Select Page ::

Bitcoin Cash Is the Only Fork Underperforming Bitcoin This Year – CoinDesk – CoinDesk

Posted on July 23, 2020 by Danzig

Bitcoin cash is the only forked cryptocurrency underperforming bitcoin in 2020, according to data from Messari. The inaugural fork is only up 9% year to date.

Although most alternate cryptocurrencies (or altcoins) have rallied over the past few months, bitcoin cash the only fork around today that traded throughout the 2017 cryptocurrency bull market has been left behind. Bitcoin cash only started underperforming bitcoin in May, but two months was enough time for the forked cryptocurrency to underperform bitcoin by 18 percentage points so far this year.

Its common for altcoins to outperform bitcoin during bullish market cycles. Altcoins with low or medium market capitalizations often experience higher volatility than bitcoin, which may yield higher returns should bitcoins price also appreciate.

Bitcoin cash, on the other hand, has simply experienced more of a volatility compression compared to the other forks, especially bitcoin sv, which has a market capitalization closest to bitcoin cash, said Dan Koehler, liquidity manager at OKCoin.

Bitcoin gold and bitcoin diamond remain in a much smaller market cap bucket and thus could be experiencing higher volatility and returns as a result, he added.

Another, more fundamental possible explanation for bitcoin cashs lackluster performance is that the protocols ecosystem including developers, investors and entrepreneurs has unraveled, according to Zach Resnick, managing partner at Unbounded Capital, a BSV-long fund. Bitcoin underperforming other forks like bitcoin gold and bitcoin diamond is not surprising due to their characteristically high volatility, he told CoinDesk.

Regardless of the reason, bitcoin sv, bitcoin gold and bitcoin diamond have all outperformed bitcoin by more than 40 percentage points in 2020.

The leader in blockchain news, CoinDesk is a media outlet that strives for the highest journalistic standards and abides by a strict set of editorial policies. CoinDesk is an independent operating subsidiary of Digital Currency Group, which invests in cryptocurrencies and blockchain startups.

Visit link:

Bitcoin Cash Is the Only Fork Underperforming Bitcoin This Year - CoinDesk - CoinDesk

What is the difference between Bitcoin and Bitcoin Cash? – Decrypt

Posted on July 23, 2020 by Danzig

Just over ten years ago, Bitcoin (BTC), the world's first cryptocurrency, was invented and launched by the mysterious Satoshi Nakamoto.

Since then, Bitcoin has undergone several upgrades and been forked well over 100 times. Most of these efforts fell flat within months of launching, but Bitcoin Cash (BCH) has managed to buck the trend, becoming by far the most successful Bitcoin fork.

Though similar in many ways, there are several ideological and technical differences between Bitcoin and Bitcoin Cash which you'll want to be aware of. Here are the main ones:

From the early days of Bitcoin's existence, it quickly became apparent that the network isn't capable of handling enough transactions per second to make it a true competitor to centralized payment systems like Visa. This issue came to a head in 2017 when the number of transactions dramatically increased, causing Bitcoin's average transaction fee to climb to as high as $55 by the end of the year.

To address this scaling issue, a number of off-chain scaling solutions entered development, including the Lightning Network and various side-chain scaling options. But Bitcoin ABC (led by blockchain developer Amaury Schet) sought to keep scaling on-chain (that is without relying on offline processing or side-chains) initiated a fork of the Bitcoin protocol in August 2017. The fork occurred just after the launch of the Segregated Witness (SegWit) update, which slightly improved Bitcoin's scalability by reducing the size of transactions, allowing more to fit into a block.

This fork produced a new cryptocurrency known as Bitcoin Cash, which keeps the original Bitcoin codebase but without the SegWit upgrade, and with the maximum block size increased to 8MB.

Arguably the main technical difference between Bitcoin and Bitcoin Cash is the maximum block size allowed by each network.

For Bitcoin, the size of each block is limited to roughly 1MB, but there have been examples of blocks successfully mined that are larger than this due to the benefits of the aforementioned SegWit upgrade. Bitcoin Cash, on the other hand, has a maximum block size of 32MB (increased from 8MB in May 2018). This change significantly increased the number of transactions that can be included in each block and the overall speed of the Bitcoin Cash network.

Bitcoin Cash keeps the 10-minute average block discovery time first implemented by Bitcoin. This means that transactions are confirmed approximately equally quickly between the two chains, but because more transactions can be squeezed into each Bitcoin Cash block, the overall throughput of the Bitcoin Cash network is around 100 transactions per second (tps)compared to just 7 tps for Bitcoin (14 tps with SegWit).

Since Bitcoin Cash has larger blocks, but far fewer actual transactions compared to Bitcoin, it also benefits from lower fees. Currently, the average Bitcoin Cash transaction fee is around 0.5 cents, versus $2.07 for Bitcoin.

Besides an increased maximum block size and lack of SegWit support, Bitcoin Cash differs from Bitcoin in a variety of other ways. For one, it has several additional commands/functions enabled, known as opcodes. Back in 2018, several opcodes that are disabled in Bitcoin were re-enabled on the Bitcoin Cash chain, while some entirely new ones were also added. This difference gives Bitcoin Cash enhanced smart contract functionality over Bitcoin.

Bitcoin Cash can also be considered more centralized than Bitcoin. Right now, a single pool controls more than a quarter of the Bitcoin Cash hash rate, whereas the top three pools combined make up over 55% of the hash rate. Comparatively, the largest Bitcoin pool controls around 17.7% of the hash rate, whereas the top three contribute under 47%.

Overall, Bitcoin and Bitcoin Cash are similar in ambition and purpose, but Bitcoin has been far more successful in garnering adoptiondespite the arguable technical improvements offered by Bitcoin Cash.

Here is the original post:

What is the difference between Bitcoin and Bitcoin Cash? - Decrypt

The Crypto Daily Movers and Shakers July 20th, 2020 – FX Empire

Posted on July 23, 2020 by Danzig

It was a mixed start to the day. Bitcoin rose to an early morning high $9,194.4 before hitting reverse.

Falling short of the major resistance levels, Bitcoin fell to a late morning intraday low $9,111.8 before finding support.

Bitcoin fell through the first major support level at $9,133.77 before rallying to a final hour intraday high $9,299.0.

Bitcoin broke through the first major resistance level at $9,230.77 and second major resistance level at $9,272.43 before pulling back.

The late pullback saw Bitcoin fall back through the second major resistance level to sub-$9,240 levels.

The near-term bullish trend remained intact in spite of the early July pullback to sub-$9,000 levels. For the bears, Bitcoin would need to slide through the 62% FIB of $6,400 to form a near-term bearish trend.

Across the rest of the majors, it was yet another mixed day on Sunday.

Bitcoin Cash SV (-0.52%), Ripples XRP (-0.20%), Stellars Lumen (-0.48%), and Tezos (-0.95%) bucked the trend with modest losses.

It was bullish for the rest of the majors.

Binance Coin and EOS rallied by 5.01% and by 3.17% respectively to lead the way.

Bitcoin Cash ABC (+2.11%), Cardanos ADA (+1.15%), and Ethereum (+1.44%) also found strong support.

Litecoin (+0.42%), Moneros XMR (+0.89%), and Trons TRX (+0.68%) trailed the front runners.

For the week, it was also a mixed bag for the majors.

Stellars Lumen and Tezos bucked the trend, with gains of 5.23% and 5.55% respectively.

It was bearish for the rest of the majors.

Bitcoin Cash ABC (-3.58%), Bitcoin Cash SV (-6.20%), Litecoin (-4.71%), and Trons TRX (-3.56%) led the way down.

Binance Coin (-1.64%), Cardanos ADA (-2.23%), EOS (-1.38%), and Ethereum (-1.50%) also struggled.

Moneros XMR (-0.52%) and Ripples XRP (-0.86%) saw relatively modest losses in the week.

In the week, the crypto total market cap rose to a Monday high $273.18bn before falling to a Thursday low $258.89bn. At the time of writing, the total market cap stood at $266.81bn.

Bitcoins dominance fell to a Monday low 63.09% before rising to a Thursday high 64.28%. At the time of writing, Bitcoins dominance stood at 63.46%.

Read the original post:

The Crypto Daily Movers and Shakers July 20th, 2020 - FX Empire

Report Shows Bitcoin’s Covid-19 Recovery Stronger Than Other Markets With Zero Intervention – Bitcoin News

Posted on July 23, 2020 by Danzig

The response to the Covid-19 pandemic has been ruthless on the global economy and during the last six months, traditional stocks and commodities have felt extreme market volatility. Coinshares published a comprehensive report this week in regard to how bitcoin performed during the coronavirus outbreak. The seven-page study highlights how bitcoins rebound to pre-Covid price levels has unsurprisingly garnered attention amongst the investment community.

Coinshares head of research Chris Bendiksen recently published a report that discusses how bitcoin (BTC) reacted to the coronavirus outbreak and the mid-March market volatility. Despite what critics like Peter Schiff say, BTC has outperformed a great number of global assets including gold since the March 12, 2020 (Black Thursday) market rout.

Golds price per ounce was $1,589, and the price has risen 13.90% to a high of $1,810 on July 17. Bitcoin (BTC) on the other hand slid to a low of $3,870 on Black Thursday sliding -49.39% that day. However, since then the price of BTC has increased 135% where it stands today at just above the $9,100 per coin region.

The report called Understanding Bitcoin During the Covid Crisis written by Bendiksen highlights how resilient bitcoin can be. Coinshares believes that the initial tumble on March 12 was ignited by fear spreading from other markets.

It then became particularly severe due to bitcoins unique market structure, Bendiksens report notes. The overall usage of leverage in bitcoin spot and derivatives markets is generally large, but in the time leading into March 12 & 13, leverage levels were abnormally high, making them extra vulnerable to shocks.

The report continues by adding:

Interestingly, even after sustaining a drop of that magnitude, Bitcoin not only found a natural bottom, it vigorously rebounded over the succeeding weeks and liquidity levels have normalised. Not only does that demonstrate that what we observed was a market dislocation caused by exogenous shocks, not a broad revaluation, but it also shows that Bitcoin markets are highly resilient and self-correcting, even in the complete absence of external intervention.

Despite the swift rebound, the Coinshares researcher explained that due to bitcoins market structure not really changing, theres little reason to doubt the March 12 volatility could happen again. Bendiksen says there were a number of things that happened prior to Black Thursday, which can be examined again for future volatility events.

The report details that traditional financial markets were on shaky ground in early March, and a stampede for cash took place after Europe and North America implemented the initial lockdowns.

But was really noticeable was the leverage levels in bitcoin markets prior to the Black Thursday fallout.

In bitcoin markets, leverage had been building in various forms, the report reveals. USD lending rates on margin platforms were elevated, and Long/Short (L/S) ratios at spot exchanges such as Bitfinex were hovering at abnormally high levels. Having come down from twin peaks of almost 12x in late December and early January, L/S ratios spiked back above 9x in the weeks leading up to March 11. By March 17, the ratio had dropped to less than 2x.

Bendiksen also stressed that the situation on derivatives exchanges did not help and the number of outstanding BTC-collateralized loans spiked to an all-time high before the March 12 event. Despite the -49.39% drop that day, Bendiksen said that BTC eventually found a bottom between $3,500 and $4,000 per coin.

Going forward, the Coinshares report said that monitoring leverage metrics will help gauge future volatility risk. Unlike traditional markets, BTC also didnt get help from external intervention from organizations like the Fed, and [bitcoins] recovery has been stronger and faster than almost all other markets, the research paper highlights.

Bendiksens report concludes by saying:

The continued and common usage of leverage in bitcoin markets means that the bitcoin price remains vulnerable to volatility spikes. If outside events of similar magnitude were to recur, it is not unlikely that bitcoin prices would behave in a similar way. Keeping an eye on these metrics should help in gauging ongoing volatility risk.

What do you think about Coinshares recent report concerning bitcoin and Covid-19? Let us know in the comments section below.

Image Credits: Shutterstock, Pixabay, Wiki Commons, Coinshares, Datamish.com, Genesis Capital,

Disclaimer: This article is for informational purposes only. It is not a direct offer or solicitation of an offer to buy or sell, or a recommendation or endorsement of any products, services, or companies. Bitcoin.com does not provide investment, tax, legal, or accounting advice. Neither the company nor the author is responsible, directly or indirectly, for any damage or loss caused or alleged to be caused by or in connection with the use of or reliance on any content, goods or services mentioned in this article.

News – The Freedom to Speak and Criticize – The Heartland Institute

Posted on July 23, 2020 by Danzig

Harpers magazine recently posted a letter signed by over 150 leading authors, journalists, and public intellectuals calling for greater support for freedom of speech. The letter criticized the intolerance for opposing views frequently exhibited on Twitter and social media. Does the freedom to criticize speech threaten the free exchange of ideas?

Signers included David Brooks, Noam Chomsky, Malcolm Gladwell, Salman Rushdie, Gloria Steinem, and Matt Yglesias. To quote from the letter, The restriction of debate, whether by a repressive government or an intolerant society, invariably hurts those who lack power and makes everyone less capable of democratic participation. We need to preserve the possibility of good-faith disagreement without dire professional consequences.

A society organized for the benefit of people as opposed to the glory of rulers requires freedom for people to think, voice their ideas, and engage with others. Our rational faculties require critical exchange. And limiting government requires freedom to criticize our leaders.

Some commentators have criticized social media censorship by companies like Facebook, Twitter and Google while others want more active removal of offensive content. The censorship claim is technically false, as only governments truly censor, whether through prior restraint to prevent publication of views or punishments for speech.

Is freedom from government coercion sufficient, or can the actions of private individuals neutralize freedom of expression? Negative reactions to the Harpers letter ultimately turn on these questions.

Third parties can illegitimately chill speech, as Harpers signatory Salman Rushdie can attest to. His 1988 novel The Satanic Verses was considered blasphemous by Muslims; Irans Ayatollah Khomeni issued a fatwah on or order to Muslims to kill Mr. Rushdie, who spent a decade in hiding. In January 2015, armed gunmen killed 11 employees at the offices of the French radical magazine Charlie Hedbo over offensive content.

Criminal acts are unacceptable. We will not have free exchange if violence is the price of speaking. Are other forms of outrage over or criticism of speech acceptable?

Some must be. People who found Mr. Rushdies book offensive should be free not to buy it. The writing of letters by newspaper readers or television viewers demanding that certain columnists or reporters be fired also seems acceptable.

Social media mobs seem more adept at getting offenders fired than letter writers ever were. A parallel for todays events might be the Hollywood blacklist during the anti-communist McCarthy era. While Senator McCarthy and the House Committee on Un-American Affairs exercised government power, the blacklist was private reprisal. The entertainment industry feared public backlash from employing actors, actresses, directors or writers seen as communists or communist sympathizers.

Is there anything different and more dangerous about social media? For one, social media permanently records peoples misstatements and offensive actions. An inappropriate Halloween costume lives forever on Facebook or Instagram and cannot be denied. Furthermore, social media outrage organizes at warp speed compared to the letter writing campaigns of yesterday.

Yet social media critics cannot fire businesses employees; they prevail only by persuading business managers of the merits of their complaints. I may think that businesses respond too quickly and overreact to social media outrage. As an economist, I recognize that business leaders know the challenges they face much better than I do.

Consider the recent resignation of CrossFit founder and CEO Greg Glassman in the wake of his criticism of protests over George Floyds death at the hands of Minneapolis police. Was his company taken from him unjustly? Not necessarily; the financial harm he caused was real. Reportedly 1,000 of the companys 14,000 gyms ended their affiliations in response, and Reebok severed a decade-long licensing deal. CrossFit is privately held, but investors sought to make money, not lose due to Mr. Glassmans comments.

Loss of ones ability to earn a livelihood is a harsh penalty likely to chill speech, both now and during the Hollywood blacklist. Ultimately, however, social media protests only succeed by persuading others that someones speech is offensive. Persuasion and criticism are part of life in a voluntary society.

More here:

News - The Freedom to Speak and Criticize - The Heartland Institute

Goya Foods, Free Speech, and Pluralism | William J. Watkins, Jr. – The Beacon

Posted on July 23, 2020 by Danzig

Angry that the CEO of Goya Foods praised Donald Trump as an incredible builder, the Left has organized a boycott of the company. Goya, of course, brands itself as providing authentic Latino foods. According to its website, Goya Foods is the largest, Hispanic-owned food company in the United States.

CEO Robert Unanue was at the White House to participate in President Trumps Hispanic Prosperity Initiative. The initiative was created by executive order and seeks to improve access to education and economic opportunities in the Hispanic community.

According to the Mercury News, In his brief remarks, Unanue announced Goya would donate 1 million cans of Goya chickpeas and 1 million other food products to American food banks. He said the company wanted to help families hurt by the coronavirus pandemic. This is a nice gesture and shows corporate responsibility.

But for AOC and others, any praise or association with Trump is a capital offense that requires shaming and dire economic consequences.

Unanue protests that the boycott of Goya amounts to a suppression of speech. Well, not exactly.

Under the First Amendment, Congress shall make no law . . . abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press. The right to free speech cannot be impaired absent government action. We, as citizens, have the freedom to buy from whomever we choose, whether our reasons are good or bad. If, for example, Middle America boycotted the NFL because of its embrace of the radical woke agenda, this would not deny the players or league the right to speak their minds. Boycotts and protests are a proper tool that can be used to convey a message and/or put pressure on another private actor. But they should not be used lightly or casually.

While Unanue was incorrect to assert that his free speech rights are under attack, he is correct in saying that other democratic values are endangered. What is really at stake is American pluralism. The typical dictionary defines pluralism as a condition or system in which two or more states, groups, principles, sources of authority, etc., coexist. According to Thought.com, [t]he political philosophy of pluralism suggests that we really can and should all just get along. First recognized as an essential element of democracyby the philosophers ofAncient Greece, pluralism permits and even encourages a diversity of political opinion and participation.

With the present cultural revolution, there is no room for a diversity of opinions. You are either a supporter of the radical agenda or you are an enemy who must be silenced and destroyed. For the Left, if you are one of the 62,984,828 Americans who voted for Trump in 2016, then you are the evil. The new revolution denies that reasonable people can hold different positions on the best course for our country. Those expressing opinions contrary to Leftist dogma are being forced out of the marketplace of ideas by cancel culture run wild. Again, this crusade is not an attack on the constitutional right of free speech, but on pluralism.

There is no denying that we will have strong disagreements. Principles often have sharp edges and can cut. But we will not survive as a country if we cant agree to disagree. The fact that AOC and others would seek to tear down the largest Hispanic-owned food company in the United States for the CEOs nice words about Trump when Trump is pushing a program to help the Hispanic community shows Procrustean conformity is the only allowable course.

The United States is more diverse today than it ever has been. If we abandon pluralism, then our future will be nothing but warring factions seeking to cancel each other. We will be at perpetual war until one faction prevails. This winner will dictate what one is allowed to say, think, and do. We are headed in an ugly direction. Cant we all just get along?

Link:

Goya Foods, Free Speech, and Pluralism | William J. Watkins, Jr. - The Beacon

Federalization of police threatens the rights of all Americans | Opinion – lehighvalleylive.com

Posted on July 23, 2020 by Danzig

By Martricia ODonnell McLaughlin

Federal law enforcement is infiltrating U.S. cities led by Democrats, by order of Donald Trump. We citizens who value free speech, free assembly, states rights and our Constitution must loudly condemn this action.

Our federal government was established as a limited government and has successfully functioned as such, through periods of crises and turmoil as well as through more tranquil times, for more than 240 years. Under the Constitution, the federal government does not have a general police power. Police powers belong to the states and their delegations to local law enforcement.

Trumps deployment of federal law enforcement to cities such as Portland, Ore., is a dangerous disruption of constitutional power. It also places our civil liberties at great risk.

For a man who opines that mandating the wearing of masks for public health and safety is an infringement of liberty to operationalize federal law enforcement against protesters is outrageous. There is not a constitutionally protected right to be mask-free during a pandemic, any more than there is a constitutional right to enter restaurants shirtless. There is, however, a long-protected right to freedom of speech and freedom of assembly.

The tactics reportedly used in Portland should arouse the outrage of every citizen. We are not Argentina, East Germany, China, or North Korea. We do not condone authoritarian police tactics to sweep protestors from the street, to deploy police without identification, to blindfold and question citizens. We must be aware that if we allow a Republican president to act in this way today, a Democratic President may act similarly tomorrow. The former might attack the radical left, the latter the radical right.

Also disturbing is the blatant partisanship of these deployments. Trump and his allies, such as Sen. Lindsey Graham, overtly indicate they are targeting jurisdictions led by Democrats. Politicization of the police is dangerous. The administration similarly politicized coronavirus infections early, claiming the highest rates were in regions led by Democrats. Today the hot zones are overwhelmingly in red states.

The supporters of the administration long ago acquiesced to Trumps deviation from the norm that a president serves all the people and have allowed partisanship in power that has never risen to such levels. This must not be allowed to continue where basic freedoms are at stake.

In todays divided culture, the Constitution appears as a brilliant document, guiding us through these turbulent times. Its declaration of basic freedoms to speak, petition our government and assemble peaceably is precious. The absence of a federal police power, allowing states to police themselves, is wise and achieves a necessary balance against the erosion of democracy and the advance of an uncivil, authoritarian regime.

Martricia ODonnell McLaughlin is an attorney and mediator in Easton.

Original post:

Federalization of police threatens the rights of all Americans | Opinion - lehighvalleylive.com

Why China continues to gather sway on the UN Human Rights Council – Fox News

Posted on July 23, 2020 by Danzig

Despite long being under a cloud of controversy for its human rights record from the treatment of ethnic minorities to the muzzling of critics, all of which was amplified in the past year China continues to climb the ranks as a human rights leader in the United Nations.

On April 1, it was no fool's trick that Chinascored a spot on the U.N.'s Human Rights Council panel, which is in charge of choosing human rights monitors globally. Then on April 27, in the throes of a controversy over its handling of the coronavirusand its questionable relationship with the World Health Organization (WHO), China was appointed chair for selecting the upcoming Special Rapporteur,or "U.N. expert on free speech."

That selection was announced this week the Chinese Communist Partynamed Bangladeshi-born attorney Irene Khan, who has become something of a controversial figure in recent years for her support of the Beijing leadership.

Allee des Nations (Avenue of Nations) of the United Nations Palace in Geneva, with the flags of the member countries.

Yet despite accusations of widespread humanrights violations, China continues to ascend in the international body founded on principles of justice, peace and accountability.

"The U.N. is often an upside-down parallel universe. The election process and governance structure of organizations like the Human Rights Council make it easily susceptible to exploitation by China and other U.S. adversaries," Richard Goldberg, a senior advisor at the Foundation for Defense of Democracies (FDD) told Fox News. "We need a proactive diplomatic campaign to delegitimize and degrade the organization while establishing credible, alternative mechanisms to hold human rights abusers accountable."

POMPEO SAYS UN HUMAN RIGHTS COUNCIL HITS 'NEW LOW' WITH ANTI-US RESOLUTION ON RACE, POLICE

According to Hillel Neuer, the executive director of the Geneva-based, independent human rights organization U.N.Watch, Khan "enjoys close ties with the Communist regime" and has "showered praise for the Chinese regime" and its Belt and Road Initiative, which is considered one of the factors fueling the persecution of minorities like the Uighurs.

In addition, Khan is said to have lauded China's "contribution to global sustainable development" through a $1 trillion infrastructure program tailored to increase its reach and ownership of strategic places and organizations in at least 70 countries.

Khan whose appointment as Special Rapporteurwill go into effect next month served as Secretary-General of Amnesty International from 2001 to 2009, and left under unclear circumstances. Throughout her tenure, critics accused Khan of redirecting the human rights watchdog into fighting poverty and away from its original mandate centered on advocacy for prisoners of conscience. In 2011, she went on to become director-general of the Rome-based International Development Law Organization, which focuses on the rule of law and sustainable development, of which China is one of the eight state financiers.

"[Khan]has a record of being a supporter of economic and social rights over political and civil liberties," noted Sean Roberts, director and associate professor of International Development Studies at the George Washington University. "As such, it is likely that China is banking on the idea that she will continue this legacy at the U.N. and avoid highlighting freedom of speech issues related to the internal politics of any given country, including China."

As chair of the five-nation Human Rights Council, which the U.S. withdrew from in 2018 at the behest of then-Ambassador Nikki Haley, China vetted and picked Khan out of 48 applicants to serve as the United Nations Special Rapporteur for freedom of expression and opinion, becoming the first woman to hold such a title.

"The Chinese government has been working hard to be a participant in as many of the U.N.'s initiatives as possible, both in terms of funding and engagement. At the same time, the United States is increasingly stepping back from the U.N., allowing China to take on an even greater role," Roberts underscored. "And China's soft power globally, especially in the developing world, is on the rise at the same time as that of the U.S. is on the wane. Thus, China is able to get support from a lot of other U.N. member states to achieve its goals of more authority in the U.N."

Roberts cautioned that while the U.N. "has never been effective enough to live up to its lofty mission," it remains a dominant force in global politics.

"If the U.S. continues to retreat from its role in the organization and allows China to expand its power there, China's position as a global leader will inevitably be enhanced regardless of its respect for human rights," he said. "Most of all, this threatens to deteriorate any power that the Universal Declaration of Human Rights still holds in the world."

But Chinese leadership and control of international organizations extend well beyond the scope of the United Nations.

The U.S.-China Economic and Security Review Commission (USCC) in April published an extensive list identifying "Chinese citizens serving in leadership positions in key international organizations: from U.N. principal organs, and U.N. funds and programs, to U.N. specialized agencies and international trade and financial institutions.

All the while, concerns are being raised by the United States and other allies with regardto the national security law that came into play inside the once autonomous Hong Kong this month.

A woman walks past a promotional banner of the national security law for Hong Kong, in Hong Kong, Tuesday, June 30, 2020. China has approved a contentious law that would allow authorities to crack down on subversive and secessionist activity in Hong Kong, sparking fears that it would be used to curb opposition voices in the semi-autonomous territory. (AP)

The new law pavesthe way for a national security committee to be formed in Hong Kong under the jurisdiction of Beijing, and it also means that those accused of anti-government offenses now can be triedon the mainland and subject to significantly more stringent punishments.

At the U.N. Human Rights Council, which was led this month by Cuba, 53 countries voted in support of China's heavy-handed clampdown with the justification that the people of Hong Kong could now "exercise their freedom in a safe environment."

Those who opposed the controversial law were considerably outnumbered, led by the U.K., but garnering the support of just 26 other countries.

"China is ascending in the U.N. because the U.N. provides an environment of corruption in which the Chinese Communist Party thrives. Consider that the World Health Organization, a part of the United Nations, praised the 'transparency' of the Chinese during the coronavirus when the Chinese government, in fact, censored and suppressed information," conjectured Will Coggin, managing director of the American Security Institute. "Much as the U.S. pulled out of funding the WHO, we should consider whether it's worth continuing to spend $10 billion a year to fund the U.N. What does that money get us?"

Furthermore, Beijing's treatment and forced disappearance of more than a million Chinese minority Muslims, known as Uighurs, is also coming under increasingly blistering limelight.

Uyghurs people demonstrate against China during the Universal Periodic Review of China by the Human Rights Council, on the place des Nations in front of the European headquarters of the United Nations, in Geneva, Switzerland, Tuesday, Nov. 6, 2018. (Salvatore Di Nolfi/Keystone via AP)

The U.S. has long spoken out against reports of mass concentration camps, unjustified allegations of terrorism and subsequent imprisonmentand torture of the minority group, which is mostly present in the Xinjiang region. And this week U.K. Foreign Secretary Dominic Raab took a bold step in denouncing China for "gross and egregious" human rights abuses against its Uighur population and said sanctions against those responsible cannot be ruled out.

US SPEAKS UP FOR MINORITY MUSLIM UIGHURS IN CHINA - WHILE ISLAMIC COUNTRIES STAY MOSTLY SILENT

Two years ago, as evidence of such camps was first exposed, China vehemently denied their existence. The government later admitted to their existence, vowing that they were "reeducation" institutions and a pivotal tool against terrorism.

Nonetheless, even the United Nations' own independent human rights experts have conveyed outrage over the repression of "fundamental freedom" by the Chinese leadership as it continues to cement its place on the Council.

In a joint statement last month, some 50 experts bemoaned that they had "repeatedly communicated" their "grave concerns," ranging from "impunity for excessive use of force by police and the alleged use of chemical agents against protesters; to the alleged sexual harassment and assault of women protesters in police stations; together with the alleged harassment of health care workers" in Hong Kong, along with the collective repression of specific communities "especially religious and ethnic minorities, in Xinjiang and Tibet" to the disappearances of human rights advocates across the country.

CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP

The U.S. took matters into their own hands this week, imposing sanctions on 11 additionalChinese companies over human rights violations against the Uighurs. The fallout will have a direct impact on several suppliers to major international brands such as Google, Apple, HP, Ralph Laurenand Hugo Boss, whichhave financial liaisons with the newly sanctioned companies.

Whether there will be any change of course on China's part remains to be seen.

See the original post here:

Why China continues to gather sway on the UN Human Rights Council - Fox News

Malaysia opposition warns of ‘chilling effect’ of applying old law to social media – WTVB News

Posted on July 23, 2020 by Danzig

Thursday, July 23, 2020 6:31 a.m. EDT by Thomson Reuters

By Joseph Sipalan

KUALA LUMPUR (Reuters) - A decades-old Malaysian law requiring video or film productions to be licensed before being broadcast extends to social media, a minister said on Thursday, prompting an outcry from the opposition over its implications for freedom of expression.

Communications and Multimedia Minister Saifuddin Abdullah told parliament that licences were needed "regardless of whether they are mainstream media agencies or personal media that broadcast films on social media or traditional channels".

Opposition lawmakers accused the government of trying to cast a wide regulatory net on social media content using a 1981 National Film Development Corporation (FINAS) Act, which predates the internet.

Opposition leader Anwar Ibrahim said the minister's interpretation was a "worrying development", saying: "This is unreasonable and backwards. At the same time, the government believes it will uphold freedom of speech."

"It is clear the government wants all parties, be it politicians, or social media users to face action for content that may not fit the government's view," Anwar added in the statement.

In a statement after the uproar, Saifuddin said he was only explaining the current status of the law and that the government was aware of the need to improve it to match present needs.

"It must be stressed that the PN government has never thought of using the act to stifle individual freedom on social media," he said, using the acronym for the ruling Perikatan Nasional coalition.

Over 80% of Malaysia's 32 million population are active social media users, according to the Digital 2020 report by We Are Social and Hootsuite.

Opposition lawmaker Wong Shu Qi said that according to the minister's interpretation, any privately uploaded video would be deemed illegal.

Individuals convicted under the act face penalties of up to 50,000 ringgit ($11,748.12), a maximum of two years in jail, or both.

"Will the government take action against all TikTok users? Will the government request every YouTuber to apply for licence?" Wong said, referring to two popular social media platforms.

(Editing by Martin Petty and Alison Williams)

The rest is here:

Malaysia opposition warns of 'chilling effect' of applying old law to social media - WTVB News

College Democrats Don’t Condemn Threats of Violence Against Conservatives – Texas Scorecard

Posted on July 23, 2020 by Danzig

They continued to label YCT at UNTs actions as racist, homophobic, and transphobic. UNT Democrats didnt respond to our inquiry regarding what they will do to ensure the safety of all students exercising their freedom of speech on campus. Instead, they asked YCT at UNT what they will do on that front, and they asked YCT and UNT to accept and condemn their actions as racist, homophobic, and transphobic.

The Democrats original press release that didnt condemn threats of violence against YCT at UNT and Neidert is still on Twitter.

In a recent press release, Democrats at the University of North Texas (UNT) refused to condemn threats of violence leveled against conservative students, and instead announced a new strategy to silence these conservatives. This follows the College Democrats push to ban Young Conservatives of Texas (YCT) from campus and a new biased article from the campus taxpayer-funded newspaper, favoring the Democrats position.

Recently, a coalition of extreme-left student organizations at UNT, led by UNT College Democrats, starteda petition to ban YCT at UNT.

This coalition alleges YCT at UNT has a pattern of racism, transphobia, and homophobia throughout the 2019 through 2020 school year. One of these allegations caught the attention of UNT President Neal Smatresk, who said, We are looking into this.

YCT at UNT replied in part:

We are not a perfect organization, but it is clear that some students just want us disbanded because we are conservatives. We are not going to bow down to the leftist mob that is filled with [vitriol] and hate.

Over the past few weeks, YCT at UNT has been threatened with violence and doxxing (attempts to publish private and identifying information on the internet). They also faced hexing from a witch, and they claim to have been hacked.

These actions, along with Smatresks tweet, have garnered nationwide concern about free speech at UNT. State Rep. Briscoe Cain (RDeer Park) announced he would gladly represent them if they are banned.

Saturday morning, the UNT College Democrats published a press release where they condemned the attempt to doxx members of YCT at UNT, but the group did not condemn the other threats leveled at the conservative student organization.

YCT at UNT Chairwoman Kelly Neidert told Texas Scorecard the release was definitely not satisfactory.

They should have condemned the actual threats of violence and overall harassment, not to mention the witches, she said.

Mentioning recent interactions with the UNT administration, the College Democrats admitted their ban petition has failed. But they are not backing down, adding YCT wont be banned unless UNT is liable for the groups actionsactions UNT Democrats have labeled as bigoted and hate speech.

They have since announced a new strategy. Labeling YCT at UNT as a right-wing hate group, the Democrats plan to raise the volume of those they claim are the most vulnerable to right-wing hate groups such as YCT. UNT Democrats hope this strategy virtually silences the conservative student organization, and their new approach appears to already be underway.

On July 16, two days earlier, North Texas DailyUNTs taxpayer-funded student newspaperpublished a biased article about the petition to ban YCT at UNT. Nowhere in the article did it mention the threats of violence leveled at YCT or Neidert, and it frames the extreme-left coalition as the victims.

In the article, one coalition member said:

I believe that YCT should be removed from campus because Im a queer person that goes to a minority-serving university, GLAD President Ryan Semegran said. There are students that specifically go to UNT because theyre branded as a liberal college that takes everybody and accepts everybody.

Leftist organizations like GLAD use sexual identity as a Trojan horse to push leftist political agendas such as silencing freedom of speech.

Texas Scorecard sent an inquiry to Smatresk, asking if this article was sanctioned by UNT and if it is indicative of moves coming against YCT from the university. No response was received by publication time, and Smatresk has issued no new statement on this.

In a clear attempt to isolate YCT at UNT, the coalition is also pushing for other student organizations on campus to have a no-contact order with the conservative student organization.

Inquiries sent to the UNT Democrats were not replied to by publication time.

Texas Senate Bill 18, also called the campus free speech bill, became state law last September and prohibits UNT from banning YCT on campus.

Concerned Texans may contacttheir state representative, state senator, andGov. Greg Abbott. They may alsocontact UNT President Neal Smatresk.

Link:

College Democrats Don't Condemn Threats of Violence Against Conservatives - Texas Scorecard

How buyouts by big tech stifle innovation – Livemint

Posted on July 23, 2020 by Danzig

Earlier this month, Google announced that it had picked up a 7.7% stake in Reliances Jio Platforms, weeks after a similar deal by Facebook. Given that both the tech giants have a history of buying stakes in other firms, the phenomenon is not new. However, such big deals may not really help the digital platforms sector: a new study suggests that they tend to create a kill-zone" that drives out startups incentive to innovate.

The study, whose authors include former Reserve Bank of India governor Raghuram Rajan, was published as a working paper by the US National Bureau of Economic Research. It uses data on seven startups acquired by Google and two by Facebook between 2006 and 2018, for more than $500 million each.

The paper finds that in the three years after a typical Facebook or Google acquisition, venture capital investments in startups in the market space of the acquired firm fell 40% on average and there were 20% fewer deals in the sector.

New startups in the digital space depend on the network effect to attract users, wherein a new user values a platform based on the number of users already on it. When a tech giant acquires a new platform, it incorporates the platforms innovative features. This, the authors say, discourages users from switching to new platforms, bringing down the valuation of startups, and driving out funding. This also discourages technological innovation, the authors add.

The study recommends three key policy solutions to reverse this trend. First, interoperability would reduce the customers cost of switching platforms and give them access to wider networks. Second, if users were allowed to sell their own data, digital platforms can use it to improve their technology. Finally, the study proposes antitrust regulations to keep foreign giants out of domestic markets as a solution to foster innovation in the startup space.

Heres why BlackRocks bond chief says hes bullish on highflying tech stocks – MarketWatch

Posted on July 23, 2020 by Danzig

As the public face of BlackRocks more-than-$2-trillion fixed-income division, Rick Rieders enthusiasm around the long-term prospects of highflying tech shares can come as a surprise to those more used to hearing his opinions on the ups and downs of Treasury yields.

Part of Rieders increased focus on the stock market and the impressive gains in the technology sector reflects the growing number of hats donned by the BlackRock bond investing chief. Since taking over the firms one-stop-shop global asset allocation fund last year, Rieder has played a larger role in how the worlds biggest money manager advises investors to spread their funds across financial markets and around the world.

I dont want to get pigeonholed as a fixed-income person. Ive been doing equities in portfolios for many years but it is a fair assessment that Im doing a lot more of it now, he said, in an interview with MarketWatch last week.

Since he took over the management of BlackRocks Global Allocation Fund MKLOX, +0.40% at the end of last March, it has recorded a 9.9% return as of June 30, even as competing funds lost on average 1.1% over the same stretch.

In Rieders view, traditional equity investors overlook the merits of a companys ability to accumulate cash in favor of how its profits grew. On top of that, they didnt investigate how money traveled from the business to an investors pockets, an exercise more often practiced by bond buyers figuring out who was first in line to a companys cash.

Earnings are subject to enormous accounting variation, and at the end of the day, what the coronavirus amplified was this theme of its all about your cash flow, said Rieder.

For that reason, he said equity investors should buy shares of tech and healthcare businesses that carried explosive upside convexity, or the potential to see rapid growth in the cash they produce over time.

Many investors have balked at the eye-popping climb in tech shares, which have driven a 20% gain in the Nasdaq Composite COMP, -1.26% this year while the S&P 500 SPX, -0.47% and Dow DJIA, -0.36% struggle to return to their previous heights.

Read: Is the great rotation in the stock market under way as coronavirus cases surge? Or is it a false dawn? Heres what experts think

Despite their tremendous run-up, Rieder says he remains bullish on the long-term prospects of tech companies, especially those that know how to make use of data to improve their operations.

His fascination with data extended to how he uses numbers to methodically track and augment his health and workout routine. On his wrist, Rieder wears both an Apple Watch and a Whoop, which monitors a persons resting heart rate and sleep patterns. He noted this habit briefly aroused confusion on Twitter among those who mistook the Whoop as a second Apple Watch.

Were going through the greatest technology revolution of all time, and its all about data and how you assimilate it, he said.

Rieder said the biggest tech companies leading the stock-market such as the FAANGs Facebook Inc. ( FB, -1.54%, Amazon.com Inc. AMZN, -2.90%, Apple Inc. AAPL, -2.92% , Netflix Inc NFLX, -1.66% and Google parent Alphabet Inc. GOOG, -2.64% GOOGL, -2.44% were unencumbered by expensive factories and other physical infrastructure, allowing them to quickly expand and dominate promising new fields by analyzing reams of data and spending big on research.

Read: Tech has been a pandemic savior for the market and has been richly rewarded. So what happens now?

Yet in the past, the time and cost involved in developing a brand or a complicated logistical and transportation network prevented businesses from changing tack when new opportunities arose.

Now you can do things in hyperspeed, he said.

He acknowledged the knack of the U.S. tech giants to squeeze out their competition had worrisome potential to draw backlash from antitrust regulators. But they will have to balance the risk of a crackdown against how it might affect companies that had improved the welfare of consumers.

Theres an incredible balance that has to be struck between things that are not in the public good, with regard to freezing out other entities that want to compete, and the fact that a lot of these products are actually bringing down a lot of costs for consumers or that consumers love their products, he said.

If tech allowed investors to capture the incredible returns from the new economy, he said any good asset allocation fund should also figure out the best way to limit losses.

On that front, Rieder said he struggled to understand why many stock investors would play defense through shares of utility companies, an industry where, he argued, it made more sense to buy their bonds. He pointed out a utility companys annual profits as a share of companys equity was effectively capped by regulators at around 10%.

Why would you buy that? he said, adding that investors shouldnt waste their equity dollars on companies that are really stable.

In other words, Rieder said that when investors think about their portfolios, they should align the qualities of a particular investment with how a companys earnings and cash flows were projected to change in the future.

In the broad investment world, a lot of the returns are about picking between bonds and stocks and deciding where youd rather be, he said.

Original post:

Heres why BlackRocks bond chief says hes bullish on highflying tech stocks - MarketWatch

Leading innovation in UK aerospace – Aerospace Manufacturing

Posted on July 23, 2020 by Danzig

The ATI is helping the UKs leading aerospace technologists take the lead in next generation environmentally-friendly aircraft

Aerospace Technology Institute (ATI) chief executive, Gary Elliott, offers his thoughts on the institutes Accelerating Ambition strategy, the funding opportunities through its ATI Programme, the impact of Covid-19 and how it is helping support manufacturing.

It is a great pleasure for the Institute to appear in Aerospace Manufacturing again. The May edition covered not only the ATI Boeing Accelerator, but also two ATI projects, ICap and DRAMA, concerned with composite materials and additive manufacturing. This reflects the fact that six years after the ATI was founded, we have built up with our partners in industry, academia and government a project portfolio worth over 2.5 billion to drive step changes in civil aerospace, embracing the industry at large, and establishing the building blocks for future success.

Gary Elliott, chief executive of the Aerospace Technology Institute

Beginning with R&D projects however risks putting the cart before the horse. The ATI was created primarily to develop a technology strategy for the sector, to bring clarity, focus and consensus to how government and industry should invest together for maximum national economic benefit. And the extent of that benefit is clear, with recent analysis showing that spillovers from aerospace R&T make a return to the rest of the economy four times higher than the return to aerospace itself. One hundred and fifty million pounds of public investment each year from 2013 to 2026 will create an economic return of 114bn by 2035.

Turning to the strategy, aerospace can seem like a sector which changes slowly, but I am struck by how different the agenda is now since we started. In 2014 it was about improving competitiveness and driving environmental advances in line with the then targets set by the Advisory Council for Aeronautics Research in Europe (ACARE). Potential new products on the horizon were single-aisle and middle-of-the-market aircraft. Now, competitiveness remains vital, but sustainability has leapt right up the agenda with the much more challenging net zero target for greenhouse gas emissions by 2050. Consideration of new products now is driven by the environmental imperative, but also new mobility opportunities such as urban air taxis enabled by developments in autonomy and electrification. These three pillars competitiveness, sustainability, and mobility underpin the Institutes most recent technology strategy Accelerating Ambition published in November last year.

Covid-19 has of course been a game-changer. Its impact has been massive and is likely to last some time. But we have worked hard to stay open for business, maintain our activities, and maximise the ATIs value to the sector. And it has been encouraging to see the high level of interest in our most recent funding opportunities submissions to Aprils expression of interest for the ATI programme were up by around 250%, for example. This tells us that companies still see R&D particularly on sustainable aviation and green technologies as core to their strategies. But it would be nave to think that nothing has changed. Companies will have to manage the economic slowdown. Some projects will be postponed or cancelled in the process. Some skilled technical staff may be furloughed or worse. The Institute is therefore urgently looking at ways to bring forward critical research for the recovery, deploy the UKs leading aerospace technologists, and give the UK a lead in next generation environmentally-friendly aircraft.

Scale of future challenges

Well before Covid-19, the scale of the future challenge in aerospace was forcing us to think anew about how innovation happens in the sector. It is clear that if we are to achieve the new environmental targets, the pace of change needs to pick up. As well as large scale projects in areas such as electric flight, sustainable fuels, and new aircraft architectures led mainly by the industry leaders, many other disruptive innovations will be needed, often coming from smaller companies or operators outside the traditional aerospace family; innovations that will need to be adopted, certified, and exploited by the industry at scale and at pace without compromising the industrys excellent safety record. And it must result in affordable products.

Competitiveness, sustainability, and mobility underpin the Institutes recent technology strategy Accelerating Ambition published last November

This thinking led us to create the ATI Boeing accelerator last year along with Boeing and GKN. As well as the opportunity to attract equity funding from Boeing, the accelerator provided mentoring across a wide range of disciplines, as well as direct access to leading engineers in the main aerospace companies. The first cohort of nine start-up companies has just completed its programme, and we look forward to tracking their future success. As a proof of concept, it has worked very well, and we hope to embark on a second cohort in due course.

Ushering in the new world of air mobility services requires another paradigm shift, particularly in the management of the skies, and the greater role of the aircraft itself in air traffic management. This led us to propose to Innovate UK some two years ago a holistic programme to model the future system. Now known as Future Flight, we are working closely with that initiative to bring forward the vehicle technologies critical to realising the vision another great opportunity for companies outside the mainstream to develop their ideas.

All stand together

Before ending, I should touch on Europe and the international scene. The UK is a great aerospace nation and the Institute is determined to develop its capabilities to the full. At the same time, aerospace is a global industry and all major aircraft programmes represent the culmination of efforts in many countries. Many companies with overseas headquarters are already in the UK, and we will give a warm welcome to others who want to set up here and pursue their activities. We are also pushing hard with the Aerospace Growth Partnership to ensure that the UK retains good access to the EUs R&D programmes in the future. And we are creating opportunities for bilateral R&D projects with other countries we have run two joint calls with Sweden and are working up a call with Canada.

In conclusion, whilst present conditions are difficult, the Institute remains open for business. It is here for UK aerospace and I hope that any organisation within the sector will know that they can speak to us for help and advice on their current or future research plans plans that we may be able to showcase in future editions of Aerospace Manufacturing.

http://www.ati.org.uk

Subscribe to our FREE Newsletter

See more here:

Leading innovation in UK aerospace - Aerospace Manufacturing

Firan Technology Group Corporation (FTG) Announces Transport Canada Has Approved FTG Aerospace Toronto as an Approved Maintenance Organization (AMO) -…

Posted on July 23, 2020 by Danzig

TORONTO, July 22, 2020 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- Firan Technology Group Corporation (TSX:FTG), a leading provider of electronic products and avionic sub-systems for the aerospace and defense markets, has received approval from Transport Canada to be an Approved Maintenance Organization (AMO). Under this approval, FTG Aerospace Toronto is approved for the maintenance of aeronautical products, specifically for instruments or display devices. With this approval, FTG can now maintain or repair its display products and provide airworthiness tags for repaired products.

This is an important accomplishment for FTG as it enables us to now fully support our customers through the complete lifecycle of our products, stated Brad Bourne, President and CEO, FTG Corporation. We have a strategy to increase our activity in the large aftermarket segment of the Aerospace industry and this certification is a key milestone in accomplishing our objective, he added.

ABOUT FIRAN TECHNOLOGY GROUP CORPORATION

FTG is an aerospace and defense electronics product and subsystem supplier to customers around the globe. FTG has two operating units:

FTG Circuits is a manufacturer of high technology, high reliability printed circuit boards. Our customers are leaders in the aviation, defense, and high technology industries. FTG Circuits has operations in Toronto, Ontario, Chatsworth, California, Fredericksburg, Virginia and a joint venture in Tianjin, China.

FTG Aerospace manufactures and repairs illuminated cockpit panels, keyboards and sub-assemblies for original equipment manufacturers of aerospace and defense equipment. FTG Aerospace has operations in Toronto, Ontario, Chatsworth, California, Fort Worth, Texas and Tianjin, China.

The Corporation's shares are traded on the Toronto Stock Exchange under the symbol FTG.

FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

This news release contains certain forward-looking statements. These forward-looking statements are related to, but not limited to, FTGs operations, anticipated financial performance, business prospects and strategies. Forward-looking information typically contains words such as anticipate, believe, expect, plan or similar words suggesting future outcomes. Such statements are based on the current expectations of management of the Corporation and inherently involve numerous risks and uncertainties, known and unknown, including economic factors and the Corporations industry, generally. The preceding list is not exhaustive of all possible factors. Such forward-looking statements are not guarantees of future performance and actual events and results could differ materially from those expressed or implied by forward-looking statements made by the Corporation. The reader is cautioned to consider these and other factors carefully when making decisions with respect to the Corporation and not place undue reliance on forward-looking statements. Other than as may be required by law, FTG disclaims any intention or obligation to update or revise any such forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise.

For further information please contact:

Bradley C. Bourne, President and CEO Firan Technology Group CorporationTel: (416) 299-4000 x314bradbourne@ftgcorp.com

Jamie Crichton, Vice President and CFO Firan Technology Group CorporationTel: (416) 299-4000 x264jamiecrichton@ftgcorp.com

Additional information can be found at the Corporations website http://www.ftgcorp.com

Follow this link:

Firan Technology Group Corporation (FTG) Announces Transport Canada Has Approved FTG Aerospace Toronto as an Approved Maintenance Organization (AMO) -...

Aerospace Academy set to begin its new school year on Aug. 17 – Antelope Valley Press

Posted on July 23, 2020 by Danzig

PALMDALE The Palmdale Aerospace Academy will begin the new school year on Aug. 17, six days later than originally planned, and using a distance learning model.

The charter schools Board of Directors held a special Board meeting on Tuesday to approve the schedule change and the distance learning model.

Gov. Gavin Newsom on July 17 ordered all schools in counties on the states monitoring list to remain closed for the start of the new school because of spiking COVID-19 cases.

TPAA Executive Director/Superintendent Matthew Winheim said once Newsoms order went out, as well as directives from the Los Angeles County Department of Public Health, it was clear what they needed to do.

We had a hunch from the beginning that we might need to do this, Winheim said. But the information coming from so many different sources was just unclear; how are they going to finally tell us were permitted to open.

After the governor issued his order, Winheim said it was clear the distance learning model was the way to go. In addition, the delayed start gives TPAA time for the online workshops that the parents will need to help their children.

We felt that it was incredibly important for us to be able to offer a series of webinars for our parents to know how they can support their students, Winheim said.

It also allows for more time to ensure technology has been properly cleaned and updated for students.

The extra time will also provide an opportunity for more robust training for the teaching staff in how to engage students in a distance learning model.

The Board agreed to open up in distance learning model for at least for the first eight weeks. Should the governors orders change, and the public health department allow, a hybrid model does exist.

We believe that its best for the kids to be here with their teachers and learning as much as possible, Winheim said. None of this is desirable. We would love to have our kids in their seats in a regular learning environment but it just isnt possible right this second.

The rest is here:

Aerospace Academy set to begin its new school year on Aug. 17 - Antelope Valley Press

Aerospace Seating Market Report to 2026 Demand Analysis and Trend Insights – Cole of Duty

Posted on July 23, 2020 by Danzig

Tentatively called Aerospace Seating Market Research Report, Global Market Insights, Inc., has compiled the report having undertaken extensive research and providing an in-depth evaluation of the global market. The report is basically inclusive of a detailed study of this market in combination with vital parameters which may impact the commercialization scale of the global industry.

An exceptionally scientific subjective pertaining to the worldwide market has been shrouded in this report. The examination assesses the important segments of this industry by contemplating its historical figures and projections, In the report, considerable insights concerning Porters five power model, a SWOT investigation, as well as a PESTEL analysis of the market are likewise given.

The Aerospace Seating Market report coverage is comprised of various parameters such as the industry size, regional opportunities for market expansion, important participants in the industry, restraining factors as well as driving forces, segmental analysis, and details on competitive landscape.

Get sample copy of this research report @ https://www.gminsights.com/request-sample/detail/2448

The main aim of the study is to entail substantial data and updates pertaining to the market and also to educate the audience on the various growth opportunities prevailing in the industry, which may help augment the business space. A deep-dive summary of the Aerospace Seating Market in combination with an in-depth set of the market definitions and business sphere overview have been provided in the report.

The abstract section is inclusive mainly of the information about the market dynamics. This is further encompassed of the driving factors augmenting the industry share, business constraints, trends characterizing the industry, in tandem with the numerous growth opportunities prevalent in the space.

Information about the pricing evaluation alongside the value chain analysis have been given in the study. Historic figures and estimates pertaining to the industry expansion spanning the projection period are also entailed in the study.

The Aerospace Seating Market report comprises all the significant details on the growth rate of the global industry over the forecast period. In addition, the myriad technological developments and innovations that may plausibly impact the worldwide market share through the anticipated period are mentioned in the report.

Split by seat class, the Aerospace seating market has been divided into

Split by aircrafts, the Aerospace seating market is divided into

Top Companies

Zodiac Aerospace, B/E Aerospace, Aviointeriors S.p.A, Thompson Aero Seating Ltd., Acro Aircraft Seating, ZIM Flugsitz GmBH, and RECARO Aircraft Seating GmbH & Co. KG

Request for customization @ https://www.gminsights.com/roc/2448

What are the key takeaways of this report?

Read the original here:

Aerospace Seating Market Report to 2026 Demand Analysis and Trend Insights - Cole of Duty

Aerospace Simulation Systems Market Trends Analysis, Top Manufacturers, Shares, Growth Opportunities, Statistics & Forecast to 2025 – Cole of Duty

Posted on July 23, 2020 by Danzig

Market Study Report, LLC offers a latest study on Aerospace Simulation Systems market featuring a holistic view of the market size, industry share, profit estimates, SWOT analysis and the regional landscape of the business. The report precisely expounds key challenges and future growth prospects of the market, while highlighting the current competitive scene and analyzes the expansion strategies adopted by leading market players.

The research report on Aerospace Simulation Systems market report consists of a thorough assessment of this industry domain. As per the study, the market is expected to acquire notable returns and showcase a healthy growth rate during the forecast period.

Request a sample Report of Aerospace Simulation Systems Market at:https://www.marketstudyreport.com/request-a-sample/2805680?

The document investigates the major industry trends and elaborates on the volume of sales, market size, growth opportunities, and revenue estimations. The report provides a succinct analysis of growth avenues and also elaborates market segmentations.

Also, the research report evaluates the impact of COVID-19 pandemic on the growth propellers of the Aerospace Simulation Systems market.

Other takeaways of the Aerospace Simulation Systems market report:

Ask for Discount on Aerospace Simulation Systems Market Report at:https://www.marketstudyreport.com/check-for-discount/2805680?

As per the regional analysis of the Aerospace Simulation Systems market:

The report comprises of a granular analysis of the geographical landscape of the Aerospace Simulation Systems market and divides the same into North America, Europe, Asia-Pacific, Middle East & Africa and South America.

Significant Key Features Highlights of The Reports:

KEY QUESTIONS ANSWERED IN THE REPORT:

For More Details On this Report: https://www.marketstudyreport.com/reports/global-aerospace-simulation-systems-market-2020-by-manufacturers-regions-type-and-application-forecast-to-2025

Related Reports:

1. Global Boat Wiring Harness Market 2020 by Manufacturers, Regions, Type and Application, Forecast to 2025This report categorizes the Boat Wiring Harness market data by manufacturers, region, type and application, also analyzes the market status, market share, growth rate, future trends, market drivers, opportunities and challenges, risks and entry barriers, sales channels, distributors Analysis.Read More: https://www.marketstudyreport.com/reports/global-boat-wiring-harness-market-2020-by-manufacturers-regions-type-and-application-forecast-to-2025

2. Global Aircraft Elevator Market 2020 by Manufacturers, Regions, Type and Application, Forecast to 2025Aircraft Elevator Market Report covers the makers information, including shipment, value, income, net benefit, talk with record, business appropriation and so forth., this information enables the buyer to think about the contenders better. This report additionally covers every one of the districts and nations of the world, which demonstrates a provincial advancement status, including market size, volume and esteem, and also value information. It additionally covers diverse enterprises customers data, which is critical for the producers.Read More: https://www.marketstudyreport.com/reports/global-aircraft-elevator-market-2020-by-manufacturers-regions-type-and-application-forecast-to-2025

Originally posted here:

Aerospace Simulation Systems Market Trends Analysis, Top Manufacturers, Shares, Growth Opportunities, Statistics & Forecast to 2025 - Cole of Duty

Impact of Covid-19 on Aerospace Galley Trolley and Container Market 2020-2025 – Cole of Duty

Posted on July 23, 2020 by Danzig

Latest Research Report: Aerospace Galley Trolley and Container industry

This has brought along several changes in This report also covers the impact of COVID-19 on the global market.

Global Aerospace Galley Trolley and Container Market documents a detailed study of different aspects of the Global Market. It shows the steady growth in market in spite of the fluctuations and changing market trends. The report is based on certain important parameters.

Get a Sample PDF copy of the report @ https://reportsinsights.com/sample/58517

Aerospace Galley Trolley and Container Market competition by top manufacturers as follow:

The risingtechnology in Aerospace Galley Trolley and Containermarketis also depicted in thisresearchreport. Factors that are boosting the growth of the market, and giving a positive push to thrive in the global market is explained in detail. It includes a meticulous analysis of market trends, market shares and revenue growth patterns and the volume and value of the market. It is also based on a meticulously structured methodology. These methods help to analyze markets on the basis of thorough research and analysis.

The Type Coverage in the Market are: ContainerTrolley

Market Segment by Applications, covers:Regional AircraftVery Large AircraftWide Body AircraftNarrow Body Aircraft

The research report summarizes companies from different industries. This Aerospace Galley Trolley and Container Market report has been combined with a variety of market segments such as applications, end users and sales. Focus on existing market analysis and future innovation to provide better insight into your business. This study includes sophisticated technology for the market and diverse perspectives of various industry professionals.

Aerospace Galley Trolley and Container is the arena of accounting worried with the summary, analysis and reporting of financial dealings pertaining to a business. This includes the training of financial statements available for public ingesting. The service involves brief, studying, checking and reporting of the financial contacts to tax collection activities and objects. It also involves checking and making financial declarations, scheming accounting systems, emerging finances and accounting advisory.

To get this report at a profitable rate.: https://reportsinsights.com/discount/58517

Market segment by Regions/Countries, this report coversNorth AmericaEuropeChinaRest of Asia PacificCentral & South AmericaMiddle East & Africa

Report Highlights: Detailed overview of parent market Changing market dynamics in the industry In-depth market segmentation Historical, current and projected market size in terms of volume and value Recent industry trends and developments Competitive landscape Strategies of key players and products offered Potential and niche segments, geographical regions exhibiting promising growth A neutral perspective on market performance Must-have information for market players to sustain and enhance their market footprint

Access full Report Description, TOC, Table of Figure, Chart, [emailprotected] https://reportsinsights.com/industry-forecast/Aerospace-Galley-Trolley-and-Container-Market-58517

About US:

Reports Insights is the leading research industry that offers contextual and data-centric research services to its customers across the globe. The firm assists its clients to strategize business policies and accomplish sustainable growth in their respective market domain. The industry provides consulting services, syndicated research reports, and customized research reports.

:(US) +1-214-272-0234

:(APAC) +91-7972263819

Email:[emailprotected]

Sales:[emailprotected]

Follow this link:

Impact of Covid-19 on Aerospace Galley Trolley and Container Market 2020-2025 - Cole of Duty

Big Data Analytics In Defense and Aerospace Market to Witness Huge Growth with Projected Google, IBM, Microsoft, Oracle, Cisco – Cole of Duty

Posted on July 23, 2020 by Danzig

The Latest research study released by HTF MI COVID-19 Impact on Global Big Data Analytics In Defense and Aerospace Market with 100+ pages of analysis on business Strategy taken up by key and emerging industry players and delivers know how of the current market development, landscape, technologies, drivers, opportunities, market viewpoint and status. Understanding the segments helps in identifying the importance of different factors that aid the market growth. Some of the Major Companies covered in this Research are Accenture, Airbus Defense & Space, Amazon, Century Link, Cisco Systems, CSC, Google, IBM, Microsoft, Oracle, Palantir, Pivotal, Saab, SAS Institute, Splunk, Teradata Corporation, etc.

Click here for free sample + related graphs of the report @:https://www.htfmarketreport.com/sample-report/2723293-covid-19-impact-on-global-big-data-analytics-in-defense-and-aerospace-market

Browse market information, tables and figures extent in-depth TOC on COVID-19 Impact on Big Data Analytics In Defense and Aerospace Market by Application (Defense & Aerospace), by Product Type (, Apps and Analytics, Cloud, Compute, Infrastructure Software, Networking, NoSQL, Professional Services, SQL & Storage), Business scope, Manufacturing and Outlook Estimate to 2025.

The global impacts of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) have significantly affecting the Infrastructure in overall market in 2020. The outbreak of COVID-19 has brought effects on many aspects, like flight cancellations; travel bans and quarantines; restaurants closed; all indoor events restricted; over forty countries state of emergency declared; massive slowing of the supply chain; stock market volatility; falling business confidence, growing panic among the population, and uncertainty about future. Know more with latest edition of COVID-19 Impact on Global Big Data Analytics In Defense and Aerospace Market Study; Early buyers will receive 20% customization free on report

for more information or any query mail at [emailprotected]

At last, all parts of the COVID-19 Impact on Global Big Data Analytics In Defense and Aerospace Market are quantitatively also subjectively valued to think about the Global just as regional market equally. This market study presents basic data and true figures about the market giving a deep analysis of this market based on market trends, market drivers, constraints and its future prospects. The report supplies the worldwide monetary challenge with the help of Porters Five Forces Analysis and SWOT Analysis.

If you have any Enquiry please click here @:https://www.htfmarketreport.com/enquiry-before-buy/2723293-covid-19-impact-on-global-big-data-analytics-in-defense-and-aerospace-market

Customization of the Report: The report can be customized as per your needs for added data up to 3 businesses or countries or 40 analyst hours.On the basis of report- titled segments and sub-segment of the market are highlighted below:COVID-19 Impact on Global Big Data Analytics In Defense and Aerospace Market By Application/End-User (Value and Volume from 2019 to 2025) : Defense & Aerospace

Market By Type (Value and Volume from 2019 to 2025) : , Apps and Analytics, Cloud, Compute, Infrastructure Software, Networking, NoSQL, Professional Services, SQL & Storage

COVID-19 Impact on Global Big Data Analytics In Defense and Aerospace Market by Key Players:Accenture, Airbus Defense & Space, Amazon, Century Link, Cisco Systems, CSC, Google, IBM, Microsoft, Oracle, Palantir, Pivotal, Saab, SAS Institute, Splunk, Teradata Corporation,

Geographically, this report is segmented into some key Regions, with manufacture, depletion, revenue (million USD), and market share and growth rate of COVID-19 Impact on Big Data Analytics In Defense and Aerospace in these regions, from 2012 to 2022 (forecast), covering China, USA, Europe, Japan, Korea, India, Southeast Asia & South America and its Share (%) and CAGR for the forecasted period 2019 to 2025.

Informational Takeaways from the Market Study:The report COVID-19 Impact on Big Data Analytics In Defense and Aerospace matches the completely examined and evaluated data of the noticeable companies and their situation in the market considering impact of Coronavirus. The measured tools including SWOT analysis, Porters five powers analysis, and assumption return debt were utilized while separating the improvement of the key players performing in the market.

Key Developments in the Market:This segment of the COVID-19 Impact on Big Data Analytics In Defense and Aerospace report fuses the major developments of the market that contains confirmations, composed endeavors, R&D, new thing dispatch, joint endeavours, and relationship of driving members working in the market.

To get this report buy full copy @:https://www.htfmarketreport.com/buy-now?format=1&report=2723293

Some of the important question for stakeholders and business professional for expanding their position in the COVID-19 Impact on Global Big Data Analytics In Defense and Aerospace Market :Q 1. Which Region offers the most rewarding open doors for the market Ahead of 2020?Q 2. What are the business threats and Impact of COVID scenario Over the market Growth and Estimation?Q 3. What are probably the most encouraging, high-development scenarios for COVID-19 Impact on Big Data Analytics In Defense and Aerospace movement showcase by applications, types and regions?Q 4.What segments grab most noteworthy attention in COVID-19 Impact on Big Data Analytics In Defense and Aerospace Market in 2019 and beyond?Q 5. Who are the significant players confronting and developing in COVID-19 Impact on Big Data Analytics In Defense and Aerospace Market?

For More Information Read Table of Content @:https://www.htfmarketreport.com/reports/2723293-covid-19-impact-on-global-big-data-analytics-in-defense-and-aerospace-market

Key poles of the TOC:Chapter 1 COVID-19 Impact on Global Big Data Analytics In Defense and Aerospace Market Business OverviewChapter 2 Major Breakdown by Type [, Apps and Analytics, Cloud, Compute, Infrastructure Software, Networking, NoSQL, Professional Services, SQL & Storage]Chapter 3 Major Application Wise Breakdown (Revenue & Volume)Chapter 4 Manufacture Market BreakdownChapter 5 Sales & Estimates Market StudyChapter 6 Key Manufacturers Production and Sales Market Comparison Breakdown..Chapter 8 Manufacturers, Deals and Closings Market Evaluation & AggressivenessChapter 9 Key Companies Breakdown by Overall Market Size & Revenue by Type..Chapter 11 Business / Industry Chain (Value & Supply Chain Analysis)Chapter 12 Conclusions & Appendix

Thanks for reading this article; you can also get individual chapter wise section or region wise report version like North America, Europe or Asia.

About Author:HTF Market Report is a wholly owned brand of HTF market Intelligence Consulting Private Limited. HTF Market Report global research and market intelligence consulting organization is uniquely positioned to not only identify growth opportunities but to also empower and inspire you to create visionary growth strategies for futures, enabled by our extraordinary depth and breadth of thought leadership, research, tools, events and experience that assist you for making goals into a reality. Our understanding of the interplay between industry convergence, Mega Trends, technologies and market trends provides our clients with new business models and expansion opportunities. We are focused on identifying the Accurate Forecast in every industry we cover so our clients can reap the benefits of being early market entrants and can accomplish their Goals & Objectives.

Contact US :Craig Francis (PR & Marketing Manager)HTF Market Intelligence Consulting Private LimitedUnit No. 429, Parsonage Road Edison, NJNew Jersey USA 08837Phone: +1 (206) 317 1218[emailprotected]

Connect with us atLinkedIn|Facebook|Twitter

Visit link:

Big Data Analytics In Defense and Aerospace Market to Witness Huge Growth with Projected Google, IBM, Microsoft, Oracle, Cisco - Cole of Duty

Aerospace Winglets Market Qualitative Analysis on Demand 2031 – Cole of Duty

Posted on July 23, 2020 by Danzig

The global Aerospace Winglets market gives detailed Evaluation about all of the Important aspects related to the market. The study on international Aerospace Winglets economy, offers deep insights regarding the Aerospace Winglets market covering all of the crucial aspects of the marketplace. Moreover, the report provides historical information with prospective forecast over the forecast period. Various important factors like market trends, revenue growth patterns market stocks and supply and demand are contained in almost all the market research document for every business. A number of the important aspects analysed in the report contains market share, creation, key regions, revenue rate as well as key players.

The study of various sections of the international market are also Covered in the research report. In addition to that, for the forecast periods conclusion of factors such as market size and the competitive landscape of the market is analysed in the report. Due to the rising globalization and digitization, there are new trends coming to the marketplace daily. The research report provides the detailed analysis of all of these tendencies.

Get PDF Sample Copy of this Report to understand the structure of the complete report: (Including Full TOC, List of Tables & Figures, Chart) @ https://www.marketresearchhub.com/enquiry.php?type=S&repid=2731411&source=atm

In addition, the Aerospace Winglets marketplace report also supplies the Latest trends in the global Aerospace Winglets market with the assistance of primary in addition to secondary research methodologies. Also, the analysis report on Aerospace Winglets market gives a wide analysis of the market including market overview, production, manufacturers, dimensions, price, value, growth rate, income, prices, export, consumption, and sales revenue of this global Aerospace Winglets market. On the other hand, the Aerospace Winglets market report also studies the market status for the prediction period. However, this will help to grow the advertising opportunities throughout the world as well as major market suppliers.

Segment by Type, the Aerospace Winglets market is segmented intoBlended WingletsElliptical WingletsRaked WingletsSharklet WingletsSplit Scimitar WingletsWingtip Fence WingletsOthers

Segment by Application, the Aerospace Winglets market is segmented intoMilitary AircraftCivil Aircraft

Regional and Country-level AnalysisThe Aerospace Winglets market is analysed and market size information is provided by regions (countries).The key regions covered in the Aerospace Winglets market report are North America, Europe, China and Japan. It also covers key regions (countries), viz, the U.S., Canada, Germany, France, U.K., Italy, Russia, China, Japan, South Korea, India, Australia, Taiwan, Indonesia, Thailand, Malaysia, Philippines, Vietnam, Mexico, Brazil, Turkey, Saudi Arabia, U.A.E, etc.The report includes country-wise and region-wise market size for the period 2015-2026. It also includes market size and forecast by Type, and by Application segment in terms of production capacity, price and revenue for the period 2015-2026.Competitive Landscape and Aerospace Winglets Market Share Analysis

Aerospace Winglets market competitive landscape provides details and data information by manufacturers. The report offers comprehensive analysis and accurate statistics on production capacity, price, revenue of Aerospace Winglets by the player for the period 2015-2020. It also offers detailed analysis supported by reliable statistics on production, revenue (global and regional level) by players for the period 2015-2020. Details included are company description, major business, company total revenue, and the production capacity, price, revenue generated in Aerospace Winglets business, the date to enter into the Aerospace Winglets market, Aerospace Winglets product introduction, recent developments, etc.The major vendors covered:BLR Aerospace, LLCFACC AGGKN AerospaceKaman Aerospace AerostructuresRUAG AerostructureKorean Air Aerospace Division

Do You Have Any Query Or Specific Requirement? Ask to Our Industry [emailprotected] https://www.marketresearchhub.com/enquiry.php?type=E&repid=2731411&source=atm

The Aerospace Winglets market report provides helpful insights for Every established and innovative players throughout the globe. Additionally the Aerospace Winglets market report provides accurate evaluation for the shifting competitive dynamics. This study report includes a complete analysis of future growth in terms of the evaluation of the mentioned forecast period. The Aerospace Winglets market report offers a comprehensive analysis of the technological advancement prognosis over time to be aware of the market growth prices. The Aerospace Winglets market report also has progressive analysis of the huge number of unique facets which are boosting or operating in addition to regulating the Aerospace Winglets market growth.

A systematized methodology can be utilized to create a Report on the Global Aerospace Winglets market. For the research of economy on the Conditions of study Approaches, these techniques are useful. All of the Information Regarding this Products, makers, vendors, clients and much more is covered in research reports. Various important factors like market trends, revenue Growth patterns market stocks and demand and supply are included in virtually all The market study report for every industry. Adaptation of fresh ideas and Accepting the most recent trends are a few the reasons for virtually any markets growth. The Global Aerospace Winglets market research report provides the profound understanding about the Regions in which the marketplace is impactful.

You can Buy This Report from Here @ https://www.marketresearchhub.com/checkout?rep_id=2731411&licType=S&source=atm

Aerospace Winglets Market Qualitative Analysis on Demand 2031 - Cole of Duty

Select Page ::