Are the Big Tech companies breaking antitrust rules? Their CEOs testify before Congress. – Marketplace

Amazons Jeff Bezos, Apples Tim Cook, Googles Sundar Pichai and Facebooks Mark Zuckerberg, CEOs of four of the worlds most powerful companies, are testifying before Congress Wednesday.

Specifically, they are going before the Houses Subcommittee on Antitrust, Commercial, and Administrative Law, and the issue here boils down to power. How did these companies get it? Did they do so legally, or did they break rules? Finally, do they have too much power?

Erik Gordon, professor at the University of Michigans Ross School of Business, spoke with host Sabri Ben-Achour. The following is an edited transcript of their conversation.

Sabri Ben-Achour: So can you explain why this hearing is happening? And, specifically, why this question of how these companies became so powerful and whether they did so legally is an issue right now?

Erik Gordon: The hearing is happening because members of Congress think that these companies are really powerful, and that theyre abusing their power, and that Congress should look into it and maybe pass some new laws. The question you brought up is the key question. Under current antitrust law, its perfectly OK to be big and to be powerful, and, in fact, to be a monopoly, as long as you got big and powerful by lawful means, as long as you didnt do anything illegal. The government cant break you up, under current law, just for being big.

Ben-Achour: So whats an example of how, say, Google or Facebook or whichever might have accumulated power illegally?

Gordon: Suppose you have a dominant online search engine, and you use that search engine dominance to make you even more powerful in an other area. So, for example, suppose you say, You can only use my search engine, if you use my browser. Now you get big and powerful in the browser business, because you already had power in the search engine business. That would be an example of getting bigger and more powerful illegally.

Ben-Achour: Do you think anything significant will come out of these hearings? Or are they sort of theatrical?

Gordon: I have a sense that in an election year, were going to see some theater. Its an opportunity for politicians to control the questions. They get to put together some nice sound bites for their campaign. This isnt the first round of hearings we had, and in the other hearings, where there were some beat-ups of Zuckerberg and other tech people, oh, a few bills were introduced in Congress. They didnt go anywhere. Nothing much happened.

As a nonprofit news organization, our future depends on listeners like you who believe in the power of public service journalism.

Your investment in Marketplace helps us remain paywall-free and ensures everyone has access to trustworthy, unbiased news and information, regardless of their ability to pay.

Donate today in any amount to become a Marketplace Investor. Now more than ever, your commitment makes a difference.

Read more:

Are the Big Tech companies breaking antitrust rules? Their CEOs testify before Congress. - Marketplace

What to watch today: Dow to open higher ahead of Big Tech hearing and Fed policy decision – CNBC

BY THE NUMBERS

Dow futures indicated a roughly 70-point gain at the opening bell, ahead of a blockbuster Big Tech congressional hearing, a Fed policy statement and another batch of corporate earnings reports. S&P 500 and Nasdaq futures also were mildly higher. The Dow on Tuesday fell about 205 points, or .77%. The S&P 500 gave up .65% while the tech-heavy Nasdaq Composite sank 1.27%.

The Dow, S&P 500 and Nasdaq have fallen in three of the past four trading days, although all remain on course for solid July gains. The Dow begins the new day at a more than two-week low, coming off its lowest close since July 13.

*Treasury yields edge higher ahead of Fed interest rate decision (CNBC)

The Federal Reserve's Open Market Committee will issue its latest policy statement at 2:00 p.m. ET, followed by Fed Chairman Jerome Powell's virtual news conference 30 minutes later.

General Electric (GE), Boeing (BA), and General Motors (GM) lead a long list of morning earnings reports; streaming service Spotify (SPOT) also reports. After the bell, PayPal (PYPL), Qualcomm (QCOM) and Yum China (YUMC) are scheduled to post quarterly earnings.

*GM swings to a loss as coronavirus shuttered factories and devastated sales (CNBC)*GE reports quarterly loss as coronavirus pandemic hits hard (Reuters)*Boeing posts net loss of $2.4 billion and slows aircraft production amid coronavirus-weakened demand (CNBC)

Total mortgage application volume fell 0.8% last week from the previous week, according to theMortgage Bankers Association's latest report.Mortgage applications to buy a home were down 2% last week compared to the prior week but 21% higher annually. (CNBC)

The CEOs of Amazon, Apple, Google-parent Alphabet and Facebookare set to testify in front the House Antitrust Subcommittee later today. The blockbuster virtual hearing will be Amazon chief executive Jeff Bezos' first congressional testimony. It comes as part of the House Judiciary Committee's investigation into Big Tech and potential anti-competitive practices. Mark Zuckerberg is expected to defend Facebook's acquisitions of Instagram and WhatsApp, portraying them as key to creating better services for both users and advertisers. (CNBC)

*Jeff Bezos will testify about how Amazon is the quintessential American company (CNBC)*Google CEO Sundar Pichai plans to tell Congress the company faces plenty of competition (CNBC)*Tim Cook will testify that Apple is in fierce competition with Google and Huawei (CNBC)

Biotech firm Moderna (MRNA) is planning to price its potential coronavirus vaccine at $50 to $60 per course for high-income countries, according to a Financial Times report. The price for the two-dose vaccine comes in higher than the proposed price from Pfizer(PFE) and German-based BioNTech, according to Reuters, based on the companies' $1.95 billion deal with the U.S. government to produce and deliver 100 million doses. The price for Moderna's vaccine, which entered late-stage human trials earlier this week, is not finalized, Reuters reported. (FT)

Hong Kong is increasing its restrictions to curb the spread of Covid-19 as local officials warn the city is at risk of a large-scale virus outbreak. There's been an "upsurge" in local infections, said Chief ExecutiveCarrie Lam, who warned of overrunning the health-care system. The government is banning gatherings of more than two people, suspending indoor dining at restaurants and requiring face masks in public. (Reuters)

*Europe scrambles to avoid a second coronavirus wave, as infections rise (Washington Post)

The U.S. Senate will not pass a coronavirus relief bill that does not have liability shields for businesses and universities, Majority LeaderMitch McConnelltold CNBC. The Kentucky Republican said Tuesday on "Closing Bell" that the GOP was "not negotiating over liability protection," but he added the party was open to compromise with Democrats on other issues. Senate Republicans released their roughly $1 trillion legislative proposal on Monday. (CNBC)

*Most swing state voters support extending $600 weekly unemployment benefit, CNBC/Change Research poll finds(CNBC)

The Trump administration has started negotiations with the office of Oregon's governor over the presence of federal agents in Portland, according to the Associated Press, expressing a willingness to scale back if the state increases its own enforcement in the city, which has seen nearly two months of nightly protests in the wake of George Floyd's death. The talks are still in the early stages and no agreement is in place, the wire service reported. (AP)

*Portland protests bring early-morning clash with feds after more than 1,000 turn out Tuesday (The Oregonian)* Attorney General Barr, grilled by House Democrats, defends aggressive federal response in Portland (LA Times)

In a historic move,AMC Theaters(AMC) and Comcast-ownedUniversal Picturesinked an agreement to shorten the theatrical release window for Universal's movies, allowing them to head to digital streaming just 17 days after their debut on the big screen. Theaters previously would have the exclusive rights to films for about 90 days. AMC will share in some of the new revenue from the digital on-demand rentals. Comcast is parent company of CNBC and NBCUniversal. (CNBC)

Starbucks (SBUX) exceeded Wall Street expectations in its earnings report and raised its adjusted earnings outlook for the fiscal fourth quarter, sending its stock up more than 5% in premarket trading. The coffee chain expressed optimism about its recovery from the coronavirus in the U.S. and China, although it saw global same-store sales plunge 40% in the quarter. (CNBC)

*Restaurant transactions plateau as coronavirus cases surge (CNBC)

The American Federation of Teachers, one of the largest teachers' unions in the U.S., will support any of its local chapters that decide to strike if they feel school reopening plans are not safe enough. The federation, which represents 1.7 million school employees, said in its Tuesday resolution that striking should be the last option, but it called for reopening plans to include social distancing measures and mask requirements. It also said buildings should only reopen in places where coronavirus transmission rates are low. (USA Today)

Visa (V) came in 4 cents above estimates with quarterly earnings of $1.07 per share, with revenue above estimates as well. The payments processor did say that payment volume was down 10% during the quarter with profit dropping 23%, as consumer spending was hit by rising unemployment.

Mondelez (MDLZ) reported adjusted quarterly profit of 63 cents per share, 7 cents above estimates, with the snack maker's revenue slightly above Wall Street forecasts. Strong demand for its snacks in North America helped offset other declines, and Mondelez also announced an 11% dividend increase.

FireEye (FEYE) surprised analysts who had expected a loss by reporting an adjusted profit of 9 cents per share with revenue above estimates as well. The cybersecurity company benefited from the shift to cloud-based work amid the pandemic.

Avis Budget (CAR) reported a quarterly loss of $5.60 per share, slightly smaller than the loss of $5.68 that analysts were expecting. The car rental's revenue beat estimates, with a recovering used car market and increased leisure rentals helping results.

L Brands (LB) is cutting 15% of its corporate staff, amounting to 850 jobs. The parent of Victoria's Secret and Bath & Body Works also projected a smaller than expected current quarter sales decline.

Spirit Airlines (SAVE) will tell its unions to be prepared for possible October furloughs of 20 to 30% of workers, according to a memo sent to employees and first reported by Reuters.

Advanced Micro Devices (AMD) beat estimates by 2 cents with adjusted quarterly profit of 18 cents per share, with the chip maker's revenue above estimates as well. AMD also raised its full-year forecast, as the surge in the number of employees working from home raises demands for its chips.

EBay (EBAY) reported adjusted quarterly earnings of $1.08 per share, 2 cents above estimates, with the e-commerce company's revenue also beating forecasts. It also raised its full-year outlook, amid more online shopping by people staying indoors during the coronavirus pandemic.

Amgen (AMGN) earned an adjusted $4.25 per share for its latest quarter, compared to a $3.82 consensus estimate, with revenue above forecasts as well. The biotech company was helped by stronger sales of its newer drugs.

Budweiser has unveiled its newest beer with a twist. It has no alcohol. The 50-calorie Bud Zero is now going out nationwide and was created with the help of former NBA star Dwyane Wade. The new drink gives Anheuser Busch Inbev (BUD) further exposure to the non-alcoholic beer category, which has been growing fast this year. (USA Today)

Read more:

What to watch today: Dow to open higher ahead of Big Tech hearing and Fed policy decision - CNBC

Congress is going to ask Big Techs leaders all the wrong questions. Here are the right ones – San Francisco Chronicle

Welcome back to Tech Chronicle. If you want something thats not afraid to compete for your attention, try this fine newsletter.

The House Subcommittee on Antitrust, Commercial and Administrative Law, after a brief delay, is summoning Big Tech to explain itself Wednesday. Called to testify are the CEOs of Alphabet, Amazon, Apple and Facebook.

Together, Sundar Pichai, Jeff Bezos, Tim Cook and Mark Zuckerberg oversee companies worth about $6.3 trillion. They didnt get that way by being shy about crushing the competition. Remember Cuil? Quidsi? Palm? Path? Exactly.

If youre the drinking type, pour a shot every time you hear a CEO talk about obsessing about customers, not competitors; worrying about Chinese competitors waiting in the wings; making a positive difference in society; and having pathetically small market share, really, if you just count it correctly.

Expect a lot of naive, time-wasting questions from our elected representatives. If you remember Zuckerbergs four-hour House hearing in 2018, it wasnt exactly a shining moment for Congress. (You love America, we know that was one memorable quote.)

If subcommittee members were serious, heres what theyd ask:

Where do you get the data that informs your decisions to buy smaller tech companies? Amazon, Apple, Facebook and Alphabets Google all have unique lenses into online activity, and the cloud infrastructure they are building just adds to their ability to surveil smaller rivals before they become real challengers. One clue Zuckerberg had about Instagrams early hypergrowth was the number of photos users were posting from the startups mobile app to Facebooks social network.

What tools do you have to retaliate against startups that refuse to sell to you? Amazon threatened a price war against Quidsi before buying it. After Twitter turned down a Facebook buyout offer, Facebook turned off access to its friends lists.

Do users have a reasonable way to extract their personal data and share it with competitors? Most big tech companies offer some kind of way to export user data. That doesnt mean its useful.

How do you restrain entrepreneurs who sell their startups to you from starting new competitive ventures? The best way Silicon Valley has of self-regulating against would-be monopolists is its ability to churn out new startups. Noncompete agreements prevent that from happening.

I dont expect any of these topics to come up at the Wednesday hearing, because posturing and lecturing is a lot easier. But in between shots, there might be room for hope.

Owen Thomas, othomas@sfchronicle.com

Related Stories

Hopefully theyll look to the facts, understand the values of the people that theyre thinking about and understand that were in this together. Microsoft co-founder Bill Gates, speaking to CNBC on the prospects for public acceptance of a coronavirus vaccine

From Capitol Hill to Wall Street: Apple, Facebook and Alphabet report earnings Thursday, the day after their CEOs wrap up their congressional testimony.

Dana Mattoli and Cara Lombardo on Amazons habit of competing with startups it invests in. (Wall Street Journal)

Roland Li on Googles long-term work-from-home plans. (San Francisco Chronicle)

Teddy Schleifer on Peter Thiels latest political backing of restrictions on immigration. (Recode)

Tech Chronicle is a weekly newsletter from Owen Thomas, The Chronicles business editor, and the rest of the tech team. Follow along on Twitter: @techchronicle and Instagram: @techchronicle

View original post here:

Congress is going to ask Big Techs leaders all the wrong questions. Here are the right ones - San Francisco Chronicle

Ahead of Big Tech Hearing, Less Than Half of the Public Trusts Congress to Best Regulate the Industry – Morning Consult

July 29, 2020 at 12:01 am ET

55% of adults, including 64% of Democrats and 56% of Republicans, said they believe Congress has a lot or some understanding of how to regulate the tech industry.

Republicans were most likely to trust the president (70%) with regulating the industry in the best way.

With the House antitrust subcommittee ready to pull out all the stops ahead of todays hearing with the chief executives of Amazon.com Inc., Apple Inc., Alphabet Inc. and Facebook Inc., a new survey suggests that most of the public has little or no faith in Congress ability to regulate the tech industry.

More than half (55 percent) of the 2,200 adults surveyed in a Morning Consult poll conducted July 23-26 said they believe Congress had a lot or some understanding of how to regulate the technology industry, but they were 9 percentage points less likely, at 46 percent, to trust the lawmakers best to do so. Adults, regardless of party affiliation, were more likely to trust other government institutions, such as the court system (57 percent) and federal agencies (53 percent), to best regulate the sector.

The survey has a margin of error of 2 points.

Both Democrats and Republicans saw a nearly 10-point discrepancy between whether they believed Congress had at least some understanding of how to regulate tech companies and whether they trusted federal lawmakers to best approach such regulation. Among Democrats, 64 percent said they believed Congress understood the issue, while 56 percent said they had trust in the legislative branch an 8-point gap. Democrats were far more likely to trust members of their party (74 percent) and the courts (64 percent) with tech regulation than Capitol Hill.

And among Republicans, 56 percent said they believed Congress understood either a lot or some of the issues, but only 47 percent trusted them at least somewhat with doing so in the best way a 9-point dip. They were more inclined to say they trusted the president (70 percent) and fellow Republicans (67 percent).

Key members of the House Judiciary Committee will spend hours this afternoon seeking answers from the four tech executives Jeff Bezos, Tim Cook, Sundar Pichai and Mark Zuckerberg in response to a slew of allegations that their companies abuse their market power by making it harder for competitors to succeed in their respective industries. The hearing is expected to be the culmination of a nearly 14-month congressional investigation into the four tech giants, led by Rep. David Cicilline (D-R.I.), the antitrust subcommittees chairman. So far, the inquiry has yielded 1.3 million documents of evidence some of which could be unveiled during the hearing, senior congressional aides told reporters last week.

However, Congress has a history of failing to understand certain tech issues: When Googles Pichai last appeared before a congressional panel in December 2018, Rep. Steve King (R-Iowa) complained about a notification that appeared on his granddaughters iPhone, a product made by Apple Inc.

Underscoring the panels investigation, however, is an American public with mixed views on tech regulation. A plurality of adults (35 percent) said they didnt know or had no opinion on whether the federal government needs to regulate the tech industry more, less or exactly the same as it is doing currently. Thirty percent said the industry needs more regulation, while 24 percent said it was being regulated the right amount and 11 percent said the federal government should regulate it less.

And that sense of uncertainty goes hand-in-hand with how U.S. adults view the amount of power the tech industry has. When asked to choose which industry holds the most power and influence in America, technology in Silicon Valley ranked last: 6 percent picked tech, compared to 42 percent who chose politics in Washington. The share who picked the tech industry is statistically unchanged since the first time the question was asked in a February 2018 survey.

Get the latest global tech news and analysis delivered to your inbox every morning.

View post:

Ahead of Big Tech Hearing, Less Than Half of the Public Trusts Congress to Best Regulate the Industry - Morning Consult

Enterprise hits and misses – big tech heads to Washington to repent, the systemic risk of cloud dependency, and the future of manufacturing work -…

As Jon Reed has a break from his colleagues a well earned week away, switches off his work notifications and recoups from the madness of 2020, I have the privilege of pulling together this week's Enterprise Hits and Misses. Enjoy.

Lead story - Tech giants leaves Washington largely unscathed after a grilling from US legislators

MyPOV:As was expected, the showdown between the so-called Robber Barons' of the 21st Century and US politicians last week was less of a hauling over the coals and more of a grandstanding opportunity for legislators to show they get tech'. Opportunities were missed to get a deeper understanding of the implications of centralised power online from the likes of Amazon, Facebook, Apple and Google, with Democrats and Republicans alike straying towards partisan topics of interest. Stuart's scathing write up -Big Tech goes to Washington: Big tech goes home untroubled - but what did anyone expect?- captures the mood nicely:

...the tension between the purpose of the session and the compulsion of politicians in such circumstances to posture, revel in their Perry Mason moment' and act up for the cameras as the Grand Inquisitor that most of them think they are, but emphatically are not. It's been seen time and again, both in the US and other political fora around the world, that the only way to get good' results from such sessions is to ask a series of short, to-the-point, simple questions that demand straight answers and provide no room for equivocation.

The COVID-19 pandemic meant that proceedings were carried out virtually, which brought its own unique problems. However, the tech titans largely came away unscathed, with the CEOs listening to their PR Chiefs and giving answers that were non-committal at best, avoidant at worst. But the entire event was overshadowed by President Trump taking to Twitter (the irony) to declare that he will take actions into his own hands if "Congress doesn't bring fairness to Big Tech".

Until next time though, Silicon Valley can largely sleep easy. Stuart:

I went in with low expectations so I emerged without disappointment. To be fair, there was some indication that more research had been done on this occasion by some of the sub-committee members - or their interns - with emails and past comments thrown in the face of the CEOs, particularly Zuckerberg.

But no blows landed and no serious damage was done. If looked at in a bread and circuses' sort of way, there wasn't even the sight of any of the titans losing his cool under pressure.

On this side of the Atlantic, British politicians were also dwelling on the the impact of digital business on the broader economy (or so the headlines would have you believe). The mainstream media caused some hysteria, claiming that the government would be slapping a new tax' on online sales in order to level the playing field for bricks-and-mortar businesses and help raise 2 billion a year. The truth? Stuart explains why that'snot quite the case...:

What is happening is that the UK Government, looking ahead to the 2023 re-evaluation of business rates, has issued a Call for Evidence consultation document to invite comments from interested parties- including Amazon et al - on whether there's a better way of doing things. Feedback will then be scoped into a review in 2021 - after the No Deal' Brexit deadline has passed and when who knows what will be happening COVID-wise.

So, online tax to save the economy? No. 2 billion a year from making the Amazons of the world pay their due? No. Nice bit of hyperbole to froth up the right wing mainstream media? Job done!

diginomica picks -my top stories on diginomica this week

Vendor analysis, diginomica style

Use cases galore -They're the bread and butter of diginomica content and this week we saw a swathe of use cases come in, tackling a variety of change issues.

Derek's grab bag -With all the fearmongering concern around the rise of the robots and a future that will see us ruled by AI overlords, it was refreshing to see Neil drill down this week on whyArtificial Intelligence will not resemble human intelligence. However, there will be AI that is extremely useful. Neil notes:

We are not close to "situational awareness." I see no path to an AGI that is a duplicate (and superior one) to human intelligence. Our current efforts are not much more than point solutions. Nor do I see the need. Airplanes don't flap their wings, they fly higher and faster than birds.

What I do see, however, is a third thing - an artificial intelligence that is different and superior to human intelligence. We will have the technology for this in this century. While the relentless push to AGI raises serious ethical questions, they will not moderate progress.

It's worth checking out Jerry's view on whetherCalifornia's CPRA will become the standard for national consumer privacy legislation. His take: the current system puts too much burden on users to understand and manage personal data themselves and nowhere near enough on the companies that collect and use data. And finally it wouldn't be a Hits and Misses without a bit of retail analysis from Stuart -this week he takes a look at John Lewis's post-pandemic ambitions, where the UK household name is set to put digital front and centre of its plans.

Lead story - External consultants can't fill the gap in the digital enterprise

My POV:A piece appeared this weekfrom Steve Andriole, a Professor at Villanova University, which argues the case for internal consulting teams for digital transformation and boldly tells McKinsey, Accenture and Cap Gemini to step aside!

Adriole's take is that external consultants are not only expensive but that they can't get to the heart of an organisation that is having to grapple with wide ranging complexity in the digital age. Instead internal capability must be built - you can't outsource your knowledge. A message I can fully get behind. He says:

Digital transformation requires an integrated understanding of a company's strategic strengths, weaknesses and intentions, and an understanding of the technologies necessary for it to win. Digital transformation also requires an intimate understanding of a company's language, ways of working, culture and the politics that explains what's possible. External consultants simply cannot know these things unless they move in and stay for a long while. More broadly - and this is the key point - "digital" is now the primary competitive advantage a company can exert on its competition. Digital transformation simply cannot be handed off to consultants. There is nothing more "core" than competency in this area.

Adriole calls for an internal team of consultants (in other words, invest in people and build out capability where you have gaps, don't hand off responsibility to a third party out of fear). He concludes:

But the takeaway is clear: rethink the role external consultants play at your company especially when it comes to digital transformation, and then consider how an internal team might accelerate success.

Cyber security

Honourable mentions

An honourable whiff this week goes to Domino's - a companywhich has digital cloutin the market, but might need some lessons in responding to zeitgeist trends. The pizza delivery giant had to backtrack on an offer in New Zealand to give anyone with the name Karen' a free pizza - the idea being that Karens have had a tough time online lately and the nice ones deserve a treat. However, as is the way of the internet, a backlash quickly grew over claims the company was rewarding privilege. Maybe stick tostuffed crustswhat you're good at, Domino's

However, my primary whiff this week goes to a number of people online that think that a future of work that involves distributed workforces is a terrible idea. First up I spotted this piece tweeted out by our very own Jon Reed, calledOur remote work future is going to suck'. Among the reasons cited include how remote work can stifle your career growth, how it breaks large companies and how it enables you to be forgotten. It seemsGoogle,FacebookandTwittermissed the memo on those points, ha? As Jon put it nicely:

I then spotted a slightlyless dogmatic thread from Matt Ballentineon Twitter, which prompted some very interesting responses from followers about why employees need office space. I'm probably slightly cheating here because I wouldn't class this as a full blown whiff' (sorry, Jon), but it continues on the theme and the replies are worth a read to see how strongly some people feel about it.

My main rebuttal (as someone that's worked from home for 7 years) to the above is:

Anyway, that's me done for this week's Enterprise Hits and Misses. It's been an honour and I hope I've managed to do at least half a good a job as Jon does (this is a mammoth task every week and he makes it all look so easy!). Until next time

View post:

Enterprise hits and misses - big tech heads to Washington to repent, the systemic risk of cloud dependency, and the future of manufacturing work -...

Cohen: It’s time to break up big tech – The Ledger

They thwart competition and abuse their power, whether it's by failing to protect users' privacy and data or controlling one of our most basic freedoms free speech in hopes of influencing, if not, swaying elections.

Monopolistic companies such as Facebook, Twitter, Google, Apple and others have become far too powerful. They thwart competition and abuse their power, whether it's by failing to protect users' privacy and data or controlling one of our most basic freedoms free speech in hopes of influencing, if not, swaying elections.

These actions warrant congressional intervention, especially given Silicon Valley's well-known political bias against conservatives including the president of the United States of America. President Donald Trump's tweets are routinely "fact-checked" and censored, for example, while his political opponents are not.

This rigged system has far-reaching consequences that, among other things, shape public opinion and culture and taint America's standing in the world while diminishing our collective rights.

Take Apple. If you ask Siri what "demon" means, she says "an evil spirit or devil, especially one thought to possess a person or act as a tormentor in hell." The second definition Siri offers is "a cruel, evil, or destructive person or thing." Now, brace yourself for Siri's third definition a police officer.

This prompted a terse response from GOP Leader Kevin McCarthy, who tweeted Thursday:

"Big Tech Bias in America is real and it's disgusting. Apple's Siri defines 'demon' as 'a police officer.'

"Go ahead and try it.

"Apple needs to answer for why they're instigating this kind of hate in America."

Indeed. Especially when you consider that as of April 2017 there were 728 million iPhones in use worldwide, according to Statista, including at least 100 million users in the U.S. The far-left radicals at Apple Inc. are indoctrinating users to believe law enforcement officers are demons. This not only maligns police officers' character, including black cops and other minorities in uniform, but also puts cops lives at risk given today's extremely volatile political climate.

Then there's Twitter silencing conservatives en masse. This week, the social network censored tweets by the president and his son Donald Trump Jr. for sharing a viral video of doctors speaking about the purported benefits of hydroxychloroquine, a controversial medicine that some experts claim helps COVID-19 patients.

"A Henry Ford Health System study shows the controversial anti-malaria drug hydroxychloroquine helps lower the death rate of COVID-19 patients, the Detroit-based health system said Thursday," reported the Detroit News. "Officials with the Michigan health system said the study found the drug 'significantly' decreased the death rate of patients involved in the analysis."

Nonetheless, the overlords at Twitter still censored the tweets.

But that's not all. Google, Facebook and Twitter have also been censoring the right-leaning news site Breitbart, according to its news editor-in-chief, Alex Marlow. This week, Marlow told Tucker Carlson on his Fox News program that Breitbart's Google search traffic is down over 99% since May. "If you want to search for Joe Biden or Biden, the chances of you getting a Breitbart article are virtually zero," Marlow told Carlson.

See how election meddling works?

Conservative voices are being silenced across the spectrum leading up to the November election while those on the left continue to get full access to voters.

This corrupt system cannot stand in a democracy.

Congress must act.

Adriana Cohen is a nationally syndicated columnist with Creators Syndicate.

Original post:

Cohen: It's time to break up big tech - The Ledger

Heres What We Know About the Recon Dark Web Search Engine – TechNadu

While traditional search engines, by definition, dont work for the Dark Web, several sites let you find information on this hidden section of the internet with relative ease. Engines that let you search Dark Web markets in particular abound.

Recon is one of the most recent examples of a darknet market search engine. So what do we know about it?

Source: The Onion Web

Recon is a tool that users can access to explore multiple Darknet markets simultaneously. So its in direct competition with other sites, such as Kilos. Instead of having to visit or even know about all these different markets, you can use a single place compare and contrast items on offer. It also makes it easier to find these markets in the first place!

While we dont know the real identity of the person (or persons) behind Recon, it seems pretty clear that one HugBunter administrates the site. This is supposedly the same HugBunter behind Dread a Reddit-style forum for users of the Dark Web to congregate.

Dread made the news in September of 2019 when HugBunters dead mans switch was activated, but someone using that name has returned in the meantime, and Dread is still online. So as far as anyone knows, Recon comes from the same family of sites.

Recon exists on the Tor network, so youll need to visit the reconponydonugup.onion site using the Tor browser.

However, if you are curious to see it for yourself, dont just jump in using a Tor Browser copy. Be sure to properly protect yourself by at least using a VPN to hide your Tor access from the ISP.

Recommended: 7 Best No-Logs VPN Services in 2020

Recon uses several different methods to let users search listing and information across multiple markets. It uses historical market data as a part of the search resource, but the most powerful aspect of Recon is its API or application programmer interface.

Owners of darknet markets who want people to find products on their sites through Recon can choose to integrate the API with their site. Recon then gets regular updates from these sites to ensure the listings users find through Recon are up to date.

This is different from how a surface web search engine works, which crawls the public web for information and then lets you search it. Since Dark Web sites cant be crawled in this way, search engines like Recon are the only real way to discover or quickly search across various websites.

Recon doesnt seem to be fundamentally different from other Dark Web market search tools. In other words, you cant buy anything from Recon directly. It only shows you the way to another market that has the products youre looking for.

It means there are plenty of illegal items of every description on offer. The most prominent of these Dark Web market items are drugs, but firearms and fake documents are also popular. If you want to know more about the sorts of things that are sold on the Dark Web, check out our article on the subject.

Of course, there are also plenty of intangible products. Information is always a hot commodity, and the Dark Web is a great place to buy and sell it. This can include stolen user information, the fruits of corporate espionage, or malware. If its digital, only the imagination limits whats possible.

Not everything sold on these hidden markets is illegal. Some of it isnt even very interesting, actually.

Recon displays a wealth of information for every market that it lists. The specific information includes:

Recon lists markets that dont have any connection with them, but any market owner apparently can claim their profile page via their PGP keys. So when a profile is claimed, everyone can be fairly sure its the real owner who has done so, despite the known problems with PGP.

Speaking of PGP keys, that seems to be the fastest way to find vendors in Recon. Since they all post their public PGP keys to allow people to contact them securely, Recon uses these keys as a quick lookup.

So if one already has the PGP key of a vendor you want, its as simple as pasting it into the Find a vendor bar.

Must Read: How To Use PGP Encryption for Secure Communication

While Dark Web markets get taken down regularly, these search engines seem to be a little more robust because they take a small cut after strictly acting as middlemen. Sure, when it comes to illegal goods, the middleman still shares in the guilt.

However, neither the buyers nor sellers know the true identity of the people behind Recon. As long as the technical protection remains in place and none of the humans in the loop fold, theres little authorities can actually do.

On the other hand, this also means its extra risky to actually use these facilities considering that when they are taken over by the law, they turn into traps instead.

Either way, we can never recommend using the dark web to commit crimes of any kind, but it never hurts to know whats lurking in the internets dark underbelly.

Read the rest here:

Heres What We Know About the Recon Dark Web Search Engine - TechNadu

Summary of the Gambling Industry – Arizona Daily Register

If you have missed out on any gambling news during this time, here is the catch-up.

Betting exchange Smarkets has launched its operations in Sweden. The company has received approval from the National Regulator. The London-headquartered company is known for peer-to-peer platforms for trading on sports, politics, and current affairs.

Smarkets is the second betting exchange in Sweden. Swedens online gaming and betting industry has reported revenues of SEK14bn in 2019 as per the regulator Spelinspektionen and Swedish Tax Agency.

Smarkets is one of the only operators with full technology stack and has offices in Los Angeles and Malta apart from London.

Scientific Games has added Legends Racing series from Quantum Leap Solutions into OpenMarket offering. SG has done it with the partnership with Racecourse Media Group (RMG).

OpenMarket is an aggregator platform with content from multiple providers. The digital sportsbook operators can access this platform through a single integration.

Legends Racing brings the racing stars from the last 50 years to the single platform with 9000 top-class horses, including jockeys such as Lester Piggott, Willie Carson, and Pat Eddery. It is also the first daily virtual product that uses real horses, forms, jockeys, and silks along with commentary from Mike Cattermole.

Lightning Box has agreed on a deal with Ruby Seven Studios to provide the latter top-performing games. The slot provider announced the deal with the North American social gaming company.

As per the agreement, Chicken Fox and Silver Lioness 4x would go live on the social casino network in Q3 2020 along with TropWorld Casino, Lucky North-Casino, and Best Bet Casino.

Lightning Box has expanded its footprint in the Northern American region with Loto Quebec in 2019 previously with British Columbia Lottery Corporation. They have 19 games already live in this market. The new agreement would further consolidate their position.

Red Rake Gaming has partnered with Baumbet. As per the agreement, Baumbet would distribute the suite of top-performing games of Red Rake. The Romania-based, Baumbet would now give them the access to titles and tournament tools of Red Rake.

The list of titles includes Super12Stars, a packaged slot with feature games, and bonus rounds. Along with it, slots from different portfolios like Million 7, The Asp of Cleopatra, Ryan OBryan, and Mysteries of Egypt would be part of it, among others.

Red Rake has been looking to expand into the regulated market and increasing its reach and the agreement with Baumbet makes the full sense of it.

FeedConstruct has become the first provider of air hockey live video streaming and betting partner of Infinity Cup.

FeedConstruct has entered into a partnership with Infinity Cup and as per that it would live to stream the matches in HD quality.

It would also provide daily coverage of 30 players vs player games to more than 10 betting markets. It is understood that the common and easy play air hockey would have high growth potential and would attract the bettors.

Relax Gaming is a gaming aggregator and known for its unique content and has now teamed up with BetConstruct. It would launch a selection of proprietary and third-party games live.

Now, the top-performing titles like Temple Tumble, Money Train, and Snake Arena will be part of the casino partners with a diverse range of games in the European markets.

The slots from third-party partners of Relax Gaming are also set to be launched from ReelPlay, Kalamba Games, and Fantasma through the aggregation platform.

Relax has recently signed multiple deals to consolidate its position in the European market.

Salsa Technology has agreed to a deal with software developer Betomall. As per the agreement, the video Bingos portfolio of Salsa will now be available on the Betomall platform.

Betomall provides sports betting and gaming solutions for betting shops and online operators via its platform. The Cyprus-based Betomall was launched in 2009.

The Betomall customers would now gain access to popular titles like Groove Bingo, Pachinko 3D, and the Latin American classic Jogo dos Bichos Praia. Salsa Technology will join the list of many providers to offer casino and slot games.

Swintt has extended the partnership with Singular. As per the agreement iGaming, clients of Singular will have access to the entire suite of Swintt. It would cover 50 games including the latest Sea Raiders.

All the exclusive land-based popular in European markets including Germany would be served to the Singular clients. The Swintt Lite series will also be available. The lite series save data costs in the developing markets. The Lite series is optimized for Singular clients.

Singular is known to serve sportsbooks and iGaming platforms to several operators in the online and retail sectors.Salsa Technology and Atomo Gaming form partnership

Salsa Technology and Atomo have formed a partnership. Atomo Gaming, a joint between ESA Gaming and Italtronic will have access to the Video Bingos, Candy Bingo, Super Zodiac Bingo, and Farm Bingo of Salsa.

This partnership would also ensure EasySwipe of ESA integrated into the platform of Salsa Technologys Game Aggregation Platform (GAP). The new GAP would be available to clients across Latin America and beyond.

Easy Swipe is a lightweight HTML5 mobile-first game and allows users to easily use the best quality game.

Source: https://calvinayre.com/2020/07/30/business/gambling-industry-announcement-and-partnership-roundup-july-30-2020/

Read the original post:

Summary of the Gambling Industry - Arizona Daily Register

Join the first after the legalization gambling exhibition Ukrainian Gaming Week 2020 – CalvinAyre.com

The Chairman of the Verkhovna Rada Dmytro Razumkov signed the draft law 2285-d about legalization of gambling business, which was adopted at second reading on July 14, 2020, according to the publication on the governmental website. On July 28, the document was sent to the President Volodymyr Zelensky for signature.

The large-scale industry exhibition Ukrainian Gaming Week 2020 organized by Smile-Expo will be the first big gambling event after the legalization. The event will take place in Kyiv on October 6-7. Exhibitors will present cutting-edge gambling solutions, discuss subtleties of the Ukrainian gambling law, advantages and prospects of the market.

Conference and top speakers

The event will offer an industry-specific conference, featuring international gambling experts, Ukrainian lawmakers, and representatives of specialized organizations. Top speakers are:

Participants of the exhibition

The exhibition with the total area of 5,000 square meters expects 100 exhibitors and 3,000 attendees.

Exhibitors will include software developers, gambling hardware manufacturers, affiliate networks and programs, banks, payment aggregators, gambling operators, bookmakers, marketing and SEO agencies, consulting, law companies, and many others. Some of them are:

Digital Chain a full-cycle agency that offers customers a wide range of efficient marketing solutions that allow achieving different business goals will act as an exhibitor and Badge Sponsor.

Alpha Affiliates will play the role of a Bracelet Sponsor of UGW 2020. This affiliate program works in the gambling niche with offers from direct advertisers and focuses on foreign markets.

The exhibition will also involve a lecture session, where speakers will present reports with functional case studies, present new products, as well as presents from exhibitors and sponsors will be drawn.

UGW Awards

Besides, Ukrainian Gaming Week 2020 will select the best companies in the sector. Winners of UGW Awards in 12 nominations will be awarded at the huge party on October 6.

Organizer and venue

The international company Smile-Expo that has been hosting events about innovations, including gambling events, for 14 years worldwide is organizing the exhibition.

Ukrainian Gaming Week 2020 will take place at Kyiv-based International Exhibition Centre, pavilion 4-B on October 6-7.

Program and event highlights.

Read the original here:

Join the first after the legalization gambling exhibition Ukrainian Gaming Week 2020 - CalvinAyre.com

Gambling Market : Drivers, Restraints, Opportunities, and Threats 2022 Kentucky Journal 24 – Kentucky Journal 24

This market research report includes a detailed segmentation of the global Gambling market by Casino, by Lotteries, by Poker, by Betting and by Bingo & others. The market research reports 888 Holdings, Bet-at-home.com, Betfair Entertainment, Ladbrokes Betting & Gaming, and Unibet as the major vendors operating in the global gambling market.

Request For Report Sample@ https://www.trendsmarketresearch.com/report/sample/9766

Gambling Market Overview:

Infoholics market research report predicts that the global Gambling market will grow at a CAGR of 5.7% during the forecast period. The market for Gambling industry is expanding all around the globe as many governments are making extra efforts to increase tax earnings and attract an increasing number of tourists. Many countries have already legalized and some on the verge of legalizing the gambling industry due to the economic benefit it offers. The gambling market is mostly observed in developed countries where proper compliance is present and strict regulations are followed.

According to the Gambling industry analysis, Asia Pacific accounted for the largest share of the global Gambling market in 2016. The reason for the markets growth in the Asia Pacific is due to the emergence of major casinos in the region that are operated by the US-based companies which divert some of the US overseas-derived businesses to the region. North America has the second largest market share after the Asia Pacific among all the regions.

Competitive analysis and key vendors

The gambling industry is growing at a rapid pace in the last few years with people showing tremendous interest in playing games for entertainment all around the world. The gaming activities which were traditionally played in casinos, game parlours, bookmakers are now increasingly being played online. This has paved the way for online gaming to be one of the fastest growing segments in the gambling industry.

The gambling market is extremely dynamic in nature with business models changing at a rapid pace. This has led to many software and technology companies, regulators, attorneys, operators, media, payment solution providers, and investors to majorly focus on this industry. Many countries are coming forward to develop the gambling industry and encourage its growth because it generates tourism revenue for the country.

Get Complete TOC with Tables and Figures@ https://www.trendsmarketresearch.com/report/discount/9766

Some of the key vendors in the Gambling market are:

Gambling Market Research by Types

Gambling Market Research by Product

Geographical segmentation

The gambling market is analyzed by six regions North America, Europe, Asia Pacific, Latin America, and the Middle East & Africa. These regions will grow at an impressive rate during the next five years. Asia Pacific is a high growth region in this market due to the emergence of major casinos in the region that are operated by the US-based companies which divert some of the US overseas-derived businesses to the region. The regions are analyzed according to the types and product category. Country-wise analysis of leading countries in these regions is covered in the report.

<<< Get COVID-19 Report Analysis >>> https://www.trendsmarketresearch.com/report/covid-19-analysis/9766

Benefits

The report provides detailed information about the usage and adoption of Gambling market in various applications and regions. With that, key stakeholders can find out the major trends, drivers, investments, vertical players initiatives, government initiatives toward the product adoption in the upcoming years, along with the details of commercial products available in the market. Moreover, the report provides details about the major challenges that are going to have an impact on market growth. Additionally, the report gives complete details about the business opportunities to key stakeholders to expand their business and capture revenues in the specific verticals. The report will help companies interested or established in this market to analyze the various aspects of this domain before investing or expanding their business in the Gambling market.

See the rest here:

Gambling Market : Drivers, Restraints, Opportunities, and Threats 2022 Kentucky Journal 24 - Kentucky Journal 24

UK Gambling Venues to Remain Closed for At Least Two More Weeks – Casinos Real Money News

Just like many other parts of the world, the United Kingdom is still reeling from the effects of the coronavirus pandemic despite the progress that has been made with regards to its containment. The number of casualties has been slowly decreasing and plans for the possible reopening of various parts of the economy were already underway. One of the most notable ones was the reopening of gambling venues that was scheduled for August 1. This did not come to pass.

A statement released by UK Prime Minister Boris Johnson on Friday revealed that, as part of the measures to ensure the virus is fully contained, the countrys government will be postponing some of the plans to reopen. This will remain so for at least two weeks as revealed by the Prime Ministers statement.

Casinos, bowling alleys, skating rinks, and remaining close contact services must remain closed. Indoor performances will not resume.

The Prime Minister acknowledged that the steps being taken by the government are a heavy blow to many people but he has promised that all the relevant data will be taken into account as the country plans the next reopening phase. Already things are shaping up as expected and it will not be long before a new plan is announced.

Now, while two weeks may seem like a relatively short time, the Betting and Gaming Council has expressed some concern regarding the impact that the postponement will have on the gambling industry. According to Michael Dugher, the BCG chief executive officer, the decision is highly illogical especially because of the financial implications.

He stated that over 5 million ($6.5 million) will be lost for each week that the gambling venues and entertainment destinations remain closed. This is pretty big especially considering that other fleeting changes have also had an impact on the industry.

Moreover, about 6,000 jobs would be lost due to the extension of the closure of the gaming venues in the country. These, he believes, are totally avoidable costs especially considering the fact that casinos reportedly posed much less risk than other venues that have since reopened.

We made the all necessary preparations for safe reopening and we were given the green light by Public Health England on the basis of the significant investment made by operators, and having been told by the Government themselves that casinos posed a negligible risk compared with the tens of thousands of other places that have been reopened.

In the United Kingdom, the gambling industry employs 14,000 people in casinos and an additional 4,000 in the supply chain. The industry is also a major contributor to state tax coffers and therefore its closure would also impact that particular revenue stream for the government. Online gaming may still be a great choice but it can not totally make up for the lack of retail options.

Even so, it seems like the containment of the pandemic is the main agenda at the moment, and perhaps the losses are a risk the countrys government is willing to take.

Read this article:

UK Gambling Venues to Remain Closed for At Least Two More Weeks - Casinos Real Money News

Ohio bookmaker to pay restitution for running illegal gambling operation, laundering proceeds, filing false income tax return – The Highland County…

Justin Herdman, U.S. Attorney for the Northern District of Ohio, announced recently that Ryan Driscoll, age 48, of Aurora, was sentenced to three years of probation and ordered to forfeit $628,950 in cash seized during a search warrant and pay $208,693 to the IRS as restitution after entering a plea of guilty on Jan. 15, 2020, to running an illegal sports gambling business with others, laundering the proceeds and filing a false income tax return.

Not only did this individual try to enrich himself illegally, but he also attempted to avoid paying taxes on these ill-gotten proceeds in order to further profit and conceal his crimes, said U.S. Attorney Justin Herdman. This substantial forfeiture and restitution reflect the nature and great lengths that Driscoll went to avoid paying his duly owed income taxes.

Individuals are required to pay taxes on all sources of income, even income earned from illegal gambling, said Bryant Jackson, Special Agent in Charge, IRS Criminal Investigation, Cincinnati Field Office. Ryan Driscoll also attempted to launder the profits from his offshore illegal gambling business, but the IRS followed the money trail, which was vital to dismantling his criminal conduct.

According to court documents, from July 2015 to August 2019, Driscoll operated as a bookmaker for his clients and provided them with access to offshore sports gambling websites. The websites allowed Driscolls clients to place bets on sporting events and track wins and losses and monies due. Driscoll paid out winnings and collected losses locally.

During this time, Driscoll concealed the fact that the majority of his income came from the illegal gambling business and hid the proceeds as large bundles of cash in $10,000 increments in his home.

In 2019, Driscoll made a payment for membership at a country club using the proceeds from the illegal gambling business. This transaction was designed to conceal and disguise the nature and source of the illegal funds. Between 2014 and 2017, Driscoll also deposited approximately $167,827 in cash into his personal bank accounts and used an additional $197,879 in cash and money orders to make payments on vehicles and his country club membership.

For the tax years 2014 through 2017, Driscoll underreported his income by approximately $825,323.00, which resulted in additional tax due and owing of approximately $208,693.00. In 2018, Driscoll knowingly submitted a false income tax return that grossly underreported his income and failed to disclose proceeds made from the illegal gambling business.

This case was investigated by the IRS-Criminal Investigation and U.S. Secret Service. This case was prosecuted by Assistant U.S. Attorneys Alex A. Abreu, Robert E. Buford and James L. Morford and former U.S. Attorney Carmen E. Henderson.

More:

Ohio bookmaker to pay restitution for running illegal gambling operation, laundering proceeds, filing false income tax return - The Highland County...

The link between loot boxes, gaming, and childhood gambling – The Independent

At the age of 13, Jonathan Peniket begged his father to allow him to spend his pocket money on Fifa. He wanted to buy packs for his team, a random selection of players which he could trade, or use to play online. His dad said no, that it was gambling. But eventually Jonathan got his way. He didnt regard it as gambling. To him, it seemed no different to buying Pokmon cards or football stickers. It was only when hed spent more than 3,000 at the age of 18 that he realised the insidious nature of loot boxes.

Jonathan was first introduced to video games when he was a child. His older brother had a GameBoy and Jonathan would watch over his shoulder and occasionally have a go. Then one Christmas, when Jonathan was about eight, the pair were bought a PlayStation 2 as a shared present. It wasnt much longer before Jonathan bought a second-hand edition of Fifa 2005.

Gaming became part of his life and, while he didnt consider it a problem, several times his parents were worried he had become addicted. But what Jonathan was becoming addicted to was perhaps more harmful. When Fifa first introduced its Ultimate Team mode in 2009, it swiftly became a topic of conversation with all his school friends. The conversation turned away from who beat who 4-0 online last night, and instead became about who had which players in their teams, and who had the better virtual cards.

Sharing the full story, not just the headlines

View post:

The link between loot boxes, gaming, and childhood gambling - The Independent

‘Almost like the mob’: Companies among assets seized in Ontario illegal gambling probe – London Free Press (Blogs)

In the latest Operation Hobart busts on Wednesday, four other people were charged with bookmaking, commission of an offence for a criminal organization, proceeds of crime, money laundering and tax evasion. Three others were charged with money laundering and proceeds of crime. They are all to appear in court in Brampton Sept. 17.

Among those charged was Douglas English, 38, of London. Hes charged with bookmaking and the possession of drugs for the purpose of trafficking. He is not a member of the Hells Angels, Wade said.

Police swooped down on locations in London, Oakville, Toronto, Pickering, Welland and Thornbury on Wednesday and seized three residences, one vacant vacation property and eight vehicles, including sports cars, a vintage automobile and a Harley Davidson motorcycle, OPP said.

Officers say they also seized $82,590 in Canadian cash and $23,398 in U.S. cash, about seven kilograms of Psilocybin (magic mushrooms) and half of kilogram of marijuana with a combined value of $66,986.

But the seizure of the financial assets of three land development companies, which included building lots in the Collingwood area and a $7 million, newly-built house on one lot, stand out. None of the residences seized, nor development companies, was in London, police say.

The violence is because of the profits. If we only arrest people and if we dont seize the profits, were only doing half the job, Wade said.

Property and violence have been front and centre in Operation Hobart, and Barlettas name keeps popping up.

Visit link:

'Almost like the mob': Companies among assets seized in Ontario illegal gambling probe - London Free Press (Blogs)

Glasgow to lead the way with gambling study as event ‘kick-starts conversation’ – Glasgow Times

PEOPLE who have faced gambling issues are invited to take part in an event organised to kick-start the conversation on protecting others from harm.

Gambling, which has been labelled a public health issue by medical professionals and academics, can cause money problems, relationship breakdowns, stress and anxiety.

Glasgow is leading the way on combating the issue, with lessons learned in the city to be used to shape future work across Scotland and the UK.

Experts by experience can join Glasgow City Council staff and councillors, the NHS, charities and leading researchers at an online event, via Zoom, on Thursday (August 6) at 6.30pm.

READ MORE:Study to look at online gambling in Glasgow during Covid-19 lockdown

It will be hosted by Public Health Scotland and the Health and Social Care Alliance Scotland (the ALLIANCE).

Will Griffiths, programme manager at the ALLIANCE, said: It is crucial that people with lived experience are involved in shaping work to reduce gambling harms across Glasgow.

The person centred approach proposed by the Glasgow Gambling Harms Group is timely and there is scope for strong engagement with people with lived experience, third sector, public health colleagues and other statutory partners to reduce the harm gambling cause across the city.

This event will be a vital starting point to ensure that people with lived experience of gambling harms will be at the heart of co-producing the implementation of the work in Glasgow.

Phil Mackie, a consultant at Public Health Scotland, said: People can experience a wide range of harms linked to gambling, including money problems, relationship breakdown, stress and anxiety, and, in some extreme circumstances, suicide.

For every person that experiences problems with gambling, on average six other people in their lives will be negatively affected.

Whilst anyone can be affected at any time, we know that some people and communities are more vulnerable to gambling harm than others.

He added: This situation has, in all likelihood, been exacerbated by the social and economic impacts of Covid-19.

READ MORE:Calls for city to lead the way in battle against harmful gambling

As we move from managing the pandemic towards renewal and recovery, taking action now to tackle gambling harms will help make Glasgow a better, fairer place to live, work and play.

The event is the first of many ways for people to get involved in a three-year project funded by the UK Gambling Commission.

It aims to understand how people and communities experience harm through gambling and decide what action should be taken in Glasgow.

Bailie Annette Christie, convener for wellbeing, empowerment, community and citizen engagement at the city council, said: As Scotlands largest city, Glasgow must tackle gambling harms head on.

There has been a massive rise in recent years in online gambling, gambling advertising and marketing, coupled with a growing conflation between gaming and gambling and the gamblification of sports.

We need to understand the impact of these changes on vulnerable people, especially young people, and their future potential.

Read the original post:

Glasgow to lead the way with gambling study as event 'kick-starts conversation' - Glasgow Times

Tesla Vs The Short Sellers: The Battle Is Never Over – InsideEVs

This article comes to us courtesy ofEVANNEX, which makes and sells aftermarket Tesla accessories. The opinions expressed therein are not necessarily our own at InsideEVs, nor have we been paid byEVANNEXto publish these articles. We find the company's perspective as an aftermarket supplier of Tesla accessories interesting and are willing to share its content free of charge. Enjoy!

Posted onEVANNEX August 04, 2020byCharles Morris

Now that TSLA stock has soared higher than $1,600, and the company appearspoised to join the S&P 500, its game over for the short sellers, right? Not so fastdespite losing whole closets full of shirts, some of the shorts are still hanging on, and they arent expected to fold up their tents just yet.

Theres no question that the rain has been pouring on the shorts parade.Securities Lending Timesreported in late July that short interest in Tesla was at its lowest level since 2015. According to S3 Partners, short interest decreased by 13.80% over the month prior to July 15. The shorts have lost a collective total of over $20 billion so far this year.

"Elon Musk is the lead actor in the biggest financial soap opera that's ever been. He makes roofs, rockets and cars, and it's a controversial bet. People doubt him but he performs," S3 Partners founder Bob Sloan toldBloomberg. "The short sellers are a really stubborn bunch."

Many shorts have been squeezed out of their positions, but as of July 15, Tesla short interest stood at $19.79 billionstill a colossal figure. Many market watchers believe the battle is far from over. Jacob Wolinsky, writing inValueWalk, cited data from Ortex Analytics showing that there were still over 11 million Tesla shares held in short positions as of July 23.

Tesla is the largest domestic equity short Ive ever seen...and the first US equity short with over $20 billion of short interest, says S3 Partners Managing Director Ihor Dusaniwsky. Only Apple has ever come close to attracting the same levels of short interest.

The short sellers interest in Tesla is not only due to skepticism about the companys prospectsaccording to Securities Lending Times, its partly inspired by a never-ending series of controversies and conspiracy theories having to do with Elon Musk, which arespreadvia social media and online forums.

Elon Musk has been quick to claim victory over the short sellers, however, this doesnt quite paint the full picture, says Peter Hillerberg, co-founder of Ortex Analytics. It is highly likely that what weve seen over recent weeks is at least in part a short squeeze, whereby the Tesla share price has been pushed higher by short sellers closing their positions. For high-conviction short sellers, this will just have been a further signal to hold tight and wait for an opportunity to take profit.

Furthermore, with the companys expected addition to the S&P 500 index, along with itslong-awaited Battery Day, coming up, it will surely be regularly featured in the headlines over the next few months feeding what some stock analysts call a hype premiumsomething that short sellers tend to see as an opportunity.

Whichever way you look at it, the battle of wits between Tesla and its short sellers is far from over, says Hillerberg.

===

Sources:Securities Lending Times,Bloomberg,ValueWalk; Video:Wall Street Journal

See the original post here:

Tesla Vs The Short Sellers: The Battle Is Never Over - InsideEVs

Check Out This Tesla Model S With A Rotary Engine: First EV Converted To Rotary? – InsideEVs

This story began when Kyle Conner showed us a post from The Vehicle Finderon Facebook. No info, just images. Some of them just presented a Model S being apparently repaired, but then we saw the one you have above: the Tesla had an engine on its front axle. If you look closer, youll see it is a Mazda 13B rotary engine with a turbo helping it breathe. We had to find out more.

The guys at The Vehicle Finder were accommodating to point us in the right direction. The car is a work from Reuben Bemrose, a shop owner in New Zealand. Rs Garage once made headlines by putting a 13B on a Ferrari 456 body. There was a rumor that Ferrari threatened to sue him for that, but Bemrose denied this happened. He still has that sports car, apparently.

We have tried to contact him both in his personal Facebook profile and also on the garage page last August 2, but have not heard from him. His Instagram profile tells us a little more about the plans for this car.

From what this image shows, it seems that Bemrose bought the body of a Model S that suffered a front crash. In another Instagram post, he mentions that carrying it was interesting, as you can see below.

His Instagram description talks about his cars. Apart from the Ferrari, he also mentions a 17 Tesla P100D 13BPT. Thats undoubtedly his new project.

As soon as we saw the picture, we wondered if the idea is to make a range extender of some sort. Now that we know a little more about the guy behind the 13B conversion, we believe his goal is to create a fast combustion-engined car that looks like a Tesla.

If you know Bemrose, tell him we have sent him a message to learn more about the project. If it has no battery, as we are almost sure that is the case, our friends at Motor1.com would still be interested in talking about his future creation.

Source: The Vehicle Finder

Read the original post:

Check Out This Tesla Model S With A Rotary Engine: First EV Converted To Rotary? - InsideEVs

Here are Monday’s biggest analyst calls of the day: Nikola, Merck, Yum! Brands, Tesla & more – CNBC

Patrick T. Fallon | BLoomberg | Getty Images

(This story is for CNBC PRO subscribers only.)

Here are the biggest calls on Wall Street on Monday:

UBS upgraded the social media service company after its strong earnings report and said it sees several long-term positives for the stock including the "offline to online ad shift" among other things.

"While we think the Q2 report contains many positive rate of change narratives, our rating change to Buy is not short-term but longer in duration driven by key themes - PINS remains in a unique position at the intersection of two secular tailwinds: 1) the offline to online ad shift & 2) the blurring of lines between digital ad & eCommerce. In particular, our higher conviction in the monetization path is reflected in our raised multi-year revenue forecast."

Note: this call occurred after the bell on Friday.

Bernstein said in its upgrade of the stock that it's bullish on the upcoming 5G cycle and sees a more "positive" risk/reward.

"Given a cleaner outlook around customer and regulatory disputes, potential further upside from possible Huawei chip sales, accelerating economics as AAPL reenters the model, and subsequent potential for multiple expansion we judge QCOM's risk-reward to be more positive than it has been in a long time."

Continued here:

Here are Monday's biggest analyst calls of the day: Nikola, Merck, Yum! Brands, Tesla & more - CNBC

Tesla Model Y drive, Fisker and VW, the potential of bi-directional charging: Today’s Car News – Green Car Reports

Volkswagen isnt yet saying yes to Fisker. U.S. city grids need some smart upgrades. Electricity could be the new currency of parking garages. And we take the Model Y for a drive. This and more, here at Green Car Reports.

The Tesla Model Y is going to be the benchmark for a generation of compact electric crossovers, including the Volkswagen ID.4, Ford Mustang Mach-E, and Volvo XC40 Recharge, among many others. One of our editors took the Model Y out for an afternoon drive to see what the buzz is all about.

Fisker has been seeking to use Volkswagens MEB platform for electric vehicles for the upcoming Fisker Ocean crossover. However negotiations with VW are now reportedly on pause according to an SEC document filed Friday.

A study from a Department of Energy lab suggests that if electric-vehicle adoption is strong, some U.S. cities grids might feel the squeeze from EVs unless they help enable smart charging and grid upgrades.

And could electricity from your electric vehicle serve as a currency for parking in the future? Nissan is already offering that to EV drivers at its new Pavilion exhibition space in Japan

_______________________________________

Follow Green Car Reports onFacebookandTwitter

Sign up to get the latest green car and environmental news, delivered to your inbox daily!

I agree to receive emails from Green Car Reports. I understand that I can unsubscribe at any time. Privacy Policy.

Read more:

Tesla Model Y drive, Fisker and VW, the potential of bi-directional charging: Today's Car News - Green Car Reports

Chinese Tesla rival Xpeng Motors in talks over $300 million in funding ahead of U.S. IPO, sources say – CNBC

Xpeng Motors latest electric car is called the P7.

Xpeng Motors

Xpeng Motors, one of Tesla's rivals in China, is in talks to raise around $300 million in funding ahead of an initial public offering (IPO) in the U.S., two sources familiar with the matter told CNBC.

Qatar's sovereign wealth fund, theQatar Investment Authority, is one of the investors in the funding round, the sources said. Alibaba, which is already an investor in Xpeng, also joined the round, one of the people said.

The final amount raised might be higher than $300 million as a number of investors are still in discussions to put money into Xpeng, the sources,who wanted to remain anonymous because the discussions are private, added.

Xpeng Motors declined to comment. The Qatar Investment Authority was not immediately available for comment when contacted by CNBC.

Alibaba confirmed to CNBC that it was involved in the funding round.

"Through our investement in Xpeng, Alibaba aims to leverage our established expertise in digitalization to support the advancement of the smart electric automaker industry," a spokesperson said in a statement.

The electric carmaker's latest cash injection is part of the same $500 million round of funding it raised earlier this month from investors including Aspex, Coatue, Hillhouse Capital and Sequoia Capital China. And it follows a$400 million investment in Novemberfrom investors that included Chinese smartphone maker Xiaomi.

Xpeng Motors has also confidentially filed for an IPO in the U.S., but has not decided which exchange to list on yet, the sources told CNBC.

The potential listing in the U.S. comes amid rising tensions between America and China which could impact foreign firms listed on Wall Street. In May, the U.S. Senate passed legislation that would increase scrutiny on Chinese firms trading on American exchanges which carries the threat of delistings for some foreign firms.

China has spawned a number of electric car companies thanks to favorable policies for the sector including subsidies. While some have collapsed, others such as Xpeng, are looking to push forward and grow.

This month, the car start-up started deliveries of its new P7 sedan which is seen as a competitor to Tesla's Model 3. In January, Tesla began rolling out Model 3 carsmade in its Shanghai factoryto customers in China.

China's electric vehicle sector has been hurt by the coronavirus outbreak. Sales of so-called new energy vehicles fell 33.1% year-on-year in June, according to data from the China Association of Automobile Manufacturers. However, sales have been rising month-on-month as theChinese economy showssigns of rebounding.

Earlier this year, the Chinese government unveiled policies it hoped will boost demand for electric cars. Some new energy vehicle subsidies and tax break policies that had been set to expire this yearwere extended to 2022. And nationwide charging infrastructure got a 2.7 billion yuan ($387 million) investment.

If Xpeng does go public in the U.S., it will join fellow Chinese electric carmaker NIO, which listed in September 2018. And on Thursday, Li Auto, another Chinese electric automaker started trading on the Nasdaq, raising $1.1 billion.

Read the original:

Chinese Tesla rival Xpeng Motors in talks over $300 million in funding ahead of U.S. IPO, sources say - CNBC