Select Page ::

Disneyland in Paris has finally opened its doors for travellers – Happytrips

Posted on July 17, 2020 by Danzig

The two theme parks, Disneyland Park and Walt Disney Studios Park along with Disney Village, and Disneys Newport Bay Club Hotel were reopened for tourists on July 15, 2020. Things were opened with the latest Coronavirus health and safety measures, which include face masks and social distancing.

On the day of reopening, the theme park saw a steady stream of visitors pouring in from across the city in the morning hours. As reported by the local media, a group was pictured by the Mickey Mouse ears. People were seen dancing with happiness as they entered their famous Disneyworld.

According to the Disneyland Paris website, character meet and greets will change to accommodate social distancing while playgrounds, makeover experiences, remain shut for now. Ticket counters remained closed along with playgrounds and make-up workshops. On Saturday, Walt Disney World reopened its famous parks in Orlando, despite the fact that the place has seen a jump in new cases.

In 2019, Disneyland Park in Paris has welcomed around 9.7 million visitors!

Read the original post:

Disneyland in Paris has finally opened its doors for travellers - Happytrips

The Public Pulse: Try this approach for OPS; Police stops; ACLU and free speech – Omaha World-Herald

Posted on July 17, 2020 by Danzig

So, we read in The World-Herald that Laura Murphy, a former ACLU executive, has proclaimed that Facebooks civil rights policies leaves a lot to be desired. She specifically criticizes Facebooks failure, in her view, to adequately fact check posts by President Trump. This so-called politician exemption, she says, elevates the speech of people who are already powerful and disadvantages people who are not.

Since when did our country adopt a two-tiered freedom of speech whereby the expressions of politicians should be curtailed so as not to disadvantage those citizens who are less powerful? I thought the right of speech was a right that belonged to all citizens equally. Not according to the ACLU, apparently.

Dean Olson, Omaha

In response to Bob Reidels July 8 letter (Responsible behavior needed), George Floyd did not resist arrest, and look what happened to him. Youre right that if youre stopped by a police officer youre better off cooperating as long as youre white. Every black man knows his chances of survival might be better if he can escape. Thats what has been demonstrated not just by George Floyd but by many others all over the country for generations.

If police would like to foster compliance amongst blacks, they need to stop abusing and even killing those who comply.

Andrew White, Kearney

Im still trying to figure out what is racist about the campaign mailer saying that Janet Palmtag associated with the views of atheists and radicals. I saw nothing mentioning the race or ethnicity of Ernie Chambers. Last time I looked, he was still an atheist and a radical. When everything is racist, nothing is racist.

Read the original post:

The Public Pulse: Try this approach for OPS; Police stops; ACLU and free speech - Omaha World-Herald

Nanotechnology in Medical Projected to be Resilient During 2019-2025 – Cole of Duty

Posted on July 17, 2020 by Danzig

Nanotechnology in Medical Market 2019: Global Industry Insights by Global Players, Regional Segmentation, Growth, Applications, Major Drivers, Value and Foreseen till 2024

The report provides both quantitative and qualitative information of global Nanotechnology in Medical market for period of 2019 to 2025. As per the analysis provided in the report, the global market of Nanotechnology in Medical is estimated to growth at a CAGR of _% during the forecast period 2019 to 2025 and is expected to rise to USD _ million/billion by the end of year 2025. In the year 2016, the global Nanotechnology in Medical market was valued at USD _ million/billion.

This research report based on Nanotechnology in Medical market and available with Market Study Report includes latest and upcoming industry trends in addition to the global spectrum of the Nanotechnology in Medical market that includes numerous regions. Likewise, the report also expands on intricate details pertaining to contributions by key players, demand and supply analysis as well as market share growth of the Nanotechnology in Medical industry.

Get PDF Sample Copy of this Report to understand the structure of the complete report: (Including Full TOC, List of Tables & Figures, Chart) @ https://www.researchmoz.com/enquiry.php?type=S&repid=2692310&source=atm

Nanotechnology in Medical Market Overview:

The Research projects that the Nanotechnology in Medical market size will grow from in 2019 to by 2024, at an estimated CAGR of XX%. The base year considered for the study is 2019, and the market size is projected from 2019 to 2024.

The following players are covered in this report:AmgenMerckNovartisRochePfizerSmith and NephewNanotechnology in Medical Breakdown Data by TypeNano MedicineNano DiagnosisOtherNanotechnology in Medical Breakdown Data by ApplicationHospitalsClinicsOthers

Do You Have Any Query Or Specific Requirement? Ask to Our Industry [emailprotected] https://www.researchmoz.com/enquiry.php?type=E&repid=2692310&source=atm

Some important highlights from the report include:

You can Buy This Report from Here @ https://www.researchmoz.com/checkout?rep_id=2692310&licType=S&source=atm

The Questions Answered by Nanotechnology in Medical Market Report:

And Many More.

The report on the global Nanotechnology in Medical market covers 12 sections as given below:

See the original post here:

Nanotechnology in Medical Projected to be Resilient During 2019-2025 - Cole of Duty

Nanotechnology in Medical Devices Market Business Outlook, Geographical Segmentation, Industry Size, Share and Comprehensive Analysis to 2027 – Cole…

Posted on July 17, 2020 by Danzig

Nanotechnology in Medical Devices Market report has recently added by Healthcare Intelligence Markets which helps to make informed business decisions. This research report further identifies the market segmentation along with their sub-types. Various factors are responsible for the markets growth, which are studied in detail in this research report.

This report gives a detailed and comprehensive understanding of Global Nanotechnology in Medical Devices Market. With precise data covering all key aspects of the existing market, this report offers existing data from leading manufacturers. Understanding of the market condition by compliance of accurate historical data regarding each and every segment for the forecast period is mentioned. Leading factors affecting the growth of the market in a positive and negative perspective is examined and evaluated and projected in the report in detail. Insightful views and case studies from various industry experts help make the report more authentic.

Ask for the Sample Copy of This Report:

https://healthcareintelligencemarkets.com/request_sample.php?id=59934

Top Key Players Profiled in This Report:

Stryker Corporation, 3M Company, St. Jude Medical Inc., Affymetrix Inc.

The key questions answered in this report:

Get Discount on This Report:

https://healthcareintelligencemarkets.com/ask_for_discount.php?id=59934

Reasons for buying this report:

This research report represents a 360-degree overview of the competitive landscape of the Global Nanotechnology in Medical Devices Market. Furthermore, it offers massive data relating to recent trends, technological advancements, tools, and methodologies. The research report analyzes the Global Nanotechnology in Medical Devices Market in a detailed and concise manner for better insights into the businesses.

Finally, the researchers throw light on different ways to discover the strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats affecting the growth of the Global Nanotechnology in Medical Devices Market. The feasibility of the new report is also measured in this research report.

If You Have Any Query, Ask Our Experts:

https://healthcareintelligencemarkets.com/enquiry_before_buying.php?id=59934

Table of Contents:

Here is the original post:

Nanotechnology in Medical Devices Market Business Outlook, Geographical Segmentation, Industry Size, Share and Comprehensive Analysis to 2027 - Cole...

Quebec Proposes Expanding The Role Of Pharmacists 1st Part: Broadening The Scope Of Professional Acts That Pharmacists Are Permitted To Perform -…

Posted on July 17, 2020 by Danzig

17 July 2020

Norton Rose Fulbright Canada LLP

To print this article, all you need is to be registered or login on Mondaq.com.

In this legal update and in a forthcoming legal update, we willbe addressing two proposed regulations published by the Office desprofessions du Qubec. These proposed regulations are partof several legislative initiatives aimed at granting pharmacistsgreater professional autonomy and at broadening the scope of theprofessional acts they are permitted to perform.

In particular, the Regulation respecting certainprofessional activities that may be engaged in by a pharmacistproposes to broaden the conditions under which pharmacistswill be able to prescribe, adjust or stop certain medications.

The Rglement sur l'amorce et la modificationd'une thrapie mdicamenteuse, surl'administration d'un mdicament et sur laprescription de tests par un pharmacien (Regulation respectingthe initiation and amendment of a drug therapy, the administrationof a drug and the prescribing of tests by a pharmacist) includesthe following amendments to the current regulations:

Originally published 16 July, 2020

Norton Rose Fulbright is a global law firm. We provide theworld's preeminent corporations and financial institutions witha full business law service. We have 3800 lawyers and other legalstaff based in more than 50 cities across Europe, the UnitedStates, Canada, Latin America, Asia, Australia, Africa, the MiddleEast and Central Asia.

Recognized for our industry focus, we are strong across all thekey industry sectors: financial institutions; energy;infrastructure, mining and commodities; transport; technology andinnovation; and life sciences and healthcare.

Wherever we are, we operate in accordance with our globalbusiness principles of quality, unity and integrity. We aim toprovide the highest possible standard of legal service in each ofour offices and to maintain that level of quality at every point ofcontact.

For more information about Norton Rose Fulbright, see nortonrosefulbright.com/legal-notices.

Law around the worldnortonrosefulbright.com

The content of this article is intended to provide a generalguide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be soughtabout your specific circumstances.

POPULAR ARTICLES ON: Food, Drugs, Healthcare, Life Sciences from Canada

Gluckstein Personal Injury Lawyers

This pandemic has been a unique and unsettling experience for just about everyone. Many issues have arisen that we may not have considered when we first learned about COVID-19.

Bereskin & Parr LLP

Repurposing existing or abandoned drugs is an attractive route to finding a treatment and cure for COVID-19 quickly. To initiate such efforts, the World Health Organization (WHO) has set up...

Blake, Cassels & Graydon LLP

Canada has a vibrant life sciences and pharmaceutical industry, with a broad array of firms conducting research and developing innovative medicines, generic medicines, biosimilar products...

See more here:

Quebec Proposes Expanding The Role Of Pharmacists 1st Part: Broadening The Scope Of Professional Acts That Pharmacists Are Permitted To Perform -...

Nanostructured Drug Market Growing at a CAGR %: Analysis of Prevailing Industry Opportunities and Winning Manufacturers 2017 to 2026 – Jewish Life…

Posted on July 17, 2020 by Danzig

The global Nanostructured Drug market report provides geographic analysis covering regions, such as North America, Europe, Asia-Pacific, and Rest of the World. The Nanostructured Drug market for each region is further segmented for major countries including the U.S., Canada, Germany, the U.K., France, Italy, China, India, Japan, Brazil, South Africa, and others.

You will get latest updated report as per the COVID-19 Impact on this industry. Our updated reports will now feature detailed analysis that will help you make critical decisions.

Nanotechnology is a developing field of science that includes nuclear or sub-atomic level control of issue. A nanometer is equivalents to 1 billionth of a meter. Nanotechnology has different application in various fields, for example, concoction sensors, batteries, nourishment, energy units, sun powered cells, texture, energizes, gadgets, space, better air quality, cleaner water, and outdoor supplies. One of the key utilizations of nanotechnology is in medication; nano-drug ranges from the therapeutic application, for example, biological device, nanomaterial, nano-electronic biosensors, and biological machines.

Browse Full Report: https://www.marketresearchengine.com/nanostructured-drug-market

The report covers:

Nanostructured medications are gaining importance in R&D because of the advantages offered by them regarding drug stability, bioavailability, timeframe of realistic usability and measurements. Powerful and safe medication conveyance is a noteworthy test in biotechnology and pharmaceutical manufacturers. Novel methods, for example, nanotechnology are being acquainted by organizations with produce innovative product, which is driving development of the nanostructured drug market globally.

The global Nanostructured Drug market is segregated on the basis of Product as Liposomes, Polymeric Micelles, Solid lipid Nanoparticles, Microemulsion and Nanoemulsion, and Nanosuspension. Based on End User the global Nanostructured Drug market is segmented in Cancer and Tumors and Autoimmune Disorders.

Competitive Rivalry

Merck, Pfizer, Novartis, Abbott, GlaxoSmithKline, Roche, Sanofi, Eli Lilly, AstraZeneca, Johnson & Johnson, and others are among the major players in the global Nanostructured Drug market. The companies are involved in several growth and expansion strategies to gain a competitive advantage. Industry participants also follow value chain integration with business operations in multiple stages of the value chain.

The Nanostructured Drug Market has been segmented as below:

Nanostructured Drug Market, By Product

Nanostructured Drug Market, By End User

Nanostructured Drug Market, By Region

Nanostructured Drug Market, By Company

Report Scope:

The global Nanostructured Drug market report scope includes detailed study covering underlying factors influencing the industry trends.

The report covers analysis on regional and country level market dynamics. The scope also covers competitive overview providing company market shares along with company profiles for major revenue contributing companies.

The report scope includes detailed competitive outlook covering market shares and profiles key participants in the global Nanostructured Drug market share. Major industry players with significant revenue share include Merck, Pfizer, Novartis, Abbott, GlaxoSmithKline, Roche, Sanofi, Eli Lilly, AstraZeneca, Johnson & Johnson, and others.

Reasons to Buy this Report:

Request Sample Report from here: https://www.marketresearchengine.com/nanostructured-drug-market

Table of Contents:

Other Related Market Research Reports:

Octreotide Acetate Market 2019: Industry Demands, Industry Analysis & Forecast By 2024 MRE Analysis

About MarketResearchEngine.com

Market Research Engine is a global market research and consulting organization. We provide market intelligence in emerging, niche technologies and markets. Our market analysis powered by rigorous methodology and quality metrics provide information and forecasts across emerging markets, emerging technologies and emerging business models. Our deep focus on industry verticals and country reports help our clients to identify opportunities and develop business strategies.

Media Contact

Company Name: Market Research Engine

Contact Person: John Bay

Email: [emailprotected]

Phone: +1-855-984-1862

Country: United States

Website: https://www.marketresearchengine.com/

More here:

Nanostructured Drug Market Growing at a CAGR %: Analysis of Prevailing Industry Opportunities and Winning Manufacturers 2017 to 2026 - Jewish Life...

RCFP statement on Liberty University lawsuit against New York Times – Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press

Posted on July 17, 2020 by Danzig

Liberty University filed a lawsuit against the New York Times and two of its journalists on Wednesday over a story reporting that students at the Virginia school contracted COVID-19 after the university partially re-opened campus amid the coronavirus pandemic.

In response to the lawsuit, Katie Townsend, legal director for the Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press, made the following statement:

This lawsuit is an affront to the First Amendment and the guarantee of a free press. Its clearly intended to harass journalists and a news organization simply for reporting on the impact of Liberty Universitys decision to partially reopen during a pandemic.

People across the country are relying on the news media for accurate, critical information about how institutions are responding to COVID-19, and journalists and news organizations should not have to face retaliation or threats of criminal penalties for fulfilling that responsibility.

The lawsuit comes four months after Liberty University Police filed arrest warrants for ProPublica reporter Alec MacGillis and Rendleman, claiming they trespassed on university property. The Reporters Committee issued a statement condemning the criminal trespassing charges, which were later dismissed by a local prosecutor.

The Reporters Committee regularly files friend-of-the-court briefs and its attorneys represent journalists and news organizations pro bono in court cases that involve First Amendment freedoms, the newsgathering rights of journalists and access to public information. Stay up-to-date on our work by signing up for our monthly newsletter and following us on Twitter or Instagram.

See the article here:

RCFP statement on Liberty University lawsuit against New York Times - Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press

SCOTUS Gives Private Religious Schools The Okay To Discriminate Freely – Forbes

Posted on July 17, 2020 by Danzig

United States Supreme Court Building, Washington DC, America

It makes a certain amount of common sense; a religious organization ought to have the freedom to make sure that all its staff are on the same faith page. But the Supreme Court just took this argument much, much further.

In 2012 the court issued a decision onHosanna-Tabor Evangelical Lutheran Church and Schoolv.Equal Employment Opportunity Commission that cemented the ministerial exception, the principle that religious organizations should be exempt from the usual anti-discrimination laws when it came to their employees involved in ministry. The case didnt provide a clear guide to exactly which employees counted as ministers, but thanks to the Supreme Courts new decision, we know that teachers at religious schools come under that umbrella.

The court lumped two cases togetherOur Lady of Guadalupe School v. Morrisey-Berru, and Kristen Biel v. St. James Schoolto address this very issue. This has been touted as a First Amendment case, based on both the free expression clause and the establishment clause. Basically, the idea is that the government should not be able to tell a religious school how to run its business.

The court found against the fired teachers at the center of both cases, holding that ministerial exception applied to anyone who teach faith to students, even if they have neither the training or title involved in doing so.

One may argue that this all makes sensewhy would a Catholic School want to hire a Muslim or atheist teacher, and why would those teachers want to work at a private Christian school in the first place? Shouldnt a religious school be able to keep a staff of believers?

But the decision goes far beyond that question. Groups like the American Center for Law and Justice have been applauding the decision as a win for religious freedom, but they havent been very vocal about the actual content of the cases.

That may be because neither has anything to do with the fired teachers faith. Morrissey-Bellu sued her school alleging age biasbeing fired for being too old. Biels case is also disturbing. She alleges that she was fired after telling administration that she had been diagnosed with breast cancer and would have to take time off for treatment. She was told that having two teachers in the year would be too confusing for the students.

The Supreme Court didnt take a position on whether or not the alleged discrimination had actually occurred; their ruling is essentially that even if discrimination (discrimination that would be illegal in any other work setting) actually occurred, it was none of the courts business. As Justice Alito wrote for the 7-2 majority:

The religious education and formation of students is the very reason for the existence of most private religious schools, and therefore the selection and supervision of the teachers upon whom the schools rely to do this work lie at the core of their mission

Discrimination in private religious schools is nothing new. Investigations found many Florida private schools exercising anti-LGBTQ policies, and the Catholic church has more than once fired teachers for being gay.

This ruling throws the doors wide open. A private religious school need only assign every teacher something like a ten-minute devotional duty as part of the day, and that teacher now falls under the ministerial exception. The school may fire that teacher at any time, for any reason, and that teacher will have no legal recourse. This may be called a win for religious school First Amendment rights, but the First Amendment rights of their teachers have just been clobbered.

The capper here is that in some states, those private religious schools are able to accept students paid for with vouchers, meaning that taxpayers foot the bill for schools that are able to freely discriminate in ways the taxpayer might find objectionable. Private religious schools have often resisted taking taxpayer dollars because of fears that government money comes with government strings attached; slowly but surely, the Supreme Court is cutting those strings, and with them, any sort of accountability to taxpayers themselves.

See original here:

SCOTUS Gives Private Religious Schools The Okay To Discriminate Freely - Forbes

Protesters, here is legal advice on getting pro bono representation after an arrest and your First Amendment – REVOLT TV

Posted on July 17, 2020 by Danzig

REVOLT.TV is home to exclusive interviews from rising stars to the biggest entertainers and public figures of today. Here is where you get the never-before-heard stories about whats really happening in the culture from the people who are pushing it forward.

Due to the past few months of the Black community dealing with the killings of Breonna Taylor, Ahmaud Arbery, George Floyd and more back-to-back; we are no stranger to the art of protesting. Thankfully, when Atlanta protesters are arrested and resources are limited, attorney Durante Partridge offers pro bono legal help to those in need.

I know a lot of lawyers Im familiar with or I interact with regularly, Partridge tells REVOLT about his extensive network who he can rely on to help protesters nationwide. They post things on their social media and things like that just to let it be known. Do research a bit [about] different lawyers and try the different bar organizations to see if they have the information that can lead you in the right way.

REVOLT had the chance to speak with attorney Partridge to get his insight on what actions to take when stopped by the police, pro bono representation, and how to properly exercise your First Amendment right. Get the legal facts below.

What inspired your pro bono representation of protesters who were arrested in Atlanta?

My background. Since I have been an attorney, and even before, [Ive been] just doing a lot of protesting, organizing and just being part of different groups who also do the same thing or thats their foundation. Theyre in the streets protesting, theyre challenging politicians to change policy and things along those lines. Ive always been around it, so it was a no brainer to step out and step up to do something... That doesnt take away from public defenders or anything like that. I respect everyone thats on the frontline, but we all have a job to do. We all have a role to play in that regard.

How exactly do these pro bono services work?

Essentially, we have a group of lawyers in Atlanta who are normally retained by clients and I believe it was about 300-400 lawyers who got together, and created the ATL Justice Lawyers Group on Facebook. If anyone needed assistance or continued to need assistance with respect to our representation for protesting, they could contact us at our email [address]... Once they email us, someone from the team will grab their information, make contact with them and pair them with representation. Its a lot bigger than myself.

One of the lawyers that I look up to in the community a lawyer by the name of Lawrence Silverman just put out a tweet that really compelled a lot of people to just step up and help out, including myself. Basically that call-to-action which wasnt necessarily a call-to-action but just seeing fellow colleagues put themselves [out there] made sense for a lot of other people to do the same, and we just came together to form this coalition of lawyers who are helping people and trying to do good work for the community.

For those Black or brown people who may not be in Atlanta or have the means to pay for legal help if theyre arrested, how do you advise them on seeking out help?

I actually went to law school in Houston and I have a couple colleagues out there [a] lawyer by the name of Brenda DeRouen. She tapped into her network and basically created a list of names as it relates to different lawyers, different Black lawyers specifically, that were interested in helping out and [representing] some of our protesters who are out... If you have been arrested and you dont know, just check with some of the local bar association platforms within the local community. Thats probably a good place to start. From there, just check-in with different lawyers to see if they offer some service with respects to help with protesters.

How have you seen corrupt police officers abuse power and their positions in the courtroom?

Its interesting and its part of the reason why Im not practicing as an assistant D.A. I saw so much. I still see so much as it relates to police reports not [being] 100% accurate and things like that. What happens when we talk about an abuse of power, just having that authority as an officer to write your own reports and in some instances, youre not writing those reports right on the spot. You might take some notes and then revisit it later, but a lot of that comes off of your recollection of what happened. As humans, we have a tendency sometimes to paint things in a certain light that may appear to be more positive for our narrative or not in some situations. I did see a lot of that and had to correct a lot of that as well, especially in those situations where things were recorded and the police report contradicts that of whats in the recording, or vice versa.

I try to challenge officers all the time as it relates to their police reports and I like to give the best evidence that I can, which typically is gonna be dash cam video, bodycam video or things like that, which will shed light on what really happened as opposed to relying on someones memory.

I tell clients all the time, We have a police report [and] a police report is helpful to give us some direction. But, I dont 100% rely on police reports and I have to remind some of my prosecutor colleagues, as well, that they should not also.

What actions do you advise Black people to take when theyre stopped by police?

If at all possible, I would record the interaction. We want to make sure that we survive the encounter and that we document the encounter as best as possible. If were in a situation where were being pulled over, just start your camera. Even if its just audio recording, have some sort of documentation as it relates to the altercation. We see cases where officers will turn off their bodycam, or not activate the bodycam... Just so theres no issues in respect to what actually happened, I would definitely say document everything, take notes in relation to who stopped you and how they interacted with you, as well, because if theres any issues with that interaction, you are empowered to go and make a complaint against those officers. Theyre not totally immune to any issues if they are doing wrong.

The most important thing, I think, is to survive the encounter. Its unfortunate that we have to have that outlook, but given some of the things that weve seen in the media, I just feel like thats the most important thing and that we can live to fight another day. In some situations, weve done nothing to provoke the negative actions or reactions. So, Im not saying we should bow down or anything like that. But, if an officer is doing the wrong thing, then we need to be able to survive that, file our complaint and be able to follow up to get those people removed from the local police department or wherever theyre working. Those are the primary things that I would suggest when getting stopped.

Theres a lot of misconceptions about exercising our rights, and what we can and cannot do. How do we properly exercise our First Amendment?

I tell people all the time, especially during this climate, the First Amendment is very important. We have to realize the fine line that we have regarding the First Amendment. What I can say in regards to that... just do it. Speak your mind, speak on your opinions, and your thoughts, and spread the narrative. Thats the most important thing we can do is speak. Now, the limitations come on the First Amendment when we are impeding on someone elses rights typically. For instance, if we have a non-disclosure [agreement] or something like that in place and were speaking on something that were under contract to not speak on, then that creates a problem. Or if were inciting some type of violence or something along those lines, then we dont have the freedom to speak as it relates to that. Again, thats impeding on someone elses rights.

As far as protesting, posting everything that goes to not necessarily pushing a narrative, but exploiting information and just putting a bigger spotlight on these issues, continue to do it and dont shut up. A lot of us here in Atlanta, were older or generations above the current generation thats leading the protests right now. Were encouraging them to stay out in the streets and keep going because youre making the change whether you see it or not. These policymakers are actually talking about this stuff on a daily basis, [and] trying to figure it out. A number of confederate monuments are starting to come down and were really gaining traction and the talks of reparations. Its just beautiful and a lot of things are happening at this point. We just have to keep going and doing what we have to do.

Original post:

Protesters, here is legal advice on getting pro bono representation after an arrest and your First Amendment - REVOLT TV

Chamber Sip-N-Learn Event Will Cover Bias in Media – San Clemente Times

Posted on July 17, 2020 by Danzig

Staff report

The San Clemente Chamber of Commerces July Sip-N-Learn Event will focus on Bias in the Media, and will be presented by First Amendment Voice.

The Zoom call event will take place on Thursday, July 23 from 5:30-6:45 p.m. and will be led by Steve Miska, Executive Director of First Amendment Voice. First Amendment Voice is a nonpartisan, nonprofit, 501c (3) organization that aims to facilitate inclusive dialogue on civic matters to educate and inspire citizens to engage on important matters in their communities.

Bias in the Media event topics will include exploring trends in the media landscape, learning how technological change shapes information consumption, the importance of local news and breakout sessions. Picket Fence Media Publisher Norb Garrett will participate in the event.

To register, email susie@scchamber.com by Friday, July 17. A small donation of $8 is requested for this event. Cost for Chamber members is $5. To learn more about First Amendment Voice, visit firstamendmentvoice.org.

Original post:

Chamber Sip-N-Learn Event Will Cover Bias in Media - San Clemente Times

Woman who refused to wear mask wants half of $100,000 donated to Starbucks barista – WANE

Posted on July 17, 2020 by Danzig

SAN DIEGO, Calif. A California woman took to social media to criticize a Starbucks barista for refusing to serve her because she didnt have on a mask. That barista ended up getting $100,000 dollars in donations.

Now the spurned customer wants half of that money and is threatening to sue to get it.

Amber Gilles says she posted a photo of barista Lenin Gutierrez after he asked her to wear a mask at Starbucks.

The caption reads Meet Lenen from Starbucks who refused to serve me cause Im not wearing a mask. Next time I will wait for cops and bring a medical exemption.

That post exploded online, and a GoFundMe to raise tip money for Gutierrez surpassed $100,000.

Gilles claims she has medical problems preventing her from wearing a mask and that she was discriminated against. She also said she thinks masks are not effective.

I get shortness of breath, dizziness and it messes with the heartbeat, said Gilles. And I do have asthma as well, and I do get maskne. So theres several things going on and not only that but it doesnt even work.

She shared two pieces of paperwork to show what she calls a medical exemption. A 2015 doctors report she shared shows analysis of her uterus and an ovarian cyst.

And a handwritten note with a San Diego chiropractors letterhead that she asked not to be shown on camera says she has underlying health conditions that prevent her from wearing a mask.

She says her post about the experience is a First Amendment right.

It was discrimination and everybody is okay with it and enabling and rewarding that kind of behavior, said Gilles.

Gilles wants half of the money donated, which was given to Gutierrez in cash last week, and is threatening to sue.

She says the lawyers shes spoken to about taking her case are expensive and she cant afford one yet so she started her own GoFundMe to raise legal fees.

When asked if she has any apology or message to the public, Gilles replied: No absolutely not. I feel like I need the apology. Ive been discriminated against, Im the one whos sick.

Starbucks now requires customers to wear facial coverings or masks in all 9,000 of its company-owned American stores.

The mandate supersedes local laws in some states or cities that might not require wearing one.

Customers who refuse to wear a mask inside can order using delivery, the drive-thru or curbside pickup, the company said.

See original here:

Woman who refused to wear mask wants half of $100,000 donated to Starbucks barista - WANE

Trump-connected college to host in-person graduation, despite state limits on gatherings – POLITICO

Posted on July 17, 2020 by Danzig

The school released a list of safety precautions it is taking for the ceremony. Among them, graduates and other attendees will be screened for Covid-19 symptoms, required to wear masks and sit 6 feet apart from each other.

But Ryan Jarvi, press secretary for Michigan Attorney General Dana Nessels office, said that "organized gatherings of more than 100 people are prohibited by law in that part of the state, and such events clearly show a lack of consideration for the dangerous threat this virus presents."

Emily Stack Davis, a spokesperson for the college, did not confirm how many people were expected to attend. MLive reported that the ceremony is expected to bring 2,600 people to the city of 8,000 residents.

Jarvi said, Should this event proceed, we trust the local law enforcement agencies to exercise their authority and discretion in their enforcement efforts.

We sympathize with those who want to celebrate the success of college graduates, but the unfortunate circumstances surrounding this pandemic have made that difficult for many, and we encourage alternatives to large assemblies that could further jeopardize the health of many people."

Hillsdale College said it had communicated its plans to Gov. Gretchen Whitmers office more than a month before the events. The college also said it continued to work with local law enforcement and health officials; the state Attorney Generals office likewise suggested this was the appropriate and necessary step.

The college, in a press release, said Hillsdale Colleges Commencement is an 'expressive activity' protected by the First Amendment. So far, the college still intends to put on the ceremony.

"Commencement is the most significant event in the life of a college, said Arnn. As old as the first universities, this milestone represents the conclusion of the Colleges labor and also inaugurates an even greater undertaking: each graduates commencing to live a good and happy life in accordance with the highest principles, a life for which they have spent four years preparing.

Continue reading here:

Trump-connected college to host in-person graduation, despite state limits on gatherings - POLITICO

Religious liberty scores a win at the Supreme Court – Bangor Daily News

Posted on July 17, 2020 by Danzig

In a year beset by disappointing decisions from the Supreme Court, a trio of religious liberty cases decided this term provides constitutionalists with some hope.

Lets review:

Little Sisters of the Poor v. Pennsylvania: The Little Sisters of the Poor need no introduction. This order of female Catholics has been serving the elderly in 30 countries for more than 175 years. Although the Little Sisters seem like an unlikely target, the order has been in the crosshairs of one government or another for nearly a decade. In a 7-2 decision written by Justice Clarence Thomas, the Supreme Court held that the federal government had the authority to exempt the Little Sisters from its birth control mandate.

Sadly, the legal battle may not be at an end for the Little Sisters. The case likely will go forward on other grounds, but the court strongly implied that the Religious Freedom and Restoration Act (RFRA) would operate to protect the conscience rights of the Little Sisters. That statute, the court explained, provides very broad protection for religious liberty. It forbids the government from substantially burdening a persons exercise of religion unless the government can demonstrate that there is no less restrictive means by which it can further a compelling government interest.

The contraceptive mandate clearly fails RFRAs test. Certainly, there are other ways the government can provide contraceptives without forcing nuns to do so.

In Espinoza v. Montana, the Supreme Court reaffirmed the fundamental right of families to send their children to the school of their choice, including religious schools. By a vote of 5-4, the court held that a state program to help families cover the cost of private school may not discriminate against schools with religious missions.

At issue in the case was a modest Montana program that granted tax credits for donations to organizations that awarded private-school tuition scholarships. The Montana Supreme Court held that the states Blaine Amendment forbade Montana from providing the tax credits to parents who chose a religious school.

The Supreme Court reversed. The court held that Montanas Blaine Amendment discriminated against religious schools and the families whose children attend them.

In an opinion written by Chief Justice John Roberts, the court held that the Free Exercise Clause protects religious observers against unequal treatment. Montana had discriminated on the basis of a schools religious status, plain and simple. The courts decision strongly suggests that similar amendments remaining in 35 states are constitutionally infirm and may not be used to discriminate against religious schools.

In Our Lady of Guadalupe v. Morrissey-Berru, the court held that the First Amendment bars courts from intervening in employment disputes involving teachers at religious schools. Writing for the court, Justice Samuel Alito stated that the First Amendment protects church autonomy including the right of religious institutions to decide matters of faith and doctrine without government intrusion. This protection, Alito noted, was crucial to the Framers of our Constitution the British Crown, for example, had the right to fill religious offices and to otherwise control religion.

As applied to schools, the court recognized that teachers who are entrusted with inculcating religious values and beliefs are ministers of the faith, even though they are not formally ordained. As such, the government may not interfere with a religious schools decision to hire or fire such an employee.

As Alito recognized, parents choose to send their children to religious schools for religious education and formation. Thus, a narrow interpretation of the ministerial exception would have interfered with the ability of parents to raise their children with a distinctly religious education. In short, teachers at religious schools play a critical role in transmitting the faith to the next generation and are properly categorized as ministers.

Justice Thomas has famously lamented that the Free Exercise Clause seems to rest precariously on the lowest rung of the courts ladder of rights. With its trifecta of religious liberty decisions this term, the Supreme Court may finally be poised to give equal weight to religious liberty. Its about time.

Erin Hawley is a senior legal fellow at Independent Womens Law Center. She wrote this for InsideSources.com. The BDN publishes opinions from partner news services to bring a wider variety of perspectives to readers.

Excerpt from:

Religious liberty scores a win at the Supreme Court - Bangor Daily News

Moon may be 85 million years younger than astronomers think it is, new study suggests – Firstpost

Posted on July 17, 2020 by Danzig

FP TrendingJul 17, 2020 08:39:19 IST

A new study now suggests that Earth's satellite is about 85 million years younger than earlier.

According to a report in Science Alert, researchers say lunar rock samples collected on the Apollo missions are not old enough to verify the normally accepted thought that the Moon is 4.51 billion years old.

Earth's natural satellite was formed from debris created by a collision between the young Earth and a protoplanet. Image credit: Ron Miller

As per the report, the commonly accepted hypothesis is that the Moon was formed from the debris of a collision between the Earth and a smaller planet called Theia. The collision led to the spewing out of molten rock that eventually cooled down and solidified into one whole body that began orbiting the Earth.

This means that the rock that makes up the Moon came from Earth and can be used to date it. Now study now suggests that the Moon was created when the Earth was almost fully formed.

Space.com reported that researchers at the German Aerospace Center found out that, not only did the moon once have a massive, fiery magma ocean, but our rocky satellite also formed later than scientists previously expected.

According to new research, the moon's birth has been pegged at only 4.425 billion years ago.

One of the oldest Moon rocks Image credit: NASA

The research team used mathematical models to calculate the composition of the moon over time. Basing their research on the idea that the moon was host to a massive magma ocean, researchers calculated how minerals that formed as the magma cooled and solidified over time.

As per a statement issued by study co-author Sabrina Schwinger, a researcher at the German Aerospace Center, "By comparing the measured composition of the moon's rocks with the predicted composition of the magma ocean from our model, we were able to trace the evolution of the ocean back to its starting point, the time at which the moon was formed."

Thorsten Kleine, a professor at the Institute of Planetology at the University of Mnster in Germany added that this is the first time that the age of the moon can be directly linked to an event that occurred at the very end of the Earth's formation.

These findings were published in the journal of Science Advances.

Find latest and upcoming tech gadgets online on Tech2 Gadgets. Get technology news, gadgets reviews & ratings. Popular gadgets including laptop, tablet and mobile specifications, features, prices, comparison.

Read the original here:

Moon may be 85 million years younger than astronomers think it is, new study suggests - Firstpost

Latest Ethereum price and analysis (ETH to USD) – Coin Rivet

Posted on July 17, 2020 by Danzig

Ethereum has embarked on a 4.6% move to the downside this morning after a significant drop in positive sentiment following the Twitter hack that swept across the industry yesterday evening.

Leading figures in politics and entertainment had their accounts hacked before thiefs wrote tweets pleading for followers to send Bitcoin to a wallet.

Losses so far are estimated to be around $250,000, although the details that have also been linked from the breach could be worth far more.

The association of cryptocurrency and the scam is undoubtedly a step backwards in terms of mass adoption as it will put newcomers off from entering the industry.

At the time of writing Ethereum, which is the second largest cryptocurrency by market cap, is trading at $231 after facing a fourth rejection from the $250 level of resistance in the past six weeks.

Its failure to break above the psychological level at $250 may be telling, but its worth noting that Ethereum remains in a more bullish posture against its Bitcoin trading pair as it continues to use the 0.0254BTC level as support.

While price action has been very low on the volatility scale in recent months, it seems as though it is coiling up for a major move in the coming weeks with a news event like the hack potentially acting as a catalyst.

If Bitcoin begins to dive to around $8,830 altcoins like Ethereum will follow with levels of support coming it at around $219 and $199, the latter of which is also in confluence with the daily 200 moving average.

For more news, guides and cryptocurrency analysis, clickhere.

Ethereum was launched byVitalik Buterinon July 30 2015. He was a researcher and programmer working on Bitcoin Magazine and he initially wrote a whitepaper in 2013 describing Ethereum.

Buterin had proposed that Bitcoin needed a scripting language. He decided to develop a new platform with a more general scripting language when he couldnt get buy-in to his proposal.

If you want to find out more information about Ethereum orcryptocurrenciesin general, then use the search box at the top of this page. Please check the below article:

https://coinrivet.com/ethereum-adopts-erc-1155-as-an-official-standard/

As with any investment, it pays to do some homework before you part with your money. The prices of cryptocurrencies are volatile and go up and down quickly. This page is not recommending a particular currency or whether you should invest or not.

You may be interested in our range ofcryptocurrency guidesalong with the latest cryptocurrencynews.

Disclaimer: This is not financial advice.

More here:

Latest Ethereum price and analysis (ETH to USD) - Coin Rivet

Q4 2020 will be crazy for crypto, says VC: DeFi, Ethereum 2.0, Libra, and more – CryptoSlate

Posted on July 17, 2020 by Danzig

Photo by Antonio Janeski on Unsplash

Save for strong developments with specific altcoins such as Cardano and Chainlink, coupled with the news that PayPal may integrate Bitcoin, the crypto industry has been rather quiet over recent months.

Look no further than the price of BTC, which has flatlined over the past two to three months around the low-$9,000s.

But as Chris Burniske, a partner at the crypto-focused venture fund Placeholder Capital, recently reminded his followers, odds are its going to be a crazy fall (Q3/Q4) for the cryptocurrency and blockchain industry.

The following is just a list of a number of important events taking place by the end of the year as compiled by Burniske.

Other events that Burniske himself didnt identify but his followers did include, the launch of optimistic rollup technology on Ethereum, the launch of Bakkts digital asset application for consumers, and a potential public listing of Coinbase shares.

While it may be a few months until these events, investors should expect volatility in the price of Bitcoin and altcoins much sooner.

As noted by cryptocurrency analyst Josh Olszewicz, the Bollinger Bands, an indicator that is often used in analyzing the volatility of a market, has become the tightest since November 2018.

This has been corroborated by Josh Rager, a popular cryptocurrency analyst. He said that the historical volatility index has reached the ever-important 40 level. As Rager explained, every time the index reached this low of a reading, a strong 30% (or more) move followed.

Thats to say, by historical standards, theres a high likelihood Bitcoin will soon see a macro spike or drop that will determine the price action of the cryptocurrency market in the months ahead.

Like what you see? Subscribe for daily updates.

After 500% rally, Chainlink (LINK) just passed Ethereum in this crucial metric – CryptoSlate

Posted on July 17, 2020 by Danzig

It may sound like a broken record at this point but Chainlink (LINK) has seen extremely strong price performance over the past few months.

At the all-time highs established during Jul. 15s trading session of $8.91 (according to CryptoSlate data), the community-favorite altcoin was up by almost 500 percent from its March capitulation lows around $1.50.

Data suggests that the ongoing move higher is being backed by true buying volume.

After a retracement early this week, LINK surged back during the trading sessions of Jul. 14 and 15, setting new all-time highs above $8.00.

According to Qiao Wang, a prominent cryptocurrency commentator and Bitcoin trader, the surge was marked by a massive influx of volume on leading digital asset exchanges:

Update: Chainlink just surpassed Ethereum in terms of 24-hour trading volume. Link marines have memed it into the single most successful non-base-layer, non-stablecoin cryptoasset ever. This is so incredible.

Qiao Wang cited data from Messari (his former employer), which indicated that of the legitimate exchanges it tracked, 24-hour volume for LINK at a point reached $473 million, 50 percent higher than Ethereums $315 million at the time.

Thats to say, at a point on Jul. 14, Chainlink was the third-most traded cryptocurrency in the entire market, despite it only holding the spot of the eighth-largest cryptocurrency.

Considering the price action and analyses of LINK order books by on-chain analyst Cole Garner, this price action was seemingly skewed on the bid side.

Chainlinks booming market volume isnt the only metric of the cryptocurrency reaching notable levels.

The chart below is from Glassnode, a blockchain analytics firm. It shows that through all the volatility over the past few months, the number of addresses holding LINK has consistently been growing, with few impediments.

Commenting on the chart, CryptoSlates Cole Petersen recently wrote on Twitter:

#Chainlinks steady march higher has been driven by a combination of new investors purchasing tokens and veteran investors increasing their exposure. Think of this as the coal that helps fuel the fire It shows that the multi-year price rise *has been* sustainable.

The influx in LINK adoption comes on the back of a number of partnerships, including those with Nexo, Huobi, and the state-sponsored China Blockchain Service Network.

Chainlink is also benefiting from an influx of press and attention, spurred by the assets loud proponents, new supporters like Morgan Creek Digitals Jason Williams, and other groups and entities.

Theres also been a spike in LINK withdrawals from exchanges, Glassnode recently elaborated. The firm says that this suggests there is a meaningful contingent of LINK holders who intend to start and/or keep hodling for the time being.

These metrics, coupled with other trends, have made certain analysts extremely optimistic about the future of Chainlink. One popular crypto derivatives trader, for instance, commented:

If Bitcoin does not ruin the party, there is no reason why LINK does not continue on into double digits. It would be conservative even, considering we just broke out of a major range. 20$ + LINK would not surprise me at all.

Like what you see? Subscribe for daily updates.

Continue reading here:

After 500% rally, Chainlink (LINK) just passed Ethereum in this crucial metric - CryptoSlate

Active Ethereum addresses growing twice as fast as Bitcoin – Decrypt

Posted on July 17, 2020 by Danzig

The number of active Ethereum addresses has more than doubled since the start of 2020. Ethereum's active address count is growing at nearly twice the rate of Bitcoins.

Data from the blockchain analytics website Messari shows that Ethereums active address count has increased by 118% since the turn of the year. Bitcoins active address count, by comparison, increased by 49%.

Why are more people turning to Ethereum than Bitcoin? One obvious answerEthereum is home to the top decentralized finance (DeFi) applications.

The rise of DeFi apps on Ethereum drove the blockchains total number of unique addresses to over 100 million by early June. A July report from Dapp.com estimated that DeFi applications accounted for over 97% of all Dapp volume on Ethereum.

The 100 million figure accounts for every unique address used in a transaction on Ethereumboth senders and recipients. This, obviously, doesnt account for users who use multiple addresses, and so doesnt entirely reflect the growth of Ethereums user base.

However, data from Bitinfocharts tracks transactions that go either from or to unique Ethereum addresses. Seen below, unique active Ethereum addresses rose 160% since January 1, climbing from 208,392, to 542,458 at time of writing.

Meanwhile, Bitcoins unique active address count rose 42% in the same time, climbing from 585,047 on January 1 to 832,751 by July 10. This aligns closely with the data from Messari, and lends credence to the notion that Ethereum is currently experiencing a groundswell of renewed interest and activity.

But while the rise of DeFi has undoubtedly contributed to the rise in unique Ethereum addresses, another Ethereum-based Dapp could also be playing a major role.

As reported by Decrypt on July 5, Forsage, the most popular Dapp on activity by user count, was responsible for guzzling almost 13% of Ethereums gas. Gas is the fuel that runs Ethereum, and is used as a measurement of the price of performing computations on the network.

That means Forsagewhich the Philippines SEC has denounced as an unregistered securityis hogging 13% of the entire Ethereum blockchain. The presence of a Russian Ponzi scheme known as MMM Global has also contributed to the hoarding of Ethereums computational power in recent times. These operations usually see funds transferred from address to address, adding to Ethereums total unique address count.

Today, Forsage accounts for 12.5% of Ethereums gas usage, according to Dune Analytics, while ETH Gas Station places the figure at 15.8%.

Either way, the presence of what Ethereum researcher and developer Philippe Castonguay told Decrypt were inevitable and unstoppable Ponzi schemes should also be considered when accounting for Ethereums increased usage.

Ethereum price analysis: watching the $250 resistance level – Capital.com

Posted on July 17, 2020 by Danzig

Ethereum incurred a heavy technical rejection last week, after the cryptocurrency failed to move back inside an important rising price channel.

Ethereum price analysis shows that the cryptocurrency must overcome the $250 resistance level to encourage technical buying.

The ETH/USD pair has been trading between the $230 and $240 levels over recent days, following last weeks bearish reversal from just below the $250 level.

Ethereum has been suffering from a lack of a clear price trend, due to Bitcoin being contained within an extremely narrow price range since the halving event.

Ethereum technical analysis shows that a breakout above $250 could prompt a powerful rally towards the $300 level, and possibly higher.

The daily time frame shows that a bullish reversal pattern with substantial upside potential will form if the ETH/USD pair reaches the $300 level.

According to the size of the potential bullish pattern, the ETH/USD pair could rally towards the $480 level if the pattern is activated.

Open a trading account in less than 3 min

Ethereum technical analysis shows that the cryptocurrency only has a short-term bullish bias while the price trades above the $240 level.

The four-hour time frame currently shows that the ETH/USD pair suffered a heavy technical rejection from a rising price channel last week.

According to short-term analysis, the ETH/USD pair needs to move above the $250 level to break back inside the channel.

If the ETH/USD pair recovers back inside the channel, then technical buying interest is likely to increase.

Bulls could attempt to rally the ETH/USD pair towards the top of the channel, around the $300 level.

Ethereum technical analysis shows that the ETH/USD pair could stage a powerful bullish breakout towards the $300 level if the $250 resistance level is broken.

Ready to get started?

Download Capital.com

Go here to see the original:

Ethereum price analysis: watching the $250 resistance level - Capital.com

Ethereum Price Breaks Below the 50-Day SMA, Cryptocurrencies on Headlines after Twitter Hack – InvestingCube

Posted on July 17, 2020 by Danzig

Ethereum price retreat for second consecutive session and breaks below the 50-day moving average, in a move that puts bears in the drivers seat for the short term.Cryptocurrencies are on headlines after Twitter accounts belonging to the US former vice president Joe Biden, Bill Gates, Elon Musk, and other famous people were hacked.Twitter said that the attack on some of its employees with access to the twitter internal tools. The companys support said that it was a coordinated social engineering attack targeted internal systems and tools.

Kim Kardashian, Warren Buffett, President Obama, Kanye West, Jeff Bezos, and many other famous people, send out a tweet asking for bitcoins promising to return it back double.The tweet said:I am giving back to the community. All Bitcoin sent to the address below will be sent back doubled! If you send $1,000, I will send back $2,000. Only doing this for 30 minutes.

Almost all tweets has the same content, asking for bitcoins in promise to double them. It is not known how much exactly the twitter hackers got away, but there are rumours that the victims of the scammers sent more than $118,000 worth of Bitcoin to just one promoted address.

Ethereum Technical Analysis

Ethereum price is 2.76% lower at $231.58, hitting the lowest level the last ten days as the bears return below the 50-day moving average. The technical picture for the Ethereum cryptocurrency remains bullish for the long term despite the recent pullback, as long as it stays above the 100-day moving average.

On the downside, the initial support for ETHUSD stands at 229.44 the daily low. The next level for Ethereum traders to watch in case of further selling pressure is at 227.33 the low from July 6. Below 227, the next support zone stands at 223.01 the low from July 5.

On the other side, immediate resistance stands at $239.38 the daily high. The next resistance for Ethereum will be met at $241.45 the high from July 15. If Ethereum moves higher, the bulls will be looking for an extension above 245.75 the high from July 13.

Dont miss a beat! Follow us onTelegramandTwitter.