Industrial Thermostat Market 2020 Top-Companies Offerings, Trends, Segmented Analysis and Forecast by 2026 | Thermo, Weiss, Shel Lab – 3rd Watch News

Posted on by

Exclusive Market Research Report on Global Industrial Thermostat Market with Industry Analysis, Size, Share, Trends, Growth Opportunities, Competitive Landscape, Investment Strategies and Forecast by 2026.

The report contains in-depth information on all the key aspects of the global Industrial Thermostat market. This report contains important data such as facts & figures, market research, market analysis, SWOT analysis, competitive landscape, regional analysis and future growth prospects. The report also contains qualitative and quantitative research which gives you a detailed analysis of the global Industrial Thermostat market. The report is perfect as you can see information on the recent developments, based on which you can make risk assessments and investments in the Industrial Thermostat industry.

Get The Sample Report PDF with Detail TOC & List of [emailprotected]https://marketresearchport.com/request-sample/45000

Leading Companies Covered:

Thermo, Weiss, Shel Lab, Binder, Memmert, VWR, NuAire, Hettich Lab, Sanyo, Heal Force, Jeio Tech, Manish Scientific, GENLAB

This global Industrial Thermostat market research report has data of all the leading players operating in the industry. From their market shares in the industry, to their growth plans, recent development status, all important information has been compiled in the report to let you get an insightful look at the top players operating in the industry. The report includes the forecasts, analysis and discussion of important industry trends, market size, market share estimates and profiles of the leading industry players.

Market Research is Further Divided into Following Segments:

Market Segmentation by Product Types:Electrical, Digital

Market Segmentation by Applications:Mining, Automotive, Oil & Gas, Others

Regions Mentioned in the Global Industrial Thermostat Market:

The Middle East and Africa North America South America Europe Asia-Pacific Middle East Oceania Rest of the World

The data of the market research report has been studied, compiled and corroborated by leading industry experts and established authors. The format followed in the report is in accordance with most international market research reports. However, if you have any specific requirements, just get in touch with us, and we will customize the report accordingly as per your needs.

Get the Report [emailprotected]https://www.marketresearchport.com/reports/covid-19-impact-on-global-and-regional-industrial-thermostat-market-research-report-2020-2026-industry-analy/45000

Table of Content:Chapter 1 Industry Overview1.1 Definition1.2 Assumptions1.3 Research Scope1.4 Market Analysis by Regions1.4.1 North America Market States and Outlook (2021-2026)1.4.2 East Asia Market States and Outlook (2021-2026)1.4.3 Europe Market States and Outlook (2021-2026)1.4.4 South Asia Market States and Outlook (2021-2026)1.4.5 Southeast Asia Market States and Outlook (2021-2026)1.4.6 Middle East Market States and Outlook (2021-2026)1.4.7 Africa Market States and Outlook (2021-2026)1.4.8 Oceania Market States and Outlook (2021-2026)1.4.9 South America Market States and Outlook (2021-2026)1.5 Global Industrial Thermostat Market Size Analysis from 2021 to 20261.5.1 Global Industrial Thermostat Market Size Analysis from 2021 to 2026 by Consumption Volume1.5.2 Global Industrial Thermostat Market Size Analysis from 2021 to 2026 by Value1.5.3 Global Industrial Thermostat Price Trends Analysis from 2021 to 20261.6 COVID-19 Outbreak: Industrial Thermostat Industry Impact

Chapter 2 Global Industrial Thermostat Competition by Types, Applications, and Top Regions and Countries2.1 Global Industrial Thermostat (Volume and Value) by Type2.1.1 Global Industrial Thermostat Consumption and Market Share by Type (2015-2020)2.1.2 Global Industrial Thermostat Revenue and Market Share by Type (2015-2020)2.2 Global Industrial Thermostat (Volume and Value) by Application2.2.1 Global Industrial Thermostat Consumption and Market Share by Application (2015-2020)2.2.2 Global Industrial Thermostat Revenue and Market Share by Application (2015-2020)2.3 Global Industrial Thermostat (Volume and Value) by Regions2.3.1 Global Industrial Thermostat Consumption and Market Share by Regions (2015-2020)2.3.2 Global Industrial Thermostat Revenue and Market Share by Regions (2015-2020)

Chapter 3 Production Market Analysis3.1 Global Production Market Analysis3.1.1 2015-2020 Global Capacity, Production, Capacity Utilization Rate, Ex-Factory Price, Revenue, Cost, Gross and Gross Margin Analysis3.1.2 2015-2020 Major Manufacturers Performance and Market Share3.2 Regional Production Market Analysis3.2.1 2015-2020 Regional Market Performance and Market Share3.2.2 North America Market3.2.3 East Asia Market3.2.4 Europe Market3.2.5 South Asia Market3.2.6 Southeast Asia Market3.2.7 Middle East Market3.2.8 Africa Market3.2.9 Oceania Market3.2.10 South America Market3.2.11 Rest of the World Market

Chapter 4 Global Industrial Thermostat Sales, Consumption, Export, Import by Regions (2015-2020)4.1 Global Industrial Thermostat Consumption by Regions (2015-2020)4.2 North America Industrial Thermostat Sales, Consumption, Export, Import (2015-2020)4.3 East Asia Industrial Thermostat Sales, Consumption, Export, Import (2015-2020)4.4 Europe Industrial Thermostat Sales, Consumption, Export, Import (2015-2020)4.5 South Asia Industrial Thermostat Sales, Consumption, Export, Import (2015-2020)4.6 Southeast Asia Industrial Thermostat Sales, Consumption, Export, Import (2015-2020)4.7 Middle East Industrial Thermostat Sales, Consumption, Export, Import (2015-2020)4.8 Africa Industrial Thermostat Sales, Consumption, Export, Import (2015-2020)4.9 Oceania Industrial Thermostat Sales, Consumption, Export, Import (2015-2020)4.10 South America Industrial Thermostat Sales, Consumption, Export, Import (2015-2020)

Chapter 5 North America Industrial Thermostat Market Analysis5.1 North America Industrial Thermostat Consumption and Value Analysis5.1.1 North America Industrial Thermostat Market Under COVID-195.2 North America Industrial Thermostat Consumption Volume by Types5.3 North America Industrial Thermostat Consumption Structure by Application5.4 North America Industrial Thermostat Consumption by Top Countries5.4.1 United States Industrial Thermostat Consumption Volume from 2015 to 20205.4.2 Canada Industrial Thermostat Consumption Volume from 2015 to 20205.4.3 Mexico Industrial Thermostat Consumption Volume from 2015 to 2020

Chapter 6 East Asia Industrial Thermostat Market Analysis6.1 East Asia Industrial Thermostat Consumption and Value Analysis6.1.1 East Asia Industrial Thermostat Market Under COVID-196.2 East Asia Industrial Thermostat Consumption Volume by Types6.3 East Asia Industrial Thermostat Consumption Structure by Application6.4 East Asia Industrial Thermostat Consumption by Top Countries6.4.1 China Industrial Thermostat Consumption Volume from 2015 to 20206.4.2 Japan Industrial Thermostat Consumption Volume from 2015 to 20206.4.3 South Korea Industrial Thermostat Consumption Volume from 2015 to 2020

Chapter 7 Europe Industrial Thermostat Market Analysis7.1 Europe Industrial Thermostat Consumption and Value Analysis7.1.1 Europe Industrial Thermostat Market Under COVID-197.2 Europe Industrial Thermostat Consumption Volume by Types7.3 Europe Industrial Thermostat Consumption Structure by Application7.4 Europe Industrial Thermostat Consumption by Top Countries7.4.1 Germany Industrial Thermostat Consumption Volume from 2015 to 20207.4.2 UK Industrial Thermostat Consumption Volume from 2015 to 20207.4.3 France Industrial Thermostat Consumption Volume from 2015 to 20207.4.4 Italy Industrial Thermostat Consumption Volume from 2015 to 20207.4.5 Russia Industrial Thermostat Consumption Volume from 2015 to 20207.4.6 Spain Industrial Thermostat Consumption Volume from 2015 to 20207.4.7 Netherlands Industrial Thermostat Consumption Volume from 2015 to 20207.4.8 Switzerland Industrial Thermostat Consumption Volume from 2015 to 20207.4.9 Poland Industrial Thermostat Consumption Volume from 2015 to 2020

Chapter 8 South Asia Industrial Thermostat Market Analysis8.1 South Asia Industrial Thermostat Consumption and Value Analysis8.1.1 South Asia Industrial Thermostat Market Under COVID-198.2 South Asia Industrial Thermostat Consumption Volume by Types8.3 South Asia Industrial Thermostat Consumption Structure by Application8.4 South Asia Industrial Thermostat Consumption by Top Countries8.4.1 India Industrial Thermostat Consumption Volume from 2015 to 20208.4.2 Pakistan Industrial Thermostat Consumption Volume from 2015 to 20208.4.3 Bangladesh Industrial Thermostat Consumption Volume from 2015 to 2020

Chapter 9 Southeast Asia Industrial Thermostat Market Analysis9.1 Southeast Asia Industrial Thermostat Consumption and Value Analysis9.1.1 Southeast Asia Industrial Thermostat Market Under COVID-199.2 Southeast Asia Industrial Thermostat Consumption Volume by Types9.3 Southeast Asia Industrial Thermostat Consumption Structure by Application9.4 Southeast Asia Industrial Thermostat Consumption by Top Countries9.4.1 Indonesia Industrial Thermostat Consumption Volume from 2015 to 20209.4.2 Thailand Industrial Thermostat Consumption Volume from 2015 to 20209.4.3 Singapore Industrial Thermostat Consumption Volume from 2015 to 20209.4.4 Malaysia Industrial Thermostat Consumption Volume from 2015 to 20209.4.5 Philippines Industrial Thermostat Consumption Volume from 2015 to 20209.4.6 Vietnam Industrial Thermostat Consumption Volume from 2015 to 20209.4.7 Myanmar Industrial Thermostat Consumption Volume from 2015 to 2020

Chapter 10 Middle East Industrial Thermostat Market Analysis10.1 Middle East Industrial Thermostat Consumption and Value Analysis10.1.1 Middle East Industrial Thermostat Market Under COVID-1910.2 Middle East Industrial Thermostat Consumption Volume by Types10.3 Middle East Industrial Thermostat Consumption Structure by Application10.4 Middle East Industrial Thermostat Consumption by Top Countries10.4.1 Turkey Industrial Thermostat Consumption Volume from 2015 to 202010.4.2 Saudi Arabia Industrial Thermostat Consumption Volume from 2015 to 202010.4.3 Iran Industrial Thermostat Consumption Volume from 2015 to 202010.4.4 United Arab Emirates Industrial Thermostat Consumption Volume from 2015 to 202010.4.5 Israel Industrial Thermostat Consumption Volume from 2015 to 202010.4.6 Iraq Industrial Thermostat Consumption Volume from 2015 to 202010.4.7 Qatar Industrial Thermostat Consumption Volume from 2015 to 202010.4.8 Kuwait Industrial Thermostat Consumption Volume from 2015 to 202010.4.9 Oman Industrial Thermostat Consumption Volume from 2015 to 2020

Chapter 11 Africa Industrial Thermostat Market Analysis11.1 Africa Industrial Thermostat Consumption and Value Analysis11.1.1 Africa Industrial Thermostat Market Under COVID-1911.2 Africa Industrial Thermostat Consumption Volume by Types11.3 Africa Industrial Thermostat Consumption Structure by Application11.4 Africa Industrial Thermostat Consumption by Top Countries11.4.1 Nigeria Industrial Thermostat Consumption Volume from 2015 to 202011.4.2 South Africa Industrial Thermostat Consumption Volume from 2015 to 202011.4.3 Egypt Industrial Thermostat Consumption Volume from 2015 to 202011.4.4 Algeria Industrial Thermostat Consumption Volume from 2015 to 202011.4.5 Morocco Industrial Thermostat Consumption Volume from 2015 to 2020

Chapter 12 Oceania Industrial Thermostat Market Analysis12.1 Oceania Industrial Thermostat Consumption and Value Analysis12.2 Oceania Industrial Thermostat Consumption Volume by Types12.3 Oceania Industrial Thermostat Consumption Structure by Application12.4 Oceania Industrial Thermostat Consumption by Top Countries12.4.1 Australia Industrial Thermostat Consumption Volume from 2015 to 202012.4.2 New Zealand Industrial Thermostat Consumption Volume from 2015 to 2020

Chapter 13 South America Industrial Thermostat Market Analysis13.1 South America Industrial Thermostat Consumption and Value Analysis13.1.1 South America Industrial Thermostat Market Under COVID-1913.2 South America Industrial Thermostat Consumption Volume by Types13.3 South America Industrial Thermostat Consumption Structure by Application13.4 South America Industrial Thermostat Consumption Volume by Major Countries13.4.1 Brazil Industrial Thermostat Consumption Volume from 2015 to 202013.4.2 Argentina Industrial Thermostat Consumption Volume from 2015 to 202013.4.3 Columbia Industrial Thermostat Consumption Volume from 2015 to 202013.4.4 Chile Industrial Thermostat Consumption Volume from 2015 to 202013.4.5 Venezuela Industrial Thermostat Consumption Volume from 2015 to 202013.4.6 Peru Industrial Thermostat Consumption Volume from 2015 to 202013.4.7 Puerto Rico Industrial Thermostat Consumption Volume from 2015 to 202013.4.8 Ecuador Industrial Thermostat Consumption Volume from 2015 to 2020

Chapter 14 Company Profiles and Key Figures in Industrial Thermostat Business14.1 Thermo14.1.1 Thermo Company Profile14.1.2 Thermo Industrial Thermostat Product Specification14.1.3 Thermo Industrial Thermostat Production Capacity, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2015-2020)14.2 Weiss14.2.1 Weiss Company Profile14.2.2 Weiss Industrial Thermostat Product Specification14.2.3 Weiss Industrial Thermostat Production Capacity, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2015-2020)14.3 Shel Lab14.3.1 Shel Lab Company Profile14.3.2 Shel Lab Industrial Thermostat Product Specification14.3.3 Shel Lab Industrial Thermostat Production Capacity, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2015-2020)14.4 Binder14.4.1 Binder Company Profile14.4.2 Binder Industrial Thermostat Product Specification14.4.3 Binder Industrial Thermostat Production Capacity, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2015-2020)14.5 Memmert14.5.1 Memmert Company Profile14.5.2 Memmert Industrial Thermostat Product Specification14.5.3 Memmert Industrial Thermostat Production Capacity, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2015-2020)14.6 VWR14.6.1 VWR Company Profile14.6.2 VWR Industrial Thermostat Product Specification14.6.3 VWR Industrial Thermostat Production Capacity, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2015-2020)14.7 NuAire14.7.1 NuAire Company Profile14.7.2 NuAire Industrial Thermostat Product Specification14.7.3 NuAire Industrial Thermostat Production Capacity, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2015-2020)14.8 Hettich Lab14.8.1 Hettich Lab Company Profile14.8.2 Hettich Lab Industrial Thermostat Product Specification14.8.3 Hettich Lab Industrial Thermostat Production Capacity, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2015-2020)14.9 Sanyo14.9.1 Sanyo Company Profile14.9.2 Sanyo Industrial Thermostat Product Specification14.9.3 Sanyo Industrial Thermostat Production Capacity, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2015-2020)14.10 Heal Force14.10.1 Heal Force Company Profile14.10.2 Heal Force Industrial Thermostat Product Specification14.10.3 Heal Force Industrial Thermostat Production Capacity, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2015-2020)14.11 Jeio Tech14.11.1 Jeio Tech Company Profile14.11.2 Jeio Tech Industrial Thermostat Product Specification14.11.3 Jeio Tech Industrial Thermostat Production Capacity, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2015-2020)14.12 Manish Scientific14.12.1 Manish Scientific Company Profile14.12.2 Manish Scientific Industrial Thermostat Product Specification14.12.3 Manish Scientific Industrial Thermostat Production Capacity, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2015-2020)14.13 GENLAB14.13.1 GENLAB Company Profile14.13.2 GENLAB Industrial Thermostat Product Specification14.13.3 GENLAB Industrial Thermostat Production Capacity, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2015-2020)

Chapter 15 Global Industrial Thermostat Market Forecast (2021-2026)15.1 Global Industrial Thermostat Consumption Volume, Revenue and Price Forecast (2021-2026)15.1.1 Global Industrial Thermostat Consumption Volume and Growth Rate Forecast (2021-2026)15.1.2 Global Industrial Thermostat Value and Growth Rate Forecast (2021-2026)15.2 Global Industrial Thermostat Consumption Volume, Value and Growth Rate Forecast by Region (2021-2026)15.2.1 Global Industrial Thermostat Consumption Volume and Growth Rate Forecast by Regions (2021-2026)15.2.2 Global Industrial Thermostat Value and Growth Rate Forecast by Regions (2021-2026)15.2.3 North America Industrial Thermostat Consumption Volume, Revenue and Growth Rate Forecast (2021-2026)15.2.4 East Asia Industrial Thermostat Consumption Volume, Revenue and Growth Rate Forecast (2021-2026)15.2.5 Europe Industrial Thermostat Consumption Volume, Revenue and Growth Rate Forecast (2021-2026)15.2.6 South Asia Industrial Thermostat Consumption Volume, Revenue and Growth Rate Forecast (2021-2026)15.2.7 Southeast Asia Industrial Thermostat Consumption Volume, Revenue and Growth Rate Forecast (2021-2026)15.2.8 Middle East Industrial Thermostat Consumption Volume, Revenue and Growth Rate Forecast (2021-2026)15.2.9 Africa Industrial Thermostat Consumption Volume, Revenue and Growth Rate Forecast (2021-2026)15.2.10 Oceania Industrial Thermostat Consumption Volume, Revenue and Growth Rate Forecast (2021-2026)15.2.11 South America Industrial Thermostat Consumption Volume, Revenue and Growth Rate Forecast (2021-2026)15.3 Global Industrial Thermostat Consumption Volume, Revenue and Price Forecast by Type (2021-2026)15.3.1 Global Industrial Thermostat Consumption Forecast by Type (2021-2026)15.3.2 Global Industrial Thermostat Revenue Forecast by Type (2021-2026)15.3.3 Global Industrial Thermostat Price Forecast by Type (2021-2026)15.4 Global Industrial Thermostat Consumption Volume Forecast by Application (2021-2026)15.5 Industrial Thermostat Market Forecast Under COVID-19

Chapter 16 ConclusionsResearch Methodology

About Us:Market Research Port is one of the best report resellers in the market bringing to you accurate and trustworthy market research reports by reputed publishers. Our trusted publishers have compiled their reports and findings after painstaking research and studies, set up against varied business parameters. Each report is detailed and then vetted for accuracy by industry experts. In each report, you will find deep analysis, risk analysis, market forecasts, emerging trends, different market segments, technological advancement and its impact, and a multitude of economic factors, giving you the most comprehensive market research report. You get many advantages with such comprehensive reports.

Contact Us:Market Research Port,Brighton Street, Providence,Rhode Island 02929, United StatesContact No: +1 401 433 7610Email: [emailprotected]Website: https://marketresearchport.com/

See the rest here:

Industrial Thermostat Market 2020 Top-Companies Offerings, Trends, Segmented Analysis and Forecast by 2026 | Thermo, Weiss, Shel Lab - 3rd Watch News

Automated Chemisorption Analyzers Market 2020 Projections, Growth Opportunities, Trends, Companies Strategies and Forecast 2026 | Micromeritics…

Posted on by

Exclusive Market Research Report on Global Automated Chemisorption Analyzers Market with Industry Analysis, Size, Share, Trends, Growth Opportunities, Competitive Landscape, Investment Strategies and Forecast by 2026.

The report contains in-depth information on all the key aspects of the global Automated Chemisorption Analyzers market. This report contains important data such as facts & figures, market research, market analysis, SWOT analysis, competitive landscape, regional analysis and future growth prospects. The report also contains qualitative and quantitative research which gives you a detailed analysis of the global Automated Chemisorption Analyzers market. The report is perfect as you can see information on the recent developments, based on which you can make risk assessments and investments in the Automated Chemisorption Analyzers industry.

Get The Sample Report PDF with Detail TOC & List of [emailprotected]https://marketresearchport.com/request-sample/44799

Leading Companies Covered:

Micromeritics Instrument, Xianquan, Quantachrome Instruments, MicrotracBEL

This global Automated Chemisorption Analyzers market research report has data of all the leading players operating in the industry. From their market shares in the industry, to their growth plans, recent development status, all important information has been compiled in the report to let you get an insightful look at the top players operating in the industry. The report includes the forecasts, analysis and discussion of important industry trends, market size, market share estimates and profiles of the leading industry players.

Market Research is Further Divided into Following Segments:

Market Segmentation by Product Types:Dynamic Flow Chemisorption Analyzer, Static Chemisorption Analyzer

Market Segmentation by Applications:Research Institutions, Enterprise

Regions Mentioned in the Global Automated Chemisorption Analyzers Market:

The Middle East and Africa North America South America Europe Asia-Pacific Middle East Oceania Rest of the World

The data of the market research report has been studied, compiled and corroborated by leading industry experts and established authors. The format followed in the report is in accordance with most international market research reports. However, if you have any specific requirements, just get in touch with us, and we will customize the report accordingly as per your needs.

Get the Report [emailprotected]https://www.marketresearchport.com/reports/covid-19-impact-on-global-and-regional-automated-chemisorption-analyzers-market-research-report-2020-2026-in/44799

Table of Content:Chapter 1 Industry Overview1.1 Definition1.2 Assumptions1.3 Research Scope1.4 Market Analysis by Regions1.4.1 North America Market States and Outlook (2021-2026)1.4.2 East Asia Market States and Outlook (2021-2026)1.4.3 Europe Market States and Outlook (2021-2026)1.4.4 South Asia Market States and Outlook (2021-2026)1.4.5 Southeast Asia Market States and Outlook (2021-2026)1.4.6 Middle East Market States and Outlook (2021-2026)1.4.7 Africa Market States and Outlook (2021-2026)1.4.8 Oceania Market States and Outlook (2021-2026)1.4.9 South America Market States and Outlook (2021-2026)1.5 Global Automated Chemisorption Analyzers Market Size Analysis from 2021 to 20261.5.1 Global Automated Chemisorption Analyzers Market Size Analysis from 2021 to 2026 by Consumption Volume1.5.2 Global Automated Chemisorption Analyzers Market Size Analysis from 2021 to 2026 by Value1.5.3 Global Automated Chemisorption Analyzers Price Trends Analysis from 2021 to 20261.6 COVID-19 Outbreak: Automated Chemisorption Analyzers Industry Impact

Chapter 2 Global Automated Chemisorption Analyzers Competition by Types, Applications, and Top Regions and Countries2.1 Global Automated Chemisorption Analyzers (Volume and Value) by Type2.1.1 Global Automated Chemisorption Analyzers Consumption and Market Share by Type (2015-2020)2.1.2 Global Automated Chemisorption Analyzers Revenue and Market Share by Type (2015-2020)2.2 Global Automated Chemisorption Analyzers (Volume and Value) by Application2.2.1 Global Automated Chemisorption Analyzers Consumption and Market Share by Application (2015-2020)2.2.2 Global Automated Chemisorption Analyzers Revenue and Market Share by Application (2015-2020)2.3 Global Automated Chemisorption Analyzers (Volume and Value) by Regions2.3.1 Global Automated Chemisorption Analyzers Consumption and Market Share by Regions (2015-2020)2.3.2 Global Automated Chemisorption Analyzers Revenue and Market Share by Regions (2015-2020)

Chapter 3 Production Market Analysis3.1 Global Production Market Analysis3.1.1 2015-2020 Global Capacity, Production, Capacity Utilization Rate, Ex-Factory Price, Revenue, Cost, Gross and Gross Margin Analysis3.1.2 2015-2020 Major Manufacturers Performance and Market Share3.2 Regional Production Market Analysis3.2.1 2015-2020 Regional Market Performance and Market Share3.2.2 North America Market3.2.3 East Asia Market3.2.4 Europe Market3.2.5 South Asia Market3.2.6 Southeast Asia Market3.2.7 Middle East Market3.2.8 Africa Market3.2.9 Oceania Market3.2.10 South America Market3.2.11 Rest of the World Market

Chapter 4 Global Automated Chemisorption Analyzers Sales, Consumption, Export, Import by Regions (2015-2020)4.1 Global Automated Chemisorption Analyzers Consumption by Regions (2015-2020)4.2 North America Automated Chemisorption Analyzers Sales, Consumption, Export, Import (2015-2020)4.3 East Asia Automated Chemisorption Analyzers Sales, Consumption, Export, Import (2015-2020)4.4 Europe Automated Chemisorption Analyzers Sales, Consumption, Export, Import (2015-2020)4.5 South Asia Automated Chemisorption Analyzers Sales, Consumption, Export, Import (2015-2020)4.6 Southeast Asia Automated Chemisorption Analyzers Sales, Consumption, Export, Import (2015-2020)4.7 Middle East Automated Chemisorption Analyzers Sales, Consumption, Export, Import (2015-2020)4.8 Africa Automated Chemisorption Analyzers Sales, Consumption, Export, Import (2015-2020)4.9 Oceania Automated Chemisorption Analyzers Sales, Consumption, Export, Import (2015-2020)4.10 South America Automated Chemisorption Analyzers Sales, Consumption, Export, Import (2015-2020)

Chapter 5 North America Automated Chemisorption Analyzers Market Analysis5.1 North America Automated Chemisorption Analyzers Consumption and Value Analysis5.1.1 North America Automated Chemisorption Analyzers Market Under COVID-195.2 North America Automated Chemisorption Analyzers Consumption Volume by Types5.3 North America Automated Chemisorption Analyzers Consumption Structure by Application5.4 North America Automated Chemisorption Analyzers Consumption by Top Countries5.4.1 United States Automated Chemisorption Analyzers Consumption Volume from 2015 to 20205.4.2 Canada Automated Chemisorption Analyzers Consumption Volume from 2015 to 20205.4.3 Mexico Automated Chemisorption Analyzers Consumption Volume from 2015 to 2020

Chapter 6 East Asia Automated Chemisorption Analyzers Market Analysis6.1 East Asia Automated Chemisorption Analyzers Consumption and Value Analysis6.1.1 East Asia Automated Chemisorption Analyzers Market Under COVID-196.2 East Asia Automated Chemisorption Analyzers Consumption Volume by Types6.3 East Asia Automated Chemisorption Analyzers Consumption Structure by Application6.4 East Asia Automated Chemisorption Analyzers Consumption by Top Countries6.4.1 China Automated Chemisorption Analyzers Consumption Volume from 2015 to 20206.4.2 Japan Automated Chemisorption Analyzers Consumption Volume from 2015 to 20206.4.3 South Korea Automated Chemisorption Analyzers Consumption Volume from 2015 to 2020

Chapter 7 Europe Automated Chemisorption Analyzers Market Analysis7.1 Europe Automated Chemisorption Analyzers Consumption and Value Analysis7.1.1 Europe Automated Chemisorption Analyzers Market Under COVID-197.2 Europe Automated Chemisorption Analyzers Consumption Volume by Types7.3 Europe Automated Chemisorption Analyzers Consumption Structure by Application7.4 Europe Automated Chemisorption Analyzers Consumption by Top Countries7.4.1 Germany Automated Chemisorption Analyzers Consumption Volume from 2015 to 20207.4.2 UK Automated Chemisorption Analyzers Consumption Volume from 2015 to 20207.4.3 France Automated Chemisorption Analyzers Consumption Volume from 2015 to 20207.4.4 Italy Automated Chemisorption Analyzers Consumption Volume from 2015 to 20207.4.5 Russia Automated Chemisorption Analyzers Consumption Volume from 2015 to 20207.4.6 Spain Automated Chemisorption Analyzers Consumption Volume from 2015 to 20207.4.7 Netherlands Automated Chemisorption Analyzers Consumption Volume from 2015 to 20207.4.8 Switzerland Automated Chemisorption Analyzers Consumption Volume from 2015 to 20207.4.9 Poland Automated Chemisorption Analyzers Consumption Volume from 2015 to 2020

Chapter 8 South Asia Automated Chemisorption Analyzers Market Analysis8.1 South Asia Automated Chemisorption Analyzers Consumption and Value Analysis8.1.1 South Asia Automated Chemisorption Analyzers Market Under COVID-198.2 South Asia Automated Chemisorption Analyzers Consumption Volume by Types8.3 South Asia Automated Chemisorption Analyzers Consumption Structure by Application8.4 South Asia Automated Chemisorption Analyzers Consumption by Top Countries8.4.1 India Automated Chemisorption Analyzers Consumption Volume from 2015 to 20208.4.2 Pakistan Automated Chemisorption Analyzers Consumption Volume from 2015 to 20208.4.3 Bangladesh Automated Chemisorption Analyzers Consumption Volume from 2015 to 2020

Chapter 9 Southeast Asia Automated Chemisorption Analyzers Market Analysis9.1 Southeast Asia Automated Chemisorption Analyzers Consumption and Value Analysis9.1.1 Southeast Asia Automated Chemisorption Analyzers Market Under COVID-199.2 Southeast Asia Automated Chemisorption Analyzers Consumption Volume by Types9.3 Southeast Asia Automated Chemisorption Analyzers Consumption Structure by Application9.4 Southeast Asia Automated Chemisorption Analyzers Consumption by Top Countries9.4.1 Indonesia Automated Chemisorption Analyzers Consumption Volume from 2015 to 20209.4.2 Thailand Automated Chemisorption Analyzers Consumption Volume from 2015 to 20209.4.3 Singapore Automated Chemisorption Analyzers Consumption Volume from 2015 to 20209.4.4 Malaysia Automated Chemisorption Analyzers Consumption Volume from 2015 to 20209.4.5 Philippines Automated Chemisorption Analyzers Consumption Volume from 2015 to 20209.4.6 Vietnam Automated Chemisorption Analyzers Consumption Volume from 2015 to 20209.4.7 Myanmar Automated Chemisorption Analyzers Consumption Volume from 2015 to 2020

Chapter 10 Middle East Automated Chemisorption Analyzers Market Analysis10.1 Middle East Automated Chemisorption Analyzers Consumption and Value Analysis10.1.1 Middle East Automated Chemisorption Analyzers Market Under COVID-1910.2 Middle East Automated Chemisorption Analyzers Consumption Volume by Types10.3 Middle East Automated Chemisorption Analyzers Consumption Structure by Application10.4 Middle East Automated Chemisorption Analyzers Consumption by Top Countries10.4.1 Turkey Automated Chemisorption Analyzers Consumption Volume from 2015 to 202010.4.2 Saudi Arabia Automated Chemisorption Analyzers Consumption Volume from 2015 to 202010.4.3 Iran Automated Chemisorption Analyzers Consumption Volume from 2015 to 202010.4.4 United Arab Emirates Automated Chemisorption Analyzers Consumption Volume from 2015 to 202010.4.5 Israel Automated Chemisorption Analyzers Consumption Volume from 2015 to 202010.4.6 Iraq Automated Chemisorption Analyzers Consumption Volume from 2015 to 202010.4.7 Qatar Automated Chemisorption Analyzers Consumption Volume from 2015 to 202010.4.8 Kuwait Automated Chemisorption Analyzers Consumption Volume from 2015 to 202010.4.9 Oman Automated Chemisorption Analyzers Consumption Volume from 2015 to 2020

Chapter 11 Africa Automated Chemisorption Analyzers Market Analysis11.1 Africa Automated Chemisorption Analyzers Consumption and Value Analysis11.1.1 Africa Automated Chemisorption Analyzers Market Under COVID-1911.2 Africa Automated Chemisorption Analyzers Consumption Volume by Types11.3 Africa Automated Chemisorption Analyzers Consumption Structure by Application11.4 Africa Automated Chemisorption Analyzers Consumption by Top Countries11.4.1 Nigeria Automated Chemisorption Analyzers Consumption Volume from 2015 to 202011.4.2 South Africa Automated Chemisorption Analyzers Consumption Volume from 2015 to 202011.4.3 Egypt Automated Chemisorption Analyzers Consumption Volume from 2015 to 202011.4.4 Algeria Automated Chemisorption Analyzers Consumption Volume from 2015 to 202011.4.5 Morocco Automated Chemisorption Analyzers Consumption Volume from 2015 to 2020

Chapter 12 Oceania Automated Chemisorption Analyzers Market Analysis12.1 Oceania Automated Chemisorption Analyzers Consumption and Value Analysis12.2 Oceania Automated Chemisorption Analyzers Consumption Volume by Types12.3 Oceania Automated Chemisorption Analyzers Consumption Structure by Application12.4 Oceania Automated Chemisorption Analyzers Consumption by Top Countries12.4.1 Australia Automated Chemisorption Analyzers Consumption Volume from 2015 to 202012.4.2 New Zealand Automated Chemisorption Analyzers Consumption Volume from 2015 to 2020

Chapter 13 South America Automated Chemisorption Analyzers Market Analysis13.1 South America Automated Chemisorption Analyzers Consumption and Value Analysis13.1.1 South America Automated Chemisorption Analyzers Market Under COVID-1913.2 South America Automated Chemisorption Analyzers Consumption Volume by Types13.3 South America Automated Chemisorption Analyzers Consumption Structure by Application13.4 South America Automated Chemisorption Analyzers Consumption Volume by Major Countries13.4.1 Brazil Automated Chemisorption Analyzers Consumption Volume from 2015 to 202013.4.2 Argentina Automated Chemisorption Analyzers Consumption Volume from 2015 to 202013.4.3 Columbia Automated Chemisorption Analyzers Consumption Volume from 2015 to 202013.4.4 Chile Automated Chemisorption Analyzers Consumption Volume from 2015 to 202013.4.5 Venezuela Automated Chemisorption Analyzers Consumption Volume from 2015 to 202013.4.6 Peru Automated Chemisorption Analyzers Consumption Volume from 2015 to 202013.4.7 Puerto Rico Automated Chemisorption Analyzers Consumption Volume from 2015 to 202013.4.8 Ecuador Automated Chemisorption Analyzers Consumption Volume from 2015 to 2020

Chapter 14 Company Profiles and Key Figures in Automated Chemisorption Analyzers Business14.1 Micromeritics Instrument14.1.1 Micromeritics Instrument Company Profile14.1.2 Micromeritics Instrument Automated Chemisorption Analyzers Product Specification14.1.3 Micromeritics Instrument Automated Chemisorption Analyzers Production Capacity, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2015-2020)14.2 Xianquan14.2.1 Xianquan Company Profile14.2.2 Xianquan Automated Chemisorption Analyzers Product Specification14.2.3 Xianquan Automated Chemisorption Analyzers Production Capacity, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2015-2020)14.3 Quantachrome Instruments14.3.1 Quantachrome Instruments Company Profile14.3.2 Quantachrome Instruments Automated Chemisorption Analyzers Product Specification14.3.3 Quantachrome Instruments Automated Chemisorption Analyzers Production Capacity, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2015-2020)14.4 MicrotracBEL14.4.1 MicrotracBEL Company Profile14.4.2 MicrotracBEL Automated Chemisorption Analyzers Product Specification14.4.3 MicrotracBEL Automated Chemisorption Analyzers Production Capacity, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2015-2020)

Chapter 15 Global Automated Chemisorption Analyzers Market Forecast (2021-2026)15.1 Global Automated Chemisorption Analyzers Consumption Volume, Revenue and Price Forecast (2021-2026)15.1.1 Global Automated Chemisorption Analyzers Consumption Volume and Growth Rate Forecast (2021-2026)15.1.2 Global Automated Chemisorption Analyzers Value and Growth Rate Forecast (2021-2026)15.2 Global Automated Chemisorption Analyzers Consumption Volume, Value and Growth Rate Forecast by Region (2021-2026)15.2.1 Global Automated Chemisorption Analyzers Consumption Volume and Growth Rate Forecast by Regions (2021-2026)15.2.2 Global Automated Chemisorption Analyzers Value and Growth Rate Forecast by Regions (2021-2026)15.2.3 North America Automated Chemisorption Analyzers Consumption Volume, Revenue and Growth Rate Forecast (2021-2026)15.2.4 East Asia Automated Chemisorption Analyzers Consumption Volume, Revenue and Growth Rate Forecast (2021-2026)15.2.5 Europe Automated Chemisorption Analyzers Consumption Volume, Revenue and Growth Rate Forecast (2021-2026)15.2.6 South Asia Automated Chemisorption Analyzers Consumption Volume, Revenue and Growth Rate Forecast (2021-2026)15.2.7 Southeast Asia Automated Chemisorption Analyzers Consumption Volume, Revenue and Growth Rate Forecast (2021-2026)15.2.8 Middle East Automated Chemisorption Analyzers Consumption Volume, Revenue and Growth Rate Forecast (2021-2026)15.2.9 Africa Automated Chemisorption Analyzers Consumption Volume, Revenue and Growth Rate Forecast (2021-2026)15.2.10 Oceania Automated Chemisorption Analyzers Consumption Volume, Revenue and Growth Rate Forecast (2021-2026)15.2.11 South America Automated Chemisorption Analyzers Consumption Volume, Revenue and Growth Rate Forecast (2021-2026)15.3 Global Automated Chemisorption Analyzers Consumption Volume, Revenue and Price Forecast by Type (2021-2026)15.3.1 Global Automated Chemisorption Analyzers Consumption Forecast by Type (2021-2026)15.3.2 Global Automated Chemisorption Analyzers Revenue Forecast by Type (2021-2026)15.3.3 Global Automated Chemisorption Analyzers Price Forecast by Type (2021-2026)15.4 Global Automated Chemisorption Analyzers Consumption Volume Forecast by Application (2021-2026)15.5 Automated Chemisorption Analyzers Market Forecast Under COVID-19

Chapter 16 ConclusionsResearch Methodology

About Us:Market Research Port is one of the best report resellers in the market bringing to you accurate and trustworthy market research reports by reputed publishers. Our trusted publishers have compiled their reports and findings after painstaking research and studies, set up against varied business parameters. Each report is detailed and then vetted for accuracy by industry experts. In each report, you will find deep analysis, risk analysis, market forecasts, emerging trends, different market segments, technological advancement and its impact, and a multitude of economic factors, giving you the most comprehensive market research report. You get many advantages with such comprehensive reports.

Contact Us:Market Research Port,Brighton Street, Providence,Rhode Island 02929, United StatesContact No: +1 401 433 7610Email: [emailprotected]Website: https://marketresearchport.com/

See the rest here:

Automated Chemisorption Analyzers Market 2020 Projections, Growth Opportunities, Trends, Companies Strategies and Forecast 2026 | Micromeritics...

Open Robotics

Posted on by

We offer robotics R&D, consulting, custom engineering, and application development services to industry and government. We work with companies large and small and public agencies around the world. Contact usto learn more.

Whether you want to learn more about Gazebo, need to streamline your ROS-based product development, or are looking for a partner for your next R&D program, we're here to help. We engage in variety of projects, including:

The unifying theme of our team and our work is openness. We use and we build open systems. To the greatest extent possible, we freely distribute our work product, whether software, hardware, or documentation, under an open source license.

Of course we can be open while still keeping secrets when needed. It's no problem for our team be exposed to and work with client-confidential information, from designs and plans to source code. But we aim in each project to allow our team to focus our development efforts on producing more and better open tools that will benefit the broader community. After all, it's the development of those tools that got us where we are today.

Contact usto discuss your next project.

Read this article:

Open Robotics

What’s the Difference Between Automation and Robotics?

Posted on by

Industrial automation, Robotic Process Automation, test automation What do the terms all mean!? Are robotics and automation the same thing?

A lot of people wonder if automation is right for them. Business owners are asking "Should I invest in automation?" and "Should I invest in robotics?"

But, what's the difference between the two? Is automation the same thing as robotics?

Automation is a hot topic in many industries right now. It can refer to several things, not just robotics. This article breaks down the differences betweenthe various terms.

First things first, if you are a business owner you are probably wondering whether automation or robotics is right for your business. The quick answer is: it really depends on your current business needs.

Consider these questions:

If you can think of even one or two tasks which are repetitive or cause a bottleneck, they may be a good candidate for automation. If they are physical tasks, industrial automation or robotics could be the answer. If they are virtual tasks, a form of software automation might work.

The basic difference between automation and robotics can be seen in their definitions:

There are obviously crossovers between the two. Robots are used to automate some physical tasks, such as in manufacturing. However, many types of automation have nothing to do with physical robots. Also, many branches of robotics have nothing to do with automation.

Make sense?

Let's look more closely at the different terminologies.

A lot of industries are talking about automation at the moment. Terms like Business Process Automation, Robotic Process Automation, adaptive automation and test automation are all over the place.

There are two basic types of automation: software automation and industrial automation.

Most of the information on automation that you can find online is about software automation. This involves using software to carry out tasks which humans usually do when they are using computer programs.

For example, GUI test automation is a way to test computer programs. It involves recording the actions of a human while they are using a graphical user interface. These actions are then replayed to autonomously test the program after changes have been made to the underlying software.

Other types of software automation include:

The difference between BPA and RPA is quite subtle. To use an analogy from robotic manufacturing, BPA is a bit like ripping out your entire human-operated production line and replacing it with a fully autonomous factory. RPA is like adding a collaborative robot to one workstation within the production line.

When we talk about "automation and robotics", we are usually referring to industrial automation.

Industrial automation is all about controlling physical processes. It involves using physical machines and control systems to automate tasks within an industrial process. A fully autonomous factory is the extreme example.

There are many types of machine within industrial automation. For example, CNC machines are common in manufacturing.

Robots are only one type of machine.

Let's start with the basics. Robots are programmable machines which are able to carry out a series of actions autonomously, or semi-autonomously. They interact with the physical world via sensors and actuators. Because they are reprogrammable, they are more flexible than single-function machines.

Robotics, therefore, refers to anything involving robots.

Within industrial automation, robots are used as a flexible way to automate a physical task or process. Collaborative robots are designed to carry out the task in the same way a human would. More traditional industrial robots tend to carry out the task more efficiently than a human would.

To make it a little more complex, some robots are "autonomous" (meaning that they operate without humans directly controlling them) but they are not used in automation. For example, a toy line-following robot can autonomously follow a line painted on the ground. However, it is not "automation" because it isn't performing a specific task. If instead the line-following robot were transporting medicines around a hospital, then it would be automation.

When deciding whether to invest in automation for your business, consider the following:

Do you have any queries about the differences between types of automation? Askus in the comments below or join the discussion on LinkedIn, Twitter, Facebook or the DoF professional robotics community.

Read the original post:

What's the Difference Between Automation and Robotics?

Time to Build Robots for Humans, Not to Replace – ReadWrite

Posted on by

Thinking about the future of robots and autonomy is exciting; driverless cars, lights-out factories, urban air mobility, robotic surgeons available anywhere in the world. Weve seen the building blocks come together in warehouses, retail stores, farms, and on the roads. It is now time to build robots for humans, not to replace them.

Humans are incredibly good at adapting to dynamic situations to achieve a goal. Robotic and autonomous systems are incredibly powerful at highly precise, responsive, multivariate operations. A new generation of companies is turning their attention to bringing the two together, building robots to work for humans, not replace them, and reinventing several industries in the process.

New methods of ML, such as reinforcement learning and adversarial networks, have transformed both the speed and capability of robot systems.

These methods work extremely well when:

Where the probability of unforeseen situations and rules are low, robots can work miraculously better than any human can.

An Amazon robot-powered warehouse is an excellent illustration of well-characterized tasks (goods movement), in constrained environments (warehouse), with limited diversity (structured paths), and all end states are known (limited task variability).

What about in a less structured environment, where there are greater complexity and variability? The probability of errors and unforeseen situations is proportional to the complexity of the process.

In the physical world, what is a robot to do when it encounters a situation it has never seen before? That question conflicts with the robots understanding of the expected environment and has unknown end states.

The conflicted robot is precisely the challenge companies are facing when introducing robots into the physical world.

Audi claimed they would hit level 3 autonomy by 2019 (update: they recently gave up). Waymo has driven 20 million miles yet operationally and geographically constrained.

Tesla reverted from a fully robotic factory approach back to a human-machine mix, the company stating, Automation simply cant deal with the complexity, inconsistencies, variation and things gone wrong that humans can.

To solve these problems in the physical world, weve implemented humans as technology guardrails.

Applications such as driverless cars, last-mile delivery robots, warehouse robots, robots making pizza, cleaning floors, and more, can operate in the real world thanks to humans in the loop monitoring their operations.

Humans are acting as either remote operators, AI data trainers, and exception managers.

The human in the loop has accelerated the pace of technology and opened up capabilities we didnt think we would see in our lifetime, as the examples mentioned earlier.

At the same time, it has bounded the use cases to which we build. When we design robotic systems around commodity skill sets, the range of tasks is limited to those just those skills.

As a result, what robots are capable of today primarily cluster around the ability to navigate and identify people/objects.

As these companies bring their solutions to market, they quickly realize two realities:

(1) Commodity tasks make it easier for others to also attempt a similar solution (as seen with the number of AV and warehouse robot companies emerging over the past few years).

(2) High labor liquidity depresses wages, thus requiring these solutions to fully replace the human, not augment, in high volumes to generate any meaningful economics. E.g., Waymo/Uber/Zoox needs to remove the driver and operate at high volumes to turn a profit eventually.

The result of the commodity approach to robotics has forced these technology developers to completely replace the human from the loop to become viable businesses.

The open question is: is this the right intersection between machine and human? Is this the best we can do to leverage the precision of a robot with the creativity of a human?

To accelerate what robots are capable of doing, we need to shift focus from trying to replace humans, to building solutions that put the robot and human hand-in-hand. For robots to find their way into critical workflows of our industries, we needed them to augment experts and trained technicians.

Industries such as general aviation, construction, manufacturing, retail, farming, and healthcare could be made safer, more efficient, and more profitable. Changing the humans role of operator and technician to manager and strategist.

Helicopter pilots could free themselves from the fatiguing balance of flight and control management. Construction machine operators could focus on strategies and exceptions rather than repetitive motions.

Manufacturing facilities could free up workers to focus on throughput, workflow, and quality, rather than tiring manual labor. Retail operators could focus on customer experiences rather than trying to keep up with stocking inventory.

These industries all suffer from limited labor pools, highly variable environments, with little technology, and high cost of errors. Pairing robotic or autonomous systems that work hand in hand with the experts could invert from the set of dynamics compared to commodity use cases.

Companies could build solutions that need only to augment the operator, not replace him or her, to meaningfully change the economics of the operation.

The current generation of technology innovation is starting, with a new generation of companies using robotics and autonomy to change the operating experience across industries.

Robot solutions that share many key dimensions:

The impossible means we can make more complex decisions at orders of magnitude more precision and speed. Yet so many industries still rely on human labor and operations over human ingenuity and authority.

As the world adapts to social distancing and remote work, its more important than ever to leverage technology as our proverbial exoskeletons to maximize what humans are great at, and let technology do the rest.

*Venrock is an investor in Skyryse and Simbe Robotics

Ethan is a Partner at Venrock where he invests in technology companies solving hard engineering problems across developer infrastructure, autonomy, advanced computing, and space.In and out of the office, he is a passionate early adopter, space geek, and competitive athlete. You can usually find Ethan outdoors with his kids building things that move or fly.

Follow this link:

Time to Build Robots for Humans, Not to Replace - ReadWrite

Robots At Work: Call the ‘germbusters’ – Yahoo News

Posted on by

This may become a common sight.

At work, at the shops or public transport.

Disinfecting robots.

According to the World Health Organization, traditional cleaning methods using humans and cleaning solutions are only 60% effective.

Across the world, new robots designs are quickly emerging in an attempt make spaces safe again.

This remote-controlled robot is equipped with a disinfecting vapour cannon.

It can sanitize large areas inside and out and may help Britain get back to work after lockdown, according to its developers.

"As it is it can be used in a variant of applications from inside of buildings such as this, external, shopping centres, churches. It can be operated from a hundred metres away. It could go inside a building and disinfect the inside of different rooms inside a building while the operator sits in a car outside."

Another method is using UV light to sanitize objects and spaces, like this robot, thats being deployed in malls in Singapore.

Instead of spraying chemicals, the Sunburst UV Disinfecting Mobile Robot relies on its ultraviolet C lamps to sterilize surfaces, hard-to-reach crevices and even the air.

UV disinfecting robots are being put on the frontlines elsewhere across the world as well, like this one in a Boston food warehouse or in Buenos Aires.

Argentinian firm UV Robotics says while a human cant cover every millimetre of a space that needs sterilization the UV robot can and has a disinfection rate of more than 99%.

Over in Asia, Hong Kong International Airport is deploying 12 cleaning robots which emit ultraviolet rays, spray disinfectant and clean floors.

The technology was first used on chartered flights that brought residents back to Hong Kong for lockdown.

"We have been doing this in the last one or two months and preparing for the resumption of passenger flights and we hope they will all come back."

And underground, Hong Kong's subway is deploying an autonomous fleet of mini-fridge-sized robots spraying a "vaporized hydrogen peroxide" (VHP) solution to disinfect trains and stations.

Story continues

"The first thing we do is use bleach water solutions to clean the environment. But there are still tiny gaps, a tiny area that is not easy to reach, therefore we keep on deep cleaning, keep on deep cleaning day in and day out.

- This may become a common sight at work, at the shops, or public transport. Disinfecting robots. According to the World Health Organization, traditional cleaning methods using humans and cleaning solutions are only 60% effective.

Across the world, new robot designs are quickly emerging in an attempt to make spaces safe again. This remote-controlled robot is equipped with a disinfecting vapor cannon. It can sanitize large areas inside and out and may help Britain get back to work after lockdown, according to its developers.

MARK TELFORD: It can be used in a variant of applications from inside of buildings such as this, external, shopping centers, churches. It can be operated from 100 meters away. It could go inside of a building and disinfect the inside of different rooms inside of a building while the operator sits in a car outside.

- Another method is using UV light to sanitize objects and spaces, like this robot that's being deployed in malls in Singapore. Instead of spraying chemicals, the Sunburst UV Disinfecting Mobile Robot relies on its ultraviolet C lamps to sterilize surfaces, hard-to-reach crevices, and even the air.

UV disinfecting robots are being put on the frontlines elsewhere across the world as well, like this one in a Boston food warehouse or in Buenos Aires. Argentinean firm UV Robotics says, while a human can't cover every millimeter of a space that needs sterilization, the UV robot can and has a disinfection rate of more than 99%.

Over in Asia, Hong Kong International Airport is deploying 12 cleaning robots, which emit ultraviolet rays, spray disinfectant, and clean floors. The technology was first used on chartered flights that brought residents back to Hong Kong for lockdown.

STEPHEN YIU: [INAUDIBLE] We have been doing this in the last one or two months and prepare for the resumption of the passenger and flight, where we hope that they will all come back here in June.

- And underground, Hong Kong's subway is deploying an autonomous fleet of mini-fridge-sized robots spraying a "vaporized hydrogen peroxide solution" to disinfect trains and stations.

TONY LEE: The first thing we do is use 1-to-49 bleach solutions to clean the environments. But there are still a tiny gap, a tiny area that is not easy to reach. Therefore, we keep on deep cleaning, keep on deep cleaning day in and day out.

With this hydrogen peroxide robot, we are able to have 100% sure by spraying the hydrogen mist that we normally, in the past, they used in the hospital, in the lab to have a deep disinfection.

Link:

Robots At Work: Call the 'germbusters' - Yahoo News

Robots will help us manage Covid-19, but not in the way we think – swissinfo.ch

Posted on by

Brad Nelson, a robotics professor in Switzerland, had been planning to install a robotic catheter system in China at one of the worlds largest hospitals when the Covid-19 crisis hit.

Jessica covers the good, the bad, and the ugly when it comes to big global companies and their impact in Switzerland and abroad. Shes always looking for a Swiss connection with her native San Francisco and will happily discuss why her hometown has produced some of the greatest innovations but cant seem to solve its housing crisis.

More

Julie worked as a radio reporter for BBC and independent radio all over the UK before joining swissinfo.ch's predecessor, Swiss Radio International, as a producer. After attending film school, Julie worked as an independent filmmaker before coming to swissinfo.ch in 2001.

More

Soon after, Nelson and his team at the federal technology institute ETH realised that the robotic catheters designed to protect surgeons from harmful x-rays during brain operations had unintended benefits against the novel coronavirus.

We discovered that using remote robotic systems that allowthe surgeon to perform procedures outside the operating roomcould also prevent the transmission of Covid-19, Nelson told swissinfo.ch.

Surgical robots have been around for decades to perform minimally invasive surgeries that can help patients recover faster. Similarly, industrial robots have been assembling cars in factories for years.

But amid the pandemic, robots could bring back some sense of normalcy by doing essential tasks that have become too risky for humans, and relieve us from other, much more mundane chores.

It became clear very early on that the reason to have robotics in the first place is exactly because of situations like Covid-19. This has put even more focus on the types of robots and services we can provide, Peter Fankhauser, CEO of theSwiss start-up ANYbotics, told swissinfo.ch.

His company is one of many catering to humanitys new need for robotic help. The Robotics for Infectious Diseases, a new consortium of roboticists addressing Covid-19, found reports of more than 150 ways robots are being used in Covid-19.

In different countries, disinfecting robots with UV lights have been sweeping through hallways inhospitals and schools, four-legged robots have been delivering packages to doorsteps, and robotic dogs have been spotted monitoring social distancing in parks.

The pandemic arrived at a time of huge advances in the robotics field with the rise of AI and machine learning.

In Switzerland, the field has been booming. Researchers and start-ups like Sensars and MyoSwiss are developing wearable or prosthetic robots. Flying robots like Dronistics can undertake rescue missions. Educational robots are teaching computational thinking and engineering.

When the pandemic spread, Dario Floreano, who heads the National Centre of Competence in Research Robotics, and colleagues gathered to think about ways Swiss researchers could contribute to tackling the global scourge.

We could develop a lot of technology solutions, but the last thing people need is to figure out a new technology, he said. What we need is to figure out how to apply the ones we have. It wasnt the time to send experimental prototypes into the field.

Some of these reservations to push robotics too hard stemmed in part from some of the misconceptions about where robots can really make a difference and where theyre mere gimmicky hype.

Earlier this year, the Idiap Research Institute in Martigny in Canton Valais showed off a robot that makes raclette cheese at the Consumer Electronics Show in Las Vegas.

It grabbed attention, but the intention was never to replace the person who makes the raclette, said Sylvain Calinon, the team leader. It started as a joke. Living in the Valais, I know that a robot can never replace that special interaction you have with the person who makes your raclette.

But the point was to start a conversation about the technology that is powering the robot in a way that was easy for people to understand. As the cheese melts and is scraped off onto a plate, the robot must adapt to the changing weight and shape of the cheese. The robot is programmed to learn from demonstration whereby a person guides the robot by hand, or the robot observes a persons gestures, and then imitates them.

The technology could be applied to many areas such as getting dressed.

The Idiap team has been working on such a use case as part of I-Dress, a project that uses robot assistants to help someone dress, including health care workers, who have to limit physical contact with garments to avoid contamination.

The robot has to adapt to the needs of an elderly person, which are different than a young person who was injured in a sports accident, Calinon explained during a visit to the research institute.

ANYbotics' four-legged walking robots have been used for routine inspections and to solve maintenance problems in industries such as offshore and onshore energy, chemical production and construction sites.

Since the Covid-19 outbreak, it has been receiving requests for their four-legged robots to disinfect spaces in public buildings such as schools and hospitals that have stairwells.

There, previously harmless tasks carry serious health risks. This makes autonomous robots designed for places too dangerous for humans more reliable, and cost-effective.

Routine inspection in industrial environments continues to be our focus but the sky is the limit in terms of applications, Fankhauser said. The company is also working on using the robot for delivery services for packages from warehouses to customers homes in difficult to reach areas.

Demand for such services has been given a boost by the rise in use of teleconference and telepresence during the pandemic. The initial impetus for building teleoperating functionality wasto keep surgeons safe and out of warzones. This eventually led to the creation of the Da Vinci surgical system that is used in more than 60 countries.

About a decade ago, there was some effort to make telepresence robots that essentially move around, monitoring patients and allowing them to talk to their family. However, the idea hadnt really taken off until Covid-19 said Nelson.

With the pandemic, this changed. In Italy, robots named Tommy have been doing the rounds with nurses to help take patients blood pressure and check oxygen levels.

Despite the potential, experts warn that developing robots exclusively for the purpose of tackling the pandemic is the wrong approach. The robotics industry learned this lesson during the Ebola outbreak when the United States government and the US National Science Foundation discussed ways robotics could help stop the transmission.

As the pandemic waned, the ideas became less interesting and didnt get any traction, Nelson said. But Covid-19 is different as it has restricted daily activities much more, opening the door for robots.

Another challenge is finding investors other than governments. The economic downturn has already complicated financing for robotics start-ups as investors focus on keeping existing companies afloat.

This is one of the reasons Calinons team is prioritising flexibility both in the back-end programming and its robots range of use.

We dont want to put all of our efforts in one specific application, he said. Maybe tomorrow there is another problem, but something completely different.

What is challenging, Calinon said, is that there is an immediate widespread need. When something is at the stage of a research project, usually it's quite complicated to move it to the terrain in the same week or the same month.

It took 15 or so years for the Roomba vacuum cleaning robots to come on the market. The development timeframes has shortened to five to seven years in many cases, but robots still require lengthy testing and safety inspections before they are ready for use, especially when they have to interact with humans.

Robotics perhaps more than many other fields has had to fight back images of robots that are out of control. One malfunction in a hospital or a school could have lasting consequences for peoples acceptance of robots.

For start-ups, accidents can be disastrous from a business perspective, said Floreano. They are just starting to grow their business so it can be difficult to absorb the blow.

The robotics industry also has to contend with concerns about making some jobs obsolete at a time when unemployment is skyrocketing in many countries, including Switzerland.

In a recent op-ed, J. Jesse Ramrez at the University of St Gallen argued that robots have not actually saved us in this pandemic because they can't truly replace essential human labor.

The pandemic has underscored how important essential workers are, many of whom have been underpaid and undervalued for a long time, he said. He is suspicious of the idea that our problems afford a technical fix.

Id like to see the people who do the work leading discussions about if and how their work can or should be automated, said Ramrez.

Robot experts dismiss fears of mass unemployment from robots. Fankhauser said that people often ask him when they would see robots on the streets or delivering food. But he didnt think that was the way robotics would evolve anytime soon.

I think it's going to be much more that someday you'll have ten robots in the sewage systems in Zurich instead of having people down there, he said. They are going to be out of sight a lot of the time.

He admits that there is also more apprehension about robots everyday life in Switzerland than in countries like Japan. He tries to describe robots more like smart tools and to be transparent about what they can and cant do.

Some experiences and interactions in life are irreplaceably human. Using robots might have benefits from an infectious disease standpoint but humans need physical contact.

We need touch. We have that sensitivity to touch and feeling, that tells us how we can expect someone to behave, Nelson said. To encode that in a machine is challenging for engineers.

Originally posted here:

Robots will help us manage Covid-19, but not in the way we think - swissinfo.ch

They Were Just Too Small: Ex-Rockets Player Ridicules Michael Jordan and Chicago Bulls Would Have Beaten Them in 1995 – Essentially Sports

Posted on by

The 1994-95 NBA season saw Houston Rockets win back-to-back titles. They had won it the year before and with a clean sweep in the finals they claimed consecutive championships. The Rockets got their hands on the trophy as soon as Michael Jordan retired in 1993. But MJ was back on the Bulls team during the Rockets second championship quest. But why couldnt he stop them?

Many people believe Michael Jordan is the greatest basketball player ever. Keeping this in mind, even the GOAT could not stop the Rockets and Hakeem Olajuwon from winning consecutive titles. The Bulls had made winning so normalized through their three-peat that the fans expected them to win everything.

However, when MJ returned in 1995, the Bulls werent in good shape. At the end of the regular season, they finished third in the central division and fifth in the eastern conference. The iconic #23 was avoided by Jordan when he returned due to certain reasons. He chose to wear #45, a decision that was quickly overturned by His Airness.

After 21 months without competing in the league, it was definitely a challenge for MJ. The team ended up going to the playoffs but it did not last long. The Orlando Magic dominated the Bulls with a 4-2 victory in the conference semi-finals. A talented team comprising Shaquille ONeal and Penny Hardaway advanced to the finals after beating the Bulls and later eliminating the Pacers in the conference finals.

Sporting landmarks like these always tend to raise up a lot of discussions. Several what if scenarios appear before our eyes and we cant help but think about them. Here, the main question is, if Michael Jordan and the Chicago Bulls made it to the 1995 NBA Finals, who would have emerged champions? The Bulls or the Rockets? Michael Jordan or Hakeem Olajuwon?

Well, a member of the 95 Rockets team expressed his views on the matter on ESPNs First Take. Kenny Smith might be popular these days due to his appearance as an analyst on Inside the NBA. But before that, Smith won the championship twice by playing for the Rockets.

Here is what the 55-year-old had to say on the matter. Though Smith offered due respect to the greatest player ever, he disagreed with the idea of the Bulls defeating the Rockets in 1995.

First of all he was wearing number 45, the year that they lost, Smith said. And he was actually in the league. People forget that. But they were just too small. No Horace Grant. He was in Orlando. Dennis Rodman was still in San Antonio. Thats why they lost to Orlando Magic, he explained.

We wouldve done the same thing. The team that they lost to 4-2, we swept, he reasoned. It wasnt Jordan wasnt the best player. That wasnt the best team. So if they didnt keep Horace Grant or they didnt get a Dennis Rodman with Michael, they wouldve been too small on the inside. I dont think they wouldve won eight straight, Smith expressed.

Do you agree with Kenny Smith or is there a different take from your side? Thoughts and opinions are most welcome!

Visit link:

They Were Just Too Small: Ex-Rockets Player Ridicules Michael Jordan and Chicago Bulls Would Have Beaten Them in 1995 - Essentially Sports

New Welcome Bonus and Market at the Casino Kingdom – Key To Casinos

Posted on by

#Promotions #Casinosis_Metamorphosis #NoDepositBonus #GambleLike_Germany

Casino Rewards group has a piece of good news for its fans and customers, as one of their operators has recently changed the welcome bonus and begun to offer services to players from Germany.

Thus,Casino Kingdomintroduced a new welcome bonus that consists of:

What is more, this operator now acceptsplayers from Germany, offering services in their national language.

ABOUT CASINO KINGDOM

Being a part of theCasino Rewardsgroup and boasting over 15 sister brand, the operator offers a decent affiliate program. It was established in 1999 and obtained a Kahnawake gambling license. The brand offers a big game lobby, as well as several popular payment methods. What is more, it is user and mobile-friendly which provides a smooth gaming experience.

For even more options, do not miss recentupdates at 7BitCasino.

See more here:

New Welcome Bonus and Market at the Casino Kingdom - Key To Casinos

NSA welcomes Welsh Government’s response to future of farming – Meat Management

Posted on by

Posted on Jul 10, 2020

The National Sheep Association (NSA) has welcomed the Welsh Governments response to the Sustainable Farming and Our Land consultation but says it has some concern about the longevity of policy changes.

This comes after an official response was published to last years consultation which received over 3,300 responses from farmers.

It proposed that future funding should support farmers who operate sustainable farming systems and protect the environment, including business support with a focus on advice, capital investment and skills development and a Sustainable Farming Payment which would reward farmers for mainly environmental outcomes.

NSA chief executive, Phil Stocker, said: While there is a lot of detail to be worked through, the principles set out in the response and the Ministers statement are welcomed and read as being supportive of farming in Wales as well as recognising the value of farmers and farming to the nation.

In terms of future support to farming in Wales, again, we welcome the principle that the Government should incentivise and support farmers to run truly sustainable farming systems, and we welcome the intention to move way beyond the income foregone approach

NSA doesnt read this as meaning that change wont come in many areas we welcome change and we agree with many of the statements made in the Governments response. We welcome the references to the importance of food production in Wales and the contribution that high-quality food production will contribute to Welsh Sustainable Brand Values. We also welcome the references to food security and the importance of export and imports so that Wales can lean towards producing what the nations climate and natural resources and culture do so well, recognising that other nations will do likewise and that consumers in Wales will want choice and dietary variation.

In terms of future support to farming in Wales, again, we welcome the principle that the Government should incentivise and support farmers to run truly sustainable farming systems, and we welcome the intention to move way beyond the income foregone approach, with a strong suggestion that sustainability is viewed in the widest of contexts multifunctional farming and land management.

NSA Cymru/Wales regional development officer, Helen Roberts commented: This announcement is most certainly welcome, however, as with most announcements, there does remain some concern. In this instance, we have specific concerns about further consultation with no specific timescales. The speech seems to hint that there will be an interim scheme from when BPS ends, and a new scheme is launched. With Senedd elections due next May, there is concern this policy wont be delivered as said.

Here is the original post:

NSA welcomes Welsh Government's response to future of farming - Meat Management

Posted in NSA

National Storage Affiliates Trust Announces Date of its Second Quarter 2020 Earnings Release and Conference Call – Business Wire

Posted on by

GREENWOOD VILLAGE, Colo.--(BUSINESS WIRE)--National Storage Affiliates Trust (NSA or the Company) (NYSE: NSA) today announced the Company will release financial results for the three months ended June 30, 2020 after market close on Thursday, August 6, 2020. NSA will host a conference call to discuss its financial results, current market conditions and future outlook at 1:00 p.m. Eastern Time on Friday, August 7, 2020. Following prepared remarks, management will accept questions from registered financial analysts. All other participants are encouraged to listen to the call via webcast using the link found on the Companys website.

Conference Call and Webcast:Date/Time: Friday, August 7, 2020 at 1:00 p.m. ETWebcast link available at: http://www.nationalstorageaffiliates.com Domestic (toll free): 877-407-9711International: 412-902-1014

Replay Information:Domestic (toll free): 877-660-6853International: 201-612-7415Conference ID: 13692161

A replay of the webcast will be available for 30 days on NSAs website at http://www.nationalstorageaffiliates.com. Any transcription, recording or retransmission of the Companys conference call and webcast in any way are strictly prohibited without the prior written consent of NSA.

Supplemental materials will be posted to the investor relations section of the companys website prior to the conference call.

About National Storage Affiliates Trust

National Storage Affiliates Trust is a Maryland real estate investment trust focused on the ownership, operation and acquisition of self storage properties located within the top 100 metropolitan statistical areas throughout the United States. As of March 31, 2020, the Company held ownership interests in and operated 780 self storage properties located in 35 states and Puerto Rico with approximately 49 million rentable square feet. NSA is one of the largest owners and operators of self storage properties among public and private companies in the United States. For more information, please visit the Companys website at http://www.nationalstorageaffiliates.com. NSA is included in the MSCI US REIT Index (RMS/RMZ), the Russell 2000 Index of Companies and the S&P SmallCap 600 Index.

Link:

National Storage Affiliates Trust Announces Date of its Second Quarter 2020 Earnings Release and Conference Call - Business Wire

Posted in NSA

NSA enthused by Government progress on Trade and Agriculture Commission | London Business News – London Loves Business

Posted on by

The National Sheep Association (NSA) are pleased to see advancement on the recently announced Trade and Agriculture Commission, set up to report to government on trade policies and agriculture.

NSA Chief Executive Phil Stocker said, Its really pleasing to see the Government have acted so quickly on this. Were very pleased to see sheep farmer Rob Hodgkins on the panel, as an NSA member and proactive farmer, we know Rob will provide a strong voice for sheep farming interests.

However, NSA is concerned about the time frame and is calling for quick advancement of work by the commission. Stocker added, This is very time sensitive with Trade Deals already being developed by the Government. The commission needs to act quickly and decisively but taking on board the interests of all sectors to produce its report. However, six months is a tight timetable, and we are concerned the necessary work might be rushed if were not careful.

While there are strong agricultural voices at the table, there are many that arent, and we encourage the commission to draw on others expertise and experience to develop the work in a timely fashion. NSA is clear this should not be a monopoly of those at the table, but something that encompasses the industry broadly. It is further important to allow a draft to be seen and commented on by producer associations, speaking on behalf of their specific sectors. There are a lot of people leaning on this commission and so it is important it is done right and encompasses industry perspective as widely as possible.

NSA is calling now for swift advancement and timeline of how the commission is going to approach its work.

Follow this link:

NSA enthused by Government progress on Trade and Agriculture Commission | London Business News - London Loves Business

Posted in NSA

The third became the first | News | rheaheraldnews.com – Rheaheraldnews

Posted on by

Throughout our history, United States citizens have debated 45 words that have become the bedrock on which our culture stands: Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.

Since the death of George Floyd, I have spent an enormous amount of time reflecting on what has occurred and continues to occur in our country. What originated in Minneapolis, Minnesota, has brought forth a level of dialogue around not only racism, but also our First Amendment right to free speech and peaceful assembly.

I did what any lifelong learner would do I researched it and refreshed my knowledge on those 45 words that are imprinted on Americans. Did you know that the First Amendment was actually supposed to be the Third Amendment? The original first and second amendment were defeated at the time. The original First Amendment dealt with how members of the House of Representatives would be assigned to the states a measure that would have resulted in more than 6,000 members of the House of Representatives! The original Second Amendment? It addressed congressional pay (it was later approved as the 27th Amendment 203 years later).

And then the third became the first. How fortuitous it was to have the first two amendments fail so that the third would become the first! The amendment for which the United States is known around the world and arguably has influenced other nations became first through fate.

While our courts have decided that some speech is protected and some not (fighting words, child pornography, true threats, etc.), it is important to remember that we should not necessarily differentiate who is entitled to free speech and assembly and who is not. Remember the document celebrated during our recent holiday: that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable rights, that among these are life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness. Those 45 words of the First Amendment encapsulate the liberty we cherish. You cannot be supporters of freedom of speech and assembly of only ideas with which you agree and only people with whom you agree.

The bottom line is this: Our First Amendment rights are fundamental to the fabric of our nation. Whether or not we agree with the speech or demonstration, we have been afforded this right by our founding fathers. Our ability to contribute to the marketplace of ideas whether or not we like or agree with those ideas and those who share them is what makes our country an incomparable place to live, work and play.

-Randy Boyd is president of the University of Tennessee.

More:

The third became the first | News | rheaheraldnews.com - Rheaheraldnews

Movie Theaters Sue New Jersey Claiming First Amendment Right to Reopen – Variety

Posted on by

A group of movie theater companies including AMC, Cinemark and Regal have filed a lawsuit against the governor of New Jersey, claiming a First Amendment right to reopen during the pandemic.

The companies, led by the National Association of Theatre Owners, is challenging Gov. Phil Murphys order that allows malls, libraries, churches and museums to reopen, but keeps movie theaters and other entertainment venues closed.

Plaintiffs bring this action to ensure that movie theatre are treated equally with other similarly situated places of public assembly, and in order to exercise their First Amendment rights to exhibit films of significant artistic, cultural, political and popular merit, the lawsuit states.

The suit takes particular issue with Murphys orders allowing churches to reopen, with indoor gatherings limited to 100 people or 25% capacity. The plaintiffs contend there is no reason that theaters should not be allowed to reopen under the same restrictions.

There is no rational basis for Defendants distinction between, for example, places of worship and movie theatres for purposes of reopening, yet Defendants have allowed places of worship to reopen while movie theatres must remain closed, with no scheduled date for reopening, the lawsuit states.

Theaters have been designated for reopening under Stage 3 of the states protocols. The state entered Stage 2 on June 15, and the state has subsequently allowed indoor malls to reopen. Gyms, fitness centers, indoor amusement parks, performing arts centers, and multiplexes remain closed.

The major cinema chains are hoping to be able to open by the end of July. New Jersey is one of a handful of states that have not already allowed theaters to reopen or set a timeline that would allow them to do so by the end of July.

The exhibitors have met with state officials to share their safety protocols, but allege that New Jersey officials have been unmoved.

A spokesman for the National Association of Theatre Owners and a spokesman for Gov. Murphy did not immediately respond to requests for comment.

Link:

Movie Theaters Sue New Jersey Claiming First Amendment Right to Reopen - Variety

The First Amendment and alternative proteins – Beef Magazine

Posted on by

Independence Day may have come and gone, but it's clear that patriotism is alive and well in this country. I dont know about you, but it was so nice to unplug for a few days and spend some time with family, friends and fellow patriots as we celebrated our God-given freedoms and liberties that we enjoy in the United States of America.

And whether you spent the holiday participating at a peaceful rally or shooting off an explosive display of colorful fireworks, the best part about our country is our First Amendment the freedom of speech.

Related: Are fake meats gaining traction this summer?

As a blogger, writer and speaker by trade, this freedom is not lost on me. We are a country of free thinkers, and I hope our ability to freely express our opinions without fear of repercussion is something that is never stripped from us.

All that said, sometimes the First Amendment can be distorted in a way that does harm to others. Im not talking about being offensive or saying something that isnt considered politically correct or in poor taste. Im talking about something that leads to less transparency and greater consumer confusion in the marketplace.

Related: 8 things about fake meats for beef producers to consider

On June 9, a letter submitted by individuals at Harvard Law School cited the First Amendment as the main reason why cell-cultured protein companies should be able to freely label their products as they see fit.

Here is an excerpt from the letter:

The Harvard Law School Animal Law & Policy Clinic writes to respectfully urge the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) to adopt a labeling approach for cell-based meat and poultry products that does not overly restrict speech and that respects the First Amendment. The Animal Law & Policy Clinic (ALPC) undertakes work in the area of animal law and policy, domestically and internationally, and focuses on high-impact opportunities to improve the treatment of animals through litigation, policy analysis, and applied academic research.

As part of this work, ALPC closely monitors technological developments within the food sector that have the potential to affect animals. Cell-based meat and poultry products (hereinafter referred to collectively as cell-based meat, also known as cultured or cultivated meat) are such innovations in food, with tremendous potential to positively impact animals, human health, and environmental sustainability.

As USDA Secretary Perdue envisions, cell-based meat could even offer a way to meet the tremendous protein needs of the growing global population. While the regulatory pathway for cell-based meats is not yet entirely defined, the USDA Food Safety and Inspection Service has recognized cell-based meat and poultry products as meat and poultry products under its governing statutes, has asserted jurisdiction over labeling for such products, and is in the process of drafting labeling regulations for cell-based meats.

It is at this juncture that ALPC writes to urge USDA-FSIS to adopt a labeling approach that does not overly restrict speech and respects the protections afforded to commercial speech under the First Amendment. As detailed extensively below, a ban on the use of common or standardized meat and poultry terms on non-misleading cell-based meat labels is likely unconstitutional, as are labeling restrictions that are more extensive than necessary.

USDA-FSIS should wait until it has a better understanding of the composition and safety of finished cell-based meat products and an opportunity to review proposed labels before establishing speech restrictions that raise constitutional questions. By delaying the establishment of restrictive labeling requirements, USDA-FSIS will be able to assess whether, or to what extent, such speech restrictions are actually necessary in order to protect consumers from being misled.

Further, USDA-FSIS should only compel process-based disclosures or qualifiers on cell-based meat labels on a case-by-case basis when doing so is necessary to protect consumers from an increased food safety risk or material compositional difference.

While the folks at Harvard build a good case, I urge USDA to ensure that these products are clearly labeled to distinguish what is grown in a petri dish compared to what is produced on the hoof.

Clearly, these products are going to make claims on environmental, animal welfare and nutritional superiority to traditional meat products, as stated in this letter. While these claims are unproven and unsubstantiated, there should also be clearly defined labeling rules in place that limits these companies from also stealing our nomenclature and posing as regular beef.

Although I could talk at great lengths on this topic, Ill leave you with this every food offered to consumers should have to follow the same rigorous testing, limitations on marketing claims and proper and clear labeling rules, no matter what. Whether its traditional butter or a new-age petri dish protein, consumers deserve clear, transparent and well-defined labels that allow them to make educated and informed decisions in the grocery store.

By the way, I recently sat down with Willie Vogt, Farm Progress executive director, to discuss alternative protein trends, summer grilling, beef nutrition and more.

The interview was featured on the Around Farm Progress podcast. Of our chat, Vogt writes, Beef, it's on the grill this summer. But there's more going on with the beef industry, from how to cook the high-quality protein properly, to climate change, to a changing competitive landscape.

To explore those topics, in this episode of the podcast Around Farm Progress, Amanda Radke, long-time blogger forBEEF magazine,offers insight on a few hot topics, from grilling resources, to climate change and she even discusses the marketing approaches taken by meat-alternative companies. Oh, and she has an up-and-coming competitor in promoting beef, her daughter Scarlett.

Listen to the entire conversation by clicking here.

The opinions of Amanda Radke are not necessarily those of beefmagazine.com or Farm Progress.

More:

The First Amendment and alternative proteins - Beef Magazine

Indie Director Blasts Government’s Argument that Filming Isn’t Protected Speech – Hollywood Reporter

Posted on by

Gordon Price's attorney argues the government's position that filming is only facilitative of speech is "akin to arguing writing or typing can be freely regulated because they merely 'facilitate' speech and press rights."

An independent filmmaker is challenging the ability of the government to charge fees for commercial shoots in national parks and he's pushing back against its defense that the act of filming isn't protected by the First Amendment.

Gordon Price in December sued U.S. Attorney General William Barr, along with heads of the National Parks Service and Department of the Interior. He had been cited by NPS for filming without a permit in public areas of the Yorktown Battlefield in Virginia's Colonial National Historical Park for his feature Crawford Road, which centers on a stretch of road in the area that is rumored to be haunted and is home to multiple unsolved murders.The filmmaker argues that charging a fee for commercial shoots in national parks is effectively an unconstitutional prior restraint on free speech.

The government in June filed a motion to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction and for judgment on the pleadings. DOJ lawyers argue that Price's "nonspecific intention to film again at some point in the future is insufficient to establish standing to sue." Even if he did have standing, the government argues that the act of filming isn't actually protected speech, that it didn't happen in a public forum and that the NPS' permit and fee structure for commercial filming is content neutral. (Read the full motion here.)

On Wednesday, Price filed his own motion for judgment on the pleadings.

"Price has standing to challenge the Permit Regime's constitutionality because not only was it enforced against him, it is preventing him from engaging in specific filming at DOI-managed lands," writes attorney Robert Corn-Revere in the motion, which is posted in full below. Price had scouted locations at Yorktown and Manassas National Battlefields for a project that included a re-creation of the Saltville Massacre of Oct. 3, 1864, according to the complaint, but hasn't filmed there because of the citation he received for Crawford Road.

"The government has already enforced the Permit Regime against Price, requiring him to appear in federal court, retain counsel, and seek dismissal of the charges," writes Corn-Revere. "The government ultimately acquiesced, not on grounds the citation was improper or erroneous, but because it wanted to avoid Price's constitutional challenge. Notably, in dismissing, the criminal court expressly stated Price's remedy lies in a civil suit like this."

Corn-Revere argues that the government is trying to avoid the First Amendment by ignoring precedent that establishes there's no clear line between "the act of creating speech and the speech itself." He says the idea that filming is only facilitative of speech is "akin to arguing writing or typing can be freely regulated because they merely 'facilitate' speech and press rights."

He further argues that federal lands, specifically national parks, are traditional public forums but, even if they weren't, the permit structure is unconstitutional because it's inconsistent and unreasonable.

"Under the Permit Regime, commercial and noncommercial productions, engaged in the same activity, having the same impact, are treated differently absent any justification other than that Congress views noncommercial entities as not having 'profits' worth siphoning," writes Corn-Revere. "The First Amendment does not allow the government to raise revenue by taxing the exercise of constitutional rights, or charging fees in excess of costs of administering a legitimate regulation that governs speech."

Also on Wednesday, 10 media organizations including Getty Images, the National Press Photographers Association and the Society of Professional Journalists filed an amicus briefin support of Price.

"Amici are unaware of any court that has adopted the Governments position that the act of filming is not protected speech, or that filming is merely 'facilitative' of speech. And the government fails to cite to one," states the brief. "The Supreme Court has repeatedly held that the creation of speech is explicitly protected by the First Amendment. These protections encompass a range of conduct related to the gathering of information including photography."

The organizations also argue that NPS allowed members of the media and the general public to create videos from the exact location where Price filmed his project.

"The government opened the park up for those 'approved' individuals to engage in expressive activity without restriction but charged Mr. Price with a crime for doing the same," they argue. "Amici do not dispute that the National Park Service can charge admission fees for members of the public, including photographers and filmmakers, who seek to enter NPS parks and engage in expressive conduct. However, the government cannot require permits and impose hefty financial barriers targeted at those who plan to take photographs or engage in other expressive activities, based solely on the content of the film or the identity of the speaker."

More here:

Indie Director Blasts Government's Argument that Filming Isn't Protected Speech - Hollywood Reporter

The Civics Project: Constitutional wall between church and state forever being tested | Opinion – Florida Today

Posted on by

Kevin Wagner, The Civics Project Published 11:59 a.m. ET July 10, 2020

Question: The recent U.S. Supreme Court decision on state funding for religious schools confuses me. What does the Constitution actually say about religion?

Answer: The U.S. Constitution does not say much directly. Article 6: Clause 3 states that No religious test shall ever be required as a qualification to any office or public trust under the United States.

Religion is mentioned again in the First Amendment, where we find many of the rights that we defend and debate today. The First Amendment restricts government from infringing on speech, the press, petitioning government for redress, and peaceable assembly. Those freedoms and the limitations on them are the subject of a great deal of debate and case law.

The First Amendment also speaks to two distinct issues regarding religion. First, it protects the free exercise of religion, and second it prohibits the government from establishing a religion. The second provision, often referred to as the Establishment Clause, is the basis for the concept of the separation of church and state. Courts have historically used this clause to prohibit government from favoring a particular religion, or any religion.

Kevin Wagner(Photo: Palm Beach Post)

The idea of keeping the government apart from religion has its roots in the founding. It was popularized in a letter from Thomas Jefferson to the Baptist Association of Danbury, Conn., in 1802. Jefferson wrote in part that prohibiting the state from establishing a religion would result in [b]uilding a wall of separation between Church & State.

The U.S. Supreme Court has endorsed Jeffersons wall approach to the interpretation of the Establishment Clause. In Everson v. Board of Education (1947), Justice Hugo L. Black wrote that the First Amendment was intended to erect a wall of separation between Church and State. The nations high court also recommended that the wall should be kept high and impregnable, while cautioning against even the slightest breach.

In the abstract, that can seem pretty easy, but it is not. Religious people and institutions regularly interact with government and society. What breaches the wall and what does not can be confusing. In Lemon v. Kurtzman (1971), the Supreme Court created a test to help, which requires a valid law to have a secular (non-religious) purpose, neither advance or inhibit religion, and avoid excessive government entanglement with religion. What constitutes excessive entanglement has proven hard to define, and courts have been somewhat inconsistent in their interpretations.

While the Lemon Test has proven surprisingly durable, it has been subject to significant criticism. Many current jurists, including a number of U.S. Supreme Court justices, do not favor the test or the separation doctrine. Opponents argue that Jeffersons letter is being given too much weight and significance. Opponents have also argued that the wall metaphor is an overly broad interpretation of the Establishment Clause.

The current Supreme Court has favored a more expansive reading of the Free Exercise Clause, often at the expense of the Establishment Clause. This has resulted in rulings requiring religious exemptions for generally applicable laws and regulations in areas such as healthcare and education. Concerns about the Establishment Clause have been pushed to a more subordinate position.

Kevin Wagner is a noted constitutional scholar, and political science professor at Florida Atlantic University. The answers provided do not represent the views of the university.

The professor wants to hear from you. Keep in mind that no question is too basic; but it can be too partisan. So if you have a question about how American government and politics works, send us an email at rchristie@pbpost.com.

Read or Share this story: https://www.floridatoday.com/story/opinion/2020/07/10/wall-between-church-and-state-forever-being-tested-opinion/5413787002/

Read the rest here:

The Civics Project: Constitutional wall between church and state forever being tested | Opinion - Florida Today

A Fractured Supreme Court Strikes Down and Severs the TCPAs Government Debt Exemption, Leaving the Rest of the Statute Intact – JD Supra

Posted on by

This week, a divided Supreme Court issued a plurality opinion in Barr v. American Association of PoliticalConsultants, Inc. (Political Consultants) striking down and severing a 2015 amendment to the TCPA, which exempts government debt collection calls (government debt exemption) from the statutes general prohibition on calls to cell phones (cell phone ban). The effect of this ruling was to affirm the Fourth Circuits decision and leave the cell phone ban intact.

A majority of justices agreed that the government debt exemption violated the First Amendment but disagreed as to everything else: whether strict or intermediate scrutiny governed the First Amendment analysis, whether the government debt exemption failed that analysis and whether the severability and equal protection principles applied by the plurality constitute an appropriate remedy. In focusing on their disagreements, the Justices largely ignored the issue of political speech and the generous First Amendment protection usually afforded it.

The plurality opinion was drafted by Justice Kavanaugh, joined in full by Justices Robert and Alito and in part by Justice Thomas. Kavanaugh began by offering this choice observation: Americans passionately disagree about many things. But they are largely united in their disdain for robocalls. (Kavanaugh Slip Op. at 1). The pluralitys perception of public opinion appears to have been the main driver of its decision and the analysis used to reach its destination (upholding the TCPA) was relatively straightforward.

First, Kavanaugh found that the government debt exemption was a content-based restriction on speech subject to strict scrutiny and that the government conceded that the exemption could not survive strict scrutiny. In doing so, Kavanaugh rejected the AAPCs argument that Congresss act of passing the government debt exemption in 2015, which permits what many consumers view as the most annoying and intrusive type of calls (debt collection), revealed that Congress did not have (or at least no longer had) a genuine concern for consumer privacy. Instead, the AAPC contended, Congress was only concerned with collecting debt owed to the federal government. But, wrote Kavanaugh, As is not infrequently the case with either/or questions, the answer to this either/or question is both. Congress is interested both in collecting government debt and protecting consumer privacy. (Kavanaugh Slip Op. at 11). Second, Kavanaugh determined that severance was appropriate under both general severability and equal treatment principles, which allow unconstitutional laws to be cured by either extending the benefits or burdens to the exempted class, sometimes referred to as leveling up or down. (Kavanaugh Slip Op. at 17-20).

Justices Sotomayor, Breyer, Ginsburg and Kagan concurred in the judgment of the plurality with respect to severability, but wrote separately to emphasize their belief that strict scrutiny did not apply. Sotomayor found that the government debt exemption failed strict scrutiny, while Beyer, Ginsburg, and Kagan found it did not and expressed concern that the plurality was using the First Amendment in a way that could threaten the workings of ordinary regulatory programs posing little threat to the free marketplace of ideas enacted as a result of that public discourse. (Breyer Slip. Op. at 4).

Justice Gorsuch agreed with the pluralitys finding that the government debt exemption was subject to strict scrutiny and violated the First Amendment but disagreed as to why. Of all of the Justices, Gorsuch was most sympathetic to the AAPCs argument that the governments consumer privacy rationale was suspect: [If] the government thinks consumer privacy interests are insufficient to overcome its interest in collecting debts, its hard to see how the government might invoke consumer privacy interests to justify banning political speech. (Gorsuch Slip Op. at 3). Gorsuch and Thomas were also most concerned with protecting speech and affording the AAPC a real remedy. Instead of severing the government debt exemption, which has the perverse effect of expanding the TCPAs restrictions on speech, Gorsuch and Thomas would have leveled up expanded the benefits afforded government debt collection speech to political speech by awarding the AAPC a novel remedy: an injunction prohibiting the TCPAs application to political speech. (Id. at 5).

Takeaways and stray observations:

Follow this link:

A Fractured Supreme Court Strikes Down and Severs the TCPAs Government Debt Exemption, Leaving the Rest of the Statute Intact - JD Supra

WATCH: Young Americans willing to give up First Amendment rights to avoid offending others – Campus Reform

Posted on by

As the cancel culture trend continues to hit college campuses, Campus Reform has reported on a number of cases where colleges and universities have sanctioned professors, and in one case even expelled a student, for posts he made on social media.

Campus Reform Digital Reporter Eduardo Neret recently asked students and young Americans about their thoughts on schools monitoring the social media of students and faculty. He also asked whether they would be willing to sacrifice some of their free speech rights to make sure others on campus feel comfortable.

[RELATED: Free speech zones galore: 5 Times students First Amendment rights were violated on campus in 2019]

I definitely think they should be monitoring the hate speech because that shouldn't be allowed."

WATCH:

Most students and young Americans said they were fine with colleges and universities monitoring social media accounts. Some even said they would willingly turn their accounts over for inspection.

I definitely think they should be monitoring the hate speech because that shouldnt be allowed, one individual said.

She also added she would encourage a school to inspect her social media accounts if it has to do with helping the school in...creating a sense of more safety and security and erasing the hate speech.

[RELATED: Free speech org vows to 'monitor' colleges with classes online]

If thats something I can be helpful for, Id be happy to.

I have nothing to hide, another student said.

Many were quick to say they would trade their free speech rights for the comfort of others on campus.

I would do that, cause I mean if Im just giving up a little of what I care about just to make others feel better, Id do that, another person said. Id make that exchange.

Follow the author of this article on Facebook: @eduneret and Twitter:@eduneret

Read more from the original source:

WATCH: Young Americans willing to give up First Amendment rights to avoid offending others - Campus Reform

Impact of COVID-19 on Nano Healthcare Technology for Medical Set for Rapid Industry Expansion, To Touch value of double digit CAGR By 2027 with Top…

Posted on by

Nano medical technology has gained immense popularity over the last few years. As the investment for advanced and effective medical equipment development increases, the growth of global nanotechnology for the medical device market will accelerate in the next few years. Nanotechnology in the medical field is one of the reforms that can improve the efficacy of various medical platforms and provide significant opportunities to change the healthcare sector in relation to the diagnosis, treatment and prevention of various diseases.

The Nano Healthcare Technology for Medical Equipment Market has been the biggest increase since 2016, because of their participation in ecommerce platforms and traditional retail stores and their geographical footprints with extended service areas. It is a modern approach to Nano Healthcare Technology for Medical Equipment Market that focuses on designing a cohesive user experience for customers at every touch point. The market providers need to deploy software services through the cloud because they enable efficient connectivity across all channels.

Request Sample Copy of this [emailprotected]:

https://www.researchnreports.com/request_sample.php?id=264996

Smith & Nephew Plc., Stryker Corporation, GE Global Research, Abbott Laboratories, AstraZeneca Plc., Ferro Corp, 3M Company, Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc., Merck KGaA, and PerkinElmer, Inc.

A Detailed quantitative analysis of drivers, incarceration and market opportunities is provided in the overview section. This section also includes key and competitive metrics along with a business overview for planning the competitive landscape of the market. This section provides a thorough analysis of the overall competitive scenario in the Global Nano Healthcare Technology for Medical Equipment Market by providing a market appeal analysis based on regional and market share analysis of core workforce.

The report gives intensive data concerning the performance of the worldwide market in each key territorial fragment. The North America, Europe, Latin America, Asia-Pacific and the Middle East and Africa are the key regional markets contemplated in the report. The sales of products in every district in the first half of the reports investigation time frame are given in detail in the report, alongside the total valuation of the same.

Get Reasonable Discount on this Premium Report @:

https://www.researchnreports.com/ask_for_discount.php?id=264996

This statistical survey report presents a comprehensive assessment of the global market for Nano Healthcare Technology for Medical Equipment, discussing several market segments such as capacity, product prices, demand and supply dynamics, sales volume, sales and growth rates.

Following are the List of Chapter Covers in the Nano Healthcare Technology for Medical Equipment Market:

For More Information:

https://www.researchnreports.com/enquiry_before_buying.php?id=264996

About Us:

Research N Reports is a new age market research firm where we focus on providing information that can be effectively applied. Today being a consumer driven market, companies require information to deal with the complex and dynamic world of choices. Where relying on a sound board firm for your decisions becomes crucial. Research N Reports specializes in industry analysis, market forecasts and as a result getting quality reports covering all verticals, whether be it gaining perspective on current market conditions or being ahead in the cut throat Global competition. Since we excel at business research to help businesses grow, we also offer consulting as an extended arm to our services which only helps us gain more insight into current trends and problems. Consequently we keep evolving as an all-rounder provider of viable information under one roof.

Contact Us:

Sunny Denis

Research N Reports

10916, Gold Point Dr,

Houston, TX, Pin 77064, USA

+1-510-420-1213

[emailprotected]

http://www.researchnreports.com

Continued here:

Impact of COVID-19 on Nano Healthcare Technology for Medical Set for Rapid Industry Expansion, To Touch value of double digit CAGR By 2027 with Top...