The Tesla Model Y Made In Germany Will Be Quite Different – The Drive

Good morning and welcome back to Speed Lines, The Drive's roundup of what matters in the world of cars and transportation. It's Friday, and that is always a good thing. On tap for today: the "fundamental architecture" of the Tesla Model Y will be differentwhen it comes to Germany, Volvo's hybrid gamble pays off and BMW's still trying the hydrogen thing.

A quick programming note: due in large part to the extremely slow auto industry news cycle as of late, Speed Lines will be running on Monday, Wednesday and Friday from now on for the foreseeable future. If you have strong feelings about this move or general feedback, I'd love to hear them in the comments.

Tesla had another great week, posting its fourth consecutive quarterly profit at $104 million and even more deliveries than in Q1. It announced its next factory will be in the Austin, Texas area. Its stock price continues to soar until it becomes the standard by which all global currency is judged by. All good things for the most-watched automaker on the planet.

But this is Elon Musk we're talking about, so there's always a chance he'll pull a fast one on the rest of us. Buried in Tesla's Q2 earnings call is a detail that didn't catch a lot of headlines: the fact that the Model Y crossover sounds like it will be significantly retooled when its production begins in Germany's Giga Berlin plant sometime next year. Here's a transcript of that call from Seeking Alpha, emphasis mine:

Well, we bring a massive amount of effort into manufacturing engineering, the machine that makes the machine. There's probably 1,000%, maybe 10,000% more engineering required for the factory then for the product itself. So we're certainly making progress. I mean, battery and powertrain factory, Gigafactory in Nevada is, you know, alien dreadnought version 0.5, something like that, starting to approach version 1.

We're getting way better at making cars. You can see that in Giga Shanghai. You'll see that even more with Berlin. And we're really changing the design of the car in order to make it more manufacturable. The fundamental architecture of Model Y will be different in Berlin, it may look the same, but the internals will be quite different and fundamentally more efficient architecturally than what we've done to date.

And Tesla manufacturing exec Drew Baglino followed up:

Yes. I was going to expand on that. I think part of the Alien Dreadnought concept is not just automation, but minimizing the number of process steps and complexity involved in the manufacturing system, which involves really integrating design and manufacturing across from like when the raw materials enter the factory to the finished goods exit. And we're learning so much through doing that.

It's extremely rare, if not entirely unprecedented, for an all-new car to be retooled completely with a year or two of its launch while it still looks the same. Having said that, quality issues around the Model Y are already well-documented, and considering the many, many production problems its sibling the Model 3 had, it does not surprise me that Tesla is trying to retool things as it gets that car out to the global masses.

This could well be a catch-up movelike a software patchafter Tesla rushed to get the Model Y out on time. Baglino is talking about production; Musk seems to be talking about the car itself. An Electrek post from earlier this month indicates it's a mix of both.

Presumably, those manufacturing techniques will be adapted at the Fremont and Shanghai plants, so it will be interesting to see if the Model Y itself is really that much of a different car. Somebody get Sandy Munro on the phone.

Gone, somewhat sadly, are the days when Volvo subsists on turbocharged five-cylinder engines. But in their place have been a new generation of plug-in hybrid, forced-induction motors across the entire range. They're impressive powerplants for sure; I was just testing a T8 XC90 and was won over by its power and efficiency.

These motors are clicking with buyers, too, reports Automotive News. Plug-in hybrid sales are now up 80 percent in the first half of 2020. From that story:

"In the first half 14 percent of the cars we sold globally were hybrids," Volvo CEO Hakan Samuelsson toldAutomotive News Europe in a telephone interview. "In Europe, it was close to a quarter of the cars we sold."

The actual figure was 24 percent, up from 9 percent in the first half of 2019, according to Volvo's figures for Europe, which include the EU, Britain and the European Free Trade Association (EFTA) countries.

Globally Volvo sold 37,775 plug-in hybrids during the first six months, up from 21,015 during the same period last year.

It's been especially good for Volvo in Europe, where, like all automakers, it is trying to wean itself off diesel sales and still appeal to customers who don't want to pay high prices for petrol. I'm in favor of it too because increased hybrid sales can only help to drive battery costs down as the market gradually shifts to fully electric cars.

Speaking of alternate powertrains, BMWwhich along with Honda and Toyota was on the hydrogen train longer than it probably should have beenhasn't given up on the fuel cell game. It's doing a hydrogen version of the X5 starting in 2022, reports Bloomberg:

BMW AG will make a version of its X5 SUV that runs on hydrogen fuel-cells, part of the carmakers plan of producing as many drive variants as possible until one technology proves dominant.

The i Hydrogen NEXT will get a limited production run starting in 2022, the German manufacturer said in a statement Friday. Toyota Motor Corp. will supply the fuel cells for the vehicle.

The technology could have the potential to become another pillar in the portfolio of BMW, Chief Executive Officer Oliver Zipse said.

View original post here:

The Tesla Model Y Made In Germany Will Be Quite Different - The Drive

What Are EV Regulatory Credits And Why Is Tesla Selling So Many Of Them? – Yahoo Finance

Tesla Inc (NASDAQ: TSLA) reported its fourth consecutive profitable quarter on Wednesday after the company generated 50 cents in GAAP EPS in the second quarter. Despite an earnings and revenue beat, Tesla shares fell 5%on Thursday, and regulatory credits may be to blame.

Tesla reported $6.04 billion in revenue in the second quarter. However, despite opening a new plant in China and launching the new Model Y, Teslas automotive sales were down 4% from a year ago.

Tesla also reported just $104 million in GAAP net income in the second quarter, but that profit includes $428 million in regulatory credit sales.

What Are Regulatory Credits? Environmental emissions programs around the world, such as the Zero Emissions Vehicle (ZEV) program in California, give out credits to automakers that produce and sell electric vehicles. In addition to California, there are at least 13 other U.S. states that have similar programs in place. If an automaker doesnt have enough credits by the end of the year, it could face punishment from state regulators.

Since Tesla produces nothing but EVs, the company racks up way more credits than it needs to meet the minimum regulatory requirements, so it turns around and sells the excess credits to other automakers so that they can avoid penalties.

For example, Fiat Chrysler Automobiles NV (NYSE: FCAU) has reportedly committed to buying $1.27 billion in credits from Tesla to comply with new European environmental regulations that go into effect in 2021.

See Also:ARK Invest Analyst Discusses Tesla's Path To ,000 Share Price

Why Does It Matter? Since Tesla receives these regulatory credits for free, they're able to sell them at 100% profit margins, which boosts the companys overall margins. Teslas regulatory credit sales revenue in the second quarter was up nearly 200% from a year ago.

Tesla is seemingly relying heavily on these credits to turn a profit, according to GLJ Research analyst Gordon Johnson.

In fact, given TSLA is guiding 2020 credit sales of $1.2bn vs. the current consensus EBIT estimate of $1.2bn, TSLA is effectively guiding to zero profits from actually selling cars, again, in 2020, Johnson wrote in a note.

To make matters worse, Johnson and other analysts say demand for these credits is unsustainable in the long-term as automakers around the world roll out their own EV models in coming years. Without this 100%-margin revenue boost, Johnson estimates Teslas actual automotive gross margin was just 18.7% in the second quarter, its lowest level in a year.

TSLA Chart by TradingView new TradingView.widget( { "width": 680, "height": 423, "symbol": "NASDAQ:TSLA", "interval": "D", "timezone": "Etc/UTC", "theme": "light", "style": "1", "locale": "en", "toolbar_bg": "#f1f3f6", "enable_publishing": false, "allow_symbol_change": true, "container_id": "tradingview_8e1fc" } );

Benzingas Take: Tesla certainly isnt doing anything wrong in profiting off of its excess regulatory credits, but investors can bet their bottom dollar other auto companies like Fiat Chrysler are doing everything they can to wean themselves off of buying credits and boosting Teslas numbers as soon as possible.

A big part of Teslas 500%gain in the past year has been proving a sustainably profitable business model, but its unlikely that regulatory credit sales will be part of that equation in the long-term.

Latest Ratings for TSLA

View More Analyst Ratings for TSLA View the Latest Analyst Ratings

See more from Benzinga

2020 Benzinga.com. Benzinga does not provide investment advice. All rights reserved.

See original here:

What Are EV Regulatory Credits And Why Is Tesla Selling So Many Of Them? - Yahoo Finance

Options traders bet Tesla’s earnings report will add $75 billion to the stock’s market cap – CNBC

Tesla speeds into Wednesday afternoon's earnings report having added more than $142 billion to its market cap since it last reported on April 29.

Some options traders are betting that the electric automaker can add another $75 billion to that number by the end of this week.

The stock price has doubled during that period, and has soared by nearly 275% in 2020. Tesla would have to bounce another 25% out of earnings to complete that market cap move by Friday, but options traders are more than willing to bet that Elon Musk's company is more than capable of doing exactly that.

"We saw call volume outpace put volume today by [a ratio of] about 2 to 1. Most of that was very short-dated. Right now, the options market is implying a move of about 14% by the end of the week," Optimize Advisors CIO Michael Khouw said Tuesday on CNBC's "Fast Money."

While options contract pricing in Tesla may be implying a move of 14% in either direction, the most popular strike in Tuesday's session were actually those that required a 25% move higher just to break even.

"Most of that activity was concentrated in the weekly 2,000-strike calls," said Khouw. "Almost 20,000 of those traded for around about $25 [per contract]. Buyers of those calls are obviously betting that the stock could go above that $2,000 strike price by the end of the week."

While these traders are confident in Tesla completing this mammoth move higher in such a short period of time, the overall options market is less certain of the stock's ability to get it done. According to Khouw, the market is predicting only a 14% chance that these contracts end up being profitable.

Tesla was trading 1% higher Wednesday morning.

Disclaimer

Continue reading here:

Options traders bet Tesla's earnings report will add $75 billion to the stock's market cap - CNBC

Huston-Tillotson University announces partnership with Tesla on learning initiatives, programs for students – KXAN.com

AUSTIN (KXAN) Huston-Tillotson University, Austins only Historically Black College and University, is partnering with Tesla to begin working on innovative learning opportunities for its students.

On Wednesday, the Tesla car company announced it will build its next Gigafactory in the Austin area, and now the university says its plans with Tesla are even closer to fruition.

Huston-Tillotson said its collaborating with Tesla to form strategies involving faculty collaborations, undergraduate research and more.

The university said it hopes the employment opportunities that will be possible because of the Tesla partnership will help prepare students for mid- to-high-skilled careers.

Huston-Tillotson said in its welcome letter to Tesla:

We anticipate our collaboration with Tesla to lead ultimately to internships, apprenticeships, externships, and fruitful careers for HT students. Tesla is an organization that aligns with and supports Huston-Tillotson Universitys core values and mission. Tesla, welcome to Austin, Texas!

Originally posted here:

Huston-Tillotson University announces partnership with Tesla on learning initiatives, programs for students - KXAN.com

Tesla and Microsoft Earnings Will Move the Market – Barron’s

ROBYN BECK/AFP via Getty Images

Text size

The most important events for the stock market Wednesday will come after the closewhen Microsoft and Tesla will report earnings.

Tesla stock is up 275% year to date, and its now the worlds most valuable car company, worth almost $300 billion. Microsoft is up a paltry 32%, but after adding $380 billion in market cap, its now worth $1.5 trillion, making it the second most valuable company in the U.S., trailing only Apple.

Newsletter Sign-up

A morning briefing on what you need to knowin the day ahead, including exclusive commentary fromBarron's and MarketWatch writers.

Expectations are high. Officially, Tesla is expected to post a small second-quarter loss, but that estimate appears stale. Teslas second-quarter deliveries crushed forecasts, and analysts have been slow to adjust their numbers. The so-called whisper number could be closer to 50 cents in per share profit. The stakes are high: If Tesla produces a quarterly profit, its stock could be added to the S&P 500.

Microsoft is expected to earn $1.36 a share and, like Tesla, it will have to do better than the official numbers to meet heightened expectations. The company has topped earnings estimates for 16 straight quarters. The last time Microsoft missed estimates the stock dropped 7.2%. There will be less drama at Microsoft, but earnings still matter.

Come to think of it, earnings always matter.

Al Root

The U.S. State Department ordered Chinas foreign ministry to close its Houston consulate Wednesday.

Whats Next: The U.S. governments approach toward China could continue through November as President Donald Trump and Secretary of State Mike Pompeo have blamed China for the coronavirus outbreak. Retaliation by China could inject more uncertainty into already-shaken markets.

Archie Mitchell

The U.S. Department of Justice says two men who worked for Chinas intelligence service gained unauthorized access to computers around the world and stole terabytes of data, targeting everything from gaming software development to Covid-19 research.

Whats Next: Li and Dong are unlikely to face trial over the charges because China doesnt have an extradition treaty with the U.S. But the indictment serves to raise awareness of the financial and intellectual property threat posed by such hacksand deter others who might lack the same protections.

Anita Hamilton

President Trump held his first coronavirus briefing since April on Tuesday, during which he told reporters at the White House that the Covid-19 pandemic would probably get worse before it gets better.

Whats Next: Trumps briefing also comes as he trails in polls to former Vice President Joe Biden. Given the spike in cases paired with polling that shows many Americans dont approve of how he has handled the pandemic, the president might look to such briefings as a way to win over the American public.

Connor Smith

Former Vice President Joe Biden laid out his latest economic proposal, a plan for child and elder care, on Tuesday. The presumptive Democratic presidential nominee called for $775 billion to be spent over the next 10 years on tax credits for early childhood care, universal prekindergarten for 3- and 4-year-olds, and increased spending on in-home care for the elderly and disabled.

We cant just build back to the way things were before ...This is about dignity and respect for working people. Joe Biden

Whats Next: Even if Biden is elected and Democrats win a majority in the Senate in November, Republicans would likely still have enough votes to use a filibuster to block Bidens proposals. To push any plans through, Biden would either have to work with Republicans or convince the Senate to eliminate the filibuster entirely.

Ben Walsh

A fourth Covid-19 rescue package wont pass until early August, House Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy (R., Calif.) and Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R., Ky.) said Tuesday. The extra unemployment benefits that more than 30 million workers are receiving would expire before a deal to extend or modify them can be struck.

Whats Next: Senate Republicans, still trying to navigate fissures in their own caucus and with the White House, have yet to present their proposal. Without that, the one thing that needs to happen for a bill to passnegotiationscant begin in earnest.

Ben Walsh

Dear Moneyist,

My dad passed away from Covid-19 in early April, 2020. He was a first responder at a walk-in clinic, and was in great health with no underlying health conditions. His death is still a shock to me as he and I were very close.

Me, my sister, our stepmother of five years, and her son are left behind. He did not leave a will. It has been over two months, and we have now just received financial information regarding our dads estate.

My stepmother hired a lawyer who wants us to sign papers to say she gets everything (money, house and car) and my sister and I basically get nothing (just enough to cover one semester of college).

She originally agreed to split everything evenly, and now she is denying any mention of that. She claims she wants all of this to be fair and the court system is fair when she knows none of this is respectable.

She said if we dont sign our rights over, she will put everything through probate, including memorable items like family heirlooms, clothes, pictures or anything she possibly could. What should our next move be?

Feeling Trapped

Read The Moneyists response.

Quentin Fottrell

Newsletter edited by Stacy Ozol, Anita Hamilton, Matt Bemer, Benjamin Levisohn

Original post:

Tesla and Microsoft Earnings Will Move the Market - Barron's

Vietnam Threatens China with Litigation over the South China Sea – Lawfare

Vietnam and China have sparred over competing claims in the South China Sea for nearly 50 years. But for the first time, in November 2019, Vietnamese officials publicly issued threats to initiate international legal proceedings against Chinasimilar to the Philippine case that ended in 2016. Since November, there have been further indications that the Vietnamese government is quite serious, despite the limited success enjoyed by the Philippines when it invoked the law. In this post, I will address two questions on this issue: What motivates the Vietnamese government to consider this step at this time? And what can Vietnam gain?

For starters, at stake are development rights for the oil and gas reserves under Vietnams continental shelf. While the U.N. Convention on the Law of the Sea allocates resource rights in the water and under the seabed to Vietnam, out to at least 200 nautical miles from Vietnams shores, China stakes a historic rights claim to much of the same resources through its nine-dash line. This line encompasses about 80 percent of the South China Sea but has already been formally invalidated once by the arbitrators in the Philippine case. Despite its loss in court, China did not abandon its claim. Throughout 2019, Chinese government vessels harassed Vietnamese hydrocarbon survey efforts in an especially rich undersea region known as Vanguard Bank. Under the joint venture between Rosneft and Petro-Vietnam, an exploratory drilling rig began operating in the area in July 2019. China then sent its own survey vesselsunder heavy coast guard escortto demonstrate its claim. Further north, in 2011, ExxonMobil and Petro-Vietnam discovered commercially significant oil and gas deposits in Vietnams Block 118. The Ca Voi Xanh (Blue Whale) gas fieldthe area these two companies are trying to developlies only 50 miles off Vietnams coast but straddles the vast area claimed by China. A final go-ahead decision is expected sometime this year, and gaining clarity over its legal rights to resources in the region may be a key reason for Vietnam to arbitrate.

Also at stake are fishing rights in Vietnams 200-mile exclusive economic zone and in the waters off the disputed Paracel Islands. The Vietnamese government defies annual Chinese fishing bans that attempt to control and curb Vietnamese fishing activities in areas that overlap with Chinas nine-dash line. Arbitration in this region would clarify legal rights to the resources and deflect some of the domestic pressure to protect Vietnamese fishermen. Domestic resentment is a force that must be managed carefully since, in 2014, at the height of a dispute over Chinese oil rig HYSY 981, the Vietnamese people conducted anti-China riots, assaulted Chinese in Vietnam and vandalized Chinese commercial interests.

Finally, as noted above, Vietnam disputes Chinese ownership of the Paracel Islands, a group of small but strategically important features that lie between the Vietnamese coast and Chinas Hainan Island. The islands have long been claimed by Vietnam, but Chinese forces first occupied features in the Paracels in 1955 in the wake of Vietnams war for independence against France. In 1974 China fought a short sea battle against South Vietnamese forces to take full control over the last remaining Vietnamese positions. Since then, China has consolidated control over the islands, built up a military garrison, and harassed or arrested Vietnamese fishermen who try to continue fishing there.

The most likely purpose behind Vietnams threat to litigate is to gain clarity about its resource rights and to develop leverage to stop Chinese interference so that Vietnam can move forward with exploitation contracts for its offshore gas and oil deposits. But Chinese interference with resource exploitation is not a new challenge for Vietnam. Nor is the domestic political pressure over Chinese interference with Vietnamese fishing. Both issues have been managed through diplomacy in the past. What makes this time different?

Vietnams threat to litigate comes amid ongoing multilateral negotiations involving the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) and China over a Code of Conduct for the South China Sea. Negotiations on a Code of Conduct have been under way for two decades as an upgrade to an initial agreementthe Declaration of Conduct for Parties in the South China Seathat was seen as a stopgap measure when it was created in 2002. The parties may be close to a deal, and there is some suggestion that all sides are jockeying for position before finalizing an agreement that locks in a new status quo. To Vietnam, that status quo should provide it exclusive rights to the hydrocarbon resources under its continental shelf based on international law. This explains Vietnams strategy, which involves confronting China at sea to protect its exclusive resource rights, publicly advancing the legality of Vietnams stance and the lack of legal legitimacy for Chinas claim, while maintaining multiple avenues open for diplomacy.

China, by contrast, believes a new status quo should acknowledge its extralegal historic interests in the South China Sea, includingat a minimumjoint rights to the resources under the seabed. Further, lurking just beneath the surface is a deep sense of Chinese entitlement to deference from the smaller states of Southeast Asia. Vietnams acceptance of Chinese resource rights in the South China Sea therefore serves as a barometer of its acquiescence to Chinese predominance. This was the implicit message of Chinas foreign ministry spokesman when he said recently that China hoped Vietnam would respect Chinas sovereignty and jurisdiction over the contested waters, and not take actions that could complicate the situation.

Unfortunately, ASEAN is rarely able to apply effective multilateral pressure against China in the South China Sea. Its Southeast Asian members are united neither in political perspective regarding China nor in their core interests. The South China Sea disputes are an acute problem for ASEANs maritime states but pose little trouble for its continental members. Further, one effect of Chinas co-optation of the interests of Cambodia is that ASEANas a consensus-driven organizationfinds unity harder to achieve. Thus, there are few opportunities for Vietnam to deploy a unified Southeast Asian front against Chinese encroachment of its interests.

Chinas power play in maritime Southeast Asia is apparent in its negotiating positions on the Code of Conduct. China seeks to limit the influence of the United States and other outside powers by using the code to prohibit commercial development in the South China Sea from companies outside the region. Further, China seeks a veto over military activities in the South China Sea between the Southeast Asians and outside powers. In response, the maritime Southeast Asian states issued a series of diplomatic letters to the United Nations outlining the lack of legal basis to Chinas claims. These two approachesdiversifying international commercial relationships and seeking to build security relationships with outside powershave represented some of the strongest pressure points against China that the Southeast Asian claimant states have possessed to date.

Despite increasing engagement, security developments between the U.S. and Vietnam have progressed slowlyfor a variety of reasons. Vietnam maintains deep and long-standing energy and security ties with Russia, which is by far Vietnams largest source of weapons and military equipment. Russia is the source of one of the Vietnamese navys most advanced military capabilitiesits Kilo diesel submarines, Gepard-class frigates, and Tarantul/Molniya-class corvettes armed with supersonic SS-N-25 anti-ship cruise missilesas well as its K-300P Bastion-P coastal defense systems. On the energy front, Vietsovpetro, a joint Russian-Vietnamese energy corporation, has long been a major player in Vietnams energy industry. It is currently operating offshore in the Ca Tam (Sturgeon) oil field. The bilateral relationship was elevated from a strategic partnership to a comprehensive strategic partnership in 2012, paving the way for broader cooperation. One result of this change was a further advancement in Vietnams energy sector cooperation as they announced plans for Russias Rosatom State Atomic Energy Corporation to build a research center for nuclear science and technology in Hanoi with a 15-megawatt research reactor. Even as the Vietnam-Russia relationship advances, it is increasingly dwarfed by Chinas growing economic and security presence. Vietnam increased its military budget by nearly 400 percent in the decade between 2005 and 2014, but its capacity is far behind the military power China can bring to bear in the South China Sea. Furthermore, Russias developing entente with China causes Hanoi to question whether Russian support would be available in a potential standoff with Beijingexplaining why Vietnam is actively preparing to undertake international litigation at this time.

Although Hanoi has managed so far to keep its relationship with China stable through bilateral diplomacy, it has made no progress on earning Beijings respect for its resource interests in the South China Sea. Multilateral diplomacy through ASEAN has been a disappointment, and Vietnam cannot count on either Russia or the U.S. to be its great power patron when the chips are down. Further, even with the rapid expansion of its military budget, Vietnam knows it cannot prevail in a standoff with China. International litigation may be an increasingly attractive option to alter trends that are not currently working in Vietnams favor, especially if China provokes Vietnam with a major at-sea incident of some kind.

The military imbalance, however, is not the only barrier Vietnams leaders will need to address if they pursue a legal case against China. Vietnams domestic politics are in flux as a political transition approaches. The Vietnamese Communist Party is due to elect a new slate of leaders at its National Congress in January 2021. Additionally, the Vietnamese and Chinese communist parties maintain separate relations from the formal state-to-state diplomatic ties, giving Beijing multiple avenues of influence over the countrys decision-making. Further, as Vietnams largest trading partnerwith over $100 billion annually in two-way tradeChina has tremendous influence over the health of Vietnams economy. Vietnams manufacturing sector is especially dependent on Chinese raw materials and equipment. But this dependence may be softening. In 2018, Vietnams National Assembly ratified its countrys participation in the Comprehensive and Progressive Agreement for Trans-Pacific Partnership (CPTPP) that became the successor to the Trans-Pacific Partnership when the Trump administration pulled out of negotiations. The CPTPP gives Vietnam low-barrier entry to major Pacific economies, including Japan, Canada and Australia. Vietnam also entered into a trade deal in 2019 with the European Union that eliminated 99 percent of the tariffs on goods imported by Europe. And, so far in 2020, Vietnamese manufacturing received a boost from the U.S.-China trade war. Even so, China remains Vietnams largest trading partner, giving Beijing economicas well as politicalinfluence over its neighbor to the south.

In opening the possibility of litigation, Vietnam hopes to overcome these vulnerabilities by harnessing the court of international public opinion as much as the strength of international law. The Vietnamese understand that litigation would not be the end of the matter, even if it wins. Persuading China to accept a South China Sea order based on law, rather than raw power and its own history, is a long game. If Vietnam challenges China in court, its purpose will be to increase the costs to Beijing of its intransigence. China needs stability in the South China Sea to pursue its long-term interest in developing a stable and reliable maritime component of its Belt and Road Initiative. If the Vietnamese win an international case over resource rights, China is likely to face many years of military and diplomatic pressure from the U.S., Japan, Australia, India, the United Kingdom, France and other states that have already demonstrated willingness to provide active support to the international legal order in the South China Sea. Accordingly, it is possible that the mere threat to litigate will have a favorable effect on Vietnams bilateral and multilateral negotiations with China. If not, following through with international litigation may be Vietnams best way to change unfavorable trends in the South China Sea.

The views expressed are the authors own and do not reflect the official views of the U.S. Navy or any other agency of the U.S. government.

Read the original post:

Vietnam Threatens China with Litigation over the South China Sea - Lawfare

Q&A: Tracy Zea, new chief of the Waterways Council – WorkBoat

On July 8, Tracy R. Zea was named the new president and CEO of the Waterways Council Inc., which advocates for modern and well-financed inland waterways on behalf of river carriers, ports and shippers. He has been the WCIs vice president of government relations since 2015, and prior to that served as an aide to the House Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure, which oversees federal waterways policy. In this interview, Zea talks about advocating for the waterways during the pandemic and his priorities for WCI going forward.

WorkBoat: What are your immediate and long-term goals for WCI?

Zea: Mytop objectiveeachday is creating valueforourmembers. WCI has had a long history of doing this throughthelegislativeprocess, and that is whymynumber onepriority isto build on theprevioussuccess that has been achievedoverour17-yearexistence. A more immediate priority istoensurethatthe Water Resources Development Act(WRDA)of 2020 is signed into law, with WCIs top requesttoadjusttheconstruction andmajor rehabilitationcost-share for theInlandWaterwaysTrustFund.If this isachieved,it willsignificantlyadvance the portfolio of projects waiting in thequeuefor construction.

WB: This is an election year. What Congressional races is WCI watching most closely in terms ofretaining waterways friendly lawmakers in Congress, and would a Democrat in the White House make a difference for inland legislative priorities?

Zea: There is a sayingthatelections have consequences,and for that reason,WCI pays close attention to every race.A snapshot of a couple of elected officials from the House Transportation and Infrastructure Committee that we will be watching on election night are Congressman Lamb (PA-17), Congressman Davis (IL-13), and Congresswoman Finkenauer (IA-1). Then in the Senate, majority leader McConnell (R-KY), Jones (D-AL) and Senator Ernst (R-IA). WCI has had strong success operating in a bipartisan fashion, and it is my intention that WCI will continue to operate that way moving forward.

WB: Your background is in Congress and you worked directly on water resource bills as an aide to the House Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure. How is this experience going to help you as you lead WCI?

Zea: WCI is an advocacy organization, and by working on the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure Idevelopeda keen understanding of the legislative process. I worked specifically on the Water Resources Reform and Development Act(WRRDA)of2014, which was a transformative bill for the Corps of Engineers.Itsno secret that over the last 10 years Congress has drastically changed frombusiness as usual.Having worked on Capitol Hill during thenew business as usual time period allows for me to help guide WCI to key legislativevictories.

WB: How has the pandemic affected your advocacy efforts in Congress?

Zea: The inland waterways industry has shown that it is not immune to Covid-19. Significant precautions have been taken by companies to keep their employees safe and healthy. The Inland Waterways User Board announced at its meeting in July that IWTF fuel receipts are down for FY20 as a result of the COVID-related economic downturn. The receipts were tracking almost identically to FY19 until February, when we saw almost a flat line. Expected total projections may be significantly lower than FY19. WCI does not believe that this will be the new normal going forward for IWTF receipts and once the economy starts to normalize, there will be a return torevenues closer to the $120 million range. The bigger question moving forward in the next five years will be how will the COVID relief funding packages will affect the allocations for appropriations subcommittees. Over the last five years (lawmakers) have continued to increase allocations for the Corps of Engineers Civil Works budget, but with trillions of dollars being spent on COVID relief, will it have a negative impact? WCI believes that Congress has recognized over the last several years that the Corps of Engineers provides meaningful benefits to the nation and will continue to fund them at or above current levels.

WB: How has the pandemic changed how WCI operates as an organization?

Zea:Like mostcompaniesand associations, WCI has been working remotely since the start of the pandemic but staying connectedthroughvideo conferences and phone calls.The biggestchallenge for us as an organization is that we have had to get creative on ways we approachCapitolHillremotely withour lobbying efforts.

WB: To assure a strong stream of funding for new waterways construction projects, WCI and other waterways groups seek Congressional approval of a change in the Inland Waterways Trust Fund from the current 50/50 split to 75 federal and 25 from the industry-supported Trust Fund. The House and Senate versions of WRDA, however, are recommending 65/35. Is this likely to stick, and what will the lower ratio mean for project completion and new starts?

Zea: As an organization we wouldhaveloved to see 75%/25%, but 65%/35%is still amajorwin, and if it is enacted into law,could potentially provide an additional billion dollars toward construction and major rehabilitation of inland waterways modernization projects. Currently, there are 18 modernization projects that are valued at just over $8 billion, and by adjusting the cost-share, these projects will significantly be expedited tocompletion.

WB: The federal government and the barge industry have been talking for years about expanding container-on-barge services in certain coastal areas, and recently some significant federal grants have been distributed for projects. What do you think is the future of container-on-barge?

Zea: Container on barge is definitely an opportunity for growth on the waterways. There are several different operations looking at creative ways to execute this.Federal grants have been asignificantadvancement for this initiative as inland ports/terminals prepare for containers toarrive.

WB: The coal industry has been on a decline for many years now, as the low price of natural gas and environmental rules have cut demand, causing many plants to close. Meanwhile, President Trump has promised a coal renaissance. What do you see happening to coal in the future?

Zea: The domestic coal market has faced a difficult yeardue toshrinking exports, low gas prices, low demand for electricity given a mild winter, and Covid-19 and the relatedGDPdrop. There was high coal inventory at the start of the year, with the recent heat of the summer just starting to burn the stockpiles.On the export side, EIAforecasts U.S.coal exports will decrease in 2020 by 32% to 63MMst. U.S. Atlantic ports, which are the primary outlet for U.S. coal exports, are seeing decreased demand because of the global economic slowdown. Based on an assumed increase in global coal demand in 2021, EIA expects U.S. coal exports to increase by 7% next year. EIA expects increases in 2021 to be limited because of less demand for U.S. coal in India. India, the top destination for U.S. exports, has decreased consumption of both steam and coking coals by nearly 50% this year. India has alsoopened updomestic mining options to private companies. We knowthat coal use has declinedas a resultof naturalgas and subsidized renewables, but itstill remainsan abundant, stable, reliable, affordable source of energy, providing about 30% of the electricity used daily in the United States and more than 37% of the worlds electricity supply.

WB: President Trump and many leaders in Congress promised a major investment in the countrys flagging infrastructure, including locks and dams. Thishasnthappened yet, andprospects seem uncertain in an election year. How do you see this playing out? How do you make sure that river infrastructure is part of any final plan?

Zea: In the short term,WCI is focusing onadjusting the cost-share for construction and major rehabilitation projects on the inland waterways systeminWRDA 2020.WCI truly believes that this policy can significantly advance our inland waterways system.The long-term outlook for infrastructure looks like a playfor2021,butnot this year. WCI continues to educate Congress and the public onthe benefits of the inland waterways transportation system.

WB: There have been some major positive developments in the past few years for the waterways. The Olmsted dam opened after30 years of construction hiccups, and there have been record federal budgets for the inland waterways, allowing for significant movement on new and ongoing projects to improve river navigation. How can this turnaround be explained after years of struggles for proper funding?

Zea: A lot of it turns out to be the right political players in the right spotat the right time.(Former House Transportation and Infrastructure Committee) Chairman (Bill) Shuster, (R-Pa.,) made the WRDA bill a top priorityduring his tenure (from 2013-2019). And the leadershipofSen. (Lamar)Alexander (R-Tenn), chairing theSenate AppropriationsEnergy and Water Subcommitteehas been so helpfultotheindustry.WCIs job moving forward isto ensure thatthesewater resourcebills remain a priority for Congressnow and in the future.

The rest is here:

Q&A: Tracy Zea, new chief of the Waterways Council - WorkBoat

Strategic Resources Closes the Acquisition of the Mustavaara Mine in Finland – PRNewswire

VANCOUVER, BC, July 28, 2020 /PRNewswire/ -Strategic Resources Inc. (TSXV: SR) (the "Company" or "Strategic")announces that it has successfully closed the acquisition of the Mustavaara reservations and associated intellectual property, core samples and storage facilities with the bankruptcy estate of Ferrovan Oy ("Ferrovan"). Strategic plans to update a National Instrument 43-101 resource for the asset in the third quarter of 2020 and then pursue updating a National Instrument 43-101 Preliminary Economic Assessment on the project that reflects current market prices and cost estimates.

Scott Hicks, CEO commented, "Mustavaara provides the company with a cornerstone asset in the vanadium space. Acquiring a substantial brownfield deposit for such a modest cost should serve Strategic's shareholders well going forward. The closing of this transaction along with the restructuring of the Silasselk earn-in announced in June sets the company up for success and provides substantial flexibility going forward."

Mustavaara Project Description

Mustavaara is a large vanadium-iron-titanium deposit, which was mined by the Finnish state company Rautaruukki Oy between 1976 and 1985. The Project is located in the Municipality of Taivalkoski, 75km southwest of the city of Kuusamo. The vanadium produced from Mustavaara and the nearby Otanmki deposit accounted for approximately 10% of the world vanadium production at that time. Mining was suspended due to adverse market conditions and the processing facilities were dismantled in 2001.

Ferrovan commissioned Pyry Finland Oy to complete a Pre-Feasibility Study ("PFS") for the project in 2011. The resulting 2012 PFS outlined a project that would have a concentrator near site and a smelting plant located close to the coast in the city of Raahe.

The PFS was based on a reserve of 97 million tonnes at 13.8% magnetite and 0.91% vanadium in concentrate in the Probable reserve category. Prior work indicated that the magnetite content could be upgraded by a factor of six as a result of the concentrating process. Consequently, the vanadium grade could also be enhanced significantly from 0.2% vanadium to 0.9% vanadium (equivalent to 1.65% V2O5). This resource is now considered historical.

Cautionary Historic Resource Description

The above historical informationincludes estimates of the quantity, grade, and metal content of the Mustavaara deposit that Strategic has not verified as a current mineral resource, and which was prepared before Strategic entered into an agreement to acquire an interest in the Mustavaara property. Strategic considers the historical estimate to be relevant given that the report was done relatively recently and considers the estimate to be reliable given the status of the authors of the estimate. Neither Strategic nor any qualified person engaged by Strategic has done sufficient work to classify the historical estimate as a current mineral resource; and Strategic is not treating the historical estimate as a current mineral resource.

Qualified Persons

Leo Hathaway, P.Geo., Vice President of Strategic and the Qualified Person as defined by National Instrument 43-101 Standards of Disclosure for Mineral Projects for the Mustavaara Project has reviewed, verified and approved all disclosure of scientific or technical information made by Strategic herein, including disclosure of a mineral resource, and the general contents of this news release.

About Strategic Resources

Strategic Resources Inc. (TSXV:SR) is a Vancouver, Canada based mineral exploration and development company that is focused on vanadium projects in Finland and Peru. The Company continues to evaluate new opportunities that are related to the electrification of the economy.

Further details are available on the Company's website athttps://strategic-res.com/.

To follow future news releases, please sign up athttps://strategic-res.com/contact/.

STRATEGIC RESOURCES INC.

Signed: "Scott Hicks"

Scott Hicks, CEO

Neither the TSX Venture Exchange nor its Regulation Services Provider (as that term is defined in the policies of the TSX Venture Exchange) accepts responsibility for the adequacy or accuracy of this news release.

Cautionary Note Regarding Forward-Looking Information

Certain statements and information herein, including all statements that are not historical facts, contain forward-looking statements and forward-looking information within the meaning of applicable securities laws. Such forward-looking statements or information include but are not limited to statements or information with respect to completing a National Instrument 43-101 compliant resource and undertaking a National Instrument 43-101 compliant Preliminary Economic Assessment. Often, but not always, forward-looking statements or information can be identified by the use of words such as "will", "should" or variations of those words and phrases or statements that certain actions, events or results "will" or "should" be taken, occur or be achieved. There is no assurance Strategic will be successful in completing any of the transactions on the terms outlined above, or at all.

SOURCE Strategic Resources Inc.

https://strategic-res.com

Original post:

Strategic Resources Closes the Acquisition of the Mustavaara Mine in Finland - PRNewswire

Chief Secretary to the Treasury delivers his first speech in the role to thinktank Onward – GOV.UK

The new radicals - how the Treasury can drive government change

Its a pleasure to be delivering my first policy speech as Chief Secretary to the Treasury, ahead of the Spending Review this autumn.

Today I will be speaking about how the Treasury can be an accelerator of change in government.

And so it is fitting to be hosted by Onward, who for the past year-and-a-half, have been leading the renewal of ideas on the centre-right of British politics.

A Spending Review is a significant moment in the lifecycle of any government.

We must not only conduct this review against the backdrop of the most challenging peacetime economic circumstances in living memory.

We must do so as a government re-elected a little over seven months ago with a strengthened majority and an emboldened mandate.

Now, these two factors are not mutually exclusive.

Over the past few weeks the Prime Minister, Chancellor and Chancellor of the Duchy of Lancaster have each delivered speeches outlining how our recovery from this pandemic can be a moment for national renewal.

But as Chief Secretary, my role is to talk less about the what and to focus more on the how.

So, today I want to explore how the Spending Review can act as the mechanism to deliver the Prime Ministers ambition to level up our country.

Now this practical approach is rooted in my experience at different stages of my political career.

As a constituency MP, I have on many occasions run up against a system that is slow and siloed.

In frustration, Ive found myself asking why there is a seven year gap between funding being agreed for a road scheme and the first digger arriving.

Or why it takes a decade to decide to produce a full business case on whether to reopen eight miles of railway track - taking twice the length of time of the second world war.

Before becoming a minister, I sat on the Public Accounts Committee for four years, where reports repeatedly showed schemes where the outcomes did not reflect the inputs.

As an example, nine regional fire control centres were built at a cost of three quarters of a billion pounds. Not one of them worked.

The lack of upfront clarity on outcomes, the slow speed of delivery and the variable quality of data have been familiar themes during these years.

The Spending Review is an opportunity to challenge this.

But first, its worth considering the context for what will be the first multi-year review since 2015.

Given my previous role, it wont surprise you if I start with Brexit.

For me, Brexit was a vote for change by people who felt the status quo was not delivering for them.

But now we must deliver, particularly for those who at the election lent us their vote for the first time.

And we must deliver differently in the wake of a crisis that has accelerated many trends within our economy and our society.

Take healthcare.

Before coronavirus, around 95% of GP consultations were face to face. By the end of April, this had almost reversed with more than 85% taking place remotely, either by phone or online.

And few GPs now say they want to return to the old approach.

Whitehall has also had to change.

The Furlough Scheme was announced by the Chancellor on 20 March and opened for applications just one month to the day later

Likewise, the Self Employment Income Support Scheme opened almost a whole month ahead of schedule.

Normally such schemes take months years even to deliver.

And HMRC achieved this with more than 80% of their staff working from home.

Id like to put on record my thanks to the civil servants in the Treasury, HMRC and elsewhere for the speed and focus with which they have tackled these extraordinary challenges.

But if the wheels of government can be made to spin this fast in a crisis, with all the added pressures of lockdown, why cant it happen routinely?

For example, why did it have to take a pandemic to collect the right information to understand who the most clinically vulnerable people in our society are?

Indeed, would we have been able to collate the necessary data without the backdrop of a health emergency?

Answering these questions will not only help us to deal with the consequences of COVID-19.

It also cuts to the heart of this governments defining mission - to level up investment and opportunity across the UK.

I think most people understand that the action we are taking to support businesses and jobs during this pandemic is the right thing to do, even though it comes at a cost.

Indeed, as the OBR have made clear, the cost of inaction would have been far greater.

The Prime Minister has made it clear that austerity is not the answer to navigating the changed economic landscape.

But departments will have to make tough choices in the months ahead.

These choices will be shaped by our commitment to review the Green Book.

To properly level-up the country we must ensure that Treasury decision-making reflects our countrys economic geography.

Spending decisions cannot be based solely on cost-benefit ratios that are assessed in silos. There must be room for more balanced judgements which take account of the transformative potential of investment to reduce inequality and drive localised growth.

Levelling up also must be more than a mere shifting of resource from Lon-don to other large metropolitan cities.

It needs to work for the entire United Kingdom, including as part of our enduring commitment to the Union.

And it must recognise that that within a single bus journey different neighbourhoods in the same area can often be worlds apart.

Accelerating the UKs economic recovery.

Levelling-up opportunity throughout our country.

Improving our public services.

And making the UK a scientific superpower.

These are the priorities the CSR must drive forward.

And to do so, I am focussing on three areas which will shape our approach to the Spending Review.

The first is outcomes.

I want this Review to tie expenditure and performance far more closely together than has been the case up to now.

For decades the most innovative companies have made a habit of setting clear objectives and then relentlessly tracking, measuring and evaluating the outcomes of their work.

This approach should not just be confined to Silicon Valley.

We must not forget that the public will judge success not by how much is spent, but by what they experience in their daily lives.

The state of local roads.

The time taken to get a hospital appointment.

How safe the neighbourhood feels.

If funding decisions are to improve over time, we in the Treasury need to have clearer sight of both the intended outcomes and subsequently evaluation of their delivery.

Well be publishing details on these outcomes at the Spending Review, thereby setting the priorities across government for the remainder of this Parliament.

Another key challenge to measuring outcomes is the divide between policy and delivery.

Bridging this divide is made even more difficult by the fact that some of the most complex policy challenges sit across multiple departments and arms- length bodies.

At last years Spending Review, the government announced a new Shared Outcomes Fund to test innovative ways of bringing together the public sec-tor.

The aim was to address cross-cutting issues in a way that improves out-comes and ensures value for money.

Im pleased to announce today that I have approved the first round of pilots from this fund.

These pilots will use innovative approaches to address a wide variety of issues.

From tackling drug misuse in some of the worst-affected areas by better joining up local law enforcement agencies, healthcare and prisons.

To planting trees outside woodlands to help meet our climate change targets.

Or supporting GPs and other healthcare professionals to refer patients to outdoor activities in their local community to help manage complex health and social challenges, like mental health and loneliness.

While the various pilot schemes may seem eclectic, the one thing each successful bid has in common is that each is backed by a robust method to track and measure the delivery of outcomes.

Im hoping we can learn from the success of these projects.

Indeed, we can learn from them even if theyre not successful, because well have better data to understand why.

Closely connected to outcomes is speed, my second area of focus.

Speed is a hallmark of the digital era. Over half of mobile internet users will leave a site that takes longer than three seconds to load.

The early response to CBILS, and the delivery of Bounce Back loans shows government can adapt and deliver schemes that work at speed.

When it comes to infrastructure we must not only foster a culture of pace, agility, and strong leadership.

We must also learn from the work of the Infrastructure and Projects Authority and the National Audit Office.

Programmes need to start with robust goals and we have to resist the temptation to repeatedly change plans.

Our maxim should be measure twice and cut once.

That way we can better address the sobering fact that our capital costs are typically between 10 and 30% higher in this country than in other European countries.

This is why a new Infrastructure Delivery Task Force has been established known as Project Speed.

Led by the Chancellor, Project Speed will aim to cut down the time it takes to develop, design and deliver vital projects.

Another key element of building faster is utilising modern construction techniques linked to clearer standardisation across projects.

I want to explore how the same principles of standardisation and modularisation that delivered the first Nightingale Hospital, one of the largest in the world, in just nine days can now help deliver the governments flagship commitment to build forty new hospitals.

Its not that government doesnt innovate when it comes to construction.

Its just that the innovation is unevenly distributed.

For example, how many of you are aware that the Department for Education has - over the last seven years - brought the cost per metre squared of a new school down by a third?

Yet government as a whole still has a long way to go in optimising the speed and value for money of our construction spend.

Take housing.

Eighty-four per cent of detached housing in Sweden use prefabricated timber elements.

Here by contrast the figure is just 5%.

No doubt it is still associated in peoples minds with spartan post-war housing stock.

But the modern reality is very different, as typified by the so-called Japanese dream factories where a single factory can deliver around 20,000 units in a year.

Customers are able to personalise their future home to match their individual needs and aspirations - making buying a home closer to the experience of buying a car.

This is what we should be seeing in the UK.

Yet too often housing construction would look familiar to Victorian eyes.

Original post:

Chief Secretary to the Treasury delivers his first speech in the role to thinktank Onward - GOV.UK

Program to deliver $1.2 million in grants to struggling small businesses will provide economic relief – Monroe Evening News

As COVID-19 continues to plague the nation, small businesses are hurting.

As COVID-19 continues to plague the nation, small businesses are hurting.

From owners struggling to keep their businesses afloat to employees facing furloughs and terminations, such enterprises are feeling the brunt of the pandemics effects.

Data indicates approximately 30-50% of small businesses face closure if the pandemic continues at its current rate, according to Tim Lake, president and CEO of the Monroe County Business Development Corp.

Thats why a new program generated by elected officials is being looked at as integral to the survival of many small businesses in the state and Monroe County.

Earlier this month, the Michigan Strategic Fund, under the guidance of Gov. Gretchen Whitmer and the state Legislature, unveiled a new program geared towards providing economic relief and support to small businesses impacted by the pandemic.

The Michigan Small Business Restart Program will provide $100 million to small businesses across the state.

About $1.2 million will go specifically to businesses located within Monroe County, according to Lake.

(The program) will provide a much-needed financial relief for suffering businesses, Lake said. I do not think anyone felt the pandemic and its effects on the economy would last this long.

The program, which will be administered through 15 different economic development corporations, will issue grants of up to $20,000 to selected businesses.

The Monroe County region will receive aid through Ann Arbor Spark, the designated EDO that will administer the funds. The EDO also will administer grants to businesses in Washtenaw, Jackson, Hillsdale, Livingston and Lenawee counties.

The money is being generated through the CARES Act, legislation designed to address the impact of COVID-19.

The program is modeled after a previous one the Michigan Small Business Relief Program, which allocated $20 million to relief efforts for small businesses.

That program, which began in March, provided much of the same services as the latest one. It ended up aiding more than 2,700 businesses by its completion.

Businesses that received aid through that previous program are ineligible for the new one. The application process began July 15 and will run through Aug. 5.

The application will be administered through the Michigan Economic Development Corporation. The MEDC anticipates it will end up helping more than 5,000 businesses by the programs conclusion.

The Monroe BDC will help in the selection process for businesses located within Monroe County. Selections will be made by Sept. 30.

Additionally, 30% of the funds will be specifically earmarked for businesses owned by women, minorities and veterans, as mandated by the program.

It comes after several industries within the state have slowly returned to operating, though many are doing so under heightened regulations.

In March, many of those businesses were shuttered as state officials took action to slow the spread of the virus.

Even though several sectors of the states economy have reopened, many businesses are still trying to recover from the closure months ago.

Most businesses are certainly not back to full operations or generating the same revenue they did during this period last year, Lake said.

The hardest hit businesses are those that operate on an in-person basis, mostly in the service sector, according to Lake.

That includes salons, restaurants, hotels, bars and gyms, all of which are operating under varying restrictions enacted by Whitmer, who issued executive orders outlining rules of operation for each industry.

The latest program will help businesses stay open in hopes of being able to one day return to normal operations, Lake said, adding that small businesses are naturally vulnerable to financial hardships.

Most small businesses have very limited, if any, financial reserves, Lake said. A sudden and steep loss of revenue can be fatal.

Small business is integral to the fabric of a community, according to Lake, who said such businesses contribute to organizations within Monroe County and attract residents to the area.

Small businesses are risk takers that will bring in new products or services to a community that larger retailers or service providers would not consider economically favorable to their shareholders, Lake said. These unique offerings create an environment that gives our community a special character and competitive advantage over other communities.

Another potential economic shutdown could prove catastrophic to those contributions.

Not only would it mean an increased possibility of illness-related deaths, but it also would, once again, heavily impact the livelihoods of many business owners and their employees.

It would be impactful to many of our in-person businesses as they would be the first impacted, Lake said. They have just started generating a revenue stream (again) it would be cut off.

The pandemic also will shape the future of work in the country.

It has accelerated the need for businesses to increasingly adopt and integrate new technology, such as cloud-based applications or more automation, into their operations, Lake said.

The challenge for small businesses is these enhancements present a new learning curve and are capital intensive, Lake said. In most cases, capital is in short supply.

Facts

Resources available for local businesses

There are several resources available to local businesses struggling with the impact of COVID-19, according to Tim Lake, president and CEO of the Monroe County Business Development Corp.

I would encourage any struggling business to call the BDC, and we will direct the company to an appropriate resource for their issue, Lake said. I would encourage any business with questions or concerns to reach out.

An asset map of resources for businesses was produced by the Monroe County Link Plans Grow Strategically Pillar Team.

While several businesses are experiencing cash flow problems, many also are struggling with how to safely stay open or reopen and also address staffing issues, according to Lake.

Some also may need help establishing an online presence or shifting their business model to contactless product or service delivery, he added.

There are resources to assist these businesses, Lake said. The Michigan Small Business Development Centers have been providing support in many of these areas and will continue to do so during the pandemic.

The Monroe County Business Development Corp. can be reached at 241-8081 or at its website, monroecountybdc.org.

Excerpt from:

Program to deliver $1.2 million in grants to struggling small businesses will provide economic relief - Monroe Evening News

Property/Casualty Insurance Industry Suffered Largest-Ever Drop in Surplus in the First Quarter of 2020 – GlobeNewswire

2020_Q1_By_The_Numbers_Horiz_v1 (1)

First-Quarter 2020: By The Numbers

Jersey City, NJ, July 28, 2020 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- The surplus for the private U.S. property/casualty insurance industry dropped by $75.9 billion in the first quarter of 2020its largest-ever quarterly declineas the stock market suffered a major downturn, according to Verisk (Nasdaq:VRSK), a leading data analytics provider, and the American Property Casualty Insurance Association (APCIA). Since then, the COVID-19 pandemic has continued to affect many insurers and will likely impact underwriting results for the second quarter and the remainder of the year.

The surplus fell to $771.9 billion as of March 31, 2020, from the record-high $847.8 billion at the end of 2019. This drop was mostly driven by a decline in valuations of insurers investments. While the decline set surplus back to mid-2018 levels, traditional leverage ratios remained below their long-term averages.

Other industry results remained steady or improved from a year earlier. Net income after taxes in first-quarter 2020 was $17.9 billion, essentially the same as in first-quarter 2019. The net underwriting gain in the first quarter was $6.3 billion, a 19.9% increase from a year earlier. Net written premiums increased to $164.4 billion in first-quarter 2020 from $154.7 billion in first-quarter 2019a 6.2% increase.

While having no apparent effect on first-quarter underwriting results, the COVID-19 pandemic and associated economic disruptions have affected many insurers, and the impact goes beyond the investment losses reported in the first quarter. Based on what is already known about the first half of 2020 and on available forecasts, significant changes are expected in insured exposures as well as in the amount and mix of claims. Verisk research estimates that personal auto insurers have offered more than $13 billion in policyholder rebates and credits. MarketStance, a Verisk solution, estimates that at least 1 million insured businesses in the United States will fail in 2020, and direct written premiums in commercial lines will decrease 2.8%.

The historic drop in industry surplus in the first quarter was concerning for many insurers, as it began to show the impact of COVID-19 on their results, said Neil Spector, president of ISO. But the impact of COVID-19 on the industry is just beginning to unfold. Will personal auto insurers see the reduction in losses matching the policyholder rebates and credits offered this spring? To what extent will commercial lines premiums be affected by the challenges facing the economy? How will insurers adapt and continue to serve their customers efficiently in our new normal?

Verisk recently created an online resource page atverisk.com/insurance/covid-19/to help insurers learn about new regulations, read about critical insights, and discover new products being created to address the effects of COVID-19. It also recently launched a web page that provides strategies for personal lines insurers in the new normal: verisk.com/newnormal.

Property/casualty insurers started the year with solid net written premium growth, but that was the calm before the storm, said Robert Gordon, senior vice president for policy, research and international at APCIA. By the end of the first quarter, insurers experienced their largest-ever quarterly surplus decline as the stock market suffered its largest drop since 1987 and interest rates reached a record low. While the industry remains safely capitalized, many individual insurers face potentially significant unknown coronavirus liability exposures, as well as political and regulatory threats of mandated retroactive and prospective COVID-19 coverage.

View the full report from Verisk and APCIAhere.

About VeriskVerisk (Nasdaq:VRSK) is a leading data analytics provider serving customers in insurance, energy and specialized markets, and financial services. Using advanced technologies to collect and analyze billions of records, Verisk draws on unique data assets and deep domain expertise to provide first-to-market innovations that are integrated into customer workflows. Verisk offers predictive analytics and decision support solutions to customers in rating, underwriting, claims, catastrophe and weather risk, global risk analytics, natural resources intelligence, economic forecasting, and many other fields. Around the world, Verisk helps customers protect people, property, and financial assets.

Headquartered in Jersey City, N.J., Verisk operates in 30 countries and is a member of Standard & Poor's S&P 500Index and part of the Nasdaq 100 Index. For more information, please visitwww.verisk.com.

About APCIARepresenting nearly 60 percent of the U.S. property casualty insurance industry, the American Property Casualty Insurance Association (APCIA) promotes and protects the viability of a competitive private insurance market for the benefit of consumers and insurers. APCIA represents the broadest cross section of home, auto, and business insurers of any national trade association. APCIA members represent all sizes, structures, and regions, which protect families, communities, and businesses in the U.S. and across the globe. For more information, visitwww.apci.org.

Contact:

Joe Madden for VeriskJoseph.Madden@verisk.com201-232-4486

Jeffrey Brewer for APCIAjeffrey.brewer@apci.org847-553-3763

Loretta Worters for I.I.I.lorettaw@iii.org212-346-5575

Read the rest here:

Property/Casualty Insurance Industry Suffered Largest-Ever Drop in Surplus in the First Quarter of 2020 - GlobeNewswire

Corporate profile: EMC Insurance says it is committed ‘to our people’ – Grand Forks Herald

Prairie Business recently interviewed several businesses about what their approach is to hiring new employees and the important skills and attributes they look for in potential hires.

D.J. Campbell, branch human resource business partner manager for EMC Insurance Companies in Bismarck, N.D., shared perspective about what the company looks for when attracting new hires, among other topics.

An approach to hiring new employeesWhats the best way youve found to let prospective employees learn about openings? Sourcing talent is an important step in the talent acquisition process. An organization's ability to reach and attract talent should strategically fall in line with its business objectives. Gone are the days when you could just post a job and wait for the right person to apply. How you source a candidate depends primarily on the position. If it's an entry-level role, I would start by working with career services departments in colleges and universities. If it's a senior-level role, utilizing LinkedIn to match desired skills or posting the position with a specific industry association would be more appropriate. Your sourcing strategy should be intentional and strategic to ensure you develop a competitive talent pool and ultimately the right person for the role.

What does your companys hiring process entail?Our process is aligned to ensure we find the right person for the role following all applicable laws and regulations. This includes alignment of the hiring manager and position requisition, defining the process that will be used, strategic sourcing, objectively qualifying applicants, tailoring the interview questions and process to identify key skills needed to fill the role, incorporating behavioral interview techniques, engaging and introducing the applicant to the enterprise, and managing expectations and answering questions throughout the process. Additionally, EMC believes that our ability to thrive in the future is directly connected to having a diverse workforce, so we have worked to embed diversity, equity and inclusion best practices into our process.

Are there new strategies you plan to use when hiring in a post-pandemic world?In a post-pandemic world, we will see a lot of changes to the way we do business. Initially, I don't see much changing with our talent acquisition strategies. Many people have been thrusted into working remotely and utilizing new technology to stay connected. This same technology will only heighten the talent acquisition process. As someone who leads this process, I understand that many people have been and will continue to be impacted by the pandemic. Many people have lost their jobs adding additional stress. The way we interact with these affected individuals needs to reflect our company values; empathy for their situation, transparency in the process, and timely communication. Talent pools will be larger, so alignment with the hiring manager will be critical. Identifying the skills, knowledge, and abilities needed to fill the role and discussing preferred qualifications will allow the process to move more quickly and efficiently. Another big change I see in the future is our ability to provide opportunity to individuals limited by their geographic location. With remote working capabilities being enhanced during the pandemic, we now have the ability to hire people for positions outside of our typical enterprise locations.

Important skills and attributesWhat are the most important attributes and/or skills you look for in a potential new hire?When sourcing new talent, we look for individuals that embody our values - honesty and integrity, customer focus, collaboration, innovation, and driving results. These are the beliefs we operate by that create our corporate culture. We count on all EMC employees, current and future, to exercise these principles in their daily work: honesty and integrity, customer focus, collaboration, innovation and driving results. We tailor our process to ensure these values are present in the candidate and align with them professionally.

What leadership skills are most important for a new hire to bring on board?The attributes we look for in a leader follow the same attributes we would look for in an individual contributor at an enhanced level. Our competency model for a leader incorporates the individual's ability to develop talent, make decisions, drive vision and purpose, think strategically, and display business insight. We expect our leaders to engage, model, and commit to their teams to inspire action to achieve our business objectives.

How does the company train or encourage internal candidates to prepare for executive roles?EMC has made continuing education a cultural initiative. We have many professional development opportunities allowing all team members the opportunity to grow professionally. Internally, we have a learning management system including subscriptions to LinkedIn Learning and Udemy for Business. Externally, professional development is encouraged and paid for by the company. Earned designations are also given monetary rewards. Team members are encouraged to participate in community related events and associations with memberships paid for by the organization. With our alternative work arrangements policy and accompanying technology, the growth opportunity at EMC is endless.

Highlights of your companyWhats the companys philosophy on work/life balance?Work-life balance has become a deciding factor in talent acquisition and retention, and should be part of the organization's total rewards package. We have adopted an alternative work arrangement policy that offers team members many remote working options. Team members can flex their hours, work compressed work weeks, work in a different city at a branch location, work remotely full time, or work remotely part time. We offer our team members a generous amount of paid time off and encourage a work-life balance that fits the team members needs. In 2020, we took it a step further and now offer 12 weeks 100% paid maternity leave for new mothers and four weeks paid caregiver leave for all team members. Additional benefits included to facilitate work-life balance include life skills training, a corporate wellness programs, on-site health screens and flu vaccines, gym membership reimbursement, and an employee assistance program.

Whats the best thing about working for your company?In my opinion, the best thing about our organization is our commitment to our people. People are the cornerstone of any business, and we take great pride in attracting, developing, and retaining a strong workforce. Our people strategy is centered around culture. As our current workforce has begun to look at retirement, we have been proactive in changing our company culture. This meant capitalizing on our ability to offer growth opportunities within the organization, developing EMC University at a corporate level, developing college level coursework in partnership with Bismarck State College, volunteering in and giving back within our communities, and aligning our goals to all team members o they can see the impact they are making in our business. We continue to evaluate and evolve our people strategies to align with a 21st century workforce, and we are heavily investing in innovation to tackle todays problems and create tomorrows solutions.

See the article here:

Corporate profile: EMC Insurance says it is committed 'to our people' - Grand Forks Herald

The pandemic has spawned disinformation campaigns that blend truth, lies, and sincere beliefs – Nieman Journalism Lab at Harvard

The COVID-19 pandemic has spawned an infodemic, a vast and complicated mix of information, misinformation and disinformation.

The notion of disinformation often brings to mind easy-to-spot propaganda peddled by totalitarian states, but the reality is much more complex. Though disinformation does serve an agenda, it is often camouflaged in facts and advanced by innocent and often well-meaning individuals.

As a researcher who studies how communications technologies are used during crises, Ive found that this mix of information types makes it difficult for people, including those who build and run online platforms, to distinguish an organic rumor from an organized disinformation campaign. And this challenge is not getting any easier as efforts to understand and respond to COVID-19 get caught up in the political machinations of this years presidential election.

Rumors are, and have always been, common during crisis events. Crises are often accompanied by uncertainty about the event and anxiety about its impacts and how people should respond. People naturally want to resolve that uncertainty and anxiety, and often attempt to do so through collective sensemaking. Its a process of coming together to gather information and theorize about the unfolding event. Rumors are a natural byproduct.

Rumors arent necessarily bad. But the same conditions that produce rumors also make people vulnerable to disinformation, which is more insidious. Unlike rumors and misinformation, which may or may not be intentional, disinformation is false or misleading information spread for a particular objective, often a political or financial aim.

Disinformation has its roots in the practice of dezinformatsiya used by the Soviet Unions intelligence agencies to attempt to change how people understood and interpreted events in the world. Its useful to think of disinformation not as a single piece of information or even a single narrative, but as a campaign, a set of actions and narratives produced and spread to deceive for political purpose.

Lawrence Martin-Bittman, a former Soviet intelligence officer who defected from what was then Czechoslovakia and later became a professor of disinformation, described how effective disinformation campaigns are often built around a true or plausible core. They exploit existing biases, divisions and inconsistencies in a targeted group or society. And they often employ unwitting agents to spread their content and advance their objectives.

Regardless of the perpetrator, disinformation functions on multiple levels and scales. While a single disinformation campaign may have a specific objective for instance, changing public opinion about a political candidate or policy pervasive disinformation works at a more profound level to undermine democratic societies.

Distinguishing between unintentional misinformation and intentional disinformation is a critical challenge. Intent is often hard to infer, especially in online spaces where the original source of information can be obscured. In addition, disinformation can be spread by people who believe it to be true. And unintentional misinformation can be strategically amplified as part of a disinformation campaign. Definitions and distinctions get messy, fast.

Consider the case of the Plandemic video that blazed across social media platforms in May 2020. The video contained a range of false claims and conspiracy theories about Covid-19. Problematically, it advocated against wearing masks, claiming they would activate the virus, and laid the foundations for eventual refusal of a Covid-19 vaccine.

Though many of these false narratives had emerged elsewhere online, the Plandemic video brought them together in a single, slickly produced 26-minute video. Before being removed by the platforms for containing harmful medical misinformation, the video propagated widely on Facebook and received millions of YouTube views.

As it spread, it was actively promoted and amplified by public groups on Facebook and networked communities on Twitter associated with the anti-vaccine movement, the QAnon conspiracy theory community and pro-Trump political activism.

But was this a case of misinformation or disinformation? The answer lies in understanding how and inferring a little about why the video went viral.

The videos protagonist was Dr. Judy Mikovits, a discredited scientist who had previously advocated for several false theories in the medical domain for example, claiming that vaccines cause autism. In the lead-up to the videos release, she was promoting a new book, which featured many of the narratives that appeared in the Plandemic video.

One of those narratives was an accusation against Dr. Anthony Fauci, director of the National Institute for Allergy and Infectious Diseases. At the time, Fauci was a focus of criticism for promoting social distancing measures that some conservatives viewed as harmful to the economy. Public comments from Mikovits and her associates suggest that damaging Faucis reputation was a specific goal of their campaign.

In the weeks leading up to the release of the Plandemic video, a concerted effort to lift Mikovits profile took shape across several social media platforms. A new Twitter account was started in her name, quickly accumulating thousands of followers. She appeared in interviews with hyperpartisan news outlets such as The Epoch Times and True Pundit. Back on Twitter, Mikovits greeted her new followers with the message: Soon, Dr Fauci, everyone will know who you really are.'

More recently, Sinclair Broadcast Group, which owns or operates 191 local television stations across the country, had planned to air an interview with Mikovits in which she reiterated the central claims in Plandemic. In airing this program, Sinclair would have used the cover and credibility of local news to expose new audiences to these false and potentially dangerous narratives. The company is reconsidering its decision after receiving criticism; however, the interview was reportedly posted for a time on the companys website and was aired by one station.

This background suggests that Mikovits and her collaborators had several objectives beyond simply sharing her misinformed theories about COVID-19. These include financial, political and reputational motives. However, it is also possible that Mikovits is a sincere believer of the information that she was sharing, as were millions of people who shared and retweeted her content online.

In the United States, as COVID-19 blurs into the presidential election, were likely to continue to see disinformation campaigns employed for political, financial and reputational gain. Domestic activist groups will use these techniques to produce and spread false and misleading narratives about the disease and about the election. Foreign agents will attempt to join the conversation, often by infiltrating existing groups and attempting to steer them towards their goals.

For example, there will likely be attempts to use the threat of Covid-19 to frighten people away from the polls. Along with those direct attacks on election integrity, there are likely to also be indirect effects on peoples perceptions of election integrity from both sincere activists and agents of disinformation campaigns.

Efforts to shape attitudes and policies around voting are already in motion. These include work to draw attention to voter suppression and attempts to frame mail-in voting as vulnerable to fraud. Some of this rhetoric stems from sincere criticism meant to inspire action to make the electoral systems stronger. Other narratives, for example unsupported claims of voter fraud, seem to serve the primary aim of undermining trust in those systems.

History teaches that this blending of activism and active measures, of foreign and domestic actors, and of witting and unwitting agents, is nothing new. And certainly the difficulty of distinguishing between these is not made any easier in the connected era. But better understanding these intersections can help researchers, journalists, communications platform designers, policymakers and society at large develop strategies for mitigating the impacts of disinformation during this challenging moment.

Kate Starbird is an associate professor of human centered design and engineering at the University of Washington. This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license.

Read this article:

The pandemic has spawned disinformation campaigns that blend truth, lies, and sincere beliefs - Nieman Journalism Lab at Harvard

Furniture Store Arhaus to Open at The Mall at Green Hills – Williamson Source

Arhaus, a leader in artisan-crafted furniture and home dcor, is opening an 11,583 square foot store inside the Mall at Green Hills on July 31.

We have been looking for the right location to open a Nashville store for years, and we are thrilled to bring our new design to The Mall at Green Hills, said John Reed, Chairman, and CEO, Arhaus. Nashville is home to a community that appreciates good food, good music, and good design. We cant wait to welcome local residents into our store and introduce them to the artisan craftsmanship were known for.

Inspired by the vibrant streets and thriving creative scene in Nashville, designer Philip Michael Brown, of Philip Michael Brown Studio, shared Reeds vision for the space. Arhaus stores embody the design quality and craftsmanship of its productsand vice versa, said Brown. The Nashville store design illustrates Arhaus commitment to quality, natural materials, intentional design, and celebrating the communities in which we are building new stores.

What excites me most about the new space is the mix of materials it evokes, Reed continued. We are taking natural materials and showing them in a contemporary way. Arhaus brings handmade, artisan-crafted products to our customers, and our new store will highlight thatall while maintaining our commitment to sustainability and using reclaimed materials as much as we can.

Arhaus was founded in 1986 with a mission to design and build unique, high-quality home furnishings while honoring the Earths natural resources and giving back whenever possible. With a commitment to using sustainably sourced, recycled, and reclaimed materials, Arhaus works directly with artisans and workshops to craft its products.

They offer customization and complimentary design services to all customers. Whether meeting in-store, in-home, or virtually via phone call, video chat, or email, Arhaus team of Design Consultants can guide customers through projects of all sizes. From designing a single piece of custom furniture to creating an entire room from the ground up, no task is too big or too small.

See the original post here:

Furniture Store Arhaus to Open at The Mall at Green Hills - Williamson Source

Jordan Red Jackets Looking to Sting in New Region 2-AAAA – WLTZ 38 NBC

RED JACKETS MOVE UP FROM CLASS AA TO REGION 2-AAAA

COVID-19 pushed back Muscogee County summer conditioning a month in comparison to other GHSA schools, but now teams like the Jordan Red Jackets are right on pace practicing in their helmets. A lot of these players, especially the seniors, are excited to be back on the field.

I was scared at first, said Jordan senior quarterback and wide receiver Hayden Dixon. Thinking I wasnt going to have my senior season because for all of us out here it means a lot to us.

Jordan High is focused on intensity and hard work this offseason under third-year Head Coach Joe Kegler.

Were just trying to up the intensity, up the togetherness and up the family atmosphere around here, said Kegler. Were trying to get better everyday in all aspects of the game.

The Red Jackets finished last season (0-10) in Class AA, and now theyre moving up to 2-AAAA. Jordan joins Carver, Hardaway, Columbus, Kendrick, LaGrange, Spencer, Shaw and Troup County.

You get to compete against some familiar teams and some familiar faces, so I think its good for the fans, said Kegler.

It will make it better. More intense, and the games will be faster and better, said sophomore wide receiver and safety Tycen McDaniels.

Jordans three-way quarterback battle features two seniors and a junior. Their veteran leadership, which includes nine seniors, and experience will help give the Red Jackets an edge.

I feel like this year we are going to have a more tight-knit group, said Dixon. More family-oriented. We struggled years before with that.

Well be older with more experience, stronger and faster, said McDaniels. Well be able to keep up with everybody.

Weve got a good group of young guys and older guys who played some last year, said Kegler. Were anxious to put the pads on, strap it up and see what we look like.

More here:

Jordan Red Jackets Looking to Sting in New Region 2-AAAA - WLTZ 38 NBC

Maestro Reveals Hiring of Former Cloud9 Partnership Exec Jordan Udko – TEO – The Esports Observer

Livestreaming solutions company Maestro formally announced Tuesday that it hired Jordan Udko as its executive vice president of revenue. Udko quietly joined the company in April. Since joining, Udko has led Maestro to sign deals with companies including Pandora, Adweek, FanDuel, and VidCon, with further deals with entertainment conglomerates to be announced.

Prior to joining Maestro, Udko was executive vice president of commercial partnerships for team organization Cloud9. During his tenure he secured partnerships with non-endemic brands including Microsoft, BMW, AT&T, and Puma. In July of 2019, Udko told The Esports Observer that reception to the Puma partnership was seven times the average of what the normal sentiment was for, lets say, the Lakers and Wish, their jersey sponsor.

An interactive video platform for creative and content owners, Maestro has raised $5.8M USD to date, and is currently delivering livestream solutions for multiple esports game publishers including Ubisoft, Activision Blizzard, Microsoft, and Epic Games.

Read this article:

Maestro Reveals Hiring of Former Cloud9 Partnership Exec Jordan Udko - TEO - The Esports Observer

UNICEF and Altibbi partner to provide health services for youth in Jordan [EN/AR] – Jordan – ReliefWeb

Empowering youth in Jordan to lead healthier lives

AMMAN, 27 July 2020 UNICEF and the telehealth platform Alitibbi have announced a new partnership to empower youth in Jordan to lead healthier lives through improved access to quality healthcare, information on disease prevention, including COVID-19, and scaled-up mental health and wellbeing services.

The partnership will provide 3,000 young people with access to real-time consultations with medical professionals at no cost. Telehealth is a future-ready, innovative method of health provision that can improve access to healthcare for the most vulnerable youth, including those living in remote areas without access to specialized medical services.

The COVID-19 pandemic has exposed the critical need to provide reliable, quality healthcare to young people to support their physical and mental health, said Ettie Higgins, Deputy Representative, UNICEF Jordan. UNICEFs partnership with Altibbi will empower young women and men, who are at the most critical juncture in their lives, with the services and information they need to be healthy and successful.

"This partnership truly brings the power of smart technology to provide the youth with remote and fully private access to a great network of board-certified doctors with reliable scientific content 24/7 that allows the youth to totally defeat taboos and misconceptions. This partnership will increase health literacy by covering a spectrum of the most relevant topics that include COVID-19 and mental health," said Jalil Al Labadi, Chief Executive Officer, Altibbi.

Altibbi, a Jordanian social enterprise, is already supporting national efforts to prevent the transmission of the coronavirus through the running of the 111 COVID-19 response hotline, handling 10,000 telehealth consultations per day.

The initial 3,000 young people who will benefit from the telehealth partnership are students enrolled in UNICEFs Amaluna economic engagement programme and Syrian refugee volunteers. Each will receive telehealth consultations, informational bundles on COVID-19, mental health and other relevant health topics, and yearly in-person medical consultations.

The initiative is part of UNICEFs efforts to support young people to successfully transition to adulthood. Telehealth services are key in ensuring young people can successfully transition to the labour market, as the most vulnerable may lack access to tools and information to complete medical clearances necessary for employment, and to improve the participation of young women in the labour force.

Media ContactsClaire McKeeverCommunications SpecialistUNICEF JordanEmail: cmckeever@unicef.org

About UNICEF

UNICEF promotes the rights and wellbeing of every child, in everything we do. Together with our partners, we work in 190 countries and territories to translate that commitment into practical action, focusing special effort on reaching the most vulnerable and excluded children, to the benefit of all children, everywhere.

For more information about UNICEF and its work for children in Jordan, visit http://www.unicef.org/jordan.

Follow UNICEF Jordan on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram

More:

UNICEF and Altibbi partner to provide health services for youth in Jordan [EN/AR] - Jordan - ReliefWeb

Jordan Ayew crowned Crystal Palace Player of the Season – Goal.com

The Ghana international has been rewarded for his impressive campaign with the Eagles

Jordan Ayew has been crowned Crystal Palace Player of the Season after his outstanding performances in the 2019-20 campaign.

Ayew saw off competition from Vicente Guaita and Gary Cahill to clinch the award after earning 37 per cent of the total votes from almost 6,000 club supporters.

It was an eventful Tuesday evening for the Black Stars forward who contributed nine goals and two assists for the Eagles this term. They ended the Premier League campaign in the 14th spot after a 1-1 draw against Tottenham Hotspur on Sunday.

Ayew was also named the Players' Player of the Season and his 87th-minute winning strike against West Ham United back in October was awarded the Goal of the Season.

After receiving the three awards, the 28-year-old paid tribute to former Marseille President, Pape Diouf who died in March after battling with coronavirus.

Ive worked so hard to get into the team and I think the first season I came into this team wasnt the best but the club had faith in me, the club wanted me to stay and I wanted to stay as well, Ayew was quoted by the club website.

"I had the desire to have a better season and things have gone so well. Im just grateful.

"I want to thank everyone at the football club; I want to thank the fans especially, theyve been massive for us this season, for me especially theyve been massive. Id like to thank all the people that supported me within the difficult moments that I had in my football career.

"When I have this type of award I just think of my family and obviously of the fans. And one man thats been so influential in my football career: thats [mentor and former Olympique de Marseille president] Pape Diouf. I lost him within the period of COVID and he passed away, I wish he was still here so I could present him this."

During the season, Ayew was named Crystal Palace Player of the Month twice and he scooped 10 man-of-the-match awards.

Article continues below

Roy Hodgson, in his remarks, described the Ghana international as an unbelievable player and also reserved praise for his work ethics.

"[Jordan] is an unbelievable enthusiast and hard worker, somebody really who never falls below a certain level of performance, someone who never misses a training session and is always lively and alert in each training session, irrespective if its the day after coming back after a long journey or after having a day or two off, the managersaid.

"He's made great strides going forward. When he came to us, he showed a lot of qualities but I think the qualities he possesses he really has worked on and improved... Well done, Jordan."

Read this article:

Jordan Ayew crowned Crystal Palace Player of the Season - Goal.com

The government wants free speech at universities but not for everyone – The Guardian

Last week, the government launched details of a scheme to provide universities with access to emergency loans, should they get into financial difficulty as a result of Covid-19. Nestled into the detailed policy document was a recommendation that funding for students unions should focus on the wider student community rather than niche activism and campaigns.

But there is nothing niche about our activism and campaigns. They have led to major societal change over the last century. Without the tremendous efforts of students past and present, the world around us would be a worse place to live. Many of the UKs most notable political accomplishments have emanated from the actions of students and their brave campaigning.

In the 1970s the National Union of Students (NUS) became the first national group to campaign for homosexual rights, and we have continued to fight for equal rights for all our LGBT+ students and the wider LGBT+ community. Students coordinated boycotts against South Africa as part of the anti-Apartheid movement that ultimately persuaded Barclays to divest from the country and helped bring about the fall of Apartheid. These are victories that we can be proud of.

And students continue to campaign for transformative change, and a better society. In recent years we have successfully campaigned for half of UK universities to divest from fossil fuels, put decolonising education firmly on the national agenda, and taken a stand against sexual violence on campus. This is before we even start to mention the individual achievements of students unions in making their campuses more accessible for all of their students from gender neutral bathrooms to expanded lift access for disabled students.

This shamelessly political dog whistle from the government is insulting. They seek to dismiss all of this work and believe that universities should starve these activities of funding. Their hypocrisy in stating this in one breath while, in the next, calling on universities to promote free speech must be lost on them.

The silencing and further marginalisation of minority voices, not just on our campuses but across mainstream media and politics, is the biggest threat to free speech that we currently face, not a few cases of high-profile commentators who, despite their huge platforms, claim to be no-platformed (I prefer: democratically boycotted by students who refuse to listen to bigotry). Meanwhile, universities pay lip service to diversity and inclusion, giving marginalised communities a seat a table without recognising that the foundations it is built on are rotten. Students unions empower those who would simply fall through the cracks and remain ignored to organise for the education they deserve. In advocating for funding cuts, the government is silencing the marginalised students voices this is the real threat to freedom of speech.

As our organising comes under attack, it reaffirms my belief that we must continue to be radical. Students are constantly ahead of the curve and we cannot curb our ambition just to let others catch up. We must grasp at the root of these injustices white supremacy, transphobia, austerity and fight for what we believe in. Funding cuts, the failed project of a marketised education system where universities are made to compete against each other for students, and the devastation of the hostile environment have harmed students and their communities, as well as universities and colleges.

As we emerge from lockdown and continue to feel the impacts of the Covid-19 pandemic, we have the opportunity to change our education system for the better. We can make it more inclusive and accessible, create avenues for better lifelong learning for all and ensure that education is well-funded and staff properly paid. None of this will happen without the actions of students. We will be needed to highlight cases of injustice, to continue the fight for free, accessible, lifelong education, and to build collectivism between learners, educators and other workers at these institutions that will make our vision a reality.

While some might be scared by such a blatant attack on students unions from the government, I feel energised. They are recognising our strength and they are scared of what we might do with it. That is why there is absolutely no chance of us stopping our niche campaigns now.

See the article here:

The government wants free speech at universities but not for everyone - The Guardian

Princeton Grapples With Race, Woodrow Wilsons Controversial Past, And A Professors Dissent – Forbes

Campus of Princeton University

Judging by common metrics of success, Princeton University does well. It is highly selective, accepting only 5% of its applicants, and its 2019 endowment stood at $26.1 billion. Alumni include First Lady Michelle Obama, four U.S. Supreme Court justices, and two United States presidents, James Madison and Woodrow Wilson.

There is more to an institution than status and wealth, however, and the freedom of inquiry and expression that is the lifeblood of liberal education is in danger at this extraordinary campus. Successful in so many ways, Princeton faces a crisis of values.

Princetons commitment to the free exchange of ideas was once exemplary. In April 2015, with a clear majority vote of its faculty, it became the first university in the nation to follow the University of Chicagos lead in adopting the Chicago Principles on Freedom of Expression, the landmark commitment to the discussion of ideas, however offensive or disagreeable those ideas may be to some members of our community.

In the tense time following the shooting of Michael Brown in Ferguson, Missouri, a student group called the Princeton Open Campus Coalition modeled reasoned debate among its multi-gender, multi-ethnic members. Princetons president, Christopher Eisgruber, made Keith Whittingtons book, Speak Freely: Why Universities Must Defend Free Speech, a campus read, not just for incoming freshmen, but for all Princeton students. African American philosopher Cornel West and Robby George, director of Princetons James Madison Program in American Ideals and Institutions, have demonstrated in their frequent public discussions how scholars can represent widely different worldviews yet together build consensus around shared truths. In other words, Princeton seemed unusually able not only to protect speech but even to cultivate civility in disagreement.

This year has been different. By contrast, in 201516, Princetons Trustee Committee on Woodrow Wilsons Legacy took nearly six months to determine how to approach the problem of its distinguished but controversial alumnus whose name is attached to a Princeton college and school. Its measured decision was to vote for transparency in recognizing Wilsons failings and shortcomings as well as the visions and achievements that led to the naming of the school and the college. A report from the trustees described how students and others were troubled by Wilsons past support of segregation. As president of Princeton, he had acted to bar Black students from admission, and as U.S. president, he supported the segregation of the civil service.

On June 22, 2020, in the wake of the killings of George Floyd, Ahmaud Arbery, and Breonna Taylor, students and alumni demanded the public renunciation of Woodrow Wilson. This time, it took President Eisgruber but five days to reverse the 2016 decision. Little or no time was allocated for discussion or disagreement.

Many demands from students and faculty followed. Alumni of Princetons Black Justice League, which was active on campus from 201418, declared to President Eisgruber, we denounce your actions as woefully inadequate. On July 4, a letter with roughly 350 signatures of professors, staff, and graduate students listed 48 demands to further its campaign against racism. They included a call for the establishment of a faculty committee to oversee the investigation and discipline of racist behaviors, incidents, research, and publication on the part of faculty, with guidelines to be authored by a faculty committee. Other demands were extra leave time for faculty of color and the removal of the statue of John Witherspoon, slave-owner, but also past president of the college that later became Princeton and signer of the Declaration of Independence.

Enter Joshua Katz, a 22-year veteran of the department of classics and holder of an endowed chair in the humanities. Self-described as a library rat and liberal democrat, he published his dissent in Quillette four days after the faculty letter appeared. He warned that many of the proposals in the July 4 faculty letter would lead to civil war on campus and erode even further public confidence. He worried that the proposed faculty committee to address racism could become a star chamber. Based on its treatment of other students, he characterized the now-defunct Black Justice League as a small local terrorist organization.

The reaction to Professor Katzs declaration was fierce. The chairman of the department of classics, Michael Flower, labeled what Professor Katz had written about the League abhorrent. Princetons president joined the discussion, decrying Katzs use of the term terrorist as false, irresponsible, and offensive.

The department of classics seemed intent on killing the messengerwhich always ended badly in the ancient worldrather than engaging their longtime colleague in discussion. Professor Dan-el Padilla Peralta, who had once been Katzs student and acknowledges his help in his 2015 memoir, Undocumented, spoke of his fury at the op-ed and did not hesitate to state that Katzs flagrant racism makes our case for us. Another classics professor, Brooke Holmes, accused Katz of racialized vilification and rejected the argument of one of Katzs former students that he should have the benefit of the doubt.

Some 90 students signed a letter denouncing Professor Katz and noted the unique complicity of classics in white supremacy and Eurocentrism. (Ironically, in reality, Katzs scholarship on Native American languages, as well as Sanskrit, Tocharian, and Egyptian hieroglyphics, should make him rather unsusceptible to the charge of Eurocentrism.) Professor Flower observed, I myself have never heard him make a racist remark . . . When I read the article, I just, what just happened? But instead of dialogue with a colleague, what ensued was near ritualistic denunciation, a canceling that had to happen.

Remarkably, there has been little public discussion of the tactics of the now-defunct Black Justice League, an omission that makes the critique of Professor Katz very difficult to judge. Some students, speaking on pledge of anonymity, reported that Black classmates who opposed the League were called Aunt Jemima and white supremacist. Screen shots from an Instagram live session show an alumnus of the League grilling a recent Princeton graduate of Asian descent, charging him with an alleged racist statement from years earlier. Other participants suggest that the young graduate will soon lose his job, with one questioning why he should ever have been allowed into Princeton. President Eisgruber himself observed that the rhetoric of the Black Justice League (which had once occupied his office for 32 hours) might be seen as provocative or offensive.

Lost, too, in this contretemps is any focus on Princetons legacy of anti-Asian bias: In 2015, the Office of Civil Rights cleared the university of the charge after a long investigation, but ugly behavior toward Asian applicants in the not-too-distant past is documented.

Princeton, to its credit, walked back the threat of investigation of Professor Katz, and President Eisgruber affirmed that Katz exercised protected freedom of speech and will not be censored or sanctioned. The spotlight will be on Princeton to protect his status at the university scrupulously.

The free exchange of ideas is not a state of being that flourishes without careful attention. It is easily lost when passions, including passions for noble causes, run high. But the default response to criticism of any given social justice initiative cannot be a charge of racism with coercive power to end the discussion and punish dissenters. It will not advance social justice, and it will assuredly destroy the dialogue and debate that can move our society forward.

Continue reading here:

Princeton Grapples With Race, Woodrow Wilsons Controversial Past, And A Professors Dissent - Forbes