Why governments are threatened by teens on TikTok – The Next Web

In Egypt, teenager Menna Abdel Aziz used social media to ask for protection after a sexual assault. She was arrested on a variety of charges, including misusing social media and corrupting family values.

Two young women, Haneen Hossam, with 915,000 TikTok followers, and Mawada Eladhm, with 3.1 million TikTok followers) were also arrested for their social influencing videos. Renad Imad, another social media influencer, was arrested after allegations of posting indecent content and prostitution.

In late June, belly dancer Sama El-Masry was sentenced to three years imprisonment for posts to the TikTok video sharing platform and other social media.

These and several other arrests follow on the heels of earlier cases, including singer Sherine Abdel Wahabs arrest for insulting the Nile River at a concert, Rania Youssefs arrest for wearing a revealing dress in 2018 and the 2015 arrest of novelist Ahmed Naji, said to be the first contemporary Egyptian writer arrested for violating public modesty.

These cases illustrate the social vulnerability of young women, especially those without social and economic connections, and confusion about what is permissible expression, and what isnt.

What is clear is that the Egyptian women mentioned above are seen as increasingly dangerous to entrenched social, political, and gendered hierarchies.

[Read: How TikTok teens amplified political activism and threatened Trumps political campaign]

COVID-19 has only underlined questions about when to regulate speech. Quarantines and lockdowns have affected social engagement patterns, as people seek new outlets to connect with others. Usage rates of Netflix, Instagram Live, and TikTok have skyrocketed.

In the US, the media market is ring-fenced by the norms of free speech. But recently, US President Donald Trump threatened to shut down Twitter after it added fact-checking links to his tweets. Both Trump and a Florida congressman have had tweets flagged for glorifying violence. Facebooks hands-off policy to policing politics on its platform has resulted in a virtual walk-out at that company and a new commitment to regulating political speech.

Some commentators consider the present moment to be a turning point in the battle to keep fake news and alternative facts out of social media.

A pressing question is whether a platform for expression such as TikTok deserves to be regulated. The Trump administration is considering a TikTok ban. Their concern is Chinese control of US data, not dance videos. What, if anything, should be done about user-created content?

To understand the perils of over-regulation, we can consult the most important theorist of liberty, John Stuart Mill. In my recent book, I present Mill as a liberal, a feminist, and a critic of state interventionism. Mill argues for almost complete freedom of expression and freedom of the press in countries capable of free discussion and exchange of ideas. He places individuality at the center of his vision of what a person with character is, and he argues that there is value in nonconformism.

Social media platforms often play a role in reinforcing trends and in creating a sort of sameness, but they remain vehicles for self-expression, especially of young people. Mill would not support their regulation by the government.

If we want to understand why non-liberal governments see threats in self-expression, we can return to communist Czechoslovakia and dissidents such as Vclav Havel. In his 1978 essay, The Power of the Powerless, Havel identifies a hidden sphere of youth culture. Pre-political engagement takes place there and sometimes leads to the creation of a parallel polis, or space where a group of citizens can feel politically active.

During the Arab Spring, graffiti and popular songs were part of the parallel polis. Similarly, Czechoslovakian dissidents found places for expression in popular culture. Thus, Charter 77, the political movement which Havel co-founded, was connected to popular music and concerts. Politically, even music matters.

Thus, in a manner reminiscent of the American youth culture of the 1960s, the parallel polis offers an alternative to a tightly controlled, state-centered public life. Both an unfettered utopia and an escape, this space is the dream of users of immersive platforms such as Second Life. And in the case of Minecraft, an in-game uncensored library exists as an archive of censored real-world data. Thus, a game can have important real-world consequences.

So can Twitter. Media analysts see Twitters 500-million daily tweets as an important vehicle of activism. The book #Hashtag Activism: Networks of Race and Gender Justice explains how counter publics use Twitter to advocate for social change, identity redefinition, and political inclusion.

Now, in the aftermath of the George Floyd shooting, we are also seeing more overtly political uses of TikTok. Teens are using the platform to record protest marches and to make statements about social justice.

Today, TikTok and Instagram, or even mahraganat music (described as an Egyptian fusion of electronic and folk music) are seen by some governments not as entertainment, but instead as challenges to state social control. Mahraganat, for example, was recently banned in Egypt. Calls to ban TikTok have been raised worldwide and bans have been tried out in India and Indonesia.

Platforms such as TikTok are oriented towards younger users. The age of users raises valid questions about the privacy and protection of minors. But outright bans may over-regulate the legitimate expression of young people. And applying cybercrimes laws to regulate user-created content may do the same thing. A new Egyptian social media campaign (#If Egyptian Families Permit) to free the arrested young female TikTok users makes just this point.

Women in the Middle East and North Africa region have been complaining about legal and social restrictions on their behavior and bodies since well before the Arab Spring. Until this tension is mediated in civil society, governments will continue to see a hidden sphere of resistance in even apolitical, user-created dance videos on TikTok. And young people will continue to find new ways to connect on social media, in spaces that are increasingly hard for governments to regulate.

This article is republished from The Conversation by Chris Barker, Assistant Professor of Political Science, American University in Cairo under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article.

Read next: This training bundle can get you ready for a career in video game development, even if youve never coded before

Do you want to get the sassiest daily tech newsletter every day, in your inbox, for FREE? Of course you do: sign up for Big Spam here.

Read this article:

Why governments are threatened by teens on TikTok - The Next Web

Big Tech Companies are Making Climate Change Commitments, but Are They Actually Impactful? – EP Magazine

Big Tech Companies are Making Climate Change Commitments, but Are They Actually Impactful?

Many large companies like Apple, Amazon and Microsoft are rethinking their supply chains and carbon footprints after pressure from consumers and employees to address their role in climate change. Heres what these groups are doing, and experts take on their effectiveness.

While your short showers and LED lights help in the overall fight against climate change, massive corporations play a massive role in the climate crisis. Their carbon footprints, energy and water use and high volume of disposable/non-recyclable products greatly affect the environmental systems at play.

Luckily, some Big Tech leaders are starting to recognize their role. However, many are choosing to help is not-very-helpful ways, like through carbon offsets.

Earlier this month, Apple became the latest Big Tech giant to promise to reduce the emissions of planet-warming greenhouse gases, announcing in a statement that by 2030, every Apple device sold will have net-zero climate impact.

This idea of net-zero climate impact involves both direct changes in systems and indirect, reallocation of funds outside the company. Apple will reduce emissions by 75 percent in its manufacturing chain by recycling more components of its products and encouraging its suppliers to use renewable energy. For the remaining 25 percent, the company plans to balance them by funding reforestation projects and improving energy efficiency in its operations.

However, climate activists note that these offsetting, funding efforts are inadequate, as they do little to actually change and redefine the systems the companies utilize. Companies that offset emissions through external funding allow emissions to grow at a time when the scientific consensus demands that emissions be cut in half by 2030 in order to avoid the worst effects of climate changeand be reduced to zero by 2050.

Want to learn more about carbon offsets? Reach this article by GreenBiz.

Read the original here:

Big Tech Companies are Making Climate Change Commitments, but Are They Actually Impactful? - EP Magazine

This Week in Washington IP: FTC Oversight, Big Tech Antitrust Issues and Promoting Cybersecurity During the Election Cycle – IPWatchdog.com

This week in Washington IP events, Congressional hearings on technology and innovation take place through Wednesday, while the House Government Operations Subcommittee kicked the week off Monday afternoon with a look at the most recent round of government agency IT acquisition scores under FITARA. At noon on Tuesday, the House Cybersecurity Subcommittee discusses cybersecurity issues related to the 2020 elections. Over in the Senate, committee hearings will focus on cybersecurity recommendations from the Cyberspace Solarium Commission, cybersecurity in the energy sector, as well as oversight of the Federal Trade Commission. Elsewhere, the Aspen Institute explores innovations in carbon removal and democratic participation, while New America closes the week out with a conversation on racial equity in technological platforms.

House Subcommittee on Government Operations

Hybrid Hearing on FITARA 10.0

At 2:00 PM on Monday in 2154 Rayburn House Office Building.

This was the 10th biannual hearing held by the House Government Operations Subcommittee to assess the implementation of the Federal Information Technology Acquisition Reform Act (FITARA), a 2014 law passed to overhaul aging IT systems across federal agencies. According to a transcript of a July 20 hearing of the subcommittee, this hearing marked the first time since the passage of FITARA that no federal agency scored a D or F on the IT acquisition strategy scorecard. The first witness panel for the hearing included Clare Martorana, Chief Information Officer, Office of Personnel Management; Jason Gray, Chief Information Officer, Department of Education; Maria A. Roat, Deputy Federal Chief Information Officer, Office of Management and Budget; and Carol Harris, Director, IT Management Issues, Government Accountability Office. The second panel included David Powner, Director of Strategic Engagement and Partnerships, The MITRE Corporation; LaVerne Council, CEO, Emerald One, LLC; and Richard Spires, Principal, Richard A. Spires Consulting.

House Subcommittee on Cybersecurity, Infrastructure Protection, & Innovation

Secure, Safe, and Auditable: Protecting the Integrity of the 2020 Elections

At 12:00 PM on Tuesday, online video webinar.

Cybersecurity in voting systems is a major topic of concern every election season but especially so during presidential elections. In recent weeks, the U.S. Department of Homeland Security has been facilitating contact between cybersecurity experts and local election officials along with providing other resources to promote security in voting systems. The witness panel for this hearing will include David Levine, Elections Integrity Fellow, Alliance for Securing Democracy, German Marshall Fund of the United States; Sylvia Albert, Director of Voting and Elections, Common Cause; Amber McReynolds, CEO, National Vote at Home Institute; and John Gilligan, President and CEO, Center for Internet Security, Inc.

Senate Committee on Armed Services

Findings and Recommendations of the Cyberspace Solarium Commission

At 2:30 PM on Tuesday in 106 Dirksen Senate Office Building.

The Cyberspace Solarium Commission released its report on the state of cybersecurity strategy implementation including 75 recommendations on promoting cyber deterrence in the U.S., many of which have been included in amendments to bills that have been passed by Congress this summer. In early June, the commission also released a white paper on cybersecurity lessons learned during the COVID-19 pandemic. The witness panel for this hearing will include Senator Angus S. King, Jr. (I-ME), Co-Chair, Cyberspace Solarium Commission; Representative Michael J. Gallagher (R-WI), Co-Chair, Cyberspace Solarium Commission; and Brigadier General John C. Inglis, ANG (Ret.), Commissioner, Cyberspace Solarium Commission.

The Brookings Institution

Breaking Up Big Tech: Should Congress Do It?

At 4:00 PM on Tuesday, online video webinar.

Increased antitrust regulation of major tech firms like Google, Facebook, Apple and Amazon has been a field of political debate that has become increasingly bipartisan in recent years. This event will explore whether these companies wield monopoly power and whether government action must be taken in order to protect the public interest. The event will feature a discussion with a panel include Kara Swisher, Co-Founder and Editor-at-Large, Recode, and Columnist, The New York Times; Tom Wheeler, Visiting Fellow, Governance Studies, Center for Technology Innovation; Oliver Darcy, Senior Media Reporter, CNN; and moderated by Dipayan Ghosh, Co-Director, Digital Platforms & Democracy Project, Harvard Kennedy School, and Faculty Member, Harvard Law School.

The Aspen Institute

Aspen Tech Policy Hub Demo Day Improving Democracy Through Technology

At 9:00 AM on Wednesday, online video webinar.

The Aspen Tech Policy Hub at the Aspen Institute is a tech policy incubator featuring an in-residence fellowship program in the San Francisco area. This particular demonstration day explores projects by policy hub fellows related to the theme Improving Democracy Through Technology with projects focused on identifying dark ads meant to spread election disinformation, automated advocates for scalable legal service provision and facilitating feedback to government officials from underprivileged communities. Presentations of these projects will be offered by policy hub fellows Elizabeth Allendorf, AI Engineer, Northrop Grumman; Matthew Volk, Senior Engineer, Facebook; Jessica Cole, Civic Technologist and Former Head of Innovation and Economic Development, City of Walnut Creek, CA; and Amy Wilson, Former Managing Director, MACH37. Following the presentations will be remarks by California Supreme Court Justice Mariano-Florentino Cullar.

Senate Committee on Energy and Natural Resources

Hearing to Examine Efforts to Improve Cybersecurity for the Energy Sector

At 10:00 AM on Wednesday in 366 Dirksen.

In early May, President Donald Trump issued an executive order on securing the bulk-power system across the U.S., an order which requires various efforts by energy providers and government officials to mitigate risks associated with cyber attacks which can negatively impact the U.S. economy and national defense. In early July, the U.S. Department of Energy issued a request for information in the Federal Register seeking information pursuant to Mays executive order to identify current practices in the energy industry to reduce supply chain vulnerabilities, especially from Russian and Chinese sources. The witness panel for this hearing will include Alexander Gates, Senior Advisor, Office of Policy for Cybersecurity, Energy Security, & Emergency Response, U.S. Department of Energy; Joseph McClelland, Director, Office of Energy Infrastructure Security, Federal Energy Regulatory Commission; Steve Conner, President and CEO, Siemens Energy, Inc.; and Thomas F. OBrien, Senior Vice President and Chief Information Officer, PJM Interconnection.

Senate Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation

Oversight of the Federal Trade Commission

At 10:00 AM on Wednesday in 253 Russell Senate Office Building.

Following swiftly on the heels of a House Antitrust Subcommittee hearing last week featuring the CEOs of major U.S. tech firms, this Senate hearing to provide oversight of the FTC is likely to focus on the agencys enforcement of antitrust regulations against the tech ruling class. Advance coverage of this hearing indicates that topics of interest will also likely include the regulation of social media content as well as digital privacy concerns. The witness panel for this hearing will include the Honorable Joe Simons, Chairman, FTC; the Honorable Noah Phillips, Commissioner, FTC; the Honorable Rohit Chopra, Commissioner, FTC; the Honorable Rebecca Slaughter, Commissioner, FTC; and the Honorable Christine Wilson, Commissioner, FTC.

The Aspen Institute

Innovators in Carbon Removal: A Virtual Exchange of Ideas

At 2:00 PM on Wednesday, online video webinar.

In late July, a bipartisan coalition of Senators introduced the Carbon Removal, Efficient Agencies, Technology Expertise (CREATE) Act, a bill that would create a comprehensive federal initiative for carbon dioxide removal by establishing a carbon management program with officials from various federal agencies including the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense, as well as the creation of four working groups to enhance existing research projects. This event, the latest in the Aspen Institutes Innovators in ________: A Virtual Exchange of Ideas series, will feature a discussion on carbon capture and utilization with David Elenowitz, President and Founder, Zero Carbon Partners.

New America

A Conversation on Racial Equity and Technology

At 5:00 PM on Wednesday, online video webinar.

Since its advent about two decades ago, the Internet has been hailed as one of the most democratizing technologies in terms of providing access to information to all, including underprivileged classes who have historically not had access to many useful resources. However, some commentators have pointed out how Internet-based frameworks still work to eliminate opportunities for many members of these underprivileged classes on search engines, social media platforms and more. This event will feature a discussion with a panel including Dr. Charlton McIlwain, Vice Provost, Faculty Engagement and Development, and Director, Public Interest Technology Alliance, New York University; Dr. Michele Claibourn, Director, Research Data Services, Social, Natural, and Engineering Sciences, University of Virginia Library, and Co-Director, Commas Lab; and Saif Y. Ishoof, Vice President for Engagement, Florida International University.

More here:

This Week in Washington IP: FTC Oversight, Big Tech Antitrust Issues and Promoting Cybersecurity During the Election Cycle - IPWatchdog.com

Why Trump is in favor of the China-owned TikTok sale to Microsoft – Vox.com

Last week, US lawmakers hauled the heads of four giant tech companies into a virtual antitrust hearing, ostensibly over concerns their companies are too big.

This week, the president of the United States is sort-of-kind-of-maybe trying to help a different giant US tech company become even bigger by forcing the Chinese owners of TikTok to sell it to Microsoft.

There are all kinds of perspectives on a potential sale of TikTok from ByteDance to Microsoft. Some rational people think its a good idea: They dont want the popular social video app with a huge presence in the US to be controlled by a Chinese company because Chinese companies are, in various ways, extensions of the Chinese government.

Others quite rightly worry about potential retaliation from China against US companies that do business in that country, as well as the breakdown of the entire concept of an open internet.

But it seems to me that one of the striking parts of the whole deal would be that the US government, which says it worries about the reach and power of its homegrown tech giants, is now actively encouraging a deal that would supersize one of those giants.

Which suggests that the US isnt really worried about the reach and power of its tech giants.

Caveat time! There are many confounding, surprising, and improbable components to the ByteDance-TikTok-Microsoft-White House-China story, which is very much a moving target. This afternoon, for instance, Donald Trump insisted that in order for the deal to go through, the US government would have to get a very substantial portion of any sale price if Microsoft does buy TikTok from ByteDance.

Trump, of course, says all kinds of things, all the time. Many of those things are not true. But if he actually means it this time, it means the deal looks much less likely than it did a few hours earlier.

And while were at it, lets be clear that its hard to make a real antitrust argument against a Microsoft-TikTok deal, at least as antitrust law works in the US right now: TikTok may worry the social media giant Facebook, but Facebook still dwarfs TikTok; same thing for Googles YouTube. Facebook, for instance, says it has 256 million users in the US and Canada; TikTok says it is at 100 million.

Its also not a coincidence that Microsoft CEO Satya Nadella was not in Washington last week, testifying along with the heads of Apple, Google, Facebook, and Amazon. With the exception of its Xbox gaming platform, Microsoft has a very modest consumer internet presence in the US psyche*. If any big tech company is going to acquire TikTok, it would be Microsoft.

But lets also be very clear: While Microsoft has turned itself into a giant tech company that focuses on business customers, it is still very much a Giant Tech Company one that the US government spent years trying to break up because of the way it abused its status as the dominant computer operating system in the 1990s.

In its last 12 months, Microsoft generated a staggering $143 billion in revenue for context, thats two Facebooks. And while its growth is coming from enterprise customers and cloud services, Microsoft still dominates personal computers. If youre not reading this on a phone or tablet, the odds are very high youre reading this on a Microsoft Windows-powered machine.

In short: If you were worried about the concentration of tech power in the US, you wouldnt add the most consequential new social media platform in years to a company that made $44 billion in profits four Amazons last year. (That said! In the near term, Facebook execs wont complain while Microsoft figures out, structurally and technically, how to separate TikTok from its current owner/operators and rebuild large portions of it. Big companies usually expect to take a year or more to swallow up a significant acquisition; this one could be way more difficult.)

If US lawmakers were truly concerned about the power of tech giants, they would actively be debating laws to rein that in, instead of punting the work to enforcement agencies like the DOJ and the FTC. And an entire faction of US politicians wouldnt spend their time in important antitrust hearings focusing on made-up claims that big internet companies are bad because they censor conservatives.

If anything, you could argue that a TikTok sale to Microsoft makes it even less likely that well see real antitrust movement against Google or Facebook. If that deal goes through, both companies can credibly argue that TikTok is now an even fiercer rival because it has Microsoft behind it.

Again: Im happy to entertain arguments for or against TikTokSoft its a genuinely fascinating and important inflection point for tech and world politics. But next time you tell me the US government is Very Worried About Big Tech, youre going to have work much harder to convince me.

* Not for lack of trying: If Microsoft had succeeded in its attempt to buy Yahoo many years ago, or if it hadnt burned billions trying to build a consumer ad business, maybe things would be different.

Support Voxs explanatory journalism

Every day at Vox, we aim to answer your most important questions and provide you, and our audience around the world, with information that has the power to save lives. Our mission has never been more vital than it is in this moment: to empower you through understanding. Voxs work is reaching more people than ever, but our distinctive brand of explanatory journalism takes resources particularly during a pandemic and an economic downturn. Your financial contribution will not constitute a donation, but it will enable our staff to continue to offer free articles, videos, and podcasts at the quality and volume that this moment requires. Please consider making a contribution to Vox today.

Visit link:

Why Trump is in favor of the China-owned TikTok sale to Microsoft - Vox.com

Big Tech Companies are Helping Employers Test Workers – Occupational Health and Safety

Big Tech Companies are Helping Employers Test Workers

As businesses continue to grapple with the question of how to reopen safely, a number of big tech names are stepping up and offering testing and contact tracing COVID services to employers.

Returning to work means rethinking a number of safety and health precautions, and companies are trying to figure out how to conduct testing, do contact tracing and enforce social distancing. Earlier this summer, however, a handful of big tech companies like Fitbit and Verily stepped up to provide companies with health-vetting, workforce tools.

Verily Life Sciences, a sister company of Google, worked quickly to introduce a free coronavirus-screening site for the public and set up testing location in March earlier this year. It took some time to work efficiently, but as of June (a whole two months ago), it had helped 220,000 people get testing in 13 states.

Since then, Verily has worked towards helping employers by introducing a health screening and analytics service for businesses trying to safely reopen during the pandemic. Earlier this year, Verily announced an app-based health screening service for businesses and schools called Healthy at Work.

The app provides COVID-19 diagnostic testing for employees and makes recommendations to employers about how often employees should be retested based on local health data and test results.

Employers are really focusing on how to ensure that they are not the source of another outbreak, said Dr. Vivian Lee, the president of health platforms at Verily, a unit of Googles parent company, Alphabet. And that they do not wind up in a situation where theyre putting the safety of their employees at risk when they need to be back in an office or a workplace setting.

Other big tech companies are following Verilys lead. For example, Microsoft and the larger insurer United Health Group recently collaborated on a free symptom-checking app that helps target workers at risk for the virus and recommend testing resources.

Read more:

Big Tech Companies are Helping Employers Test Workers - Occupational Health and Safety

From Lake County to the Libertarian ticket: Presidential candidate says both sides want change – Chicago Daily Herald

Legalize all recreational drugs, let individuals decide about wearing face masks and end all foreign military entanglements, Libertarian presidential nominee Jo Jorgensen says.

That's the "issues" side of the candidate, who recalls some of her views taking shape as she was growing up in Grayslake, participating in 4H and marching in her high school band in the 1970s.

Jorgensen, 63, now lives in South Carolina and has a doctorate in industrial psychology, was a tech entrepreneur and teaches college students.

She dove into the 2020 race with Republican President Donald Trump and Democratic nominee and former Vice President Joe Biden because "government's too big, too noisy, too intrusive. It hurts those it tries to help," she told the Daily Herald.

She cites as an example the Food and Drug Administration, which is "so bloated by red tape," Jorgensen said. "It creates huge obstacles in bringing new drugs to the market" and is costly, hampering efforts to fight COVID-19, she said.

Libertarian presidential candidate Jo Jorgensen was a drum major in the Grayslake Community High School marching band in the 1970s.- Courtesy of Jo Jorgensen

Jorgensen was born in 1957 at Condell Memorial Hospital in Libertyville and grew up in Grayslake.

"We were typical 1960s 'free-range' children," she said, recalling riding her bike to Woodview Elementary School and cutting across the frozen lake in winter. "I literally walked through a cornfield to get to Grayslake Junior High School."

At then-Grayslake Community High School, Jorgensen was "anti-political," objecting to student council because it reminded her of George Orwell's "Animal Farm" -- "an elite making decisions for everybody else."

She said that's the problem with America now, adding, "I don't care if it's Trump or (Speaker Nancy) Pelosi."

But she engaged at the grass-roots level, serving as president of the French and 4-H clubs and marching in the high school band as a drum major.

"Part of that was because I could fit into the uniform," she said.

While she was a freshman, the band performed at graduation, where the valedictorian caused a stir with a speech calling it "hypocritical for someone to drink a martini and tell others they couldn't smoke marijuana."

The speech struck a chord with Jorgensen, who has never used illicit drugs but wants them legalized, arguing that government interference exacerbates addiction and related problems.

"If R.J. Reynolds and Seagrams sold drugs, you wouldn't have these shootouts where innocent children are harmed," Jorgensen said.

Congress has been wrestling unsuccessfully to come up with a new aid package for Americans beset economically by COVID-19. Jorgensen opposed its predecessor, the CARES Act, because "a lot of bailout money went to large corporations. If someone isn't doing that good of a job maybe they shouldn't be bailed out. If people kept their own money (less taxes) it could help the mom-and-pop stores," she said.

Jorgensen opposes mandating mask-wearing to prevent COVID-19 spread, although "business establishments have the right to set whatever rules they want. (Like) 'no shoes, no service.' I don't think the government should do that."

On foreign relations, Jorgensen advocates turning "America into a giant Switzerland. Armed and neutral," she said, adding European countries are wealthy and should pay for their own defense. "There should be no foreign military aid."

Asked how she'd provide for millions of uninsured Americans, Jorgensen opts for a system such as the Healthy Indiana Program that offers health insurance to low-income residents at reduced prices with an annual deductible.

In late July, Jorgensen returned to her roots, making a campaign stop with voters in Green Oaks.

"I have extremely fond memories of growing up in Lake County," Jorgensen said, which include sailing on Grays Lake and skating after her father, a concrete company owner, had cleared off a section of frozen ice.

That experience translated into her love of hockey but Jorgensen can also whip out a needle and sew a French seam. One of her handmade garments made it to the Illinois State Fair finals when she was a teenager, although "to be honest, I didn't get any blue ribbons for my cooking."

She graduated in 1979 from Baylor University and in 1980 from Southern Methodist University with an MBA. She worked as a marketing representative for IBM, later owned a software duplication company and worked as a business consultant. Now, Jorgensen teaches psychology at Clemson University.

Libertarians haven't made a dent in Illinois' presidential elections. Candidate Gary Johnson received 3.8% in 2016 and 1.1% in 2012.

Jorgensen says all conventional wisdom is off in 2020 and she's optimistic.

"The myth is we mostly draw from the right; we actually draw people from both sides," she said. "However, the people who tend to give us their vote are people who are independent or who have never voted."

See the original post:

From Lake County to the Libertarian ticket: Presidential candidate says both sides want change - Chicago Daily Herald

‘It’s very, very real’: Jordan nurse helps treat COVID-19 in Texas, Arizona – SW News Media

Health care workers who volunteer for the National Disaster Management System usually respond to natural disasters that overwhelm health systems, like tornadoes and hurricanes. But unlike those regional disasters, workers returning from helping a hospital overwhelmed by COVID-19 find themselves attending to the same crisis when they return home.

One of those volunteers is Mike Leverson, an emergency room nurse who lives in Jordan. Twenty-four hours after Leverson returned from a month-long deployment to two southern states, he was back working extended hours to fight the virus at Minneapolis' Abbott Northwestern Hospital his home campus.

"I feel fine," Leverson said. "I am tired, but I'm not any more tired than the rest of my co-workers are and I'm certainly not as physically stressed as my new friends in Arizona and Texas."

Leverson is part of the NDMS Minnesota Disaster Medical Assistance team, a group of health care volunteers who travel across the country and set up mobile trauma units to supplement overwhelmed medical facilities.

"We usually respond to natural disasters," Leverson said. "They can deploy and respond to special eventslike the presidential inauguration. Teams were supposed to deploy to the Olympics in Japan"

Usually the team would set up a field clinic, but in the case of COVID-19, volunteers are being integrated right into hospitals.

Leverson received his first call to duty at the end of June, when NDMS was looking for nurses to deploy. The next morning he was on a plane to Arizona. He said the difference was immediately noticeable when he arrived at Tucson Medical Center.

"I could tell, from what it's like in Minnesota and the Midwest, that they were overwhelmed," Leverson said. "They were very appreciative and welcoming, but you could see signs that the system and the hospitals were overwhelmed with the amount of sick people they were seeing with COVID-19 infections."

A lack of ICU beds and ventilators were some of the first signs Leverson picked up on.

"They were running very, very short on ventilators," he said. "If there had been any more acute COVID patients that needed ventilators I guessI don't know what they would'vedone."

Like at Abbott Northwestern, the Tucson staff was working extended hours to accommodate the surge in patients, but it was still a struggle to keep up.

"They were trying to do the same thing but they just couldn't handle the patients that were coming in with those infections, so the staff was being overwhelmed," Leverson said.

After working two weeks in Tucson, Leverson headed home for one night before departing to Laredo Medical Center in Texas for another two-week stint.

"The amount of sick people (in Laredo) was greater," he said. "It stressed that hospitalsystem to a greater degree than it did in Tucson."

Leverson returned to Jordan last week and started an overnight shift back at Abbott Northwestern the following day.

"It was great to be back home," Leverson said. "You flip a switch and go right back to work."

But Leverson didn't return to Minnesota with the exact same perspective. He said traveling to and working in harder hit places, instead of watching the events unfold on TV news, helped reinforce his understanding of how critical and taxing the crisis is for the nation.

"This is still real. It's very, very real," Leverson said. "It's not going awayyet and we still need to do the things we need to do to take care of the infection and make sure it doesn't get any worse"

Leverson is a third-generation nurse and a nine-year member of the Jordan Fire Department.

Read the original:

'It's very, very real': Jordan nurse helps treat COVID-19 in Texas, Arizona - SW News Media

Here’s Why the Dior x Air Jordan 1 is the Hottest Sneaker of 2020 – MSN Money

Courtesy of StockX

The sneaker industry has always been hot. Many 90s kids remember how they coveted Jordans during their grade school days as the greatest to ever do it lead the Bulls to championship after championship. Along with that winning mentality came the desire to be like Mike and that meant owning his shoes. And so a multi-million dollar industry was born, with each year bringing a hot release that collectors had to have. While the must-have shoe often differs from brand to brand, Nike and Air Jordan have always been in the mix, but it feels like its been a while since we saw a collaboration as hot as the Dior x Air Jordan 1.

Initially previewed during Diors Fall 2020 Runway show last December, the Dior x Air Jordan 1 has the same cut and look as your normal Jordan 1, but the colorway is where it really shines. The grey accents with the light blue and the ever-classic Nike swoosh emblazoned with a Dior pattern elevate these kicks to high art. But the designer take on the shoe certainly drove the price up the high top version alone is a staggering $2,200 and only 8,000 pairs were made. Made in Italy and edge-painted by hand, theyre in rarefied air thats certainly worthy of Jordan himself. Dior assembled a microsite for sneakerheads to get a chance to buy them (as is standard procedure for these kinds of high-end collabs) that was supposed to take place during the spring. However, the draw was delayeddue to the coronavirus until early July.

These kinds of splashy partnerships always draw a fair amount of attention. But I have to think even Dior was shocked by the reception. A staggering five million people entered into the raffle according to WWD. Of course, with such a limited inventory, you might have missed out on a chance to get them initially. Fortunately, for those witha lot of extra funds sitting around, resellers like StockX can give you a shot at getting them . . . for a price.

Its typical to see resellers double or triple the price of a hot sneaker when it hits the secondary market. But given the inherent rarity of these shoes, youre going to pay far more than you otherwise would have paid. As of this writing, StockX has the shoes going anywhere from $10,000 to $12,000 depending on the reseller and the size. Part of this considerable price hike is just the nature of missing out, but once you add in the rarity and the designer aspects of it, that price goes up. For those collectors who just haveto have them? Theres probably not a price they wouldnt pay to get their hands on them. If that person is you, well, consider today your lucky day.

Dior x Air Jordan 1s

See more here:

Here's Why the Dior x Air Jordan 1 is the Hottest Sneaker of 2020 - MSN Money

LET’S RIDE: The Woodlands’ Jordan verbals to SMU – KPRC Click2Houston

Will Jordan is a Pony.

The Woodlands Highlander junior committed to the legendary SMU golf program last Friday a dream come true.

"I kind of started playing a lot later than other golfers," he said. "I started playing tournament in the sixth grade and I was okay. I couldn't really tell where I was on the scale back them. By the end of last summer, I realized I could go play somewhere really good."

June 15th was the official day that college coaches could reach out to high school juniors and Jordan had options.

"SMU is somewhere I've always really loved," he said "The campus is unbelievable. It's a small, prestigious school, which fits me. The facilities are unmatched and the coaches really care about their players. SMU has had tremendous team success recently and the recruits joining me want to build something special while we are there."

With golf being one of the only sports playing during the COVID-era, Jordan will be hard at work the next two years prior to heading to Dallas.

"Sure, I'm going to try and lead The Woodlands to state, but I'm really focused on the necessary changes to my swing, my body and mentally to get prepared for the next level."

See more here:

LET'S RIDE: The Woodlands' Jordan verbals to SMU - KPRC Click2Houston

Doc Gallows Resurrects Sex Ferguson Character With The Help Of Psychedelics – Ringside News

Sex Ferguson and Chad 2 Badd wrestled in a Boneryard Match during the main event of Talk N Shop A Mania. That match ended with Ferguson getting buried by Chad in a hole dug for one. Now Ferguson is back as Doc Gallows dropped a new video to hype Talk N Shop A Mania 2.

Click here for our complete coverage of Talk N Shop A Mania.

Gallows uploaded a new video where he was in a bathtub drinking on some wine straight out of the bottle. He said that Sex Ferguson is back with the help of psychedelics. He didnt reveal what he took, but he was apparently having a good trip in the tub.

Rocky Romero recently appeared on Wrestling Observer Live where he revealed that Gallows is already coming up with plenty of ideas for their pay-per-view sequel. Talk N Shop A Mania 2 is going to happen which was made pretty clear by Karl Anderson on the morning after the initial pay-per-view event.

Well have to see what The Good Brothers have planned for the second installment of Talk N Shop A Mania. It certainly looks like Gallows is getting some premium inspiration.

Follow this link:

Doc Gallows Resurrects Sex Ferguson Character With The Help Of Psychedelics - Ringside News

Magic Mushrooms Might Not Be Legal Yet, But DC Could Be Heading That Direction – Our Community Now at Colorado

Washington D.C. voters will decide in November whether to deprioritize law enforcement of psychedelics. (Courtesy of Flickr)

'Shrooming in Washington, D.C., will still be illegal after November, but you might have less of a chance of getting arrested for possessing and using psychedelic plants if Initiative 81 gains voter approval.

Initiative 81 is a non-binding referendum to deprioritize enforcement against mushrooms and psychedelic plants. Decriminalize Nature D.C., the group behind the initiative, breaks down the effort:

The proposal will appear on the November ballot in Washington, D.C., which would become the third state nationally to pass such a measure, if approved. Denver and Oakland approved their own pro-mushroom measures last year, according to DCist.

Before anyone starts tripping at a national monument, know this movement is actually an effort to legalize medicinal mushrooms that could help veterans and other patients diagnosed with PTSD. More research like work being done at the Johns Hopkins Center for Psychedelic & Consciousness Research could spur other uses for these plants.

Decriminalize Nature D.C. collected more than 35,000 signatures in support of the measure, and about 25,000 of those signatures were deemed valid. That was just enough to qualify Initiative 81 for the November election ballot, and based on a poll from April, D.C. voters narrowly favor the measure with 51-percentsupport.

Will you vote for the psychedelics reform measure? Tell us below in the comments.

Follow this link:

Magic Mushrooms Might Not Be Legal Yet, But DC Could Be Heading That Direction - Our Community Now at Colorado

Cybin Applauds TheraPsil’s Advocacy to Bring Psilocybin Therapy to Palliative Care of Canadian Patients | INN – Investing News Network

Cybin Corp. applauds the efforts of TheraPsil, a non-profit coalition that advocates for legal, Special Access Programme (SAP) access to psilocybin therapy for palliative care of Canadians.

Cybin Corp. (Cybin or the Company), Canadas leading-edge mushroom life sciences company, is proud to applaud the efforts of TheraPsil, a non-profit coalition that advocates for legal, Special Access Programme (SAP) access to psilocybin therapy for palliative care of Canadians.

Recently, four Canadians battling incurable cancer were approved by the federal Minister of Health, Patty Hajdu, to use psilocybin therapy in the treatment of their end-of-life distress. According to TheraPsil, these four patients mark the first publicly-known individuals to receive a legal exemption from the Canadian Drugs and Substances Act, under Section 56, to access psychedelic therapy. They are also the first known patients to legally use psilocybin since the compound became illegal in Canada in 1974.

This is a watershed moment for the patients involved who deserve the right to manage their health challenges with dignity, said Paul Glavine, Co-founder of Cybin. Everyone at Cybin applauds the efforts of TheraPsil and these brave individuals, and we thank the Minister of Health for her foresight.

Former Ontario Health Minister and Cybin advisor, Dr. Eric Hoskins, praised Minister Hajdus approval. I am pleased to see this important step towards considering psilocybin as a natural compound with a growing body of experience of therapeutic uses for patients in need, rather than strictly a prohibited substance, Hoskins said. I joined Cybin because of their dedication to patients who need and benefit from psilocybin-assisted therapy.

Dr. Jukka Karjalainen, Cybins Chief Medical Officer concurs: This landmark recognition of the benefits of psilocybin is tremendous validation for our sector. Cybin is proud to applaud TheraPsils efforts, while continuing to focus on the development of a psilocybin oral film delivery system which will potentially alleviate the burden of pill consumption for seniors and patients in palliative care, who often have difficulty swallowing.

About Cybin

Cybin is a life sciences company advancing mushroom-based psychedelic and nutraceutical products for various psychiatric and neurologic conditions. Cybin is developing technology that seeks to improve bioavailability to achieve the desired effects of psychedelics at lower dosages. Cybin is developing products with new delivery systems and intends to support clinical trials to evaluate efficacy to potentially combat major depressive disorder and addiction and improve cognitive flexibility.

Forward Looking Statements

Certain statements in this press release constitute forward-looking information. All statements other than statements of historical fact contained in this press release, including, without limitation, those regarding the ability to receive all necessary approvals, the bioavailability and potential use of the oral film delivery system, the potential safety and efficacy of psilocybin administered in an orally-dissolving film, research and clinical trial programs, statements regarding Cybins future, strategy, plans, objectives, goals and targets, and any statements preceded by, followed by or that include the words believe, expect, aim, intend, plan, continue, will, may, would, anticipate, estimate, forecast, predict, project, seek, should or similar expressions or the negative thereof, are forward-looking statements. These statements are not historical facts but instead represent only Cybins expectations, estimates and projections regarding future events. These statements are not guaranteeing future performance and involve assumptions, risks and uncertainties that are difficult to predict. Therefore, actual results may differ materially from what is expressed, implied or forecasted in such forward-looking statements. The forward-looking information and forward-looking statements included in this press release are made as of the date of this press release. The Company does not undertake an obligation to update such forward-looking information or forward-looking information to reflect new information, subsequent events or otherwise unless required by applicable securities law.

Source

Read the original post:

Cybin Applauds TheraPsil's Advocacy to Bring Psilocybin Therapy to Palliative Care of Canadian Patients | INN - Investing News Network

Level 3 Travel Advisory for Barbados and the Eastern Caribbean – US Embassy in Barbados

On August 6, the U.S. Department of State removed the Global Level 4 Travel Advisory Do Not Travel and adjusted the individual travel advisories of Barbados and the countries of the Eastern Caribbean to Level 3 Reconsider Travel. After nearly five months of a global do not travel advisory, the upgrade to Level 3 takes into account both the current assessment of conditions on the ground and the fact that the COVID-19 pandemic continues to pose unprecedented risks for travelers. We routinely review safety and securityconditionsacross the region and will update destination-specific information asappropriate. Travel advisories are not issued against countries. They have a singular purpose to keep U.S. citizens informed and help ensure their health and safety. We will continue to work with Barbados and the countries of the Eastern Caribbean through bilateral communication, economic cooperation, and humanitarian aid to end the spread of COVID-19.

By U.S. Embassy Bridgetown | 8 August, 2020 | Topics: Press Releases

Originally posted here:

Level 3 Travel Advisory for Barbados and the Eastern Caribbean - US Embassy in Barbados

Nigel Spence: The Recipe for the Perfect Pig Caribbean Journal – Caribbean Journal

This year, with the pandemic and shutdowns in place, I finally got around to reading a lot more of the trade magazines I have piled up in my desk and revisiting so many recipes and notes I have jotted down hastily for future use, that sometimes never gets past that point-as life sometimes gets in the way more often than not for me. Such is the life story of a chef/owner/marketer/human resources person/ shopper/equipment mechanic and administrator. I may start the day at the market, move on to prepping, interview a prospective employee, fight with my fish guy, then end the day fixing a pump tube on the dish machine then having a drink with the bartender next door just to get away from it all for a moment. Yet I wake up every day and love doing it all over again and wouldnt have it any other way. For some, chaos is par for the course and fuel for the soul. I am one of those somebodies.

This pandemic has introduced me to someone I knew very little aboutmeit forced me to reflect on life and where I fit in and I gotta tell u folks it wasnt pretty!

What was pretty though was some of the amazing dishes I produced while looking at all the notes I wrote on napkins, on receipts, on the back of business cards, etc.

Which is where I came upon a business card from the owner of a farm. A few years back he invited me and about 10 other chefs to a pig feast; at which we were to share our thoughts and give feedback on the prepared dishes expertly paired with some great wines.

It was a smart idea as the pork he peddled was quite a departure from anything we are used to here in America and would certainly need a positive nod from us chefs to get it on menus in the area, and patrons indoctrinated into this new style of protein.

It certainly worked because I remember everyone oohing and awwing with each course, and the most memorable part of the evening for me was when I bit into a cut called the collar steak. I even wrote on the back of business card Experiment further with collar steak as soon as possible-a true gamechanger.

And then of course life got in the way and it never made it to my menu but at least some of the other chefs who had their s#$%t together better than I do, did get it on theirs.

Until NOWthe name of the pig in question is a heritage breed coming all the way from Hungary, now being raised in the United States called a Mangalitsa pig. Unlike the regular pigs we know, this one has hair. Yes I know all pigs have hair, but this one has real honest to goodness mane of hair like sheep and about as much fat to match the hair. Most American pigs are bred to be lean, as in the other white meat-but this one certainly is not!

As a matter of fact, the collar cut as it is called looks more like a cut of beef, with deep red hues and marbling rivaling a high grade rib-eye steak. The cut I used is taken from the neck and was about of an inch thick. Because of all the marbling, I decided it would be high on the flavor scale, so I didnt want to adulterate that flavor by adding too many seasonings to it (though this is totally a personal preference). I simply sprinkled some kosher salt and freshly ground black pepper on the steak. I then grabbed a small sprig of rosemary, added clarified butter to a roasting pan over low heat, added the rosemary sprig and dropped the steak on top of it. I slowly pan roasted while basting it with the now mildly flavored butter from the pan. I roasted the first side for approximately 5 minutes while it developed a golden crust, I then flipped it over and continued to pan roast and baste for an additional 4 minutes. I then transferred it to a 300-degree oven and let it slowly finish up for another 3 minutes to get to a medium temperature.

I then removed it and allowed it to rest for 15 minutes tented with foil, while I deglazed the pan with a bit of allspice liqueur (slightly sweet complex liqueur from the allspice berry), mounted some butter on the sauce and served it next to the steak.

Oh, my gravy what a treat! The steak was quite juicy, tender, definitely a departure from the texture of a standard American pork chop that just gets really chewy and dry anywhere north of medium rare. Not even the Iberico pork could stand next to this little freak, except that I have never had the collar steak from the Iberico steak, only the standard chop, so I guess I am not quite comparing apples to apples.

Nonetheless, this thing was the BEST cut of pork I have ever had and reminds me well of the first time I had it at the dinner party. Though I might be biased toward my own technique, I would venture to say the first time I had it was not as good as this second time probably because it may have been cooked past my ideal temperature of medium for a pork chop, which is what the collar steak was meant to mimic.

This recipe is obviously less about the seasonings or aromatics and more about the protein itself and the cooking technique, which is of utmost importance to get the best taste and texture on your plate. Enjoy!

Nigel Spence, a Culinary Institute of America alumnus, was born in Kingston, Jamaica. Nigel freelanced at the Television Food Network for 3 years where he worked with culinary luminaries such as Bobby Flay and Emeril Lagasse. Chef Spence has appeared twice on Throwdown with Bobby Flay where he emerged the victor in cook offs against the Food Network star and was featured on CBS when he appeared on Tonys Table as well as ABCs Neighborhood Eats, NBCs The Today Show , Sirius Everyday Living with Martha Stewart and TVFNs Chopped. The acclaimed and New York Times-reviewedRipe Kitchen and Baris Mr Spences first entrepreneurial endeavor.

The rest is here:

Nigel Spence: The Recipe for the Perfect Pig Caribbean Journal - Caribbean Journal

Facebook is wrong to censor Donald Trump – The Spectator USA

Donald Trump has hardly covered himself in glory in his latest public responses to the pandemic. His calamitous Axios interview with Australian journalist Jonathan Swan will probably enter the presidential history books for all the wrong reasons.

Nevertheless, the news that Facebook has removed a video of the Presidents latest appearance on Fox News on the grounds that it spreads misinformation about COVID-19 should raise alarm bells in the ears of anyone who cares about free speech. Twitter has similarly frozen a Trump campaign account until the video is removed.

Facebook has taken issue with Trumps comment that children are almost immune from coronavirus. They have labeled this remark as harmful misinformation and therefore taken it upon themselves to ensure that nobody can view the video on their platform.

This heavy handed response is a step up from the platforms previous policy,announced in May, which involved labeling potentially misleading content with a warning. Only when content is in danger of causing imminent physical harm, the policy claimed, should it be removed.

Whether Trumps remarks will cause children to come to imminent physical harm is up for debate. Not only did he qualify his statement with the word almost an admittedly rare moment of restraint the jury is still very much out on the science when it comes to COVID-19 and children. There has not been a single case of a child under 10 passing on coronavirus in contact tracing carried out by the World Health Organization and a study by Britains Royal College of Paediatricians and Child Health found the evidence consistently demonstrates reduced infection and infectivity of children in the transmission chain.

Donald Trump was offering an outspoken opinion on an inconclusive topic many will disagree with him but do his remarks really deserve censorship? As with so much of the science behind the pandemic, theres no way yet of knowing for certain whether he was peddling so-called misinformation.

Facebook has plowed more than $1 million into assembling a global army of fact checkers to monitor its content, but, as this decision painfully shows, any assessment of the facts always requires a degree of subjective judgment. Its simply not possible to police content in an entirely objective, apolitical way.

***Get a digital subscription toThe Spectator.Try a month free, then just $3.99 a month***

Misinformation a word that is almost Orwellian in tone is defined so vaguely that it can be applied increasingly liberally to all manner of online content. Heaven forbid that individual users might deploy their own reasoning skills to assess whether the information they are consuming is useful or valuable. Once again consumers are being treated as easily led fools who can only be trusted with news sources that have been vetted on their behalf.

Mark Zuckerberg is still reeling from the drop in share price and advertising revenue that occurred after the Stop Hate for Profit campaign when he refused to censor Trump earlier in the pandemic. Was Facebook waiting for an opportunity to show its contrition? The decision to remove the Fox video smacks more of big corporate PR than it does a genuine defense of the public interest.

By appointing itself as a cultural and political arbiter, Facebook finds itself on a slippery slope. It must wield its power carefully if it doesnt want to hemorrhage users who are tired of being patronized.

This article was originally published on The Spectators UK website.

Read the original:

Facebook is wrong to censor Donald Trump - The Spectator USA

Fear of Authoritarian Regimes Is Pushing the Film Industry to Self-Censor – Foreign Affairs Magazine

What sets the United States apart from the rest of the world is and has always been its soft power. The Soviets may have equaled the Americans in nuclear capability, but they could never rival the appeal of the American way of life. And even as China tries to spread its culture across the globe, its rise tends to inspire more trepidation than admiration.

Many ingredients combine to give U.S. soft power its strength and reach, but entertainment and culture have always been central to the mix. Film and television have shaped how the world sees the United Statesand how it perceives the countrys adversaries. Yet that unique advantage seems to be slipping away. When it comes to some of the great questions of global power politics today, Hollywood has become remarkably timid. On some issues, it has gone silent altogether.

The most glaring example is the growing wariness of U.S. studios to do anything that might imperil their standing with the Chinese government. Chinas box office is as large as the American one, and entertainment is above all a business. So Hollywood sanitizes or censors topics that Beijing doesnt like. But the phenomenon is not limited to China, nor is it all about revenue. Studios, writers, and producers increasingly fear they will be hacked or harmed if they portray any foreign autocrats in a negative light, be it Russian President Vladimir Putin or North Korean dictator Kim Jong Un.

It wasnt always this way. In the 1930s, Charlie Chaplins The Great Dictator took on Adolf Hitler. Later, Martin Scorseses Kundun shone a light on the fate of Tibet, and The Unbearable Lightness of Being and The Hunt for Red October made the Cold War come alive. Today, the market power of Chinaand the cyberpower of some rogue statesis making studios and creatives think twice about producing such daring, overtly political films. And as the retreat from the kind of films that once bolstered American soft power accelerates, Hollywood is running out of real-life antagonists.

Nazi troops were marching into Poland when Chaplin began filming The Great Dictator. The films titular character, a buffoonish, mustachioed dictator named Adenoid Hynkel, was clearly meant to deflate Hitlers magnetic appeal. The British government, seeking to appease Germany, initially suggested it might ban the film from British theaters. (It changed its mind once the war commenced.) Even among Chaplins collaborators in Hollywood, some feared a backlash. (Hollywood also had a financial interest in reaching the large German film market, although historians debate how much this led American studios to bend to Nazi preferences in the 1930s.) U.S. President Franklin Roosevelt is said to have personally encouraged Chaplin to continue production. When the film was released in 1940, it proved an artistic and political triumph and was among the highest-grossing films of the year. Soon, overt condemnations of fascism were the norm: between 1942 and 1945, over half of all Hollywood films touched on the war in some way or another, hundreds of them with an anti-Nazi message.

With the Cold War came a new adversary against which to deploy the promise and glamor of American consumerism. Hollywood was on the frontlines of this effort. American films from the early years of the Cold War often brimmed with anti-Soviet jingoism. (I Was a Communist for the FBI, released in 1951, is a classic of the genre.) Indeed, nearly half of all war-themed movies coming out of Hollywood in the 1950s were made with the Pentagons assistance and vetting to ensure they were sufficiently patriotic. (To this day, the Pentagon and the CIA have active entertainment liaisons.) Even foreign productions were enlisted in the culture war against the Soviets: in 1954, when British animators adapted Animal Farm, George Orwells famous allegorical indictment of Stalinism, they enjoyed secret CIA funding.

When it comes to some of the great questions of global power politics today, Hollywood has become remarkably timid. On some issues, it has gone silent altogether.

By the 1960s, Hollywood productions began to cast the United States and its role in the world in a far more critical light. But even if it was not their intended effect, these films projected American values and bolstered U.S. soft power in their own way: by demonstrating Americans openness and tolerance for dissent. Dr. Strangelove called out the absurdity of apocalyptic nuclear confrontation. Apocalypse Now, Platoon, and even the popular TV series M*A*S*H presented nuanced and sometimes harrowing perspectives on U.S. power abroad.

Today, audiences can take their pick: there is no shortage of jingoistic U.S. films or televisionseries, nor of material that challenges pro-American foreign policy orthodoxies. When it comes to how other great powers are portrayed, however, some hot-button topics are now off limits. American films dealing with the history and people of Tibet, a popular theme in the 1990s, have become a rare sight. There has never been a Hollywood feature film about the dramaticand horrificmassacre in Tiananmen Square in 1989. The 2012 remake of Red Dawn initially centered on a Chinese invasion in the United States but was later rewritten to make North Korea the aggressor instead of China. And Variety called the 2014 blockbuster Transformers: Age of Extinction a splendidly patriotic film, if you happen to be Chinese.

Across the board, film studios appear to take great care not to offend Chinese sensibilities. One scene in last years Abominable, coproduced by DreamWorks and the Shanghai-based Pearl Studio last year, featured a map showing the so-called nine-dash line, which represents Chinas expansiveand highly contestedclaims in the South China Sea. That same year, CBS censored its drama series The Good Fight, cutting a short scene that mentioned several topics that Beijing considers to be taboo, including the religious movement Falun Gong, Tiananmen, and Winnie the Pooha frequent and sly stand-in for Chinese President Xi Jinping on Chinese social media.

The most obvious reason for Hollywoods timidity is the enormous size of Chinas market. Unlike the Soviet Union during the Cold War, China is not only a geopolitical adversary but also a major economic partner. Its box office numbers will soon be the worlds largest. Hollywood never cared much about distributing its movies in the Soviet Union. The same isnt true of China today.

The promise of Chinese funding is another potential reason for studios to toe the party line on sensitive political questions. The Shenzhen-based tech giant Tencent, for instance, is an investor in the highly anticipated remake of Top Gun. An early trailer for the movie shows Tom Cruise wearing his iconic flight jacketbut without the Taiwanese and Japanese flag patches that were sewn into the back in the original 1986 film. The worlds largest cinema chain, which includes the American subsidiary AMC Theatres, is now owned by the Wanda Group, a Chinese conglomerate. Foreign funders can be useful partners, but their presence, unsurprisingly, can also make producers wary of content that might displease their benefactors.

Box office and funding are not the only reasons Hollywood is shying away from certain topics. It is likely that studios and theater chains also worry that some content might lead them to come under attack from foreign hackers. Hollywood itself was already hit in 2014, when Sony Pictures fell victim to a major cyberattack ahead of the premiere of The Interview, a satire of North Koreas leader Kim Jong Un. The North Korean government had previously warned Sony, branding the films depiction of Kim an act of war and promising a resolute and merciless response. Debate remains in the industry over whether the hack was in fact the work of North Korean hackers or rather that of disgruntled insidersor perhaps even Russia. Regardless of the culprit, the attack was an inflection point. Since the days of The Great Dictator, studios have worried that controversial material might hurt their bottom line. But the Sony hack added fear that personal or professional harm might come to those who provoke certain foreign leaders or regimes.

Russia elicits particular fear. When the idea of adapting the book Red Notice, which details the corruption of Putins cronies, was discussed at a major studio a few years ago, executives balked, fearful of the potential repercussions of angering Putin, according to a person familiar with the discussions (The upcoming comedy with the same title, featuring Dwayne Johnson, is unrelated.) Red Sparrow, the 2017 film based on a novel by a former CIA operative, kept the books Russian setting but left out Putin, who had played a central role in the novel. As the Hollywood Reporter notedat the time, by avoiding Putin, Fox also is steering clear of any Russian hackers who might protest.

Fears of a cyberattack are not fiction. HBO, Netflix, and UTA, one of Hollywoods largest talent agencies, have all suffered hacks in recent years; in the case of HBO, federal prosecutors eventually indicted a former Iranian military hacker. Devastating cyberattacks against other U.S. entities, such as the 2015 data breach at the federal Office of Personal Management, which U.S. officials linked to the Chinese government, have shown that no institution is immune from the threat. Russian meddling in the 2016 U.S. presidential election further fueled the perception in liberal Hollywood that foreign hackers are skilled, ruthless, and essentially undeterrable.

Hollywoods self-censorship is no passing fad. The specter of retaliatory attacksonline or offlineis unlikely to fade, and barring a major economic meltdown, the appeal of Chinas massive moviegoer market will remain. Chinese acquisitions of theater chains, investments in film studies, and cofinancing of movies make Beijing a critical player that can shape the content of American entertainmentand thereby blunt a key aspect of American soft power.

Indeed, the U.S. government increasingly views the entertainment industry as a potential national security liability. The Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States (CFIUS), the government body tasked with vetting foreign investments in critical industries, has traditionally not concerned itself with the entertainment sector. But the tide seems to be turning. In 2016, Chuck Schumer, the Democratic senator from New York, wrote a letter to then Treasury Secretary Jack Lew noting the Wanda Groups acquisition of AMC Theatres, as well as its investments in American studios, urging the committee to pay closer attention to such deals.

As the line between technology and media continues to blur, CFIUS will probably heed Schumers call before long. (Indeed, CFIUS is currently engaged in a review of ByteDance, the Chinese parent firm of the massively popular video-based app TikTok.) But greater government scrutiny is unlikely to make studio executives more willing to run with content that might draw the ire of Beijing and threaten their profits. The result is an uneven competitive landscape that rewards those who play it safe. Tibet, Taiwan, and Tiananmen will remain taboo subjects in Hollywood. The same deference shown to Beijing may be extended to countries that lack major box offices but whose regimes have shown themselves willing to attack their perceived opponents abroad, such as North Korea and Russia.

Chaplin attacked Hitler and made money (and art) in the process. But it is hard to imagine a modern-day Chaplin tackling Vladimir Putin, let alone Xi Jinping. Villains in comic-book capes still existindeed they are proliferating. Yet the kind of ripped-from-the-headlines film that once bolstered American soft power vis--vis its rivals is increasingly rare.

Not long ago, an Oscar-winning screenwriter was asked to rewrite one of the biggest video game franchises. The company began by saying that the war-based game had a problem: who was the enemy? It could notbe China, of course. Nor Russia, North Korea, or Iran. As the company executives said, We dont know who we can make the villain anymore.

Loading...Please enable JavaScript for this site to function properly.

View post:

Fear of Authoritarian Regimes Is Pushing the Film Industry to Self-Censor - Foreign Affairs Magazine

Elon Musk | Biography & Facts | Britannica

Elon Musk, (born June 28, 1971, Pretoria, South Africa), South African-born American entrepreneur who cofounded the electronic-payment firm PayPal and formed SpaceX, maker of launch vehicles and spacecraft. He was also one of the first significant investors in, as well as chief executive officer of, the electric car manufacturer Tesla.

Top Questions

Elon Musk was born on June 28, 1971.

Elon Musk cofounded the electronic payment firm PayPal and founded the spacecraft company SpaceX. He became chief executive officer of the electric-car maker Tesla.

Elon Musk founded SpaceX, a company that makes rockets and spacecraft. He became the chief executive officer and a major funder of Tesla, which makes electric cars.

Musk was born to a South African father and a Canadian mother. He displayed an early talent for computers and entrepreneurship. At age 12 he created a video game and sold it to a computer magazine. In 1988, after obtaining a Canadian passport, Musk left South Africa because he was unwilling to support apartheid through compulsory military service and because he sought the greater economic opportunities available in the United States.

Musk attended Queens University in Kingston, Ontario, and in 1992 he transferred to the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, where he received bachelors degrees in physics and economics in 1995. He enrolled in graduate school in physics at Stanford University in California, but he left after only two days because he felt that the Internet had much more potential to change society than work in physics. That year he founded Zip2, a company that provided maps and business directories to online newspapers. In 1999 Zip2 was bought by the computer manufacturer Compaq for $307 million, and Musk then founded an online financial services company, X.com, which later became PayPal, which specialized in transferring money online. The online auction eBay bought PayPal in 2002 for $1.5 billion.

Musk was long convinced that for life to survive, humanity has to become a multiplanet species. However, he was dissatisfied with the great expense of rocket launchers. In 2002 he founded Space Exploration Technologies (SpaceX) to make more affordable rockets. Its first two rockets were the Falcon 1 (first launched in 2006) and the larger Falcon 9 (first launched in 2010), which were designed to cost much less than competing rockets. A third rocket, the Falcon Heavy (first launched in 2018), was designed to carry 117,000 pounds (53,000 kg) to orbit, nearly twice as much as its largest competitor, the Boeing Companys Delta IV Heavy, for one-third the cost. SpaceX has announced the successor to the Falcon 9 and the Falcon Heavy: the Super HeavyStarship system. The Super Heavy first stage would be capable of lifting 100,000 kg (220,000 pounds) to low Earth orbit. The payload would be the Starship, a spacecraft designed for providing fast transportation between cities on Earth and building bases on the Moon and Mars. SpaceX also developed the Dragon spacecraft, which carries supplies to the International Space Station (ISS). Dragon can carry as many as seven astronauts, and it had a crewed flight carrying astronauts Doug Hurley and Robert Behnken to the ISS in 2020. Musk sought to reduce the expense of spaceflight by developing a fully reusable rocket that could lift off and return to the pad it launched from. Beginning in 2012, SpaceXs Grasshopper rocket made several short flights to test such technology. In addition to being CEO of SpaceX, Musk was also chief designer in building the Falcon rockets, Dragon, and Grasshopper.

Musk had long been interested in the possibilities of electric cars, and in 2004 he became one of the major funders of Tesla Motors (later renamed Tesla), an electric car company founded by entrepreneurs Martin Eberhard and Marc Tarpenning. In 2006 Tesla introduced its first car, the Roadster, which could travel 245 miles (394 km) on a single charge. Unlike most previous electric vehicles, which Musk thought were stodgy and uninteresting, it was a sports car that could go from 0 to 60 miles (97 km) per hour in less than four seconds. In 2010 the companys initial public offering raised about $226 million. Two years later Tesla introduced the Model S sedan, which was acclaimed by automotive critics for its performance and design. The company won further praise for its Model X luxury SUV, which went on the market in 2015. The Model 3, a less-expensive vehicle, went into production in 2017.

Musk expressed reservations about Tesla being publicly traded, and in August 2018 he made a series of tweets about taking the company private, noting that he had secured funding. The following month the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) sued Musk for securities fraud, alleging that the tweets were false and misleading. Shortly thereafter Teslas board rejected the SECs proposed settlement, reportedly because Musk had threatened to resign. However, the news sent Tesla stock plummeting, and a harsher deal was ultimately accepted. Its terms included Musk stepping down as chairman for three years, though he was allowed to continue as CEO.

Dissatisfied with the projected cost ($68 billion) of a high-speed rail system in California, Musk in 2013 proposed an alternate faster system, the Hyperloop, a pneumatic tube in which a pod carrying 28 passengers would travel the 350 miles (560 km) between Los Angeles and San Francisco in 35 minutes at a top speed of 760 miles (1,220 km) per hour, nearly the speed of sound. Musk claimed that the Hyperloop would cost only $6 billion and that, with the pods departing every two minutes on average, the system could accommodate the six million people who travel that route every year. However, he stated that, between running SpaceX and Tesla, he could not devote time to the Hyperloops development.

Follow this link:

Elon Musk | Biography & Facts | Britannica

Blog: Elon Musk and the future of the D&O market – Insurance Age

Elon Musk recently made headlines in the insurance industry press for stating that he has replaced Teslas D&O policy with a personal indemnity for the companys board members in response to disproportionately high renewal quotations.

The story is one high-profile example of a possible trend of companies scaling back on D&O cover as the market continues to harden. So what is moving the market, how are businesses responding and what might the consequences be if companies increasingly rely on

Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.

To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact [emailprotected].

You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact [emailprotected] to find out more.

You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact [emailprotected] to find out more.

Read the rest here:

Blog: Elon Musk and the future of the D&O market - Insurance Age

Elon Musk says coronavirus pandemic is ‘practice run’ for …

Elon Musk

Mike Blake | Reuters

Elon Musk said how the United States reacts to the Covid-19 pandemic can be viewed as a sort of trial run before an even more deadly virus spreads across the globe.

"At some point there probably will be a pandemic with a high mortality rate, something that's killing a lot of 20 year olds, let's say. This is kind of like a practice run for something that might in the future might have a really high mortality rate," the Tesla CEO said in an interview with comedian Joe Rogan that aired Thursday.

"We kind of got to go through this without it being something that kills vast numbers of young, healthy people," he added.Musk stressed that he believes the mortality rate of Covid-19 is much lower than estimated. The World Health Organization said in March that the Covid-19 mortality rate is 3.4% globally.

The WHO warned last month that more young peopleare becoming critically ill and dying from the coronavirus.Dr. Mike Ryan, executive director of WHO's emergencies program, has said that it's a mistake to assume the virus only seriously harms older people and those with underlying health conditions.

Musk has been a vocal critic of how government and health officials are reacting to the coronavirus pandemic that's killed at least 73,431 people in the United States. While talking to analysts in the company's Q1 2020 earnings call, Musk said stay-at-home orders are "forcibly imprisoning people in their homes against all their constitutional rights."

Public health officials have routinely cautioned that reopening too quickly could result in cases of Covid-19 re-accelerating and developing new hot spots that could overwhelm health systems.

Musk that people will come out of the pandemic with healthier habits, such as increased hand washing and mask usage, which he views as a silver lining. More vaccines and cures could be generated too as the understanding of these viruses improve, he added.

Subscribe to CNBC on YouTube.

More:

Elon Musk says coronavirus pandemic is 'practice run' for ...

Jeff Bezos and Elon Musk’s plans to colonize space are even crazier than we thought – New York Post

As a child, Elon Musk would read comic books and sci-fi novels and dream of fantastical worlds. Now the tech entrepreneur is on the verge of visiting one.

Musks focus narrowed some 20 years ago while poking around NASAs website. He noticed that there was no timetable for a manned mission to Mars. He later called the lack of vision shocking.

Musk, then already a millionaire from the sale of a software company, ditched Silicon Valley for Los Angeles, in order to be closer to the aerospace industry, and set his sights on the stars.

Now the future of space is largely in his and the hands of other free-spending, big-dreaming billionaires like him, including Amazons Jeff Bezos.

But what will this future look like?

Some answers can be found in the new book Star Settlers: The Billionaires, Geniuses, and Crazed Visionaries Out to Conquer the Universe (Pegasus Books) by Fred Nadis, out now.

I see [guys like Musk] almost like medieval cathedral builders, with this multi-century project that theyre willing to take their time and their livelihood, Nadis told The Post.

That said, the author thinks these billionaires may be dreaming a bit too big.

Musk, the founder of Tesla, has said that all of his earthly business ventures are just a way to fund his true passion: colonizing Mars.

His company, SpaceX, is planning to send humans to the red planet in 2024. Within a century, Musk envisions reusable rockets blasting off every two years and ferrying some 200 passengers at a time, ultimately establishing an outpost of a million people.

Its still unclear how theyll survive.

At its closest, Mars is some 35million miles from Earth, and a trip would take around nine months. Once they get there, the problem explorers will face is that Mars atmosphere is much thinner than Earths and the planet generates no electromagnetic field, meaning it gets pounded by cosmic rays and other energy harmful to humans.

Its really challenging, Nadis says. Not quite as simple as SpaceX might make it out to be.

Musk has offered sketchy details of what life off-world might look like. Any Mars colony would have to be self-sustaining and not rely on supplies from Earth. Musk has suggested food be grown on hydroponic farms, either underground or in an enclosed structure to protect the crops from radiation, but because Mars surface gets about half the sunlight Earth does, whatever plants that can be grown will likely have to be supplemented with artificial lights and powering those lights will be no small challenge.

Musk has said farms will be powered by solar panels, though hes offered few details.

Really pretty straightforward, he told Popular Mechanics last year.

In the same interview, the billionaire suggested Mars inhabitants might live under a glass dome with an outdoorsy, fun atmosphere until the planet is terraformed artificially transforming the planet to make it more Earth-like, with a livable atmosphere.

But that plan also presents a problem: A 2018 NASA-sponsored study concluded that terraforming Mars is impossible, because there is not enough carbon dioxide locked in the soil to release into the air.

Musk, however, isnt daunted. He has suggested exploding 10,000 nuclear missiles over Mars surface in order to melt the planets ice reserves, thereby releasing the carbon dioxide locked within. His company has even produced Nuke Mars T-shirts.

Scientists are divided on whether the idea would work. Penn State climate scientist Michael Mann, for example, told US News and World Report in 2015, There are so many things that could go wrong here, it is difficult to know where to start.

Meanwhile, Bezos and his company, Blue Origin, are also focused on moving off-world but onto space colonies. Bezos is worried that the Earths resources will be gone in a few hundred years, spurring the need to leave.

Bezos draws much of his inspiration from the work of Gerard ONeill, a Princeton physicist who in the 1970s laid out a grand design for space colonies.

There are so many things that could go wrong here

ONeill envisioned two giant counter-rotating cylinders rotating in order to create artificial gravity joined at each end by a rod. The massive structures could be 4 miles in diameter and at least 16 miles long.

The interior of each cylinder would offer controlled climates and temperate weather, with an Earth-like landscape consisting of forests, artificial rivers and mountains. To protect from cosmic radiation, the cylinders would be lined with moon rock. Plants, pigs and chickens might be raised for food. Low-gravity sports might serve as entertainment.

Colonists might reside in apartments overlooking farmland and living conditions in the colonies should be much more pleasant than in most places on Earth, ONeill wrote in 1974.

With certain technological advances, ONeill envisioned the cylinders being able to grow to encompass some 30,000 square miles, allowing room for up to 700million people.

The colony would likely be parked in a stable orbit between the Earth and the moon, first calculated by a mathematician in 1772. ONeill has said there is room for several thousand colonies there.

Bezos is a fan of ONeills designs, and has said that he one day envisions a trillion of us living on space colonies, though Nadis predicts thats hundreds of years away.

The Amazon founder said its his generations job to begin laying the groundwork for the colonies so that future generations can actually construct them.

The kids here, and your children, and their grandchildren, youre going to build the ONeill colonies, Bezos told attendees at a Washington, DC, press conference last year.

A colony on the moon might be a more realistic bet in some of our lifetimes. Making it to the moon has long been a dream for many, including Bezos and the Japanese tech billionaire Yusaku Maezawa, who tweeted earlier this year that he was looking for a girlfriend to join him on a trip to the orbiting body.

Nadis said the most likely habitats at first will be simple modular units, built on Earth, then flown via rocket to the moon. But one tantalizing prospect is the moons lava tubes seemingly massive underground tunnels made by lava flows. Living inside them would offer protection from radiation and a more stable temperature (about -4 degrees Fahrenheit) than the surface.

Scientists arent yet sure how big or deep these tubes are and what they might look like inside. In his influential magazine, Moon Miners Manifesto, sci-fi fan Peter Kokh once described a civilization of thousands of people living on the rocky terrain, almost like setting up camp in an Earth cave. Sunlight would be piped down below via shafts or optical cable bundles. Elevators would be built to carry inhabitants to the surface. Ultimately, it might be possible to seal a tube and pressurize it, just like with an airplane, creating a breathable habitat.

But one major problem none of these dreamers have been able to solve is human procreation: It may be extremely difficult in space. Never mind the challenges of having sex in diminished gravity. The radiation in space could render males temporarily and females permanently sterile, Nadis writes.

In one Russian experiment, rats were unable to produce babies in space, and when those space rats returned to Earth and mated with regular rats, the offspring tended to have significant abnormalities.

Other bodily functions might suffer in space as well. Take sleep, for example. Our bodies are cued by light exposure and the 24-hour day. On the moon, though, a day lasts more than 27 Earth days, severely screwing with human circadian rhythms. (Mars day is very similar to Earths.)

One solution is to equip habitats with lights that simulate the sun. The compartments then get darkened for night.

And what about peeing and pooping in diminished gravity? Early astronauts had to do their business in a bag (bits sometimes missed and floated around their space capsule). But, in the future, waste might be recycled. A 2017 paper in the journal Life Sciences in Space Research detailed a compact bioreactor that could recycle Numbers 1 and 2 into an edible goo.

Even with so many potential complications, Nadis appreciates the vision of the billionaire space explorers.

What once was fringe thought escaping to the stars has been inching toward the center, the author writes. A potentially profound cultural change appears underway, as we shift from thinking of ourselves as an earthbound species to one of (potential) spacefarers.

But, he concludes, whether we are worthy candidates for dispersal through the solar system or galaxy remains an open question.

Read more here:

Jeff Bezos and Elon Musk's plans to colonize space are even crazier than we thought - New York Post