Propaganda, fake news and disinformation on the internet could destroy us Susan Dalgety – The Scotsman

NewsOpinionColumnistsThe internet is a wonder of the modern world, but it is being used to spread dangerous conspiracy theories and undermine democracy, writes Susan Dalgety

Friday, 24th July 2020, 4:45 pm

Since lockdown, my life has moved online. My ancient iPhone 6, second-hand when I bought it, is by my side 24 hours a day. (Top tip: always buy refurbished tech, works just as well as the new models and costs far less).

I fall asleep to the sounds of American liberal news channel MSNBC and wake in the middle of the night to listen to Rachel Maddow, patron saint of progressives everywhere. I scroll through Twitter before I get up. I read my newspapers online while eating breakfast, and yes, I subscribe to the Scotsman you should too. What work I do, now that my Malawi projects are on hold because of the pandemic, I carry out online. Zoom meetings, Facetime chats, hours of endless Google searches, some of them useful.

I shop for everything on my phone, from my lockdown workwear leggings to supplies for our new coronavirus tradition, Saturday cocktails. Todays is an Espresso Martini. I stay in touch with friends and family, close by and across the world. It is as easy to have a weekend catch-up with Martha in New Yorks East Village as it is to DM my sister in Dumfries.

And throughout the day I get updates from Malawi about the relentless rise of the virus there. Malawi, with one of the smallest economies in the world, also has most expensive data, at 21.50 for 1GB of data. The cheapest bundle here costs, literally, pennies. But despite the cost, around 40 per cent of the 18 million population has a mobile phone.

Digital life now our real life

Even my 80-something mother, who resisted the lure of the internet until recently, has her smartphone and iPad sitting by her landline. (Top tip: always buy your mother a new piece of tech for a landmark birthday, refurbished wont cut it on special occasions).

Our four grandchildren are, of course, digital natives, born into a world where life happens on YouTube and WhatsApp is their playground.

The advent of lockdown saw schools retreat on to Microsoft Teams. Across Scotland teachers dropped dense PowerPoint decks once a week and parents struggled to coach their kids through them, before giving up and letting little Jack or Olivia watch Netflix.

Our digital life is now our real life. What started as a grand experiment in August 1991, when Tim Berners-Lee loaded the first ever website onto the new-fangled internet, is now as essential to humanity as water and sanitation.

In 2016, a report from the Human Rights Council of the United Nations General Assembly even declared access to the internet a basic human right.

The internet is one of the most powerful instruments of the 21st century for increasing transparency in the conduct of the powerful, access to information, and for facilitating active citizen participation in building democratic societies, the UN said.

It is also one of the most powerful instruments for interfering in democracies, as a report published by Westminsters Intelligence and Security Committee earlier this week shows.

The report said the UK was clearly a target for disinformation campaigns around its elections, and that there was credible open source commentary suggesting influence campaigns from the Russians during the Scottish independence referendum in 2014.

In other words, Putin and his online army may well have flooded Facebook and other social media platforms with fake news to encourage the break-up of the UK. Just as they did in the 2016 presidential elections, which led to the inauguration of Donald J Trump as leader of the free world.

And just as they most likely did during the Brexit campaign. Only it seems the Conservative government couldnt be bothered to investigate that breach of democracy. For fear of what they might expose perhaps?

Fans of Cold War spy novels will not be surprised that Putins Russia interferes in American and British elections. After all, psy ops (psychological warfare) was the main weapon used by the USA and Soviet Russia in their 30-year battle for supremacy.

Vaccine conspiracy theories

America and Nato may have won that war, but Putin is making great advances in this new battlefield.

America is now pitied across the world as the coronavirus burns its way through 50 states, while its President fiddles (allegedly) his tax returns. Britain leaving the EU will damage our economy and weaken our global influence, and Scotland leaving the UK would further diminish Britains standing.

It is not just Alex Salmond, Russia Today TV presenter and former First Minister, who would cheer the break-up of the UK. Vladimir Putin would also raise a glass of ice-cold vodka to toast the new world order.

The speed and global reach of the internet has also fuelled the dystopian debate that insists humans born male can become female, simply by wishing they had a cervix.

It has allowed a cancel culture which sees women, even those as famous as JK Rowling, ostracised for daring to question this new gender orthodoxy. And social media is the seed bed for nonsensical conspiracy theories about vaccines some planted, surprise, surprise, by Putins digital troops.

A third may not use Covid vaccine

Microsoft founder and global philanthropist, Bill Gates, had to go on the record this week to debunk a theory that he is supporting the development of a coronavirus vaccine because he wants to use it to implant tracking devices in the worlds population. You may well laugh, but a recent Yahoo News/YouGov poll found that 28 per cent of US adults believe this nonsense, and here in the UK, a third of people say they are unsure or definitely would not use a coronavirus vaccine.

And it is largely people who prefer social media to TV news who hold such extreme views.

I am no epidemiologist though I do have a PhD in Googling but even I understand that if not enough people take up the vaccine once its found, we will not achieve herd immunity. Life will not get back to normal.

We need to get the truth out there, Bill Gates said during his interview on CBS News on Wednesday.

And the truth is that the internet is one of the worlds greatest ever inventions, up there with the wheel and vaccines.

Social media is one of the wonders of the world, allowing a child in central Malawi to connect instantly with their friend in Orkney. But the network that has transformed the world into a global village also has the potential to destroy us. Now let me check Twitter to see what Trump has been up to today.

A message from the Editor:

Thank you for reading this article on our website. While I have your attention, I also have an important request to make of you.

With the coronavirus lockdown having a major impact on many of our advertisers - and consequently the revenue we receive - we are more reliant than ever on you taking out a digital subscription.

Subscribe to scotsman.com and enjoy unlimited access to Scottish news and information online and on our app. With a digital subscription, you can read more than 5 articles, see fewer ads, enjoy faster load times, and get access to exclusive newsletters and content. Visit http://www.scotsman.com/subscriptions now to sign up.

Our journalism costs money and we rely on advertising, print and digital revenues to help to support them. By supporting us, we are able to support you in providing trusted, fact-checked content for this website.

Read the rest here:

Propaganda, fake news and disinformation on the internet could destroy us Susan Dalgety - The Scotsman

Massive Growth in Human Genetics Market Breaking new grounds and touch new level in Upcoming Year by QIAGEN, Agilent Technologies, Thermo Fisher…

Human Genetics Market report focused on the comprehensive analysis of current and future prospects of the Human Genetics industry. This report is a consolidation of primary and secondary research, which provides market size, share, dynamics, and forecast for various segments and sub-segments considering the macro and micro environmental factors. An in-depth analysis of past trends, future trends, demographics, technological advancements, and regulatory requirements for the Human Genetics market has been done in order to calculate the growth rates for each segment and sub-segments.

Human Genetics Market is growing at a High CAGR during the forecast period 2020-2026. The increasing interest of the individuals in this industry is that the major reason for the expansion of this market.

Get Sample Copy (Including FULL TOC, Graphs and Tables) of this report:

https://www.a2zmarketresearch.com/sample?reportId=261272

Note In order to provide more accurate market forecast, all our reports will be updated before delivery by considering the impact of COVID-19.

Top Key Players Profiled in this Report are:

QIAGEN, Agilent Technologies, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Illumina, Promega, LabCorp, GE

Various factors are responsible for the markets growth trajectory, which are studied at length in the report. In addition, the report lists down the restraints that are posing threat to the global Human Genetics market. It also gauges the bargaining power of suppliers and buyers, threat from new entrants and product substitute, and the degree of competition prevailing in the market. The influence of the latest government guidelines is also analyzed in detail in the report. It studies the Human Genetics markets trajectory between forecast periods.

Key Questions Answered in this Report:

Hurry Up! Get 20% Discount on this Report @:

https://www.a2zmarketresearch.com/discount?reportId=261272

The report summarized the high revenue that has been generated across locations like, North America, Japan, Europe, Asia, and India along with the facts and figures of Human Genetics market. It focuses on the major points, which are necessary to make positive impacts on the market policies, international transactions, speculation, and supply demand in the global market.

Reasons for buying this report:

Table of Contents

Global Human Genetics Market Research Report 2020 2026

Chapter 1 Human Genetics Market Overview

Chapter 2 Global Economic Impact on Industry

Chapter 3 Global Market Competition by Manufacturers

Chapter 4 Global Production, Revenue (Value) by Region

Chapter 5 Global Supply (Production), Consumption, Export, Import by Regions

Chapter 6 Global Production, Revenue (Value), Price Trend by Type

Chapter 7 Global Market Analysis by Application

Chapter 8 Manufacturing Cost Analysis

Chapter 9 Industrial Chain, Sourcing Strategy and Downstream Buyers

Chapter 10 Marketing Strategy Analysis, Distributors/Traders

Chapter 11 Market Effect Factors Analysis

Chapter 12 Global Human Genetics Market Forecast

Buy Exclusive Report @:

https://www.a2zmarketresearch.com/buy?reportId=261272

If you have any special requirements, please let us know and we will offer you the report as you want.

Read the rest here:

Massive Growth in Human Genetics Market Breaking new grounds and touch new level in Upcoming Year by QIAGEN, Agilent Technologies, Thermo Fisher...

Centre for Commercialization of Cancer Immunotherapy and Regenerative Medicine and the Ontario Institute for Regenerative Medicine Partner to Boost…

TORONTO & MONTREAL--(BUSINESS WIRE)--Regenerative medicine (RM) has the potential to transform healthcare by developing curative therapies for diseases such as heart failure or vision loss. By repairing damaged tissues and organs, this will not only improve patients lives but create economic impact in a market forecasted to reach $5.6B USD by 2025.

Several Canadian-made cell therapies will take a major step closer to the clinic thanks to a new collaboration between the Ontario Institute for Regenerative Medicine (OIRM) and the Centre for Commercialization of Cancer Immunotherapy and Regenerative Medicine (C3i).

Each organization will leverage their unique resources and expertise to help Canadian research teams overcome common but significant hurdles in the RM translational process, from clinical trials through to therapeutic application.

C3i is a funded Centre of Excellence in Commercialization and Research of the federal governments Networks of Centres of Excellence program. It accelerates the development of cancer immunotherapies and cellular-based therapies by providing one-stop-shop services in the chain of product development through to commercialization, as well as supporting Canadian-based companies working in this space.

OIRM is a comprehensive clinical translation ecosystem in Ontario focused on translating promising RM research from the lab to the clinic. Unfortunately, OIRMs core provincial funding was not renewed, compromising multiple world-class translational research programs at pivotal points in clinical development.

Our partnership with C3i is truly a win-win for both organizations, for RM research in Ontario and Canada, and for the health of Canadians, says Dr. Duncan Stewart, President and Scientific Director, OIRM. With C3is deep commercialization resources and manufacturing expertise, OIRM will be able to shift our translational pipeline into high gear. In turn, OIRM will help C3i achieve lateral growth in the RM field on par with their impact to date in the field of cancer immunotherapy.

The CEO of C3i, Mr. Benoit Deschamps, says: We believe that the C3i-OIRM partnership truly expands the one-stop-shop model in supporting cell and gene therapies for Canadian technologies.

In addition to supporting commercialization and manufacturing activities, OIRM and C3i will launch a joint Industry and Investor Program that will include pitch days technology scouting calls tailored to the interested organization as well as opportunities to work alongside researchers to develop strategic solutions needed to advance technologies through the pipeline.

The C3i-OIRM partnership will be guided via a joint steering committee. The OIRM administrative centre and a satellite office for C3i will share space in Torontos MaRS Discovery District.

As part of its Canadian mandate, C3i is excited to expand the Ontario-Quebec corridor and support innovation, ensuring that Canadian technology in cell and gene therapy space can flourish and remain accessible to Canadians, said Mr. Deschamps.

Go here to see the original:

Centre for Commercialization of Cancer Immunotherapy and Regenerative Medicine and the Ontario Institute for Regenerative Medicine Partner to Boost...

Literature Review of Surgical Treatment in Idiopathic Full-Thickness M | OPTH – Dove Medical Press

Mantapond Ittarat,1,2 Thanapong Somkijrungroj,2,3 Sunee Chansangpetch,2,4 Pear Pongsachareonnont2,3

1Surin Hospital and Surin Medical Education Center, Department of Ophthalmology, Suranaree University of Technology, Surin, Thailand; 2Department of Ophthalmology, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University and King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital, Thai Red Cross Society, Bangkok, Thailand; 3Vitreoretinal Research Unit, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand; 4Glaucoma Research Unit, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand

Correspondence: Pear Pongsachareonnont Department of Ophthalmology, Faculty of Medicine 1873 Rama IV Road, Patumwan, Bangkok 10330, ThailandTel +66-2256-4142Fax +66-2-252-8290Email pear.p@chulahospital.org

Purpose: To summarize current surgical techniques for treating primary macular holes (MHs).Methods: We reviewed publications detailing surgical approaches to primary MHs, briefly described their protocols, and outlined their results.Results: Currently, the technique for primary MH repair is pars plana vitrectomy, removing the posterior cortical vitreous, stripping the epiretinal membranes, and ending with intraocular gas tamponade. The evident benefit of peeling off the internal limiting membrane (ILM) was clearly shown for MHs at stages 2 to 4 by achieving an anatomical closure rate of > 90%, even in large MH up to 650 m. Newer MH surgical techniques include modification of ILM flap techniques, placing an autologous scaffolding of tissue within the hole, and cell therapy has shown to increase the closure rate of large and chronic macular holes, resulting in modest functional improvement in complicated MHs.Conclusion: Since the turn of the century, the success rate of modern macular surgery has increased, even for large and chronic MHs. There seems to be no limit to novel concepts in MH surgery, which range from anatomical closure to those proposing natural restoration of visual function via stem cell therapy.

Keywords: macular hole, macular hole surgery, stem cell therapy, internal limiting membrane peeling

This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution - Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License.By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms.

See the rest here:

Literature Review of Surgical Treatment in Idiopathic Full-Thickness M | OPTH - Dove Medical Press

Five developments in oncology targets – Drug Target Review

Drug Target Review explores some of the newest oncologic drug targets, including those for glioblastoma, lung cancer and breast cancer.

According to new research published inDevelopmental Cell, the PRC1 protein is an essential component in cell division. Acting as a viscous glue, the protein creates resistance as cells pull chromatids to either end of the single dividing cell.

The team explains that this process controls the speed that DNA is separated into daughter cells, suggesting that the over-abundance of PRC1 characteristic observed in many cancer types (including prostate, ovarian and breast cancers) may be causing the cells to divide unevenly, resulting in chromosomal abnormalities and driving cancer growth and mutation.

PRC1 produces a viscous frictional force, a drag that increases with speed, said Scott Forth, an Assistant Professor of Biological Sciences and member of the Center for Biotechnology and Interdisciplinary Studies at Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute in the US. The friction it produces is similar to that of water if you try to move your hand through water slowly, you move easily, but if you push your hand fast, the water pushes back hard.

The team explained that correct cellular division relies on physical forces produced by motor proteins and microtubules, essentially ripping pairs of chromatids apart so a single cell of the cellular DNA ends up in each daughter cell. The mitotic spindle is an element of cellular machinery that uses mechanical forces push, pull and resistance to complete the task.

We think the force PRC1 produces is integrating and dampening out cellular motions as the DNA is separated so that ultimately, you get the correct rate of chromosome segregation, Forth said. However, if this process goes awry due to too much or too little PRC1, it can cause uncontrollable cancer growth.

Researchers have found that expansion stress can drive breast tumours to become highly aggressive in their growth, invasion and metastasis.

Expansion stress is a condition often seen in solid cancer tumours when, as they grow, biomechanical forces in the tumour microenvironment cause compression within the tumour, tension at its periphery and altered interstitial fluid flow.

The interdisciplinary team from the University of Alabama at Birmingham (UAB), US, also suggested that the biomechanical forces may modulate the immune response through cancer cell-immune cell crosstalk.

To explore how these biomechanical forces may be impacting breast cancer growth, the researchers created a tissue-engineered, three-dimensional (3D) breast cancer mimetic system that recapitulates the in vivo growth of breast cancer cells. It includes tumour-associated fibroblasts, endothelial cells and immune cells, within a physiologically relevant extracellular matrix.

According to the team, the biomechanical forces significantly altered the proteome of breast cancer cells and enhanced exosome production. These tumour cell-secreted exosomes are one of the intercellular mediators of signalling in the tumour microenvironment and are now considered key regulators of tumour progression.

In the study, the exosomes promoted aggressive tumour cell growth, induced immune suppression and altered immune cell polarisation in the tumour microenvironment. Furthermore, the researchers recently engineered an oscillatory compression device for real-time application of biomechanical force on orthotopic mammary tumours in mice, which allowed them to observe exosome-mediated immunosuppression and aggressive tumour growth.

The researchers concluded that their study suggests that exposure to mechanical strain promotes invasive and pro-tumourigenic phenotypes of breast cancer cells. They also added that mechanical strain also impacted the growth and proliferation of cancer cells, altered exosome production and induced immunosuppression in the tumour microenvironment.

The paper was published in Laboratory Investigation.

Researchers studying lung cancers revealed that the cancers observed in non-smokers are distinctly different to those in smokers, with different genetic underpinnings dependent on age, and lifestyle. They suggest that some patient populations may respond to targeted treatments better than others.

The study, conducted in Taiwan, was co-led by scientists at The Institute of Cancer Research.

According to the scientists, around 10-15 percent of lung cancers in the UK occur in people who have never smoked, but in East Asia this proportion is much higher, especially among women.

The study, published in Cell, details the analyses of tumour samples from 103 lung cancer patients from Taiwan, the majority of which were non-smokers. The researchers conducted a detailed analysis of genetic changes, gene activation, protein activity and cellular switches in lung cancer to develop a comprehensive picture of the biology of lung cancers in non-smokers.

Looking at the genetics and the related proteins produced by cancer cells in the tumour samples, the team found that some early-stage lung tumours in non-smokers were biologically similar to more advanced disease in smokers.

Tumours in females typically had a defect in the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) gene, whereas in men the most common mutations were in the KRAS (Ki-ras2 Kirsten rat sarcoma viral oncogene homologue) and adenomatous polyposis coli (APC) genes. The team suggested this could cause the two sexes to respond differently to treatments.

The study also identified a pattern of genetic changes involving the APOBEC (apolipoprotein B mRNA editing catalytic polypeptide-like)gene family in 75 percent of tumours in female patients under the age of 60 and 100 percent of with no mutation in the EGFR gene.

APOBEC proteins play an important role in the function of the immune system but can be hijacked by cancers to speed up their evolution, which can expedite the development of drug resistance. According to the team, patients without EGFR defects tend to respond better to immunotherapy and suggest that testing for APOBEC could help identify women more likely to respond.

Finally, the team identified 65 proteins that were overactive in the tumours that could be targeted by existing drug candidates.

While the new study included patients treated in Taiwan, the researchers believe that many of their findings could be applicable to UK patients. They will be validating their findings in larger studies and beyond Asia.

Dr Jyoti Choudhary, Team Leader in Functional Proteomics at ICR, UK, said: We carried out the most comprehensive study ever conducted into the biology of lung cancers in an East-Asian population with a high proportion of non-smokers and found that their disease is molecularly diverse and distinct from what we classically see in smokers.

We observed distinct patterns of genetic faults in non-smokers and between women and men, which suggest that a woman who has never smoked, for example, is likely to respond differently to treatment than a male smoker.

Dr Emily Armstrong, Research Information Manager at Cancer Research UK, said: In order to beat cancer, we need to understand all the ways it can develop Understanding the difference between lung cancers in smokers and non-smokers could be vital for providing patients with the most appropriate treatment.

Scientists have identified a population of cells within glioblastomas from which all other cancerous cells within the tumour arise. They suggested that targeting these glioblastoma stem cells (GSCs) could be a potent future treatment option.

Tumour heterogeneity, or the genetic variation of tumour cells, is one reason why brain cancers can be resistant to treatments. After a treatment, resistant cells remain and subsequently repopulate the tumour.

In a new study, researchers identified a cancer cell hierarchy, indicating that each cell originates from a single cancer cell type, coined glioblastoma stem cells by the team. They suggested that targeting these cells with drug interventions could therefore slow cancer growth.

The team began by sequencing the RNA from 55,000 glioblastoma cells and 20,000 normal brain cells. They identified five main cancer cell types within each tumour and found that these are similar to cell types found within the human brain.

One cell type described was a progenitor GSC, a cell type from which all other glioblastoma cells would develop. They further showed that there was a cellular hierarchical organisation to the cancer that originates from progenitor GSCs.

According to the team, GSCs divided at a faster rate than the mature cancer cells. In fact, they made up most of the dividing cells within the tumour, despite making up a relatively small proportion of the cells within the whole tumour. These rapidly dividing cells are the earliest detectable cancer cells in the hierarchy, suggesting they are a promising target for therapy.

The researchers identified that molecular vulnerabilities of the progenitor GSCs and targeted them in experiments. They found that progenitor GSC survival and proliferation decreased as a result of these interventions and that in pre-clinical disease models, this reduced tumour growth and increased survival of the animals.

Our work has gone a long way to resolve the complexity of glioblastoma heterogeneity and provides a new framework to reconsider the nature of glioblastoma, explained research leader, Dr Kevin Petrecca, a neurosurgeon and brain cancer researcher at The Neuro (Montreal Neurological Institute and Hospital) of McGill University, part of the McGill University Health Centre in Canada. As part of this work, our study also shows, in contrast to decades long dogma, that glioblastoma stem cells are the most rapidly dividing cancer cells in the tumour, and we identified new ways to target these cells. There is still much work to be done. Understanding how these cancer cells interact with the cancer microenvironment is not well understood in this disease, but this study serves as a good starting point to begin to understand how glioblastoma originates and evolves prior to treatments.

This study was published in Nature Communications.

Scientists have identified AVIL as an oncogene responsible for glioblastoma, the deadliest brain tumour. According to the researchers, the discovery offers a promising new treatment target for this cancer, as this gene is vital to the survival of glioblastoma cancer cells.

Glioblastoma is one of the most deadly cancers. Unfortunately, there is no effective treatment option for the disease, said researcher Dr Hui Li, of the University of Virginia School of Medicine and the UVA Cancer Centers Department of Pathology, both US. The novel oncogene we discovered promises to be an Achilles heel of glioblastoma, with its specific targeting potentially an effective approach for the treatment of the disease.

In this study, Li and colleagues identified AVIL, a gene that is typically involved in cells maintaining their size and shape, as an oncogene that can cause cancer cells to form and spread.

In their experiments, blocking AVIL destroyed glioblastoma cells within mice, but had no effect on healthy tissue. The team concluded that therapies targeting this gene are likely to be highly effective and selective.

AVIL is overexpressed in 100 percent of glioblastoma cells and clinical samples, and is expressed at even higher levels in so-called glioblastoma stem cells, but hardly expressed in normal cells and tissues, said Li. Silencing the gene wiped out glioblastoma cells in culture and prevented animal xenografts, while having no effect on normal control cells. Clinically, high AVIL expression correlates with worse patient outcomes. These findings and classic transformation assays proved AVIL being a bona fide oncogene.

The researchers said that the AVIL gene plays a critical role in glioblastoma development and survival. Li added that the strategy they used to identify this oncogene, studying a structural variant identified in a paediatric cancer, could be used to identify other genes driving other adult cancers.

The paper was published in Nature Communications.

Link:

Five developments in oncology targets - Drug Target Review

How Neurotechnology Market Will Dominate In Coming Years? Report Covering Products, Financial Information, Developments, Swot Analysis And Strategies…

Up Market Research (UMR) has published a latest market research report on Global Neurotechnology Market. The global report is prepared in collaboration with the leading industry experts and dedicated research analyst team to provide an enterprise with in-depth market insights and help them to take crucial business decisions. This report covers current market trends, opportunities, challenges, and detailed competitive analysis of the industry players in the market.

The published report explains about the current supply and demand scenario and presents the future outlook of the market in a detailed manner. Up Market Research (UMR) has applied a robust market research methodology to bestow the new entrants and emerging players with 360 wide-view analysis on the latest advancements and their impacts on the market. It has congregated massive amount of data on the key segments of the market in an easy to understand format. The research report has laid out the numbers and figures in a comprehensive manner with the help of graphical and pictorial representation which embodies more clarity on the market.

You can buy this complete report @ https://www.upmarketresearch.com/buy/neurotechnology-market

Report Covers Impacts of COVID-19 to the market.

The on-going pandemic has overhauled various facets of the market. This research report provides the financial impacts and market disturbance on the Neurotechnology market. It also includes analysis on the potential lucrative opportunities and challenges in the foreseeable future. Up Market Research (UMR) has interviewed various delegates of the industry and got involved in the primary and secondary research to confer the clients with information and strategies to fight against the market challenges amidst and after COVID-19 pandemic.

Market Segmentation:

Few of the companies that are covered in the report.

General ElectricSiemens HealthcareKoninklijke PhilipsToshiba MedicalShimadzuHitachi MedicalElektaTristan TechnologiesAllengers MedicalNatus MedicalMagstim

Note: Additional companies can be included in the list upon the request.

By Product Type:

Imaging ModalitiesNeurostimulationCranial Surface MeasurementNeurological ImplantsOthers

By Applications:

HospitalsClinicsDiagnostic CentersAmbulatory Surgical Centers

By Geographical Location:Asia Pacific: China, Japan, India, and Rest of Asia PacificEurope: Germany, the UK, France, and Rest of EuropeNorth America: The US, Mexico, and CanadaLatin America: Brazil and Rest of Latin AmericaMiddle East & Africa: GCC Countries and Rest of Middle East & Africa

Exclusive Free Sample Report @ https://www.upmarketresearch.com/home/requested_sample/18826

The research report provides a detailed analysis of the prominent player in the market, products, applications, and regional analysis which also include impacts of government policies in the market. Moreover, you can sign up for the yearly updates on the Neurotechnology market.

7 Reasons for Buying Neurotechnology Market Report

If you have any query regarding the report, ask our experts: @ https://www.upmarketresearch.com/home/enquiry_before_buying/18826

Below is the TOC of the report:

About Up Market Research (UMR)

Up Market Research (UMR) has an extensive experience in the creation of tailored market research reports in several industry verticals. We cover in-depth market analysis which include producing creative business strategies for the new entrants and the emerging players of the market. We take care that our every report goes through intensive primary, secondary research, interviews, and consumer surveys. Our company provide market threat analysis, market opportunity analysis, and deep insights on the current and market scenario.

To provide the utmost quality of report, we invest in analysts that holds stellar experience in business domain and has excellent analytical and communication skills. Our dedicated team goes through quarterly training which helps them to acknowledge the latest industry practices and to serve the clients with foremost consumer experience.

Contact Info UpMarketResearchName Alex MathewsEmail [emailprotected]Website https://www.upmarketresearch.comAddress 500 East E Street, Ontario, CA 91764, United States.

More:

How Neurotechnology Market Will Dominate In Coming Years? Report Covering Products, Financial Information, Developments, Swot Analysis And Strategies...

MOBILE BIOMETRICS MARKET TRENDS, TECHNOLOGY AND FORECAST | BY TOP COMPANIES APPLE INC.; IDEMIA; NUANCE COMMUNICATIONS, INC.; NEC CORPORATION – Market…

Details about the market drivers and market restraints included in thisMOBILE BIOMETRICSreport helps understand whether the demand of the products in ICT industry will rise or get lower. Qualitative and transparent research studies are performed devotedly to offer you the excellent market research report for your niche. The report is accomplished with transparent research studies and is generated by a team work of experts in their own domain. The market studies, insights and analysis carried out in this MOBILE BIOMETRICS market research report keeps marketplace clearly into the focus which helps achieve business goal.

Download Mobile Biometrics Research Report in PDF Brochure@ (Note: Kindly use your business/corporate email id to get priority):https://www.databridgemarketresearch.com/request-a-sample/?dbmr=global-mobile-biometrics-market

Global mobile biometrics market is expected to register a healthy CAGR of 27.29% in the forecast period of 2019-2026. The report contains data from the base year of 2018 and the historic year of 2017.

Research strategies and tools used of Mobile Biometrics Market:

This Mobile Biometrics market research report helps the readers to know about the overall market scenario, strategy to further decide on this market project. It utilizes SWOT analysis, Porters Five Forces Analysis and PEST analysis.

Details Key Players of Mobile Biometrics Market -:

The report incorporates key player profiles along with the information of the strategies they are adopting to remain ahead in the competition.

List of few players are-:Apple Inc.; IDEMIA; Nuance Communications, Inc.; NEC Corporation; Precise Biometrics AB; Gemalto NV; BIO-key: FUJITSU; ImageWare Systems, Inc.; BioEnable Technologies Pvt. Ltd; Applied Recognition, Inc.; Cognitec Systems GmbH; Fulcrum Biometrics, LLC; Neurotechnology; M2SYS Technology Kernell Inc.; VoicePIN.com Sp. z o.o.; Verint VoiceVault Voice Authentication; Aware, Inc.; Mobbeel; Veridium Ltd.; Fingerprint Cards; ValidSoft; Egis Technology Inc.; Shenzhen Goodix Technology Co., Ltd.; Synaptics Incorporated and Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. among others.

Drivers & Restraints of Mobile Biometrics Market-:

Market Drivers:

Significant rise in demand for electronic verification solutions; this factor is expected to boost the growth of the market

Market Restraints:

Requirement of additional components and software integration for the successful deployment of this technology is also expected to restrict the growth of the market

Several market drivers, market restraints, along with opportunities and challenges are taken into consideration under market overview which gives valuable insights to businesses for taking right actions. Businesses can surely rely upon this first-class market report to accomplish an utter success.

Breakdown of Mobile Biometrics Market-:

The Mobile Biometrics market report performs segmentation which is done on the basis of type, end-user, and manufacturers and applications to fully and deeply research and reveal market profile and prospects.

Global Mobile Biometrics Market By Component (Hardware, Software), Authentication Mode (Single-Factor Authentication, Multi-Factor Authentication), Application (Access Control, Mobile Banking/Payment, Authentication, Others), Industry (Consumer Electronics, Healthcare, Finance & Banking, Travel & Immigration, Government/Law Enforcement & Forensic, Military & Defense, Others)

Regional Insights-

Regional analysis helps the market players to take an exhaustive assessment of the Mobile Biometrics market region wise so that it becomes easy for them to distinguish and investigate the developing pattern and hidden opportunities all over the world.

Regional Coverage of the Market

South America

North America

Middle east and Africa

Asia and Pacific region

Europe

Table of Contents Major Key Points

Part 01: Mobile Biometrics Market OverviewPart 02: Manufacturers ProfilesPart 03: Global Mobile Biometrics Market Competition, by PlayersPart 04: Global Mobile Biometrics Market Size by RegionsPart 05: North America Mobile Biometrics Revenue by CountriesPart 06: Europe Mobile Biometrics Revenue by CountriesPart 07: Asia-Pacific Mobile Biometrics Revenue by CountriesPart 08: South America Mobile Biometrics Revenue by CountriesPart 09: Middle East and Africa Revenue Mobile Biometrics by Countries

Continued.

New Business Strategies, Challenges & Policies are mentioned in Table of Content, Request Detailed[emailprotected]https://www.databridgemarketresearch.com/toc/?dbmr=global-mobile-biometrics-market

Report synopsis

To analyze the market size of the market and infer the key trends from it.

Industry Chain Suppliers of Mobile Biometrics market with Contact Information

Historical, current and projected market size in terms of volume and value

In-depth market segmentation

Comprehensive quantitative analysis of the industry is provided for the period of 2018-2025 to assist stakeholders to capitalize on the prevailing market opportunities.

Buy[emailprotected]https://www.databridgemarketresearch.com/checkout/buy/enterprise/global-mobile-biometrics-market

Yes, Report can be customized to meet the clients requirements. Please connect with us ([emailprotected]), we will ensure that you get a report that suits your needs.

About Data Bridge Market Research:

An absolute way to forecast what future holds is to comprehend the trend today!Data Bridge set forth itself as an unconventional and neoteric Market research and consulting firm with unparalleled level of resilience and integrated approaches. We are determined to unearth the best market opportunities and foster efficient information for your business to thrive in the market.

Contact:

US: +1 888 387 2818

UK: +44 208 089 1725

Hong Kong: +852 8192 7475

[emailprotected]

Continue reading here:

MOBILE BIOMETRICS MARKET TRENDS, TECHNOLOGY AND FORECAST | BY TOP COMPANIES APPLE INC.; IDEMIA; NUANCE COMMUNICATIONS, INC.; NEC CORPORATION - Market...

You get 2 choices for president. That’s it. – Action News Now

There's been a lot of news, but I want to focus today on an argument made by Maryland Gov. Larry Hogan that I think is worth exploring for its complete and total wrongness.

Hogan is a pretty remarkable politician -- a Republican popular in a blue state, he has not been afraid to call out the Trump administration.

He's got a new book out about his fight with cancer and in it he describes Trump administration Cabinet members (he doesn't say which ones) suggesting he should run against President Donald Trump this year. He considered it but didn't, ultimately.

Who does he support for president? But what I want to address here is how Hogan is treating the question of whether he'll support Trump this fall. He's done variations of this in a few interviews, including with CNN's Jake Tapper on Sunday.

TAPPER: You didn't vote for President Trump in 2016. You have consistently criticized his approach to governing. A few days ago, you told "The Dispatch" podcast you probably will not endorse him before the election. Who do you think is a better person to lead the US through this very difficult time, Joe Biden or Donald Trump?

HOGAN: Well, I think I'm just going to let the American people make that decision. The election is 100 days away. I think early voting starts in 60 days or less. So we're getting very close for the American people to make that decision. I think, quite frankly, a lot of people, like me, are frustrated with the divisiveness and dysfunction on both sides and don't feel like we have two great choices.

That idea is true. A lot of Democrats who supported other people in their primaries probably aren't too excited about Joe Biden. And a lot of Americans are probably concerned that Democrats are moving too far to the left even as they're frightened by Trump.

But Hogan went a bit further in an interview with the conservative radio host Hugh Hewitt:

"I mean, there's, there are other choices. I didn't make that choice between Hillary and Donald Trump the first time. I did a write-in for my dad, who I had a lot of respect for and who we could probably touch on with your Nixon background there. But, you know, it's, it's not a black or white decision."

Technically speaking, he's correct. You can write someone in or pick one of the other presidential candidates who will likely appear on your ballot. The Green Party has Howie Hawkins. The Libertarians have Jo Jorgensen. Neither of them are going to be president.

But he's also totally wrong. And this is where Hogan veers into politician-speak silliness. Your 2020 vote is entirely a black-and-white decision.

If you support Trump, he needs your help. A series of CNN battleground state polls out this weekend show the President trailing in three states he won in 2016, including Florida, which no successful Republican presidential candidate has lost in 96 years. Since Calvin Coolidge.

If you don't support Trump, you'd better vote that way. Because he's on the ballot and despite those polls, you might end up with four more years of him.

That's about as binary a decision as it's possible to have. Barring unforeseen calamity, either Donald Trump or Joe Biden will take the oath of office on January 20 at noon. It will not be Larry Hogan's father, who died in 1975.

The subtext of Hogan, a Republican, not vocally supporting Trump is that he opposes Trump but he doesn't want to turn off all the Republicans who do. Hogan has this luxury since he's the governor of a state that will almost certainly cast its electoral votes for Biden. And he'll be reminding everyone of that if he runs for president in 2024!

But the effect of Hogan's words is the idea that it doesn't matter which candidate wins and that another option is worth considering. The time for other options, in the electoral system that's grown up around us, was during primary season.

There are plenty of people arguing the US electoral system needs changes. Those aren't going to happen before November 3.

R or D for 150 years. It is a fact of American life that the two parties have held a death grip on the White House since the Civil War. And they'll keep it unless or until the entire system is changed.

The parties have beaten back Populists, Progressives, Socialists, Dixiecrats and Independents. They've humbled Teddy Roosevelt, Eugene Debs, Strom Thurmond, George Wallace and Ross Perot. Would-be moderate independent Howard Schultz's campaign never even formally launched this year.

The last non-major-party electoral votes were a very long time ago. Despite offering frustrating options, the major parties have only gotten more dominant. Nobody but a Republican or a Democrat has gotten any electoral votes at all in more than 50 years, since Wallace, promising to keep segregation, won five Southern states in 1968.

Change agents run in party primaries. The power the parties hold over the US system is why Bernie Sanders, who isn't a Democrat, ran as a Democrat two times. It's why Ron Paul ran as a Republican twice. It's why Trump, who hasn't always been a Republican, ran as a Republican in 2016. Recall that he dabbled with a Reform Party run in 2000 only to realize there was no path to victory.

In November, until the country changes the system, it's R or D at the presidential level.

A bad year for a protest vote. Presidential candidates try to sell every presidential election as the most important one ever, but this certainly carries some real-time importance.

Set aside the more political divisions of Trump's presidency:

Focusing only on his stewardship of the country in the midst of pandemic:

Americans have seen, under Trump and during the pandemic, that who sits in the Oval Office actually does have a bearing on daily life. And for that reason, in 2020, there are no other choices.

See the original post:

You get 2 choices for president. That's it. - Action News Now

Coronavirus, Brexit and climate change threaten food security for millions in the UK – Sky News

A Minister for Food Security is urgently needed to deal with the threat posed by COVID-19, Brexit and climate change, according to a cross-party group of MPs.

Millions of people have struggled to access food as a result of the coronavirus pandemic, with the number of food bank users doubling during lockdown.

The Environment, Food and Rural Affairs Committee warns that food insecurity is "likely to get worse before it gets better" because of risks including a second wave of coronavirus cases, as well as potential disruption and delays to the food supply system as a result of a "disorderly Brexit".

The committee analysed the government's response to the disruption to food supplies caused by COVID-19.

Although committee chair Neil Parish said the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs response was "commendable" once the pandemic hit, the report questions why the government appeared unprepared for disruptions - such as supermarket shortages due to increased demand - which other countries had experienced when they went into lockdown before the UK.

Increased buying was not a result of "panic", according to the committee, but "a reasonable and predictable response to the expectation that more meals would need to be eaten at home".

Mr Parish said despite the easing of lockdown "problems with food security are far from over".

He added: "Food banks and other food redistribution organisations have reacted heroically to a shocking spike in demand for food aid, but this problem is likely to get worse before it gets better.

"It is therefore essential that the government appoints a new minister for food security who will stop this issue falling between the cracks.

"The government's actions to lock down the country and close businesses were necessary, but they had huge impacts on the food sector and on food security."

:: Listen to the Daily podcast on Apple Podcasts, Google Podcasts, Spotify, Spreaker

The report also highlighted issues with the voucher scheme for free school meals. Initially the vouchers could be used at supermarkets like Waitrose and M&S but not at Aldi or Lidl, which the report said was "out of touch with the reality of where families were likely to shop".

Around 4.9 million adults and 1.7 million children are currently facing food insecurity in the UK, according to the committee, which the UN defines as a lack of physical and economic access to sufficient and nutritious food.

The cross-party group is asking the government to consult on whether a 'right to food' should be put in legislation.

A government spokesperson said: "[we have] invested record levels of funding to help people get the food they need.

"Our COVID-19 task force has also brought together expertise across government to tackle the extraordinary circumstances of this pandemic and ensure those most vulnerable in our society are protected."

View original post here:

Coronavirus, Brexit and climate change threaten food security for millions in the UK - Sky News

Brexiteer exposes heavy restraints the EU had over the UK – ‘EU rules come crashing down!’ – Daily Express

Former Labour MP Frank Field argued European Union rules on free movement resulted in carers' wages being kept low in the UK. While speaking to Brexit Watch with Jonathan Saxty, the Brexiteer insisted it was important the UK was free to correct the negative effects the EU had on Britain. Mr Field also called for mass reform to the care sector after Brexit at the end of the year.

Mr Field said: "We will not ever be able to do justice for carers in this country until we have left the European Union and we can control our borders.

"For decades now it has been obvious that Britain is an ageing population.

"Therefore, other things being equal, we would have seen a very significant rise in the wages of carers as demand went up.

"This increase in demand was totally neutered by being part of the European Union with the free movement of labour.

DON'T MISS:Report to Remainer Sadiq Khan - Brexit BIGGER risk than coronavirus

"This meant that people just came into this country and filled those vacancies at current wage rates rather than pushing them higher."

Mr Field argued the importance of reforming the care industry and its importance in post-coronavirus Britain.

He said: "What I very much hope for the Government's reform is they integrate the NHS and social care and that we commit ourselves to a higher minimum wage for the sector of care.

"We would move away from having a single national minimum wage to having wages pushed up further in certain areas, like with caring.

"This is so we can reward people better and we will be able to do so because of the higher minimum wage rates for that sector will not be attracting people from the EU under the free movement rules.

"The simple reason being those rules come crashing down as well.

"We will be in a position for the very first time to start delivering seriously a proper wage for those carers that look after so many of us at the end of our lives.

"Leaving the European Union at the end of the year allows us from January 1 onwards to have a proper wage policy.

READ MORE:

Guy Verhofstadts cynical plot to see Brexit Britain suffer exposed[ANALYSIS]EU has NO future! Verhofstadt triggers backlash[INSIGHT]Brexit LIVE: EU breaks silence with scathing attack on UK[LIVE BLOG]

"We will be able to increase real salaries for care workers as of January next year."

Brexit trade deal talks between the UK and EU have so far proven unsuccessful.

Michel Barnier last week claimed that a deal was looking less likely as he admitted to not making much progress with the UK.

However, UK Brexit negotiator David Frost claimed that a deal could be reached by the end of the year if the EU realised the UK would not sacrifice its sovereignty for a trade deal.

Visit link:

Brexiteer exposes heavy restraints the EU had over the UK - 'EU rules come crashing down!' - Daily Express

Brexit: Peers told judges will decide on disputed powers – The Scotsman

NewsPoliticsThe row over where some powers will lie when they return from the EU with the UK government or devolved administrations has intensified after it was revealed that judges will have to decide when there are disputes between the four nations.

Wednesday, 29th July 2020, 6:33 pm

The House of Lords was told that legal disputes between governments would be resolved through the courts though it was not specified which courts and no new dispute resolution procedure would be established.

Opposition MPs have been calling for such a system to be organised to arbitrate on disagreements around common frameworks where legislation is already devolved, such as air quality and agriculture, but where standards were set by Brussels.

While Business Secretary Alok Sharma has already introduced proposals for a UK internal market earlier this month, he has avoided the issue of disagreement arbitration. However his government colleague Lord Martin Callanan, today told peers that judges would decide.

Responding to Plaid Cymrus Lord Wigley question about the need for a dispute resolution system with all four nations having an equal voice, he said: I hope there wont be any disputes, but if there were they would be legal disputes and the correct forum for resolving legal disputes is through the court system.

We have no intention of setting up an alternative dispute resolution procedure when we have one of the best and most efficient court systems in the world to resolve disputes.

Reacting to the statement, Kirsten Oswald MP, the SNPs Westminster Deputy leader, said it was confirmation that the UK government has no intention of meaningfully engaging with the devolved governments for an agreed dispute resolution system.

She added: It is yet another sign of the Tories total disregard for the devolved nations. The Tory government has opened the door for companies with deep pockets to challenge Holyrood legislation if we try to maintain higher standards than Westminster post-Brexit putting at risk our key industries with the threat of the imposition of lower standard goods and produce.

Far from strengthening the devolved nations, the UK government's internal market plans will enable the decisions of the Scottish Government to be overridden over devolved areas such as food and agriculture in Scotland."

The Scottish Government had previously said the internal market proposal, which requires all four nations to accept goods and services from other parts of the UK, even if they have set different standards locally, makes a mockery of devolution.

A message from the Editor:Thank you for reading this story on our website. While I have your attention, I also have an important request to make of you.With the coronavirus lockdown having a major impact on many of our advertisers - and consequently the revenue we receive - we are more reliant than ever on you taking out a digital subscription.Subscribe to scotsman.com and enjoy unlimited access to Scottish news and information online and on our app. With a digital subscription, you can read more than 5 articles, see fewer ads, enjoy faster load times, and get access to exclusive newsletters and content. Visit https://www.scotsman.com/subscriptions now to sign up.

Our journalism costs money and we rely on advertising, print and digital revenues to help to support them. By supporting us, we are able to support you in providing trusted, fact-checked content for this website.

See more here:

Brexit: Peers told judges will decide on disputed powers - The Scotsman

Brexit to cause ‘double shock’ for UK economy regardless of deal, study finds – The New European

PUBLISHED: 15:01 28 July 2020 | UPDATED: 15:53 28 July 2020

Adrian Zorzut

Chancellor Rishi Sunak speaks CEO of Worcester Bosch, Carl Arntzen (right) during his visit to Worcester Bosch factory. Photograph: Phil Noble/PA.

PA Wire/PA Images

The UKs economy could be in for a double shock as companies who survived the coronavirus pandemic could face going under as a result of Britain leaving the EU single market at the end of this year.

Email this article to a friend

To send a link to this page you must be logged in.

Become a Supporter

Almost four years after its creation The New European goes from strength to strength across print and online, offering a pro-European perspective on Brexit and reporting on the political response to the coronavirus outbreak, climate change and international politics. But we can only continue to grow with your support.

A study by the London School of Economics warned that UK industries across the board face huge financial pressures as a result of Brexit, regardless of whether Boris Johnson secures a trade deal with the EU or not.

Analysis of monthly surveys from members of the Confederation of British Industry (CBI), a not-for-profit body that represents UK businesses, shows that companies remain deeply concerned over the simultaneous impacts of Brexit and the coronavirus pandemic on trade.

Executives across the business spectrum are particularly worried about the state of the UK economy from autumn when the Treasurys furlough scheme ends and the new trading environment for the UK outside the EU begins to bite.

The report, Covid-19 and Brexit: Real-Time Updates on Business Performance in the United Kingdom due out on Wednesday by the LSEs Centre for Economic Performance said industries that were able to operate with staff working from home during the pandemic will be one of the hardest hit by changes brought about by Brexit.

It said sectors such as professional services, including accountancy and legal services, publishing, and chemicals, will be stung with having to fill out customs declarations to trade with the EU.

The report also criticises Downing Street for falling short on its promise to guide Brexit according impact assessments across all UK industries after it emerged only 10 sectors have been covered to date.

The government must move beyond its broad assessment of Brexit impacts to much more finely tuned plans in preparation for the biggest slowdown of our lifetime said Josh de Lyon, a research assistant at the LSE centre who co-authored the report.

Swati Dhingra, an economics professor who also contributed to the study, said that Covid-19 had reduced the capacity of the UK economy to take further shocks, and rushing Brexit through would broaden the set of sectors that experienced worsening business conditions.

The LSE report urges the government to devise a industrial strategy that reflects the reality of being in a post-Brexit UK which is placed in a post-Covid world economy in which global trade shrinks.

Naomi Smith, chief executive for pro-EU group Best for Britain, said the clock is ticking to heed the warnings.

The LSEs work chimes with the findings of Best for Britains recent report into the double-whammy winter looming for UK businesses, particularly in areas such as the Midlands and North West England, where the major business sectors are particularly exposed.

We echo the LSEs concerns that a thin or no-deal Brexit will result in wider economic damage.

The needless piling of pain upon pain for struggling businesses will cost jobs and hurt the economy, at a time when our countrys finances desperately need to be shored up.

The government must heed these warnings, and grab the opportunity to draw up much more detailed plans for businesses, sector-by-sector, before time runs out.

Almost four years after its creation The New European goes from strength to strength across print and online, offering a pro-European perspective on Brexit and reporting on the political response to the coronavirus outbreak, climate change and international politics. But we can only rebalance the right wing extremes of much of the UK national press with your support. If you value what we are doing, you can help us by making a contribution to the cost of our journalism.

Read the original here:

Brexit to cause 'double shock' for UK economy regardless of deal, study finds - The New European

UK moves to keep EU waste and recycling targets post-Brexit – www.businessgreen.com

The UK is looks set to miss its 2020 recycling target

Government promises to enshrine target to achieve 65 per cent recycling rate by 2035 in UK law as it publishes new Circular Economy Plan

The government has confirmed a number of key EU recycling targets are to be maintained in the UK once the Brexit transition preriod comes to an end, as it today published a fresh circular economy plan that will put into law a goal to recycle 65 per cent of municipal waste by 2035.

The announcement comes around a fortnight the UK missed the official deadline for transferring the EU's Circular Economy Package - including a raft of statutory recycling targets - into UK legislation, a move that caused concernamong some green groups.

However, the new UK Circular Economy Package unveiled today enshrines a number of the EU's headline ambitions into UK law, namely for for municipal waste to be reduced by 65 per cent by 2035, and a commitment to ensure that no more than 10 per cent of municipal waste ends up in landfill by the same date.

The recycling policy package, which is set to become law later this year, restricts the materials which can be landfilled or incinerated, and mandates that waste separately collected for recycling from households cannot be burned for energy or buried.

The UK has struggled to boost its recycling rate recent years, particularly in England. Having plateaued at around 45 per cent for several years across the UK, last year the figure even dropped slightly, rendering the EU's legal target to achieve a 50 per cent recycling rate by the end of 2020 a near impossible task.

Launching the new Circular Economy Package today, Environment minister Rebecca Pow said increasing recycling rates and reducing the amount of waste going to landfill would create a "cleaner waste economy" while also helping to deliver much needed CO2 reductions.

"Through our landmark Environment Bill we will be bringing forward a raft of measures to do just that, and this new Circular Economy Package takes us yet another step forward to transforming our waste industry," she said.

Other measures targeted at driving up recycling and reducing waste in the government's Environment Bill include plans for a tax on businesses that produce or import plastic packaging that has less than 30 per cent recycled content, and a deposit return scheme for single-use drinks containers that would boost recycling rates.

Libby Peake, head of resource policy at environmental think tank Green Alliance, applauded the government's decision to maintain the 65 per cent ambition.

"Its great news that the government has listened to our call to enshrine the ambitious 65 per cent recycling target into UK law," she said. "This suggests a resolve not to let the EU pull ahead from us on environmental ambitions. Now we need the right policies to follow through and deliver the reqiured improvements."

Meanwhile, the Chartered Institution of Waste Management said it was "pleased to see the joint statement issued today by the four UK governments". It added: "While the devil is always in the detail, and CIWM will be scrutinising the list of transposition measures proposed, it is reassuring to see that the UK will remain aligned with an important package of measures that will shape resources and waste policy across Europe for years to come."

In related news, meanwhile, the government also revealed today that plastic carrier bag sales have dropped more than 95 per cent in England's main supermarkets since 2015 when the 5p charge was introduced.

The average person in England now buys juts four bags a year from the main supermarket retailers, the government said, compared with 10 last year and 140 in 2014.

While the 5p charge currently applies to all retailers employing more than 250 people, the government has consulted on extending this to all businesses as well as increasing the minimum charge to 10p. A formal response to that consultation will be delivered "in due course", the government said today.

Read this article:

UK moves to keep EU waste and recycling targets post-Brexit - http://www.businessgreen.com

Dont leave food security and farming at mercy of Brexit and virus The Yorkshire Post says – Yorkshire Post

NewsOpinionColumnistsTHERE is now unanimity at Westminster over the need for an independent inquiry into Covid-19 after Boris Johnson acceded to calls by Sir Ed Davey, the Lib Dem interim leader, this month.

Thursday, 30th July 2020, 5:48 am

Yet, while its timing is still open to debate as the pandemic unfolds and Europe begins to brace itself for a second wave of cases, lessons can be learned in the interim.

Each Whitehall ministry, quango, NHS trust and local authority needs to be reviewing and refining its work now and the best-led organisations will already be doing so without waiting to be pre-empted by an inquiry.

An example is food security and todays call by the Commons Environment, Food and Rural Affairs Select Committee for Defra to appoint a dedicated minister whose primary task is maintaining crucial supplies rather than becoming sidetracked by other policy pressures.

Notwithstanding the farming and food industrys collective effort to keep the shelves stocked when Britain was in the grip of panic buying, they now have a second challenge Brexit as Britain prepares to leave the European Union on December 31.

But it is clear, judging by the underlying tone of this Parliamentary report, that theres insufficient confidence in Defras current leadership on issues ranging from the availability of sufficient labour to help farmers with the annual harvest to uncertainty governing trade future arrangements with the EU and no grasp of the consequences of well-intended initiatives like the voucher scheme for free school meals.

As such, theres no reason or excuse for such select committee reports being ignored by Environment Secretary George Eustice or others. Operating on a cross-party basis, they command authority and should be used as the basis for more immediate policy improvements before a more reflective and wide-ranging inquiry can be held.

Editors note: first and foremost - and rarely have I written down these words with more sincerity - I hope this finds you well.

Almost certainly you are here because you value the quality and the integrity of the journalism produced by The Yorkshire Posts journalists - almost all of which live alongside you in Yorkshire, spending the wages they earn with Yorkshire businesses - who last year took this title to the industry watchdogs Most Trusted Newspaper in Britain accolade.

And that is why I must make an urgent request of you: as advertising revenue declines, your support becomes evermore crucial to the maintenance of the journalistic standards expected of The Yorkshire Post. If you can, safely, please buy a paper or take up a subscription. We want to continue to make you proud of Yorkshires National Newspaper but we are going to need your help.

Postal subscription copies can be ordered by calling 0330 4030066 or by emailing subscriptions@jpimedia.co.uk. Vouchers, to be exchanged at retail sales outlets - our newsagents need you, too - can be subscribed to by contacting subscriptions on 0330 1235950 or by visiting http://www.localsubsplus.co.uk where you should select The Yorkshire Post from the list of titles available.

If you want to help right now, download our tablet app from the App / Play Stores. Every contribution you make helps to provide this county with the best regional journalism in the country.

Go here to see the original:

Dont leave food security and farming at mercy of Brexit and virus The Yorkshire Post says - Yorkshire Post

Fourth Amendment – the Text, Origins, and Meaning

The Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution is a section of the Bill of Rights that protects the people from being subjected to unreasonable searches and seizures of property by law enforcement officers or the federal government. However, the Fourth Amendment does not prohibit all searches and seizures, but only those that are found by a court to be unreasonable under the law.

The full text of the Fourth Amendment states:

Originally created to enforced the doctrine that each mans home is his castle, The Fourth Amendment was written directly in response to British general warrants, called Writs of Assistance, in which the Crown would grant overarching, non-specific search powers to British law enforcement officials.

Through Writs of Assistance, officials were free to search virtually any home they liked, at any time they liked, for any reason they liked or for no reason at all. Since some of the founding fathers had been smugglers in England, this was an especially unpopular concept in the colonies. Clearly, the framers of the Bill of Rights considered such colonial-era searches to be unreasonable.

In deciding whether a particular search is reasonable, the courts attempt to weigh important interests: The extent to which the search intruded on the individual's Fourth Amendment rights and the extent to which the search was motivated by valid government interests, such as public safety.

Through several rulings, the U.S. Supreme Court has established that the extent to which an individual is protected by the Fourth Amendment depends, in part, on the location of the search or seizure.

It is important to note that according to these rulings, there are several circumstances under which police may lawfully conduct warrantless searches.

Searches in the Home:According to Payton v. New York (1980), Searches and seizures conducted inside a home without a warrant are presumed to be unreasonable.

However, such warrantless searches may be lawful under certain circumstances, including:

Searches of the Person:In what is popularly known as its stop and frisk decision in the 1968 case of Terry v. Ohio, the Court ruled that when police officers see unusual conduct leading them to reasonably conclude that criminal activity may be taking place, the officers may briefly stop the suspicious person and make reasonable inquiries aimed at confirming or dispelling their suspicions.

Searches in Schools:Under most circumstances, school officials do not need to get a warrant before searching students, their lockers, backpacks, or other personal property. (New Jersey v. TLO)

Searches of Vehicles:When police officers have probable cause to believe that a vehicle contains evidence of criminal activity, they may lawfully search any area of the vehicle in which the evidence might be found without a warrant. (Arizona v. Gant)

In addition, police officers may lawfully conduct a traffic stop if they have reasonable suspicion that a traffic violation has occurred or that criminal activity is being carried out, for example, vehicles seen fleeing the scene of a crime. (United States v. Arvizu and Berekmer v. McCarty)

In practical terms, there is no means by which the government can exercise prior restraint on law enforcement officials. If an officer in Jackson, Mississippi wants to conduct a warrantless search without probable cause, the judiciary is not present at the time and can't prevent the search. This meant that the Fourth Amendment had little power or relevance until 1914.

In Weeks v. United States (1914), the Supreme Court established what has been known as the exclusionary rule. The exclusionary rule states that evidence obtained through unconstitutional means is inadmissible in court and cannot be used as part of the prosecution's case. Before Weeks, law enforcement officials could violate the Fourth Amendment without being punished for it, secure the evidence, and use it at trial. The exclusionary rule establishes consequences for violating a suspect's Fourth Amendment rights.

The Supreme Court has held that searches and arrests can be performed without a warrant under some circumstances. Most notably, arrests and searches can be performed if the officer personally witnesses the suspect committing a misdemeanor, or has reasonable cause to believe that the suspect has committed a specific, documented felony.

On January 19, 2018, U.S. Border Patrol agents without producing a warrant to do so boarded a Greyhound bus outside the Fort Lauderdale, Florida station and arrested an adult female whose temporary visa had expired. Witnesses on the bus alleged that the Border Patrol agents had also asked everyone on board to show proof of U.S. citizenship.

In response to inquiries, the Border Patrols Miami section headquarters confirmed that under the long-standing federal law, they can do that.

Under Section 1357 of Title 8 of the United States Code, detailing the powers of immigration officers and employees, officers of the Border Patrol and Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) can, without a warrant:

In addition, The Immigration and Nationality Act 287(a)(3) and CFR 287 (a)(3) states that Immigration Officers, without a warrant, may within a reasonable distance from any external boundary of the United States...board and search for aliens in any vessel within the territorial waters of the United States and any railcar, aircraft, conveyance, or vehicle.

The Immigration and Nationality Act defines Reasonable distance as 100 miles.

Although the implicit privacy rights established in Griswold v. Connecticut (1965) and Roe v. Wade (1973) are most often associated with the Fourteenth Amendment, the Fourth Amendment contains an explicit "right of the people to be secure in their persons" that is also strongly indicative of a constitutional right to privacy.

See the rest here:

Fourth Amendment - the Text, Origins, and Meaning

Fourth Amendment | United States Constitution | Britannica

Fourth Amendment, amendment (1791) to the Constitution of the United States, part of the Bill of Rights, that forbids unreasonable searches and seizures of individuals and property. For the text of the Fourth Amendment, see below.

Britannica Quiz

History Lesson: Fact or Fiction?

Bangladesh became independent in 1991.

Introduced in 1789, what became the Fourth Amendment struck at the heart of a matter central to the early American experience: the principle that, within reason, Every mans house is his castle, and that any citizen may fall into the category of the criminally accused and ought to be provided protections accordingly. In U.S. constitutional law, the Fourth Amendment is the foundation of criminal law jurisprudence, articulating both the rights of persons and the responsibilities of law-enforcement officials. The balance between these two forces has undergone considerable public, political, and judicial debate. Are the amendments two clauses meant to be applied independently or taken as a whole? Is the expectation of privacy diminished depending on where and what is suspected, sought, and seized? What constitutes an unreasonable search and seizure?

The protections contained in the amendment have been determined less on the basis of what the Constitution says than according to what it has been interpreted to mean, and, as such, its constitutional meaning has inherently been fluid. The protections granted by the U.S. Supreme Court have expanded during periods when the court was dominated by liberals (e.g., during the tenure of Chief Justice Earl Warren [195369]), beginning particularly with Mapp v. Ohio (1961), in which the court extended the exclusionary rule to all criminal proceedings; by contrast, during the tenure of the conservative William Rehnquist (19862005) as chief justice, the court contracted the rights afforded to the criminally accused, allowing law-enforcement officials latitude to search in instances when they reasonably believed that the property in question harboured presumably dangerous persons.

The full text of the amendment is:

The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.

Originally posted here:

Fourth Amendment | United States Constitution | Britannica

"It’s the decent thing to do" – News – Pueblo Chieftain

Three patients of Pioneer Health Care Center in Rocky Ford who tested positive for COVID-19 (one test is awaiting confirmatory results) have died, Crowley / Otero Health Departments Director Rick Ritter told the Tribune-Democrat Friday. Ritter said the health department gives its condolences to their families.

"Any time this happens we are certainly sorry that they lost a loved one," Ritter said.

COVID-19 cases in Otero County totaled 36 as of Saturday, according to Colorado Public Health and Environment, although Ritter said in a news release that numbers reflected by the state were not up to date. In the same statement, Ritter confirmed that three coronavirus patients at Pioneer Health Care Center in Rocky Ford had died and at the nursing home two staff and a total of 13 patients tested positive for the novel coronavirus. Ritter noted that results of confirmatory tests for some patients were still awaiting results as of Saturday.

Following Gov. Jared Polis's executive order mandating mask use in indoor public facilities July 16, businesses and services have had to crack down on enforcing mask use. Although many businesses and public buildings have posted signs alerting prospective patrons to their mandated enforcement of mask use, others have posted notices that state they will not enforce mask use.

In some instances, the notices make questionable references to the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act, the 4th and 5th Amendments, or other facets of the U.S. Constitution or U.S. law.

Thaxton's Market in Fowler, for example, posted a sign in their window that read, "Due to HIPPA and the 4th Amendment, we cannot legally ask you what your medical condition is."

The sign continued to state that store employees would assume anyone entering without a mask was exempted from the statewide mandate. The Tribune-Democrat called Thaxton's Market last week to inquire about the store policy, but it did not hear back in time for publication.

Arkansas Valley Lumber outside Rocky Ford stirred up controversy when a sign it had posted in its entrance made rounds across local social media groups. The sign declared Arkansas Valley Lumber was no longer a public company and would only accept business from "United States citizens that believe in their constitutional right of freedom from oppression."

A day later, Arkansas Valley Lumber apologized on its official Facebook page and clarified that it would not discriminate against anyone, although it maintained that it would not enforce the use of masks.

Ritter isn't sold on Thaxton's claims or those of others, however.

"There's a lot of information I'm just going to come out and say it disinformation out there," said Ritter.

Ritter noted the statewide mask order makes exemptions for people with health conditions that complicate their breathing, such as asthma or COPD.

But contrary to what some businesses are claiming, a store is not legally prevented from offering patrons masks, nor is a store prohibited from asking someone who claims to have a medical condition that prevents mask use what that condition is, according to attorney to Otero County Nathan Schultz.

"I've seen a lot of people saying they're not going to ask about masks due to HIPPA," said Schultz. "The Fourth Amendment, then one store that says they're not going to ask about masks because of the Fifth Amendment. HIPPA is designed to protect information from covered entities, like doctors and hospitals, from disseminating that information without a release. That has absolutely no bearing on a grocery store. The Fourth Amendment and Fifth Amendment, both, any time you're trying to claim you have constitutional protection, there has to be government action."

Schultz agreed it was possible that some business owners might have conflated HIPPA with the American Disabilities Act, which prohibits discrimination based on disability. But even the American Disabilities Act allows for what Schultz called reasonable inquiry if someone doesn't have an obvious disability.

"I think the stores still have the duty to ask someone to wear a mask," Schultz said. "If they're saying they don't cause of health reasons, you can ask what the health reason is because then the store needs to establish what reasonable accommodations they can make."

Schultz said allowing someone to not wear a mask would probably not be a reasonable accommodation. Instead, though, a store could implement curbside service in such an instance, Schultz suggested.

Schultz said seeing misinformation circulate on social media has been frustrating. Counter to more claims from those opposed to mask use saying the governor's mandate was unlawful or does not have the same effect as law, Gov. Polis's executive order carries the full weight of law, Schultz said.

"Earlier this week, the public health order 20-31 came out, also mandating masks. Public health orders are enforceable by local law enforcement under 25-1-506," said Schultz. "Those can be punished civilly, they can do it administratively where they can pull your business license, or they can do it criminally up to a first degree misdemeanor."

Otero County Sheriff Shawn Mobley said his office will not enforce the mask mandate. Mobley referenced his short staffed department and ongoing criminal investigations. Schultz said he thinks Mobley's decision is okay, but that he was angered by sheriffs from other counties who claimed Polis's law was unconstitutional or did not carry legal weight.

Bent County Sheriffs Office also said in a joint statement with Bent County Public Health that the sheriffs office there would not be enforcing the mask mandate, although they did not provide additional reasoning with their statement.

Otero County will try to utilize civil and administrative means to regulate the mask mandate as opposed to pursuing criminal charges, Schultz said, noting it doesn't do anyone any good to start jailing more people right now.

Another piece of disinformation Schultz wanted to address was that of masks versus the size of COVID-19 particles. Schultz made the distinction that the novel coronavirus that causes COVID-19 is not airborne in the stirctest sense: The viruss primary mode of transmission from host to host is through respiratory particles in other words, spit.

"I'm still seeing a lot of misinformation about the cloth masks themselves," Schultz said. "A lot of people are pointing out micron sizes and all that. This virus has never been airborne, it's transferred through saliva droplets. So the cloth mask does nothing to protect the wearer, it's designed to protect the community from the wearer. So if everyone's wearing a mask, the saliva's less likely to spread to others.

In other words, posts on social media claiming that cloth masks dont stop COVID-19 from passing through them are missing the point, because COVID-19 travels primarily in much larger respiratory droplets that are stopped by a cloth face covering.

Health Director Rick Ritter stressed that many businesses have been compliant with the mask order and that the health department receives numerous calls daily from people looking to improve the safety of their establishments.

Ritter said hes seen people be dismissive of social distancing guidelines and mask use because they dont believe others are taking it seriously.

"To the people saying, 'Well nobody's doing it," that's absolutely wrong," said Ritter. "And that is disrespecting the businesses that are working hard to do what's right, to protect customers, employees, and this is not a hard thing to do, my gosh, we put on pants to cover our lower torso, we put on shirts, and that's not a violation of our constitutional rights.

"If I went out naked on the street, and you can print this, the police would be called. If I said, You can't make me put on pants, that's against my constitutional right to be naked, that wouldn't cut any ice. We're just covering our face and if somebody says, Well you put on pants for decency's sake, I say you put on a mask for decency's sake because you're protecting others.

"A mask is primarily worn to protect others, and that's what I'm saying. These cloth masks, if we all wear them like we're supposed to, it's a kindness to others, it's a consideration for others, and we're going to reduce risk."

Schultz added the health department is working around the clock to try to achieve the best outcome for the community.

Tribune-Democrat reporter Christian Burney can be reached by email at cburney@ljtdmail.com. Help support local journalism by subscribing to the La Junta Tribune-Democrat at lajuntatribunedemocrat.com/subscribenow.

Read the original post:

"It's the decent thing to do" - News - Pueblo Chieftain

New Potential Advances In Treating Psoriasis: A Skin Condition That Affects 125+ Million People – Forbes

Although psoriasis has been a well-recognized skin condition for many years, there has been significant progress over the last decade on effective therapeutic models and treatment modalities for this autoimmune condition. But what exactly is this condition that affects nearly 125 million people across the globe and more than 8 million Americans? As explained by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), psoriasisis a chronic autoimmune skin disease that speeds up the growth cycle of skin cells. This often emanates as patches of thick red skin and silvery scales which are typically found on the elbows, knees, scalp, lower back, face, palms, and soles of feet, but can affect other places (fingernails, toenails, and mouth). The condition may present as a wide spectrum of severity and skin symptoms. Furthermore, psoriasis is often linked to more severe and chronic medical conditions, such as psoriatic arthritis, diabetes, and cardiac issues, to name a few. Psoriatic arthritis is especially common in those that have psoriasis, resulting in inflammation, joint pain, and stiffness that may inevitably lead to severe mobility issues.

Given the seriousness of this condition as well as its widespread prevalence, significant research and efforts have gone into finding sustainable treatments. There are entire labs, fellowships, clinical platforms, and organizations dedicated to helping individuals with psoriasis. Notably, the past decade has seen significant improvements in various treatment modalities, ranging from topical treatments, to injections and oral medications. There are many different mechanisms of action and physiological targets for psoriasis treatments; a few examples include reducing inflammation, slowing skin growth, or altering the immune system.

Phototherapy has received a lot of attention and research in the past few years. Per The National Psoriasis Foundation, the basic premise of phototherapy involves exposing the skin to wavelengths of ultraviolet A light (UVA) or ultraviolet B light (UVB) under the supervision of a health care provider to treat psoriasis. The idea behind this treatment is that UV light penetrates the top layers of skin and stops the skin cells from growing too quickly, leading to improvement in psoriasis symptoms.

Using phototherapy to help with psoriasis symptoms.

More recent developments are also gaining traction. Late last week (July 16th), The New England Journal of Medicine (NEJM) published an article titled Trial of Roflumilast Cream for Chronic Plaque Psoriasis. The article discusses a clinical trial in which researchers tested the use of Roflumilast cream, which contains phosphodiesterase type 4 (PDE-4) inhibitor, as a potentially viable and sustainable topical treatment modality for plaque psoriasis. The study describes that 331 patients were randomized: 109 were assigned to roflumilast 0.3% cream, 113 to roflumilast 0.15% cream, and 109 to vehicle [placebo] cream. The results indicated that Roflumilast cream administered once daily to affected areas of psoriasis was superior to vehicle cream in leading to a state of clear or almost clear at 6 weeks. However, the authors explicitly conclude that Longer and larger trials are needed to determine the durability and safety of roflumilast in psoriasis. This is often the case with new and cutting-edge therapieslarger and well-repeated, evidence-backed trials are required in order to truly understand a treatments efficacy and safety.

Another fascinating research trial by Harvard Universitys Wyss Institute for Biologically Inspired Engineering and John A. Paulson School of Engineering and Applied Sciences (SEAS) was published yesterday, describing the use of small interfering RNA (siRNA) to help control psoriasis-related activity at the genetic level. The article explains that using siRNA based therapies on the skin has traditionally been challenging, given the compounds instability and the skins barrier function. However, in this study, the authors claim that they found a way to effectively deliver the treatment molecule into the skin, resulting in down-regulation of psoriasis-related signals. Though more testing will be required to fully determine the safety and efficacy of this treatment model, this new development may potentially open the doors to a new way of delivering topical medications.

A dermatologist applies a therapeutic ointment to the affected skin of a patient with psoriasis.

Indeed, psoriasis is a very serious and life-altering condition for many people. With such a wide variety of symptoms and presentations, patients must ultimately consult with trained and certified medical professionals on what treatment and therapy is best for their specific situation. As many new therapies and methods of treatment continue to emerge, government leaders, the scientific community, medical professionals, and patients must maintain a high level of scrutiny to ensure that enough testing and evidence-based research is done in order to ultimately maintain the highest emphasis on patient safety. Nonetheless, the fact that many institutions and experts are continuing to work on creating more effective and practical therapies provides hope for the millions of people affected by this condition.

The content of this article is not implied to be and should not be relied on or substituted for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment by any means, and is not written or intended as such. This content is for information purposes only. Consult with a trained medical professional for medical advice.

Here is the original post:

New Potential Advances In Treating Psoriasis: A Skin Condition That Affects 125+ Million People - Forbes

President Donald Trump’s Texas visit focuses on oil and gas workers – The Texas Tribune

Sign up for The Brief, our daily newsletter that keeps readers up to speed on the most essential Texas news.

President Donald Trump sought to give a morale boost to the beleaguered Texas energy industry during a visit Wednesday to the Permian Basin, while also rallying oil and gas workers against Democrats ahead of the November election.

"We are telling the Washington politicians trying to abolish American energy: Don't mess with Texas," Trump said during an afternoon speech at Double Eagle Energy in Midland, after an oil rig tour and fundraiser in nearby Odessa.

Trump's comments doubled as part campaign speech, part policy announcement, as he repeatedly assailed Democrats' energy proposals and predicted their presumptive presidential nominee, Joe Biden, would not "do too well in Texas" as a result. Polls continue to show a close competition in the once-solidly red state.

As for policy, Trump announced an extension for liquified natural gas exporters, following through with the Department of Energys proposal earlier this year to extend export contracts through the year 2050. Trump also announced permits granting approval to vital pipeline and railway infrastructure along the U.S.-Mexico border, including two permits allowing the export of Texas crude to Mexico, which he signed, after speaking, alongside Texas Republicans who joined him in Midland.

For now, though, the industry continues to face severe headwinds from the coronavirus pandemic. Trump touted his administration's actions to help the reeling industry earlier this year, including a deal with Saudi Arabia and Russia to drastically cut production.

"We were very close to losing a very powerful, great industry," Trump said, "and now we're back and we're just gonna keep expanding."

Among the permits that Trump signed was one that granted the company NuStar Energy permission to operate and maintain existing pipelines underneath the Rio Grande that transport hydrocarbons and petroleum products through a 46-mile pipeline from Hidalgo County into northern Mexico. Another permit Trump signed allows for Kansas City Southern Railway Co. to build and operate a new international railway bridge in Laredo, the type of cross-border project on the international boundary that requires a presidential permit.

Still, politics consumed a considerable amount of Trump's speech, as he warned that the "radical left ... is fighting to abolish American energy, destroy the oil and gas industries, and wipe out your jobs."

Trump sought to tie Biden to the Green New Deal, the ambitious plan to combat climate change championed by freshman U.S. Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, D-N.Y. Trump said the Green New Deal would "ban oil and gas leasing on all federal lands and by the way, there'd be no fracking." Biden has said he wants to end all oil and gas drilling on federal lands but that he does not support a total fracking ban.

While Texas officials welcomed Trump to the state by endorsing his "support of Texas energy producers, the industry across the state has been harshly disrupted in 2020. At least 46,000 people working in the Texas energy sector have lost their jobs during the pandemic, and some workers in West Texas have said they dont plan to return to the industry.

In the early months of the pandemic, energy job losses accounted for the highest number of jobless claims filed in dozens of Texas counties, and those workers could have serious trouble finding new jobs in the oil and gas sector for at least the rest of 2020, according to analysis by the Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas.

The state budget also depends heavily on oil and gas taxes, and Texas Comptroller Glenn Hegar said recently that the budget will face a $4.6 billion deficit in part due to the major decline across the oil and gas sector. Hegar said the industry will not bounce back soon.

Most people really focus on price, but an equally important component is what is production volume, Hegar told The Texas Tribune earlier this month. Texas has lost a large number of rigs.

The state typically makes up 50% of all the rigs in North America, but that has dropped to 40%, the lowest number recorded since the data first began to be tracked in the 1960s, he said.

Trump spoke at Double Eagle Energy after attending a fundraiser in nearby Odessa for his reelection campaign. The event was expected to raise $7 million, according to the Republican National Committee. Proceeds went to Trump Victory, a joint fundraising committee between Trump's campaign and the RNC.

The luncheon was at the Odessa Marriott Hotel and Conference Center, and tickets started at $2,800. Supporters who gave $100,000 got to participate in a roundtable discussion with Trump beforehand.

The trip was Trump's 16th visit to Texas as president but his first to the Midland-Odessa area, a Republican stronghold.

Poll after poll in recent months has shown Trump and Biden in a dead heat in Texas, which he carried by 9 percentage points in 2016, the smallest margin for a GOP presidential nominee here in two decades. Still, Trump said Wednesday it was a "great victory" and that he is now "leading what we had even four years ago," even though surveys show the contrary.

Biden released a statement ahead of Trump's arrival in Texas that focused on his response to the coronavirus pandemic, which has been on the rise in recent weeks across the state. Biden noted that Hurricane Hanna, which hit the Texas coast over the weekend, has made the situation in Texas "far more precarious."

"Mr. President, now isnt the time for politicking or photo ops," Biden said. "Texans need a President with the experience and vision to fight for families no matter how many catastrophes reach our shores."

The Democratic National Committee also denounced Trump's handling of the virus with a daylong digital advertising campaign on the Odessa American's homepage. The Texas Democratic Party held a news conference ahead of Trump's visit to highlight how the pandemic has disproportionately impacted Latino Texans.

Afterward, the party noted in a statement that America surpassed 150,000 deaths Wednesday and said it "never had to be this bad" under Trump and Gov. Greg Abbott.

The coronavirus loomed large even before Air Force One touched down in Midland. U.S. Rep. Louie Gohmert, R-Tyler, who was expected to travel with the president, announced he had tested positive for the virus. Once Trump arrived, a Houston congressional candidate who was set to greet the president at the airport, Wesley Hunt, announced he had tested positive on his way there and returned home.

Correction: An earlier version of this article misspelled Permian Basin.

Kansas City Southern Railway and the Texas Comptroller of Public Accounts have been financial supporters of The Texas Tribune, a nonprofit, nonpartisan news organization that is funded in part by donations from members, foundations and corporate sponsors. Financial supporters play no role in the Tribune's journalism. Find a complete list of them here.

Read the original:

President Donald Trump's Texas visit focuses on oil and gas workers - The Texas Tribune

Donald Trump’s campaign has head start on Joe Biden but hard road to win in Maine – Bangor Daily News

BANGOR, Maine A mostly masked group of volunteers gathered at a Dunkin on Saturday to get last-minute coaching before heading out to knock on doors for President Donald Trump and down-ballot local Republican candidates in the November election.

Republicans have touted their ground game and constant presence in battleground areas including Maine as their main advantage in defending Trump in Novembers election. Vice President Joe Biden, the presumptive Democratic nominee, is just beginning here, but he has opened up a wide polling lead nationally and is winning in many swing states.

Trump prioritized Maine more than any recent Republican candidate four years ago, visiting five times ahead of an election in which he won the 2nd Congressional District. When he made an official visit here last month, he said he plans to win the state in 2020. His campaign recently placed it on a short list of states that Trump thinks he can flip this year.

That is unlikely. Trump trailed Biden 50 percent to 38 percent statewide in a Colby College poll released on Tuesday showing Democrats leading all of Maines key races, including in the crucial U.S. Senate race. Biden was 3 percentage points ahead in the 2nd District. No Republican presidential candidate has won Democratic-leaning Maine since 1988.

Trumps rough polling and massive campaign apparatus raise chicken-or-egg questions about the 2020 race. His ground game is likely to matter most in Maine if the race for the one electoral vote for the 2nd District remains close and winnable as he looks to protect areas he won.

From my perspective, as long as he remains competitive and I believe he will remain competitive, at least in the 2nd Congressional District, I think the grassroots activism is important, said Michael Leavitt, a Republican strategist who ran President George W. Bushs 2004 re-election campaign in Maine.

Republican organizers told volunteers on Saturday in Bangor they made 16,000 knocks on doors the past weekend and over 600,000 voter contacts during the campaign. The national party, outspent nearly 10 to 1 here by Democrats in the 2016 cycle, has spent $805,000 in Maine from January 2019 to June 2020, four times more than their Democratic counterpart.

Former Gov. Paul LePage, who chairs Trumps Maine campaign, said in an interview earlier this month that the party only knocked on 11,000 doors in 2016 and this campaign is something weve not seen for a long time in Maine. He thought Trump may visit twice more, questioned polls and expected Trumps standing to improve as people learn more about Bidens history.

He has enthusiasm on his side, he said of Trump. The Democrats are hunkered down and I dont know if thats going to help them in the long haul.

Democrats are playing catch-up, as is typical while facing an incumbent. Biden recently hired two key Maine employees former Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee staffer James Stretch as state director and Portland City Councilor Spencer Thibodeau as a senior advisor. National Republicans have 24 staffers here.

Thibodeau touted Democrats registration edge. As of May, they passed independents as Maines largest voting bloc, with 90,000 more registered voters than Republicans, according to state data. He said that edge is significant, but the hard work is still to be done.

Republicans have reintroduced in-person events after shutting them down in March due to the coronavirus. In Maine, 80 percent of events are in person and and 20 percent are virtual with the party following state gathering limits, a Trump spokeswoman said. On Saturday, organizers split volunteers into pairs for canvassing, which they did not allow reporters to observe.

Democrats are focused on electronic forms of stumping. Texting and phone campaigns are key parts of the campaigns strategy, as well as virtual events, like Bidens wife, Jill, taking a virtual tour of a University of Maine engineering lab. A Saturday kickoff event streamed on Facebook by the state party was policy focused, with Senate President Troy Jackson, D-Allagash, discussing labor issues with U.S. Rep. Tim Ryan, D-Ohio.

Toby McGrath, a Democratic operative who managed the 2008 and 2012 campaigns in Maine for President Barack Obama, was confident that Democrats could catch up organizationally. He said campaigns will often tout high numbers of voter contacts to get attention but should focus more on quality over quantity. But while he said Biden is in a good spot, things can change.

I would rather be Biden, but 99 days is a long time in a political campaign, McGrath said.

More here:

Donald Trump's campaign has head start on Joe Biden but hard road to win in Maine - Bangor Daily News