Caribbean Entertianment News – 10 Things To Know About This Caribbean Singer Lost To COVID-19 – Caribbean and Latin America Daily News – News Americas

By NAN ET Editor

News Americas, NEW YORK, NY, Fri. July 24, 2020: The Caribbean lost one of its legendary singers to COVID-19 this week. Legendary Jamaican born singer and producer, Dobby Dobson, died on Tuesday, July 21, 2020 at age 78 in Fort Lauderdale, Florida from complications of COVID-19. Here are 10 things to know about this iconic singer.

1: Dobson was born Highland Dobson on July 5, 1942 in Kingston, Jamaica. He began singing while a student at Central Branch School in Kingston and at Kingston College, where he sang in the chapel choir, and successfully took part in Vere Johns Opportunity Hour talent contest as a member of The Twilights. While at Kingston College he wrote the doo-wop song Cry a Little Cry as a tribute to his biology teacher.

2: Dobson then recruited a group of schoolmates from the Delta stream at the college to back him on a recording of the song, under the name the Dobby Dobson and the Deltas on Lyndon and Sonia Pottingers Tip-Top label in 1959.

3: Leaving school in 1959, Dobson went on record with Charles Josephs as part of the duo Chuck and Dobby, before becoming a solo artist in the early 1960s.

4: He later moved on to work with both Coxsone Dodd and Duke Reid, recording as a member of both The Virtues and The Sheiks, and recorded Loving Pauper with Reid, which became his signature tune.

5: Despite his musical success, Dobson kept his job as a salesman and proof-reader for The Jamaica Gleaner. In 1971, he recorded That Wonderful Sound for Rupie Edwards, which sold over 40,000 copies in the Caribbean, and was followed up by the equally successful Endlessly, which was also a minor hit on the UK Singles Chart.

6: Disappointing album sales led Dobson to move into production, including The Meditations late 1970s albums Message From The Meditations and Wake Up, as well as early work by Barrington Levy.

7: In 1979, Dobson emigrated to New York City, where he worked in real estate, although he would still occasionally visit the recording studio, and performed at both the Reggae Sunsplash and the Reggae Sumfest festivals.

8: He continued to be popular with international fans, doing many live performances and covers. He later became a born-again Christian and recorded several gospel albums.

9: Over the course of his career, he released 27 albums including the last in 2012, titled, Im Just No Body and Desperation.

10: A year before, on August 6, 2011, the Governor-General of Jamaica conferred the Order of Distinction in the rank of Officer (OD) upon Dobson, for his contribution to reggae music and representation of Jamaican culture. Minister of Culture, Gender, Entertainment and Sport, Olivia Grange on Thursday expressed sadness at the passing of Dobson, stating: He will be greatly missed by us all and I wish to express condolences to his relatives, friends and associates.

See Dobson in a live performance here.

Continue reading here:

Caribbean Entertianment News - 10 Things To Know About This Caribbean Singer Lost To COVID-19 - Caribbean and Latin America Daily News - News Americas

Panama withdraws as host of 2022 Central American and Caribbean Games – Insidethegames.biz

Panama has withdrawn as host of the 2022 Central American and Caribbean Games due to the COVID-19 pandemic.

Central American and Caribbean Sports Organization (CACSO) President Luis Mejia Oviedo criticised Panamanian authorities for relaying the decision to media first, rather than the body responsible for the event.

Oviedo said he had recently received a letter from Eduardo Cerda, the general director of the Government agency for sport in the country, confirming Panama's commitment to hosting the Games.

Panama is the Central American country with the highest number of deaths and infections from coronavirus.

More than 57,000 people in Panama have contracted COVID-19, resulting in at least 1,250 deaths.

"For CACSO, health comes first, and we have always been in contact with the Organising Committee to find ways to solve the Games and allow Panama to guarantee the health of its population," Oviedo, a member of the International Olympic Committee, said.

"I am surprised and disappointed that the authorities did not have the professionalism to even coordinate such important information with our organisation."

Panama's withdrawal has forced the CACSO to find a new host for the event and Oviedo said the Games would still take place in 2022.

The CACSO Executive Committee is scheduled to meet this weekend to discuss the process for selecting the replacement hosts.

The Central American and Caribbean Games have been held every four years since 1998.

Barranquilla in Colombia staged the last edition of the event in 2018.

View post:

Panama withdraws as host of 2022 Central American and Caribbean Games - Insidethegames.biz

Pirate Of The Caribbean Reboot: 5 Things We Want To See (5 We Don’t) – Screen Rant

The Pirates of the Caribbean franchise has been one of Disney's most successful, with five movies all of which did incredibly well at the box office. While they have certainly been varied in terms of quality, there's no doubt that the films themself have been very entertaining overall.

RELATED:15 Movies To Watch If You Love Pirates Of The Caribbean

However, the franchise is now expected to be taking a new turn with the sixth instalment. A reboot appears to be happening with fresh characters and storylines injecting new life into the franchise. But what should Disney do and what should they avoid with this reboot?

The pirate world is one full of mythology, with different creatures such as the Kraken being perfect examples of monsters that have been written about for years. The franchise has done a good job at bringing some of them to life, but there are still plenty left.

It would be great to see more mythology from the world of pirates explored, mainly because it has always been a key component in the franchise to this point. They play a great difference into the movies, not just being reliant on the pirates themselves.

Will Turner was the perfect hero within the Pirates of the Caribbean franchise as he went from being anti-pirates to being a proud one following in his father's footsteps. However, that doesn't mean that the same type of story needs to be told again.

RELATED:Pirates of the Caribbean: 10 Worst Things Will Turner Did, Ranked

The reboot shouldn't bring back Will Turner or anything to do with his character, but it's also important not to create another similar storyline to what his was. That's one storyline that should stand alone, with something fresh being used instead.

The trajectory that Pirates of the Caribbean was taking was one where the world of pirates was beginning to die out. It was coming closer towards a modern way of life, rather than building up the pirate world and while that allowed for some fun storylines, a total reboot could change that.

Going back to the past to a time when pirates dominated the season without any navy involvement could be a really interesting way of starting a new set of movies. It would mean some totally new storylines could be told, which would help freshen things up.

One of the big problems that the Pirates of the Caribbean franchise had was that characters very rarely actually died. While it is a family adventure movie, the fact people kept on returning from death really did take away from the stakes of major action moments.

It's something that people don't want to see again and while the film doesn't need to turn into an incredibly bloody and violent film that sees tons of deaths, there should be at least some believability with people when their time comes to an end.

One of the reasons that the franchise has been as successful as it has been is down to the comedic elements that take place throughout the movie. Pirate movies can be quite serious and gritty, focusing too heavily on the action without providing some laughs to entertain audiences.

RELATED:Every Pirates of the Caribbean Movie Ranked Worst To Best

But that was never a problem with this franchise. There were always a few comedy moments throughout that ensured the films were suitable for the whole family, and any reboot should keep that same tone as it's something Disney got spot on.

At the same time, while it is important to keep some funny moments within the film, it also doesn't want to be a full-on comedic movie. Audiences need to be able to take things seriously and there should be some elements of action, emotion, and scares.

Making it a complete comedy would be a wrong turn for the franchise as it has proven to be so popular by striking the perfect balance between fun and seriousness. Audiences aren't clamouring for more laughs in the franchise, just a more compelling tale.

Something the Pirates franchise has done well is create compelling and interesting villains. Each film has a strong character that is easy to hate, which has helped make each movie feel very important. However, at the same time, Disney has relied on bringing back the same characters several times.

RELATED:Johnny Depp's 10 Highest-Grossing Movies, Ranked According To Box Office Mojo

If Disney truly wants to reboot the franchise, then it is important to give it a totally fresh start in the villain department. We don't need to see a character who has a history with the franchise, it's time for something new and equally as terrifying as what has come before.

Jack Sparrow is obviously the most recognisable character from this world, and if he isn't going to return then it's easy to see why Disney might want to create a 'new' version of him. Whether it was with a younger pirate hoping to be like him or something less obvious, by just having a character with similar mannerisms.

There is never going to be a character as strong as this, therefore pivoting and trying out different pirate mannerisms instead of him would be a much better idea.

Anyone who has been on Pirates of the Caribbean ride will know about Redd. She's been a core character of the ride throughout and she was changed several years ago to have a more prominent, female-empowering role. Because of that, it would be good to see this character become the lead for the reboot.

A female lead has been rumored, and considering that this franchise all came from the ride in the first place, it would be nice to see Disney once again go back to the attraction for inspiration. It would help enhance the character within the ride and is something Disney could then use further in the theme parks, making for a more cohesive experience all around.

It's almost impossible to imagine a Pirates of the Caribbean movie without Captain Jack Sparrow, but that in itself is part of the problem. The franchise can't move forwards or feel fresh again while he's still in the world and while he's an incredible character, it's best that he doesn't appear in the reboot.

While the film is expected to have a female lead for the first time, Captain Jack hasn't been ruled out for making appearances. However, to give a new lead the full attention they deserve, it would be wise to keep him out of this one, allowing the character to rest.

NEXT:Pirates Of The Caribbean: 5 Ways To Reboot The Franchise (& 5 Reasons It Should Be Left Alone)

Next 10 Awesome Pieces Of Thor Fan Art We Love

Here is the original post:

Pirate Of The Caribbean Reboot: 5 Things We Want To See (5 We Don't) - Screen Rant

Remnants Of Gonzalo Moving Across The Far Southeast Caribbean – WJXT News4JAX

Location 125 miles WNW of Trinidad Wind 35 mph Heading W at 21 mph Pressure 29.86 Coordinates 63.0W, 11.0N Discussion

At 500 p.m. AST (2100 UTC), the remnants of Gonzalo were located near latitude 11.0 north, longitude 63.0 west. The remnants of Gonzalo are forecast to move generally westward across the southern Caribbean for the next couple of days.

Maximum sustained winds are near 35 mph (55 km/h) with higher gusts. Gusty conditions associated with squalls will be possible as the remnants of Gonzalo move westward.

The estimated minimum central pressure is 1011 mb (29.86 inches).

There are no coastal watches or warnings in effect.

Wind: gusty conditions associated with squalls will be possible across portions of the southern Caribbean as the remnants of Gonzalo move westward during the next couple of days.

Rainfall: the remnants of Gonzalo are expected to produce additional rainfall amounts of 1 to 2 inches, and isolated storm total amounts of 4 inches over far northeastern Venezuela through this evening. The system is also expected to produce 1 to 2 inches of rain over the leeward antilles and the remainder of far northern Venezuela. This includes Aruba, bonaire, and Curacao.

Go here to see the original:

Remnants Of Gonzalo Moving Across The Far Southeast Caribbean - WJXT News4JAX

A couple is finally going home after their 5-day Caribbean vacation turned into a 5-month coronavirus lockdown – MSN Money

James Ohliger and Romane Recalde traveled to the Turks and Caicos Islands in March for a five-day vacation.

But when the local government decided to close its borders until July in order to curb the spread of the coronavirus, the couple's five-day trip turned into a five-month quarantine.

During this time, many Turks and Caicos businesses that rely on tourism have suffered.

"The island is completely dead," Ohliger, cofounder of Jerry Media, told Business Insider Today. "All the reservations canceled. The beach is basically a private beach for us and everything shut down."

The Turks and Caicos Islands, which saw over 1.5 million tourists in 2019, is expected to lose $22 million a month because of the lockdown. The islands' economy is based almost entirely on tourism, particularly from the United States.

Ohliger, who has traveled there for the past 33 years, said it's been hard to see so many people out of work. His friend, Kamario Smith, normally works as a bartender at the Ocean Club Resort on the island ofProvidenciales, and called the impact "very, very devastating."

The couple plans to return to New York on July 22, the day Turks and Caicos reopens its borders.

Video: Meet the 'Airbnb for pools': Swimply dives into the stay-at-home market (CNBC)

UP NEXT

More:

A couple is finally going home after their 5-day Caribbean vacation turned into a 5-month coronavirus lockdown - MSN Money

Julio Villafae Joins Ribbon as Vice President of Sales for the Caribbean and Latin America Region – Telecom Reseller

Villafae brings more than 25 years of experience in building and driving revenue growth for global brands

Westford, MA July 22, 2020 Ribbon Communications Inc.(Nasdaq: RBBN), a global provider of real time communications software and network solutions to service providers, enterprises, and critical infrastructure sectors, today announced that Julio Villafae has joined the company as Vice President of Sales for the Caribbean and Latin America (CALA) region. Villafae will be responsible for leading and driving Ribbons revenue growth and business development efforts in the CALA region.

Julio is highly regarded in the industry and brings a strong track record of building high performance go-to-market organizations and delivering excellent sales results in CALA for world-class brands, said Steven Bruny, Executive Vice President of Sales of the Americas Region for Ribbon. Julios strategic relationships with service provider executives in CALA, his value-selling approach and proven ability to merge and lead sales teams will greatly benefit our customers in the region. We are excited to welcome Julio to the Ribbon family.

I am looking forward to leveraging my experience, relationships, and overall background to help Ribbon continue to build its brand awareness and growth in the region, said Villafae. Ribbon is in a great position to capitalize on the numerous market opportunities the dynamic CALA region presents, and I am excited to be a part of the team.

Mr. Villafae has more than 25 years of international business experience, which includes leading sales and business development efforts for world-class organizations like Motorola, Cisco, Harris, SES and Inmarsat in the CALA region. His experience also includes opening offices in Argentina, Brazil and Mexico as well as leading the establishment of manufacturing facilities in Brazil.

About RibbonRibbon Communications (Nasdaq: RBBN), which recently merged with ECI Telecom Group, delivers global communications software and network solutions to service providers, enterprises and critical infrastructure sectors. We engage deeply with our customers, helping them modernize their networks for improved competitive positioning and business outcomes in todays smart, always-on and data-hungry world. Our innovative, end-to-end solutions portfolio delivers unparalleled scale, performance, and agility, including core to edge IP solutions, UCaaS/ CPaaS cloud offers, leading-edge software security and analytics tools, as well as packet and optical networking leveraging ECIs Elastic Network technology. To learn more about Ribbon visitrbbn.comand for more information about our packet and optical networking portfolio visitecitele.com.

Important Information Regarding Forward-Looking Statements

The information in this release contains forward-looking statements regarding future events that involve risks and uncertainties. All statements other than statements of historical facts contained in this release are forward-looking statements. The actual results of Ribbon Communications may differ materially from those contemplated by the forward-looking statements. For further information regarding risks and uncertainties associated with Ribbon Communications business, please refer to the Risk Factors section of Ribbon Communications most recent annual or quarterly report filed with the SEC. Any forward-looking statements represent Ribbon Communications views only as of the date on which such statement is made and should not be relied upon as representing Ribbon Communications views as of any subsequent date. While Ribbon Communications may elect to update forward-looking statements at some point, Ribbon Communications specifically disclaims any obligation to do so.

Here is the original post:

Julio Villafae Joins Ribbon as Vice President of Sales for the Caribbean and Latin America Region - Telecom Reseller

The Politics of Pandemics – NewsClick

Representational image. | Image Courtesy: UZreport.uz

When we think of epidemics, smallpox comes to mind, but we remember it as a disease which was successfully eradicated by a vaccine; but it was also a virus used as a weapon for biological warfare 33 years before the vaccine was invented.

In India, we have grown up listening to stories of dreaded diseases and every family has a memory of some epidemic or the other. The most dreaded was the smallpox, a disease for which the only cure seemed to be desperate prayers to Sheetla Mata, the goddess of smallpox'.

Smallpox was one of the deadliest diseases known to humans and it affected people around the globe. But the history of smallpox holds a unique place in the history of medical sciences; it is the only human disease to have been eradicated by vaccination.

The smallpox vaccine was the first successful vaccine to be developed. It was introduced by Edward Jenner (1749-1823. He observed that milkmaids, who previously had caught cowpox, did not catch smallpox.

The global eradication effort initially used a strategy of mass vaccination campaigns to achieve 80% vaccine coverage in each country, and thereafter by case-finding, followed by ring vaccination of all known and possible contacts to seal off the outbreak from the rest of the population.

The vaccine was discovered in 1796 and in 1980 the World Health Organisation (WHO) announced that the disease had been successfully eradicated from the world.

While so much effort had gone into the eradication of the dreaded disease, there were some people who saw the smallpox as a weapon for war; a weapon to defeat their enemies. In other words, smallpox was used as a biological weapon.

Sir Jeffrey Amherst, the commander of the British forces in North America, deliberately used smallpox to diminish the native American population hostile to the British. An outbreak of smallpox in Fort Pitt provided Amherst with the means to execute his plan. On June 24, 1763, Captain Ecuyer, one of Amhersts subordinate officers, gifted the Native Americans with smallpox-infected blankets from the smallpox hospital. He recorded in his journal: I hope it will have the desired effect. As a result, a large outbreak of smallpox occurred among the Native American tribes in the Ohio River Valley.

This was not the first use of a biological weapon in history and unfortunately not the last.

Biological warfare (BW)also known as germ warfarehas been defined as the use of biological toxins or infectious agents such as bacteria, viruses, insects, and fungi with the intent to kill or incapacitate humans, animals or plants as an act of war. The use of biological weapons is prohibited under customary international humanitarian law, as well as several international treaties. The use of biological agents in armed conflict is a war crime.

Biological warfare was banned by the 1972 Biological Weapons Convention (BWC). The Convention was the result of prolonged efforts by the international community to establish a new instrument that would supplement the 1925 Geneva Protocol, which prohibits the use but not possession or development of chemical and biological weapons.

The same year the Convention was passed by the United Nations, a young scientist-turned-journalist by the name of Dr K S Jayaraman (born 1936) read about some strange experiments on mosquito control being conducted in villages outside Delhi.

When Jayaraman contacted Rajendra Pal in WHO about the project since the international organisation was associated with it, he was told that there were orders from the WHO Director-General not to discuss the project with the Indian press. Dr. Pal showed Jayaraman a confidential letter addressed to Mr. Willard at WHO regional office in Delhi which said the project is considered sensitive to the Indian Press.

Jayaraman left the room, telling Dr. Pal that under these conditions, he could only write what he knew and the WHO Director-Generals injunction to keep Genetic Control Mosquito Unit (GCMU) out of the Indian press.

At this point Dr. Pal invited the correspondent back again and agreed to an interview. The interview ended with the first question of Jayaraman, namely, the reason why GCMU was studying yellow fever mosquitoes instead of malarial mosquitoes. As everyone knows, India does not have yellow fever.

Jayaraman was the science correspondent for the Press Trust of India, which was headed at the time by the formidable C Raghavan. I remember clearly that Raghavan had come to see my father, who had just retired from the Prime Ministers Office, to tell him about these experiments.

A Google search revealed that the New Scientist of October 9, 1975, carried a news report with a headline: Germ War allegations force WHO out of Indian mosquito project

The report stated: The PAC report declares that the Genetic Control of Mosquitoes Research Unit (GCMRU) project has been ill conceived and is of no utility whatsoever to India. It does, however, have a vital and direct bearing on biological warfare or is likely that the ultimate and only beneficiary of the GLMO experiment is the US machine.

However, the original PAC reports cannot be found on the internet so I wrote to Raghavan, now more than 90 years old, to ask whether my memory was right and he had indeed told my father about these bizarre experiments.

We did some extensive investigations - the PTI Science Correspondent, K.S.Jayaraman, and I - and did an expose of several foreign-funded "research" activities in India, most US-funded (PL-480 funds), and with some military significance, including biological warfare. We were denounced in Parliament by Health Minister Karan Singh, but inquiries by two Public Accounts Committees, vindicated us. I am attaching summary of their findings.

The PAC report is very lengthy but the first paragraph of the Conclusions shows how extensive were the experiments which were being conducted and how many institutions were involved in the projects under the auspices of the WHO.

7.1.1. The examination by the Committee of some of the research projects in the country conducted in collaboration with foreign organisations raise a number of interesting questions. The Committee find that the Genetic Control of Mosquitoes Unit Project, the bird migration and arbovirus studies at the Bombay Natural History Society, the Ultra Low Volume Spray experiments for Urban malaria control at Jodhpur, the Pantnagar Microbial Pesticides Project and some of the research projects undertaken in West Bengal and Nargwal in collaboration with the John Hopkins University establish beyond doubt a definite pattern. This is that agencies of foreign governments, in some cases explicitly military agencies of those governments (as in the case of the collaboration between the Bombay Natural History Society and the Miugratory Animal Pathological Survey - MAPS - of the United States Armed Forces Institute of Pathology have been conducting basic research through Indian scientists and Indian scientific organisations.

Even in cases where such research is carried out in collaboration with philanthropic civilian organisations from abroad, the Committee find that some of these civilian organisations also have active liaison and communication at several levels with military agencies. No doubt, some of these research programmes have been shown as developmental or basic research. These projects, however, have been closely concerned with the collection of vital viral, epidemiological or ecological data, which are well capable of being used against the security of the country and that of our neighbouring countries.

The utility of some of these projects to India, especially the Genetic Control of Mosquitoes Unit project seems to be only doubtful or potential, whereas the primary data obtained from these projects are likely to be of vital importance to foreign governments interested in developing techniques of chemical, biological, bacteriological, herbicdal and anti-subversive warfare.

These revelations exposed the Ministry of Healths complicity in these projects. The Minister of Health at the time was Karan Singh.

Among the documents Raghavan sent to me was a letter from Jyotirmoy Basu (CPI(M) Member of Parliament) to Prime Minister Indira Gandhi which was an annexure to the PAC report.

Letter from PAC Chairman, Jyotirmoy Basu, to Prime Minister of India, vide para 2 above (PAC167-p225)

New Delhi, 31st January, 1975

Dear Mrs. Gandhi

The G.C.M.U. Programme has given rise to serious suspicion in my mind. I have tried to collect information from various unconnected sources and I have come to the conclusion that this programme has been financed by P.L.480 for execution through WHO and is primarily meant for the three things mentioned below:

(1) To carry on certain experiments in India which are harmful to the population and which are not allowed to be done in their own country i.e. U.S.A.

(2) They are experimenting and keeping things in readiness in case the U.S.A. Government ever wanted to wage a chemical, bacteriological or virus warfare against this country.

(3) To prepare themselves to wage a chemical, bacteriological or virus warfare against another country keeping India as base.

The agreement between P.L.480 Fund Administrator and W.H.O. has expired on 31 December 1974. In spite of that this is continuing and out of these experiments all the results and findings will be the property of U.S. Government. To make sure that this does not progress any more, I am writing this because I am very apprehensive of this programme and I am doing in the best interests of the country and the people.

I earnestly suggest that a thorough probe should be done by the most competent Intelligence Agency at your command.

Yours sincerely,

(Jyotirmoy Basu)

Mrs. Indira Gandhi

Prime Minister of India

New Delhi.

Because of the timely intervention and persistence of several journalists, including Raghavan and Jayaraman, the projects were wound up. But research in biological warfare, no doubt, continues and the threat it poses is greater today than it was in 1975.

There have been many conspiracy theories suggesting that the novel coronavirus is linked to biological warfare. There are many conspiracy theories, some even link US tech magnate Bill Gates to having an interest in the spread of the virus. A briefing prepared for the European Parliament in April 2020 alleged that Russia and China are driving parallel information campaigns, conveying the overall message that democratic state actors are failing and that European citizens cannot trust their health systems.... to undermine democratic debate.

The report comes as Hungary an EU member state faces criticism for preparing a national survey that includes a question on a coronavirus crisis proposal by investor George Soros that experts say will force nations into debt slavery.

In the national consultation due to be mailed to all Hungarian citizens, the government asks whether people should reject George Soross plan, which would in-debt our homeland for an unforeseeable long time.

According to Rasem 'Abidat, an activist of the Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine (PFLP) and a columnist for the Palestinian daily, Al-Quds, based in East Jerusalem, the coronavirus is a biological weapon that the US and Israel decided to employ against China and Iran after failing to harm them by conventional means.

At this stage we do not know if any of these claims have any truth. But we do know that it is a pathogen dispersed globally though free trade and international travel. But this we do know that even if the pandemics effect on the world isnt a conventional attack on government targets or the military, its a widespread and indiscriminate attack on global citizens and the economy. This outbreak has directly impacted the lives of billions of people, making it the most effective model for future terrorist activities and a new model for circumventing the conventions of modern warfare.

Governments across the globe are using the pandemic to lower labour standards, wipe out human rights of millions of people and mobilising fear to equip themselves with powers of control and surveillance over entire population. The vaccine, when it comes, will have no way to protect us against the authoritarian measures put in place by democratic governments.

Nandita Haksaris a human rights lawyer, teacher, campaigner and writer. The views are personal.

Read the original:

The Politics of Pandemics - NewsClick

Whats next after coronavirus? (letter to the editor) – SILive.com

It bothers me and lots of Americans, what happened to our great country. I do not know why the current administration is not clearly telling the American people who is responsible for this pandemic.

We only hear that China did all of this.

I was wondering, when all this happened, where was our intelligence community?

The whole world is suffering and people are dying right and left, why isnt there an investigation to find who is responsible for destroying the human race?

People had no experience with this kind of suffering. It is the responsibility of all those countries who have germ warfare labs to completely destroy these machines who are killing people. All these nukes are obsolete.

Now we are entering into a new era. It is in the best interest of all the countries who are making nuclear weapons and these warfare germs to destroy them completely and spend money for the humanity of the world so people can have a better life and clean water to drink.

I am wondering if this coronavirus is a natural disaster or an economic or political game among superpowers. I guess we will never know, as up until now we do not know who killed John F. Kennedy, who did 9/11 and who is doing this corona. I guess we have to live with these conspiracy theories. If this virus is doing human to human transmission, I hope the next virus after corona will not be airborne.

All these economic disasters have to be investigated, and those people or countries responsible should be punished to the fullest extent, so we can all live a normal life.

(Dr. Mohammad Khalid is a Todt Hill resident.)

View original post here:

Whats next after coronavirus? (letter to the editor) - SILive.com

Did America Use Bioweapons in Korea? Nicholson Baker Tried to Find Out – The New York Times

To my nonscientists eye. Similar caveats we may never have incontrovertible proof, its remotely possible, though perhaps eternally unprovable, we may never know, its at least possible, will we ever know?, let me just blurt out what I think happened, etc. infest Bakers narrative, usually preceded or followed by wild accusations (and, occasionally, by a sign of self-awareness: I lay in bed some of today reading more of this book, hating it, excited by it, embarrassed by it).

At times, the book is framed as a deliberate challenge to the intelligence community: I could be completely wrong. The only way to prove me wrong is by declassifying the entire document. But this is not how a historian proceeds. Again and again, Baker bristles with anger over actions that were seriously contemplated by the C.I.A., other intelligence agencies and the military but never undertaken. I felt trembly and disgusted at the same time, he writes of Operation Sphinx, a proposal to gas millions of Japanese from the air during World War II. Its a horrible and disillusioning thing to know that your own country was passing around a paper like Sphinx in the Pentagon. Really? To know that in a brutal war men thought brutal things?

At another point, he questions the long, interesting, confusing letter he got from Floyd ONeal, one of some 30 captured American airmen and Marines who confessed to germ-warfare bombing in Korea. ONeals confession is surprising and moving, though, whether or not its true, Baker tells us. ONeal recanted completely after he was released, and writes in his letter of sustaining torture so awful he still wont describe it to Baker more than 50 years later: What they did for the next days I dont care to discuss but I finally agreed to sign their confession. There is nothing surprising or moving about a coerced confession, save for ONeals ability to endure the price it exacted.

Baker concedes that Americans individually have done good things, a gesture followed by a banal list that includes sunglasses, topiary, no-hitters and the midcentury New Yorker. Yes, and also little baby ducks and old pickup trucks. This is another affectation of virtue, not a moral argument.

I share Bakers disgust with all the crazy, wasteful, illegal, counterproductive and murderous things the C.I.A. has done, and no doubt continues to do. Hell, I even like dogs. Bakers Olympian worldview, though, takes him to almost the same place he landed in Human Smoke, his paste-up 2008 history of the road to World War II: immobilized by purity and concluding that we should never have intervened, even to stop the Nazis. Americans are neither beasts nor angels, just human beings trying to forge our way through the murky moral choices this world poses. To pretend otherwise is perhaps the worst deception of all.

Read the original:

Did America Use Bioweapons in Korea? Nicholson Baker Tried to Find Out - The New York Times

Write Again … And you know who – Washington Daily News – thewashingtondailynews.com

Please let me, friends, thank you in advance for reading todays column. Your indulgence is not unappreciated.

You see, Ive written this, and versions of it, many, many times in my head. Even if I should get it right, I know there will be those who dont agree, who perhaps take issue with my assertions.

To them I would say, I respect your right to disagree. And I really do.

One of the glories of the form of government that was bequeathed us by our founders was the marvelous notion that we are allowed, even encouraged, to not only disagree, but to freely express such sentiments without fear of a government intervention, or worse. There are those who dont acknowledge this.

The First Amendment. To think there are, have always been, millions of human beings who are not now, have never, been permitted freedom of speech. Think of that, my fellow Americans, the next time someone, or some group, exercises their First Amendment rights by speech and or assembly with a viewpoint you oppose.

For those, however, who elect to use such protest as an excuse for vandalism, destruction of property, looting, please know that I abhor their actions, and believe they should be subject to those laws that prohibit such conduct. They are a minority, but do an injustice to those whose protests should be heard.

Back to my original intent regarding todays column. Here goes:

When Abraham Lincoln was assassinated, there were those in our land (two countries) at the time, who rejoiced.

You know who they were, and if you had to apply one of the now two much-used, over-used, political labels of our time, you know which would apply.

When Franklin Delano Roosevelt died, there were those in our land who were not saddened. You know who.

Eleanor Roosevelt was greatly admired throughout much of the world (this is not hyberpole) during her lifetime. There were those in our land, however, who despised her. You know who.

When John Fitzgerald Kennedy was assassinated, there were those in our land who were pleased. You know who.

When Martin Luther King Jr. was assassinated, there were those in our land who thought he got what was coming to him. You know who.

When Robert (Bobby) Francis Kennedy was assassinated, there were those in our land who were not displeased. You know who.

Referencing those two political labels further, consider the following:

Who opposed the abolition of slavery? You know who.

Who opposed setting aside portions of our wilderness lands so as to preserve them in perpetuity? You know who.

Who opposed splitting up the monopolistic enterprises of the Robber Barons? You know who.

Who opposed establishing child labor laws? You know who.

Who opposed setting minimum wage requirements? You know who.

Who opposed limits on workers hours? You know who.

Who opposed Womens Suffrage? You know who.

Who opposed unions? You know who.

Who opposed programs such as Social Security, Medicare and Medicaid? You know who.

Who opposed desegregation of our military? You know who.

Who opposes environmental/conservation safeguards? You know who.

Who opposed the Civil Rights Act? You know who.

Who opposed the Voting Rights Act? You know who.

Who opposed racial integration? You know who.

Who opposed/opposes making it easier to vote? You know who.

Who opposed/opposes strengthening gun safety requirements? You know who.

And who have the opposers consistently blamed at one time or another for all these things they have found so objectionable? The media the government the intellectuals the liberals the blacks (there was a time when another word was commonly used) the Jews

Why, there was another country that once had those who used such despicable tactics to come to power in Europe in the 1930s. We know how that came out, dont we?

Perhaps most recent, who opposes mandatory wearing of masks during this pandemic? You know who.

Now, in closing (bet youre glad to read that) let me assert that there are those who fall into the opposers column, who dont buy into all of such a negative, anti-progressive philosophy.

And, conversely, there are some who are on the other side who do not espouse and fully support some of their agenda as well.

If you made it here to the end, thanks for sticking with me. Perhaps more important, as I wrote near the beginning of this much too lengthy expository exercise, if you disagree in full or in part with anything Ive written, I respect your right to do so.

If you agree in full or in part with anything Ive written, well, then you know your history.

Should you choose to meet me here again next week, Ill look forward to it.

Peace.

Follow this link:

Write Again ... And you know who - Washington Daily News - thewashingtondailynews.com

How The First Amendment Can Fight BLM Messages – ValueWalk

How The First Amendment Can Fight BLM Messages, Rosewood City Removes Street Art After Receiving Demand

Get our free ebook on how the Soviet Union became Putin's Russia.

Q2 2020 hedge fund letters, conferences and more

WASHINGTON, D.C. (July 22, 2020) - Many cities have permitted supporters of Black Lives Matter [BLM] and related causes to post messages supporting their views, but those who think there should be some balance may have a new weapon.

In 2016, Warren Buffett made what has turned out to be a very astute and well-timed investment decision. The Oracle of Omaha decided to invest $1 billion of Berkshire Hathaway's capital on nearly 10 million worth of shares in Apple during the first quarter of the year. If youre looking for value stocks, and exclusive Read More

Although Rosewood City in California had permitted a group to paint the words "BLACK LIVES MATTER" on a city street, they ordered the words removed just after receiving a request from an attorney to be able to paint the words "MAGA 2020" on the same stretch of street, or nearby.

Although the City provided another explanation for suddenly agreeing to remove the BLM message, and pledged that "no further art installation will be authorized on the City's streets," it's more likely that the City realized that it cannot constitutionally permit one group to post a message, and deny that same privilege to another group with another message, says public interest law professor John Banzhaf, whose similar complaint forced radio and TV stations to balance cigarette commercials with antismoking messages, and led to the ban on cigarette commercials.

The City claimed that it ordered the removal of the BLM words because"staff is concerned about public safety issues that may arise from painting murals on its public streets, which could result in driver confusion and traffic accidents," but the timing makes it more likely that the removal was prompted by a fear of a law suit for violating the First Amendment, says Banzhaf.

Professor Banzhaf explained that streets, sidewalks, and parks have traditionally been classified as "public forums" (or "open forums") where, under the First Amendment, speech (including signs) cannot be restricted based upon their content or meaning.

So, while the government can impose content-neutral - commonly known as "time, place, and manner" - restrictions on free speech activities in public forums, it cannot constitutionally permit "Black Lives Matter" and prohibit "MAGA 2020," anymore than it could permit the words "Pro Life" and refuse "Pro Choice," or OK "Yes Israel" but nix "OK Palestine" or "No Israel," says Banzhaf. who has testified as a First Amendment expert before a congressional committee.

Thus those who oppose the message or viewpoint convened by "BLM" or simply think there should be some balance to the messages displayed on city property, can fight back by demanding the right, under the First Amendment, to pose a contrasting message, suggests Banzhaf.

In many cases the result may be, as in Redwood City, that the BLM message will be removed or, in some cases, messages expressing a different viewpoint will be posted by other groups or individuals, suggests Banzhaf.

See the original post:

How The First Amendment Can Fight BLM Messages - ValueWalk

David Arbeitman: Columnist provides sanitized version of history – GazetteNET

Published: 7/24/2020 4:47:58 PM

Jay Fleitmans Securing liberty for all (July 7) is plagued by bias and important omissions. If we are to distill his message to its essence, the gist of his column seems to be be proud of our country and look on the bright side.

This strikes me as particularly tone-deaf during our pandemic, economic recession, police violence and systemic racism, and climate emergency. Yes, there is a nod to the decimation of the indigenous native population and slavery, which he refers to as great blots in American history but no recognition that social injustice and racism is not just a relic of the past, but institutionalized into the fabric of our current society.

In reviewing our tumultuous past, he highlights anarchist bombings, labor unrest and communist subversion as notable threats to our democracy, but neglects to mention that the McCarthy era was a much greater threat to our democracy than any communist subversion.

For a person who claims to be a defender of the Constitution and the Bill of Rights including the First Amendment he does not explicitly reject Trump repeatedly attacking a free press and labeling the news media as the enemy of the people.

As a student of history, is he not aware that Hitler and Stalin used the same terms to muzzle dissenting opinions and criminalize criticism of their regimes? While he presumably celebrates the right to peaceably assemble, he portrays protesters as rioters and looters, even though the vast majority were peaceful when exercising their First Amendment rights.

I, for one, am quite relieved that Fleitman is not teaching U.S. history to our students in our public schools as he would present a sanitized version of our history. I believe that the greatest threat to our democracy and our national security is President Trump. In accepting and encouraging help form foreign powers to help him steal the election, Trump showed and continues to show disdain for our Constitution and our electoral process.

Those who do not stand up to would-be dictators who threaten our democracy are complicit in undermining democratic values and the rule of law and will be judged harshly by history.

David Arbeitman

Florence

View original post here:

David Arbeitman: Columnist provides sanitized version of history - GazetteNET

RCFP supports fight for records related to Jamal Khashoggi killing – Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press

Amicus brief filed by the Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press and 32 media organizations

Court: U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit

Date Filed: July 23, 2020

Background: In 2018, the Committee to Protect Journalists and the Knight First Amendment Institute separately submitted Freedom of Information Act requests to five federal agencies related to the Saudi Arabian governments execution of journalist Jamal Khashoggi.

The two organizations sought records about the duty to warn a person about a known threat, under Intelligence Community Directive 191, and specifically about the duty to warn Khashoggi prior to his murder.

After all of the agencies failed to respond to the FOIA requests, the Knight Institute filed a lawsuit, which CPJ joined. During litigation, each of the agencies except the State Department responded to the request by invoking the Glomar doctrine, claiming that acknowledging the existence or non-existence of documents responsive to the requests would compromise national security. Subsequently, the Knight Institute voluntarily dismissed its claims, leaving CPJ as the sole plaintiff. The U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia upheld the Glomar responses, granting summary judgment for the government.

CPJ then appealed to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit.

Our Position: The D.C. Circuit should reverse the district courts decision that the intelligence agencies adequately justified their Glomar responses to the FOIA requests.

Quote: Given the unbridled growth of Glomar responses across federal agencies, the pernicious way in which overclassification of documents interacts with the Glomar doctrine, and the press freedoms implicated by the records at issue, district courts should be required to apply a heightened standard of proof in this case and others like it would bring the doctrine back in line with the language and purpose of the [Freedom of Information] Act.

Related: In 2019, a D.C. district court ruled that the FBI could not invoke the Glomar doctrine in response to a FOIA request about the agencys impersonation of documentary filmmakers. The Reporters Committee filed suit after the agency invoked the doctrine to avoid searching for records related to agents impersonation of a documentary film crew to investigate Nevada rancher Cliven Bundy and his followers after a 2014 armed standoff between Bundy and the U.S. Bureau of Land Management.

In 2016, a New York appeals court allowed the New York City Police Department to invoke the Glomar doctrine in response to a FOIA request about the departments surveillance of two Muslim men. The Reporters Committee and 20 media organizations submitted a friend-of-the-court brief in the case, arguing that the doctrine cannot be invoked by a state.

More here:

RCFP supports fight for records related to Jamal Khashoggi killing - Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press

Elon Musk and coronavirus skeptic Alex Berenson reportedly discussed starting their own publication – MSN Money

Provided by Business Insider Tesla and SpaceX CEO Elon Musk. Susan Walsh/Associated Press

Tesla and SpaceX CEO Elon Musk and writer Alex Berenson, who have both been skeptical about the severity of the coronavirus outbreak, reportedly discussed starting their own publication.

According to The New York Times' Ben Smith, Musk and Berenson considered launching their own news company, and Berenson held discussions about bringing on reporters. He has since abandoned the plan, The Times reports.

Musk told The Times that he and Berenson "basically just agree that there's room for a fiercely nonpartisan news company." Representatives for Musk did not immediately respond to Business Insider's request for comment.

Berenson, an author and former New York Times reporter, has been outspoken about his theoriesthat the response to the coronavirus outbreak has been overblown, despite evidence from experts. He has incorrectly said "kids, children, almost anybody under 30 is at no risk" of contracting COVID-19 and that the lockdowns themselves are the source of problems related to the virus.

He has also tweeted that "Masks are useless," despite evidence that wearing a mask prevents the spread of the virus and saves lives.

In June, Berenson published a booklet called "Unreported Truths about COVID-19 and Lockdowns," which Amazon's Kindle Direct Publishing service initially declined to publish, saying that the book did not comply with its guidelines. Berenson tweeted a screenshot of Amazon's email, saying the company "censored" his book.

Musk quickly spoke up, tweeting at Amazon CEO Jeff Bezos that the situation was "insane." "Time to break up Amazon," Musk tweeted. "Monopolies are wrong!" Soon after, Amazon said the book was blocked in error and would be reinstated.

Musk appears to agree with Berenson on many of his views, calling the early response to the outbreak a "panic" and "dumb" and falsely saying that children are "essentially immune" to the virus. Musk has pushed for reopening businesses throughout the country, describing stay-at-home orders as "fascist" and at first defying local ordinances to reopen his Tesla plant in California.

Musk has also described coronavirus death counts in the US as "misleading," despite the fact thatexperts estimate the US has undercounted deaths.

Video: Dr. Fauci responds to negative comments of his handling of the COVID-19 pandemic (USA TODAY)

UP NEXT

View original post here:

Elon Musk and coronavirus skeptic Alex Berenson reportedly discussed starting their own publication - MSN Money

Is Giving to Biden or Trump Grounds for Getting Fired? New Poll Finds a Disturbing Number of People Who Think It Should Be – Reason

Poll finds self-censorship on the rise across political groups. A disturbingly high percentage of people polled earlier this month think private political donations should be grounds for getting fired. The number was especially high among respondents under age 30, with 44 percent of the youngest group saying business leaders who donate to Donald Trump should be fired and 27 percent saying the same for execs who give to Joe Biden. Meanwhile, 62 percent of all respondents said they're reluctant to share their political views for fear of offending othersup four points from when the same question was posed in 2017.

Those are a few of the findings in a new national poll conducted by the Cato Institute and YouGov.

When it comes to free expression, the "fears cross partisan lines," writes Cato Director of Polling Emily Ekins. "Majorities of Democrats (52%), independents (59%) and Republicans (77%) all agree they have political opinions they are afraid to share."

There are some differences of degree. A majority (58 percent) of people who categorized themselves as "very" liberal told pollsters they felt they could express themselves freely, while only 48 percent of "moderate" liberals said the same.

"Political expression is an issue that divides the Democratic coalition between centrist Democrats and their left flank," suggests Ekins.

The percentage of respondents who felt they could speak freely was even lower among those who labeled themselves "moderate" (36 percent), "conservative" (23 percent), or "very conservative" (23 percent).

Of course, the poll doesn't tell us how much people's perceptions on this front are true to life and how much they reflect distorted evaluations. Maybe staunch liberals feel they can speak more freely because cultural currents do indeed allow it; maybe they just don't realize when their free expression is offending or alienating people. Maybe it's a little of both, plus a lot of other reasons.

On the conservative side, the strong feeling of having to self-censor is likely somewhat rooted in a media and political culture that thrives on peddling its own marginalization. But there's also statistical evidence that self-identification with conservatism and the Republican Party are on the decline, and no doubt that conservative ideas are sidelined in many elite institutions.

It's also hard to guess what people actually mean about their politics when they describe themselves as stronger or less-strong "liberals" or "conservatives" in an era where these meanings are mutable and often bizarre.

Ekins notes that even strong liberals are less confident in their ability to speak freely in 2020 then they were in 2017: "the share who feel pressured to self-censor rose 12 points from 30% in 2017 to 42% in 2020." At the same time,

The share of moderates who self-censor increased 7 points from 57% to 64%, and the share of conservatives rose 70% to 77%, also a 7-point increase. Strong conservatives are the only group with little change. They are about as likely now (77%) to say they hold back their views as in 2017 (76%).

Self-censorship is widespread across demographic groups as well. Nearly two-thirds of Latino Americans (65%) and White Americans (64%) and nearly half of African Americans (49%) have political views they are afraid to share. Majorities of men (65%) and women (59%), people with incomes over $100,000 (60%) and people with incomes less than $20,000 (58%), people under 35 (55%) and over 65 (66%), religious (71%) and non-religious (56%) all agree that the political climate prevents them from expressing their true beliefs.

Not all self-censorship is bad, of course. There are times and places for restraint. So it's hard to know quite how to interpret the results above.

Alas, another part of the study is much more unambiguously depressing: A large number of people think whether someone is employable ought to be tied to their personal politics.

"Nearly a quarter (22%) of Americans would support firing a business executive who personally donates to Democratic presidential candidate Joe Biden's campaign," notes Ekins. "Even more, 31% support firing a business executive who donates to Donald Trump's re-election campaign." And:

Support rises among political subgroups. Support increases to 50% of strong liberals who support firing executives who personally donate to Trump. And more than a third (36%) of strong conservatives support firing an executive for donating to Biden's presidential campaign.

Young Americans are also more likely than older Americans to support punishing people at work for personal donations to Trump. Forty-four percent (44%) of Americans under 30 support firing executives if they donate to Trump. This share declines to 22% among those over 55 years olda 20-point difference. An age gap also exists for Biden donors, but is less pronounced. Twenty-seven percent (27%) of Americans under 30 support firing executives who donate to Biden compared to 20% of those over 55a 7-point difference.

Respondents also expressed fear that their own political opinions or donations would cost them a job or a career opportunity. "Younger people are also more concerned than older people, irrespective of political viewpoint," notes Ekins.

Examining all Americans under 65, 37% of those under 30 are worried their political opinions could harm their career trajectories, compared to 30% of 3054 year-olds and 24% of 5564 year-olds. But the age gap is more striking taking into account political views.

A slim majority (51%) of Republicans under 30 fear their views could harm their career prospects compared to 39% of 3044 year-olds, 34% of 4554 year-olds, and 28% of 5564 year-old Republicans.

Democrats reflect a similar but less pronounced pattern. A third (33%) of Democrats under 30 worry they have views that could harm their current and future jobs, compared to 27% of 3054 year-olds, and 19% of 5564 year-old Democrats.

You can find the full surveyconducted July 16, 2020, with a national sample of 2,000 American adultshere. The sections on political donations and self-censorship are here. The margin of error is plus or minus 2.36 percentage points.

A couple of (positive) Portland updates:

Twitter is exploring subscription options.

The Malaysian government is backtracking on making people who post videos to their personal social-media accounts get a license.

A new documentary goes inside Immigration and Customs Enforcement.

Read the original:

Is Giving to Biden or Trump Grounds for Getting Fired? New Poll Finds a Disturbing Number of People Who Think It Should Be - Reason

"Ife," a film about two woman in love faces an uphill battle in a country where homophobia runs rampant – MSN Money

The Equality Hub A new film, titled 'Ife,' about two women in love, is challenging queer stereotypes in Nigeria's movie industry

Two women lay in bed in a tight embrace, one is stroking the other's hair and whispers that she is in love with her.

These intimate scenes wouldn't be out of place in a Hollywood movie, but in Nigeria's film industry, Nollywood, they are near taboo.

But Nigerian filmmaker Uyaiedu Ikpe-Etim says she is tackling the subject head-on in her new film titled "Ife," to create space for queer characters in the country's prolific movie industry.

"Ife'" means love in the Yoruba language, spoken in West Africa, and most prominently in southern Nigeria.

LGBTQ characters are described poorly in Nollywood and are viewed in problematic roles that encourage violence or judgment from viewers, Ikpe-Etim says.

"I'm queer so 'Ife' is dear to my heart. I wanted to represent LGBTQ characters in a different light than how they are shown in past stories, to change how heterosexuals view them," she explained.

The story centers on two women Ife and Adaora and the uncertainty surrounding their relationship. It is created in partnership with Equality hub, an NGO in Nigeria focused on fighting social injustices against sexual minorities.

"They come into problems when they are not certain of the future of their relationship considering that these two women live in Nigeria which is a homophobic country," she said of the storyline.

In the West African nation where homophobia runs rampant, Ikpe-Etim is an advocate for the country's lesbian, gay, bisexual, trans, and queer (LGBTQ) community.

Homosexuality is frowned upon in Nigeria. The Same-Sex Marriage (Prohibition) Act of 2014 says anyone found guilty of same-sex marriage faces up to 14 years in prison.

A 2019 survey by The Initiative for Equal Rights (TIERS), a Nigerian human rights organization, found that 75% of people in the country support the continued enforcement of the anti-gay laws.

Ikpe-Etim, 31, says "Ife" has no fixed release date yet but will be out before the end of the year.

What is certain is that it faces an uphill battle with Nigeria's film censors, who have said they may "go after the producers," if they find that the film promotes homosexuality.

The National Film and Video Censors Board (NFVCB) is the government agency set up to regulate films and videos in Nigeria.

Adedayo Thomas, executive director of the NFVCB, told CNN the board will not approve films that promote themes that don't conform with the country's "constitution, morals and traditions."

"We are monitoring the progress of the movie, and if it goes against the law by promoting homosexuality, we will be forced at some point to go after the producer and executive producer," he added.

According to Thomas, Ife was never submitted to the NFVCB before its trailer was released, making it impossible to classify or censor the film.

"We look at the content of the film and we look at the end. For example, in a movie that glorifies fraud, we look at how it ends, did the fraudster meet their waterloo? How the movie ends will determine our censorship. You wouldn't watch your kid to watch a film that glorifies fraud," he told CNN.

"Ife's" producer Pamela Adie says agencies like NFVCB suppress the creativity of filmmakers.

"If there is a demand for films like Ife and if people want it, and the censor's board does not approve then it means they are indirectly stifling the creative powers of filmmakers. To deny a film simply because of queer characters is discrimination," she said.

Nollywood has always had a problematic relationship with its queer characters, portraying them as mentally ill, under the influence of witchcraft or troubled.

In Emotional Crack, a 2003 film, one of the lead characters, Camilla falls in love with Crystal, a married woman who suffered domestic abuse from her husband.

Both women kicked off a relationship that eventually ended when Crystal became unsure of remaining in a same-sex relationship.

While the film was one of the country's early introductions into LGBTQ relationships, it repeated damaging stereotypes like branding Camilla as violent, predatory, and suggested that Crystal's lesbianism was as a result of being mistreated by a man.

Similarly, in a 2010 film, "Men in Love," the affair of the lead couple was tagged a "strong satanic bond."

Adie told CNN that she wants to challenge other filmmakers in Nollywood to create more nuanced queer stories devoid of the usual stereotypes.

"My hope is that Ife shapes things up, and mainstream Nollywood starts to think about stories that portray the reality of LGBT Nigerians," she explained.

The 36-year-old added that "Ife" is one of few films with a focus on lesbians in Nigeria, "a lot of representation has been geared towards gay men," she says.

Nigeria is not the only country with strict rules regarding films with strong LGBTQ representation.

In April 2018, Rafiki was banned by Kenya's Film and Classification Board (KFCB) because of its intent to "promote lesbianism," in the East African nation.

Despite the challenges around creating queer centered films in Nigeria, Adie says there has been an outpouring of support for "Ife" from audiences in the country.

"It is something that is groundbreaking. We have received support, from when we released the poster to the trailer. It feels like people didn't know they wanted this kind of content till now."

Continued here:

"Ife," a film about two woman in love faces an uphill battle in a country where homophobia runs rampant - MSN Money

A Nollywood film about two women in love faces an uphill battle in a country where homophobia is rampant – The Philadelphia Tribune

Two women lay in bed in a tight embrace, one is stroking the other's hair and whispers that she is in love with her.

These intimate scenes wouldn't be out of place in a Hollywood movie, but in Nigeria's film industry, Nollywood, they are near taboo.

But Nigerian filmmaker Uyaiedu Ikpe-Etim says she is tackling the subject head-on in her new film titled "Ife," to create space for queer characters in the country's prolific movie industry.

"Ife'" means love in the Yoruba language, spoken in West Africa, and most prominently in southern Nigeria.

LGBTQ characters are described poorly in Nollywood and are viewed in problematic roles that encourage violence or judgment from viewers, Ikpe-Etim says.

"I'm queer so 'Ife' is dear to my heart. I wanted to represent LGBTQ characters in a different light than how they are shown in past stories, to change how heterosexuals view them," she explained.

Homophobia in Nigeria

The story centers on two women Ife and Adaora and the uncertainty surrounding their relationship. It is created in partnership with Equality hub, an NGO in Nigeria focused on fighting social injustices against sexual minorities.

"They come into problems when they are not certain of the future of their relationship considering that these two women live in Nigeria which is a homophobic country," she said of the storyline.

In the West African nation where homophobia runs rampant,Ikpe-Etim is anadvocate for the country's lesbian, gay, bisexual, trans, and queer (LGBTQ) community.

Homosexuality is illegal in Nigeria. The Same-Sex Marriage (Prohibition) Act of 2014 says anyone found guilty of homosexuality faces up to 14 years in prison.

A 2019 survey by The Initiative for Equal Rights (TIERS), a Nigerian human rights organization, found that 75% of people in the country support the continued enforcement of the anti-gay laws.

Censorship of queer films

Ikpe-Etim, 31, says "Ife" has no fixed release date yet but will be out before the end of the year.

What is certain is that it faces an uphill battle with Nigeria's film censors, who have said they may "go after the producers," if they find that the film promotes homosexuality.

Adedayo Thomas, executive director of the NFVCB, told CNN the board will not approve films that promote themes that don't conform with the country's "constitution, morals and traditions."

"We are monitoring the progress of the movie, and if it goes against the law by promoting homosexuality, we will be forced at some point to go after the producer and executive producer," he added.

According to Thomas, Ife was never submitted to the NFVCB before its trailer was released, making it impossible to classify or censor the film.

"We look at the content of the film and we look at the end. For example, in a movie that glorifies fraud, we look at how it ends, did the fraudster meet their waterloo? How the movie ends will determine our censorship. You wouldn't watch your kid to watch a film that glorifies fraud," he told CNN.

"Ife's" producer Pamela Adie says agencies like NFVCB suppress the creativity of filmmakers.

"If there is a demand for films like Ife and if people want it, and the censor's board does not approve then it means they are indirectly stifling the creative powers of filmmakers. To deny a film simply because of queer characters is discrimination," she said.

Stereotyping queer characters

Nollywood has always had a problematic relationship with its queer characters, portraying them as mentally ill, under the influence of witchcraft or troubled.

In Emotional Crack, a 2003 film, one of the lead characters, Camilla falls in love with Crystal, a married woman who suffered domestic abuse from her husband.

Both women kicked off a relationship that eventually ended when Crystal became unsure of remaining in a same-sex relationship.

While the film was one of the country's early introductions into LGBTQ relationships, it repeated damaging stereotypes like branding Camilla as violent, predatory, and suggested that Crystal's lesbianism was as a result of being mistreated by a man.

Similarly, in a 2010 film, "Men in Love," the affair of the lead couple was explained away by a "strong satanic bond."

Adie told CNN that she wants to challenge other filmmakers in Nollywood to create more nuanced queer stories devoid of the usual stereotypes.

"My hope is that Ife shapes things up, and mainstream Nollywood starts to think about stories that portray the reality of LGBT Nigerians," she explained.

The 36-year-old added that "Ife" is one of few films with a focus on lesbians in Nigeria, "a lot of representation has been geared towards gay men," she says.

Outpouring of support

Nigeria is not the only country with strict rules regarding films with strong LGBTQ representation.

In April 2018, Rafiki was banned by Kenya's Film and Classification Board (KFCB) because of its intent to "promote lesbianism," in the East African nation.

Despite the challenges around creating queer centered films in Nigeria, Adie says there has been an outpouring of support for "Ife" from audiences in the country.

"It is something that is groundbreaking. We have received support, from when we released the poster to the trailer. It feels like people didn't know they wanted this kind of content till now."

View original post here:

A Nollywood film about two women in love faces an uphill battle in a country where homophobia is rampant - The Philadelphia Tribune

Amazon To Invest In Reliance Retail: Is Big Tech Joining Hands To Conquer India? – Inc42 Media

Amazon Inc is in talks to buy a 9.9% stake in Reliance Retail

Amazon wants a preferred, strategic stake in Reliance Retail for JioMart

Mukesh Ambani recently highlighted that its retail unit has received a strong interest from strategic and financial investors

Almost a week after Mukesh Ambani announced that Reliance will now push for the growth of Reliance Retail, reports have surfaced that Amazon Inc is in talks to buy a 9.9% stake in Reliance Retail.

Amazon wants a preferred, strategic stake in Reliance Retail for JioMart, the report added. However, the value of this deal remains unknown. The reports bring a deja vu to April when Facebook picked up a 9.9% stake in Reliance Jio and the company went on to raise approx $20.2 Bn between April and July. Is Reliance Retail the next Jio?

Reliance Retail, founded in 2006, is the largest retail chain in India. It serves over 3.5 million customers each week through its nearly 10,000 physical stores in more than 6,500 cities and towns in the country.

Speaking at the 43rd annual general meeting (AGM) 2020, Reliances chairperson and managing director Mukesh Ambani highlighted that its retail unit has received a strong interest from strategic and financial investors. However, Ambani did not emphasise on this topic further.

Reliance Retail had recorded a turnover of INR 1.62 Lakh Cr in the financial year 2020, ending March this year. With this, Reliance has managed to widen its gap with the competitor Kishore Biyanis Future Group that has an annual turnover of INR 30,000 Cr. Both Amazon and Reliance Retail have also been locked in a battle to acquire a majority stake in Future Retail.

According to media reports, Reliance Industries may also acquire 30% stake in Future Groups Future Retails retail unit Future Retail for INR 6K Cr.

Though Ambani did not mention any elaborate platform for fundraising through Reliance Retail, Morgan Stanley, which served as the financial advisor to Reliance Industries for Jio Platforms deals, recently valued Reliance Retail at about $29 Bn.

Ambani had announced that JioMart will function closely with WhatsApp to create new opportunities for the local kirana stores and the consumers. He noted that Reliance Jio has successfully piloted the beta version of JioMart Grocery in 200 cities, delivering close to 2.50 Lakh orders daily. Therefore, it now aims to spread it across to other categories as well.

With this, JioMart will be a direct competitor to ecommerce platforms like Amazon and Flipkart, who have marked their presence in all segments except pharmaceuticals.

JioMart has now enabled a multipurpose point of service (POS) service to enable smooth transactions between stores and their customers. Isha Ambani noted that the grocery delivery platform will further empower and engage kirana stores by allowing them to stay connected with their customers through multifunctional PoS.

Isha Ambani emphasised that the JioMart was built on two fundamental pillars. First, to create a powerful omnichannel tech-platform to unite customers, kiranas and producers. Second, to have a physical network of Reliance Retail that takes benefits of new commerce to every corner.

Amazon always had ambitions of consolidating with a local partner to smoothen its Indian play, but that failed after Flipkart was acquired by Walmart. Hence, with Reliance Retail, Amazon is bound to smoothen its tough times with the Indian government as well to strengthen its ecommerce foothold in the country.

View original post here:

Amazon To Invest In Reliance Retail: Is Big Tech Joining Hands To Conquer India? - Inc42 Media

Zuckerberg, Bezos, other tech CEOs to testify at anti-trust hearing – Toronto Star

WASHINGTONFour Big Tech CEOs Facebooks Mark Zuckerberg, Amazons Jeff Bezos, Googles Sundar Pichai and Apples Tim Cook will answer for their companies practices before Congress at a hearing Wednesday by the House Judiciary subcommittee on antitrust.

The panel has conducted a bipartisan investigation over the past year of the tech giants market dominance and their effect on consumers.

Its the first such congressional review of the tech industry. It has aimed to determine whether existing competition policies and century-old antitrust laws are adequate or if new legislation and more funding for enforcement are needed.

The four CEOs are expected to testify remotely.

The hearing originally was set for Monday. It was rescheduled to allow lawmakers who are committee members to participate in commemorations at the U.S. Capitol on Monday and Tuesday for Rep. John Lewis, the civil rights icon and longtime Georgia congressman who died July 17.

Original post:

Zuckerberg, Bezos, other tech CEOs to testify at anti-trust hearing - Toronto Star

Private Islands AWE

Episode 1

Did you know that there are 12 thousand private islands in the world? On this episode of Private Islands we're showing you how to find your own secluded paradise.

Escape from the pressures of everyday life with Private Islands. On this episode were showing you how your front yard can be miles of palm trees and glittering coastline.

Join us as we explore the most magical and luxurious private resort island in the world. Owned by famed illusionist David Copperfield, Musha Cay provides a memorable one-of-a-kind experience like nowhere else on earth.

We're traveling 1,000 miles away from anywhere in search of the perfect private island. Forget about the jet lag because when you land in paradise, your dream becomes reality. It's first-class service on the private island of Desroches.

The Bahamas has grown into private island real estates most in-demand market. Escape to the most exotic and remote islands a multi-millionaire buyer, celebrity, or luxury-seeking tourist can find on this episode of Private Islands!

There's nothing like it in the Caribbean, or even in the world! The result of seven years of construction, Emerald Cay in Turks and Caicos combines pristine natural beauty with state-of-the-art luxury to provide the ultimate private island paradise.

Come see how the affluent are rediscovering themselves in the private island of Turks and Caicos. Immerse yourself in sunshine, sea and surf, just 500 miles off the coast of Florida. Life's short, but your quality time doesn't have to be!

Join host Christina Cindrich as she takes you on a magical journey through the private island of French Polynesia. Discover heaven on earth in your own utopian paradise full of beauty, adventure and above all, sheer escapism.

Tales of pirates, betrayal and hidden treasure all share a part of this island's past. There are some places on earth that simply must be experienced to fully understand and Peter Island in the British Virgin Islands is one of those places.

Roatan is one of the best kept secrets of the Caribbean. We take viewers on an underwater adventure and show the most luxurious private islands Honduras has to offer.

From Miami to colorful Key West, the Florida Keys have become one of the America's favorite tropical escapes. Join host Christina Cindrich as she takes you to some of the most secluded private islands for an experience that cannot be beat.

Join host Christina Cindrich in a country that combines both adventure and luxury into one complete island experience. With one foot planted in the mysterious jungles and the other dipped in the Caribbean Sea, Belize will awaken all of your senses.

Located off the coast of "The Spice Isle" Granada in the Caribbean is one of the most luxurious private islands you'll ever see. Calivigny Island is truly the ultimate escape for the affluent traveler in search of their own slice of paradise.

Youll live as few have lived before in a place where the finest luxuries co-exist in absolute harmony with nature. This is Little Bokeelia Island, a private island paradise that could be yours!

Join host Christina Cindrich as she takes you to one of the worlds most exotic destinations, Fiji! Noted for its magical landscape, stunning beaches, and friendly people, these islands are a spectacular taste of heaven right here on Earth.

Join host Christina Cindrich in the postcard perfect island nation of Fiji. With its white sandy beaches, fascinating culture and magical underwater world, this is an unforgettable Private Island experience that youll never want to be rescued from!

Join host Christina Cindrich on a 300-acre private island paradise off the coast of Antigua. With its gorgeous villas and multi-million dollar estates, Jumby Bay's beauty will cast an unforgettable spell of serene enchantment.

Join host Christina Cindrich for an unforgettable experience on two Four Seasons luxury island resorts in the Maldives. Your postcard perfect paradise will come to life right before your eyes in a destination that will surely take your breath away.

Experience the romance of the South Pacific, the laid-back beauty of the Caribbean, the adventure of Central America and the exotic splendor of Asia. Host Christina Cindrich takes you to her top 10 most incredible private islands in the world.

Perhaps nowhere else in Thailand can you enjoy the combination of sun, beach and nightlife quite like in Phuket. Thailand's largest and most popular island seduces its visitors with a vibrant mix of nighttime entertainment and beach culture.

Isla Simca is a jungle hideaway where natural beauty, art, adventure and architecture fuse into a one-of-a-kind retreat. Join host Christina Cindrich on this Panamanian island that until now has been hidden away from the world's prying eyes!

The Grenadines, an island chain deep in the Caribbean. The name alone elicit visions of exotic and peaceful scenery. St. Vincent being the largest, but away from the hustle and traffic, become mesmerized by the beauty of these castaway islands.

The name Laucala is whispered in all the best circles partly because only the best know how to pronounce it. Owned by the co-founder of Red Bull, this Fijian paradise is one of the worlds top island resorts and once there its easy to see why.

Conjuring up postcard-perfect images of South Pacific indulgence and breathtaking scenery, Bora Bora is a haven of exclusive luxury in French Polynesia. Join host Christina Cindrich in this exclusive Private Islands episode you wont want to miss!

Join host Christina Cindrich in a destination known as the real Africa. With its private river islands and abundance of wildlife, Zambia gives an authentic feeling of a wilderness that is wild, beautiful, and slightly unpredictable.

Read more from the original source:

Private Islands AWE