls will need a lot of strength to reverse the trend.

Photo by Thought Catalog from Pexels.

2020 Benzinga.com. Benzinga does not provide investment advice. All rights reserved.

Originally posted here:

Cryptocurrencies Price Prediction: Bitcoin, Ethereum & Litecoin American Wrap 7/1/2020 - Benzinga

Litecoin, Stellars Lumen, and Trons TRX Daily Analysis June 30th, 2020 – Yahoo Finance

Litecoin

Litecoin rose by 1.28% on Monday. Following on from a 0.71% gain on Sunday, Litecoin ended the day at $41.87.

It was a mixed start to the day. Litecoin rose to an early morning high $41.53 before sliding to a late morning intraday low $40.57.

Coming within range of the first major support level at $40.47, Litecoin rallied to a late intraday high $42.24.

Litecoin broke through the first major resistance level at $42.11 before easing back to sub-$42 levels.

At the time of writing, Litecoin was down by 0.05% to $41.85. A mixed start to the day saw Litecoin rise to an early morning high $41.99 before falling to a low $41.78.

Litecoin left the major support and resistance levels untested early in the day.

Litecoin would need to avoid a fall through the $41.56 pivot to support a run at the first major resistance level at $42.55.

Support from the broader market would be needed, however, for Litecoin to break out from Mondays high $42.24.

Barring another crypto rally, the first major resistance level would likely cap any upside.

Failure to avoid a fall through the $41.56 pivot could see Litecoin struggle on the day.

A fall through to sub-$41 levels would bring the first major support level at $40.88 into play.

Barring an extended crypto sell-off, Litecoin should steer clear of the second major support level at $39.89.

Major Support Level: $40.88

Major Resistance Level: $42.55

23.6% FIB Retracement Level: $62

38.2% FIB Retracement Level: $78

62% FIB Retracement Level: $104

Stellars Lumen rose by 0.69% on Monday. Following on from a 2.39% rally on Sunday, Stellars Lumen ended the day at $0.06478.

Tracking the broader market, Stellars Lumen rose to an early morning high $0.06494 before hitting reverse.

Falling short of the major resistance levels, Stellars Lumen fell to a late morning intraday low $0.06300.

Steering clear of the first major support level at $0.06226, Stellars Lumen rallied to a late intraday high $0.065420.

Stellars Lumen came within range of the first major resistance level at $0.06544 before easing back to sub-$0.065 levels.

At the time of writing, Stellars Lumen was down by 0.22% to $0.064938. A mixed start to the day saw Stellars Lumen rise to an early morning high $0.065175 before sliding to a low $0.064882.

Stellars Lumen left the major support and resistance levels untested early on.

Story continues

Stellars Lumen would need to avoid a fall through the $0.06440 pivot to support a run at the first major resistance level at $0.06580.

Support from the broader market would be needed, however, for Stellars Lumen to break out from Mondays high $0.065420.

Barring another broad-based crypto rally, the first major resistance level and Mondays high would likely limit any upside.

Failure to avoid a fall through the $0.06440 pivot could see Stellars Lumen struggle throughout the day.

A fall back through to sub-$0.064 levels would bring the first major support level at $0.06338 into play.

Barring another extended crypto sell-off, however, Stellars Lumen should steer clear of sub-$0.060 levels. The second major support level at $0.06198 should limit any downside on the day.

Major Support Level: $0.06338

Major Resistance Level: $0.06580

23.6% FIB Retracement Level: $0.1051

38% FIB Retracement Level: $0.1433

62% FIB Retracement Level: $0.2050

Trons TRX rallied by 2.52% on Monday. Following on from a 1.94% gain on Sunday, Trons TRX ended the day at $0.01619.

Bullish throughout the day, Trons TRX rallied from an early morning intraday low $0.015786 to a late intraday high $0.016380.

Steering clear of the major support levels, Trons TRX broke through the first major resistance level at $0.01602.

Coming up against the second major resistance level at $0.01631, Trons TRX eased back to sub-$0.01620 levels.

At the time of writing, Trons TRX was up by 0.19% to $0.016220. A relatively bullish start to the day saw Trons TRX rise from an end of Sunday $0.01619 to an early high $0.01622

Trons TRX left the major support and resistance levels untested early on.

Trons TRX would need to avoid a fall through the $0.01612 pivot to support a run at the first major resistance level at $0.01645.

Support from the broader market would be needed, however, for Trons TRX to break out from Mondays high $0.01638.

Barring another broad-based crypto rally, the first major resistance level and Mondays high would likely cap any upside.

Failure to avoid a fall through the $0.01612 pivot would bring the first major support level at $0.01586 into play.

Barring another extended crypto sell-off, Trons TRX should steer clear of sub-$0.015 levels. The second major support level at $0.01552 should limit any downside.

Major Support Level: $0.01586

Major Resistance Level: $0.01645

23.6% FIB Retracement Level: $0.0322

38.2% FIB Retracement Level: $0.0452

62% FIB Retracement Level: $0.0663

Please let us know what you think in the comments below

Thanks, Bob

This article was originally posted on FX Empire

Read the rest here:

Litecoin, Stellars Lumen, and Trons TRX Daily Analysis June 30th, 2020 - Yahoo Finance

Charlie Lee Is Active to Make Their Money Litecoin (LTC) Talk – The Cryptocurrency Analytics

Common sense according to a Litecoin enthusiast should dictate why Bitcoin is the King and on how Litecoin complements the BTC without competing with it. Sometimes it is good to learn the fundamentals and ignore the Fear, Uncertainty, and Doubt.

Litecoin Foundation tweeted: Litecoin will go over 55 million wallet addresses in the next 24-48 hours.

The idea of Litecoin making it to 55 million wallet addresses can be exciting if it would in some way learn to an increase in the price of the tokens. Whether the wallet address is at profit or loss can be determined by considering the price at which the tokens were acquired and on how it is possible ensure a positive balance.

Some people opine that Lightning Network is dead. This can be a hasty decision. While traders are only concerned about the price going up and coming down, there are lot of tasks to be done to ensure that the price happens. Price does not happen simply. It is true that LTC can be used for payments just like BTC and that it is cheaper and faster.

The good thing about Litecoin is that the richest wallet has so far had only 2.5 percent of the supply. There are lot of opinions than facts. Facts are facts, but opinion is something that can be spelled by anyone based on their individual perception of statistics and facts revolving around them.

A little while ago the Litecoin Foundation tweeted: There have been 307,603 new non-zero #Litecoin wallet addresses created in the past 7 days. That is an average of 43,943 new addresses per day.

This just means that Litecoin community are progressing in steps towards whatever they are progressing towards.

Sydney Ifergan, the crypto expert tweeted: Litecoin Development gets support from different donations in the community contributing to its overall growth. Good for LTC.

Investors are interested in making their money talk for themselves. Of note about 99% of the LTC historical outputs have been monetary. Accountability goes like Litecoins blockchain has had 146,796,072 Outputs over 9 yrs.

The Litecoin Community have been actively involved in the process of creating awareness, adoption, and adoption of the LTC by virtue of their strong and vibrant community.

And, now we have Charlie Lee expressing himself openly about one stuff or the other, which in turn is good for the community. As despite all the ideas of human behavior, familiarity breeds passion. People understand facts they hear from a known face than from an unknown face.

See the original post:

Charlie Lee Is Active to Make Their Money Litecoin (LTC) Talk - The Cryptocurrency Analytics

Litecoin (LTC) Up $0.24 in Last 4 Hours, Underperforms All Top Cryptos to Start the Day; 2 Day Up Streak Ended – CFDTrading

Litecoin 4 Hour Price Update

Updated July 01, 2020 11:19 PM GMT (07:19 PM EST)

The back and forth price flow continues for Litecoin, which started the current 4 hour candle off at 41.88 US dollars, up 0.58% ($0.24) from the previous 4 hours. On a relative basis, the previous 4 hours were pretty good: Litecoin bested all 5 of the assets in the Top Cryptos class

41.19 (USD) was the opening price of the day for Litecoin, resulting in the day prior being one in which price moved down 1.65% ($0.69) from the day prior. The price move occurred on volume that was down 50.73% from the day prior, but up 15.94% from the same day the week before. Those trading within the Top Cryptos asset class should know that Litecoin was the worst performer in the class during the day prior. The daily price chart of Litecoin below illustrates.

The first thing we should note is that Litecoin is now close to its 20 day moving averages, which may act as price barrier for the asset. The clearest trend exists on the 30 day timeframe, which shows price moving down over that time. Or to view things another way, note that out of the past 30 days Litecoins price has gone down 17 them.

Over on Twitter, here were the top tweets about Litecoin:

On chain volume for #Litecoin over the past 24 hours was 2,165,307 #LTC That equals ~90,200 LTC per hour in trxs, or $3,726,200 worth of LTC sent and received per hour.

Flip your LTC for HEX, now that LTC it still has value, HEX the best defi project of 2020 for years LTC is not moving get more out of HEX staking, benefits and bigpayday LTC does not have this @litecoin

@btccentermiami @CurrencyDesign @CointelegraphZN @CoinFestUK @CoinJournal @xbtnews101 @MrSpinnyG @litecoin_bull Love it. Tom does great work. Best in the industry producing this format, no doubt. In terms of impacting adoption assuming pre-coiners will interact with the notes, itd be ideal to have more educational copy on them. However not all crypto artists double as #propagandists

Visit link:

Litecoin (LTC) Up $0.24 in Last 4 Hours, Underperforms All Top Cryptos to Start the Day; 2 Day Up Streak Ended - CFDTrading

Litecoin (LTC) Up $0.24 On 4 Hour Chart, Started Today Up 1.48%; in a Downtrend Over Past 14 Days – CFDTrading

Litecoin 4 Hour Price Update

Updated July 02, 2020 01:35 AM GMT (09:35 PM EST)

Litecoin entered the current 4 hour candle at $41.88, up 0.58% ($0.24) from the last 4 hour candle. Litecoin outperformed all 5 assets in the Top Cryptos asset class since the last 4 hour candle.

Litecoin entered today at $41.8, up 1.48% ($0.61) from yesterday. The price move occurred on volume that was up 8.26% from the day prior, but down 40.47% from the same day the week before. Out of the 5 instruments in the Top Cryptos asset class, Litecoin ended up ranking 2nd for the day in terms of price change relative to yesterday. Below is a daily price chart of Litecoin.

Notably, Litecoin is now close to its 20 and 100 day averages, located at 43.11 and 43.63 respectively, and thus may be at a key juncture along those timeframes. Trend traders will want to observe that the strongest trend appears on the 30 day horizon; over that time period, price has been moving down. Price action traders in particular will want to note that the 90 day period appears to show price forming a base; this could indicate that a support/resistance level is developing. For another vantage point, consider that Litecoins price has gone down 17 of the previous 30 trading days.

For laughs, fights, or genuinely useful information, lets see what the most popular tweets pertaining to Litecoin for the past day were:

Thanks for the suggestions guys, it seems @changeangel_io is a top draw, how did I not know about this exchange before? Very easy to use, great exchange rate. My exchange is now done and my Digibyte out weigh my litecoin now. Thank you!

@CurrencyDesign @btccentermiami @CointelegraphZN @CoinFestUK @CoinJournal @xbtnews101 @MrSpinnyG @litecoin_bull Pay credit where its due the notes are definitely a good vehicle to spread the #btc message.Maybe backs could explain concepts like Bitcoins sound money fundamentals so people see that although volatile & used for speculation, its also a superior long term SoV to fiat.

@shreena74052483 @litecoin_bull @ROYALMRBADNEWS I found , that it actually did my brain a rest just sitting.. inner peace.. no guilt to just sit as you are being forced too.. when have we ever been forced to chill out.. use it .

See the article here:

Litecoin (LTC) Up $0.24 On 4 Hour Chart, Started Today Up 1.48%; in a Downtrend Over Past 14 Days - CFDTrading

The Crypto Daily – The Movers and Shakers – July 3rd, 2020 – FX Empire

Bitcoin fell by 1.51% on Thursday. Reversing a 0.98% gain from Wednesday, Bitcoin ended the day at $9,100.0.

A mixed start to the day saw Bitcoin rise to an early morning intraday high $9,266.2 before hitting reverse.

Falling short of the first major resistance level at $9,322.13, Bitcoin fell to a mid-morning low $9,171.8.

Steering clear of the major support levels, Bitcoin recovered to $9,260 levels before a 2nd sell-off.

The 2nd sell-off saw Bitcoin slide to a late afternoon intraday low $8,950.

Bitcoin fell through the first major support level at $9,133.53 and the second major support level at $9,027.17.

Avoiding the 23.6% FIB of $8,900, Bitcoin recovered to $9,100 levels to limit the loss on the day.

While breaking back through the second major support level, the first major support level at $9,133.53 pinned Bitcoin back.

The near-term bullish trend remained intact in spite of the recent pullback to sub-$9,000 levels. For the bears, Bitcoin would need to slide through the 62% FIB of $6,400 to form a near-term bearish trend.

Across the rest of the majors, it was a mixed day on Thursday.

Cardanos ADA slid by 4.03% to lead the way down.

Binance Coin (-2.72%), Bitcoin Cash ABC (-2.06%), Bitcoin Cash SV (-2.59%), Ethereum (-2.02%), Litecoin (-1.79%), Stellars Lumen (-2.48%), Tezos (-2.63%), and Trons TRX (-1.73%) also struggled.

EOS (-0.71%), and Ripples XRP (-0.83%) saw relatively modest losses.

Moneros XMR bucked the trend, rising by 1.19%.

Through the current week, the crypto total market cap rose to a Wednesday high $260.82bn before falling to a Thursday low $249.3bn. At the time of writing, the total market cap stood at $254.86bn.

Bitcoins dominance rose to a Monday high 66.29% before falling to a Thursday low 65.63%. At the time of writing, Bitcoins dominance stood at 65.81%.

The rest is here:

The Crypto Daily - The Movers and Shakers - July 3rd, 2020 - FX Empire

Indias crypto trading boom: 7 apps to buy, sell, store bitcoins and other cryptocurrencies – YourStory

Even as India faces its worst economic crisis in almost three decades, local crypto trading, especially on peer-to-peer exchanges, has peaked.

This is believed to be a direct impact of the Supreme Court lifting RBIs unconstitutional two-year ban on cryptocurrencies in March, only three weeks before the country went into lockdown.

Anticipating a favourable result, not only did new crypto exchanges and bitcoin trading platforms launch in India, but some also relaunched their apps.

Photo: Shutterstock

Further, the crypto boom in the last three months has coincided with one of the biggest depreciations of the Indian rupee the yearly inflation rate is almost 10 percent now leading to an overall peaking interest in alternate forms of wealth, particularly bitcoins.

The founder of a global bitcoin exchange told YourStory recently,

Bitcoin trading volumes in India have surpassed the spike of December 2017, when the digital currency was enjoying an unprecedented bull run globally. Since the lockdown began, BTC volumes have increased 10X, according to Bitcoin.com.

As per the latest exchange rates on Coin Dance, one Bitcoin the most popular cryptocurrency in the world is worth Rs 7.04 lakh.

YourStory lists a few apps that allow users to seamlessly trade in not just Bitcoin, but hundreds of other popular cryptocurrencies across the globe.

Coinbase is among the most well-recognised cryptocurrency exchanges in the world, with over 25 million users in 32 countries. It allows users to securely buy, store, and sell cryptocurrencies, including Bitcoin, Bitcoin Cash, Ethereum, Ethereum Classic, Litecoin, and others.

About 98 percent of cryptocurrencies on Coinbase are stored offline, and the app claims to be as secure as a traditional bank. It has over 10 million downloads on Google Play Store, and is rated 3.8 out of 5.

Photo: Shutterstock

Binance is the worlds largest cryptocurrency exchange by trading volume. It blends blockchain tech with finance access, and allows trading in more than 150 cryptocurrencies, including Bitcoin, Litecoin, Ethereum, Link, Tezos, Cardano, and Binance Coin.

The app has a recurring buy option, where users can choose how much and how frequently they want to buy a certain cryptocurrency, and Binance automates the rest of the process. Users can even send and receive crypto from friends or family through their Binance wallets by scanning QR codes.

It counts over a million downloads on Google Play Store, and is rated 4.5 out of 5.

Cryptocurrency exchange WazirX promises lightning fast INR deposits and withdrawals. Its advanced trading interface allows traders to buy and sell cryptocurrencies through a Live Open Order Book system.

The app supports digital assets, including Bitcoin, Bitcoin Cash, Litecoin, Dash, XRP, Ethereum, Zilliqa, and others. Users can deposit or withdraw cryptocurrencies and also cash in or cash out USDT (a cryptocurrency which corresponds to the value of the US dollar) via P2P trading.

The app has over 1,00,000 downloads on Google Play Store, and is rated 4.2 out of 5.

Photo: Unocoin | Medium

Unocoin is among Indias leading crypto asset and blockchain companies, with over a million customers. It is backed by leading VCs like Blume Ventures, Huiyin Blockchain Ventures, Mumbai Angels, and others.

It also allows mobile and DTH recharges with bitcoins, and subscriptions of Bitcoin or Ethereum. The app has more than a million downloads on Google Play Store, and is rated 3.9 out of 5.

Zebpay relaunched its app in India in January 2020, ahead of SC's hearing on RBIs crypto ban. It enables crypto traders to buy and sell across 130 countries, with zero trading fees.

Zebpay also comes with features like real-time and historical crypto market data tracking, 24X7 price alerts for users favourite crypto assets, and instant fund deposits through Zebpays third-party partners.

The app claims to have over three million customers worldwide. It has crossed a million downloads on Google Play Store, and is rated 3.7 out of 5.

Bitbns is a marketplace that allows multi-currency trading, and supports over 70 cryptos, including Bitcoin, Ethereum, Ripple, Litecoin, Binance Coin, Monero, Stellar, and Neo. The platform recently enabled USDT, where cryptocurrencies can be traded against the US dollar.

Bitbns lets users store their funds in a secure, 2FA-enabled cryptocurrency wallet with the option to withdraw, transfer, deposit, or trade instantly. It also allows users to trade at 4X their net worth by borrowing from others.

Bitbns has over 1,00,000 downloads on Google Play Store, and is rated 4.1 out of 5.

BitBuddy, a marketplace dedicated to bitcoin trading, launched in April 2020 to make the most of Indias ongoing crypto boom. It allows users to buy and sell bitcoins with multiple payment modes, including Google Pay and PayPal.

BitBuddy rolled out with a two-month introductory offer of zero trading fees. The app has crossed 1,000 downloads on Google Play Store, and is rated 4.2 out of 5.

Want to make your startup journey smooth? YS Education brings a comprehensive Funding Course, where you also get a chance to pitch your business plan to top investors. Click here to know more.

Originally posted here:

Indias crypto trading boom: 7 apps to buy, sell, store bitcoins and other cryptocurrencies - YourStory

Bitcoin and Altcoins at a Turning Point – Cryptonews

This past week, bitcoin started a fresh decline below the USD 9,500 and USD 9,200 support levels. BTC even broke the USD 9,000 handle before it found support near USD 8,800. The price is currently (08:30 UTC) recovering, but the bulls are likely to face hurdles near USD 9,200 and USD 9,300.Similarly, most major altcoins are trading in a bearish zone, including ethereum, XRP, litecoin, bitcoin cash, BNB, EOS, TRX, ADA, and XLM. ETH/USD is currently trading above USD 222, but it might fail near USD 228 and USD 230. XRP/USD is showing bearish signs and trading below USD 0.180.

Total market capitalization

After testing the USD 8,800 support, bitcoin price started an upside correction. BTC recovered above the USD 9,200 level, but it is struggling to clear the USD 9,200 resistance. Moreover, there is a crucial weekly resistance forming near USD 9,300, above which the bulls might take control in the coming sessions.If not, the price is likely to resume its decline below the USD 9,000 support. In this case, the bears are likely to target a new low below the USD 8,800 support.

Ethereum price is correcting higher from the USD 215 support and it closed above USD 220. However, ETH is facing a lot of hurdles such as USD 225, USD 228 and USD 230. To start a strong increase, the price must surpass the USD 230 resistance.Conversely, a downside break below the USD 220 support may perhaps restart downtrend. The weekly support is at USD 215, below which the price might dive towards USD 204 or USD 200.

Bitcoin cash price declined steadily below the USD 230 support level. BCH even broke the USD 220 support and is currently correcting higher. On the upside, an initial resistance is near the USD 225 level. The first key resistance is near the USD 230 level, above which the price might revisit the USD 240 resistance. On the downside, the main supports are USD 202 and USD 200.Litecoin is trading just above the USD 40.00 support and it is struggling to recover. An initial resistance is near the USD 42.00 level, above which the price might start a decent recovery towards the USD 45.00 resistance. If not, there is a risk of more losses below the USD 40.00 support in the near term.XRP price is following a bearish path and trading well below the USD 0.182 pivot level. It seems like the price might continue to move down below USD 0.175 and USD 0.172. The next major support is seen near the USD 0.165 level. On the upside, the price must surpass the USD 0.182 resistance to start a steady recovery.

In the past three sessions, a few small-capitalization altcoins gained over 5%, including CHSB, BTG, BNT, QNT, CKB, BCD, REN, DGB, HIVE, SNX, ADA, and CRO. Out of these, BTG is showing a lot of positive signs and it tested the USD 10.00 resistance.

To sum up, bitcoin price is facing a lot of hurdles on the upside, starting with USD 9,200. If BTC fails to recover above USD 9,200 and USD 9,300, there is a risk of a fresh decline below the USD 9,000 support in the near term._____

Read this article:

Bitcoin and Altcoins at a Turning Point - Cryptonews