Kids need sports: Will the MIAA cancel sports for the second straight season after rousing summer success stories? – Wicked Local Medford

Theres no denying the last four months of isolating the population to slow down the pandemic has had mixed results. The spread of the virus has definitely been declining insome states, but now state and local governments must figure out a way for a safe return to what we have taken for granted throughout all of our lives.

Reopening of the schools has to head up that list, because the kids, in particular, need that interaction. This has become no more apparent than their reaction to finally being sprung back onto the baseball and softball diamonds the last few weeks in most communities. From the earliest levels to teenagers, they couldnt wait to swing that bat or throw that ball, and their enthusiasm was palpable. Playing the game they love, while abiding by the safety regulations put in place to protect against the virus has had a positive impact on the participants. It can be done with the proper protocols even in the classrooms and most local youth leagues were able to work through these guidelines for the sake of their kids.

The Beverly Little League tried to reopen for a summer season, but erring on the side of caution it thought it was best for the safety of everybody involved to just cancel the 2020 season altogether. The reaction of that decision among the parents was predictable.

In last weeks Herald Citizen and on Wicked Local Beverly, Beverly Little League President Scott McKenzie explained what went into the decision to cancel the season, and how he and the rest of the board of directors anguished over it. There were numerous reactions to the story on the Beverly Citizen Facebook page, but this one from a concerned parent basically summed up the importance of sports in a youngsters development.

"We are fortunate that all three of our kids have been able to get back to sports (lax & field hockey) over the past couple of weeks. Seeing first-hand the positive impact it has had coming out of three months of quarantine is truly amazing. Kids need this NOW more so than any other summer! This is a giant miss by BLL [Beverly Little League], no excuse considering the precedent is already been set with other towns/ sports going back online. I was looking forward to one last summer at Harry Ball."

The Beverly parent mentioned that playing this summer has had a "positive impact" on three of his children. He noted kids need that more than ever now after spending time in quarantine, as everybody was told to do to flatten that mythical curve. There was not the usual interaction among teammates in the spring thats necessary for their development, but there was probably a whole lot of playing video games to pass the time of day.

Among the area Little Leagues that have resumed operations include: Danvers, Gloucester, Hamilton-Wenham, Melrose, Medford, Marblehead, Peabody Little League, Peabody West Little League, Swampscott, Salem, Georgetown and Somerville.

Nick Fisher, a coach and board member in the Medford Youth Softball League, knows the hard work by adults to implement the safety protocols has been worthwhile for the kids.

"It's been great," Fisher said. "As someone who has coached sports for a while, the requirements have forced me to be more intentional on how I plan and execute a practice. Like many of the Board members, I was pretty concerned about the requirements in place going into our first practice, but seeing how much joy it brought the girls to be outside and around their friends and classmates has made the extra work totally worth it."

Medford softballs president Danielle DiRusso agrees.

"Everyone involved was great with complying with guidelines," she said. "Games have definitely been a little challenging figuring out logistics of extended dugouts and getting information out to parents and coaches. But I think we are ready, and the girls are definitely ready to play."

Matt Callahan, head coach of the new U-17 Saugus Iron Legion Essex County Baseball League team, had a difficult time understanding why kids couldnt play against each other before Gov. Charlie Bakers Phase 3 reopening went into effect to allow competitive games. They were allowed to practice in June, but games at that time were banned.

"Were just going to keep practicing until we can play games. Its hard to understand what is allowed in our society, and what isnt. You would think this would be more of a priority, but its not," Callahan said after a practice in June.

But on July 6, baseball and softball games on all levels became a reality, which pleases many.

The Massachusetts Interscholastic Athletic Association [MIAA] has begun this week debating the merits of having a fall sports season, but if they look at the success of area Little Leagues, softball programs, and teen and adult leagues its clear it can be done with the new normal health and safety guidelines. It just takes a little extra work on the adults part to make sure kids dont lose out on another scholastic athletic season like what happened to them in the spring.

Joe McConnell is the Senior Multimedia Sport Journalist for Gannett New Englands North Unit, and he may be reached at jmcconnell@wickedlocal.com.

See original here:

Kids need sports: Will the MIAA cancel sports for the second straight season after rousing summer success stories? - Wicked Local Medford

Commentary: What is the truth about forgiving others? – SW News Media

Have you ever felt something was unfair, you didnt deserve it and you found it difficult to forgive? Were pretty sure thats a universal feeling. If thats something youve experienced, youre not alone.

Especially in the last few months you probably have noticed that there seems to be so much anger and bitterness playing itself out in society on a local, national and international basis. There are undoubtedly also some couples and families who struggle with forgiveness. To forgive, or not, is a choice.

This reminds us of a familiar story well share because it is about choices. Its titled: "A Tale of Two Wolves."

One evening an old Cherokee man told his grandson about a battle that goes on inside people. He said, My son, the battle is between two wolves inside us all.

"One is evil. It is anger, envy, jealousy, doubt, sorrow, regret, greed, arrogance, self-pity, resentment and lies. The other is good. It is joy, peace, love, hope, serenity, humility, kindness, empathy, forgiveness, generosity, compassion and faith.

The grandson thought about it for a minute and then asked his grandfather: Which wolf wins? The old Cherokee simply replied, The one you feed.

In "A Tale of Two Wolves," we see how we have a choice about what we focus on. We can choose to focus on anger and resentment or we can focus on learning how to have peace and forgiveness. We know its not always easy to find forgiveness when you have been wronged, but forgiving can bring benefits.

Nelson Mandela said, As I walked out the door toward my freedom, I knew that if I did not leave all the anger, hatred and bitterness behind, that I would still be in prison. Yes, it is a burden to carry all those negative feelings.

So, what does it mean to forgive? Lets look at the definition of forgiveness from The Forgiveness Project (http://theforgivenessproject.com): Forgiveness is the principled decision to give up your justified right for revenge; it also requires the forgiver to recognize that the offender is human like myself.

Forgiveness has many benefits, including having less hostility and anger; less stress; lowered blood pressure so heart health is improved; better mental health with less anxiety and depression; better relationships; and a stronger immune system. All of these are great benefits for the forgiver.

To explore more about forgiveness, we talked to Excelsior resident, psychologist Mona Gustafson Affinito, PhD, who has written two books on forgiveness. These books are "When to Forgive" and "Forgiving One Page at a Time," which has a diary format to help people work through the forgiveness process. In this second book, Dr. Affinito said, Forgiving is a long, hard process, calling for deep searching into the Self and ones ideas of justice and morality.

We acknowledge that forgiveness is a concept that can be quite complex and difficult at times. Dr. Affinito said, Forgiveness is related to gratitude. It reflects an attitude in life that were grateful for whatever we are given. She added, The one person whos sure to gain from forgiveness is the forgiver. Well also be watching for Dr. Affinitos upcoming book, "My Fathers House," which she plans to have published before the end of this year.

Forgiveness means different things to different people. In general, it often means that people make a decision to forgive and to let go of resentment. They also might decide to stop looking to get revenge.

When theres a realization that we are all human, some mistakes are easier to forgive. When its an intentional wounding, its definitely harder to work through being able to forgive. Forgiving doesnt mean forgetting. It means being able to get rid of the burden you carry with you so you feel free. Louis B. Smedes said, To forgive is to set a prisoner free and discover that the prisoner was you.

What about you? Is there someone you want to forgive or some injustice that you have suffered? Only youll know when, and if, forgiveness is what you want to do. By now youve probably guessed that the truth about forgiving others is that when you forgive, it sets you free and you benefit even more than the people youre forgiving.

As we work toward greater understanding and forgiveness, well reap the benefits. This will also contribute to more peace and caring between people and in families, communities and our world.

Read more:

Commentary: What is the truth about forgiving others? - SW News Media

Auburn University expert: Here’s how to prepare for Alabama wildfire season – Alabama NewsCenter

As most of the United States enters the wildfire season, Auburn Universityexpert John Kush comments on what can be expected and how landowners and managers can help reduce occurrences and damage.

Kush is a retired research fellow in the School of Forestry and Wildlife Sciences at Auburn. He conducted research for 39 years with a focus on stand dynamics, fire effects and restoration, and he taught classes related to forest ecology. He teaches a forest fire management class and several others in the restoration ecology graduate certificate program at Auburn.

Q: What is the best way to prepare land to help prevent forest fires in the future?

John Kush: The best way to prepare land to help prevent forest fires is to reduce the fuel load that is present. Fire needs three things: oxygen, heat and fuel. There is very little we can do about those first two factors, but we can work on the fuel. Good portions of the South see fire every year through people conducting prescribed fires. Often the goal is to improve wildlife habitat, recreation and aesthetics, making forest management easier. Fires make this happen, but they also reduce the fuels available to burn. The smaller amount of fuel available to burn, the less intense the fire. If fire is not an option, there are mechanical means to reduce/remove the fuel, but these can be very expensive. The situation in California is one where fuels have accumulated over the past several decades due to a lack of prescribed fire management and people building homes/communities within forested habitat. Once a fire starts where the fuels are heavy and draped in trees and shrubs, they are very difficult to contain and dangerous to fight.

There are ways homeowners can work toward reducing the wildfire risks their homes face by making them Firewise. The National Fire Protection Associationhas some excellent information on its website to assist homeowners.

Q: How does this forest-fire season look when considering the current amount of rainfall across the U.S.?

Kush: The fire season is very dynamic and can change in a matter of a few days. Just five to seven weeks ago, the Gulf Coast was experiencing drought conditions, while in Auburn we had nearly 10 inches of rain in April alone. Several fires were occurring from east of New Orleans, along the Gulf to central Florida. The rains arrived and right now there is little threat of wildfires in the Southeast. When you talk about the western U.S., their fire season typically runs from June to October. It can start earlier and go later depending on the weather conditions that year. Currently, Alaska is experiencing as many wildfires as are happening in the western states of New Mexico, Arizona and California. As the summer goes on, the threat of wildfires will move north into the Rocky Mountains and then the Pacific Northwest. The problem in the western U.S. is the low humidity, sometimes in the single digits. Once the relative humidity drops below 20%, fires can easily ignite and spread, driven by winds that can be fairly common.

A good source to review is the National Interagency Fire Centers website, which has wildfire predictions. An excellent source of information about fire weather for Alabama can be found on the Alabama Forestry Commission site.

If you are interested in current drought conditions and the potential wildfire risk, check the Keetch-Byram Drought Indexand the Fire Danger Rating, both on the Wildland Fire Assessment System site.

Predictions for drought this summer are also available on the National Weather Services Climate Prediction Centers site. If you are interested in seeing where wildfires are happening in the U.S., visit the USDA Forest Services Active Fire Mapping Program site.

Q: What is the annual economic damage caused by forest fires?

Kush: The annual economic damage caused by wildfires will depend on the length of the wildfire season and the proximity of the fires to homes/communities. The annual losses have been estimated to range from $63 billion to nearly $300 billion. In general, economic losses from wildfires will increase each year with expected changes in climate, becoming warmer and drier, leading to extended wildfire seasons. In addition, people will continue to move out into the wildland-urban interface, making it more difficult to fight wildfires when they start.

Q: What are the most common causes of the fires?

Kush: The most common causes of wildfires are human-related. Estimates have this as high as 85%. Many of them are unintentional, the result of burning debris, unattended campfires, careless disposal of cigarettes, malfunctioning machinery and more. And then you have the intentional act of arson. The major source of a natural cause for a wildfire is lightning strikes.

Q: What is something that would amaze us about forest fires?

Kush: In addition to fire being beneficial to many ecosystems and species, fires move faster when traveling uphill. A fire tornado can form when winds around a fire begin to spin. A large enough fire can produce its own weather system. Some species of pine trees need forest fires. The heat allows them to release seeds from their otherwise tightly sealed cones. Another benefit is that areas managed with fire have fewer ticks and chiggers than they would otherwise.

This story originally appeared on Auburn Universitys website.

Original post:

Auburn University expert: Here's how to prepare for Alabama wildfire season - Alabama NewsCenter

Bitcoin Cash (BCH) Up $5.46 Over Past 4 Hours, Makes Big Move Relative to Past Month; Started Today Up 8.58% – CFDTrading

Bitcoin Cash 4 Hour Price Update

Updated July 28, 2020 01:35 AM GMT (09:35 PM EST)

Bitcoin Cash came into the current 4 hour candle up 2.04% ($5.46) from the open of the last 4 hour candle, marking the 2nd candle in a row an increase has occurred. Relative to other instruments in the Top Cryptos asset class, Bitcoin Cash ranked 4th since the last 4 hour candle in terms of percentage price change.

268.98 (USD) was the opening price of the day for Bitcoin Cash, resulting in the previous day being one in which price moved up 8.58% ($21.25) from the previous day. The price move occurred on stronger volume; specifically, yesterdays volume was up 136.84% from the day prior, and up 734.72% from the same day the week before. Relative to other instruments in the Top Cryptos asset class, Bitcoin Cash ranked 3rd since the previous day in terms of percentage price change. Lets take a look at the daily price chart of Bitcoin Cash.

The first thing we should note is that Bitcoin Cash is now close to its 200 day moving averages, which may act as price barrier for the asset. Trend traders will want to observe that the strongest trend appears on the 14 day horizon; over that time period, price has been moving up. For additional context, note that price has gone up 15 out of the past 30 days.

For laughs, fights, or genuinely useful information, lets see what the most popular tweets pertaining to Bitcoin Cash for the past day were:

The Bitcoin Cash community is currently in grifter mode. The reason for the turn to grift (donations and foundations) is because zero time has been spent developing viable business models.Tell people why and how building on BCH will be profitable and no need for grift.

Hello all ,From today I start my own Giveaways, I have not much money but I give 100% to winner. This time 1$ Bitcoin cashJust follow. @LiaqatA54199946 RetweetLikeWinner announced soon

@bccponzi Can you please tell me, what makes both Bitcoin Cash and SV eligible to be top 10 and $AMPL not?

Continued here:

Bitcoin Cash (BCH) Up $5.46 Over Past 4 Hours, Makes Big Move Relative to Past Month; Started Today Up 8.58% - CFDTrading

Third Anniversary of Bitcoin Cash Highlights a Myriad of Network Improvements | Featured – Bitcoin News

In twelve days the Bitcoin Cash community will celebrate the third anniversary of the 2017 fork that happened on August 1. Since then, a number of changes have happened during the last three years and the following editorial will discuss the significant differences between both chains.

The Bitcoin Cash (BCH) fork took place almost three years ago in 2017 and the official anniversary is twelve days away. A lot has happened since then and in 2018, the Bitcoinsv (BSV) community forked away from the BCH chain.

Currently, BTC, BCH, and BSV are the largest and most popular Bitcoin branches by onchain use, adoption, and overall market valuations. The Bitcoin Cash fork stemmed from the multi-year scaling debate over the 1MB block size limit, and the BTC chain still maintains that consensus limit.

In 2017, the BCH block size was increased and ever since then, its been raised to 32MB. Besides having a much larger block size, the BCH chain has seen a myriad of improvements during the last three years.

Bitcoin Cash (BCH) developers have increased to the block size to 32MB, re-enabled old Satoshi opcodes, added version bits voting, and increased the default datacarriersize to 220 bytes.

BCH engineers also implemented a Segwit recovery exception, enabled Schnorr signatures, created Cash Accounts, enabled Schnorr signatures on OP_Checkmultisig, support for OP_Reversebytes was added, and increased chained tx limit from 25 to 50.

With other improvements and tools like Cashfusion and the Simple Ledger Protocol (SLP), theres a total of 30 completed Bitcoin Cash improvements since August 1, 2017.

During the last few months since May 11, 2020, it has been 1-5% more profitable to mine on the BTC chain in contrast to mining BCH. Although, statistics show on Coin Dance that it is 2,054.93x more expensive to transact on the BTC chain instead of leveraging BCH.

At press time it is $0.003 per BCH transaction or a third of a U.S. penny. Data from Billfodl shows that the next block fee for BTC or the fee to have your transaction mined in the next block (10 minutes), is $0.92 per transaction. Even though BCH has a much larger block size, the BTC chain is also 140GB larger than the BCH chain.

BTCs codebase is polished regularly and theres a lot of different small things that have been changed since August 1, 2017. However, the BTC network still maintains consensus for a 1MB block size, and this is improved slightly with Segwit and transaction batching. Theres a lot more offchain development happening between projects like the Lightning Network and sidechains created by teams like RSK, and Blockstream.

BTC does hold 95% of the SHA256 hashrate and the average BTC block reward today is around $57,400, while BCH sees $1,400 per block. The Bitcoin Cash network processed 137 blocks in the last 24 hours, while BTC miners processed 129 blocks. BTC is seeing an average of 326,293 transactions today, while the BCH 24-hour transaction metric on July 21 is just under 20,000.

BTC has seen an all-time high of 439,000 transactions confirmed in a 24-hour period. However, due to the 32MB BCH block size, the Bitcoin Cash chain has processed upwards of 2.4 million in one 24-hour period back in 2018.

Two projects that are considered very important to the BCH ecosystem have seen a lot of development during the last year. Specifically, Cashfusion and the Simple Ledger Protocol has galvanized the BCH chain in a few different ways.

Cashfusion has been recognized for providing a higher level of anonymity than traditional Coinjoin practices, as the outputs are not uniform.

On January 29, data analyst James Waugh wrote that Cashfusion was far more practical than other Coinjoin protocols. Waugh explained he sifted through thousands of transaction inputs and outputs and realized that its not possible to establish a concrete link between them.

With the Simple Ledger Protocol (SLP), the BCH community has seen tokenization on the chain grow robust.

Thousands of unique tokens have been created and just recently the most popular stablecoin tether (USDT) was issued onchain using the SLP infrastructure. Whether BCH supporters hate tether or not, the 6 million USDT issued on Bitcoin Cash is meaningful because BCH offers permissionless stablecoins.

BCH-based USDT cannot be frozen like the smart contracts implemented in a number of ERC20-based stablecoins. Additionally, the fees on the Ethereum chain have been astronomical lately, and many BCH supporters see a great number of token projects migrating for lower transaction fees.

Even though fees at $0.003 per BCH transaction are incredibly inexpensive, the Postage Protocol invoked by Cointext founder, Vin Armani, could make fees disappear in certain instances.

Overall a lot has changed in the world of Bitcoin Cash (BCH) and a great number of supporters will be celebrating next week.

What do you think about the last three years of BCH improvements compared to BTCs changes? Let us know in the comments section below.

Image Credits: Shutterstock, Pixabay, Wiki Commons, IntotheBlock stats, Simpleledger.info, Reddit, Coin Dance,

Disclaimer: This article is for informational purposes only. It is not a direct offer or solicitation of an offer to buy or sell, or a recommendation or endorsement of any products, services, or companies. Bitcoin.com does not provide investment, tax, legal, or accounting advice. Neither the company nor the author is responsible, directly or indirectly, for any damage or loss caused or alleged to be caused by or in connection with the use of or reliance on any content, goods or services mentioned in this article.

Excerpt from:

Third Anniversary of Bitcoin Cash Highlights a Myriad of Network Improvements | Featured - Bitcoin News

Bitcoin Cash Price Analysis: BCH/USD rocketing to $300 after breaking out of tight range – FXStreet

Bitcoin Cash continues to build on the gains recorded over the weekend. The trading on Monday was mainly bullish but did not have enough force to penetrate the resistance of the tight narrow range discussed. However, the Asian session on Tuesday saw the bulls ascend to the helm, breaking past the resistance at $270 (narrow range limit).

BCH/USD is trading at $276 at the time of writing. The price is also above the 200-day SMA, which is a key milestone. All technical levels and indicators point towards continued bullish action. It is only a matter of minutes before the bulls take down the resistance at $280 and shift the focus to $300.

The RSI in the daily range is almost entering the overbought region. The MACD is moving further up within the positive region. The bullish divergence above it shows that bulls are indeed in control. For now, pushing the price past $280 is the bulls priority. Higher support, preferably above $280 would give the bulls an opportunity to focus on taking the fight to $300.

See the original post:

Bitcoin Cash Price Analysis: BCH/USD rocketing to $300 after breaking out of tight range - FXStreet

Crypto Market Sentiment is Back Up, Bitcoin & Ethereum In The Positive Zone – Cryptonews

Source: iStock/primeimages

Following a small drop seen last week, crypto market sentiment score (sentscore) is now right back where it was two weeks ago and not a step further, as per crypto market sentiment analysis site Omenics. The combined moving 7-day average sentscore for the top 10 coins is back to 5.77/10.

With the rise in prices - particularly bitcoin (BTC) and ethereum (ETH) surpassing the crucial USD 10,000 and USD 300 levels, respectively - we are also seeing a rise in the majority of the top 10 coins' sentscores.

All but binance coin (BNB) and chainlink (LINK) are green this week.

This also means that LINK has dropped out of the positive zone, and with no coin taking its place, leaving only two coins there: bitcoin and ethereum, both of which saw a significant rise in their respective scores. Bitcoin already reached the relatively rarely seen sentscore of 7, while ethereum stands nearby with 6.7.

The large majority of the remaining coins are in the 5-5.9 range, with only bitcoin cash (BCH) staying below. However, it too is a the verge of this range, seeing a score increase in the past seven days.

The definite winner of the week is one of the last week's two green coins: tether (USDT)'s score went up nearly 25%. Two other coins saw two-digit rises, albeit a lot smaller ones in comparison, these being EOS and bitcoin.

As for the last 24 hours, the situation is even better. The combined moving average sentscore for the top 10 coins has entered the positive zone with 6.2/10 - compared to last week's 5.2. Bitcoin and ethereum have scores of 7.7 and 7.2, respectively, while cardano (ADA), litecoin (LTC), and LINK all entered the positive zone with scores of 6 and above. The other five coins also have high sentscores, between 5.4 and 5.9.

Sentiment change among the top 10 coins*:Interpreting the sentscores scale:- 0 to 2.5: very negative- 2 to 3.9: somewhat negative zone- 4 to 5.9: neutral zone- 6 to 7.49: somewhat positive zone- 7.5 to 10: very positive

Daily Bitcoin sentscore change in the past month:

The 29 coins outside the top 10 list have also had a good week for the most part. Sixteen are green, none are in the negative zone, and three are in the positive zone: IOTA (MIOTA), waves (WAVES), and NEM (XEM).

___

* - Methodology:

Omenics measures the market sentiment by calculating the sentscore, which aggregates the sentiment from news, social media, technical analysis, viral trends, and coin fundamentals-based upon their proprietary algorithms.As their website explains, Omenics aggregates trending news articles and viral social media posts into an all-in-one data platform, where you can also analyze content sentiment, later adding, Omenics combines the 2 sentiment indicators from news and social media with 3 additional verticals for technical analysis, coin fundamentals, and buzz, resulting in the sentscore which reports a general outlook for each coin. For now, they are rating 39 cryptocurrencies.

Read more:

Crypto Market Sentiment is Back Up, Bitcoin & Ethereum In The Positive Zone - Cryptonews

Letter to the Editor: Waltham resident calls for end to censorship – Wicked Local Waltham

This Letter to the Editor ran in the July 23 issue of the Waltham News Tribune.

TO THE EDITOR:

In the rush to stop hate and misinformation on social media we need to hit pause and allow some public debate, because theres another side to this issue: censorship, a violation of our Bill of Rights.

The New Left demands censorship of any statement that isnt 100% in lockstep with their program. If you dont comply, they will attack you and in some cases, destroy your life.

This isnt what might happen; this is what is happening in America today.

With the media as their soul mates, the New Left has significant power. If you think thats an exaggeration look at the record of recent years. How many lives were destroyed rightly or wrongly by the press? The answer is: all the ones the New Left wanted destroyed.

The important question we need to ask is, who is going to be the policeman in this folly? The president, congress, a committee, Mark Zuckerburg, CNN, FOX, RNC, DNC? Put all of them, and their best intentions, into one bucket and I still wouldnt trust them or anyone else on this earth with control over my speech.

Personally, I dont believe theres such a thing as hate speech. You should be free to say what you want, on any subject. You can speak volumes about the benefits of necrophilia you aint ever gonna convince me its a good thing!

There should be no barriers to the exchange of ideas, so why are people afraid to let people say what they want? Are they afraid that not everything they believe will stand up to scrutiny?

Our forefathers have proven to the world what geniuses they were and one of the most sacred beliefs they understood was a God given right: free speech. They knew anything short of that was a form of compliance, allegiance to someone elses beliefs, a form of mind control. Thats why they didnt put limitations on any speech.

The power the New Left has achieved has created a new silent majority; silent because no one dares speak or write in opposition for fear they will be publicly humiliated, labeled a hate monger.

And now we want Facebook and others to determine what free speech will be free.

One of your most basic rights as an American is at stake here; its time for you to speak out.

John Savarese

Fuller Street

Letter to the Editor: Guidelines for writing

The News Tribune welcomes letters to the editor and guest columns from readers on issues of local interest. Letters are limited to 400 words; columns are limited to 600 words. Submissions exceeding the word limit may not be published and will be returned to the writer for editing. All opinion submissions are due by 9 a.m. the Monday before publication.

Submissions must include the authors street, which will be published with the name of the author. Only submissions from residents will be published. Unsigned letters and form letters will not be published. No two submissions by the same author will run in a 30-day period.

Send submissions to: Waltham News Tribune, 9 Meriam St., Lexington, MA 02420; or email to waltham@wickedlocal.com. Letters must include a phone number for verification purposes only; numbers will not be published.

See the rest here:

Letter to the Editor: Waltham resident calls for end to censorship - Wicked Local Waltham

Netflix Scraps Turkish Original ‘If Only’ Over Censorship of Gay Character – TheWrap

Ozge Ozpirincci via YouTube / Beyaz Show

Netflix has decided to scrap production on a Turkish original series called If Only after Turkish officials refused them a filming license unless they removed a gay supporting character from the script.

Netflix remains deeply committed to our Turkish members and the creative community in Turkey, a Netflix spokesperson told TheWrap Tuesday. We are proud of the incredible talent we work with. We currently have several Turkish originals in production with more to come and look forward to sharing these stories with our members all around the world.

The eight-part relationship drama starring Turkish actress Ozge Ozpirincci was ordered in March and was being made by Turkish production outfit Ay Yapim, with Ece Yren serving as creator and showrunner.

Also Read: Netflix Pulls 'Designated Survivor' Episode From Turkey After Turkish Censors Objected

Here is shows logline, from Netflix:

The series tells the story of Reyhan who is unhappy and disappointed in her marriage with Nadir. On 27th of July 2018 at 8:19pm, during an evening where she was feeling exhausted of her husband whom shes known since his circumcision, of their marriage, their 9 year-old twins that were conceived as a result of a broken condom, the life she leads but mostly of herself, the strongest blood moon eclipse of the past 500 years takes place. And thanks to a miracle, Reyhan travels in time, to the turning point of her life, the night Nadir proposes to her, but this time with the wisdom of her 30 year old self.

According to a person familiar with the situation, Turkish officials are allowed to see scripts before they approve or deny filming permits. Producers would not have been able to continue filming If Only in Turkey unless they removed the gay character from the script, so the decision was made to cease production rather than give up creative control of the project.

Netflix currently has three other Turkish Originals on the platform, including Love 101, The Protector, and The Gift, the latter of which has been renewed for a third season. The streaming service has at least two other series in development.

The actor, who would have turned 69 today, made his acting debut in a little-seen 1977 comedy "Can I Do It 'Till I Need Glasses?"

Williams made his big screen debut in little-seen 1977 comedy "Can I Do It 'Till I Need Glasses?"

Williams made several appearances doing sketches on 1977's "The Richard Pryor Show"

The quirky comedy series "Mork and Mindy," a spinoff from "Happy Days" and an alien character he debuted on that hit, premiered in 1978 and put Williams on the map.

Christopher Reeve presented Williams with a People's Choice Award for Favorite Male Performer for "Mork and Mindy" in 1979.

"The World According to Garp" (1982) marked one of Williams' first dramatic performances, in the title role of a John Irving novel adaptation.

Williams was received his first Oscar nomination for his role in 1987's "Good Morning, Vietnam."

O Captain! My captain! Williams captivated a young audience by playing an unorthodox professor in 1989's "Dead Poets Society."

"There you are, Peter." Williams played a grown up Peter Pan returning to Neverland in 1991's "Hook."

Williams memorably voiced the Genie in Disney's animated classic "Aladdin," which came out in 1992.

"Mrs Doubtfire" was released in 1993 and remains one of Williams' most iconic roles.

Williams played a wild man returning to civilization as a result of a board game gone very wrong in 1995's "Jumanji."

Williams played one half of a flamboyant gay couple opposite Nathan Lane in 1996's "The Birdcage."

Williams won the Best Supporting Actor Oscar for 1997's "Good Will Hunting" with Matt Damon and Ben Affleck.

Williams celebrating his Oscar win for "Good Will Hunting" in 1998 with Matt Damon and Ben Affleck, who also won Oscars for Best Original Screenplay.

For a film in which he plays a doctor/clown, 1998's "Patch Adams" was a somber and dramatic turn for Williams.

Williams went dark and twisted for Mark Romanek's 2002 cult favorite thriller "One Hour Photo."

Williams played Teddy Roosevelt in 2006's "Night at the Museum" and reprised the role in the 2009 sequel. The threequel, "Secret of the Tomb," hit theaters in 2014 -- just months after his death.

Williams with his daughter Zelda (with second wife Marsha Garces) in 2009.

Williams with his wife, Susan Schneider, in 2012. The couple was married in 2011.

Williams played President Dwight D. Eisenhower in Lee Daniels' "The Butler" in 2013.

The last Williams film to be released while he was alive was 2014's "The Angriest Man in Brooklyn," which co-starred Mila Kunis.

"Night at the Museum: Secret of the Tomb" was the last studio film Williams had completed prior to his death. He posted this photo with his stand-in and stunt double in May 2014.

The last photo Williams ever posted to social media was this #tbt featuring him with his daughter on July 31: "Happy Birthday to Ms. Zelda Rae Williams! Quarter of a century old today but always my baby girl. Happy Birthday @zeldawilliams Love you!"

The actor, who would have turned 69 today, made his acting debut in a little-seen 1977 comedy Can I Do It Till I Need Glasses?

The actor, who would have turned 69 today, made his acting debut in a little-seen 1977 comedy "Can I Do It 'Till I Need Glasses?"

Read more from the original source:

Netflix Scraps Turkish Original 'If Only' Over Censorship of Gay Character - TheWrap

Everywhere And Nowhere: The Many Layers of ‘Cancel Culture’ – Voice of America

NEW YORK - So you've probably read a lot about "cancel culture." Or know about a new poll that shows a plurality of Americans disapproving of it. Or you may have heard about a letter in Harper's Magazine condemning censorship and intolerance.

But can you say exactly what "cancel culture" is? Some takes:

"It seems like a buzzword that creates more confusion than clarity," says the author and journalist George Packer, who went on to call it "a mechanism where a chorus of voices, amplified on social media, tries to silence a point of view that they find offensive by trying to damage or destroy the reputation of the person who has given offense."

"I don't think it's real. But there are reasonable people who believe in it," says the author, educator and sociologist Tressie McMillan Cottom. "From my perspective, accountability has always existed. But some people are being held accountable in ways that are new to them. We didn't talk about 'cancel culture' when someone was charged with a crime and had to stay in jail because they couldn't afford the bail."

"'Cancel culture' tacitly attempts to disable the ability of a person with whom you disagree to ever again be taken seriously as a writer/editor/speaker/activist/intellectual, or in the extreme, to be hired or employed in their field of work," says Letty Cottin Pogrebin, the author, activist and founding editor of Ms. magazine.

"It means different things to different people," says Ben Wizner, director of the ACLU's Speech, Privacy, and Technology Project.

In tweets, online letters, opinion pieces and books, conservatives, centrists and liberals continue to denounce what they call growing intolerance for opposing viewpoints and the needless ruining of lives and careers. A Politico/Morning Consult poll released last week shows 44% of Americans disapprove of it, 32% approve and the remaining 24% had no opinion or didn't know what it was.

For some, "cancel culture" is the coming of the thought police. For others, it contains important chances to be heard that didn't exist before.

Recent examples of unpopular "cancellations" include the owner of a chain of food stores in Minneapolis whose business faced eviction and calls for boycotts because of racist social media posts by his then-teenage daughter, and a data analyst fired by the progressive firm Civis Analytics after he tweeted a study finding that nonviolent protests increase support for Democratic candidates and violent protests decrease it. Civis Analytics has denied he was fired for the tweet.

"These incidents damage the lives of innocent people without achieving any noble purpose," Yascha Mounk wrote in The Atlantic last month. Mounk himself has been criticized for alleging that "an astonishing number of academics and journalists proudly proclaim that it is time to abandon values like due process and free speech."

Debates can be circular and confusing, with those objecting to intolerance sometimes openly uncomfortable with those who don't share their views. A few weeks ago, more than 100 artists and thinkers endorsed a letter co-written by Packer and published by Harper's. It warned against a "new set of moral attitudes and political commitments that tend to weaken our norms of open debate and toleration of differences in favor of ideological conformity."

The letter drew signatories from many backgrounds and political points of view, ranging from the far-left Noam Chomsky to the conservative David Frum, and was a starting point for contradiction.

The writer and trans activist Jennifer Finney Boylan, who signed the letter, quickly disowned it because she "did not know who else" had attached their names. Although endorsers included Salman Rushdie, who in 1989 was forced into hiding over death threats from Iranian Islamic leaders because of his novel "The Satanic Verses," numerous online critics dismissed the letter as a product of elitists who knew nothing about censorship.

One of the organizers of the letter, the writer Thomas Chatterton Williams, later announced on Twitter that he had thrown a guest out of his home over criticisms of letter-supporter Bari Weiss, the New York Times columnist who recently quit over what she called a Twitter-driven culture of political correctness. Another endorser, "Harry Potter" author J.K. Rowling, threatened legal action against a British news site that suggested she was transphobic after referring to controversial tweets that she has written in recent months.

"The only speech these powerful people seem to care about is their own," the author and feminist Jessica Valenti wrote in response to the Harper's letter. "('Cancel culture' ) is certainly not about free speech: After all, an arrested journalist is never referred to as 'canceled,' nor is a woman who has been frozen out of an industry after complaining about sexual harassment. 'Canceled' is a label we all understand to mean a powerful person who's been held to account."

"Cancel culture" is hard to define, in part because there is nothing confined about it no single cause, no single ideology, no single fate for those allegedly canceled.

Harvey Weinstein and Bill Cosby, convicted sex offenders, are in prison. Former television personality Charlie Rose has been unemployable since allegations of sexual abuse and harassment were published in 2017-18. Oscar winner Kevin Spacey has made no films since he faced allegations of harassment and assault and saw his performance in "All the Money in the World" replaced by Christopher Plummer's.

Others are only partially "canceled." Woody Allen, accused by daughter Dylan Farrow of molesting her when she was 7, was dropped by Amazon, his U.S. film distributor, but continues to release movies overseas. His memoir was canceled by Hachette Book Group, but soon acquired by Skyhorse Publishing, which also has a deal with the previously "canceled" Garrison Keillor. Sirius XM announced last week that the late Michael Jackson, who seemed to face posthumous cancellation after the 2019 documentary "Leaving Neverland" presented extensive allegations that he sexually abused boys, would have a channel dedicated to his music.

Cancellation in one subculture can lead to elevation in others. Former San Francisco 49ers quarterback Colin Kaepernick has not played an NFL game since 2016 and has been condemned by President Donald Trump and many others on the right after he began kneeling during the National Anthem to protest "a country that oppresses black people and people of color." But he has appeared in Nike advertisements, been honored by the ACLU and Amnesty International and reached an agreement with the Walt Disney Co. for a series about his life.

"You can say the NFL canceled Colin Kaepernick as a quarterback and that he was resurrected as a cultural hero," says Julius Bailey, an associate professor of philosophy at Wittenberg University who writes about Kaepernick in his book "Racism, Hypocrisy and Bad Faith."

In politics, Virginia Governor Ralph Northam, a Democrat, remains in his job 1 1/2 years after acknowledging he appeared in a racist yearbook picture while in college. Sen. Al Franken, a Democrat from Minnesota, resigned after multiple women alleged he had sexually harassed them, but Lt. Governor Justin Fairfax of Virginia defied orders to quit after two women accused him of sexual assault.

Sometimes even multiple allegations of sexual assault, countless racist remarks and the disparagement of wounded military veterans aren't enough to induce cancellation. Trump, a Republican, has labeled cancel culture "far-left fascism" and "the very definition of totalitarianism" while so far proving immune to it.

"Politicians can ride this out because they were hired by the public. And if the public is willing to go along, then they can sometimes survive things perhaps they shouldn't survive," Packer says.

"I think you can say that Trump's rhetoric has had a boomerang effect on the rest of our society," says PEN America CEO Suzanne Nossel, who addresses free expression in her book "Dare to Speak," which comes out next week. "People on the left feel that he can get away with anything, so they do all they can to contain it elsewhere."

Follow this link:

Everywhere And Nowhere: The Many Layers of 'Cancel Culture' - Voice of America

Concerns Around Data Access by Foreign Nations Should be Expanded Beyond the Current China Focus – Social Media Today

Should the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) be allowed to access the data of citizens from other countries, and what are the risks of allowing such?

This is the core question at the heart of calls to ban rising video app TikTok, which has come under increased scrutiny in several regions over its ties to the Chinese regime. To be clear, TikTok's Chinese-owned parent company ByteDanceis indeed beholden, under China's cybersecurity laws, to share its data with the CCP, if so requested. We don't know if such requests have been made in the past, but we do know that ByteDance has previously censored content and managed its platforms in line with CCP rule.

It remains likely that the CCP could request, and receive, data on TikTok users from around the world, for whatever purposes it may have in mind - but what are those purposes, really, and does that access really pose a threat?

The answer to this is both unknowable, and somewhat moot. The threat of China, which has gradually pushed its borders through violent conflicts of late, both in Hong Kong and India, is clearly a concern, but China itself should not be the key issue here. The concern highlighted by TikTok is more about personal data - who can access it and what it can be used for.

Yes, it's a concern that the CCP may be able to access data on foreign citizens, but should it not also be a concern that any nation is able to theoretically access the data of citizens in another?Facebook, a US-owned company, has more data on more people than any other company in history. LinkedIn has your professional and educational records. Google has your search data. While the concerns around data sharing in this respect is lessened due to regulatory measures and international agreements, if you don't think China should have access to your information, an argument could be made that all tech platforms should have to store user data locally.

And that could have other potential benefits.

This week, the CEOs of Facebook, Google and Amazon will all attend a House antitrust subcommittee in the US, which will examine the market dominance of these growing platforms, and consider whether it's beneficial to allow the tech giants to keep getting bigger.

The focus, in this sense, is more on facilitating market competition, and ensuring that they don't use their power to restrict opposing development, yet the hearing, in some ways, is also about what should be done, more generally, to limit the rising power of the tech giants.

And in many cases, nothing can be done - these are already some of the biggest companies in the world, with huge power and influence. Controlling them, in any form, will be difficult - but maybe, through closer analysis, it could open up a new discussion about potential changes to regulations, which may allow more security and innovation at a regional level.

Again, this comes back to how the tech giants operate, and TikTok may be the key example. On examination, maybe it would make more sense to force each tech platform to not so much split their apps and tools into separate companies, but to sub-license their regional entities separate organizations. For example, Facebook would need to create data centers in each nation that it operates, and hire a local team to manage its systems. Google would be required to do the same. That would then also mean that regional data restrictions could be implemented, enabling each nation to control the data of their own citizens.

If there were local concerns about antitrust and limiting innovation, they could be handled on a smaller scale, with specific rulings based on local laws. Already, data rulings like the CCPA and the GDPR have changed some local regulation of platforms. What if each company had to house each nation's data within that nation?

That would likely provide more protection, more security, and more capacity for localized control. And it would also provide one other key benefit.

One of the bigger challenges governments have faced as the tech giants have rose to become multi-billion dollar behemoths is in ensuring that they're also paying their fair share, in regards to local taxes. Which, in the majority, they are not.

Most of the tech giants find workarounds and loopholes to avoid paying tax in each region, which leads to frustration when local businesses, struggling to compete against their expanding service offerings, lose out, because they do have to fulfill their local tax obligations.

But if each platform was forced to operate within each nation, that would be different - that would mean that the Googles and Facebooks of the world could no longer utilize tax havens and legal technicalities to reduce their obligations, which would mean that each region could bring in a greater share of local tax revenue, equivalent to the rising usage of each system.

For example, back in April, the Australian Government proposed new lawswhich would essentially force Google and Facebook to share any revenue they generate as a result of news content that they use on their platforms with the relevant, local publishers of such material.

The idea here is to help these publishers stay afloat, by giving them a cut of Google and Facebook revenue, which publishers have argued is, at least in part, generated on the back of their work.

That proposal will not work. Several nations have tried similar, and Google and Facebook simply maneuver around such regulation - and rightly so, it's a poorly thought out strategy, which, while well-intentioned, doesn't take into account the balance of power in this relationship, and how much each is reliant on the other.

But what if, instead, the Australian Government sought to implement more effective tax systems, which then ensured that Google and Facebook paid their fair share? Both Google and Facebook have paid only marginal tax on their earningsin the Australian market because they've been able to funnel their expenses through lower-cost nations like Singapore, in order to reduce their tax burden - but what if they were actually forced to establish operations within the local market, which would not only see them store local user data there, but also require them to adhere to local tax rules?

With many publications struggling amid the pandemic, there's clearly a need for new funding to help them maintain operations where possible. Adequate taxing of the tech giants, in each region, could provide such, meaning that while they wouldn't have to share revenue direct with publishers, as such, they'd be doing so indirectly, with the funding outcomes essentially being the same.

That would be in addition to local jobs, local investment, and localized control of user data. So rather than concern about foreign companies accessing data on citizens, each region would be able to set legal parameters for data access, ensuring that they maintained control over their own information.

In essence, the TikTok/China case puts a spotlight on the new data battleground, which each nation needs to examine closely, especially in light of the ongoing voter manipulation efforts in the lead up to now virtually every national election. Data access allows for such, and the global conversation that happens on social platforms can indeed encourage people's views in other nations, and change electoral outcomes.

If each nation had more control over how their citizens'data was accessed and used, that could limit manipulative capacity, while also, as noted, ensuring that each company pays its fair share.

In which case, the conversation around the CCP accessing your data should really be broadened to any foreign government having access to user data from other regions. The implications of any such change would be far-reaching, but it could be the next step from the current state.

Continue reading here:

Concerns Around Data Access by Foreign Nations Should be Expanded Beyond the Current China Focus - Social Media Today

Nasdaq Gains 173 Points to Kick Off Busy Week in Tech; Moderna Scores $472 Million for Coronavirus Vaccine Research – The Motley Fool

The major indexes gained on Monday amid optimism for another COVID-19 stimulus package following yesterday's comments by Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin that lawmakers are approaching a deal for a $1 trillion bill. The proposal is expected to include another round of $1,200 checks and could potentially extend an eviction moratorium.

The Nasdaq Composite (NASDAQINDEX:^COMP) outpaced the Dow Jones Industrial Average and the S&P 500. The index rose 173 points, driven by gains in major tech stocks like Apple (NASDAQ:AAPL) and Amazon.com (NASDAQ:AMZN).

CEO Tim Cook. Image source: Apple.

It's going to be a busy week for tech giants. The CEOs of Apple, Amazon, Facebook (NASDAQ:FB), and Alphabet (NASDAQ:GOOG) (NASDAQ:GOOGL) subsidiary Google have agreed to testify in front of the House Judiciary Committee as part of an historic antitrust hearing. The hearing was originally scheduled for today but was postponed to Wednesday in order for congressional lawmakers to pay their respects to Representative John Lewis, the civil rights icon that passed away earlier this month.

Antitrust scrutiny of large tech corporations has been intensifying in recent years, with critics arguing that the companies collectively wield too much market power and that different aspects of their respective businesses undermine competition in various ways. Lawmakers are expected to grill Tim Cook, Jeff Bezos, Mark Zuckerberg, and Sundar Pichai as they gather evidence around those allegations as part of a broader antitrust probe that was launched last summer.

All four of those behemoths are then set to report earnings the following day after the market close.

Shares ofModerna (NASDAQ:MRNA) jumped by 9% after the biotech announced yesterday that it had secured an additional $472 million from the U.S. government's Biomedical Advanced Research and Development Authority (BARDA) in order to support a larger phase 3 program for Moderna's COVID-19 mRNA vaccine candidate, mRNA-1273. That funding comes after the biotech previously received $483 million from BARDA and brings the total value of awards to $955 million.

The expanded phase 3 program, which commenced today, will include 30,000 participants and be conducted in collaboration with the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID). Moderna says it remains on track to deliver 500 million doses per year starting in 2021, with the potential to ramp to 1 billion doses per year.

Image source: Getty Images.

"We thank BARDA for this continued commitment to mRNA-1273, our vaccine candidate against COVID-19." Moderna CEO Stephane Bancel said in a statement. "Encouraged by the Phase 1 data, we believe that our mRNA vaccine may aid in addressing the COVID-19 pandemic and preventing future outbreaks."

Toymaker Hasbro (NASDAQ:HAS) saw its stock lose 7% after announcing second-quarter earnings. The company missed revenue expectations because many retailers were closed due to the COVID-19 crisis. Revenue in Q2 fell 29% to $860.3 million, shy of the $992 million in sales that analysts were expecting. That led to adjusted net income of $2.7 million, or $0.02 per share.

Hasbro said it was unable to meet strong consumer demand due to store closures and product shortages. Partner factories in China, which represent 55% of the company's total production capacity, have now resumed operations and are operating at normal levels. Management is optimistic that conditions will improve throughout the rest of the year.

"While the full-year COVID-19 impact geographically remains unpredictable, as stores reopen and we begin to return to production for entertainment we expect the environment to improve in the third quarter and set us up to execute a good holiday season," said Hasbro CEO Brian Goldner.

Continued here:

Nasdaq Gains 173 Points to Kick Off Busy Week in Tech; Moderna Scores $472 Million for Coronavirus Vaccine Research - The Motley Fool

Have we given the tech giants the keys to our privacy and our medical secrets? – EURACTIV

For months, the world has been asking: how can we avoid a resurge of the pandemic, which would be catastrophic for our economies and well-being? Part of the answer lies in establishing a screening and tracking system for people who have been exposed, in order to prevent them from infecting those around them in turn, writes Pierre Pozzi Belforti.

Pierre Pozzi Belforti is a venture capital investor in the Silicon Valley and professor at Solvay Brussels Business School and at Sciences Politiques Paris.

Many European governments have turned to a digital solution, already established in China and other Asian countries: encouraging citizens to download a COVID-tracking application on their smartphone.

The question is, however, if these applications hide a fundamental problem. When downloading a tracing app, are we introducing a digital Trojan horse into our private lives? While the apps are called free, we should know that nothing is truly free in the digital world.

A customer will always pay for a service, one way or the other. In the digital world, this is often by giving unlimited access to all her or his personal information, possibly combined with a paid supplement via a subscription.

They say that the tracing apps will preserve our anonymity, because sensitive information is stored only on the smartphone. However, in reality, it is easy to associate the identity of the owner of a smartphone with his/her pseudonym.

It is striking to see how technology giants, not least two of the very largest, have seized on the opportunity to offer, together, an application to the authorities. We have never before seen a co-development agreement between the two fiercest competitors arise so quickly.

This willingness to cooperate is undoubtedly a testament to the desire to help build a screening system, but it might also hint at motives that are much more worrying for our free democratic societies.

Any tech entrepreneur and venture capital financier knows that the health sector offers some of the most lucrative income opportunities ahead for these companies. Investment bank Morgan Stanley estimates that the digital health businesses could generate annual revenues above $ 300 billion, just within the next seven years.

We should not take this lightly. Medical data is the kind of data we want and need to protect the most, as it is the ultimate frontier between our body, our most intimate data on our physical individuality, and the outside world.

Sadly, some tech companies are taking advantage of the COVID crisis and disarray it created with European governments to break a taboo and normalize the idea of access to the market for personal medical data by presenting it as a major help for detection of infected people, which was the true soft spot to approach and convince authorities given the urgency

All of this happened with very little open debate. National and European authorities, which pushed in good faith these mobile applications for COVID given the pandemic emergency, innocently and probably unknowingly contributed in opening the first breach on EU citizens most confidential data.

This should have resulted from a large and in-depth democratic debate at the European level very early on. There has certainly been debate in France, in the National Assembly, and it is ongoing in the House of Representatives in Belgium and in some other European countries.

However, a few national debates do not resolve the moral, ethical, social, and eminently strategic problems on Data sovereignty facing the European Union and its citizens.

No independent audit system has been put in place to ensure that collected medical information is deleted in a definitive way after use

No new EU rules have been imposed ensuring that it is not sold to other platforms or data processors, nor any penalties or fines in the event of breaches have been introduced as with GDPR.

Unfortunately, it is today a fait accompli that this highly sensitive data of EU citizens is being captured by the American or Chinese tech giants through apps available on their platforms

The Hippocratic Oath taken by all doctors include the phrase

I will never cheat on their trust and will not use the power inherited from circumstances to force conscience.

I will give care to the needy, and whoever asks for it. I will not be swayed by the thirst for gain or the quest for glory.

Accepted in the privacy of people, I will withhold the secrets that will be entrusted to me. Received inside the houses, I will respect the secrets of the homes, and my conduct will not be used to corrupt manners.

Like doctors, todays tech giants penetrate the most intimate parts of our lives; they are by our side day and night via the digital tools, which continuously accompany and monitor us.

Nevertheless, none of them seem ready to voluntarily follow the rules laid out by Hippocrates 25 centuries ago.

Tech giants do not promise to respect household secrets, not mislead trust, or exploit the power inherited from the circumstances.

On the contrary, their business models are based on surveillance capitalism, which captures all our most private information, including this additional breach into medical data, to exploit them commercially and, even more worryingly, to enhance personal profiling to the extreme with no respect for Privacy and in contravention of basic democratic laws and principles protecting each EU citizen.

In our democratic countries any law enforcement entity, from Police to European Drug Enforcement Agency to tax authorities, are subject to strict laws and existing jurisprudence, and mostly need a Court decision to be able to enter into our home, listen and record our conversations, read our correspondence, capture information on our medical data, etc.

Digital platforms do all this without limitations, without being subject to any legislation protecting our privacy except GDPR (which is not sufficient anymore and needs enlargement of scope and enhanced implementation by national authorities), without any sovereign public control nor independent audit over time.

How was this made possible, and are we still in time for our national and European politicians to turn the scales by firmly ensuring our values and principles to protect the individuals freedom and right not to be subject to such rapacious unlimited harvesting of private information and detailed profiling?

We must protect European citizens from a drift towards what some renowned specialists, like Harvard Professor Emeritus Shoshana Zuboff, have called surveillance capitalism,.

In addition to the unacceptable capture of all our information on our lives, now we risk additional seizing by the digital platforms of medical data that is private for us and truly strategic in terms of enhancing knowledge for Machine Learning and Data gathering, which are two key components of Artificial Intelligence sovereignty.

This will dramatically enhance their future intangible technological power over us, alongside another exponential growth of their financial profits, whilst imprisoning our EU citizens into applications that will be more and more impossible to renounce over time as they gain strength and presence in our daily lives, particularly when capturing the strategically vital digital Med-tech market share

Just on July 16, 2020 we learned that the US government is envisaging a ban on Chinese TikTok social media gaming application because it gathers too much private information from 37.2 million American users of the application in 2019, along with some other 60 applications.

The US is following India that, a few days earlier, has already banned TikTok and 60 other Chinese applications as well.

Clearly, this proves how far these digital applications, even as benign as gaming, can go without the public at large understanding the issues and the risks, whilst the authorities slowly realize the immensity of the hidden world of massive rapacious information gathering that exists behind the scene of supposedly benign, free applications.

Its amazing and very sad to notice that, when it is a matter of protecting US citizens privacy, all measures are conceivable by its government including drastic one like banning an application, whereas not much has been done as of today within the EU on the massive data harvesting that EU citizens have been victims for over two decades by US and Chinese online platforms.

The EU Court of Justice ruling published on July 16, 2020, denouncing the US-EU data-sharing deal Privacy Shield as it fails to protect EU citizens Privacy, is clearly a signal that we need to dramatically strengthen our EU protection policies and avoid being too accommodating as the stakes are extreme.

Indeed, it is a new and unexpected massive geostrategic and vital challenge for the EU, of a scale that has no common ground with other challenges like immigration, terrorism or the new EU budget.

This challenge is emerging from the US and Chinas highly competitive technological race for world supremacy, one that needs to be quickly understood by our top EU decision-makers in all its intricacies, fully grasped, and wisely confronted without delay by elaborating a clear, long-term vision and implementation strategy.

We must set up a system within the EU to ensure ultimate sovereignty and governance over technology within the European Union.

Only in this way can we protect our citizens freedom and full privacy, prevent possible social and economic discrimination, and avoid strategic enslavement of the EU by foreign technology platforms massively harvesting all our data and ultimately imposing unparalleled domination of our societies by foreign countries/blocs.

Last but not least, it is also the mother of all battles to ensure Ultimate Mankind Sovereignty over the emergence of a potentially ubiquitous and dominating Artificial Intelligence that is on the horizon within 15 to 20 years, unless we take an assertive role and adopt an appropriate legislative framework to protect ourselves and our sovereignty both as humans and as EU citizens.

Politicians in Europe have a duty to tackle it quickly and without procrastination.

James Freeman Clarke, an American theologian, and author from the 19th century, said: a politician thinks of the next election, a statesman thinks of the next generations.

When projecting a vision for the EU into the 21st centurys increasingly unstable and unpredictable world, we definitely need more statesmen and stateswomen in Europe having the vision and courage to take our future in our hands.

In the coming 10 years, we must build a technologically sovereign and independent Europe, able to compete on equal footing with the other two main blocs wanting to dominate AI and Data, and be respected for its actions and admired for the defence of the Ultimate Sovereignty of its universal human and democratic values.

View post:

Have we given the tech giants the keys to our privacy and our medical secrets? - EURACTIV

Dont Ban TikTok. Make an Example of It. – The New York Times

For a while, it seemed that TikTok might dodge the techlash. After all, what could be problematic about a short-form video app featuring a bunch of teenagers and 20-somethings doing choreographed dances, roller skating, hanging out in influencer mansions and cutting into photorealistic cakes?

The answer turns out to be: Plenty.

In the past year, as it has become one of the most popular apps in the world, TikTok has accumulated many of the same problems that other large-scale social networks have. In addition to all the harmless Gen Z fun, there are TikTok conspiracy theories, TikTok misinformation and TikTok extremism. There are even activists using TikTok to influence our elections, including a network of teenagers and K-pop fans who claimed they used the app to sabotage President Trumps rally in Tulsa, Okla., last month by registering for tickets under false identities.

All of this might have been overlooked or forgiven, except for one fact. TikTok is owned by ByteDance, one of the largest tech companies in China.

TikToks Chinese ownership has become a subject of intense scrutiny by lawmakers, regulators and privacy activists in recent weeks. Mr. Trump is considering taking steps to ban the app in the United States. Companies including Wells Fargo, and government agencies including the Transportation Security Administration, have instructed their employees to delete TikTok from their work phones because of concerns that it could be used for surveillance or espionage.

In response to the mounting pressures, TikTok is wrapping itself in the American flag. The company has hired a small army of lobbyists in Washington, has brought in an American chief executive (the former Disney executive Kevin Mayer) and is reportedly exploring selling a majority stake in the company to American investors.

Jamie Favazza, a TikTok spokeswoman, said in a statement that in addition to the chief executive, the social network had an American as its chief information security officer and another as its head of safety.

Weve tripled the number of employees in the U.S. since the start of 2020, she said, with plans to hire 10,000 more people over the next three years in places like Texas, New York and Florida.

There are legitimate concerns about a Chinese-owned company capturing the attention and data of millions of Americans especially one like ByteDance, which has a history of bending the knee to the countrys ruling regime. Like all Chinese tech companies, ByteDance is required to abide by Chinese censorship laws, and it could be forced to give user data to the Chinese government under the countrys national security law. Lawmakers have also raised concerns that TikTok could be used to promote pro-China propaganda to young Americans, or censor politically sensitive content.

Ms. Favazza said TikTok stored American user data in Virginia and Singapore. She added that the companys content moderation efforts were led by U.S.-based teams and not influenced by any foreign government, and that TikTok had not and would not give data to the Chinese government.

There are also reasons to be skeptical of the motives of TikToks biggest critics. Many conservative politicians, including Mr. Trump, appear to care more about appearing tough on China than preventing potential harm to TikTok users. And Silicon Valley tech companies like Facebook, whose executives have warned of the dangers of a Chinese tech takeover, would surely like to see regulators kneecap one of their major competitors.

Ill be honest: I dont buy the argument that TikTok is an urgent threat to Americas national security. Or, to put it more precisely, I am not convinced that TikTok is inherently more threatening to Americans than any other Chinese-owned app that collects data from Americans. If TikTok is a threat, so are WeChat, Alibaba and League of Legends, the popular video game, whose maker, Riot Games, is owned by Chinas Tencent.

And since banning every Chinese-owned tech company from operating in America wouldnt be possible without erecting our own version of Chinas Great Firewall a drastic step that would raise concerns about censorship and authoritarian control we need to figure out a way for Chinese apps and American democracy to coexist.

Heres an idea: Instead of banning TikTok, or forcing ByteDance to sell it to Americans, why not make an example of it by turning it into the most transparent, privacy-protecting, ethically governed tech platform in existence?

As a foreign-owned app, TikTok is, in some ways, easier to regulate than an American tech platform would be. (One way of regulating it, a national security review by the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States of ByteDances 2017 acquisition of Musical.ly, TikToks predecessor app, is already reportedly underway.) And there is plenty more the U.S. government could do to ensure that TikTok plays a responsible role in our information ecosystem without getting rid of it altogether. It could require the company to open-source key parts of its software, including the machine-learning algorithms that determine which posts users are shown. It could pressure TikTok to submit to regular audits of its data-collection practices, and open up its internal content moderation guidelines for public comment. As Kevin Xu, the author of Interconnected, a blog about United States-China relations, points out, ByteDance could impose strict internal controls to prevent its Chinese employees from accessing any of TikToks systems, and open-source those controls so that outsiders could verify the separation.

Samm Sacks, a cyberpolicy fellow at the centrist think tank New America, told me that some of the solutions being proposed for TikTok such as selling itself to American investors wouldnt address the core problems. An American-owned TikTok could still legally sell data to third-party data brokers, for example, which could then feed it back to the Chinese authorities.

Instead, Ms. Sacks said, the American government should enact a strong federal privacy law that could protect TikTok users data without banning the app altogether.

Lets solve for the problems at hand, she said. If the concern is data security, the best way to secure the data is to put TikTok under the microscope, and put in place really robust and enforceable rules about how theyre using and retaining data.

Forcing TikTok to operate in a radically transparent way would go a long way toward assuaging Americans fears. And it could become a test case for a new model of tech regulation that could improve the accountability and responsibility of not just Chinese-owned tech companies but American ones, too.

At its core, a lot of the TikTok fear factor comes down to a lack of information. In March, TikTok announced that it would open transparency centers where independent auditors could examine its content moderation practices. The company has also begun releasing transparency reports, similar to those issued by Facebook and Twitter, outlining the various takedown requests it gets from governments around the world.

But we still dont know how TikToks algorithms are programmed, or why theyre showing which videos to which users. We dont know how its using the data its collecting, or how it makes and enforces its rules. We should know these things not just about TikTok, but about American social media apps, too.

After all, Facebook, Instagram, YouTube, Twitter and Snapchat are playing a huge role in the lives of millions of Americans, and for years, they have operated with a degree of secrecy that few other companies of their importance have been allowed. What little we understand about these platforms inner workings is often learned years after the fact, gleaned from insider leaks or repentant former employees.

Some experts see TikToks current predicament as a chance to change that.

I think TikTok is a bit of a red herring, Alex Stamos, Facebooks former chief security officer and a professor at Stanford University, told me in an interview. Ultimately, Mr. Stamos said, the question of what to do about TikTok is secondary to the question of how multinational tech giants in general should be treated.

This is a chance to come up with a thoughtful model of how to regulate companies that operate in both the U.S. and China, no matter their ownership, he said.

The debate over TikToks fate, in other words, should really be a debate about how all of the big tech companies that entertain, inform and influence billions of people should operate, and what should be required of them, whether theyre based in China or Copenhagen or California.

If we can figure out how to handle TikTok an app with a genuinely creative culture, and millions of American young people who love it well have done a lot more than preserving a world-class time-waster. Well have figured out a model for getting big tech platforms under control, after years of letting them run amok.

See the original post here:

Dont Ban TikTok. Make an Example of It. - The New York Times

Uber drivers fight for employment rights and access to their data – Business Insider

Uber is facing an uprising from drivers in Europe who want both increased stability and greater freedom and are demanding stronger employment rights and access to their data.

On the employment-rights front, two Uber drivers continue to fight for basic guarantees in the UK's Supreme Court. Uber drivers are classified as independent contractors, which means they are not entitled to sick pay or the minimum wage.

But in 2016, British drivers James Farrar and Yaseen Aslam successfully argued that Uber should give drivers "worker status," which grants them rights like paid holidays and the national minimum wage. Uber has continually appealed that decision and now taken its fight to the UK Supreme Court, where a ruling is expected in October.

It could be a landmark decision for gig-economy workers and a costly outcome for Uber.

Uber's argument is that its platform only connects passengers with drivers, who are given the flexibility to log into the app when they please and turn down rides they don't want to take.

Farrar is a former Uber driver who is involved in both legal cases. He's now the founder of Worker Info Exchange, an organization that hopes to help gig-economy workers in Europe obtain their data.

Worker Info Exchange is one of the founding members of the International Alliance of App-Based Transport Workers, a union fighting for the rights of gig-economy workers. It was formed in January and already has delegates across 23 countries and multiple platforms, including Lyft, Ola, and Bolt, as well as Uber.

In an interview with Business Insider, Farrar countered Uber's depiction of the platform and painted a darker picture of long hours and poor pay. He said he was forced to take all the rides he was offered to chase a 4.4-star average to avoid seeing his account deactivated.

"Uber gives me work, but also I'm obliged to do that work for Uber," Farrar said. "Uber will say you can cancel the job if you like, but you can't do that without incurring some kind of a penalty. If I was truly self-employed, I could cancel all the work I wanted to. It wouldn't make any difference; it's my choice."

He added: "It strikes me as Uber trying to justify a fairly complicated shell game, which ultimately cheats workers. If you're at the lowest rung, and you're vulnerable to terrible exploitation like you can be in the gig economy, then you need the protection of a minimum wage."

Uber says it has changed its model since the 2016 tribunal. For example, it introduced free insurance for its drivers.

Farrar is also part of a second high-profile lawsuit filed on July 20 against Uber in Amsterdam, where the company is headquartered for all of its non-US operations.

This lawsuit seeks to force Uber to release the personal data of drivers, which it claims is hidden in profiles tagged with information about late arrivals, cancellations, and complaints about attitude and inappropriate behavior from customers.

Uber drivers say they believe that the algorithm uses the tags to manage their performance.

"The app decides millions of times a day who's going to get which ride and who gets the nice rides, who gets the short rides," Anton Ekker, the lawyer representing the Uber drivers in the lawsuit, said.

"It's all about the distribution of power. So Uber is exerting control through data and automated decision-making, and it's blocking the access to that," he said, adding that this is a problem throughout the gig economy. "If Uber is forced by the courts to provide more data, this will contribute to workers' rights, to balancing this power relation."

Uber said it had responded to all requests for data.

"Drivers, and anyone else using our app, can request access to the data that we can legally provide," an Uber spokesperson said. "We will give explanations when we cannot provide certain data, such as when it doesn't exist or disclosing it would infringe on the rights of another person under GDPR."

The data-privacy lawsuit is directly connected to the UK Supreme Court case: Farrar said he became aware of what he characterized as hidden driver profiles from the internal communications Uber submitted for its defense case.

The release of such data could be a blow to Uber's argument that its drivers are independent contractors, as it could show that the app does more than just connect self-employed drivers with paying customers.

The lawsuits against Uber are part of a perceived power imbalance in the gig economy, where workers feel they answer to black-box algorithms rather than human managers.

Uber says that using location information to match passengers with drivers leads to more business for drivers, but Farrar said he believed the increasing reliance on algorithms could work against drivers' interest and result in unfair outcomes.

"Uber has a rule that if you reach 4.4 in your ratings, you're deactivated. So basically Uber has outsourced management to the discriminatory view of their customer," Farrar said. "The question then becomes who reaches 4.4 faster? If I'm a white European man from Ireland, am I going to reach 4.4 faster than a migrant worker from West Africa?"

Uber doesn't publicly disclose which rating results in drivers being booted off its platform, but prior reporting from Business Insider put the number at 4.6.

Understanding the data and how it is used by the algorithms is the first step in addressing the asymmetric power between gig-economy workers and tech giants like Uber, according to Farrar.

"The long, hard road that we are on now is how do we organize the dispersed digital workforce? And what is the currency for our organizing? The gateway in the future to worker rights is through digital rights," he said.

A win against Uber could open the floodgates for data-privacy challenges against other apps.

The need to assert the rights of gig-economy workers is now more important than ever, Farrar said, with delivery apps expected to be some of the biggest winners in the post-pandemic economy.

Global customer volume in the digital gig economy is projected to grow to $455 billion in 2023, from $204 billion in 2018, according to Mastercard.

See the original post here:

Uber drivers fight for employment rights and access to their data - Business Insider

Apple is going fully carbon neutral by 2030 will other tech giants follow suit? – TrustedReviews

Apple has committed to taking the entire company carbon neutral by 2030 as it seeks to set new environmental standards for the tech industry and beyond.

The iPhone maker says it is setting a roadmap for other companies with its plans to reduce carbon emissions by 75%, while outlining new solutions to offset the other 25% of its footprint.The company says that by the time 2030 rolls around, every device you buy from Apple will be 100% carbon neutral.

In a media release, CEO Tim Cook said the commitment represents the dawn of a new era of innovative potential that will have plenty of benefits beyond progress in the fight against climate change.

Businesses have a profound opportunity to help build a more sustainable future, one born of our common concern for the planet we share, Cook said.

The innovations powering our environmental journey are not only good for the planet theyve helped us make our products more energy efficient and bring new sources of clean energy online around the world. Climate action can be the foundation for a new era of innovative potential, job creation, and durable economic growth. With our commitment to carbon neutrality, we hope to be a ripple in the pond that creates a much larger change.

Apple says recycled materials will become and increasingly important part of its product development, while improving its manufacturing process for a greater reliance on carbon-free techniques.

The firm explains: Apple is supporting the development of the first-ever direct carbon-free aluminium smelting process through investments and collaboration with two of its aluminium suppliers.Today the company is announcing that the first batch of this low carbon aluminium is currently being used in production intended for use with the 16-inch MacBook Pro.

Apple is also investing in multiple energy efficiency and renewable energy initiatives while making big commitments to carbon removal projects.

The firm writes: In partnership with Conservation International, the company will invest in new projects, building on learnings from existing work like restoring degraded savannas in Kenya and a vital mangrove ecosystem in Colombia. Mangroves not only protect the coasts and help support the livelihood of those communities where they grow, but they also can store up to 10 times more carbon than forests on land.

Apples data centres have been powered by 100% renewable energy since 2014. We would like to see the company do more in reducing the precious earth materials it uses for its phones and tablets, but Apple is continues to take a leadership role.

Apple adds: All iPhone, iPad, Mac, and Apple Watch devices released in the past year are made with recycled content, including 100 percent recycled rare earth elements in the iPhone Taptic Engine a first for Apple and for any smartphone.

Chris Smith is a freelance technology journalist for a host of UK tech publications, includingTrusted Reviews. He's based in South Florida, USA.

Unlike other sites, we thoroughly review everything we recommend, using industry standard tests to evaluate products. Well always tell you what we find. We may get a commission if you buy via our price links.Tell us what you think email the Editor

Read this article:

Apple is going fully carbon neutral by 2030 will other tech giants follow suit? - TrustedReviews

OOIDA’s tour trailer heads to Bloomington, Ill. – Land Line – Land Line Media

The next scheduled stop for OOIDAs tour trailer is in Bloomington, Ill., which is close to Normal and home of a product called beers best friend.

The Spirit of the American Trucker is scheduled to be at the Bloomington TA Travel Center on July 28-30. It is at Exit 160 from I-55/I-74 at the Route 9 junction.

Bloomington is 130 miles southwest of Chicago. Peoria, Ill., is 40 miles west.

The Bloomington TA has 160 parking spots for semis. The Country Pride full-service restaurant is temporarily closed, according to the TA & Petro website.

The Bloomington TA is dedicated to Gary Buchs, who was named a Citizen Driver in 2015.The Citizen Driver Award recognizes professional drivers who earn public respect for the trucking industry through good citizenship, community involvement, health and wellness outreach, and leadership.

At the time, he had logged 2.25 million crash-free miles. He was awarded the Citizen Driver honor after stopping to help at a car collision, rescuing a woman in the vehicle by prying the car door open to pull her out. He has won at least 10 Landstar Star of Quality commendations and a Landstar Platinum Star.

There is a good chance that a Bloomington-made product is available at truck stops and in taverns you may have visited. Beer Nuts, bags of salty-sweet peanuts, are manufactured and packaged in Bloomington.

A go-getter named Edward Shirk took over a confectionary story in downtown Bloomington in 1937. One of the products was called Redskins, which were glazed peanuts with their red skins intact. Shirk began marketing them to taverns and liquor stores and changed the product name to Beer Nuts in 1953, according to a company history online.

Heres a video on the history and production of Beer Nuts.

The Bloomington metropolitan area includes adjacent neighboring city Normal. It is home to Illinois State University, which used to be known as Illinois State Normal University. In 1867 the town was incorporated Normal, its name taken from the college. Normal schools or colleges trained teachers.

Normal was incorporated as a dry town, and intoxicating drinks were prohibited until the early 1970s, according to town history.

If you see OOIDAs tour trailer, stop by and say hello to Jon Osburn, its skipper. He enjoys visiting about the Associations activities and current issues. He usually has copies of Land Line Magazine to hand out. You can join or renew your OOIDA membership for $10 off the regular price there. Free face masks are available at The Spirit. You also can get vouchers for flu, shingles and pneumonia vaccines from Jon.

The next scheduled stop for The Spirit after Bloomington is in Morris, Ill. Here is the schedule.

See original here:

OOIDA's tour trailer heads to Bloomington, Ill. - Land Line - Land Line Media

COVID-19 Vaccine Candidate Heads To Widespread Testing In U.S. – Red River Radio

The COVID-19 vaccine candidate made by the U.S. biotech company Moderna and developed in collaboration with the National Institutes of Health starts its final phase of testing Monday.

This phase is called Phase 3 efficacy testing, and it is designed to see if the vaccine actually prevents disease. Up to 30,000 volunteers will be assigned to one of two groups. One group will receive two injections spaced approximately 28 days apart of mRNA-1273, as the vaccine is known. The other group will receive an injection containing only salt water. Neither the volunteer nor the person administering the injection will know what's in the syringe in order to avoid bias in favor of one outcome or another. Of course, people running the trial will know who is getting what.

Researchers will monitor both groups to see who, if anyone, gets sick. Organizers of the trial say there will have to only be approximately 150 cases of COVID-19 among study participants to say with confidence that the vaccine is actually preventing disease. How long it takes to reach that number, and how many participants will have to be enrolled in the study, is an open question. It depends in part on how much the virus is circulating in the communities where the trial takes place. It could take as many as 30,000 volunteers to get the answer, and the entire process will probably take months.

According to a list maintained by the World Health Organization, there are four other vaccine candidates to reach Phase 3 testing: three made by Chinese entities and one by a collaboration between the University of Oxford and AstraZeneca.

The Moderna vaccine is a new kind of vaccine based on the genetic material that makes up the coronavirus. Snippets of RNA (a chemical cousin of DNA) are enclosed in a nano-capsule and injected into someone's arm. The RNA contains instructions to make a protein found of the outer surface of the coronavirus. This protein is what stimulates the immune system to make antibodies against the virus. The idea is that if this harmless protein in the vaccine can generate those antibodies, then if the vaccinated individual is exposed to the virus, their immune system will be able to fight it off.

The Phase 3 trail will take place at 89 centers around the United States. To find out more or join the study, go to ClinicalTrials.gov and search identifier NCT04470427, or go to https://www.coronaviruspreventionnetwork.org/.

Read more here:

COVID-19 Vaccine Candidate Heads To Widespread Testing In U.S. - Red River Radio

Upstart Dash win the Challenge Cup 2-0 over the Red Stars – Taiwan News

SANDY, Utah (AP) Sophie Schmidt scored on an early penalty kick and Shea Groom added a stoppage-time goal to give the Houston Dash the Challenge Cup tournament title with a 2-0 victory over the Chicago Red Stars on Sunday.

The month-long tournament was National Women's Soccer League re-boot after the regular season was shut down by the coronavirus outbreak. Houston, in its seventh year in the league, had never previously made the playoffs.

The Red Stars went to the NWSL championship game last season, but were routed 4-0 by the North Carolina Courage.

Houston was aggressive from the start. Kristie Mewis was on the run when she was fouled by Kayla Sharples for a Dash penalty kick. Schmidt nailed the PK in the fifth minute. It was the tournament's first penalty kick in regulation.

The Red Stars nearly drew even in the 15th, but Savannah McCaskill's header off a rebound hit the post.

McCaskill had another chance from distance in the 67th minute, but Houston goalkeeper Jane Campbell tipped it up and over the crossbar.

The Dash took a hit in the 29th minute when Mewis had to come out of the game with a hamstring injury. She sobbed as she was subbed out of the game.

The NWSL was the first professional team sport to return in the United States. Eight of the leagues nine teams have been sequestered in Utah for the duration of the tournament, which started on June 27.

The leagues ninth team, the Orlando Pride, withdrew shortly before the start because of positive COVID-19 tests. But there were no positive tests in the so-called bubble in Utah for the duration of the event.

The Red Stars were the tournaments sixth seed going into the knockout round. They advanced to the semifinals on penalties after a scoreless draw with OL Reign, then held off Sky Blue 3-2 on Wednesday.

Chicago had just two total goals in the tournament before the outburst against Sky Blue.

The Dash are the upstart underdogs of the Challenge Cup, after finishing seventh in the NWSL last season. English national Rachel Daly led Houston with three goals in the tournament and was the Challenge Cups most valuable player.

Daly had a chance to increase Houston's lead in the 73rd minute, but couldn't quite get set after a cross from Nichelle Prince and the shot went wide.

Daly assisted on Groom's goal in the 91st minute. It was Groom's third goal of the tournament.

Sundays game at Rio Tinto Stadium, home of the NWSLs Utah Royals and Major League Soccers Real Salt Lake, was broadcast nationally on CBS, the leagues new television partner this season.

___

More AP soccer: https://apnews.com/Soccer and https://twitter.com/AP_Sports

See the original post:

Upstart Dash win the Challenge Cup 2-0 over the Red Stars - Taiwan News

The Rare, Elusive Spirit Bears Of British Columbia – WBUR

Kermode bears, also known as spirit bears, are incredibly elusive. They live only in one section of British Columbias central coast, and a new study indicates the gene that turns their fur white is even rarer than previously thought. Well talk to two researchers from the study about the quest to protect and preserve the Great Bear Rainforest.

Doug Neasloss, director of the Kitasoo/Xaixais First Nation Stewardship Authority. Former chief councilor of the Kitasoo/Xaixais First Nation. (@DNeasloss)

Christina Service, science coordinator and wildlife biologist for Kitasoo/Xai'xais First Nation Stewardship Authority. (@CN_Service)

On the unique beauty of the Great Bear Rainforest

Doug Neasloss: I would say this place is quite a magical place. I mean, this is one of the only places left where you'll get old-growth and ancient-growth forests, large biodiversity in the wildlife there. Some of these trees can be quite a few meters wide, and up to two to three hundred meters tall. So you can get some really big trees up there.

Christina Service: It's remarkably rare. I mean, I think often when people say rainforest, you think of the Amazon in the tropics. But the temperate rainforests are just as magical. There's so much diversity, so many shades of green than you could even imagine with the lichens and, as Doug mentioned, these ginormous old cedars and spruces. The forest is something that almost everyone should witness at some point in their lives.

"I think often when people say rainforest, you think of the Amazon in the tropics. But the temperate rainforests are just as magical."

On where the spirit bears name comes from

Doug Neasloss: I think people have always had a healthy respect for just the rarity. They're just extremely rare animals, only found in this part of the world. And it's kind of neat when you're in this dark green forest, you know, and you see this bright white bear come walking out, you know, it just has this spiritual presence about it. And so that's how it was coined, the name spirit bear. It was also actually a big campaign as well to protect this part of the world in the early 90s, when it was under threat from forest companies. They wanted to develop, and that was a name that we used for the spirit bear to help protect this region.

On what gives the spirit bears their white fur

Christina Service: They're not albinos, they have pigment. In contrast, albinos would have, you know, sort of the typical pink eyes and things you would associate with that. They're actually, in many ways, closer to redheads in humans. So it's actually the same gene that controls the white coat in spirit bears as redheads and red hair in humans. And so they have the same pigment [as black bears]. But as Doug said, shockingly, in this forest, in this ecosystem, they're pure white from tip to tail.

In our culture, our elders have always said everything is connected. If you take one thing out, it affects everything else... I think it's really important that we look at things from a bit of a holistic perspective and look at protecting quite large regions and protecting all the biodiversity in these areas.

On the challenges facing the Great Bear Rainforest

Doug Neasloss: I would say forestry is certainly an ongoing issue and loss of habitat. I would say global warming is certainly another major issue. But as ocean temperatures are rising. Major decline in salmon numbers. Historically, some of our rivers used to have about 80000 salmon. Some of those same systems now are down to about four or five thousand salmon. So we're continuing to monitor some of these issues and trying to do what we can in terms of protection In our culture, our elders have always said everything is connected. If you take one thing out, it affects everything else. And so, for instance, if you lose salmon thats going to affect the forest, that's going to affect the bears. So, yeah, I mean, I think it's really important that we look at things from a bit of a holistic perspective and look at protecting quite large regions and protect all the biodiversity in these areas.

On the spirit bears role in conserving the rainforest

Doug Neasloss: I believe the spirit bear is basically the face of the Great Bear Rainforest. I know back in the 90s, this area was all slated to be cut. It was all on the chopping block. And the government had given all of these permits to all the forest companies and they were going to knock it all down, and it was because of First Nations communities and environmental groups that really came together and coined the term Great Bear Rainforest, and there was a big surge to protect a lot of this region. And certainly, the spirit bear was a catalyst, because this is the only part of the world that you will find a spirit bear.

"The spirit bear is basically the face of the Great Bear Rainforest."

On the pandemics impact on their conservation work and research

Doug Neasloss: Our community has gone into complete lockdown. Nobody coming in, nobody going out. And that's been affecting a lot of our work, and then some of our projects. And luckily, we actually do have more local people So we were out there for quite a few weeks continuing on with the study, which has been great. And I should say it's had some positive effects. I mean, the fact that theres no tourism this year was a window to see if bears will behave a bit differently and allow us to get out there and develop management plans accordingly. So, kind of an opportunity in some ways.

Trailer for the film "Great Bear Rainforest: Land of the Spirit Bear.," from MacGillivray Freeman Films.

Smithsonian:"This Rare, White Bear May Be the Key to Saving a Canadian Rainforest""Very quietly we paddle to shore in a raft from the research vessel, which has stopped at the mouth of a small river cascading into the Pacific, one of more than a hundred salmon-bearing rivers in the 1,500-square-mile territory of the Kitasoo/Xaixais people. Were halfway up the coast of British Columbia, in the heart of the Great Bear Rainforest, in one of the largest unspoiled temperate rainforests on earth. We climb out and sit on boulders in the intertidal zone, in front of a meadow. Behind it is primeval forest, a solid wall of trees western red cedar, Sitka spruce, alder, hemlock, Douglas fir."

National Geographic:"First Nations Fight to Protect the Rare Spirit Bear from Hunters" "There are stories about the white bears that hide in the deep forest of British Columbias coast. Old stories, handed down from one generation to the next for thousands of years, since the last Ice Age gripped the world, and glaciers licked the edge of the rain forest. One tale, told by the Kitasoo/XaiXais Nation, says that as the sheets of ice began to retreat, Raventhe creator of all thingsmade the animal known as the spirit bear to remind him of the ice and snow. Its a story that speaks not only to First Nations connection with wildlife but also to their deep roots in the Great Bear Rainforest, an area the size of Switzerland thats home to some 20,000 First Nations people."

The New York Times:"Hair From Ghostly Bears Reveals New Genetic Secrets" "Douglas Neasloss was skeptical that Spirit bears existed. A member of the Kitasoo/Xaixais First Nation in Canada, he had heard the stories of white-furred bears that roamed British Columbias rainforest. But Mr. Neasloss, a former tour leader and cultural interpreter, had never seen one until 2005, when he experienced one of the most magical moments of his guiding career. During a hike, he caught sight of a cinnamon-tinged white bear as it walked out ahead of him, then lay down 50 feet away to munch on a freshly caught salmon."

Terrace Standard:"Terrace conservation officers relocate Spirit bear" "Terrace conservation officers relocated a Spirit bear far into the wilderness to keep it away from human residential areas. The bear got into a freezer situated outside a cabin in Rosswood, said Tracy Walbauer of the Terrace Conservation Officer Service. 'Im not sure if he actually fed on anything in the freezer, but there was fish in the freezer and then we intervened immediately,' he said. Conservation officers moved the bear about 50 km further into the wilderness."

Link:

The Rare, Elusive Spirit Bears Of British Columbia - WBUR