‘Pure Invention’: How Japan’s pop culture became the ‘lingua franca’ of the internet – The Japan Times

Toys. Video games. Portable music players. Kawaii characters. Anime. When it comes to modern pop culture, weve all turned Japanese.

Thats the contention of the new book Pure Invention: How Japans Pop Culture Conquered the World by Matt Alt. Its an exploration of how key Japanese exports have influenced the wider worlds perception of the country and infused the world with a bit of Japaneseness at the same time.

Pure Invention: How Japans Pop Culture Conquered the World, by Matt Alt368 pagesCROWN

It occurred to me that Japan is a country that has a lot of cultural pull, but there had never been a book that tried to qualify it, says Alt, a native of the Washington, D.C. area (and occasional contributor to The Japan Times) who has lived in Tokyo since 2003.

To go about qualifying Japans pop cultural pull, Alt turned to some of the countrys most iconic inventions, from the Walkman to the Game Boy to Hello Kitty. To warrant inclusion, each had to satisfy what Alt calls the three ins: inescapable, influential and inessential. In other words, no Toyota cars or instant ramen: The products had to be something you wanted, not needed.

Taken as a whole, says Alt, these products have transformed the way we dream, and given us a template for a cool factor that wasnt made in America.

As Japan emerged from World War II, the first indication this devastated country might one day become a pop culture behemoth came in the form of cheap toy jeeps designed by a toymaker named Matsuzo Kosuge. Though made using cast-off beer cans and food tins, the jeeps nonetheless featured the precise and detailed design for which Japan would soon become famous and, due to a shortage of toys in the U.S., became a hit both in Japan and stateside. Pure Invention positions Kosuges story and his postwar success as the template for what was to come.

Kosuges jeep practically sums up U.S.-Japan relations in a single product, says Alt. Before too long, Japan found itself at the forefront of pop culture globalization. In 1946, Japan was already exporting toy jeeps to its former sworn enemy; by 1993, then-first lady Hillary Clinton would be spotted killing time on Air Force One with Nintendos first portable console, the Game Boy and playing Tetris, a game created in the former USSR.

Other Japanese gadgets chronicled in Alts book include the Nintendo Entertainment System, the karaoke machine and the Tamagotchi. But Pure Invention is about more than hardware: it also traces the more ephemeral parts of Japanese pop culture that have made it big worldwide, including anime, manga, emoji, kawaii culture, the post-modern literature of writers like Haruki Murakami and even the way we communicate online. The final chapter of the book traces the strange, tangled connections between 2channel, an anonymous online bulletin board for Japanese otaku (nerds), to 4chan, an English-language copycat, to Gamergate, the so-called alt-right and finally the rise of Donald Trump.

Author Matt Alt | MATT SCHLEY

I never imagined Id be seeing Trump supporters use anime imagery in support of their cause, says Alt. But anime and Japanese tastes have become the lingua franca of the internet.

In another sense, however, Alt posits that its no surprise the U.S. and other Western countries have embraced much of Japans cultural shorthand. After all, theyre experiencing many of the same economic and societal issues Japan already has. Or, as Alt puts it: Japan got to the future a little early.

The Japanese stock market had an epic crash in the 90s, which led to decades of economic stagnation, says Alt. Young people were casting about for new ways to define how they would live their lives in a world where all the promises of the Boomer generation had been wiped out. Were now seeing the same thing happen in the U.S. in the post-recession era, and many of the tools young people use to deal with it come from Japan.

Alt even sees echoes of such Japanese tools in this years biggest news stories: the COVID-19 pandemic and the Black Lives Matter protests. In the latter, as with earlier movements like the Arab Spring and Occupy Wall Street, organization leadership is diffused and gatherings are planned on social media something users of 2channel had mastered back in the early 2000s (albeit with very different goals).

As for COVID-19 and the worldwide lockdowns, many of those stuck inside have turned to the tools of the otaku, says Alt, including Japanese video games like Animal Crossing: New Horizons, which sold over 13 million units worldwide within six weeks of its release in March.

It points to the Japanization of our tastes, says Alt. A big part of our fantasy DNA is now made in Japan. Its fundamentally changed the way we spend time and identify ourselves.

Matt Alt discusses Pure Invention in the latest episode of The Japan Times Deep Dive podcast. Listen now at jtimes.jp/podcast.

Read more from the original source:

'Pure Invention': How Japan's pop culture became the 'lingua franca' of the internet - The Japan Times

Joe Rogan Is Spreading Transphobic Hate Speech and It’s Putting Lives in Danger – Men’s Health

Joe Rogan is one of the biggest figures in podcasting. His show, The Joe Rogan Experience, consists of lengthy, often rambling interviews with a diverse array of athletes, academics, actors, entrepreneurs, and more. But you could also say that Rogan has really built his audience through selecting guests who bring their own notoriety to his show, or whose specialist subject is the kind of hot-button issue that will inevitably gain him some streams.

These interviews can take many forms, like getting infamous tech boss Elon Musk to smoke weed on camera, instantly immortalizing the moment in meme form. Or, more esoterically, speaking with pilots who claim to have had close encounters with UFOs. A lot of the time it's harmless (if slightly deranged) fun. And then there are the episodes which, by virtue of Rogan's massive online reach, lend a veneer of credibility to some truly dangerous prejudices.

Take the recent episode with guest Abigail Shrier. During Shrier's conversation with Rogan, in which she promoted her book, Irreversible Damage: The Transgender Craze Seducing Our Daughters, Shrier invalidated the lived experience of trans and nonbinary kids and teens, and made numerous dangerous, entirely unsound false equivalencies. She compared transitioning among teenagers to historic adolescent phenomena such as eating disorders, self-harm, and (bafflingly) the occult, calling this age group "the same population that gets involved in cutting, demonic possession, witchcraft, anorexia, bulimia."

She even described wanting to transition as a "contagion" with the potential to infect other children with the same ideas, drawing yet more scientifically baseless parallels with eating disorders. "Anorexics, they are always really careful when they put them together," she said. "They have to be on hospital wards because we know that it will cause it to spread."

Michael S. SchwartzGetty Images

Plenty of savvy producers book guests like this to stir up controversy and accumulate outrage-clicks from their viewers. But was Rogan sitting back as a host and letting Shrier dig her own grave? Nope. He appeared to reaffirm this notion that being trans is something a child can be persuaded into through peer pressure, referring to time spent with "wacky friends" at school. He also mocked Caitlyn Jenner, and described LGBTQ+ activists as people who aren't "looking at all sides of it."

"They have this agenda," he said, "and this agenda is very ideologically driven that anyone who even thinks they might be trans should be trans, are trans, and the more trans people the better. The more kids that transition the better."

For all their talk of self-harm and other issues that teenagers can experience, neither Rogan nor Shrier openly acknowledged that more than half of transgender and nonbinary youth seriously considered attempting suicide last year. And that wasn't due to "wacky friends" somehow transmitting gender dysphoria; it was due to the prolific, ubiquitous messaging in media that tells them there is something wrong with them, and how they feel doesn't matter.

By alluding to a pro-trans lobby with that aforementioned agenda, Rogan positioned himself and Shrier as marginalized voices in their own righta technique commonly employed by high-profile pundits who believe "cancel culture" is somehow coming for their right to free speech. But Rogan has 283 million active users across his social channels. Similarly, Harry Potter author J.K. Rowling tweets her transphobic half-thoughts out to 14.3 million followersmany of whom are the very kids she is attacking. They have huge platforms, and they are using them to actively, willfully spread misinformation and propaganda that will cause very real harm.

"As long as these tactics keep making him money ... he doesn't care who he hurts along the way."

Of course, you could always make the argument that Rogan doesn't actually believe any of the views that he encourages his guests to espouse on his show. Maybe he is just a cultural weathervane, conducting interviews on whatever outrageous topic is making headlines at the time. In one episode, he might endorse Democratic presidential candidate Bernie Sanders, or provide a safe space for openly gay strongman Rob Kearney to share his story. But in others, he is guilty of humoring (if not downright enabling) homophobic jokes and alt-right conspiracy theories from his guests.

Which is worse? To expose such bigotry to your millions of subscribers because you genuinely endorse it? Or to have so little conviction that you will knowingly platform hate speech about some of the most vulnerable, persecuted young people in our society to benefit your own career? You be the judge. Both are appalling in their own way.

Rogan likes to put on a furrowed brow and even, pensive voice; the hallmarks of a reasonable man with an inquisitive mind. Someone who is "just asking questions" or "wants to start a debate." In reality, he's an intellectual shock jock who amplifies the voices of conspiracy theorists, white supremacists, homophobes, and transphobes in the name of interesting conversation. And it's becoming increasingly clear that as long as these tactics keep making him money and acquiring him followers, he doesn't care who he hurts along the way.

This content is created and maintained by a third party, and imported onto this page to help users provide their email addresses. You may be able to find more information about this and similar content at piano.io

This commenting section is created and maintained by a third party, and imported onto this page. You may be able to find more information on their web site.

See original here:

Joe Rogan Is Spreading Transphobic Hate Speech and It's Putting Lives in Danger - Men's Health

Etihad passengers flying to these nine countries may need Covid-19 tests – The National

Travellers flying from Abu Dhabi to nine countries may need to show negative Covid-19 test results before boarding flights, says Etihad Airways.

The national airline of the UAE has released a list of countries that includes Lebanon, Sri Lanka and Pakistan, in an advisory on its website.

Travel rules are changeable at the moment, so the airline recommends that anyone planning to fly to these destinations check the country requirements before travelling to Abu Dhabi airport, in order to find out if they need to present negative test results.

Those who arrive at the airport without test results when they are required may be denied boarding.

The latest update to Etihad's general travel advice expects passengers to check the rules of the destination country before flying.

Several countries around the world now require travellers to show negative test results upon arrival. These rules are constantly being updated, and procedures may change between the time of booking a flight and the date of travel, so always double check closer to the date of your flight.

In Lebanon, travellers coming from countries where polymerase chain reaction testing is available, must now present negative results when they land in Beirut. They will then be tested again at Beirut-Rafik Hariri International Airport and must adhere to home quarantine until receiving their test results. At the time of writing, the rule did not apply to children under 5, but passengers should clarify this before travel.

In the Seychelles, where commercial flights are scheduled to resume on Saturday, August 1, travellers must provide proof of a negative Covid-19 test conducted within 48 hours of boarding. This only applies to visitors on a list of countries considered low to medium risk the UAE is on this list. All other visitors cannot yet enter the Seychelles.

Sri Lanka is set to reopen to travellers on Saturday, August 1. The country has announced new tourism rules that require passengers to present negative Covid-19 test results upon arrival in Colombo.

According to the latest information from the International Air Transport Association, entry to Azerbaijan requires a negative Covid-19 test certificate issued within 48 hours of a flight. A further test is required on arrival in the country and travellers need to secure a hard copy of their results.

Similar rules are in place in Indonesia, Malaysia and Thailand, where only certain categories of foreign nationals are permitted to enter or transit.

Iata's latest update for Pakistan does not list any requirements that travellers must carry negative Covid-19 test results. Instead, it advises that "a completed International Passenger Health Declaration Form must be presented upon arrival".

Travellers flying to South Korea are required to show a negative result only if they have transited or visited specified countries, says Iata's latest update.

The National has contacted Etihad for further clarification on the situation, which is constantly changing.

Passengers flying with Etihad who need to take a PCR test before a flight can use the airline's new at-home testing facility. It is in partnership with Mediclinic and allows travellers to book an appointment for the test and receive results before travel.

UAE residents travelling to Abu Dhabi to fly with Etihad must also show a valid negative test result before crossing the border.

Updated: July 21, 2020 06:29 PM

Read this article:

Etihad passengers flying to these nine countries may need Covid-19 tests - The National

Bahamas shatters record with 55 new infections in a single day, total at 274 – EyeWitness News

NASSAU, BAHAMAS There have been a record 55 new coronavirus cases in The Bahamas, the largest increase in cases in a single day.

Grand Bahama recorded 39 new infections, and has surpassed New Providence in confirmed cases of the virus.

The ages of the patients ranged from 25 to 77.

The total number of cases now stands at 274 119 in New Providence, 120 in Grand Bahama, 21 in Bimini, four in the Berry Islands, four in Cat Cay, two in Cat Island, and four in Moores Island.

There were five additional cases in New Providence including two men, ages 56 and 84; and three women, ages 59, 23 and 40.

Four more infections were recorded in Bimini, according to the Ministry of Health.

These include three women, ages 32, 30, and 18, and a 48-year-old man.

An additional three cases were recorded on Moores Island a 51-year-old woman, a 44-year-old man and a 76-year-old man.

The single COVID-19 case recorded in Great Guana Cay was a 55-year-old man.

Notwithstanding the ministry reporting 55 new cases, the case breakdown by age accounted for 52 new infections.

Cases since The Bahamas reopening to international commercial carriers on July 1 a total of 170 have eclipsed the total number of cases between the onset of the pandemic in mid-March and the end of June, 104 cases.

Health officials were unable to provide further details on the cases.

Investigations are ongoing, and a complete update of details will be published at a later date, read the statement.

Health officials continue to follow the condition of the other current COVID-19 positive cases.

As a result of the surge in cases, Grand Bahama has been placed under a two-weeklockdownbeginning at 7pm today until August 7 at 5am.

Go here to see the original:

Bahamas shatters record with 55 new infections in a single day, total at 274 - EyeWitness News

Lockdown: All Bahamian islands now locked down for weekend – TCPalm

Dr. George Charite and Dr. Marc Binard, of Integrated Medical Centre in Marsh Harbour, Bahamas, detail what Bahamians are going through following Hurricane Dorian. Treasure Coast Newspapers

UPDATE, JULY 24, 2020: The Office of the Prime Minister of the Bahamas announced on its Facebook page Friday afternoon there will be a weekend-long lockdown of all islands in the Bahamas. This is in addition to the two-week lockdown ordered for Grand Bahama which took effect Thursday.

Prime Minister Hubert Minnis will address the nation at 6 p.m. Friday.

Earlier story:The island nation of the Bahamas, almost entirely dependent economically on tourism dollars, announced a partial closure of its borders to incoming tourists.

The reason? Rising cases of COVID-19.

The announcement was made July 19 by Bahamian Prime Minister Hubert Minnis. The statement announced:

The following travel restrictions were announced:

This travel is still permitted, as long as travelers provide a negative COVID-19 test taken within 10 days of arrival:

The Duchess, owned by Capt. Billy Black of Stuart, heads into Walker's Cay July 9, 2020 to clear Bahamian customs. The Bahamas has announced changes to its policy for visitors planning to travel there.(Photo: CONTRIBUTED PHOTO BY JAMES HARMS)

One of the hardest hit spots is Grand Bahama Island, with 31 new cases in the past two weeks. Grand Bahama is a destination frequently visited by Floridians traveling into the country on personal boats. It was COVID-19 free for a little more than two months.

More: Tourists can travel to the Bahamas by air and sea, if proven to be COVID-19 negative

The increase in cases coincided with the re-institution of international flights and passenger sea transport, Minnis said. Many of the cases, he said, were traceable to Bahamian residents returning to the Bahamas.

Tuesday, Minnis announced the island of Grand Bahama will now be on total lockdown beginning Thursday. That presents a problem for Floridian boaters coming to the Bahamas because West End, on Grand Bahama, is a place where many boaters clear customs. The lockdown will last for two weeks. No travel into or off of the island, even between other islands, will not be allowe

Since Grand Bahama has been identified as a hot spot, Minnis announced these measures effective for the island:

Some Floridians have been fishing and boating in the Bahamas since it re-opened. Capt. Billy Black of Stuart, skipper of the Duchess, has been in Grand Cay and Walker's Cay in the Abacos taking charters fishing.

Joe Edge, of Port St. Lucie, took his boat to Guana Cay and is able to fly back on private charter.

Edge said in the Abacos, there have been no positive COVID test results. He believes it is becausefor the most part, people are wearing masks when theyre supposed to.

"Inside buildings when they cant social distance, everyone wears masks," Edge said, who emailed from Guana Cay Tuesday. "Compliance is the word of the day in Abaco and I think that says a lot when it comes to no infections and no positive tests here."

Guana Cay was one of the islands hit hardest by Hurricane Dorian last year. Edge said the island is doing well in its rebuilding and recovery except it still does not have power.

"Orchid Bay Marina just finished itsfirst dock and is waiting to install power and water, other than that things are going well," he wrote. "They just need a constant reliable power source."

As for the fishing, Edge said there has been much more wind than usual for this time of year. Despite that, the fishing for blackfin tuna has been goo

Minnis said Bahamian health officials are monitoring this situation closely.If efforts to decrease the number of cases are unsuccessful, other restrictive measures may be recommended, including a lockdown beginning July 24, he said.

A seven-member team from the Ministry of Health consisting of three physicians, one microbiologist and three nurses arrived on Grand Bahama Sunday to help provide clinical health support.

To stay up to date on Bahamian travel restrictions and changes, go to the Office of the Prime Minister's web page atOPM.gov.bs.

Ed Killer is TCPalm's outdoors writer. Become a valued customer by subscribing to TCPalm. To interact withEd, friend him on Facebook at Ed Killer, follow him onTwitter @tcpalmekiller or email him at ed.killer@tcpalm.com.

Want more breaking news coverage? If you're already a subscriber, thank you! If not, please subscribe and help keep coverage of the most important breaking news coming.

Go here to read the rest:

Lockdown: All Bahamian islands now locked down for weekend - TCPalm

US Navy Destroyer Rescues Yacht Off the Coast of the Bahamas – The Maritime Executive

USS Mitscher (USN file image)

By The Maritime Executive 07-19-2020 02:24:38

[Brief]On Saturday, the Arleigh Burke-classdestroyer USS Mitscher assisted a sailing yacht which had gone adriftabout 150 nautical miles east of the Bahamas.

The distressed vessel radioed for help on the morning of July 17, and U.S. Coast Guard District 7 received the message. The Coast Guard coordinated with Mitscher, which was the closest ship able to render assistance. Mitscher rendezvoused with the vessel later that evening and towed it to San Salvador, Bahamas overnight.

The 51-foot sailing vessel had a damaged steering shaft and was unable to maneuver. There were three adults onboard and all arein good condition.

I am thankful that we were in a position to render assistance to mariners in distress, said Mitscher's CO, Cmdr. Matthew Cox. The crews ability to quickly prepare and safely tow the vessel to safe harbor shows the versatility, professionalism, and teamwork of our sailors.Im very proud of how the team worked together during this event.

Mitscher, which is part of Destroyer Squadron 22 and Carrier Strike Group 2, is underway in the Atlantic Ocean conducting unit-level training.

Excerpt from:

US Navy Destroyer Rescues Yacht Off the Coast of the Bahamas - The Maritime Executive

Freedoms and liberties went too far, says AG – EyeWitness News

NASSAU, BAHAMAS Attorney General Carl Bethel today suggested the governments balancing act of mitigation efforts may have gone too far toward liberty, freedom of travel.

He maintained that contact tracing efforts has shown that new cases of the coronavirus on previously uninfected islands was largely the result of Bahamians and residents traveling abroad and then subsequently visiting Family Islands.

The attorney general said if The Bahamas had the same structure as authoritarian China the government could have reopened the borders to the world and block Bahamians from travel.

But he pointed out the nation is a democratic one with enshrined fundamental rights.

Bethel said: Now, this is the reality. We live in a free and democratic country and, you know, if we were in authoritarian China, we could easily have said, yes, well open to the world, and we will block our citizens from going anywhere, but thats not The Bahamas.

We have a constitutional democracy. We have the rule of law and people have fundamental rights, so we are where we are because of the nature of our constitutional order and the profound commitment of the Bahamian people to the protection of their own fundamental rights and.. also the fundamental rights of others.

He made the statement during debate in the Senate of a resolution to extended the state of emergency and the emergency orders to September 30, 2020.

He conceded the balance may have gone too far toward liberty, freedom of travel.

We are where we are because of the nature of our constitutional order and the profound commitment to the Bahamian people and their fundamental rights, Bethel said.

We are where we are, and the government, pursuant to medical advice, will do whatever is necessary to protect the health and safety of the Bahamian people, the preservation of our health system, the ability of our hospitals to cater to the broad range of health needs that has to be fundamental to our efforts.

Health official briefed Cabinet and other stakeholders on Thursday.

He said those details were being shared with the opposition, civil society, the trade union and other stakeholders to inform them on where the country stands today.

Bethel said only a vaccine will restore the normality of which we are accustomed.

To the extension of the state of emergency, the attorney general said the extension from month to month reflects on Parliaments oversight, as the orders could be extended for six months in one instance.

He insisted Parliament remains sovereign under the constitution even in an emergency.

Bethel said the government must do what is right to protect Bahamians and strike the right balance to sustain life and health, and economic activity and must move towards an appropriate balance between these two undertakings.

These are serious times and we are in the grips of what appears to be a second wave, largely associated with the reopening of the economy, the borders, Bethel said.

He added: We will fight and defeat this insidious virus.

We will strike the right balance. We will save our country.

For his part, PLP Senator Michael Darville said the opposition cannot support the orders in its current form and it needs to be amended.

In the House of Assembly on Thursday, the Official Opposition proposed to amend the state of emergency to the end of August, but the amendment was voted down.

Darville said the government must be measured and sober in its deliberations.

This article has been edited to include the attorney generals direct quote on China in the Senate.

More here:

Freedoms and liberties went too far, says AG - EyeWitness News

Boohoo urges government to take action after slavery scandal – Retail Gazette

// Boohoo calls on government to take action in protecting workers after allegations of malpractice// Boohoo had over 1 billion wiped from its share value in just two days after the allegations

Boohoo has urged the government to take action in protecting workers by introducing a licensing scheme to ensure that textile factories are fit to trade.

The urgency comes after the fast fashion retailer, which owns Boohoo, PrettyLittleThing and Nasty Gal, was embroiled in allegations of malpractice at a supplier in Leicester.

Boohoo had more than 1 billion wiped from its share value in two days after a Sunday Times article accused it of paying factory workers as little as 3.50 an hour.

READ MORE:

Following the allegations, retailers such as Next and Asos dropped Boohoo products from their websites.

On Friday, Boohoo Group chief executive John Lyttle sent a letter to Home Secretary Priti Patel headlined protecting people being exploited in UK garment factories.

He wrote that around 40 per cent of Boohoos products were manufactured in the UK, supporting thousands of jobs in this country that may otherwise be lost to overseas markets.

Lyttle added that Boohoo is taking action to investigate allegations of malpractice in its supply chain and asks government to take action too.

He wrote that Boohoo backed calls from the BRC and the All-Party Parliamentary Groups (APPGs) for Fashion and Textiles and Ethics and Sustainability for the government to implement a Fit to Trade licensing scheme to ensure all garment factories met their legal obligations to employees.

On Friday, Boohoo co-founders Mahmud Kamani and Carol Kanebought another 15 million worth of shares in a bid to stop its share price from falling any further.

Kamani injected 10.7 million into five million shares, while Kane spent 4.3 million on Boohoo stock on Thursday, in an attempt to boost the embattled business.

Meanwhile, fast fashion retailerQuiz said it believes that one of its suppliers, based in Leicester, has used a subcontractor at the centre of allegations over breaches to the national living wage.

The National Crime Agency said on July 8 that it was assessing allegations of modern slavery and exploitation in the textile industry in Leicester.

Click here to sign up to Retail Gazettes free daily email newsletter

Read the rest here:

Boohoo urges government to take action after slavery scandal - Retail Gazette

Why don’t we have the powers to fully tackle exploitation? – The MJ

There is no doubt that councils are also working even harder. No more so than here in Leicester, the first and possibly the last city to suffer from the imposition of a COVID-19 local lockdown, and one where despite having no powers to protect exploitation in garment factories, we have received the finger of blame for this. Without any epidemiological evidence and with questionable motive, endemic issues have come to the fore in places where they should have always been a high priority.

These issues have been a high priority at Leicester City Council for some time.

Whilst we dont have any authority or powers to inspect factories for potential labour market exploitation, these responsibilities rest with a complex web of government agencies, we do have responsibility to drive bad jobs out of the city and to welcome good jobs (of which there are already very many in textiles and beyond). We do this for the wellbeing of our residents and for the wellbeing of the local the economy.

Why dont we have the powers? Its a question we have asked.

In 2017 the Human Rights Select Committee chaired by Harriet Harman MP, visited Leicester, where a session of the committee was also held. The final report included a recommendation to bring forward legislative proposals to grant powers to local authorities to close down premises which are found to exploit workers. This was a recommendation we encouraged and supported yet was rejected by government.

A short time later, thecity mayor convened a Textiles Coalition Event, which led to the National Labour Market Enforcement Strategy published and, with the encouragement of Sir David Metcalf of Labour Market Enforcement (LME), the setting up of a pilot task force to test how multi-agency working between enforcement bodies and others including GLAA, HMRC HSE, the council, industry bodies, suppliers, retailers and consumers.

Leicester City Council got behind this fully, without any new resources being offered to us.

Operational activity at multiple premises took place, resulting in a small number of modern day slavery investigations. A review of the initial pilot by LME concluded that whilst data sharing had improved, lack of ongoing intelligence leads hampered progress. It was generally agreed that better communication was needed so Leicesters mayor Sir Peter Soulsby and Sir David Metcalf came up with the idea for a unique post, funded by the council. This post is now filled and actively supporting better data sharing: but the problems of reporting and resources remain.

Away from this enforcement work, the mayor has pushed forward a range of activity to promote and create good jobs and to drive out bad jobs. In addition to promoting the National Living Wage Foundation campaign across the city, by May 2019 we had provided business support and run ethical compliance workshops and other events for 150 businesses and we have given over 400k of grants to textiles businesses as part of a wider 1.2m grant pot from the European Union.

Our work with textiles businesses across the city has not abated. We jointly commissioned a feasibility study for a textiles hub with the LLEP (our local enterprise partnership), and have identified a site, and funding to subsidise for building works and a lease. This work has had to be paused due to COVID-19 but we are now discussing next steps with partners.

Weve yet to be offered financial support from industry or government to support this work.

Coming right up to date, in mid-July we co-convened a webinar to help fashion and textiles businesses learn more about making their workplaces COVID19 secure. We delivered the webinar alongside the Business Gateway Growth Hub, which is an initiative of the LLEP.

Over twenty-five businesses signed up to the event, on 14th July which looked specifically at managing COVID-19 related risks and implementing measures to remain compliant with legal requirements. Advice was tailored to the fashion and textiles industry with a step-by-step guide outlined to make factories COVID19 secure.

Its now over a year since Beis announced the governments intent to establish a single enforcement body and the consultation ended last October. The government website states that consultation responses are still being analysed.

We havent seen any progress.

Labour market exploitation around the country, in many sectors, has of course taken place in that time.

Were calling on Government to immediately publish their plans for this single enforcement body so we can remove the over-bearing barrier of too many stretched organisations trying to navigate a system thats too easily exploited resulting in people being exploited.

Councils must to be given the adequate powers and resources to work closely with the single enforcement body to help prevent exploitation of workers, to drive out bad jobs and ensure they are replaced by good jobs. By establishing this body in the centre of England, in Leicester, we will also be able to replace some of the jobs lost as a result of HMRC contracting over the last few years ahead of moving out of the city completely by 2022.

Bringing people out of exploitation is everyones business. In Leicester we are proactively trying to address the problem head on, on all fronts.

So, what are you doing?

Cllr Adam Clarke is deputy city mayor at Leicester City Council

See the article here:

Why don't we have the powers to fully tackle exploitation? - The MJ

Roger Lampach and Pascal Bouvry Appointed to Co-Lead the MeluXina Supercomputer – HPCwire

July 21, 2020 In order to guarantee the establishment and development of the MeluXina project, LuxProvide S.A. a subsidiary of LuxConnect created in 2019 is currently in full swing.

Roger Lampach was initially appointed Managing Director of LuxProvide in August 2019 with the mission of setting up a team that can ultimately number up to 50 people. Now Roger Lampach and Professor Pascal Bouvry have both been appointed CEOs, forming a complementary pair. Drawing on his experience, particularly in the implementation and development of LuxConnect, Roger Lampach supervises the industrial and project management aspects, while Pascal Bouvry ensures the scientific follow-up of the implementation of the Luxembourg HPC, while keeping his function of professor at the University of Luxembourg.

The management team is completed by Valentin Plugaru who joined LuxProvide as CTO. Finally, Matthieu Lefebvre holds the position of Group Leader, User Engagement & Professional Services in charge of setting up a team of specialists dedicated to the various sectors covered by the computing capacities of the supercomputer: Industry 4.0, Ecotech (mobility), Healthtech , Logistics, Space and Finances.

The establishment of the LuxProvide management team, with a coherent distribution of responsibilities, is a further important step for Luxembourg to operate its own HPC which will integrate the European network of supercomputers. In an increasingly digital world, the MeluXina supercomputer will support the digital transition of the national economy and offer companies new opportunities to innovate and stay competitive, Declared Mario Grotz, Chairman of the Board of Directors of LuxProvide.

In addition, in January 2020, the European High Performance Computing Joint Undertaking and LuxProvide published a call for tenders for the acquisition, installation and maintenance of the national supercomputer named MeluXina. The final offers are currently being analyzed and a decision on the successful supplier will be made shortly.

Focused on the needs of its users, in particular businesses and other players in the Luxembourg economy, MeluXina is a key element of the Luxembourg Governments innovation policy. The supercomputer aims to develop and support a digital, secure and sustainable economy that aims to support the digital transition of the economy by improving competitiveness and facilitating business innovation. With this in mind, the Luxembourg HPC center will be a one-stop-shop with easy access to high-performance computing capacities.

About LuxProvide

Under the governance of the Ministry of State of the Ministry of the Economy, LuxProvide S.A., as a 100% subsidiary of LuxConnect, is in charge of the acquisition, launch and operation of MeluXina. With its head office in Bissen, LuxProvides mission is to facilitate access to the use of MeluXinas computing capacities by setting up a structure to provide dedicated support to companies in their projects relating to high performance computing. Composition of the LuxProvide Board of Directors: Mario Grotz (chairman), Paul Konsbruck (director), Roger Lampach (managing director) and Pascal Bouvry (managing director).

About MeluXina

The supercomputer will be installed in LuxConnects DC2 data center in Bissen, which is powered by green energy from Kiowatt, the cogeneration plant powered by waste wood. MeluXinas computing power will be 10 petaflops, which corresponds to 10,000,000,000,000,000 computing operations per second. The modular architecture of MeluXina will be focused on the needs of its users including companies and actors of the Luxembourg economy, with a particular emphasis on the use by SMEs and start-ups.

Source: LuxProvide

Read this article:

Roger Lampach and Pascal Bouvry Appointed to Co-Lead the MeluXina Supercomputer - HPCwire

Secrets of the Boeing 747: on board the last Qantas jumbo jet – The Guardian

There is a place on a Boeing 747 that youve probably never seen.

At the back of the giant plane there is a panel that opens up to an incredibly narrow set of stairs. Squeeze your way up these and you come to a small cavity where eight slender beds are wedged in Jenga-style configuration, with curtains for privacy.

Its like the basement in Parasite, but in the sky, and more cramped.

You have to ask yourself how anyone could sleep up here without having a panic attack. But the crew of a 747 has to do just that or at least used to.

The secret room is just one of a number of oddities that will soon disappear forever. The 747 the original jumbo jet is soon to be no more.

Qantass last model departed Sydney for the final time on Wednesday, bringing to an end five decades of service. The planes, with their distinctive shape of a hump-like upper deck, have been flying in Australia since 1971.

The retirement was always on the cards, but the date was brought forward six months due to the ravaging effects of Covid-19 on the aviation industry. This week British Airways also retired their 31-strong fleet of 747s, citing the pandemic and a major downturn in travel.

But before the curtain fell on a piece of aviation history and the plane flew off to the Mojave desert in the US, the Guardian was invited on board for a last look.

The tour had a dystopian edge. Without the aircon or lights on, the cabin was super-hot and dark. Entering via the back of the plane, there was a gaping hole where the seats in rows 61 to 64 had been ripped out. The carpet was gashed where the seats had been.

On the plastic around the windows and the armrests were messages scrawled in texta: Goodbye 747 youll be missed 25 years of flying with you was a pleasure, Kim was here 🙂 Farewell Queen.

The disorientating effect of boarding the plane (a plane without passengers, a plane that was not going to take you anywhere, a plane with seats missing) was intensified when surveying the airport. Apart from one tiny plane, no flights were taking off. Aircraft were parked. The runways were empty. There were no passengers.

There was so much symbolism, it seemed to be screaming: An epoch is ending!

Qantas Group CEO Alan Joyce said in a statement that the 747 was significant as it bought in a new era of lower fares and nonstop flights.

Its hard to overstate the impact that the 747 had on aviation and a country as far away as Australia. It replaced the 707, which was a huge leap forward in itself but didnt have the sheer size and scale to lower airfares the way the 747 did. That put international travel within reach of the average Australian and people jumped at the opportunity, Joyce said.

Although beloved by passengers and crew alike, the 747s were environmentally unsound, often cited as a worst-offending model by Heathrow when it published its league tables of the noisiest, most polluting airlines.

But there was no doubt in talking to pilots and engineers, that this plane was deeply loved.

Qantas pilot Ewen Cameron, a 747 pilot for 40 years, said: Its a great aeroplane. Its so heavy but its really stable. You point it in one direction, it keeps going in that direction. Its very forgiving. Its just been part of my life. The passengers love the [Airbus] A380 but theres a more nostalgic love for this one.

There is nostalgia for the 747 because perhaps more than any other plane, it required immense magical thinking. This hulking thing, this beast, was going to lift off the ground and take you and 400 other people all drinking cocktails and watching movies from Sydney to London.

Everything works really well. There is nothing cumbersome about it, said Cameron. It looked cumbersome when I first saw it I was struck by the pure size. I have a fair understanding of aerodynamics, but watching it take off you think, that shouldnt happen.

It shouldnt, but it did. Over and over again.

The story of the manufacturing of the first Boeing 747 is legendary.

A workforce of 50,000 that called itself the Incredibles built the aircraft in less than 16 months.

John Sutter, Boeings 747 engineer, wrote of the 1969 maiden flight: I saw Boeings new jet as 75,000 drawings, 4.5 million parts, 136 miles of electrical wiring, five landing gear legs, four hydraulic systems, and 10 million labour hours.

Since that day the planes have transported 5.9 billion people, nearly 80% of the worlds population, Boeing says.

The other 20% have missed out.

Before the end of our little tour we were taken into the cockpit that felt like being inside the guts of an old IBM super-computer, with buttons, levers and knobs that went from the dashboard right up to the roof.

Then we each got a turn at sitting in business class in the big old leather (or leather-feel) chairs that had a scotch, cigar and fireplace vibe. Once you sank into a business class seat, it was difficult to get up.

Around 4pm, Qantas had to move the plane from the hanger. We all got off and stood on the bridge.

The enormous plane was pushed out on wheels that seemed comically too small to carry such weight. But it moved gracefully, and although not airborne, seemed to glide across the tarmac, more like an ocean liner than a plane. The word magisterial came to mind.

But something else did too.

The scene in the hangar, as the plane was towed out, felt reminiscent of a funeral procession, where people line the roads and pay respects as the hearse rolls by slowly.

But here, engineers and maintenance workers stood on the bridge, watching the plane roll out, their arms outstretched, filming the departure on their cameras. It was a moment that almost seemed choreographed, it was so like a salute.

Read the original here:

Secrets of the Boeing 747: on board the last Qantas jumbo jet - The Guardian

The Rise of the Machines – IndustryWeek

Automation is not a new phenomenon in manufacturing. American manufacturers started replacing people on production lines with automatic palletizers, filling machines, and case packers back in the 1950s. Robots did not come into the picture until the 1990s. Most of the large manufacturing plants in the U.S. are now highly automated.

But there is a new threat that is striking fear into the heart of working people. It is the possibility that artificial intelligence will progress to the point that machines will become sentient and replace people in all working environments. This idea has been popularized in movies like the Terminator, when scientists created a computer chip that made machines conscious and self-aware. Tesla founder Elon Musk and physicist Stephen Hawking both warned that machines will eventually start programming themselves, and trigger the collapse of civilization.

This idea of artificial intelligence advancing to the point of sentient machines is becoming a popular concept in the media. An article from the Brookings Institute states that "a quarter of U.S. jobs will be severely disrupted as artificial intelligence accelerates the automation of existing work. A study from the Oxford Economics Group suggests that "robots could take over 20 million manufacturing jobs around the world by 2030. An article in Smithsonian magazine, When Robots Take All of Our Jobs, said "fully 47% of all U.S. jobs will be automated in a decade or two.

Many computer scientists believe that sophisticated artificial intelligence systems using deep learning can develop networks of layered algorithms that talk to each other, and will ultimately lead to consciousness. In his bookThe Singularity is Near,futurist Ray Kurzweil predicts that computers will be as smart as humans by 2029.

If you evaluated all of the speculative articles on artificial intelligence in the last decade, you could conclude that that we are on the verge of building a robot that is self-aware and can think just like a human. Creating a computer that is sentient would require simulating the capabilities of the human brain and, contrary to popular reports, no computer has made the simplest self-initiated decision or has manifested any hint of intelligence to date.

How do computers and artificial intelligence compare to the human brain?

A digital computer system is a non-living, dry system that works in serial as opposed to parallel. It can operate at very high speeds, and the design includes transistors (on/off switches), a central processing unit (CPU) and some kind of operating system (like windows) based on binary logic (instructions coded as 0's and 1's). All information must go through a CPU that depends on clock speed. Digital computers do not create any original thought. They must be programmed by humans.

The human brain is a living, wet analogue of networks that can perform massively parallel processes at the same time and operates in agreement with biological laws. There is no programming, and the brain has the ability to change from one moment to the next, constantly forming new synapses. The human brain also includes areas we call the subconscious and conscious mind, which are absolutely essential in reaching consciousness or sentience.

The best book explaining the differences between a computer and the brain is The Future of the Mind by Michio Kaku. He says, The brain does not work like a computer. Unlike a digital computer, which has a fixed architecture (input, output, and processor) neural networks are collections of neurons that constantly rewire and reinforce themselves after learning a new task The brain has no programming, no operating system, no Windows, no central processor. Instead, its neural networks are massively parallel, with billions of neurons firing at the same time in order to accomplish a single goal: to learn. It is far more advanced than any digital computer in existence.

Digital supercomputers have billions of transistors. But to simulate the typical 3.5 pound human brain would require matching the brains billions of interactions between cell types, neurotransmitters, neuromodulators, axonal branches and dendritic spines. Because the brain is nonlinear, and because it has so much more capacity than any computer, it functions completely different from a digital computer.

Neurons are the real key to how the brain learns, thinks, perceives, stores memory, and a host of other functions.The average brain has at least 100 billion neurons. The neurons are connected to axons, dendrites and glial cells, which each have thousands of synapses that transmit signals via electro/chemical connections. It is the synapses that are most comparable to transistors because they turn off or on. But it is important to point out that each neuron is a living cell and a computer in its own right. A neuron has the signal processing power of thousands of transistors. Neurons are slower but are more complex because they can modify their synapses and modulate the frequency of their signals.

Each neuron has the capability to communicate with 10,000 other neurons. Unlike digital computers with fixed architecture, the brain can constantly re-wire its neurons to learn and adapt. Instead of programs, neural networks learn by doing and remembering, and this vast network of connected neurons gives the brain excellent pattern recognition.

Neuroscientists know that having feelings and emotions is necessary to emulate human thinking, and it also may be a key to establishing consciousness. In fact, it appears that to even have a chance of being self-aware or conscious, the computer will have to be equipped with emotions. Michio Kaku says, Hence, emotions are not a luxury; they are absolutely essential, and without them a robot will have difficulty determining what is and is not important. So, emotions, instead of being peripheral to the progress of artificial intelligence, are of central importance.

The brain uses emotions as a value system to help determine what is most important. For a robot to attain human thinking, it would need to be designed with a value system and emotions, even though many emotions can be irrational.

In computers, information in memory is accessed by polling its precise memory address. This is known as byte-addressable memory. In contrast, the brain uses content-addressable memory, such that information can be accessed in memory through spreading activation from closely related concepts. For example, retrieving the word girl in a digital computer is located in memory by a byte address. On the other hand, when the brain looks for girl, it automatically uses spreading activation to memories related to other variations of girl, like wife, daughter, female, etc.

Another big difference is that the computer lacks sensory organs like eyes, ears, tongue and the sense of touch. Although computers can be programmed to see, or smell, they cannot truly feel or experience the essence of senses. For example, writes the computer might have a vision sensor, writes Kaku, but the human eye can recognize color, movement, shapes, light intensity, and shadows in an instant. The computer can neither hear nor smell like the brain much less decide whether the sense pleases it. The five senses give the brain an enormous understanding of the environment.

He adds: To catalog the common sense of a 4 years old child would require hundreds of millions of lines of computer code. Without a temporal lobe, the robot could not talk. Without a limbic system the robot would not have any emotions.

The unconscious mind is a great reservoir of our experiences. It is not like a computer hard drive because it records everything we have smelled, touched, tasted, or heard including perceptions, memories, feelings, reflections, thoughts, hope since birth. It is also the seat of our emotions and repressed memories. There is no one place which stores this information; it is stored all over the brain from the pre-frontal cortex, to the thalamus, and many other different parts of the brain. The unconscious mind does not reason or think; it simply stores all of the information needed by the conscious mind for the thinking process.

All conscious thinking processes begin in the subconscious mind and are outside human awareness. Consciousness is a holistic phenomenon occurring simultaneously in the entire brain. The brain calls up information that is content addressable. This may be feelings, experiences, memories, or facts that the brain views as related to the problem. Just how the brain can access the right neurons to gather the relevant information for the conscious mind to think is still unknown.

To solve a problem or find and answer, the digital computer processes information from memory using CPUs, and then writes the results of that processing back to memory.

The most important point in comparing the brain to a computer is that in a computer, the answers are all programmed in. In the living brain the answers are created.

As neurons process information, they are also modifying their synapses. As a result, retrieval from memory always slightly alters those memories. Unlike the digital computer, in the brain, processing and memory are performed by the same components.

Self-Awareness

The only model that we know that has evolved to self-awareness and consciousness is the human brain. Over millions of years, the human brain grew in size and complexity until it developed conscious thought and self-awareness. The author assumes that to really achieve artificial intelligence that has self- awareness will require designing a computer that has most of the features and capabilities of the human brain.

The artificial intelligence theorists seem to be counting on the fact that at some point in the next 20 years a microprocessor will be invented that will reach a singularity point where it becomes conscious and self-aware. This article shows that for the brain to evolve to self-aware status requires developing an unconscious mind, using emotions, having modulated neurons and content addressable memory, and combining processing with memory.

All of these articles that project that self-aware robots with intelligence that can match the brain offer little proof. The reality is that progress of artificial intelligence towards consciousness has been dismal. Everything that computers do is still programmed by humans. In reality, developing a self- aware computer is not going to happen in this century and probably not at all based on digital architecture.

Mike Collins, president of MPC Management, is the author of The Rise of Inequality and the Decline of the Middle Class. He has more than forty years of experience in manufacturing.

Read the original:

The Rise of the Machines - IndustryWeek

Connecticut AG joins healthcare lawsuit against Trump administration alleging LGBTQ+, minority discrimination – Healthcare Finance News

On Wednesday, Connecticut Attorney General William Tong joined 21 attorneys general in filing a lawsuit to stop a new Trump Administration rule that, the coalition alleges, makes it easier for healthcare providers and insurance companies to discriminate against certain vulnerable and protected classes of Americans.

In a lawsuit filed against the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, HHS Secretary Alex Azar, and the head of HHS's Office of Civil Rights, Roger Severino, the coalition of attorneys general contend that the new rule emboldens providers and insurers to discriminate against LGBTQ+ individuals, those with limited English proficiency and women, among others.

They claim the rule strips express protections for these groups in HHS regulations that implement the nondiscrimination provision of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act.

This provision of the ACA prohibits discrimination based on race, color, national origin, sex, disability, or age by health programs or facilities that receive federal funds.

Tong joins New York Attorney General Letitia James, California AG Xavier Becerra and Massachusetts AG Maura Healey, as well as the attorneys general of Colorado, Delaware, Hawaii, Illinois, Maine, Maryland, Michigan, Minnesota, Nevada, New Jersey, New Mexico, Oregon, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, Vermont, Virginia, Wisconsin and the District of Columbia in filing the lawsuit.

WHAT'S THE IMPACT?

In the lawsuit filed Tuesday in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, the coalition argues that HHS has unlawfully ignored the harms that the new rule will impose on vulnerable populations, including LGBTQ+ individuals, individuals with limited English proficiency and women, as well as other protected classes.

The coalition also contends that HHS has failed to justify why it pivoted from its prior policy, which, among other things, explicitly prohibited discrimination in healthcare, and required health entities to provide meaningful language assistance services to individuals with limited English proficiency, including notifying them of their rights to translation and interpretation services.

In addition, the lawsuit alleges that the Trump Administration was motivated by animus toward the transgender community in issuing this rule.

Specifically, the coalition said the new rule is arbitrary and contrary to law under the Administrative Procedure Act, and that it violates the equal protection guarantee of the Fifth Amendment.

THE LARGER TREND

Under the Obama Administration, HHS issued regulations implementing Section 1557 of the ACA in 2016making clear that discrimination on the basis of gender identity, nonconformity to sex stereotypesand pregnancy status are forms of sex discrimination prohibited by the statute. Specifically, Section 1557 prohibits discrimination by any healthcare program (including providers and insurers) against individuals on the basis of race, color, national origin, sex, disabilityor age.

Federal courts have also held that the statute's prohibitions on sex discrimination protect transgender and other LGBTQ+ individuals from such discrimination, which was confirmed in last month's Supreme Court decision in Bostock v. Clayton County.That decision held that discrimination based on sexual orientation and transgender status are forms of sex discrimination prohibited by federal civil rights law.

Despite numerous failed legislative and legal battles to repeal and dismantle the ACA, the Trump Administration's new rule would effectively eliminate many of the express protections contained in the Section 1557 regulations, according to the attorneys general.

They say the move would unlawfully exclude many health insurers from Section 1557's scope, and would embolden healthcare providers and health insurers to deny care and insurance coverage. The new rule, they argue, would also impose barriers and impede timely access to healthcare for Americans, in violation of Section 1554 of the ACA.

Before the rule was finalized, the coalition previously called on the Trump Administration to withdraw the rule by submitting a comment letter to HHS last August, as well as by sending a letter to HHS this past April, at the start of the COVID-19 public health crisis.

Twitter:@JELagasseEmail the writer:jeff.lagasse@himssmedia.com

See the article here:

Connecticut AG joins healthcare lawsuit against Trump administration alleging LGBTQ+, minority discrimination - Healthcare Finance News

Maxwell’s sworn testimony on Epstein is coming back to haunt her – Laredo Morning Times

David Voreacos and Patricia Hurtado, Bloomberg

Four years ago, Ghislaine Maxwell sat in front of several lawyers in a midtown Manhattan law firm office and explained her role in Jeffrey Epstein's life.

"My job included hiring many people" including cooks, gardeners, pilots, assistants and cleaners for his six homes, Maxwell said in a deposition. "A very small part of my job was from time to time to find adult professional massage therapists for Jeffrey."

The deposition, done over two days in April and July 2016, offers the only substantive public record from Maxwell about what she did for the sex offender. It's also part of the reason she was arrested earlier this month -- prosecutors allege she lied nine times while giving her answers under oath. The questioning was part of a defamation lawsuit brought by Virginia Giuffre, who has said she was abused by Epstein and Maxwell.

An appeals court unsealed 40 of the 613 transcript pages of her deposition last August. In the portion that's publicly available, Maxwell is asked at least five different times if she believed that Epstein sexually abused minors. She doesn't give a yes or no response, instead attacking Giuffre as a liar. The most she says in the public transcript: "You are asking me to speculate and I won't speculate."

In his own deposition for the case, Epstein repeatedly asserted his Fifth Amendment right against self-incrimination when asked whether Maxwell conspired with him.

Maxwell has pleaded not guilty to the criminal charges and is now in a Brooklyn jail awaiting trial next year. Jeffrey Pagliuca, a lawyer who defended Maxwell at the deposition and now in the criminal case, didn't return a voice mail or email seeking comment.

Prosecutors say Maxwell, 58, "delivered" at least three girls as young as 14 to be sexually abused by Epstein in the 1990s and that she sometimes participated. The government also told a judge it has additional witnesses, flight logs and business records to bolster their case that she groomed girls for Epstein's abuse.

The indictment, unsealed on July 2, includes two counts of perjury based on her deposition. Prosecutors say she lied about her knowledge of Epstein's activities, including denying knowledge of his recruitment of underage girls and his interactions with underage women at his properties.

The defamation lawsuit, which was settled for an undisclosed amount, was brought against Maxwell because she denied Giuffre's account of abuse in print. A day after portions of Maxwell's deposition were made public last August, Epstein died of an apparent suicide in a Manhattan jail where he was awaiting trial on sex trafficking charges involving underage girls.

Giuffre claims she was recruited to give sexual massages after Maxwell saw her reading a massage therapy book while working at Mar-a-Lago, President Donald Trump's resort in Palm Beach, Florida. Maxwell said Giuffre was 17 when she began to give him massages.

"You can be a professional masseuse at 17 in Florida, so as far as I am aware, a professional masseuse showed up for a massage," Maxwell said. "There is nothing inappropriate or incorrect about that."

During her questioning, Maxwell rejected Giuffre's statements that Maxwell told her to have sex with other men, including billionaire Glenn Dubin and Prince Andrew, calling her assertions "1000% false." In fact, "I barely remember her at all," she said of Giuffre. Prince Andrew and Dubin have denied Giuffre's allegations.

At one point in the deposition, Maxwell's anger boiled over, and she banged the table in frustration.

"I have been so absolutely appalled by her story and appalled by the entire characterization of it and I apologize sincerely for my banging at the table earlier," she said. "It's borne out of years of feeling the pressure of this entire lie that she has perpetrated."

Read more from the original source:

Maxwell's sworn testimony on Epstein is coming back to haunt her - Laredo Morning Times

First 5: Fighting over the meaning of First Amendment freedoms – Salina Post

Gene Policinski. Photo courtesy the Freedom Forum

By GENE POLICINSKI

Theres a bit of an intellectual fistfight going on these days about free expression and we all have a stake in the outcome.

The early rounds have been going on for years: in essence, a theory that pops up periodically in history that some ideas simply are too dangerous to allow them to be voiced in public. The opponent to that theory: The longtime belief in the marketplace of ideas, where any person may advance any idea however repugnant, vile or even evil and be subject to the review, and perhaps revile, of all others.

Critics of the marketplace approach have several arguments. American critics note the amendment was adopted in 1791, carrying forward ideas about free expression that even then were centuries old, and thus see it as out of place in a modern world.

Another objection is that the internet, with its instant and global reach, makes ineffective the expected marketplace interplay of speaker and responder, through which the hope is bad ideas fail, good ideas improve and best ideas thrive.

Yet another criticism of the marketplace concept is that money, technology and power have created an elite group (or groups) in control of most meaningful communication (and perhaps content) across the web, rendering criticism, counterviews, unpopular or unconventional ideas and certainly revolutionary ones unable to reach a mass audience.

Critical race theorists believe that American jurisprudence essentially has elevated the liberty interests of the First Amendment over the equality interests of the 14thAmendment.

And finally, there is the claim that some ideas simply are too dangerous or misleading or manipulative to be allowed into the marketplace at all from race, ethnic and religious hatred to sexual exploitation and abuse to commercial messaging and political misinformation now aided and abetted by hidden algorithms and those in charge of a handful of private tech companies more intent on profits than seeking truth.

Whew. Thats a pretty strong set of arguments that some things need fixing when it comes to free expression in the early years of the 21stcentury. Most of us likely would agree with many, if not all of them on first glance.

Interestingly, the sides in this dispute dont automatically align along our current political fractures. Some liberals and conservatives see the web as too wide open, allowing dangerous ideas and speakers access to audiences that can be influenced; while others view the web as a tightly controlled funnel of filtered information combined with manipulation that blocks voices (either too conservative or too liberal take your pick) with a goal of shaping public opinion.

The current battle is not just over the criticisms, but over the solutions as well. Twitter and other sites gain praise and scorn for blocking some users for alleged violations of those sites terms of service, ranging from foul language to misleading health claims to personal attacks and what the sites deem deliberate misinformation. Tech firms can block, tag and take down posted content, in a bit of irony to some, because they have their own First Amendment rights as private companies.

So, some on either side of this dispute would bring government into the ring, where First Amendment freedoms would apply one side seeking exceptions to free speech protections for things such as violent content, or racist views, or demeaning portrayals of women, or LGBTQ persons; and the other combatants asking government to oversee and override those private companies decisions, in the name of protecting conservative voices they see as all-too-often excluded from public discourse.

Who are the combatants of late? In one corner, signatories to an open letter titled, A Letter on Justice and Open Debate, published July 7 inHarpers Magazine,include a number of the worlds best-known creative minds, such asJ.K. Rowling,Wynton Marsalis,Gloria Steinem,Salman Rushdieand about 150 other authors, journalists, publishers and artists.

In the other corner of this particular bout are those who signed this week onto another letter published on the online commentary site The Objective which self-identifies as a place with information and views by and for historically ignored communities another group of literary, media and artists. This missive entered the fray acknowledging the fight even reaches into its signatures area, noting some could be identified only generally, usually by professional occupation and place of work, because of fears of workplace retaliation by the established communication masters for whom some work.

Their view of theHarpersletter, in a piece titled, A More Specific Letter on Justice and Open Debate explains, Nowhere in it do the signatories mention how marginalized voices have been silenced for generations in journalism, academia and publishing and the letter does not deal with the problem of power: Who has it and who does not.

To be sure, many of latest blows in this intellectual boxing match have been struck via high-concept review of the theories of human communication and in well-founded critiques of who had and has access to tools of speaking out in public news media, book publishers, broadcasters and now social media companies.

But in the early rounds, the heavyweights punched the outmoded model of the marketplace of ideas for two reasons: One, that it never worked as intended because many minority groups, however defined, were denied access to speak and be heard a stark truth that cannot be denied; and two, there is such a thing as truth, and to knowingly permit non-truth is counter-productive to society and should not be permitted.

Boil it all down and it comes to a very simple First Amendment question: Is the response to speech you consider untruthful, disgusting or misleading more speech or less speech? If the former, what do you do as, with lightning speed and wide public acceptance by the unknowing, the web is flooded with true threats to public health, hate speech from white supremacists or deliberately misleading political ads and fraudulent electioneering from world adversaries?

If the latter, who gets to be the national nanny, defining truth, excluding some voices while inviting in others and monitoring the billions of social media posts each day all while remaining nonpartisan and apolitical in todays hyper-divided nation?

Wiser minds including, with hope, most of us will need to parse those questions and more as the First Amendments five freedoms (religion, speech, press, assembly and petition) are tested in court, on the street and occasionally on the pages of online magazines.

As for me, I theorize the nations founders would chuckle at the idea that all of this is new. The mechanisms of communications were different, but the goals in 1791 were the same: The exchange of ideas for a better life for us all, many at the time deemed too dangerous for society to hear ideas like all men are created equal and that democracy was favorable over monarchy.

While this fistfight is mainly staged in the mind, there are real-world examples of the cost of the fight.New York Timesop-ed editorBari Weissresigned the other day, saying in a letter she self-published that she was hired with the goal of bringing in voices that would not otherwise appear in your pages: first-time writers, centrists, conservatives and others who would not naturally think of theTimesas their home.

In leaving the paper after about three years, she said, a new consensus has emerged in the press, but perhaps especially at this paper: that truth isnt a process of collective discovery, but an orthodoxy already known to an enlightened few whose job is to inform everyone else.

Weiss concludes her resignation by noting founderAdolph Ochs1896 statement to make of the columns ofThe New York Timesa forum for the consideration of all questions of public importance, and to that end to invite intelligent discussion from all shades of opinion.

Ochss idea is one of the best Ive encountered, Weiss continues. And Ive always comforted myself with the notion that the best ideas win out. But ideas cannot win on their own. They need a voice. They need a hearing. Above all, they must be backed by people willing to live by them.

More of us need to make our voices heard in this latest fight over the meaning of the First Amendments 45 words, lest we see them reshaped or lost without having ever set foot in the ring.

. . .

Gene Policinski is a senior fellow for the First Amendment at the Freedom Forum, and president and chief operating officer of the Freedom Forum Institute. He can be reached at[emailprotected], or follow him on Twitter at@genefac.

Visit link:

First 5: Fighting over the meaning of First Amendment freedoms - Salina Post

Warren, city of Rochester sued over curfew – WXXI News

Stanley Martin, a lead organizer with Free the People Roc, an activist group thats recently been at the center of Rochesters Black Lives Matter movement, is suing Mayor Lovely Warren and the city of Rochester over the curfew enacted by the mayor on July 15. Shes joined in the suit by the Rochester chapter of the National Lawyers Guild.

In a lawsuit filed in federal court Friday, Martin and the Lawyers Guild ask the court to strike down the curfew, arguing that it violates the First Amendment right to free speech and the right to peaceably assemble. Additionally, the plaintiffs argue that because Warren implemented the order for the purpose of targeting people in Black and brown neighborhoods, it also violates the Equal Protection clause, reads the filing.

Warren ordered the curfew after a spate of violent incidents in the city. As they announced the curfew, city officials said that 20 people had been shot or stabbed over a two-week period. Warren noted that large parties preceded many of the incidents.

The mayor renewed the curfew Tuesday and has said shell continue to renew it every five days until the violence ceases.

The curfew prohibits gatherings of five or more people in public places -- including sidewalks and parks -- and 10 or more people gathered in private between the hours of 11 p.m. and 5 a.m. Anyone accused of violating the curfew can be charged with a misdemeanor.

We remain confident that the mayors order regarding public gatherings after 11 p.m. will withstand legal scrutiny, city spokesperson Justin Roj said Friday.

Free the People Roc, which has held weekly Black Lives Matter rallies in Rochester since May 30, held a protest against the curfew the day it was announced. It started at 11 p.m. in Martin Luther King Jr. Park and lasted until roughly 2 a.m., when police arrested 30 people and charged them with violating the curfew. According to the complaint, among those arrested were members of Free the People Roc and the Lawyers Guild, who were acting as legal observers.

Martin and the Lawyers Guild claim that those arrests violated their free speech rights. Theyre asking the court to order the city to refrain from interfering or otherwise policing lawful and peaceful assemblies and protests in the city of Rochester, to cease enforcement of the curfew, and for officers to refrain from covering their names and badge numbers when they are on duty, as well as to provide the name and badge number upon request.

The lawsuit alleges that when Katherine Adamides, a legal observer with the Lawyers Guild, tried to write down the names of 19 police officers lined up at the scene of the protest, 14 of them covered their names with tape, their hands, or their arms. Three of the officers, it claims, covered their badge numbers.

Jeremy Moule is CITY's news editor. He can be reached atjmoule@rochester-citynews.com.

Read more:

Warren, city of Rochester sued over curfew - WXXI News

Sketching augmented challenges posed to NATO and its eastern flank | Daily Sabah – Daily Sabah

With the world facing the perils of the COVID-19 pandemic, one cant turn away from the fact that a new set of security challenges might pop up following the crisis. The pandemic could also impact the dynamics within NATO as it holds the potential to augment the vulnerabilities of the Euro-Atlantic bloc, especially along the front line of the alliances eastern flank.

In the wake of increasing military threats from Russia, it is imperative for NATO to understand and access the upcoming threats and beef up its preparedness pertaining to the augmented challenges at hand.

What has unified the allies of NATO in the contemporary scenario has been Russias illegal annexation of Crimea and invasion of eastern Ukraine in 2014. These actions have called for an expansion of the alliance's defense mechanisms in order to protect its member states from the external threats that in todays world have expanded beyond the military domain to also include threats related to cybercrime, black propaganda and much more, which in unified form pose challenges that require a hybrid defense.

In all these years, ever since its foundation in 1949 with 12 member states, NATO has proved its relevance on all frontiers. However, disunity among member states, especially related to putting more focus on strengthening the alliances eastern or southern frontiers, has caused several disagreements and, from time to time, threatened the unity and integrity of NATO. It is imperative for all member states to understand that only as a unified whole could NATO significantly challenge the status quo posed by Russia along the eastern flank.

Russias aggression in 2014 resulted in NATO member states agreeing to double the Rapid Reaction Force, create an even faster Very High Readiness Joint Task Force, and increase defense budgets to 2% of the gross domestic product (GDP) by 2024. In recent years, so as to strengthen the eastern flank, member states of NATO, especially the U.S., have called for increased implementation of the 2014 deals. It is discouraging to note that only five member states, namely Poland, Romania, Greece, Latvia and Estonia, have lived up to this commitment of increasing defense expenditure to 2% of the GDP so far. Lithuania and Turkey come close to the 2% mark with 1.98% and 1.89%, respectively. To solve the logistical and infrastructural challenges in moving troops, tanks and equipment across Europe to the eastern flank, it is important for NATO members to agree to the establishment of a military Schengen.

When viewed across the canvas of augmented vulnerabilities, there is no denial of the fact that the Russian forces consider the nations along NATOs eastern flank, mostly the Baltic states of Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania, as the Achilles heel of NATO, thus increasing the need for member states to calculate the potential subversions that could take place either directly in terms of military engagement with Russia or by buying their goodwill through medical diplomacy.

Russias military presence in the Black Sea poses similar threats as its Baltic Sea military capabilities. Black Sea countries like Ukraine and Georgia could be encouraged to join NATO by invoking Article 10 which provides for the enlargement of the alliance. Turkey, Romania and Bulgaria are already member states.

With differences of opinion among NATO member states, especially pertaining to analyzing Russian threats, there has been shift in countries that are the nucleus of attention of NATO. Many member states think that Russia will not engage in any direct confrontation as it would then invoke Article 5 of NATO, which states that an attack on one member is considered an attack on them all.

Russia's Kaliningrad military buildups are seen as a counter to the eastern flank military deployment. Keeping in view the contemporary challenges, presenting a stronger deterrence is the need of the hour, focused on strengthening the military capabilities along the eastern flank and providing all assistance required to the nations along the front line of NATO's eastern frontier. It is even more imperative to present a unified picture of the NATO member states that especially calls for greater participation of the European family to augment their stature as being part of the alliance.

In contemporary times, Poland has significantly supplanted West Germany to become the centerpiece of NATOs anti-Russia defense and host to hundreds of thousands of U.S. and allied forces that have returned to Europe after Russias annexation of Crimea in 2014. Troops are placed on a rotational basis and not permanently. Currently, NATO has enhanced forward presence (EFP) in Estonia led by the U.K., in Latvia led by Canada, in Lithuania led by Germany, and in Poland led by the U.S. The return of the military troops closer to Russia projects the strengthened attitude of NATO.

Despite the difference, what has held member states together is the common political consensus that the eastern flank needs to be defended. Resilience to hybrid threats on several fronts, including the military domain and the cyber realm, is critical to strengthen NATOs preparedness to face the challenges of the contemporary era. In the wake of the realization that Russia is not to give up its toughened view against NATO and will continue its hybrid warfare, it is imperative for NATO to maintain unity and increase its deterrence on the eastern flank.

In order to brace themselves to be resilient to the challenges of the 21st century, which have been aggravated by the COVID-19 pandemic, NATO members must adopt the principles of unity, prevention and resilience to strengthen their approach toward the eastern flank.

*Politician from Poland, Former vice-president of European Parliament, Minister of European Affairs and Minister in Prime Minister Office

Read the original post:

Sketching augmented challenges posed to NATO and its eastern flank | Daily Sabah - Daily Sabah

Trump’s troop drawdown from Germany will take ‘years,’ says Inhofe – DefenseNews.com

WASHINGTON and COLOGNE, Germany U.S. President Donald Trumps goal to withdraw 10,000 American troops from Germany will take years to execute, according to Senate Armed Services Committee Chairman Jim Inhofe, R-Okla.

Inhofes disclosure, after he was briefed by Pentagon officials on the plans, suggests there wouldnt be the hasty pullout critics feared, but a more drawn-out approach. The troops are potentially a quick-reaction force against Russia and can be deployed rapidly to the Middle East and Africa.

It is clear to me that this concept will take months to plan, and years to execute, Inhofe said in a statement after the briefing Wednesday. Rigorous planning and deliberate implementation of this concept is the best way to give our military families a measure of certainty and ensure they receive the care and support they deserve.

Trump administration officials have been planning for the last two months to begin a major drawdown of troops from the NATO ally, to include shifting at least 9,500 personnel to other bases overseas or in the United States, and to cap the total number of U.S. troops stationed there at 25,000. The total is almost 35,000 now, and the troop cap is 50,000.

Officials have suggested the move is designed to reduce the U.S. footprint in a single overseas allied country and instead spread out American response forces some farther east for more strategic flexibility. Critics say the move would undermine Americas commitment to the NATO alliance and risk a key hub for training and staging forces.

Trump initiated the move in part because he believes Germany isnt spending enough on national defense, and that European countries are taking advantage of American military might.

Lowering the troop cap as the administration plans would significantly undermine the capacity to rotate in U.S. forces for reinforcement or training, according to former U.S. Ambassador to NATO Ivo Daalder, now president of the Chicago Council on Global Affairs. The decision, overall, appeared to be driven by presidential pique, he said, and not an assessment of how to achieve Americas national security goals.

Sign up for our Early Bird Brief Get the defense industry's most comprehensive news and information straight to your inbox

Subscribe

Enter a valid email address (please select a country) United States United Kingdom Afghanistan Albania Algeria American Samoa Andorra Angola Anguilla Antarctica Antigua and Barbuda Argentina Armenia Aruba Australia Austria Azerbaijan Bahamas Bahrain Bangladesh Barbados Belarus Belgium Belize Benin Bermuda Bhutan Bolivia Bosnia and Herzegovina Botswana Bouvet Island Brazil British Indian Ocean Territory Brunei Darussalam Bulgaria Burkina Faso Burundi Cambodia Cameroon Canada Cape Verde Cayman Islands Central African Republic Chad Chile China Christmas Island Cocos (Keeling) Islands Colombia Comoros Congo Congo, The Democratic Republic of The Cook Islands Costa Rica Cote D'ivoire Croatia Cuba Cyprus Czech Republic Denmark Djibouti Dominica Dominican Republic Ecuador Egypt El Salvador Equatorial Guinea Eritrea Estonia Ethiopia Falkland Islands (Malvinas) Faroe Islands Fiji Finland France French Guiana French Polynesia French Southern Territories Gabon Gambia Georgia Germany Ghana Gibraltar Greece Greenland Grenada Guadeloupe Guam Guatemala Guinea Guinea-bissau Guyana Haiti Heard Island and Mcdonald Islands Holy See (Vatican City State) Honduras Hong Kong Hungary Iceland India Indonesia Iran, Islamic Republic of Iraq Ireland Israel Italy Jamaica Japan Jordan Kazakhstan Kenya Kiribati Korea, Democratic People's Republic of Korea, Republic of Kuwait Kyrgyzstan Lao People's Democratic Republic Latvia Lebanon Lesotho Liberia Libyan Arab Jamahiriya Liechtenstein Lithuania Luxembourg Macao Macedonia, The Former Yugoslav Republic of Madagascar Malawi Malaysia Maldives Mali Malta Marshall Islands Martinique Mauritania Mauritius Mayotte Mexico Micronesia, Federated States of Moldova, Republic of Monaco Mongolia Montserrat Morocco Mozambique Myanmar Namibia Nauru Nepal Netherlands Netherlands Antilles New Caledonia New Zealand Nicaragua Niger Nigeria Niue Norfolk Island Northern Mariana Islands Norway Oman Pakistan Palau Palestinian Territory, Occupied Panama Papua New Guinea Paraguay Peru Philippines Pitcairn Poland Portugal Puerto Rico Qatar Reunion Romania Russian Federation Rwanda Saint Helena Saint Kitts and Nevis Saint Lucia Saint Pierre and Miquelon Saint Vincent and The Grenadines Samoa San Marino Sao Tome and Principe Saudi Arabia Senegal Serbia and Montenegro Seychelles Sierra Leone Singapore Slovakia Slovenia Solomon Islands Somalia South Africa South Georgia and The South Sandwich Islands Spain Sri Lanka Sudan Suriname Svalbard and Jan Mayen Swaziland Sweden Switzerland Syrian Arab Republic Taiwan, Province of China Tajikistan Tanzania, United Republic of Thailand Timor-leste Togo Tokelau Tonga Trinidad and Tobago Tunisia Turkey Turkmenistan Turks and Caicos Islands Tuvalu Uganda Ukraine United Arab Emirates United Kingdom United States United States Minor Outlying Islands Uruguay Uzbekistan Vanuatu Venezuela Viet Nam Virgin Islands, British Virgin Islands, U.S. Wallis and Futuna Western Sahara Yemen Zambia Zimbabwe

Thanks for signing up!

By giving us your email, you are opting in to the Early Bird Brief.

Where was the interagency process that led to this decision, Daalder said. Its the way this administration operates, which is they say lets do this, and then they figure it out.

A staunch ally of the president, Inhofe appeared to part with other hawkish Republicans in announcing his support for the presidents sound approach to realigning U.S. military posture in Europe. Inhofe has said he supports a lily-pad approach to basing and mentioned Ukraine, Bulgaria and Romania as other locations to consider.

But Inhofe also hedged by emphasizing military families, whose lives would be upended by a rapid withdrawal.

We need to maintain a strong presence in Europe to deter Russia, sustain a flexible platform for projecting power into other theaters like Africa and minimize the impact of these changes on military families who already sacrifice so much for our country, he said.

Still, the matter is expected to be a friction point in talks between the Senate and the House to reconcile their annual defense policy bills. The House-passed version included bipartisan language rebuking the withdrawal plans, while the Senate did not take up a similar, bipartisan amendment led by Sen. Mitt Romney, R-Utah.

Both Democrats and Republicans on Capitol Hill have expressed concerns about the plan. Twenty-two GOP members of the House Armed Services Committee sent a letter to Trump last month stating that the current troop levels in Germany have helped make America safer.

The Senate-approved bill included a requirement that the Pentagon report to Congress on allies annual military spending, based on an amendment from Sen. Mike Lee, R-Utah. The annual report would have to cover the common defense contributions of NATO countries and other allies, including Gulf Cooperation Council countries, Australia, Japan, South Korea and New Zealand.

The House and Senate bills also express a sense that Congress wants the Baltic states of Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania to model NATO allies in terms of burden sharing, and the two pieces of legislation encourage the U.S. to pursue a coordinated plan for those countries continued security.

The House-passed State Department spending bill includes $11.4 million each in foreign military financing for Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania, with $115 million for Ukraine and $35 million for Georgia.

Meanwhile, leaders in Berlin seem to have made peace with the idea that the White House may actually go ahead with a repositioning of U.S. troops out of Germany, as U.S. Army Secretary Ryan McCarthy has called the move.

Officials in Europe initially shrugged off the drawdown rhetoric, first reported in the United States in early June, simply because the Trump administration had left them completely in the dark. The fear now is that a reconfiguration of the U.S. footprint on the continent could effectively lead to a net decrease of troops, whether in Germany or elsewhere.

The decisive question for Europe and NATO is whether these troops will be removed from Europe or not, German Defence Minister Annegret Kramp-Karrenbauer said during a trip to Bratislava, Slovakia, at a July 17 event organized by the Globsec think tank.

Were not exactly happy when our American friends leave us, she said. Thats the one thing. But it wont lead to German security collapsing.

She stressed that Germany and Poland, which has been mentioned as a potential host for the forces slated to leave Germany, should be speaking with one voice as Pentagon leaders finalize their plans. Polish leaders have made clear that any plus-ups of Americans in their country would be undesirable if the price is a drawdown in another part of the alliance, she added.

Therefore, the issue is not a drag on our bilateral relations, Kramp-Karrenbauer said of the Berlin-Warsaw rapport.

Leo Shane III contributed to this report.

Read the rest here:

Trump's troop drawdown from Germany will take 'years,' says Inhofe - DefenseNews.com

Emmanuel Macrons EU army dream crushed as nonsense plan – Who would be in charge? – Daily Express

Speaking to Express.co.uk, the fomer SNP deputy leader claimed a European army will always remain a dream and would never become reality for French President Emmanuel Macron. The Brexiteer argued that in the construction of an EU army, member states would not even manage to agree on who would be in charge of the military operation. Mr Sillars argued the project could never mimic NATO as it would lack a key member state like the US powerful enough to fund it.

He said: "I think the elite will use every problem to argue for further integration towards the United States of Europe, and I think that's inevitable because it has been the elite's objective ever since the treaty of Rome was saying that back in the 1950s.

"But I'm not sure that they will accomplish it in the way that it would be necessary for Macron's idea of a European army.

"I don't think in reality that the member states would be willing to actually pay for a European army that could project force in the world domain.

"And I think that's one of the dreams of Macron that will not come true. And if you look at how you would construct a European army, you run into an immediate problem: who would be the chief of staff?

"Well, it wouldn't be someone from Greece because, you know, France wouldn't have that.

"It wouldn't be someone from Italy because French and Germany wouldn't have that.

READ MORE:Macron suffers bitter failure as French President attacked over EU

"France may go along with the Germans but would the Germans go along with other nations?

"What about Poland? The more you think of the attempt to construct a European army, what a nonsense it is.

"And if you take that by comparison with NATO, why does NATO manages to operate as a single organisation made up of a number of countries?

"It is because they have one supreme organisation in it that handles the big money and takes control of the logistics and the command.

"That's the United States. You couldn't have a mimicked image of NATO inside the European Union.

"So I say it's dream times for Macron and not realistic times."

Officials in the trade bloc have long spoken of a European army in order to push Brussels geopolitical position in the world. Funding for a European Defence Fund has also been included in the new Multiannual Financial Framework (MFF).

Earlier this month, Germany's CDU and SCU parliamentary groups foreign policy spokesman, Jurgen Hardt insisted the EU must be more capable of action.

He said: It is important that the EU itself becomes more capable of action and that it cannot only respond effectively to crises in its own neighbourhood, but also act preventively.

Our American friends expect the same from us.

They are less and less willing to play a part in order to regulate regions that they consider to be far away, but which are immediate neighbourhoods for us.

We have to build our own civil-military leadership structure that can control EU operations.

We have to divide the tasks even more clearly among the EU member states, which makes the use of resources more efficient.

DON'T MISS:Macron suffers bitter failure as French President attacked over EU[REACTION]'Desperate' Macron braces for more 'rancorous' divisions in EU[VIDEO]French PM planned NEW treaty with Germany to keep Britain in EU[INSIGHT]

And we have to build interoperable weapon systems.

We want to gradually integrate the armed forces of the EU member states so that we create a European army in the long term through an army of Europeans.

The defence scheme would receive 8billion (7.1billion) in the mammoth 1.1trillion MFF.

This came before and despite the EU facing a severe financial crisis following the coronavirus pandemic.

Mr Hardt, however, indicated any European army would be to supplement NATO rather than replace it.

Originally posted here:

Emmanuel Macrons EU army dream crushed as nonsense plan - Who would be in charge? - Daily Express

NATO Chief believes movies should release in theaters despite the pandemic – JoBlo.com

The head of the National Theatre Owners Association, John Fithian, declares that theaters need to stay open and he believes that studios delaying films in the wake of the COVID-19 pandemic is not helping matters.

Movie theaters initially closed their doors back in March and recently things have gradually begun to change. Theaters in China have reopened recently but this was after opening after some believed was a bit too early which resulted in their closure again before opening again last weekend. Of the 5,000 or so theaters in the States, about 1200-1500 have reopened, with mostly drive-ins bringing in most of the business. More theaters were on their way to reopening but as the nation continues to hit record-breaking numbers in terms of cases and deaths due to the coronavirus, many states have forced the closure of theaters and other public venues. It's a very messy situation that has led to films like Christopher Nolan's TENET, delaying its release indefinitely.

John Fithian became the latest person to add fuel to this debate and it was sparked when he was asked by "Variety" about Warner Bros.' decision to move TENET from its August 12 release date to a presumed later date in 2020. Fithian emphasized that until a coronavirus vaccine is found, theaters cannot open to 100% capacity and he believes this is the reason that studios and theaters should begin to deal with the "new normal" and just open and release films as planned:

On the one hand, I think he has a point. It seems like the studios are waiting for some kind of miracle where the big box office markets open up again and they can make the necessary money off their expensive tentpole releases. They're patiently waiting for Los Angeles and New York City to give approval for their theaters to open but that has yet to be the case, which is why TENET delayed its release again and will be likely why other releases will follow suit. It seems as if Fithian is saying that bringing in some money is better than bringing in no money so studios and theaters should maintain their dates and just adjust to whatever money can make until things gradually get back to normal again. Is this financially feasible for a studio to do this? Probably not but the longer they wait to open films, it's going to kneecap the theaters out there that are waiting to distribute these releases. AMC, Regal, and Cinemark seemto be banking on films like TENET in order to get back into the game but studios are clearly focusing their efforts on the markets that will make them the most money and with Los Angeles and New York City out of play as of now, they don't want to seem to budge until these players are part of the box office conversation again.

Do YOU agree that studios should maintain release dates and open films in theaters that happen to be open or is it smart to wait it out?

The rest is here:

NATO Chief believes movies should release in theaters despite the pandemic - JoBlo.com