Researchers test flapping wing ornithopter drone – Aerospace Testing International

A group of researchers from Asia and Australia have developed and tested a flapping wing ornithopter that mimics one of the worlds fastest birds, the swift.

The prototype drone, which weighs just 26g and is similar in size to a swift has been optimized to fly in cluttered environments near humans, with the ability to glide, hover at very low power and stop quickly from fast speeds, avoiding collisions manoeuvres that quadcopter drones struggle to perform.

The researchers claim the ornithopter can hover, dart, glide, brake and dive just like aswift, making it more versatile, safer and quieter than existing quadcopters.

According to the researchers, the biologically-inspired drones could be used in applications such as the pollination of indoor vertical farms without damaging dense vegetation, chasing birds away from airports and surveillance.

The project which was led by National University of Singapore research scientist Dr Yao-Wei Chin said, The optimized ornithopter acts as a kind of scarecrow, greatly saving on labour costs for pest control companies and airport operators.

By improving the design so ornithopters can now produce enough thrust to hover and to carry a camera and accompanying electronics, the flapping wing drone could be used for crowd and traffic monitoring, information gathering and surveying forests and wildlife.

The light weight and the slow beating wings of the ornithopter poses less danger to the public than quadcopter drones in the event of a crash and given sufficient thrust and power banks it could be modified to carry different payloads depending on what is required.

Researcher Javaan Chahl professor of sensor systems at the University of South Australia in Adelaide said, There are existing ornithopters but until now, they were too inefficient and slow to be agile. We have overcome these issues with our flapping wing prototype, achieving the same thrust generated by a propeller.

Flapping wings can lift like an aeroplane wing, while making thrust like a propeller and braking like a parachute. We have put this together to replicate the aggressive flight patterns of birds by simple tail control.

However, Chin said that the researchers are a long way from entirely replicating biological flight: Although ornithopters are the closest to biological flight with their flapping wing propulsion, birds and insects have multiple sets of muscles which enable them to fly incredibly fast, fold their wings, twist, open feather slots and save energy.

Their wing agility allows them to turn their body in mid-air while still flapping at different speeds and angles.

Common swifts can cruise at a maximum speed of 31 meters a second, equivalent to 112km/h or 90mph.

At most, I would say we are replicating 10% of biological flight, he said.

The paper Efficient flapping wing drone arrests high speed flight using post-stall soaring was published in the July issue of the journalScience Robotics.

The project was a culmination of PhD work done by Dr Yao-Wei Chin at Nanyang Technological University under the guidance of Associate Professor Gih-Keong Lau (now with National Chiao Tung University, Taiwan), and an international collaboration comprising Professor Boo Cheong Khoo (National University of Singapore), Professor Javaan Chahl and Dr Jia Ming Kok (University of South Australia and Defence Science and Technology Group, Australia), Dr Yong-Qiang Zhu (Qingdao University of Technology, China) and Dr Woei Leong Chan (National University of Singapore).

See the article here:

Researchers test flapping wing ornithopter drone - Aerospace Testing International

Freedom of Speech – HISTORY

Contents

Freedom of speechthe right to express opinions without government restraintis a democratic ideal that dates back to ancient Greece. In the United States, the First Amendment guarantees free speech, though the United States, like all modern democracies, places limits on this freedom. In a series of landmark cases, the U.S. Supreme Court over the years has helped to define what types of speech areand arentprotected under U.S. law.

The ancient Greeks pioneered free speech as a democratic principle. The ancient Greek word parrhesia means free speech, or to speak candidly. The term first appeared in Greek literature around the end of the fifth century B.C.

During the classical period, parrhesia became a fundamental part of the democracy of Athens. Leaders, philosophers, playwrights and everyday Athenians were free to openly discuss politics and religion and to criticize the government in some settings.

In the United States, the First Amendment protects freedom of speech.

The First Amendment was adopted on December 15, 1791 as part of the Bill of Rightsthe first ten amendments to the United States Constitution. The Bill of Rights provides constitutional protection for certain individual liberties, including freedoms of speech, assembly and worship.

The First Amendment doesnt specify what exactly is meant by freedom of speech. Defining what types of speech should and shouldnt be protected by law has fallen largely to the courts.

In general, the First Amendment guarantees the right to express ideas and information. On a basic level, it means that people can express an opinion (even an unpopular or unsavory one) without fear of government censorship.

It protects all forms of communication, from speeches to art and other media.

While freedom of speech pertains mostly to the spoken or written word, it also protects some forms of symbolic speech. Symbolic speech is an action that expresses an idea.

Flag burning is an example of symbolic speech that is protected under the First Amendment. Gregory Lee Johnson, a youth communist, burned a flag during the 1984 Republican National Convention in Dallas, Texas to protest the Reagan administration.

The U.S. Supreme Court, in 1990, reversed a Texas courts conviction that Johnson broke the law by desecrating the flag. Texas v. Johnson invalidated statutes in Texas and 47 other states prohibiting flag burning.

Not all speech is protected under the First Amendment.

Forms of speech that arent protected include:

Speech inciting illegal actions or soliciting others to commit crimes arent protected under the First Amendment, either.

The Supreme Court decided a series of cases in 1919 that helped to define the limitations of free speech. Congress passed the Espionage Act of 1917, shortly after the United States entered into World War I. The law prohibited interference in military operations or recruitment.

Socialist Party activist Charles Schenck was arrested under the Espionage Act after he distributed fliers urging young men to dodge the draft. The Supreme Court upheld his conviction by creating the clear and present danger standard, explaining when the government is allowed to limit free speech. In this case, they viewed draft resistant as dangerous to national security.

American labor leader and Socialist Party activist Eugene Debs also was arrested under the Espionage Act after giving a speech in 1918 encouraging others not to join the military. Debs argued that he was exercising his right to free speech and that the Espionage Act of 1917 was unconstitutional. In Debs v. United States the U.S. Supreme Court upheld the constitutionality of the Espionage Act.

The Supreme Court has interpreted artistic freedom broadly as a form of free speech.

In most cases, freedom of expression may be restricted only if it will cause direct and imminent harm. Shouting fire! in a crowded theater and causing a stampede would be an example of direct and imminent harm.

In deciding cases involving artistic freedom of expression the Supreme Court leans on a principle called content neutrality. Content neutrality means the government cant censor or restrict expression just because some segment of the population finds the content offensive.

In 1965, students at a public high school in Des Moines, Iowa, organized a silent protest against the Vietnam War by wearing black armbands to protest the fighting. The students were suspended from school. The principal argued that the armbands were a distraction and could possibly lead to danger for the students.

The Supreme Court didnt bitethey ruled in favor of the students right to wear the armbands as a form of free speech in Tinker v. Des Moines Independent School District. The case set the standard for free speech in schools. However, First Amendment rights typically dont apply in private schools.

What does free speech mean?; United States Courts.Tinker v. Des Moines; United States Courts.Freedom of expression in the arts and entertainment; ACLU.

Excerpt from:

Freedom of Speech - HISTORY

The Student Press Law Center condemns the suspension of Georgia students for posting photos of their crowded school during COVID-19 – Student Press…

For immediate release: Aug. 6, 2020

For more information: Diana Mitsu Klos, 202-728-7267; dmk@splc.org

Download the statement as a PDF

The Student Press Law Center condemns in the strongest terms the reported suspensions of at least two students at North Paulding High School in Dallas, Georgia who posted photos and a video on social media showing a crowded school hallway on the first days of school amid the COVID-19 pandemic.

In addition, SPLC is deeply concerned by reports that students and staff were told over the school intercom by principal Gabe Carmona that there will be consequences for anyone who sends things out that show the school in a negative light without permission, including photographs or video, specifically warning of any content given to news media.

Students must not be disciplined for exposing health and safety issues at their school, particularly in the midst of a pandemic. The school districts policy related to cell phone and social media use on campus raises serious First Amendment concerns in and of itself. The extreme measures taken to discipline students who have exposed risk seem to undermine the policys stated progressive disciplinary structure and to chill the future expression of students or staff, said Hadar Harris, executive director of the Student Press Law Center.

In addition, we are extremely concerned that as schools begin to open up across the United States, that administrators are going to seek to silence reporting (formal and informal) by students. Schools should be on notice that students have the right to report responsibly and lawfully on the situation in their schools even if it is not the most flattering view of the school. Any student who is suspended or threatened with discipline should be aware they have First Amendment and due process rights, including the right to appeal suspensions, Harris added.

In the landmark 1969 Tinker v. Des Moines Independent School District Supreme Court case, which set the standard for student free speech, Justice Abe Fortas wrote, It can hardly be argued that either students or teachers shed their constitutional rights to freedom of speech or expression at the schoolhouse gate. Yet at least one student at North Paulding High School was reportedly suspended from school for five days, even though the school districts own policy recommends that discipline relating to telecommunications devices begin with administrative conference to three days of in-school suspension.

SPLC encourages students who are facing discipline for First Amendment issues to immediately seek legal representation. In addition, SPLC has a free legal hotline to assist. The identity of anyone who contacts our hotline is kept confidential unless they expressly decide to go public.

The Student Press Law Center (splc.org, @splc) is an independent, nonpartisan 501(c)(3) nonprofit working at the intersection of law, journalism and education to promote, support and champion the rights of student journalists and their advisers at the high school and college levels. Based in Washington, D.C., the Student Press Law Center provides information, training and legal assistance at no charge to student journalists and the educators who work with them.

Related

More:

The Student Press Law Center condemns the suspension of Georgia students for posting photos of their crowded school during COVID-19 - Student Press...

Harbor Commission declines to take action on controversial billboard – The Triplicate

The Crescent City Harbor Commission on Tuesday flirted with the idea of terminating a lease with a media company over a billboard on its property that has generated controversy.

After some of the commissioners received complaints, even a threat of vandalism, against a California Endowment billboard ad, Harbormaster Charlie Helms brought the issue to commissioners.

The port leases land to Outfront Media, which owns the billboard. The billboard depicts seven people of differing ethnicities, all wearing facemasks touting political slogans, including Universal Health Care, Black Lives Matter, Dreamers, and End Racism.

However, Helms explained that the Harbor District has no legal right to terminate the lease with Outfront Media, which provides space for five signs at about $16,000 annually.

Helms reported that the Harbor Districts lease with Outfront Media began in June 2019 and lasts for five years. Beginning June 1, 2023, Outdoor Media will increase its annual rent to $17,557.92.

Helms pointed out to the commissioners they have no plans for the land the billboard sits. He added a second, similar billboard by the California Endowment in on Highway 101 near South Beach.

To me, were getting paid $16,000 a year for dirt, Helms said. We dont have to do anything in the way of maintenance of the signs. They dont have anything up that is pornography or anything else. Its good earnings for the Harbor District with very little time invested.

While Commissioner Rick Shepherd was amenavle to asking Outfront Media to remove the billboard, the others did not wish to wade into political waters. Commissioner Wes White indicated taking action could be seen as an infringement on freedom of speech and potentially open the harbor district to a lawsuit.

This body is supposed to be apolitical. That clearly is a political sign, White said. Were supposed to be an apolitical organization and if we start messing with a sign thats political in nature, were no longer apolitical for those reasons.

California Endowment is a non-profit organization created in 1996 when Blue Cross of California acquired the for-profit subsidiary WellPoint Health Networks. California Endowment website touts that is has more than $3 billion in assets, which it has used to fund the $1 billion Building Healthy Communities initiative. The program invested in 14 California communities including Del Norte County.

However, the initiatives message on the billboards generated negative comments, including by Del Norte County Supervisor Roger Gitlin on his Facebook page July 25.

Inserting the very serious COVID-19 pandemic dilemma into politics, the California Endowment has mixed partisan, divisive opinion with public health in erecting this billboard(s) entering Crescent City, Gitlin wrote. The billboard is exclusionary and insulting to Del Norte County and changes no minds, further polarizes us and widens the Grand Canyon-esq gap between our diverse cultures. This shameful display should be taken down immediately and continued funding for the California Endowment should be re-considered.

Harbor Commission Carol White expressed her concerns over the free speech restrictions incites imminent lawless action component listed in Helms report.

There have been people threatening to get out there and spray paint it, White said. It didnt just tick off one group of people. Theres quite a few different organizations that are not happy about it being up there.

She added shes referred her constituents with complaints to Outfront Media and California Endowment.

Shepherd initially backed asking Outfront Media to remove the billboard but was not in favor of terminating the lease between them.

The other commissioners favored taking no action with Brian Stone saying this could lead down a slippery slope.

We have been accused in the past by the public of doing things which were not in the best interest of the harbor basically mismanaging the harbor, Stone said. For us to try to terminate this lease at this point in time would, one, open ourselves up to the possibility of liability over freedom of speech, and two, to breaking a lease without having a reason.

Jim Ramsey said he didnt see the billboard as political, noting that the California Endowment was the group that paid for the advertisement and he didnt want to give up Outfront Medias revenue to the port.

No one has complained to me about the sign, Ramsey said. And if someone has threatened to spray paint it, hopefully the sheriff will catch them.

See the original post here:

Harbor Commission declines to take action on controversial billboard - The Triplicate

Letter to the Editor – Lynn Journal

Response to First to Worst

To the Editor,

There are a few reasons for why the Covid 19 virus has been worse here than in other countries. One is due to non-replacement of needed medical supplies used to fight the Sars virus under President Obama. Another is the never-ending accusations and obstruction of President Trump by some who want to make it difficult for him, even if its dishonest and against what is good for the country. These people should be regarded as red rather than blue as in Soviet Red Army or their current allies in Red China.

Many of todays young people are ignorant to history like the over 600,000 white guys who died in the civil war-fighting for what they believed was their country when our population was little more than a tenth of what it is today. Many lost arms and legs to a wood saw with the only painkiller of some whiskey.

Its also a shame to slander someone with accusations of racism by unfounded talk by those who are racist for political gain or just because they want to get t heir way. I thought that race isnt supposed to matter.

It would be good if more people consider the Golden Rule and that no one is perfect.

Fred Peck

Lynn

Read more here:

Letter to the Editor - Lynn Journal

Thematic ETFs Invest In the Hottest Trends. How Not To Get Burned. – Barron’s

Text size

Investors are often told that the golden rule of investing is diversification. Sometimes, though, it pays to make a targeted bet. That has been the driving force behind thematic exchange-traded funds: These niche funds grew three times as fast as the rest of the ETF industry in the second quarter.

Thematic ETFs typically focus on long-term, societal trends, such as disruptive technologies, climate change, or shifting consumer behaviors. Some of the most popular themes include cloud computing, robotics, and electric vehicles, as well as the gig economy, e-commerce, and clean energy.

These are hot topics, for sure. And theyre hot stocks: Year to date, 89 out of the 129 thematic ETFs on the market beat the S&P 500 index, returning 17% on average; 47 of them even outran the best-performing sector, technology. Thanks to both strong inflows and market-beating performance, thematic ETFs saw their assets increase 65% in the second quarter, more than three times the broader ETF industrys 19% growth, according to data from Global X, which offers 20 thematic ETFs. Five years ago, there were just 40 thematic ETFs with $5 billion in assets. Today, theres $41 billion in these ETFs.

The Covid-19 pandemic, meanwhile, has disrupted how people live and how companies are runpossibly forever. More than ever, investors have become aware that the future might look very different from today, says Matthew Bartolini, State Streets head of SPDR Americas research, and they are interested in the companies that could be the biggest beneficiaries. This acceleration is likely to remain very sticky beyond Covid-19, says Jay Jacob, head of research and strategy for Global X.

For a theme to be investible, there must also be a large enough addressable market, and sufficient companies with products and services to address that market. Some industries, while promising, are still too nascent. TrueMark Investments, a new ETF firm founded just a year ago, closely monitors venture capital and private equity to identify emerging public companies for its $12 million TrueShares Technology, AI & Deep Learning ETF (ticker: LRNZ).

Note: Data as of July 30, 2020; *annualized; **the fund has fee waivers in place capping expenses at 0.55% until at least February 1, 2021; N/A means the funds are launched less than three years ago.

Sources: Global X, Morningstar

Despite thematic ETFs impressive returns, investors should proceed with caution. Most of these ETFs are quite small; More than half of the 129 funds have less than $100 million in assets, though a dozen have crossed the $1 billion mark. Most are also fairly new; just 16 funds have a 10-year track record, mostly in clean energy and natural resources; 75 havent been open for three years. Theyre also a bit more complicated to build, since theyre either actively managed or track a customized indexand that means they can be more costly. The average expense ratio for this group is 1.05%, while the broader ETF industry charges just 0.67%.

Two of the largest thematic ETFs, the $6.1 billion ARK Innovation (ARKK) and $4.7 billion First Trust Cloud Computing (SKYY), have returned 61% and 29%, respectively, year to date, beating the $32 billion Technology Select Sector SPDR (XLK)s 18% return. The $1.6 billion ARK Genomic Revolution (ARKG) is the largest thematic ETF focused on health-care innovation; it has returned 63% year to date, ahead of the $24 billion Health Care Select Sector SPDR (XLV)s 5% return.

Thematic ETFs dont perform like their sectors ETFs because they are actually quite different. Most thematic ETFs have very little overlap with traditional sector funds. They usually have fewer stocks, and tend to own more small and international stockssometimes across multiple sectors. The 39 holdings in ARK Innovation, for instance, have an average market cap of $8.4 billion, whereas the technology SPDR, with 72 stocks, has an average market cap of $339 billion. The ARK fund also has 13% in international stocks, and the SPDR, virtually zero. Only two of the ARK funds holdings Xilinx (XLNX) and Autodesk (ADSK)also belong to the SPDR tech ETF, and due to their smaller size, they account for only 1% of the SPDR tech. Similarly, only three out of the 39 stocks that the ARK Genomic Revolution holds are also in the health-care SPDR, making up just 4% of the latters portfolio.

Newsletter Sign-up

Every weekday evening we highlight the consequential market news of the day and explain what's likely to matter tomorrow.

Because thematic ETFs are so specific, even those with similar names can turn out to have little in common. The same theme can be interpreted differently, and various methodsfrom fundamental to quantitativeare used to select and weigh stocks.

Investors who still want some diversification might be better served with equal-weighted funds, especially those with a higher number of holdings. The $2.4 billion iShares Exponential Technologies (XT) and the $1 billion SPDR Kensho New Economies Composite (KOMP), for instance, have about 200 and 400 holdings, respectively, and both are largely equal-weighted, with minor modifications. This is really about delivering thematic beta, says Jeff Spiegel, head of iShares megatrend and international ETFs at BlackRock, Its not about having a view that one particular company will be the winner of the theme. Its much more about getting exposure to a range of firms.

Many thematic ETFs are more concentrated, however. These can be more pure plays, but only as a supplement to an otherwise well-diversified portfolio. Ark Financials and Global Xs ETFs, for instance, have fewer holdings, often less than 50, and the weighting depends on either active managers conviction or how well the stocks have been performing. Thematic investing, if done right, should be more concentrated, says Global Xs Jacob, You own the companies that are best positioned to benefit from the materialization of a trend.

Write to Evie Liu at evie.liu@barrons.com

Read more:

Thematic ETFs Invest In the Hottest Trends. How Not To Get Burned. - Barron's

Calvin Sandborn: Lessons from the pandemic an approach to climate change – The Province

As Greta Thunberg argues, we have failed to empathize with our own great-grandchildren and the world of disease, drought, storms, floods, wildfire, mass migration, political instability and war that awaits them.TROY FLEECE / Regina Leader-Post

Be kind, be calm, be safe. Dr. Bonnie Henry

The evidence is overwhelming. The best strategy for beating COVID-19 is to combine good science with kindness. Now the same combination is needed to stop climate change.

B.C. has one of the best records in the world fighting COVID largely because provincial health officer Dr. Bonnie Henry delivered scientific facts along with relentless reminders to be thoughtful of others.

In sharp contrast, the U.S. has the most COVID-19 cases and deaths in the world largely because President Donald Trump denied the science and urged Americans to nurse grievance and abandon empathy. Tens of thousands will now die because the inconvenience of mask-wearing is deemed more important than the lives of neighbours.

It turns out that bad science and failure of empathy is a particularly lethal combination.

There is an important lesson here. In essence, we have failed to deal with climate change for the same reasons that the U.S. failed in dealing with COVID. We have failed to heed the consensus science predicting imminent climate catastrophe. And, as Greta Thunberg argues, we have failed to empathize with our own great-grandchildren and the world of disease, drought, storms, floods, wildfire, mass migration, political instability and war that awaits them. Our refusal to walk in their shoes is the moral failure of our age.

Hopefully,our pandemic experience could change all this.

First, the COVID experience should renew respect for good science. For over 30 years, fossil fuel corporate fog machines have run a disinformation campaign against inconvenient scientific facts and funded politicians to claim that climate change is another hoax. But the pandemic with its more immediate connection between actions and fatal consequence has vividly demonstrated the danger of substituting conspiracy theories and alternative facts for scientific fact.

As Angela Merkel recently stressed: You cannot fight a pandemic with lies and disinformation any more than you can fight it with hate.

Every day, principled scientists such as Dr. Anthony Fauci re-instil public trust in sound science. Soon, a successful race for a vaccine like the 1950s race for a polio vaccine and the 1960s space race should dramatically restore trust in science. And science clearly demands urgent action on climate change.

Perhaps more important, the pandemic has taught us the critical importance of kindness, of fellow-feeling, of community. There is a reason why Dr. Henrys first public health injunction is Be kind. We are all interconnected, and we have to think about others in order for the community to be healthy.

We may bridle at putting on a mask, but we now know that selfish actions in a pandemic can kill a neighbours grandfather, give a friend a stroke. Similarly, we may bridle at giving up air travel and reducing car use, but if we love future children, we must act on climate change.

Our sense of community and kindness has deteriorated, particularly in the U.S. shattered by decades of media that shifted the social paradigm from FDRs I am my brothers keeper to the Trumpian Every dog for itself. Rush Limbaugh, Survivor, The Apprentice and professional wrestling have taught that people are either winners or losers, and you must not be a loser. Kick others off the island before they kick you off.

But the pandemic has vividly demonstrated that the Golden Rule is a better approach. Do unto others as you would have them do unto you is superior social policy. We all win when we act on objective facts, and are kind to others including our imperilled grandchildren.

Calvin Sandborn teaches environmental law at the University of Victoria, and is the author of Becoming the Kind Father.

Letters to the editor should be sent to provletters@theprovince.com.

CLICK HEREto report a typo.

Is there more to this story? Wed like to hear from you about this or any other stories you think we should know about. Emailvantips@postmedia.com.

Originally posted here:

Calvin Sandborn: Lessons from the pandemic an approach to climate change - The Province

Remembering the bomb – The News International

It was the morning of August 6, 1945 when the most tragic and horrific incident in human history happened. During World War II, an atomic bomb was dropped on the Japanese city of Hiroshima and within seconds, the city full of life was burned into ashes due to the combination of heat and explosive material.

More than 100,000 fatalities were reported. Another atomic bomb was dropped on Nagasaki three days later on August 9, 1945 killing around 80,000 people. To avoid more human losses, Japan decided to surrender on the 15th of August, 1945 and thus, World War II officially ended.

Every year, the day is marked on August 6 in the city of Hiroshima. Special prayers for lasting world peace are also held. The first ceremony, which was held after two years of the tragic incident in 1947, eventually succeeded to attract a large number of participants, including relatives of the families of the deceased and peace loving people from all over the world. On the occasion, participants show their firm commitment for ensuring world peace.

In my view, it was indeed a tough time for Japan 75 years ago as an economically devastated country was facing extreme pressure. In response to the atomic attack, there were two options available to react aggressively or show patience. However, the Japanese leadership decided to promote peace. They had to compromise on almost every national issue. But the Japanese people were very well aware of the fact that education is the only tool with which they could regain their lost position to stand on their feet once again. Between 1945 and 1952, widespread educational, technological and social reforms were witnessed in almost every field.

Rather than showing aggression and wanting to take revenge, the Japanese leadership analyzed the whole situation with a cool mind and decided to transform the country into one free of violence. The great Japanese nation also felt no hesitation to seek support from former enemy countries. The contribution of renowned American business management expert W Edwards Deming is widely acknowledged throughout Japan. Under his guidance, the Japanese nation learned about the importance of quality products. Dr Deming taught the golden rule that improving the quality of Japanese products can result in rapid growth rate and good reputation of Japan in the eyes of the international community.

Today, after 75 years, the dominance of Japanese technologies in every sector is an undeniable fact. There was a time when Japan had to take loans but today the world economy is heavily dependent on Japan. All this happened because the Japanese nation did not give up, and carried on their journey towards prosperity with positive intentions into the right direction.

There is a prominent dominance and wide popularity of Japanese companies, such as: Toyota, Honda, Suzuki, Sony, Toshiba, Panasonic, Nikon, Canon and Mitsubishi, in the global market with a repute of producing reliable, durable and best quality products.

Besides technological advancements, Japan is also known as a role model for world peace. Its foreign policy is based on the remarkable principle of 'Proactive Contribution to Peace' for ensuring international cooperation in different sectors. The Japan International Cooperation Agency (JICA) is also committed to becoming a bridge between the people of Japan and developing countries, including Pakistan, through the sharing of knowledge and experience, in order to transform a more peaceful and prosperous world. Thats why the positive role of Japan is being acknowledged throughout the world.

We should learn a lesson from Japan about how a highly demoralized, financially devastated and defeated nation succeeded to rise from the ashes of the atomic bomb to become the second-largest economy. In my view, the adoption of an optimistic approach in the right decision always results in achieving desired goals and targets.

The writer is a member of the National Assembly and patron-in-chief of the Pakistan Hindu Council.

Twitter: @RVankwani

Original post:

Remembering the bomb - The News International

‘On the raggedy edge of losing it’: Son of missing Helen Sedo speaks out – yorkregion.com

My mom comes from a generation that doesnt talk about mental health problems, he said, explaining that despite this, before COVID-19, shed been working on it and chatting with him about her problems. Being open about it is critical and thats something she had been doing.

He said in the past couple of years Helen has been struggling with a series of stressful situations, followed up by emotions resembling depression.

She struggled with her anger at times, she struggled with staying in a good mood, he said. For the last several years, after my grandmother passed, shes been struggling. My grandfather deteriorated incredibly quickly after (my grandmothers) death, within a 1.5 years he was in a dementia ward in a retirement home. It was a heavy burden (my mother) took on.

Following COVID-19, Michael, who now lives in Cambridge, said hes been giving his parents their physical space considering their age and his wish not to take risks with a deadly virus.

Since COVID hit, our conversations have largely revolved around that, he added, noting the pair had been speaking several times a week.

Then, just 48 hours after he received a happy, normal voicemail message from her congratulating him on a successful job interview, he got the worst news of his life. Shed disappeared.

Since then, Michael does not believe shes been using her cellphone.

However, he said, police are not sharing those sorts of details with the family at the moment.

If theres been one seemingly positive thing thats occurred since her disappearance, its the amount of support the family has received, including people from the depths of his phone contact list reaching out to offer help and perfect strangers showing up at the familys Aurora home to grab flyers and hand them out all over town.

Theres been a tremendous outpouring of support people we havent spoken to in decades, he said.

He said hes struggled the most with the idea that his mother, like him, a wilderness camper her whole life, didnt tell anyone where she was headed, a golden rule in the family growing up.

Although detectives involved with the case were unavailable to speak, Michael said one area they have been looking into involves hotels and motels in the Huntsville and Gravenhurst area, where the family have a plot of land.

So far, nothing.

The sense of desperation is climbing and hope is fading fast, he said, chocking back tears.

Sedo is described as a white female, five-foot-one, dark brown shoulder-length hair, wearing glasses and carrying a red- and olive-coloured duffel bag.

Anyone with information is asked to contact York Regional Police #1 district criminal investigations bureau at 1-866-876-5423 ext. 7141 or Crime Stoppers at 1-800-222-TIPS or leave an anonymous tip online at http://www.1800222tips.com.

See the article here:

'On the raggedy edge of losing it': Son of missing Helen Sedo speaks out - yorkregion.com

When Joe Biden Tried To Paint Clarence Thomas as a Crazy Libertarian – Reason

How long has Democratic presidential hopeful Joe Biden been in the political game? Long enough to have been at the center of a smear campaign during the Senate confirmation hearings of the longest-serving member of the current U.S. Supreme Court.

The 1991 showdown over Supreme Court nominee Clarence Thomas is mostly remembered today for the accusations of sexual misconduct leveled by Anita Hill. But the hearings actually kicked off with Senate Judiciary Committee Chair Joe Biden trying to discredit Thomas as a crazy libertarian and reckless judicial activist.

"I assure you I have read all of your speeches, and I have read them in their entirety," Biden told Thomas shortly after the nominee's opening statement. "And, in the speech you gave in 1987 to the Pacific Research Institute, you said, and I quote, 'I find attractive the arguments of scholars such as Stephen Macedo who defend an activist Supreme Court that would'not could, would'strike down laws restricting property rights.'"

"It has been quite some time since I have read Prof. Macedo," Thomas replied. "But I don't believe that in my writings I have indicated that we should have an activist Supreme Court."

Biden claimed that he didn't buy it. "Quite frankly, I find it hard to square your speeches," he told the nominee, "with what you are telling me today."

Thomas gave the speech in question at the Pacific Research Institute in San Francisco on August 10, 1987. It touched on a number of issues, including the views of Stephen Macedo, then an assistant professor in the government department at Harvard University and the author of The New Right v. the Constitution, a 1987 book published by the libertarian Cato Institute. The book made a case for "principled judicial activism."

Macedo's book was basically an extended critique of Robert Bork, the highly influential conservative legal thinker who championed a thoroughgoing doctrine of judicial deference. The "first principle" of the U.S. system, Bork insisted, was majority rule, not individual rights. What Bork's view meant in practice was that the federal courts should defer to lawmakers in most cases. "In wide areas of life," Bork argued, "majorities are entitled to rule, if they wish, simply because they are majorities."

Macedo advanced the opposite view. "When conservatives like Bork treat rights as islands surrounded by a sea of government powers," he countered, "they precisely reverse the view of the Founders as enshrined in the Constitution, wherein government powers are limited and specified and rendered as islands surrounded by a sea of individual rights."

Which brings us back to Thomas. Here is his 1987 Macedo quote in full:

I find attractive the arguments of scholars such as Stephen Macedo who defend an activist Supreme Court, which would strike down laws restricting property rights. But the libertarian argument overlooks the place of the Supreme Court in a scheme of separation of powers. One does not strengthen self-government and the rule of law by having the non-democratic branch of the government make policy. Hence, I strongly support the nomination of Bob Bork to the Supreme Court. Judge Bork is no extremist of any kind. If anything, he is an extreme moderate, one who believes in the modesty of the Court's powers, with respect to the democratically elected branches of government.

So yes, Thomas said he found Macedo's arguments "attractive." But then Thomas immediately faulted Macedo and endorsed Bork, the very figure that Macedo was trying to bring down. In other words, Biden ripped Thomas' words out of context to give them the opposite meaning of what Thomas actually said.

The whole episode reflects poorly on Biden.

Excerpt from:

When Joe Biden Tried To Paint Clarence Thomas as a Crazy Libertarian - Reason

The legacy of Vermin Supreme is anything but normal Film Daily – Film Daily

The minute you see the boot at any political rally, you automatically know youre in the presence of a Vermin Supreme fan, or the man himself. The boot of course operates on a bunch of different levels, Supreme tells us, during our interview with the United States presidential candidate.

What else would you expect from the satirical artist who wants to give every American a pony? Starting in 1992, Vermin Supreme has run for president in every election cycle, with the intention of making the public more aware of how ridiculous the U.S. government can be.

Yet when 2020 came around, the tone of Supremes campaign transformed. Sure, the boot was still there, and he still toted his giant toothbrush but his campaign has taken a genuinely serious turn. Supreme ran a serious campaign for the Libertarian Party nomination in 2020 after being approached by the political organization.

My campaign manager Desire Lindsey reached out to me and asked me if I was interested in running a serious campaign. I had to really consider what that meant. Of course, it was a very different type of campaign, because I wasnt goofing; I wasnt spoofing. I still made jokes and could use my humor, but I was sort of in this other realm as another parallel character: you know, serious Vermin.

Just like serious Vermin, Vermin Supreme didnt arrive overnight. Vermins humble beginnings were as a booker/promoter for clubs in Baltimore, and since all of these promoters were vermin, he naturally wanted to be the vermin supreme.

But Supreme found himself getting burned out, looking for a fresh start. Coincidentally, the Great Peace March for Global Nuclear Disarmament was coming through Baltimore at the same time, and he found his new life at least for the time being.

I was inspired and started walking with them to DC. Met a bunch of anarchists, and decided that I wanted to be involved in this roving demonstration protest movement. Joining in on several other marches as well as teaming up with the collective Seeds for Peace, Supreme spent his time fighting alongside fellow anarchists in these protests.

Around the same time, Supreme also started attending Rainbow Gatherings. An anarchists dream, these events situated in nature claimed to offer freedom from capitalist society and focused on peace, mutual aid, and mutual respect. In this heady hippy atmosphere, Supreme found himself drawn to developing his clowning skills, as he puts it.

At that time, especially at the gatherings, because they allow you a whole amount of freedom, I spent the first several years honing my clowning skills, honing my audience/master of ceremonies skills at talent shows and things of that nature. Supremes time mastering these skills was put to the test when he later joined the Shanti Sena, a peacekeeping group designed to help de-escalate situations.

Specifically, Supreme spent time trying to smooth over tension with cops and walk with them during Rainbow Gatherings, helping destigmatize their relationship. Their purpose was trying to bring them over to a different way of seeing things they were propagandized about seeing. Using humor, Supreme helped try to build a better relationship with authorities.

While all of this was going on, Supreme found himself running for office, starting with the mayor of Baltimore in 1987. Of course, running for him meant just being funny, not any genuine political goal. As Supreme took his clowning skills to the outside world, using them at protests to help de-escalate and relax police and protestors alike, he would also campaign at such events.

The Rainbow Gatherings and political demonstrations were my first national audiences, as people come from all over. As Supremes desire grew further, he entered a New Hampshire U.S. Presidential party primary race; the state is known as being the earliest to hold its primary and therefore enjoys the loudest media buzz.

I was going up to New Hampshire, taking advantage of their first-in-the-nation primary status, and the vast, intense mediascape there. Interacting with the actual candidates, and using that as a vehicle to promote my message of absurdity, and me calling them on their stuff. There, the Vermin Supreme we know & love today was born.

Since 1992, Supreme has been on the ballot as part of New Hampshires primaries, running under different parties (just because candidates have to declare a party to run). He never truly was a Democrat running Democrat nor a Republican running Republican, but a man with his own views just wearing a varied hat each election cycle.

But come 2016, he found himself drawn to the Libertarian Party. When I ran as a Libertarian, even the first one I still wasnt totally there, but by 2016, I was a Libertarian running for the Libertarian nomination. Its part of the reason why he decided to run a more serious campaign in 2020, as he could use his views and the Libertarian Party to troll the duopoly of the American election system.

Even Supreme had to warm up to the Libertarian Party at first, as he felt his views and theirs would clash. As a left anarchist, mutual aid is a very important thing to me. But I was always a little bit leery of even bringing it up to my Libertarian friends because I was afraid they would corrupt the phrase and murder it.

The Libertarian Party as a party it acknowledges the state. If you look at the platform, its minimizing the military, minimizing this, and that. But the thing to understand is the Libertarian Party, number one, is a party comprised of anarchists and minarchists attempting to dismantle the state.

Thats just important for people to know. Its also important for people to know its not a right-leaning monolith. Thats one of the misunderstandings I had to 0vercome. It had its own interior right and left political spectrum.

As he opened up to the Libertarian Party, Supreme realized he finally landed with a party that, while not perfectly matching, did represent many of his ideals. So while his election in 2016 was still more for fun, it was the first time Supreme felt at home in the party he chose to run under. And when offered the chance to seriously run under the party, it was a no- brainer.

So, with such a long-standing political comedy career, how does one even begin to preserve the work done? Supreme has done his best to make his legacy known, as he started the non-profit Vermin Supreme Institute. We are putting out things where we recognize the good work that people are doing; were putting out little known history bits and trying to develop resources that offer mutual aid, information, and education.

Supreme also penned a book called I Pony: Blueprint for a New America, writing as a time-traveller from a Vermin Supreme-run America and why he needs to be stopped! But its not just Supreme trying to preserve his legacy.

Supreme told us about the strange way he got involved in the making of the documentary Who is Vermin Supreme?. I noticed someone following me and filming me, and it was Steve . He asked me if I was interested in participating in a documentary.

I agreed, just because I thought it would be a great way to get a bunch of my friends to say nice things about me and be able to see it before I die, Supreme joked. But Ondericks documentary is arguably the most intimate about Supreme, as not only does it dive deep into his campaigns, but also his childhood growing up in Rockport, Maine, and his time in Baltimore before joining anarchist movements.

I guess I was feeling old enough back in 2012 to be concerned about my legacy, Supreme noted. But Who is Vermin Supreme? is far from the only documentary to capitalize on his legacy. This is Vermin Supreme by political satire artist Rod Webber is another addition to the filmmakers extensive catalog of political documentaries.

When Webber ran as Flower Man in 2016, he was in the same circles as Supreme. So as Webber was filming a documentary about his campaign, a lot of the footage happened to feature our favorite boot-wearing candidate as well. That gave Webber a brilliant idea: This is Vermin Supreme.

Supreme explained. When was making his own documentary movie, he realized that he had a folder full of Vermin Supreme. Maybe not enough for a documentary he thought, but he started looking around, and started pulling stuff from the internet, and did interviews and things like that. He came up with enough for a very entertaining documentary.

In addition to the collection of documentaries about him, Supreme also helped write and starred in Vote Jesus: The Chronicles of Ken Stevenson. Initially a documentary about Supreme, Chronicles turned into a mockumentary about a more conservative character than Supreme named Ken Stevenson.

Interviewing leading figures in the Republican party, the film has yet to see the light of day, but Supreme promises it will eventually be released to the public. For now, check out the clips on director Vic Davids YouTube page to see a much more clean-cut Vermin Supreme, as well as the scathing review of the film from Film Threat magazine that Supreme reminisced about fondly during our interview.

What message does Supreme want to broadcast? You are the power; you can make a difference. It is not the government that has been getting us through these crises. It is compassion. It is love. It is volunteerism. It is mutual aid. It is people helping people. We can make a difference, and if were lucky well be able to overcome all these incredible obstacles that we have presented to us as a species.

The legacy of Supreme is very well documented, and even when Supreme decides to finally retire and step down from politics, people wont forget about him. Sure, he may be best known for his boot, bullhorn, and giant toothbrush, but its the messages behind those that will outlast the iconic objects themselves.

See the rest here:

The legacy of Vermin Supreme is anything but normal Film Daily - Film Daily

Group to ‘convoy’ through Sun City, other area communities – Your Valley

By Guy Daugherty

On the 100th anniversary of the womens suffrage movement, the Maricopa County Libertarian Party will lea a protest against presidential exclusion exclusion.

The event is scheduled 9 a.m. Saturday, Aug. 8 at the Youngtown Shopping Center, 11863 N. 111th Ave., Youngtown. Party members will lead a group of local community members in a COVID-safe demonstration, driving convoy style along main roads through Youngtown, El Mirage, Surprise, Sun City Grand, Sun City West and Sun City. They will be decorating their cars parade-style and will go live together on their social media channels.

This is a coordinated effort across the nation with hundreds of confirmed events and thousands of participants to protest the Commission on Presidential Debates decision to exclude all other parties who are listed on the presidential ballot from planned debates.

One hundred years ago, women led by the Women Voters Coalition were taking to the streets to protest the government to recognize their rights as sovereign citizens, and their right to be heard in elections. The WVC also created the first presidential debates to give American voters a greater understanding of all their presidential candidates. In 1987, the Commission on Presidential Debates was formed to take over sponsorship of the debate.

The CPD created polling restrictions to not allow third parties in the debate by selecting random polls to determine who is polling above 15%. However, most of these polls do not mention a third party candidate.

Libertarians and their supporters want polling restrictions changed to quantifiable results that cannot be manipulated by the CPD. Any political party listed as an option on American ballots should be allowed to debate so that Americans can determine the best candidate for their informed vote, according to Libertarian Party officials.

Editors Note: Mr. Daugherty is a Libertarian Party member and host for the Aug. 8 convoy event.

Originally posted here:

Group to 'convoy' through Sun City, other area communities - Your Valley

Back To The Drawing Board: Why SpaceX Success Demands NASA Revolution – Forbes

Getty Images/iStockphoto

Sundays breathtaking return of the American astronauts aboard Elon Musks crewed Dragon space capsule was a moment of great national pride. While space enthusiasts and dreamers around the world applauded, however, there were people taking bows and credit that frankly should not have been. If our political leadership on both sides of the aisle could recognize the real lesson of this success, instead of gloating in their misdirected self-congratulations, they would seize this opportunity to take the next step and completely remake how NASA leads human spaceflight into the future. While NASA has begun slowly changing its mindset and indeed been working more with private companies, it has not, by a long shot, done enough to further our countrys position as a leader in the 2nd Space Race. There needs to be, in short, a revolution in NASA affairs.

Of the many challenges the previous administration inherited in 2009, one was a space policy long on vision but short on funding. A blue-ribbon panel was quickly commissioned with unprecedented budgetary rigor and led by the greatest technical space leaders of the time, including General Les Lyles, Dr. Wanda Austin, and the esteemed industrialist Norm Augustine. Their report to the President highlighted many recommendations, the most significant of which was that the flagship Constellation program, the delight of the previous administration, was entirely unaffordable.

Congress and much of NASA, the very institution that brought rocket science into our living rooms last century, had together become the face of an overwhelming adversity to change. One leader challenged this status quo and, backed by a handful of policy mavericks, decided to pursue a risky next step. Lori Garver, the deputy administrator of NASA at the time, persuaded enough of these naysayers to support her vision of a Commercial Crew Program, a controversial idea to harness the new space industry's spirit of adventure by redirecting some funding to restore government faith in Americas free market leadership instead of NASAs politburo. Garvers initiative and considerable fortitude set into motion an epic contest and on Sunday we witnessed the winner at the finish line.

SpaceXs has won the contest and by besting Boeing has affirmed the thesis that the time is right to toss out the old NASA model and pivot to a privatization of most of NASAs programs. Some of that is already underway, with the venerable Lockheed Martin in a close partnership with Jeff Bezos Blue Origin on their lunar lander project and Amazons ground stations. Whats now necessary is taking inventory of every program and project within NASA and rethinking how they should be restructured to encourage discovery and exploration while simultaneously promoting free market expansion into the cosmos.

To strengthen American leadership and freedom in space, government policymakers must advance our nation's superior space competency with private capital and competition to lead economically. This government led privatization should reward sustainable businesses and reject political backroom deal making. An economic sector of competitive, self-directed but lightly-regulated companies, independent of institutional inertia or political patronage.

The quintessential NASA program of this type needs little introduction but is indicative of many others less noticed. As part of the compromise to secure Congressional support for the Commercial Crew competition, NASA announced the Congressionally mandated old NASA style SLS program in 2011, boasting an ambition to build the largest rocket in history even bigger than the massive Saturn V. Though essentially just a recombining of legacy shuttle componentry, the program has been beset with cost overruns and program delays with no end in sight. While insiders have viewed the SLS project and many others like it as the bridge to nowhere, the corporatist and institutional inertia has been full-throated in its denunciation of SpaceX. Today, no one is sure whether SLS will ever deliver, but the program nonetheless gets plenty of political support to bring Soviet-style jobs back home.

Many ask what the real difference is between traditional space companies and these commercial or private, so-called next-generation companies. Both hire from the same universities, and quite often next generation founders spring from the traditional. They both perform on contracts with the government, though the next generation prefer competitive fixed price contracts to enable a more streamlined management structure. The principal difference is that the companies in the new economy are founded and self-directed with a purpose and vision of their own choosing, not ones directed by a government mission. Unlike the earlier generation of companies that were lured with cost plus contracts to leave commercial aviation or truck building to develop bombers and tanks, this new generation of companies exists for its own unique vision. They are also eager to leverage their founding vision and purpose to help solve national needs at competitive, fixed prices. These companies are less interested in management advice from Washington bureaucrats and more interested in competing to leverage their potential and deliver eye-watering capabilities, much like SpaceX just did.

Our traditional Cold War space industry isnt bad but, just as with any other wartime industry, it desperately needs to be transformed to be relevant for the 21st century. We have the best engineering talent in the world that is far superior to any other. Unfortunately, most of them are still working in a Soviet style industry that only grows when the government does. A pivot to further unleashing private industry and following its lead rather than directing it will elicit even more clear winners.And once it is done, there will be no turning back.

Last centurys political industrial complex was necessary to win the first space race but is now an obstacle to winning the second. The government must shift to supporting and leveraging commercial ambitions (just as NASA demonstrated with SpaceX and Lockheed is doing with Blue Origin) to achieve even greater technically ambitious dreams. NASA's new model must prioritize commercial growth to achieve these goals and not compete against it with programs like SLS, best tossed into the ash heap of history. It must be one that promotes free enterprise by leveraging entrepreneurial vision and private capital; that rewards well-led companies and not just the well postured; and that prevents politicians from choosing the winners and losers of the Final Frontier.

The U.S. commercial space industry has now shown that it can replace the space shuttle at a fraction of the cost. We must go the rest of the way, and NASA must be reborn for a new purpose and a new century's vision. By repurposing every mission in this fashion, the terrestrial free market economy will expand responsibly with even greater earth science knowledge and an interplanetary economy of unlimited growth will be unleashed, the ultimate dream since the first telescope pointed towards the heavens. Lori Garvers grand experiment is complete, and the results are in. Its time to go back to the drawing board to save billions, promote real commerce and unleash the Americas greatest asset: our spirit of adventure and the freedom to run, soar, and now orbit - as far as our hearts will take us.

Excerpt from:

Back To The Drawing Board: Why SpaceX Success Demands NASA Revolution - Forbes

NASA to remove offensive nicknames for planets, galaxies and nebulae – Houston Chronicle

The glowing remains of a star, blowing off its outer layers at the end of its life, is officially called planetary nebula NGC 2392. But as a nickname, it has been called the "Eskimo Nebula."

NGC 4567 and NGC 4568, a pair of spiral galaxies found in the Virgo Galaxy Cluster, have been called the "Siamese Twins Galaxy."

No more.

NASA announced Wednesday that it's reexamining the unofficial nicknames used to describe distant cosmic objects.

Related: Would humanity have been ready if Comet NEOWISE was hurtling toward Earth?

"As the scientific community works to identify and address systemic discrimination and inequality in all aspects of the field, it has become clear that certain cosmic nicknames are not only insensitive, but can be actively harmful," the news release said. "NASA is examining its use of unofficial terminology for cosmic objects as part of its commitment to diversity, equity, and inclusion."

Removing the "Eskimo Nebula" and "Siamese Twins Galaxy" nicknames is an initial step, and the agency said it will use only the official, International Astronomical Union designations in cases where nicknames are inappropriate.

"These nicknames and terms may have historical or culture connotations that are objectionable or unwelcoming, and NASA is strongly committed to addressing them," Stephen T. Shih, Associate Administrator for Diversity and Equal Opportunity, said in the news release. "Science depends on diverse contributions, and benefits everyone, so this means we must make it inclusive.

Go here to see the original:

NASA to remove offensive nicknames for planets, galaxies and nebulae - Houston Chronicle

NASA’s Mars rover Perseverance is fine and out of ‘safe mode’ – Space.com

You can breathe easy now: All is officially well with NASA's newly launched Mars rover Perseverance.

Perseverance went into a protective "safe mode" shortly after its liftoff yesterday (July 30) because part of the spacecraft got a bit colder than expected when it zoomed through Earth's shadow.

NASA officials stressed at the time that this development was not particularly concerning and that Perseverance, the centerpiece of the agency's $2.7 billion Mars 2020 mission, would likely bounce back quickly. That optimism was borne out: The rover has exited safe mode and resumed normal operations, mission team members announced today (July 31).

Live Updates: NASA's Mars rover Perseverance mission in real time

"With safe mode exit, the team is getting down to the business of interplanetary cruise," Mars 2020 deputy project manager Matt Wallace, of NASA's Jet Propulsion Laboratory in Pasadena, California, said in an update today. "Next stop, Jezero Crater."

Perseverance will land inside the 28-mile-wide (45 kilometers) Jezero on Feb. 18, 2021. The crater harbored a lake and a river delta billions of years ago, and the car-sized rover will search the area for signs of ancient life and characterize its geology in detail.

Perseverance will also collect and cache several dozen samples on Mars, which a joint NASA/European Space Agency campaign will return to Earth, possibly as early as 2031.

Related: The Mars Perseverance rover mission in photos

Mars 2020 will also conduct several technology demonstrations. For example, one of Perseverance's instruments will generate oxygen from Mars' carbon dioxide-dominated atmosphere. The mission also features a small helicopter called Ingenuity, which will attempt to make the first-ever rotorcraft flights in the skies of another world.

Mars 2020 is one of three missions currently winging their way toward the Red Planet. The United Arab Emirates' Hope orbiter and China's Tianwen-1 orbiter-lander-rover mission launched on July 19 and July 23, respectively. All of these craft are scheduled to arrive at Mars in February 2021.

Mike Wall is the author of "Out There" (Grand Central Publishing, 2018; illustrated by Karl Tate), a book about the search for alien life. Follow him on Twitter @michaeldwall. Follow us on Twitter @Spacedotcom or Facebook.

Go here to read the rest:

NASA's Mars rover Perseverance is fine and out of 'safe mode' - Space.com

NASA Administrator Statement on the Passing of Mike Freilich – PRNewswire

WASHINGTON, Aug. 5, 2020 /PRNewswire/ -- The following is a statement from NASA Administrator Jim Bridenstine on the passing of Mike Freilich, passionate explorer and former director of NASA's Earth Science Division:

"Our planet has lost a true champion with the passing of Mike Freilich. NASA sends our condolences to his loved ones, and the entire NASA Family shares their loss.

"As the head of NASA Earth Science, Mike was known for his diligence and an unwavering commitment to accuracy and making sure the science was strong. His oversize passion for all things related to expanding knowledge about the complex systems of our planet saw an incredible diversity of missions launch on his watch. Mike never avoided the tough decisions, but his deep expertise and innate love of science helped our agency to innovate and expand the ways it observes our home planet.

"Mike's excellence as a scientist is well known. His dedication to oceanography and helping train the next generation of scientific leaders was inspiring. He won numerous awards throughout his career, and it was NASA's honor to join our colleagues at the European Space Agency, the European Organisation for the Exploitation of Meteorological Satellites,and the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration to name the Sentinel-6 Michael Freilich mission for him. This satellite will gather critical information about the oceans for which Mike had such an abiding passion.

"Mike wept openly as he signed the launch vehicle for IceSat2, his last launch as Earth Science director. It was a testament to how much being able to work on missions that helped us to better understand our planet and improve life across it meant to him.

"At NASA, we pledge to carry on that work and build on the legacy that Mike has left us. His presence will continue to be felt across the agency and our planet, in space and in our hearts."

More information about Mike Freilich and the upcoming mission that bears his name is available at:

https://go.nasa.gov/2EV76nJ

SOURCE NASA

Home Page

Here is the original post:

NASA Administrator Statement on the Passing of Mike Freilich - PRNewswire

NASA Astronauts Shoot Music Video In Space, ‘It’s a Great Day To Be Alive’ – TMZ

Country music star Travis Tritt is not rotating around the Earth, but his music is getting some serious space spins ... because NASA astronauts made their own fun video to his hit song!!!

NASA commander Chris Cassidy is the astronaut in the center of this awesome homage to Travis' hit, "It's a Great Day To Be Alive."

Chris and the other folks onboard the International Space Station are doing alright 250 miles above Earth ... they got rice cooking in the microwave and some homemade soup ... so Chris says they're feeling pretty good and that's the truth.

As for the musical choice, Chris says NASA's Expedition 63 crew "is very much aware of the hard times which exist in the neighborhoods of the world rotating below," and he wants folks to remember ... "Cherish the people you love."

Chris ends with some words to live by, whether you're firmly planted on terra firma ... "Even amid the uncertainty and difficulties of battling through these challenging times, we encourage everyone to be the best 'crewmates' and take care of each other."

Thank you ,Chris ... and Travis.

More here:

NASA Astronauts Shoot Music Video In Space, 'It's a Great Day To Be Alive' - TMZ

Treating the Mental and Physical Symptoms of Psoriasis – Allure

For the eight million Americans living with psoriasis, the mental impact can be as great as the physical one. A dermatologist and psychologist weigh in on why treatment must address both burdens.

This story originally appeared in the August 2020 issue of Allure. Learn how tosubscribe here.

By Joel Gelfand, a professor of dermatology and epidemiology at the University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine and director of the schools Psoriasis and Phototherapy Treatment Center.

I worked on a survey that found 30-40 percent of people in the United States think psoriasis is contagious they dont want to shake the hand of someone with psoriasis. Think about that. If one in every three people that you run into on the street is going to have that view of your skin, thats a really challenging thing to cope with. Psoriasis can be socially isolating and cause people to feel anxious and depressed.

Psoriasis is not contagious. Its a common autoimmune disease of the skin, in which your body recognizes a normal skin protein as abnormal and tries to get rid of it by making skin flake off. This results in large, thick, scaly plaques that crack and bleed, and can be painful and itchy. The areas it impacts can vary, but some of the most sensitive are the scalp, face, genitals, and fingernails. A lot of patients wont wear short sleeves or shorts because their knees or elbows are affected. The typical onset is in young adulthood, but Ive seen it in infants all the way up to a patient in her 80s, who experienced it for the first time after her sister died. Studies have shown that people facing major life events are at higher risk of developing psoriasis, and that patients with psoriasis report higher levels of stress. Theres a cyclical relationship.

As tough a disease as psoriasis is, we do have a variety of ways of treating it. It can take weeks or months to see results. When the disease is localized, people like topical medications, which decrease the growth of excess skin cells [that make up psoriasis plaques]. But they may not work for some patients, and theyre inconvenient, especially if a lot of areas are affected. Pills can reduce the overactive immune response, but some can prompt gastrointestinal symptoms. Injectable medications, called biologics, are highly effective but expensive, and can make people slightly more prone to infection because they decrease immune activity in the body. My lab is researching at-home UV phototherapy, which would be more widely available than office-based ones.

Visit link:

Treating the Mental and Physical Symptoms of Psoriasis - Allure

Cloud Computing in Education Sector Industry Market Analysis And Demand With Forecast Overview To 2025 – CueReport

Latest published market study on Global Cloud Computing in Education Sector Industry Market with + data Tables, Pie Chart, high level qualitative chapters & Graphs is available now to provide complete assessment of the Cloud Computing in Education Sector Industry Market highlighting evolving trends, Measures taken up by players, current-to-future scenario analysis and growth factors validated with Viewpoints extracted via Industry experts and Consultants. The study breaksCloud Computing in Education Sector Industry market by revenue and volume (wherever applicable) and price history to estimates size and trend analysis and identifying gaps and opportunities.

The report on Cloud Computing in Education Sector Industry market covers the key trends of the industry which impact its growth with reference to the competitive arena and key regions. The study highlights the challenges this industry vertical will face along with the growth opportunities which would support the business development in existing & untapped markets. Besides this, the report also includes few case studies including those which take into account the corona virus pandemic, with an intention to offer a clear picture of this business sphere to all stakeholders.

Request Sample Copy of this Report @ https://www.cuereport.com/request-sample/29396

Important pointers of COVID-19 effect analysis:

Request Sample Copy of this Report @ https://www.cuereport.com/request-sample/29396

Assessment of regional terrain:

Top rated pointers from the Cloud Computing in Education Sector Industry market report:

Important facts about this Report

Request Customization on This Report @ https://www.cuereport.com/request-for-customization/29396

See the rest here:

Cloud Computing in Education Sector Industry Market Analysis And Demand With Forecast Overview To 2025 - CueReport

Troubled Freedom Foods keeps it in the family for now – The Australian Financial Review

Investors were told the company grew too quickly with not enough oversight and that it now had too many different products. Demand for products remained strong, the company said.

"There is a need for executive ownership and accountability to implement the operational turnaround. This cannot wait for an external search for a new CEO to be completed," the company said in a statement.

"Michael Perich has a deep understanding of the business and will provide the stability, focus and leadership required as the company manages the issues that have been previously reported to the ASX."

The company said Mr Perich's incentive arrangements would be established at a later date.

Mr Perich has previously acted as a Freedom non-executive alternate director for Ron Perich, and was also director of dairy farm operations at the Perichs' Leppington Pastoral Company as well as joint managing director of Australian Fresh Milk Holdings.

Executive chairman Perry Gunner will resume his role as chairman. The company also flagged "further board rejuvenation" after appointing new directors Jane McKellar and Genevieve Gregor, a former Goldman Sachs banker, earlier this year. Ms McKellar is overseeing the chief executive search process.

Freedom Foods said it intended to conduct an external process for a permanent CEO "at the appropriate time once the operational turnaround is sufficiently progressed".

Freedom Foods, whose brands include Messy Monkeys and Milk Lab, has appointed a number of advisers to conduct a review into the company, including Moelis, PWC and Ashurst.

See the original post:

Troubled Freedom Foods keeps it in the family for now - The Australian Financial Review