COLUMN/PERSPECTIVE: The spiritual experience of hiking the Appalachian Trail – Brunswick News

The Apostle Paul saw the light on the road to Damascus.

The Rt. Rev. Frank Logue and his wife, Victoria, have seen it repeatedly on the Appalachian Trail.

Unlike Paul, the Logues were not blinded by what they saw but the trail has spoken to them about the beauty of creation and, like Paul, theyre written about it.

The Logues are coauthors of several trail guides, including Appalachian Trail Hiker: Trail-Proven Advice for Hikes of Any Length and Best of the Appalachian Trail: Day Hikes. They also wrote and photographed, Guide to the Blue Ridge Parkway.

He likened it to telling people where the trails greatest hits are located if they dont have the time to hike the entire 2,200 miles from Springer Mountain, Ga., to Mount Katahdin, Maine, as they once did seven months to the day, from March 2 to Sept. 2 in 1988.

As with many people, that hasnt been enough. Theyve gone back several times to hike sections.

Places you may not know to do, but places we think are worth the hike, he said of the books.

Asked if he had only one hike left, where would he go, Logue said, Id go to western Maine and the last section of the trail, he said. It goes through timberland, probably the remotest spot on the trail.

But he said Georgia has places just as stunning.

Thirty miles north of Blood Mountain is as pretty as it gets, he said.

Victoria Logue said she and her former Boy Scout husband were equally eager to hike the trail.

My family camped. My father was in the Navy from New England to Hawaii, and they saw a lot of the outdoors at his duty stations, she said.

On the trail, the Logues had one small tent and all the weather.

They were snowed in a couple of days at Rainbow Spring Campground in North Carolina and farther up the trail an April snow chased them into a barn with gaps in its walls. They had the company of 13 scouts and their leaders.

We were forced to leave because we ran out of food, she said.

They soon found clear hiking because it hadnt snowed a few miles down the trail.

They kept hiking north and by the time they reached New England, she said, we were so used to getting rained on we just kept going.

For many couples, being sore-footed and bone weary in miserable weather would make for some unhappy days, but Victoria Logue said they were prepared for all of it.

Shortly after they got married, they spent two months in Kathmandu Valley, where We learned how to get along. And they were prepared to write the guides from the time they met when he was a staff photographer, and she was a writer for a Warner Robins newspaper.

Their days of writing trail and scenic highway guides are likely behind them. Now 59, she said she is concentrating on devotional books and as Bishop of the Episcopal Diocese of Georgia, the 57-year-old Logue is on the road a lot for his ministry.

As with her husband, Victoria Logue has a favorite hike in mind.

I would probably want to do a hike in Europe, St. Cuthberts Way in England, and she also wanted to walk the Way of St. Francis in Italy, she said.

She spoke of writing devotionals, but to hear them talk about the trail it is clear their Christian faith is bolstered as they hike.

Hiking the Appalachian Trail was for us a spiritual journey, that changed their walk from journalism to ministry and trekking those long distances changed the way they live, Frank Logue said.

Patience, endurance, goal-setting cant be matched in any other way, he said.

Had it not been for hiking, they would have never written any books and, after the experience, he started a church from scratch, King of Peace in Kingsland where he ministered from 2000 until 2010.

Asked about his favorite trail experiences, spiritual or otherwise, Logue said he had several, including When the rhododendron are blooming in the southern Appalachians, as the trail follows dark tunnels through the thickets, he said.

The smell of the balsam fir on the high places, when youve been on Roan Mountain. Ive done it again and again even on a foggy day. That is just amazing to me, he said.

Then you think of fall in New England, walking the Long Trail/AT in Vermont, he said.

They have seen places that come to mind instantly, the high, breezy meadows of the Grayson Highlands in Virginia, Cumberland Mountain, Clingmans Dome in the Smokys and Charlies Bunion, a rock knob with a 360 degree view.

Sometimes, you have those places to yourself and hear just your own breath and the wind in the trees. Sometimes its just you and the sound of your soles padding on the rocks and roots that other hikers feet have polished to a sheen like a drill sergeants boots.

There are places in the mountains you can feel Gods presence. I dont know an atheist who hasnt had the hair go up on the back of their neck out in nature. It can be a spectacular waterfall, maybe a grouse, walking up on a deer that doesnt bolt.

You cant predict when it will happen because it can sneak up on you in those cathedrals of trees or in some less remarkable places where a icy, clear stream tumbles over rocks, he said. He agreed theres more to it than intelligent design. Its the work of a loving God who created it in a way we can enjoy.

There is a sense we were created for each other. The flower wants to be admired in a way that is beautiful to us.

See more here:

COLUMN/PERSPECTIVE: The spiritual experience of hiking the Appalachian Trail - Brunswick News

Pastor Paula White calls on angels from Africa and South America to bring Trump victory – USA TODAY

President Donald Trump's spiritual adviser Paula White-Cain led an impassioned prayer service for his reelection. USA TODAY

Megachurch pastor and televangelist Paula White-Cain, who is spiritual adviser to President Donald Trump,delivered a prayer service Wednesday night in an effort to secure Trump's reelection.

During the service, which wasstreamed on Facebook Live, White-Cain called on "angelic reinforcement" from the continents of Africa and South America.

"I hear a sound of victory, the Lord says it is done," she said. "For angels have even been dispatched from Africa right now... In the name of Jesus from South America, they're coming here."

In her prayer, White-Cain is also heard speaking in tongues an occurrencein which a speaker talks in a language they do not know, usually during an intense religious experience. Speaking in tongues has been practiced in multiple Christian denominations, as well as other religions.

White's video has goneviral since it went online Wednesday night. And many have expressed outrage over her words.

"God is sending angels from a place Trump called a [expletive] to help him get re-elected?" Bishop Talbert Swan, a pastor, activist and NAACP Chapter President, wrote on Twitter. "'I hear the sounds of victory...' Consider a hearing aid."

"Shell be lucky if Stephen Miller doesnt send those angels to ICE Detention Centers," wroteAna Navarro-Crdenas, political strategist and commentator for CNN, Telemundo and The View.

White-Cain also statedthat"demonic confederacies...are attempting to steal the election from Trump." As of Thursday morning, Joe Biden had 264 electoral votes and Trump 214, according to USA TODAY counts.

Even before outrage over Wednesday's video, White-Cain wasa controversial figure in Christian circles because she preaches prosperity theology (or prosperity gospel) a belief that God will reward believers with material wealth if they donate generously to religious causes.

Who is Paula White?Trump's spiritual adviser says president is a man of repentance

Autoplay

Show Thumbnails

Show Captions

Read or Share this story: https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2020/11/05/paula-white-trumps-spiritual-adviser-african-south-american-angels/6173576002/

Read more from the original source:

Pastor Paula White calls on angels from Africa and South America to bring Trump victory - USA TODAY

Spiritual Warriors on Behalf of Donald Trump – The Bulwark

Listening to the rhetoric of President Donald Trumps allies over the last few days as the ballots rolled in and his hopes of re-election dwindled, we were reminded of the ways in which religious historywhich can sometimes feel distant and foreign to contemporary concernsremains very relevant to the present. In their language of warfare spiritual and secular, Trumps evangelical allies have been playing with a fire that may continue to burn long after they give up this contest. It is worth taking a moment to look closely at, and consider the consequences of, their preaching and shouting and, yes, tweeting, the rhetoric of holy war.

Paula White, the presidents spiritual adviser, for example, spent last Wednesday night leading a Pentecostal prayer service, engaging in spiritual warfare for the purpose of securing Trumps re-election. The most sensational partbesides speaking in tongueswas the summoning of angels to fight for him, saying, For angels have even been dispatched from Africa right now. . . . In the name of Jesus from South America, theyre coming here.

White later said that we come against people that are working at high levels right now with demonic confederacies who were working against the election, against America, against that who You have declared to be in the White House. Behind her as she preached was a man pacing back and forth with a Bible, possibly engaged in a Jericho March, a prayer walk to intercede, protect, enact change, etc.

If this was the spiritual warfare to try and re-elect Donald Trump through holy violence, Trumps former campaign strategist and senior counselor Steve Bannon had something less incorporeal in mind. He said on his podcast that at the beginning of Trumps second term, the president should execute Dr. Anthony Fauci and FBI Director Christopher Wray: Id actually like to go back to the old times of Tudor England. Id put their heads on pikes, right, Id put them at the two corners of the White House as a warning to federal bureaucrats, you either get with the program or youre gone.

Bannons core political belief unites a clash-of-civilizations, defense-of-the-West conviction with a combative, ultraconservative Catholicism. While his legal battles in the United States tend to get the most attention, its worth noting that he has also been engaged in a long legal clash in Italy over the control of a 13th-century monastery that he reportedly wants to turn into the headquarters for a project to realize his theological-political vision.

Not only does Bannon play around with neomedieval notions of executions, he has made a habit of playing with violent tropes of the past. Addressing (virtually) the Catholic Identity Conference in Pittsburgh at the end of October, he said that traditional Catholics needed to engage in war against myriad enemies standing against Donald Trumps re-election. Among the enemies: the compromised Vatican.

At that same conference, Archbishop Carlo Maria Vigan gave a speech saying that we are in the End Times and that a New World Order, the antithesis of Christian Society, exists and must be fought. Vigan connected the U.S. election to a major moral and spiritual conflict:

Allow me a brief word about the political situation in the United States on the eve of the presidential election. Fratelli Tutti [i.e., Pope Franciss latest encyclical, published in October] seems to be a form of Vatican endorsement of the Democratic candidate, in clear opposition to Donald Trump, and come a few days after Francis refused to grant audience to Secretary of State Mike Pompeo in Rome. This confirms which side the children of light are on, and who the children of darkness are.

The conferences main homepage image shows four armed Knights Templar kneeling before a priestcoyly violent religious imagery heading a religious conference in which speakers preached violence against those opposing Donald Trump.

Podcast November 09 2020

On todays Bulwark podcast, Sarah Longwell, Bill Kristol, and Jonathan V. Last join Charlie Sykes to discuss Joe Bidens...

Both Paula Whites spiritual warfare and Bannons call to the faithful to engage in religiously inspired physical warfare bring to mind the Crusadesthe holy wars launched by the Church in 1096 onwards against various Muslim powers. The chroniclers of those wars recorded visions of saints, angelic hosts joining the soldiers on the battlefield, apocalyptic missions ending in the conquest of Jerusalemreferring to Revelation itself in the process. Those ideas then spread beyond wars in the Levant to wars in Spain, violence against Jews across Europe, wars against pagans and Orthodox Christians in the Baltic, wars against heretics and rival lords in southern France, wars against political enemies in Italy, wars against proto-Protestants in Bohemia. (Arguably the last of these conflicts was during the age of Napoleon.) Once the rhetoric of holy war is used, the idea, like a virus, spreads and mutates and never seems to die.

On Thursday, as President Trumps electoral defeat seemed ever more inevitable, televangelist George Pearsons took to the airwaves to apprise the faithful of the horrific situation facing Gods president. Alternating between speaking directly as God and for God, Pearson warned that he (presumably God) was angry with what was happening to his ordained leader and that retribution was underway. It was a declaration that evangelical conservatism alone is the arbiter of who or what deserves divine sanction or retribution.

Pearsons hardly stands alone. History is a wasteland of religious justifications for political activism, identity, and violence. On the other hand, Christianity, and American Christianity especially, has arguably possessed more than its fair share of these unions of political thought and religious belief. Millennialismessentially the idea that through constantly improving and reforming society, mankind could prepare and even accelerate the return of Jesus Christ and his physical kingdom on Earthwas a defining feature of Puritan thought, and after the Great Awakening, its influence could be seen in almost all the Protestant sects who dominated early American culture and politics. Flawed laws and leaders, sinful social behaviors, and even the toleration of practices and peoples of other beliefs were all seen as potentially hindering the literal second coming of Christ.

The quintessentially American variation of apocalyptic millennialism has had a range of consequences. On the positive side of the ledger: During the colonial and Revolutionary periods, when religious leaders were shapers of democratic and pluralistic political thought in the colonies, evangelicals embraced anti-authoritarianism and anti-elitism. They pushed to broaden political access and to question temporal rulers, and they established individual agency and freedom as the key ingredients to both good government and a godly society. Even at the time, many people saw this belief system as linked to the American Revolution, as clergy exhorted soldiers and civilians to regard the cause of American liberty as synonymous with the will of heaven. The early Republic saw this same merging of religious and political activism promote a variety of social reforms. And the long arc of major American social reformsexpanding the franchise, the abolition of slavery, public education, aspects of the welfare state, and even environmental conservationismwas connected to the belief that salvation depends on constant political activism designed to win Gods favor.

Yet the inability to separate political exigencies and actors from religious meaning also produced some of the darkest chapters in American history. Natives who refused Christian conversion did not fit into the architecture of a godly society and were exterminated, expelled, and displaced with near unanimous approval. At least part of the reason loyalists were treated roughly during the Revolutionary eramany were stripped of citizenship and had their property seized; some were killed in public lynchings; others were forcibly deportedis that their rejection of separation from Great Britain was seen by some patriots as hindering the creation of Gods kingdom. Fourscore years later, Southern religious leaders invoked God to defend slavery and, when civil conflict loomed, advocated a treasonous rebellion to defend it. In the 20th century, this alliance of religious conviction and political identity gave us potent conservative movements like the Moral Majority and its antiprogressive agenda of rolling back the rights of women and homosexualsand led directly to todays marriage of evangelicals and the Republican party, on which Donald Trump has depended.

Some of Trumps supporters wanted him re-elected to help bring about that millennial kingdom. Some showed up to the Clark County, Nevada election department to kneel and pray that righteousness prevails while wearing red MAGA hats. Some cast the election in Manichaean terms. Representative Clay Higgins of Louisiana, for example, tweeted about Freedom or oppression. A free Republic or total government control, essentializing to good and evil, before saying Make your stand and quoting George Washington. On Thursday, Higgins tweeted out Psalms 55:9-11:

You need not be an elite exegete to detect in Higginss tweet a call to holy violence, whether spiritual or physical, in service of Trumps re-election. These themes from Christian history, be it the Crusades or colonial America, never really seem to go away; notions of sacred violence, and of apocalyptic millennialism, have a powerful and dangerous longevity. Of course, evangelical Christianity is not monolithic, and one of the compelling social conflicts of our time will be the battle to dominate the future and meaning of its apocalyptic strain. At the same time, with public tension and political extremism coming into full view surrounding Donald Trump and his coalitions loss of the presidency, it is worth remembering that our leaders have a responsibility to consider their words and beliefs carefully. God wills it is an idea that can draw blood.

More:

Spiritual Warriors on Behalf of Donald Trump - The Bulwark

NJAC Rededication: 1970 Revolution impacts spirituality and religion in T&T – Wired868

[] White supremacist philosophy, then predominant in the society, was reinforced by very visible symbols of wealth, power, science, technology and general achievement, which resulted from centuries of exploitation of the human and physical resources of colonised societies around the world.

[] The new teachings of the Trinidad and Tobago Revolution and the resulting rise in enlightenment made most of these practices unacceptable after 1970.

The people began to develop greater respect, confidence and belief in their own culture, philosophies and ideas. There was a renewed pride in what they inherited from their ancestors or what they created in their own communities

The following column is part of an NJAC series on their contribution to Trinidad and Tobago society after the Black Power Revolution of 1970:

In 1970, the National Joint Action Committee (NJAC), under the insightful leadership of the Chief Servant Makandal Daaga, launched a serious campaign for the liberation of the minds of our people in Trinidad and Tobago. This was a necessary step on the road to the creation of a free and just society. The existing colonial and slave mentality was the foundation for the political, economic, cultural, social and even religious denial of the dignity and humanity of the masses.

When NJAC launched the mass Peoples Movement in 1970, we found that Caribbean society in general still maintained several of the practices, norms and policies of our slave, indentured and colonial past. Generations of non-white men and women had grown up in absolute powerlessness. They were victims of a society that denied them their right to govern their own lives and even imposed oppressive laws and regulations to limit their personal activities at the individual levels.

White supremacist philosophy, then predominant in the society, was reinforced by very visible symbols of wealth, power, science, technology and general achievement, which resulted from centuries of exploitation of the human and physical resources of colonised societies around the world. There is little wonder that these deceptive, dehumanising doctrines, suggesting the inferiority of colonised or ex-colonised peoples, have been so successful in implanting a self-fulfilling inferiority mindset in oppressed people.

Given these socio-political realities of 1970 society, NJACs call for peoples power and a new and just society was considered an act of rebellion by the existing power elite. It was a rebellion the controllers of power were bent on extinguishing.

NJAC and the movement, however, had a very forceful instrument in the tens of thousands of people marching daily and supporting NJACs demands for change. With the genius of Makandal Daagas leadership at the helm, NJACs mobilisation of the masses was so swift and dynamic that the powers that be, and everyone else, were compelled to lend a very attentive ear. NJAC was thus able to mount a very serious challenge to the white supremacist philosophy.

Racism was even present within some churches at that time. Before 1970, for instance, some churches gave special privileges to white members of the congregation (like reserved seats in the front pews or having the black members wait to allow the whites to leave first). The very fact that these practices were then widely accepted speaks volumes to the nature of race relations existing at that time. The new teachings of the Trinidad and Tobago Revolution and the resulting rise in enlightenment made most of these practices unacceptable after 1970.

The people began to develop greater respect, confidence and belief in their own culture, philosophies and ideas. There was a renewed pride in what they inherited from their ancestors or what they created in their own communities. A good example of this is seen in the immense impact the movement had on the development of philosophies and lifestyles that did not originate in Europe or North America.

The case of Rastafarianism is one significant example. The growth of the Rastafarian philosophy and lifestyle only took off in T&T in the 1970s. Tyehimba Salandy, in his book I and I in Iere Land: A History of the Rastafari Movement in Trinidad & Tobago, stated: While the emergence of the Rastafari movement in Jamaica occurred within the context of British imperialist rule, the emergence of Rasta identity in Trinidad and Tobago happened in the post-independence period. The subsequent explosion of Rasta identity came after the initial Black Power uprising.

The movement ushered in a new era for the religious community, particularly for the Catholic, Orisa, Spiritual Baptist, Pentecostal, Anglican, Muslim and Hindu faiths. This was reflected in official and social recognition, changes in policy, as well as in a new awareness and growth in their members and followers. These faiths began to command greater space and respect within society.

In 1972, Dr Brinsley Samaroo, in reference to the impact of the Revolution on the East Indian community, stated, Currently, there is the revival of rituals, increased religious fervour, name changing (back to Indian names) and a return to Indian forms of dress.

It should also be noted that the first T&T national and the first African to be appointed Bishop of the Anglican Church in Trinidad and Tobago, Clive Abdullah, received his appointment on 29 September 1970. Even before his appointment, during the period of the mass demonstrations (26 February to 21 April 1970) Bishop Abdullah was very vocal in his criticism of the lack of representation of black leaders in the Anglican Church in Trinidad and Tobago.

During the 1980s and 1990s three historic laws were passed by the parliament to the benefit of the Orisa faith: the Act for the Incorporation of the Orisa Movement of Trinidad & Tobago, Egbe Ile Wa (1981); the Opa Orisa Shango Movement Act (1991); and the Orisa Marriage Act (1999). Trinidad and Tobagos 1981 Act for the Incorporation of the Orisa Movement was the first legal enactment to legitimise the status of African-derived religions outside of the African continent. It was the first time that the Orisa faith was granted formal recognition and designated the status of other religious groups.

The Shouter Baptists also enjoyed a rise in their recognition and respect during this period. Barbara Grey-Burke (Archbishop of the Spiritual Shouter Baptists) was strongly influenced by the 1970 movement she participated in.

She said of the movement: Women stood defiantly with the men during protest marches [] after 1970, more black women were employed in the banks and as air hostesses.

She believed that for many black women in Trinidad and Tobago, Liseli Daaga (wife of Makandal Daaga) symbolised the power of black consciousness.

The 1970s was undeniably a period of true mental liberation for our people, thus releasing their natural potential for creativity and innovation.

Prior to 1970, T&Ts democracy rating was very low. Viewpoints that opposed those of the government or the power elite were not tolerated. Several books that presented a different world view, often very progressive, were banned by the government as subversive literature. During this time, several NJAC members suffered persecution, police harassment, fines in court, arrests and detention in police cells before some of these undemocratic laws and practices were curbed.

This ran counter to the foundation of any truly democratic society based on freedom of speech, freedom of the press, freedom of expression and the general free flow of information that gave the population the opportunity to freely decide which philosophy (or approach) they considered the best.

Chairman Mao Tse Tung, leader of the Chinese Revolution, whose books were then banned in T&T, presented the spirit of democracy quite appropriately when he wrote: Let one hundred flowers blossom, let one hundred schools of thought contend.

In Trinidad and Tobago, on the other hand, a brilliant son of our soil, Kwame Ture (formerly Stokely Carmichael), was banned from coming home by the government led by Dr Eric Williams. Ture, who coined the slogan Black Power and fought against racism and oppression of black people in the United States, was only allowed to come home to the land of his birth in 1996 when the ban was lifted by the Basdeo Panday government.

As a result of the influence of NJAC and the Peoples Movement, a dialogue emerged among most of the religious denominations present in Trinidad and Tobago at the time. This led to the formation of the Inter-Religious Organization (IRO) in 1970. Three years later, the body was incorporated by an act of parliament on 17 July 1973.

Also established was the Caribbean Conference of Churches, which published the Caribbean Contact paper to promote a regional religious and spiritual perspective. In one of its 1975 editions, the Caribbean Contact stated that the saints of the 20th century did not come from within the Church but from outside the Church. Three persons identified as such saints were Makandal Daaga, Kwame Ture and Khafra Kambon.

Such was the regional and international impact of the movement that the pope convened a meeting of the World Conference of Churches (WCC) in Geneva to discuss the effect NJACs ideas were likely to have on religious activities and influence in the Caribbean. Reverend Roy Neehall of the Presbyterian faith represented Trinidad and Tobago at that meeting.

The WCC secretariat also gave Reverend Neehall the additional responsibility of investigating reports of Black Power attacks on a church in Trinidad, arising out of the entry of demonstrators into the Cathedral of the Immaculate Conception on 26 February 1970. Reverend Neehall spent five days investigating the incident and submitted in his final report that there was no evidence of any attack on the church in Trinidad.

The existing churches at the time received much criticism for their failure to take a position or address the poverty and exploitation of large sections of our communities. There were some very positive responses, with the church fraternity generally becoming more sensitive to the needs of underprivileged members of the society.

There was also a greater effort on the part of religious bodies to take positive measures to alleviate the impact of poverty on their flock and on our communities in general. For instance, catholic priest Father Gerard Pantin and Wesley (Wes) Hall (a Barbadian and West Indian cricketer then on a coaching assignment with WITCO in Trinidad) founded Service Volunteered for All (Servol ) on 8 September 1970.

The objective was to foster spiritual values, cooperation and family responsibility within underprivileged communities. Through Servol, the Church sought to provide opportunities for persons in dispossessed communities, with a special emphasis on Laventille.

Fifty years later, Servol continues to contribute to poverty alleviation among the needy through their training, character building and job opportunities. Approximately 300,000 persons have benefited from their training, nurturing and support programmes for children, young adults and young parents. The Servol model has been taken as far as Australia, Kenya, South Africa, Vietnam, Israel and Ireland, as well as to several Caribbean territories.

On 26 February 2020, the 50th anniversary of the launch of the mass Peoples Movement, which culminated in the Trinidad and Tobago Revolution of 1970, NJAC returned to the Cathedral of the Immaculate Conception. The cathedral was occupied by demonstrators on that same date 50 years ago. The return to the cathedral earlier this year, however, took quite a different form; that of a service in commemoration of the 50th Anniversary of the Trinidad and Tobago Revolution of 1970.

Archbishop Charles Jason Gordon, who conducted the commemorative service, stated in his homily: Unless citizens understand the deep underbelly of the Black Power Revolution and the way it still affects us today, 50 years later, then we would not move the revolution on to its next stage.

1970 was a watershed but it leads us today to reflect on what the country has gained and in what ways the Black Power Revolution is still unfinished Unfinished because we have reached far from where we were, but we have not yet come to the promised land

He added: 1970 wounds must heal for T&T to move forward.

Servant Leader of NJAC Kwasi Mutema told the congregation at the Cathedral: you have young people who would have followed the script, so to speak. They went to their schools, they went to their universities, they graduated, and we have young professional doctors and lawyers who just cannot find work, and they are unhappy. They cannot move forward with their lives.

They want to start a family, but they have to deliberately put that on hold. That is a severe state of unhappiness and we do not realise what we are doing to our society when you get that level of unhappiness. A happy people do not commit crime.

Read the original post:

NJAC Rededication: 1970 Revolution impacts spirituality and religion in T&T - Wired868

US election 2020: Biden seeks spiritual comfort before maelstrom of ‘loneliest job in the world’ – Sky News

The church of St Joseph on the Brandywine in Wilmington has played a significant role in the life of Joe Biden.

It was no surprise then that, even as he begins the transition from private citizen to most powerful man on the planet, he sought spiritual comfort within its 19th-century walls.

What was surprising perhaps was that the small gathering of media and members of the public at the church gates was granted such a clear view of the former vice president, now under increased Secret Service protection, as he made his way inside.

It was to the total delight of locals who are getting used to the novelty of being home to Delaware's first ever president of the United States.

He was accompanied by his daughter Ashley, and grandson Hunter, and it wasn't just the 10.30am mass that brought the president-elect to St Joseph.

:: Subscribe to the Daily podcast on Apple Podcasts, Google Podcasts, Spotify, Spreaker

As he left the service, he made the short walk to the church's cemetery. Buried there are his first wife Neilia and daughter Naomi, killed in a car accident in 1972, and his son Beau, who died of cancer in 2015.

As they paid their respects, Mr Biden was seen to put his arm around the shoulder of Beau's son Hunter.

It was a very personal moment for a man whose private life has become part of his political story. That story will now be America's guiding light for the next four years.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Karen Peterson and Victoria Bandy also regularly pay their respects at Beau Biden's grave. Like most people in the neighbourhood, they know the Biden family and have plenty of stories of their encounters over the years.

They say Mr Biden's Catholic faith is fundamental to who he is, and the president he will be.

"I think it means everything to him. I think it gives him the strength to do this," said Victoria. "I don't think his heart was really in this to begin with because of losing Beau, but he knows Beau would have wanted him to do this."

Karen added: "Joe's faith is central to his life and the person he is."

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

While Mr Biden was at mass, the team managing the transition from the Trump administration was unveiling a website outlining his plans. More announcements are coming - a sign that Mr Biden is not holding his breath waiting for Donald Trump to concede.

There was a wave for the supporters who had gathered in the sunshine to offer their good wishes before Mr Biden retreated back into the protective bubble that will be his life from now on.

It was a few moments of peace and reflection for a man who will soon enough face the maelstrom of what has so often been called the loneliest job in the world.

Read the rest here:

US election 2020: Biden seeks spiritual comfort before maelstrom of 'loneliest job in the world' - Sky News

OPINION/SPIRITUALLY SPEAKING: Were still in this together – Wicked Local Kingston

The first lesson about leadership I learned, was as a ninth-grade football player and the quarterback for my high school team.

We are not enemies, but friends. We must not be enemies. Though passion may have strained, it must not break our bonds of affection. The mystic chords of memory will swell when again touched, as surely they will be, by the better angels of our nature. --Abraham Lincoln

The first lesson about leadership I learned, was as a ninth-grade football player and the quarterback for my high school team. We were led by our coach, lets call him Coach Jim, and he coached us in a way Ive since learned by personal experience and study, is about the worst strategy to bring folks together. The worst way to motivate others. The worst way to unify disparate group of folks. The worst way to lead.

He was a bully.

He ruled the field and the locker room, not with inspiration or support or encouragement or joy at play, but instead with fear; with threats, with anger and with such meanspiritedness that he drove me to quit the sport, one Id loved since I first took to the gridiron in the fifth grade. At practice the air was filled with expletives, shouted at full volume at the team, and so we learned to just put our heads down and play, hoping Coach would not single us out for a tongue lashing before our peers. We were afraid of his wrath. The violence of our sport was reflected in the violence of his rhetoric and actions.

When he did wind up to let us know how he was really feeling, his face would turn a deep shade of red, and the spittle would fly from his mouth and his words would flow with such contempt for us that we prayed for play to end early. Coach was in a bad mood. The irony is that for all his blow-hardy speeches and closed-fist threats and arrogance, our team played awfully. We allowed him to divide us and be pitted against one another. He imagined he was bringing out the best in us, I suppose, but the truth was he was a terrible coach. That season we lost more than we won and rarely had any fun as we played.

So much for a bullys ability to lead, to evoke the better angels in human nature.

I couldnt get this notion of bullying off of my mind as our nation went to the polls and decided our national fate and direction for the next four years. It has been an ugly, ugly campaign season and an ugly, ugly year for human behavior in our land. Who could have imagined the image of armed protesters, bullies, storming the state capitol in Michigan this summer in response to the lockdown? The blatant disregard, even contempt, so many of my fellow citizens have shown for science and public health, that folks would actually see the rejection of mask wearing as a symbol of liberty, patriotism even?

Are we living in a parallel universe? Is this really America?

Though in some places the threat of COVID has brought us together and inspired compassionate and wise leadership, in other places, for lack of such moral leadership, through bullying leadership, the virus now threatens us two-fold. First, with the threat of getting sick and then with the threat of watching us come apart at the seams as a country, our devolution as a democracy.

Instead of leaders evoking the best in us, our angels, too many leaders instead evoke the worst in their followers. Inspire violence and hate, not peace and cooperation. Call out for cruelty and not compassion, meanness and not mercy.

Last March as COVID spread throughout the land, I was idealistic and hopeful. I prayed to God that this shared threat would bring out the best in us as fellow citizens. To each do our parts to keep the whole healthy and well and unified. To sacrifice for a neighbor: to mask up and distance and take good care. Together, we would get through this. When Americans are unified, anything is possible.

But if competent leadership is not there to move the masses to act with such virtue, it will not happen. So, even though we are facing into the worst heath crisis our nation has faced in 100 years, are now almost eight months into what might continue for another year, we are sick in a way. We are diseased civically, and we are in critical care as a national community.

Thats the price we pay when bullies lead.

Chaos. Fear. Danger. Incompetence. Disunity. It doesnt matter if it is on a football field or in a family or a corporate boardroom or in the halls of government.

Thus, in the days ahead I offer this prayer for our land. That we might be led by those who bring out the better angels of our nature, as Lincoln once said. That we might move off of the sidelines of democracy and get right into the thick of it, into the contest. Vote. Organize. Be informed. Take responsibility for our citizenship. That America might live up to the noblest of our shared ideals: neighbor helping neighbor, and always, ALWAYS remembering.

We are all in this together.

The Rev. John F. Hudson is senior pastor of the Pilgrim Church, United Church of Christ, in Sherborn (pilgrimsherborn.org). If you have a word or idea youd like defined in a future column or have comments, please send them to pastorjohn@pilgrimsherborn.org.

Read more:

OPINION/SPIRITUALLY SPEAKING: Were still in this together - Wicked Local Kingston

Inspiration – The Abundant Power Hour 11/09 by Universal Energy | Spirituality – BlogTalkRadio

"Topic Pick" Change is in the air!Have something you would like us to discuss? Email Ask@UniversalEnergyRadio.com.Conversation that make a Difference! Shift for your highest and greatest good in this world of great transformation. How we look at all things. How we interact with all things. Join the conversation when we are LIVE. Messages from Source through tarot and intuitive guidance and validation for your nexts steps.

Three major transitions for Anita were her multiple marriages and birth of her son which taught her many lessons about herself, the discovery of her love for computers which led to some great careers, and her move to a rural area which enriched her love of nature. All of these experiences have led her to tap into her intuitive abilities and study more about God, Angels, Reiki, Channeling, Shamanism and Spirit Animals.

Anita knows that she just has to ask for help and guidance and it will appear. She trusts and flows with the love in the Universe!www.earthpathguide.com

Anna Banguilanis a Life Coach & Spiritual Humorist. Blessing the messes and now helping others tap in to their Master Mind to release blocks and resistance to receive what they truly want, bringing more clarity, joy, peace and revealing their true identity.www.lifegetsbetterandbetter.com

It's Time Ya'll Just Ask!

More:

Inspiration - The Abundant Power Hour 11/09 by Universal Energy | Spirituality - BlogTalkRadio

Yes, There Is a Spiritual Side to Having a Healthy Relationship With Food | RELEVANT – RELEVANT Magazine

Lets face it. Over the last few months, theres been a lot of stress in the world and when theres a lot of stress, many of us take it on with our appetites. Yeah, its been pretty easy to justify snacking in the middle of a global pandemic, a historic election season and the general tension of being an American in 2020. And while theres nothing wrong with that, we do need to be mindful not just of how were eating, but of how our eating is affecting us.

Nicole Mesita is a dietician who lives in San Francisco who has a passion, in her words, to help people of all shapes and sizes discover body peace and acceptance through the unconditional love of Jesus. She spoke with us about why shes not a fan of dieting, what a better alternative for healthy eating might look like is and how to be mindful of others who are struggling with food issues.

Tell us a little about what you do?

Eating disorders are one of the deadliest mental illnesses. Its actually second, the first one is narcotic usage. People dont really realize that, and they also dont realize that the number one cause of eating disorders is dieting. People are dieting at a younger age, theyre going on diets earlier and what we know about diets is that 95 to 98 percent of them dont last. They result in weight regain, and even more weight gain. Theres metabolic problems that can happen.

So, an eating disorder can really derail someone from Gods calling on their life. Its one of those mental illnesses that a lot of people want to have too, because if they lose it, then theyre afraid of the consequences, like weight gain and loss of control.

It is a really hard one to break free from. When I talk to my clients and theyre telling me 95 percent of their day is spent thinking about food and their body, thats not biblical. Thats the opposite of what God says in Philippians think about things that are praiseworthy. God doesnt want us being obsessed about our body.

I hear you talking about some of the dangers of dieting and diets, but youre a dietician.

I promote what we call mindful eating or intuitive eating. God gave you, me and everyone hunger and fullness signals. Those were innate in us when we were babies. We cried when we wanted food, and then we stopped when we were full. So Im teaching people to go back to hunger and fullness signals. Eating when youre hungry, stop when youre full, honor what it is that you actually want. God does give us a variety of food that we do crave, and those things arent wrong to crave. Sometimes youre going to crave a big salad, other times youre going to crave a burger.

So my job as a dietician is not only helping people foster this healthier relationship with food and their body, but teaching them how to get back to those innate signals that they had when they were kids before diet culture took them away from those things.

Do you see spiritual connections to healthy eating?

I think weve created this idol about physical health where physical health only looks a certain way. What the research really tells us is that it can look a variety of ways, and God created us all with different body sizes. If were idolizing a certain body, thats not spiritual. You can achieve health no matter what your size is. Thats not saying that every person is healthy, regardless of their size. Its just saying that you can achieve health no matter what your size is, and itll free you up to really focus on your spiritual health, which is more important.

Theres so much research about spiritual health being tied to being overall health like lower blood pressure, lower stress and all of those things, but our culture equates physical health with being thin and looking a certain way. Research is telling us more and more that just isnt the truth.

This summer increased a lot of our stress and a lot of us fell into unhealthy eating and maybe unhealthy drinking habits. Do you have any advice for people whose stress has them eating too much, not eating enough or maybe just eating at odd hours?

I think the first thing I would ask is for people to get curious about those things. If you are saying, Hey, Ive been eating a lot more than usual, or Ive been eating at random times in the night, I would say ask yourself about why that might be happening. Not in a judgmental or accusatory way, but just a genuinely curious way. Because oftentimes, the way that we eat does directly affect what is going on with our mental health and the stress that were experiencing.

It really takes a lifetime to unlearn some of the weird ideas weve picked up around not just eating, but healthy eating.

Right. The Church also holds its own beliefs about them too, and they can actually be super harmful. Were often not creating a very inclusive environment for people with larger bodies in churches, and thats absolutely heartbreaking. Youll hear about different diets in church Bible studies, or people will make jokes about gluttony. Its just totally heartbreaking as a dietician to hear my clients say, I dont feel comfortable going to my church because of these comments.

How can we all be more aware, not just of our own possible unhealthy eating habits, but of the need to be sensitive to others who might be struggling?

I think really just being aware of weight discrimination and how that affects people in larger bodies. The stigma for those individuals increases cortisol in their body, and cortisol is a stress hormone that, makes you, funnily enough, gain weight. Were just creating this cycle of stress causing this weight gain, and thats a thing that people really cant control either.

Original post:

Yes, There Is a Spiritual Side to Having a Healthy Relationship With Food | RELEVANT - RELEVANT Magazine

Morality, spirituality must be at centre of discussions aimed at lasting unity – Stabroek News

Dear Editor,

Recent correspondents Ravi Dev and Vincent Alexander were referred to in a letter published in the November 5th Stabroek News written by Tacuma Ogunseye in a letter titled `The major hindrance to unity is unwillingness of race groups to accept need for adjustment in historical advantages they achieved.

The insights obtained in the argument by Dev and Alexander are credible and further no one can quarrel with Tacumas analysis of both sides. I will not break a lance with Tacuma on his emphasis on the question of indigenous people. Safe to say that a necessary tool as we seek to reach the plateau of national unity is a thorough understanding of the history of each of the six races of Guyana.

The burden of this letter is the contention that beyond all we have heard from, Dev, Alexander, Tacuma and others is a question I offered in (1991) that to ensure the success of whatever programmes and systems are put in place a moral and spiritual revival is the lynchpin of a national edifice.

I remember one seasoned journalist the late Cecil Griffith trivialize this idea.

This revival and understanding of morality and spirituality, must be at the epicentre of discussions and decisions aimed at lasting unity.

If we sit around the conference table and participants are devoid of these characteristics, lasting unity, genuine love for fellow man and a deep sense of patriotism will remain an elusive dream.

Yours faithfully,

Hamilton Green

Go here to see the original:

Morality, spirituality must be at centre of discussions aimed at lasting unity - Stabroek News

Spiritual teacher Sri M comes out with new collection of short stories – Times of India

Author and spiritual teacher Sri M has come out with a new collection of short stories titled, "The Homecoming and Other Stories", publishing house Penguin has announced. The book, which features 13 stories, urges readers to delve deep into the human spirit and get a glimpse of why people do the things they do.From horror stories to tales that will shock and pull at heartstrings, the book claims to have something for everyone in this eclectic collection."To me, a short story is like the lovely little stream that trickles down my backyard when it rains. Before the monsoon stops and the stream vanishes, I rush to catch its subtle movements, as the stream makes its way to the river nearby."And the river, it continues to flow in its own 'novel' way, come rain or shine," said Sri M, who turned 72 on Friday, said.

Born as Mumtaz Ali in Thiruvananthapuram, Sri M was awarded the Padma Bhushan, the third-highest civilian award in India, in January this year for distinguished service of high order in spirituality.

Visit link:

Spiritual teacher Sri M comes out with new collection of short stories - Times of India

Tokayev receives head of Spiritual Administration of Muslims of Kazakhstan – Kazinform

NUR-SULTAN. KAZINFORM President Kassym-Jomart Tokayev has received today Chairman of the Spiritual Administration of Muslims of Kazakhstan, Supreme Mufti Nauryzbai kazhy Taganuly, Kazinform has learnt from the Akorda press service.

During the meeting, the Head of State was informed of the charity activity of the Spiritual Administration of Muslims of Kazakhstan amid the coronavirus pandemic.

According to Nauryzbai kazhy Taganuly, the Spiritual Administration of Muslims of Kazakhstan lent a helping hand and provided Kazakhstani hospitals with oxygen devices, face masks and protective gear made at sewing workshops at mosques. Additionally, 314 apartments have been provided within the framework of the Yel ulesi paterde program.

The meeting further focused on the plans and prospects of activity of the Spiritual Administration of Muslims of Kazakhstan, creation of the Islamic academy, construction of the Library of Islam and theology and other problems.

Having praised the work of the Spiritual Administration of Muslims of Kazakhstan, the Head of State wished it success in further endeavors.

Read the original post:

Tokayev receives head of Spiritual Administration of Muslims of Kazakhstan - Kazinform

Worldly concerns bleed into the spiritual realm | State – Southernminn.com

A figure of a saint consumed by flames after protesters storm a church in Chile. In Armenia, a nationwide prayer for peace. A womens protest against abortion restrictions outside a Polish house of worship.

Around the world, Associated Press photographers captured moments like these in the past month showing how secular conflicts, disputes and worries inevitably intersect with the spiritual realm.

An international dust-up sparked anti-France protest in Istanbul after Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan suggested his French counterpart, Emmanuel Macron, needed mental health treatment because of his attitude toward Islam and Muslims.

In the United States, President Donald Trump visited a Las Vegas church while on a campaign tour to Nevada as the politically polarized nation barreled toward the hotly disputed November election. With Trump, a rare churchgoer, sitting in the front row, the pastor proclaimed that God told her that morning he would secure a second term.

And amid the latest outburst of fighting between Azerbaijani and Armenian forces, two volunteer doctors, one of them wearing military fatigues, prayed with a priest in a church in the separatist Caucasus region of Nagorno-Karabakh, in Azerbaijan territory but under control of ethnic Armenian forces.

Traditionally, pets are blessed the first week in October for the feast day of St Francis of Assisi, the patron saint of animals and the environment. In the Philippines, a Roman Catholic priest sprinkled holy water as a dog poked its head out of a car window in a socially distanced drive-through blessing.

These and more are among the APs top faith-related images published in October.

Read the original post:

Worldly concerns bleed into the spiritual realm | State - Southernminn.com

The strange tale of a former massage therapist turned religious leader & his 5 spiritual wives – The Independent

- Advertisement -

SingaporeThe strange tale of a local religious leader reported by the former husbands of the women followers who he took as spiritual wives has been in the news lately.

The leader, according to a series of reports in The Straits Times, is not a registered Muslim Religious Teacher, and was already under investigation in 2015 due to accusations of inappropriate behavior toward the daughter of one of his spiritual wives. The police said in the following year that no action would be taken against him, after consideration of the facts and circumstances.

He is not, however, listed on the database of certified religious teachers in Singapore, the Asatizah Recognition Scheme, which ST discovered upon checking with the Singapore Islamic Scholars and Religious Teachers Association (Pergas).

The man, who is unnamed in the reports, is a former massage therapist. He founded a new Muslim sect that encourages members to gamble, which is forbidden, in order to raise money to help the poor.

- Advertisement -

A report about the women who are now his spiritual wives says that they remain loyal to him and aid the man in running his eatery and events management company, that they are all in their 40s and that they constitute the core of the religious group, which numbered around a dozen at one point.

Moreover, the five spiritual wives have attained a degree in education. One lectures at a junior college and co-founded a womens association. Another has a diploma in Shariah law and certificates in Islamic education and research, has founded a womans organisation and served as the senior executive of a charity group. Two of the wives had been employed in a local Malay Muslim organisation.

A number of the wives have children and are divorced from their former husbands.

ST identified the woman who has a diploma in Shariah law and certificates in Islamic education and research as Kak Long, which means older sister in Malay, and who is believed to have recruited the other wives.

The group does not practice open recruitment but directly approaches trustworthy candidates or financially independent women.

Kak Long told ST that there are individuals who are spreading untruths regarding the sect.

ST also endeavoured to speak to the leader of the sect, and reported that on Oct 25, the man told ST that he has no involvement in the group and denied having spiritual wives.

But the husbands of the wives are telling a different story.

One man, who used the moniker Mr Ahmad to hide his identity, told ST he had been part of the group from 2004 to 2007, joining because of the groups alleged thrust to help Muslims, especially women and the needy.

At one point, all the men were forced out of the group and it became an all-female following.

Mr Ahmad said the leader brainwashed his ex-wife and that the spiritual wives had been promised S$3 million each in 2015 if and when the groups businesses succeeded.

Another former male follower told ST that the leader would go into a trance and spoke in an Indonesian accent. Through a spirit called Mbah, he would advise followers on religious and business matters, and even scold them for doubting his divine powers.

He left the group in 2009 after the leader began calling himself a prophet.

Three of the spiritual wives former husbands, as well as four other ex-members of the group came forward to ST with the story, for the purpose of warning the Muslim community regarding the errant leader.

Pergas chief executive, Ustaz Mohammad Yusri Yubhi Md Yusoff, told ST via an email, We encourage the Muslim community to report any deviant teachings to the relevant authority, that is, Muis (Islamic Religious Council of Singapore).

We would also advise our Muslim community to seek knowledge from qualified religious teachers or asatizah who are recognised under the ARS. /TISG

Please follow and like us:

- Advertisement -

Go here to read the rest:

The strange tale of a former massage therapist turned religious leader & his 5 spiritual wives - The Independent

Trip to top of wind turbine offers spectacular sights and spiritual sensation – Wicked Local Plymouth

First there was the Sermon on the Mount. Now theres the Sermon on the Wind Turbine.

First there was the Sermon on the Mount. Now theres the Sermon on the Wind Turbine.

Pastor Neil Eaton of New Hope Chapel in Plymouth took advantage of a visit last week to Camelot Industrial Park to preach from a very tall pulpit: 250 feet off the ground while standing on the top of the towering structure. With only a harness hooked to a railing holding him back, the minister said he felt very close to God while experiencing another more understandable sensation.

"A reverent sense of fear," he said. "Thats a healthy one, given that I stood above the earth at 250 feet!"

Eaton accompanied Matt Glynn, a part-owner of the wind turbine, and others including this reporter for a chance to see Plymouth from a whole new viewpoint. Bright blue skies with barely a breath of a breeze made for a spectacular experience. Most of the participants, though, preferred to witness this grand vista while being seated on a tiny platform high above the ground.

Not Pastor Eaton, who climbed the heights with his son Ben. He stood bolt upright to fully appreciate this moment way up there where the air is rarified.

"Our perspectives are generally shaped by what we see and hear around us horizontally in culture, people and circumstances," he said. "But we have a more hopeful perspective when we see everything from a greater altitude."

Local veterinarian Norm Stillman of Court Street Animal Hospital also went to the top of the turbine, which involved climbing two rather long ladders and then taking a slow elevator ride inside the structure. He too ascended to the platform, but decided sitting on it was more prudent than being erect.

"I never even thought about standing up," Stillman said.

He added, "Ive always believed we live in a very beautiful corner of the world, but surveying it in one sweeping panorama from the top of the turbine really brought it home to me. It was a spectacular moment and very high on my Plymouth bucket list. Now if I can just get a ride on the Mayflower, my list will be complete!"

Glynn, Lou Alvesand videographer Josh Malloy, who took drone photos of the climb,were also part of the turbine troupe. For the president of Glynn Electric, this was his third time to the top of the tower, which generates 1.5 megawatts of electricity enough to power 322 homes for a year. The turbine is owned by Claudette Thomas, Joe and Ann Balboni, Simon Thomas and Brian Kuhn. Glynn is a minority owner.

"It was no less scary than the first two times," he said. It was his first time up there since the death of his son Joshua Glynn, who was killed in an automobile accident two years ago. Joshuas Way, a residential road within view from the top of the turbine, was named for the Plymouth man.

"Looking off toward where Joshuas Way is, I could not help but think we are going to make Plymouth a better place to live with what we are doing there," he said.

As a man of the cloth, Eaton equated his high-altitude experience to a spiritual sensation.

"When we have a relationship with God through Christ, we know what we see and hear is not all there is," he said. "There is more. The resurrection of Christ gives us a higher, more hopeful view of our lives. The scriptures are like the view from the wind turbine. When we read them, we can see further into the future with joy."

The pastor also said he felt a comforting sense of security. "Because I was fastened by a safety harness lanyard to a solid support on the frame of the turbine," he said with a grin.

For this reporter, viewing Plymouth from 250 feet up was exhilarating, breathtaking and a little bit scary. Not being as trusting of a higher power as Pastor Neil, it was more than gratifying to experience this majestic moment firmly seated on the platform.

Oh me of little faith!

More:

Trip to top of wind turbine offers spectacular sights and spiritual sensation - Wicked Local Plymouth

Spiritual Enlightenment: What It Is and How to Experience It

the mystical experience of spiritual enlightenment. photo:shan sheehan

Its a ridiculous idea that I, or anyone, could possibly convey what enlightenment really is. The most accurate relationship to the matter would demand that I just shut up. Although that leaves you with nothing, thats

Many misconceptions and myths have been built up over time and we need to shake these off of the word enlightenment. You know that were not talking about a seventeenth century movement, a modern outlook, or being informed of something. Our focus is more akin to a Zen usage, referring to whats thought of as a spiritual awakening of some sort. But even here, people are often misled to believe that becoming enlightened means transforming from an ordinary caterpillar of a human into the butterfly of a transcendent soul, or some such.

Whatever methods may purport to achieve such an endwhether its to be highly disciplined and monk-like, sit endlessly in contemplation, or learn to surrender to a higher powerat some point were supposed to be rewarded with a dramatic change in state, experiencing something blissfully transcendent. The good news about this view is that it encourages personal participation, as opposed to merely asking one to believe in religious, spiritual, or even scientific assertions. The bad news is that its fundamentally a false view. A change in state is irrelevant to the truth. Freeing the term enlightenment from the baggage of rumor and myth is useful if our goal is to know whats true about it. When considering what enlightenment really is, its important to get beyond the word and hearsay, and to realize that this Consciousness is prior to any idea, image, term, or belief.

Consider that at some point in human history, even after someone had already become deeply and directly conscious, there was no enlightenment. In other words, no one was seeking spiritual enlightenment; they were seeking the Truth. If the legend of Gautama Buddha is to be trusted, even he wasnt searching for something called enlightenment. He was trying to become free, to completely understand and transcend life and death. This is a different focus.

In the work of trying to personally understand what self, life, and reality are all about, enlightenment is a term used to indicate a direct-consciousness of the Absolute truth, whatever is absolutely true regarding what is. In the case of you, which is the primary subject for spiritual enlightenment, it is your true nature, what you really are, the absolute reality of your existence.

the only way to truly know spiritual enlightenment is to experience it firsthand. photo: victor bezrukov

Even disregarding how its used in other domains, the term enlightenment can be confusing. Although spiritual enlightenment is always about whats True, there are various degrees of consciousness to be had, and the term refers to all direct-consciousness, whether shallow or deep, about self or reality. While it always refers to being directly conscious of the true nature of something, its not always referring to the same subject matter or the same level or depth of consciousness.

Vernon Howard

Although defining or explaining spiritual enlightenment isnt possible with any kind of accuracy, that doesnt mean that it is ambiguous or that it is something open for debate, about which each individual should draw their own conclusionslike what kind of diet is best for them, or whether or not to believe in god. Such intellectual pursuits are a completely different matter from direct-consciousness. By definition, a direct encounter cant be found in anything heard or imagined. It also cant be found within opinion or conclusion, thought or feeling. These are all activities that relate indirectly to things. Being conscious of whats absolutely true is not something to decide about within ones world of opinions. Even though all this may be challenging to sort out, spiritual enlightenment is exactly and only what it is.

Why is it so difficult to understand the domain of enlightenment? Because comprehension comes from the mind, and the mind best grasps only what can be categorized and objectified. In other words, the way our minds work is to take meaningless indirect input and carve it up into distinct and separate aspects, and then give meaning to these distinctions as they relate to us and to every other distinction.

The word object originally referred to an item presented to the senses. What we perceive both physically and mentally is the object of perception. When we think about something that is not an actual object, we still use objectification as a mental reference, either as image, metaphor, or representation. Its the way we create and relate to whatever is imagined, perceived, or thought. When you imagine something, for example, you create an image or mental object in your mind. Since image is a function of sight, you must mentally form an object to view. In similar ways, this object-relating is involved in how we create thought, memory, emotion, and so on.

Our whole mind is framed upon object relations. For example, we speak of an emotion as if its a particular and separate thing located inside the body, and even somehow imposed upon us, it was like sticking a knife in my heart, or when we hear that someone is a political lightweight, or that a conversation was a heavy discussion. Time itself is not an object, but notice how we think of the past as a place where things happened, and the future as the next objective reality we will enter. The depth and reality of this mental framework go far beyond my simplistic examples and in ways that are difficult to describe or notice. Even with further explanation, its likely that much will be overlooked, but the reality of this matter will arise again and again. Im suggesting that this objectified framework for thinking is the foundation for our entire perceived world, which makes it well worth considering on your own.

In any case, because of this natural limitation of mind, we are challenged when tackling thought outside this framework, and further, are incapable of grasping what cant be grasped by the mind. Direct-consciousness or spiritual enlightenment is of that kind. It cannot be understood short of having it, because it does not fit into any framework whatsoever.

Because the Absolute cant be grasped by the mind, its impossible to imagine what spiritual enlightenment is. Trying to conceive of something inconceivable is doomed to failure. Since the mind functions by making distinctionsbasically knowing everything as if separate objectsand relating these distinctions to each other, this creates what we call experience and so what we perceive as reality. That being the case, the mind is ill-equipped for the job of being conscious of absolutes. An absolute lacks objective or even subjective distinctions. The Absolute truth isnt separate from anything. It is everything, but not any thing, nor is it several things or even all things. The absolute nature of Being is the source of reality and reality itself.

See? That just doesnt communicate anything useful, does it? There is no use in talking too much about direct-consciousness since it will of necessity sound like gobbledygook. Just consider that it is not anything you think or imagine. Enlightenment is not a change of state, an experience, a conclusion, or a philosophy. Its not even an insight or realization. It is not a function of the mind or perception, which is all we have access to. It is only you. It is the thing itself. That is why we call it direct. But as Ive said, even direct is too far.

to experience spiritual enlightenment is to transcend the mind.

Using the word direct implies immediate and without buffer, but even that implies a separation, as though some action needs to be taken to be direct. This is not the case with spiritual enlightenment because you are already there, so to speak. There is no action, there is no perception, there is no separationno matter how infinitely small or close. There is NO separation, NO process. It IS you. It IS reality. It IS the nature of existence. It is NOT a perception of these. It is NOT an experience of any kind, subjective or objective.

You can see then that if your mind struggles to identify and so know the object (physical or ethereal) that is your true nature, it can never happen. We must consciously be in the very same place and reality that is the thing-itself. So if we use a term like direct experience, it is only for lack of any more accurate means of conveying whats meant. Thats to be expected, however, since no term or idea can be accurate. Spiritual enlightenment is not something experienced, and although direct is the modifierindicating something different about this use of the word experienceit will inevitably be misunderstood.

Nothing in our culture or language can adequately represent thisConsciousness. One reason is that almost no one ever has such deep direct-consciousness and so there is very little that is widely sharedwhich is necessary for something to be culturally acceptable and known by people in general. Yet even if it were represented and we had ways to speak about it that were more closely aligned with whats true, these would still only be representations and not the real deal. More than any other aspect of human existence, enlightenment can only be grasped directly. Short of that, it cannot be understood.

Lets try to clear up what I mean by experience since its crucial to this discussion. Your experience, in this moment and every moment, is all that you know and perceive. It is everything you are aware of in any wayyour internal state, mental activities, what you perceive as your environment, everything you feel or sense, intuit, imagine, remember, think, believe, and even the influence of the content of your unconscious mind. It is the whole world for you; it is what you experience as you and reality, others, and everything else.

Think of it this way: There is nothing in your awareness that is outside of your experience. If you think there is, then you arent grasping what Im calling experience. People with a spiritual bent or imagination often seem to hold that they can experience something outside of what Im referring to as experience. If youre doing that, stop it.

Experience is created by mind; and the predominant, although not exclusive, contributor to this knowing of our reality is perception. Perception is not a direct encounter of what isit is always indirect, different than, and separate from whatever is perceived. Spiritual enlightenment requires a direct-consciousness of the truth, not an indirect perception or experience. Our consciousness is stuck within this indirect perceptive-experience. Its as if we are looking out from rather than being conscious of the very place we exist.

The perceived reality in which we live is very difficult to get free of because its nature isnt recognized. Our perceived-experience is a bit like being in a dream. Within the dream, no matter where you look or what you do, there is nothing outside the dream world that constitutes your entire experience. Grasping that its a dream will suddenly end the search because it becomes clear there is nothing within the dream that you could possibly use to free you of it. This is because the perceived dream reality itself is not real. Once you wake up from the dream, that entire perceived reality falls away. The problem with this analogy, however, is that when you wake up, you are immediately in a very similar reality. Its basically the same kind of perceptive-experience, with the added distinction of being the real one, allowing you to make a distinction between the dream world and the real world, grasping that the dream world isnt real. But youre still stuck in perception and experience, and the context of object-reality.

It is this object context that creates the most significant difference between these two worlds. Because of this context, we see that in the dream world there are no lasting consequences, while in the real world there are. This difference makes it almost impossible to deny the reality of our real world. The thing is, nothing needs to be denied. Its the true nature or absolute reality that were considering. Whatever is true about the world is already true. Our problem in grasping that, however, is a lot like searching within a domain that can never provide the answer. In that way, this analogy of the dream worldwhere there is no way out of that experience without grasping the true nature of itis apt.

Enlightenment is not an aspect of experience or mind on any level or in any way. This is not to say that ones mind goes unaffected when having an enlightenment experience. It is affected, and always in a positive way. There is increased freedom from previously binding aspects of mindnot every aspect, and usually not most, but some. This may be why, in some circles, it has come to be called a spiritual enlightenment experience. But any changes in ones experience or mind are not the enlightenment itself. This often goes unnoticed, even by people having some direct-consciousness.

Accompanying a spiritual enlightenment is often a temporary euphoria, the length of which depends on the depth of the consciousness. This doesnt mean that having an insight or realization and being euphoric about it constitutes an enlightenment. The only essential aspect of spiritual enlightenment is an increase in consciousness, and specifically becoming directly conscious of the true nature of some aspect of existence. From this consciousness, the mind will create some form of knowing whats true in the matter. It will be as accurate as the mind can be, but it will not be the consciousness itself. You may have a genuine insight or realization but, without this clear consciousness that is the same as the thing itself, you have not had an enlightenment.

When you have a genuine spiritual enlightenment, you become conscious that your nature is nothing. You have no quality, no aspect, and you exist in no location, so there is no objective aspect for the mind to grasp. The true nature is absolute, and so paradox is an aspect of this consciousness, making it incomprehensible to the mind.

Although much of this cant be understood prior to having an enlightenment or twowhich I highly recommend for everyonethe idea at least provides a possibility to which you can relate in some way. Yet I cant overemphasize that this is not something to believe. If you believe what I said about being nothing, etc., then you are believing in the wrong thing. No matter what you think or believe about this, it is not the truth.

Having an experience about which you might say there is nothing or you experienced emptiness or some such, is NOT an enlightenment. It is a perceptive-experience, and any experience is a function of mind. People who work hard to contemplate these matters can and do come up with many altered states, realizations, conclusions, and experiences, many of which might be described in similar terms. But these are not direct-consciousness. Spiritual enlightenment is a consciousness of the true nature of you, not an experience of any kind. These statements about enlightenment are made only to provide a springboard from which to leap, and to shake up the fixed mind-set about something that is literally inconceivable. Please hear them in that context.

The Consciousness that is enlightenment is grasping the Absolute truth about the nature of existence (fill in the blank as to the existence of what). It turns out that there is absolutely nothing here, but this isnt an absence of anything, nor separate from what is, because it is existenceits not an aspect or quality or perception. There is no objective reference for understanding this. What I just said will be confusing because, of necessity, you will search experience, mind, perception, thought, and feeling in order to translate whats said, and no matter what you come up with, it wont be what I meant. The Absolute truth does not and will never lend itself to something that can be thought, felt, sensed, intuited, or perceived in any waynot even in an unusual or special way.

Creating the possibility of dropping some aspect of the person you are opens the space to do so, but it doesnt do it for you. Recognizing, for example, that youre not your anger, or even one who needs to use anger as a tool to manage his needs, does not eliminate anger from your automatic impulses. It does, however, create the opportunity for you to see anger for what it is and stop using it, or begin to use it in a very different and conscious way.

This is true for any aspect of yourself, such as the idea that you are superior or worthless, wanting to control others, your fear of rejection, your habit of interrupting, your urge to smoke, the need to be right, being pretentious, or any other characteristic within your self-experience. But youll instinctively hang on to anything that is seen as you, so how is it possible to let go of it?

In order to let go of or eliminate any characteristic feeling-impulse or behavior, it must be recognized as not-you and not needed. The operative word here is recognized. Whether it is in fact not you does little unless you experience it as such. Once something is experienced clearly as not-you, the mental-emotional impulse that creates the characteristic in question can then be released from the lexicon of aspects identified as you or as a tool of yours.

Depending on the depth of your experiential consciousness, this may be as easy as simply dropping it, or you may find yourself undergoing a process of long-term hard work. No matter how it goes, the first requisite to free yourself of anything is that you recognize it is not you. Very powerful and embedded human assumptions make this difficult.

Spiritual enlightenment allows one to grasp that the self is unreal and that your true nature is inconceivable and not formed at all. This provides a platform upon which to truly transform. At this first level of direct-consciousness it is likely not to be all that deep or clear, but this distinction will eventually evolve as you become even more conscious. With this consciousness you create the possibility of more readily letting go of any aspect of your self-experience, since, with some attentiveness and work, you can see it as not-you.

In that case, it seems less like destroying something called you and is instead freeing yourself from limitations that you are not. If you hold that something is you, you cant let go of it because its you. If its experienced as not-you, then obviously you can let go of it. See how this works?

Dont confuse disliking something about yourself for seeing it as not-you. Rejection of some self-aspect isnt the same as grasping that it isnt you. The very fact that you feel compelled to reject it already acknowledges that you experience it as yourself and want that to be otherwise.

Wanting, liking, disliking, denying, ignoring, believing, and so on are not the same as the distinction of you and not-you. You can apply all these reactions to anything perceived. What makes something you is that you identify it as you. Multiple aspects exist in what you call yourself, both positive and negative. With enlightenment, you become conscious of what is really true about your nature and existencewhat you actually areand realize that you are not what you previously experienced as yourself.

But make no mistake, spiritual enlightenment is not a panacea. Simply having an enlightenment experience, or several, doesnt change you without your participation. As Ive said, enlightenment isnt the end, as people often think. Its the beginning.

Whatever occurs within the mind is never a consciousness of ones true nature. Mind is about brain and mental activity, concept and perspective, perception and experience. Your true nature is about the actual or fundamental existence of the being that you are. You are your true nature; you generate and perceive the content of mind. Consciousness isnt mind, but mind is a form of consciousness.

Becoming conscious of your true nature doesnt necessarily change the mind. Consciousness, mind, and brain arent all references to the same thing. For clarification, we could hold the brain as a tool, and mind as using the tool. Sort of like a piano is the tool and music is what arises from playing it. Music isnt the piano, and the piano isnt music, but they are related. Consciousness, in this analogy, is like the player-listener, which is neither music nor piano, but the creator of both.

Im just trying to make some distinctions here so that you have a better way to understand what Im saying. In this depiction, spiritual enlightenment is becoming conscious that you are the player-listener (sort of), and not the tool being played, or the resultant content of the playing. Dont take all this too seriously; it is just a way to provide you with an inaccurate understanding of what I mean by saying spiritual enlightenment doesnt necessarily change the mind. Grasping that your nature is neither an object (the brain) nor the activity of experiencing and understanding (the mind) doesnt change the object or activity. Only changing those changes those.

Of course, realizing that you are the player-listener when you formerly experienced yourself as music or piano would be quite an awakening. This would likely change the way the music comes out, or what is played, but much would remain the same. After all, the keys and notes are still the same ones, and most of the music has already been written. Furthermore, since so much of the brain mind has been ingrained as automatic and repeated patterns of reaction and activity that have been deemed necessary for self-survival, this forceful activity is likely to continue. It is the activity of life, and this proceeds as if of its own accord.

We need to take care not to divide up these distinctions too sharply for fear of falling into the trap of oversimplifying the matter by object-ifying everything. Unfortunately, such objectification is supported by the very use of an analogy. In fact, the analogy only works because it does just that. It divides the references into distinct and known objects that are more easily understood. This is its purpose and strength, but also its weakness. It demonstrates the assertion I made about how mind works to grasp things. This is unavoidable.

But, as can be seen within this piano analogy, there is an even greater danger of misunderstanding. Please dont hear player-listener as the observer or witness or awareness. These are already the accepted forms of self-as-consciousness and they are not what Im talking about. To make this mistake would be a significant setback. Remember, although Consciousness is not mind, mind is a form of Consciousness, so in our piano analogy, you would actually be all of it and none of it at the same time. But you will be ignorant of this fact if you are identified as any of the elements experienced, rather than the Absolute Consciousness that is you. This is why we need to take care to reach beyond the presentation of any analogy or model to seek out the truth.

Changing anything about oneself takes a personal commitment. Yet theres a cultural reason why people confuse spiritual enlightenment with transformation. Because contemplation is the accepted road to spiritual enlightenment, it appears that its a task of searching for something. This something might be held as grand, life altering, and the greatest thing since sliced breadotherwise why would anyone work so hard to pursue it? I suspect people imagine that anything with such a reputation would transform them merely upon its encounter. This is false. As Ive said, consciousness of the truth doesnt change anythingthe truth is already that way.

Becoming conscious of who and what you really are is invaluable for transformation, but this awakening alone doesnt accomplish it for you. For the most part, any personal changes that occur must be done consciously and deliberately, or else little about the self is changed. Without intervention, the automatic programmed self-mind will still tend to dominate your experience, and so, shy of profoundly deep or complete spiritual enlightenment, some ignorance or lack of consciousness will remain. Because of this, spiritual enlightenment degrades into a form of knowing but not being. This knowing is correct as a reference, but inaccurate if its considered to be the thing-itself, or the true nature of being.

Enlightenment only occurs suddenly, since it is outside of time or process. When someone has what is called an enlightenment experience, it is a sudden glimpse of the true nature of something, usually oneself. Although such consciousness is absolute and true, it is rarely universal. It isnt becoming conscious of everything, so to speak. This is obvious to anyone whos had a first enlightenment and is confused by the fact that there still remains much unknown and the self remains pretty much intact. Remember, after realizing his true nature, one of my students said, Its now obvious that I am not this mind or this self, so why do I continue to be trapped within both mind and self? This is a good question, and requires some attention.

As Ive said, becoming conscious of whats true isnt about changing anything. Most of the attachments and identifications that comprise the self-experience usually remain intact. The consciousness of your true nature doesnt necessarily provide any depth of consciousness about the workings of the self-mind. With such direct-consciousness, however, experience, self, and mind will be viewed from a different perspectivesort of like seeing them from the outside for the first time, and with the understanding of not being any of them, thus providing the possibility of not identifying with them. This creates a new relationship to all that, but it doesnt change all that.

As ones consciousness increasingly deepens, the confusion, or remaining ignorance, regarding consciousness and mind begins to clarify over time. Still, this is only likely to occur if the self and mind are studied and observed through the lens of this consciousness. Such clarity is usually a gradual process, since it occurs within the normal activities of being human and within human understanding. Although spiritual enlightenment is sudden and outside of mind, understanding is usually slow, as the mind is steadily recreated to include a new function capable of paradoxical thought. We might call that developing wisdom.

Even with this depth of consciousness and understanding, there usually remains in the mind a separation of self and being, of consciousness and perceived reality. Eventually, there should be no such separation. The entire matter of absolute existence can have nothing left out or left unconscious. Existence and non-existence cant be seen as separate or different. Enlightenment is absolute existence and must include the direct-consciousness of the self, the mind, reality, and all that is, or it isnt complete.

Eventually, when Absolute Consciousness is grasped to be the same as existence, a natural transformation must occur since, at that point, being human wouldnt be separate from the Absolute. This would change the whole foundation of experienceit would both exist and not exist, and these would be the same. This maybe an ultimate goal for some, but not for many, and is exceptionally rare. The truth is almost no one is going to achieve it. Upon his own complete spiritual enlightenment, Gautama Buddha himself didnt think people could possibly grasp it, and he was only convinced to teach because of the slim possibility that someone might. Yet this shouldnt stop anyone from pursing it, accomplishing whatever depth of consciousness can be had and freedom attained.

Albert Einstein

Most people who pursue spiritual enlightenment dont actually want the complete and Absolute truth. Perhaps they want to directly experience their own true nature and have that as an accomplishment. This is fine, and a good outcome for most. From here, transformation can be undertaken in earnest and with a much better foundation. Some sort of transformation was probably their real goal in the first place. Of course, just as in the case of spiritual enlightenment, they will find that their fantasies were wrong about transformation too; but that is how it always begins.

Although it cant be stated any more clearly, people just dont believe that spiritual enlightenment is not something perceived in any way. Since perception is how we know or experience reality, we dont imagine any other real possibility, and certainly not something weird called direct-consciousness. How can you relate to a statement such as: Absolute Consciousness does not exist in the domain of experience, and yet is not elsewhere? The response to such an assertion is to imagine that it is a very special form of experience, or a unique domain of perception. No. This is simply what can be thought when trying to conceptualize the matter. Of course, it is mistaken. It may be impossible to communicate, but it really cant be said much better than this:

The Heart Sutra

Another option would be to say that objective reality is Nothing or does not exist; and Nothing is objective reality. Here, form is everything that is or exists. Nothing is an absolute and is the true nature of form. Since its a translation as well as a reference, we can reword this description a bit without changing the meaning but perhaps clarifying the message:

That didnt help much, did it? Im sorry that its not easier to get. The above communication represents a very deep level of consciousness. This depth of realization goes beyond self and into the heart of the real nature of reality. Even those whove had their first few spiritual enlightenments dont really grasp the truth of whats being said. Although it sounds neat, doesnt it?

Enlightenment is not an experience or something experienced. It is not a perception or something perceived. It is not an object or even a subject. It isnt what you may define or figure out. It is not an idea or conclusion. It isnt a state of mind of any kind, nor a really big and wonderful world of magical phenomena. All of these things may happen, but none of them are spiritual enlightenment, no matter how hard you may assert that they are.

Enlightenment simply reveals to your consciousness that there is absolutely nothing here, and it is you, and it is reality, and it is everything. Since the mind cant hold such an absolute consciousness, this will degrade into a form of knowing that can be related to; and even those whove had such consciousness often take this knowing for the consciousness itself. They are mistaken.

If youve had a kensho (first glimpse) or two, all this may make some sense to you, although youve likely found such acknowledgments absent from the enlightenment discourse. Hearing my assertions, however, you can probably relate to them in some way. Some of what Im saying (and will continue to say throughout this book) is directed to those whove had at least one spiritual enlightenment experience. Regarding such experiences, there is precious little communication available, and most of it is kept on a very cryptic level. I understand why this is sotrying to explain these matters, one has to be willing to come off as a pontificating fool. Although my attempted communications will run into more serious challenges than that and may be misunderstood, know that Im trying to speak to you as seriously and candidly as possible.

If you havent had your first enlightenment experiences yet, much of whats said here wont make any sense, but you should hear the story and possibility anywayit plants a seedand its useful to hear that it doesnt automatically transform you, since transformation exists in the domain of process. Therefore you can begin transformation without spiritual enlightenment. Of course, enlightenment can help a great deal but much can be done without any enlightenment whatsoever. If transformation is your goal, you would be ill-advised to wait for complete spiritual enlightenment.

This article on spiritual enlightenment is excerpted with permission from Chapter 3What Is and Isnt Enlightenment of Pursuing Consciousness: The Book of Enlightenment and Transformation by Peter Ralston.

Go here to read the rest:

Spiritual Enlightenment: What It Is and How to Experience It

5 Things You Should Know About Spiritual Enlightenment …

Firstly, Spiritual Enlightenment has many meanings. The word enlightenment means the full comprehension of a situation. If we consider this definition, enlightenment should be defined as the full comprehension of the spiritual world and our spiritual side. Spiritual Enlightenment is also called Spiritual Awakeningor Spiritual Growth. This spiritual experience passes overreaches religion, thought and our mind. It gives us a level of knowledge about the spiritual world.

It is the complete understanding of life, ourselves, nature, the worlds we live in, everything. There are many people trying to reach enlightenment. The truth is that only those who are searching and learning spiritual ways to get the enlightenment will be lucky to find it. There are many methods to get Spiritually Enlightened. These are spiritual practices and works. Some of these are: meditation, prayer, chanting, yoga, martial arts, fasting, dancing, sensory depravation, near death experience, spontaneous enlightenment and many more.

Meditation is one of the most powerful spiritual practices. It comes in many types, you can try them and choose the best for you. Meditation is a method of calming your mind and bringing your attention to your inner self, your inner world. It will help you clear your mind and thoughts. It teaches you how to focus on your inside instead of the outside, material world.

Prayer is another powerful Spiritual Enlightenment method. But I am talking about listening for God, not praying for help. Nowadays praying is not what it is supposed to be. People pray for help, only when they are in need of a miracle. These prayers will not teach us spirituality. The real prayers are when we contemplate and silence our minds. Waiting for God and its presence. We are listening to our peaceful mind. We are calm and full of gratitude. This kind of prayer can get us to enlightenment.

Chanting is the singing of words and sounds that help ourselves to align our inner spiritual energy with God. Therefore, chanting as an enlightenment method is often used in different cultures (African, Hawaiian, Native American). It can appear in different forms as Gregorian chant, Quran readings, Buddhist chants, Vedic chants, mantras and many more. These chants will calm our mind. They also change our bodys vibration. This vibration can help our spirit to grow.

Yoga is a method that connects us with the divine. The positions and meditation and breathing techniques that it includes can help us calm our mind. It will help us focus on our inner self. It will help us to unite our spirit with the divine and reach the Spiritual Enlightenment.

In conclusion, there are many more Spiritual Enlightenment. They are waiting for you to discover them. Practice a spiritual work, not only for the enlightenment, but for your inner peace. It will help you keep yourself in balance. It will keep you and all your levels healthy including your mind, body, spirit, emotions.

Read the original:

5 Things You Should Know About Spiritual Enlightenment ...

Spiritual Enlightenment – Truths & Paths | Live and Dare

Buddhist monks, Hindu yogis, modern spiritual teachers, and Burning Man enthusiasts may all use the termspiritual enlightenmentbut are they speaking about the same thing?

In this article I will explore what enlightenment is, both the traditional definition as well as the modern changes to it. There is no consensus around this topic, and its an area of intense metaphysical debate. My purpose here is to eliminate some misconceptions, and to discuss what are the optimal attitudes to develop in relation to this lofty goal.

Why is this important? Because the right attitude will empower you to live a deep and fulfilling life, while the wrong attitude will make you feel frustrated, inferior, or indifferent.

The traditional concept of enlightenment comes from the spiritual traditions of India notably the various schools of Yoga, Vedanta and Buddhism and denotes the highest state of spiritual attainment. The end of the path.

Some of the synonymous for enlightenment, given by different schools of thought, are:

All these traditions have several points of disagreement when it comes to defining the metaphysical nature of enlightenment. However, at their root they all seem to agree on at least three points:

As you can see, the bar is high.

There are similarities between this concept and what is called Salvation or the Kingdom of God in Christian Mysticism, and union with God in Sufism, but exploring those parallels is beyond the scope of this article.

According to the Bhagavad Gita, only one in a billion people knows the Truth, that is, is Enlightened. Yet, nowadays there are many people who judge themselves to be enlightened.

For 99% of those people, one of the following is true:

There will always be people in category a, and Im not so worried about that. The ego is a master of deceit, and it can hide itself in spirituality too.

I also have no problem with category b, although I find it potentially confusing and misleading to name certain stages of the way as enlightenmentwhen they dont actually meet the traditional standards defined for this state (as per Hindu and Buddhist references).

There are levels of experience. There are no levels of Realization. Ramana Maharshi (paraphrased)

There are many milestones on the way, after which deep and permanent transformations happen, and a lot of the possibility of future suffering simply drops away. I speak of this from having observed several teachers, and also from my own personal experience.

These milestones are better called awakening. And there are many stages of spiritual awakening before final enlightenment/liberation. It is a process.

Moving on, the real problem is people in category c. They are distorting the essential meaning of enlightenment. Perhaps they confuse certain awakenings along the way with full liberation, judging themselves to be enlightened.

In order to make that work for themselves, they need to redefine enlightenment in softer terms, so that it matches their level. And then, because there is obviously a lot of work still ahead for them, they either say that enlightenment is a step in the journey and not the end of it or they pretend that all which is still lacking is not that important (like most neo-advatins).

I dont mean to say that everyone that claims to be enlightened is being deceitful, nor does it mean that they are not effective spiritual teachers. But, if they do not meet the traditional requirements, it seems to me they are either lacking humility or self-awareness. Or else they should use another word to describe their experience/state.

Looking on the bright side, however, even such watering down of enlightenment is beneficial for some people, since it makes it feel more achievable. With that comes increased motivation and dedication to spiritual practice.

Still, one can get that benefit without distorting the initial teaching. Ill explore how towards the end of this post.

Many of the traditions mentioned above agree that enlightenment is already here and now, and that it is our true nature or the true nature of reality. It is not that we have to achieve it or become it, but rather we need to remove the obstacles to its expression.

Some teachings regard liberation as a goal, something to be consciously and methodically worked towards. They emphasize the need to transform and purify the mind (or even transcend it altogether) through practices such as meditation, spiritual study, ethics, devotion, etc. We can call this the gradual approach.

Other traditions prefer to emphasize thealready present aspect of enlightenment, and then center the teachings more around inquiring into yourtrue nature and simply living in the present with non-attachment. We can call this the sudden approach.

In my own spiritual journey, I have practiced for several years under both of these frameworks. There are subtle differences in the type of language they use, the practices they recommend, and the people they attract.

Below is a list ofpros and cons based on my own experience and observation.

Gradual Approach (example: Theravada Buddhism, Raja Yoga, etc.)

Sudden Approach (Zen, Dzogchen, Advaita, etc.)

These approaches are both traditional, true and tested, and I respect them greatly. It is common to see seekers moving from one to another in different stages of their journey.

A combination of practices seems more desirable. Or at least being aware of the traps of your particular approach.

The seeker in a gradual path can also cultivate the feeling that everything is perfect here and now, and that the true nature is always accessible. Conversely, the seeker on a sudden path can cultivate the practices and mental qualities of the slow approach, and contemplate the truth of sudden enlightenment, gradual cultivation.

Full enlightenment is possible, and is not only for monks. However, it is extremely rare. I believe that at any time in the world there are probably less than a hundred people in that peak of achievement.

When this truth becomes clear about how elusive and rare full enlightenment realluy is, many people feel discouraged, frustrated, or demotivated. The amount of effort involved is so great, and the time requirements are so considerable, that many just conclude that enlightenment is not for me; I could never practice like those masters.

For most people, seeking it obsessively is actually a source of suffering.

All of these issues happen when we take enlightenment as a hard goal, and cling to it. And these problems all disappear the moment we make a small tweak in our mindset.

What is this tweak? To look at enlightenment as a direction, rather than a goal. Here, my martial arts background comes to rescue:

A goal is not always meant to be reached.

It often serves simply as something to aim at.

Bruce Lee

This attitude also prevents the following problems: (a) feeling that you are not good enough, or worthy; (b) feeling frustrated with the slowness of your progress or the size of the road ahead; (c) wanting to give up; (d) watering down the original concept of enlightenment.

Once you regard it as a direction, you are much softer about it. You are able to better enjoy the path itself, without anxiety, and to grow towards liberation in a more organic way. It also becomes less likely that your spiritual search will negatively interfere with other aspects of your life.

In many traditions, the teachings are quite binary: you are either ignorant, or enlightened. However, since enlightenment is so rare and elevated, this way of seeing things can often be unhelpful.

There are like a thousand important milestones that can happen before full enlightenment, and many of these are truly life-changing. Acknowledging these mini-awakenings can help keep the seeker motivated and on track.

The advanced Yogis, monks and masters that we may compare ourselves to are in the peak of their path. They are like the Olympic athletes of meditation. Many of us are only serious amateurs, aficionados, or semi-professionals. Very few people will practice like those masters. But everyone (you included) can practice a little, and with time enjoy a much happier, more peaceful, and more meaningful life.

Of course, we can and ought to look up to those who completely embody the state of liberation, for the purpose of being inspired to walk in that direction. But this ceases to be helpful once it turns into a self-degrading or demotivating comparison.

If the spiritual search is likened to the search for wealth, then the enlightened ones are the deca-billionaires. It takes a tremendous amount of effort combined withfavorable conditions to arrive at that point.

But how many of us want to go that high?

While very few people are ready to put in the effort and sacrifice to build that amount of wealth, most people can benefit from putting in some effort and arriving at a point of financial freedom. For the great majority of seekers, going from financial struggle to a million dollars in the bank is good enough. Which takes me to my next point.

The spiritual path exists so we can free ourselves from suffering. So we can find true peace, unity, wisdom, meaning. So we can live a deep life, a life of truth.

So let us learn to follow this path and grow in it in a gentle waywithout violence towards ourselves (or others), for it defeats the purpose.

Let us learn to enjoy the path itself. Then there will be no sacrifice. No struggle. Only the natural expansion of consciousness.

If you force a child to grow up quicklyand abandon all her toys, this will not be effective. Even if she grows up quicker than usual, she will resent this growth, and hold secret attachments to the toys that were given up prematurely.

If instead you simply facilitate her growth, a moment comes when the child feels like giving up those toys of her own accord. This is organic growth painless, natural, and timely.

This type of growth is hindered when we try to compare ourselves to others on the spiritual path, pretend to be ahead of where we actually are, or cling hard to the ultimate goal. So let us avoid that trap and focus on the journey right now, where we actually are, one step at a time.

Withtime, as our practice deepens, there will be a sense of joy, peace, and freedom that comes from your spiritual practice that is unlike anything you can experience elsewhere. When that starts to happen then whether it still takes you 5 months, 5 decades, or 5 lifetimes to achieve enlightenment, it wont matter much. You are happy and well, in your unique place in the universe, and nothing else matters.

The first signs of progress on the path of Yoga are perfect health, physical lightness, a luminous face, a beautiful voice, and freedom from craving. Swetasvatara Upanishad

Not bad, Id say.

For my side of things, I dont practice 16 hours a day like monks do, nor do I follow the teachings perfectly. I meditate two to three hours per day, and try to follow the principles and practices during the day to the best of my ability.And I can tell you, from personal experience, that the fruits of the first steps in the path of Liberation are more valuable than anything the world can ever offer you!

Keeping this in mind, and Enlightenment as a north (rather than an obsessive goal), I keep on the path happily, knowing Im doing the best thing I could do with my life. Whether enlightenment exists or not, whether it is possible for me or not, whether it takes ten years or 10,000 yearsseeking it seems to lead to a good life.

In a way, enlightenment and spiritual service are the goal and purpose of all my efforts. But from a more pragmatic perspective, I simply practice because I practice.

I practice because it is the best way to live.

Let us spiritual seekers take enlightenment seriously, without changing the original meaning of this statelest we diverge into sidetracks that only take us half-way up.

Let us take enlightenment as a direction, a Northand not a hard goal to cling on to. If enlightenment happens, thats great. If not, let us walk with the conviction that even the first true steps in the path of liberation already bring more life benefits and superpowers than anything we can find in this world. Simply practicing the spiritual techniques can change your life for the better (here is how it changed mine).

Spirituality, in the end, is about finding the best way to live. Passionately explore your spiritual path; but also enjoy it.

When I started writing this article, I had a lot to say, and no idea how it would end. There are blood, sweat, and tears behind each of the lessons expressed in this post. My heart was pushing me to share this with all fellow seekers out there, and now my mind has finally caught up with these learnings and gave them form.

May this be beneficial for your journey.

Read the original here:

Spiritual Enlightenment - Truths & Paths | Live and Dare

The 3 Stages Of Spiritual Enlightenment : In5D

Spiritual enlightenment is the fundamental goal of most spiritual practices that you undertake. Enlightenment marks the culminating point of your practice you feel unity of soul with everything, all the mental and physical engagements are left aside. Spiritual enlightenment is the possession of highly evolved souls. Spiritual masters from all over over the world experience spiritual enlightenment, and help others on their own paths.

Spiritual enlightenment is often categorized into levels for practical purposes. The highest stage of spiritual enlightenment marks the attainment of unity with God or being one with everything. But can still there are certain levels through which the individual needs to evolve. In a similar way that man has evolved from more primitive animals, the human conciousiness or soul also evolves. For our practical purpose, put them in stages and analyze the state of being in each stage:

At the very first level of enlightenment, the individual starts experiencing reality as it is. It means that your mind ceases to interfere with what you are experiencing. We are engaged in continuous talk, gossip, analyzing the environment around us, planning about future, or worrying about the past. When you are in a state of spiritual enlightenment you are completely in the present moment. You stop judging and labeling the world. Your mind is calm, quite and still. You are very awake, and aware of the current moment right now.

At the second stage of enlightenment, you feel apart of yourself in everything around you. You feel a connection with every object and individual in the world. The borders between yourself and the world around you dissipate. Your soul begins to merge with Supreme Soul. You feel that you are not individual anymore and not separate from anything. You feel that you are in everything and everything is just a part of the Supreme Soul from where you also have emerged. Many people describe this feelings of completeness and love.

The third stage of enlightenment, you no longer feel connected to everything but realize you are everything. You the experience the oneness of Creator Source and are not separate from anything in the universe. This stage of enlightenment is a direct experience of oneness.

Spiritual enlightenment is the fruit that sets you free, as you lose all wants and wishes to receive the fruits of your actions. You feel the bliss of completeness and true love. At first it gives you the feeling that you need Light. At the next stage, you feel that you are merging in Light. And in the final stage you and the Light are one.

source: http://www.spiritualnow.com/articles/19/1/What-is-Spiritual-Enlightenment/Page1.html

Gregg Prescott, M.S.Editor, In5D.com

It is important to remember that when it comes to spiritual enlightenment, you cannot enlighten anyone else for this is a sole (and soul) journey. You can always help others along their path or even light the candle that piques their curiosity, but the only one you can truly enlighten is yourself. When it comes to enlightening others, all you can do is to plant the seed and hope the garden is watered with knowledge.

In5D PATREON: https://www.patreon.com/in5d See our In5D articles the day before theyre released, AD FREE, on Patreon for a minimal donation!

Follow In5D on Facebook, YouTube, Twitter, WG1WGA, Patreon, and OnStellar

Subscribe to In5d to get the latest news in your e-mail inbox.

[newsletters_subscribe form=1]

Tags: enlightenment, spiritual, spiritual enlightenment

The rest is here:

The 3 Stages Of Spiritual Enlightenment : In5D

What Is Spiritual Enlightenment or Spiritual Awakening?

A definition of spiritual enlightenment or spiritual awakening is hard to pin down. This is, in part, because "spiritual enlightenment" and "spiritual awakening" have been used in so many ways to describe so many things, similar to the way in which "love" is used to describe everything from a preference for ice cream to a merging with everything. And it is also because spiritual enlightenment and spiritual awakening are such rich and complex experiences that they are innately hard to define.

Some definitions are very specific and narrow. One such definition for spiritual enlightenment is the complete dissolution of one's identity as a separate self with no trace of the egoic mind remaining. This sets the bar very high and means that very few people qualify as enlightened.

The opposite approach is to say that everyone is enlightened, that there is only awake consciousness. In this view, it's only a question of whether this natural awakeness has been recognized or not. Of course, when a word describes everything or everyone, it loses some of its usefulness. If everyone is enlightened, then why even talk about it?

Perhaps there's a definition that includes both of these perspectives, which recognizes that consciousness is always awake and enlightened, but the amount of awakeness, or aware consciousness, that is present in any moment can vary. This definition acknowledges that there's a difference in the amount of awakeness, or enlightened consciousness, that different people experience or that one person experiences at different times but still suggests that the potential for full awareness or becoming enlightened is the same for everybody. If every apparent individual consciousness is infinite in its potential, then each can also be infinite both in its capacity to expand or awaken and in its capacity to contract or identify with a narrow or limited experience.

If all consciousness is made of the same essential awareness and light, and if everyone has an equal potential for enlightenment, then all expressions of consciousness are equally valid and valuable. Everyone truly is a Buddha or enlightened being, at least in potential. So defining enlightenment in many ways now makes sense, depending on what is being pointed to. One may use the word enlightenment to point to the state of self-realization beyond the ego or to point to the innate potential for this realization in all of us.

As for differentiating between the words enlightenment and awakening, "enlightenment" implies a more finished and constant state of realization, while "awakening" has more of the active quality of a verb and therefore suggests a movement or shift in consciousness. An awakening may be defined as a sudden increase in the overall amount of consciousness an individual is experiencing. There can be small awakenings and bigger awakenings. Not only does consciousness have unlimited potential for the amount of awakeness, but it also has an unlimited potential to shift in any way, at any moment. Consciousness can and sometimes does shift from contracted states of fear, anger, or hurt to expanded states of peace and joy in an instant. Unfortunately, it can also shift in the other direction. Consciousness has no fixed state.

As it is being defined here, a spiritual awakening is a sudden expansion or shift in consciousness, especially a more dramatic one (we don't usually refer to a minor realization as a spiritual awakening). Enlightenment, on the other hand can be used to mark a particular level of realization or awakeness, even if the exact definition varies depending on who is using the word, as it does with every word.

What really matters is what your awareness is doing right now. How is your consciousness appearing or shifting in this moment? Are you realizing more of your experience and Essence right now? Or are you contracting and limiting your awareness with thoughts and identification? Is any shifting happening from reading these words?

Enlightenment or awakening is a profound mystery, and the best definition may be found in the actual experience of your own shifts in consciousness. Just as it's more nourishing to eat an apple than read about one, so it can be more rewarding to explore the movements of your own awareness than to try to understand these things mentally. While definitions of such things can be helpful, it can also be beneficial to not have too many concepts, which could interfere with your actual experience. It's a good thing that language isn't so fixed or defined when it comes to spiritual unfoldment. Maybe the best definition of enlightenment is no definition. Then there is only what is found in your own direct experience of awareness.

(The above is from the free ebook: That Is That: Essays About True Nature available here.)

What are the causes of spiritual awakening or enlightenment?

Consider the miracle of a flower. What is it that causes a plant to flower? Does sunshine cause a plant to flower? Does lots of water? Or is it good soil? Maybe all of these together? Or is there really something more subtle in the nature of the flower itself that causes it to flower? Is it something in the DNA of the plant? Does that mean the whole process of evolution over eons of time is involved? What other factors might cause the flowering? Does gravity play a part? The season and the temperature? The quality of the light? (Some plants will not flower under glass or artificial light.) What about animals that eat the fruit and spread the plant? Or the birds or bees that pollinate the flower? Do they cause the subsequent flowering of the newly established plants? Are there even subtler influences? What about presence and love? The intention and attention of a gardener? And is the existence of the world of form itself necessary for a plant to flower? And what about consciousness? Is there an ultimate force that directs the creation and unfolding of all expressions of form that is behind the appearance of a rose or a daisy?

What if it is a combination of all of the things mentioned? And also what if they have to all be in the right proportion? Is that proportion different for every species of plant? Some plants need lots of water or light to flower. Others will die with too much water or light. There is a unique formula that is involved with the appearance of the simplest apple blossom and the most complex orchid.

When you consider all of these influences and even more that were not mentioned or can't even be known or imagined, then it truly is a miracle when a flower happens. It is impossible to say what causes it to happen with any certainty or completeness. Yet, it's an act of incredible grace whenever all of these diverse, subtle, and gross influences come together in just the right way for an iris or a bird of paradise to open its unique petals to the sky. Ultimately, if you trace all the factors back to all their causes, you find that everything that exists is somehow intimately connected to the cactus flower or dandelion in your front yard. We need a vague and powerful word like "grace" to name this amazing interplay of forces and intelligence. Obviously, to reduce it to a formula doesn't come close to capturing or describing the vast richness of variables and forces at play. There is no formula complex enough to capture the whole mystery of a magnolia blossom...

Spiritual awakening is a kind of flowering of consciousness. When consciousness expands and opens into a new expression, we call that a spiritual awakening. And while there are as many kinds of awakenings as there are flowers, they are all equally mysterious. What is it that causes a child to start to awaken to the nature of words and language? What causes the awakening of sexuality in a teenager? How does one suddenly know they are falling in love? Or even more profoundly, how does one explain the birth of unconditional or divine love?

Finally, what are the causes of the most profound spiritual awakenings, where consciousness suddenly recognizes its ultimate true nature? Why does that type of flowering appear in one consciousness today and another one tomorrow? If the formula for a simple petunia is a vastly complex interplay of earthly, human, and even cosmic forces, then imagine how complex the formula is for the unfolding of a human consciousness into full spiritual enlightenment as one's true nature. The good news is that we cannot and do not need to know the totality of the formula involved to grow some petunias, and we cannot and do not need to know the formula for spiritual enlightenment. Yet, we can be curious about all of the factors involved and even play with them to see what effects, if any, they may have in our individual experience of consciousness unfolding.

Sometimes the mysteriousness and unpredictability of the whole process of awakening leads us to shrug our shoulders and say it is all up to grace or to God. And, of course, that is true; and yet, does that mean there's no place in this unfolding for our own actions? Is there a place for spiritual practice? What about meditation, self-inquiry, or study of spiritual texts? And how about devotional practices or the transmission of presence from being with a great teacher or master? We can easily become disillusioned with any or all of these activities because the results they produce are so unpredictable and varied, and it can seem simpler to avoid the question of their role altogether. Ask any gardener if it works every time to water and weed and fertilize a plant? Or does a plant sometimes fail to flower no matter how well it is cared for? But does that mean you never water or fertilize your plants?

At other times we can be overly convinced that our practice or inquiry will lead to the desired results, often because it seemed to work at least once for us, or for someone we know. The only problem with spiritual practices is that they occasionally work! Then we think that we have the formula and that every time we sit down to meditate or ask, "Who am I?" we will have that same experience of expansion or awakening again. That is like thinking you will always have a bumper crop of marigolds every time you plant them.

There is a middle way between denying the importance or role of spiritual practice and having unrealistic expectations that self-inquiry, meditation, or devotional practice is going to, by itself, cause an awakening. We can experiment and play with these processes, just as a gardener will experiment with different fertilizers or watering patterns to see what happens. It ultimately is all up to grace, and yet, what if grace works through us as well as on us? What if spiritual practice is as much a part of the mystery of existence as anything else?

Maybe we can hold the question of what role inquiry, devotion, effort, surrender, transmission, meditation, gratitude, intention, silencing the mind, study of spiritual books, involvement with a teacher or master, ripeness of the student, karma, grace, and luck play in our enlightenment with an openness and curiosity, instead of a need to define their roles once and for all. The flowering of consciousness in your own existence is as unique as every flower, and ultimately we are all here to discover how it is going to happen uniquely this time around. What is your consciousness like right now? How open is the flower of your awareness? Is it still budding or has it blossomed? Just as every flower fades and another comes along, what about now? And now? What happens this time when you meditate? What happens now when you inquire "Who am I?" How does it feel right now to open your heart with gratitude even if nothing much is happening? What impact does reading this article or any other piece of writing have on you? Every stage of a plant's existence is valuable and even necessary for its flowering. Your experience is always adding to the richness of the unfolding of consciousness in this moment. May you enjoy the garden of your true nature, including when spiritual awakenings are blooming, and when spiritual enlightenment seems far away.

(From the free ebook: That Is That: Essays About True Nature.)

About Nirmala: Advaita spiritual teacher, Nirmala has been offering satsang and spiritual mentoring in the U.S. and internationally since 1998. Nirmala offers a unique vision and a gentle, compassionate approach, which adds to the rich tradition of inquiry into our true nature. He is the author of several books, including Nothing Personal: Seeing Beyond the Illusion of a Separate Self and Living from the Heart. In his books and mentoring sessions, Nirmala points to the wisdom within each of us, and fosters the individuals own potential for spiritual awakening and enlightenment. Free ebook downloads of several of Nirmalas books are available here.

Visit link:

What Is Spiritual Enlightenment or Spiritual Awakening?

National Trust observes Divali with educational presentations – Loop News Trinidad and Tobago

The National Trust will observe this year's Divali celebrations witha look at the history of Divali and an overview of some of the well-known temples in Trinidad and Tobago.

Dr Radica Mahase, Senior Lecturer at COSTAATT, will do a presentation on the History of Divali from the time it was introduced by Indian Indentured Labourers to contemporary celebrations in Trinidad and Tobago.

This can be viewed on the National Trust Youtube channel on Friday, November 13.

Dr. Visham Bhimull, founder of Caribbean Hindustani, will also share an interesting history of Hindustani language and Divali.

This presentation will take the form of a pre-recorded video immediately followed by a virtual meeting with Dr. Bhimull for further remarks and questions on Thursday, November 12. .The Trust is also sharing the history behind the presence of some of the many temples that have come to form an integral part of the cultural, religious and built landscape that uniquely defines Trinidad and Tobago. here are the temples you can read more about on the Trust's website:Temple in the Sea, Exchange Village Shiv Mandir (Mud Mandir), Moose Bhagat Temple and Reform Village Shiva Mandir.

The public can look forward to opportunities to visit these when the Trust resumes tours.

The Reform Shiva Mandir

Temple In The Sea

Off the coast at Waterloo, this temple is regarded as a sacred pilgrimage destination for worshippers. Originally built in 1947 on land, Siewdass Sadhus first construction had to be removed as it was in McMillan Park, which was private land belonging to Tate and Lyle Limited. He was even charged and arrested after legal proceedings surrounding the construction of this structure. Nonetheless, determined to have the temple built, he turned to the sea and spent over 25 years toting material on his bicycle, from land to waters of the Gulf of Paria. His hard work is testimony to the strength of the human spirit. It is an essential ingredient when one considers that Divali is all about spiritual enlightenment. Our interpretation is that he was unwavering in his beliefs, which saw him through to the end of this project, allowing or members of his community to have a safe place of worship, to practice and carry on their beliefs. This temple is on a man-made island and is connected to the mainland by a pedestrian causeway. Images and murtis of Hindu deities are displayed in an exquisite manner. The temple was rebuilt in 1995 under a committee of which Randal Rampersad was Chairman.

Exchange Village Shiv Mandir (Mud Mandir)

This temple was built of mud and cow dung at the hands of indentured labourers who resided in the barracks adjoining the estate. Located in Couva, this is one of the oldest standing temples in T&T. The walls of this structure are termite resistant and feature large, raised-relief sculptures portraying several deities, making it unique to Caribbean vernacular architecture. The sole alteration to the original structure is the addition of an aluminum roof was installed in 1985. This Mandir is now a protected monument as it was listed as a property of interest in 2019.

Moose Bhagat Hindu Temple

Located in Tableland, it is believed to be the second oldest temple built in the Western hemisphere. Manhant Moose Bhagat Dass was allotted land along the Naparima/Mayaro Road after his indentureship. While clearing the land, his blade struck a rock and blood flowed from it. In a dream that night Lord Shiva appeared to him, instructed that a temple be constructed on the site of the bleeding rock- as this was actually Shivas resting place and therefore a sacred place. Work began in 1902 and was completed in 1904, with this temple being done in honour of Shiva. The stone that inspires this holy building resides with the temple.

Reform Village Shiva Mandir

Located in Gasparillo, this gem on Railway Road is an original historical building that was completed in 1945 but opened in 1946 on the night of Maha Shivratri (Great Night of Lord Shiva). The entire temple was constructed by hand, using sand and stone materials collected in buckets from the Guaracara River. The walls were hand plastered, featuring representations of Ganesh, Vishnu and Parvati. Without the use of modern tools and being compelled by faith to build their own place of worship, the Hindu forbearers, put in commendable work in creating this sacred site. In 2019 this Mandir became a listed property of interest protected under the National Trust Act.

The public is invited to visit the National Trust's Facebook page to share experiences on how they are celebrating Divali this year.

Continued here:

National Trust observes Divali with educational presentations - Loop News Trinidad and Tobago