Thinking about fellowship? Ask yourself these 5 questions – American Medical Association

More residents are pursuing fellowship each year, according to data from the National Resident Matching Program. The decision to opt for additional trainingin lieu of going straight into practiceis a personal one. It is also one that residents must make early on in their training as they plot their career course.

A recent resident who opted to skip fellowship and become an attending physician offers his insight on the answers to five questions that informed his decision and could be helpful to other medical and surgical residents.

After three years as an emergency medicine resident at McGovern Medical School at the University of Texas Health Science Center in Houston, July 1 marked the first day in the emergency department as an attending physician for Jason Lesnick, MD. He opted to go directly to practiceaccepting a position in the emergency medicine department at nearby Memorial Hermann Northeast Hospitalinstead of pursuing a fellowship position.

The decision to pursue a fellowship is all about what you plan to do eventually, Dr. Lesnick said. For emergency medicine, you dont need to a fellowship. A lot of my friends who do orthopedic surgery, almost all of them subspecialized, whether they want to do hip or ankle or upper extremity [surgery], there are multiple chances for them to get additional training beyond residency and thats sort of the standard for their specialty.

Learn the top five factors fellowship program directors look for in applicants.

Training longer will mean you have less time to maximize your income. When pondering fellowship, you should consider your potential income losses by extending training and the potential gains your additional training could yield. Dr. Lesnick noted that physicians are significantly behind the curve when it comes to savings relative to their peers who are typically working and saving some of their take-home pay during the time that doctors spend accruing more debt in medical school.

Dr. Lesnick has interest in potentially working in C-suite positions down the road, which could be something a physician trains for with a one- or two-year administrative fellowship. Still, he felt much of that experience could be gained outside of a fellowship, and by going into practice his salary is a multiple of what it would have been during fellowship.

If you do a two-year [administrative] fellowship, theyll pay for your MBA as well, he said. The problem is the cost of an MBA plus the salary you would make as a fellow is still significantly less than what you can make as a community physician. My plan is to get my MBA on my own and that still keeps every option open for me while keeping me from losing a large sum of money potentially available to me.

Learn how much youll spend looking for a fellowship.

In choosing to eschew fellowship, Dr. Lesnick considered geography. He wanted to stay in the Houston area and begin building a life with his fiance. As a recent chief resident at one of the larger emergency medicine programs in the city, he was confident he could secure an attending position in the area.

The experience [of pursuing fellowship] is obviously an incredibly valuable opportunity, Dr. Lesnick said. The learning that could come from it, the mentorship and connections are very valuable. But, by having done residency in a big city and having worked with people in a large program already, I was looking at it in the sense that I already had those connections. So that aspect was less of a factor for me.

I was really not interested in moving from Houston right now. Im very happy here with my fiance. We didnt see much of a point in moving for one maybe two years and having to move again after that, eventually.

Learn how the choice to subspecialize differs by gender.

Deferring income to pursue fellowship means that you are also likely to wait on paying down your loans in any significant fashion. Dr. Lesnick saw that as a con of going for a fellowship position.

By continuing to live like a resident while collecting an attendings salary he believes he can pay down his loans entirely in around two years.

Loans feel like hundreds of thousands of little weights you carry around with you, Dr. Lesnick said. Theres pressure I feel to want to get that done with as soon as possible and by going straight into practice without a fellowship I will be able to do it much faster.

Learn the three items you should have on your loan-repayment checklist during residency.

Seek out physicians and mentors whose opinions you value and get their input on what additional value a fellowship could offer.

The most important thing is to talk to multiple people who have been there and done what you want to do and ask them do you think its worth it for you to do, Dr. Lesnick said. For those who have already done it you can ask would you go back and do it again?

Ultimately, Dr. Lesnick said, you shouldnt skip a fellowship if its what you have your heart set on.

You have to take a good long hard look in the mirror and ask yourself what are your future goals? Dr. Lesnick said. If a fellowship is necessary to reach those goals, you wont be happy unless you do it. If you are pursuing a career that doesnt require a fellowship, I would posit that it might not be worth your time.

With summer application deadlines for several subspecialties looming, make use ofFREIDAa recently revamped comprehensive AMA tool that captures data on more than 12,000 residency and fellowship programs accredited by the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education.

Continue reading here:

Thinking about fellowship? Ask yourself these 5 questions - American Medical Association

KCS says they’re well prepared for Gov. Cooper’s announcement on school re-openings, now they just need official guidance – Independent Tribune

Were aiming for the week of July 27 to have all that available. The week prior would be essential communication that needs to go out, for example, if were under Plan B, there is some communication wed like to push out a little bit earlier in regards to how the students will be grouped because that is high-priority info for parents to know, and then follow up that next week, the week of the 27th, with more detailed plans for each area.

KCS is operating as is much of the state on three plans for the potential re-opening of schools. Plan A is 100 percent attendance on campus. Plan B is 50 percent and Plan C is completely online learning.

Gov. Cooper is expected to make an announcement this week on what the official plan will be. Schools can place more harsh restrictions than Cooper allows, but they cannot lighten them.

KCS Superintendent Chip Buckwell said he has heard Coopers announcement could come as soon as Tuesday, but it could also come Wednesday or Thursday.

The general consensus is the announcement will be Wednesday, and if that is the case, or if it happens Tuesday, KCS is planning a meeting Thursday morning with Cabarrus Health Alliance to consult on the plan and then there will be another Board of Education Meeting on Monday at 2 p.m. for the Board to approve or disapprove of the plan officially moving forward.

Here is the original post:

KCS says they're well prepared for Gov. Cooper's announcement on school re-openings, now they just need official guidance - Independent Tribune

And then it happened – UMN News

Three years ago, Michael Osterholm laid out in a book the scenario of a global influenza pandemic originating in China that portended the current COVID-19 situation with eerie accuracy. Though Osterholm did not know when such a pandemic would occur, he was certain it would.

When [a pandemic] happens, Osterholm wrote, it will spread before we realize what is happening. ... And unless we are prepared, it would be like trying to contain the wind. Infectious disease is the deadliest enemy faced by all of humankind.

Now that COVID-19 has emerged as that enemy, Osterholm has been in constant demand. Regional, national, and international mediaincluding CNN, MSNBC, CBS, and even irreverent comedian and podcast host Joe Roganhave sought him out repeatedly. The Washington Post and New York Times have published his op-eds. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, and the World Health Organization all seek his counsel.

Osterholm has deep knowledge of infectious diseases, a long track record of being ahead of the curve in understanding their impact, and a decided knack for distilling complex situations into comprehensible terms. Along the way, he has raised visibility for the University of Minnesota and the School of Public Health (SPH) as a source of credible, reliable information at the heart of a global pandemic.

A teacher and a mentor

After completing his bachelors degree at Luther College, Osterholm did his graduate work at the University. He began working at the Minnesota Department of Health (MDH) as a graduate student in 1975 and rose to the level of state epidemiologist in 1984, a position he held for 15 years.

He founded the U of Ms Center for Infectious Disease Research and Policy (CIDRAP) in 2001. He wanted to ground policy in solid science, with the mission to prevent illness and death from targeted infectious disease threats through research and the translation of scientific information into real-world, practical applications, policies, and solutions.

I wish I had 10 Michaels to raise the profile of the importance of prevention around the planet.

Throughout his long tenure, Osterholm has taught. Hes a Distinguished Teaching Professor in the Division of Environmental Health Sciences in the School of Public Health and an adjunct professor in the medical school. The single most important thing I do is teaching, which Ive been doing for 44 years, he says.

Mikes been able to train many people in a variety of roles to work in different capacities, says Kristen Ehresmann, director of the Infectious Disease Epidemiology, Prevention and Control Division at MDH.

Back in 1979, as an SPH graduate student, Ehresmann became a research assistant under Osterholm at the MDH. Three decades later, shes leading what she calls the guts of the response to COVID-19. Shes quoted nearly daily in the media, offering both cautions and explanations.

In addition to Osterholm and Ehresmann, media have sought out at least a dozen more SPH alumni and faculty to interpret and analyze various aspects of the coronavirus pandemic. A group of faculty and students have also worked with the MDH on models employing the most recent data to map and predict the spread of the pandemic to help hospitals prepare for potential spikes.

SPH dean John Finnegan says its not surprising that health authorities and the public are looking to the University for this expertise or that U of M alumni are fortifying the ranks of those responding to the pandemic.

Finnegan has been especially proud of Osterholms role lately. He says, I wish I had 10 Michaels to raise the profile of the importance of prevention around the planet.

Explore the CIDRAP COVID-19 podcasts.

Read the original:

And then it happened - UMN News

Medical experts weigh in on whether or not to send kids back to school in the fall – FOX 4 Dallas

Medical experts weigh in on whether or not to send kids back to school in the fall

While many politicians have been weighing in, FOX 4 Asked the medical experts for their opinion.

DALLAS - Now that Texas is leaving it up to parents to decide whether to return to school or continue with a virtual education, many parents are struggling to decide which decision is best for their child.

While many politicians have been weighing in, FOX 4 Asked the medical experts for their opinion.

The doctors agree that unlike other respiratory illnesses, it is rare for children to become seriously ill from COVID-19. However, that is not necessarily the case for their teachers or their grandparents they may see outside of school.

Dr. Albert Karam, a Dallas pediatrician, says with only six months of data on COVID-19, there is no right, wrong or easy answer. He recommends parents weigh the risk versus benefit for their families.

Medication risks versus benefit. Most of the time, the benefit outweighs the risk, he said. In this case with school, we know kids need not only cognitive learning, behaviorally, socially, these kids physically, emotionally need each other the way our country has run for 100 years now.

Dr. Mark Casanova, president of the Dallas County Medical Society, says other countries have been able to successfully reopen schools. But that is likely due to widespread compliance with mask-wearing and physical distancing in their societies as a whole.

Their mask-wearing and physical distancing have been different than here in U.S. Can it be done? Yes. We are seeing evidence of that, Dr. Casanova said. But it needs to be done as part of a package deal.

Dr. Julie Linderman, a pediatrician at Inwood Village Pediatrics in Dallas, says the CDC data on death rates paints an interesting picture. At the height of the death rate, the line for 0 to 24-year-olds stayed flat, while it increased with each older age bracket.

Kids are by far the least affected population, which is really counter-intuitive because typically with respiratory illness kids in the past have been the most affected group, she said.

Dr. Linderman says when schools reopen, teachers should still social distance from other teachers. Families should be cautious if their households include grandparents or those at high risk. She believes reopening schools to in-person attendance is important for children's overall wellbeing.

There are a lot of parents who can do some virtual school. Maybe one parent stays home or has a flex schedule, she said. But there is a huge percentage of the population that does not have that ability. The kids really suffer.

Dr. Linderman recommends that once children return to school, it would be wise for them to physically distance themselves from their grandparents while wearing masks.

Read more:

Medical experts weigh in on whether or not to send kids back to school in the fall - FOX 4 Dallas

Podcast: Wildlife surveillance may help identify the next pandemic – Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis

Visit the News Hub

This episode of 'Show Me the Science' focuses on monitoring and identifying pathogens that might jump from animals into humans

Scientists prepare to take a skin biopsy from the wing of a bat as part of a health check in Peru. Wildlife biologists, infectious disease experts and others, including scientists at Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis, are proposing a decentralized, global wildlife biosurveillance system to identify before the next pandemic emerges animal viruses that have the potential to cause human disease.

A new episode of our podcast, Show Me the Science, has been posted. At present, these episodes are highlighting research and patient care on the Washington University Medical Campus as our scientists and clinicians confront the COVID-19 pandemic.

The virus that causes COVID-19 is thought to have originated in wild bats that live in caves around Wuhan, China. Many devastating epidemics in recent years including SARS, Ebola and HIV/AIDS were caused by animal viruses that spilled over into people. Before another pandemic begins, a diverse group of infectious disease experts, ecologists, wildlife biologists and other experts say that a new, decentralized, global system of wildlife surveillance must be established to identify animal viruses in wild animals that have the potential to infect and sicken people.

In this episode, Jennifer A. Philips, MD, PhD, an associate professor of medicine and co-director of the Division of Infectious Diseases at Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis, and Gideon Erkenswick, PhD, a postdoctoral research associate in Philips lab and director of Field Projects International, discuss why we need an early-detection system for viruses that have the potential to trigger the next pandemic and how it would work.

The podcast Show Me the Science is produced by the Office of Medical Public Affairs at Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis.

Experts propose decentralized system to monitor wildlife markets, other hot spots

Full Transcript

[music plays]

Jim Dryden (host): Hello, and welcome to Show Me the Science, a podcast about the research, teaching and patient care as well as the students, staff and faculty at Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis, Missouri, the Show Me state. My name is Jim Dryden, and Im your host this week. Weve been focusing these podcasts on the COVID-19 pandemic and Washington Universitys response. This week, were discussing where COVID-19 might have come from and how to detect the next virus with pandemic potential before it spreads. Its thought that the virus that causes COVID-19 may have originated in wild bats that live in caves around Wuhan, China. Like many devastating epidemics in recent decades from Ebola to HIV/AIDS, its thought this pandemic was triggered by an animal virus that spilled over into the human population. Now, a diverse group of infectious diseases experts, wildlife biologists, ecologists and others, including researchers at Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis, is proposing that a global system of wildlife surveillance could and should be established to identify viruses from animals that have the potential to infect people.

Jennifer Philips, MD, PhD: Its hard to say how often it happens, but its happened enough in our history, and when the wrong pathogen enters the human population where we dont have adequate immunity, then the cost to human life can be enormous. And as weve seen the social disruption that is caused can also be really tremendous.

Dryden: Thats Washington University infectious diseases specialist Jennifer Philips, one of the authors of a new article on biosurveillance published in the journal Science. Shes part of the international team proposing that we pay closer attention to emerging infectious diseases by monitoring wild animals around the world. It would have been very difficult to do this sort of work even 10 years ago, but Gideon Erkenswick, a postdoctoral researcher in Philips laboratory, who also is a director of Field Projects International, a research organization focused on studying wildlife, says it is possible now to do complicated surveillance even in very remote places.

Gideon Erkenswick, PhD: There is and have been few groups that have been doing this work. Theres been a lot of hand-waving from individuals that have recognized for a long time how important biosurveillance is, but theres not been a lot of commitment to it internationally. For example, we still dont have any standardized international regulation on the movement of wildlife that reflects disease risks.

Dryden: Currently, there are scientists studying animals stationed in many places around the world. Erkenswick says with the technology now available, it would be possible to put resources together to learn more about potentially emerging viruses before they can cross from some of those animals into humans. He says a decentralized, global wildlife biosurveillance system would have the potential to identify viruses that could cause human disease before the next pandemic emerges.

Erkenswick: You would have diverse groups of people who are trained and cognizant of the risks we are now all very aware of, especially with SARS-CoV-2. You would be collecting samples from bats. You would visit caves, you would go into natural habitat, collect samples in wildlife markets. You probably would collect samples from rural communities where theres a lot of overlap between wildlife habitats, and then you would bring them to a nearby location where, again, using safe technique you extract RNA and DNA and directly on-site sequence for conserved regions within viral genomes. You can prescreen things fairly rapidly for the presence of an infectious agent.

Dryden: So without getting too terribly technical, what kind of tools would those be?

Erkenswick: So the kind of things were talking about in terms of new technology are portable sequencers. Theres a new sequencer thats literally the size of a USB stick and can fit in your pocket, and you can carry that to a rainforest, and then you sequence it right on the spot. If you do encounter something like SARS-CoV-2, if you chance upon it, do you really want to be collecting it, storing it, bringing it all over the place before you figure out if theres something potentially worrisome in it? The ideal situation is, on the spot, you can safely assess whether there is something there.

Dryden: And its not as simple as looking for sick animals in this cave or in the wet market because the viruses that would affect us like SARS-CoV-2 may or may not make the animals sick, correct?

Philips: Right. Thats absolutely true. So especially bats are able to tolerate a lot of viruses without necessarily being sick. And so just sampling sick animals is not really an adequate way to do biosurveillance. There have been a small number of government-funded biosurveillance efforts. And these programs are really sort of groundbreaking in beginning to do this kind of work, and they have done amazing work, but theyre very focused and localized so the sampling is quite intermittent in just certain locations. And theres just few regional labs that do the analysis. And so there hasnt thats, I guess, the start of whats needed, but it hasnt really provided the kind of global sampling that is probably needed. Or touched upon the variety of environments in wildlife markets and in the wildlife trade, where humans and wildlife do come into contact with one another. And I think the other point thats worth making is that these biosurveillance systems that we do have right now, because theres sort of no global consensus, no global effort, theyre subject to political whims of a few countries.

Dryden: Now, how common is it that animal viruses can cross over into humans? Its not uncommon, correct?

Philips: When it happens, we only know about it if there is really transmission between humans or ongoing transmission, or if we happen to identify an individual whos sick and comes to medical attention and actually gets a rare diagnosis. So we dont know how many times it necessarily happens, but we know its happened many times in our lifetime. So even in the last 20 years, this has happened at least three times in the case of coronaviruses, starting with the SARS epidemic and then MERS and now, of course, SARS-CoV-2, the virus that is causing the COVID-19 pandemic. And its not restricted to coronaviruses either, so other viruses in our lifetime have transmitted infection and those include HIV and Ebola among others. Its hard to say how often it happens, but its happened enough in our history. And when the wrong pathogen enters the human population where we dont have adequate immunity, then the cost to human life can be enormous. And as weve seen, the social disruption that is caused can also be really tremendous.

Dryden: So where does the idea for a decentralized, global surveillance system come from?

Erkenswick: There is and have been few groups that have been doing this work. And theres been a lot of hand-waving from individuals that have recognized for a long time how important biosurveillance is, but theres not been a lot of commitment to it internationally. For example, we still dont have any standardized international regulation on the movement of wildlife that reflects disease risks.

Philips: Well, I think this came together because we really brought together a group of individuals who have really diverse expertise and interests, people with human, animal and environmental expertise, with the understanding that all of these things are really inextricably linked together. We thought that bringing this group of people together was important to try to come up with ideas of how we could prevent this kind of thing from happening again in the future. And, as a group, we brainstormed what could be critical next steps to create more effective biosurveillance infrastructure, I would say. Thats something that would have to be practical, affordable. It has to be safe for people who are doing the biosurveillance or the sampling. It has to be feasible. But one thing thats really happened in the last five years is that theres more affordable and portable technology that could really be implemented more widely around the world and could take advantage of the local expertise at, really, sites of wildlife-human interface.

Erkenswick: Thats why we did it. We felt there was a need for this diverse group of peoples voices to be heard in a collective way. You want to go to places where theres no theres very little overlap between human communities and wildlife populations. So you know whats natural because it is totally normal for a species to have their own viruses and bacterial infections, and they cope with them, and they survive just fine, and theyre not necessarily infectious to us. So you want to know whats in the natural system, then you want to know whats different when these animals, wildlife and humans are in contact.

Dryden: Now a system like this would do surveillance of wild animals like bats, certainly, but what about domestic animals, even pets?

Erkenswick: Domestic animals and pets are very much part of that human-wildlife interface. If you live in the rainforest in Southeast Asia and you have a dog or a cat, and its roaming around and goes into the forests and attacks a primate or a bat, so yeah, absolutely. And you want to know if that exchange is being mediated by domestic animals, absolutely.

Dryden: What sorts of global biosurveillance systems do we have in place now, if any?

Erkenswick: In the lead up to this article, some of the things we did was contact a lot of colleagues we know throughout the world that do wildlife research in Madagascar, in Indonesia, in Peru, in Ecuador and we just literally surveyed friends and associates, Where do you take animals when theyre sick? And in almost every situation, it was, Nowhere. We dispose of things. We collect things. We store them, but really theres nobody offering to do this work, and its expensive. Here in the U.S., we have just vaulted forward on our capacity to do pathogen screening. I mean, in high school, you have kids running PCR machines and extracting DNA and in some cases sequencing DNA. In places where zoonotic risks are greatest, you just have light microscopes. Its not that the capacity to do genetic or genomic-based pathogen detection couldnt be there. There are smart people with a lot of experience that just dont have the tools. And the idea behind this paper is that it can be done affordably. We can utilize all of those people on the ground to do much better biosurveillance.

Dryden: If they have the equipment in place, is it easy to know that this is something that can cross over from one species to another, or do you know that it can make people sick when people start getting sick?

Philips: Theres not one answer to that question. Part of risk assessment builds upon all the knowledge that our virologists have built up over the years. So for some microbes or some viruses that we know are related to viruses that infect humans like coronaviruses, then we start to learn something about that. And we can make some predictions. We know whether a population of viruses now that are circulating in bats have the sequence that would allow them to attach to the receptors that would enable them to infect human cells. Or we may know something about whether theyre dissimilar enough from circulating viruses that humans might lack immunity to those viruses. So sometimes it builds upon the knowledge that we have. And then sometimes we can take new viruses and see whether they do infect human cells in the lab, or even just whether if we replace the sequence of a virus that we work within the lab with a sequence thats circulating in the wild, how would that impact its ability to infect human cells or to infect an animal model. And then I think theres a lot of unknown about just what is circulating and what is the potential. And so part of it is starting to gain more information about that interface.

Dryden: So this is a way to identify viruses, but can knowing about these viruses keep us safer, maybe even prevent this type of outbreak next time?

Philips: Yeah. I think especially and this is very much what happens with influenza. I think thats the case where its most developed. And one can certainly see with coronaviruses that having this information allows you to stay ahead in terms of therapeutics and interventions. So hopefully, we will have effective therapeutics. Well have monoclonal antibodies, maybe, and vaccines that work for SARS-CoV-2. And we would like to have more broadly neutralizing antibodies or broadly effective therapeutics. And we can ensure that we stay ahead of whats in the wildlife population, right, that interface. Weve had three epidemics in 20 years. Its not that rare an event. So we should be trying to make sure that we can stay ahead in terms of our therapies and our interventions.

[music plays]

Dryden: Erkenswick, Philips and their colleagues around the world have proposed better biosurveillance, but governments and funders still need to cooperate to make the idea a reality. But considering the thousands who have died and been hospitalized and the millions of jobs lost due to the pandemic, perhaps setting up such programs to screen for viruses would be a money saver in the long run. They say that as humans and animals continue to interact in new ways and in new locations, its virtually certain other animal pathogens also will cross over to humans in the future. But without a decentralized, global system of biosurveillance, it wont be possible to predict how and when that will happen.

Show Me the Science is a production of the Office of Medical Public Affairs at Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis. The goal of this project is to keep you informed and maybe teach you some things that will give you hope. Thanks for tuning in. Im Jim Dryden. Stay safe.

Washington University School of Medicines 1,500 faculty physicians also are the medical staff of Barnes-Jewish and St. Louis Childrens hospitals. The School of Medicine is a leader in medical research, teaching and patient care, ranking among the top 10 medical schools in the nation by U.S. News & World Report. Through its affiliations with Barnes-Jewish and St. Louis Childrens hospitals, the School of Medicine is linked to BJC HealthCare.

Related press release here

See more here:

Podcast: Wildlife surveillance may help identify the next pandemic - Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis

Dr. Richard Isaacs: Video-first doctor visits are here to stay – ModernHealthcare.com

Even as COVID-19 cases surge across the nation, hospitals and physician practices are working to figure out how to bring back some non-emergency services and procedures that had been put off for months. Questions remain about what this new normal will look like. For one thing, virtual care is here to stay, says Dr. Richard Isaacs, CEO and executive director of the Permanente Medical Group, and president and CEO of the Mid-Atlantic Permanente Medical Group, Kaiser Permanentes two largest medical group practices. He expects roughly 60% of Kaiser members visits will be virtual in the future. He recently spoke with Modern Healthcare Managing Editor Matthew Weinstock. The following is an edited transcript.

MH: How are your medical groups handling the recent spike in cases?

Isaacs: Ive been very impressed with the physician groups on both coasts, and in (Northern) California, we were one of the first areas that received patients from Japan via plane, and also via ship. This was around the middle of February, and we learned (a lot) about coronavirus, and it was unprecedented. There was a fair amount of uncertainty, and there continues to be uncertainty, but we helped lead the states effort in dealing with these patients, who were scheduled to be disembarked from the ship and be repatriated to Travis Air Force Base. However, the Department of Defense felt that, at that point, it was a national security issue, so we were involved in repatriating COVID-positive patients to various hospitals across Northern California, and about 50% of our hospitals received the first COVID patients here in Northern California. We were very much involved in the suppression strategies, and we were excited because early on we flattened the curve like nowhere else on the globe. California was the front-runner in preventing (the spread of) this disease.

However, over the last three to four weeks, weve been seeing another surge of the disease across the entire state of California, and (more than) half of the states are currently surging.

MH: What does that mean for practices that are trying to balance the surge, but also bringing back non-emergency procedures?

Isaacs: Early on, we continued to take care of all of the patients who had essential needs. We took care of all emergencies, all cancer surgeries were managed, which was about 50% of our normal volume in Northern California, which we did in February, March and April. About three weeks ago, as the shelter-in-place orders were lifted, we started opening back up. We take care of 4.5 million members in Northern California and another 800,000 in the mid-Atlantic region. We have patients who have been waiting for their elective care. The biggest challenge for me right now is the delay in screening. When people were sheltering in place, they werent getting their typical mammography, colorectal cancer screening, so theres some queuing of patients who really need to get this essential screening care.

MH: How do you start building that back into the routine?

Isaacs: The priority has been patient safety and also staff safety. Were working very hard to ensure that we maintain social distancing in the medical office buildings and in the hospital, and that we encourage people to come in when theyre healthy. We do screening at the entry of every medical office. If someone has symptoms of COVID-19 or they have fever, we take care of them in a different setting. So the goal is to keep COVID-free medical offices and manage patients for their essential needs.

MH: Youve talked about battling the pandemic on two endsCOVID-19, but also the pandemic of fear. How are you talking to patients about coming back when they may be fearful of exposing themselves in a medical setting?

Isaacs: The medical office is the most trusted place where you can be, because we have regular processes that sterilize and sanitize the hallways and the medical examination rooms. People are doing essential grocery shopping. Its much safer to be in a Kaiser Permanente facility than in any place in the community today.

MH: Kaiser was at the forefront of using telehealth even before the COVID crisis. How has that grown during the pandemic?

Isaacs: We started our video-first strategy in March. We knew that patients were sheltering in place, and there was that pandemic of fear. We encourage patients to pursue the video-first strategy and see their primary-care physician on video. Were currently doing close to 80% of all examinations and medical care on a video-first platform, and the patients who need to be seen are then triaged into the appropriate venue for care.

Were seeing tremendous satisfaction with the care from home. We deliver supplies and medications right to their front door, and its hugely satisfying for our membership.

MH: Are there specialties where you started offering telehealth because of the pandemic that you hadnt done before?

Isaacs: The Permanente medical groups have been leaders in telemedicine. The first foray was dermatology, and in a pre-COVID world, 90% of all initial dermatology consults were being done via video or secure message with a photograph. Were very experienced with telemedicine, but in the COVID world, with sheltering in place, it pretty much spanned every specialtypediatrics, OB-GYN, primary care, family medicine, mental health, internal medicine are all doing large percentages of video visits, and my job now is to harvest all of these learnings from the COVID experience, because this is an incredible way to deliver care. Im very pleased, and the doctors are excited, because its very user-friendly for the physician, their care team, and also the patients.

MH: Does this become the new norm post-COVID? How does that permanently transform what youre doing?

Isaacs: I believe its going to completely transform. Its the integration of technology with care delivery, and we will have the ability to do video 24/7, 365, and ideally, youre having a video with a patient and a physician who knows you very well. With our electronic medical record system, were able to connect all 12.5 million members that we take care of across the United States. We have all of their information at our fingertips. If a patient needs a physician or advice at 2 in the morning on a Saturday, they can reach us and get a video visit with a provider who will have all of their information.

MH: How do you address it from a physician-training standpoint? How do you make everybody on your team feel comfortable doing it on an ongoing basis?

Isaacs: We developed protocols for how to do video care effectively, and we train our physicians in the appropriate technique. Obviously, this is a secure environment. We want the patients to understand that its a one-on-one evaluation, and we just provide the environment for the physicians to do their job.

As we learn in medical school, the majority of all diagnoses are achieved (when) taking the (patients) history. The physical helps clarify some things, but the majority of diagnoses are made during the initial contact and conversation.

MH: Do you expect your physicians will return to an office setting, or will they be doing most of their work remotely now?

Isaacs: Were trying to determine whats the appropriate mix. I think that there will always be a need for face-to-face and office examinations. Right now, its looking like 60% of all visits in the future could be done via video, with an exam for the other 40%, when needed.

MH: Getting back to the surge in cases, how are you managing burnout and morale among your physicians?

Isaacs: I talk a lot about the trifecta of uncertainty, which does contribute to some burnout, because we dont know how long this is going to last. The trifecta is: When will there be a vaccine? When will we have enough herd immunity that we can go back to some semblance of normalcy? Thats No. 1.

No. 2 is the uncertainty of the economic recovery, and it looked like we were heading back toward job recovery about three, four weeks ago in several states, and now the governors are talking about sheltering in place again.

The third uncertainty, and unfortunately this whole COVID-19 with the economic sequelae, (helped reveal) the racial unrest, social injustice, and (expose) years of systemic racism in this country.

As far as the burnout goes, its really about collaborating as a team. Were all in this together, and the Permanente medical groups are integrated multispecialty groups that actually care about each other, and more importantly, care about the care delivery to the population. Its amazing to see how our subspecialists have really risen to the occasion and are supporting everyone in primary care, as theres been a shift in burden from some specialty care to primary care.

My job is to make it easy for people to do the right thing. Having the resources, the tools, the technology helps eliminate some of that burnout, and just knowing that youre in this together has been very helpful.

More here:

Dr. Richard Isaacs: Video-first doctor visits are here to stay - ModernHealthcare.com

Here’s Why NASCAR Racing Is Harder Than Everyone Thinks | HotCars – HotCars

The world of motorsports is a colorful one; filled to the brim with all different types of racing series for each and every individual interest. Here in the United States, our biggest source of automotive racing is that of NASCAR. While Europe has events such the WEC and Formula 1, we've got IMSA, IndyCar, and NASCAR.

NASCAR takes place on predominantly oval racetracks. This, in turn, has led fans of other racing disciplines to call into question the veracity of the sport. More specifically, if driving in NASCAR is even worthy of an 'athlete' designation.

Though it may not look that hard, we can assure you that NASCAR/oval racing is the furthest thing from simple. Besides the car itself, drivers need to stay hyper-focused, in-shape, and always be ready to lay their life down if (that were to happen). The physics of pushing a car so beyond its natural limits will, naturally, lead to push-back, which is what the drivers need to maintain.

Still not convinced? Well, allow us to elaborate on why NASCAR racing is way harder than most people think...

In a majority of the racing scenes around the world, circuits consists of delicately crafted and windy sets of tarmac. Long straightaways, hairpin turns, chicanes, and so on, are just a few types of turns that make up a race track. NASCAR, on the other hand, is far less complex. Here in the States, our cars go in ovals (with the occasional deviation to tracks like Mid Ohio, for example).

Because of this lack of variety in racetracks, NASCAR gets a bad wrap overseas, as well as domestically. A common complaint you may encounter will likely be "all they do is turn left!" To that we say "Yes, they do (usually) only turn left. It sounds boring and mundane to an uninformed observer, but, in reality, few things are as challenging as effectively "just turning left"...

As drivers go around the track, the elevation, offset, and other components of the circuit play a crucial role in how the driver manipulates the throttle, clutch, and brakes. To add to that, the mechanics behind the scenes need to fine-tune their car for every race; setting up the camber, suspension stiffness, toe, etc.

All the prep means nothing, though, if you can't setup a winning strategy. What looks like driving in circles is, actually, an intense chess match taking place in excess of 180 mph. If you want to win, you'll need to manage your fuel, tire wear, position on-track, the cars in front of/behind you, ad infinitum.

As you can see, there's a lot more working behind the curtain than anybody would anticipate at first.

RELATED:People Still Believe These Racing Myths

Thanks in part to the growing prominence of sim-racing, it's become way easier for upcoming drivers to understand the factors mentioned above. What sim-racing can't prepare you for, however, is the sheer power inside these incredibly fast, lightweight race cars.

For a majority of the newer seasons, almost every cars has had ~750-hp, which varies depending on the rules and regulations. In upcoming years, for instance, NASCAR plans to add a boost function using hybrid engines; granting the driver an extra 100-hp than it already had.

Just think about that: a car that's almost 1,000-horsepower, has no driver assists, and is very uncomfortable. Yet, some will still think that taming such a beast would be no issue? To us, the opposite seems to fall underOccam's razor. If it didn't, then driving one of these to the finish line wouldn't require years of practice and experience.

RELATED:Behind The Scenes Of NASCAR: Everything You Didn't Know About America's Number One Motorsport

Even if you discount the driving skill, critical-thinking, and difficulty required to succeed NASCAR, you can't also argue the bravery these drivers showcase every time they get into the car.

Yes, we'll concede that (in the modern era) motor racing isn't nearly as dangerous or fatal as it was decades prior. Nevertheless, it being worse years ago doesn't mean it's 100% safe today. Since 2001, NASCAR has had 15 fatal accidents. Not too bad and, as stated in "NASCAR Safety Improvements Save Lives," Michael Hill says "The range of expected deaths plus or minus one standard deviation would lie between 11 and 19. In fact, if the chances of dying in a NASCAR crash were the same as for all other crashes, the odds of having zero fatalities over that many crashes [220/year] would be more than three million to one."

That statement illustrates the leaps and bounds NASCAR has made to improving safety afterDale Earnhardt's death. Still, the possibility is always there. However infinitesimally small the chance maybe, it could very well be YOU next, so it's important to prepare for such a thing (God forbid it actually happen).

If that doesn't prove NASCAR racing is harder than you may have thought, ask yourself this: "Would you still go to work every day if you knew you could be killed while doing it?" Military service members, firefighters, and police officers need not answer...

NEXT:NASCAR Racers Who Cheated So Well They Deserve To Keep The Trophies

Fast & Furious 9: The Most Surprising Car That Might Make An Appearance

More here:

Here's Why NASCAR Racing Is Harder Than Everyone Thinks | HotCars - HotCars

A Deeply Provincial View of Free Speech – The Atlantic

The letter in Harpers vaguely alludes to instances of alleged silencing that sparked complicated discussions, very often about institutional racism. Whatever the arguments around each particular incident, the letter concludes, the result has been to steadily narrow the boundaries of what can be said without the threat of reprisal. (At least two of the signatories have since distanced themselves from the statement, and on Friday another group of writers and academics published a lengthy counterletter that originated in a Slack channel called Journalists of Color.)

That the signatories of a letter denouncing a perceived constriction of public speech are among their industries highest-paid and most widely published figures is a large and obvious irony. Many of the writers who signed their name have been employed or commissioned by outlets including The New Yorker, The New York Times, Vox, The Washington Post, and this magazine. Several have received lucrative book deals; otherslike Rowling, Salman Rushdie, and Wynton Marsalisare global icons. The educators on the list are affiliated with universities including Harvard, Yale, Stanford, and Columbia.

Theres something darkly comical about the fretfulness of these elite petitioners. Its telling that the censoriousness they identify as a national plague isnt the racism that keeps Black journalists from reporting on political issues, or the transphobia that threatens their colleagues lives. The letter denounces the restriction of debate, whether by a repressive government or an intolerant society, strategically blurring the line between these two forces. But the letters chief concern is not journalists living under hostile governments, despite the fact that countries around the world impose draconian limits on press freedom.

Across the globe, the challenge facing journalists and intellectuals is not the pain of Twitter scorn; the Committee to Protect Journalists estimates that at least 250 journalists were imprisoned worldwide last year for their reporting. In the U.S., the Trump administration continues to threaten reporters safety and undermine the belief that journalists play a valuable role in a democracy. The country is moving deeper into an economic recession, decimating industries including journalism and academia. And yet the suddenly unemployed people the Harpers statement references clearly lost their jobs not because of a pandemic or government pressure, but for actions criticized as potentially harming marginalized groups. This small group includes James Bennet, the former opinions editor of The New York Times (and a former editor in chief of this magazine), who was forced to resign after the op-ed page he supervised published an article by Arkansas Senator Tom Cotton that endorsed state violence.

See the original post:

A Deeply Provincial View of Free Speech - The Atlantic

Writers warn in open letter against threat to free speech – The Associated Press

LONDON (AP) Dozens of artists, writers and academics have signed an open letter decrying the weakening of public debate and warning that the free exchange of information and ideas is in jeopardy amid a rise in what they call illiberalism.

J.K. Rowling, Salman Rushdie and Margaret Atwood are among dozens of writers, artists and academics to argue against ideological conformity in an open letter in Harpers Magazine. The letter comes amid a debate over so-called cancel culture where prominent people face attack for sharing controversial opinions.

The forces of illiberalism are gaining strength throughout the world and have a powerful ally in Donald Trump, who represents a real threat to democracy, the letter said. But resistance must not be allowed to harden into its own brand of dogma or coercionwhich right-wing demagogues are already exploiting. The democratic inclusion we want can be achieved only if we speak out against the intolerant climate that has set in on all sides.

Rowling, for example, has attracted criticism over her views on transgender issues, which have angered many activists. In a series of tweets, Rowling said she supported transgender rights but did not believe in erasing the concept of biological sex.

The comments prompted Daniel Radcliffe and other cast members of the Potter films to publicly disagree with her. Rowling was unmoved, but was attacked for weeks online.

The letter criticized the state of public debate and the swift and severe retribution dealt out to any perceived wrongs. It decried an intolerance of opposing views, a vogue for public shaming and ostracism, and the tendency to dissolve complex policy issues in a blinding moral certainty.

The way to defeat bad ideas is by exposure, argument, and persuasion, not by trying to silence or wish them away, the letter said. We refuse any false choice between justice and freedom, which cannot exist without each other.

Other signatories included Noam Chomsky, Gloria Steinem and Malcolm Gladwell.

Read the original post:

Writers warn in open letter against threat to free speech - The Associated Press

The Harper’s ‘letter’ proves we need to have a serious talk about free speech – Business Insider – Business Insider

On Tuesday, Harper's published what has become known as "the letter," a document cosigned by more than 150 artists, writers, and academics defending the broad principle of "the free exchange of information and ideas," which they refer to as "the lifeblood of a liberal society." It has sparked both praise and ridicule.

But more than anything, it's demonstrated why an honest debate, even a fight, over the value of free speech needs to be had.

The letter, a vaguely written, even anodyne statement that reads as if it's been stepped on by too many writers, opens with a message of support for the recent protests and "wider calls for greater equality and inclusion across our society." It then laments the "swift and severe retribution in response to perceived transgressions of speech and thought" that the cosigners argue is taking place in institutions ranging from academia to media to everyday workplaces. Its main thesis appears to be "We need to preserve the possibility of good-faith disagreement without dire professional consequences."

There are those who see free speech as a concept that benefits only the powerful, and then there are those staunch free-speech advocates myself among them who view free speech as the most effective tool available for marginalized voices; no meaningful positive social change could occur without it.

It took millennia to establish the norm that you can piss people off, especially the powerful, with your speech and it should generally be tolerated. If it's jettisoned in the name of a certain definition of justice, what happens at the next injustice? You can't use free speech to fight it anymore.

For some critics, the focus was on the letter's signatories who included the feminist icon Gloria Steinem, the socialist academic Noam Chomsky, and the jazz legend Wynton Marsalis and was spearheaded by the Black writer Thomas Chatterton Williams. Despite being cosigned by people who are diverse in race, gender, religion, sexuality, age, and politics, the number of wealthy, older, white cosigners nullified the letter's message for many.

Others pointed to certain signatories such as JK Rowling, the "Harry Potter" author who has recently made polarizing statements about transgender people, and the writer Jesse Singal, whose choice to write about people who stopped identifying as trans was vilified by some on the left. For some critics, the inclusion of such people automatically rendered the letter a moot point.

One signatory, the writer Jenny Boylan, apologized for having her name listed beside certain people (though she didn't name anyone). The Black writer Malcolm Gladwell tweeted in response: "I signed the Harpers letter because there were lots of people who also signed the Harpers letter whose views I disagreed with. I thought that was the point of the Harpers letter."

The most interesting criticism I came across was from Ken White, the civil-libertarian lawyer who also blogs and tweets as "Popehat." White is often my go-to legal-splainer on First Amendment issues, so when he criticized the letter, my ears perked up.

I spoke with White about the concept of the "preferred first speaker" conundrum. Put simply, it's the idea that there should be few limits on speech but substantial limits on the response to such speech.

"Sometimes I feel that criticisms of 'cancel culture' amount to an attempt to impose civility codes on the marketplace of ideas, sometimes by the same people who otherwise would be objecting to such civility codes applied to the first speaker," White told me.

He added: "Calling a group of people a 'mob' is a way to avoid addressing their argument. It deprives them of agency, assumes they are taking their position out of groupthink or rage rather than because of values, and implicitly suggests that their proposition is less credible because too many people are sharing it."

The socialist writer Freddie deBoer wrote Tuesday of some of the progressive responses to the letter: "You want to argue that free speech is bad, fine. You want to adopt a dominance politics that (you imagine) will result in you being the censor, fine. But just do that. Own that."

I'd agree. If you think that free speech has lost its value and we've reached the pinnacle of all human understanding and that the correct parameters of what may be said are now perfectly understood and must be locked in place for all time let's have that argument.

And for those who are free-speech absolutists, the right of free association remains a tenet of the value. That's a sometimes difficult circle to square, so specificity is necessary. Perhaps the argument is of course you CAN fire someone because they said something that offended a colleague, but don't make that an action of first resort or treat every instance of offense the same. After all, there are certainly people in workplaces offended by progressive speech, and no progressive would argue that the reflexive response should be that their job must be placed in jeopardy.

Take one the thorniest of political issues: the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. On one side a person can claim to feel unsafe by a colleague's support of a brutal occupier state. On the other, a person can claim to feel unsafe by a colleague's support of the anti-Semitic theocracy Hamas.

If this seems ridiculous, it's not.

Just last month, David Shor, a progressive election data analyst, tweeted a link to a Black Princeton University professor's study that theorized rioting helped Republicans win elections. Shor was promptly dismissed from his job at Civis Analytics after colleagues expressed their offense at the tweet.

The company has every right to fire an at-will employee, especially if they'd rather not deal with the hassle. But what justice was served by Shor's firing? The only lesson to be gleaned is that data analysts need to be very careful about what data they tweet. Incidents like this are part of what inspired the Harper's letter.

To those who presume that denying a culture of open debate and free expression will lead to a permanent entrenchment of correct ideas, I'd like to know who sets the rules. Who is pure enough to have lived a life with no problematic associations or regrettable past expressions of speech?

Because if you want to make the case that free speech has outlived its use, let's be clear about the society you envision after it's been done away with.

For many of the letter's signatories, the concept of censorship is not in the abstract.

Steinem spent her life protesting and agitating in the fight for women's rights. She knows what it is to express deeply unpopular speech and to have it censored by authorities. Chomsky, whose left-wing social-justice credibility is hard to seriously challenge, is a longtime critic of both government and corporate censorship, and he's been a victim of both.

Garry Kasparov, the chess champion and Russian dissident, offended the political orthodoxy of his country and now lives under permanent threat of assassination. So does the celebrated author Salman Rushdie, because he wrote a book that angered a theocracy over three decades ago.

Jonathan Rauch, a gay writer who was a signatory of the letter, wrote in 2014 of a US Army Map Service astronomer named Frank Kameny, who was fired from his government job in the 1950s explicitly because he was gay.

Raugh wrote: "As of 1954, homosexuals not only lived in constant fear of being fired, shamed, and beaten or killed; we were also prevented by our government from making our case. To practice same-sex love was a crime; but even to praise it was 'cheap pornography.' Something else I often find called on to emphasize to young people, at a time when college speech codes are usually justified as protecting minority rights, is that turnabout is not fair play. The problem is not that the bad guys were in charge of the speech rules in 1954, whereas the good guys are in charge now. The problem is that majorities, politicians and bureaucrats are very unreliable judges of minorities' interests."

Kameny fought the government over his firing all the way to the Supreme Court, and ultimately lost. But beginning a decade before the Stonewall riots and for the rest of his life, he challenged the government through his writing and activism, which was possible only because of the First Amendment, and the right to cause offense through speech. In 2009, late in his life, the Obama administration officially apologized for his firing. Four years after his death, same-sex marriage was legalized by the Supreme Court.

If the presidency of Donald Trump has taught us anything, it's that certain liberal norms must be defended, if only to keep people with tyrannical instincts like him from determining what should and shouldn't be acceptable forms of expression. If the worst could happen and it always could the right to express unpopular opinions is the best weapon available to beat back the tyrant.

This doesn't mean speech shouldn't come without consequences, or that criticism is necessarily "censorship," or that anyone is entitled to a job even if they've become more trouble to their employer than they are worth.

But for the unconvinced, I would ask for some consideration that the principles of open debate and free expression are not outdated reactionary platitudes.

And for those who believe free speech has outlived its purpose, I would ask for an upfront conversation about what comes next.

Read the original here:

The Harper's 'letter' proves we need to have a serious talk about free speech - Business Insider - Business Insider

Free-speech hypocrites, unscandalous scandals, and endless heat got you down? Here’s how to survive the summer of madness – Toronto Star

We are living through a summer of madness. I cannot recall a time of greater rage, unhingement, outbursting, cruelty, silliness, and above all, humourlessness.

Truly, this pitchfork summer has been ruled by the narcissism of small differences. Never have I seen people so unwilling to let things go, especially when the confluence of horrors is so intense. We are all a lit match.

I find it calming to think of Greenland sharks, the longest-living creatures on Earth, some of them 500 years old, moving through deep Arctic waters while far away and above, hot little humans squabbled and slaughtered each other and Shakespeare wrote his plays. Take the long view. The Greenland shark certainly does.

The first prong in the pitchfork: we are enduring the hottest year in history. Thats a grand claim that morally condemns us as a species, yes, but what it really boils down to is this. In June, Calgary was hammered by hail the size of canned hams. This week, a sudden huge rainstorm killed power across much of Toronto, which killed air conditioning which kills sanity.

It only takes one more thing could be stink bugs, could be a Harpers.org letter defending American free speech and suddenly everyones hair is in flames. Opponents want free speech for themselves, not for those who signed the letter, and now everyone has third-degree burns.

I just watched Jaws I sense a mordant fish theme here which holds up remarkably well, and it strikes me that on social media, everyone thinks theyre Chief Brody and regards everyone else as the great white shark. But the shark is the only blameless creature on the boat, doing what sharks do.

Take the most recent Ottawa scandal failing to grip the nation. Reporters tell us with glee that aside from paid work by the PMs brother and long-famous mother, the WE charity the one no longer running a hasty cross-country student COVID jobs plan had paid Sophie Grgoire Trudeau $1,400 for a speech in 2012.

My reaction was anguished. Why are Canadian scandals always so quaint? Why cant we do big shameless American crimes? Crime better, Canada.

Second prong: we are in early- or mid-pandemic. Although people are carefully trying to edge back into work with its lovely pay, few jobs are worth the risk of painful death alone in a hospital room, spatchcocked by a tube. So were at home, which breeds paranoia. We love our co-workers, who are probably out to get us.

The third prong is destitution, and if not that, heart-clutching financial worry. Pinned to the wall this summer, good people have gone off their nut.

NDP Leader Jagmeet Singh said that a white gunmans failed invasion of Rideau Hall proved that the RCMP was racist, since a mentally ill Mississauga man of colour, Ejaz Choudry, and others, had been shot to death by police recently.

This person showed up with weapons, publicly, at the residence of the prime minister of Canada and was arrested without being killed, Singh said. So hes saying a nonracist RCMP would have shot Corey Hurren out of a sense of fairness. Singh did not regard the gunmans survival as a police success, which it is.

He then said Trump had done more to check police violence than had Trudeau. Sound of Canadians dropping their groceries.

If Singh has a point, and I dont think he has, its in questionable taste. But public discourse is like that now, weird, self-centred, hurtful. The Conservatives wanted Parliament reopened and then had the worst attendance record of any party at COVID-19 committee meetings.

Conservative party house-sitter Andrew Scheer, seen maskless and smirking in Pearson airport, was talking to Manitoba Premier Brian Pallister, who later apologized for having briefly de-masked. (Another dollar-store scandal.) Scheer didnt apologize, taking his cue from Donald Trump, who now says he wants to build a monument to statues.

The Liberals face no credible opposition in Parliament, not by design but by opposition panic and confusion. Right now the Conservative party emblem is the bright little face of Erin OToole, an ex-soldier who wants to send every Canadian to basic training.

He wants us shipshape and military-style, hes talking gun rights and bouncing loonies off our beds. We dont need this level of strange right now.

Never miss the latest news from the Star, including up-to-date coronavirus coverage, with our email newsletters

In a pitchfork summer, back to those Greenland sharks swimming quietly, their massive cartilaginous bodies bending in black water. I find it comforting that the shark has always been there, while humans were crabs, pairs of ragged claws scuttling across the floors of silent seas, temporary scavengers out of our collective minds in 2020.

Emulate the shark. Move slowly. Think before you attack. Let nothing faze you. Try not to take offence at small things, just as the shark doesnt mind the long dangling parasites attached to its corneas.

We will all be judged on how we behaved in the summer of the pitchfork.

Link:

Free-speech hypocrites, unscandalous scandals, and endless heat got you down? Here's how to survive the summer of madness - Toronto Star

How Kelly Preston anchored John Travolta through tragedy, controversy and bad movies – The Mercury News

Condolences from celebrities and many others poured in for John Travolta and his two children, following news that Kelly Preston, his wife of 28 years, had died of breast cancer at age 57.

Arnold Schwarzenegger, Prestons co-star on the 1988 film Twins, tweeted that she was extraordinary, with talent off the charts. The former California governor also said she had a big heart and was such a wonderful wife and mother.

My heart breaks for John and the kids, Shania Twain tweeted, while Russell Crowe called Preston a sparkly-eyed gem. Piers Morgan praised her and Travolta for having one of the most enduring Hollywood marriages. Morgan also said he was gutted for Travolta.

The overriding message of the RIP tweets conforms to the view that Preston was the beautiful, vivacious and steely anchor at the heart of a celebrity marriage that, yes, by Hollywood standards, was pretty remarkable.

What made the marriage even more remarkable is that it endured pretty daunting challenges: The 2009 death of their 16-year-old son, Jett, from a seizure; ongoing questions about the couples devotion to the Church of Scientology; and the gay rumors and accusations over the years that Travolta sexually harassed or assaulted men working for him.

If all those challenges were not enough, the couple had to weather the very bad movies Travolta made or that they made together, including the box-office bomb Battlefield Earth in 2000 and Gotti, the 2018 John Gotti biopic that was critically panned.

Travolta announced his wifes death via Instagram late Sunday night, saying, It is with a very heavy heart that I inform you that my beautiful wife Kelly has lost her two-year battle with breast cancer. She fought a courageous fight with the love and support of so many.

Travolta also thanked Prestons nurses and doctors at the University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center for her care.

Travolta and Preston met while filming 1988s The Experts. They married in Paris in 1991 and became parents to Jett in 1992, a daughter, Ella Bleu, in 2000 and a son, Benjamin, in 2010. Preston had a lengthy career in movies and TV, including 1980s teen comedies, Jerry Maguire in 1996, and For the Love of the Game in 1999. But she also took some time off from acting over the years to focus on raising her children.

In public, Preston and Travolta always managed to appear affable and seemingly carefree, Daily Beast writer Dana Kennedy said in a 2018 profile of the couple.

Kennedy followed the couples visit to the Cannes Film Festival, where they were promoting Gotti, in which Travolta played the notorious crime family boss and Preston played his long-suffering wife, Victoria.

Some say that much of the couples ability to project the image of a long and happy marriage was due to the inner strength of the outwardly easy-going Preston, Kennedy reported. For one thing, Preston was hard-core in her dedication to Scientology, which helped to anchor Travolta. For that reason, Travolta relied on Prestons stability and was terrified of losing her, former Scientologists said.

Kelly is a much more dedicated Scientologist than John, Mike Rinder, the former top spokesman for the Church of Scientology, told the Daily Beast.

Karen de la Carriere, another former high-ranking Scientology executive, told the Daily Beast that Travolta was a bad boy in his personal behavior, while Preston either didnt hear or chose to ignore his alleged indiscretions. De la Carriere also saidScientology doctrine trains its members to ignore or to discount unpleasant news about themselves or the organization.

Kelly is a true believer, added de la Carrieres husband, Jeffrey Augustine. He also said that Travolta may have a dark side but that the actor loved his family. Because of Preston, hed never leave Scientology, Augustine said.

In 2012 interview for the Lifetime talk show The Conversation, Preston talked openly about how the Scientology process of auditing had helped her, the Business Insider reported.

In Scientology, we have whats called auditing, and that helps you to address things in your life and to strip them away, Preston said. Its a path of spiritual enlightenment. Also, it helps rid the mind of painful experience completely.

Preston credited the people at her church with helping her get through difficult times, while also revealing that she had become focused on staying sober so that she would be a better mother.

Our kids are the center of our universe, Preston said.

At Cannes, Travolta credited Scientology for filling him with the enduring confidence to mount personal challenges and career comebacks, reports said.

I practice Scientology, and we do very simple things to get ourselves in better shape: take care of yourself, get good sleep, be better parents, be productive, be motivated, Travolta told the audience. It sounds simple, but they all contribute to your well-being.

Their daughter, Ella Bleu, has followed her parents into Scientology and has become an up-and-comer in the church, according to The Underground Bunker, a blog run by journalist Tony Ortega, that covers Scientology.

With the loss of Preston, Travolta may be in the place that reportedly terrified him facing life without her. In his Instagram post, the actor wrote: Kellys love and life will always be remembered.

He also said he would take some time to be with his children, who have lost their mother, so forgive me in advance if you dont hear from us for a while. But please know that I will feel your outpouring of love in the weeks and months ahead as we heal.

Read the original:

How Kelly Preston anchored John Travolta through tragedy, controversy and bad movies - The Mercury News

A Brighter Tomorrow > News > USC Dornsife – USC Dornsife College of Letters, Arts and Sciences

From environment to family, transportation to health care, from work and leisure to what well eat and how well age, USC Dornsife faculty share how they think our future world will look. [11 min read]

As the 19th century drew to a close and a new era dawned, an American civil engineer named John Elfreth Watkins consulted experts at the nations greatest institutions of science and learning for their opinions on 29 wide-ranging topics. Watkins, who was also a contributor to the Saturday Evening Post, then wrote an extraordinary magazine article based on what these university professors told him.

Published on Page 8 of the December 1900 issue of Ladies Home Journal a sister publication of the Post it was titled What May Happen in the Next Hundred Years. Watkins opened the article with the words, These prophecies will seem strange, almost impossible. In fact, many of his far-sighted predictions for the year 2000 which included the invention of digital color photography, television and mobile phones proved remarkably accurate.

For this issue of USC Dornsife Magazine, we have repeated the experiment by inviting 10 scholars drawn from USC Dornsife faculty and representing diverse disciplines to predict what the world will look like in the year 2050 and the year 2100.

A Bluer Planet

Astronauts circling the globe in 80 years may find our blue planet looking quite a bit bluer, says Naomi Levine, assistant professor of biological sciences and Earth sciences.

The middle of the Pacific or Atlantic oceans are what we call the deserts of the ocean. Theyre really low in nutrients, and things that live there are usually small. As a result, these areas look very blue because there isnt much ther except water, Levine explains. As the climate warms, we predict that these desert areas are going to expand. So, ocean waters will look bluer from space.

A Brighter Shade of Green

Our planet may also look a bit greener. Travis Williams, professor of chemistry, says that without an active plan for removing the carbon clogging our atmosphere, nature could step in.

If we dont choose a biomass thats going to utilize higher temperatures and that atmospheric carbon, nature is going to choose on our behalf, and I dont think were going to like it, he says. To avoid harmful organism explosions like algae blooms, Williams foresees a human-led reforestation of the planet, at a scale several times the size of the Amazon rainforest.

What's On the Menu?

A greening planet could also be due to changes in our agricultural systems. A move away from monoculture farming and a return to an ancient polyculture approach might be on the horizon, says Sarah Portnoy, associate professor (teaching) of Spanish. Portnoy researches indigenous food cultures of Mesoamerica and suggests that in the future we could adopt the milpa food system. Animals would be grazing on the same land where there are cover crops and squash, corn, beans and all kinds of herbs growing together, she says.

This isnt just a utopian pipe dream. Governments will have to seriously rethink agriculture if they want to reduce rising rates of chronic disease such as obesity, especially among the poor. The agriculture that is supported by the government now is skewed toward crops like soybeans and wheat. Our food system is geared to the cheapest calories, Portnoy says.

The high-calorie, processed foods produced from these monoculture, subsidized crops are less expensive than fruits and vegetables, but do little for our health. Unless we reprioritize which crops get government cash, we can expect disparities in health between economic classes to continue. By 2050, only the privileged might be able to afford strawberries or carrots.

Food supplies will alter in other ways as well, thanks to climate change. The bluer oceans will be less friendly to bigger marine organisms, which means fewer large fish to harvest.

When you change ocean temperatures, it changes what types of organisms can grow, and that cascades up the food web, says Levine. Sushi chefs in 2050 might dish up more avocados and scallops than tuna rolls. This could work for future diners, Portnoy thinks. Theres a move toward being a lot more intrepid as an eater, and toward plant-based diets, she says.

One Big, Happy Family

Starting off your day in 2050 could mean wheeling your toddler to the state-funded neighborhood day care center. Birth rates are currently plummeting across the industrialized world and governments may soon need to tackle the problem as a public health priority, says Darby Saxbe, associate professor of psychology and director of the USC Center for the Changing Family.

Well realize that, when the birth rate goes down, that affects our future workforce, she says. When were not able to replace our population, it ultimately becomes a national security issue. Child care benefits, family leave and subsidized, part-time work schedules for parents could be the governments strategy to encourage a new baby boom.

We may be well into the digital age, but you might not find too many iPads in the nurseries of the future. Increased awareness of the pitfalls of screen time could change our approach to parenting via device. The original scions of social media themselves now admit to limiting their own childrens time online, observes Saxbe. In fact, in some of the more expensive private schools in Los Angeles, you have to sign a no screen time pledge.

The keywords there might be expensive and private. A movement away from childhood spent online could leave behind children from poorer families as technology becomes cheaper and the cost of human labor rises. It will likely soon be less expensive to instruct classrooms of kids via lessons on tablets than by engaging a human teacher.

You might end up with a two-class system, Saxbe warns. You have more kids having a digital childhood thats a little less regulated, especially in neighborhoods where its not safe to play outside. Wealthier families are going to be able to afford more hands-on child care and more hands-on educational activities, instead of leaving kids alone with their technology.

However, technology can still benefit the family in the coming decades. In fact, Saxbe believes this is a largely untapped opportunity with great potential. Silicon Valley technologists primarily childless young men still havent tackled devices like the breast pump or baby monitor, which could both use a redesign.

Has there been a real focus on innovation and investment when it comes to things that serve parents and families yet? asks Saxbe. I think theres a big market there.

Working 10-4

After dropping your child off at day care, you head to work. You likely wont be putting the keys in the ignition of your own car, though. Kyla Thomas, sociologist at the USC Dornsife Center for Economic and Social Research and director of LABarometer, a quarterly internet-based survey of approximately 1,800 L.A. county residents, says that by 2030 commuters will probably rely more on public transit and shared, autonomous vehicles to get around.

Public transportation will be faster and more convenient, and increased density in neighborhoods will mitigate sprawl. Parking will be more expensive and harder to find. By 2100, Thomas says, private car ownership will be a thing of the past.

Hopping out of your driverless commuter van, you clock in at the office for your six-hour work day. Patricia Grabarek, lecturer with USC Dornsifes Online Master of Science in Applied Psychology program, believes that the traditional 40-hour work week could get phased out by 2050.

We are in the midst of a job revolution thats on the scale of the Industrial Revolution, Grabarek says. The entire nature of work will change.

Automation promises to replace many jobs, and streamline others. Combine this with the growing emphasis on work-life balance, embodied by current millennials pushing for workplace flexibility, and we could see our work week lighten in load.

Our leaders are recognizing the problem that employees are burning out. People are working too much and they are not as productive as they could be. Bosses will start modeling better behaviors for their employees, Grabarek says. After-hours emails could soon be banned, as is already the case in France and Germany.

This doesnt mean well all be aimlessly underemployed, however. There is a fear that automation will eliminate jobs but, in the past, weve always replaced the jobs that weve lost. Innovators will come out and replace them with new jobs we cant even come up with now, she says.

No matter how advanced computers become, human curiosity remains superior. Automation will be good at analyzing data, Grabarek says, but the questions will still originate with human researchers.

It's Quitting Time

Finished with work for the week, youre off to start the weekend. One item not likely to be on the agenda? Attending a traditional religious service.

In the United States, theres a trend away from institutionalized religion and toward highly individualized spirituality, says Richard Flory, associate professor (research) of sociology and senior director of research and evaluation at the USC Dornsife Center for Religion and Civic Culture. People just arent interested in institutions anymore, and nothing seems to be stepping forward to replace that interface between the individual and society.

Churches and temples could find new life as condos, bars or community centers, with religion relegated to a decorative background.

Rather than kneeling in prayer, people might find themselves downing a psychedelic drug to reach personal spiritual enlightenment. Movements that center around hallucinogens such as ayahuasca, a psychoactive tea from the Amazon, have gained traction in recent years, Flory notes.

Of course, there might just be an app for it all. Consciousness hacking aims to use science to bypass years of devotion to a spiritual practice and give everyone the hard-won benefits of such a practice instantly. In the future, I could see having some sort of implanted device to get to this level of consciousness, Flory says.

Reading the Tea Leaves

You may also use your leisure time to crack open a good book one with a slightly different texture. As climate change threatens our traditional resources, more sustainable alternatives such as seaweed could step in as a paper substitute, predicts Mark Marino, professor (teaching) of writing and a scholar of digital literature.

By 2100, literature could be written across the heavens instead.

Roboticist poets will create autonomous micro-texts that will be able to swarm into collectives, self-organize, aggregate and adapt, says Marino. Bevies of these nano-rhy-bots will create superstructures that can write epics on the Great Wall of China, on the surface of Mars or in the bloodstream of their readers.

Better Living Through Quantum Computing

Aging in the New Age may mean more nontraditional family units. Older adults prefer to age and die at home, but what happens when you dont have a big family network to support that? It may mean people might be more invested in friend networks, or the idea of chosen family, says Saxbe. Cue The Golden Girls theme song.

Sean Curran, associate professor of gerontology and biological sciences, believes that a focus on increasing our health span, the period of life during which one is free from serious disease, rather than simply elongating our life spans, will improve the quality of our longer lives as we age.

The goal is to have a personalized approach to aging that takes into account an individuals genetics, environment and life history, explains Curran. The assisted living facility of the future will be patient-centered, with each resident having a personalized prescription to maintain optimal health.

Eli Levenson-Falk, assistant professor of physics and astronomy, predicts that quantum computing could unlock the development of those drugs.

Quantum computers solve problems much more swiftly and with higher information density than todays computers. Although the technology is still in its infancy, Levenson-Falk predicts that by 2050, practical quantum technologies will be used commercially by major drug companies for research and development.

Enormously complicated computational tasks like simulating a chemicals molecular structure are much more achievable through this technology.

The idea is that with a quantum computer you can sort of emulate nature, he explains. We might have the canonical example for this by 2050: the physical shape of a protein molecule.

Predicting this shape is nearly impossible with a classical computer, Levenson-Falk says.

Measuring it is difficult and requires you to predict the shape first. With a good quantum simulator, we can emulate the protein and just let quantum mechanics do the processing for us, then measure the result at the end.

The Quantum Age

Indeed, quantum computing might solve questions that relate to the very fabric of the universe. Or at least get us closer to the answers.

Dark energy, dark matter, quantum gravity and thequantum classical transition are the principle problems existing in physics today. Quantum technologies are the best bet to solve the last one, says Levenson-Falk. Quantum sensors will probably also be used to help detect dark matter, or at least falsify some theories. And there are some proposals for using quantum technologies to poke at quantum gravity.

We cannot, of course, predict our shared future with 100 percent accuracy, but one thing we can be sure of is that it will be filled with new challenges and opportunities to create a better tomorrow. Although advances in technology will certainly help determine our future, how equitably those advances are shared in our interconnected world will also play a dominant role in shaping it.

This is a tale of two societies: You could either see things get better and more supportive for families, or you might see two-class stratification, Saxbe warns.

As the future unspools, we are given both the invaluable gift and the tremendous responsibility of deciding how we want it to look. Whether our world in 2100 takes on the dystopian qualities of Blade Runner or embodies the utopian, egalitarian ideals of Star Trek remains in the terrestrial hands of those already building that future.

Go here to read the rest:

A Brighter Tomorrow > News > USC Dornsife - USC Dornsife College of Letters, Arts and Sciences

Jim Carrey Would Like to Be Erased Forever – Men’s Health

When the individual has no belief in his own act and no ultimate concern with the beliefs of his audience, we may call him cynical . . . the cynic, with all his professional disinvolvement, may obtain unprofessional pleasures from his masquerade, experiencing a kind of gleeful spiritual aggression from the fact that he can toy at will with something his audience must take seriously.

~ Erving Goffman, The Presentation of the Self in Everyday Life

IT'S WINTER 2010 and Jim Carrey has once again walked through the door, Truman style. Walking through the doorthe metaphor taken from Carreys role as the Truman Shows titular movie star (Carrey, the movie star within the movie), which became a prophetic part both for Hollywood culture and for Carrey himselfwalking through the doorhappens every so often. It has become the life-imitating-art way for Carrey to express escape. From fame. From expectation. From having to play himself. Like most pathways to enlightenment, the threshold crossing can be painful; walking through the door at times means sweet euphoria and, at times, supreme hell.

So Jim Carrey is through the door once again, and, now on the other side, dragging large paint cans down the cold streets of the West Village. Hes set up an art studio here. He spends all day painting and parts of the early morning dispatching drunks and most hours heartbroken. Hes battled depression his whole life, was on Prozac for a time, and had since switched to a regimen of part cognitive behavioral therapy and part holistic medicationhydroxytryptophan and tyrosine, just enough to bump his dopamineand now part painting, which is doing wonders for Carrey, because creativity is medicine.

Word has gone around town that Carrey is painting. Word is: Carreys looking for a writer to help pen an essay about his paintingswhat they all mean, this hellacious euphoria put to canvas.

Across town in Park Slope, writer Dana Vachon decides to take full advantage of the offer and go say hi. He has absolutely no interest in authoring Jim Carreys art manifesto; he just wants to meet the comedian. They swap numbers.

Not long after, Carrey texts: Hey man, what are you doing?

Vachon is back at his apartment, stealing Wi-Fi from his neighbor and fully expecting never to talk to Carrey ever again. (Carrey, now, years later: He had no idea how badly I needed a friend.)

Vachon: I dunno, what are you doing?

Carrey: Watching Netflix.

Vachon: What are you watching?

Carrey: John Barrymore in Jekyll and Hyde.

And then, all of a sudden, the two are on a phone call, both watching the 1920 horror flick together, riffing.

Linda Fields Hill

And then Jim Carrey, step by step, begins breaking down the facial performance of John Barrymore: Now watch here. Barrymore knows he needs to do these things with his face. So theres an economy that hes . . .

And then, for whatever reasonmaybe its their shared late-night, cable-surfing insomnia, or how theyd both known extreme highs and lows in life, or how theyd both been at one point disgusted by the faade of their industries (Vachon began as a Wall Street analyst)this kind of conversation continues. For years.

And then one day, something comes to Vachon, an opening to a story, Jim Carrey's story. The two had been discussing writing Carreys biography together. But neither of them had wanted to write some boring memoir, because do you ever really know someone after reading their memoir? (And can you ever really know anyone anyway?) Carrey didnt think so. Carrey wanted to create.

Vachon calls Carrey now.

Memoirs and Misinformation: A Novel

Vachon: Hey, Ive got this scene. Theres this guy. His names Jim Carrey. And hes in his house. And he spends like, a lot of time there. And you wouldnt expect it, but hes just mainlining content.

Theres a long pause. Vachon is terrified. Carrey is about to tell him its a horrible idea, he thinks.

Carrey, finally: And you know what else? Sometimes Jim Carrey makes himself up before he goes to bed, because hes afraid of selfies that will be taken at the morgue, if he dies in his sleep.

And thats itthe book is born. It begins with that scene and then it explodes: deepfake Jim Carrey pornography, Chinese conspiracies, backyard epiphanies, aliens. Carrey and Vachon cant stop themselves.

Is it true? Did these things really happen to a man named Jim Carrey? It doesnt matter. They feel true. They feel truer than any celebrity memoir. For Jim Carrey, it feels like the truest version of himself hes ever created.

Do you know Jim Carrey? The real Jim Carrey? Jim. Jimmy. Jimbo. The Jimster.

Youve certainly seen the Jims.

Youve seen the fun, farting Jim Carrey, the goofball. The physical comedian. The 1994 Jim Carrey, star of that breakout year when Ace Ventura and The Mask and Dumb and Dumber all pushed his salary to $10 million per film (and then not long after, $20 million), when he was getting compared to Buster Keaton and Jerry Lewis and the head of Columbia Pictures said he may be the biggest star in the world. Well, for a time, maybe until the mid 2000s, Carrey probably was the biggest star in the world.

And then there was a gapmaybe ten yearsin which you probably forgot Jim Carrey existed.

And then he resurfaced, and you probably read about the new Jim Carreys, the bizarre, the provocative, the wait-is-that-really-Jim-Carrey Jim Carreys. Maybe you read about how he became a painter and a political cartoonist. How he began painting multi-ethnic Jesus (Christ consciousness) and then Trump. Or how he nearly lost his mind filming Man on the Moon, and, how, a few years ago, after that documentary about how he nearly lost his mind filming Man on the Moon, he grew out a beard and began going on talk shows and saying things like: I used to be a guy who was experiencing the world, and now I feel like the world and the universe experiencing a guy. Or, during that uncomfortable fashion show interview: I didnt get dressed up. There is no me.

You probably thought Jim Carrey just went crazy.

But the truth is stranger and more wonderful still.

Jim Carrey

For eight years, they talk. Talking and writing is medicine, salvation. And Jim Carrey tells Dana Vachon about everything. Everything it has ever meant to be Jim Carrey. All the Jim Carreys. The child Jim Carrey making faces in his bedroom mirror. The teenage Jim Carrey, the high school dropout, driving with his dad hundreds of miles through the snow to perform standup. The Jim Carrey making his big break, opening for the legend, Rodney Dangerfield, booking The Tonight Show, getting his first TV role. The 1994 Jim Carrey. And then the Jim Carrey that remained when the mega star Jim Carrey began to fade.

And with all these Jim Carreys assembled, the two friends begin crafting the next Jim Carrey, the Jim Carrey to contain all Jim Carreys. A Jim Carrey different from the Jim Carreys of past writers and journalists, those people who believe after an hour or so with a subject, they can somehow capture that person, read his inner most self in everything he does: in the way he responds to a fan, or drinks a Diet Coke, or swings a golf club. No, you just get more Jim Carreys. The Rolling Stone Jim Carrey or the Esquire Jim Carrey or the TMZ Jim Carrey. And can you actually call those real?

No. But while helping write this new Jim Carrey, the Jim Carrey who battles aliens with Gwyneth Paltrow and isnt real, something really weird starts to happen: Dana Vachon begins to see the Jim Carrey everybody else kinda missed.

One day, while the two are writing an absurdist scene fixated on Carreys fathers bowtie, Carrey leaves the room and Vachon, still writing, looks up to see Carrey standing there holding the actual bow tie, like a relic. On another occasion, working on a hallucinogenic dialogue with his fatherhis father being ground to death in a Play-Doh Fun Factory beltCarrey writes the line, I started dreaming for you, and Vachon thinks, hell, here in the craziest, most unreal scene was the truth of a father son relationship: I started dreaming for you.

Aaron RapoportGetty Images

Carreys father died in that breakout year, 1994. He never saw Carrey become a mega star. If theres one thread that ties together all the Jim Carreys, it is he, Percy Carrey, Jims father. How his father reminded him of a real-life cartoon. How his father had given up musician dreams, artist dreams, to raise a family and see his son through the snow to his comedy gigs, his sons art. I started dreaming for you.

A truth. Did Vachon stumble upon ... a truth? And does Danna Vachon know Jim Carrey now? The ur-Jim-Carrey, the true Jim Carrey?

Well, if you ask Jim Carrey who Jim Carrey really is, he will probably tell you that Jim Carrey is, in fact, no one. Jim Carrey doesnt exist. And doesnt that make a purposefully fictional Jim Carry who doesnt exist just about the most real Jim Carrey of them all?

If Jim Carrey didnt go crazy, then what the heck actually happened?

The answer is that sometime around 2000, Jim Carrey began to see. He began to see the charade of personathe Latin origins meaning something like: a theatrical mask. Like Carrey's own film, The Mask: its something you wear, something that alters you and also becomes you, but falsely.

And the true story of Carreys not-crazy path to enlightenment begins in Toronto. Carrey started, in his teenage years, as an impressionist. He did Elvis and Henry Fonda and Ghandi and dozens more. Then one day, he wanted to be original. So he dropped the impressions and took the stage each night simply as Jim Carreywith nothing prepared. He would just improvise on the spot. Some nights he got killedyelling, bottles thrown. Some nights he did the killingand the throwing. He was becoming someone new each time, some new Jim Carrey.

But who did Jim Carrey want to be? Who could he be? He was still so young.

So young that when Rodney Dangerfield first spoke to Carrey in his dressing room, he just looked down at the young comedian and, without saying a word, began howling uncontrollably with laughter.

He turned to his friend, Joe Ancis, and said: Who the FUCK is this guy, man?? Look at him!

Then to Carrey: Have you ever been in LOVE??

He had not. But what Carrey could be was the audiences release valve. He could be unbridled joy. He could be a man Free from Concern, so that his audience would be free from concern. That would be his persona, his main mask, he decided.

Erving Goffman, the Canadian sociologist, wrote of social behavior as mask wearing. When we dine with friends, when we meet strangers, when we interview for jobs, we, like thespians, are wearing faces. We do this unconsciouslyand mostly to blend in. But there is one person among us who wears his mask differently, consciously, intentionally. Goffman called this wearer cynical. A cynical individual may delude his audience for what he considers to be their own good, or for the good of the community. Elsewhere, Goffman refers to one cynical act as a pious frauda kind of innocent deceit.

Archive PhotosGetty Images

For years, the Man Free from Concern was Carreys fraud. He laughed and farted and climbed up walls and lived knowingly, willingly, inside Hollywoods Truman Showall to make his audience roar. But a time came when Jim Carrey no longer wanted to be that man, when the jesters face became too heavy and he took that mask off.

Thats what his novel with Dana Vachon comes to be about. Its about dismantling Persona. Its about the persona of Jim Carrey, someone who tried so hard for so long to be one thing, but realized, later, he was no longer doing it for an audience, but for himself. His mask, his Ego, demanded relevance and so he was performing for it, for himself. He was committing self-fraud.

So he threw the mask of Jim Carrey away, and he began a new, better, more cynical act: a war on Jim Carrey, a fraud to reveal fraudulence.

You see, for the last two decades, Jim Carrey has been on a singular quest to reveal and then vanquish Ego. To tear off its face, to stretch it and show that face as a false idol. And then to paint on it several contradictory faces that are somehow all true and falseand then to wear it.

What happened when Jim Carrey set forth on this quest? Well, the world couldnt see what Jim Carrey was doing. What he was doing with those weird red-carpet interviews and bizarre late-night ramblings: he was showing the audience their own masks. They didnt understand.

And what happened after he did these things? The world simply had enough of Jim Carrey. They started writing things like Why wont Jim Carrey just shut up? and Hollywood wont cast Jim Carrey anymore. He had all these colors to paint with nowhumor and heartbreak and self-awareness. (Thats what Dangerfield meant when he laughed: there was a world of emotions left to be had and with them you construct art and with art you get to be free and not burdened by Self. With art you get to teach others about the burden of Self.)

Yes, he had all these colors now, and he walked through that door on a quest to vanquish self, and he dragged paint cans down the streets of the West Village, and all the while we thought he was just losing his mind, losing his relevance. But it was the opposite. OH BOY! was Jim Carrey on to something this time.

Jim Carrey is sitting in his L.A. kitchen with Dana Vachon a month before publication. Theyre doing a Zoom interview about their novel and looking like two brothers who cant seem to sit still at the dinner table. They wear the same devilish grin.

They talk about meeting each other and becoming fast friends and how they didnt mean anything by turning Gwyneth Paltrow into a militant alien killer, because Jim Carrey actually really respects Gwyneth Paltrow, and also we plugged Goop, so what do you want??

And then there comes the question, the question no one really knows the answer to anymore, because they stopped asking: who is Jim Carrey nowall these years later?

Kevin Winter/BAFTA LAGetty Images

Carrey becomes serious. Im two things, he says. Im a body and mind that has to defend itself and take care of itself and try to make a good show of itself in the world. (The original fraud.) And then Jim Carrey is the other thing, which contains the first: he is everything. There is nothing that isnt me, he says. And this everything is why he, Jim Carrey, doesnt really exist. Because how can you exist, when you are the same as all things?

And then Jim Carrey tells the story of the first time he walked through this door, Truman style. The moment when Jim Carrey didnt want to be Jim Carrey anymore and his new beautiful fraud truly began. It's a story best told last. Would you believe it if told first?

It begins one night in 1999.

In a very desperate moment in my life, I was driving up the Pacific Coast Highway in a convertible in December, and it was cold and I had tears pouring down my face, trying to figure out what the hell this whole mess is all about, Carrey begins. He was brokenhearted then. No bags. Hell bent on San Francisco. Wanting to just check into a random hotel. Then I thought: What are you doing? People know you. You can't just, desperately check in with no bags and looking like a maniac.

Carrey decided to turn around. When he turned onto the on-ramp back to L.A., he thought about his recent roles as Andy Kaufman and Tony Clifton in Man on the Moon. He had disappeared behind those masks, and for the first time in a long time, he was free of Jim Carrey. He realized he was free only when he was someone else. And then Jim Carrey thought: what if I am someone else? And this feeling came over me, Carrey remembers. Every bit of concern that I had in my body drained out of me. And suddenly everything was crystal clear. The moon, it was like I could reach up and pull it out of the sky. And I started laughing hysterically. I'm driving in the cold, and I'm laughing hysterically, and Im crying at the same time with laughter, and my mind just started writing jokes, one after the anotherjokes, jokes, jokes, jokesto make myself laugh. I was free. I was totally free.

The experience lasted for three days. And then the world returnedemails and calls from agents and, just, life. But Carrey glimpsed enlightenment: wholeness. And for the rest of his career, through art, he has wanted to convey this truth. But only if we can sift through the fraud. The fraud is for our own good.

You must read beneath the words, Carrey concludes. Because [the novel] is really close to the bone. There are things here that are the source of terrible pain and the source of terrible challenge in my life. Theyre all there in one form or another. It just might not be the exact details. But if you open up to reading a little deeper, youre gonna know me.

So maybe, in the end, we can know Jim Carrey. He's just, well, a little different, and maybe he isn't even Jim Carrey anymore. That's the strange and wonderful truth. As to which parts are true truth, which parts are personas and which parts are crying in convertiblespeople will want to know.

Carrey just grins.

Thats their problem, he says.

And then, loudly, in a different voice and maybe a different Jim: ITS THEIR PROBLEM, MAAAAAAN!!

This commenting section is created and maintained by a third party, and imported onto this page. You may be able to find more information on their web site.

Read more:

Jim Carrey Would Like to Be Erased Forever - Men's Health

Free Tarot Reading, July 10, 2020 – YourTango

Plan a creative weekend, star signs!

Your free tarot card reading is here for you and all zodiac signs in astrology starting Friday, July 10, 2020.

The Sun is in the zodiac of Cancer. The waning gibbous Moon will be located in the sign of Pisces all day.

Today's daily number is a Life Path 3, the Communicator of numerology.

RELATED: Check Out Your Daily Horoscope For Today And Tomorrow Here

Famous Life Path 3s include Mary J Blige, Bill Cosby, and Snoop Dogg.

Life Path 3 individuals are creative, communicative, often disorganized in their focus, but it's what makes their dynamic in the workplace so inspiring, zany and eye-catching.

RELATED: Your Weekly Love Horoscope & Tarot Card Reading For July 6 - 12, 2020, Based On Your Zodiac Sign

Today, while the waning gibbous Moon is in the sign of Pisces, we are ready to try something a bit off the path.

It can feel hard to have both feet on the ground.

Our focus is on experimentation and not on accomplishing any one thing.

All zodiac signs can think broadly.

We have the potential to be visionaries and to reach for the sky.

All zodiac signs are dreamy and driven which can mean losing sight of reality, but that's when great ideas are born!

Today's a great day for doing something spiritual and creative!

The Last Quarter Moon in Aries will arrive this week, so there's plenty of time to focus on accomplishing something later. For Friday, dream!

Six of Swords

You are going through some things today that are helping you to transition into a better relationship with yourself.

It may feel as though you are almost giving birth to a new mindset, and the experience of enlightenment can feel both exhilarating and exhausting all at the same time.

Learning as you go as part of this beautiful change. Celebrate it.

RELATED: 8 Reasons Aries Women Are The Best Women To Love

Knight of Pentacles

You aren't stuck even if you feel as though you are. People often go through situations where they have to repeat circumstances over and over again before they figure out how to overcome them.

If you find yourself repeatedly experiencing the same painful reality, it's because your mind wants you to learn a new way of thinking.

Introduce something different into your lifestyle to help you see the world with different eyes.

RELATED: 5 Facts About Taurus You Should Know (But Don't), According To Astrology

Eight of Wands

You are going to be traveling soon.

This can be a physical relocation or one that is emotional.

The path can be difficult to take but necessary.

You will find this to become a very enriching and fulfilling experience.

Perhaps one of the most important you'll ever experience in your entire life.

RELATED: 8 Biggest Lies About Gemini's Two-Faced Personality Corrected!

King of Pentacles

Being ambitious is not a form of greed.

You are looking to improve yourself for good reasons.

Don't feel guilty for wanting more from your life.

Consider you breaking through the glass ceiling so that you can help others.

First, to get there you must help yourself.

RELATED: 4 Secrets To Making A Cancer Love You Forever

Nine of Pentacles

You are ready for more good things that life has to offer, and you are willing to work hard for it.

Setting your standards high is important for you today.

You will not want to settle for less than you deserve, nor should you. Your sacrifices are worth it.

RELATED: Why Are Leo Zodiac Signs So Famous

The Star

The Universe sees all that you've experienced, and it's there beside you to guide you along.

Even when you have felt all alone, your higher power knows and has been there beside you.

Trust in your faith. And don't give up hope.

RELATED: 8 Reasons Virgo Women Are The Best Women To Love

Justice

When you were treated unfairly you hoped that karma would return evil for evil.

But you have come to a place where you forgive even though you cannot forget.

Letting go of the painful past is healing for you.

Releasing it has helped you to move on and not worry about what happens to other people because your attention is back on yourself.

RELATED: 7 Ways To Love A Libra Woman & Win Her Heart, According To Astrology

The Moon

But often show you who they are, and it is hard to imagine that you misplaced your trust.

You may see something in person once that was your everything, and now you must accept them for who they are.

This can be a difficult time and yet you are ready to face the truth which is why it's manifested at this time.

RELATED: 10 Celebrity Scorpios And Why They Are So Cosmic, Per Astrology

The Hierophant

Establishing a new way of doing things may seem to be harder than you had thought.

So, now it's important for you to decide if you would like to continue to go your own independent way or join an organization whose mission mirrors your hopes and dreams for helping change the world.

RELATED: 6 Things You Probably Don't Know About The Sagittarius Woman

The Emperor

Do you need someone strong in your life to help give you support, but it can feel scary to be so needy right now.

You might be looking for a person to show you this type of courage because by observing it you can be stronger too.

RELATED: 5 Reasons Why A Capricorn Zodiac Sign Is The Best Friend You'll Ever Have

The Fool

You are so ready for a major change that you might be willing to take a risk you've never considered before.

You are losing your sense of inhibition and this can be an invigorating time of growth and discovery for you.

You may see a door open as a result because the Universe is wanting to reward you for your trust in the process.

RELATED: 5 Compelling Reasons *Everyone* Should Date An Aquarius (At Least Once)

The Empress

Your heart is wide open to receive love and adventure.

You have spent a good amount of time thinking and evaluating your life and sense that life is headed in a beautiful direction.

Perhaps you are going to discover a new way of expressing your life's purpose and sharing love with others.

RELATED: The Negative Personality Traits Of The Pisces Zodiac Sign, According To Astrology

Let's make this a regular thing!

Aria Gmitter, M.S, M.F.A., is YourTango's Senior Editor of Horoscopes and Spirituality. She studies with the Midwestern School of Astrology and is a member of the South Florida Astrological Association.

Original post:

Free Tarot Reading, July 10, 2020 - YourTango

Dalai Lama: We Should Act As One to Protect Our World – Exchange 99

This planet is our solely residence. Environmental specialists say that over the subsequent few many years, international warming will attain such a stage that many water assets will go dry. So ecology and combatting international warming are crucial.

For instance, my nation, Tibet, is the final word supply of water in Asia. Rivers together with Pakistans Indus, Indias Ganges and Brahmaputra, Chinas Yellow River, in addition to the Mekong, move from Tibets plateau. So we must always pay extra consideration to the preservation of Tibetan ecology. This isnt just for the curiosity of 6 million Tibetans however all folks on this area. Up to now, after I was flying over Afghanistan, there have been clear indicators that what was once lakes and streams had been already dry. I really feel that Tibet additionally could grow to be like that quickly. Relating to Tibets political issues, Ive already retired. However concerning Tibets ecology and really wealthy tradition, Im totally dedicated.

We human beings have these marvelous, good minds. However were additionally the most important troublemakers on the planet. Now we must always make the most of our brains with compassion, and a way of concern. This is the reason one among my commitments is promotion of deeper human values.

From delivery, we depend on others, notably our moms. From then, every particular persons existence solely will depend on a group, as a result of were a social animal. Neighborhood is the supply of our happiness, so we should care for the group. So now, in fashionable occasions, the idea of humanity is one group. East, west, north, south: everyone seems to be interdependent. The fashionable financial system has no nationwide certainaries. Due to this fact, now wed like a way of oneness of all 7 billion human beings. Up to now, many issues had been created due to an excessive amount of emphasis on our variations, resembling nationalities and religions. Now, in fashionable occasions, that pondering is old-fashioned. We must always take into consideration humanity, about the entire world.

We should hearken to scientists and specialists. Their voices and information are crucial. And spiritual folks ought to pay extra consideration to scientists reasonably than simply pray, pray, pray. Within the historic Nalanda Buddhist custom, which we Tibetans comply with, the whole lot is investigated and never accepted by religion alone. If via reasoning we discover some contradiction, even in Buddhas personal phrases, then weve got the fitting to reject them. From childhood, I used to be at all times engaged in plenty of debate. Our pondering was primarily based not in religion however reasoning.

Buddha himself was not born in a palace however beneath a tree. He attained enlightenment beneath a Bodhi tree. When he handed, it was beneath a tree. One of many guidelines throughout our monsoon retreat is that we must always not minimize down something inexperienced. So this exhibits that Buddha himself paid consideration to inexperienced points.

Hours, minutes and seconds: time by no means stands nonetheless. We are also a part of that nature. The previous is vital, however already previous. The longer term remains to be in our palms, so we should take into consideration ecology on the international stage.

This essay is tailored from his current TIME 100 Discuss

See original here:

Dalai Lama: We Should Act As One to Protect Our World - Exchange 99

Russia’s Vote On The Constitutional Amendments A Putin Triumph, An Electoral Fraud, Or A Step Towards A More Balanced Political System? – Middle East…

The voting in Russia on the constitutional amendments to what is now being referred as the "president's constitution". concluded on July 1, 2020 after voters had been able to cast their ballot electronically or in person over an entire week. According to the official results, nearly 78% of the voters were in favor of the amendments out of a voter turnout of 67.97%[1] The official results announced by the Central Election Commission (CEC) drew diverse reactions. Putin's camp showed elation. It was a "triumph"and a "vote of confidence in Putin"said Putin's press secretary Dmitry Peskov, who claimed that the vote had proceeded without scandals and with minimal violations.[2] This appraisal was contested by Putin's opponents who claimed that the results had been achieved by fraud. Opposition activist Alexei Navalny tweeted: "It is incredibly enraging how the CEC and [its chairman Ella] Pamfilova are deliberately trying to show that don't give a damn about the law. They orchestrated a fake voting, and publicly announce its results, although at that moment in the parts of Russia where 85% of the population resides the voting precincts were still working. They should face a court trial."[3] A third opinion believed that the official results were valid, but that the respectable showing by the opposition ushered in a new and perhaps more positive era in Russian politics

Below is a sampling of reactions to the elections.:

Ballot boxes being opened (Source: Rtvi.com)

The Official Results Accurately Reflected Popular Sentiment

The popular Tolkovatel Telegram channel claimed that the authorities had astutely sprinkled social benefit amendments and the overriding issue in Russia was the social issue. The opposition had also shot itself in the foot by failing to decide whether to boycott the vote or participate and vote no. If the entire opposition had voted no, it could have secured a virtual tie in Moscow: "In general, the majority voted in favor of the new constitution... The forecasts of Sergey Belanovsky and other sociologists on the growth of the protest wave did not come true...

"Two factors have played a role in that. The first was the social support measures (increased child support and unemployment benefits... Many were pleased, especially outside big cities, where even 10 thousand rubles is real money.

This pro-amendments poster reads: Annual indexation of pensions (Source: Vedemosti.ru)

The second was the lifting of the quarantine measures. (...) The third was the "social"block of the amendments to the Constitution.

"The opposition (both systemic and non-systemic) failed to reach the voters... They did not have a single plan of action. For example, Navalny, Yabloko, [former Yekaterinaburg mayor Yevgeny] Roizman and a significant part of the 'Internet'intelligentsia called for a boycott of the voting. The Communist Party, [Maxim] Katz, Khodorkovsky and others planned to vote 'against'... As a result, both strategies have failed.[4]

Political analyst Anna Fedorova commented on the high turnout of the voting: "The main reason for the high turnout is that the issues that were put to the vote are really important for people. Voters came to the polls because they want to be heard on these issues. The Constitution is the fundamental document for the country, so the high turnout is not surprising. It should be so."

"Observers, including those from opposition organizations, recorded only a small number of minor violations. There were no gross violations, that could cast doubt on the results" added Fedorova.[5]

Dmitry Drize a featured columnist for Kommersant wrote in an article titled "The Authorities Got the Result that They Needed"that the strategy of packing all the amendments together was a winning one. Every person found an amendment that appealed to him. A pensioner got annual indexation of pensions. Those who believed in the family as the country's spiritual backbone received an amendment postulating that "there would be no 'parent 1' or 'parent 2', but [a family meant] only a man and a woman."Moderate reformers got some semblance of parliamentary oversight etc. And since the government is also part of society it inserted some amendments on its own behalf.

The government also gave the people a sense of involvement in a major event the ratification of a constitution. Additionally, the government was still benefitting from the impression that it had restored Russia's position as a great power. "There is such a thing as an appeal to consciousness. The process itself is important here - the country has reached a new level. We have passed through the stages of a long journey, and you, the deep nation, are a direct participant. You are part of the important process of rising from your knees. Yes, 'Crimea is ours'constitutes a unifying idea. We are no longer humiliated and insulted, we are a power, and this is enshrined in the basic law. The 90s are defeated. In other words, you do not need to see only the notorious resetting [of Putin's presidential terms] to zero- look at the broader picture: we are doing everything for you, we are trying."

Amendment backers appeal to patriotism in a campaign billboard that reads "We will defend our ancestors'memory (Source: Rbc.ru)

Drize also criticizes the lack of a unified opposition plan: "Some critics might say that the state used administrative resources but if people everywhere are against, similar tactics will not work...The opponents of the amendments conducted a difficult and prolonged battle with each other...as a result the authorities got the result they wanted."[6]

Political analyst Sergei Mikheyev claimed that what interested the voters was survival and they voted in favor of amendments pushing other considerations aside"Do you call this [voting behavior a] lack of enlightenment? This is the deep wisdom that allows Russia to survive. When some personal resentments, inconveniences, and sometimes even abuse and crimes of power fade into the background when survival is at stake".[7]

Critics Of The Voting: The Fix Was In From The Beginning

Regime opponents were far from convinced that fair elections had been conducted, and claimed that the authorities had set themselves goals for both turnout and percentage in favor of the amendments and then manipulated the vote to get the desired results.

Political scientist Fedor Krasheninnikov argued that the election was a sham: "We were informed in advance that the turnout would be about 70% and the votes 'for'the amendments will amount to 70%. These predefined numbers are now being drawn up [by election commissions] ... It was not a genuine vote, but an imitation of it ..."[8]

Alexander Kynev, another political scientist, claimed that the regime won thanks to its ability to impose fear on certain voters:

"Cities no longer want to support the current government... Authority in Russia is based purely on coercion - this is the main result of the vote. (...) The group most loyal to Putin is comprised of those who succumb to state pressure... those who fear losing their jobs."

Although he did not believe these were fair elections, Kynev still criticizes the boycott of the voting advocated by Navalny: "The result of the protest vote in the cities shows the defeat of Navalny's plan, for the first time in many years he made a gross political mistake. "[9]

Prominent physicist Sergei Shpilkin, who specializes in vote analysis claimed that he had discovered evidence proving that the June 25-July 1 plebiscite had been tainted.

Shpilkin's graphs of 88 million votes show shares of :"yes"votes approaching 100% in precincts that reported similarly abnormally high turnouts. Shpilkin's estimate is that up to 22 million votes may have been cast fraudulently. He concluded: "There was no manipulation of votes in Russia's elections on this scale in the recent past. In absolute terms, this is an unprecedented case."[10]

Shpilkin believed the actual vote approximated the following: The real turnout, apparently, was about 44%, and the percentage of votes for the amendments was about 65%. Thus, the number of voters who voted for the amendments was approximately 29% of all Russian voters, or about 31 million people.

Sergey Shpilkin (Source: Newtimes.ru)

Political consultant Gleb Pavlovsky accepted Shpilkin's figures as authoritative and claimed that they did not bode well for Putin: I think that this is the beginning of another era. It was important for Putin to acquire a tool to cow his inner circle, so that they would not snoop with their eyes [in search of a successor]. He did not get it. He demonstrated that almost half of the country does not support him. He has big problems."[11]

Liberal politician Boris Gudkov writing in Echo of Moscow claimed that Putin had lost in reality despite an election deck stacked in his favor "He lost under conditions when he banned campaigning against constitutional amendments. He lost, despite disguising his 'reset to zero'"with a veneer of minor amendments. He lost, despite the titanic efforts of the entire propaganda apparatus and huge financial resources thrown "into battle" in support of his life-long rule! Today we already know how the Kremlin's result was "forged"by crooks from the election commissions: according to official figures, 83.6% (!) (58.5 out of 70 million) of the citizens who allegedly took part in the vote voted 'ahead of schedule', i.e. beyond ALL CONTROL [emphasis original] and independent monitoring. Our fraudulent electoral system has never had such favorable opportunities for total fraud."[12]

A Third Approach: Putin Won But His Opponents Can Also Draw Encouragement From The Results

In contrast to the approaches that celebrated Putin's triumph or decried the vote as a fraud, a third approach claimed that Putin's victory was genuine but not a total knockout and therefore the regime would hitherto have to consider the positions of its opponents.

Political scientist Alexei Makarkin believes the results were genuine as the authorities had successfully mobilized administrative resources. However, the opposition as well could take comfort in the results "The entire campaign that accompanied this vote carried a message that the people are 'for'the amendments, and only a few marginals are opposed to them. Suddenly it turns out that the situation is not so simple."[13]

Mk.ru's observer [featured columnist] Mikhail Rostovsky authored an extensive analysis in this vein that is reproduced below in full. Perhaps Rostovsky was influenced by the fact that Mk.ru is read by both sides, but he essentially requested the opposition to respect the vote and take solace in the fact that they had proven themselves a serious force. He also opined that despite the new constitution allowing Putin to continue in office till the age of 83, he was now further convinced that Putin would not exercise this option. Rostovsky wrote:

"Putin and the new version of the Constitution that he promoted have definitely won. But by the same token the opponents of the new version of the Basic Law did not lose unequivocally. The voting results, which ended on July 1, were a rare example of political balance. The level of support that received power is quite sufficient to maintain governance in the state. But it is likewise impossible to say that the government has received an absolute mandate.

"A political split within a country is usually a bad thing. However, sometimes the existence in society of two opposing opinions that enjoy wide enough support, can, on the contrary, play a stabilizing role. When deciding on resetting Putin's presidential terms to zero, Russia adopted a Solomonic decision the best that is possible in this situation. Vladimir Vladimirovich Putin is required to work with both those who voted for it and those who voted against.

"The most dangerous official outcome for the country's future would be the Central Asian version where the level of support for the new version of the Constitution stood at 100% of the vote. Some national republics of Russia exhibited results closely approximating this 'standard of success': Chechnya - 97.92% (who would doubt it), Tuva - 96.79.

"But such results do not seem very typical even against the background of other national regions with well-developed traditions of 'respect for the bosses': Bashkiria - 88.68%, Mordovia 85.60%.

"And such indicators seem completely atypical against the background of the authorities'results in other territories. Moscow: 65.29% in favor and 33.98% against. Kamchatka: 61.76% in favor and 37.16% against. Arkhangelsk region: 65.78% for and 33.98% and against. Magadan: 62.03% in favor and 36.62% against.

"There was even a region in Russia in which the draft Constitution was defeated by an absolute majority. The Nenets Autonomous Okrug found itself in this unusual role in which no new version of the Basic Law exists. 55.25% of the voters who participated in the vote said.

"What do such results attest to regarding the country's will? [Namely]that there exist two competing visions of Russia's future that are supported by society. Here is how, even before the vote, they were described on social networks by the VTsIOM General Director Valery Fedorov: 'Those in favor of the amendments view them as guarantees for continuing Putin's patriotic and social policies. And that suits them perfectly. They support it. And resetting to zero for some of them is not that important, but for the other part it is even a positive, because it reinforces guarantees of a constant course. Those who are against saw the resetting [of Putin's terms] as negative- because they do not want to continue living under Putin, who [even] today does not suit them.

"Of course, the balance of power between those who are for and those who are opposed is obviously uneven. But the one fifth part of the population who said no to the revision of the Constitution is not 'a bunch of social misfits'. Yes, this is a minority. But not an overwhelming minority. This is a very significant part of the population, whose presence the authorities simply cannot ignore.

"Is the formation of this significant minority the first step towards the emergence of a truly competitive policy in Russia? I really want to, but, unfortunately, I cannot answer this question in the affirmative.

"A traditional problem for Russian opponents of the government is their inability to unite around a single candidate. At the vote on the draft Constitution, they did not have such a problem. The candidate "I am against amendments" united both Communists , Navalny supporters, and all others who do not support Putin. However, already during the next election exam for the authorities - a single voting day in September - the political game will again be conducted according to the usual rules.

"But I still believe my point is accurate: the presence of a significant political minority in the country can have a positive impact on our public life. It is a given that those who favor change and those who back stability are usually opposed. But an alternative view of the situation is possible: they not only oppose, but they also complement each other.

"Continuous changes, without a steering wheel and rudder, are a sure road to chaos. Absolute stability without change is synonymous with hopeless stagnation. How do these general considerations apply to Russian politics in applied terms? I think that's how. Theoretically, a new version of the Constitution gives Vladimir Putin the right to remain in office as president until 2036. I did not believe in the fact that this will be so even before the popular vote. Now I do not believe it even more so.

"Voting results for the authorities are not the pep talks from the hoary Soviet joke: 'We are ready to carry out any task of any party and any government!' Voting results for the authorities show quite a significant level of available support, however, with an entire series of conditions. Like, we trust you, Vladimir Vladimirovich [Putin], of course, but ...

"Perhaps I am engaging in wishful thinking. But, if you were to choose from a whole set of other realistic options, I think this situation is optimal for the country. In a situation where COVID-19 plunged the world into a crisis, and an easy way out of it is not yet visible, Russia vitally needs a strong and self-confident power. But at the same time, the government should not feel itself eternal and omnipotent; it should not assume that citizens would happily consider rubberstamping any decision. It seems to me that the results of the popular vote on amendments to the Constitution send to those who are now at Russia's helm a similar mixed and ambiguous signal.

"Commenting on the results of voting on social networks, the famous Russian journalist Ekaterina Vinokurova addressed everyone with a passionate appeal: 'All in all, it is unnecessary to declare those who think differently enemies. There is no need to insist that [everyone must] join unified ranks on one side of the barricades.'That is eloquently put. An attempt to put everyone into a single line, has on more than one occasion pushed Russia onto a dead end path of development. The majority must respect the opinion of the minority, and the minority - the position of the majority.

"The resetting of Putin's presidential terms to zero has occurred. However, this was done during a popular vote, the results of which, on the whole, appear to fully approximate reality. Russia is divided into those who like to reset Putin's presidential terms to zero and those who are uncomfortable with this. But the country still has a working institution of elections albeit imperfect, albeit with failures . This institution should remain a universal method for resolving the issue of power and resolving political differences in Russia. Despite the limited effectiveness of this method in our specific Russian conditions, others are still worse.[14]

Mikhail Rostovsky (Source: Mk.ru)

[1] Tass.ru, July 2, 2020.

[2] Tvrain.ru, July 2, 2020.

[3] Twitter.com/navalny/, July 1, 2020.

[4] T.me/tolk_tolk, July 2, 2020,

[6] Kommersant.ru, July 2, 2020.

[7] Tvk6.ru, July 5, 2020.

[8] Novayagazeta.ru, July 1, 2020.

[9] Novayagazeta.ru, July 1, 2020.

[10] Themoscowtimes.com, July 3, 2020.

[11] Tvk6.ru, July 5, 2020.

[12] Echo.msk.ru, July 5, 2020.

[13] Tvk6.ru, July 5, 2020.

[14] Mk.ru, July 2, 2020.

Original post:

Russia's Vote On The Constitutional Amendments A Putin Triumph, An Electoral Fraud, Or A Step Towards A More Balanced Political System? - Middle East...

DiCarlo Shy upon Recognition, Relentless in Her Mission – Wanderer

Elizabeth Liz DiCarlo has been advocating for people on multiple fronts for more than 40 years. That statement of fact recently put DiCarlo in a special category of women from Massachusetts she was named as a Commonwealth Heroine by the Massachusetts Commission on the Status of Women.

Her name was advanced by State Representative Antonio Cabral of the 13thBristol District.

Noted in DiCarlos biography posted on Mass.gov, Cabral gave a long list of her service achievements such as working with populations from Central America, HIV/AIDS education for at-risk people, affordable-housing issues, and efforts to mitigate discrimination faced by LGBTQ people. She is without a doubt the ultimate people-person.

WhenThe Wanderercaught up with DiCarlo, she softly said of all the recognition she has been receiving, its a little embarrassing. Yet DiCarlo speaks strongly and very clearly when it comes to the issues she believes in fighting for, namely helping those who may be the last to receive services. And while she claims to be retired, it was quite clear her work is far from over.

Im working with the Democratic Town Committee, she said of her ongoing work on voter registration so that, people can vote for those who represent them and their interests.

After graduating from the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill in the 1970s, DiCarlo became a nurse working as a public health sector. She is originally from Newton but moved to the New Bedford area after graduating. Her family built a home in Mattapoisett around 1975. I was very happy about that! she said.

New Bedford became her base from which she began work organizing labor-union groups and immersing herself in multi-cultural neighborhoods. I love the richness, the diversity of cultures, she said. New Bedford has people from Cape Verde, the Caribbean, Latin America, Ireland, France there have been waves of immigration through the centuries. She said her work over the years has focused on identifying where need exists and then finding the ways and means to serve the people.

One need that DiCarlo identified as growing in urgency is affordable housing. The next generation cant afford to live in Mattapoisett, she stated and explained that the rising cost of owning or even renting properties is impacting young and old alike. Our seniors want to downsize and live in Mattapoisett, but where?

DiCarlo said it is time to think about different types of housing stock and shared her hope that Mattapoisetts updated Master Plan, currently under review by the Planning Board and other committees with the assistance of SRPEDD, will help in finding new ways to solve old problems keeping a roof over heads. She expressed concern that if Mattapoisett doesnt take a proactive approach to affordable housing, Someone will come in and do it.

Systems, process analysis, data collection, and assessment are some of the cornerstones of public nursing, and DiCarlo has thrown her talents to all of those through the years.

On Cape Cod, DiCarlo was hired as a consultant to bring together a network of agencies and community centers for a needs assessment of the 15 towns that comprise the peninsula. There are growing Latino, Caribbean, and Brazilian communities on the Cape, she said, the goal being to understand how well the people can access healthcare services. To her surprise, 1,000 households participated, not hesitating to share their data. She had deployed 200 volunteers in the effort. There were four languages to take into consideration, she said, The response was fabulous. The data from the surveys pointed to the need for culturally competent care and interpretation services.

With pride, DiCarlo said that this project inspired the development of dental services for immigrant populations throughout the Cape. We found that there was a major issue for these people in accessing dental care. The development of dental operatories, locations and services made available to those without insurance or the means to pay for services, bloomed. We developed partnerships with Cape Cod Regional Vocational High School in Harwich and Cape Cod Community College to provide oral health services. That program reached out across Buzzards Bay to Marthas Vineyard as well.

More recently, DiCarlos work has focused on getting out the vote. We want people to come out and vote their values. From a regional standpoint, she said a strong effort had been made in networking for social justice including LGBTQ platforms, but that it is important to increase the dialogue and understanding that voting matters. Having an up-to-date voter registration is critical.

DiCarlo has been involved in school-based, voter-registration drives and placing visual reminders around New Bedford and the surrounding area that display dates of elections. We need people to think about what is important to them; in the larger cities, you have to find ways of reaching people But this isnt new stuff, she added with a chuckle. Weve been doing this since the Rainbow Coalition, personal empowerment, and political empowerment.

HIV/AIDS, health education, and the role of public health nursing are also part of DiCarlos early work. We engaged with communities to assess their assets and identify their limitations to come up with opportunities, she said. We had candid discussions about how to be safe; its not just giving out information but in having those explicit conversations about sexual practices and drugs. She said providing health care was also part of the program, so people could get the care that they needed.

Given the current pandemic, DiCarlo believes, Its not enough to give education, systems have to be in place to help the victims. She said the Southcoast region has done a good job reaching businesses to ensure that distancing and face coverings are used in the workplace.

While talking about workers her thoughts turned to their homelives. Lots of family members may live in a small apartment. We need to educate the children, make sure food resources are readily available, and think about how they will care for one another to prevent the spread of COVID, she said. Half of New Bedford is Latino. They live in dense situations. If we are looking at the data, we need to make sure educational opportunities are there.

That whole-systems approach is the hallmark of a public health professional or, as DiCarlo framed it, All things are possible with honest collaboration, dignity and respect.

By Marilou Newell

Go here to see the original:

DiCarlo Shy upon Recognition, Relentless in Her Mission - Wanderer

The Art and Science of Changing Lives Press Releases on CSRwire.com – CSRwire.com

Limbitless Solutions builds self-confidence and independence in kids with limb differences.

Jul. 09 /CSRwire/ - Originally published by Adobe

As a graduate student in mechanical engineering at the University of Central Florida (UCF), Albert Manero always wanted to use his engineering skills to change the world. One morning in 2013, he caught a glimpse of how he might do it.

I heard a radio interview with a man who developed the first 3D-printed mechanical hand, shared his design, and essentially started a global movement of makers, Manero says. I was determined to help by bringing whatever skills and lab resources I could to the project.

It wasnt long before a family in Orlando reached out to Manero with a slightly modified requestsomething he and his fellow classmates hadnt tried before. They asked if we could build a bionic arm for their six-year-old son, he says. Their request was a little intimidating and also exciting. We knew if we could assemble the right team of engineers and designers that we could do it. Within eight weeks, we had a prototype, and thats when Limbitless Solutions was born.

Limbitless Solutions finds its inspiration

Manero was soon consumed with the project. Juggling classes and international research, he and his fellow students established a nonprofit organization on the UCF campus. Their focus: making low-cost, lightweight, personalized bionic arms at no cost to families. Making the limbs financially accessible is key. A bionic limb can traditionally cost as much as $50,000something that is unaffordable for many families, especially since a bionic limb requires replacement every few years as a child grows.

Coming up with the mission was a great start, but the real inspiration came when they looked at the problem through the eyes of children with limb differences. Even when kids can get traditional prosthetics or bionic limbs, they may be embarrassed to wear them or simply have a hard time seeing the device as an integrated part of themselves.

Kids with limb differences often face challenges. Our mistake was to assume they just want to blend in and feel normal, says Manero, now president of Limbitless. When we started talking with them, we realized that these kids want to be seen and celebrated for who they aresuperheroes."

That insight made Limbitless what it is today. The team has grown from its initial group of engineers to include artists, designers, developers, and around 25 student interns each semester from across engineering, marketing, and arts disciplines at UCF. The result is a blend of science and creativity that is evident in every bionic arm the organization develops.

Personal designs empower kids to express themselves

Kids are especially excited about the fact that each arm is custom-designed to reflect their unique personality. They get to collaborate with students from the UCF School of Visual Arts and Design to create personalized outer sleeves using creative tools such asAdobe PhotoshopandAdobe Illustrator. Then, the Limbitless art and painting team uses Photoshop, Illustrator,Dimension, andSubstance Painter, along with professional airbrushing equipment, to give each bionic arm its unique character.

Together, theyve designed arms that look like everything from a bouquet of flowers to the arm of Iron Man. This creative expression is crucial for creating a sense of ownership, empowerment, and confidence in each and every child.

Annika Emmert, 15, one of Limbitlesss bionic kids, was 10 when she received her first arm. I cant even begin to explain the opportunities Ive had since meeting the amazing people from Limbitless, Emmert says. The fact tht I got to design my own bionic arm makes me feel good about wearing it. It has changed my life for the better."

That blend of creativity and engineering comes through in everything Limbitless does, including the apps it develops. Kids learn how to control their new arms by playingLimbitless RunnerandLimbitless Adventuregames built usingAdobe XD,Mixamo,Fuse, Photoshop, Illustrator, andAnimate. These fun, immersive games help limb recipients get comfortable with flexing their muscles to produce movements and gestures. That training is key to faster adoption. Testing the effectiveness of the training games in relation to adoption of the arms has been an integral part of their first clinical trial. Preliminary testing shows positive results for use of training games to accelerate the ability to use the bionic arm.

For families, theres an app for bionic arm calibration, troubleshooting, and family support chat. The organization has even developed an app and a website portal that allows families to customize their bionic designs online. Both were designed and prototyped in Adobe XD.

Visual storytelling changes the conversation around limb differences

Limbitless is more than halfway through the clinical trials on its bionic arms. Once complete, FDA certification will enable the prosthetics to be covered by insurance, thereby making the arms more accessible to children with limb differences. In the meantime, the non-profit is working hard to raise awareness and attract funding. Visual storytelling is central to its efforts.

The advocacy and marketing teams top priority is to share the Limbitless mission through the website, social media, flyers, and posters, and they rely onAdobe InDesign,Illustrator,Photoshop,XD, andSparkto do so. Videos on Twitter, Facebook, and YouTube, created usingAdobe Premiere Pro,Premiere Rush, andAfter Effects, are particularly effective in communicating the Limbitless mission and celebrating limb recipients.

Limbitless' sole focus is not only on the technology, such as our bionic arms, but the children using the technology, their families, their lives, and their stories, says Mrudula Peddinti, Branding Director at Limbitless Solutions. Creative storytelling goes beyond scientific data and statistics about a device. It adds emotional impact and the humanity behind the prosthetic. Our role is not only to develop and provide accessible technology, but also utilize the power of visuals to amplify our bionic kids' and families' voices and stories to build awareness throughout the rest of the community. This is what allows Limbitless to not only garner genuine buy-in and support of our mission, but also empower our bionic kids.

The Limbitless bionic kids themselves are helping to raise awareness using visual storytelling. , and now they have their own comic. TheBionic Kidcomic series is the brainchild of then 10-year-old Zachary Pamboukas, who received his first bionic arm in 2016, and his older brother, Christo. The two boys came up with the idea to raise money for other kids in need of bionic arms, writing the story and even helping with the illustrations. The comic is helping to change the conversation around limb differences.

Bionic Beginningsis the amazing origin story of the Bionic Kid, Zachary, a boy who confronts a bully through nonviolent means and ultimately becomes a superhero. It shows how to openly communicate about disabilities, says Manero. A group SVAD professors, Limbitless illustrators, and undergraduate interns sat down with Zachary and Christo to bring the story to life in Photoshop, Illustrator and Spark. We even had the boys draw some of the details to make sure the storyline and characters were just right.

Building a STEAM-powered maker space

When Manero realized how important it was to blend art with engineering, he contacted Matt Dombrowski, assistant professor in the School of Visual Arts and Design at UCF. Dombrowski has been instrumental in pulling the thread of creativity through every team and building an academic program thats truly STEAM-powered.

The idea is to blur the lines among disciplines and show students how to work at the intersection of art and engineering, says Dombrowski. We believe creativity is an essential skill for everyone which is whyAdobe Creative Cloudis embedded in everything we do.

That multidisciplinary approach is a driving force for Limbitless, and the organization will soon have an ideal space for its design-driven engineering to flourish. The non-profit plans to open a new lab on the UCF campus, partially funded by Adobe, which will increase safety, ramp up production to help kids in need, and expand the educational impact for students. This new facility will amplify production up to 10x!

The new Limbitless Learning Lab will more than triple the organizations square footage, allowing more room for 3D printing, laser-cutting, airbrushing, and injection molding equipment. It will also include conference rooms and training areas, ideal for K12 field trips and summer STEAM camps that teach the value of importance of creativity and expose students to the three pillars of the Limbitless mission: engineering design, artful expression, and gamified training. Limbitless has already hostedfield trips for several high school classes, and the new space will allow the organization to expand the program, empowering the next generation of innovators.

Manero also wants to provide a safe space for staff and students to try new ideas and tackle new challenges as they arise, a philosophy that came into play during the COVID-19 crisis. Early in the pandemic, Limbitless quickly repurposed its manufacturing space to produce personal protective equipment (PPE) for local healthcare providers. Employing the capabilities ofAdobe Creative Cloud, the team utilizedLightroomandPhotoshopto process the images of the designed protective visors imprinted with the messageslove,hope,compassion,andthank you yet another sign of its emphasis on creativity and the human spirit. The organization also helped manufacture parts for one of the worlds first3D-printed mechanical ventilators, supplementing supplies for hospitals dealing with an influx of respiratory patients.

"We're so fortunate to have the opportunity to make an impact during the COVID-19 pandemic. We know that this isn't the last challenge we're going to face, says Manero. We want to give students a place where they can pursue creative ideas about how to empower individuals and entire communities.

Limbitless goes full STEAM ahead

For Manero and his team, the journey has been challenging and rewarding. The growing family of bionic kids inspires them to keep improving bionic arm technology and expand design options. More than 160 Limbitless interns have gained valuable 21stcentury STEAM learning skills, and many have gone on to make their mark in art, game development, software, and even accessible technology. And the future looks even better.

Combining immense creative talent and passion with technology and engineering, we can change the world with solutions that are not only functional, but also beautiful, expressive, and empowering, says Manero. Thats really the heart of our mission at Limbitless.

Read the original:

The Art and Science of Changing Lives Press Releases on CSRwire.com - CSRwire.com

There are no limits to learning it’s our path to empowerment – East Coast Radio

Were born not knowing much except how to cry, eat, and sleep. But as we grow, its up to us to expand our horizons. Gaining knowledge is like lighting a fire in our lives. For Athol Williams, Mbali Mahlale, and Kwezi Qika, a commitment to learning has set them each firmly on a path to fulfilment.

Mbali Mahlale was born without arms. The pupil has taught herself to write with her right foot, and eat with her left. Theres nothing difficult about school because I like reading and practising Maths, she says. Learning is her gateway to a world of possibility. Fuelled by an unwavering resilience, Mahlale is determined to become a dentist one day. Sometimes people think I cant do much because of the way I look, she says. Being born without arms wont stop me from succeeding.

Athol Williams life is a testament to success against all odds. Raised in Mitchells Plain, a coloured township, during apartheid meant that Williams was subject to deliberately inferior schooling. I realised that to beat the system, I would have to take personal responsibility for my life and my own education, he says. A schoolboy with a voracious appetite for wisdom, Williams absorbed everything he could. Today, hes the only person to have achieved five Masters degrees from five of the top universities in the world. To uplift others, Williams co-foundedREAD to RISE, an organisation that distributes childrens books. I think its very important for us to always remember the power of sharing knowledge, he says.

But learning isnt just confined to the classroom. As a child, all Kwezi Qika wanted to do was surf yet he couldnt swim. He stayed on the sand, watching as people shredded waves. When a friend gave him a surfboard and wetsuit, Qika was too embarrassed to admit that he didnt know how to swim. Qika merely bobbed on his board between the breakers, hoping he wouldnt get knocked off. Eventually, his desire to carve lines in the water outweighed his lack of knowledge. I had to learn because I knew if I didnt, Im going to drown, he says. Diving in, he doggedly pursued his liquid education and went on to become South Africas first black longboarding champion.

The resolve to always keep learning propels Mahlale, Williams, and Qika on a trajectory of empowerment. Its at the end of our limitations that we see our lives coloured by the gift of knowledge. No matter our circumstances, theres always something to be gained.

Link:

There are no limits to learning it's our path to empowerment - East Coast Radio