Caribbean Map / Map of the Caribbean – Maps and …

The Caribbean, long referred to as the West Indies, includes more than 7,000 islands; of those, 13 are independent island countries (shown in red on the map), and some are dependencies or overseas territories of other nations.

In addition, that large number includes islets (very small rocky islands); cay's (small, low islands composed largely of coral or sand) and a few inhabited reefs: See Belize.

In geographical terms the Caribbean area includes the Caribbean Sea and all of the islands located to the southeast of the Gulf of Mexico, east of Central America and Mexico, and to the north of South America. Some of its counted cay's, islands, islets and inhabited reefs front the handful of countries that border the region.

The Bahamas and Turks and Caicos are not considered a part of the Caribbean, however, we show them here because of their cultural, geographical and political associations with the Greater Antilles and other Caribbean Islands.

At the beginning of the 15th century the population of the Caribbean was estimated to be nearly 900,000 indigenous people immediately before European contact.

Then in 1492, Christopher Columbus, the Italian explorer began his exploration of the Caribbean, becoming the first European to venture into the area.

After reportedly landing in the eastern Bahamas, Columbus named these islands the Indies, because he thought he had finally reached Asia (and the East Indies).

Numerous explorers followed in his path, then tens of thousands of settlers arrived from the Americas, China, European countries and India. Included in that mix were religious outcasts and a small army of pirates.

Across the Caribbean, slaves from Africa were imported in great numbers to work the sugar and tobacco plantations.

By then the indigenous populations of the islands were in severe decline as exposure to disease and brutal genocide wiped out much of their number.

Great military powers continually fought for control of the islands, and finally, a blended mix of African and European cultures and languages transformed this large group of islands and its peoples into one of the premier tourist destinations on the planet.

Long called the West Indies, the overall area is now commonly referred to as the Caribbean, a name that became popular after World War II.

Over the last few decades legions of travelers have journeyed to the Caribbean to enjoy the amenities. They frequently arrive in cruise ships that sail in and out, from ports in Florida and Puerto Rico.

Overall the Caribbean is a magical place of palm trees, white sand beaches, turquoise waters and sunshine, all blessed with a climate that consistently offers a much-needed break for those stuck in the cold weather doldrums of the north.

If you haven't been, you should, and if you've been here more than once, you will come again, as these islands, these beach-ringed, jungle-covered rocks are home to thousands of historical surprises and activities galore.

So come wiggle you toes in the sand, and eat and sleep under the stars in the Caribbean. You won't be disappointed.

See the original post:

Caribbean Map / Map of the Caribbean - Maps and ...

Brandon King bats for Black Lives Matter, to lend support Caribbean communities affected by pandemic – sportsmax.tv

Despite a rich history in football, the Caribbean has not had many moments to savour on the World stage, making them, interestingly, all the more special.

Cuba provided the first of the moments, making the quarterfinals of the FIFA World Cup all the way back in 1938.

Cuba had always been a little special island, long proving itself self-sufficient and able to compete with the rest of the world, despite any political or financial issues that could serve to slow its development.

That self-sufficiency and ability to achieve despite significant odds meant that Cubas entrance to the FIFA World Cup was not a emblematic moment and the rest of the Caribbean felt no closer to the possibility of making it on the world stage.

Thirty-six years later, Haiti provided the second moment, getting to the FIFA World Cup in 1974.

That feat, for a country, which had long-standing political issues and an overbearing poverty problem, was immense.

Now the rest of the Caribbean began to take note. Maybe now other islands could dare to dream.

While Haitis football has ebbed and flowed and they have not quite gotten back to those heady heights, the moment was important.

All of a sudden, the possibilities for Caribbean football were immense.

But it took another 20 years before the Reggae Boyz were on a similar journey. For the first time, CONCACAF had more than the obligatory two spots that would go to Mexico and the United States.

Now there was hope for someone else to join the fray. Still there were obstacles.

In 1997, the Reggae Boyz were up against it. In the final round they were winless, until a series of three games, 1-0 wins over each of El Salvador, Canada, and Costa Rica.

After finishing winless in the first four games of the final qualifying round, Jamaica recorded three 10 wins over El Salvador, Canada, and Costa Rica, giving them a chance at history.

Jamaica were on the cusp of becoming the first English-speaking team from the Caribbean to make it to the World Cup.

But standing in their way was the mighty Mexico. Jamaica needed to avoid losing to a team they had lost to 6-0 earlier in those qualifiers. There was hope but it was slim.

History has a funny way of staying the same and no matter how many times this story gets told, the 0-0 draw the Reggae Boyz achieved against the attacking juggernauts that were Mexico still seems unlikely.

An entire nation celebrated, but so did the rest of the Caribbean. After all, there were other countries in the region that had proven worthy adversaries for the Reggae Boyz and that meant somebody else could make it too.

In 2006, somebody else did.

Trinidad and Tobago, still with two of its legends, Dwight Yorke and Russell Latapy, in tow would take an ageing team, and prove the Caribbean were now becoming a force to be reckoned with.

Until 2018 when Iceland made their World Cup bow, T&T were the smallest nation to ever play in the tournament.

But it wasnt easy either, and Trinidad and Tobago, after finishing fourth in the final round had to contend with the unknown quantity that was Bahrain.

The tiny twin-island republic had to play against a team, which had financial resources that would dwarf it.

Things looked even more bleak for T&T after the first leg of the home-and-away tie on November 12, 2005, played at the Hasely Crawford Stadium, ended 1-1.

This meant, T&T had to go away to win against a team they couldnt get the better of at home.

Again, the Caribbean beat the odds and a 1-0 win at the Bahrain National Stadium on the 16th of November 2005 again changed the course of history for the Caribbean side and the region around it.

The Caribbean has, since those moments made great leaps in the transport of its players all over the world, even if those marginal improvements have yet to bare fruit in terms of consistent Caribbean representation at the ICC World Cup.

But the improvements continue as can be seen with the large number of locally grown players, now turning out for the national teams of countries all over the region.

Today there is more and more competition from the rest of the Caribbean and neither T&T nor Jamaica have a free run of the region anymore.

It is interesting that the success of the three over the last 46 years, is what has created a competitive Caribbean and destroyed the spectre of their unquestioned dominance.

Visit link:

Brandon King bats for Black Lives Matter, to lend support Caribbean communities affected by pandemic - sportsmax.tv

Isaias Live Updates: Tornadoes Are a Threat as Storm Charges North – The New York Times

Isaias is bringing the threat of tornadoes as it barrels north.

Isaias pounded a large swath of the Atlantic Coast on Tuesday, unleashing heavy rains and winds as fast as 70 miles per hour as it swept through the Carolinas and into the Northeast.

Isaias, which made landfall in North Carolina as a Category 1 hurricane and quickly weakened to a tropical storm, left a trail of floods, fires and hundreds of thousands of people without electricity. Some of the storms most devastating effects, including the deaths of at least two people, were wrought by a series of tornadoes that it spawned across its path.

New York and New England were on alert and bracing for the worst of the storm to hit later on Tuesday, with tropical storm warnings reaching as far up the Atlantic Coast as Marthas Vineyard in Massachusetts.

Gov. Philip D. Murphy of New Jersey declared a state of emergency for the entire state, and closed government offices. Gov. Andrew M. Cuomo of New York said the front end of the storm had already arrived in parts of the state.

I urge New Yorkers to look out for local weather alerts, exercise caution and avoid unnecessary travel, especially if you are in the storms direct path, he said on Twitter.

At 2 p.m. Eastern, the center of Isaias, which is written as Isaas in Spanish and pronounced ees-ah-EE-ahs, was about 65 miles west of New York City.

Officials said that the storms rapid pace, moving nearly 35 m.p.h., stood to help limit river flooding and allowed the authorities to mobilize swiftly in assessing the toll.

All in all, this storm got in, got out pretty quickly, Gov. Roy Cooper of North Carolina said in an interview on Good Morning America on Tuesday. Because of that, he added, the damage was not as great as it could have been.

Tornadoes had landed in parts of northeastern North Carolina, southeastern Virginia and southern New Jersey. Another likely touched down near Dover, Del. Photos and videos posted to social media showed trees snapped and pieces of buildings blown on top of vehicles. Tornado threats would continue north along the coast and into New England, and the New York City region was under a tornado watch until 4 p.m.

Isaias could cause flash flooding around much of the Mid-Atlantic region, the center said, with potentially life-threatening urban flooding possible in Washington, Baltimore and other cities along and just west of I-95. The storm had delivered only a glancing blow to Florida as it skirted the coast there, with officials expressing relief that it failed to cause the level of damage they had feared. Georgia was largely spared as well.

The authorities in Bertie County, N.C., were assessing the devastation caused by a tornado that ripped through a neighborhood overnight, killing at least two people.

Television footage showed a rural patch of mobile homes that had been eviscerated, leaving streaks of debris. One home had been reduced to splintered wood and metal, piled with kitchen appliances, furniture and laundry.

The Bertie County sheriff, John Holley, told reporters on Tuesday that the tornado touched down in the early morning hours on Tuesday, shredding the cluster of homes so intensely that only two still stood.

The rest of them is pretty much gone, he said in an interview with WVEC-TV, a television station based in Hampton, Va., adding that he had regularly passed the community during 38 years with the Sheriffs Department and it was now unrecognizable. It dont look real, he said. Its sad and its hard.

The authorities said that at least 12 people had been hospitalized. Mr. Holley said that his deputies were looking for at least three people who were unaccounted for.

Our hearts are heavy as we continue to survey damage and get the big picture about what transpired and just how many were impacted, said Ron Wesson, the chairman of the Bertie County Board of Commissioners.

The authorities made it to the community in the northeast corner of the state before the storm had even passed, county officials said, with emergency workers contending with the wind and rain in the dark of night as they pulled people from their homes.

We want to emphasize that this is not a recovery mission, and rescues are still taking place, Mitch Cooper, the emergency management director for Bertie County, said on Tuesday.

Officials were also trying to take stock of the aftermath across the state. Weve had a number of tornadoes, Governor Cooper, a Democrat, said on Good Morning America. Im not sure of the count yet.

More than two million utility customers along the storms path in North Carolina, Virginia, Maryland, Delaware, New Jersey, Pennsylvania and New York were without power, according to Poweroutage.us, a website that tracks and aggregates reports from utilities.

As of 1:45 p.m. Eastern time, more than one million customers were without power in New Jersey, a number significantly higher than in any other state. In Eastern North Carolina and Virginia, 448,066 utility customers were without power, and in Pennsylvania more than 356,000 customers were affected.

Storms can disrupt power in a number of ways. Strong wind gusts can sometimes snap cables and poles directly, though utilities try to build and maintain their infrastructure to be wind-resistant. Often the culprit is a broken tree limb or debris from a building that strikes a power line, or a skidding vehicle hitting a pole. Lightning strikes can damage equipment, and so can wind-driven rain or flash floodwaters.

Downed power lines can remain dangerous even when the lights nearby seem to be out, and wet conditions add to the danger. Utility companies like Dominion Energy warn the public to stay at least 30 feet away, and not to attempt to move them.

Loss of off-site power caused one reactor at the Brunswick nuclear power plant in Southport, N.C., to automatically shut down overnight, according to a Nuclear Regulatory Commission notice. The plants other reactor was unaffected. The report said safety systems worked as intended and the impact of the shutdown was minimal.

The projected path of the storm has shifted slightly westward on Tuesday, giving New York City and the surrounding areas a slight reprieve from the heaviest expected rainfall.

But the shift has also increased the chance of severe weather in the region, including the possibility of weak, brief tornadoes, said Matthew Wunsch, a meteorologist with the National Weather Service. A tornado watch is in effect until 4 p.m. for New York City, Long Island, much of New Jersey and parts of Connecticut.

Even with the worst rain falling to the west, the New York City area could still see some heavy bands of rainfall pass through in the morning and afternoon, Mr. Wunsch said. Winds will pick up in the afternoon, with sustained speeds of 35 to 45 m.p.h. and gusts over 60 m.p.h., he said, and coastal flooding is expected in the evening and through tomorrow.

Mr. Wunsch said the fast-moving storm was likely to inflict far less damage overall than Hurricane Sandy did in October 2012. Sandy was such a large-scale event, and it happened over such a long period of time, he said. It was just a different beast altogether.

Even so, officials in New York City were bracing for the bad weather and urging residents to be vigilant for wind, rain and power outages. Beaches were closed on Tuesday.

Gov. Phillip D. Murphy of New Jersey declared a state of emergency and asked people to stay off the roads and to secure loose furniture and other items that could be blown around by the high winds. He said hundreds of thousands of utility customers could lose power in the state, depending on the severity of the wind gusts and the specific track of the storm.

The southern end of the state was already being hit Tuesday morning, with a tornado reported in Strathmere in Cape May County.

Gov. Andrew M. Cuomo of New York said in a statement that the state had rescue teams standing by with boats and high-water vehicles in areas that could be hardest hit by the storm. The state had also sent out water pumps, chain saws, sandbags and bottled water, he said, noting that up to six inches of rain could fall in some areas.

Several homes caught fire, cars were swept away in floodwater, and outdoor stairways were ripped off houses as Hurricane Isaias made landfall in Ocean Isle Beach, N.C., on Monday night.

Morgan Strenk watched from her vacation home as rising water flooded the streets outside and filled her basement with three feet of water.

We didnt think it was going to get to this level, she said.

And while the water crept higher, a more urgent threat emerged: Stepping onto her porch, Ms. Strenk smelled smoke, and saw a house across the street going up in flames. The fire then spread to a neighboring house.

When a family came out of another nearby house, Ms. Strenk said she signaled with her flashlight to invite them to come shelter with her on the opposite side of the street.

One of the houses burned completely to the ground, Ms. Strenk said. Only a burned front porch and stairway remains of the other. Photos she took show a burned structure with only the stilts remaining, and a car that was swept up by the flood and dropped nose-down in a pool of water.

The streets are just covered with debris, a lot of houses right on the shoreline lost their stairs, she said on Tuesday. Theres random pieces of furniture all over the place.

In all, fire crews had to put out at least five structure fires, said Tony Casey, a spokesman for Horry County Fire Rescue, which had come from South Carolina to help the local firefighters.

Twin emergencies on two coasts this week Hurricane Isaias and the Apple Fire, which has burned 27,000 acres in Southern California offer a preview of life in a warming world and the steady danger of overlapping disasters.

And in both places, as well as everywhere between, a pandemic that keeps worsening.

Experts say that the pair of hazards bracketing the country this week offers a preview of life under climate change: a relentless grind of overlapping disasters, major or minor.

The coronavirus pandemic has further exposed flaws in the nations defenses, including weak construction standards in vulnerable areas, underfunded government agencies, and racial and income disparities that put some communities at greater risk. Experts argue that the country must fundamentally rethink how it prepares for similar disasters as the effects of global warming accelerate.

State and local governments already stretched with Covid responses must now stretch even further, said Lisa Anne Hamilton, adaptation program director at the Georgetown Climate Center in Washington. Better planning and preparation are crucial, she added, as the frequency and intensity of disasters increase.

In recent weeks as the coronavirus has been resurgent in many parts of the country, experts and politicians alike have implored people to protect themselves and others by always wearing a face mask in public.

Does that apply when you have to be out in the gusting wind and driving rain of a tropical storm? Our health columnist Tara Parker-Pope says, probably not: Face masks arent as effective when they are wet.

For one thing, its much harder to breathe through a wet mask than a dry one, Ms. Parker-Pope notes. And on top of that, a moist or wet mask doesnt filter as well as a dry mask. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, which recommends mask-wearing in general, says they should not be worn when doing things that may get the mask wet.

It doesnt take a tropical storm to drench a mask, of course. They can become soaked with condensation from your breath or sweat from your face, and some people think of wetting them deliberately to cool off in hot weather. But the harm done is the same, wherever the moisture comes from.

A paper surgical mask that gets soaked should probably be discarded, Ms. Parker-Pope advises, but a cloth mask can be washed, dried and re-used.

When rain is coming down in buckets, social distancing is not likely to be a problem, and any viral particles exhaled by an infected person probably would be quickly diluted by gusting wind and rain. So there is little need to wear a mask out in a rainstorm, Ms. Parker-Pope notes: In fact, you should take it off and keep it dry, so if you need to duck into a store to wait out the storm, you have a dry mask to wear indoors.

Reporting was contributed by Johnny Diaz, Christopher Flavelle, Henry Fountain, Patrick J. Lyons, Tara Parker-Pope, Rick Rojas, Daniel Victor, Will Wright, Alan Yuhas and Mihir Zaveri

See more here:

Isaias Live Updates: Tornadoes Are a Threat as Storm Charges North - The New York Times

What’s Coming to PBS This Fall and Winter – WTTW News

2020 may be an unprecedented year, but one constant is PBS programming, featuring such stalwarts as Henry Louis Gates, Jr.,Masterpiecedramas, new kids shows,and exhaustiveFrontlinedocumentaries. Here's a preview of some of what's coming in the fall and summer.

September 7

This new PBS KIDS series for preschoolers follows the observant and curious bunny rabbit Elinor as she and her friends Ari the bat and Olive the elephant explore science, nature, and community in Animal Town.

September 9

As the possibility of editing human DNA with CRISPR technology becomes more and more refined,NOVAexamines the difficult questions posed by such advances: how far should we go?

September 22

As it has since 1988,Frontlinepresents the life stories of the two major party candidates for president, Donald Trump and Joe Biden, examining the evolution of their views, their path to the presidency, and defining moments of their career. It's an in-depth portrait of both candidates in a decisive election.

October 5

Hosted by theNew York Times-bestselling author Kelly Corrigan, this interview series from PBS andPBS NewsHourwill feature such luminaries as Bryan Stevenson, the lawyer, founder of the Equal Justice Initiative, and author ofJust Mercy.

Premieres October 6

The sixth season of the popular ancestry investigation series continues with new episodes featuring everyone from Carly Simon to Lupita Nyong'o, PBS's own Lidia Bastianich, Gayle King, Jordan Peele, Bill Hader, and more.

October 9

This new half-hour, age-appropriate program features both conversations between real children and their parents as well as segments from PBS KIDS showsArthur,Daniel Tiger's Neighborhood, andXavier Riddle and the Secret Museumabout race and racial justice.

October 16

Enjoy a starry tribute celebration of Recording Academy Lifetime Achievement Award winners featuring archival clips and acceptance remarks from the honorees and the artists they have influenced, including Chicago, Roberta Flack, Iggy Pop and more.

October 19

Artist Matt Furie's creation Pepe the Frog has been co-opted by alt-right people online as a symbol of hate. Now Furie is trying to reclaim his creation.

October 28

The bushfires that devastated Australia in the past year wreaked havoc on the unique wildlife of the continent. Follow the stories of rescue and rehabilitation of kangaroos, wombats, koalas and other species.

Premieres November 1

Hugh Laurie stars in this newMasterpiece drama as an ambitious politician whose enemies seem to be picking apart his public and private life to his detriment.

December 29

Laura Ingalls Wilder was 65 when she turned her childhood in the Ozarks into theLittle House on the Prairieseries, influencing generations of Americans conceptions of the West.

January 3

In thisMasterpiecefilm, Glenda Jackson plays an independent grandmother who lives alone despite early-stage Alzheimer's. The drama is propelled by the disappearance of her only friend, Elizabeth, and the mystery surrounding it.

January 2021

This new adaptation of the beloved books of James Alfred Wight, aka James Herriot, brings the humorous adventures of a young country veterinarian in Yorkshire during the 1930s.

February 2021

For his next sweeping history, Henry Louis Gates, Jr. takes on the exuberant history of the Black church in America, as a site for worship, resilience, organizing, freedom and more, in two parts.

February 2021

This documentary, executive produced by Alicia Keys, tells the stories of six female Black entertainers, and their struggles against racism in the entertainment industry:Lena Horne, Abbey Lincoln, Nina Simone, Diahann Carroll, Cicely Tyson, and Pam Grier.

Winter 2021

SOUL! was America's first variety show, premiering in 1968 and running for six years. In this documentary, the niece of the show's producer and eventual host, Ellis Haizlip, tells the story of the pioneering show.

The COVID-19 pandemic could be the perfect time to dive into Ken Burns's in-depth films covering the breadth of American history and culture, from baseball to jazz to the Civil War, and beginning in August all of his films will be available to stream via WTTW Passport, available to WTTW members.

Read more here:

What's Coming to PBS This Fall and Winter - WTTW News

Opinion: The problem in Portland isn’t the law; it’s the lawlessness – The Detroit News

David Harsanyi Published 11:00 p.m. ET July 29, 2020

Despite the occasional looting, chaos, property damage, trespassing, rioting, graffiti, assaults, arson and general mayhem, the media consistently assure us that antifa "protesters" are "largely peaceful." And since the majority of buildings in Portland, Seattle and Denver haven't been looted yet, who am I to argue?

Of course, it takes only a sliver of the population to transform downtowns into a mess and create quality-of-life issues for thousands of law-abiding citizens. And the mayors who surrender parts of their cities to left-wing "protesters" are tacitly endorsing lawlessness themselves.

There's little doubt that if alt-right activists had occupied a few city blocks in Seattle or tried to firebomb a federal courthouse in Portland, we'd be in for feverish wall-to-wall media coverage, engulfed in a national conversation about the perils of right-wing radicalism. Every elected Republican would be asked to personally denounce the extremists to make sure they take implicit ownership of the problem.

When a few hundred angry tiki torch-carrying Nazis marched in Charlottesville, you would have thought the RNC had deployed the Wehrmacht. Those who led the riot were even asked to opine on CNN. On the other hand, left-wing rioters the people Chris Cuomo and other journalists compared to GIs landing on Normandy are immediately transformed into apolitical actors, rogue "anarchists," as soon as any violence starts.

Who knows? Perhaps the majority of citizens and businesses in Portland, Seattle and Denver want their elected officials to let antifa act with impunity. Or maybe some of those citizens and businesses will begin fleeing those cities. Whatever the case, it's a local concern.

To a point. If mayors do nothing to stop anarchists from tearing down federal monuments or from defacing, vandalizing, and attempting to burn down federal buildings, the feds have every right to dispatch teams of agents to restore order.

None of which is to deny that there are legitimate concerns about how law enforcement is conducting itself. I'm sympathetic to criticisms of the federal officers who operate in camouflage and in unmarked vans. Cops should display badge numbers and identification if they truly aren't doing so right now otherwise civilians have no real way to hold those in authority accountable for their actions. But the claim that Pinochet-like secret police have begun snatching Portland protesters off the street and making them disappear amounts to the arrest of one man, who refused to speak without his lawyer and was released a little more than an hour later without any charges.

If it were up to me, I'd leave Portland to the anarchists and their political accomplices. But federal law enforcement including agencies such as the DEA, FBI, ICE, ATF, Department of Homeland Security and Marshal Service regularly operate across the country. Sometimes they make arrests, and sometimes they do so after going undercover. This happens under every administration, every day, and it often happens for far less compelling reasons. As far as we know, cops haven't broken any laws in the streets of Portland. The protesters who cover their faces have broken tons.

With this in mind, it's been instructive watching many of the same characters who cheer on governors who take undemocratic emergency powers and shut down houses of worship without the consent of the people and who sometimes arrest Americans for playing Wiffle ball, attending church or cutting hair act as if policing portends the end of democracy. The same people who incessantly clamor to empower the federal government when it suits their purposes now act as if protecting a federal courthouse is the Reichstag fire.

MSNBC's John Heilemann says that Trump's sending federal police into Portland is a "trial run" for using "force" to "steal this election." In a piece titled "Trump's Occupation of American Cities Has Begun," Michelle Goldberg, somehow still allowed to freely opine at The New York Times, says that "fascism" is already here. House Speaker Nancy Pelosi calls the police "stormtroopers" who are "kidnapping protesters."

All of these contentions are ugly conspiracy theories, hyperbolic allegations meant to fuel partisan paranoia before an election. Even if we accept the criticisms of law enforcement, the driving problem, and it's been happening to various degrees in a number of major cities, is that mayors are allowing "protesters" to trample on public and private property. They allow it because they share the same left-wing sensibilities. But protesting should never be a license for anarchy.

David Harsanyi is a senior writer at National Review and the author of the book "First Freedom: A Ride Through America's Enduring History With the Gun." T

Read or Share this story: https://www.detroitnews.com/story/opinion/2020/07/30/opinion-problem-portland-isnt-law-its-lawlessness/5535192002/

See more here:

Opinion: The problem in Portland isn't the law; it's the lawlessness - The Detroit News

Remembering John Lewis, and the Political Theology that Changed a Nation – The Dispatch

My father is an incredibly gifted teacher. Until he retired to become a cattle farmer (true storythats what he does now), he was a math professor. He spent most of his career at Georgetown College, a small Baptist college near Lexington, Kentucky. At one point, he was so popular that when students were asked to vote on a faculty member to give the commencement address, he received an absolute majority of votes cast (not a plurality) in spite of competing against dozens of colleagues.

In church, his Sunday School classes were always packed. Ill never forget his biggest class. After multiple ordeals within the strange hothouse of faculty infighting, he developed a curriculum for a class called, The Christian and on-the-job politics. It was a great idea (Ive got a strong pro-Dad bias here, so hang with me), and it created an actual buzz in the congregation. I skipped my youth group to attend the first class. There werent enough seats. Folks lined the walls.

He started the class with something he called the LBALAG principle. When confronted with the Lesser Bad, he asked, Shouldnt the Christian be at Least as Good? He walked through verse after verse of Christ and the Apostles advocating love in the face of hate, blessings in the face of persecution, kindness in the face of intolerance, put it in the historical context of violent, state-sanctioned murder of Christian believers, and said, Given our far lesser challenge in our own workplaces, cant we be as least as loving and at least as kind as these first Christians?

He took a lesson about dealing with or coping with bad bosses or malicious co-workers and transformed it into a lesson about loving bosses and caring for co-workers. He made the point that you can never, ever divorce goals from methods, ends from means. It made a powerful impact on my high-school mind. It convicted me. How fragile was my love for others when I struggled with basic kindness even while living a life of ridiculous privilege?

I think of that lesson often. I thought of it again when John Lewis was laid to rest.

My Sunday newsletter two weeks ago argued that all too many Christians lack a robust political theology. We think of political engagement primarily through the prism of issues and secondarily (if at all) through serious consideration of methods. In politics, we tend to ask far more, What should a Christian believe? than consider, How should a Christian behave?

I touched on this on the weekend when Lewis died, but how many times in American life have we seen a better marriage of Christian belief and Christian behavior than the nonviolent resistance to segregation and Jim Crow in the American South? Remember Lewiss own words, from a 2004 interview:

During those early days, we didnt study the Constitution, the Supreme Court decision of 1954. We studied the great religions of the world. We discussed and debated the teachings of the great teacher. And we would ask questions about what would Jesus do. In preparing for the sit-ins, we felt that the message was one of love the message of love in action: dont hate. If someone hits you, dont strike back. Just turn the other side. Be prepared to forgive. Thats not anything any Constitution say anything about forgiveness. It is straight from the Scripture: reconciliation.

In his legendary Letter from a Birmingham Jail, Martin Luther King Jr. didnt just deliver a master class on the injustice of segregation, he also delivered a lesson in the method of nonviolence, of the graduated approach before he took to the streets. In any nonviolent campaign, King wrote, there are four basic steps: collection of the facts to determine whether injustices exist; negotiation; self purification; and direct action.

And he appealed of course to scriptural principle and scriptural example:

One who breaks an unjust law must do so openly, lovingly, and with a willingness to accept the penalty. I submit that an individual who breaks a law that conscience tells him is unjust, and who willingly accepts the penalty of imprisonment in order to arouse the conscience of the community over its injustice, is in reality expressing the highest respect for law.

Of course, there is nothing new about this kind of civil disobedience. It was evidenced sublimely in the refusal of Shadrach, Meshach and Abednego to obey the laws of Nebuchadnezzar, on the ground that a higher moral law was at stake. It was practiced superbly by the early Christians, who were willing to face hungry lions and the excruciating pain of chopping blocks rather than submit to certain unjust laws of the Roman Empire.

Moreover, its important to remember that the civil rights movements success was hardly assured. In other words, the fact that the tactics worked is not the reason they were justified. They were right regardless of the outcome. And they were pursued against great odds.

What looks inevitable in hindsight was anything but certain. In fact, if you were placing contemporary bets on a political outcome, would you guess that some version of a three-century status quo would prevail, or that the civil rights movement would achieve a legal revolution nearly on par with emancipation itself?

At the same time, can we even recall a modern Christian political movement so consistent with the upside-down logic of biblical Christianity? To gain your life you must lose your life. Bless those who persecute you. Love your enemies. The last shall be first.

In fact, the turning point of the movement came in 1963, in the Birmingham Childrens Crusade, when the least-powerful members of Southern society, the black children of Alabama, confronted Bull Connors dogs and firehoses, andfinallyshocked the conscience of a nation chock full of Christians and moved it to take decisive legal and political action.

Thats what a Christian political theology looks like in action. Both ends and means are suffused with Gospel truth.

Now, lets return to the LBALAG principle and reflect just a bit on contemporary Christian political action. In the face of less evil than the systematic segregation, lynching, and comprehensive violation of basic human rights that characterized the Jim Crow South, are Americas contemporary political Christian leaders behaving at least as good as these civil rights-era heroes?

Or are we frequently responding with a degree of fear and panic and compromise thats mystifying in its historical context?

In 2016, one of the things that we learned was that Donald Trumps rise first owed its real strength to the irreligious rightthe segment of the Republican electorate that attended church the least. For example, in March 2016, a Pew poll found that Trump trailed Ted Cruz by 15 points among Republicans who attended religious services every week. But he led Cruz by a whopping 27 points among those who did not.

In early 2017, The Atlantics Peter Beinart wrote a prescient, important essay noting the negative cultural effects of our increasingly secular politics, on both the left and the right. Far from ushering in a new, more tolerant political dawnsecularization was creating a far more vicious political reality.

Heres Peter, first speaking about the right:

Secularism is indeed correlated with greater tolerance of gay marriage and pot legalization. But its also making Americas partisan clashes more brutal. And it has contributed to the rise of both Donald Trump and the so-called alt-right movement, whose members see themselves as proponents of white nationalism. As Americans have left organized religion, they havent stopped viewing politics as a struggle between us and them. Many have come to defineusandthemin even more primal and irreconcilable ways.

And next, speaking about the left:

The decline of traditional religious authority is contributing to a more revolutionary mood within black politics as well. Although African Americans remain more likely than whites to attend church, religious disengagement is growing in the black community. African Americans under the age of 30 are three times as likely to eschew a religious affiliation as African Americans over 50. This shift is crucial to understanding Black Lives Matter, a Millennial-led protest movement whose activists often take a jaundiced view of established African American religious leaders. Brittney Cooper, who teaches womens and gender studies as well as Africana studies at Rutgers,writesthat the black Church has been abandoned as the leadership model for this generation. As Jamal Bryant, a minister at an AME church in Baltimore,toldThe Atlantics Emma Green, The difference between the Black Lives Matter movement and the civil-rights movement is that the civil-rights movement, by and large, was first out of the Church.

And given the tenor of the times, these words from Beinart are downright prophetic:

Black Lives Matter activists may be justified in spurning an insufficiently militant Church. But when you combine their post-Christian perspective with the post-Christian perspective growing inside the GOP, its easy to imagine American politics becoming more and more vicious.

It is now increasingly clear that the un-Christian de-linking of ends and means is working its dark magic on the United States of America, including on the American church. When confronting lesser evils, our political selves are behaving far worse than we should, and theres strong evidence that the religious right is now joining the irreligious right on the march down that dark path. Rather than resisting the de-linking, its advancing the degradation of our political culture.

Remember the statistics about churchgoing Republicans rejecting Trump more than their non-churchgoing peers? Well that changed, dramatically. By the time Beinart wrote his essay, white churchgoing Evangelicals supported Trump more than nonchurchgoing Evangelicals, and that gap has now persisted for years. Rather than presenting the last line of defense against his rise, churchgoing Evangelicals are now the foundation of his political power.

Whats the old saying? If you cant beat em, join em. Thats exactly what white Evangelicals did. They didnt change the post-Christian ethos of Trumps movement. All too many times they embraced that ethos. And in so doing they have often shocked the conscience of the nation, but sometimes in the worst ways.

As a nation says farewell to John Lewis and is saying farewell to his peers in that great generation of black Christian political leaders, its worth remembering that there is a better way. Christian political engagement can look very different than it so often looks today. Yes, later in life John Lewis could be bitterly partisan and sometimes deeply uncharitable, but in those most crucial years, he showed us what Christian political courage looked like. May we remember, and may we learn.

One more thing ...

Speaking of Christian charity, Id urge you all to watch George W. Bushs brief eulogy at Lewiss memorial service. It pays proper tribute to Lewis, without keeping any record of personal wrongs. Lewis, remember, famously boycotted Bushs first inauguration. This is how to lay down partisan differences to celebrate the best memories of a great man:

One last thing ...

In my quest to send you good music that nourishes the soul, Ive neglected to send along the best beard in Christian music. I love this songit communicates the power of encountering Christ in scripture. Its a power that can transform a person and a nation. Enjoy:

Photograph by Alexi Rosenfeld/Getty Images.

Excerpt from:

Remembering John Lewis, and the Political Theology that Changed a Nation - The Dispatch

How the Internet has Warped Film Criticism – mxdwn.com

Evan Krell July 31st, 2020 - 6:47 PM

The rise and rapid expansion of video sharing sites like YouTube have given people all over the world a voice and a platform to talk about film and other forms of entertainment. Its done plenty of good by promoting more independently created content and breaking down a lot of boundaries between creators and audiences. Movie making, discussion, and critique is easier than ever. YouTube however has become a breeding ground for alt-right groups of internet trolls posting hour long videos complaining about films featuring women and people of color in prominent roles. This groups often have their origins in nerd culture and their roots can be traced back to the mid 2000s when the internet was still relatively new, all things considered.

In 2004, amateur filmmaker James Rolfe inadvertently started a trend when he uploaded the first video in his Angry Video Game Nerd series. This series featured Rolfe portraying the titular character of the Angry Video Game Nerd, a foul mouthed, ill-tempered video game player who would review bad video games in a humorous manner. These reviews would usually feature skits, running gags, and slapstick interwoven with actual criticism of the games. When the series hit YouTube in 2006 it gained immense popularity and paved the way for the angry reviewer archetype.

Perhaps most famous of these was Doug Walkers character the Nostalgia Critic. The shows format was very similar to Angry Video Game Nerd, only centered around films instead. The Critic would go through the movie, picking it apart, performing skits, all the while screaming and swearing. Countless imitations would pop up over the years, almost all of which would focus on bad movies or video games. The biggest allure to the series wasnt the actual criticism though. People were drawn to these videos because of the over the top personalities and the humorous skits. Neither series really provided great critical insight, but they served their purposes as light bits of humor, often appealing to teenage audiences.

Both Angry Video Game Nerd and Nostalgia Critic (pictured above) are still running today with new episodes. Though the landscape of the internet and YouTube have changed drastically since both series were created. In the early 2010s both Screen Junkies and CinemaSins would get their start on YouTube. Screen Junkies biggest claim to fame is their Honest Trailers series. These videos are set up like a traditional movie trailer but poke fun at the movie by pointing out shortcomings and what not. CinemaSins features a narrator going through a movie scene by scene, pointing out every single little problem or inconsistency with the film and adding it to the sin counter with the total being shown at the end of the video. Like the angry reviewers before them, these videos became immensely popular and still rake in hundreds of thousands of views today with new videos. Unlike the earlier reviewers, these shows will focus on recently released popular movies rather than poor quality films of the past.

In recent years, people have begun flocking to these kinds of videos and putting them on a pedestal as the gold standard for film criticism. Despite these internet series starting off as being nothing more than comedy, people have begun to take their word as gospel and point to them in an attempt to discredit people who happen to like a film that has been covered. Many filmmakers have spoken about the prevalence of these kinds of channels. Jordan Vogt-Roberts, director of Kong: Skull Island stated, These guys are just trolling the art form we love and profiting from it while dumbing down the conversation. Many other directors and writers have agreed, stating that these types of videos are reductive and replace the nuance of film criticism with nitpicking and mean spirited complaining.

A lot of this rallying behind voices like CinemaSins stems from a disdain for mainstream movie critics. This has been especially prominent in so called nerd culture with one of the most notable examples being the response to the DC Comics superhero films. The films of the DCEU have done relatively poorly with critics and many hardcore fans of DC have claimed that its an elaborate conspiracy of critics paid off by Marvel and Disney to give their competitors lower scores. People like to flock to these internet personalities because they tell it like it is, which naturally ends up drawing in alt right circles. Despite many championing these internet personalities as voices of reason, any attempt at criticizing them results in a response of its just satire, stop taking it so seriously. If it fits their narrative, its gospel. If it doesnt then its just a joke.

Even if reviewers like CinemaSins are just meant to be viewed satirically and not seriously, it doesnt help that the creators dont make this clear at all. Even more so, the type of people being drawn to these reviewers arent being satirical at all. With a sizable alt right presence, the conversation drifts towards people complaining about films that dont conform to white, male, hegemonic expectations for films. Perhaps most infamously was the response to The Last Jedi, featuring an unprecedented amount of vitriol and debate among the Star Wars fan base. The film despite being praised by critics for its inventive story, fleshed out characters, and stunning visuals was met with an extreme amount of backlash by many fans claiming that it ruined the franchise forever. To this day its hard to mention the film in any capacity online without someone starting a debate about it.

Any attempt at nuanced criticism was buried by the hordes of people tearing the film down as disgrace to Star Wars. The most vitriolic hate was directed towards the female characters of the film, labeling the protagonist Rey as being too perfect and a Mary Sue, a reductive name given to characters who have no flaws. Perhaps most egregious was the way members of the cast were treated by these internet trolls. Rose Tico actor Kelly Marie Tran ended up leaving social media entirely due to the constant harassment from the trolls targeting her because of her gender and race. Some radical alt right internet users even went as far as to create an entire cut of The Last Jedi that removes almost all of the female characters, running at just 47 minutes. This goes beyond just mere satire and is symbolic of the deep rooted misogyny in many of these pop culture circles.

To say that entities like CinemaSins singlehandedly created the alt right movement would be too much. These types of people have always been around and the internet has only further radicalized them and given them a more vocal platform. However, its important to realize how intertwined they are. It started with angry comedy reviewers and evolved into channels entirely dedicated to making surface level judgements and nitpicks on films under the guise of genuine critique. The audiences grew and grew, drawing in the alt right crowds from nerd circles, many of whom have developed a deep resentment towards women and define themselves by their hatred. This comes from deep sexist roots of othering women and feeling like they, straight white men, are entitled to sex. And much like the bad faith internet reviewers, they use their platform to tear down movies for having women and people of color in prominent roles. There is no nuance, no genuine critique. Just pure hatred.

This issue is much larger than just angry Star Wars fan boys. The rise of the online alt right can be found in every facet of life and has become especially prominent on video streaming sites. Additionally, YouTube has taken very little action against the hateful content on their site despite literal Nazis posting videos. YouTubes algorithm makes it such that its impossible to watch anything Star Wars related without the recommended videos section becoming flooded with vitriolic rants directed at the women and people of color involved with the franchise. Its important to always be mindful of the content youre consuming, and to take a stand against bigotry and hatred where it manifests. The internet has, and continues to do plenty of good. Creators from marginalized backgrounds are getting more exposure then ever and people are able to engage with media like never before. The ugly, hateful underbelly of YouTube still festers and needs to be uprooted entirely to ensure a healthy online environment.

Visit link:

How the Internet has Warped Film Criticism - mxdwn.com

‘It’s like they’re testing it on us’: Portland protesters say tear gas has caused irregularities with their periods – OPB News

Federal officers deploy gas to disperse crowds of protesters near the Mark O. Hatfield federal courthouse in Portland, Ore., July 20, 2020.

Jonathan Levinson / OPB

After more than 50 days of nightly protests against racism and police violence, demonstrators in Portland are intimately familiar with the immediate effects of tear gas: blurry eyes, burning skin, choking, coughing, crying, retching.

But some protesters believe the gas is doing more than causing red eyes and seething skin. OPB interviewed 26 protesters, ranging in age from 17 to 43, who said they believe regular exposure to tear gas has caused irregularities within their menstrual cycle.

Related: 60+ days of tear gas leaves behind 'a stew of pollutants'

The experiences range. Some protesters reported getting their period multiple times in a single month. Others reported debilitating cramps at least one that ended in a hospital visit and blood clots the size of half a fist. Trans protesters who had stopped menstruating since taking testosterone said they have seen their cycles restart.

There are two common threads between the experiences of the 26 protesters: All said what they were experiencing was abnormal for their bodies. And all believed the tear gas, which law enforcement has been using against demonstrators for two months, was at fault.

Related: 60-plus days of tear gas leaves lingering questions about environmental impacts

There has been little scientific research into whether tear gas can affect a persons hormones and experts warn against extrapolating a solid medical conclusion from anecdotal evidence. But while the science remains thin, the troubling stories have mounted as the release of the chemical has become a near-nightly occurrence.

Lindsey Smith, a 26-year-old preschool teacher who has been live-tweeting the protests since mid-June, said shes noticed a pattern: If she inhales a significant amount of gas in the night, shell have her period the next morning. She said this has happened at least three times in two months even though the hormonal birth control shes on makes it so shes only supposed to menstruate four times a year.

On July 12, after another night that saw federal officers blanket the crowd with tear gas, Smith tweeted to ask if anyone else was menstruating after being exposed to the gas. She received nearly 30 responses from protesters with their accounts of irregular periods: cramping within hours of exposure, periods that stretched for nearly a month, or arrived weeks early.

She was also met with some trolls.

When I posted that, there were a lot of alt-right people screenshot-ing it and reposting it and a lot of them are saying, Good, I hope after this youre sterile, she said. That was the first time that the thought occurred to me: I dont know what this is going to do. And I dont think anyone really knows long-term.

Within the small body of research that does exist on tear gas, the question of what effect it could have on a persons reproductive health, if any, has been left unanswered.

Sven Eric Jordt, an associate professor at the Duke University School of Medicine who has extensively studied tear gas agents, said its possible the gas impacts hormones. He pointed to a 2010 study that showed burning the agent in CS gas, a common type of tear gas, could generate chemicals potentially toxic enough to affect hormonal homeostasis. Researchers in Chile raised concerns tear gas might cause miscarriages in 2011, leading the government to temporarily ban its use. In Bahrain, Physicians for Human Rights documented accounts of pregnancy loss among civilians gassed during anti-government protests.

But no one can say with certainty if theres a link.

Theres really no data on this. Its entirely possible that some of these chemicals that if you inhale them at high levels can have effects, Jordt said. But its really hard to say.

Intense stress could be another culprit. Rising levels of cortisol, the bodys primary stress hormone, are known to upend normal menstrual cycles, And the policing tactics common among local and federal officers including tear gas, impact munitions, and flash bangs could all be fairly described as cortisol-inducing. Not to mention the new unusual rituals that could potentially alter someones usual menstrual cycle: bedtimes pushed to the early morning, a diet of snacks and energy drinks, nightly sprints away from gas and police.

But some protesters in Portland are convinced that stress alone cant explain their experiences.

While many nights are traumatic, protesters are not breathing lungfuls of the chemical every single evening. And some report its only in the aftermath of these hazy nights, during which theyve inhaled for minutes without a mask, that they notice the irregularities.

Alissa Azar, 29, has been protesting downtown at least five nights a week since the demonstrations began. She said shes been caught in the thick of a cloud of gas six times. On two of these occasions, her period started immediately after. The other four times, it started within a few days.

Obviously were experiencing a significant amount of stress right now physically, mentally, emotionally. It would be naive to believe that doesnt have an effect. However, I definitely think theres a correlation between menstruation and tear gas, she said. The timing has been too spot-on.

She said the periods are different than what she expects. Each one lasts for four or five days. The cramps are more like the contractions she had when she gave birth, inducing nausea and severe back pain. A dozen other protesters interviewed had similar accounts of cramps that felt like sharp rocks being cradled in their stomachs.

Were not paranoid. This isnt a coincidence. Somethings going on, Azar said. Within 15 minutes of a gas attack, myself and others will have to take a break from how bad the cramps are.

For some, the experience goes beyond physical pain. Five transgender individuals taking testosterone, which typically stops menstruation after a matter of months, told OPB theyd seen their cramps and bleeding return after attending demonstrations.

These protesters say these unexpected periods were accompanied by a sense of gender dysphoria, the clinical term for the discomfort and distress people feel when their bodies dont align with their gender.

Its definitely a back and forth feeling. Im still pretty early in my transition, and Ive waited a really long time to be able to do this, said Lester Lou Wrecksie, a nonbinary transmasculine person who has been taking testosterone since September.

Wrecksie, 43, said on most nights they stay in the back of protests, largely out of the way of gas. But on June 21, they got knocked down and ended up getting caught in the chemical for longer than usual. Two days later, Wrecksie said their cycle returned for the first time in half a year.

Its unsettling to be like, I can go out into the air with chemicals and have it basically undo part of what Im trying to do for myself, they said.

A few protesters said they were concerned enough with the period irregularities that they scheduled a call with the local Planned Parenthood. Paula Bednarek, the medical director for Planned Parenthood Columbia Willamette, said clinicians had not noticed an uptick in patients reporting unusual menstruation since the protests began.

But enough reports linking period irregularities and tear gas have cropped up nationwide in the last few months that another branch of Planned Parenthood has taken note. An epidemiologist with Planned Parenthood North Central States, which supports reproductive health in Iowa, Minnesota, Nebraska, North Dakota, and South Dakota, crafted a research proposal after putting out a call for reports from protesters whod spontaneously menstruated after being tear-gassed. A handful of online outlets have also done write-ups this summer questioning a possible connection between the chemical and periods.

Dr. Rohini Haar, a medical expert for Physician for Human Rights, said while these experiences should be acknowledged, she believed there is danger in overreporting a potential link without the hard scientific evidence to back it up.

Haar, an expert in crowd control weapons who has studied the health consequences of tear gas up close among Palestinian refugees, said shed only started hearing these anecdotal reports of tear gas affecting menstruation a few weeks ago. She worried these new accounts could genderize protests and lead to a narrative that protesting is only safe for people without ovaries.

This may be an issue, but its certainly not enough of an issue to intimidate people away from protesting especially women, she said. Its not the situation where you should tell your teenager, This definitely injures your reproductive tract, you are not allowed to go. There is no evidence to say that.

Dr. Jordt said he thought it would be worth trying to find out. He suggested a local or state health department in Oregon should initiate a study, taking health data from protesters and residents and following up with them over the long term.

Jordt estimates there are currently five or six of these sorts of studies that look at long-term effects of tear gas on people who have been exposed repeatedly, most coming from the Middle East during the Arab Spring. But he said governments in these countries often hampered the efforts of the doctors leading these studies, making it difficult to follow up with civilians over long periods of time.

One of the most comprehensive studies within the United States was conducted on recruits for the U.S. Army in 2014. Researchers found recruits exposed to CS gas as part of a training exercise were at a higher risk for developing respiratory illnesses, including influenza, pneumonia and bronchitis.

They were exposed to the gas just once.

Jordt pointed to two reasons why learning the long-term health effects of repeated exposure to tear gas has yet to become a top concern of health experts in the United States: The first is that its rarely used at the levels the country has seen this summer. While its been used en masse on protesters before in Ferguson, Missouri, in 2014, during the Occupy Wall Street movement in 2011, during the Vietnam War protests in the 60s and 70s he said the chemical hasnt been pervasive enough to become a top priority among health experts.

Nor is it top of the list for law enforcement agencies. Jordt said theres a strong belief among law enforcement that teargas is their safest option for controlling crowds. He suspects they will not be the ones leading the charge for a deeper study.

The lack of concrete studies has left some protesters feeling like guinea pigs, scouring Google for answers on whats happening to their bodies with no satisfying results.

We dont know the long term effects of this, said Elisa Blackman, 24, who said she got her period five times between June 2 and July 5. She tried to search for an explanation, but the hits she got on the internet focused on effects you could expect in the minutes after being gassed, not weeks or years.

Its like theyre testing it on us.

Go here to see the original:

'It's like they're testing it on us': Portland protesters say tear gas has caused irregularities with their periods - OPB News

Talib Kweli’s Harassment Campaign Shows How Unprotected Black Women Are Online and Off – Jezebel

In late July, rapper Talib Kweli posted a lengthy message to his Instagram account, announcing that after 11 years, he was finally leaving Twitter. I have officially left @twitter for the greener pastures of @patreon which is membership fee based, Kweli wrote. Now most of my exchanges will always be with real fans who invest in me.

But Kweli didnt leave Twitter voluntarily. On July 23, Kweli was suspended for repeated violations of Twitter rules, according to a spokesperson for the app, after he spent over two weeks in the mentions of black women who characterized his behavior as harassment. His primary target: A 24-year-old student and activist named Maya Moody, who became Kwelis obsession after a discussion about colorism in hip-hop went left.

The suspension came nearly two weeks after Kweli began incessantly tweeting at Moody, sometimes for more than 12 hours straight in a single day. During that time, several Black women participated in a campaign to report Kweli for targeted harassment and get him suspended, to no avail.

Its unclear what, precisely, changed Twitter Supports mind after weeks of inaction. In a statement to Jezebel, a Twitter spokesperson claimed his account was suspended for violating its rules around harassment, among other things:

[Talib Kwelis] account has been permanently suspended after repeated violations of the Twitter rules. Twitters purpose is to serve the public conversation. Violence, harassment and other similar types of behavior discourage people from expressing themselves, and ultimately diminish the value of global public conversation. Our rules are to ensure all people can participate in the public conversation freely and safely.

Moody is unsurprised by Twitters initial inaction, which fits into a pattern of the company ignoring rampant abuse against Black women on the platform. Twitter has a history of defending those who speak out against oppressionspecifically Black peoplebut staying silent when white supremacists and alt-right people are saying unbelievable things online and still allowing them to have platforms, still allowing them to post crazy things, Moody explained. But those that have spoken against [bigots] have been suspended for way less than targeting someone and harassing them constantly for over two weeks straight.

Twitter is familiar with this critique from Black women. In 2019, Rachelle Hampton wrote a piece for Slate about Black feminists who encountered far-right trolls on Twitter in the early and mid-2010s; this was before Gamergate and before the calamity of the 2016 presidential election. Whether it was white men masquerading as Black people or other racist and sexist harassment campaigns, Black women have often been the early targets of coordinated harassment and doxxing before it spreads to other people of color and white people. Yet theyve been largely ignored. As Hampton wrote in Slate, some media outlets diminished the danger of trolls by characterizing their flirtation with white nationalism as tongue-in-cheekuntil those trolls took their rhetoric offline and onto the streets of Charlottesville, Virginia.

While the Kweli debacle isnt a matter of racist right-wingers versus Black women, the harassment campaign Moody has endured illuminates a larger concern Black women have long held about normalized harassment on Twitter. Whether from miscellaneous trolls or verified Twitter users like Kweli, Moodys experience is not just an isolated incident, but rather a microcosm of the harm Black women experience online dailywhether or not anyone listens.

It started in early July, when a video of rappers 50 Cent and Lil Wayne talking about dating exotici.e. non-Blackwomen made the rounds, prompting a Twitter user to ask which rappers, aside from Snoop Dogg, are married to Black women. Another user replied with a list of names: Jay-Z, 2 Chainz, Gucci Mane, Chance the Rapper, Ludacris, Kendrick Lamar, Big Boi, Killer Mike, and more. Talib Kweli was also included in the list.

On July 9, Moody responded, writing, Literally almost all of them are married to lightskinned women but thats a conversation for another day.

Moodys offhand comment hinting at colorism in the Black community soon spiraled.

Kweli replied the next day, tweeting the following: Nah lets have this convo today. Are we talking all of my relationships? My childrens mother as well? Or are you only talking about who you think Im currently in a relationship right now? I mean, is any of this really any of your business?

Kweli dug up and publicized Moodys old tweets in an attempt to discredit her, including one in which Moody swooned over white actor Alan Ritchson and quoted a popular meme of Tamera Mowry (whose husband is white) lamenting that people have called her white mans whore. (Black women and other women of color have reappropriated Mowrys quote in a humorous light over the years, reframing it as a joke for when they find a white man attractive, perhaps beyond their best judgment.) Kweli framed Moodys tweetcalling herself a white mans whoreas proof of her hypocrisy, failing to understand the facetiousness.

But Kweli didnt stop at this contextless attempt to smear Moody. For weeks, Moody has been subjected to Kwelis incessant attacks on social media, during which Kweli accused Moody of aligning with white supremacists and Nazis. During this very public spat, photos of Moodys parents and identifying information was leaked by trolls, various Twitter accounts publicized her stepmothers salary, and she received death threats and threats of sexual abuse from defenders of Kwelis.

Its definitely been draining and overwhelming, Moody told me in a phone interview last week. Yesterday alone, I had to get 12 different accounts suspended for trying to make new profiles doxing my family and me using my stepmoms name and pictures and where we live... basically pretending to be my stepmom on Twitter.

Kweli, meanwhile, vowed on the app that he wouldnt let up unless Moody deleted her Twitter account or apologized. When a Twitter user pointed out at the time that his tweets for the past 13 hours had been nothing but harassment, Kweli replied, I can go for 13 years if you come for my family. Im just getting started.

In an email to Jezebel, Kweli denied that he was harassing Moody. Maya Moody is a liar, he wrote. Ive never cyber harassed anyone in my life. I responded, on Twitter, to the lies that Maya posted about me. When you respond to someone who posts lies about you, that is not harassment.

Responding for hours on end for over two weeks on various social media platforms may, in fact, qualify as cyber harassment, which the National Conference of State Legislatures defines as an act that usually pertains to threatening or harassing email messages, instant messages, or to blog entries or Web sites dedicated solely to tormenting an individual. It waseventuallyconsidered harassment by Twitters standards as well.

But he was, indeed, just getting started. For weeks, it was impossible to scroll through Kwelis Twitter account without seeing him interacting with Moodys Twitter handle. The Root covered Kwelis Twitter behavior in late July with a post full of screenshots.

Moody is not the only woman who has been on the opposite end of Kwelis fixation. A two-hour-long YouTube video from 2019 details seven months of targeted harassment against Yvette Carnell, YouTuber and ADOS (African Descendents of Slaves) co-founder.

Kwelis harassment of Moody didnt remain on Twitter. He dragged the fiasco to Instagram for his 918,000 followers to enjoy, posting screenshots of her tweets, accusing Moody of harassing him, and dedicating an hour-long Instagram Live session to the kerfuffle (ironically titled Addressing The Lies That I Harass Black Women).

In his Instagram Live video, Kweli accuses Moody of denying the blackness of light-skinned Black women. Shes saying that these womenwho are Black womenare not Black enough because theyre light-skinned. And shes also implying that these rappers only marry these women for the color of their skin.

Moody didnt say that, nor did she imply it. Acknowledging a Black persons light complexion doesnt inherently negate their blackness, and for Kweli to act as if the desirability of light-skinned and non-Black women isnt pervasiveregardless of ones intentionsis absurd.

So many people pretend that they dont know that [colorism] is a real thing, especially in the Black community, Moody said. This is something that impacts every aspect of our lives, from our education system to our prison system to [who gets] harsher punishment. Its a part of us. And if we cant acknowledge that and talk about that without getting defensive and gaslighting each other and saying, you know, You just hate Black men, just hate Black people... No, thats not the case. I love us. And because I love us, I want us to be able to have the conversation and talk about it.

In Kwelis Instagram Live video, he acknowledged that colorism is a problem. Despite this, he has maintained his obtuse approach toward Moodys initial tweet, and continued to talk about her on his Instagram. This has always been about a bunch of groupies doing celebrity cockwatch, Kweli wrote in a recent Instagram post. He tagged Moody.

When Jezebel contacted Kweli, his response via email was long and thorough, but terse in tone. Kweli accused Moody of calling him a child rapist; tweeting white supremacist diss tracks about him; harassing and encouraging others to harass his wife, DJ Eque; contacting all of his business partners in an attempt to stop him from getting work; posting his phone number; and using a photo of him and the mother of one of children as her Twitter header.

Kweli sent me an iCloud folder full of screenshots he says prove his point. But for the most part, the photos demonstrate just how much Kweli has lost the plot. The diss track Moody tweeted was by a white rapper named Diabolic, whose insipid comments downplaying the threats that the Trump administration posed appeared to anger Kweli years ago. This was enough for Kweli to infer that Moody a Nazi sympathizer. (A perusal of Diabolics social media concludes that while prone to conspiracy and disdainful toward what he considers communism, Diabolic is likely not a Nazi, just ignorant).

The insinuation that Moody instrumented a harassment campaign against DJ Eque also falls flat. Many Black women on Twitter began to reach out to DJ Eque in earnest, days into Kwelis neverending tweetstorm against Moody, asking Eque why she hasnt tried to intervene. In since-deleted tweets, Eque wrote, Hey he makes his own damn choices for his life and that hes a debater who has a way with words. Im sorry but I rather he do it online than to me, she wrote. She later tweeted that she tried to ask Kweli to stop, but said she felt less inclined to do so after Moody started calling Kweli a rapist.

Moody did accuse Kweli of being a child rapist, citing an article about Kweli suing a blog for defamation after it claimed, without evidence, that Kweli raped a teenage girl. Moody also called Kweli a predator, based on sexual harassment allegations against Kweli made by Res, a Philadelphia artist with whom Kweli once collaborated. In 2018, Res publicly accused Kweli of bullying her and holding her career hostage after she rejected his sexual advances.

Kweli uploaded an Instagram photo of a court document in response, showing that Ress sexual harassment claim was dismissed by a judge. Kweli wrote, Res is a liar... I find her claim to be dubious in nature. Bogus. Kweli also accused Res of taking advantage of the MeToo movement for personal gain.

That same day, Res tweeted a screenshot of a 2014 e-mail from Kweli, in which he admits attempting to kiss her in a pool.

Moody denies contacting Kwelis business partners. She also denies publicizing his phone number, and none of the screenshots Kweli sent to me support this claim either (someone else did, however, and Kweli did receive a few threatening text messages).

But Moody did not hesitate to own up to temporarily changing her Twitter header. It was a petty move, but during a phone call with Jezebel, she explained why she wasnt above it. After three days of consistent, non-stop harassment, I sure did, Moody said, laughing. After I already blocked [him] and told [him] to stop and leave me alone and [he] did not... yes, I did. I sure did. And I am not sorry.

Its worth noting that virtually no other hip-hop artists pushed back on Kwelis behavior. His tweets were on full display for all to see, and few condemned him. Activist and rapper Noname was one of the few public figures who bothered to speak out against Kwelis two-week harassment spree, invoking the mockery and abuse that hip-hop artist Megan Thee Stallion received after she was reportedly shot.

Watching black men joke about [Megs] shooting as a call to action to harm more black women hurts in a way Im not smart enough to articulate, Noname tweeted. And the silence from male rappers while Talib Kweli harassed black women for weeks, disgusting.

The presumption is that Black women are fair game, easy targets, for racists and Black men alike. Misogynoir is for everyone.

[Megs] life could have easily been taken from her, Moody said. And it just goes to show how Black women are not taken seriously. They make a mockery of our pain.

Both Moody and Kweli experienced nastiness throughout this ordeal. Both of their personal lives were made public for drama-thirsty spectators, and both received threatening messages. Trolls and bored opportunists with an ax to grind got into the mix to hassle and terrorize both parties. But there is an obvious power imbalance at play here that, judging by Kwelis email to me, he is reluctant to acknowledge. He writes (emphasis ours):

I challenge Jezebel and Maya to

1. present these death threats

2. prove she was doxxed or sexually harassed

3. prove that somehow any of these claims are connected to me. I have screenshots of everything I say happened.

While Kwelis relevance has waned since the height of his popularity in the 90s and early 2000s, Kweli still maintained over one million Twitter followers and was featured in an interview with Common just last week. Hes not an obscure artist, and hes not a random guy on social media. Hes a 44-year-old who has collaborated with Pharrell and Kanye West and enjoys a devoted following. Moodys audience is nothing to sniff at, with just under 30,000 Twitter followers, but shes still a student who largely tweets about pop culture and men she finds attractive. Yes, Moody spoke disparagingly of Kweli, but only after he turned her tweet into an indictment against him and spammed her.

But just as perplexing was Kwelis attempt to deny that he harassed Moody while justifying his harassment of another Black woman. When I asked Kweli about his alleged harassment campaign against Yvette Carnell, he didnt deny it, but rather justified it.

Yvette Carnell AKA @breakingbrown is the founder and patent owner of #ADOS which is an anti-immigrant hate cult, Kweli wrote. Carnell is a board member of PFIR [Progressives for Immigration Reform] which is a white nationalist organization. The job of ADOS is to target progressive black folks.

He added, Why would Jezebel, a known feminist site, not know what ADOS is? ADOS is anti-feminist. The fact that Maya Moody would align herself with an anti-immigrant, pro right-wing, anti-feminist, hate cult like ADOS proves that everything Ive said about her intentions is correct.

The condescension was glaring, and the assumption that I am uninformed about ADOS is strange. For the record, Im well aware of the ADOS movement. I agree with its support of reparations to descendants of enslaved people (I am one), and I see no harm in emphasizing the unique history of Black Americans with slave ancestry. I do not, however, agree with its pseudo-nationalist leanings, its approach toward immigrants, its race essentialism, nor its tendency to platform right-wing talking points.

I am skeptical of the ADOS movement for several reasons. That does not mean I think it is appropriate for Kweli to spend seven months harassing a member of that movement. It is obsessive behavior that Carnell did not deserve. Kwelis failure to understand this is alarming, but it also makes sense: Kweli doesnt believe his behavior is harassment as long as he sees his actions as righteous.

(Moody confirmed to Jezebel that she is not involved or associated with ADOS).

Kwelis tendency to jump to conclusions is how this entire mess started in the first place, and its a mess he seemed unwilling to let go weeks after it all began. Last Tuesday, he made an Instagram post about Moody that he crossposted to Facebook. On Wednesday, he talked about her in an Instagram Live stream from his moving car. Grown ass man bullying a woman smh the insecurities are really jumping out, one woman commented on Kwelis Instagram Live. Yet Talib Kweli and Maya Moody are just part of a larger narrative about how Black women are treated on social media, a pattern that continues without interventiona story that never seems to end.

Read more:

Talib Kweli's Harassment Campaign Shows How Unprotected Black Women Are Online and Off - Jezebel

Is Arkansas Senator Tom Cotton the next Trump? – People’s World

President in waiting, Arkansas Sen. Tom Cotton. | AP

Amidst a public health catastrophe thats already taken 150,000 lives in this country and a national anti-racist uprising which has mobilized millions, the extreme right is methodically planning its next steps, ensuring its political survival no matter the outcome of the November 3rd elections. Whether or not Trump prevails and wins a second term, the Republican Party is preparing for a future after him. And in Arkansas Sen. Tom Cotton, its possible they might have found their next frontman.

Cotton has earned widespread condemnation from the liberal media, Black leaders, and left commentators in recent weeks thanks to his back-to-back provocative attacks on Black Lives Matter demonstrators and the reporters and scholars behind the New York Times 1619 Project. Unless youre a Washington watcher, Cotton might be someone whos passed under your radar. But now that hes put himself front and center in the so-called culture wars, he deserves some fresh scrutiny.

When protesters demanded an end to systemic racism and police violence in June, Cotton urged Trump to show BLM no mercy; he said to Send in the Troops in a controversial NYT op-ed. After that, Cotton picked a fight with Nikole Hannah-Jones, the Times journalist who jumpstarted a national conversation around the central role that slavery and its legacy played in the founding of the United States and its subsequent history.

Almost as if his only goal was to poke at his ideological opponents and rile up the GOPs racist base, Cotton filed a bill that would ban federal funding for any educational curriculum that drew on the Pulitzer Prize-winning materials of the 1619 Project. Talking to the Arkansas Democrat-Gazette about his bill earlier this week, Cotton said doing more to integrate slavery and the oppression of Black Americans into school history classes is left-wing propaganda and revisionist history at its worst.

The comment that critics believe really showed Cottons true colors, however, was when he called slavery the necessary evil upon which the union was built. Generations of untold human suffering was apparently the price to pay to build the greatest and noblest country in the history of mankind. Its the same nationalist and racist ideology constantly pushed by Trump, but from a politer and more articulate spokesman.

(Although, to give Cotton his due for speaking some truth, slavery was indeed the necessary evil that enabled U.S. capitalism to take over the worldhundreds of years of unpaid slave labor helped American imperialism dominate competitors in global markets and amass the resources needed to build and fuel the worlds most powerful war machine by the early 20th century.)

If the far right is looking for a fresh poster boy for their authoritarian agenda, they probably couldnt ask for better than Cotton. Hes a darling of the MAGA crowd, a hawk when it comes to foreign policy, one of the most anti-China voices in Congress, a law-and-order guy who says we have an under-incarceration problem, and a firm opponent of immigration. And, at just 43 years old, hes the youngest member of the Senate. That means hell potentially be around to lead the Trumpist brigades long after Trump himself is gone.

Hes got the strongman populist instincts that appeal to the base as well as the connections to the party establishment and big money that it takes to get things done in Washington. Hes a pal to both alt-right bomb-thrower Steve Bannon as well as former GOP chairman Reince Priebus, the very example of insider politics. Hes equally at ease at either a Tea Party rally or a Senate caucus meeting.

Cotton comes from a working-class family in the town of Dardanelle, in west-central Arkansas, where he grew up on the Cotton cattle farm. His parents were both public employees; dad worked for the state Health Department, and mom taught at the local school. After finishing high school, Cotton studied government at Harvard University. He became known for the conservative positions he took in articles for the college newspaper, attacking reforms such as affirmative action. He went on to earn his law degree from Harvard and practiced law for a short time following his 2002 graduation. In 2005, he enlisted in the U.S. Army, opting to serve in the infantry.

It was during his time in the Army that Cotton catapulted onto the political scene. Writing to the NYT from Baghdad in 2006, he condemned journalists whod exposed a secret Bush administration program to monitor international financial transactions for the purpose of tracking supposed terrorist activity. Cotton charged the whistleblowing reporters with helping terrorists and said they belonged behind bars. The Times never published the letter, but a conservative blog did.

From the time of that letter onward, Cotton became known as a militarist without equal. His Army credentials and service medals from both the Iraq and Afghanistan campaigns were deployed as validators for his opinions on foreign policy. As a legislator, hes always been ready to shovel public funds into the military-industrial complex and flex American muscle around the world. In his blustery maiden speech upon joining the Senate in 2015, he announced, Our enemies and allies alike must know that aggressors will pay an unspeakable price for challenging the United States. The best way to impose that price is global military dominance.

Since January 2017, Cotton has been a reliable Trump loyalist in the Senate, hewing more closely to the presidents line than even Majority Leader Mitch McConnell. Hes a Trumpist, but without the total bootlicking and lack of dignity typical of so many Trump coattail politicians. The president highly values his counsel, reportedly keeping Cotton on speed dial and regularly consulting with him about whom to nominate to the Supreme Court or appoint to Cabinet.

Cotton knows well enough to keep himself close to Trump, given the ferocious fealty the GOP electorate shows the president, but the Arkansas Senator also ensures that he appeals to a wider swath of the GOP than Trump himself manages to do.

From the start of his political career, Cotton has been a part of the dark money world of seedy establishment Republican politics that initially shunned Trump. When he first ran for Congress in 2012, Cotton had the backing of the libertarian Club for Growth super PAC. Jumping to the Senate two years later in 2014, the same group helped him portray centrist Democratic Sen. Mark Pryor as an Obama hack. Cottons strong anti-Iran line garnered him hundreds of thousands of dollars that year from Bill Kristols Emergency Committee for Israel.

And his biggest backer of all? The billionaire Koch brothers network, which funded his electoral effort to the tune of some $8.1 million. The same big money operation refused to back Trump in 2016, even though it was their mega-spending on behalf of the far-right agenda of tax cuts, deregulation, and crooked elections which actually paved the way for Trumps rise to power. Tom Cotton, however, has always been their man.

Cotton has the potential to bridge the factional divides in the Republican Party opened up by the growth of Trumps extreme right populism. He could also, possibly, even appeal to moderates and independents who are open to a conservative agenda but turned off by Trumps crass style and divisiveness. Cotton knows when to push the lefts buttons and also when to not go too far. The Democratic Party of Arkansas didnt even come up with someone to challenge Cotton this fall; hes running unopposed for re-election in November.

In just a short time, Cotton has risen from being the junior senator from a small rural state to one of the most talked-about candidates for 2024. Hes a Harvard Law graduate, a decorated veteran, and he doesnt display any of the wacky conspiracy thinking or unpredictability and recklessness so often associated with Trump. The pro-fascist elements in the GOP, which extend well beyond Trump and his cabal, would certainly rally around a military man like Cotton. And the billionaire class has proven it will enthusiastically back him to the hilt.

Add up all of these facts and you end up with a far-right political leader who, in the long term, may end up proving even more dangerous than Donald Trump.

Like free stuff?So do we. Here at Peoples World, we believe strongly in the mission of keeping the labor and democratic movements informed so they are prepared for the struggle.But we need your help.While our content is free for readers (something we are proud of) it takes money a lot of it to produce and cover the stories you see in our pages. Only you, our readers and supporters, can keep us going.Only you can make sure we keep the news that matters free of paywalls and advertisements.If you enjoy reading Peoples World and the stories we bring you,support our work by becoming a $5 monthly sustainer today.

View post:

Is Arkansas Senator Tom Cotton the next Trump? - People's World

Confederate Groups Are Thriving on Facebook. What Does That Mean for the Platform? – Slate

Local residents show support for a Confederate soldier statue on the grounds of the City of Virginia Beach Municipal Center in Virginia during a rally calling for the statues removal on Aug. 24, 2017.Alex Wong/Getty Images This article is part of the Free Speech Project, a collaboration between Future Tense and the Tech, Law, & Security Program at American University Washington College of Law that examines the ways technology is influencing how we think about speech.

Earlier this month, a meme was shared in the Facebook group Save Southern Heritage that featured the portraits of two men: the Prophet Mohammed on the left and Robert E. Lee on the right, their chins tilting toward each other. [Mohammed] owned many slaves. Robert E. Lee was against slavery, the caption reads. So why are we tearing down statues instead of mosques? That post, which received 248 likes, is still up, despite the suggestion of real-world violence. But a comment, rambling about Arabs and Jews running this mess as a little joke, was removed within hours. Whether it was Facebooks algorithms, or content moderators, or one of the groups eight admins, a decision was made that one had to go while the other could stay. One slipped through the porous free speech filter; the other did not.

In the wake of Black Lives Matter protests, demands for Facebook to address hate speech have escalated, coinciding with a nationwide movement to remove Confederate statues and flags from cities, states, and institutions long imbued with Confederate symbolism. More than 1,100 companies and organizations have pulled ads from Facebook for at least the month of July as part of the #StopHateforProfit advertiser boycott. At the same time, Gov. Ralph Northam of Virginia has ordered the removal of the statue of Lee that famously towers over Monument Avenue in Richmond, Mississippi decided to drop the cross of the Confederate battle flag from its state flag, and NASCAR banned the flag from its races.

These movements, intertwined and mutually reinforcing, pose a particular threat to those who consider themselves present-day Confederates. From their perspective, Facebook has become more essential than ever to amplifying their message at a critical moment in historyjust as Facebook has shown a new willingness to police their speech.

Facebook has recently deplatformed hundreds of groups that express overtly violent, white supremacist beliefs, such as those associated with the Boogaloo movement. But the platform has yet to settle on a consistent approach to a more difficultand more commonquestion: how far to go in policing groups that the platform doesnt consider hate groups, but that nonetheless often attract hateful content. This gray area contains hundreds, perhaps thousands, of neo-Confederate groups that are thriving on the platform. Individual posts containing hate speech are sometimes flagged and removed, but as a whole, these groups have so far remained relatively unscathed amid Facebooks heightened moderation, continuing to churn out thousands of posts a day in support of the Lost Cause. By insisting they promote heritage not hate, theyre able to skirt the boundaries of content moderation, even as their ideology rests on a reverence for the Confederacy and the antebellum South. Their complicated position on Facebook gets to the heart of the problems inherent to content moderation itself. It is a slow, often arbitrary process, driven not by clear understandings of what hate speech and hate groups are, but by haphazard flagging, a reliance on self-policing, and confusion over the kind of space Facebook or its critics want to create.

Since Facebook users exist in echo chambers, its easy to miss how widespread Confederate heritage communities are if your Facebook friends arent sympathetic to their cause. Many such groups, both public and private, have existed since the mid-2010s, but a spate of new groups appeared this summer. Some local varieties have just hundreds of members, while other national groups, such as Confederate Citizens, have nearly 100,000 members. Not only are these groups extensive, but they also serve as content factories. Groups such as In Defense of the Confederacy, Dixie Cotton Confederates, and Save Southern Heritage see hundreds of posts each day, which circulate rapidly around other groups, pages, and news feeds. At heart, these groups share some common features: the casting of Lee as a benevolent, misunderstood figure despite his documented defense of slavery in the U.S.; the efforts to preserve and build Confederate iconography; the indignation at the toppling of statues; and therhetorical?call to arms.

Many of these groups spend a lot of time thinking about hateful speech. Just take a look at their self-policing and content policies: Its not uncommon for a group to explicitly forbid hate speech, racist content, and bullying. Nor is it rare for moderators to post and repost these rules in a groups main discussion. Megan Squire, a computer science professor at Elon University known for her work on extremist communities on Facebook, told me that this dynamic is particular to Confederate groups. A public-facing Facebook presence is important to the Confederate agenda of, for instance, getting the Lost Cause narrative in childrens textbooks. At the same time, they also attract this sort of hateful element, and so they know they need to clamp down on that or it will look bad, Squire said. I guess my question is always: If people didnt talk like that on your page, you probably wouldnt have to write that rule, right?

Moderators and group members are vigilant in part because theyre aware some of the content they attract (and many would like to espouse) wont fall within Facebooks policies. I fully respect the First Amendment. But the Wizard of Facebook doesnt. I dont want to get kicked off Facebook or have my growing page taken down because of racist words, posted a moderator of Confederate Defenders, a public group, a few years ago. That same moderator wrote earlier this month, with greater urgency, With all the censorship going around, I dont want to lose my page. PLEASE BE CAREFUL WITH YOUR LANGUAGE.

For many Confederates, that censorship is a worthwhile trade-off. If Im willing to self-censor myself and my organization, I can reach a reasonable number of people with my message and I can do it every day, Kirk Lyons, an admin of Save Southern Heritage, told me. He also runs the Facebook page for the Southern Legal Resource Center, an organization he co-founded that has been called the legal arm of the neo-Confederate movement. Lyons identifies as an unreconstructed Southerner, but the Southern Poverty Law Center considers him a white supremacist lawyer. (Lyons denies this and maintains that the SPLCs article on him contains many inaccuracies.) Lyons sees Facebook as a sort of necessary evil to getting his message out. Its worth putting up with all of Mark [Zuckerberg]s nonsense because its so much easier than it was in the email age or the letter and postage stamp age, he said. If hes careful, he explained, his individual posts can reach hundreds of thousands of people, such as a recent image of a Confederate flaghis Confederate flagflown over NASCARs race at Talladega.

How sincere the language opposing hate speech comes across varies from group to group, user to user, which is fitting for a movement known for its broad ideological spectrum. Some say that their beliefs are compatible with an outright rejection of racism or even disrespectful content; they may believe they can revere Dixie on their own terms, irrespective of the racial violence its rooted in. Along these lines, the least incendiaryand the most moderatedgroups tend to focus on Confederate soldiers and their descendants, as well as historical documents.

On the more extreme end of the spectrum, groups affiliated with the League of the South are known for openly discussing white supremacist beliefs. (For this reason, Facebook actually deplatforms them: A few weeks ago, for instance, Facebook took down one such group based in North Carolina, though a new group replaced it within a day.) Group discussions often bear out the disparities among Confederates approach to hate speech. In screenshots Squire sent me from a private Confederate monument protection group in her county, a number of members expressed anger at seeing a fellow Confederate hold up a sign at a rally on July 11 that read, NO FREE COLORED TVS TODAYpresumably a racist dog whistle. I dont care how you look at this, but to me this is racist period, said one user. People state over and over we are for history and heritage yet make signs like this. Some reiterated this isnt what they stand for, some didnt understand what the big fuss was about, and others were more focused on the signs potential to give fuel to detractors and the liberal media.

But that sort of pushback is dwarfed at times by the amount of hateful speech that persists. Group members often post about landing themselves in Facebook jail for a reason. Even in the public groups, its not unusual to see racial slurs, some of which arent later removed. Last month, for example, a member of Save Southern Heritage used the N-word to refer to people destroying and looting. Im impressed you werent banned for that word on FB, another member replied. I agree with every word though. More common than racial slurs, however, are calls to violencesometimes specific, sometimes more vague. In a group called Save the Confederacy and restore our Confederate heritage flags up, a post on a Black Lives Matter demonstration prompted a few users to say that drivers should run protesters over and take out as many as possible. In Dales Confederate Group, which is now private, a user commented this month that the best thing to do with Democratic cities is to bomb them.

All the examples mentioned here, aside from Squires, come from public groups. Private groups are strict about admittance: Virtually all require you to answer questions about your commitment to the Confederacy, your opinion on the real cause of the Civil War, and what the Confederate flag means to you upon your request to join. Given the content thats visible in public groups, its safe to assume that more borderline-to-outright-hateful speech thrives in these self-contained spaces. One of the eternal problems with Facebook is that if this stuff goes on in a private group, the only way to report the content is to join the group, find the content, and report it. Each report takes 10 clicks. Its putting a lot of work on a user, said Squire. And in private Confederacy groups, those users may not be inclined to do any of that work.

A recent civil rights audit of Facebook, carried out by independent civil rights experts and lawyers over the course of two years, criticized the platform for prioritizing free speech over nondiscrimination. The auditors concluded, among other things, that Facebook needs to be more proactive about identifying and removing extremist and white nationalist content. I dont know if Mark appreciates that hateful speech has harmful results, and that Facebook groups have real-world consequences, Jonathan Greenblatt, chief executive of the Anti-Defamation League, told the New York Times after the civil rights report was released.

Those real-world consequences are worth considering. Before Facebook restricted public access to its application programming interface, or API, in 2018, Squire used Facebooks data to systematically study about 700,000 users across 2,000 hate groups and 10 different ideologies. Of these groups, the Confederates were the least likely to cross over with other ideologies: About 85 percent of them belonged only to Confederate groups. There are two stories here. The first is that Confederate groups are relatively contained and self-sustaining, and that their members dont dabble much in other, more violent ideologies. From that perspective, their threat consists mostly of the speech within their groups. The second story is about the other 15 percent of Confederates who cross over into militia, white nationalist, alt-right, and anti-immigrant groups. The prime example of the dangers of that crossover is the Unite the Right rally in 2017. Although the rally was ostensibly held to protect the Lee monument in Charlottesville, Virginia, it became a gathering for hate groups across the far-right, including neo-Nazis and Klansmen, that left at least 33 injured and one counterprotester dead.

Its not controversial to say that neo-Nazi or Boogaloo groups should go, but its less clear what a mainstream platform should do with heritage not hate groupsgroups that, as the SPLC puts it, in their effort to gloss over the legacy of slavery in the South strengthen the appeal of Lost Cause mythology, opening the door for violent incidents. Even the SPLC, which refers to neo-Confederacy as a whole as a revisionist branch of American white nationalism, doesnt consider a number of Confederate heritage groups, such as the Sons of Confederate Veterans, to be hate groups.

When I asked Squiresomeone whos outspoken about her activism and who provides data on far-right extremists to the SPLC and antifa activistswhether she believes Facebook should allow these groups to operate on its platform, she pointed to the fact that their speech isnt illegal. And more than that, she said, their beliefs are not fringe down here in the South. She mentioned that state representatives in her state of North Carolina have ties to the Sons of Confederate Veterans, and that the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill gave $2.5 million last year to that organization after protesters toppled a statue of a Confederate soldier on campus in 2018. Were fighting it, obviously, but its a very long and uphill battle, Squire continued. And I think Facebook has to bridge both of those realities.

As people continue to call for more robust definitions of hate speech online, it may be helpful to remember that sometimes what we want from Facebook is misaligned with how the platform operates. Facebook can be dangerous not just for its content, but for its lack of public data; for how its (private) algorithms work; for the ways it amplifies certain voices and can lead to deeper polarization and, in some cases, radicalization. Theres a reason researchers are always going on about the dire need for transparency. Outside of calling for Facebook to police its most extreme content, its worth asking what we can reasonably expect from a private company that operates in its own interest.

Sometimes what we want from Facebook is misaligned with how the platformoperates.

After Facebook released the findings of the civil rights audit, the Verges Casey Newton succinctly summed up the problem in his newsletter: The company could implement all of the auditors suggestions and nearly every dilemma would still come down to the decision of one person overseeing the communications of 1.73 billion people each day. The same could be said of the majority of #StopHateforProfits 10 recommendations for Facebook, which demand changes such as further audits, a C-suite civil rights executive, and heightened content and group moderation. This campaign is not calling for Facebook to adopt a new business model, spin off its acquisitions, or end all algorithmic promotion of groups, wrote Newton. Nor is it calling for an overhaul of Facebooks approach to transparency. Yet these sorts of changes may in fact be necessary to addressing the root of Facebooks speech and radicalization problems.

The complexities of Confederate discourse on the platform ultimately show that singling out hate speech as the primary target of public outrage at Facebook is, in part, a distractiona Sisyphean endeavor that has a tendency to obscure more serious issues. Such a focus leaves us with the classic censorship vs. free speech dichotomy, which inevitably leads to some people demanding a return to the First Amendment, and others retorting that the Constitution doesnt pertain to private sites, ad infinitum. What borderline speech can force us to do is to move beyond the terms of that debate, to update the conversation (and call to action) to reflect the platform as it operates today.

But what a better conversationlet alone moderation frameworkwould actually look like is unclear. Newton writes that the best hope for addressing Facebooks role in accelerating and promoting hate speech, misinformation, and extremist views comes not from the campaign or the audit, but from Congress, which has the potential to question the companys underlying dynamics and staggering size. And thats certainly one avenue for change, especially with Zuckerberg testifying before the House Judiciary antitrust subcommittee on Wednesday. But informed government regulation often relies on citizen engagement, and in the case of Facebooks speech problems, users must grapple not only with the flashiest and most extreme bits of Facebooks content, but also with the shades of speech that exist just below that, and the mechanisms that allow that speech to flourish.

Update, Aug. 3, 2020: The description of the meme shared in theSave Southern Heritagegroup has been updated.

Future Tense is a partnership of Slate, New America, and Arizona State University that examines emerging technologies, public policy, and society.

Read this article:

Confederate Groups Are Thriving on Facebook. What Does That Mean for the Platform? - Slate

Marine Corps amphibious assault vehicle involved in deadly mishap was set to be replaced a decade ago – Task & Purpose

The Marine Corps amphibious vehicle involved in a deadly mishap Thursday has a long history and was set to be replaced a decade ago. However, defense budget cuts scrapped its multi-billion-dollar replacement in 2011.

Amphibious vehicles commonly called "Amtracks" have been part of the Marine Corps' fighting force since World War II, when in 1943 they carried Marines onto the shores of Tarawa, a tiny island in the Pacific.

The modern version, the Assault Amphibious Vehicle, entered service in 1972.

Related: Marine Corps identifies Marines and sailor presumed dead after amphibious assault vehicle accident

The armored troop carriers can be armed with a .50 caliber machine gun and a grenade launcher. They deploy from Navy amphibious ships' well decks to ferry troops to nearby beaches. On land, they're outfitted with tank treads and can transport assault teams to and from the battlefield before returning to their ships. They can carry up to 21 troops and are operated by a crew of three.

At the turn of the 21st century, replacing the AAV became the top priority for the Marines.

Its planned replacement, the Expeditionary Fighting Vehicle, was a larger, faster version of the AAV. It could travel at speeds over 25 mph while at sea more than triple the AAV's top speed of 8 mph in the water.

However, the technology in the EFV was expensive, and throughout the first decade of the 2000s costs ballooned for the General Dynamics-made craft. By 2011, the program cost was an estimated $15 billion. The program was canceled in January of that year.

Then-Congressman Duncan Hunter said at the time the cut would do "more harm than good, especially when the core competency of the Marine Corps centers on amphibious operations."

Hunter, a Marine veteran of the war in Iraq, left Congress in January after pleading guilty of stealing money from his campaign.

A cheaper replacement the Amphibious Combat Vehicle is still in the early stages of funding and development.

Lt. Gen. Joseph Osterman, the outgoing commanding general of I Marine Expeditionary Force, said at a Camp Pendleton news conference Friday that, despite its age, the AAV has been modernized since 1972.

"AAVs were originally procured in 1972 but they've gone through many service life extension programs," Osterman said. "They bring it in, they literally bring it down to just the hull and rebuild everything inside of it. We've done that multiple times through the years."

2020 The San Diego Union-Tribune. Distributed by Tribune Content Agency, LLC.

See more here:

Marine Corps amphibious assault vehicle involved in deadly mishap was set to be replaced a decade ago - Task & Purpose

BWX TECHNOLOGIES : MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS (form 10-Q) – marketscreener.com

CAUTIONARY STATEMENT CONCERNING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTSThe following information should be read in conjunction with the unauditedcondensed consolidated financial statements and the notes thereto included underItem 1 of this quarterly report on Form 10-Q ("Report") and the auditedconsolidated financial statements and the related notes and Item 7 "Management'sDiscussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations"included in our annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2019(our "2019 10-K").In this Report, unless the context otherwise indicates, "we," "us" and "our"mean BWX Technologies, Inc. ("BWXT" or the "Company") and its consolidatedsubsidiaries.From time to time, our management or persons acting on our behalf makeforward-looking statements to inform existing and potential security holdersabout our Company. Forward-looking statements include those statements thatexpress a belief, expectation or intention, as well as those that are notstatements of historical fact, within the meaning of Section 27A of theSecurities Act of 1933 and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,as amended (the "Exchange Act"). Statements and assumptions regardingexpectations and projections of specific projects, our future backlog, revenues,income and capital spending, strategic investments, acquisitions ordivestitures, return of capital activities, margin improvement initiatives orimpacts of the novel strain of coronavirus ("COVID-19") pandemic are examples offorward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements are generally accompaniedby words such as "estimate," "project," "predict," "believe," "expect,""anticipate," "plan," "seek," "goal," "could," "intend," "may," "should" orother words that convey the uncertainty of future events or outcomes. Inaddition, sometimes we will specifically describe a statement as being aforward-looking statement and refer to this cautionary statement.We have based our forward-looking statements on information currently availableto us and our current expectations, estimates and projections about ourindustries and our Company. We caution that these statements are not guaranteesof future performance and you should not rely unduly on them as they involverisks, uncertainties and assumptions that we cannot predict. In addition, wehave based many of these forward-looking statements on assumptions about futureevents that may prove to be inaccurate. For example, the extent to which theCOVID-19 outbreak impacts our business will depend on future developments thatare highly uncertain and cannot be predicted, including new information that mayemerge concerning the length and severity of the COVID-19 health crisis, and theactions to contain its impact, in addition to the potential recurrence orsubsequent waves of COVID-19 or similar diseases. While our management considersthese statements and assumptions to be reasonable, they are inherently subjectto numerous factors, including potentially the risk factors described in thesections labeled Item 1A, "Risk Factors" of our 2019 10-K, of our quarterlyreport on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March, 31, 2020 (our "First Quarter2020 10-Q") and of this Report, most of which are difficult to predict and manyof which are beyond our control. Accordingly, our actual results may differmaterially from the future performance that we have expressed or forecast in ourforward-looking statements.We have discussed many of these factors in more detail elsewhere in this Report,including under the heading "COVID-19 Assessment" of this Item 2 "Management'sDiscussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations" andItem 1A, "Risk Factors", and in Item 1A "Risk Factors" in our 2019 10-K and ourFirst Quarter 2020 10-Q. These factors are not necessarily all the factors thatcould affect us. Unpredictable or unanticipated factors we have not discussed inthis Report or in our 2019 10-K and our First Quarter 2020 10-Q could also havematerial adverse effects on actual results of matters that are the subject ofour forward-looking statements. We do not intend to update or review anyforward-looking statement or our description of important factors, whether as aresult of new information, future events or otherwise, except as required byapplicable laws.GENERALWe operate in three reportable segments: Nuclear Operations Group, Nuclear PowerGroup and Nuclear Services Group. In general, we operate in capital-intensiveindustries and rely on large contracts for a substantial amount of our revenues.We are currently exploring growth strategies across our segments to expand andcomplement our existing businesses. We would expect to fund these opportunitieswith cash generated from operations or by raising additional capital throughdebt, equity or some combination thereof.Nuclear Operations GroupThe revenues of our Nuclear Operations Group segment are largely a function ofdefense spending by the U.S. Government. Through this segment, we engineer,design and manufacture precision naval nuclear components, reactors and 21-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Table of Contentsnuclear fuel for the DOE/NNSA's Naval Nuclear Propulsion Program. In addition,we perform development and fabrication activities for missile launch tubes forU.S. Navy submarines. As a supplier of major nuclear components for certain U.S.Government programs, this segment is a significant participant in the defenseindustry.Nuclear Power GroupThrough this segment, we design and manufacture commercial nuclear steamgenerators, heat exchangers, pressure vessels, reactor components, as well asother auxiliary equipment, including containers for the storage of spent nuclearfuel and other high-level nuclear waste. This segment is a leading supplier ofnuclear fuel, fuel handling systems, tooling delivery systems, nuclear-gradematerials and precisely machined components, and related services for CANDUnuclear power plants. This segment also provides a variety of engineering andin-plant services and is a significant supplier to nuclear power utilitiesundergoing major refurbishment and plant life extension projects. Additionally,this segment is a leading global manufacturer and supplier of critical medicalradioisotopes and radiopharmaceuticals.Our Nuclear Power Group segment's overall activity primarily depends on thedemand and competitiveness of nuclear energy. A significant portion of ourNuclear Power Group segment's operations depend on the timing of maintenance andrefueling outages, the cyclical nature of capital expenditures and majorrefurbishment and life extension projects, as well as the demand for nuclearfuel and fuel handling equipment primarily in the Canadian market, which couldcause variability in our financial results.Nuclear Services GroupOur Nuclear Services Group segment provides various services to the U.S.Government. The revenues and equity in income of investees under our U.S.Government contracts are largely a function of spending of the U.S. Governmentand the performance scores we and our consortium partners earn in managing andoperating high-consequence operations at U.S. nuclear weapons sites, nationallaboratories and manufacturing complexes. With its specialized capabilities offull life-cycle management of special materials, facilities and technologies, webelieve our Nuclear Services Group segment is well-positioned to continue toparticipate in the continuing cleanup, operation and management of criticalgovernment-owned nuclear sites, laboratories and manufacturing complexesmaintained by the DOE, NASA and other federal agencies. This segment alsodevelops technology for a variety of applications, including advanced nuclearpower sources, and offers complete advanced nuclear fuel and reactor design andengineering, licensing and manufacturing services for new advanced nuclearreactors.Divestiture of U.S.-Based Commercial Nuclear Services BusinessOn May 29, 2020, our subsidiary BWXT Nuclear Energy, Inc. divested itsU.S.-based commercial nuclear services business, a component of our NuclearServices Group segment. In a cashless transaction, we exchanged net assetstotaling $18.0 million, consisting primarily of property, plant and equipmentand certain warranty obligations, for a manufacturing facility and theassociated land of approximately the same value. The acquired assets arereported as part of the Nuclear Services Group segment.Acquisition of Laker Energy Products Ltd.On January 2, 2020, our subsidiary BWXT Canada Ltd. acquired Laker EnergyProducts Ltd. ("Laker Energy Products"). Laker Energy Products is a globalsupplier of nuclear-grade materials and precisely machined components for CANDUnuclear power utilities and employs approximately 140 personnel. Laker EnergyProducts is reported as part of our Nuclear Power Group segment.Critical Accounting Policies and EstimatesFor a summary of the critical accounting policies and estimates that we use inthe preparation of our unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements,see Item 7 "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition andResults of Operations" in our 2019 10-K. There have been no material changes toour critical accounting policies during the six months ended June 30, 2020 withthe exception of the adoption of Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB")Topic Intangibles - Goodwill and Other (Topic 350): Simplifying the Test forGoodwill Impairment as described in the notes to the condensed consolidatedfinancial statements in Part I of this Report. 22-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Table of ContentsAccounting for ContractsOn certain of our performance obligations, we recognize revenue over time. Inaccordance with FASB Topic Revenue from Contracts with Customers, we arerequired to estimate the total amount of costs on these performance obligations.As of June 30, 2020, we have provided for the estimated costs to complete all ofour ongoing contracts. However, it is possible that current estimates couldchange due to unforeseen events, which could result in adjustments to overallcontract revenues and costs. A principal risk on fixed-price contracts is thatrevenue from the customer is insufficient to cover increases in our costs. It ispossible that current estimates could materially change for various reasons,including, but not limited to, fluctuations in forecasted labor productivity orsteel and other raw material prices. In some instances, we guarantee completiondates related to our projects or provide performance guarantees. Increases incosts on our fixed-price contracts could have a material adverse impact on ourconsolidated results of operations, financial condition and cash flows.Alternatively, reductions in overall contract costs at completion couldmaterially improve our consolidated results of operations, financial conditionand cash flows. During the three months ended June 30, 2020 and 2019, werecognized net changes in estimates related to contracts that recognize revenueover time, which increased operating income by approximately $11.4 million and$18.9 million, respectively. During the six months ended June 30, 2020 and 2019,we recognized net changes in estimates related to contracts that recognizerevenue over time, which increased operating income by approximately$21.0 million and $23.7 million, respectively.COVID-19 AssessmentA global outbreak of COVID-19 has occurred impacting over 200 countries,including the U.S. and Canada where we maintain our principal operations.Developments have been occurring rapidly with respect to the spread of COVID-19and its impact on human health and businesses, with new and changing governmentactions occurring on a daily basis. As a result, we have been closely monitoringthe COVID-19 pandemic and its impacts and potential impacts on our business.We have received notifications from the U.S. and Canadian governmentsdesignating BWXT as an essential business given our roles in national security,energy production and medical manufacturing. We continue to operate ourfacilities and have taken numerous precautions to mitigate exposure and protectthe health and well-being of our workforce. The COVID-19 pandemic has not causeda significant disruption to our operations or our supply chain to date.Because developments related to the spread of COVID-19 and its impacts have beenoccurring rapidly, it is difficult to predict any future impact at this time. Wemay experience material disruptions to demand for our products and services andour operations in the future as a result of, among other things, national,state, provincial or local government enforced quarantines, worker illness orabsenteeism, and travel and other restrictions. For example, we have experienceda year over year decline in revenues in our medical radioisotopes andradiopharmaceuticals business due to a decrease in demand for electivediagnostic procedures. For similar reasons, the COVID-19 pandemic may alsoadversely impact our supply chain and other manufacturers which could delay ourreceipt of essential goods and services. For example, certain services scheduledduring nuclear power plant outages during which our Nuclear Power Group segmentwould operate have been rescheduled. We have also experienced delays in thebidding and contracting process for our U.S. Government businesses due toCOVID-19 concerns. Any number of these potential risks could have a materialadverse effect on our financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.The extent to which the COVID-19 outbreak impacts our business will depend onfuture developments that are highly uncertain and cannot be predicted, includingnew information that may emerge concerning the severity of the virus and theactions to contain its impact.See Item 1A "Risk Factors" in this Report for an additional discussion of risksof the COVID-19 pandemic on our business. 23-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Table of ContentsRESULTS OF OPERATIONS - THREE AND SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2020 VS. THREE ANDSIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2019Selected financial highlights are presented in the table below: Three Months Ended Six Months Ended June 30, June 30, 2020 2019 $ Change 2020 2019 $ Change (In thousands)REVENUES:Nuclear Operations Group $ 410,252$ 358,352$ 51,900$ 834,027$ 663,153$ 170,874Nuclear Power Group 67,983 86,639 (18,656) 155,900 171,038 (15,138)Nuclear Services Group 33,328 29,829 3,499 70,093 58,923 11,170Eliminations (7,043) (3,589) (3,454) (13,292) (5,429) (7,863) $ 504,520$ 471,231$ 33,289$ 1,046,728$ 887,685$ 159,043OPERATING INCOME:Nuclear Operations Group $ 85,972$ 75,226$ 10,746$ 176,331$ 132,851$ 43,480Nuclear Power Group 1,102 14,883 (13,781) 9,572 27,466 (17,894)Nuclear Services Group 4,122 1,490 2,632 10,522 3,061 7,461Other (5,600) (6,744) 1,144 (10,959) (12,840) 1,881 $ 85,596$ 84,855$ 741$ 185,466$ 150,538$ 34,928Unallocated Corporate (3,162) (4,320) 1,158 (4,765) (6,359) 1,594Total Operating Income $ 82,434$ 80,535$ 1,899$ 180,701$ 144,179$ 36,522Consolidated Results of OperationsThree months ended June 30, 2020 vs. 2019Consolidated revenues increased 7.1%, or $33.3 million, to $504.5 million in thethree months ended June 30, 2020 compared to $471.2 million for thecorresponding period in 2019, due to increases in revenues from our NuclearOperations Group and Nuclear Services Group segments totaling $51.9 million and$3.5 million, respectively. These increases were partially offset by a decreasein revenues in our Nuclear Power Group segment of $18.7 million.Consolidated operating income increased $1.9 million to $82.4 million in thethree months ended June 30, 2020 compared to $80.5 million for the correspondingperiod of 2019. Operating income in our Nuclear Operations Group, NuclearServices Group and Other segments increased by $10.7 million, $2.6 million, and$1.1 million, respectively. In addition, we experienced lower UnallocatedCorporate expenses of $1.2 million when compared to the corresponding period of2019. These increases were partially offset by a decrease in operating income inour Nuclear Power Group segment of $13.8 million.Six months ended June 30, 2020 vs. 2019Consolidated revenues increased 17.9%, or $159.0 million, to $1,046.7 million inthe six months ended June 30, 2020 compared to $887.7 million for thecorresponding period in 2019, due to increases in revenues from our NuclearOperations Group and Nuclear Services Group segments totaling $170.9 million and$11.2 million, respectively. These increases were partially offset by a decreasein revenues in our Nuclear Power Group segment of $15.1 million.Consolidated operating income increased $36.5 million to $180.7 million in thesix months ended June 30, 2020 compared to $144.2 million for the correspondingperiod of 2019. Operating income in our Nuclear Operations Group, NuclearServices Group and Other segments increased by $43.5 million, $7.5 million, and$1.9 million, respectively. In addition, we experienced lower UnallocatedCorporate expenses of $1.6 million when compared to the corresponding period of2019. These increases were partially offset by a decrease in operating income inour Nuclear Power Group segment of $17.9 million. 24-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Table of ContentsNuclear Operations Group Three Months Ended Six Months Ended June 30, June 30, 2020 2019 $ Change 2020 2019 $ Change (In thousands)Revenues $ 410,252$ 358,352$ 51,900$ 834,027$ 663,153$ 170,874Operating Income $ 85,972$ 75,226$ 10,746$ 176,331$ 132,851$ 43,480% of Revenues 21.0% 21.0% 21.1% 20.0%Three months ended June 30, 2020 vs. 2019Revenues increased 14.5%, or $51.9 million, to $410.3 million in the threemonths ended June 30, 2020 compared to $358.4 million for the correspondingperiod of 2019. The increase related to the timing of the procurement of certainlong-lead materials when compared to the corresponding period of 2019 as well asadditional volume in our naval nuclear fuel and downblending operations.Operating income increased $10.7 million to $86.0 million in the three monthsended June 30, 2020 compared to $75.2 million for the corresponding period of2019. The increase was due to the operating income impact of the changes inrevenues noted above.Six months ended June 30, 2020 vs. 2019Revenues increased 25.8%, or $170.9 million, to $834.0 million in the six monthsended June 30, 2020 compared to $663.2 million for the corresponding period of2019 as we continue to expand production related to the Columbia-Class nuclearpropulsion system. The increase comprised additional volume in the manufactureof nuclear components for U.S. Government programs and the timing of theprocurement of certain long-lead materials when compared to the correspondingperiod of 2019.Operating income increased $43.5 million to $176.3 million in the six monthsended June 30, 2020 compared to $132.9 million for the corresponding period of2019. The increase was due to the operating income impact of the changes inrevenues noted above as well as favorable contract adjustments related to ournaval nuclear fuel operations.Nuclear Power Group Three Months Ended Six Months Ended June 30, June 30, 2020 2019 $ Change 2020 2019 $ Change (In thousands)Revenues $ 67,983$ 86,639$ (18,656)$ 155,900$ 171,038$ (15,138)Operating Income $ 1,102$ 14,883$ (13,781)$ 9,572$ 27,466$ (17,894)% of Revenues 1.6% 17.2% 6.1% 16.1%Three months ended June 30, 2020 vs. 2019Revenues decreased 21.5%, or $18.7 million, to $68.0 million in the three monthsended June 30, 2020 compared to $86.6 million for the corresponding period of2019. The decrease was primarily related to lower revenues in our nuclearcomponents business of $20.9 million largely attributable to decreased activityassociated with major steam generator design and supply contracts as well as adecrease in volume associated with our medical radioisotopes business. Thesedecreases were partially offset by revenues associated with the Laker EnergyProducts acquisition of $5.7 million.Operating income decreased $13.8 million to $1.1 million in the three monthsended June 30, 2020 compared to $14.9 million for the corresponding period of2019, primarily attributable to the decrease in revenues noted above as well asa decline in operating margins as a result of net favorable changes in estimatesrelated to certain long-term contracts recorded in the prior year.Six months ended June 30, 2020 vs. 2019Revenues decreased 8.9%, or $15.1 million, to $155.9 million in the six monthsended June 30, 2020 compared to $171.0 million for the corresponding period of2019. The decrease was primarily related to lower revenues in our nuclearcomponents 25-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Table of Contentsbusiness of $11.3 million largely attributable to decreased activity associatedwith major steam generator design and supply contracts. We also experienced adecrease in revenue of $9.5 million due to lower levels of in-plant inspection,maintenance and modification services when compared to the same period in theprior year. These decreases were partially offset by revenues associated withthe Laker Energy Products acquisition.Operating income decreased $17.9 million to $9.6 million in the six months endedJune 30, 2020 compared to $27.5 million for the corresponding period of 2019,primarily attributable to the decrease in revenues noted above as well as adecline in operating margins as a result of net favorable changes in estimatesrelated to certain long-term contracts recorded in the prior year, as well ashift in our product line mix when compared to the same period in the prioryear.Nuclear Services Group Three Months Ended Six Months Ended June 30, June 30, 2020 2019 $ Change 2020 2019 $ Change (In thousands)Revenues $ 33,328$ 29,829$ 3,499$ 70,093$ 58,923$ 11,170Operating Income $ 4,122$ 1,490$ 2,632$ 10,522$ 3,061$ 7,461% of Revenues 12.4% 5.0% 15.0% 5.2%Three months ended June 30, 2020 vs. 2019Revenues increased 11.7%, or $3.5 million, to $33.3 million in the three monthsended June 30, 2020 compared to $29.8 million for the corresponding period of2019, primarily attributable to an increase in design and engineering workexecuted by our advanced technologies business.Operating income increased $2.6 million to $4.1 million in the three monthsended June 30, 2020 compared to $1.5 million for the corresponding period of2019. The increase was due to the operating income impact of the changes inrevenues noted above in addition to a decrease in selling, general andadministrative expenses related to business development activities caused by thetiming of proposal activities.Six months ended June 30, 2020 vs. 2019Revenues increased 19.0%, or $11.2 million, to $70.1 million in the six monthsended June 30, 2020 compared to $58.9 million for the corresponding period of2019. The increase was primarily attributable to design and engineering workexecuted by our advanced technologies business and an increase in the volume ofcommercial nuclear inspection and maintenance outage work in the U.S. whencompared to the same period in the prior year.Operating income increased $7.5 million to $10.5 million in the six months endedJune 30, 2020 compared to $3.1 million for the corresponding period of 2019 dueto the operating income impact of the changes in revenues noted above.Other Three Months Ended Six Months Ended June 30, June 30, 2020 2019 $ Change 2020 2019 $ Change (In thousands)

Operating Income $ (5,600)$ (6,744)$ 1,144$ (10,959)$ (12,840)$ 1,881

We do not include the value of our unconsolidated joint venture contracts inbacklog. These unconsolidated joint ventures are included in our NuclearServices Group segment.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Edgar Online, source Glimpses

Read the original:

BWX TECHNOLOGIES : MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS (form 10-Q) - marketscreener.com

With final successful rescue, US Customs and Border Protection bids farewell to UH-1 Huey – Vertical Magazine

On July 21, just outside of Las Cruces, New Mexico, a U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) Bell UH-1N helped locate and rescue two hikers lost along the mountainous Organ Needle Trail.

And with that successful mission, the last UH-1 in operation with CBP performed its final official mission and headed for retirement. Eight days later, CBPs Air and Marine Operations (AMO), El Paso Air Branch, using that same aircraft, conducted the final flight of the UH-1N helicopter for the agency.

It went up there and searched around and we were able to coordinate the locations of search-and-rescue personnel to the people who were lost, El Paso Air Branch Director John Stonehouse told Vertical in a recent interview. They had been out there for about a day and overnight. That was the last official mission the Huey went on. So, it was nice to see it go on one more official mission.

For its farewell flight, the aircraft soared over El Paso, touring its final official home with CBP. It then came back down the taxiway at the citys international airport, where the resident fire engines saluted with arcing jets of water.

The UH-1 November model that we had really allowed us to move multiple people in and out of situations, to get into areas that were maybe higher and hotter than our smaller aircraft could get into, Stonehouse said. Were specifically talking about a law enforcement role where we have to deploy personnel or a rescue role where we are trying to recover additional personnel.

Those rescues could be officers or agents that are down, U.S. citizens that are lost or illegal migration where people have been injured or lost in specific areas that require immediate medical attention, he said.

Flying from El Paso, CBP Hueys spent most of their time operating in the rugged, remote Big Bend Sector, which spans 135,000 square miles (350,000 square kilometers) over 118 counties in Texas and Oklahoma and includes Big Bend National Park, Stonehouse said. Four of the units five UH-1Ns deployed to major hurricane relief efforts, including responding to massive flooding in Houston in the aftermath of Hurricane Harvey in 2017.

The twin-engine, medium-lift UH-1N has been in operation with AMO since Feb. 10, 2015, and was intended as a short-term asset to bridge the gap of medium-lift helicopter capabilities, as AMO initiated the UH-60 Service Life Extension Plan. With that program underway and the recent approval to standardize the medium-lift helicopter fleet to the UH-60, the UH-1N served its purpose in keeping AMOs capabilities viable.

It really has proven its value, even though it is older and its outdated in terms of what it can do, Stonehouse said. We used the UH-1 really as a stopgap capability to get to a standardized medium-lift fleet, which is in alignment with our 2030 vision and strategy.

The fleet of N-model Hueys are all former U.S. Marine Corps aircraft retired between August 2010 and September 2012 and subsequently upgraded to meet AMO requirements. Upgrades included a new communications suite, glass cockpit displays, new wire-strike kit, high-skid landing gear and tail boom and rotor modifications. The Pratt & Whitney Canada PT6T-3 engine received electrical and fuel system upgrades and installation of extended exhaust deflectors. Each aircraft received the $1.3 million upgrade to AMO standard by Rotorcraft Support Inc. of Van Nuys, California.

Since 2011, the UH-1Ns and older model Hueys have operated more than 8,000 hours, contributed to seizure of approximately 16,700 pounds of marijuana and 35 vehicles, contributed to the arrest or apprehension of 245,862 individuals, and were involved in the rescue of 152 individuals.

The five UH-1Ns will be auctioned by the General Services Administration in August. Funds generated will be returned to the AMO operating budget and immediately applied to sustainment of the UH-60 Black Hawk fleet, which will replace the UH-1N along the southern border and is in use across the continental United States and Puerto Rico.

The Hueys will be replaced with two UH-60A+ Black Hawks and one Lima-model equipped with external hoist capability. A single UH-60A is currently in operation with the second scheduled for delivery later in 2020. The UH-60L is scheduled for delivering in April 2021, Stonehouse said.

All three helicopters will come from the U.S. Army. Hoisting is extremely important along the southern U.S. borders mountainous terrain, Stonehouse said.

A lot of people dont realize, they think El Paso is flat, but weve got some big mountains up here, Stonehouse said. Plus, our [area of responsibility] extends down into Big Bend, where theres a lot of beautiful mountains. Its a gorgeous area that we have and we patrol and we get to work in every day, but it does have its environmental challenges.

Once CBP zeroes its fleet with UH-60s, the entire aviation wing of the agency will have a standardized medium-lift capability optimized for emergency response at long range, Stonehouse said.

The UH-60, the benefit it brings, we can haul twice the personnel; we can go twice the distance and about 40 percent faster than we can versus the UH-1, Stonehouse said. Of course, anytime you standardize a fleet, training costs come down, operating costs come down and the interoperability across the nation really goes up.

Read more from the original source:

With final successful rescue, US Customs and Border Protection bids farewell to UH-1 Huey - Vertical Magazine

The Mission of the Texas A&M AgriLife Extension Service by Mario Villarino – KSST

DevelopedbyDr.MarioA.Villarino,CountyExtensionAgentforAgricultureandNaturalResourcesHopkinsCounty, Texas

The mission of the Texas A&M AgriLife Extension Service is to provide quality, relevant outreach and continuing educational programs and services to the people of Texas. Extension educates Texans in the areas of agriculture, environmental stewardship, youth and adult life skills, human capital and leadership, and community economic development. The agency improves the lives of Texans through an educational process that uses research-based knowledge focused on issues and needs. Because of the broad range of needs, priorities and learning styles, extension personnel use several educational tools to educate people. Using mass media (i.e. this publication) helps extension professional educate many people in a subject very quickly. As our communities get more involved in rural activities and where our food comes from, many get interested in Gardening. Gardening is, in the way I see it, the primer of agriculture. Because of its simple start up process, easy access to varieties and their seeds, gardening offers a wide variety of experiences shared with other sectors of agriculture. And, at the core of gardening rest the soil. The soil is a storehouse for all the elements plants need to grow: nutrients, organic matter, air, and water. Soil also provides support for plant roots. When properly prepared and cared for, soil can be improved each year and will continue to grow plants forever. Uncared for soil will soon become suited only for growing weeds. Texas gardeners must work with many different soils. Some are very sandy, some are sticky clay, and others are rocky and shallow. Sandy soils do not hold enough water; in windy areas, blowing sand can injure vegetables. Clay soils hold too much water and do not allow enough air to enter the soil. Vegetables need a deep and well-drained soil with adequate organic matter. Good garden soil with proper moisture will not form a hard ball when squeezed in the hand. It should crumble easily. The soil should be tilled as deeply as possible, at least 8 to 10 inches. Deep tilling loosens soil and lets vegetable roots go deeper. Turn each shovelful of soil completely over. Till soil when it is moist but not wet. Working soil when it is too wet can cause it to become rough. Spade the soil in the winter to prepare for spring planting. Winter temperatures and moisture help mellow soil. This is especially important if the soil is being worked for the first time. Add organic matter each year during soil preparation to build and maintain the soil. Be sure all plant material is turned under the soil. If organic material is added before planting a fall garden, it should be well-rotted, such as compost. Before planting, rake the soil clean and level it. Remove all sticks, rocks and other material. Allow water to drain away from plant roots the soil several months before planting to allow it time to decompose. Most gardeners do this during the winter. Manure: Use composted manure and incorporate it into the soil well ahead of planting. Do not use fresh manure, as it can damage plants and introduce diseases. Apply 30 to 40 pounds of composted manure for every 100 square feet. Compost consists of de-cayed plant materials. Work it into the soil before planting. Sawdust: Compost this before adding it to the garden. Do not use un-composted sawdust because it will rob the soil of nitrogen and, consequently, starve the plants of this essential nutrient .Green manure: Plant rye or oats in the fall and plow or spade it under in the spring. These cannot be used if a fall garden is planted. Do not add more than a 4-inch layer of organic material. Most heavy clay soils benefit from the addition of gypsum. It adds some nutrients but, more importantly, it loosens clay soils and makes it more workable. Spread about 3 to 4 pounds of gypsum per 100 square feet over garden soil after it has been dug in the winter. Work it into the soil or allow it to be washed in by rain. Add sand and organic matter to clay soil to make it more workable. Mix 2 inches of clean sand and 3 inches of organic matter, such as leaves, with the soil. Do this during the winter season. Use a shovel or rake to pull the soil up into beds 8 to 10 inches high. Pack beds or allow them to settle before planting. Also level the tops of the beds and widen them to about 6 to 8 inches before planting. Plant on top of the beds. After completing the steps required to properly prepare the soil for planting, gardening might seem anything but easy. But with proper soil preparation, gardening will get easier every year.

For more information on this or any other agricultural topic please contact the Hopkins County Extension Office at 903-885-3443 or email me at [emailprotected].

Go here to see the original:

The Mission of the Texas A&M AgriLife Extension Service by Mario Villarino - KSST

Nestbox is a modular trunk extension that turns cars into campers – Dezeen

Czech firm Studio 519 has designed a plywood module called Nestbox, which fits neatly into the boot of a car and can be expanded into a double bed and fully fitted kitchen for camping.

The unit, created for local company Ego, comes in four sizes to suit a range of cars and can be customised with modules such as a cooker, mini-fridge, sink and camping shower attachment.

During transport these different elements are neatly compacted into a steel-backed mainframe which, at its largest, measures just over one metre long and half a metre wide and tall.

But on arrival, a system of integrated, space-saving drawers and fold-away attachments allow the Nestbox to be turned into a complete sleeping and cooking set-up in a matter of minutes.

"Our main goal was to achieve a similar level of comfort to a motorhome within the confines of a van," said the head of Studio 519, Richard Vodika.

"We happily gave up the convenience of a flush toilet, which you get in a camper, in favour of more freedom when travelling.

By expanding the possibilities of a regular van you facilitate a way of travelling that is far richer in experiences. It allows you to slow down your life and get closer to nature."

To set up the bed, a panel of slats that is folded away on top of the mainframe during transit can be unfurled over the car's collapsed back seats and finished off with a foldable mattress.

Meanwhile, the kitchen is condensed into one large drawer, which can be pulled out from the trunk to provide counter space and access to the cooker and mini-fridge.

The sink is collapsable and integrated into a drop-leaf panel that can be stowed away while not in use.

A range of smaller drawers was specifically designed to store kitchen equipment while on the road, with designated slots carved out of the wood to hold knives and cutting boards.

Locally sourced birch plywood is used liberally throughout the design to create a sense of warmth and bring nature into the interior of the car.

"The materials and the colour scheme stand in contrast to classic automotive aesthetics and are more likely to evoke a sense of home," said Vodika.

"Except for the folding washbasin, everything is locally sourced and made in the Czech village of Blovice or its surrounding area," Vodika continued.

"The designers and the people who manufacture the kits work on the same grounds. This kind of immediate feedback is very important for us."

Vodika hopes that Nestbox can offer alternative modes of travel and a renewed sense of agency to holidaymakers, who were left in the cold by the Covid-19 travel restrictions.

"We are in the middle of a mindset shift right now," he said.

"Global travel restrictions have caused people to rethink what they expect from their vacations and their leisure time. Nestbox is able to give its users a sense of privacy, security and most importantly freedom."

Elsewhere, designers have started to ponder how we can make traditional modes of transport safer in a post-pandemic world, with PriestmanGoode sharing plans for how we should "future-proof" air travel and Italian architect Arturo Tedeschi and Hong Kong's Ponti Design Studio releasing concepts for how to integrate social distancing measures into local tram systems.

Here is the original post:

Nestbox is a modular trunk extension that turns cars into campers - Dezeen

A home of their own, together | Features – boulder-monitor.com

Could senior cooperative housing, a model gaining popularity in states with aging populations, be the solution to alleviating social isolation and population loss in Montanas rural small towns?

In Montanas rural counties, where demographic trends show large numbers of young people leaving for the states fast-growing urban areas, the need for elderly housing solutions is going to become increasingly important.

These communities are losing population and growing older. But many seniors in these communities dont want to leave because they know their neighbors and have spent decades as leaders in the community. Housing options for the elderly are few and far between in these areas. Older farmhouses are often poorly equipped for people to age in place, as they often have stairs and require lots of maintenance. Many small towns lack assisted living facilities or nursing homes, and many senior citizens dont need or want that type of round-the-clock care, preferring a more independent lifestyle.

Across the United States, especially in places like Florida, Arizona and California, senior cooperative housing organized around the concepts of resident control and sustaining independence with minimal services is becoming an appealing model. Cooperative housing usually includes independently owned living units, such as condos or houses, arranged around a communal gathering space with some shared activities.

Senior cooperative housing communities are different from assisted living facilities or retirement communities because theyre not usually developed by outside entities, and residents take charge of programming, forming boards that govern everything from landscaping to occupancy. They often include shared kitchen facilities, outdoor areas and rooms where visitors can stay.

What attracts older adults to senior cohousing is the desire for greater social engagement, for a new old-fashioned neighborhood, as one member put it, said Sherry Cummings, a former professor of social work at the University of Tennessee Knoxville who co-authored a book about the facilities. Theyre designed so people see each other a lot. They typically get together for several meals or activities each week. They help one another out with practical tasks, such as driving someone to the airport, and support each other through crisis situations.

In 2016, the Montana Cooperative Development Center funded a feasibility study on the prospects for new housing cooperatives in the Northern Rockies. The study documented a high degree of interest in the development of housing cooperatives as a potential strategy to address a number of housing needs in the northern Rockies.

Jill Eversole Nolan, a retired Ohio State University faculty member, co-authored a study on rural cooperative housing for older adults for the Journal of Extension in 2001, aimed at giving extension offices information for people curious about the facilities.

Cooperative housing for older adults would most certainly be a viable option in Montana, she said in an interview with the Missoulian earlier this year.

Eversole Nolan completed her doctorate on quality of life for older adults in rural communities, with a focus on senior cooperative housing.

In reviewing the literature, older adults wanted to stay in the community where they had lent their leadership and where they had family, she said. Their friends were there, their farm was there, but as dynamics changed many of the children would go off and not return to the farm, so they were at an age where they could not maintain the farm but they still wanted to stay in the community. But there were not housing opportunities.

Eversole Nolan visited cooperative living communities for those age 55 and older in rural towns in the Midwest and in the southeastern United States.

I interviewed one woman that was 95, she recalled. She said, I was born here, I grew up here, I got married and raised children here and I want to die here. Something like a cooperative housing community was a good choice for her because she could not live in her home and continue her way of life.

Older houses in rural areas lack upgrades that allow older, disabled and frail adults to function normally, Eversole Nolan said. Something as simple as a rounded faucet knob can be difficult for someone with arthritis, and a lack of elevators in multi-story housing can be impossible to live with for some.

She also noted that cooperative housing isnt just for people who want to be social all the time.

Some individuals didnt want to partake in a lot of group interaction, she said. Others engaged in many activities. So it gave them a choice to choose the way of life they were accustomed to living.

Margaret Roesch is an organizer for and resident of Village Hearth Cohousing, an intentional cohousing neighborhood for 55-and-over LGBT residents, friends and allies in Durham, North Carolina.

We certainly never imagined, when we joined Village Hearth as members, that we would move in during a global pandemic, Roesch said in a recent newsletter to members. It has certainly added some unexpected twists, but it also makes us all the more thankful and excited to be joining a community of caring people.

The 28-residence facility includes a common house and was built just this year.

People are moving in now, and instead of in-person happy hours, the group has instituted Zoom happy hours during the pandemic.

Read the original:

A home of their own, together | Features - boulder-monitor.com

Southern Poverty Law Center Announces Initial Grants in $30M Vote Your Voice Initiative Four Georgia… – SaportaReport

By Clare S. Richie, public policy specialist, Community Foundation for Greater Atlanta

In June, the Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC) announced Vote Your Voice, a partnership with the Community Foundation for Greater Atlanta to invest up to $30 million through 2022 from the SPLCs endowment to engage voters and increase voter registration, education, and participation; support Black- and brown-led organizations often ignored by traditional funders; support and prototype effective voter engagement strategies; and re-enfranchise returning citizens despite intentional bureaucratic challenges. SPLC recently announced a total of nearly $5.5 million in a first round of grants to 12 voter outreach organizations across the Deep South, four of those organizations are in Georgia.

The 12 organizations have proven track records empowering voters of color and presented innovative proposals to boost voter registration, education and mobilization in Vote Your Voices five targeted states Alabama, Georgia, Florida, Louisiana and Mississippi. The grants will help the organizations continue their efforts to turn out low-propensity voters amid voter suppression schemes and other barriers, including the pandemic, in advance of upcoming elections.

Organizations working to boost voter engagement in Georgia are:

Black Voters Matter increases civic engagement and power building in predominantly Black communities. The organization works in nine southern states Alabama, Florida, Georgia, Louisiana, Mississippi, North Carolina, South Carolina, Tennessee, and Virginia. In 2019, it expanded into two northern states Michigan and Pennsylvania. Through the $500,000 grant the organization will register, educate and mobilize Black voters in 17 Alabama counties and 24 Georgia counties through mini grants to grassroots groups and conduct outreach via texting and other digital and social media strategies.

The Georgia Coalition for the Peoples Agendas mission is to improve the quality of governance through a more informed and active electorate who will hold elected officials accountable.The organization operates seven offices metro Atlanta, Athens-Clarke County, Bibb County, Chatham County,Dougherty County,Richmond County and Troup County and conductscivic engagementactivities, registers thousands ofvoters,holds educationalforumsand mobilizes volunteers to participatethrough phone banks, texting and providing rides to the polls, focusing primarily on African American women and men in57 counties across the state.Through the $75,000 grant, the organization will continue their work focusing on people of color, young people, single women and low-income Georgians. Their tactics include phone banking, texting and relational organizing.

The New Georgia Project (NGP) is focused on voter registration, engagement and power building for the large and growing population of African Americans, Latinos, and Asian Americans in Georgia. NGP is part of a movement not a moment to meet the changing demographics of Georgia, to harness the unheard voices of the New American Majority and to position Georgia for leadership in the South and across the country, identify local policy priorities, demystify the political process, and move their families and neighbors to action. Through the $750,000 grant, the organization will engage in voter registration, education and mobilization among low-propensity communities of color, women of color and young people. Additionally, it will counter online voter suppression with videos, songs, social listening and tech tools.

ProGeorgia is a bold, trusted, and diverse collaborative that champions an equitable and inclusive democracy, for and with traditionally underrepresented communities. The organization supports and coordinates the civic engagement programs of its diverse partners. ProGeorgia develops the infrastructure, executes the joint strategies, and employs new tools and technology to assure a government that is more responsive to the needs of its constituencies. Through the $750,000 grant, the organization will continue its work to register, educate, mobilize and protect voters in low-propensity communities of color as well as women of color and young people, focusing on 33 counties for voter engagement and 70 counties for election protection.

SPLC and Community Foundation have started to accept applications for grants in a second round of distribution across the target states. The initiative is seeking a broad cross-section of nonprofit organizations with deep roots within communities prioritized; experience in nonpartisan voter registration, education and mobilization; and a commitment to working with the initiatives data partner to track progress and impact.

Together with the first cohort, organizations participating in the Vote Your Voice initiative will use grants to amplify their ongoing work to engage millions of voters across the South this election cycle to exercise their basic right to vote and ensure their voices are heard.

Applications for the second round of grants are due by August 14, 2020. Organizations can apply here. Additional application information may be found here. Click here for more details including a full list of organizations that received first-round grants.

This is sponsored content.

Excerpt from:

Southern Poverty Law Center Announces Initial Grants in $30M Vote Your Voice Initiative Four Georgia... - SaportaReport

COVID-19 is revealing the flaws of Silicon Valley culture – Fast Company

Thanks to intentional culture-building, startup workplaces have evolved to become much more than officestheyre where people take meals, cultivate friendships, and find their purpose. Great culture attracts and retains great talent, encourages people to spend more time working toward company goals, and rallies the team around a mission. For many employees at these companies (and the other companies that emulate their cultures), the role of the workplace has taken on an outsize importance.

But as round after round of startup layoffs have occurred during the COVID-19 pandemic, the downsides of this type of culture are becoming rapidly apparent. As a founder-turned-venture capitalist, I find myself contemplating the total costs of this indoctrination-style approach to culture. When people are laid off, they lose income and health insurancedevastating losses in the middle of a global health pandemic. But they also lose some things that are far less tangible but potentially even more costly. Intentional and immersive culture-building has tied our identities, self-worth, emotional security, and lifes purpose to our jobs, leaving both employeesand employersvulnerable.

Years ago, after a round of layoffs at TaskRabbit, the company I founded, I had to face some hard truths about the culture we had so painstakingly built. We spent years cultivating an environment that could offer fulfillment, purpose, and a sense of belonging to every team membera family in a very real sense. Our success in doing so meant that layoffs suddenly became about much more than discontinuing a persons income. We had power we shouldnt have had as employers: Thanks to the culture wed built, separating a person from their job also separated them from their sense of self, their purpose, and their closest friends. There isnt a severance package in the world that can soften that blow.

There isnt a severance package in the world that can soften that blow.

Just as record-high unemployment has made it crystal clear that relying on employers to provide healthcare is a faulty and dangerous idea, its time to stop propping up the very Silicon Valley notion that a persons identity, lifes purpose, and belonging should go hand in hand with their place of employment. This moment requires a total shift in mindset. Instead of building cultures that emphasize a companys role in peoples lives, what if we dedicate our efforts to prioritizing the individuals themselves?

As the founders I work with have started to grapple with this very question, many find themselves arriving at the same conclusion: Shifting as much autonomy as possible to the employee makes companies stronger.

This simple mindset shift meets the moment were in. As parentsparticularly momsshoulder compounding responsibilities at home and many young people pour off-hours into social justice, its becoming more apparent than ever that employees require greater control over how they spend their time, energy, and talents. Workplaces must adjust to accommodating the full lives of their employees to navigate this new reality. The solution isnt as simple as switching to Zoom meetings and remote project managementit requires a culture that gives employees greater agency over their own work.

Recognizing the full life of your employees requires accepting that we all have multiple roles to play. People can be engineers and activists, marketers and moms, dev-ops and dads. People who write code by day might write short stories by night. That star support employee might also front a band. Every team is full of people with obligations to their families, social circles, passions, and communities. By giving each employee full control of how and when they work, they can better integrate their work into the rest of their livesand their workplace will cease to become the central place where people feel a sense of purpose. Instead of encouraging employees to stay late at work, push them to set a schedule that helps them find balanceand meaningin other parts of their lives as well. This isnt just the necessary remedy for getting through this particular moment, and it isnt just a fluffy nice thing to doits a pathway to creating stronger companies over time.

It will bring a greater wealth of experience to your workplace. When individuals are encouraged to prioritize their other life roles, they bring those experiences and skills back to their work. This diversity of thought and perspective is something that many startups lack, and the positive impact of it is incalculable. Imagine: Spending more time helping his aging parents leads your designer to have an UX epiphany that streamlines your app. The community organizing your product manager does on the side shows up in the way she marshals resources to get that feature done on time. Helping her kid with history homework gives your copywriter an idea that becomes your next successful lead generation campaign. Moving away from an office-centric life also makes groupthink much more difficult, which means you can approach problems with more perspectives and get to clarity (and solutions) faster.

It increases a companys resilience and agility. Companies with more individualistic cultureslike those with distributed teams and greater employee autonomyadjusted much more quickly to our new work-from-home reality than companies with office-centric cultures. Working parents suddenly juggling home education and childcare on top of work responsibilities at companies that didnt take an individualistic approach found themselves in an impossible bind. Imagine how much productivity could have been gained had every working mother simply been empowered to figure out her own schedule and workflows.

This ability to swiftly adapt to changing circumstances is often the difference between survival and death for early stage companies. Theres no such thing as an entirely future-proofed business, but trusting the individuals on your team to make the best decisions for themselves and for the company is a solid start.

It boosts the value, productivity, and momentum of your employees. Giving your employees the leeway to invest in themselves and their lives doesnt just increase your chances of retaining them, it increases the value they can bring to your company. All that energy people spend figuring out how to juggle the many obligations in their lives on the margins can actually be used for productive work. Whats more, people experiencing success in other aspects of their lives can use that momentum in the work they do for your company.

Theres no doubt that culture can make or break a company. As an ecosystem, startups have been wise to prioritize it and approach it with intention. But the cultures we built before simply arent good enough for what comes next. This moment of uncertainty provides a unique opportunity to do things better, and founders thinking about the future understand they must adapt. Rather than turning a company into employees whole world, focusing culture-building efforts on giving employees agency and celebrating their lives beyond work is a good place to start.

Leah Solivan is the founder of TaskRabbit and the general partner at Fuel Capital.

More:

COVID-19 is revealing the flaws of Silicon Valley culture - Fast Company

Harvard GSD faculty take on the challenge of building just cities – The Architect’s Newspaper

The current global health emergency and the ongoing uprising against police violence in the United States have once again laid bare the nations enduring crisis of white supremacy. In the design and planning professions, many scholars, practitioners, and organizers have pointed out that these challenges are not new, but foundationalwhiteness and anti-Black racism have long defined the ways in which design is framed, taught, and practiced. As design schools across the country begin to respond to longstanding criticism over their wholesale embrace of whiteness in pedagogy, it is useful to examine the work that some educators and researchers are doing to analyze and challenge systems of oppression, both within the disciplines and more generally in U.S. cities. The Architects Newspaper talked to several practitioners at the department of urban planning and design at Harvards Graduate School of Design (GSD) about the work theyve been doing in this area.

Urban Design and the Color Line

Taught by Stephen Gray, associate professor of urban design, Urban Design and the Color Line is a seminar workshop that developed out of a series of research projects at the GSD. Having advised student researchers on mapping strategies for the exhibition Bang! Bang! Bang! Housing Policy and the Geography of Fatal Police Encounters and the atlas project Map the Gap: Visualizing Sociospatial Inequity in the U.S., Gray went on to conduct extensive research on racial inequities in the Boston area for Urban Intermedia: City, Archive, Narrative, an exhibition curated by professors Eve Blau and Robert Pietrusko.

In the portion of the exhibit that focused on Boston, Gray and Alex Krieger, research professor in practice of urban design, examined neighborhoods in the citys South Bay area, where redlining, urban renewal, and infrastructure projects have long determined which communities have access to resources. As Gray told AN in a recent conversation, outwardly beneficial linear park projects like Southwest Corridor Parkfirst developed on Bostons South End in the 1970s and 80sraised particularly compelling questions about race, urban design, and infrastructure. If people arent meaningfully involved in the imagination and making of a space, does that space actually have any benefit to them in the long run? Gray asked.

Following his work on Urban Intermedia, Gray developed the curriculum for Urban Design and the Color Line, a course that centers on infrastructural reuse projects in the United Satesnamely, New Yorks High Line and its progeny. Gray and his students have partnered with the Urban Institute, GSD CoDesign, Friends of the High Line cofounder Robert Hammond, and the High Line Network (HLN), a group of leaders of industrial reuse projects around the world that aims to learn from the social and economic challenges faced by the High Line, to help develop an equitable impacts framework pilot for 19 HLN member projects. Pairs of students in the course focused on two infrastructure projects each during the semester. After analyzing the histories and geographies of racial inequity in the cities where the projects are located, the students proposed equity agendas for their assigned HLN projectsrecommendations that were handed off to the partner organizations for possible implementation.

According to Gray, the class and its research constitute a sort of informed speculation: Were using student research to inform curriculum, which is now informing practice. The ultimate objective is to deploy student minds and educational resources to make a real and measurable impact in the world, a mandate that has only become more pronounced as institutions and city agencies alike are called to action over white supremacy and state violence against Black people. Americas segregated cities present immense challenges to the people who shape their built environments, but as Gray notes, If urban designers are intentional about our work, we can begin to break down some of those divisions.

CoDesign

Founded in 2018 at the GSD, CoDesign is a multifaceted, school-wide initiative that aims to tighten links between design, research, teaching, practice, and activism. Building on existing relationships between government agencies, GSD researchers, private design practices, and local communities in the Boston area, CoDesign equips educators, researchers, and students with tools for a more equitable approach to design and community engagement. This work has taken many forms over the course of two years, including technical assistance for the citys Community Preservation Act and research assistance for the Boston Foundations Place Leadership Network and the Highline Network.

In a recent conversation with AN, CoDesigns faculty coordinator Dr. Lily Song reflected on both the opportunities and challenges presented by university-based community engagement work. For one, relationships between elite institutions like Harvard and local BIPOC or working-class neighborhoods are historically defined by institutional exclusion, extraction, and displacement. There are also disconnects between what is typically expected of design students at the GSD and what local partners are often seeking. Communities are hardly looking for abstract design propositions or beautiful renderings that dont reflect their aspirations or their needs, Song said. At the same time, the skills of students can be useful if theyre plugged into what efforts local community groups are leading. Leveraging the GSDs convening power, research acumen, and financial resources, CoDesigns local partners can advocate for policy changes, fundraise for community-led projects, and begin to challenge established power relations.

As the GSD and other leading design schools face intense scrutiny over their cultures of white supremacy and intensification of systems of racial injustice, CoDesign teamed up with Powerful Pathways to release the Design Studio First Aid Kit. Posted on the initiatives Instagram page and shared as a free zine online, the kit offers straightforward guidance on how to begin confronting white supremacy and its intersecting oppressions in studio environments. Song views it as a resource for jumpstarting a much longer, more committed process. The idea is that we can all administer first aid in ways that are accessibleits not a panacea, but a first step, Song said.

Acknowledging that CoDesign is somewhat constrained by its need to serve a wide variety of communities and stakeholders across the Boston area, Song also recognizes the ways in which the current uprising has invigorated the push for anti-racist practices. With the longstanding scourge of police violence against Black people and the broader injustices of white supremacy in stark relief, there is an opportunity to advance a more liberatory and reparative vision with CoDesign. The Design Studio First Aid Kit is just one part of that process. Moving forward, Song emphasizes the need to foreground radical community work led by BIPOC organizers. Whether we ally or accomplice, we first need to reckon with our own identities, power, and privileges and use them in service of these movements. Its defining yourself and your work beyond your day job, Song said. You harness the network and resources you have at your disposal.

Design for the Just City

Design for the Just City centers on the fundamental question: Would we design better places if we put the values of equality, inclusion, or equity first? Led by Toni L. Griffin, professor in practice of urban planning, since its inception nearly ten years ago, the research lab has promoted justice in the design and planning disciplines through a series of exhibitions, master-classes, talks, workshops, and publications.

In order to frame its mission, the lab has spent years developing the Just City Index, a matrix designed to be used as a tool for communities to establish their own definition and principles for what makes each city or neighborhood more just. The listed values range from reconciliation and spirituality to protest, empathy, and participation, all categorized under a series of 12 Values Indicators, from acceptance to welfare. Through its free digital resources, as well as design workshops hosted in Johannesburg, Amsterdam, and Cambridge since 2018, the Just City Lab aims to empower communities to articulate their own values and aspirations.

In 2015, the Just City Lab collaborated with Gehl Studio, the J. Max Bond Center, and Transportation Alternatives to compile Public Life & Urban Justice in NYCs Plazas, a report investigating the real and potential impacts of public space design on public life and urban justice. Using seven public spaces in New York City as case studies, the lab and its collaborators took a critical look at the contributions of the citys Public Plaza Program to quality of life and issues of social justice.

In the wake of the murders of Breonna Taylor and George Floyd by police in Louisville, Kentucky, and Minneapolis, the Just City Lab has released one essay per week from its 2015 publication The Just City Essays: 26 Visions for Equity, Inclusion, and Opportunity. The volume contains reflections and visions for how to pursue reparative and restorative justice in 22 cities through architecture, city planning, art, and policy-making. With writings by such prominent figures as urbanist Teddy Cruz, architect Theaster Gates, and former mayor of Minneapolis Betsy Hodges, The Just City Essays are meant as a provocation, a call to action. As the Just City Lab states on its Instagram page, Now, during these times of dissonance, unrest, and uncertainty, their contents have become ever more importantWe hope they may continue conversations about our shared responsibility for the just city.

Go here to read the rest:

Harvard GSD faculty take on the challenge of building just cities - The Architect's Newspaper