Chingari Bets On Cloning TikTok And Indias Nationalist Sentiment To Drive Its Growth – Inc42 Media

With a UI that closely mirrors TikTok, Chingari is looking to position itself as a direct replacement to the Chinese app

Chingari has adjusted its focus after the TikTok ban to sideline its gaming and news aggregation sections

It claims to be organically adding 1Mn users daily but competition from Instagram Reels, Mitron, Bolo Indya, ShareChat and others is growing by the day

Given the choice between two apps which are exactly the same, but one is made in China and the other one is made in India which one will you choose? Chingari cofounder Sumit Ghosh.

The growing anti-China sentiment in India and the government ban on 59 Chinese apps has brought intense focus on Indian apps and alternatives to Chinese products. On June 29, 2020, around 8 pm, MeitYs released the list of 59 banned Chinese apps including popular short-video platform TikTok.

As Chingaris Ghosh describes the frenzy, Right after the ban announcement, the platform experienced 500K 600K new downloads for the whole next day. The servers started cracking, the backend infra was going crazy, we had to shut a lot of APIs down, Even at the time of our conversation (past week), Ghosh claimed to be witnessing 1 lakh downloads per hour.

Besides Chingari, short-video sharing platforms like Mitron, Bolo Indya, ShareChats Moj, Gaana HotShots and Trell have also reported a steep rise in the number of user traction after the ban. Even Instagram has launched its TikTok-like Reels. So what exactly differentiates Chingari from these platforms?

The difference is that Chingari is the closest to TikTok, in terms of UI and Ghosh claims that Chingari is also looking to solve one gap that none of its competitors have the creator tools that made TikTok popular. Other players think that people will just upload videos from the camera or their gallery, and the videos will go viral. But it is not like that, it is the creation tools that made TikTok what it is today, he said.

Chingari claims to have perfected all TikTok-like creation tools except the AR filters, which are currently under work. Chingaris UI is indeed a close replica of TikTok app to the extent that even the arrangement of buttons and the profile page look like mirror images.

For a company whose unique selling point is that it is an Indian company with TikTok-like features, copying the UI seems like an intended move. And this also allows Chingari to be in a safer position to compete with TikTok if it returns to India.

Clearly, Chingari is betting on the growing nationalist sentiment in the country. But will the platform be able to provide the similar global reach and revenue opportunities that TikTok once offered? And if not, why would an Indian consumer stick to Chingari once the nationalist sentiments die down. SlideShare cofounder Amit Ranjan pointed out recently, tailwinds like nationalist sentiments and the app vacuum wont last forever.

Like any other content platforms that thrive on the passion of creators, the success of Chingari depends on the quality of the content and the variety of creators it attracts. For instance, if there are 1000 creators on the platform, not only will more users join up, but it will also attract more creators to tap the rising user base. Its a cycle of growth that each content platform needs to thrive. And once that happens, it will become difficult for creators to abandon their acquired social following and reach.

To achieve this, Chingari is running a rewards campaign for creators. Every content creator on the platform gets paid depending on how viral their videos get. For every video that one uploads on the Chingari app, you get points (per view) which can be redeemed for money, according to a company statement.

Chingari is also onboarding influencer managers and agencies to onboard more creators on the platform. Till now, the platform has tied up with 200 such agencies and plans to scale these partnerships to 10K after its Series A funding round, which is expected to be announced by the end of July 2020.

Chingari is also working with a few brands that are willing to pay about 20%-30% of what they were paying to TikTok, in return for some influencer marketing on the platform. These brands primarily include fashion and ecommerce companies, noted Ghosh. The company is not focused on monetisation at this point of time, but once the user base is established, Chingari plans to monetise through advertisements like Facebook and Twitter.

Given that there is no monetisation model currently, Ghosh claims that Chingari does not store any sensitive user data at the moment. But once it launches ad-led monetisation, the company will be collecting user data including the age and gender to target them with the right ads. Currently, the login process uses a Google account to onboard users.

Started in 2018, the development of Chingari app was led by cofounder Biswatma Nayak along with Siddharth Gautam and other team members of Globussoft which includes Ghosh. Chingari was incubated at Ghoshs IT consultancy firm Globussoft. Following the growth in user base, it is now being registered as a separate entity and Ghosh will exit Globussoft to join this new entity.

In a recent UI update, Chingari has moved the position of the games sections to a side menu. According to Ghosh, gaming was acting as a friction for new users who are looking for a TikTok replacement and the company does not want to distract them from the core offering which is short-form videos.

Further, the news aggregation section has also been moved to the sidelines. It primarily attracts the audience over the age of 35 who come to the platform and consume news. However, Chingari plans to introduce a one-minute news bulletin video clip instead of the text format in the near future to boost its reach. This is similar to what Dailyhunt and Inshorts offer in terms of news.

Since the ban, Chingaris downloads have jumped to 22 Mn downloads from 3.5 Mn, and it is also seeing 5 Mn daily active users (DAUs) and 124 Mn video views per day. Going forward, Ghosh is aiming to reach 100 Mn users over the next three months. This is based on the companys current growth rate, which is 1 Mn users added per day. At this rate, it will cumulate to 90 Mn in the next three months, but Chingari is hopeful of a boost in the next month or so to get there sooner.

But in an earlier conversation, Chingaris competitor Bolo Indya Founder Varun Saxena told Inc42, The race for Indian video apps is not to acquire users, it is going to be for retaining these users two weeks from now, he added. Chingari claims to have a 10%-12% retention rate currently, and how well it is able to keep the new users around will determine whether it can really turn the spark into a roaring fire.

With inputs from Kritti Bhalla.

Correction Note | 16:25, July 17, 2020

The original version of this article erroneously mentioned that Chingari had to turn down a lot VCs after time of Chinese app ban. We have updated the article to reflect that the company had to shut down a lot of APIs after the Chinese app ban. We apologise for the mistake.

Go here to see the original:

Chingari Bets On Cloning TikTok And Indias Nationalist Sentiment To Drive Its Growth - Inc42 Media

Value of Fosmid Cloning Market Predicted to Surpass US$ by the of 2017 2025 – 3rd Watch News

According to the latest report published by PMR, the Fosmid Cloning market is anticipated to grow at a steady pace over the forecast period (2019-2029). The report sheds light on the various trends and restraining factors that are expected to shape the growth of the Fosmid Cloning in the upcoming years. The report ponders over the various parameters that are expected to impact revenue generation, sales, and demand for the Fosmid Cloning in the various regional markets.

According to the study, the Fosmid Cloning market is likely to attain a market value of ~US$ XX by 2019 and grow at a CAGR of ~XX% during the assessment period. The market study introspects the competition landscape of the Fosmid Cloning market and highlights the key developments and technological innovations witnessed in the current Fosmid Cloning market landscape.

Request Sample Report @ https://www.persistencemarketresearch.co/samples/19651

Key findings of the Fosmid Cloning market report:

Fosmid Cloning Market Segmentation

The report dissects the Fosmid Cloning market into different segments to provide a fair understanding of the different aspects of the Fosmid Cloning market.

The regional analysis of the Fosmid Cloning market sheds light on the growth prospects of the Fosmid Cloning market in different regions. The current market trends, the impact of regulatory policies, market share, size, and value of each regional market are presented in the report supported by easy-to-understand graphs and tables.

Key Participants

The key participants in fosmid cloning Market are Bio S&T, Illumina, Inc., Lucigen, and others. The companies are mainly focusing on intense marketing to convey benefits of fosmid cloning.

The report covers exhaustive analysis on:

Regional analysis for Market includes

Report Highlights:

Request Report Methodology @ https://www.persistencemarketresearch.co/methodology/19651

Key Questions Related to the Fosmid Cloning Market Addressed in the Report

Why Choose PMR?

For any queries get in touch with Industry Expert @ https://www.persistencemarketresearch.co/ask-an-expert/19651

Original post:

Value of Fosmid Cloning Market Predicted to Surpass US$ by the of 2017 2025 - 3rd Watch News

COVID-19 Update: Global Voice Cloning Market is Expected to Grow at a Healthy CAGR with top players IBM, Google, Lyrebird, Nuance Communications, etc…

Note: Due to the pandemic, we have included a special section on the Impact of COVID 19 on the Voice CloningMarket which would mention How the Covid-19 is Affecting the Industry, Market Trends and Potential Opportunities in the COVID-19 Landscape, Key Regions and Proposal for Voice Cloning Market Players to battle Covid-19 Impact.

The Voice CloningMarket report is compilation of intelligent, broad research studies that will help players and stakeholders to make informed business decisions in future. It offers detailed research and analysis of key aspects of the Voice Cloning market. Readers will be able to gain deeper understanding of the competitive landscape and its future scenarios, crucial dynamics, and leading segments of the global Voice Cloning market. Buyers of the report will have access to accurate PESTLE, SWOT and other types of analysis on the global Voice Cloning market. Moreover, it offers highly accurate estimations on the CAGR, market share, and market size of key regions and countries. Players can use this study to explore untapped Voice Cloning markets to extend their reach and create sales opportunities.

The study encompasses profiles of major Companies/Manufacturers operating in the global Voice Cloning Market.Key players profiled in the report include:IBM, Google, Lyrebird, Nuance Communications, Baidu, Microsoft, AWS, AT&T, NeoSpeech, Smartbox Assistive Technology, exClone, LumenVox, Kata.Ai, Alt.Ai, CereProc, Acapela Group, VocaliD, Voicery, Aristech, Cepstral, Ispeech, VivoText, Voctro Labs, rSpeak, CandyVoice and More

Get PDF Sample Copy of the Report to understand the structure of the complete report (Including Full TOC, List of Tables & Figures, Chart):https://www.marketinforeports.com/Market-Reports/Request-Sample/121642

Market Segment By Type:CloudOn-premises

Market Segment By Application:Healthcare and life sciencesEducationMedia and entertainmentTelecomTravel and hospitality

To get Incredible Discounts on this Premium Report, Click Here @ https://www.marketinforeports.com/Market-Reports/Request_discount/121642

The authors of the report have analyzed both developing and developed regions considered for the research and analysis of the global Voice Cloning market. The regional analysis section of the report provides an extensive research study on different regional and country-wise Voice Cloning industry to help players plan effective expansion strategies.

Regions Covered in the Global Voice Cloning Market: The Middle East and Africa (GCC Countries and Egypt) North America (the United States, Mexico, and Canada) South America (Brazil etc.) Europe (Turkey, Germany, Russia UK, Italy, France, etc.) Asia-Pacific (Vietnam, China, Malaysia, Japan, Philippines, Korea, Thailand, India, Indonesia, and Australia)

Years Considered to Estimate the Market Size:History Year: 2015-2019Base Year: 2019Estimated Year: 2020Forecast Year: 2020-2025

For More Information:https://www.marketinforeports.com/Market-Reports/121642/Voice-Cloning-market

Customization of the Report:Market Info Reports provides customization of reports as per your need. This report can be personalized to meet your requirements. Get in touch with our sales team, who will guarantee you to get a report that suits your necessities.

Get Customization of the [emailprotected]:https://www.marketinforeports.com/Market-Reports/Request-Customization/121642/Voice-Cloning-market

Get in Touch with Us :Mr. Marcus KelCall: +1 915 229 3004 (U.S)+44 7452 242832 (U.K)Email: [emailprotected]Website: http://www.marketinforeports.com

Originally posted here:

COVID-19 Update: Global Voice Cloning Market is Expected to Grow at a Healthy CAGR with top players IBM, Google, Lyrebird, Nuance Communications, etc...

Will We Ever Be Able to Upload a Mind to a New Body?

In Altered Carbon, the body no longer matters. As one character quipped: You shed it like a snake sheds its skin. Thats because the human consciousness has been digitized, and can be moved between bodiesboth real and synthetic.

The Netflix series takes place hundreds of years in the future, but references versions of technology that have been in development for years, like brain mapping, human and AI neural links, and mind uploading to computers. Millions of dollars has been bumped into technological ideas that promise, one day, our brains will be turned digital. That said, there are those who believe the human mind is too complex, and our consciousness too nuanced, to be recreated in a digital product. And none of that even goes into what would happen if someones digitized mind was placed into real human flesh.

Will we ever be able to upload our minds into other bodies? Furthermore, should we? And honestly, if we ever achieved such a feat, could we even call ourselves human anymore? On this weeks Giz Asks, we reached out to experts in neuroscience, philosophy and futurism.

Department of Philosophy and Cognitive Science Program, The University of Connecticut

An upload would not be a homo sapien, so, strictly speaking, it wouldnt be human, but it may have traits that we think of as human in a loose sense, such as rationality and humanlike concerns and emotions. It could be human-like. It might, over time, morph into something far less humanlike, as it becomes immersed in its new environment.

This may strike one as incredibly cool, and science fiction-like. So, could you even upload your mind into another body? Im skeptical for several reasons.

1. Suppose you go to a brain uploading center, Mindsculpt. Youve just learned you have a terminal illness, and you are eager to upload. There, at Mindsculpt, they aim to measure every feature of your brain that is relevant to your personality, sensory experiences, memories, and so on.

Is this truly feasible, at least at some point in the future? At this point,we do not have a remotely complete picture of what features of the brain give rise to thinking, personality, sensations, etc. If the features involve microscopic, quantum phenomena, then a precise upload of you cannot be created, as there is a fundamental limit on what we can know about a quantum system. (See Heisenbergs Uncertainty Principle). This would mean we you cant really upload your mind. Sorry.

2. But suppose a computational duplicate of your brain can be created. And suppose uploading technology was perfected. Should you go to Mindsculpt? No.

Suppose, while at Mindsculpt, the uploading process does not involve destroying your biological brain. Wouldnt you still be there, on the table, after your brain was scanned and transfered to a program? Why would your mind shift from your brain to the computer, leaving your still working biological brain there? This seems magical to me. A more reasonable hypothesis is that you are still on the table, and a program is created that specifies the workings of your brain. (I discuss this in more detail here.)

If this seems at least plausible to you, you definitely shouldnt sign away your legal rights to an upload, or sign up for the kind of uploading that is likely to be developed (destructive uploading)! Destructive uploading destroys the biological brain in effort to measure its computational features. And nondestructive uploading may simply be a total waste of money, or worse. If the program was downloaded, maybe it creates a duplicate of you that lives in a computer simulation, or in a body like yours, trying to take your job or date your partner. After all, it will be convinced it is you. And you might have legal obligations to take care of it!

3. Finally, we have little sense of whether AI can be conscious. The jury is out. So if you aim to transfer your mind, it may be that your upload isnt consciousit doesnt feel like anything to be them. This again suggests that the upload isnt really you. (See David Chalmers.) (See: Can a Machine Feel?)

And we havent even delved into the question: what is a mind? To know whether you survive uploading, it would be important to have a sense of what a mind is. If the mind is just the brain, then, you do not survive. Some say the mind is a program. But a program, like an equation, is an abstract entity. An equation doesnt exist anywhere, although inscriptions of it do. Presumably, your mind is a concrete thing, having a location. Perhaps you are a program instantiation some thing, running a program (akin to a computer, in some sense). But what is that thing? This just brings us back to my original question: what is a mind?

G/O Media may get a commission

Research Fellow at the Future of Humanity Institute at Oxford University

There are two problems with uploading our minds into another body, one philosophical and one technical.

The philosophical problem is whether this is a transfer of personal identity, some kind of cloning/copying making a new person with the same or different identity, or something else entirely. Many people think the answer is intuitively obvious and get very annoyed when others strongly disagree. Myself, I agree with the philosopher Derek Parfit who famously analyzed similar cases (often involving Star Trek-like teleporters) in his book Reasons and Persons (1984): there is no true fact of the matter about who is the real continuation of the original person, what matters is at most psychological connectedness.

The technical problem is of course how to actually do it. Currently our minds emerge from or are our brain activity. We need some way of creating a brain that does the same. I have written a fair bit on whole brain emulation, the hypothetical future simulation of entire brains in software. That would involve scanning a brain (possibly destructively), reconstructing the neural network from the scan, and running the simulation on a suitable computer. In Altered Carbon this is achieved by having a cortical stack implanted, presumably constantly scanning the brain neural network using some form of nanotechnological fiber network.

There is a lot of information in a brain: about 100 billion neurons, each with about 8000 synaptic connections to other neurons we need to keep track of, and quite likely a several pieces of information for each synapse. To scan that you would need a 3D resolution of a few nanometers: actually doable with current microscope technology, albeit only for small (a few micrometers) and frozen/plastinated brain tissue. The connectivity and synapse information may run into maybe 10 petabyte; the actual 3D scan is far bigger. This, and running all the relevant electrochemical processes, may sound like an extremely tall order. Today, it is impossible. But it is relevant to remember that Moores law (in various forms) and science marches onif things continue for a few decades this may not be too hard.

Scanning a living brain is likely much harder than scanning a neatly frozen brain since everything is moving about, there is an active immune system that tries to interfere, and the scanning method better not interfere with function. I think it is physically possible but likely much harder. We need not just great nanotechnology but also a fine understanding of how to interface brains to electronics on a truly vast scale: it is going to take much longer than getting the first uploads to work from frozen scans.

There is an extra issue in Altered Carbon, and that is the recipient bodies. These are either grown clone bodies or donor bodies, nearly totally organic. I can easily imagine (given the above assumptions of technology) how a computer running the brain software could control a biological body, but I have a far harder time imagine how to download a brain network into a recipient brain. Somehow we need to rearrange all the connections to correspond to the downloaded person. That is an extremely tricky thing even with mature nanotechnology, since many neurons stretch across much of the entire brain and now need to be re-routed. This is the part I definitely doesnt believe can be realistic.

There is an obvious ethical issue when using donor bodieswhat do you do with homeless minds? And many other issues easily come to mind: can you lose your right to have a body? Can you sell it? Rent it? Is it a bad thing that you can treat it as disposable? (The roleplaying game Eclipse Phase plays with many of these issues, from refugees who had to flee a disaster by uploading and now are software, over the clanking masses who cannot afford organic bodies and have to make do with shoddy robot bodies, to fancy designer-bodies for those who can afford them). But this does not really say anything about whether it is a moral thing to move between bodies, just that there are a lot of social context that matters. It is like discussing healthcare: how it is provided, to whom, what practice is allowed, mandatory and banned, all these things have huge ethical implications but doesnt really tell us whether medicine itself is moral.

Some people would say the whole idea is wrong because it is against nature: humans are not meant to be immortal body-hoppers. But that something is natural does not mean it is moral or acceptable: we do fight cancer and cruelty, despite both being parts of natural life. A slightly more sophisticated version argues that human life is shaped by its mortality and other features, so a change would make us something not-human and hence it is not good for humans to aspire to it. But this by this argument monkeys should not seek to become humans enjoying art, science, religion, sport etc. since such higher pleasures are not monkey pleasures. This seems backwards to me: we can enjoy monkey pleasures too, and we have removed many of the limitations of being a monkey. Similarly being a potentially immortal body-hopper removes some pretty big limitations in life yet still allows us to limit ourselves if we so chooses. It is possible to turn off ones stack.

Many like to say that it is the human limitations that make us human. But the world of Altered Carbon is full of limitationsjust because people are potentially immortal doesnt mean heartbreak, cruelty, oppression, faulty technologies and all the other bad things worth fighting against have disappeared. I suspect that no matter how advanced we become we will always bump into limitations that we will struggle with.

Some thinkers worry that if we enhance ourselves we will try to control everything in our lives. Everything of ourselves will be a potential object of design and engineering, and this both will make it less authentic and make us frustrated as we constantly tinker with it. There is some truth to this: we are suffering from a fair bit of first world problems today with our free and flexible lives (compared to our ancestors). But that just seem to mean we should culture the virtue of enhancing ourselves wisely and responsibly rather than not being able to enhance oneself.

Would it make sense to call oneself human if one is actually moving from cortical stack to cortical stack? I think so. Being human is about a particular perspective on the world, a human-style mind with its peculiar biases, motivation system, ways of thinking and feeling, and so on. A working mind transfer will transfer our human minds to whatever substrate can run thempure software, a robot, a biological bodyand that means that it will now at the very least house a human mind.

We can hope that this allow us to extend and improve our minds so we can properly call ourselves transhuman and maybe one day even posthuman, but I have a suspicion that even far-future superintelligences may still use the word human to denote what they are.

Neuroscientist and founder of Carboncopies Foundation

Probably, yes. For most scientists the default hypothesis is that everything about our mind and conscious awareness is an emergent consequence of the operations carried out by the biological machinery of the brain. That hypothesis has withstood every test so far. In principle, if we can understand those operations and implement them, then that new implementation will again produce the mind and conscious awareness.

The principal operators in the brain are called neurons. Those tiny processors know nothing except that incoming excitation or inhibition changes their membrane potential. At some threshold they respond with an electric discharge of their own. Together, the orchestration of billions of neurons is the information processor that plays the symphony that is our experience of being.

Uploading a mind involves recording enough data about a persons working brain to replicate its cognitive functions mathematically, then to implement those mathematical functions in another device that will produce the same mind when it is active. Because you can then move a mind from brain to brain (device), we say you have achieved substrate-independence. The neural engineering used to do that is called whole brain emulation.

The biggest challenge is to access the brains relevant data. In neural engineering today, the first steps towards whole brain emulation are efforts to build neural prostheses - replacement parts for small parts of the brain. Examples are retinal prostheses and the ambitious hippocampal neural prosthesis project at the Berger Lab of the University of Southern California, which should enable patients with a malfunctioning hippocampus to regain the ability to create new memories. If you can replace each part of the brain with an equivalent neural prosthetic device that is in essence the same as whole brain emulation. At a later stage, when we know how to recover dynamic function from 3D structure scans as well, there may be wholesale methods for whole brain emulation from such scans, yet another path to mind uploading.

Yes, at Carboncopies we think its very important that we do. Its already pretty easy to see why medical neural prostheses are useful and desirable to cure a patients brain dysfunction. Beyond that, neural prosthesis holds the promise of enhanced abilities. Imagine, for example, that you can explicitly choose which things to remember and which ones to forget when you have a hippocampal neural prosthesis. Its also pretty easy to see why mapping and modeling brain functions is important to science, medicine, and to learn what could be implemented in artificial intelligence.

When our skills at building neural prosthesis reach the point where whole brain emulation is possible we reach a very special milestone. Up to that point, the need to interact with the remaining biological parts of a brain mean that there are hard limits to the sort of cognitive functions that are possible. For example, biological neurons will never be able to react fast enough to be aware of or to respond to events that happen at the microsecond scale, a dynamic part of our universe that only our machines can presently experience. Overcoming these and other limitations is the human thriving argument for mind uploading. It means that we gain the choice to expand our range of possible experience and capabilities, to participate in more, instead of ceding the bigger picture to our machines as we remain constrained to a narrow subset of what the universe has to offer.

The is also an important survival argument for mind uploading. If we cannot modify our mental abilities then we are constrained to an evolutionary niche. If the history of evolution has shown anything, it has shown that those niches tend to disappear. Present developments, for example in artificial intelligence, suggest that human thought might soon play an ever-decreasing and minor role in the future society of intelligences. Adapting to change may well be a survival requirement.

I cant say that Ive ever thought of a human who uploads as anything other than human. When a person has prosthetic limbs or a cochlear implant we dont call them anything other than human. So, I imagine that we can still call ourselves human, even if we had prosthetic bodies. If anything, augmenting our abilities through technology has always been a uniquely human characteristic.

Professor of Neurobiology, Biomedical Engineering and Psychology, and Neuroscience, Duke University

No, because our minds are not digital at all. It depends on information embedded in the brain tissue that cannot be extracted by digital means.

It will never happen. This is just an urban scifi myth that has no scientific merit or backing. It only diminishes the unique nature of our human conditionby comparing it to digital machinesand instills fear on people who do not know better.

Do you have a burning question for Giz Asks? Email us at tipbox@gizmodo.com.

Clarification: Susan Schneiders first name was incorrectly listed as Sarah. This has been fixed.

Read the original here:

Will We Ever Be Able to Upload a Mind to a New Body?

Inside Citizen, the App That Asks You to Report on Crimes – WIRED

There is some sort of a thrill going out and doing it, says Logan Williams, a former contractor who filmed videos for Citizen in Los Angeles. Its a rush, it releases endorphins.

In March, Citizen suspended its street team program and stopped all payments to its contractors, citing pandemic-related safety concerns. A Citizen spokesperson said the company hasnt made any decisions about when the program might resume.

Thrilling and Chilling

Hobbyists and hyper-concerned civilians have monitored police radio chatter for decades. There are whole internet forums and communities on YouTube dedicated to following the communications of law enforcement, fire departments, and other first-response agencies. Its an activity that attracts a certain personality type, curious and discerning. Citizen isnt the first app to give these enthusiasts the ability to livestream, but it is the one thats completely dedicated to it. Its no wonder amateur stringers flock to it.

Everybody wants to be the hero, or the source, or a key player in a situation, says Andy Frakes, a former Citizen employee responsible for sending out incident alerts. For better or worseunfortunately, its usually for worsepeople want to be involved, or to just get that catharsis that for whatever reason they need more than anyone else.

For someone like Anthony, its a kick just to get a look at the action.

Seeing the lights and sirens just brings out the little kid inside of me, Anthony says. I don't know. I just kind of like that stuff.

Its not all motivated by childlike wonder. Anthonys time responding to hundreds of emergency calls has molded his aspirations. When he grows up, he wants to be a cop.

This obviously is not a good time to be in law enforcement with everything going on, Hope admits. But my heart goes out for the majority of law enforcement officers. So I feel like, if this is what he really wants to do when he gets older I mean, he's 12, so it could change. He could change his mind 10 times, but as of now, I think you let your kids follow their passion if it's something they like to do.

Thin Blue Line

The relationship between Citizen and law enforcement has always been uneven. When Citizen first launched in New York City, NYPD officials were overwhelmingly against it, frustrated by the idea that the app might encourage aspiring crime fighters. Bill Bratton, the former NYPD commissioner and co-architect of New Yorks controversial stop-and-frisk policy, staunchly opposed the app when he was in office. In an unexpected turn of events, Bratton has now become an adviser on Citizens board.

It has the potential to be a techy breakthrough in community engagement for emergency agencies. But for those not inclined to trust law enforcement, Citizen feels like yet another tool of mass policing.

What the Citizen app is doing is empowering people as law enforcement, and we already know that's a problem, says Nicol Turner Lee, the tech policy advocate. Not everybody can be a vigilante in a country that is already skewed when it comes to race relations. We don't need people, particularly in this highly partisan, highly polarized environment, to have additional means to be able to further discriminate against vulnerable populations."

In March, Citizen added features that have become staples of any standard social media platform: activity notifications, private messaging, the ability to add friends. Around the same time, Citizen reintroduced a feature that lets users create their own incident alerts, instead of waiting for the incident to show up after it's been broadcast on a scanner and added to the app by Citizen's employees.

See the original post here:

Inside Citizen, the App That Asks You to Report on Crimes - WIRED

The Business of Drugs: inside the economics of America’s longest war – The Guardian

As a CIA analyst in Shanghai and Pakistan during Americas war on terror, Amaryllis Fox was familiar with drawn-out, intractable conflict. Shed studied the compounding effects of redoubling on failed policies, of redundant good versus evil arguments peddled into a quagmire, costing billions and an incalculable loss of life. But the situation in Americas longest military war, now nearing two decades, paled in comparison to the subject of Foxs post-CIA project for Netflix: Americas costly, decades-longer engagement known as the war on drugs.

The Business of Drugs, a six-part series Fox hosts on Netflix, takes a clear-eyed approach to the futility of drug enforcement: what are the incentives, economic and personal, that keeps the market flow of narcotics churning despite a generational trail of violence and waste? Declared in 1971 by Richard Nixon, the war on drugs refers broadly to the federal governments campaign to control psychoactive substances through draconian legislation, expansion of enforcement agencies, and military aid and intervention to other countries. Drug enforcement policies have long served as cudgels against minority groups the first anti-opium laws, in the 1870s, targeted Chinese immigrants; anti-cannabis measures in the 1910s and 20s aimed for Mexican workers and the current iteration grows from these roots; from mandatory minimum sentences to no-knock warrants, the war on drugs has fueled, in part, the mass incarceration of Americans, especially people of color. Nearly 50 years and $1tn in, the business of drug prohibition has not only not worked, but the problem is worse than it was when the policy began, Fox told the Guardian.

The Business of Drugs plays like a condensed, updated version of the popular National Geographic series Drugs, Inc (also on Netflix), moving from Americas voracious consumption of illicit substances to the global network of supply evading, or dwarfing, interlocking attempts at enforcement. The series six segments are delineated by substance cocaine, synthetics (such as MDMA, also known as ecstasy), heroin, meth, cannabis and opioids and explore substances of wildly varying levels of addictiveness, use and geography. Together, the chapters form a loose condemnation of prohibition as both policy and moralistic stance.

The series is not a matter of admitting defeat in the war on drugs, Fox said. Instead it demands looking at the policies themselves rather than the fight to enforce them, and asking ourselves if in fact prohibition has any logical hope of working, or whether its a residue of a moralistic stance that I think is no longer relevant in our society.

Like its title, The Business of Drugs aims to be straightforward, or as clear as possible on the economics dollars by gram, price increases by mile of transport in shadowy systems for which transparency is a risk. Each episode visits a different hotspot epitomizing the challenges, market and opportunity for positive change for each substance. For cocaine, Fox traces the bloody trail of the wests habit from the plants cultivation in Colombia (a no-brainer for farmers, given the yield and influence of cartels), through Mexican smuggling routes, over the border to Americas draconian incarceration system for possession. Synthetics presents the therapy potential of MDMA, particularly for PTSD, if declassification from schedule 1, the highest classification for drugs of allegedly no medical benefit, would permit serious research. For heroin, Fox visits the ports of Kenya, where the route for smuggling the drug produced largely from opium poppies in Afghanistan has proliferated into an economic boon for some and devastating addiction epidemic for others.

In the installments on heroin (in Kenya) and meth (in Myanmar), Fox meets with government or military officials propagating the line of drugs as good versus evil, themselves firmly aligned with good, despite evidence to the contrary. The cost of prohibition inverts to the cost of unwieldy and haphazard legalization in the case of marijuana in some US states, especially California, where above-board business is cutthroat, onerously regulated, and ripe for consolidation by big business interests. And in an episode on opioids, Fox explores a familiar and devastating story of an American epidemic fueled by big pharmaceutical companies and the inertia of inadequate regulation.

According to Fox, everyone from individual coca plant growers in Colombia to worldly United Nations economists agreed that there were two ways to stop the exhaustive and unending war on drugs: end demand, or legalize and regulate with fair competition. Demand, largely from the US and western Europe, wont be going away, which leaves policy. We think that we can go in and stop it at the point of supply, said Fox, but as long as that demand continues, the reward is high enough that the economic reality is that this is going to continue.

The reality of those economics that for many, the choice to participate in the black market drug economy outweighs the cost of abstaining (if there is a choice to abstain at all) is critical in understanding how to bring an end to this war.

Fox and her team, including partner Zero Point Zero Productions, the company behind Anthony Bourdains Parts Unknown, worked for over a year in pre-production to establish sources willing to speak about participation in illicit, violent networks. The interviews, often anonymous a man who swallowed heroin packets in Kenya to cross into Tanzania, the small-batch cocaine dealer following his fathers footsteps in California, the masked dealer who sees a spate of zombie overdoses on a bad batch of synthetic marijuana as a business opportunity were built on both the desire to effect change through lived experience and, said Fox, the human impulse to share your life, to be meaningful and have the data that youve learned and the expertise that you have spent your professional life gathering be relevant. Maybe its in a criminal industry, but each of the people we spoke to from the smallest grower down the line each of them is a substantive expert in their field.

There is the tendency in the media and in everyday life to think of the drug trade as being driven by the low-level growers and dealers and others who are caught up in it, Fox said. But these testimonies revealed rational calculations of risk versus economic and social security. Many of us, if we found ourselves in the same position, would make the same choices for our family and for our own economic wellbeing, she said.

That realization was, to her, hopeful the continuance of a fight against controlled substances remains frustratingly futile, but an assessment of choices on the ground in favor of drug dealing, growing and trafficking also known, for many, as economic survival demonstrated that its not a good versus evil battle that is going to go on forever, its actually a matter of economics and policy. If we make changes to those things, we can see a different outcome.

The only way for us to tackle this is to have a very logical, adult conversation as a nation about whether theres any possibility of demand going away, Fox said. And if not, what do we need to do in terms of legalization and regulation to bring an end to the violence and mass incarceration that this policy has created?

Read the original here:

The Business of Drugs: inside the economics of America's longest war - The Guardian

Gretchen Burns Bergman: My two kids survived the war on drugs. Others haven’t. – The San Diego Union-Tribune

In the middle of dual crises caused by COVID-19 and opioid overdoses, the systemic racism of our criminal justice system raised its ugly head with the police killings of Breonna Taylor and George Floyd, the latest in a long line of violent and unjust law enforcement incidents. To remain silent was simply no longer an option, so people have taken to the streets to condemn racism and demand justice.

Mothers across the cultural spectrum mourn the loss of their children to an overarching and punitive criminal justice system and incarceration, but dramatically more so in Black communities, where it has become infuriatingly normalized to have a father in prison. African Americans are incarcerated at more than 5 times the rate of whites.

My two sons struggled for decades with addiction to heroin, although they were born to White privilege. My older son was arrested for possession of marijuana when he was 20 years old, and spent 11 years cycling in and out of prison for nonviolent drug offenses and relapse. He is a survivor of both incarceration and accidental overdose. My younger son was also damaged by criminal justice involvement, which created significant roadblocks to recovery. Both were stigmatized and criminalized, and our family struggled with societal shame, mounting financial pressures and emotional pain.

The drug war is a war on people and it was designed to control and harm people of color. It has cost over $1 trillion over the past four decades, and created a system of mass arrest and incarceration, disproportionately affecting Black and Brown communities.

Moms who have gone through immense hardships to migrate to another country so that their children have a chance to live and prosper are having their sons and daughters torn from them when they arrive in the United States. We have a humanitarian crisis at our border.

Mothers who were found to be using drugs, despite no evidence of child neglect or abuse, have had their children taken away by Child Protective Services and placed in foster care, a flawed system that during the coronavirus pandemic can affect a parents ability to even visit a child. Besides the trauma of separation, removing a child can be a missed opportunity to provide a treatment incentive for the parent. These policies have had a deeply harmful effect on communities of color and poverty.

Moms are deeply grieving the loss of loved ones to overdoses. A person dies every 11 minutes of an opioid overdose in the U.S. This is particularly frustrating and enraging as many of these overdose deaths could have been prevented with harm reduction strategies and naloxone, a safe drug that can quickly reverse an opioid overdose.

And although our country has endured decades of blatant prejudice and injustice to communities of color by the criminal justice complex, most recently and vividly we heard George Floyd call out for his mama as he was being slowly killed by a police officer who held him down with a knee on his neck for almost 9 minutes.

My sons are now in their 40s, and both are in long-term recovery, working as drug and alcohol counselors. Together we advocate for harm reduction strategies and an end to the failed war on drugs. They came through my body and will forever be connected to my spirit and soul. We all are human beings and we share the fact that we all have a mother who brought us into this world.

So its time to listen to moms. We see, feel, smell and taste when our children are harmed. We hope, we fear, we experience sadness and joy as our children go through their life experiences.

We understand the intersection of racism, the war on poverty, immigrant and LGBTQ prejudicial policies and the drug war. Silence creates a form of acceptance, so we must speak out for tolerance and equality, particularly when times are tough and we fear we no longer have a voice. If we hesitate and fail to protect the rights of others and look away in a self-protective stance, we will have lost our humanity, and in the process evil will have won over good. Now more than ever, we need to work in coalition and with respect for one another.

We must all raise our voices for change together because we are losing far too many precious lives. Moms must be vigilant in promoting and protecting humane and life-affirming policies, and in resisting all forms of hatred and bigotry. Too many moms are mourning.

Burns Bergman is co-founder and executive director of A New PATH (Parents for Addiction Treatment & Healing) and lead organizer of Moms United to End the War on Drugs. She lives in Rancho Santa Fe.

Read more from the original source:

Gretchen Burns Bergman: My two kids survived the war on drugs. Others haven't. - The San Diego Union-Tribune

20 charged as part of sheriff’s ‘War on Drugs’ – ABC 36 News – WTVQ

LAUREL COUNTY, Ky. (WTVQ) Another 20 people have been charged with drug offenses as part of Laurel County Sheriff John Roots War on Drugs.

According to the sheriff, detectives, deputies, and the departments K-9 teams were part of the round up.

While conducting unrelated drug investigations, answering complaints and at traffic stops, investigators found subjects with meth, heroin, Xanax, hydrocodone, gabapentin, assorted pills, scales, hypodermic needles, glass pipes with white residue, cut straws with residue and other paraphernalia, and U.S. currency,. the sheriff said.

Some subjects were also found with outstanding warrants and outstanding warrants for failure to appear on drug charges.According to the departments Facebook page, those arrested and the charges against them are:1. Lee Merritt Sr., Age 55 arrested off Hawk Creek Road charged with possession of a controlled substance first-degree first offense methamphetamine; possession of drug paraphernalia; public intoxication controlled substances.2. Justin Mullins age 27 of Old County Road, McKee, Ky arrested on Hal Rogers Parkway in London charged with trafficking in a controlled substance first-degree first offense; trafficking in a controlled substance third-degree first offense; possession of a controlled substance third-degree; prescription controlled substances not in proper container first offense; resisting arrest.3. Destiny Hobbs age 19 of Mildred Road, McKee, Ky arrested off Wendell Way in London charged with possession of a controlled substance first-degree first offense methamphetamine.4. Steven Wayne Helton age 35 of Hanes Baker Rd., Corbin arrested off West Cumberland Gap Pkwy. charged with possession of a controlled substance first-degree first offense methamphetamine; possession of a controlled substance second-degree; prescription controlled substances not in proper container first offense; possession of drug paraphernalia.5. Kenny Blake Wagers, Jr age 21 of McWhorter Road, London arrested off McWhorter Road charged with possession of a controlled substance first-degree first offense methamphetamine; possession of a controlled substance first-degree first offense heroin; possession of drug paraphernalia.6. Charles Nantz age 30 of Clancy Ln., Lily arrested off Clancy Lane charged with trafficking in a controlled substance first-degree first offense methamphetamine; wanton endangerment degree; three counts of possession of a controlled substance third-degree; possession of drug paraphernalia.7. Ricky Lee Miracle age 33 of Cecil Wyatt Rd., Corbin arrested off West Cumberland Gap Pkwy. charged on a Whitley Circuit Court bench warrant of arrest charging court order violation regarding charges of possession of a controlled substance first-degree first offense methamphetamine; possession of drug paraphernalia.8. Kimberly Ann Hubbard age 33 of Blake Dr., London arrested off Miracle Lane in London charged with public intoxication controlled substances stated had been using meth; disorderly conduct second-degree; an outstanding Laurel District Court bench warrant charging failure to appear in court.9. Ashley R. Smith age 24 of Barr Creek Rd., Oneida, KY arrested off East Laurel Rd. charged with possession of a controlled substance first-degree first offense methamphetamine; possession of drug paraphernalia; possession of marijuana.10. Christopher Adam Cole age 32 of Runnels Branch Road, Littcarr, KY arrested on KY 490 charged with operating a motor vehicle under the influence first offense; possession of drug paraphernalia with meth residue; operating on suspended or revoked operators license.11. Rebecca Caudill age 32 of Runnels Branch Road, Littcarr, KY arrested on KY 490 charged with public intoxication controlled substances; possession of drug paraphernalia with meth residue.12. Joseph Chad Curry age 45 of Curry Rd., London arrested off Curry Road charged with possession of drug paraphernalia.13. James Marcum age 46 of East Laurel Rd., London arrested off East Laurel Rd. charged on a failure to appear warrant.14. Mary Melissa Roark age 36 of Fire House Rd., East Bernstadt charged with possession of a controlled substance first-degree first offense methamphetamine.15. Landon Collins age 32 of Locust Grove Rd., London arrested off East 4th Street in London charged with possession of drug paraphernalia.16. Irvin Johnson age 34 of Taylor Subdivision Rd., London arrested off Tobacco Road in London charged with possession of drug paraphernalia; wanton endangerment second-degree police officer is victim.17. Angela Shepherd age 43 of Sallys Branch Rd., London arrested off Slate Lick Road charged with trafficking in a controlled substance first-degree second offense methamphetamine; trafficking in a controlled substance third-degree second offense.18. Linda Jane Wallace age 50 of Van Hollow Road, McKee, KY arrested off Slate Lick Road charged with operating a motor vehicle under the influence second offense; driving on DUI suspended license first offense; trafficking in a controlled substance first-degree second offense methamphetamine; trafficking in a controlled substance third-degree second offense; prescription controlled substances not in proper container first offense; driving on DUI suspended license first offense.19. Johnny Gregory age 51 of Highway 472, Manchester arrested off Slate Lick Rd. charged with possession of drug paraphernalia.20. Marsha Denny age 41 of Sallys Branch Rd., London arrested off Slate Lick Rd. charged with public intoxication controlled substances; possession of drug paraphernalia.

Read the original:

20 charged as part of sheriff's 'War on Drugs' - ABC 36 News - WTVQ

Here’s What Netflix’s ‘The Business of Drugs’ Host, Amaryllis Fox, Did for the CIA – Men’s Health

Longer than the nearly two-decades long War on Terror, notes Amaryllis Foxhost of Netflix's newest documentary series, The Business of Drugsis the War on Drugs (declared by Richard Nixon in 1971).

And whats been profitable for syndicates and cartels is also profitable for television and Netflix, which has an almost-unending queue of narcotics-based documentaries: Dope, Drug Lords, Inside the Real Narcos, the practically celebratory Have a Good Trip, the list goes on.

Helping us navigate this series of drug investigations is Fox, who introduces herself and her career:

Fox worked primarily on weapons. That algorithm she described used a variety of metrics to identify hotbeds for terrorist activitya ratio of hookah bars to madrassas and percentage beneath livable wage a border guard gets paid, Fox told the New York Times in an interview for her novel, Life Undercover: Coming of Age in the CIA. She was recruited by the agency at 22.

Life Undercover: Coming of Age in the CIA

For eight years, Fox posed as an art dealer abroad, recruiting assets for the CIA and helping prevent terror groups from acquiring weapons of mass destruction. (For a separate operation in Shanghai, Fox writes, she and her husband allowed themselves to be surveilled by the Chinese government while the CIA also watched; the CIA was spying on the spies.)

Fox left the agency in 2010. She now lives in Los Angeles with her daughter from a previous marriage; her now-husband is Robert F. Kennedy III, son of Robert Kennedy Jr. (the two met at Burning Man).

Foxs book is currently being adopted into a an Apple TV series starring Brie Larson. There is no release date yet.

The book met some criticism, however, when former intelligence officers questioned some of Foxs accounts (of course, Fox had to change details to protect sensitive information, an editorial decision she says accounts for any discrepancies.)

Since leaving the agency, Fox has covered current events, appearing on news outlets like CNN, Al Jazeera, and the BBC. She also co-hosted American Ripper on the History Channel.

Fox said she shot most of the Netflix series while in her third trimester of pregnancy; she gave birth in January 2019.

This content is created and maintained by a third party, and imported onto this page to help users provide their email addresses. You may be able to find more information about this and similar content at piano.io

This commenting section is created and maintained by a third party, and imported onto this page. You may be able to find more information on their web site.

View post:

Here's What Netflix's 'The Business of Drugs' Host, Amaryllis Fox, Did for the CIA - Men's Health

Whats on TV Tuesday: Dirty John and The Business of Drugs – The New York Times

DIRTY JOHN: THE BETTY BRODERICK STORY 10 p.m. on USA. Following the success of its first season, which adapted the hit podcast Dirty John for television, this anthology series tracks the very public unraveling of a marriage. It stars Amanda Peet as Betty Broderick, and Christian Slater as her husband, Dan, who seemed to lead an idyllic life in Southern California in the 80s until Dan, a successful medical-malpractice lawyer, hired a new legal assistant named Linda Kolkena (Rachel Keller). Dan and Bettys marriage spats and divorce played out in La Jolla for more than five years, until Betty shot and killed Dan and Linda, who had married, while they slept. The season finale wraps up Bettys case, which, as The New York Times reported in 1991, divided this normally placid city and has drawn attention to the issue of domestic psychological abuse.

SHOWBIZ KIDS (2020) 9 p.m. on HBO. With Instagram, YouTube and TikTok, it seems easier than ever for young people to achieve viral fame and to use that celebrity to break into the entertainment industry. Still, there are young aspiring actors, singers and dancers trekking to auditions and spending their days practicing or attending classes, all in the hopes of becoming the next big thing. But at what cost? This documentary, which was written and directed by the former child actor Alex Winter, looks at the history of young stardom, at a time when there are those in Hollywood who are trying to make the industry safer and more inclusive for everyone. It features interviews with Evan Rachel Wood, Jada Pinkett Smith and Mara Wilson who share what it was like to grow up or raise their children in Hollywood. The documentary follows up-and-coming entertainers and examines the sacrifices their families are making to help them achieve their dreams.

HOT ONES 10 p.m. on TruTV. What started out as a highly entertaining (and cringe-worthy, if youre hot sauce-averse) way to conduct a celebrity interview has been transformed into a TV game show. On its midseason premiere, the host Sean Evans challenges two best friends on their trivia knowledge and threshold for spicy chicken wings.

THE BUSINESS OF DRUGS Stream on Netflix. In the trailer for this new series, its host, the former C.I.A. analyst Amaryllis Fox, says that the only way to bring the war on drugs to an end, is to understand the economics that drive it. Over six episodes, Fox travels the world to understand the lucrative and often deadly global drug trade, from a new heroin route in Kenya to Californias legal marijuana market.

MARJOUN AND THE FLYING HEADSCARF (2019) Stream on Eventive. Its been five years since the Sept. 11 terrorist attacks, and 17-year-old Marjoun (Veracity Butcher), the protagonist of this film, is trying to get her father out of jail. Hes been arrested on charges stemming from his alleged connections to Hezbollah. In her quest to clear his name, Marjoun confronts her relationship with god and her identity as a Muslim American in her hometown, Little Rock, Ark.

Read this article:

Whats on TV Tuesday: Dirty John and The Business of Drugs - The New York Times

The drug war is a real war, and Iowa’s death row inmate was fighting in it – The Gazette

One of Iowas most notorious murderers and meth dealers is scheduled to die this week.

While Iowa outlawed capital punishment more than 50 years ago, the federal government is pressing forward with executions of four federal inmates, part of the Trump administrations tough-on-crime posture. The U.S. Supreme Court decided against the convicts legal challenge last month, allowing the first executions since 2003 to proceed.

One of them Dustin Honken, called an Iowa drug kingpin by the media and police was convicted in federal court in the 1993 killings of five people in Northern Iowa, including two children.

When Honken dies, there will be one fewer criminal in the world. But if the goal of our justice system is to prevent another criminal from taking other innocent lives, we have to take a sober look at the conditions precipitating his crimes.

Honken did not just go out killing indiscriminately. After he was first charged with federal drug crimes, he targeted two former drug trade associates who became government informants, along with one of their girlfriends and her two children.

In other words, Honken killed to protect his illegal business. The killings he committed are despicable and wholly inexcusable, so this is not an excuse, but it is one explanation.

The drug war is an actual war, and Honken was fighting in it.

If the drug war were effective at stifling the drug trade, maybe we could calculate a macabre yet acceptable trade-off a little more violent crime in exchange for less drug-related harm. But thats not how it works in practice the prevailing prohibition and enforcement regime has proved impotent at anything besides wrecking peoples lives.

Over the past 20 years, Iowa officials have waged a war against methamphetamine, led with concerted enforcement efforts by local, state and federal authorities, and new laws restricting access to meth manufacturing ingredients. We appear to be worse off for their efforts.

Meth: Iowas on it, too, more than ever before

Iowas annual report on drug control last year showed indicators of methamphetamine harm and trafficking are rising in the state deaths from meth and other psychostimulants, the portion of patients entering treatment who list meth as their primary substance, the number of people imprisoned for meth-related charges and the volume of meth seized by authorities.

A key figure is the price of methamphetamine the average price per gram dropped about 20 percent between 2010 and 2018, while the average purity grew by 20 percent, according to the Iowa Counterdrug Task Force. That suggests more potent methamphetamine is more easily available than ever before. Its clear Iowa is losing the war on meth.

Sometimes drugs make people more violent, but that effect is overstated. And, as we have seen, prohibition has a poor record of mitigating risky drug use anyway. The other cause of drug-related violence and the one we can meaningfully address through public policy is prohibition itself.

Maybe you have noticed that bootleggers of the U.S. alcohol prohibition era and marijuana smugglers this century have used violence to protect their supplies. But modern beer distributors and medical marijuana dispensaries dont do that. The difference is the legality.

Its a radical idea, but if people with methamphetamine use disorder had easy access to safe and legal substances, maybe people like Honken would be put out of business peacefully. Maybe if we ended the federalized and militarized response to drugs, people like that would have less reason to use lethal force.

Honken does not have many sympathizers. Iowa Catholic bishops are calling on President Donald Trump to commute Honkens execution sentence, but there is no mass outpouring to save his life. The killings are too grisly and the facts are too solid to elicit that kind of response.

But this isnt about Iowas meth kingpin. Its about his five victims, and countless others who have been killed or had their lives torn apart, chalked up to collateral damage in the war on drugs.

ARTICLE CONTINUES BELOW ADVERTISEMENT

Honken will pay for his crimes. But who pays for the system that helped create this unthinkable tragedy? Thats on us.

adam.sullivan@thegazette.com; (319) 339-3156

More here:

The drug war is a real war, and Iowa's death row inmate was fighting in it - The Gazette

Standing up to vested interests – The Statesman

The cat is finally out of the bag in Manipurs war on drugs. Decorated police officer Thounaojam Brinda Devi MPS has stated in a sworn affidavit before the Manipur High Court that she came under tremendous pressure from chief minister N Biren Singh and a close acquaintance of his to not press charges against politician-cum-drug lord Lhukhosei Zou.

Brinda had arrested him two years ago along with 4.595 kilograms of No 4 heroin powder estimated to be worth about Rs 30 crore in the international market; 280, 200 world is yours party drug tablets worth about Rs 28 crore, and more than Rs 57 lakh in cash.

She is now facing contempt proceedings for her tirades against the Narcotics Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Court, which she posted on social media after the judge agreed to release Zou on bail for medical reasons.

Brinda stated in her affidavit that on the intervening night of 19 June 2018, a team from the Narcotics and Affairs of Border department of Manipur Police arrested Zou along with seven others.

The operation, which started around 4.30 pm that day and lasted till well past midnight, was led by her as she was the additional superintendent.

Once the crackdown began, some of the arrested persons revealed that drugs were hidden in different places including the quarter of an Autonomous District Council member at Lamphel.

When the police team was about to enter the quarter, a WhatsApp call came from one Moirangthem Asnikumar, a Bharatiya Janata Party state unit vice-president, who enquired about any developments in drugs-busting operations. Brinda told him that she was in the middle of an operation then.

The BJP leader then made her speak to the chief minister who had been briefed about the situation. Biren Singh told her to go ahead and arrest the ADC member if drugs were found there. The last cordon and search was conducted at the quarter along with a team of Lamphel Police (Imphal West Police) led by then SP (lmphal West) Themthing Mashnngva.

He, however, did not enter the premises of the ADC quarter, Brinda said in the affidavit. Before and after the drugs were found, the ADC member, who turned out to be Zou (chairman of the ADC, Chandel district), repeatedly requested the lady officer to settle the issue. Brinda refused to do so. After the drugs were seized, Zou asked her to allow him to call the director general of police and the chief minister.

She refused to do so as well. On the morning of 20 June, Asnikumar went to Brindas residence at Yaiskul Janmasthan. She spoke to him in the presence of her husband in the bedroom, according to the affidavit.

During the conversation, Brinda has stated, the BJP leader told her that the arrested ADC member was the right hand man of one Olice, a close acquaintance of Biren Singh. Asnikumar informed her that the CM had ordered Zou to be exchanged with his wife or son, which Brinda refused as the drugs were seized from him and not his wife or son.

Helpless, Asnikumar left but he went back a second time. He said that the CM and Olice were extremely unhappy with Brindas defiance of their order. He again asked her to release Zou.

Brinda told the BJP leader that the culpability of the ADC chairman should be left to the court. Informing him that there were over 150 personnel present in the entire operation along with independent witnesses, she asked what she would tell the team and the public when asked how the ADC chairman vanished after arrest. Asnikumar left the scene.

Then around 11 am on the same day, Brinda stated that Asnikumar came back for a third time and told her that the CM and Olice were adamant that she release Zou under any condition.

According to the affidavit, she replied, I do not need this job. I came back to this service at the request of New Delhi on the promise that I would be supported in the work I do and can leave the job anytime if I am not satisfied. This attempt of the CM is to finish my career by destroying my credibility. I will not release the man.

In the meantime, Mashnngva also went to her residence. Along with him, Asnikumar and Brinda discussed the matter. She told both of them that it was not possible to release Zou.

She warned about the danger of the CM involving himself in a narcotics case of such magnitude, especially since the BJP government in Manipur was young at the time.

On 14 December 2018, SP of the NAB informed Brinda that the DG had called for a meeting at 11 am that day. The DGP enquired about the whereabouts of the charge sheet of the ADC case.

Brinda informed him that it had reached the court but the DGP said the CM wanted it removed from there. She replied that it was not possible as the charge sheet had already been submitted.

Later, that evening, SP NAB informed her that he had just come back from meeting the CM and the latter was infuriated that the charge sheet had still not been removed. On 11 January 2019, Yumkham Rather, Special Judge NDPS Manipur, wrote a letter to the DGP and secretary of the Bar Council of Manipur describing a grave development that had taken place in the Zou case. In that letter, the judge stated that on 14 December 2018, Imphal West SP Jogesh Chandra Haobijam IPS and H Chandmjit Sharma, senior advocate, reportedly came and met T Bipinchandra, the special public prosecutor, at his office.

They asked the investigating officer to withdraw the charge sheet against Zou, the affidavit stated. Brinda further said on 31 March 2019, an Imphal-based daily published the news about how Sharma and Chandra tried to meddle in the trial. Around 8.30 am that day, SP NAB told her to come to office.

When she asked why, he replied that an order had come from the DGP that the NAB make a written public clarification that there was no pressure to remove the charge sheet. Upon her refusal to do so, the SP (NAB) issued a press statement to that effect.

After Brindas revelation became public through local media and went viral online, Biren Singh issued a statement that nobody would be spared, even if they were family or BJP members, in the fight against the drug menace as well as the ongoing case.

The Opposition went hammer and tongs with state Congress Party president M Oken saying that a Cabinet meeting of the government should be urgently called, and the case of Zous arrest along with the seizure of drugs handed over to an independent body like the Central Bureau of Investigation. In yet another turn of events, Mashnngva, now DIG, filed a criminal contempt case against the publisher and editor of an Imphal-based English daily for carrying portions of Brindas affidavit in their newspaper.

The lady officer was also named by him and the matter has been listed for hearing by the Manipur High Court. Manipur Polices public relations officer, W Basu Singh has also released a press statement saying that there were no political interferences in the investigation being carried out in the Zou case. Brinda, who is the daughter-inlaw of former United National Liberation Front supremo RK Meghen, entered Manipur Police Service only after she had moved the High Court over the refusal of the then Congress government to induct her, given her family ties with the UNLF chief.

Then she resigned from service after reporting that her Commanding Officer was withdrawing money in her name for petrol expenses.

Her protests elicited no response from both the government and police authorities. Only after pressure was mounted on the state government by the Union ministry of home affairs through the Intelligence Bureau, she rejoined service. A no-nonsense officer with grit and determination, Brinda has said on record that she doesnt mind being sent to jail for her convictions. But observers feel that the High Court should exercise judicial activism and help curb the drug menace in Manipur.

The writer is the Imphal-based Special Representative of The Statesman.

See the original post here:

Standing up to vested interests - The Statesman

Reuters appoints Indonesia, Philippines and Malaysia and Brunei bureau chiefs and editing roles in Southeast Asia – Reuters

Reuters has appointed key editorial roles in bureaus across Asia:

Soccer Football - Zlatan Ibrahimovic in Milan ahead of signing for AC Milan - Milan, Italy - January 2, 2020 AC Milan fans hold up mobile phones with the media outside Casa Milan as they wait to see Zlatan Ibrahimovic ahead of him signing for AC Milan REUTERS/Daniele Mascolo

Angie Teo has been appointed Indonesia Bureau Chief and will lead Reuters coverage across the worlds fourth most populous country. Angie joined Reuters in 2010 reporting on palm oil pricing in Malaysia before joining Reuters Video News and in 2014 moved to Jakarta to run Reuters video operation. Angie has anchored various major stories in Asia including the disappearance of Malaysian Airlines MH370, the assassination of Kim Jong Nam and the Easter bombings in Sri Lanka.

Karen Lema has been appointed Bureau Chief, Philippines. Karen joined Reuters in 2006 as a contractor before becoming a staff treasury correspondent in 2008. As acting bureau chief previously, Karen led the team during a period that saw the fallout from the $81 million Bangladesh Bank cyber heist and the meteoric rise of Rodrigo Duterte to the presidency in the 2016 election. Karen has also been central to the bureaus coverage that won a Pulitzer Prize for its reporting on Dutertes bloody war on drugs.

A.Ananthalakshmi becomes Bureau Chief of Malaysia and Brunei after moving to Kuala Lumpur as deputy bureau chief in 2016. Anantha distinguished herself in reporting on everything from the assassination of Kim Jong Nam to investigations of migrant deaths in detention and the palm oil industry to the surprise fall of Najib Razaks government and the return of Mahathir Muhammad in 2018 elections and then Mahathirs own fall earlier this year. Anantha joined Reuters in Bangalore, where she covered U.S. companies in the industrial, aerospace and auto sectors and previously anchored coverage of gold and other precious metals in Asia.

Ed Davies moves to one of two new positions of News Editor, Southeast Asia, responsible for helping shape the day-to-day coverage from the region. In his previous role of Indonesia Bureau Chief, Ed led the team reporting on a series of natural and transport disasters, the turbulent 2019 presidential election and a period that saw a growing tussle over the influence of Islamic groups in the worlds biggest Muslim majority country. Ed joined Reuters in 1996 in Hong Kong before moving with the Asia Desk to Singapore, and then headed to Seoul as an editor for South Korea. As deputy bureau chief in Indonesia, he reported on the country as it became one of the hottest emerging market investment destinations.

Martin Petty also becomes News Editor, Southeast Editor, moving from his former position as Bureau Chief, Philippines. While Martin led the Philippines team, he also reported from Mindanao on the five-month battle for Marawi, during which he broke news of President Dutertes secret backchanneling with insurgents and gained exclusive access to the abandoned hideout of Islamic States Southeast Asian leader. Martin also joined a Reuters team on an old fishing boat to the disputed Scarborough Shoal in the South China Sea to become the first foreign media there since it was seized by Beijing. Martin joined Reuters in Bangkok, initially as a sports reporter, before becoming a senior correspondent.

[Reuters PR blog post]

Media contact:

Heather Carpenter

heather.carpenter @ tr.com

Visit link:

Reuters appoints Indonesia, Philippines and Malaysia and Brunei bureau chiefs and editing roles in Southeast Asia - Reuters

The Top 5 Cannabis Industry Consultants You Need To Know – Forbes

Marie & Allen of Legacy Coterie / MD Numbers. Photo credit: Jennifer Skog / MJ Lifestyle

When someone has the passion to dive into the cannabis business, many is need to be dotted and ts crossed. Its impossible to know everything, especially when entering the biz for the first time. Thats where this list of top five cannabis industry consultants come in makes this business one of always learning, instead of knowing it all. Far less expensive than hiring on a full-time employee, cannabis consultants are uniquely geared to doing it right the first time, every time. Then, they can move on to the next project a win/win for the entrepreneur who has more money than time. Read on to learn more about Andrew DeAngelo, Marie & Allen of Legacy Coterie, Danny Murr-Sloat of AlpinStash, Kimberly Dillon of Plant & Prosper, and Emma & Matt of Eminent Consulting.

As a consultant, my real excitement comes from seeing my clients succeed. I get in the trenches ... [+] with them with that singular focus in mind. Thats the true reward of being a consultant: you get to build the entire industry, not just one company. After building Harborside for 13 years, Im excited to help others get to the point Harborside is at today and beyond.

Who are you? Andrew DeAngelo, Cannabis Industry Consultant and Strategic Advisor

Whats the mission of your consulting business? I want to help as many different clients as possible. My goal is, and has always been, to create a new industry with new values for society. Being a consultant allows me to do that much more widely, so that I can continue to influence the local and global cannabis industry to live by the values this plant teaches us. I want to work with any client, large or small, anywhere in the world who shares that mission.

Whos your ideal client? So that I can serve a diverse clientele, Ive created a consulting ecosystem that will enable any clientlarge or small, local or internationalto get moving in the right direction and build real momentum. When a client has complex needs, I partner with Global Go, a cannabis-centric advisory firm that provides the highest-level services in the areas of compliance, permitting, corporate strategy, mergers and acquisitions, logistics, and finance. Paul Rosen is the Executive Chairman of Global Go, and he leads a team of sophisticated professionals who know how to do projects for Fortune 500 companies, and any cannabis venture large in scale and scope. I will also donate time or provide rate discounts to social equity clients, and legacy operators who want to get legal.

What sets you apart from other consultants in the cannabis space? Ive been trading cannabis for 37 years. I helped legalize cannabis in multiple states, and I co-founded Harborside 13 years ago in Oakland, California. Ive started trade associations like the California Cannabis Industry Association, and non-profits like Last Prisoner Project, which works to free those incarcerated for nonviolent cannabis convictions. I ran the daily operations of Harborside for 13 years. I took the company from 0 to $40M in top-line revenue by relentlessly building the gold standard of cannabis retail and paying careful attention to the customer and the team. Additionally, Harborside had to defend itself in two lawsuits with the federal government and is still standing strong. Perhaps most importantly, Ive had to articulate a vision of cannabis in society, often in front of cameras, and be able to persuade an audience that my viewpoint is correct. As a co-founder of Harborside, I created every department in the organization from Inventory to HR, and worked in various roles from General Manager to Chief Revenue Officer. I helped Harborside expand into four shops, become vertically integrated with a large greenhouse farm, go public on the CSX, and create a culture for our team and customers that was unique in the industry. I want to use all of those experiences to help others succeed. And when thats combined with the collective experience of the executives at Global Go, it creates an unparalleled track record in global cannabis. I also bring integrity, trust, and humor to my endeavors. Not only will I help you grow, well have a blast doing it together.

Part of the MD Numbers family of brands, Legacy Coterie draws from decades of cannabis business ... [+] expertise and its family of vertically integrated subsidiaries to meet the demands of modern-day cannabis entrepreneurs.

Who are you? Marie Montmarquet & Allen Hackett, Founders of Legacy Coterie

Whats the mission of your consulting business? Legacy Coterie is a full service cannabis consulting, distribution, and sales service focused on empowering those impacted by the war on drugs and legacy operators in the cannabis space. Legacy Coteries mission is to develop an abundantly equitable future in the cannabis space by connecting passionate operators with the skills and resources to succeed.

Whos your ideal client? From legacy operators transitioning to the legal market, equity applicants looking to build their next enterprise, to multi-licensees scaling operations, Legacy Coterie pairs your cannabis vision with equitable, proven, world-class solutions. Legacy Coterie is interested in working with clients at all phases of product development, and seeks those interested in working with like minded companies. We want to help secure foundational and everlasting success with individuals with integrity and sensitivity to the sacrifices so many have made to make this industry possible.

What sets you apart from other consultants in the cannabis space? Our team comes from a very diverse background and is 100% women and minority owned. Not only that, but women hold every executive position in the company. We have extensive practical knowledge building out each part of the California supply chain with over 40 years of proven experience.

Owning a cannabis business, especially a small one, is difficult and stressful enough as it is. As ... [+] a consultant, my goal is to ultimately save my clients money and stress. As growers of craft cannabis we are all in this together and I truly take this to heart.

Who are you? Danny Murr-Sloat, Founder & Craft Cannabis Cultivation Consultant at AlpinStash

Whats the mission of your consulting business? At AlpinStash, we are completely dedicated to craft cannabis and compliance. Everything we do from hand mixing our soil, hand watering, hand trimming to glass curing is focused on providing flower of the highest quality. Teaching this to our clients and empowering them to have both the knowledge and skills required to own and operate a boutique grow is a personal passion and what we do best. We specialize in using Nectar For The Gods nutrients and growing in living soil.

Whos your ideal client? Since our specialty is craft cannabis, the clients we seek, whether big or small, are those who wish to provide a connoisseur level product. We are not interested in working with strictly production driven clients or those who wish to cut corners. We seek clients who are forward thinking, who want to operate a sustainable business within this growing sector of the industry, and who wish to be completely compliant as this is, by far, the most important value for a cannabis business to have.

What sets you apart from other consultants in the cannabis space? Our dedication to quality is a skill we have honed over years of research and development on a commercial level. Ive been intricately involved in every aspect of a successful cultivation business this includes concept and design of the cultivation facility, compliance/Metrc use, employee vetting and hiring, social media presence, IPM/pest management, breeding, packaging, branding and more. We have unique connections to nutrient and equipment manufactures and suppliers which we share with our clients. Our goal is to educate our clients so they can become completely self sufficient, confident, and successful.

We help brands grow. It really is that simple. We are a team of fractional CMOs that brings ... [+] strategic sales and marketing expertise when you don't have the budget for a full-time role or when you have a priority project that needs to get done but can't distract your core teams. We only work with purpose-driven brands and founders because we don't take our role as cultivating the next generation of cannabis companies lightly.

Who are you? Kimberly Dillon, Founder of Plant & Prosper a Consulting Collective for the Cannabis and Hemp Industries

Whats the mission of your consulting business? We help innovative brands launch or expand in the legal cannabis and hemp markets. My focus is on product strategy, brand strategy, and coaching. Coaching is a relatively new offering, but after finishing many projects with my clients, many retained me for strategic advisory services and that work has kept me on my toes. I especially love working alongside founders and helping them scale their businesses.

Whos your ideal client? Companies who have a meaty strategic and or messy problems on their hands. Either they want to launch a novel inhalation device and need to find white space or they don't really understand what levers are driving their business. We also love things that fall out of the scope of "marketing" and just require a sharp executive mind. We are itching to do something international. I should mention that we are picky about the projects we take on and we believe in purpose-driven brands and people. We are on a mission of purpose AND profits, not one without the other.

What sets you apart from other consultants in the cannabis space? Three things. 1) I am one of the few C-suite executives who can execute as well as be strategic. While I am hired to be strategic, I understand what it takes to get the job done. In an industry that is so new, generalists are often the MVPS. 2) I was an early team member of Papa & Barkley when the product was still made in a crockpot and legalization just happened. Since then, I have helped teams raise money, solidify their messaging strategy, define their road maps, and launch new businesses. So, that makes me an OG in a way. 3) Cannabis was not my first rodeo. I have 15 years of experience building brands, managing teams, and scaling businesses both in traditional Consumer Packaged Goods, and also in a variety of startups here and abroad. My job out of college was as a management consultant, so by nature I am curious and I use those same tools to identify a problem and develop a methodology that drives to a solution. Also, I really really like the plant!

When we set up our consulting business we did so with the values of craft culture, science, and ... [+] education at the forefront. Coming from Oregons craft industry, we want to help entrepreneurs all over the world adopt business practices that not only allow them to succeed, but also allow them to have a positive impact on the planet, patients, and the community at large. Photo credit: Outer Elements

Who are you? Emma Chasen & Matt Taylor, Founders of Eminent Consulting

Whats the mission of your consulting business? Our mission is to guide and influence emerging cannabis entrepreneurs to successfully implement a craft ethos and cutting-edge business model through scientific-based educational initiatives and authentic collaborative relationships. To accomplish this we have two arms to our consulting business: one, science-forward training for industry professionals that equips entrepreneurs and employees with the knowledge to best explain cannabis and its purported effects to consumers. The other arm is consulting with a focus on strategic business development and management consulting for cannabis entrepreneurs in emerging and existing markets. Through both of these avenues, we are able to promote our mission to deliver accessible cannabis science education and ethical, craft business practices, thereby allowing more people to benefit from plant medicine.

Whos your ideal client? We have the capacity to work with a variety of clients from one-on-one coaching and mentoring, to businesses that utilize our online training program for employee training, to entrepreneurs setting up cultivation facilities and dispensaries, to established cannabis entrepreneurs who need to improve their efficiency systems. We love to work with entrepreneurs to help bring their vision to life through the creation of educational marketing collateral, brand messaging, and management support, especially in the hiring and training process. Ultimately, our ideal client is one who aligns with our values. If a client is not interested in setting up a craft cannabis business that values organic cultivation, workers rights, and patient health, then they are not the right fit for us. We prefer clients that are authentic and committed to the path of self-improvement; always looking to refine their processes in consideration of leaving a positive impact on their communities, reducing the negative impact on their environment, and a willingness to lead by example.

What sets you apart from other consultants in the cannabis space? We have a finger on the pulse of what it takes to empower employees and effectively execute on all levels of a cannabis business. Emmas academic background in the areas of medicinal plant research, ethnobotany, and oncology research inform her the expertise and lexicon in training and advising cannabis industry professionals and consumers on cannabis science. Matts background has consistently orbited DIY subcultures such as indie and punk music communities, art, and skateboarding. The common thread among these communities is the necessity to construct a community/culture in collaboration with other like-minded folks that are seeking new ideas, and celebrating creative outlets. Being among these internally constructed communities can teach you how to build bridges between many different types of people and how to discern quality. Our combined abilities, personalities, plus our experiences working in Oregons craft industry for the last five years, have given us a unique perspective and expertise when it comes to advising clients on implementing a craft ethos and priming them for success.

Read more here:

The Top 5 Cannabis Industry Consultants You Need To Know - Forbes

Lessons From a Global Reckoning: D.C. Looks to Make 14-Year-Old Social Studies Standards More Inclusive as Cities Nationwide Grapple with Re-Engaging…

This is the third story in a six-part series, Lessons from a Global Reckoning, in which The 74 examines how issues of race are taught or ignored in Americas classrooms. As the pandemic continues and after nationwide protests following the death of George Floyd, this series seeks to take a hard look at how educators are tackling these painful but important issues. Read the rest of the pieces as they are published here.

The world has changed since D.C.s social studies standards were created 14 years ago.

A few events stand out for State Board of Education member Jessica Sutter: The election and presidency of Barack Obama; The landmark marriage equality Supreme Court ruling; And now, historic protests and a global pandemic ravaging communities of color that has once again forced the nation D.C. included to take an introspective look at whose histories have been uplifted or buried.

To think about how we teach history and whose stories predominate It is not for the faint of heart, said Sutter, a former middle school social studies teacher.

Sutter and a newly appointed 26-member committee, however, are up to the challenge, and will spend the next half year combing and critiquing a 104-page standards document that informs schools curricula by outlining key events and skills students should learn by grade.

The work is important now more than ever, Sutter said, with culturally responsive education critical in the coming months and years as schools look to re-engage students and recoup learning loss from COVID-19.

Its just so important that students see themselves in the way theyre being taught and in what theyre being taught, said Fadhal Moore, a committee member and former eighth grade history teacher at D.C.s E.L. Haynes Public Charter School. If theres a huge disconnect between students lives and what happens in the classroom, they check out.

Though the standards were well received early on, five committee members interviewed by The 74 were quick to point out wanted changes: More space for history and culture that doesnt revolve around a white, often European, narrative; giving students better tools to be engaged citizens and voters; and introducing more diverse perspectives in the K-2 grades. D.C. Public Schools curriculum is based on the standards; as many as three-quarters of D.C. charters also use them.

Officials say the standards play a vital role as a guidepost for educators. And they reflect what D.C. considers relevant history.

It sends a signal of what are the things that we are saying we value, said Scott Abbott, DCPS director of social studies. And what is actually important.

Tying in more diversity

The mix of educators, administrators, students and experts on the committee agree that the standards dont give equal attention to non-white cultures and people. E.L. Haynes Public Charter School teacher Jessica Rucker counted the number of times the word American appears in the current standards: 171 times.

If American was replaced with the words white people it would more clearly illustrate the what and who we expect students to know, she told other committee members during their first Zoom meeting July 7.

Moore has taken notes, too. African history pre-European colonization is sparse. The standards for the Industrial Revolution dont explicitly suggest uplifting diverse voices, like that of a Latino child or Black woman. One of the most striking to Moore is there are no non-western society history standards until 7th grade. And even when continents like Africa do emerge, European history is often still the backdrop. In 9th grade World History, for example, at least 10 of 16 units center on Europe or how periods like the Renaissance influenced other cultures.

Most students interactions with persons of color outside of Europe are going to be simply victims of European expansion and growth. Not exclusively, but by and large, said committee member Michael Stevens, social studies director at Friendship Public Charter School. While that network doesnt use the standards, it hopes to adopt the updated version.

Students feel this imbalance of perspectives in the classroom. In a lunch time Zoom chat with Sutter in March, one student lamented how there isnt a lot of positive history about Black people thats taught. A few others said history lessons often feel stagnant, rarely connecting past oppression of communities of color to present-day struggles.

Across D.C. public schools, 66 percent of students are Black, 19 percent are Latino and 11 percent are white.

We talk about slavery, we talk about segregation, we talk about the Civil Rights era [and] a young learner, just going off the textbook, would think that racism ended there, said Alex OSullivan, a rising junior at BASIS DC Public Charter School whos on the committee. He wants more attention paid to systemic issues like housing segregation, or the war on drugs and the resulting mass incarceration of Black men.

Committee members also feel there are gaps in civics education, which encourages students to explore their identity within society and teaches them how to be more engaged citizens.

There arent any civics standards between grades 3 and 11, Moore said. He intends to push for updated standards that include skills building across grades: How to organize a protest and obtain necessary permits, craft petitions and pen letters to local politicians, for example.

You do not become a citizen at 18. You are always a citizen, hed tell his students. So what does that mean for you to start to interact with that now?

Fadhal Moores students create VOTE signs for a rally. (Courtesy of Fadhal Moore)

Standards for the younger grades, in general, need to be more robust, committee members like Sutter and Abbott said. The current K-2 standards focus on basic concepts like reading a map, identifying American symbols like the Statue of Liberty and learning to respect others. The one outlier which Abbott said he wishes there was more of is a section on Maya, Inca, and Aztec civilizations in first grade.

Sutter thinks kids can handle more. In second grade, for example, when kids learn about American citizenship, there should also be discussion about Dreamers, she said. More specifically, What does that mean, and how are these students and families supported if they are not citizens'?

I have a 4-year-old nephew who can name you every dinosaur and pronounce their multisyllabic name correctly, she said. We underestimate young children.

Holding district, schools accountable for change

Committee member Laura Fuchs is more focused on holding DCPS and charters accountable for not cherry-picking standards theyre most comfortable with.

The H.D. Woodson Senior High School teacher takes issue with current DCPS World History curriculum. It suggests, for example, that teachers spend 12 days on a U.S.-Russia Cold War unit, while another unit covering more ground the ramifications of World War II, the Cold War and colonization on Africa and Latin America, regions with largely Black and Latino populations is allotted 11 days.

The standards, thats just one thing, she said. The problems Im facing in my classroom is because the standards are being prioritized in a very poor way.

Committee member and sixth grade geography teacher Melanie Holmes felt a similar disconnect between the standards and curriculum recently. Im working on curriculum for my individual school [MacFarland Middle School] right now and [while referring to the standards] we just found so many good standards that are left out of whats provided to teachers, she said at the meeting.

Some teachers find they have autonomy to craft organic and diverse lesson plans. Emory Calhoun at Dunbar High School brings in historians to talk about Georgetowns Black history, and has students call his aunt, who lived through the Civil Rights Movement. Cosby Hunt, an AP U.S. history teacher at Thurgood Marshall Academy, takes his classes through Jacob Lawrences 60-panel art series portraying the Great Migration of African Americans from the rural South.

Both acknowledged having that flexibility can depend, though, on a schools management style, and how new a teacher is to a particular subject.

Abbott, DCPS social studies director, said the district works with teachers to develop curriculum. It brought in six educators this summer to serve as race and equity fellows who are looking at the curriculum through this lens of anti-racism, anti-bias to identify short-term fixes as the standards review process continues. Abbott added the district is looking forward to expanding course offerings for its African American History and Culture elective the most popular non-AP elective last year.

The committee will submit recommendations to the Office of the State Superintendent of Education in December, and advise that office as it formally rewrites the standards in 2021. The State Board will vote on the revisions in March 2022, to go into effect the 202223 school year.

See the rest here:

Lessons From a Global Reckoning: D.C. Looks to Make 14-Year-Old Social Studies Standards More Inclusive as Cities Nationwide Grapple with Re-Engaging...

The Really High Highs and Embarrassing Lows of Oliver Stones First Oscar Season – GQ

My turn came up earlier. Lauren Bacall, accompanied by Jon Voight, regally walked on to bestow the awards for screenwriting, both adapted and original. She put me back into the Bogart-Huston era, still looking like a lynx with those slits for eyes and that 1940s smokers voice. My nerves couldnt help but take a quantum leap upwards. God help me now. Remember, this audience doesnt want a lecture on the War on Drugs; anyway, most didnt agree with me, or they wanted a crackdown on drugs, or they just didnt want to think about it. On the contrary, the US was clearly drifting toward an expanded prison system, and the fight against crime and terrorism was a popular theme. So be cool, man, say what you gotta say quickly and get off. This was on TV now, going out to hundreds of millions across the globe. Dont fuck this up, Oliver. Midnight had won only one Oscar so farfor Giorgio Moroders tense, driving score. Neil Simon, sitting close by, the most financially successful dramatist of his time, was my competition for adaptation of his own play, California Suite; sitting separately were Elaine May and Warren Beatty for their rewrite of the original Heaven Can Wait.

And the winner isthat grand cliche of a pause as Bacall opens the envelopeOLIVER STONE! Wow. Cheers breaking all around. I knew this moment was special. I memorized it. I planted it in my heartlike a tree that would grow. I started walking toward the stage. Nothing fancy. Just walk up there, dont stumble on these stairs.

My speech this time was considerably better delivered than at the Globes, but the meaning again was botched, as I naively wished for some consideration for all the men and women all over the world who are in prison tonight. Considering that this generality includes some genuine psychopaths and cold-blooded killers was beside the point, because who really listens or cares? I was just another writer up there making a case, my hair tumbling messily down to my shoulders, and presenting a slightly stoned, out-of-it expression. But I was young enough to strike a chord and briefly be remembered in a profession in which, I would discover, writers are profoundly interchangeable. I thanked my colleagues and got off. Lauren and Jon stayed on to give the screenwriting prize for originals to Waldo Salt, Nancy Dowd, and Robert Jones for Coming Home.

Backstage was brutal, nothing like I expected. Lauren abandoned me, stars were moving left and right to get ready for the next number. Cary Grant smiled at me again. There was Audrey Hepburn! Then Gregory Peck! Then Jimmy Stewart was congratulating me, the warmest of men. Then fifty photographers were popping flashbulbs in my face in one room, and in the next, another fifty reporters were throwing tough questions at me like grenades. I did my best and, soaked like a sponge with sweat, gratefully returned to my seat for the finale with John Wayne.

I went on to the Academy Ball and other parties, giddy, drinking, ending up quite high and drunk at a Hollywood Hills mansion where so many people congratulated me it became a blur. Alan Parkers face loomed up somewhere that night. A begrudging congratulations. Nothing more needed to be said between usfor years. I remember chatting with a cerebral Richard Dreyfuss, whod won the acting award the year before for The Goodbye Girl, then being embraced by Sammy Davis Jr., who was hugging me and spreading the love, baby!

And then, out of the smoke and music, near three in the morning, emerged a goddess, now older but still desirable, her voice strained and hoarse enough to seduce any Odysseus shipwrecked on her island. Kim Novak was Circe, able to turn men into swine, but alas, she preferred her dogs and horses on her Northern California ranch, where she lived in reclusive splendor. As I talked with her quietly on the couch, she seemed to me a woman who, never satisfied with men, had found her lonely island. I yearned for her without saying it, and felt her isolation. She was amused by men, accustomed to being desired, but could never be mortal. She preferred her dream.

Three short years ago, Id been in the gutter. Now I was on a mountaintop Id never thought possible. And in three more years, Id be back in the gutter.

Adapted from Chasing the Light: Writing, Directing, and Surviving Platoon, Midnight Express, Scarface, Salvador and the Movie Game by Oliver Stone, to be published by Houghton Mifflin Harcourt on July 21, 2020.

See the original post:

The Really High Highs and Embarrassing Lows of Oliver Stones First Oscar Season - GQ

Netflix’s The Business Of Drugs Review: Cocaine, Meth, and More | TechQuila – TechQuila

- Advertisement -

The Business Of Drugs premiered on Netflix on 14 July 2020 is a documentaryweb television mini-series. With 6 episodes titles Cocaine, Synthetics, Heroin, Meth, Cannabis, Opioids respectively.

Amaryllis Fox, a former kid CIA agent recruited at the age 21 who hopped the globe fight on the war against terror until 2010 is the host for the series.

Drugs have existed in our societies longer than terrorism! It is deeply rooted in our system and society. The drug trade is widespread and uncontrollable and to some people their only means of survival. From human carriers to stuffing of drugs inside toys, the export of drugs is untamed.

- Advertisement -

The series doesnt elaborate on what it starts with- how drugs are a part of wall street, freudian theory and a lot more. It tells the viewers more about how drugs are made and exported! The series features live testimonies from smugglers and dealers, who sell coke in small amounts and stay off radars.

The series initially compares the war on drugs to the war on terrorism, the two very different and distinctively important issues are put under common light making matter lighter for each! The Business Of Drugs includes interviews with experts in each episode who take us deeper in the whole production, sale and use. Alongside this, bits about the history of drugs is displayed.

Government spends a huge amount on the removal of Coca plant from Columbia- The largest importer of cocaine. But the question it left me with was- If the government can spend soo much money on removal on Coca plant, Why not spend it on developing Columbia, dealing with the root problem! Rather than just working on the surface with little to NO result.

- Advertisement -

While the stats and information Fox brings forward is well drawn, it never really reaches to a point where the viewers feel triggered for a want to bring about change. The view point is more or less focused on the U.S.A and not on the global impact of drugs. The Business Of Drugs simply touches over various drugs and things related to them, that have been covered in various other shows and documentaries

STREAM IT! The Business Of Drugs is informative even though it misses out on some significantly important parts. This docuseries isnt the best of the genre but its worth a watch!

- Advertisement -

The Business Of Drugs is now streaming on Netflix

Read our other reviewshere.

- Advertisement -

See more here:

Netflix's The Business Of Drugs Review: Cocaine, Meth, and More | TechQuila - TechQuila

Inside the Attack that Shocked Mexico City – Geopoliticalmonitor.com

At dawn on June 26, a leafy neighborhood of Mexico City awoke to the sounds of automatic gunfire and fragmentation grenades from a coordinated assault on the citys chief of police. On the streets of Lomas de Chapultepec, home to ambassadors and business leaders, 28 assailants ambushed Mexico Citys most senior law enforcement officer, Omar Garca Harfuch, during his morning commute and hammered his armored car with military grade weaponry. The assault left three dead but Garca Harfuch, shot three times and wounded by shrapnel, survived.

While the Mexican government has yet to formally attribute the attack to any group, preliminary reports strongly suggest the powerful New Generation Jalisco Cartel (CJNG) was responsible. In a Twitter posting from the hospital, Garca Harfuch blamed the CJNG for the attempt on his life. Local press reports, citing government security sources, indicate that Mexicos intelligence services had anticipated an attack since at least June 11, when intercepts of discussions between assassins affiliated with the CJNG revealed a pending plot against an unspecified senior official. Mexicos Security Cabinet subsequently assessed the Mexico City police chief to be one of four possible targets. After the attack, a CJNG member allegedly responsible for contracting assassins for the cartel was among 19 individuals arrested.

As clearer indications of responsibility for the attack filter into the public realm, security analysts and the media have begun to raise inevitable questions of motive and meaning. Why Mexico Citys chief of police? What did the CJNG hope to gain? And how will the government respond? Preliminary accounts provide partial answers. They suggest overlapping criminal, personal, and political motives for the attempted assassination and that the CJNG, despite recent setbacks, is both willing and able to engage in direct confrontation with the Mexican state.

On a purely tactical level, the June 26 attack was an attempt by the CJNG to reduce operational risk. After becoming Mexico Citys Secretary of Citizen Security in October 2019, Garca Harfuch depleted the ranks of local CJNG-affiliated groups. He also arrested at least three local CJNG cell leaders, one of whom Mexican authorities describe as a trusted operative of cartel leader Nemesio Oseguera Cervantes, known as El Mencho. The arrests put pressure on the CJNGs retail drug sales and extortion rackets in a key metropolitan center at a time when international COVID-19 measures have constrained its wholesale trade in heroin and synthetic drugs and the Mexican government has attacked its finances. Indeed, there is speculation that Garca Harfuchs unwillingness to negotiate with the crime syndicates he targeted may have precipitated the attack against him.

Yet, there is also a personal element to the assault. The damage that Garca Harfuch has inflicted on the CJNG over the years appears to have inspired personal animosity and made him a uniquely attractive target. According to press accounts of his career, while serving with the Federal Police Garca Harfuch coordinated operations that came close to capturing El Mencho in the mountains of Jalisco and the port city of Puerto Vallarta. He also directed investigations that led to the 2015 arrest of El Menchos son, who was extradited to the United States in February this year. In addition, Garca Harfuch is credited with having thwarted a planned CJNG alliance with the Sinaloa Cartel in 2017, which disintegrated after one of his operations led to the capture of the Sinaloa leader who was negotiating the agreement.

The choice of a wealthy and supposedly secure Mexico City enclave as an attack venue suggests a potential political motivation by the CJNG. Mexicos cartels have long used extreme violence for public messaging. A famous practice, known as calentar la plaza, uses high-profile violence to trigger a law enforcement crackdown in a targeted area, which impedes the operations of rivals and intimidates or angers the local public. The use of this tactic in the heart of the capital could be read as an effort to undermine the political standing of Mexican President Andrs Manuel Lpez Obrador, known as AMLO, and his ally, Mexico City Mayor Claudia Sheinbaum.

It is conceivable that the CJNG perceives AMLO as having taken sides however inadvertently in its ongoing rivalry with the Sinaloa Cartel. In February 2019, AMLO authorized a humanitarian visa for the mother of former Sinaloa Cartel leader Joaqun El Chapo Guzmn, enabling her to visit her son as he stood trial in New York. This March, AMLO travelled to El Chapos village of La Tuna in the mountains of Sinaloa a highly unusual trip for a sitting president and was caught on camera greeting El Chapos mother. Then, on June 19 he publicly admitted to having personally ordered the release of El Chapos son, Ovidio Guzmn, when the latter was briefly captured during a federal firefight with cartel forces in Sinaloa last October.

In that context, the CJNG may have intended its attack, highly visible and perpetrated near the seat of national government, to weaken AMLOs public support by exacerbating feelings of insecurity. Indeed, nearly three-quarters of Mexicans already consider their city to be unsafe, and 57% disapprove of AMLOs handling of public security. The attack also appears to be the second time in the past year that the CJNG has conducted a high-profile killing in the city governed by AMLOs close political ally, Claudia Sheinbaum. Sheinbaum, a member of AMLOs political party, has struggled to regain her balance on security issues since a CJNG-linked shooting of two Israelis in a luxury shopping center in Mexico City last July.

Finally, the attack delivers an unmistakable message of confidence by the cartel and reveals a willingness to directly confront Mexican forces. The plot was logistically complex, involving multiple operational cells, military grade weapons, and extensive surveillance. It took aim at a hard target more than 300 miles from the CJNGs stronghold in Jalisco and did so near the headquarters of the Mexican Army, Navy, and National Guard. Its boldness and sophistication discredited any notions that the CJNG was reeling from its recent setbacks. It also implies that, if more discreet arrangements cant be made with law enforcement and legislators, the CJNG does not fear incurring the full wrath of the state.

Now, the Mexican government must calibrate its response: too soft will invite more impunity, too hard will invoke references to a militarized war on drugs that AMLO has so assiduously avoided. The initial response appears circumspect. In a June 27 social media posting, AMLO declared that Mexicos security strategy would remain unchanged in response to the attempted assassination and that he would neither declare war nor negotiate with organized crime. The statement emphasized two pillars of his strategy educational and economic assistance to the young and a preference for preventive intelligence over military force and did not mention any cartels by name.

For the Mexican government to credibly deter future threats to public order and attacks on its officials, that strategy needs to evolve. A renewed focus on judicial reform, enhanced U.S. security cooperation, and greater sharing of criminal intelligence with foreign partners should be urgent priorities.

As many suspects in the Garca Harfuch attack have already been apprehended, now is the time to revisit the judicial reforms that AMLOs government tabled but quickly withdrew in January 2020. The reforms, which proposed changes to Mexicos Constitution and four federal laws, tried to address concerns that the countrys adoption of a US-style accusatorial justice system in 2016 made it harder for under-staffed police and prosecutors to get convictions. Rights groups correctly criticized many of the proposals for endangering due process and the presumption of innocence. However, several ideas, such as admitting judicially approved wiretaps as evidence and limiting legal challenges to avoid delays in extradition, are worth resurrecting. They could improve Mexicos conviction rate for murders and expedite transfers of international criminals.

In parallel, Mexico should reinvigorate its security partnership with the U.S. via cooperation frameworks such as the Merida Initiative and the Mexico-U.S. High-level Security Group, which already exist but are underused due to political differences and excess bureaucracy. As legal cases against the Garca Harfuch attackers progress, the two countries should also use their existing arms trafficking cooperation agreement to trace the origin of the weapons used in the attack and revive joint efforts to stop high-caliber arms from crossing their shared border.

Stronger intelligence ties to other partner nations will also be critical, as the most severe security threats to Mexico, embodied by the CJNG, are transnational. The CJNG is believed to operate across the Americas, Europe, and Asia. Yet, Mexicos intelligence service, the National Intelligence Center, functions as a domestic agency with a small foreign arm. If it were allowed to work more overseas, gathering intelligence on cartels money laundering and logistics networks, the results could help limit the finances and firepower that enable groups like the CJNG to threaten the Mexican state.

If the attack of June 26 has taught Mexico anything, its that national security depends on the ability to manage crime proactively, holistically, and with international partners. Instead of working merely to prevent attacks, it must also prevent organized crime from growing its capabilities. Otherwise, the next time a cartel takes aim at the state, the result could leave an even more indelible mark on the country.

Andrew Rennemo is a member of Chatham House. He has held roles in U.S. government focused on transnational threats and as a management consultant with PwC for risk and compliance and forensic investigation in Mexico.

The views expressed in this article are those of the authors alone and do not necessarily reflect those of Geopoliticalmonitor.com or any institutions with which the authors are associated.

See the rest here:

Inside the Attack that Shocked Mexico City - Geopoliticalmonitor.com

Decades of promised police reforms have failed to alter a culture of abuse and racism – Milwaukee Independent

President Donald Trumps executive order and the stalled bills in Congress to curb police misconduct are, at best, attempts to retune an instrument that was orchestrated for abuse.

As a former archivist in charge of the National Archives records for the Department of Justice, Federal Bureau of Investigation and Bureau of Prisons, it is clear to me that the history of police violence in the U.S. informs and influences why the U.S. is again facing protests over violence, racism and unjust death.

Wickersham Commission

Violence and corruption have long been the mainstay of American police. In 1929, President Herbert Hoover, stirred by stories of bootleggers who forged criminal alliances with police departments during the Prohibition Era (1920-1933), announced that his administration would make the widest inquiry into the shortcomings of the administration of justice and into the causes and remedies for them.

Hoover appointed the National Commission on Law Observance and Enforcement, chaired by former Attorney General George Wickersham, to investigate the failure of prohibition laws. In its 1931 report, the commission said that police made frequent use of torture as a method of law enforcement and that confessions of guilt frequently are unlawfully extorted by the police from prisoners by means of cruel treatment, colloquially known as the third degree. The Wickersham Commission defined the third degree as the employment of methods which inflict suffering, physical or mental, upon a person, in order to obtain from that person information about a crime.

Rather than reform the police, however, Attorney General Homer Cummings (1933-1939), who was appointed by Hoovers successor, President Franklin D. Roosevelt, announced in September 1933 that there was a real war that confronts us all a war that must be successfully fought if life and property are to be secure in our countryThe warfare which an armed underworld is waging upon organized society has reached disturbing proportions. The prevalence of predatory crime, including kidnapping and racketeering, demands the utmost diligence upon the part of our law enforcing agencies, supported by an informed and aroused public opinion. Cummings declared a war on crime that aimed to professionalize and militarize the police.

Professionalization was supposed to train police in scientific methods to curtail torture in police work, but militarization armed the FBI and coordinated it with local police departments across the country. The war on crime was a signature program of Roosevelts New Deal, designed to win headlines for the president when Americans were hungry for strong leadership amid the Great Depression.

Kerner Commission

Thirty years later, President Lyndon B. Johnson mounted his own war on crime. He appointed the National Advisory Commission on Civil Disorders, known as the Kerner Commission, to investigate the source of riots across the country in 1967.

Chaired by Governor Otto Kerner Jr. of Illinois, the commission reported that to some Negroes, police have come to symbolize white power, white racism, and white repression. And the fact is that many police do reflect and express these white attitudes. The atmosphere of hostility and cynicism is reinforced by a widespread belief among Negroes in the existence of police brutality and in a double standard of justice and protection one for Negroes and one for whites.

The Kerner Commission documented a reality that remains unchanged: police are trained to keep order in Black neighborhoods with the use of unchecked violence. Among other things, it highlighted the need for change in police operations in the ghetto, to insure proper conduct by individual officers and to eliminate abrasive practices.

The problem of police brutality was not untrained or rogue cops, but the design of Americas system of policing. The commission noted that many of the serious disturbances took place in cities whose police are among the best led, best organized, best trained and most professional in the country. President Johnson ignored its recommendations.

War on drugs

The next administration made the problem of police brutality worse. In June 1971, President Richard Nixon launched the war on drugs. Borrowing language from the war on crime, Nixon announced that Americas public enemy number one in the United States is drug abuse. In order to fight and defeat this enemy, it is necessary to wage a new, all-out offensive, he said.

Nixons domestic policy chief, John Ehrlichman, later recounted that the drug war was designed to link the Black community with narcotics and thereby arrest their leaders, raid their homes, break up their meetings, and vilify them night after night on the evening news.

The war on drugs not only targeted the Black community but justified the mass incarceration of Black men. Every president since Ronald Reagan has expanded the war on drugs, from programs that equipped police with military gear to patterns of enforcement that disproportionately policed people of color. Such outfitting dressed officers as soldiers and cast Black people as combatants.

Undone reform, post-Ferguson

Protests against police violence erupted once again in August 2014 when police in Ferguson, Missouri, killed an unarmed Black teenager and left his body displayed on the street for hours. Angry crowds gathered, protested and rioted. Police responded by showcasing their military equipment including tear gas, rubber bullets, stun grenades, M-16 rifles, M-14 rifles, M-1911 handguns, tactical vests, undercover apparel, riot shields, armored personnel carriers, mine-resistant ambush protected vehicles and high mobility multipurpose wheeled vehicles.

President Barack Obama issued guidelines for the Justice Department in 2015 that prohibited the transfer of some military equipment to local police departments. He explained that Americans have seen how militarized gear can sometimes give people a feeling like theres an occupying force, as opposed to a force thats part of the community thats protecting them and serving them.

Obama also created the Task Force on 21st Century Policing in 2014. It recommended new policies to build trust between racial minorities and the police, but they were sparsely adopted. After police killed Alton Sterling and Philando Castile in 2016, Obama lamented that change has been too slow and we have to have a greater sense of urgency about this.

President Trump rescinded Obamas guidelines to demilitarize the police in 2017. Trumps order reinstated the military gear and sent a strong message that we will not allow criminal activity, violence, and lawlessness to become the new normal, said Attorney General Jeff Sessions.

Today, the efforts of the White House and Congress to reform the police is an attempt to reinvent an old institution. Ideas advanced by Republicans and Democrats rely on the police to tear down the blue wall of silence, an unofficial loyalty oath among police that is customarily respected by judges and prosecutors, and which leads to a lack of accountability for police violence and abuse. Police culture protects itself.

Like before, America is again scrutinizing the role and function of the police in the wake of public corruption and brutality. But there is no promise that reform efforts now will lead to any more changes than they have in the past.

Read the original:

Decades of promised police reforms have failed to alter a culture of abuse and racism - Milwaukee Independent

Do For-Profit Prisons Violate the Constitution? – Crime Report

For-profit prisons hamper access to justice and violate constitutional protections against cruel and unusual punishment, says a paper published by the University of Baltimore Law Review.

The question [of] why we as a nation stand for private corporate profit in the realm of human imprisonment must be addressed and resolved, says the paper, noting that the enormous political clout wielded by the private prison industry has allowed it to evade calls for abolition over nearly four decades.

The implementation of for-profit incarceration in the United States hampers access to justice, wrote Robert Craig, associate director of Abolish Private Prisons, an advocacy group; and andr douglas pond cummings,a law professor at the University of Arkansas.

The authors said the constitutional issues raised by the private prison industry merited review by the U.S. Supreme Court.

Mixing profit with the core governmental function of incarceration leads to damaging consequences for prisoners, employees (of both private and public prisons), and the public at large while benefiting a small group of executives and shareholders, they wrote.

Over 120,000 federal and state detainees are currently confined to institutions operated by private corporations, according to 2017 figures. While that amounts to a relatively small fraction of the total incarcerated population in the U.S., in some states they represent a significant proportion of inmates.

In New Mexico and Montana, private prisons house 43 percent and 39 percent, respectively, of the total inmate population, according to a 2018 report by the Sentencing Project.

The private prison industry emerged as a significant player in the 1980s, driven by state efforts to reduce costs and the acceleration of the War on Drugs. Between 2000 and 2016, the number of individuals housed in private prisons increased five times faster than the total prison population, the Sentencing Project said.

Although at least eight states had eliminated the use of private prisons by 2016, the fortunes of the for-profit industry benefited from Washingtons crackdown on immigration. According to figures cited in The Sentencing Project report, the proportion of individuals held in private detention facilities under contract with the federal government increased by 442 percent between 2000 and 2016.

The University of Baltimore Law Review paper cited the work of Ira P. Robbins, a legal scholar at Washington College of Law.

Testifying in Congress a year after the countrys first for-profit prison was established in Tennessee in 1984 by a firm then known as the Corrections Corporation of America (CCA),Robbins warned of serious constitutional and pragmatic concerns connected with the rise of private prisons.

Two decades after his 1985 testimony, Robbins issued a second warning about what he called the lamentable experiment of private prisons.

It is long past time to take such warnings seriously, the paper argued.

Private prison executives and lobbyists seek to increase privatization of the industry by promising that their prisons are run more efficiently at lower costs, with greater safety records, improved facilities, and with greater outcomes for prisoners, the authors wrote.

However, studies and reports now show that these declarations by private prison executives and lobbyists are deceitful. Private prisons are increasingly being shown to cost contracting governments more, not less, are less safe, and less economical.

The evidence makes clear that a system that puts profit over quality has exposed inmates to poor food, poor sanitation, and overcrowding, asserted the authors.

And, as such, it is unconstitutional, they wrote.

The paper declared that the for-profit industry violates constitutional prohibitions of cruel and unusual punishment as well as guarantees of due process and equal protection under the law.

The unique circumstances involved with incarcerating people for profit implicates concerns that make a categorical challenge relying on modern conceptions of human dignity appropriate, the paper said.

Similar conclusions have been drawn by other researchers.

Private prisons have a 28 percent higher rate of inmate-on-inmate assaults and more than twice as many inmate-on-staff assaults, as well as twice as many illicit weapons than comparable federal facilities, according to the Justice Policy Initiative.

The papers authors wrote that the constitutional and moral concerns raised by for-profit prisons have grown more serious over the decades, and deserve new consideration by the U.S. Supreme Court.

The evidence shows that the depths to which profit seekers will sink to earn revenues knows no bounds, and the effects reverberate through the justice system, the authors conclude.

Private prisons are abhorrent on moral grounds, including for the ways that for-profitincarceration wrecks access to justice and diminishes equality in the U.S. criminal justice system.

The authors of the paper were Robert Craig, associate director of Abolish Private Prisons, an advocacy group; and andr douglas pond cummings a professor of law at the University of Arkansas at Little Rock William H. Bowen School of Law.

[Editors Note: Prof. cummings spells his name in lower-case]

Additional Reading: Private Firms Earn Billions for Service to the Incarcerated

Amid COVID-19, Inmates Work, Private Firms Profit

The full paper can be accessed here.

Andrea Cipriano is a staff writer for The Crime Report.

View post:

Do For-Profit Prisons Violate the Constitution? - Crime Report