Ocugen Granted FDA Orphan Drug Designation for OCU400 (AAV-hNR2E3) Gene Therapy for the Treatment of RHO Mutation-Associated Retinal Degenerative…

MALVERN, Pa., July 27, 2020 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- Ocugen, Inc. (NASDAQ: OCGN), a biopharmaceutical company focused on discovering, developing, and commercializing transformative therapies to cure blindness diseases, today announced the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) granted the third Orphan Drug Designation (ODD) for OCU400 in the treatment of RHO mutation-associated retinal degeneration. The RHO mutation is part of the Retinitis Pigmentosa (RP) group of rare, genetic disorders that involve a breakdown and loss of cells in the retina and can lead to visual impairment and blindness. This is one of the larger mutations within the RP class, representing about 12% of RP patients in the US.

A novel gene therapy product candidate, OCU400 has the potential to be broadly effective in restoring retinal integrity and function across a range of genetically diverse inherited retinal diseases. It consists of a functional copy of a nuclear hormone receptor (NHR) gene, NR2E3, delivered to target cells in the retina using an adeno-associated viral vector. As a potent modifier gene, expression of NR2E3 within the retina may help reset retinal homeostasis and potentially offer longer benefit, stabilizing cells and rescuing photoreceptor degeneration and vision loss.

Adding to ODDs for OCU400 for NR2E3 and CEP290 mutation-associated retinal degeneration, RHO gene mutation-associated retinal degeneration further supports Ocugens breakthrough modifier gene therapy platforms potential to treat multiple blindness diseases with a single product. RP is a group of heterogenic inherited retinal diseases associated with over 150 gene mutations, affecting over 1.5 million individuals worldwide. In addition, ~40% of RP patients cannot be genetically diagnosed, confounding the ability to develop personalized RP therapies. Traditional gene therapy or gene editing approaches may require more than 150 products to rescue these patients from vision loss. OCU400, a single product candidate, has potential to address broad-spectrum RP.

OCU400, comprising the nuclear hormone receptor geneNR2E3, has the potential to help modulate numerous biological pathways that function in maintaining the health of the retina. A recent preclinical study published in Nature Gene Therapy demonstrated the potency of NR2E3 to elicit broad-spectrum therapeutic benefits in early and intermediate stages of RP in five unique mouse models, said Dr. Mohamed Genead, acting Chief Medical Officer of Ocugen and Chair of Ocugens Retina Scientific Advisory Board. We believe OCU400 has the potential to address multiple genetic mutations associated with RP and, therefore, help a broader pool of patients, Dr. Genead continued.

Our third ODD for OCU400 from the FDA is an important step towards developing a broad-spectrum treatment for RP and getting a therapy faster to patients who are in desperate need of rescue, said Dr. Shankar Musunuri, Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and Co-Founder of Ocugen. Orphan designation for this indication supports the goal of our Modifier Gene Therapy Platform to treat a variety of inherited retinal diseases with a single gene therapy product. There are currently no approved treatments which slow or stop the progression of multiple forms of RP, which is why were excited to have a platform that can potentially address multiple mutations, including mutations in the Rhodopsin gene, with one therapy.

The FDA Office of Orphan Products Development grants orphan designation for novel drugs or biologics that treat a rare disease or condition affecting fewer than 200,000 patients in the U.S. Orphan designation qualifies the sponsor of the drug for various development incentives of the Orphan Drug Act, including a seven-year period of U.S. marketing exclusivity, tax credits for clinical research costs, clinical research trial design assistance, the ability to apply for annual grant funding and waiver of Prescription Drug User Fee Act filing fees.

About OCU400OCU400 (AAV-hNR2E3) is a novel gene therapy product candidate with the potential to be broadly effective in restoring retinal integrity and function across a range of genetically diverse inherited retinal diseases. It consists of a functional copy of a nuclear hormone receptor gene, NR2E3, delivered to target cells in the retina using an adeno-associated viral vector. As a potent modifier gene, expression of NR2E3 within the retina may help reset retinal homeostasis, potentially stabilizing cells and rescuing photoreceptor degeneration and vision loss.

About Ocugen, Inc.Ocugen, Inc. is a biopharmaceutical company focused on discovering, developing, and commercializing transformative therapies to cure blindness diseases. Our breakthrough modifier gene therapy platform has the potential to treat multiple retinal diseases with one drug one to many and our novel biologic product candidate aims to offer better therapy to patients with underserved diseases such as wet age-related macular degeneration, diabetic macular edema and diabetic retinopathy. For more information, please visithttps://ocugen.com/

Cautionary Note on Forward-Looking StatementsThis press release contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of The Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, which are subject to risks and uncertainties. We may, in some cases, use terms such as predicts, believes, potential, proposed, continue, estimates, anticipates, expects, plans, intends, may, could, might, will, should or other words that convey uncertainty of future events or outcomes to identify these forward-looking statements. Such statements are subject to numerous important factors, risks and uncertainties that may cause actual events or results to differ materially from our current expectations. These and other risks and uncertainties are more fully described in our periodic filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the SEC), including the risk factors described in the section entitled Risk Factors in the quarterly and annual reports that we file with the SEC. Any forward-looking statements that we make in this press release speak only as of the date of this press release. Except as required by law, we assume no obligation to update forward-looking statements contained in this press release whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise, after the date of this press release.

Corporate Contact:Ocugen, Inc.Sanjay SubramanianChief Financial OfficerIR@Ocugen.com

Media Contact: LaVoieHealthScienceEmmie Twomblyetwombly@lavoiehealthscience.com+1 857-389-6042

Read this article:

Ocugen Granted FDA Orphan Drug Designation for OCU400 (AAV-hNR2E3) Gene Therapy for the Treatment of RHO Mutation-Associated Retinal Degenerative...

Axovant Signs Three-Year Clinical Supply Agreement With Oxford Biomedica for Manufacturing and Supply of AXO-Lenti-PD – BioSpace

NEW YORK and BASEL, Switzerland, July 31, 2020 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- Axovant Gene Therapies Ltd (NASDAQ: AXGT), a clinical-stage company developing innovative gene therapies for neurological diseases, announced today that its subsidiary has signed a three-year Clinical Supply Agreement (CSA) with Oxford Biomedica plc (LSE:OXB), a leading gene and cell therapy group. The CSA builds on the worldwide license agreement signed between the two companies in June 2018 for the Parkinsons disease gene therapy program OXB-102, now called AXO-Lenti-PD.

Under the terms of the CSA, Oxford Biomedica will manufacture GMP batches for Axovant to support the ongoing and future clinical development of AXO-Lenti-PD, a clinical-stage gene therapy product to treat moderate to severe Parkinsons Disease based on Oxford Biomedicas LentiVector platform. Axovant is currently conducting the Phase 2 SUNRISE-PD trial with AXO-Lenti-PD. Dosing of all patients in the second cohort has been completed with 6-month safety and efficacy data expected in the fourth quarter of 2020. Oxford Biomedica expects to manufacture AXO-Lenti-PD in its commercial-scale GMP manufacturing facilities including Oxbox in the UK, and additionally in other OXB GMP facilities as required to ensure security of supply.

This Agreement with Oxford Biomedica means that together we can continue to advance the development of AXO-Lenti-PD in Parkinsons disease, said Pavan Cheruvu, Axovant Chief Executive Officer. We are pleased to extend our partnership with Oxford Biomedica, a world leader in lentiviral vector development and manufacturing, as we scale-up AXO-Lenti-PD production to support our Phase 2 and Phase 3 clinical studies and enable commercialization of the product. This marks another mutual accomplishment for our Parkinsons disease program where we expect to enroll the first subject in a randomized, sham-controlled trial in 2021.

John Dawson, CEO of Oxford Biomedica, added, This new Agreement builds upon our existing worldwide licensing agreement with Axovant and highlights the strengths of Oxford Biomedica's commercial GMP manufacturing capabilities. We are pleased with how the partnership is progressing and excited by the clinical progress to date. The agreement today signals our commitment to the efficient ongoing development of this much needed product for patients with Parkinsons disease. We are now at a stage in the partnership where we can determine the manufacturing activities and infrastructure required to support the mid and late-stage development of AXO-Lenti-PD in a way which is compatible with later commercialization and we look forward to this next phase of our partnership.

About Axovant Gene Therapies

Axovant Gene Therapies is a clinical-stage gene therapy company focused on developing a pipeline of innovative product candidates for debilitating neurodegenerative diseases. Our current pipeline of gene therapy candidates target GM1 gangliosidosis, GM2 gangliosidosis (also known as Tay-Sachs disease and Sandhoff disease), and Parkinsons disease. Axovant is focused on accelerating product candidates into and through clinical trials with a team of experts in gene therapy development and through external partnerships with leading gene therapy organizations. For more information, visit http://www.axovant.com.

About AXO-Lenti-PDAXO-Lenti-PD is an investigational gene therapy for the treatment of Parkinsons disease that is designed to deliver three genes (tyrosine hydroxylase, cyclohydrolase 1, and aromatic L-amino acid decarboxylase) via a single lentiviral vector to encode a set of critical enzymes required for dopamine synthesis, with the goal of reducing variability and restoring steady levels of dopamine in the brain. The investigational gene therapy aims to provide patient benefit for years following a single administration. The SUNRISE-PD Phase 2 trial is ongoing with dosing completed for all patients in cohort 2, with 6-month safety and efficacy data expected in Q4 2020. Axovant expects to dose the first patient in the Part B randomized, sham controlled study in 2021.

About Oxford BiomedicaOxford Biomedica (LSE:OXB) is a leading, fully integrated, gene and cell therapy group focused on developing life changing treatments for serious diseases. Oxford Biomedica and its subsidiaries (the "Group") have built a sector leading lentiviral vector delivery platform (LentiVector), which the Group leverages to develop in vivo and ex vivo products both in-house and with partners. The Group has created a valuable proprietary portfolio of gene and cell therapy product candidates in the areas of oncology, ophthalmology, CNS disorders, liver diseases and respiratory disease. The Group has also entered into a number of partnerships, including with Novartis, Bristol Myers Squibb, Sanofi, Axovant Gene Therapies, Orchard Therapeutics, Santen, Boehringer Ingelheim, the UK Cystic Fibrosis Gene Therapy Consortium and Imperial Innovations, through which it has long-term economic interests in other potential gene and cell therapy products. Additionally the group has signed a Clinical and Commercial Supply Agreement with AstraZeneca for manufacture of the adeno based COVID-19 vaccine candidate, AZN1222. Oxford Biomedica is based across several locations in Oxfordshire, UK and employs more than 550 people. Further information is available at http://www.oxb.com.

Forward-Looking Statements

This press release contains forward-looking statements for the purposes of the safe harbor provisions under The Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 and other federal securities laws. The use of words such as "may," "might," "will," "would," "should," "expect," "believe," "estimate," and other similar expressions are intended to identify forward-looking statements. For example, all statements Axovant makes regarding costs associated with its operating activities are forward-looking. All forward-looking statements are based on estimates and assumptions by Axovants management that, although Axovant believes to be reasonable, are inherently uncertain. All forward-looking statements are subject to risks and uncertainties that may cause actual results to differ materially from those that Axovant expected. Such risks and uncertainties include, among others, the impact of the Covid-19 pandemic on our operations, the initiation and conduct of preclinical studies and clinical trials; the availability of data from clinical trials; the scaling up of manufacturing, the expectations for regulatory submissions and approvals; the continued development of its gene therapy product candidates and platforms; Axovants scientific approach and general development progress; and the availability or commercial potential of Axovants product candidates. These statements are also subject to a number of material risks and uncertainties that are described in Axovants most recent Annual Report on Form 10- K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on June 10, 2020, as updated by its subsequent filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Any forward-looking statement speaks only as of the date on which it was made. Axovant undertakes no obligation to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statement, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise.

Contacts:

Media & Investors

Parag MeswaniAxovant Gene Therapies Ltd.(212) 547-2523media@axovant.cominvestors@axovant.com

Read the original post:

Axovant Signs Three-Year Clinical Supply Agreement With Oxford Biomedica for Manufacturing and Supply of AXO-Lenti-PD - BioSpace

Gene Therapy for Inherited Genetic Disorders Market size in terms of volume and value 2019-2025 – Market Research Correspondent

Global Gene Therapy for Inherited Genetic Disorders market- Report defines the vital growth factors, opportunities and market segment of top players during the forecast period from 2019 to 2025. The report Gene Therapy for Inherited Genetic Disorders offers a complete market outlook and development rate during the past, present, and the forecast period, with concise study, Gene Therapy for Inherited Genetic Disorders market effectively defines the market value, volume, price trend, and development opportunities. The comprehensive, versatile and up-to-date information on Gene Therapy for Inherited Genetic Disorders market is provided in this report.

The latest research report on Gene Therapy for Inherited Genetic Disorders market encompasses a detailed compilation of this industry, and a creditable overview of its segmentation. In short, the study incorporates a generic overview of the Gene Therapy for Inherited Genetic Disorders market based on its current status and market size, in terms of volume and returns. The study also comprises a summary of important data considering the geographical terrain of the industry as well as the industry players that seem to have achieved a powerful status across the Gene Therapy for Inherited Genetic Disorders market.

Get PDF Sample Copy of this Report to understand the structure of the complete report: (Including Full TOC, List of Tables & Figures, Chart) @ https://www.marketresearchhub.com/enquiry.php?type=S&repid=2602855&source=atm

The key players covered in this studyBioMarin Pharmaceutical Inc.bluebird bio Inc.Novartis AGOrchard Therapeutics PlcSpark Therapeutics Inc.

Market segment by Type, the product can be split intoEye DisordersHematological DisordersCentral Nervous System DisordersMuscular DisordersOthersMarket segment by Application, split intoHospitalClinicResearch InstituteOthers

Market segment by Regions/Countries, this report coversNorth AmericaEuropeChinaJapanSoutheast AsiaIndiaCentral & South America

The study objectives of this report are:To analyze global Gene Therapy for Inherited Genetic Disorders status, future forecast, growth opportunity, key market and key players.To present the Gene Therapy for Inherited Genetic Disorders development in North America, Europe, China, Japan, Southeast Asia, India and Central & South America.To strategically profile the key players and comprehensively analyze their development plan and strategies.To define, describe and forecast the market by type, market and key regions.

In this study, the years considered to estimate the market size of Gene Therapy for Inherited Genetic Disorders are as follows:History Year: 2015-2019Base Year: 2019Estimated Year: 2020Forecast Year 2020 to 2026For the data information by region, company, type and application, 2019 is considered as the base year. Whenever data information was unavailable for the base year, the prior year has been considered.

Do You Have Any Query Or Specific Requirement? Ask to Our Industry [emailprotected] https://www.marketresearchhub.com/enquiry.php?type=E&repid=2602855&source=atm

Complete Analysis of the Gene Therapy for Inherited Genetic Disorders Market:

Comprehensive assessable analysis of the industry is provided for the period of 2019-2025 to help investors to capitalize on the essential market opportunities.

The key findings and recommendations highlight vital progressive industry trends in the global Gene Therapy for Inherited Genetic Disorders market, thereby allowing players to improve effective long term policies

A complete analysis of the factors that drive market evolution is provided in the report.

To analyze opportunities in the market for stakeholders by categorizing the high-growth segments of the market

The numerous opportunities in the Gene Therapy for Inherited Genetic Disorders market are also given.

You can Buy This Report from Here @ https://www.marketresearchhub.com/checkout?rep_id=2602855&licType=S&source=atm

Furthermore, Global Gene Therapy for Inherited Genetic Disorders Market following points are involved along with a detailed study of each point:

Generation of this Global Gene Therapy for Inherited Genetic Disorders Industry is tested about applications, types, and regions with price analysis of players that are covered.

Revenue, sales are planned for this Gene Therapy for Inherited Genetic Disorders market, including with various essentials along yet another facet is assessed in this section for foremost regions.

In continuation using earnings, this section studies consumption, and global Gene Therapy for Inherited Genetic Disorders market. This area also sheds light on the variance between ingestion and distribution. Export and Gene Therapy for Inherited Genetic Disorders significance data are provided in this part.

In this section, key players have been studied depending on product portfolio, their Gene Therapy for Inherited Genetic Disorders market company profile, volume, price, price, and earnings.

Gene Therapy for Inherited Genetic Disorders market analysis aside from business, the information, and supply, contact information from manufacturers, consumers and providers can also be presented. Additionally, a feasibility study to asset and SWOT analysis for endeavors have been contained.

The rest is here:

Gene Therapy for Inherited Genetic Disorders Market size in terms of volume and value 2019-2025 - Market Research Correspondent

Gene Therapy Market Professional Industry Overview 2020 Segmentation and Development Analysis BY 2027 – Science Examiner

Impact Analysis of Covid-19

The complete version of the Report will include the impact of the COVID-19, and anticipated change on the future outlook of the industry, by taking into the account the political, economic, social, and technological parameters.

Get Sample PDF Including COVID19 Impact Analysis Of Gene Therapy, https://www.coherentmarketinsights.com/insight/request-pdf/1774

The Gene Therapy Market is expected to have a highly positive outlook for the next five years 2020-2027 according to a recently released Gene Therapy Market research report. The report has been added to his large database by Coherent Market Insights. This report is a guide that covers key strategic developments of the market including acquisitions & mergers, new technology launch, agreements, partnerships, collaborations & joint ventures, research & development, technology, and regional expansion of major participants involved in the market on the global and regional basis.

It also going to elaborate the opportunities out there in micro niches for stakeholders to take a position, step by step investigation of the competitive landscape and even commodity professional services of famous players which include GlaxoSmithKline plc, Bluebird Bio, Inc., Adaptimmune Therapeutics plc, Celgene Corporation, Shanghai Sunway Biotech Co. Ltd., Merck KGaA, Transgene SA, and OncoGenex Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

The key features of the Gene Therapy Market report 2020-2027 are the organization, extensive amount of analysis, and data from previous and current years as well as forecast data for the next five years. Most of the report is made up of tables, charts, and figures that give our clients a clear picture of the market.

The comprehensive value chain analysis of the Gene Therapy market will assist in attaining better product differentiation, along with a detailed understanding of the core competency of each activity involved. The market attractiveness analysis provided in the report measures the potential value of the Gene Therapy providing business strategists with the latest growth opportunities.

Questions have been answered at Gene Therapy Market report:

Economy Trends (Drivers, Constraints, Opportunities, Threats, Challenges, Investment Opportunities, along with Strategies) The length of the global Gene Therapy market opportunity? How share promote Gene Therapy their worth from different manufacturing brands? Which will be the niches at which players profiling with thorough plans, financials, and also recent advancements should set a presence? Which will be the anticipated growth rates for your own Gene Therapy economy altogether and also for every segment inside? Which will be the Gene Therapy application and types and forecast accompanied closely by producers?

The research report on the Gene Therapy market evaluates the growth trends of the industry through historical study and estimates future prospects based on comprehensive research. The report extensively provides market share, growth, trends, and forecasts for the period 2020-2027. The market size in terms of revenue (USD MN) is calculated for the study period along with the details of the factors affecting the market growth (drivers and restraints).

Key Topics Covered:

Part 01: Executive SummaryPart 02: Scope Of The ReportPart 03: Research MethodologyPart 04: Market Landscape Market Ecosystem Market Characteristics Market Segmentation Analysis

Part 05: Market Sizing Market Definition Market Sizing 2020 Market Size And Forecast 2020-2027

Part 06: Five Forces Analysis Bargaining Power of Buyers Bargaining Power of Suppliers Threat of New Entrants Threat of Substitutes Threat of Rivalry Market Condition

Part 07: Customer LandscapePart 08: Regional Landscape Geographical Segmentation Regional Comparison Americas Market Size And Forecast 2020-2027 EMEA Market Size And Forecast 2020-2027 APAC Market Size And Forecast 2020-2027

Part 09: Decision FrameworkPart 10: Drivers And Challenges Market Drivers Market Challenges

Part 11: Market TrendsPart 12: Vendor Landscape Overview Landscape Disruption Vendors Covered Vendor Classification Market Positioning Of Vendors

About Us:

Coherent Market Insights is a global market intelligence and consulting organization focused on assisting our plethora of clients achieve transformational growth by helping them make critical business decisions. We are headquartered in India, having office at global financial capital in the U.S. and sales consultants in United Kingdom and Japan. Our client base includes players from across various business verticals in over 150 countries worldwide. We pride ourselves in catering to clients across the length and width of the horizon, from Fortune 500 enlisted companies, to not-for-profit organization, and startups looking to establish a foothold in the market. We excel in offering unmatched actionable market intelligence across various industry verticals, including chemicals and materials, healthcare, and food & beverages, consumer goods, packaging, semiconductors, software and services, Telecom, and Automotive. We offer syndicated market intelligence reports, customized research solutions, and consulting services.

To know more about us, please visit our website http://www.coherentmarketinsights.com

Contact us:

Coherent Market Insights1001 4th Ave, #3200 Seattle, WA 98154, U.S.Email: [emailprotected]United States of America: +1-206-701-6702United Kingdom: +44-020-8133-4027Japan: +050-5539-1737India: +91-848-285-0837

Go here to read the rest:

Gene Therapy Market Professional Industry Overview 2020 Segmentation and Development Analysis BY 2027 - Science Examiner

Greenwich swimmers take the plunge to fight cancer – Greenwich Time

By David Fierro and Matthew Brown

Meghan Lynch participates in the "Buoy-to-Buoy" swim at Rocky Point Club in Old Greenwich, Connecticut on August 1, 2020. The Swim Across America Event organized by Team Julian, honoring the legacy of Greenwich's own Julian Fraser, who lost his life battling a rare form of cancer, raised over $45,000 for cancer research. Over 50 swimmers from Rocky Point Club and Greenwich High School's Swim and Water Pola teams participated in the 1-mile swim in the Long Island Sound. Several volunteers in kayaks and on paddle boards, Including Julian mother, Cristy Fraser, kept watch over the group during the benefit swim.

Meghan Lynch participates in the "Buoy-to-Buoy" swim at Rocky Point Club in Old Greenwich, Connecticut on August 1, 2020. The Swim Across America Event organized by Team Julian, honoring the legacy of

Photo: Matthew Brown / Hearst Connecticut Media

Meghan Lynch participates in the "Buoy-to-Buoy" swim at Rocky Point Club in Old Greenwich, Connecticut on August 1, 2020. The Swim Across America Event organized by Team Julian, honoring the legacy of Greenwich's own Julian Fraser, who lost his life battling a rare form of cancer, raised over $45,000 for cancer research. Over 50 swimmers from Rocky Point Club and Greenwich High School's Swim and Water Pola teams participated in the 1-mile swim in the Long Island Sound. Several volunteers in kayaks and on paddle boards, Including Julian mother, Cristy Fraser, kept watch over the group during the benefit swim.

Meghan Lynch participates in the "Buoy-to-Buoy" swim at Rocky Point Club in Old Greenwich, Connecticut on August 1, 2020. The Swim Across America Event organized by Team Julian, honoring the legacy of

Greenwich swimmers take the plunge to fight cancer

GREENWICH A team of over 50 swimmers and 15 volunteers joined forces to raise more than $45,000 in the fight against cancer and to honor a 2014 Greenwich High graduate and standout swimmer who died of osteosarcoma.

The group known as Team Julian team gathered Saturday at Rocky Point Club in Old Greenwich for the endurance swim on Long Island Sound to benefit Swim Across America Fairfield County.

The event honored the legacy of Julian Fraser, who lost his battle with a rare form of bone cancer in 2017 at the age of 20.

The swimmers from Rocky Point Club and Greenwich High School's Swim and Water Pola teams participated in the 1-mile swim in the Long Island Sound. Several volunteers in kayaks and on paddle boards, including Julian Frasers mother, Cristy Fraser, kept watch over the group during the long benefit swim.

Julian Fraser earned All-America honors as a swimmer and water polo player. He competed on numerous championship teams for GHS coach Terry Lowe, then excelled on the Santa Clara University water polo team.

We are united to raise money for the fight against cancer and to honor Julian, said Lowe, who is one of the organizers of Team Julian.

Proceeds from the event supports the Stamford-based Alliance for Cancer Gene Therapy, the nations only foundation dedicated exclusively to funding cancer gene therapy research.

To learn more about Swim Across America Fairfield County or make a donation, visit swimacrossamerica.org/fc.

dfierro@greenwichtime.com

View original post here:

Greenwich swimmers take the plunge to fight cancer - Greenwich Time

Movers & Shakers, July 31 | BioSpace – BioSpace

ASCO-Jonathan W. Friedberg has been appointed as the next editor-in-chief of theJournal of Clinical Oncology(JCO), the flagship journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO).JCOpublishes cutting-edge research on the diagnosis and treatment of patients with cancer and is one of the most highly cited oncology journals in the world. A hematologic oncologist for more than 20 years, Friedberg is currently director of the Wilmot Cancer Institute and Samuel Durand Professor of Medicine at the University of Rochester Medical Center in Rochester, New York. Friedbergs five-year term asJCOeditor-in-chief will begin in June 2021. He will succeed Stephen A. Cannistra, who will be completing his 10th year as the journals editor-in-chief.

Apic Bio Cambridge, Mass.-based Apic Bio formed a Scientific Advisory Board (SAB) which includes internationally recognized gene therapy experts. TheSAB will provide clinical and scientific expertise to help the company advance its pipeline and leverage its proprietary silence and replace THRIVE platform. The appointments to Apics Scientific Advisory Board include Robert H. Brown Jr., Leo P. and Theresa M. LaChance Chair in Medical Research, Professor of Neurology, Director of the Program in Neurotherapeutics, University of Massachusetts Medical School; R. Jude Samulski, president and chief scientific officer at AskBio; Barry Byrne, director of the Powell Gene Therapy Center at the University of Florida and Professor of Pediatrics and Molecular Genetics & Microbiology; Rob Kotin, adjunct professor at University of Massachusetts Medical School; Kevin Flanigan, Robert F. and Edgar T. Wolfe Foundation Endowed Chair in Neuromuscular Research and Director of the Center for Gene Therapy in The Abigail Wexner Research Institute at Nationwide Childrens Hospital, and professor of Pediatrics and Neurology at The Ohio State University College of Medicine; Mark Kay, Dennis Farrey Family Professor in Pediatrics and Professor of Genetics at Stanford University School of Medicine.

I-Mab Shanghai-based I-Mab named Ivan Yifei Zhuas its chief commercial officer effectiveAug. 10. In this role, Zhu will focus on building and developing I-Mab's commercialization infrastructure and strategies and preparing the company for upcoming product launches. Before joining I-Mab, he served as vice president and General Manager of the sales division of Qilu Pharmaceutical Group where he managed the company's sales and marketing team. Zhu also served as the CCO of BeiGene where he played an instrumental role in the expansion of BeiGene's commercialization team and the implementation of its commercialization strategies.

Caladrius Biosciences Michael H. Davidson was named to the board of directors of Caladrius Biosciences. Davidson is the founder and chief scientific officer of Corvidia Therapeutics, which recently announced its sale to Novo-Nordisk for $2.1 billion. Davidson also serves as clinical professor and director of the Lipid Clinic at the University of Chicago Pritzker School of Medicine.

Cidara Therapeutics-Cidara Therapeutics announced the formation of a scientific advisory board (SAB) and the appointment of four leading experts in viral and fungal infections and hematology. TheSABwill work closely with the Cidara management team to help guide the direction and design of the companys development programs with an emphasis on the continued development and expansion of the companys Cloudbreak Antiviral Conjugate (AVC) program.Cidara TherapeuticsSABincludes Frederick G. Hayden,Stuart S. Richardson Professor Emeritus of Clinical Virology atUniversity of Virginia School of Medicine; Professor Emeritus of Medicine at the University of Virginia; Michael G. Ison, professor, Divisions of Infectious Diseases and Organ Transplantation atNorthwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine; Medical Director, Transplant & Immunocompromised Host Infectious Diseases Service at Northwestern University Comprehensive Transplant Center,Chicago; Johan A Maertens,professor of Internal Medicine and Hematology, Acute Leukemia and Transplantation Unit at University Hospitals Leuven;Department of Microbiology, Immunology and Transplantationat KULeuven, Leuven,Belgium; Kieren Marr, Professor of Medicine and Oncology Director, Transplant and Oncology Infectious Diseases Program and Vice-Chair for Innovation in Healthcare Implementation,Department of MedicineatJohns Hopkins University School of Medicine.

Alydia Health Following a $13.9 million Series C financing round, Alydia Health announced Rob Binney as its new chief executive officer. Binney joins the company from Intersect ENT where he served as chief commercial officer. Prior to Intersect ENT, Binney worked in leadership roles with both startups and large medical device companies, including Boston Scientific and AccessClosure, now part of Cardinal Health. Binney succeeds Anne Morrissey, who recently stepped down as the companys CEO. Colby Holtshouse, previously Alydias interim CEO and head of Marketing, will assume the role of chief operating officer. In association with the financing round, Zina Affas Besse, managing partner at Global Health Funds will join the companys board of directors.

Synlogic, Inc. Antoine Tony Awad was named chief operating officer of Synlogic. As COO, Awad will drive Synlogic's end to end development & manufacturing organization and supply chain as well as have broader corporate operations responsibilities, inclusive of laboratory operations, IT infrastructure, and the quality organization. Awad joined Synlogic in December 2018 as head of Technical Operations. Prior to joining Synlogic, he served as senior vice president of CMC and Operations at Abpro Therapeutics and L.E.A.F. Pharmaceuticals and served in roles of increasing responsibility at Ipsen Biosciences and Merrimack Pharmaceuticals. In addition to Awad, Synlogic also named Andrew March as head of Development Operations. Prior to joining Synlogic March served as Ra Pharmaceuticals' head of Clinical Development.

Engrail Therapeutics San Diego-based Engrail announced two key executive appointments. Kimberly Vanover has been named chief scientific officer, leading the building and advancement of the companys pipeline. Eve Taylor has been named vice president of clinical development, overseeing all facets of Engrails clinical development programs and operations. Stephen Cunningham, previously executive vice president, development and CSO, will assume the role of chief development officer. Vanover most recently served as senior vice president, early-stage clinical development and translational medicine at Intra-Cellular Therapies. Taylor most recently helped lead early-stage clinical development at Intra-Cellular Therapies. Previously, Taylor led clinical development activities at Cytori Therapeutics, Ceregene and ACADIA Pharmaceuticals. The company also expanded its board of directors to five members. Tony Ho was appointed to Engrails board of directors effective immediately. Ho served as CRISPR Therapeutics executive vice president, research and development since August 2017. Prior to joining CRISPR, Tony held a number of roles at AstraZeneca, most recently senior vice president and head of oncology integration and innovation.

CressetU.K.-based Cresset announced its SAB. The Cresset Scientific Advisory Board members are Stevan W Djuric, chairman of Discovery Chemistry and Technology Consulting LLC, USA;Richard Lewis of Novartis Pharma AG; Alexander Hillisch of Bayer; AstraZenecas Andreas Bender; Julien Michel of the University of Edinburgh; Paul Czodrowski of TU Dortmund University in Germany; and Kazuyoshi Ikeda of Keio University in Japan.

NeuBase Therapeutics William Mann was named chief operating officer of NeuBase Therapeutics. Mann will leverage his decades of experience in the biopharma industry to manage NeuBase operations and advance its strategic goals. Mann most recently served as the president and CEO of Helsinn Therapeutics. Before joining Helsinn, he held multiple positions at Sapphire Therapeutics, Inc.

See the rest here:

Movers & Shakers, July 31 | BioSpace - BioSpace

Cell and Gene Therapy Market Overview, Growth & Advancement to (2020-2025) – Owned

Worldwide Cell and Gene Therapy Market report gives an in-depth review of the dynamics of the industries, which impacts on the increase of companies. The observe contains a mix of various segments inclusive of drivers, restraints, and possibilities. Special scenarios are examined on this document at the side of the highest driving elements which offers the approaches for enterprise growth. The effective strategies are implemented via the varied pinnacle-degree key gamers to shape the companies .

A comprehensive and elaborate primary analysis report highlights numerous facts like development factors, business improvement policies, analytical growth, economic profit or loss to assist readers and clients to know the market on a worldwide scale. Cell and Gene Therapy Market report gives details about the highest key players and makes that are driving the market. The report is completed after careful analysis of the collected information in various categories of the market that necessities innovative thoughts, hypothetical investigation, and its importance. The team of researchers and analysts presents the readers accurate statistics and analytical data within the report during a simple manner by means of graphs, diagrams, pie charts, and other pictorial illustrations.

Impact of Covid-19 in Cell and Gene Therapy Market

[We Have Included a part On The Impact Of Covid-19, which might Provide you ways The Covid-19 Pandemic affects the worldwide Cell and Gene Therapy Market]

Download Sample Table of Content PDF of COVID-19/CoronaVirus Impact Analysis of Cell and Gene Therapy Market 2020. http://www.researchreportsinc.com/report-sample/875819

The global Cell and Gene Therapy Market report evaluates various factors related to growth, including pricing structure, production capabilities, demand-supply scenarios and profit margins. The whole research intelligence is predicated on an exhaustive primary industry research and in-depth proactive secondary research that aim to extract valued data points about Cell and Gene Therapy Market. The resultant data enables report readers to position themselves as potential market entrants and devise growth strategies to satisfy short- and long-term business goals.

Amgen Inc., bluebird bio, Inc., Dendreon Pharmaceuticals LLC., Fibrocell Science, Inc., Human Stem Cells Institute, Kite Pharma, Inc., Kolon TissueGene, Inc., Novartis AG, Orchard Therapeutics plc., Organogenesis Holdings Inc., Pfizer, Inc., RENOVA THERAPEUTICS

For More Information about this Report Visit @ http://www.researchreportsinc.com/send-an-enquiry/875819

Table of Contents:

Global Cell and Gene Therapy Market Research Report 2020

Chapter 1 About the Cell and Gene Therapy Market Industry

Chapter 2 World market Competition Landscape

Chapter 3 World Cell and Gene Therapy Market share

Chapter 4 Supply Chain Analysis

Chapter 5 Company Profiles

Chapter 6 Globalisation & Trade

Chapter 7 Distributors and Customers

Chapter 8 Import, Export, Consumption and Consumption Value by Major Countries

Chapter 9 World Cell and Gene Therapy market Forecast through during years

Chapter 10 Key success factors and market Overview REPORT HIGHLIGHTS :

KEY QUESTIONS ANSWERED IN THE REPORT:

Buy This Report: http://www.researchreportsinc.com/checkout/875819

About Research Reports Inc:

Research Reports Inc. is one of the leading destinations for market research reports across all industries, companies, and technologies. Our repository features an exhaustive list of market research reports from thousands of publishers worldwide. We take pride in curating a database covering virtually every market category and an even more comprehensive collection of market research reports under these categories and sub-categories. We are one of the premier sources for such reports & report customization services.

Contact Us:

David ( Sales Manager )

US: +1-855-419-2424

UK : +440330807757

Email: [emailprotected]

Read the original post:

Cell and Gene Therapy Market Overview, Growth & Advancement to (2020-2025) - Owned

REGENXBIO To Host Conference Call on August 6 to Discuss Second Quarter 2020 Financial Results and Recent Operational Highlights – Herald-Mail Media

ROCKVILLE, Md., July 30, 2020 /PRNewswire/ -- REGENXBIO Inc. (Nasdaq: RGNX), a leading clinical-stage biotechnology company seeking to improve lives through the curative potential of gene therapy based on its proprietary NAVTechnology Platform, today announced that it will host a conference call on Thursday, August 6, 2020, at 4:30 p.m. ET to discuss its financial results for the quarter ended June 30, 2020, and recent operational highlights.

To access the live call by phone, dial (800) 708-4539 (domestic) or (800) 619-6396 (international) and enter the passcode 49857700. To access a live or recorded webcast of the call, please visit the Investors section of the REGENXBIO website at http://www.regenxbio.com. The recorded webcast will be available for approximately 30 days following the call.

AboutREGENXBIO Inc.

REGENXBIO is a leading clinical-stage biotechnology company seeking to improve lives through the curative potential of gene therapy. REGENXBIO's NAV Technology Platform, a proprietary adeno-associated virus (AAV) gene delivery platform, consists of exclusive rights to more than 100 novel AAV vectors, including AAV7, AAV8, AAV9 and AAVrh10. REGENXBIO and its third-party NAV Technology Platform Licensees are applying the NAV Technology Platform in the development of a broad pipeline of candidates in multiple therapeutic areas.

Contacts:

Tricia TruehartInvestor Relations and Corporate Communications347-926-7709ttruehart@regenxbio.com

Investors:Eleanor Barisser, 212-600-1902eleanor@argotpartners.com

Media:David Rosen, 212-600-1902david.rosen@argotpartners.com

See original here:

REGENXBIO To Host Conference Call on August 6 to Discuss Second Quarter 2020 Financial Results and Recent Operational Highlights - Herald-Mail Media

Catharpin mom helps raise national awareness for her young sons disease – WDVM 25

Neimann-Pick disease type C1 is a rare genetic condition that only has 500 known cases world wide.

by: Christy Matino

CATHARPIN, Va. (WDVM) Catharpin resident Meghann Ferguson is trying to bring national awareness to Neimann-Pick disease type C1, a rare genetic condition that only has 500 known cases world wide.

The disease affects the bodys ability to metabolize fat. This collection of fat can lead to enlargement of the liver and spleen and can cause difficulties with fine motor skills and cognitive impairment.

These are the symptoms that Meghann noticed when her son Liam was born, just 24 hours after his birth. Liam was also in liver failure, and the Fergusons were looking into a liver transplant.

We heard the words that we were being told genetic, degenerative, fatal those types of words, and they really hit hard, she said.

Since Liams diagnosis, Meghann has been an advocate for Niemann-Pick disease nationally. She joined the board of the National Niemann-Pick Disease Foundation and has had multiple speaking engagements.

One was at the Georgetown University Hospital, and then we also spoke at a gene therapy company in North Carolina. I was also able to present his story at the NNPDF Conference, which is the national organization for this disease, Ferguson said.

The goal is to bring more awareness to the disease, since it is so easily misdiagnosed and difficult to recognize.

The more that people are aware that this condition exists, then I think that doctors, when they see it, will think about it as a possibility, she said.

Read the rest here:

Catharpin mom helps raise national awareness for her young sons disease - WDVM 25

Circularity or safety in second life products? Here’s how to achieve both – GreenBiz

This article is sponsored by UL.

Circularity is a life-cycle approach to sustainability in product design that is gaining momentum worldwide. Circular business models maximize the use of limited natural resources, reduce reliance on the take/make/waste economy and, in many cases, reap cost savings for businesses.

However, in the race to achieve the critically important attribute of circularity, companies run the risk of sidelining other important criteria such as safety and performance.

As we enter new territory for circularity with the expansion of second-life products and materials, its important to keep a watchful eye on safety. For example, does recycled plastic maintain integrity and performance in an end product? Do refurbished electronics meet fire and shock risk requirements the same as new electronics? Do reconditioned medical devices or molded-case circuit breakers offer the same performance as new?

Harmonization of circularity, safety and performance standards is critical to achieving a more sustainable and safe economy. Evaluating circular products for all of these criteria helps ensure long-term viability of new circular approaches, protects consumers and other end users, and reduces risk associated with achieving circularity. Whats more, validations of the performance, quality and circularity attributes of products and materials can provide the evidence needed to confront myths and misunderstandings about these products and encourage widespread adoption of remanufactured or other second life or "like new" products.

While single-attribute sustainability claims such as recycled content are helpful in creating the ecosystem in which recycling markets can operate more effectively, circularity is broader and aims to optimize resources by circulating products and/or components in a way that ensures materials are used at their highest value for the longest time possible.

Several business models support circularity, but of particular focus in this article are product life extensions, by which companies extend the life of products through remanufacturing, upgrade, technical assessment or remarketing. This method is highly effective for maximizing the value and life of products and reduces the need for virgin materials as well as carbon emissions associated with production and distribution of new products.

For example, according to a study titled "The Remanufacturing Industry" by Robert T. Lund, funded by the Argonne National Laboratory, remanufactured products conservethe equivalent to 400 trillion British Thermal Units (BTUs) of energy annually, which translates into the energy used to power 6 million passenger cars each year. It also represents a significant revenue stream for many companies, with some estimates that $60 billion of remanufactured goods are sold each year in the U.S. alone.

However, some risks are inherent with this type of product life extension.

But its also important to consider the lived life of that product. The Guide Information for Electrical Equipment for Use in Ordinary Locations (Category AALZ), found on productiq.ul.com, summarizes UL's position that "when a product bearing a UL Mark is modified or rebuilt (including being refurbished, remanufactured, reconditioned or renovated) after it leaves the factory where the UL Mark was applied, UL does not know if the product continues to meet the applicable requirements unless the modification or rebuilding has been specifically investigated by UL." (Registration for Product iQ is free; register today at Productiq.ul.com.)The key question is: does this product perform as well and operate as safely as a new product?

While circularity is becoming embedded into business practices of sustainability-minded companies, there is often a lack of awareness of the possible safety risks described above. Depending on the type of product, regulations may call for testing and assessment. However, for items such as electrical equipment, automobiles, building products and furniture, there is often little awareness among manufacturers and end users of potential risks.

For companies in any industry, here are some steps toward achieving both circularity and safety.

In an effort to promote confidence in the safety of refurbished products and to increase transparency, UL has established programs for the safe and sustainable rebuilding of many categories of products. We are committed to supporting circularity on a secure foundation of safety.

As an example, consider the growing number of wind turbine farms installed over the last two decades.

These wind turbines have an average lifespan of 20 years. As the equipment nears end of life, many parties become interested in assessing continued safe and reliable operation.

UL developed a standard to determine if it would be possible to safely extend the life of turbines. UL 4134, the Standard for Safety for Lifetime Extension of Wind Turbines, employs a science-based approach to test and validate the safety and performance of equipment to extend the life of these large, costly assets. The requirements take into account the external conditions of use for the specific turbine, operational characteristics and turbine information. This data is used to calculate the remaining useful life and set the stage for physical inspections and risk analysis, allowing the turbines to continue to operate rather than being decommissioned and replaced with new turbines. This allows for extension of life through reasonable repair.

As we continue to shift from a take/make/waste to circular business models, we will need to make a number of shifts across business, government, investors and society at large. Among the lessons learned during the pandemic, we know that human health and safety remain a priority and should be top of mind as we investigate new methods for bringing circular products to market. Second life products have the potential to dramatically reduce use of precious natural resources and divert waste from the landfill; ensuring their safety and like new performance is one of the new safety imperatives of our time, and in turn will help encourage adoption.

See the original post:

Circularity or safety in second life products? Here's how to achieve both - GreenBiz

Can Our Life Insurance Pay For Life-Extending Care? – American Council on Science and Health

I've written previously about the new generation of pharmaceuticals. No longer small compounds, medications are increasingly biologicals, with greater precision, efficacy, and expense. Bio-similars, the biologic version of generics, may have a role, but co-pay expenses increase disparity along the lines of income and shift resources from other family concerns. A new paper from the Social Service Research Network offers an alternative payment approach using life insurance.

Life and Health Insurance

Life insurance, on the face of it, is a strange business where I pay a monthly premium only to see a return when I die. My highest profit comes if I die immediately, my least if I live a long life. The keen observer will note that I said long, rather than long and happy; that is because life insurance is about the quantity of my life, not it's quality. If you are looking to ensure quality, you need health insurance.

At first blush, life insurance seems like a Ponzi scheme. I pay say $1,000 annually for 25 years, and if I die, at that point, my family gets $500,000. In reality, that $1,000 is invested and growing during the interval. Insurance companies need only pay out when someone dies so they could and can use other people's premiums to offset their expenses. But many of those terms policies, which by the way is the most common "financial instrument" Americans own, lapse, meaning they end without a death payment. Hence, all those premiums accrue to the insurers.

Last bit of context. Since 2010, health insurers can not adjust premiums based on your pre-conditions the cost is the same if you are healthy or if you are taking five medications and see physicians every week. Life insurance premiums can adjust for your current and expected health. Buying at age 20 reduces your premiums compared to purchasing term life insurance at age 40 when you have hypertension and are a bit overweight.

"The main insight is that life insurers benefit from these life-extensions, especially immune-oncology." [1]

The benefit of medication extending your life is clear you get more quality time. But how do life insurers benefit? First, they continue to get premiums. If you lapse, all the benefit is lost, but it is doubtful that a person in these circumstances would end their policy. During the period of your now extended life, those premiums continue to be invested by the insurance company. Meanwhile, your payment is delayed into the future; a future where the dollar, because of inflation, is worth less. In short, life insurers realize more revenue and a reduced payout.

"Several key parameters determine the benefit to life insurers of a patient diagnosed with a life-threatening disease: the increase in survival probability resulting from treatment, patient demographics, age of diagnosis, and the life insurance premium."

The most crucial variable is the efficacy of treatment, which creates an interesting alignment of interests, both you and your insurance benefit from you receiving life-extending care. There is no similar alignment with health insurance because those treatments cost health insurers more; you are the only one profiting. To curb this "bad" behavior on your part, termed moral hazard, health insurance employs co-pays and deductibles that increase your costs, decreasing theirs.

While life-extension is always beneficial to you, it is never beneficial to a health insurer, but can be to a life insurer.

The economic model

The researchers modeled healthcare costs and life insurance premiums. Using the National Cancer Institute and Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services data, they noted that immunotherapies for cancer have rapidly expanded in numbers and cancers treated. They have become first-line or parts of combination therapy while remaining very expensive. They are efficacious, demonstrating significant increases in long term survival. Based upon their model's formula, considering the roughly 400,000 individuals who own life and health insurance and are receiving immunotherapy

"the $9.78 billion benefit to the life insurance sector well exceeds the out-of-pocket costs to consumers of $4.83 billion."

Perhaps only an actuary and the authors can fully understand the math, but bottom line, life insurance could cover those out-of-pocket costs and still turn a significant profit. There are several ways to cover out-of-pocket expenses. For example, the out-of-pocket costs could be paid by the life insurer, and the death benefit reduced by a comparable amount. They note that a policy with a death benefit of only $46,000 could cover $20,000 in co-pays and deductables. Or a patient might borrow the money from the death benefit, kind of like a reverse mortgage all the past premiums helping to secure the "loan."

Life insurance is a very common "financial instrument" across most of the at-risk economic demographics. Even individuals earning thirty-five to fifty thousand dollars buy term life, and these are the very same individuals most at risk for economic catastrophe in the face of high co-pays and deductibles. And while the paper does an in-depth analysis involving immunotherapy, the concepts could apply equally as well to other chronic conditions such as heart failure, AIDS/HIV, and Hepatitis C.

Limitations

All models have limitations; this one is no different. First, there are the "frictions," an excellent term describing regulatory frameworks that would need to be adjusted. And of course, there would be a shifting decline in profitability as the monies were redistributed. There would have to be some re-jiggering of life insurance rates to account for those profitability changes. And there would be a "moral hazard" in this case, the tendency of pharmaceutical companies to further raise their prices to take advantage of this newly found source of out-of-pocket expenses.

For those so inclined to "free-market" solutions, this may be an alternative or adjunct to finding means to fund healthcare for all.

[1] Immuno-oncology medications are the poster children of expensive biologicals that extend life. You've seen the ads for drugs for heart failure, metastatic breast, and lung cancer.

Source "Combining Life and Health Insurance"SSRN

Visit link:

Can Our Life Insurance Pay For Life-Extending Care? - American Council on Science and Health

Sen. Mitt Romney says he will propose extension of unemployment benefit – Deseret News

SALT LAKE CITY As federal lawmakers grapple with what kind of help to extend to people struggling because of the coronavirus pandemic, Sen. Mitt Romney said he plans to propose an extension of supplemental unemployment benefits on Thursday.

Romney was participating in a virtual town hall with NAACP President Derek Johnson Wednesday night when he made the announcement during a discussion of why helping people adversely impacted by economic shutdowns has become a political issue.

One thing I will note, and I will introduce this tomorrow, which is that the unemployment insurance supplement, which people have been receiving and been counting on, should not disappear while were in the middle of this debate between Republicans and Democrats, Romney said.

And so Im going to propose an ... unemployment insurance continuation through the end of the year. ... Well see if that gets accepted or not, by people on my side of the aisle, and across the aisle. But Id like to make sure that the unemployment supplemental program continues so that people can pay their rent, put food on the table and have confidence, at least through the end of this year.

Moderator April Ryan asked the senator if he could get buy in from other Republicans, especially from Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell.

My plan would say, look, a state can either go to a program where people receive 80% of what they were making while they were employed, he said. Or for the next month, they can get a $500 supplement on top of the regular state unemployment insurance, the month after that it goes down to $400 supplement, the month after that goes down to a $300 supplement on top of the regular state unemployment program.

So thats my proposal. I dont know where my colleagues will stand. My guess is theyre going to say Look, thats pretty good compromise, Mitt, and Ill get some support. The bigger question for me is where will the Democrats stand on that? But well probably find out relatively soon.

Romney said his will be only one proposal that the Senate could discuss Thursday. He said there is deep concern for those struggling with unemployment because of the public health decisions to shut down businesses.

I think theres a real belief, certainly on my side of the aisle, that we cant hold off the unemployment supplemental benefit while were negotiating a very, very broad next phase of a release relief package, Romney said.

The hourlong town hall included questions from around the country, including one from Utah, and the topics ranged from protecting voting rights, including vote by mail, to racial inequalities, to whether or not Romney should have run for president in 2016 instead of 2012.

Ryan started with praise for Romneys decision to march with Black Lives Matter advocates in Washington, D.C, and then asked how the protests translate into policy initiatives that address systemic racism.

I think the entire country has turned its focus on the fact that there is systemic, structural disadvantage associated with being African American, or for that matter, other peoples of color, he said. Its been something weve been aware of. But, you know, after the height of the civil rights movement in the 1960s, and 70s, many people sort of let that fall from their consciousness, at least from the front burner of their consciousness, and I think, with the tragic death of George Floyd and the other events that have occurred in the past several weeks, I think Americans on both sides of the aisle, white America, Black America, brown America and so forth, are saying this continues to be a real problem. We have not resolved it; we have not solved this problem. And its unacceptable.

He said there may be genuine differences in the way people want to address these problems, but the fact remains, they need to be addressed immediately.

We are all children of the same God, Romney said. He loves us all. He loves us all, and to treat people differently and to have in place procedures or structures or policies that make it unfair or unequal, is simply wrong. And I think America recognizes thats got to change.

All three praised the late Rep. John Lewis, who will be eulogized Thursday by former President Barack Obama, and said he showed people how to bring about change simply by being persistent.

We should not deify him, Johnson said, but we should use his life example to show that we all have the capacity to do good, to get in good trouble.

Ryan asked Romney about Trumps tweets saying he was going to rescind Obama-era regulations meant to eliminate housing discrimination.

Well, I think its unfortunate, Romney said when asked his thoughts on the tweets that said Trump wanted to prevent low-income housing from being built in suburban neighborhoods. Because like you, I think the Fair Housing Act has not been fulfilled yet.

He pointed out that his father George Romney was secretary of Housing and Urban Development under President Richard Nixon.

One of the things he fought for was open communities, was to take the Fair Housing Act and implement it fully, Romney said. Now, when President Nixon found out about that, he tried to shut it down. But my dad kept on battling, recognizing the only way youre going to see a reduction in racism and discrimination in our country is if people of different ethnic backgrounds and races get to know each other, and go to the same schools, and go to the same churches, and have the same opportunities.

And when that happens, why youll reduce the fear and the anxiety and that was part of what the Fair Housing Act was designed to do. So you know, Im dismayed by the presidents tweet. Well see what actually happens. This is political season. Some things that are said are not actually done. I hope thats one of those.

Romney said it wasnt just what Lewis accomplished as a congressman that is worth admiring, but the way he lived his life should be an example to those hoping to change the country and the world for the better.

Its true, in the case of John Lewis, this is a man who not only did things that are notable and should be recognized, but he by his personal character, and his vision, his fundamental goodness, and his willingness to make good trouble, make us uncomfortable, he changed many of us who watched him, Romney said.

And thats a legacy which goes on and on. And I say this, not just to extol John Lewis, but to suggest to all of us who are listening tonight, that we also influence others. And its critical, if we want to change America that we make sure that our hearts are changed, and we communicate our love and care for others, regardless of our differences and separations.

Read the original post:

Sen. Mitt Romney says he will propose extension of unemployment benefit - Deseret News

Capstone Reports Strong Second Quarter 2020 Results Growth on Schedule – Business Wire

VANCOUVER, British Columbia--(BUSINESS WIRE)--Capstone Mining Corp. (Capstone or the Company) (TSX:CS) announces its production and financial results for the three (Q2 2020) and six months ended June 30, 2020. Strong copper production totaled 38.5 million pounds of copper despite COVID-19 related production limitations at Cozamin, at consolidated C1 cash costs1 of $1.87 per payable pound produced, 9% lower than Q1 2020. Link HERE for Capstones Q2 2020 managements discussion and analysis (MD&A) and financial statements and HERE for the Q2 webcast presentation.

Q2 results were outstanding and I am proud of everyone for working safely, achieving our planned operational targets and advancing our growth initiatives, despite pandemic-related restrictions, said Darren Pylot, President and CEO of Capstone. Our commitment to growth is evident on multiple fronts, which all comes at an opportune time in line with rising copper and silver prices. Helped by a balance sheet that remains strong, we were able to keep the expansion at Cozamin on track for Q4 2020 completion, and at Pinto Valley the first of two new secondary crushers and ball mill shells were installed last week. Also, we just announced exciting news that we are ramping up cathode operations at Pinto Valley, which will add approximately 300-350 million pounds of low-cost copper cathode production over the next two decades from historic waste dumps and ongoing high-grade waste.

During Q2, we took a number of actions and capitalized on attractive foreign exchange, diesel prices and interest rates to strengthen our balance sheet and improve the Companys liquidity, said Raman Randhawa, SVP and CFO of Capstone. I am happy with Capstones financial position as we are ready to reap the rewards of 20% production growth and 10% lower costs next year, with improving copper and silver prices serving as upside.

HIGHLIGHTS AND SIGNIFICANT ITEMS

Coronavirus (COVID-19) Update

2020 Production and Cost Guidance Reinstated

Capstone is reinstating its original 2020 production and cost guidance as COVID-19 has not to date significantly adversely affected production and costs at our operations. We caution that the global effects and risks of COVID-19 are still evolving. Given the uncertainty of the duration and magnitude of the impact, our production and cash cost estimates are subject to a higher than normal degree of uncertainty. The guidance below does not reflect any potential for additional suspensions or other significant disruption to operations or increased costs due to COVID-19. Refer to the Risk section of the MD&A for further details on COVID-19 related risks.

2020 Guidance

Total

2020 Year-to-date (YTD)

Copper production (million pounds)

140 - 155

74.0

C1 cash costs1

$1.85 - $2.00

$1.96

Capstones capital expenditures are forecasted to be $70 to $80 million and exploration costs to be $7 million for 2020, which positions the Company for expected improvements of 20% production growth and 10% lower costs in 2021.

Balance Sheet Position of Strength

The Companys available liquidity1 improved from $112 million at March 31, 2020 to $136.3 million at June 30, 2020, with cash and short-term investments of $86.2 million and a net debt balance of $163.7 million, and $50.1 million undrawn on the revolving credit facility. Capstones net debt/EBITDA improved during the quarter to 2.54x.

During the quarter amidst COVID-19, Capstone undertook a series of management actions to further strengthen liquidity and manage compliance with banking covenants including the following:

Resilient Growth on Track

Pinto Valley PV3 Optimization Phase 1 and Phase 2 Update

Phase 1 is focused on achieving reliable capacity at 57k tonnes per day (tpd) without major investments in new comminution equipment. In mid-July, Pinto Valley successfully completed over half of Phase 1 work by installing the first of two secondary crushers, three secondary screen decks, as well as the first of two new ball mill shells. The balance of work is on track for completion in Q4 2020 and Q1 2021 with the second secondary crusher and six tertiary screen decks scheduled to arrive later this year and the second ball mill shell scheduled for early 2021.

Phase 2 looks to identify additional opportunities to debottleneck throughput while optimizing flotation plant performance. The target is to secure daily rates of up to 70k tpd along with 85% or higher copper recovery. Some of the scope for Flotation Plant performance will be implemented across the second half of 2020. This includes flotation bank controls, flotation operator training and right-sized rougher concentrate pumps. Additional studies include enhancements to regrind capacity, concentrate dewatering and handling and at the tailings thickener area.

The PV3 Optimization Study is scheduled for release in Q4 2020.

Pinto Valley to Expand Copper Cathode Production

As an extension to the PV3 Optimization strategy, the Company announced on July 27, 2020, that Pinto Valley has successfully demonstrated positive economics from increased dump leach performance using a novel patented catalytic technology developed by Jetti Resources, LLC. In 2019, Jetti started deploying its technology at Pinto Valleys leach operation, and one year later, cathode production per area irrigated has doubled. A plan to increase cathode production is being implemented, with the goal of generating high margin from material that would have been waste at Pinto Valleys underutilized 25 million pound per year electrowinning plant, currently operating at only ~20% of capacity. The plan is to increase cathode production to 300-350 million pounds from residual and high-grade waste over the next two decades, creating 30 new jobs. An updated NI 43-101 Technical Report is expected in 2021.

Cozamin Expansion: 50% Increase to Copper and Silver Production in 2021+

The temporary COVID-19 related ramp down in Q2 2020 did not delay the development of Cozamins one-way ramp, which continues to be on schedule and on budget, expected to be completed in December 2020 and ready for 2021. Production in 2021 and beyond, is expected to increase to a new life of mine annual run rate of approximately 50-55 million pounds of copper and 1.5 million ounces of silver.

During the temporary six-week ramp down, minimal operations safely continued and mining was focused on copper-rich areas, rather than the San Rafael zinc zone, which proved to be a successful trial for our 2021+ production profile. The ore mined during this period is the same type of feed we expect to transition to in 2021. The mill averaged 3,800-3,900 tpd during the days it operated and realized copper recoveries of approximately 96% and silver recoveries of 83%.

Cozamin Expands Resource Estimate by 66%

In June 2020, the Company announced the results of an updated Mineral Resource estimate for Cozamin. The total Measured & Indicated (M&I) Mineral Resource Estimate tonnes increased by 66%, with an 83% increase to contained copper metal to 949 million pounds and a 71% increase to contained silver metal to 39 million ounces of silver. M&I Mineral Resource for Vein 20, the principal zone in the Mala Noche Footwall Zone (MNFWZ), increased by 118% to 13,086 kt at 2.35% Cu and 52 g/t Ag. The Company is currently updating Mineral Reserves and the results of an updated technical report is expected to be announced in Q3 2020.

Cozamin Resumes Exploration Drilling

Exploration drilling at Cozamin was suspended during the six-week ramp down period and has since resumed to execute on an exciting catalogue of exploration targets. Three drills are currently working to infill high grade areas of future reserve target within the new Mineral Resource and trim up open areas immediately on the periphery of the Mineral Resource, to step out up-dip from the high grade Mineral Resource into untested territory and to step out to the southeast across an inferred fault testing a transition from zinc to copper-silver at depth.

The exploration team is currently evaluating a step-out target list for 2021 beyond the MNFWZ system to test our large land package surrounding the current mine. An easy target in 2021 will be Vein 10, located in the hanging wall to the main ore zone, Vein 20. Every hole targeting Vein 20 must first cut Vein 10 in areas of Pb-Zn-Ag-Au mineralization.

Santo Domingo Fulfils Environmental Permit Early Works Requirements

During Q2 2020, Santo Domingo started a limited series of early works, including flora and fauna rescue and site entrance and access roads, in order to preserve the existing Environmental Impact Permit (RCA). These opening works are included in our 2020 budget and are prescribed in the environmental permit and serve to maintain the validity of the permit and are scheduled for completion in Q4 2020.

Activity and interest in participating in the project via the strategic sales process have increased in Q2 2020. In addition, we have received substantial interest in sharing or mutually developing off-site infrastructure that is delineated in the NI 43-101 Technical Report and valued at approximately $500 million. Ongoing discussions and negotiations are progressing with the objective of substantially reducing the project capital costs and operational risk, while maintaining the Life of Mine profitability.

OPERATIONAL AND FINANCIAL OVERVIEW

Operational Overview

Refer to Capstones Q2 2020 MD&A and Financial Statements for detailed operating results.

Q2 2020

Q2 2019

2020 YTD

2019 YTD

Copper production (million pounds)

Pinto Valley

30.2

29.0

57.0

61.7

Cozamin

8.3

8.7

17.0

17.4

Total copper production (million pounds)

38.5

37.7

74.0

79.1

Copper sales

Total copper sales (from continuing operations)2 (million pounds)

37.8

45.5

68.3

80.9

Realized copper price ($/lb.)

2.72

2.56

2.53

2.75

C1 cash costs1 ($/lb.) produced

Pinto Valley

2.12

2.00

2.25

1.89

Cozamin

0.98

1.06

0.97

0.88

Consolidated C1 cash costs1 ($/lb.) produced

1.87

1.78

1.96

1.67

2 Sales from continuing operations has been utilized due to the Minto mine being classified as a discontinued operation in the comparative period until the point of its sale on June 3, 2019.

Consolidated

When compared to the same period last year, Q2 2020 production of 38.5 million pounds was 2% higher primarily due to increased production at Pinto Valley as a result of the increased focus on maximizing mill throughput in 2020 (53,864 tpd vs. 49,121 tpd in H1 2019). This increase was slightly offset by a decrease in production at Cozamin due to a temporary reduction of operations to comply with a Mexican government decree in response to COVID-19.

2020 YTD total production is lower than the same period last year primarily due to a lower planned head grade (0.30% vs. 0.34%) at Pinto Valley.

In Q2 2019 and 2019 YTD, sales were higher than production due to a drawdown of inventory at Pinto Valley. Inventory levels were higher in early 2019 to benefit from improved expected sales terms.

Pinto Valley Mine

C1 cash costs1 of $2.12 per pound in Q2 2020 were higher than Q2 2019, primarily due to lower capitalized stripping ($0.7 million vs. $6.7 million in 2019), partially offset by higher copper production.

Property cost per tonne milled1 of $10.86 in Q2 2020 was $0.31/tonne lower (-3%) versus the average cost per tonne milled in 2019 and $0.77/tonne (-6%) lower than in 2018.

Cozamin Mine

C1 cash costs1 were lower in Q2 2020 vs. Q2 2019. Costs were lower from reduced operating development meters and utility cost savings realized during the ramp down of operations in Q2 2020. The mine safely ramped up to full production levels by June 1st after the Mexican government declared mining as an essential service.

Financial Overview

Follow this link:

Capstone Reports Strong Second Quarter 2020 Results Growth on Schedule - Business Wire

The Tesla of Biotech Stocks – Energy & Capital

Elon Musk

The super-rich super genius responsible for mainstreaming electric cars and sending reusable rockets into space has been getting a lot of flack lately.

And not from the folks whove been shitting all over him and his electric car company before it even went public.

Most of those folks just hated on Musk because the thought of an environmentally-friendlier vehicle that didnt rely on oil was somehow equated with being a socialist treehugger determined to send us into some kind of communist vortex of bread lines and gulags.

Im exaggerating for effect, obviously.

Although there is some truth to what I say.

And the legacy carmakers and Big Oil machine certainly stoked the coals of hostility toward electric cars because, well, the acceptance of such things would not be good for business.

But today, most of those folks have relented.

The major car companies are now making their own electric cars.

The major oil companies have other things to worry about these days. And at this point, theres no stopping the transition to electric vehicles anyway.

And the hard-line, ultra-stubborn shorts? Well, they still like to take to Twitter to attack Tesla, but theyve lost so much money betting against Musk at this point, their numbers are rapidly dwindling.

So whos hating on Musk these days?

Mostly the people who once built altars to him.

Elon Musk has been on quite a roll lately.

And many of those on the left who once idolized him are now having second thoughts after the CEO criticized pronoun labels, questioned the severity of COVID, and most recently suggested that another government stimulus package would be a bad idea.

Check it out

A lot of folks melted down after seeing that one.

Especially considering that Tesla got its own form of a stimulus package many years ago in the form of a taxpayer-backed loan.

That loan helped Tesla get to where it is today.

And while the company paid back that loan early, and with interest it was still made possible by taxpayers. Taxpayers, by the way, who wouldve been on the hook had he defaulted.

Of course, Big Oil and the legacy automobile industry have long enjoyed generous taxpayer-backed loans and subsidies too. So its not as if Tesla was given special treatment in the world of crony capitalism.

But a lot of folks are annoyed that Musk is denouncing government assistance now that he no longer needs government assistance.

Truth is, Tesla is one of the most successful automakers on the planet. And investors who got in early have certainly cleaned up too.

Take a look at this chart ..

I actually remember telling folks to buy Tesla right before it went public.

Oh, the hate mail I got from that one!

Of course, this was back when mass-produced electric cars were still little more than an idea.

But if you find the right idea and the right management team to turn that idea into reality, you can make a lot of money.

And really, isnt that why we invest?

I always thought it was odd that so many folks were opposed to buying Tesla stock when it first went public because they thought the idea of electric cars was absurd.

But is it really so absurd to believe that given todays modern technology, the transition away from internal combustion is inevitable?

I dont think so.

The internal combustion engine is an outdated technology that will eventually go the way of the horse and buggy.

I dont say this to be critical of the internal combustion engine, by the way.

Its that engine that helped bring us out of the dark ages.

Many of the modern conveniences we enjoy today are only possible because of internal combustion. But that doesnt change the fact that all technology changes and evolves.

Today, we dont use carrier pigeons. We use cellphones.

We no longer have to buy giant chunks of ice to keep our food cold in an icebox. We have modern refrigeration.

And when we get sick, our doctors dont perform blood-letting sessions. They prescribe pharmaceuticals.

Change happens.

And while change can be hard for some folks to accept, it shouldnt be hard to profit from.

Even if youre not happy about change, wouldnt you still be happy to profit from it?

This has long been a major part of my investment strategy: investing in industries and companies that are changing the world by taking us out of the past and fast-forwarding us into the future.

I did this with renewable energy back in 2006 and 2007 and helped investors make millions.

I did this with the legal cannabis industry, getting in early on some of todays biggest cannabis players and riding them to the top. Those plays actually delivered some of my biggest gains to date, including:

I started investing in the psychedelics space about two years ago, and thats already starting to pay off too.

One of my early picks thats now producing psychedelic mushrooms in Mexico has already delivered a gain in excess of 221%. And here are a few more psychedelics companies Im bullish on.

Im also investing in some of the most groundbreaking biotechs that are creating new medications and therapies that could actually eliminate age-related chronic diseases while extending our life spans by as much as 40 years.

Im completely serious.

I know this may sound like science fiction, but so did Tesla when I first told investors to buy it.

I can't tell you how many times I heard folks refer to Teslas as glorified electric golf carts.

They said the idea was absurd and Tesla would never make it.

Now, they're all over the nation's highways, racking up all kinds of automotive and safety awards every year.

And this ain't no golf cart!

So when I tell you theres a company you can invest in right now thats actively testing these new life-extension drugs with the FDA, dont think its so far-fetched.

Certainly Amazon CEO Jeff Bezos doesnt think so. Hes already invested millions in this company.

And full disclosure I've got some skin in this game too.

Id be a fool not to.

Because if this thing hits the way Im expecting it to hit, those Tesla gains will look like peanuts.

And if you dont believe me, just look at it for yourself.

To a new way of life and a new generation of wealth...

Jeff Siegel

@JeffSiegel on Twitter

Jeff is the founder and managing editor of Green Chip Stocks, a private investment community that capitalizes on opportunities in alternative energy, organic food markets, legal cannabis, and socially responsible investing. He has been a featured guest on Fox, CNBC, and Bloomberg Asia, and is the author of the best-selling book, Investing in Renewable Energy: Making Money on Green Chip Stocks. For more on Jeff, go to his editor's page.

Read more from the original source:

The Tesla of Biotech Stocks - Energy & Capital

Rethinking Manhattan Project Spies and the Cold War, MAD and the 75 years of no nuclear war that their efforts gifted us – ThisCantBeHappening!

The Aug. 9, 1945 nuclear bombing of Nagasaki

75 years ago before dawn on July 16, 1945, a cataclysmic explosion shook the New Mexico desert as scientists from the top-secret Manhattan Project tested their nightmarish creation: the first atom bomb, called the Gadget.

This birth of the Nuclear Age, was quickly followed a few weeks later, first on August 6 by the dropping of a U-235 atom bomb on Hiroshima, a non-military city of 225,000, and then, three days after that on Aug. 9, by the dropping of a somewhat more powerful Plutonium atom bomb on Nagasaki, another non-military city of 195,000. The resulting slaughter of some 200,000 mostly civilian Japanese men, women and children naturally leads to talk of the horrors of those weapons and to discussions about whether they should have been used on Japan instead of being demonstrated on an uninhabited target.

What goes unmentioned, however, as we mark each important anniversary of these horrific events the initial Trinity test in Alamogordo, the Little Boy bombing of Hiroshima and the Fat Man plutonium bombing of Nagasaki is that, incredibly, in a world where nine nations possess a total of nearly 14,000 nuclear weapons, not one has been used in war to kill human beings since the bombing of Nagasaki on August 9, 1945.

And thats not all. Over those same 75 years, despite seven and a half decades of intense hostility and rivalry, as well as some major proxy wars, between great powers like the US and USSR, and the US and China, no two superpower nations have gone to war against each other.

The reason for this phenomenal and almost incomprehensible absence of catastrophic conflict of the type so common throughout human history is the same in both cases: No country dares to risk the use a nuclear weapon because of the fear it could lead other nuclear nations use theirs, and no major power dares to go to war against another major power because it is obvious that any war between two such nations would very quickly go nuclear.

Things could have gone very differently, however, with the dawn of the nuclear age.

At the end of WWII, the US was the worlds unchallenged superpower. It had emerged from war with its industrial base undamaged while Europe, the Soviet Union, Japan and much of China and were all smoking ruins, their dead numbering in the tens of millions. The US also had a monopoly on a new super weapon the atom bomb a weapon capable of vaporizing a city. And the this country had demonstrated that it had no moral compunction about using its terrible new weapon of mass destruction.

Some important scientists involved in the creation of the bomb urged the sharing of its construction secrets with Americas ally in the war against the Axis powers, the Soviet Union. These scientists, many of them Nobel-winning physicists, said negotiations should begin immediately at that point to eliminate nuclear weapons for all time, just as germ and chemical weapons had already been banned (successfully as the history of WWII showed).

But military and civilian leaders in Washington balked at the idea of sharing the bombs secrets. In fact, after Bohrs visit, President Roosevelt reportedly had the FBI monitor Nobelist Nils Bohr, one of the Los Alamos scientists who directly pleaded with him to bring the Russians into the bomb project, and even considered barring him from leaving the US. The Truman administration considered deporting Leo Szilard, and after Robert Oppenheimer proposed to Truman the sharing of the bomb with the Russians, his top-secret security clearance was revoked.

Instead of sharing the bomb with the USSR, which, remember, was Americas ally in World War II, and then working for its being banned, the US began producing dozens and eventually hundreds of Nagasaki-sized atom bombs, moving quickly from hand-made devices to mass produced ones. The US also quickly started pursuing the development of a vastly more powerful bomb the thermonuclear Hydrogen bomb a weapon that theoretically has no limits to how great its destructive power could be. (A one-megaton bomb typical of some of the larger warheads in the US arsenal today is 30 times as powerful as the bomb dropped on Nagasaki.)

Why this obsession with creating a stockpile of atomic bombs big enough to destroy not just a country but the whole earth at such a time as the end of WWII? The war was over and American scientists and intelligence analysts were predicting that the war-ravaged Soviet Union would need years and perhaps a decade to produce its own bomb, yet the US was going full tilt building an explosive arsenal that quickly dwarfed all the explosives used in the last two world wars combined.

What was the purpose of building so many bombs? One hint comes from the fact that the US also, right after the war, began mass producing the B-29 Super Fortress planes like the Enola Gay that delivered the first atomic bomb to Hiroshima and de-mothballing and refurbishing hundreds that had been built and declared surplussed right at the wars end. A B-29 could only carry one plutonium or two uranium bombs for any significant distance. But the US was building several thousand of them in peacetime. Why?

The answer, according to a 1987 book, To Win a Nuclear War authored by nuclear physicists Michio Kaku and Daniel Axelrod, is that the US was planning to launch a devastating nuclear first strike blitz on the Soviet Union as soon as it could build and deliver the 300 nuclear bombs that Pentagon strategists believed would be needed to destroy the Soviet Union as an industrial society and its Red Army as well, eliminating any possibility of the USSR responding by sweeping over war-ravaged western Europe. And the B-29 was at the time the only plane it had which could deliver the bombs.

This genocidal nightmare envisioned by Truman and the Pentagons nuclear madmen never happened because the initial slow pace of constructing the bombs meant that the 300 weapons and the planes to deliver them would not be ready until early 1950. Meanwhile, Russias first bomb, a plutonium device that was a virtual carbon copy of the Fat Man bomb dropped on Nagasaki, was successfully exploded on August 29, 1949, in a test that caught the US by complete surprise. At that point the idea of a deadly first strike was dropped (or at least deferred indefinitely) by Truman and Pentagon strategists.

A new era of Mutual Assured Destruction (MAD) had arrived, and according to Kaku and Axelrod, just in time.

For that bit of good fortune, I suggest, we have to thank the spies who, for whatever their individual motives, successfully obtained and delivered the secrets of the atomic bomb and its construction to the scientists in the Soviet Union who were struggling, with limited success, to quickly come up with their own atomic bomb.

To most Americans, those spies, especially the US citizens among them like Julius Rosenberg and notably Ted Hall, the youngest scientist at the Manhattan Project, hired out of Harvard as a junior physics major at 18, were modern day Benedict Arnolds. The truth is quite different.

Hall, who was never caught, and who was not recruited to be a spy but volunteered plans for the plutonium bomb on his own initiative after searching for and finally locating a Soviet agent, and another spy, the young German Communist physicist, Klaus Fuchs, working independently of each other, both delivering critical plans for the US plutonium bomb to Moscow, clearly prevented the US from launching a nuclear holocaust.

By decisively helping the USSR develop and test its own bomb quickly by mid-1949, half a year before the US could attain a stockpile of 300 bombs, they forced the US to have to consider the unacceptable risk of retaliation. Had the Soviets taken longer to create their own atomic bomb, the US could have gone through with its criminal plans, which would have dwarfed Hitlers slaughter of the six million Jewish and Roma people. (Pentagon experts estimated that over 30-40 million Russians would be killed by a US nuclear blitz.)

Hall, in public statements made in the mid-1990s after de-encrypted Soviet spy codes became public and his name was identified in them, explained that he had acted to share the plans for the plutonium bomb because he felt that the US, coming out of WWII with a nuclear monopoly, would have been a danger to not just the Soviet Union, but to the entire world. (The Russian bomb exploded in August, 1949 was a virtual carbon copy of the Nagasaki plutonium bomb Hall had worked on in his two years at Los Alamos.)

Looking back to the US decision to use its first nuclear weapon not as a demonstration on an empty island or military base, but on two undefended civilian cities, and to catastrophic US carpet bombings using non-nuclear bombs, of North Korea and later Vietnam, Laos and Cambodia, its hard disagree with Halls thinking. His concern about US nuclear intentions is further borne out by how close the US came to using its nuclear bombs in crisis after crisis during the late 40s and early 50s against China and North Korea during the Korean War, in support of the French expeditionary force trapped at Dien Bien Phu, by JFK in the 1961 in the Berlin crisis, in the 1962 Cuban Missile Crisis. and later when US Marines were trapped by Vietnamese troops in Khe Sanh. Each time, it was fear of the Soviets responding with their own bomb that saved the day and largely kept American bombs on the ground (actually in the Khe San case in 1968 atom bombs were actually delivered close to the Indochina front, but President Johnson called a halt to the militarys plans).

The truth is, if the Soviets had not had their own bomb during any of the above listed crises, it is hard to imagine that the US, with a monopoly on the bomb, would not have used it to full advantage. If were honest, The MAD reality enabled by Russias Los Alamos spies proved to be a lifesaver for tens or perhaps millions of people around the world.

Americans may (and should!) decry the hundreds of billions of dollars (trillions in todays dollars) that have been poured into a massively wasteful arms race with the Soviet Union and later Russia and China money that could have done incalculable good if spent on schools, health care, environmental issues etc. need to consider what the alternative would have been to Cold War and MAD. With MAD (and considerable good luck) we have had no world wars, and no nuclear bombs dropped on human beings. Without it, with the US having a monopoly on the bomb for perhaps as long as a decade following WWII, this country would have nuked cities all over the world, almost certainly destroying the Soviet Union entirely, and the US would today be known today as the ultimate genocidal monster of history, rather than having Germany left holding that eternal badge of shame.

In reconsidering the work of Soviet atomic spies, Americans also need to know the truth about the goal of the Manhattan Project. While the push to develop the bomb began with a letter from Albert Einstein to Roosevelt warning that the Germans might develop such a weapon, by the time the program got underway, it was clear that the real target was Americas Ally in the fight against the Nazis: The USSR.

Of course we must work to ban nuclear weapons and war. Such weapons are incomparably evil and if the world agrees that germ warfare and poison gas weapons should not exist, certainly nuclear weapons a million times worse should not! But we should nonetheless, as we look back at the grim 75th anniversary of those three first nuclear bombs exploded by the US, admit a debt of gratitude to those spies at Los Alamos who kept the US from committing an atrocity that humanity would have never forgiven, and for giving us this amazing three-quarters of a century of no nuclear or world war.

Dave Lindorff is a 2019 winner of an Izzy Award for Outstanding Independent Journalism from the Park Center for Independent Media. He is a founder of the collectively owned journalism site ThisCantBeHappening.net

Visit link:

Rethinking Manhattan Project Spies and the Cold War, MAD and the 75 years of no nuclear war that their efforts gifted us - ThisCantBeHappening!

OPINION | Who are the rights enshrined in the Constitution for? – News24

We may have one of the great constitutions in the world, but it means nothing if social justice still has to be attained, writes Somila Dondashe.

The preamble of the Constitution asserts that the people of South Africa recognises the injustices of the past and are therefore committed to the attainment of social justice forallwho live in it.

For all.

The South African Constitution has been hailed as a progressive document. In a society that threatens to be quite conservative, our Constitution stands valiantly. Bold in its inclusiveness, it is coloured in liberal ideas and cloaked in transformation.

Praise for the Constitution extends beyond our borders. Harvard scholar, Cass Sustein, called it the most admirable Constitution in the history of the world, and a US Supreme Court Justice hailed it as a "great piece of work that embraces basic human rights".

The presumption would then be that South Africans are reaping the social justice promised by this supreme law, but unfortunately for the majority of black people - this praised progression is a myth. Despite all the rights that stand attractive on paper, a simple look into the world's most unequal country informs even the biggest optimist that this document, alone, is simply unable to translate into the attainment of social justice.

Fetishisation of rights

The deification of the Constitution has led to what legal scholars such as Tshepo Madlingozi call a fetishisation of rights.

This glorification makes state actors act oblivious to the fact that the struggles that confront most black people today are still the same ones that they faced pre-1994. If one were to put aside the promises that exist on paper and look only at lived realities - it would be clear that black people still carry the burden of normalised social injustices.Umhlaba usabolile.

The prevalence of illegal evictions is one of these normalised social injustices. On the 1 July 2020, a video of a naked Bulelani Qolani being violently evicted from his home circulated the internet. The video shows the City of Cape Town's Law Enforcement dragging the 28-year-old man, who is naked and in full public view.

The City of Cape Town continues to conduct these illegal evictions despite the Disaster Management Act's prohibition of evictions during lockdown.

Apartheid's spatial planning and racist land and property laws have left many black people displaced and dispossessed. These laws entrenched socio-economic inequality through the common law. Legislation favoured property rights, thus private landowners could vindicate these rights through eviction processes without consideration of the occupiers' circumstances. Spatial planning meant that majority black people were deprived from formal access to land and housing and were relegated to the homelands.

Because of a host of legislation such as theNatives Land Act 27 of1913,Group Areas Act 41 of 1950and thePrevention of Illegal Squatting Act52of 1951; the majority of black people still find themselves on the periphery of human rights.

The residue from racialised land and property laws has left an unshakeable stench which has resulted in the right to housing being one of the most litigated rights. Today most black people still find themselves in undesirable living conditions, waiting for the longstanding promise of service delivery.

Disparities

The disparities between people's lived realities and the Constitution's promise of human rights are inescapable.

Section 26(1) provides that everyone has a right to have access to adequate housing and that the State must take reasonable legislative and other measures within its available resources to achieve the progressive realisation of the right.

This momentous right is a preventative measure against the system of laws that sought to ostracise black people from their own country.

Section 26(2) indicates that the State must take reasonable legislative and other measures within its available resources to progressively realise this right.

All arbitrary evictions are prohibited by section 26(3) and no one may be evicted or have their home demolished without a court order made after considering all the relevant circumstances.The Prevention of Illegal Eviction from and Unlawful Occupation of Land Act(PIE) was enacted to give effect to section 26(3). PIE protects against the eviction of unlawful occupiers living on both privately and publicly owned land.

Despite these rights and an array of case law in support, poverty continues to be criminalised in South Africa as communities and individuals are frequently and violently evicted from places they call home.

The right to housing is an all-encompassing right.

As perGovernment of the Republic of South Africa v Grootboom, housing is about more than bricks and mortar. The right is informed and informs other rights such as dignity, privacy, safety and security and water. More than half of South Africa's population lives in poverty and it is probable that the housing crisis is at the heart of this destitution.

The rights exist and the legal jurisprudence is rich, but it often fails to translate into people's lived experiences.

In an article by Tshepo Madlingozi titledSocial Justice in a Time of Neo-Apartheid Constitutionalism: Critiquing the Anti-Black Economy of Recognition, Incorporation and Distribution,he eloquently states that poor black people fall on the other side of the promise of a new South Africa. Informed by a report by Abahlali Basemjondolo, Madlingozi refers to South Africans who have been excluded from the miracle of the transition as "The Forgotten". The Forgotten are excluded from reaping the benefits of basic human rights despite the legal jurisprudence which continues to develop in their name.

Grootboomjudgment

My first introduction to the Constitution and Constitutional law was in second year in my Public Policy and Administration class when a student was explaining the separation of powers doctrine and used theGrootboomjudgment as an example of a case where the Court reminds the government of its obligation to provide adequate housing, as per section 26 of the Constitution.

The case concerns Irene Grootboom who brought the application on behalf of 510 children and 390 adults who were rendered homeless when they were evicted from their informal homes situated on private land. The application was for an order which required government to provide the respondents with adequate basic shelter or housing until they obtained permanent accommodation.

True to the circuitous nature of the legal system; Grootboom died eight years after the judgment, still waiting for reasonable accommodation from the State. Today the judgment remains a powerful precedent for communities under threat of eviction as it implores government to be consistent with its constitutional obligations to provide adequate housing. However, the case's namesake died without attaining that socio-economic right. The case is an example of how the legal jurisprudence is enriched in the name of The Forgotten - who unfortunately never see beyond their deplorable living conditions.

The developing legal jurisprudence often conceals the fact that black South Africans are still confronted with the same issues which trammelled them during the merciless years of apartheid. Black people still bear the brunt of normalised social injustices and the promise of the Constitution is frequently offered as a panacea. It has been 26 years since apartheid property and land laws were abolished but the stain of displacement still lingers. Black people still exist on the periphery of belonging.

A day after Qolani's eviction video circulated, he shared the following words with a journalist regarding the matter:basihlisile isidima sam.

The have disregarded my dignity. Lowered it.

These fervent words lament the history of dispossession suffered by black people at the hands of a merciless State. It all comes down to the fight for dignity and

a fight for the attainment of social justice forallwho live in it.

- Somila is a postgraduate LLB student who has a blog where she writes on socio-economic issues.

*Want to respond to the columnist? Send your letter or article to opinions@news24.com with your name, profile picture, contact details and location. We encourage a diversity of voices and views in our readers' submissions and reserve the right not to publish any and all submissions received.

Disclaimer:News24 encourages freedom of speech and the expression of diverse views. The views of columnists published on News24 are therefore their own and do not necessarily represent the views of News24.

More:

OPINION | Who are the rights enshrined in the Constitution for? - News24

Seth Rogen: ‘I was fed a huge amount of lies about Israel’ – The Guardian

Seth Rogen has said he was fed a huge amount of lies about Israel as a young Jewish person, stoking controversy around the countrys sometimes fraught relationship with many North American Jews.

The Canadian-US actor, who attended Jewish camp and whose parents met on a kibbutz in Israel, said the fact that the Jewish state was created on land where Palestinians were living had always been omitted.

[As] a Jewish person I was fed a huge amount of lies about Israel my entire life, Rogen told the comedian and actor Marc Maron in an episode of Marons WTF podcast.

They never tell you that, Oh, by the way, there were people there. They make it seem like it was just like sitting there, like the fucking doors open.

More than 700,000 Palestinians were driven out of their homes or fled fighting in the 1948 war that led to Israels creation. Today, those families and their descendants make up around 5.6 million refugees.

Rogen and Maron, who is also Jewish, were speaking to promote Rogens new comedy, An American Pickle, which tells the story of a Jewish immigrant from the 1920s who falls into a vat of brine and wakes up in modern-day Brooklyn.

The pair talked and joked at length about Israel and also spoke about antisemitism, which Rogen said remains pervasive and prevalent.

I remember my dad frankly telling me, People hate Jews. Just be aware of that. They just do. And its honestly something that I am so glad was instilled in me from a young age. Because if it wasnt, I would constantly be shocked at how much motherfuckers hate Jews.

Zionists have pointed to the Holocaust and centuries of bloody antisemitism as evidence that Jews will never be safe without a state. Rogen, however, argued, you dont keep something youre trying to preserve all in one place.

Asked if he would ever go to live in Israel, Rogen said no. Maron replied: Im the same way, and were gonna piss off a bunch of Jews.

Lahav Harkov, a senior contributing editor to the Jerusalem Post newspaper, criticised Rogens comments on Twitter, saying they were made from a position of really, really great privilege and ignorance - if he cant understand why Israel makes sense to millions of Jews around the world.

Among Zionists, there is anxiety that North American Jews, who could possibly outnumber Israeli Jews, are becoming less supportive of the Jewish state, even as surveys often show the opposite.

The debate has frequently reignited after high-profile figures, often Jewish, express views that are highly critical of Israel.

Most recently, Peter Beinart, a prominent Jewish American political commentator, was both derided and lauded for commentaries in which he questioned whether he could remain both a liberal and also support the Jewish state while millions of Palestinians continued to be denied basic rights.

Follow this link:

Seth Rogen: 'I was fed a huge amount of lies about Israel' - The Guardian

Japan looks forward to developing new systems to head off missile threats in enemy territory – Economic Times

Tokyo [Japan]: As North Korea and China develop new weapons that are harder to intercept through traditional methods, Japan is now looking forward developing new systems to head off missile threats in enemy territory.

Nikkei Asian Review reported that the draft recommendation approved by a team in the ruling Liberal Democratic Party (LDP) does not specifically mention striking enemy bases -- a topic that has been debated since June, when plans to deploy the Aegis Ashore land-based missile shield were suspended -- but implicitly encourages Japan to develop such capabilities.

The proposal stressed the need for "integrated air and missile defense" capabilities to protect Japan as a whole at the same time as the current Aegis-equipped ships are unable to do so.

Nikkei Asian Review reported that the lawmakers urge continuing the "sword and shield" dynamic of the US-Japan alliance while creating a stronger overall deterrent against threats. They also called to improve Japan's intelligence, surveillance and reconnaissance capabilities.

The proposal will reportedly be submitted this month to Prime Minister Shinzo Abe's government, thus, accelerating the National Security Council talks on several issues, including alternatives to Aegis Ashore and also whether to acquire enemy base strike capabilities. The officials will set a policy direction by September.

While adhering to its war-renouncing constitution, Japan seems to be now considering strikes on enemy bases in response to an imminent threat if no other options are available.

Link:

Japan looks forward to developing new systems to head off missile threats in enemy territory - Economic Times

Tanzania’s Benjamin Mkapa: the peace maker, true East African and Pan-Africanist – The Conversation CA

The former Tanzanian president Benjamin William Mkapa, who died on July 24, was the countrys third president. He was in office from 1995 to 2005.

Born in 1938 in Masasi south-eastern Tanzania, Mkapa was a staunch supporter of the Tanzania African National Union, which won independence from Britain in 1961 under Mwalimu Julius Nyerere. His star rose steadily under Nyereres long reign from 1961 to 1985 as leader of the renamed party, Chama Cha Mapinduzi.

In addition to being editor of the party newspaper and establishing the national news agency Shihata, he served as the Minister of Foreign Affairs, Information and Culture and Science, Technology and Education.

Mkapa was thus an experienced communicator, politician and administrator when he entered the presidency.

Mkapas presidency is particularly significant since it represents the first phase of Tanzanian multi-party democracy. It was Nyerere who in 1991 opened debate on a multi-party democratic system for Tanzania. He saw it coming in the wake of developments in neighbouring Kenya, where multi-party democracy was promoted at an early stage by church leaders, civil society and the population at large.

His reported response in Kiswahili loosely translates to,

When you see your neighbour being shaved, youre best advised to wetyour beard otherwise you will have a rough shave.

Nyerere was a firm supporter of Mkapa and was instrumental in Mkapas party nomination to stand for the first multi-party election in 1995.

Mkapas government initially faced a gloomy economic position. This was partly based on global economic stagnation. It was also partly due to the previous governments lack of economic and institutional discipline. His predecessor Ali Hassan Mwinyi (1985-1995) had lost the trust of the international financial institutions which provided substantial assistance and loans.

The first main challenge for Mkapa was to enhance the discipline in state finances and stabilise the economy. The second was restoring confidence among donors by pursuing western-backed neo-liberal market policies. Having agreed to implement proposals endorsed by donors, Mkapa quickly won international trust.

The resumption of external development assistance was not enough to immediately spur the economy. During the 1990s the average annual real per capita GDP shrank slightly.

But during his second term it grew markedly. The main drivers included gold and gemstones, tourism and construction.

Mkapa also oversaw a period in which poverty levels declined, however slightly. Hunger statistics from 2005 showed that rural people were worse off than those of the urban population. His attention to rural areas, so important for Nyerere, grew only towards the end of his presidency.

However, instead of strengthening village and women land rights which the land laws of 1999 tried to do, he went for a top-down formalisation of individual land rights championed by the Peruvian economist deSoto.

Mkapa came to see property and business formalisation as a major priority of his government well aligned to international financiers who supported his government handsomely.

These transitions were unable, for the time being, to challenge village and smallholder production and land management systems. But they did create an opening for future administrations to attract foreign investors pushing large scale mechanised agriculture which demand land (mostly village) but provide limited employment.

Coupled with a decline in manufacturing, a rapidly growing rural population was left with limited exit options.

Thus, at the end of Mkapas term the challenge of a structural transformation of the economy that could redistribute growth and create sustainable production systems that could absorb labour and importantly rural youth, remained unresolved.

At an early stage, Mkapa sought to enhance the legitimacy of his government both domestically and externally by fighting corruption. His anti-corruption strategy laid out by the Warioba Report started in 1996.

But his crusade didnt result in significant change. Petty corruption linked to foreign business and investment appeared to decline. But graft linked to household service delivery such as health and water did not. In fact, the evidence is that corruption showed an increase during his second presidential term and beyond.

One area where Mkapas term saw important institutional, policy and legal development was the forestry sector. This is saw 8 000 registered villages and community groups managing 70-80 % of the national land on behalf of the state.Policies such as this opened a space for rural and village involvement.

Thus people could use existing institutions from below for the purpose of managing community and joint forest management for villagers own benefits. In a significant way, this was Mkapa trying to instil a democratic and participatory spirit in Tanzania.

After his presidency Mkapa was much sought after for his spirit of cooperation, participation and peace. He became an important mediator in conflicts across Africa and including the Kenyan post-election conflict in 2007 and the 2011 referendum in South-Sudan.

The graduate of Makerere and Columbia is rightly hailed by Kenyan and others as a peace maker and true East African and Pan Africanist.

For his people in south eastern and coastal Tanzania he will most certainly be remembered as the president who made real their desire for better transport, communication and cooperation in their part of the country. In 2003 the construction of the long awaited bridge the Mkapa Bridge - across the Rufiji river was finalised.

For Tanzanians maybe as a whole he will also be remembered as a president who continued and secured the path of peace and cooperation between and for his peoples. He was 81.

Kjell Havnevik and Aida Isinika jointly edited Tanzania in transition - from Nyerere to Mkapa. Published in 2010 by the Nordic Africa Institute, Uppsala and Mkuki na Nyota, Dar es Salaam.

Read the original post:

Tanzania's Benjamin Mkapa: the peace maker, true East African and Pan-Africanist - The Conversation CA

Missoula and Western Montana speaks up: Letters to the editor for the week of Jul. 31, 2020 – The Missoulian

As a state legislator, I prioritize economic opportunity for all Montanans and their families.

Key to this goal is equal access to public education and healthcare.

Recognizing that Montanans are assets who will build their own capacity and create upward mobility for the next generation, we must support policies that allow for homeownership, fair taxation, and a college education.

World War II Veterans were welcomed home with the G.I. bill supporting their education and home ownership. Now with COVID-19, there has never been a more important time to support policies that build the middle class and not lose sight of the American dream for all people.

We will get through the crisis of COVID-19 by listening to the leaders who are innovative, forward thinking and tapped into the latest research and science. Right now, scientists around the world are developing more than 155 COVID vaccines, and 23 are in human trials. Meanwhile, wholesale distributors and pharmacies are working around the clock to ensure they can reach every part of our state, building a web of providers able to span the nation, coast-to-coast.

Mike Cooney and Steve Bullock have had their shoulders to the plow responding to COVID-19 to protect the health and lives of Montanans. They never stop working. They put people before politics.

We need strong, experienced leaders like Steve Bullock and Mike Cooney looking out for us at this critical time and into the future. Please vote for Mike Cooney for Governor and Steve Bullock for U.S. Senator.

Representative Mary Caferro HD 81,

Follow this link:

Missoula and Western Montana speaks up: Letters to the editor for the week of Jul. 31, 2020 - The Missoulian