Cork woman’s book reminds children that they’re awesome – EchoLive.ie

ITS not surprising that Geraldine ONeill, of Glounthaune, created a unique keepsake for children for the year 2020. William Fitzpatrick, Geraldines dad, penned poetry and prose too.

He was a great storyteller and poet, says Geraldine.

My Creativity Book, created by Geraldine and designed by her daughter Erin ONeill, is in aid of the Childrens Unit in Cork University Hospital.

If ever there was a year to do it then this was it, says Geraldine. The pandemic threw up challenging times for everybody.

Like everybody everywhere, Geraldine went through her own challenging times.

I lost my husband Martin last October. We were married 43 years. After he passed away a close family member suffered mental emotional issues and I stayed in a hotel in Dublin for 13 weeks to support her while she was in hospital there, says Geraldine.

This will be remembered globally as a challenging year.

I think everyone felt more vulnerable during Covid-19.

Geraldine, a former teacher, who took over Fitzpatricks in 1976 with her husband Martin and extended the shop, is a people-person with a special affinity for children.

Ive always been interested in children and their wellbeing, she says.

Reflecting back on my own childhood it was a case of being seen and not heard! I think every child is unique and they should know that the most important person in the world is themselves. A child can be anyone they like.

Geraldine has a personal message for every child inside her My Creativity Book.

You are all awesome and what matters is you.

Children always mattered to Geraldine.

Children were always special to me and always very welcome in our store, she says.

It has been a source of great sadness to us that due to the size of our premises and social distancing requirements, we have not been in a position to allow children to come inside for recent months, and we missed their presence greatly.

Geraldine, a mother of six, knows that children are at the core of family and community.

Children are such a precious gift to their families and to their community, she says.

This book; My Creativity Book, was created with the intention of acknowledging and honouring childrens contribution in how, by staying at home, they kept everyone safe. I hope children can enjoy the opportunity that the book offers them to connect with their creativity, their genius, their feelings and uniqueness.

It is not surprising that Geraldine chose the Childrens Unit CUH as the cause benefiting from the proceeds of the book.

It does wonderful work for sick children, she says.

The doctors and nurses working in the Childrens Unit look after sick children, giving them the best of care and support.

My Creativity Book is a keepsake for every child featuring the Fitzies Five, The Kindness Tree, games, quizzes, colour, and design.

As well as fun challenges, there are baking tips, treasure hunts, and even a beautiful story from grandad Fitzpatrick.

Kids love activity and learning, appreciating their creative side, says Geraldine.

Most of all, the creativity book is an affirmation for every child that they are special and they are awesome.

The book was a family affair.

There were lots of Zoom sessions from Dubai where Erin lives, says Geraldine.

My daughter, Kerri, who manages the shop, was involved in the design too. It was printed by my sister Carmel Waterman, of Carrig Print.

Geraldines dad, William, who started one of the first delis in Cork, was an imaginative storyteller. The 30 Steps is a fairy story that he wrote for his own seven children.

Dad wrote the story in 1965 and I included it in the book with a modern twist, says Geraldine.

The story has a powerful message.

The 30 Steps is all about empowerment, says Geraldine.

Princess Geraldine, devising an ingenious plan seeking a suitor, finds her knight in shining armour. The young man, one of many candidates for the Princesss hand, delayed meeting her to fix the last flagstone at the top of the 30 steps at the royal palace.

Grandad William wrote: A great king is required to have the kindness and wisdom to put his own well-being and that of another before his desire for riches and gold.

The story had great appeal for us as children, says Geraldine.

Geraldine, who went back to college doing a four year relationship course with Dr Tony Humphries, later doing a parenting course, says there is an inner child in all of us.

I think adults will relate to the creativity book too, she says.

It gives us an opportunity to tap into our inner child that comes out in us when we feel vulnerable. The messages in the book are meaningful.

It is a book that cites each individuals superpowers kindness, cleverness, imagination, creativity, friendliness, strength, uniqueness. Skills of giving hugs, singing, speed, and baking are other important assets to appreciate.

The Creativity is a great gift book, says Geraldine.

And we hope to raise 10,000 for the Childrens Unit.

It is a wonderful keepsake for 2020.

My Creativity Book by Geraldine ONeill is 10 from Fitzpatricks shop, Glounthaune. All proceeds to the Childrens Unit at Cork University Hospital.

Visit link:

Cork woman's book reminds children that they're awesome - EchoLive.ie

Empathy is a Keyword in This Years Election, But What Does It Mean Exactly? – BELatina

As with any election year, youll hear many different buzz words and key phrases relating to voting issues throughout the campaign trail during debates, conventions, political ads, and on the news.

That said, in most election years, those buzz words are more related to policies, candidate stances on various issues, and current events that will undoubtedly be impacted by the election outcome and elected administration.

In 2016 specifically, the Pew Research Center reported that voters top issues when deciding who to vote for included the economy, terrorism, foreign policy, health care, and gun violence.

While many of those issues were important then and are still important now, a lot has changed. This year one of the most important words youll hear about as you prepare to cast your ballot is empathy. But what exactly does that mean?

Its no secret that 2020 has been a year of suffering for so many across the nation and around the world. This year hurts. And the person we vote for in November is the person were putting in charge of easing that pain and fixing those problems. No pressure.

Because of the gravity of this election and the countrys current state, one of the most common keywords we hear on the road to the White House is empathy. Most notably, the claims that President Trump lacks empathy and Democratic nominee Joe Biden is the empathetic leader we need to restore decency in America.

It seems that this year, on top of the many crucial issues well be voting on from immigration to the global pandemic to national security, the economy, and racial injustice well also be asked to vote based on a persons ability to understand the feelings of another.

Sure, it might seem like empathy would be a noticeable character trait for anyone running for office or running for any leadership position, for that matter. But as many of us have learned in the past four years, empathy is not a guarantee from our president, and compassion might just be what this country needs to repair all that is broken in our nation.

According to Merriam-Webster dictionary, empathy is the action of understanding, being aware of, being sensitive to, and vicariously experiencing the feelings, thoughts, and experience of another of either the past or present without having the feelings, thoughts, and experience fully communicated in an objectively explicit manner.

However, it seems this skill goes beyond just understanding other people.

Empathy is the ability to recognize, understand, and share the thoughts and feelings of another person, animal, or fictional character, according to Psychology Today. And that ability to relate to others and respect others perspectives is essential.

Developing empathy is crucial for establishing relationships and behaving compassionately. It involves experiencing another persons point of view, rather than just ones own, and enables prosocial, or helping behaviors that come from within, rather than being forced.

Its important to note that empathy is not the same thing as sympathy. Although many people use those terms interchangeably or falsely assume they are the same.

Sympathy is feeling concerned for someone else and hoping that they become happier. Empathy is more than just concern; it involves sharing another persons emotions and having compassion for how they feel and what they are going through, which often leads to a desire to act on their behalf.

Simply put, empathy is the ability to put yourself in someone elses shoes, see their perspective, feel their pain, and consider their feelings. And while it may seem as if empathy is strictly a social-emotional skill one many of us learned during our formative years growing up and in school its so much more than that, especially for a world leader.

It became increasingly evident at the Democratic National Convention that empathy and politics are not separate concepts or unrelated terms. They are not only deeply intertwined but also must coexist for all elected officials, from the president to local leaders, to effectively lead.

Several personality traits are essential for an individual to be an effective, inspirational, and successful leader. Organization, confidence, commitment, accountability, empowerment, and integrity are all important, of course. But according to experts, empathy is as important as those other qualities, if not the most essential leadership skill. And this applies to both the workplace and the political realm.

In his column for Entrepreneur, Leadership Keynote Speaker and CEO Coach Krister Ungerboeck argues that empathy has never been needed more by influential and powerful leaders. If the hardships and frightening reality of 2020 have taught us anything, its that we need leaders with empathy.

Teams led by people who possess high emotional intelligence tend to work hard and persevere through rough patches. They also develop deeper bonds of trust, which are essential when employment statuses seem all too fragile, he explains.

Although Ungerboeck refers to the working world, where empathetic leaders are essential in helping guide others through these difficult times, the assessment also works for our argument.

In more broad terms, ranging from business to politics and everything in between, empathy is an essential tool to ensure leaders are actually as impactful and effective as they want to be.

Psychiatrist and psychoanalyst Prudy Gourguechon explains, empathy enables you to know if the people youre trying to reach are actually reached.

She adds empathy is as much about building a leadership strategy as it is about building connections. Empathy allows you to predict the effect your decisions and actions will have on core audiences and strategize accordingly. Without empathy, you cant build a team or nurture a new generation of leaders. You will not inspire followers or elicit loyalty, she tells Forbes.com.

Once upon a time, empathy may have been seen as a sign of weakness, a personality trait that shows vulnerability or an indication you are soft or a quality that would hinder your ability to lead. But the exact opposite is true, experts argue.

Just consider what a difference empathy can make in our countrys leadership. An empathetic leader would not look at the growing number of COVID-19-related deaths and say with a stone-cold stare, it is what it is. A compassionate leader would not spout racist remarks, calling COVID-19 the China virus, despite being told how harmful that misnomer may be.

A person with empathy would not mock others because of their disability and would not tear families apart at the border or send children to detention centers. A leader with empathy would not spend most of the time during a coronavirus task force briefing focusing on self-praise and blaming others while dedicating very little time to expressing condolences for victims of the virus. (Trump spent 45 minutes praising his administration and himself, and two hours attacking others, while he only spent 4 and 1/2 minutes out of the total 13 hours expressing condolences, according to a Washington Post review.)

One of Joe Bidens key strategies on the campaign trail is to play up the empathy card, clearly showcasing his ability to relate to others and understand their struggles as the result of his own experiences, both personal and professional.

From the loss of his wife and daughter to the more recent loss of his son and even his own fathers struggles to find work several decades ago Biden has made one thing very clear: he understands where Americans are coming from, and he plans to represent all Americans if elected.

While Ill be a Democratic candidate, Ill be an American president, he said. Ill work hard for those who didnt support me, as hard for them as I did for those who did vote for me. Thats the job of a president to represent all of us, not just our base or our party. This is not a partisan moment; this must be an American moment.

And Vice-Presidential nominee Kamala Harris echoed those sentiments in her acceptance speech:

[My mother] pushed us to see a world beyond ourselves. She taught us to be conscious and compassionate about the struggles of all people. To believe public service is a noble cause and the fight for justice is a shared responsibility.

She continued to say that she accepts the nomination for Vice President of the United States of America with a commitment to serve a country where we may not agree on every detail, but we are united by the fundamental belief that every human being is of infinite worth, deserving of compassion, dignity, and respect.

They are both clearly focusing heavily on their ability to not only possess and practice empathy as world leaders but also the dire need for a President who will be able to practice empathy and unite the nation during a year of unthinkable loss of lives and livelihoods.

Only time will tell just how much Americans will actually vote with empathy in mind and how important empathy will be in selecting the next leader of our country. But one thing is for sure: decency, compassion, and caring about others is most definitely on the ballot this year.

Continue reading here:

Empathy is a Keyword in This Years Election, But What Does It Mean Exactly? - BELatina

The week in TV: I Hate Suzie; Peter: The Human Cyborg; A Suitable Boy and more review – The Guardian

I Hate Suzie (Sky Atlantic) | sky.comThe Unbelievable Story of Carl Beech (BBC Two) | iPlayerThe Truth About Cosmetic Treatments (BBC One) | iPlayerPeter: The Human Cyborg (Channel 4) | 40DA Suitable Boy (BBC One) | iPlayer

Not Billie Pipers intent, no doubt, to outshine every other actor on screen. It just comes naturally. Her latest outing, I Hate Suzie, which she co-created with Lucy Prebble, is a humdinger, and despite genuine in-depth quality to the cast Leila Farzad, Daniel Ings the eyes are drawn remorselessly to Piper, even walking through a crowd or filling a glass in a corner of a vast country kitchen.

Suzie Pickles is a thirtysomething ex-teen star (as is Piper herself) whose phone photos are hacked from the cloud and leaked online. Cue shame, humiliation, public disdain, marriage meltdown and a wholly new questioning of what it means to be famous in an age famed for its censorious hypocrisy.

Piper is now quite the feted actor she remains, for Yerma at the Young Vic, unique in record-breaking critical garlands and quite the grown-up former teen star, quite apart from a couple of interesting marriages (Chris Evans, Laurence Fox). Yet even she, with relative power, has spoken of frustration at getting broadcasters to admit there might be room for possibly more than one drama about a woman falling apart before our eyes every couple of years.

She and Prebble, then, have saved their powder for Sky Atlantic, and it has done them proud. The opening episode (of eight), shown as part of a double bill on Thursday, certainly showcased this as mainly witty and wise; later it will get significantly darker, and all the better for it.

I especially loved the fact that on the fateful morning, when first her mum and then her scary best friend/agent (Farzad) call to tell her of the leak, the team of hipsters that trooped through her door for a photoshoot pot-plant carriers, dog stylists, photographers et al were supremely aware of Suzies fame, but it was just fame as a nebulous aspirational concept: no one knew what she actually did, because none of them watched telly. This is one of the more obviously in-jokes in a bittersweet satire that teems with subtler digs about the many prices of fame, and those who have the power to confer and wilfully destroy. Immense.

The Unbelievable Story of Carl Beech, aka the Nick of the entirely fabricated VIP paedo ring, must still give some hardened coppers midnight sweats. Its not just the lack of even the most cursory investigation of the laughable list of injuries (snake bites?) imposed by the alleged torturers Edward Heath, Leon Brittan etc, and they didnt even interview Beechs wife until about two years later. But its mainly that.

The normally impressive film-maker Vanessa Engle, while still forensic in her processing, may have let off too lightly both Tom Watson and a few of the media organisations, the BBC included, which had taken up the cudgels (I suspect the programme was carefully lawyered). But she certainly illuminated, by pointing out the danger, post-Savile, of the pendulum being allowed to swing in the entire opposite direction. Surely the absolutism of believing every word a victim ever says is the same absolutism as believing nothing they ever say?

I wish I hadnt watched in the same direct timeline The Truth About Cosmetic Treatments doc and Peter: The Human Cyborg, though at least I managed it in the right order. Had I tackled the impossibly brave story of Peter Scott-Morgan first, I honestly doubt whether Id have had the compassion to tackle a few whiny niggles about crows feet with anything other than withering savagery.

As it was, Michael Mosley, in a double-hander with Mehreen Baig, performed a valuable service in highlighting the strange lacuna that makes the UK about the only place on the globe where the 3bn annual cosmetic industry is almost entirely unregulated. In one survey, 83% of practitioners were found to have no medical training.

For this was not about outright surgery but soft surgery injections of hyaluronics and Botox, of limited longevity, which can be administered on the high street, in salons or by Superdrug, and demand for which has grown exponentially during lockdown. Soft surgery lies, I took from this, somewhere between the hilarious super-scam of sugar-pill homeopathy and the less fun stuff under knockout gas on the slab. And its growingly acceptable even for twentysomethings, who really dont have anything to worry about yet. Yet even Mosley grew, for him, almost cross when he said: I would certainly recommend that you check the qualifications of the person whos about to stick needles in your face.

The concluding episode this week will ask Are selfies to blame for our obsession with cosmetic surgery?, which means at least a third of an hours programme will be about a question that could simply be dealt with in a three-letter answer.

And so to Peter Scott-Morgan, an impressive ebullience of a man who was diagnosed with motor neurone disease a few years ago and decided technology was his only way out of a death sentence. Helped immensely by his being one of the worlds leading roboticists and possibly the leading expert on complex-system dynamics.

From his home in Torbay, Scott-Morgan and his partner of 40 years, Frank, have for four years planned his transformation into a human cyborg. We saw Scott-Morgan, astonishingly, standing, breathing and feeding anew, every vicious little MND attack countered by sheer clever. He was stoic and cheerful in the main, although the poignancy of having to choose ones last few spoken words before the tracheotomy consigned him to voicebox forever, was terribly affecting. This documentary left him in mid-March. An urgent update from Channel 4 soonest, please! Just to let us know hes surviving lockdown lock-in.

A Suitable Boy ended its Sunday run with garlands and sweet smiles, a breathless railway station proposal, a be-petalled wedding, sunsets all round. Lata married the nice safe shoemaker, who unselfishly loved her, rather than eloping with passion; Im hoping the entitled poet and (especially) his truly crap verse never really got a look-in.

While going down well enough with some audiences, Ive always been conscious of this series frustrated desire to do justice to Vikram Seths anvil of a novel, hence it has seemed underwhelming. The performances, and certainly the settings, were there; the ambition wasnt. It suffered perhaps from a six-week-only run, although maybe budgets wouldnt stretch to 10.

I think the mistake was, from the off, to have all characters speaking not Hindi or Urdu but either cut-glass English or an unfortunate singsong simulacrum of the same that just reminded one of dire Milligan-Sellers head-waggery. Subtitles are no longer to be feared: the BBC surely learned that from its Saturday Beeb Four Scandi-dramas, so why not for its mainstream Sunday nights? Patronising? Oh, how clever of you to notice

Once-feted adapter Andrew Davies did well to cram a lot into a relatively tiny sack, and some at least will have learned a vague little about the tense dual birth of the Indian subcontinent. Yet, coming soon after his rightly maligned Sanditon, I suspect Davies will not be counting 2019-2020 as a most suitable year.

Read the original here:

The week in TV: I Hate Suzie; Peter: The Human Cyborg; A Suitable Boy and more review - The Guardian

Cable Almost Wiped Out an Alien Race – But He Didn’t Finish the Job – CBR – Comic Book Resources

Cable's lastest battle leads the mutant to almost wipe out an entire race, but there may be a vengeful survivor out there.

WARNING: The following contains spoilers for Cable #4 by Gerry Duggan, Phil Noto, & VC's Joe Sabino, on sale now

Many of the X-Men's newest foes have been moving in the shadows and preparing to bring down the new mutant nation of Krakoa. But one major threat that almost targeted the entire world with wanton destruction was the Spaceknights, who came into conflict with Cable since he stole their ancestral sword.

And now, Cable just pretty effectively wiped outthe Spaceknights of Galador, except for Xerek, the seemingly last member of the species in Cable #4.

RELATED:X-Men Just Teased House of X's Most Important Timeline

The Spaceknights of Galador were created centuries ago on the world of Galador to combat the encroaching threat of the deadly Dire Wraiths. Taking a number of citizens of the planet and converting them into powerful cyborg warriors, the Spaceknights became a formidable force for a time. Eventually lost across the cosmos once Galador was destroyed by the Builders in the lead-up to Infinity, a number of them have recently made their way to Earth in search of the Spaceknight blade, the Light of Galador, which has been found and claimed by Cable.

Initially, their plan was to wipe out the native species and take the planet for themselves, converting it into a new Galador. But Cable was able to briefly soothe over the conflicts, instead offering to use the time-machine built within the original Cable's T-O transformed arm to teleport them back in time so they could instead save their world. Realizing the inherent threat of allowing the cyborg army to simply go back and change the future of the universe, Cable instead utilized a nuclear bomb hidden within the arm to wipe out the Spaceknights as they were assembled around him. Barely escaping through a newly formed Krakoa gate seconds before the bomb went off, Cable and Esme were able to largely wipe out the Spaceknights, and thus take out most of what remained of the Galador peoples.

RELATED:Cable Just Saved Two Worlds by Robbing a Hero's Grave

However, unbeknownst to Cable, it appears that at least one Spaceknight survived. In the final moments of life, before the nuke went off, one of the Spaceknights was able to convey a message out into the cosmos. The message was sent 1.5 seconds before the other Spaceknights were wiped out, and was sent to alert the last confirmed Galadorian Knight to the fate of his kin. It turns out that one remaining knight, Xerek, was still in suspended animation when the rest of the knights came to Earth. This means that there's still one last Spaceknight (although the message also admits there's a chance there are still other Spaceknights undiscovered across the galaxy). This last Spaceknight could eventually decide to target Earth - and specifically Cable - to try and take vengeance over the loss of the rest of his number.

The warning meant for Xerek includes a solid breakdown of Cable's powers, as well as warnings about the potential danger of the X-Men -- suggesting that if Xerek ever does awaken and come for the X-Men, they'll know to be cautious before engaging with the mutants. While Cable may have removed a major potential threat to the universe, he may have also painted a very specific target on his back -- especially as he's still carrying the Light of Galador intoX of Swords.

KEEP READING: Cable Sets Up Its Mutant Hero For Heartbreak, Again & Again

X-Men Anatomy: The 5 Weirdest Facts About Colossus' Body

Originally posted here:

Cable Almost Wiped Out an Alien Race - But He Didn't Finish the Job - CBR - Comic Book Resources

Alita: Battle Angel 2 Rodriguez spills the beans about the upcoming sci-fi! – The TeCake

One of the most famous cyberpunk-action film, Alita: Battle Angel, is soon coming up with its sequel, Alita: Battle Angel 2, produced by James Cameron. It has been directed by Robert Rodriguez and adapted from Gunnm,a Japanese manga series by Yukito Kishiro. The first part of the series was premiered on January 31, 2019, and has been into the limelight since then. It has been one of the highest-grossing films under Rodriguezs direction that has acquired an average rating of 8.2 out of 10. After the blockbuster outcome, the makers are all set to come up with its sequel.

The story revolves around a battle cyborg, named Alita, who was rescued by a doctor whose name is Ido. He soon discovers that this cyborg has none other than the soul of a teenager. Later Alita sets out in the mission of finding out her true identity.

Nothing has been revealed regarding the release date of the upcoming second part of the science fiction. Alita: Battle Angelwas first aired in the month of January of 2019, so one can expect the upcoming sequel to drop sometime in early 2021 or mid 2021. Although there are very few chances of the upcoming movie to release anytime soon because of the outbreak of COVID-19 pandemic, earlier this year. All releases and the productions were put on hold since March 2020. According to some sources, the production of Alita: Battle Angel 2is in process already, as it doesnt require outside shooting or any physical labor. It is hoped that we will be able to catch a glimpse of the movie by summer of 2021.

In case of the cast, all the lead members would be returning in their respective roles. Undoubtedly Rosa Salazar shall be resuming her role as Alita in the lead along with all the other actors. There might be new faces in the upcoming action anime, which has not been confirmed by any of the official sources yet.

No trailer has been released by any of the official sources of the franchise. One can expect the official teaser to drop a month or two prior to the release of the upcoming movie. So until we get hold of further more updates, stay tuned, and if you havent yet watched the first part of the franchise, then do give it a watch. It is totally worth the shot!

Excerpt from:

Alita: Battle Angel 2 Rodriguez spills the beans about the upcoming sci-fi! - The TeCake

MCU Fans Think ‘Captain Marvel 2’ Could be One of the Best Marvel Movies – Showbiz Cheat Sheet

Brie Larson, Academy Award-winning actress, will reprise her role of Carol Danvers, better known as Captain Marvel in the upcoming sequel Captain Marvel 2. Anna Boden and Ryan Fleck directed the 2019 Marvel Cinematic Universe (MCU) film, Captain Marvel. The first film in the franchise made waves as the first Marvel solo film to have a female as the lead. Boden was the first woman director for an MCU movie. Captain Marvel 2will also make history with another first; Nia DaCosta is the first Black female director for a Marvel movie.

Though much is left unknown about what will happen in Captain Marvel 2, there are a few signs that indicate which direction the film may go in. Rumor has it that Captain Marvel 2 will feature flashbacks to the elapsed time between Infinity War and Endgame.

With the departure of Iron Man, Captain America, and Black Widow in Marvels Avengers: Endgame, the stage has been set for new superheroes to enter the MCU. Captain Marvel is an incredible superhero; she even stood her ground against Thanos. Thanos used the Power Stone to ward off Captain Marvel. A hero as powerful as Captain Marvel needs an equally as formidable nemesis. It is entirely possible that Captain Marvels comic book nemesis, Moonstone, also known as evil Ms. Marvel, may enter the MCU in Captain Marvel 2. Moonstone would be a daunting adversary for the superhero and could also set the stage for an upcoming Dark Avengers film.

Marvel insider, Roger Wardell, has indicated that Korvac could be the main villain in Captain Marvel 2. If the part-cyborg villain plays a central role in the upcoming film, it could set the stage for Captain Marvel to eventually join forces with the Guardians of the Galaxy. In the Marvel comic books, Korvac is an enemy of the Guardians and Thor.

RELATED: MCU: Why Horror Movie Directors Like Nia DaCosta Are Perfect for Directing Superhero Films

DaCosta will direct the upcoming Captain Marvel 2. Fans took to Twitter to show their support for the film director. One fan tweeted, Guarantee you her sequel is going to be 200% better than the first. DaCosta is making history as the first black woman to direct a Marvel movie. DaCosta is a rising filmmaker best known for directing the 2018 drama Little Woods, and the yet-to-be-released 2020 thriller Candyman.

Marvel is well known for hiring up-and-coming directors and cast members to showcase their talent and launch their careers in Hollywood. However, it wasnt until recent years that women filmmakers experienced increased opportunity to direct significant blockbusters.

RELATED: Avengers 5: How the Choice of Director for Captain Marvel 2 Could Set Up Marvels Next Big Crossover

Fans are anxiously awaiting the premiere of DaCostas Captain Marvel 2 in July 2022. Captain Marvel fans have posted on social media how great of a film they hope it will be. One fan, tweeted, this will be the best MCU film.

With a star-studded cast, skilled director, and new characters, Captain Marvel 2 is sure to be a hit blockbuster. It is beautiful to see increasing diversity and inclusion for the MCU cast and crew. Captain Marvel 2 has a lot of potentials for new characters and villains to enter the MCU.

As the MCU steps into phase 4, there is a lot of anticipation and excitement surrounding the next MCU films, including Black Widow, Black Panther 2, Shang-Chi and the Legend of the Ten Rings,and Captain Marvel 2.

Go here to see the original:

MCU Fans Think 'Captain Marvel 2' Could be One of the Best Marvel Movies - Showbiz Cheat Sheet

Russian agency created fake leftwing news outlet with fictional editors, Facebook says – The Guardian

The Russian agency that interfered in the 2016 US election created a fake leftwing news publication, staffed it with fake editors with AI-generated photos and hired real freelance reporters as part of a fresh influence operation detected and removed by Facebook, the company said on Tuesday.

The latest operation by the Internet Research Agency (IRA) was still in its early stages when it was detected thanks to a tip from the FBI, according to Facebooks head of security policy, Nathaniel Gleicher. The network had 13 accounts and two pages, with about 14,000 total followers.

The Facebook accounts and pages were designed to bolster PeaceData.net, an English- and Arabic-language website that claims to be a global news organization, but whose editorial staff are fictitious. Headshots of PeaceDatas staff were created using Generative Adversarial Networks, a type of AI that can produce lifelike images of faces, according to Graphika, a social media analysis firm that produced a report on the IRA operation.

They put substantial effort into creating elaborate fictitious personas, trying to make fake accounts look as real as possible, Gleicher said.

Many of the characters had profiles on Twitter and LinkedIn. Twitter said on Tuesday that it had suspended five accounts associated with PeaceData for platform manipulation that we can reliably attribute to Russian state actors. The company said tweets from the accounts were low quality and spammy, and that it would block links to content from PeaceData. LinkedIn did not immediately respond to a query.

Much of PeaceDatas content was copied from other websites, though some was produced by unwitting freelance reporters. Advertisements on Upwork and Guru.com offered a flat rate of $75 to entry-level writers. Major topics for the site included armed conflict, human rights abuses (especially by the US and UK), corruption, and the environment, as well as WikiLeaks, the coronavirus pandemic and the baseless QAnon conspiracy theory.

Four freelance journalists who wrote for PeaceData told the Guardian that they had been approached by one of PeaceDatas editors on Twitter, LinkedIn or by email with an offer to write for the site. Two were early-career writers who had recently been laid off and were eager to establish themselves; two were more experienced writers. The Guardian agreed to let them speak anonymously because they were concerned for their careers.

The writers only learned of the deception from news reports or reporters inquiries. One of the experienced journalists said that PeaceData had paid $250 up front, which was unusual, then ghosted her after publishing one piece. I didnt imagine a scam would have paid me up front like that, she said.

Another writer said he was approached via direct message on Twitter and offered $200-$250 a piece, more than he was usually paid for writing.

I was just trying to get more bylines and get paid to do what I want to do, he said. Ive interacted with editors who do far less than what they were doing, and they paid faster than some publications ... Im a freelance writer Im used to being taken advantage of.

PeaceDatas coverage of the US portrayed the country as war-mongering and law-breaking abroad while being racked by racism, Covid-19, and cutthroat capitalism at home, according to the report. The outlet was negative toward Donald Trump, but Graphika found that its treatment of his Democratic rival Joe Biden and vice-presidential nominee Kamala Harris was noteworthy for its hostile tone.

The US-focused content of PeaceData appeared designed to build a leftwing audience and steer it away from Bidens campaign, according to the Graphika analysis. UK-focused content similarly appeared to appeal to leftwing audiences with attacks on the Labour party leader, Keir Starmer, for being too centrist.

The operation targeted supporters of Bernie Sanders and democratic socialists in the US and supporters of Jeremy Corbyn in the UK by having one of the fake accounts, the fictitious Alex Lacusta, post links to PeaceData articles in affiliated Facebook groups.

The IRA also used unwitting users to attempt to obtain authorization from Facebook to run political ads in the US, the company said. Facebook implemented the authorization process for political advertisers after the 2016 election, when the IRA was able to spend about $100,000 some of it in rubles on ads that targeted US voters with divisive messaging.

An unsigned statement posted on PeaceDatas website said allegations the site was a Russian propaganda tool were an ugly lie.

Both Facebook and Graphika concluded that the operation had been detected and taken down before causing significant damage.

It follows a steady pattern where particularly Russian actors have gotten better at hiding who they are, but their impact is smaller and smaller and they are getting caught earlier, Gleicher said. These actors are caught between a rock and hard place: run a large network that gets caught quickly or run a small network that has limited reach.

The operations greatest success to the extent that it had any lay in its ability to co-opt unwitting authors to write its content, the Graphika analysis concludes. The IRAs 13 accounts managed to deceive that pinpoint audience; they do not appear to have reached a substantially larger one.

Twitter appealed to governments around the world to stop attempting to deceive users through similar operations.

Regardless of the low-level impact in this case, governments around the world must stop these practices, the company said in a tweeted statement. Theyre antidemocratic. Attempts to manipulate our service to undermine democracy by both foreign and domestic actors will be met with strict enforcement of our policies.

Agencies contributed reporting

Original post:

Russian agency created fake leftwing news outlet with fictional editors, Facebook says - The Guardian

What the Tech: Russia, Facebook, Fake News – KFDX – Texomashomepage.com

Posted: Sep 3, 2020 / 04:31 PM CDT / Updated: Sep 3, 2020 / 04:31 PM CDT

A warning from Facebook tonight: Russians are already trying to interfere in the upcoming presidential election. And you may unwittingly be helping them. We take a closer look at the tactics Russian operatives are using your Facebook friends to influence who wins in November

We heard it four years ago, how Russia interfered in our election. Facebook and Twitter say theyre at it again. How does Russian interference work though? Jamey Tucker spoke with Cyber-security expert Joseph Steinberg who told me, it has nothing to do with voter fraud.

The Russians are masters of putting out news thats false that looks like its real, looks like its coming from American sources and people dont understand that this isnt a newspaper. Its Russian propaganda.

This is one such site pointed out by Facebook and Twitter: peacedata.net. Facebook says it was launched by the Russian Internet Research Agency backed by the Kremlin. The same organization that was found to have reached millions of Americans through social media four years ago.

There was a story in the last election cycle that the Pope endorsed Donald Trump. It sounds ridiculous but it did go quasi-viral.

Facebook deleted the Peace Data Facebook page. The people behind Peace Data posted to its website that the claims are false. Steinberg says, its nearly impossible to stop it with an algorithm.

In the end there is no way to filter, 100% of everything that could be potentially problematic. So people should use, I would say due diligence, but its really just common sense.

A few tips: Dont be too quick to share wild content you see somewhere else. Check the name of the news organization. Is it legit? Have you heard of it before? Are any reputable news outlets reporting it? If not, its probably not true. Steinberg said, by sharing it with your Facebook friends and followers, youre helping to cause the problem.

Go here to see the original:

What the Tech: Russia, Facebook, Fake News - KFDX - Texomashomepage.com

It’s official: There’s no Trump bounce out of the conventions – CNN

So, yeah. For all the speeches and all of the spin of the last two weeks, the race on September 3 is pretty much where it was on August 3.

Trump, um, doesn't agree.

Like many of Trump's tweets, these two should be read as a bit of overcompensation. Because he knows, somewhere deep down, what I've just laid out is right. And he knows that is bad news for him.

That wasn't the case for Trump. He entered his own convention in a historically weak position for an incumbent president -- with approval ratings stuck in the low 40s and running well behind Biden in most national polling. Trump's convention then needed to change things, whether the entire arc of the race or, at a minimum, voters' perceptions of him.

Trump's campaign clearly understood that imperative. Speaker after speaker -- from Trump family members to average Americans -- took the stage to extol the softer, more empathetic side of Trump. The ongoing coronavirus pandemic, which has sickened more than 6 million Americans and killed more than 185,000, was virtually nonexistent. In its place was an emphasis on "law and order," driven by scare tactics designed to make suburban women especially fearful of what America might look like if Biden is elected.

Read more from the original source:

It's official: There's no Trump bounce out of the conventions - CNN

PayPal terminating accounts linked to Russian influence operation – Business Insider – Business Insider

PayPal has terminated multiple accounts linked to a recently uncovered Russian influence operation that is said to have paid US and British writers for content aimed at influencing progressives and sowing discord in the West, Business Insider has learned.

On Tuesday, Facebook announced it was suspending a page linked to the website Peace Data following a tip from the FBI. In a statement, the company linked the site to "individuals associated with past activity by the Russian Internet Research Agency," a troll farm that the Senate Intelligence Committee concluded sought to sow discord in the US and aid the 2016 Trump campaign.

The site published an array of content from established freelance journalists, some of it pushing an obvious geopolitical agenda, including a piece portraying the popular uprising in Belarus, a Russian ally, as little more than a "regime change puppet" of the West.

A writer for the site told Business Insider on Tuesday that he was duped by the promise of a steady platform and decent money: $200 an article, or so was the promise delivered in a direct message on Twitter.

In actuality, the site's operators paid only $100 an article, the writer said, providing Business Insider a screenshot of PayPal transactions. Another writer also confirmed receiving $100 via the online-payment website. Each transaction was linked to a separate Gmail account.

PayPal, after being provided a list of accounts on its site linked to Russian activity, said it had picked up on suspicious activity associated with the accounts, which have now been terminated.

"PayPal has been actively investigating this matter and we have taken swift action to restrict the accounts in question," a company representative said in a statement to Business Insider.

The company has an internal team that works "to detect, investigate, and act to prevent potentially unlawful activity on our platforms," the person said, and "remains committed to working with law enforcement in support of their efforts to combat global illicit activities."

In a post following its outing, Peace Data said it was "shocked and appalled" by the suggestion now leveled by the FBI, Facebook, and PayPal that it is part of a Russian influence operation.

The site's purported editor, "Jake Sullivan," the name of a former adviser to Hillary Clinton, did not respond to a request for comment. His photo appears on just one other website: a Russian shipping company, where he is identified as a satisfied customer named "Sergey."

Have a news tip? Email this reporter: cdavis@insider.com

Link:

PayPal terminating accounts linked to Russian influence operation - Business Insider - Business Insider

Journalist Rana Ayyub targeted with fake tweet in her name on Pranab Mukherjee’s death – Alt News

A screenshot of a supposed tweet by Journalist Rana Ayyub is viral on social media. It is being claimed that Ayyub put out an insensitive tweet on former President Pranab Mukherjees death. The alleged tweet reads, The man who rejected martyr Afzal Gurus petition has died today. Afzal Guru is at peace today. Twitter user Jyotsna Varma, who is followed by PM Modi, posted the screenshot. In her tweet, Varma demanded action against the journalist while tagging Home Minister Amit Shah and Prime Minister Narendra Modi.

Several people have targeted Ayyub while posting this screenshot. Murali, Jai Shree Raam, and #IamSushant were some of the Twitter handles that targeted the journalist.

We compared a genuine tweet put out by Ayyubs handle with this screenshot. The tweet used for comparison carries an image along with the text as in the case of the viral screenshot. A comparison reveals stark differences between the genuine tweet and the screenshot of the alleged tweet.

It is also noteworthy that all the screenshots shared on social media are identicalthey have the same number of retweets, comments and likes.

Rana Ayyub also tweeted about the fake screenshot, Hello @TwitterIndia this photoshopped tweet is being circulated and shared by thousands on all social media leading to targeted abuse and harassment, she wrote. Ayyub also quote-tweeted Jyotsna Varma and said, Hello @TwitterIndia @instagram, this concerted attack using photoshopped tweets has begun yet again. This is not the first time, will not be the last. You dont know who photoshopped it but you do know who is spreading this fake news to threaten and target me. In the past as well, Rana Ayyub has been at the receiving end of misinformation on social media.

Donate Now

Related

Link:

Journalist Rana Ayyub targeted with fake tweet in her name on Pranab Mukherjee's death - Alt News

I’m a freelance writer. A Russian media operation targeted and used me – The Guardian

On 8 July, I was contacted via direct message on Twitter by a man who introduced himself as an associate editor for PeaceData. @Alex_Lacusta described his organization as a young, progressive global news outlet that was seeking young and aspiring writers and was looking to grow its presence on social media. Would I want to write a weekly column and be paid $200 to $250 per piece?

My interest was piqued. I had lost my part-time job in the food industry amid the economic fallout of the coronavirus pandemic, and I was in need of income and an outlet to build my portfolio. The opportunity to write a column could be the break I was hoping for.

Yes, I thought it was odd that an international media group would be reaching out to me since I had limited national exposure in the media. However, one of my pieces for the non-profit news organization Truthout on the Trump administrations response to Covid-19 had gained traction on social media. I assumed this was how I was discovered.

In his initial email introduction, Alex reduced the rate to between $80 and $150 per piece, but he argued Id be able to write columns about topics I was interested in as long as the pieces were focused on anti-war, anti-corruption, abuse of power, or human rights violations. Given my prior work, I was comfortable with these issues, and I wrote on similar issues for reputable outlets.

Before accepting, though, I read the articles that had been published on the site and researched a couple of their editors and writers. At a glance, the articles seemed up my alley. They were critical of US foreign policy and the Trump administration. Other contributors appeared to have verified Twitter accounts with tens of thousands of followers. That PeaceData had writers with verified Twitter accounts appeared to legitimize the operation.

Id end up writing three articles for PeaceData, and there were some oddities in the process.

On 22 July, I noticed Alexs Twitter account and the account of another PeaceData editor, Albert Popescu, had strikingly similar profile pictures and were recently created. At the time I recall thinking this was bizarre, yet chalked it up to coincidence and the fact this was a new publication. In my email correspondence with editors, words that should have been singular were plural or a preposition would be occasionally omitted. The errors werent widespread, and it wasnt the first time an editor had sent me a note with typos. And unlike other writers for PeaceData, I didnt experience suspicious editorial suggestions and the editors thoughts on angles for my stories seemed reasonable.

One occurrence did shake me, though, and led me to distance myself from PeaceData. By this time I had been paid by two separate PayPal accounts about $100 per article. I was told my first article was republished by GlobalResearch, a site I was unfamiliar with. About a week later between the launch of my second article and my final submission I was torturing myself by reading incoherent QAnon conspiracy theory posts on Twitter and noticed that QAnon-related accounts were sharing links from GlobalResearch.

On the GlobalResearch home page, I found several conspiratorial articles promoting hydroxychloroquine as a Covid-19 treatment, as well as 9/11 truther articles and pro-Vladimir Putin content.

I started looking into other articles posted by PeaceData and noticed one defending Belaruss dictator, Alexander Lukashenko. It was disturbing and didnt align with my values. I realized that the opportunity with PeaceData was too good to be true and decided not to write for them any longer.

On 25 August, the day my final piece for PeaceData was posted, I learned that Twitter had suspended the editors and the main account. It made me start connecting the dots. But I hoped for the best that they were just sloppy or disorganized.

One week later, I received another DM on Twitter, this time from a reporter telling me that PeaceData was potentially part of a Russian disinformation campaign. According to Facebook, US law enforcement had provided a tip that PeaceData was connected to individuals associated with past activity by the Russian Internet Research Agency (IRA). (In a post on its website, PeaceData says Facebook baselessly accused it of working with Russia.)

I was shocked and confused, but as soon as I read about it and talked to reporters, the red flags and weird occurrences began to add up. I had been completely unaware of PeaceDatas links to the IRA and Russian oligarchs. I wish this had never happened and Im not proud to be associated with it. Ive lost sleep because of it. I have been confused, embarrassed, and frankly angry at myself for letting the potential for a break get the best of my judgment. It isnt flattering being linked to an authoritarian regimes media operation. Its even quite ironic for a progressive anti-authoritarian committed to transparency who has argued that Trump and Putin are cut from the same reactionary cloth.

This has been a defining event that I do not intend to repeat. Its given me an up-close understanding of how easy it is in journalism today for entities to exploit underpaid workers, making them unwitting agents for nefarious or unclear interests. My initial advice to media consumers is to always be on guard when interacting with content and users on social media. I would have never guessed I would be caught up in a dubious media campaign. And as I process this, I cant help but think that its important to recognize that in this competitive, politically charged and consolidated political and media environment, this probably wont be the last time something like this will happen.

More:

I'm a freelance writer. A Russian media operation targeted and used me - The Guardian

Why is free speech different from hate speech? – TheLeaflet – The Leaflet

Suresh Chavhanke, the Editor-in-Chief of Sudarshan News, a Hindi channel, recently claimed to have done an expose alleging that the Civil Services have been infiltrated by the Muslim community. What he terms asBureaucracy Jihad, is a classic instance of hate speech. While students of JamiaMillia Islamia approached the High Court alleging that the said program endangers their life and liberty and makes them targets of communal attacks, others approached the Supreme Court. This explainer deals with what hate speech is all about.

THE Blacklaws Dictionary defines hate speech as, Speech that carries no meaning other than the expression of hatred for some group, such as a particular race, especially in circumstances in which the communication is likely to provoke violence.

The Constitution of India, under Article 19(1)(a) provides the right to freedom of speech and expression. However, under article 19(2), the constitution also provides for the reasonable restrictions against free speechin the interests of sovereignty and integrity of India, the security of the State, friendly relations with foreign States, public order, decency or morality or in relation to contempt of court, defamation or incitement to an offence.

Hate speech constitutes a criminal charge under Section 153A, which is the offence of promoting communal disharmony or feelings of hatred between different religious, racial, language or regional groups or castes or communities.

153B of the Indian Penal Code categorises the offence of promoting religious, racist, linguistic, community or caste hatred or incites any religious, caste or any other disharmony or enmity within India, through any speech either in written form or spoken. Section 298 of the IPC, similarly, classifies the offence of uttering words with the deliberate intent to wound the religious feelings of any person. Likewise, Section 505 of the IPC, criminalises the act of delivering speeches that incite violence. Sections 295A and 509A also have similar provisions. In 2014, while addressing a Public interest Litigation seeking guidelines for regulating Hate Speech, the Supreme Court made certain observations.

Hate speech is considered a reasonable restriction on freedom of speech and expression.

The 123(3A) of the Representation of the People Act, 1951, also criminalises hate speech by election candidates. In 2014, a Public Interest Litigation was filed before the Supreme Court of India[2014(11)SCC477], seeking guidelines on hate speech during elections. The Supreme Court observed that hate speech attempts to marginalise individuals on the basis of their membership in a group. This impacts such people socially by diminishing their social standing and acceptance within society. Hate speech, the Court observed, lays the groundwork for aggravated attacks on the vulnerable communities in the future. This weakens the ability of people to participate fully in a democracy. The Court also observed that existing laws in India were sufficient to tackle hate speeches.The root of the problem is not the absence of laws but rather a lack of their effective execution, the Court said.

These laws have often been misused to victimise artists, journalists, and activists by communal forces, on the pretext of causing communal disharmony. For instance, activists like Harsh Mander have been accused of delivering hate speech, despite the written text of his speech being available in which he advocates peace and love among religious communities. On the other hand, politicians of the ruling party who openly called for shooting peaceful anti-Citizen Amendment Act protesters have not been arrested or tried under the prevailing hate speech laws.

There is no internationally agreed definition for hate speech. According to the United Nations, hate speech is defined as any kind of communication in speech, writing or behaviour, that attacks or uses pejorative or discriminatory language with reference to a person or a group on the basis of who they are, in other words, based on their religion, ethnicity, nationality, race, colour, descent, gender or other identity factors.

it was held by the Supreme Court that in order to restrict free speech, a proximate and direct nexus must be found with any imminent danger to the community.

International human rights law has set standards by which states are supposed to adhere to strong directives against hate speech in their respective jurisdictions.

Even though the essential right to free speech is a fundamental right, it also has certain reasonable restrictions that go with it. As per Article 19(3) of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR), the right of freedom of speech can be regulated in order to honour the rights of others and in the interest of public order, public health or morals. Article 20(2) of the ICCPR also declares that any advocacy of national, racial, or religious hatred that constitutes incitement to discrimination, hostility or violence shall be prevented by law. Similarly, Article 10(2) of the European Convention on Human Rights, provides reasonable duties and restrictions during the exercise of ones fundamental right to free speech.

The United Nations Strategy and Plan of Action on Hate Speechprovides that member states must identify and support actors who challenge hate speech. They are also mandated to build capacity and develop policies to address hate speech. The Rabat Plan of Action, that was adopted by experts after a series of consultations that were convened by the United Nations Office of High Commissioner for Human Rights (OHCHR) derived authoritative conclusions and strong recommendations for the implementation of Article 20(2) of the ICCPR.

In Europe, the Constitutions of Austria, Germany, Hungary, Italy, alongside the provisions of the right to free speech, also prescribe reasonable restrictions for the same. These restrictions follow the standards provided under Article 19(3) of the ICCPR. These countries, further break down the constitutional provisions through other legal instruments regulating media laws, laws on equality and non-discrimination, laws to protect national, ethnic, linguistic or religious minorities etc. There are also specific laws to suit the regional requirements within countries like Germany and Italy.

In 2017, Germany passed a law by which social media was bound to pay a fine if they did not take down hateful content in time.

The Supreme Court of Canada opined that hate speech laws are indeed a part of the global commitment to eradicate racism and communal disharmony.

In 2018, Switzerland passed a law against hate speech and discrimination of the LGBTQ+ community.

In the United Kingdom, Article 10 of the Human Rights Act,1998, provides that everyone has the right to free speech. However, this free speech is regulated with the reasonable restrictions clause that includesformalities, conditions, restrictions or penalties as prescribed by law and is necessary for a democratic society, in the interests of national security, territorial integrity or public safety, for the prevention of disorder or crime, for the protection of health or morals, for the protection of the reputation or rights of others, for preventing the disclosure of information received in confidence, or for maintaining the authority and impartiality of the judiciary. Section 4 of Public Order Act, 1986 in the UK makes it an offencefor any person to use threatening, abusive or insulting words or indulge in behaviour, or distribute or display to another person any writing, sign or other visible representation which is threatening, abusive or insulting. Interestingly, the United States of America does not have a law against hate speech which is protected under the First Amendment Act.

Through the Press Council of India Act, 1978, the Press Council of India (PCI) was constituted. The PCI is the regulating body that ensures that the press functions in a tasteful manner, in accordance with journalistic standards. The PCI has a code of conduct for journalists that aims to foster the maintenance of high professional standards, public taste and respect for the rights and responsibilities of citizenship. On the basis of these codes of conduct, the PCI can also censor newspapers or news agencies. In fact, the PCI has the power of a civil court that can summon and examine people and evidence in the same nature of a judicial proceeding.

Television news, on the other hand, is regulated by the Cable Television Network (Regulation) Act, 1995. This act governs the code of conduct of the operation of cable television networks in India. This code also prohibitsthe broadcast of news that violates decency or attacks community or religious sentiments. These guidelines are called the programme code.

Any violation of the program code is investigated and taken cognisance of by the Inter-Ministerial Committee.

Hate speech is considered a reasonable restriction on freedom of speech and expression. This issue was considered in the case ofCanada v Taylor,[1990] 3 SCR 892where the constitutional validity of hate speech laws was challenged on the ground that it violated the right to freedom of speech and expression. It was held that hate and propaganda contribute little to the aspirations of Canadians or Canada in the quest for truth, the promotion of individual selfdevelopment, or the protection and fostering of a vibrant democracy where the participation of all individuals is accepted and encouraged. The Court also observed that it undermines the dignity and selfworth of target group members and, more generally, contributes to disharmonious relations among various racial, cultural and religious groups, as a result eroding the tolerance and openmindedness that must flourish in a multicultural society which is committed to the idea of equality. The Supreme Court of Canada opined that hate speech laws are indeed a part of the global commitment to eradicate racism and communal disharmony.

.activists like Harsh Mander have been accused of delivering hate speech, despite the written text of his speech being available in which he advocates peace and love among religious communities.

The Indian Supreme Court had also referred to this judgement in 2014. The Court had also observed the holding of another observation by the Supreme Court by which they said thatthe effect of the words must be judged from the standards of reasonable, strong-minded, firm and courageous men, and not those of weak and vacillating minds, nor of those who scent danger in every hostile point of view. In the case ofRangarajan etc., v P. Jagjivan Ram 1989(2)SCC 574, it was held by the Supreme Court that in order to restrict free speech, a proximate and direct nexus must be found with any imminent danger to the community. This nexus cannot be far fetched, remote, or conjectural.The Court held that our commitment to freedom of expression demands that it cannot be suppressed unless the situations created by allowing freedom are pressing and the community interest is endangered.The anticipated danger should not be remote, conjectural, or far-fetched. It should have a proximate and direct nexus with the expression. The expression of thought should be intrinsically dangerous to public interests.

(Ujjaini Chatterji is an Advocate based in Delhi and a regular contributor with The Leaflet.)

See the article here:

Why is free speech different from hate speech? - TheLeaflet - The Leaflet

Academics Are Really Worried About Cancel Culture – The Atlantic

Another defense of sorts has been to claim that even this cancel-culture lite is not dangerous, because it has no real effect. When, for instance, 153 intellectuals signed an open letter in Harpers arguing for the value of free speech (I was one of them), we were told that we were comfortable bigwigs chafing at mere criticism, as if all that has been happening is certain people being taken to task, as opposed to being shamed and stripped of honors.

Read: A deeply provincial view of free speech

To the extent that the new progressives acknowledge that some prominent people have been unfairly tarredincluding the food columnist Alison Roman, the data analyst David Shor, and the San Francisco Museum of Modern Art senior curator Gary Garrelsthey often insist that these are mere one-off detours rather than symptoms of a general cultural sea change.

For example, in July I tweeted that I (as well as my Bloggingheads sparring partner Glenn Loury) have been receiving missives since May almost daily from professors living in constant fear for their career because their opinions are incompatible with the current woke playbook. Then various people insisted that I was, essentially, lying; they simply do not believe that anyone remotely reasonable has anything to worry about.

However, hard evidence points to a different reality. This year, the Heterodox Academy conducted an internal member survey of 445 academics. Imagine expressing your views about a controversial issue while at work, at a time when faculty, staff, and/or other colleagues were present. To what extent would you worry about the following consequences? To the hypothetical My reputation would be tarnished, 32.68 percent answered very concerned and 27.27 percent answered extremely concerned. To the hypothetical My career would be hurt, 24.75 percent answered very concerned and 28.68 percent answered extremely concerned. In other words, more than half the respondents consider expressing views beyond a certain consensus in an academic setting quite dangerous to their career trajectory.

So no one should feign surprise or disbelief that academics write to me with great frequency to share their anxieties. In a three-week period early this summer, I counted some 150 of these messages. And what they reveal is a very rational culture of fear among those who dissent, even slightly, with the tenets of the woke left.

The degree of sheer worry among the people writing to me is poignant, and not just among nontenured faculty. (They write to me privately, and for that reason I will not share names.) One professor notes, Even with tenure and authority, I worry that students could file spurious Title IX complaints or that students could boycott me or remove me as Chair. I have no reason to suppose that he is being dramatic, because exactly this, he says, happened to his predecessor.

View post:

Academics Are Really Worried About Cancel Culture - The Atlantic

[Fantasia Review] ‘The Dark and the Wicked’ Is a Chilling Descent into Nihilistic Evil – Bloody Disgusting

Over ten years ago, Bryan Bertino made waves with his bleak debut,The Strangers, which set a high bar for home invasion horror. His subsequent films confirmed his trademark style- nihilistic horror uninterested in tidy answers and happy endings. His latest, The Dark and the Wicked, harkens back to his debut in terms of pessimism, simplicity, and estranged relationships. Perhaps most importantly, its just as ruthless in crafting intense atmosphere and potent scares.

Tucked away at a remote, rural farm sits an eerie old cabin style house. Inside lives an elderly couple, but the man is dying of an illness. It hangs heavy over the house. Relegated to his bed and no longer conscious, his wife is alone at night with the darkness. The couples adult children, Louise (Marin Ireland) and Michael (Michael Abbott Jr.), put their lives on hold to spend the week with their dying father, but straightaway feel the unease that permeates the home. Their mother is angry that theyve come, having warned them to stay away, and that theyve all drifted apart over the years adds to the disquiet. It becomes evident soon enough that their mothers warnings to stay away stem from an evil within the home, growing bolder and more disconcerting by the day.

Writer/director Bertino tends to use horror to accentuate and explore the empty space between friends, lovers, and family that have drifted apart for various reasons. For siblings Louise and Michael, they struggle through the guilt that comes with the inability to remember the last time they called home, and the remorse that their mother has been left alone to care for her dying husband. Death looms large, a heavy presence with no straightforward guide. The detachment between them only compounds the awkwardness of their forced pleasantries and unspoken confessions. Its in the distance between this family their grief and desperation for a last-minute miracle- that wickedness takes root. And boy does Bertino know how to create unsettling evil that will embed itself deep under your skin and leave you searching for the light switch.

The film wastes no time plummeting its characters straight into occult terrors deep depths, ramping it up at a steady, nightmarish clip. Harrowing visions, unnerving creaks and groans in the old house, shadow play along the walls, and oppressive energy quickly gives way to violence. Bertino knows when to use restraint and when to open the flood gates of visceral horror. The filmmaker plays around with the familiar conventions of occult horror, reconfiguring the age-old crises of faith and demonic imagery into something personal and unpredictable. Theres an insidious entity lying in wait, as eager to toy with its prey as it is to eviscerate them. Theres a level of palpable dread and danger here not easily achieved.

Ireland and Abbott Jr. are tremendous, giving layered performances to a pair of siblings raised in rural solitude. Much of Louise and Michaels communication is nonverbal, the depth of emotion made evident in their expressions and physicality. They create a textured family dynamic that makes this home feel as lived in as it looks. Look for Xander Berkeley (Candyman) to appear in a small supporting role as a priest so off-putting that he instantly makes you uncomfortable. Some of the minor supporting performances dont fare as strongly, but some of the stiltedness is part of the atmospheric point.

The Dark and the Wicked is rife with suffocating dread, disturbing visuals, and a haunting atmosphere. Its a simple film in its design and aesthetic, which works well in the films favor. The horror is intrinsic to a family coping with grief and loss, but its heightened to a horrifying degree thanks to Bertinos distinct style and his twisted vision of evil. It makes for a volatile, frightening viewing experience steeped in nihilism.

Read more:

[Fantasia Review] 'The Dark and the Wicked' Is a Chilling Descent into Nihilistic Evil - Bloody Disgusting

Lets hear it for The Boys – The A.V. Club

The BoysPhoto: Jasper Savage/Amazon

Heres whats happening in the world of television for Friday, September 4, and Saturday, September 5. All times are Eastern.

The Boys (Amazon, Friday, 3:01 a.m., second-season premiere, first three episodes): As a whole, the second season of The Boys is a solid improvement on the first: Smarter, sharper, and more engaged with its stories and characters... If season one was mostly empty spectaclea bunch of super-powered assholes unleashing heat-vision blasts and concrete-shattering punchesnow weve got a reason to care, a retort to the bleak nihilism that previously drove things along. The supers may be the basis for this show, but its the humanity that powers it. Read the rest of Alex McLevys pre-air review.

The three episodes that arrive today will be covered throughout the weekend by recapper Roxana Hadadi. And if you need a refresher on the madness of season one, catch up with our character guide.

Can you binge it? The first season awaits you on Amazon.

RuPauls Drag Race: Vegas Revue (VH1, Friday, 8 p.m.)Raised By Wolves (HBO Max, mini-binge coverage continues)

Mulan (Disney+, Friday, 3:01 a.m., premiere): Given the impressive scope of the movie, and its lengthy runtime, its disappointing that Mulan never manages to breathe life into its many environments, or its plot points for that matter. Instead it rushes thoughtlessly past what matters most, hoping the pretty spectacle and cultural accuracies will suffice. Read the rest of Beatrice Loayzas review.

Im Thinking Of Ending Things (Netflix, Friday, 3:01 a.m., premiere): Its good to remind yourself that the worlds larger than inside your own head, Jake (Jesse Plemons) says to Lucy (Jessie Buckley) early into Im Thinking Of Ending Things, [Charlie Kaufmans] latest maddening plunge down the rabbit hole of his boundless imagination. Is Kaufman assuring us or himself? By the end of this strange moviepossibly his most uncompromising and discombobulating, which is really saying somethingwe have no guarantee that the world it depicts exists outside of someones head. The question may just be whose? Read the rest of A.A. Dowds review.

Time for another wild card lightning round.

Noughts + Crosses (Peacock, Friday, 3:01 a.m., complete first season, U.S. premiere): Look for Nadra Kareem Nittles coverage of this adaptation of Malorie Blackmans YA series later today.

Away (Netflix, Friday, 3:01 a.m., complete first season): Netflixs Away depicts humanitys first, perilous mission to Mars, but its not a gritty sci-fi drama like Star Trek: Picard. Its more West Wing: NASA, with smart, passionate people working together to solve problems. Everyones well-intentioned, fundamentally decent, and capable. Read the rest of Stephen Robinsons pre-air review.

Earth To Ned (Disney+, Friday, complete first season): In this series from the Jim Henson Company, alien commander Ned and his trusty lieutenant abandon a planned invasion of Earth when they become smitten with pop culture. Naturally, they start a talk show instead.

Muppets Now (Disney+, Friday, 3:01 a.m., first-season finale): And speaking of Jim Henson, the first season of what Erik Adams calls Disneys best effort to date at bringing Hensons most famous creations back to TV ends tonight.

A Most Beautiful Thing (Peacock, Friday, 3:01 a.m., premiere): This documentary, which was headed to SXSW before, you know, everything, tells the story of the first all-Black high school rowing team.

The New York Times Presents, The Killing of Breonna Taylor (FX, Friday, 10 p.m.): The episode title should explain the significance of this one.

Looking for ways to advocate for Black lives? Check out this list of resources by our sister site Lifehacker for ways to get involved.

Read more:

Lets hear it for The Boys - The A.V. Club

Biden can win for progressives – The Chronicle – Duke Chronicle

Joe Biden has consistently failed to give a compelling answer to one question: Why are you running? It dogged his campaignthe only answer he could really muster was to defeat Donald Trump. While candidates like Bernie Sanders and Elizabeth Warren envisioned fundamental changes to American society, Joe Bidens vision was, essentially, to defeat Trump, followed by a return to normal. To his credit, he did issue a list of policies he would enact. But in many aspects, it was a new coat on the same platform that Hillary Clinton ran on in 2016, with standard platform fare like protecting and expanding Obamacare and rejoining the Paris Agreement. Meanwhile, Bernie Sanders was proposing Medicare for All and a Green New Deal to address the same issues. The wide scopes of other Democratic candidates policy agendas made Biden look comparatively tunnel-visioned.

That was, of course, before the coronavirus pandemic.

We now live in a moment with no precedent in American history. An economic collapse and pathogenic disease has forced into the light larger societal diseasesyawning inequality, the suppressed simmer of racial strife now exploding in the open and an unresponsive, corrupt government led by a political party void of morals or competency. To anyone whose political philosophy does not inhabit the dark shadow of Reaganite odium towards an active federal government, the appropriate response to this American cataclysm is clear. However, it was still surprising to see resident centrist Joe Biden team up with many of former presidential candidate Bernie Sanders policy wonks to work out a decisively progressive agenda, turning Joe Bidens candidacy into the most left-leaning in decades. While progressives were rightfully critical of the compromised, centrist platform of Joe Biden circa February 2020, its now less easy to argue in good faith with Bidens new promise to enact a presidency unseen in scale since F.D.Rall conditional, of course, on a proper and requisite mandate come November.

Joe Bidens new platform, influenced in large part by the Biden-Sanders Unity Task Forces recommendations, is the most explicitly progressive of any in modern American history. Most satisfyingly to policy nerds, Biden, or at least his policy team, very intuitively grasps the intersectional nature of these crisesand their solutions. He plans to have high-quality, zero emission public transportation through flexible federal investments with strong labor protections that create good, union jobs in Americas cities, addressing, in part, climate change, the dearth of public transit in urban America, the United States stagnating union manufacturing sector, and moreall while the plan fits into a single bullet point on his surprisingly extensive policy platform. There are many more examples of this type of intersectional policymaking that characterizes Joe Bidens approach to the contemporary American malaise.

However, Biden has still been the recipient of unremitting criticism from skeptical leftists. Liberal progressives have, historically, had good reasons to be uneasy of centrist Democratic politicians like Joe Biden. The modern Democratic Party has been defined just as much, if not moreso, by gravitation towards the center than to the left. The most generous good faith argument one could make for their existence is the cruel contours of American electoral and political geographyby the nature of our institutions, and the contemporary polarization of the American electorate creating an advantage for one party over the other, the Democratic Party bears the unique task of earning the votes of liberal acolytes in Portland, Oregon, and unionized conservatives in Portland, Pennsylvania. The contemporary Democratic Party is a big tent by necessity of self-preservation, as Republicans have a comparatively homogeneous and small base that is more advantageously distributed across Americas political geography. Thus, in order to have a chance at winning elections, the partys policies are largely made to appease a moderate voter base that is ostensibly persuadable to giving a generic centrist Democrat a shot. Indeed, Joe Biden, aficionado for compromise and incrementalism, is the textbook example of a generic centrist Democrat, someone who older, whiter voters would feel more comfortable voting for. His pre-COVID vision was criticized for being essentially a rehash of a typical Democratic platform. But the coronavirus has evidently affected his thinking, and multiple advisors around him have posited him as the new FDR, ready to expand the role of government to fill the void that Trump and modern American conservatism, through their complete and utter abandonment of good-faith governance, have created.

This label has earned the scorn of some leftists, and a Joe Biden presidency will inevitably disappoint progressives in some way. The floral poetry of campaigning on an FDR-style presidency will inevitably lead to the harsh prose of governmentcompromise, watered-down promises, and appeasing the Lovecraftian monsters on K-Street. But while we are suffering in this time of American despair, progressives must not embrace the nihilism of shunning electoral politics. The existence of Trumps presidency is well enough proof that electoral politics have real, significant consequences. Countries with female leaders have handled the coronavirus pandemic better than their male-led counterparts. It is not conjecture to believe that had we chosen the highly polarizing yet deeply competent female policy wonk over the infantile strongman, tens of thousands of Americans would still be with us. Elections matter.

I am not being hyperbolic in saying that, if Trump somehow returns to 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue come January, the United States will further its already disturbing descent into open anocracy, joining Putins Russia in a growing list of global pariahs. There is no limit to what Republicans will do to entrench their grasp on Americas institutions, as they have made explicit over the past decade. Another four years will be a prolonging of this American misery. If you have a modicum of faith in Americas institutionsyes, even as imperfect and unresponsive as they arethe choice for November is clear.

That advice applies to today and it applied in 2016, and evidently it didnt motivate enough people. There is reason for hope, however. The images of mass death, trauma, and suffering caused by a cataclysmic failure of our systems seems to have stirred support for a progressive policy agenda like never before. Joe Biden is well aware of that, as the recent changes to his platform make clear. That is a real cause for hope. This year, for those left-of-center, it may no longer be the lesser of two evils. Joe Biden was not my preferred nominee, and my sentiments are shared by many young people across the United States. But to see him talk in terms of fulfilling the demands of this momentbig, structural changemeans that American progressivism might find a willing ally in the most unexpected of places. However much the messenger may be mediocre and uninspiring, the message itself is clearAmerica is crying out for change, and we must stir this country out from its sleepwalk towards the darkness. The redemption of this country, the opportunity to begin the process of healing this countrys past and present mortal sins, is in our hands; this moment in history is begging us to choose this imperfect yet important path towards justice.

Stewart Roeling is a Trinity first-year. His column runs on alternate Fridays.

Signup for our editorially curated, weekly newsletter. Cancel at any time.

See the original post here:

Biden can win for progressives - The Chronicle - Duke Chronicle

I forgive you: Why victims’ empathy was kryptonite to the Christchurch killer – Sydney Morning Herald

The next few months (years?) will be a contest between my pretensions towards intellectual seriousness and my attention span, which is frayed by the usual modern things smartphone use and the existential dread of the pandemo-recession.

I picked it up because I was drawn to the themes of Dostoyevskys tome guilt, morality, alienation from society, and the question of madness and to what extent it exculpates a person.

New Zealanders outside the court show their support to the families of the dead and to survivors. Credit:Getty Images

And then I spent a week listening through snatches on radio and television, and half-glimpsed things on the scroll of the internet to the victim impact statements of the New Zealanders who were injured, and those who lost loved ones, in the Christchurch massacre.

I put Dostoyevsky down.

Loading

Some of the victims fired with anger. Mustafa Boztas, who was injured in the attack, told the terrorist he was "just an insignificant killer who's lonely, scared and left alone to suffer all eternity.

Ahad Nabi, whose father Haji Mohammed Daoud Nabi was shot at the Al Noor mosque, told the terrorist he was weak. He called him a sheep with a wolfs jacket on.

I am strong and you have made me stronger, Nabi said.

Others wanted the killer to know that his creed was a failure, and that his act had served only to bolster the ideals of Kiwi society he so hated its diversity, unity, peace and tolerance.

Zahid Ismail, who lost his twin brother, Junaid Ismail, in the attack, said his family would look after his brothers children, who will become confident, proud Kiwis who will live in the same place their daddy lived.

Junaids sister Raesha Ismael said the massacre had made her stronger internally.

Illustration: Reg LynchCredit:

After the events I dont feel I have to hide my faith at work anymore, she said.

Other victims elevated the grace of the faith the terrorist hated. Janna Ezat, who survived the shooting but lost her son, said to the killer: "In our Muslim faith, we say, if we are able to forgive, forgive. I forgive you."

Angela Armstrong, daughter of Laura Armstrong, who was killed inside the Linwood Islamic Centre, said the crime had led her to a greater understanding of the faith to which her mother converted. Previously she had listened to the medias narrative about Islam, rather than my own mum ... Mum tried to tell me about the goodness at the heart of Islam.

Loading

The more I listened, the more it seemed to me this public grief, this testimony of damage, was the grace-filled antithesis of everything the terrorist stood for.

The Christchurch terrorist was always going to get the maximum sentence. So why did all these people feel compelled to speak about the unspeakable damage he had inflicted on them?

Victim impact statements can be tendered privately to a judge, but these were spoken in open court, as a public act that was profoundly social, a counter to the anti-social nihilism of the killer.

It is inherent to our humanity that we have our hurt acknowledged. We see over and over how healing that acknowledgment can be in reparation for crimes and other wrongs.

The statements also inspired empathy, which is probably the best revenge you can get on a murderous white supremacist who wants Westerners to see Muslim people as sub-human.

Julia Quilter, associate professor of law with the University of Wollongong, says victim impact statements have two primary functions. First, they inform the sentencing court about the harm caused by the crime, in order to influence punishment via sentencing.

"The other important factor is an expressive function," Quilter says, "to allow victims to move beyond being a witness and allow a therapeutic process, tied to the idea of therapeutic justice."

The terrorists aspiration for a white-pure West is the mirror of Islamic State's utopia of a caliphate. He is the same as what he hates. He expressed belated remorse for his crimes but the judge rejected it as insincere.

Dostoyevskys great novel is a literary depiction of guilt. What guilt should Australia feel? The Grafton-raised terrorist was radicalised online but he was made in Australia. He was stunted by online gaming culture and the rankest corners of the white supremacist internet.

Loading

The ideas if you can elevate them to that from those corners are no longer marginal. In the mainstream politics of Trump, folk who espouse those views are very fine people.

In Australia, the Christchurch terrorist had been an avid follower of the United Patriots Front. And the anti-Islamic sentiment from some of our political leaders looks extremely ill-advised in retrospect.

What can we do to honour the Christchurch dead, and pay tribute to the unspeakable pain of the living? Patrol the borders of our public debate with unstinting vigilance. Harden our stance to the creep of extremism. Demand policy that forces online giants such as Facebook to account for the hatred to which they give a platform. Listen to victims.

Ill keep this column updated on Dostoyevsky. Maybe now is, actually, the best time of all to be reading it.

Twitter: @JacquelineMaley

Jacqueline Maley is a senior journalist, columnist and former Canberra press gallery sketch writer for The Sydney Morning Herald. In 2017 she won the Peter Ruehl Award for Outstanding Columnist at the Kennedy Awards

Read more from the original source:

I forgive you: Why victims' empathy was kryptonite to the Christchurch killer - Sydney Morning Herald

Fantasia 2020: The Dark And The Wicked Is A Great, Frightening Dive Into Evils Sovereign Territory – Forbes

The Dark and the Wicked (2020)

Bryan Bertinos The Strangers has made fans of many horror aficionados for its unflinching nihilism, strong directorial choices, and compelling performances. His latest film, The Dark and the Wicked (at this years Fantasia Fest) takes some tonal cues from that work into different, explicitly supernatural directions. The Dark and the Wicked is a bleak but entertainingly frightening film that uses strained familial relationships to heighten the drama of a fight against a being with dark, nefarious plans. Its easily one of the scariest films of the year.

A man lays isolated, bed-ridden, in a remote rural home he shares with his wife. Hes dying of illness and largely unresponsive while his wife deals with the day-to-day tasks of living effectively alone in this creepy home. The couples children Louise (Marin Ireland) and Michael (Michael Abbott, Jr) spend a week in the isolated abode to visit their dying father. The mother is angered at their intrusion and had told them not to come... we find out she had good reason. A mysterious evil has descended upon the home, affecting the family with visions and terrors galore.

Bertinos vision here shines, and the film excels in the rich darkness of its visuals and the foreboding dread of its plot. The lead performances are all riveting, and Marin Ireland (Hell or High Water, The Umbrella Academy) is exceptional as a frantically concerned (and increasingly traumatized) daughter trying to protect her family at all costs. The audience also gets a strong sense of the foreboding inevitability of everything that happensthe entitys increasing power becomes more and more evident as the siblings try and protect themselves and the family against the films increasingly dire events. The viewer is left with the feeling that perhaps indeed all the world is a stage, a vast and evil one, and perhaps we are just merely players.

There are some questions that a view may be left with (as I certainly was). On the entitys goals (which I wont spoil): why target this family? What makes the targeted individual so special to the entity, and why focus so strongly on them? There is a sense, too, that the entity goes through a rather elaborate number of steps on route to its chosen end, exhibiting nearly limitless power all in pursuit of a rather simple (it seems) goal. Why not just take what it wants, given the powers in question?

That said, The Dark and the Wicked is a deeply unsettling watch with impressive performances and truly haunting scares. The aforementioned evil succeeds in using nearly everything to its advantage, demonstrating a malicious tactical prowess that is, indeed, impressive. A number of the films scenes are quite memorable, sticking with the viewer well after the end of the film. Altogether, The Dark and the Wicked is easily one of the best executed, scariest films of the year.

Go here to read the rest:

Fantasia 2020: The Dark And The Wicked Is A Great, Frightening Dive Into Evils Sovereign Territory - Forbes

Humble Among, ‘Fear of a Wack Planet’ | Album Review – Seven Days

(Self-released, digital)

Humble Among is a rapper who proudly represents Bellows Falls. That's a sentence I never thought I would live to write, but it's true. He's been on the margins of the Vermont hip-hop scene for a long time and in recent years has grown into a prolific contributor and ardent supporter, one of those human hubs who makes a "scene" possible.

Deeply rooted in Juggalo and horrorcore culture, Humble Among's style is not a pedigree shared by many artists around these parts. He's best known for his "Halloween Tape" series, which started as a fun, one-off thematic EP in 2018 and grew into a monster of a concept album the next year. Presumably, he's gearing up for another October release this year to complete the trilogy, but his latest, Fear of a Wack Planet, is his most evolved and refined creation to date.

Humble Among has never been one to rap about rapping. All of his songs, whether caustic autobiography or nightmare narrative, are focused art. On this new surprise LP, he lets his cinematic imagination run absolutely wild, crafting a roller coaster of an apocalypse for your speakers. There's nothing frivolous about it, either: This is an urgent, timely album, touching on climate change, resource wars and collapsing cities. Also, aliens.

Fear of a Wack Planet is a predominantly locavore effort. The 802 Renaissance man THEN WHAt handles the bulk of the production, with some strong assists from horrorcore legend Bad Mind. There are local features in the mix, too. Humble Among's hometown protg Kasuke drops bleak bars for "Toxic Waste." And the impeccable Raw Deff delivers another knockout 16 on "Anxious," an ode to making peace with mental illness.

Then there's Doc C of Rhythm Ruckus, an unsung Windsor County hip-hop duo who were a big influence on Humble Among, as well as about a hundred other local rap acts. They're long since retired, but Doc C has been getting back in the booth lately. Here, he joins our protagonist for "Thin Blue Line," a gleefully offensive storytelling song about killing police.

Fear of a Wack Planet represents some serious artistic growth. Humble Among has never sounded more confident on the mic and, track after track, these are some of the strongest songs he's ever written. Which is not to say he's broadening his mass appeal. Calling an album like this "dark" is a joke this is genocidal nihilism over thumping synth beats.

That said, it's also extremely well done. The mixing and mastering, handled by Bad Mind, are impressively smooth. Yet what really makes this project pop is the artistic vision. Humble Among has a deadpan, almost quavering delivery, but after years of home studio experimentation, he's honed that into something truly compelling.

So, for subgenre aficionados or curious listeners of any persuasion, Fear of a Wack Planet is strongly recommended. This is the best possible introduction to one of Vermont's most distinctive MCs.

Fear of a Wack Planet is available at humbleamong.bandcamp.com.

See more here:

Humble Among, 'Fear of a Wack Planet' | Album Review - Seven Days