Meet the Leather Expert That’s Ripping Apart $1,000 Air Jordans – Complex

Weston Kay stands in front of a brick backdrop wearing a pair of oversized glasses, a denim shirt, and a patchy beard while brandishing a razor in hand and says, "It's time to put an end to all the speculation and cut these Shattered Backboard Jordans in half to see if the leather quality's that good.and if they're worth the $1,000 I paid for them."

Kay, who runs the leather goods brand Rose Anvil and YouTube page of the same name, has gained notoriety for cutting apart sneakers on the internet to inspect the quality of the product. He's inspected the aforementioned Air Jordan 1s, as well as a pair of lesser-quality Air Jordan 1 mids, Air Force 1s, Common Projects, Vans, and more. And he's found out whether the sneakers are good or poor in quality and amassed nearly 200,000 subscribers in the process.

"I make wallets, belts and our biggest selling thing is camera harnesses for photographers," says Kay, who is located in northern Utah, where he says there is no sneaker culture, aside from a skate shop in town. "I'm not a cobbler, I'm just a general leather worker."

Kay's videos have drawn interest mainly for two reasons: first, nearly every person with an above average interest in sneakers pays attention to quality, and second, there's something very Good Internet about cutting a sneaker in half.

His videos show that cheaper shoes, such as an Air Jordan 1 Mid, aren't even made out of real leather, while the "Shattered Backboard" Air Jordan 1s are constructed of higher-quality leather in parts of the shoe.

"I'm kind of ignorant to the whole hype game and what's hot," says Kay. "I go in fairly blind to the cultural significance of shoes and what people think of shoes. It makes it easier for me to stay unbiased and look at it from a real world sense without being swayed by hype."

The Common Projects Achilles, which retails for over $400, has long been touted as "the only sneaker you'll ever need" by men's style experts who don't know much about sneakers. It's an all-white sneaker made in Italy and renowned for its quality. Kay deconstructed a pair of these and found out quite the opposite was true.

"It really surprised me that that was one that I kind of fell victim to the hype behind it. I heard in my comment sections, online, and just throughout my life that Common Projects were this ultra high-quality sneaker," says Kay. "I was expecting something a little bit more like a boot out of them, like full leather and a lot higher quality. They ended up just being an average shoe. It was a little bit overpriced."

In his video, Kay found out the shoes were made out of "chrome-tanned leather," which is a leather made from a cheaper process than vegetable-tanned leather. He also found out that shoes have a softer sole than Vans or Converse, which means it will wear down faster.

When it came time to dissect the Shattered Backboards, Kay says he felt hesitant. He's not the first person to destroy a sneaker online, although many have done so without the purpose of actually learning about the shoe, rather lighting it on fire or dipping it in fudge for Instagram likes or YouTube views.

"That's a lot of people's holy grail shoes and then they just see some guy cutting it apart on YouTube," says Kay about the Shattered Backboards. "A lot of people were really interested and a lot of people were upset."

He found that the toebox leather on the shoe, which is perceived to be some of the best Jordan has ever put out, was a "pretty good leather for the price." The black leather that's on the toe and heel, Kay says, was a "cheap" leather without grain. Given the $160 retail price on the sneakers, Kay was impressed.

"They're far from really high quality," he says. "They're decent quality for a sneaker."

As far as leather quality in sneakers, goes Kay says many are average, and there may be several factors that cause that. "I think it's planned obsolescence," says Kay. "I also think that when you get these big companies, you have so many people that are trying to make a buck all the way up the corporate ladder. It's all about the bottom line, and they know their shoes are gonna sell no matter what. I think companies are trying to make more money. I think they want people to buy shoes more often."

As far as the future of the channel goes, Kay says he's interested in dissecting an original 1985 Air Jordan 1, although he admits it's probably too expensive. He's also had unnamed boot companies mad at him for exposing what's in their products. Through the whole process, Kay admits that he's gotten a few things wrong (which has been called out by the commenters).

What the future holds for Kay, as far as YouTube goes, remains unknown, but he's going along with it and seeing where it takes him.

"I never intended to be a guy that cuts shoes and boots and half on YouTube. It's funny, right?" says Kay. "It makes me appreciate the sneakers a lot more. It's just really fun seeing what people are paying and how much hype dictates quality in that world."

Go here to read the rest:

Meet the Leather Expert That's Ripping Apart $1,000 Air Jordans - Complex

Meet Jordan Hawkins: Heres what to know about the newest UConn mens basketball recruit – Hartford Courant

UConn will have three scholarships opening next spring, with forwards Tyler Polley, Josh Carlton and Isaiah Whaley all in their senior years. Diggins and Hawkins account for two, and could be the replacements if Bouknight, who is appearing in mock drafts, moves on to the NBA. UConns next recruiting target will probably be a frontcourt player, such as Samson Johnson, 6-10, who played with Adama Sanogo at the Patrick School in New Jersey. Once UConn fills the three spots, Hurley and his staff will be able to wait and see how the season plays out and what additional needs they will have from the Class of 2021. The nationwide recruiting battle has been brewing for 7-0 Bristol Central center Donovan Clingan, clearly a top UConn priority in the Class of 2022.

Read more from the original source:

Meet Jordan Hawkins: Heres what to know about the newest UConn mens basketball recruit - Hartford Courant

Armstead excited to team up with Jordan again on 49ers – Comcast SportsNet Bay Area

During these uncertain times just a month before the scheduled beginning of an NFL uncertain season, versatility is more important than ever.

Moments before 49ers right tackle Mike McGlinchey followed teammate Arik Armstead to the podiumfor the start of his briefing with Bay Area reporters, McGlinchey took ahold of a spray bottle and rag.

Typically, a staff member disinfects the area in the auditorium at Levi's Stadium between interviews. On Monday, McGlinchey insisted on doing the chore himself.

Its going to be important this season for players --especially backup players --to fill a variety of roles. McGlincheys status as a starter is not in question, but he is getting into the act, too.

Versatility is going to be absolutely huge, McGlinchey said. Its going to make or break guys having jobs and make or break situations to fill our roster because we can get in any situation at any point this year that were not just looking out for injury, were looking out for something we cant really defend ourselves from at times.

To be able to plug and play guys in different positions at different times is really going to allow us to keep moving as smoothly as operationally possible.

Through Sunday, 105 players throughout the NFL have spent time on the reserve/COVID-19 list in the opening weeks of training camp. Seventy-five of those players have been activated, leaving 30 players who are unable to return to their teams practice facilities until cleared.

Both 49ers added to the list, receiver Richie James and running back Jeff Wilson, have been activated.

Teams must prepare for the possibility that they will have to come up with solutions for such problems as several players at one position going on reserve/COVID-19 at the same time. Each team is allowed to carry 16 players on their practice squads this season to help alleviate any concerns.

[49ERS INSIDER PODCAST:Listen to the latest episode]

It is reasonable to expect teams will have players on the practice squad getting familiar playing both ways. Teams will certainly have reserve defensive backs cross train at cornerback and safety. Some defensive linemen and linebackers will have to know all the spots within their position groups. And backup offensive linemen must be functional at multiple positions as insurance, too.

Two of the 49ers' newcomers fit that description, McGlinchey said.

Daniel Brunskill and Tom Compton are rotating during walk-throughs as they compete for the starting job at right guard. Brunskill started at three different positions for the 49ers last season, so he is a fit at nearly every position on the offensive line.

[RELATED:How Jimmy G, Trent Williams feel about fan-less games]

Compton is a veteran who has played right tackle and both guard positions in the course of his eight-year career.

Rookie Colton McKivitz, a fifth-round draft pick, started at left tackle and right tackle at West Virginia. He also is likely to be available to play guard for the 49ers.

Its two guys come in and compete really hard for us and give us added depth not just at the one position, but a bunch of them, McGlinchey said of Compton and McKivitz. Its going to allow us to do certain things with those guys and push other guys forward.

Link:

Armstead excited to team up with Jordan again on 49ers - Comcast SportsNet Bay Area

SLC Police and Fire crews pull children from car in Jordan River Canal – fox13now.com

SALT LAKE CITY A teenager and a young child are in critical condition at Primary Childrens Hospital after a car accident late Saturday night.

According to Salt Lake City Police, a car was speeding while driving west on Indiana Avenue. As the car turned onto Delong Street, it flipped and rolled into the Jordan River Canal.

The 20-year-old driver and two juveniles escaped the car before first responders arrived.

A 15-year-old and a 2-year-old were pulled from the wreckage in the canal.

Two officers with the Salt Lake City Police Department were the first to arrive on the scene.

They jumped into the canals murky water to rescue the trapped children from the almost fully submerged car.

They jumped out of their cars and into action. Its unknown how long the juveniles were in the water at the time, said Sgt. Andrew Cluff of the Salt Lake City Police Department. With the situation being as it was, officers felt compelled to jump in and do all that they could do to get them out of the car.

Crews from Salt Lake City Fire arrived shortly after and assisted the officers in getting the children out of the water.

We are more than willing to put our lives on the line to save anyone, Cluff said. With regard to this incident, with the car completely submerged, officers were completely submerged in the car trying to get the juveniles out.

Investigators believe speed was the ultimate factor in this crash. It is unlikely the driver will face any criminal charges. The speed limit for that section of Indiana Avenue and Delong Street is 30 miles per hour.

See the original post here:

SLC Police and Fire crews pull children from car in Jordan River Canal - fox13now.com

Commentary: Shades of the past at City Hall – SW News Media

The Jorda nCity Council meeting on Aug. 3 ran about three hours and 20 minutes. It ended after 10 p.m., having started at 6:30 p.m. Two councilors were not there.

When I was on the city council, and even before, there was much discussion about how long the meetings were, and what was to be done to shorten them. One of the changes made was to eliminate a second public comment session at the end of the meeting.

Back then I did a little research and learned that the two public comment periods ran an average of seven to eleven minutes combined. The council, in its wisdom decided to eliminate one public comment period.

Meetings continued to run long, Most of the length came from councilors repeating themselves ad infinitum, and debating things during council comment. Often the things being debated had been decided earlier in the meeting. Sometimes councilors brought up things for discussion which would have been more appropriately handled as an agenda item. Those ambushes deprived (and still deprive) co-councilors of an opportunity to make a reasoned response, and opposed to just knee-jerking it.

Even back then, the councilors (well, some of them anyway) wanted to behave like unruly children, talking over each other, interrupting, holding side discussions, and generally ignoring Roberts Rules, which were then the legally mandated form for conducting a council meeting in Jordan.

So here we are again, with the council having a meeting running over three hours, just like in 2011.

Roberts Rules is gone. Audience participation is all but gone. The only ones to blame for long council meeting are the councilors themselves.

So heres my suggestion. The mayor, as chair of the meeting has the power to instruct each councilor to take turns speaking, and to limit each turn to some set time (three minutes is what the council deems adequate for the unwashed masses). The chair has the power to tell the council no one will speak until each councilor has taken his or her turn, after which each councilor may take a second, time constrained turn if he or she wishes.

The mayor, as chair has the power to tell anyone (including MnDOT) their presentation may not exceed a predetermined length. Id say 10 minutes is fair.

The mayor, as chair, also has the power to table agenda items if it looks like the agenda is too long, or contains especially time consuming items (like closed session legal issues).

And finally, the chair has the power to require that councilors not discuss during council comment any topic that has been on the agenda during the meeting. Rehashing what went on earlier in the meeting is just a waste of time.

The Quote: Talk low. Talk slow. And dont say too much. -John Wayne

Thom Boncher is a retired marketing communications manager, former Jordan City Council member and Jordan resident since 2003.

Go here to see the original:

Commentary: Shades of the past at City Hall - SW News Media

Jordan King Abdullah II is gifted with quilt crafted in Granby – masslive.com

Every quilt, as they say, has a story. With gold metallic thread, this one links all the way to Jordan from a dot on the map in the Pioneer Valley.

I was commissioned to make a quilt for King Abdullah II in Jordan by Bill Schenker, explains Brenda Knight, of Granby.

Schenker, who is the retired police chief in South Hadley, was among the group of law enforcement members from across Western Massachusetts who were part of a security team for Jordans king, Abdullah II, decades ago. The team provided security to the king and his brother when they attended the Eaglebrook School and Deerfield Academy.

Through the whole school year, he would guard him from Friday night through Sunday, every weekend, Knight explains. Bill got to know him really well over the years. They had him and his brother over to their home for barbecues and ball games. They are still very good friends. He went to visit him in Jordan a few times. They even went to his wedding.

More than a year ago now, Schenker thought hed like to get a quilt made for his old friends birthday. Someone mentioned Knights name, and thus began the story of the quilts creation.

Measuring a little over 7-feet square, the quilt, now en route to the king, is composed of star blocks, the colors chosen from a jelly roll which is a collection of fabric strips with complementary colors and patterns. It features tan shades that Knight says represented the desert and blues which reflect the sky. I also wanted to depict the ancient ruins (of Jordan), she added.

In the center, on a large square, were sewn the royal crown, a map of Jordan showing its major cities, and the flag of Jordan. The border and backing is royal blue, though upon close inspection there is royal purple as well.

The fabric is batik, says Knight, manufactured in Indonesia.

Once the squares were sewn together, she passed the project on to her daughter, Selena Krajewski, in Pennsylvania. Krajewski machine quilted the piece with the gold thread. She did a masterful job, said Knight. It came out very well.

Knight herself is masterful. As a child she learned to sew from her mother. She didnt pick up quilting until she was a young mother. I went to a lot of quilting classes, explains the long-time member of the Hands Across the Valley Quilters Club.

She has tried her hand at basket weaving. In addition, in her home hangs a number of paintings reflecting her love of the countryside in which she lives. She has tried oils and acrylic, but likes watercolor the best.

Quilting remains her favorite craft. Sewing I Spy quilts for the children at the Shriners Hospital gives me joy. But I was a bit stressed while working on the Kings quilt, she admits. I wanted everything to go right.

The first priority in quilting is planning. When Knight met with Schenker, she had the initial idea of something Americana, reminiscent of the kings years in New England. But Schenker had an idea of his own. How about two quilts? One to represent Deerfield Academy and the other to represent King Abdullahs new Kings Academy in Jordan?

Schenker told Knight he knew that the new academy, designed much like Deerfield and built in 2008, was close to the kings heart. That seemed a bit of a reach with Knights time constraints, so she brought quilt samples and he brought literature about Jordan. Together, they came up with a plan.

Before being sent to Jordan, the completed quilt hung in the Granby Public Library for a few hours. Many quilting friends and curious townsfolk came, said Knight.

It was the Schenkers first time seeing the completed quilt. It was emotional, she adds. I was happy that they were so pleased with it.

The quilt is en route to Jordan, where, Knight has been told, it will hang in a place of honor in a government building near the kings office.

Read this article:

Jordan King Abdullah II is gifted with quilt crafted in Granby - masslive.com

‘Atheist Overreach’ and the Law of Conservation of Worship – Patheos

Hello and welcome back! Recently, I got a little book with a title Id consider clickbait in a blog post:Atheist Overreach.Its author, Christian Smith, says he wrote it to help normies achieve greater insight and perhaps, dare I say, enlightenment. Oof. I wanted to show it to you because its a relatively new book that rehashes a lot of the same old bad arguments we see in apologetics most especiallythe Law of Conservation of Worship. Today, lets review this law and see how Christian Smith falls afoul of it.

(Interestingly, this book doesnt seem to push Christianity as a divinely-fueled supernatural-driven faith system. It seems to deal more with coercive religion as a means of social control of a communitys citizens and about how he thinks thats a good thing.)

Christian Smith wroteAtheist Overreach. According to his Amazon biography, he teaches sociology at Notre Dame. According to this link from the school, hes the former director of the Center for the Study of Religion and Society.

Interestingly, Smith is one of the co-authors ofDivided by Faith, a book that we actually like around here.

I suspect hes a fervent Catholic, because hes also written books arguing against biblical literalism and offering instructions for how evangelicals can convert to Catholicism. Theres this reportabout former young Catholics, too, which he co-authored.

I also dont think he likes atheists or atheism itself all that much. (Source.)

Atheist Overreachcame out just last year (2019). Thus, Smith wrote this book well after Christianitys decline had begunandwell after the vast majority of Christian leaders had recognized and accepted the fact that they were, in fact, in decline. That understanding of decline permeates the books pages like the scent of cigarette smoke. You can really perceive a difference between it and, say, that silly Lee Strobel puffery we reviewed just a bit ago. The difference starts looking even more dramatic when we compareOverreachto that soulwinning book from 1959.

So thats the author of the book.

We first discussed this idea back in 2016. Clint came up with it.A while ago, he smacked down a Christian over onGodless in Dixie with it, and it immediately got stuck in my head forever.

Here is the Law of Conservation of Worship in full form:

For every action and belief Christians hold, their enemies and sales targets have an equal and opposite reactionary action and belief. Spiritual practices are neither created nor destroyed; as beliefs change, they simply transfer to another method of expression.

And here is how it works:

Christians often assume that people of other faiths do and believe all the exact same things they do and believe, practice the same devotions, talk the same ways, and suffer the same dysfunctions in their relationships and groups. Those non-Christians just utilize different jargon for their stuff.

Since this book deals with atheism, heres how thatd look for atheists:

Obviously, atheists dont go to church; they go to science lectures. Atheists dont have priests and popes; instead, they answer to Richard Dawkins and Christopher Hitchens. Atheists dont evangelize for Jesus; they evangelize for science. Atheists dont revere the Bible as a holy book; they revere Charles Darwins bookOn the Origin of Species. Atheists dont use apologetics to PROVE YES PROVE that Jesus really exists; they use science to PROVE YES PROVE that he totally doesnt (COUGH: except they fail all the time, poor little dears, unlike Christians using apologetics). They dont trust in the teachings of their faith, but rather in the Scientific Method.

Most of all: atheists dont worship Jesus; they worship themselves.

The projection this Law inspires just goes on and on and on.

As the saying goes, every accusation they make is really a confession.

In this re-imagining, atheists seek to enshrine the persecution of Christians into the public sphere and from there, punish their enemies (Christians). Atheists seek to indoctrinate children in atheism instead of Christianity. They accept without even questioning all the things their scientists tell them. And oh, one fine day atheists hope to dance over the corpse of Christianity with delight and then make atheism Americas new official religion.

See what I mean? No wonder so many Christians imagine atheists as toddlers angry about not getting candy for dinner. Their entire conceptualization of atheism is justwrong in every single direction. They seriously see it as a sort of childish warping of their own religion!

And if atheism actually worked like they think, well, they wouldnt be wrong.

It doesnt. However, a huge number of Christian leaders are deeply invested in making the flocks think thats what it looks like. And it seems like Christian Smith is one of them.

Now then. With all that in mind, lets examine the cover ofAtheist Overreach. Seriously. Thats how far I got before head-desking.

You see, we immediately encounter a false accusation and the Law of Conservation of Worship on the cover. Heres the books full title:

Atheist Overreach: What Atheism Cant Deliver

And anybody who actually is an atheist or knows what it actually involves immediately knows that this book is not going to be helpful to anybody seeking real answers.

First of all, atheists do not commit overreach.

Instead, atheist activists fight Christian overreach. But theyre not the only ones fighting against that tyranny. Christians, too, fight the overreach of their more power-lusting peers.

And Smith oughta know this! Remember, he helped writeDivided by Faith.

For example, lets check out the website of Americans United (AU). There, we see a tab called Our Issues. These are the issues they actively fight:

In every single one of the listed items, we discover that the problem being fought is Christian overreach in that area.

Under Schools, as just one example, we discover that AUs concern centers around Christians trying to get taxpayer dollars to cover religious education at religious schools, a system which tends to be really substandard if not harmful to children.

If Christians werent constantly trying to insert their beliefs into the public sphere and force their cruel and impossible religious rules on everybody else, this organization would not even be a thing. I could say much the same thing regarding any other atheist group out there. Atheists organize to stop Christians from turning America into a theocracy.

Secondly, Smiths subtitle tells us that atheism doesnt deliver.

I saw that and thought, Of course it doesnt. What a ridiculous thing to say.

Atheism never promises to deliver anything to anybody in the first place. Its non-belief, not belief; the absence of a package of claims, not a package of claims.

But thats the Law of Conservation of Worship for ya.

Christians expect Christianity to deliver all kinds of results to them. Of course, it delivers precisely none of them outside of purely earthly stuffsometimes, like social interaction. If any Christians yowl too loudly about not getting oft-promised results, they get yelled at and gaslit into silence. If they deconvert when they realize nothing in the religion is what it says it is, they get insulted by Christians cuz they wanted a pony and didnt get it.

(Indeed, when Christians of all stripes talk about praying for stuff, many of them invoke this exact phrase to illustrate how silly it is to be upset over not getting what they pray for. Usually, they describe their own small children praying for the ponies in question. The metaphor of a silly little child praying for a pony has become very popular among Christians as a means of insulting ex-Christians for taking Christian marketing and indeed the Bible itself at their word.)

So Christians often assume thatother religions and philosophies and ideologies and mindsetsalso make similar promises to their adherents. Since Christianity promises all kinds of stuff, obviously atheism must promise all the same stuff!

I really dont know what these Christians think atheism actually promises. I could find not one example of even one of these supposed promises. Maybe the book will tell us. But whatever atheism promises to atheists, Christian Smiths subtitle asserts, it does not deliver.

Unlike Christianity. Which always delivers. Unless it doesnt. Which totally still counts as a delivery. Because shut up, thats why.

Gosh, itd really just super-suck for Christian Smith if the entire operating premise for his book turned out to be based on a really flawed misunderstanding of exactly what atheism is and what it really promises (or rather, doesnt promise at all, ever, to anybody).

But that seems to be exactly whats going on here.

Starting with the initial claim that atheists commit any kind of overreach and then continuing with a subtitled claim that atheism somehow doesnt deliver something it promises to atheists, hes already set himself up for absolute failure.

I know why hes set up this unnecessary showdown, of course.

He needs to make atheism look really unappealing. And he does so by warping atheism into a strawman that will be familiar to Christian readers.

That is the entire purpose of the Law of Conservation of Worship. Christians invoke it when they want to make other religions and mindsets look like pale imitations of their own religion, which will then be offered up as the onlyreal dealin the world.

As we saw above in his biography, Christian Smith feels deeply concerned about how quickly his religion is bleeding young adults. Catholicism in particular facesan even more rapid decline than other flavors of Christianity do. A 2015 Pew survey found that about half of young Catholics end up leaving the church, with only about 11% returning to church at some later date. Its 2018 survey gave Catholic leaders no reason for optimism either.

Absolutely, positivelynothingCatholic leaders are doing is changing anything there, either. Consequently, I imagine their ongoing panic attack over retention is entering its fourteenth-ish straight year at this point. They can demonize atheism all they want: its still growing, while Catholicism is shrinking. Even just Nones (adults who are unaffiliated with any religion) are growing rapidly.

In addition to making atheism look unappealing, then, Smith needs to make his own religion look like the Last Ideology Standing. He wants Christianity to look like the literal only option on the shelf if someone wants to lead a good, moral, decent life.

So from the very beginning,Atheist Overreachmakes two assertions that I know already are flat-out incorrect. Thats unfortunately completely expected from Christian authors, but its especially disappointing from this one.

And thats our review of thecoverofAtheist Overreach, yall!

NEXT UP: The introduction ofAtheist Overreachproves that your fourth-gradeteacher and Carl Sagan were both wrong aboutdumb questions. Get your desks nicely-padded for this one. See you soon!

Come join us onFacebook,Tumblr,Pinterest, andTwitter!(AlsoInstagram, where I mostly post cat pictures.)

Also please check out our Graceful Atheist podcast interview!

Ifyou like what you see, I gratefully welcome your support. Please consider becoming one of my monthly patrons viaPatreon with Roll to Disbelievefor as little as $1/month! MyPayPal is captain_cassidy@yahoo.com(thats an underscore in there) for one-time tips. You can also support this blog throughmy Amazon Affiliate linkand, of course, by liking and sharing my posts on social media! This blog exists because of readers support, and I appreciate every single bit of it.

(Dont worry. Its a really short book. This wont be aThis Present Darkness situation type deal. I just got frosted over the title of the book and had some things to say.)

View original post here:

'Atheist Overreach' and the Law of Conservation of Worship - Patheos

Richard Dawkins admitted ONE thing would make him believe in God – Daily Express

Professor Dawkins is highly regarded for his assertive take on atheism and his rejection of religion, but made the bombshell confession while chatting to iconic star - and fellow atheist - Mr Gervais. The pair discussed the topic in detail while appearing in a church, in which both dissected the true meanings behind God and why people believe in religion. During the talk, Prof Dawkins admitted that if he had lived in a pre-Charles Darwin era, before the theory of evolution was truly understood, then he would likely be a believer in God.

Prof Dawkins said: "Some people would say that the scientific view is rather bleak and cold. Here we are on a cloud - well a bit of dust really - that is orbiting the Sun and it's going to go and it's all going to be destroyed one day.

"Do you find that bleak?"

Mr Gervais, who is often outspoken in his views on religion, criticised the opinion, explaining: "There's no god-fearing person of any religion who feels as much awe as me when I see a mountain or a tree, or the star or anything in science and nature and art, I don't buy it.

"I just don't buy it. The fact that this is a miraculous mistake."

Prof Dawkins interjected: "And you and I are privileged to be here to enjoy it even if it's for a short time, that's wonderful."

Mr Gervais then swiped: "Oh yeah, it's good that we were born after they discovered fossils and dinosaurs isn't it?"

Prof Dawkins then explained that it was good that "we were born at all", before Mr Gervais asked: "What would you be like if you were pre-Darwin?"

The atheist replied in 2012: "Oh I would probably believe in God if I were pre-Darwin."

JUST IN:Richard Dawkins fury: How atheist hit out at religion's 'pathetic bid'

It isn't the first time Mr Gervais has been critical of those who rally against atheism, which is described as being a "disbelief or lack of belief in the existence of God or gods".

Mr Gervais, who is also a major force in the battle for animal rights, criticised those who claim atheism is a form of arrogance in a discussion with Nicky Clark in 2015.

He explained that among some of the biggest misconceptions about his beliefs were likening it to Satanism, or even defining atheism as there being "belief there is no God" as opposed to understanding it as a lack of belief.

DON'T MISS:Richard Dawkins' analysis of humanitys survival instincts exposed[INSIGHT]Richard Dawkins pinpointed impossible universe questions[ANALYSIS]Brexit: How Richard Dawkins hit out at irresponsible David Cameron[COMMENT]

The star added: A particularly annoying one is that atheism is smug or arrogant.

"What can be more arrogant than believing that the same God who didnt stop the Holocaust will help you pass your driving test?"

Throughout his career, Mr Gervais has sought to defend himself and his beliefs following major rows in the past, especially when people cite arrogance among atheists.

The rest is here:

Richard Dawkins admitted ONE thing would make him believe in God - Daily Express

‘Atheist Overreach’ Blames the Wrong People | Roll to Disbelieve: ‘Atheist Overreach’ Blames the Wrong People – Patheos

Hi and welcome back! Yesterday, we checked out the 2019 bookAtheist Overreach: What Atheism Cant Deliver by Christian Smith. Amazingly, we didnt even get past the title of the book. Today, we dive into the books introduction where we discover that yes, indeed, wecanjudge a book by its cover. Let me show you how this book completely mischaracterizes Christianitys decline and then blames the wrong people for it.

Immediately at its start,Atheist Overreachutterly mischaracterizes Christianitys decline. Im not exaggerating. Here is the very first sentence of his Introduction (p. 1; you can follow along with a lot of this on Amazons preview):

People the world over today are engaged in big struggles over the viability and importance of religion in personal and private life.

Annnnnnd let me stop us right there.

See, that is not the problem. Thats not why the struggle exists.

What the struggle actually involves is exactly how much power Christian leaders will be allowed to wield over the lives of people who do not want to comply with their demands.

More and more of us dont want Christian dominance enshrined into law and government, nor to subsidize its social clubs when well never enjoy a single benefit (even indirectly) from their operations. We fight to stop its culture wars gaining the teeth to rend human rights, and most of all its fists gaining iron gloves to batter others into obedience.

This aint aboutviability and importance. Rather, its aboutcoercive power over others.

By the same token, non-Christians dont care about Christianitys value in adherentspersonal and private lives. Instead, we despise toxic Christiansongoing efforts to force us to play along with theirhappy pretendy fun time game.

Im guessing that a Christian wont want to talk about their tribes own role in ending their dominance, though.

Smith continues:

Religions throughout human history have been an important feature of most cultures and have been practiced by billions of people.

So?Hes trying to make religion sound like a wondrous thing that people practiced for millennia, and his implication is not lost on me: those mean ole atheist meaniepies are out there trying to destroy this venerable human practice.

But its easy to demolish this argument.

An appeal to antiquity in the second sentences of his book?

Thats not a good look for an academic.

Smith introduces his villains early on at least. Heres the rest of his first paragraph:

But the modern worldhas set in motion powerful forces of secularization and, as part of that, recurrent waves of activist atheism have confronted and criticized religion. Most recently in the West, the so-called New Atheism has pressed hard to discredit belief in God and undermine religious influences in society.

Annnnnd hes wrong again.

Yes, the modern world trends increasingly toward secularization. That trend began centuries ago and has only accelerated despite the Catholic Churchs kicking and screaming. Its not even complete yet, largely because of that kicking and screaming.

Catholics (and their pals in fundagelicalism) are not kicking and screaming against secularization because theyre just so saaaaad about their imaginary friend religion being discredited or their influence being undermined.

Rather, these leaders are visiblypanicky andfurious over losing their coercive power over nonconsenting people. What Smith complains about ultimately reflects that loss of power. Nobodyd be doing that stuff if Christianity still held all the power it did once.

And Christians like Christian Smith want that power back.

He doesnt assign 100% of the blame for Christianitys decline on atheists or even New Atheists, just to keep the air clear. He appears to view atheists as one aspect of secularization (p. 131), not the entirety of it. However, atheists are in fact the only group he specifically names as driving secularization. He names no others, at least in this introduction. Though he also seems to understand that not all atheists hold the same views about morality, he presents them overwhelmingly as a mostly-unified group of smug cranks who just hate Christians for their, um, I dunno, theirepistemic justificationI guess?

I dont even know what New Atheism even means to Christian Smith in Atheist Overreach.The phrase itself lost relevance years ago. Smith names some of the big names from years ago but doesnt specifically explain what New Atheism might involve. Maybe hell do that later.

However, whoever Smith thinks is involved with Christianitys decline, theyve had next to nothing to do with the matter.

Atheists didnt do this.

Nor even Nones.

This ones all on his fervent tribemates.

Christians and in particular Catholics are losing their power because they have a solid history of abusing it. From the very first day they gained the kind of coercive power I describe, they began using it and they have always used it to its fullest extent.

Nothing any non-Christians could say could ever compare to the hundreds of skeletonsCatholics hid in Tuam. Or to the brutality they inflicted with the Magdalene Laundries. Or to the Crusades and the Inquisition, or to their long-standing habit of stealing babies from poor women to adopt out to nice Christian families. And the mind boggles at exactly how far and how deep the entire child-rape scandal really goes.

No. New Atheists, whoever they are, had almost nothing to do with the exposure of any of these scandals or the deep financial scandals Catholic leaders appear to be doing their best to conceal even now.

However, Christian Smith wants to point at those darn dirty ATHEISTS as the cause of all this trouble!

Blame atheists! Not toxic Christians! Not the people actually doing the scandalous stuff!

Now, lets move on ahead to page 2. (Yes, we have finally made it to the second page, yall! Were blazing full steam ahead now! Red hot maximum overdrive, thats us!) Smith writes:

At stake in this global struggle is the long-term character of human civilizationswhether religions will continue to have a significant place in human life or instead fade into implausibility and irrelevance.

And well pause there.No, that is not whats at stake unless by significant he means coercively dominant.

I think hes using very euphemistic language here. He sets up a false dilemma as well, because the truth of Christianitys ultimate fate will likely be found between those extremes.

But yes, Christian leaders will lose their coercive power eventually. Not a single chance they wont. If nothing else, theyll lose that critical mass of butts-in-pews (BIPs) they must have to raise the funds ($$$) they need to keep their operations going.

Hey, lets be fair, now. Buying politicians must cost a lot of money.Heres more stuff that seems very spendy: endless church programs; potentially-illegal political meddling; fruitless evangelism campaigns; forced-abduction indoctrination/re-education camps; constant payouts to abuse victims; luxuries (like yachts) for their Dear Leaders; real-estate scams; and eyesore statues.

All of that stuffs at stake too!

Gosh, yall! Wont anybody think of theyacht partiesthat are soon to be lost forever?

The biggest thing at stake is Christian dominance itself, however. Thats the Big Kahuna Burger of this whole struggle.

Without dominance, Christians cant reverse their decline.

Indeed, Christians have never been able to sell their religion without coercion. For most of their history, they havent had tosellit at all. They hadforceto do the talking for them.Thus, they never developed the skills necessary to persuade new people to join up. Nor do they want to develop those skillsnow for a variety of awful reasons.

But things are changing quickly, whether Christians like it or not.

We are quickly entering a whole new world: one where almost everybody can freely reject or accept Christian demands without fear of retaliation or repercussions.

Christianitys decreasing coercive power is a game-changer, yall. Thats why they keep losing people and why fewer and fewer people care what they think about anything. Thats why their leaders scandals keep getting exposed and why all the shielding around their criminals and abusers seems to be disintegrating all at once.

The more we learn about how Christians use power, the firmer our resolve grows to never let them have it back.

In that new world, Christian leaders wont be able to stop people from leaving their ranks. Nor will they be able to stop even their own flocks from freely choosing their desired level of engagement in devotions like tithing and church attendance, which directly translate to $$$ and BIPs.

Oh, but their losses will go even further than that into cultural declines in power.

Soon and very soon, almost everybody will feel perfectly free to criticize Christians/Christianity and be very vocal about rejecting their demands and overreach. Every Christian leader guilty of shocking hypocrisy and criminal deeds might even be caught and held accountable in that future world.

Best of all, almost nobody will fear Christian love.

What I describe is already the case formostof us.

But soon, oh soon! Itll be the norm for almost everyone. You watch and see.

And well,Atheist Overreachsees this societal change as an awful, terrible, no-good disaster for literally everybody.

So inAtheist Overreach, we have an author who doesnt seem able to engage with exactly why his religion isdeclining. Consequently, he blames the wrong people and the wrong forces for that decline.

Weve seen this problem many times in apologetics and Christian how-to roadmaps. If Christians cant even correctly identify the causes of the problems theyve identified and if they cant actually accurately identify the problems themselves in the first place then theyre not bloody likely to come up with solutions that actually address even their misidentified problems.

Instead, theyre going to offer go-nowhere, do-nothing non-solutions that amount to busy-work while their damaged yacht sinks under the waves.

It wont work. Thatll keep some of the flocks in place for a little while longer, but it wont persuade normies outside the sheepfold to obey. Not while Christian leaders are still out there committing crimes, being shockingly hypocritical, and abusing people.

And whats really offensive about this book so far is that it assigns atheistseven a bit of the blame for Christianitys decline. Thats nothing more than scapegoating, and really offensive scapegoating at that.

No, #sorrynotsorry, this ones entirely Christians own fault. Thered be nothing to criticize if they had actually abided by their own moral code and wielded their power well and justly and wisely. Nobodyd be chipping away at that power and publicizing their scandals if Christians werent such hypocrites. That hypocrisy is what led to Christianitys decline not a very few atheists being meaniepies about Baby Jesus and Mother Theresa.

Christians were never worthy of the power they held. When they had it, they hurt and abused people. This pain and abuse went on for centuriesand eventually touched almost every family under their thumb.

And that in a nutshell is why Christians are now losing dominance and will never get it back.

When Christian Smith points his finger at atheists, maybe he needs to notice the three fingers pointing back at himself.

NEXT UP: The actual product being sold inAtheist Overreach. (Its not what we usually see from Christians!) Ill show you what it is tomorrow. See you then!

Come join us onFacebook,Tumblr,Pinterest, andTwitter!(AlsoInstagram, where I mostly post cat pictures.)

Also please check out our Graceful Atheist podcast interview!

Ifyou like what you see, I gratefully welcome your support. Please consider becoming one of my monthly patrons viaPatreon with Roll to Disbelievefor as little as $1/month! MyPayPal is captain_cassidy@yahoo.com(thats an underscore in there) for one-time tips. You can also support this blog throughmy Amazon Affiliate linkand, of course, by liking and sharing my posts on social media! This blog exists because of readers support, and I appreciate every single bit of it.

Go here to see the original:

'Atheist Overreach' Blames the Wrong People | Roll to Disbelieve: 'Atheist Overreach' Blames the Wrong People - Patheos

Influential actor leaves atheism and turns to God – Uganda Christian News

Sir Philip Anthony Hopkins CBE is a Welsh actor, director and film producer. COURTESY PHOTO.

By Agencies

Sir Anthony Hopkins is one of the most well-known actors of our time. For years, he was a well-known atheist, too. But all of that changed when a woman at an Alcoholics Anonymous (AA) meeting challenged his disbelief with one, simple question. That was the beginning of the inspiring Anthony Hopkins testimony.

No matter how successful someone may seem from the outside, we all have our own internal struggles. During the earlier years of Anthony Hopkins career, he found himself in his own battle with alcoholism.

Anthonys addiction started innocently. He adopted a worldly mindset and drank because thats what you do in theater, you drink.

But as is the case too often, the social pastime soon took over his life. By 1975, Anthonys drinking had spiraled out of control.

I was hell-bent on destruction, the award-winning actor said, according to Godtv.com. It was like being possessed by a demon, an addiction, and I couldnt stop. And there are millions of people around like that.

But its in our weakest moments that Gods strength works best!

Sir Anthony Hopkins realized he needed help. So, he turned to Alcoholics Anonymous (AA). Up until then, Anthony Hopkins had been an atheist. But during an AA meeting, a woman asked him a simple question.

Why dont you just trust in God?

Its not something Anthony had ever tried. But as desperate as he was, he thought, Well, why not? Deciding to believe and trust in God was the moment everything changed for the desperate actor.

I could not stop [drinking], but I just asked for a little bit of help and suddenly, pow. It was just like, bingo, Anthony Hopkins recalled.

Miraculously, Anthony says the craving to drink was taken from him, never to return again. And hes believed in God ever since, working day after day, year after year, to grow in his faith.

When asked in a CNN interview with Piers Morgan if he believed in God, former-atheist Anthony Hopkins replied wholeheartedly, Yes, I do. I do.

Years after finding faith, Anthony Hopkins is regarded as one of the greatest actors of our time. In fact, he earned the title of Sir Anthony Hopkins when Queen Elizabeth knighted him in 1993, for his contributions to the performing arts.

As such an esteemed actor, Anthony was invited to speak to a crowd of nearly 500 high school and college students at the annual Leadership, Excellence and Accelerating Your Potential conference (LEAP). And he shared with them the dangers of conforming to the world.

If you chase the money, its not gonna work. And if you chase success, its not gonna work, he said.

In fact, in a separate interview, Anthony opened up about how unfulfilling success alone is.

You know, I meet young people, and they want to act and they want to be famous, the acclaimed actor explained. And I tell them, when you get to the top of the tree, theres nothing up there. Most of this is nonsense, most of this is a lie. Accept life as it is. Just be grateful to be alive.

After sharing how he was saved from the depths of alcoholism, Anthony Hopkins explained the power our words and our beliefs have over our lives. He also touched on how God can use anything, even our biggest messes, for good.

I believe that we are capable of so much, Anthony said. From my own life, I still cannot believe that my life is what it is because I should have died in Wales, drunk or something like that. We can talk ourselves into death or we can talk ourselves into the best life weve ever lived. None of it was a mistake. It was all a destiny.

While Anthony Hopkins has, at times, played characters who are truly evil, the actor lives out his real life with Christ in his heart. Hes been an atheist before finding God and now he just feels sorry for atheists, comparing a life of disbelief to living in a closed cell with no windows.

Id hate to have to live like that, wouldnt you? Sir Anthony Hopkins asked.

What a beautiful reminder the Anthony Hopkins testimony was of the hope we have through Jesus!

h/t:GodTV

Link:

Influential actor leaves atheism and turns to God - Uganda Christian News

Rendezvous with Rama: India can comfortably straddle the crossroads of science and religion – The Times of India Blog

In Arthur C Clarkes acclaimed sci-fi story The Nine Billion Names of God, monks at a Tibetan lamasery aspire to list all possible names of God. They believe once this list is completed, God will bring the Universe to an end. Writing out the estimated nine billion names by hand, as they have been doing, would take 15,000 years, so they hire a computer (it is 1953) and two programmers for the purpose. The Western programmers are sceptical, but as they play along (for good money), they worry the lamas will get upset at the end of three months when the computer is expected to finish churning out all the names and nothing happens. So they plan to bolt the monastery just as the computer is printing out the final pages.

Lets save the climax of the magnificent story for the end, as Clarke did. But the tale brings us to the crossroads of science and religion, often seen as being at odds to each other. This debate is particularly vigorous in the US and India, two countries that are avowedly purportedly, to some secular in different ways. India asserts its secularism constitutionally, albeit through an (42nd) amendment; it is more implicit in the US in its founding documents. Both have been imperfect in the practice of secularism, the fundamental principle of which is separation of the state from religious institutions.

For the longest time, Indian and American leaders, going back to founders of the two republics, forsook overt religious outreach. Although Mahatma Gandhi identified himself as a Hindu, he was more spiritual in its practice, seldom going to a temple or conducting rites and rituals associated with Hinduism. He called himself both an idolater and iconoclast, and in one instance said he found the tree worship instinct with a deep pathos and poetic beauty symbolising true reverence for the entire vegetable kingdom which, with its endless panorama of beautiful shapes and forms, declares to us, as it were with a million tongues, the greatness and glory of God.

Americas Christian Founding Fathers notably Thomas Jefferson and Benjamin Franklin were also deists who possessed a scientific temperament and rejected revelation, believing reason and observation of the natural world was sufficient to consider the existence of a Supreme Being or Creator.Several surveys have shown that India is now among the most religious countries in the world. According to the 2012 WIN-Gallup Global Index of Religion and Atheism report, 81% of Indians polled said they were religious, 13% were non-religious, 3% were convinced atheists, and 3% were unsure or did not respond. In the US, polls have shown anywhere from 60-70% of people are religious and 5-10% identify themselves as atheists or agnostics.

Fast forward to 2020, an age of immense scientific progress and there is growing display of religiosity. From President Donald Trumps walk across from the White House to a church to use the Bible as a prop, to Prime Minister Narendra Modis participation in the Ram Temple ceremony in Ayodhya, there is a sense they are appealing to their respective base of Bible-thumpers and beatific bhakts.

But are religion and science really incompatible? While it is said that science provides answers and religion offers comfort (and generates no small degree of strife), at the highest and purest level, both search for answers to similar questions about creation and existence. It is no accident that it was a Belgian Catholic priest-physicist, Georges Lemaitre, who first proposed what later became known as the Big Bangtheory, deducing from Einsteins work and the recession of nearby galaxies that the universe is expanding, and that it may have begun at a single point a primeval atom.

India seems particularly well-equipped to reconcile science and religion. Its principle faith and its canonical texts such as Rig Veda deal with cosmic issues such as the origin of the universe and the nature of god. Others emphasise values such as conservation and progression, even evolution. Even elements of nature agni, prithvi, akash were deified long before missiles were named after them. Small wonder many of Government of Indias scientific advisers are transparently and comfortably religious. We are the only country that conducts pujas ahead of rocket launches ostensibly to propitiate the space gods.

By some accounts, Clarkes finest work is said to be Rendezvous With Rama, where Rama is the name of an alien starship, an interstellar visitor to the solar system. One never discovers the purpose of Ramas journey in Rendezvous before it leaves. Which is probably why people often prefer the comfort that religion offers to answers that science strives to provide because the answers may not always be immediately comprehensible. There may even be no answers. For instance, what if, as the Tibetan lamas told the programmers, the answer to the question, Why are we here? is, For no particular reason just to list out all the names of god, and after that we will soon be gone in one instant.

Which brings us to the finale of Clarkes masterpiece. As the two American programmers depart the Tibetan monastery on ponies, they pause on the mountain path on their way to the airfield, where a plane is waiting to take them back home. Under a clear night sky they estimate that it must be just about the time the computer is printing out the last of the nine billion names of god. They look up to the sky Overhead, without any fuss, the stars were going out.

DISCLAIMER : Views expressed above are the author's own.

View post:

Rendezvous with Rama: India can comfortably straddle the crossroads of science and religion - The Times of India Blog

IS THIS THE BEGINNING OF THE END? – Oherald

11 Aug 2020 | 04:27am IST

Mariano H Correia

If you read and ponder minutely the various happenings occurring in this chaotic and disorganised world, one cannot deny that it could be a bad omen to humanity. Most precisely now in the 21st century many distasteful events are on the rise. There is no justice and peace amongst Nations, one sees the other as its foe and as such it looks like the world is heading for a massive catastrophe.

In the newspaper it is routine to read more unpalatable news then otherwise. News of floods, earthquakes, volcanic eruptions, terrorism, rapes and murders corruption at higher levels, cases of dacoity and terrible accidents both in the air and on land engulfs the whole newspaper. There is no space for good news as there exists none. Humankind is more prone to fast buck making by hook or by crook, come what may. Man has forgotten the idea of God and for most of them money and power are their Gods in this materialistic world.

Spirituality has taken a back seat and has been replaced by apostasy, debauchery, promiscuity, and sexual immorality. Atheism has prevailed over theism. The pandemic of COVID-19 that we are presently facing is the price we have to pay for our actions and wrongdoings. We know that the Almighty is just, all loving, merciful and compassionate, slow to anger and prompt to forgive and forget. This pandemic of COVID-19 which originated at Wuhan in China is giving sleepless nights to one and all, to the elite and the poor alike around the globe. The whole world so to say is waging a war on this invisible, tiniest of the tiny nano particle sized virus called the Novel Corona Virus 2019 as it started showing its ugly head in the fag end of December 2019.Millions and millions of people are affected and infected throughout the world and lakhs of people have succumbed to it. Its transmission is at a lightning speed.

The medical fraternity and research scientists the world over are burning midnight oil to come out with an effective vaccine to curb the same. It is still many more months away from being tried on humans, so as to ascertain its preventive effects on the deleterious symptoms and morbidity in acute and critical cases. You may say I am a pessimist, which I am. Some may agree, some may not.

Instead of worshipping, praising and thanking God, we adore mammon (money) and worldly power as our gods. Our God being a just, loving, merciful and compassionate one, at the same time a jealous God who does not want or tolerate other idol gods before him. That is why I say God has sent this scourge of this pandemic of COVID-19 to make his creation (mankind) aware of the apostasy that has been committed by man. God has lot of patience and is expecting to see how long will man keep aloof from Him, when He is waiting anxiously with open arms to embrace him. Likewise, the beginning of the universe God had warned humanity of the various possible catastrophes that would happen if His people desert Him, and go after other gods who are just idols having eyes, but cant see, having ears, but cant hear and having mouths but cant speak.

Read more:

IS THIS THE BEGINNING OF THE END? - Oherald

Adin Steinsaltz, 83, Dies; Created Epic Translation of Talmud – The New York Times

Rabbi Adin Steinsaltz, a towering scholar of the bedrock Jewish texts who spent four and a half decades writing a 45-volume translation of the Babylonian Talmud and made it accessible to hundreds of thousands of readers, died on Friday in Jerusalem. He was 83.

Shaarei Zedek Medical Center confirmed his death. A publicist for the Steinsaltz Center for Jewish Knowledge said he had had acute pneumonia.

For centuries, the study of Talmud in 2,711 double-sided pages, the record of rabbinical debates on the laws and ethics of Judaism heard in the academies of Babylonia (modern-day Iraq) between A.D. 200 and 500 was confined mostly to yeshivas. There, students, young and old, hunched over dog-eared volumes of Talmud, sometimes without teachers, would teach one another the meanings of what they were reading, largely in Aramaic, and argue the implications.

Rabbi Steinsaltzs achievement was to take the Talmud out of this relatively exclusive sphere and, with a Hebrew translation, allow ordinary Jews, taking the Long Island Rail Road to work or gathering in a cafe in Tel Aviv, to study those texts on their own. The Hebrew edition has been translated by publishers into English, French, Russian and Spanish.

Rabbi Steinsaltz, a rumpled, bespectacled figure with an unruly white beard, completed the entire Talmud in 2010, often working 16 hours a day.

He brought the Talmud into the 20th century, said Samuel Heilman, distinguished professor of sociology at Queens College specializing in Orthodox Judaism.

Rabbi Steinsaltz embarked on his lifes great work in 1965, when he was 27. His translation encompassed the ancient commentaries along the margins in the Talmud, written by revered figures like the medieval scholar Rashi.

He also provided his own commentaries on the often labyrinthine text, added biographies of the various rabbinical commentators and offered explanations of Talmudic concepts. His work, he said, was intended to accommodate even beginners with the lowest level of knowledge.

My idea was that Im trying to substitute a book for a living teacher, he said in a 2005 interview with The New York Times.

President Reuven Rivlin of Israel called Rabbi Steinsaltz a modern-day Rashi and a man of great spiritual courage, deep knowledge and profound thought who brought the Talmud to Am Yisrael the Jewish people in clear and accessible Hebrew and English.

Random House, its American publisher, translated and published 22 English volumes then stopped. Koren Publishers Jerusalem Ltd. has since 2009 been publishing the Steinsaltz English translations and completed the entire 45-volume set.

The Steinsaltz edition of the Talmud was not the first English translation. Soncino Press, a venerable British firm, completed a 30-volume translation in 1952, but it did not have the line-by-line commentary that can sustain self-study.

In 2005, Art Scroll/Mesorah Publications of Brooklyn brought out a 73-volume edition that has become the most popular version for many Orthodox Jews, and for tens of thousands of others who participate in Daf Yomi, the seven-and-a-half-year challenge to complete a study of the entire Talmud by analyzing a page a day.

Rabbi Steinsaltz was a disciple of Rabbi Menachem Mendel Schneerson, who died in 1994, and his Chabad-Lubavitch school of Judaism, which embraces nonobservant Jews and proselytizes among them. That sometimes put Rabbi Steinsaltz at odds with more hard-line Orthodox rabbis, including prominent ones, who treated him as a heretic and told their followers to spurn his works.

Rabbi Steinsaltz, a prolific and wide-ranging writer and a sharp observer of humanity, wrote more than 60 books on philosophy, mysticism, theology and even zoology. His study of kabbalah, The Thirteen Petalled Rose, is considered a classic and has been translated into eight languages.

He also translated the Jerusalem Talmud, the less comprehensive and less studied record of legal debates by rabbis in Jerusalem between A.D. 350 and 400 A.D.

Invited to impart some spiritual guidance to the staff of a magazine, The Jerusalem Report, in the early 1990s, Rabbi Steinsaltz gave lessons on lashon hara, the Jewish injunction against speaking evil. He taught that while most parts of the human body had their limits arms could carry only so much weight, legs could run only so fast the tongue could do infinite harm and therefore was set in a cagelike jaw as a reminder to guard it.

Surprisingly, he was raised in a secular household and was drawn to observant Judaism only as a teenager, when he studied with a Lubavitch rabbi.

By nature I am a skeptical person, he said in an interview with The Times a decade ago, and people with a lot of skepticism start to question atheism.

Rabbi Steinsaltz who adopted the additional surname Even-Israel (Rock of Israel) at Rabbi Schneersons urging that he take a Hebrew name was born on July 11, 1937, in Jerusalem in what was then the British mandate of Palestine. His parents, Avraham and Leah (Krokovitz) Steinsaltz, were active in a socialist group, and his father went to Spain in 1936 to help defend the leftist Republican government against Nationalist rebels led by Gen. Francisco Franco.

He attended Hebrew University, where he studied chemistry, mathematics and physics, while also undergoing rabbinical studies at a yeshiva in the Israeli city of Lod. At age 24 he became a school principal; he went on to found several experimental schools.

He lived most of his life with his family in Jerusalem, although his travels took him in one instance to the Vatican, where he had a private audience with Pope Francis in 2016. He is survived by his wife, Sarah; his sons Menachem and Amechaye; a daughter, Esther Sheleg; and 18 grandchildren.

In 1965, Rabbi Steinsaltz founded the Israel Institute for Talmudic Publications and began his monumental work of interpreting the Talmud for the masses. Since he was running schools at the time, he called the Talmud translation his hobby, but it became his crowning achievement. He told the Israeli daily newspaper Yedioth Ahronoth in 2009 that he hadnt fully considered the immensity of the work that would be required.

Sometimes when a person knows too much, it causes him to do nothing, he said. It seems its better sometimes for a man, as for humanity, not to know too much about the difficulties and believe more in the possibilities.

Original post:

Adin Steinsaltz, 83, Dies; Created Epic Translation of Talmud - The New York Times

God, Healing and the Unified Field – Omaha Reader

God, Healing and the Unified Field

by Michael Braunstein

America is becoming a secular nation. Younger Americans of the Gen X, Gen Z and Millennials are more likely to identify as agnostic, atheist or nothing in particular than previous generations. And half of todays teens and Millennials say they need factual evidence to support their beliefs. Well, were here today to deal some out.

A few decades ago, I started using the axiom, Let Science lead you to Spirit. Let Fact lead you to Faith. Here is how I got to that.

Grecian Formula 440 BC The science of physics deals with observable fact. Though Plato came up with the basics of Atomic Theory nearly 2500 years ago, it was a couple of other Grecian geniuses who used the word atomos to describe the smallest building block in creation. Leucippus and his student Democritus started using the word which means uncuttable to describe what they intuited to be the smallest building block of the universe. But weve come a long way, baby. Heres what we have found out.

Those guys were wrong. The atom can be cut. Splitting the atom is what gives us nuclear energy and, atomic bombs. And over the years, science has been looking into what an atom consists of. We find that its broken down into smaller and smaller objects. There are leptons, quarks, mesons, bosons, upside-down quarks, charmed quarks, muons, neutrons, protons and on-and-ons. The most basic of the objects in an atom are the nucleus (made of a bundle of objects) surrounded by electrons that fly around the nucleus at a distance at blazing speed, much like planets fly around the sun in the solar system. (Unless youre a Gen Z and never learned that you are not the center of the Universe.)

And here is the most important understanding of the architecture of every atom: the nucleus of any atom is separated from its electron(s) by a relatively great distance. Now, atoms are tiny. Nuclei are tinier still. Electrons can be even smaller. We all know that. But to understand how far away the electrons are from the nucleus in their scale, here is an analogy from Heinz Haber, a German scientist who came to America as part of Operation Paperclip.

If that tiny nucleus and electron were bumped up to the size of a toy marble, to represent how far the electron is from the nucleus the electron marble would have to be circling at a diameter of 300 feet! Imagine. Nucleus marble is in the center and the electron marble would be 150 feet away, half a football field.

Now, at first one would think thats a lot of empty space in an atom; you know, between the electron and nucleus. But that space is not empty. That space in an atom is filled with the very thing that keeps those two particles from running into each other: energy.

And as a matter of scientific fact, each particle we uncover in the atom of any element in the universe is built basically the same way. Its made entirely of energy. Atoms only have the illusion of being solid matter.

Okay, just make the simple leap now. Energy fills every atom and particle of the universe. There is nowhere in this universe where you can go that there is not energy. That universal energy might be called the Unified Field that Einstein made famous; a field of Energy yet to be understood or quantized that unites all the subcategory forces of energy. Or as Tolkien might have put it, One Ring that unites them all.

So were left with this fact of science that no matter (pun noted) where you go, Energy is there. And add in the scientific fact from thermodynamics that energy can neither be created nor destroyed. It always was and always will be. It can go up and down the quantum scale but it will always exist. Thats science.

Heal. Heal is a powerful verb. Its etymology traces to Germanic and Saxon iterations. Haelen was a word often used to describe patching a thatched roof in fiefdom days. It meant to make the roof whole again. And its meaning is carried over to any instance that requires making whole again. To heal the body, to heal the mind, to heal society is to make whole again.

There is no clearer way to envision our world as whole than to understand and acknowledge the oneness among us. There is no clearer mindfulness than to realize we can not be separated from each other. We are bound by the Unified Field that flows through all of creation, all of us. Nowhere is there nothing. There is nowhere where energy is not. It is in you, through you and all around you. It is what binds us. And recognizing that is what will make us whole and healed.

We would fare better if we taught a little Physics in our Theology classes and some Theology in our Physics classes.

Be well. Be healed.

Heartland Healing is a metaphysically based polemic describing alternatives to conventional methods of healing the body, mind and planet. It is provided as information and entertainment, certainly not medical advice. Important to remember and pass on to others: for a weekly dose of Heartland Healing, visit HeartlandHealing.com.2020.08.11

Atheism Doubles Among Generation Z

https://www.physlink.com/education/askexperts/ae622.cfm

https://www.cia.gov/library/center-for-the-study-of-intelligence/csi-publications/csi-studies/studies/vol-58-no-3/operation-paperclip-the-secret-intelligence-program-to-bring-nazi-scientists-to-america.html

Go here to read the rest:

God, Healing and the Unified Field - Omaha Reader

Usaa, the Greatest Revolutionary Barber After Upali, Dies of Covid-19 – The Citizen

Usaa Barber (Uppumavuluri Sambashivarao), a well known social reformer, anti-caste ideologue and anti-Brahminism fighter, succumbed to Covid-19 on July 25. He died because of the Indian medical system, which could not meet the challenge posed by the new coronavirus.

Over a century after Savitribai Phule and her son Dr Yashwantharao died of bubonic plague in 1898, Usaa Barber (whom I so named), as committed as Savitribai and Mahatma Phule to the abolition of caste and untouchability, died of the brutal Covid pandemic.

Usaa was a legend in many ways. From his student days he was a staunch atheist, and would compose songs and poems to motivate the masses. For a boy who came from a poor barber family from a village, Brahminkoduru near Tenali, known as a centre for cunning Brahminism in Andhra Pradesh, it was a surprisingly bold step.

Such a beginning of his was unexpected. Barbers have to lead a slave life by going from house to house to shave the heads of those rich unproductive castes, who keep insulting them. They were supposed to behave like skilled slaves, and eat the meagre food they were offered and survive.

In the 1960s, a barber going to school in that region was rarest of things. Usaa was put in school and later in college by his elder brother. His school teacher seems to have given a date of birth: 19 February, 1951

But unusually this barber boy, instead of shaving the heads of Brahmin poojaris who needed a clean shaven head with a scalp like that of Mahatma Gandhis at the apex of the head to perform pooja, archana, offering pure vegetarian food items to Brahmanised Hindu gods, revolted against their God itself.

The poojari life and pooja was ultimately to make money to lead ones life without doing any productive work, either in the family or at the community level. A barber had no right to enter the temple along with Dalits. For ages together the poojaris were habituated to live as parasites, justifying this sort of life as holy and worthy by use of a spiritual fascism.

God for them is free food and a good life provider. This deception was understood by the atheist Babar quite early in his life. Barbers of the area in those days were designating themselves as Nayi Brahmins to get some respect, but Brahmins were never to give them that respect.

They treated them as spiritual and social slaves meant to shave their body on a daily basis for priests and for their women who had become widows, and so would have to lose their beauty, dignity and human life, and live like a Brahmin female slave within the four walls.

The Brahminism of Andhra was brutal. Brahmin reformers like Gurijada Apparao and Kandukuri Veereshalinam Panthulu initiated some reform for a better life for their own Brahmin women, but a barbers life remained unreformed and unupgraded.

Leaders, writers and thinkers were not supposed to come from that community even in the freedom movement. They were supposed to shave the leaders heads into a beautiful and clean shape for their elegant public appearance. This was considered to be their contribution to nationalism, without any respect and livelihood.

If a barber aspired to the role of a leader, he would be snubbed and pushed back into his shaving job. The Indian freedom struggle was not anti-caste or a struggle to change the millennial occupational stagnation and indignity of labour.

Nobody had the right to change their oppressive caste occupation. The lowered caste occupations, in fact all productive occupations, were treated as undignified, lower than the most unproductive occupation like pooja and purohityam.

No Brahmin god was pro-production, and the Shudra productive god images were pushed into what was inaccurately called the little tradition by the Brahmin intellectuals of the freedom movement. The Communist intellectuals, having come from the same cultural roots, did not think of changing it, rather they reinforced it with loud silence.

Usaa Barber joined the radical left movement once it began. He was in jail during the Emergency, and later worked in the Tribal areas to conduct an armed struggle. In the plains he mobilised farmers and labour for irrigation and drinking water resources. He contested elections and challenged the so-called conservative Communists of the CPI, in the Nalgonda district of Telangana. He worked with me to expand the notion of human rights to starving masses, to caste atrocities and womens rights in the 1980s.

He was a tireless mass lover and lived with them. He was expelled from his party for his stand on Ambedkar and anti-casteism.

Usaa compared and understood the civilised barbarism with the Brahmanised radical left, and started writing and speaking against their loud-silence on caste culture in Telugu quite eloquently.

All the Communist intellectuals were upset, angry with him. If he had only come out of a radical Maoist party he would perhaps have been attacked physically, as there was a bad culture of accusing every dissenter of being a police agent. But he was from the moderate Tarimela Nagireddy (a Shudra Reddy) and Devulapally Venkateswar Rao (a Brahmin) group.

Democratic centralism destroyed the sense of democratic dissent in the Communist structures of India. It was a most unmarxist culture but well developed there. Once Brahminism operates as democratic centralism it uses only Vishnuchakra to resolve differences.

Usaa was the first full-time worker rebel in the Telugu region and oppressed caste leader who, within no time, was identified as a leader, writer, thinker, poet, composer of course, singer.

Singing in the revolution was always left to Dalits/Shudras, as Gaddar and many others did all their life without having the stature of leaders. Although they were popular among the masses, they were never given a leaders stature.

This boy started questioning the very existence of their God in the temples. Afterwards this man challenged the Brahminism within Communism. This was what the first barber Upali did by joining Gauthama Buddhas system as his close confidant in the fifth century BCE. Since then, in all known history, only Usaa Barber did so at a very young age. He never turned back.

He was in haste to fight exploitation and the oppressive system, hence joined the most militant Naxalite (Maoist) movement to kill the enemies as soon as possible at the point of a gun. He mobilised the poor Dalits and Shudra (Other Backward Class) labouring masses to rebel against landlords and oppressors.

Meanwhile in 1975 the Emergency came in. He was arrested and kept in Rajahmundry jail for two years.

Then he went into a deep tribal area called Kondamodulu and organised Tribals to fight for their lands with bows and arrows. He was a tribal among Tribals eating everything from root to raisin and rat to rabbit. Afterwards he shifted to Nalgonda to organise farmers to fight for irrigational and drinking water, and became a famous peasant leader. He contested from Motkuru in 1984 against a Communist Party of India landlord leader and lost the election. He was not sparing anybody.

He realised that even in the revolutionary movement Brahminism was playing a key role. There was a Brahmin (pure vegetarian) leader called Devulapally Venkateswar Rao (DVR) who was claiming all theoretical authority on Marx, Lenin and Mao as if they were like Vedavyasa, who wrote Mahabharat, or Kautilya, who wrote the most dangerous BrahminState craft book, the Arthashastra, or Manu who wrote the Manudharmashastra that was publicly burnt by Ambedkar.

Theirs was a culture of read and recite among their families, hence they would pick up quotations from Marx, Lenin and Maos writings and write funny documents asking the Shudra/Dalit/Adivasi cadre to apply to themselves the concrete conditions of Indias class system, as if there was no caste in the India of their mind. What an understanding of the concrete conditions of India.

Usaa sensed DVRs Brahminism in the revolutionary movement. DVR was treating as unworthy a much better revolutionary leader, Tarimela Nagireddy, who is a Shudra and the author of a famous book of economic theory called India Mortgaged. Usaa stood by Nagireddy to finish DVRs revolutionary Brahminism. But Nagireddy never saw the Brahminism in Communism and died unsuccessful.

Usaa was married to a Brahmin woman within the party. The DVR camp tried to set his wife (Padma) against him. But he could take her with him. She finally became a state government officer with a Mangali (barber) caste certificate. He was the first man to successfully navigate an extreme inter-caste married life, between a barber and a Brahman, by converting Padma into his caste, and she became the breadwinner to support his full time socio-political work and educate their only daughter, Hima Bindu.

Both of them lived all along with an unfriendly kitchen at home. The caste-denying Communist Brahminism did not realise a barber whose home preferred food was/is mostly meat and fish across Telugu society and country, and that was/is their food culture and pride.

Padma comes from a family that could not even tolerate the smell of meat or fish. Her family, caste, even her out-eating system, was always confined to pure vegetarianism, as their God was believed to be a vegetarian at home and also in Brahmin society.

All Shudra gods are considered to be meatarians. Usaas childhood food was his Gods food, whom he rejected in later life and turned to Buddha.

Padmas food culture was not a choice-based but was a caste-trained food culture. Communists should have understood that caste is in the blood and class is on the body.

Padma and Usaa had to struggle a great deal to navigate between two opposite food and work cultures as wife and husband. Like Gandhi, DVR thought that all Indians should become vegetarians, only to die after his communism comes to go to Hindu swarga. But they managed with great difficulty to be under one roof until their death, as Padma died in 2015 in his lap. Thereafter Usaa became a Buddhist and carried on his work.

In the process of fighting against DVRs so-called Braminic-Marxist theory, Usaa mastered Marxist-Leninist theory quite seriously. Later he developed differences with the Nagireddy group leaders on understanding Mahatma Phule and Ambedkar, and integrating it into a caste-class revolutionary movement, in the context of the Karemchedu massacre of Dalits by Kammas in 1985.

Although the main leaders in Telugu states were Shudras (Kammas and Reddys), their intellectual rigour was very weak and could never perceive the role of Brahminism in this Communism. It was a green snake in the green grass. A barber who knows how to identify a snake of any colour anywhere and kill it, he located this green snake in the green grass.

None of the leaders who hailed from Shudra highered caste background studied the history of Hinduism and Buddhism as rival schools to Brahminism. And, none of them read what Ambedkar wrote on Indian history.

In the life of the Indian Communist movement, only Brahmins wrote theory who never had an agrarian or artisanal productive mind. And they only became intellectual leaders -- a tragedy at that. This was a paradox. Dange, Ranadive, Charu Mazumdar, EVS Namboodripad, DVR, Vinod Mishra and so on became leaders and dreamt of becoming like Lenin or Mao. Hence Marxism became Vedamantra, not a scientific theory that could adapt itself to caste cultural conditions.

Usaa challenged that Communist Brahmin heritage. No Kamma, Reddy, Jat, Yadav, Nair, Patel, Maratha could become a well known theoretician from the Communist ranks. This barber changed that hollow Shudra house into an intellectual salon.

No Shudra leader could acquire intellectual and philosophical stature even from the Communist school, exactly along the lines of what happened in the Rastriya Swayamsevak Sangh school.

Usaa even with his limited English could perceive this. The RSS Brahmin intellectuals construct a consent system among the Shudra/Dalit/Adivasi activists about the Hindu spiritual system, which is completely under the grip of Brahmins as priests, philosophers as part of the necessary parampara. Productive Shudras have to live as spiritual slaves.

The Communist Brahmin intellectuals never allow a serious discourse on the Hindu spiritual system, quite consciously, as that would overthrow their hegemony in the Communist structures under the rubric that they believe in atheism not in religion. They refused to realise that no Shudra could become a priest in a temple like Tirupati or Jagannath, while being treated as Hindu.

Usaa has opened this shell of silence in the Communist ranks. The bogus theory that base structure and superstructure are separate guarded the Hindu Brahminical system within the Communist parties. Usaa told them that these two structures are interdependent and you are operating on hypocritical humanism.

He was expelled from the Nagireddy group, few others along with me in 1986 on the same question, of caste and Ambedkarism. He worked with me in human rights protection and feeding the poor people dying of drought conditions in Mahabubnagar district. In 1987 I wrote a small book called Annihilation of Caste - A Marxist Approach in Telugu in which he helped.

The Communist Brahmins mainly tried to make State as the agent of attack, leaving the oppression of Dalits/Tribals/Shudras through caste atrocities as myth. Caste according to them was/is a myth; class was/is material reality. They decided to see only the human body not the soul.

This theory came from Bengali and Marathi Brahmin intellectuals into the Communist revolution exactly on the lines as it came into the RSS from Maharashtra Brahmins. This barber realised it was a deceptive ideological framework that certainly does not allow even social reform, leave alone revolution.

The Shudra/Dalits who worked in leftist structures believed Marxism was a given divine truth, just as Brahmin nationalism is a God given truth in the RSS. In neither mainstream Communist party could Shudra/Dalits become intellectual leaders, as they still cannot in the RSS.

In the CPMs Politburo there is not a single Dalit/Adivasi member even now. This is where caste disease destroyed human creativity.

To sustain such Brahmin intellectual hegemony, many wings -- literary, cultural, student and so on were started in the Communist parties. The Brahmin youth were trained to read and write. Others were made to do the mass work, as if it was like tilling land again in the revolution, which no Brahmin does. And they became poojaris of Marxism.

Usaa became an all-rounder in this struggle. He became a poojari of his own gods, Phule and Ambedkar, and started shaving the head of Brahminism rather clean.

They abused him as a renegade, reactionary and lackey of imperialism. Usaa said my foot get lost. His tongue and pen became sharper and shaper. He travelled into the nooks and corners of both Telugu states preparing youth for a leaderless #BlackLivesMatterlike leaderless #ShudraDalitLivesMatter movement any time in future.

So far no Communist leader in Bengal or Kerala or Maharashtra has done that. We do not even know of a single Shudra/Dalit intellectual leader from these two states, even though the Communists ruled them for decades. Usaa Barber, a college dropout who left after his II year B.Sc, perceived this quite well.

In the literary and cultural field in the Telugu states, P. Varavara Rao led that strategy of Brahmin control. In the organisations a Brahmin is given the hold over the written word. Even if others, Shudras/Dalits/Adivasis come into that field, marginalising their written word or making it invisible has been a historical strategy. Varavara Rao with his friends did that quite consistently.

Since the Communist movement gives more weightage to the written word the theory they made Marx into a Brahmin in India and others could never counter it with a strong autonomous strategy of the written word.

Usaa hence started his own journal, a small YouTube studio in his house at the time of his sudden death. Corona took him away from his busy work. However, he made it difficult for the Communists to continue their longtime caste-blind approach and continue Brahminism into the future a life that never rested till he breathed his last.

Kancha Ilaiah Shepherd, a long-time associate of Usaa Barber, is a political theorist and author

See original here:

Usaa, the Greatest Revolutionary Barber After Upali, Dies of Covid-19 - The Citizen

TruckingOffice Integrates TMS with ELD for Seamless Dispatcher Trucker Workflow – PR Web

CANTON, Ohio (PRWEB) August 09, 2020

Imagine being a dispatcher and not really knowing what is happening on the other end with your load deliveries? Or not being able to communicate with your truckers or get updates? Trucking Office understands this problem first-hand and has just released a solution with a new technological advance that connects truckers to dispatchers at every step.

Previously, TMS (Trucking Management Software) and ELDs (Electronic Logging Devices) worked separately. Thanks to TruckingOffice building integrative pieces to combine the two, these devices are now working synonymously.

Trucking companies can use TMS to manage details of dispatching, as an automated invoicing system, to track and manage expenses, and to produce accurate reports (such as IFTA, payments, invoices, and mileage reports). TruckingOffices TMS will also keep track of dispatch records, driver pay records, truck maintenance records and more. The TMS will also do all of the number crunching for you, saving you hours of work. TruckingOffices ELD is an easy-to-install app that works as a logbook and also talks to the VID. This ELD also has a dashboard, where a truck driver can change their duty status, add logs, certify logs, and send over seven days worth of logs to their dispatcher.

TruckingOffices combination of the TMS and ELD is a completely new, integrative approach to the world of trucking. Thanks to this duo, a trucking company can place all of the information that a driver needs into the software. The software will know which driver is taking the load and send all of the required information to the driver on their app. The driver can also use this app to write notes, handle billing, and take pictures that can be sent back to his or her trucking company. The trucking dispatcher will be able to track the haul and receive paperwork while the driver is on the go. This will allow the dispatcher to create an invoice sooner than usual due to the quick communication.

Nobody else has this unique feature. Trucking offices previously used a drastic amount of spreadsheets to maintain information that is compactly, neatly stored within TruckingOffices devices. We have a great TMS and a great ELD. When you put the two of them together its unbeatable, says Allen Campbell, CEO of TruckingOffice. When you take one of the best FMCSA compliant ELD systems and combine it with a fantastic TMS system, you have one of the best pieces of software in trucking history.

TruckingOffice offers this never-before-seen combination at an affordable price. Everything about the way you function as a trucking company changes for the better when you sign on with TruckingOffice.

Share article on social media or email:

Read the original:

TruckingOffice Integrates TMS with ELD for Seamless Dispatcher Trucker Workflow - PR Web

Posted in Tms

Inter-Language Vector Space – Unlocking the Secrets of Language – Slator

Inter-Language Vector Space is a revolutionary approach to L10N AI, on par with Neural MT. Andrzej Zydro CTO at XTM International

This year XTM International, developers of the XTM Cloud enterprise translation management system, introduces Inter-language Vector Space, a technology which maps relationships between words across languages. This powerful and unique AI technology relies on gigantic amounts of data including massive Big Data lexicons, and a crawl of the complete Internet across 250 languages, making up over 31,000 language pairs. The XTM AI team built on research from Google and Facebook engineers to create a versatile and robust AI technology. Vector Space assesses the probability that two words are each others translations, which gives a primary baseline on which to develop Natural Language Processing (NLP) functionality.

Artificial intelligence and Natural Language Processing continue to make important inroads into translation technologies. Recent advances in language processing and modeling using neural networks inspired the creation of the Vector Space technology. Inter-language Vector Space is a framework on which useful AI product features and functionality can be built.

Andrzej Zydro (CTO) put it this way, Inter-language Vector Space is a revolutionary approach to L10N AI, on par with Neural MT. It marks a dramatic paradigm shift for our company from this point on, all upcoming NLP AI functionality will stem from Inter-language Vector Space. The magic behind this technology allows for automatic calculation of probability for meanings of words and phrases across languages. Recent advances in language processing building on previous work at Google and Facebook have enabled XTM to incorporate the multilingual component into what are algorithm-driven calculations. So, for example, the Vector Space probability for the English Spanish pair cat gato is 73% while for cat fuego is only 12%. We cant wait for our users to experience its magical operation first-hand.

Inter-language Vector Space in XTM Cloud

Some of the more time intensive activities that linguists encounter are simple manual tasks during the translation process. As an example, inserting inline elements (placeholder characters) into translated segments involves legwork on the part of the linguist. Transferring inline elements from the source sentence requires the translator to find the correct place to insert them in the target text. This purely technical task can be performed by AI which, thanks to the Inter-language Vector Space, is able to follow the translation word-by-word. If an inline element is put near a certain word in the source text, it is most likely to be transferred near the translation of this word in the target text. This feature helps translators make the right decisions on inline placement, explained Dr. Rafa Jaworski, Linguistic AI Expert from XTM AI team.

Automatic Corpus Alignment is not possible without bilingual dictionary data, XTMs auto-alignment feature makes extensive use of Vector Space technology. Building bilingual terminology from existing parallel source and target files is a labour-intensive process that requires manual cleaning of the output. Vector Space bilingual terminology extraction replaces tedious, repetitive tasks with more efficient intelligent automation. What linguists gain is that they can focus on creative translations, rather than a series of manual or repetitive tasks.

Would you like to know more about Inter-language Vector Space? Tune in to the XTM TechTalk episode to hear Andrzej Zydro (CTO) and Dr. Rafa Jaworski (Linguistic AI Expert) talk about various use cases of Vector Space.

Whats next

The immediate applications of Vector Space have been rolled out in the last two releases of XTM Cloud. Available functionality includes auto-placement of inlines, and auto-bilingual term extraction. During this coming year we plan to release lots more AI functionality powered by Inter-language Vector Space.

Are you curious to find out more about Inter-language Vector Space and how it can impact your translation workflows? Contact our XTM AI team at info@xtm.cloudXTM International

XTM International develops XTM, the worlds leading cloud-based translation management solution (TMS) with an integrated Computer-Aided Translation (CAT) and Computer Aided Review (CAR) tools. It is designed to be scalable, flexible and agile, with industry open standards at its core.

Focused on streamlining complex localization processes and supply chains, XTM centralizes TM assets for real-time collaboration, maximizing translation reuse. The system incorporates in-context WYSIWYG reviews, LQA tests, alternative translations for transcreation, a mobile app for project managers and a REST API with off the shelf connectors for most CMSs.

XTMs customers include many of the worlds leading enterprises, across a wide variety of industries. More information is available at the XTM website or to test XTM Inter-language Vector Space, sign up for a fully featured 30 day trial of XTM Cloud.

Read the original:

Inter-Language Vector Space - Unlocking the Secrets of Language - Slator

Posted in Tms

Transportation Management System (TMS) Market Size and Status 2020 Outlook and Forecast to 2026 – eRealty Express

Global Transportation Management System (TMS) Market report provides a basic overview of the industry including definitions, classifications, applications and industry chain structure. The Transportation Management System (TMS) market analysis is provided for the international markets including development trends, competitive landscape analysis, and key regions development status. The report provides key statistics on the market status of the Transportation Management System (TMS) manufacturers and is a valuable source of guidance and direction for companies and individuals interested in the industry.

This is the latest report, covering the current COVID-19 impact on the market. The pandemic of Coronavirus (COVID-19) has affected every aspect of life globally. This has brought along several changes in market conditions. The rapidly changing market scenario and initial and future assessment of the impact are covered in the report.

In the global Transportation Management System (TMS) market, the following companies are covered:

3GTMS Inc., CargoSmart Ltd., JDA Software Group, Inc., Oracle Corporation, Manhattan Associates Inc., Precision Software Inc., SAP SE, One Network Enterprises Inc.

Click the link to get a Sample Copy of the Report at: (20% customization on reports)

https://www.marketinsightsreports.com/reports/07022130254/global-transportation-management-system-tms-market-growth-status-and-outlook-2020-2025/inquiry?mode=24

Market Segment by Product Type:

Type1, Type2, Type3..

Market Segment by Application:

Food & Beverage

Retail

Manufacturing

Automotive

Others

Key Regions split in this report: breakdown data for each region,

United States

China

European Union

Rest of the World (Japan, Korea, India, and Southeast Asia)

Influence of the Transportation Management System (TMS) market report:

-Comprehensive assessment of all opportunities and risks in the Transportation Management System (TMS) market.

-Transportation Management System (TMS) market recent innovations and major events.

-A detailed study of business strategies for the growth of the Transportation Management System (TMS) market-leading players.

-Conclusive study about the growth plot of the Transportation Management System (TMS) market for forthcoming years.

-In-depth understanding of Transportation Management System (TMS) market-particular drivers, constraints, and major micro markets.

-Favorable impression inside vital technological and market latest trends striking the Transportation Management System (TMS) market.

The report has 150 tables and figures browse the report description and TOC:

https://www.marketinsightsreports.com/reports/07022130254/global-transportation-management-system-tms-market-growth-status-and-outlook-2020-2025?mode=24

What are the market factors that are explained in the report?

-Key Strategic Developments:The study also includes the key strategic developments of the market, comprising R&D, new product launch, M&A, agreements, collaborations, partnerships, joint ventures, and regional growth of the leading competitors operating in the market on a global and regional scale.

-Key Market Features:The Global Transportation Management System (TMS) market report evaluated key market features, including revenue, price, capacity, capacity utilization rate, gross, production, production rate, consumption, import/export, supply/demand, cost, market share, CAGR, and gross margin. In addition, the study offers a comprehensive study of the key market dynamics and their latest trends, along with pertinent market segments and sub-segments.

-Analytical Tools:The Global Transportation Management System (TMS) Market report includes the accurately studied and assessed data of the key industry players and their scope in the market by means of a number of analytical tools. The analytical tools such as Porters five forces analysis, SWOT analysis, feasibility study, and investment return analysis have been used to analyze the growth of the key players operating in the market.

The research includes historic data from 2015 to 2020 and forecasts until 2026 which makes the reports an invaluable resource for industry executives, marketing, sales and product managers, consultants, analysts, and other people looking for key industry data in readily accessible documents with clearly presented tables and graphs.

Contact Us:

Irfan Tamboli (Head of Sales) Market Insights Reports

Phone: + 1704 266 3234 | +91-750-707-8687

[emailprotected]|[emailprotected]

Go here to read the rest:

Transportation Management System (TMS) Market Size and Status 2020 Outlook and Forecast to 2026 - eRealty Express

Posted in Tms

England v Pakistan: talking points from a thrilling first Test – The Guardian

1) How do England manage without Ben Stokes?

With difficulty. The last time he was absent for more than the odd Test was in the 2017-18 Ashes, when he was helping Bristol police with their inquiries. England lost 4-0, and it was hard to say what they missed most Stokess batting, his bowling, or his blazing presence. This summer, though, they have already had to do without him to an extent. In the third Test against West Indies, he couldnt bowl; in the first Test against Pakistan, he barely batted, making nought and nine. And he has been dropping catches. If he was superhuman in the first two Covid Tests, he has been a mere mortal in the last two. Since his debut, Englands record is much the same whether Stokes is on board (won 30, lost 29, drawn eight) or not (won eight, lost seven, drawn three). His usual understudy is Sam Curran, the man with the golden home record (played eight, won eight). But this time it has to be a batsman, as a fifth bowler had already been brought in to bowl Stokess overs. Cometh the hour, cometh Zak Crawley. Curran may sneak in too, depending on

In English cricket, theres one surefire way to make everybody love you: stick around for ages. Alastair Cook, who played 161 Tests and then retired after a ropey last few years, was rewarded with an instant knighthood. Ian Botham, who followed a long and thrilling career as a cricketer with a long and plodding one as a commentator, is heading, rather bizarrely, for the House of Lords. The latest venerable veteran is Jimmy Anderson who, unlike Cook or Botham, has got better while getting older until now. This summer he has looked good, run in hard, touched 87mph, racked up maidens, yet somehow mislaid his mojo. He has taken six wickets in 92 overs while a fellow oldie (Stuart Broad) has 22 in 92.4 and a fellow swinger (Chris Woakes) has 15 in 91. If England are still rotating, Anderson is due a rest; if not, he may well be, very tactfully, dropped. Its significant the selectors have sent for Ollie Robinson, the Brighton McGrath. He surely has more chance than a fading maestro of making his mark on the 2021-22 Ashes, and needs blooding soon.

It was said of Steve Waugh after he beat his twin, Mark, to a Baggy Green that he wasnt even the best player in his family. At Taunton, Dom Bess isnt seen as the best spinner in Somerset hes behind Jack Leach. All summer England have preferred Bess, whos easily the better fielder and batsman, unless youre looking for an epic one not out. Leach is clearly the more incisive bowler, taking a Test wicket every 60 balls as against 80 for Bess, who was unlucky with Jos Buttlers handiwork last week but doesnt often trouble top players. As a left-armer Leach is also more of a threat to Pakistans batsmen, who are nearly all right-handed. He may be rusty, after falling ill before lockdown and being ignored since, but these weird times have shown rust is less of a handicap than we thought.

With his fearless 75, Buttler had his finest hour in a white shirt but only because he had just had a nightmare. He stressed he had been trying to atone for his wicketkeeping, which had been not good enough. His honesty was impressive. And now theres talk of letting Buttler play as a batsman, as he did for a year from May 2018. Bringing Ben Foakes back as keeper would sharpen the fielding. But Buttler has another role behind the stumps: being Joe Roots left-hand man. Root, more of a good guy than a born boss, heads a triumvirate. Standing at first slip, he relies on his neighbours: Stokes as the alpha male who makes things happen, Buttler as the thinker who stays cool when the battle heats up. Deprived of one consigliere, Root is unlikely to dislodge the other.

Every time a Covid Test is played, another piece of received wisdom goes up in smoke. We now see that its fine to hold three Tests on the trot at the same ground, something that had never happened in England in 140 years, as long as you have a groundsman like Matt Merchant, who laid on three results, three absorbing contests and opportunities for everyone. We now see that a crowd, though desirable, is not indispensable. Pakistan brought their own noise. England made their own match-winning momentum. The great community of cricket lovers carried on regardless, watching on Sky, listening to TMS, following the live blogs, fitting the drama into real life, tapping on clips on their phones, relishing the elegance of Babar Azam, the exuberance of Yasir Shah, the audacity of Ollie Pope, the composure of Buttler, the wonder of Woakes, the unbeatable undulations of long-form sport.

Read the original post:

England v Pakistan: talking points from a thrilling first Test - The Guardian

Posted in Tms

High time to fully appreciate the all-round value of Chris Woakes – The Guardian

It would be easy to paint Chris Woakes as an underrated England cricketer but the truth is, it rather depends where you look and who you listen to. And, perhaps, those days are in the rearview mirror now anyway.

On the drive back from Manchester late on Saturday evening I passed Edgbaston and for a good few years now the side of the stadium has been adorned with a huge photo of the Brummie Botham/Sutton Coldfield Sobers (delete as per taste both if you have any).

Chat to league players in the area who encountered Walmley in the Birmingham Premier League 15 years ago and they recall a dedicated, fresh-faced kid among the men who batted top four, sliced and diced with the new ball you could hear the seam whizzing down a former opponent said on Sunday and was destined to soar.

Speak to the Warwickshire players, support staff or members and youll only get the image of a selfless and talented professional. The operations manager, Keith Cook, has seen hundreds of players come and go during the 47 years at Edgbaston that earned him a British Empire Medal last year and places him in his all-time Bears XI.

Without a doubt hed be in there, says Cook. Hes a match-winner but a fantastic human being as well. The world would be a better place with more Woakesys around.

And then there are his England colleagues. Before last years World Cup, for example, a video circulated online in which teammates were asked to sum up Woakes. Words like perfect, pure and classy abound so too a few nods to the impeccable hair while Eoin Morgan and Jos Buttler reference the unflappable temperament.

Jason Roy sounds envious of the best cover drive you have ever seen and though seemingly devoid of ego off the field my league cricketer friend describes a player only interested in what he is up to when paths cross these days Englands one-day opener notes an element of get out of my face when Woakes is in the heat of battle.

Over four days in Manchester these attributes not least the shot Roy covets all came to the fore, with top-order wickets, 103 runs over two innings and ice in his veins during a run chase that saw him seize the initiative with Jos Buttler and deliver on a plan to stay a touch leg side, use his eye and be proactive.

It was not the first Test match where his all-round game has aligned. Pakistan received a dose on their summer here in 2016, while his maiden Test century against India was a match in which he knocked over Virat Kohli. But perhaps, belatedly, it was the performance that hammered home what a valuable red-ball cricketer England have here (something Morgans white-ball set-up realised a good while back).

Because there is still a question to be asked as to how the Test brains trust view him at times, beyond talk of Mr Dependable. A generous assessment of Woakes bowling just five overs in Pakistans second innings, during which he dispatched Azhar Ali and Babar Azam, is that Joe Root was saving his energy for the impending job of batting at No 7.

The tourists were rolled regardless but it still looked slightly odd, so too when, having tested front pads and both edges more than anyone, the captain asked him to deploy a bumper plan on day two despite Jofra Archer being similarly fresh.

Michael Vaughan, who by Saturday evening announced he was intending to set up a Chris Woakes appreciation society, questioned on TMS 24 hours earlier how much he demands the ball. Root will know the answer but, either way, he is the one charged with spotting who the force is currently with, not just who is badgering him the most.

Then for all this praise, some will bark, what about his overseas bowling average? And yes its true that 51 is more than twice the 22 at home that, among English seamers with more than his 85 wickets, is bettered only by Alec Bedser and Fred Trueman.

But think back to his showing in Hamilton in the winter a true heartbreaker of a pitch for the bowlers or Johannesburg. There is evidence of a corner being turned with the Kookaburra, after advice from consultant Darren Gough to smash the surface harder for more movement. He is 31 now and, believe it or not, players can get better.

Woakes didnt start the summer, to far less noise than Stuart Broads omission, yet with two Tests to go it is hard not to wonder if it is time Root harnessed the wave he is riding more.

The news of Ben Stokes leaving the camp increases Woakes all-round value but he can still be afforded greater access to the new ball and the clutch moments. Rather than just admiring the form horse, England should empower him further.

Go here to see the original:

High time to fully appreciate the all-round value of Chris Woakes - The Guardian

Posted in Tms