Activists on both sides of gun issue wait for action from Biden administration – News 5 Cleveland

CLEVELAND Back in March of this year, hours before the COVID-19 pandemic changed the way political campaigns work, then-candidate Joe Biden stopped in Ohio.

First, he stopped in Columbus and met with members of two gun control advocacy groups, Everytown Survivor Network and Moms Demand Action, according to Rebecca Gorski a volunteer with the latter group.

Gorski was waiting for Biden's second scheduled stop that day, but in the hours between the end of Biden's stop in the state capital and his stop in Northeast Ohio, the seriousness of the pandemic set in, and the event was canceled.

Democratic contender Sen. Bernie Sanders was also scheduled to stop in Cleveland, but his trip to Northeast Ohio was also canceled. This was March 10, a week before the March 17 Ohio primary.

For the next seven months, traditional campaign conversations were often eschewed for speeches about COVID-19, the economy and recovery.

Despite the new style of campaign, which for Biden meant months of videos and small group discussions instead of large political rallies, Gorski said the issue of firearms in the United States wasn't forgotten.

"I think candidates were speaking about it more than ever before, and I think that it's important to voters," she said.

Gorski was active in the 2020 election for Moms Demand Action in the Cleveland area. The political action group was started in 2012 by Shannon Watts in the months following the mass shooting at Sandy Hook Elementary School in Sandy Hook, Connecticut.

"So we must address these issues at the federal level," Gorski said. "And we're lucky to have guns as champions like Joe Biden and Kamala Harris and the White House."

Now, President-Elect Joe Biden and Vice President-Elect Kamala Harris support the Democrat party platform.

Part of the platform includes enacting universal background checks, closing the "Charleston Loophole," ending the manufacture of assault weapons and passing legislation for safe home storage.

"Which is it's a good idea to have good home storage requirements," said Second Amendment activist and radio host Amanda Suffecool. She said the problem begins "when you add the word mandate and then you add the word under penalty of law."

Where Gorski sees promise in the Biden-Harris agenda, Suffecool sees a breach of freedom.

"When you talk to the liberal gun club, they're like, 'Yeah, that's the platform that's not real.' Well, if it's not real, why is it saying this is the direction we want to go?" Suffecool said.

Suffecool advocates for more education when it comes to gun ownership and usage. That is not in the current platform. She doesn't think the platform is going in the right direction.

These two women don't agree on much when it comes to gun issues, but they both say the pandemic hasn't dulled the conversation about guns in America.

That conversation is seen in action at the Parma Armory.

Owner Rob Eurle said at the beginning of the year he was preparing for a rush on guns depending on the outcome of the election.

But it was the start of the pandemic and the lockdown in the spring that really brought gun sales up.

"I think it's maybe across the nation that the Second Amendment is just getting more awareness now," he said. "And you could see through this spike that we saw when the beginning of COVID that we were over like 300% and sales of both firearms and retail."

Eurle agrees there needs to be more education for potential and current gun owners.

With a change in administration, Eurle is preparing for a change in regulations.

"We don't know what restrictions we might see, or less restrictions, we might say," Eurle said. "We don't know. It's a mystery, especially with a changing every day."

He said even if background check regulations change under the new administration, he doesn't expect any change in sales.

Go here to read the rest:

Activists on both sides of gun issue wait for action from Biden administration - News 5 Cleveland

Michigan writer’s 2019 novel has strange similarities to the real plot to kidnap governor – Fox17

KENTWOOD, Mich. A book titled "The Great American Cheese War," was supposed to be just that. A fictional book. When Paul Flower reads the back cover aloud, it makes you laugh at how ridiculous the plot seems.

Flower published The Great American Cheese War in 2019, with a London publishing company.

They loved it because they dont get Americans and our gun culture, Flower said.

The plot of Flower's novel may sound oddly familiar.

This book is about the Michigan governor getting caught up in a conspiracy involving a virus, the Michigan militia, and Wisconsin," Flower said.

It is satire.

The serious issues that are underneath the humor are gun culture, second amendment debate, and this notion that we dont know whats true anymore. We have conspiracy theories that are floating everywhere,

Then Flower's story, the one he wrote and published, started to become reality.

I started getting freaked out in April. Because April was when members of the Michigan militia were suddenly inside the capital with guns, Flower said.

As if that wasn't weird enough, October came. News of the FBI investigation into a conspiracy to kidnap Governor Gretchen Whitmer hit.

Then fast forward to October, and the news about the actual plot..and then I heard it ended in Wisconsin, I started getting phone calls from people asking if I was a time traveler, Flower said.

You can buy a copy of Flower's book here.

See the original post here:

Michigan writer's 2019 novel has strange similarities to the real plot to kidnap governor - Fox17

Letter to the Editor: Harry Crist – Lewis Herald

Its time to brace yourself. January 20, 2021 our country as we know it is about to change! The left is going to try to abolish all the rights so many of us have fought and died for. Little by little they will all begin to disappear.

To the folks that voted for green new deal, it will only destroy our new found energy supremacy, making us dependant on imported oil, and raise your gas prices. And free medical??? Be prepared for higher prices as well as waiting months for an appointment. They seek to destroy our second amendment and our Supreme Court... Just wait! Socialism does not work! A short look around the world should have opened your eyes, if youre able to look past the nose on your face.

BLM, ANTIFA and Libertarians will all soon become your new lawmakers. May God help us all! I pray for my children and my grandchildren that the Book of Revelations has not begun to show its ugly face.

Now is the time to stand tall and fight back against hypocrisy and those who choose to destroy the American way of life. I for one love my country and never falter or leave anyone behind, nor forfeit my unalienable right to live free or die.

Whether or not this election was fair, it is time for all Americans to take notice, we can no longer sit back and do nothing. Im an old man, once a warrior, who will always stand tall to support our Constitutional Rights. And even though its tough during these times, I keep God in my heart and right hand. God gave us the strength to fight for what is right, use it. We are all people in Gods Hand.

Harry Crist

588 Longbranch Rd.

Hohenwald, TN

931-796-1675

See the rest here:

Letter to the Editor: Harry Crist - Lewis Herald

Even in gun-lovin’ Florida where you can fish with an AR-15 we have our limits – The Ledger

The Ledger

I frequently write about what Florida does wrong.But today Im writing about what Florida has done right. And remarkably, its on the topic of guns.

Dont get me wrong: Florida is gun-crazy in many ways.

We hand out concealed-weapons permits like Tic Tacs, leading the nation. And weve pioneered the homicide-inducing stand your ground gun law which was written by a lawmaker who is also a funeral home owner. (Conflict of interest?)

But were not all-the-way crazy.

Florida has refused to join the rush of other states to sanction the open carrying of firearms.

Open carry laws are why you see scowling young men cosplaying as military commandos in political protests in other states, standing often with AR-15s slung over their chests among crowds of protesters.

When former President Ronald Reagan was governor of California, he signed the Mulford Act, a law that specifically outlawed open carry, after members of the Black Panther Party began patrolling the streets of Oakland while brandishing loaded weapons.

The Heller case, a 2008 landmarkU.S. Supreme Court gun-rights decision, stopped short of a blanket, unfettered Second Amendment right to open-carry firearms.

"Like most rights, the Second Amendment right is not unlimited, Justice Antonin Scalia wrote in the majority opinion. It is not a right to keep and carry any weapon whatsoever in any manner whatsoever and for whatever purpose.

Florida, despite its reputation as the Gunshine State, has remained one of only four states that prohibits open carry by law. And state lawmakers have resisted efforts by gun-rights groups to change that.

A bill to allow open carry in Florida passed the Florida House in 2016but died in a Senate committee. And a year later, the Florida Supreme Court upheld the state law banning open carry in a case brought by a St. Lucie County gun owner.

In Florida, open carrying of weapons is sanctioned when youre fishing, hunting or camping.

Soevery once in a while, open-carry advocates make a display of this exception by standing on a congestedIntracoastal bridge, pretending to be fishing with their AR-15s hanging from their shoulders.

Floridas ban on open carry looks wise now, considering how the open display of firearms has become a form of visual intimidation used at political protests during this hotly contested election.

The gathering of Arizona protesters supporting President Donald Trump outside the elections office in Phoenix included men legallydisplaying their military-style assault weapons.

And the interrupted plot to kidnap and kill Michigans Gov. Gretchen Whitmer called for a swarming of 200 armed militia members at the state Capitola place where open carry is permitted and the sight of civilian commandos armed to the teeth was not unusual.

After the arrests of militia members in the plot to kill the governor, Michigan tried to ban the open carry of firearms inpolling places on Election Day. But the state courts ruled that the guns would have to be allowed in the polling places.

So, take heart, Floridians. Were not that crazy.

We may have no shortage of aggrieved hotheads and Trump dead-enders riding around in their flag-flying Vanilla ISIS pickup trucks.

But the AR-15s these self-deputized patriots crave to display will have to be imaginary.

Frank Cerabino is a columnist for the Palm Beach Post. Email him at fcerabino@gannett.com or follow him on Twitter@FranklyFlorida.

Read the original:

Even in gun-lovin' Florida where you can fish with an AR-15 we have our limits - The Ledger

Firearms Litigation: Liability, Regulation, and the Constitution – Reason

On Tuesday, December 1, there is free four-hour continuing legal education program on "Firearms Litigation: Liability, Regulation, and the Constitution." The program is co-sponsored by the Center on Civil Justice at NYU School of Law, the Duke Center for Firearms Law, and the Solomon Center for Health Law and Policy at Yale Law School. It will run from 1 to 5 p.m., Eastern Time. Free registration is available here. The event will be transmitted via Zoom.

Panel 1 is "Liability Litigation: Products, Preemption, and the PLCAA." The Protection of Lawful Commerce in Arms Act (PLCAA) is a 2005 federal statute that bans many tort lawsuits against firearms manufacturers and retailers. The PLCAA does not restrict lawsuits about firearms that are actually defectivefor example, a handgun that fires when it is accidentally dropped.

As my 2016 post describes, the federal statute, like 34 prior state statutes, resulted from numerous lawsuits organized by gun control groups and certain government officials (including Andrew Cuomo). The coordinated suits aimed to present the firearms business with a stark choice: 1. Cede control of the industry to a supervisory committee run by anti-gun advocates; 2. Be bankrupted by litigation costs from many simultaneous cases in different courts.

The PLCAA regulations on lawsuits include what is called the "predicate exception." A business can be sued if it "knowingly violated a State or Federal statute applicable to the sale or marketing of the product, and the violation was a proximate cause of the harm."

Panel 1 will mainly examine the "predicate exception." The discussion is timely. In 2019, the U.S. Supreme Court denied cert. for a 4-3 Connecticut Supreme Court decision in Remington v. Soto. The Connecticut majority held that Connecticut's general statute against Unfair Trade Practices had been violated because Remington's advertising was too militaristic in tone. Further, the statute against bad advertising in general qualified for the predicate exception. This post describes the amicus brieff I filed in support of the cert. petition; the brief addresses First Amendment doctrine and history, and was on behalf of, inter alia, VC writers Eugene Volokh and Randy Barnett.

Panel 1 will be moderated by Abbe Gluck (Yale). The panelists are Mark Lanier (Lanier Law Firm), Alla Lefkowitz (Everytown), Timothy Lytton (Georgia State), and William Tong (Connecticut Attorney General). None of them would exactly be called a PLCAA supporter.

Panel 2 is Constitutional Litigation. This panel will be wide-ranging. The moderator is Adam Skaggs (Giffords). In addition to me, panelists will be:

Joseph Blocher (Duke). His remarks may include his recent article Why Regulate Guns? The article suggests that in the gun control debate, non-owners' "fundamental freedomsto travel, to speak, to learn, to pray, and to vote without fear or intimidationare at stake."

Bob Cottrol (George Washington). He will discuss the similarities of Second Amendment litigation today with litigation on the Fourteenth and Fifteenth Amendments in the early twentieth century. Cottrol is co-author of The Second Amendment: Toward an Afro-Americanist Reconsideration, cited by Justice Thomas in his concurrences in Printz v. United States and McDonald v. City of Chicago.

Mary Anne Franks (Miami). She will discuss constitutional firearms litigation as a manifestation of fragility. Franks is author of The Cult of the Constitution: Our Deadly Devotion to Guns and Free Speech.

Deepak Gupta (Gupta Wessler). The well-known appellate advocate, who often represents Everytown, will discuss some of his recent litigation.

David Kopel (U. of Denver, Independence Inst., Cato Inst.). I too will talk about some of my cases. Additionally, I will present some history Second Amendment litigation, as described in my article Lyman Trumbull: Author of the Thirteenth Amendment, Author of the Civil Rights Act, and the First Second Amendment Lawyer.

Panel 3: The Future of Litigation Strategies

Moderated by Darrell Miller (Duke), this panel examines litigation strategy and practice, as well as statutory reforms affecting litigationperhaps including the long-running effort to get rid of PLCAA or eviscerate it.

Panelists are Hannah Shearer (Giffords, Litigation Director), Christopher Boehning (Paul Weiss, brief writer in some recent leading cases), Evan Chesler (Chairman of Cravath), Troy McKenzie (NYU), and Erin Murphy (Kirkland & Ellis, Second Amendment litigator since 2015, often representing the NRA).

See the original post:

Firearms Litigation: Liability, Regulation, and the Constitution - Reason

Is The 2nd movie a sequel? The title of Netflixs new action movie explained – HITC – Football, Gaming, Movies, TV, Music

The 2nd arrived on Netflix in the US on November 30th but is the all-action movie a sequel? What is the meaning of its title?

Netflix may be known for its library of big-name original films and TV shows but the streaming service also plays host to a huge range of lesser-known indie films.

The latest of these indie films to arrive on Netflix is the Ryan Phillipe-starring action film, The 2nd.

However, the films title has some viewers confused and has left many asking whether or not a film called The 1st exists.

Is the 2nd a sequel and if not, what is the meaning of its title?

The 2nd arrived on Netflix on November 30th after its initial release earlier in the year.

The film follows Vic Davis, the leader of the Delta Team special forces unit, as a simple visit to collect his son from college leads to an all-action shootout.

Vics son, Shawn, has a crush on a girl called Erin, who is the daughter of the countrys supreme court justice.

When Vic realises that Erins driver is not her usual escort, he quickly grows suspicious and gets ready for action.

Thats right, The 2nd is not a sequel to a film called The 1st.

Instead, the films title is a reference to its plot and the motivation of its main villain.

The 2nds title is a reference to the Second Amendment in the US Constitution which gives US citizens the right to keep and bear arms.

Thats because, the films plot centers around a vote to repeal the Second Amendment, banning guns in the US.

The films villain, Director Phillips of the CIA, wants the Second Amendment to be repealed in the hopes of creating a safer society where school shootings are a thing of the past.

However, hes chosen the wrong victim as Vic, Shawn and Erin see that Director Phillips plan fails.

The 2nd is available to stream now on Netflix in the US after releasing on November 30th while in the UK, the film is due to release on Sunday, December 6th.

In other news, Rust Creek ending explained: Explore the final moments of the Hermione Corfield-starring film

Read the original post:

Is The 2nd movie a sequel? The title of Netflixs new action movie explained - HITC - Football, Gaming, Movies, TV, Music

Ackerly Becomes 17th Texas Town to Outlaw Abortion – The Texan

The west Texas town of Ackerly has outlawed abortion.

By a unanimous vote, the city council made Ackerly the seventeenth Sanctuary City for the Unborn in Texas last night.

The ordinance makes it unlawful to procure, perform, aid, or abet abortions within town limits. The city may enforce it by two methods: the public mechanism and the private mechanism.

The public enforcement mechanism lets the city impose fines on performers of abortions provided that the fine will not create an undue burden on women seeking them. The city cannot collect these fines unless Roe v. Wade is overturned.

The private mechanism, more immediate, holds abortion providers liable in tort to surviving relatives of the aborted child, thus allowing them to sue for damages.

Like previous versions of the ban adopted elsewhere, Ackerlys ordinance opens with a series of legal facts and claims to help squeeze it through loopholes in Texas and federal law. It notes that Texas has never repealed its statutes against abortion and refers to Texas case precedent stating that such laws will remain in place until the legislature repeals them.

The Texas murder statute defines the crime of murder to include any act that intentionally or knowingly causes the death of an unborn child at every stage of gestation from fertilization until birth. See Texas Penal Code 19.02; Texas Penal Code 1.07, the ordinance reads.

Although the statute exempts lawful medical procedures from the definition of murder, see Texas Penal Code 19.06(2), an abortion is not a lawful medical procedure under Texas law unless the life of the mother is in danger, see Wests Texas Civil Statutes, article 4512.1 (1974).

Right to Life East Texas Director Mark Lee Dickson introduced the ordinance in Ackerly.

I am thankful for the mayor and city council of Ackerly who chose to stand for the lives of the most innocent and vulnerable among us, Dickson said. If every city had leaders like them, leaders who were willing to stand for what was right, we would wake up to a very different America.

Ackerlys adoption comes on the heels of Lubbocks rejection two weeks ago.

Under pressure from state lawmakers and pro-life clubs at Texas Tech, the City of Lubbock first refused to consider the ordinance after a consultation with Olson & Olson, a Houston law firm, shored up the citys official opinion that the ordinance was unconstitutional and would face unwinnable legal battles if adopted. When a petition forced the reluctant council to a public vote on the ordinance, the members unanimously voted against it with most calling it unlawful under the Texas Constitution and the Roe v. Wade ruling despite the fact that the ordinance works through private suits instead of top-down city enforcement until the potential overturn of Roe. Supporters of the ordinance came armed with a letter of legal opinion signed by several Texas attorneys arguing that the ordinance would harmonize with Texas standing abortion laws.

The relevant provision [of the Texas Constitution] prohibits municipalities from enacting ordinances inconsistent with the Constitution of the State, or of the general laws enacted by the Legislature of this State. The general laws enacted by the Legislature of this State include the pre-Roe statutes outlawing abortion, which have never been repealed, and which Olson & Olson refuses to acknowledge, the letter reads.

So far, the only lawsuit the ordinance has faced came from a number of abortion providers and advocacy groups who took issue with the language of the text. The lawsuit was dropped once the text was tweaked, and as yet the enforcement itself has not met a challenge in court.

Though the city council voted it down, the citizens of Lubbock will get the chance to vote on the ordinance when it appears on the ballot in the next uniform election.

The ordinance, which has favored rural towns, may jump a county and come to Odessa next depending on the outcome of the mayoral runoff election. Candidate Javier Joven named an abortion ban second among his priorities between auditing the budget and designating Odessa a Sanctuary City for the Second Amendment.

Below is a copy of Ackerlys ordinance.

Disclosure: Unlike almost every other media outlet, The Texan is not beholden to any special interests, does not apply for any type of state or federal funding, and relies exclusively on its readers for financial support. If youd like to become one of the people were financially accountable to, click here to subscribe.

A free bi-weekly commentary on current events by Konni Burton.

More:

Ackerly Becomes 17th Texas Town to Outlaw Abortion - The Texan

Rally New Neighbors Behind Conservative Agenda – Flathead Beacon

Opinion | Guest ColumnMontana values include protecting the unborn, securing our Second Amendment right, and developing our natural resources

By Randy Pinocci // Nov 29, 2020

Montana conservatives had an historic night on Election Day. After taking out a slew of Republicans in the primary some voting with Democrats over 200 times during the last legislative session conservatives swept seats by comfortable margins around the state. In Cascade County, Republicans won every legislative seat. With Governor-elect Greg Gianforte at the helm, conservatives will have a real chance to make Montanas economy rival those of Florida and Texas.

During the China virus pandemic, out-of-staters from places like California and Washington have flocked to Montana like refugees many buying up real estate with cash offers, sight unseen. This presents all Montanans with the responsibility of educating our new neighbors on why Montana is the last best place to live, work, and raise a family. After all, people do not leave Seattle just because they do not like the weather.

After talking with conservative leaders in California and Washington, it is clear that the sum of elitist liberals policies completely eliminated the middle class. That is how socialism works. Our responsibility as conservatives will be to fundamentally reset government and put our middle class first. Yes, we want to attract the investment that will provide jobs and build our economy up, but we cannot afford to do so at the expense of those whose families have spent generations making us what we are today. The heart of Montana is in communities like Lewistown, Havre, Sidney, Great Falls, and Colstrip not the billionaires campground known as Big Sky.

Montana values include protecting the unborn, securing our Second Amendment right, and developing our natural resources. People are free to not own a firearm, drink from paper straws, and drive an electric vehicle, but we cannot allow this to become a mandate from the heavy hand of government. With conservative majorities in the legislature, a Republican governor, and strong attorney general, we are in a position to expand our freedoms and defend them when dark money groups try to challenge them in court.

As Governor-elect Gianforte and conservative legislators work to undo 16 years of damage done by Democratic governors, we all have a duty to rally our new neighbors behind their conservative agenda. If we do not educate our new neighbors, our chapter of governing could easily become the calm before the storm when radical liberals sweep back into power and make us an extension of the left coast. They need to know that our coal funds the school their children attend, the parks they play in, and the libraries they read in.

With about 44% of our state budget being made up from federal dollars, we will have to find ways to become more financially independent from the federal government. Federal aid does not reduce the national debt and often comes with strings attached. By growing our economy in ways that expand the middle class, keeps home ownership within reach for those who work, and keeps our small businesses and family farms strong we will remain the last best place in America.

Republican Randy Pinocci represents District 1 on the Montana Public Service Commission.

View post:

Rally New Neighbors Behind Conservative Agenda - Flathead Beacon

These Stars of Right-Wing Facebook Got Their Start at NRATV – The Trace

Before Dan Bongino was one of the loudest voices in Trump-era conservative media, he was a congressional candidate. With a background as a Secret Service agent who protected Presidents George W. Bush and Barack Obama, he tried in vain to use that bipartisan glow to win over Maryland voters in a U.S. Senate race.

The president was a wonderful guy, Bongino said of Obama in 2011. From what I saw he was a wonderful father and a wonderful man and he was very, very nice and very kind to me.

Two years later before he lost another run to represent Maryland, this time in the U.S. House he wrote in a memoir that Obama was one of a group of men I would have gladly sacrificed my life for.

How things have changed. Bongino is now one of the countrys most prominent conspiracy theorists, railing against a deep state, mask mandates, and spreading false information about voting systems used in the 2020 presidential election. Videos of his combative talk show, on which he recently called Obama the most corrupt president in U.S. history, are routinely shared by the most popular pages on Facebook. And hes taken a stab at media moguldom by buying stakes in alternative social media companies geared toward the right, including Parler, the Rebekah Mercer-funded Twitter lookalike thats surged in popularity since the election.

Bonginos transformation into a peddler of conspiracy theories didnt happen overnight. In 2017, after his failed Senate run, he built a brand and audience at NRATV, a short-lived and little-watched streaming network once billed as the voice of the NRA. Hes one of a group of new conservative stars whose careers have been shaped by the defunct network. Although it went offline last year and is at the center of a bitter court battle between the National Rifle Association and its former ad agency it presaged the upstart channels like NewsMax and One America that have gained popularity with an extreme us-vs-them media strategy borrowed from the gun group. Now, former NRATV personalities like Bongino, Grant Stinchfield, and Dana Loesch are among the most influential conspiracy theorists fueling distrust in the 2020 election.

Dawn R. Gilpin, an associate professor at the Walter Cronkite School of Journalism at Arizona State University who is writing a book about the NRAs media operations, said the group has been involved in culture wars stuff for a long time. That didnt start with NRATV. Compared to its legacy publications like American Rifleman, she said, it was much more relentless, it was more pervasive if you were aware of it.

By the time NRATV stopped streaming, the gun group had sunk around $40 million into it, only to have garnered an audience in the low tens of thousands, according to documents filed in court by the NRA. Not only was it a financial boondoggle, the NRA claims its own board members were turned off by how divisive the content had become.

Born out of NRA News, a sleepy streaming channel focused on gun issues that started in 2004, NRATV was something of a cross between glossy prime time Fox News opinion shows and low-stakes lifestyle content on HDTV. Viewers could stream shows about country music and antiques, watch programs geared toward women like Love at First Shot, and then watch the NRAs executive vice president Wayne LaPierre go on lavish hunting trips. The strategy, according to court documents, was to bring in a broader group of dues-paying members beyond the hardcore.

The channel was trying to say were also a lifestyle brand, but with guns, said A.J. Bauer, an assistant media professor at New York University and co-editor of News on the Right: Studying Conservative News Cultures.

That latitude allowed NRATV to make content that was ancillary, at best, to the issues around the Second Amendment, he said. It also gave its explicitly political hosts a platform to fulminate about a wide range of issues including media bias, identity politics, and Democratic politicians. NRATV certainly wasnt the first conservative outlet to air outrageous material from the political fringe. But where it presaged the rest of the conservative media landscape was in creating what Gilpin calls a counter-public, an oppositional public to mainstream media, she said. If you can set yourself up as the enemy, then they might cover you. In fact, it happened on a couple of occasions.

Even without a big, traditional audience, clips from NRATV would soon find a second life online. Loesch was featured in several ads complaining about coverage in The New York Times, including one in which she said were coming for you. In another bizarre ad, after Bongino had criticized CNN host Don Lemon for his coverage of antifa, Bongino put whole lemons into a blender, and then drank a glass of Don Lemon-aide . That vaguely threatening material even made its way to Last Week Tonight, John Olivers comedy news show, which dedicated an entire episode to NRATVs content.

The provocative, viral-focused strategy may have gone too far even for the NRA. In its lawsuit, the NRA went so far as to call its own programming a dystopian cultural rant and distasteful and racist.

Another thing about NRATV thats worth noting is whoever was in charge of talent scouting for them did a pretty amazing job, Bauer said.

Bonginos rise has been particularly meteoric. The former New York City police officer started podcasting around 2015, and would soon be contributing and guest hosting for radio hosts like Mark Levin, Sean Hannity, and Inforwars Alex Jones. Despite his proximity to big names, he was still trying to distinguish himself among conservative commentators and struggling to grow his audience. He would dedicate some of his early shows to gun issues, but he was mostly focused on economics, which hed studied in college. His podcast was produced by CRTV, the management company for Levin, which later merged with The Blaze, Glenn Becks media company. His rise was slow, and by the time he joined NRATV, his podcast had garnered about 10 to 20,000 downloads, according to the former producer.

When asked to comment for this story, Bongino wrote back: Lol. Pee-pee tape pushers writing about false stories, absolutely hilarious. (He often criticizes journalists by referring to reports about the partially discredited dossier on Donald Trump that mentioned such a tape. The Trace didnt write about the tape, but has reported on the NRAs connections to Russia and the impeachment investigation.)

Bongino had also been appearing on NRATV, and in February 2017, he was given a show of his own, We Stand. A former producer for his podcast said the increased budget gave him the resources to hone his polarizing craft. It afforded him [the opportunity] to buy new equipment, to try out new technology, to have another platform, to have to do another show. He got a lot of reps in there, a lot of practice on their dime, one former Bongino producer told The Trace. In many respects, it is a jumping-off point.

On his show, Bongino inveighed against familiar conservative targets like the mainstream media and Robert Mueller, then investigating Trumps relationship with Russia. In late 2018, Bongino said his entire life is about owning the libs. Gilpin, who has archived much of the NRAs contents, said Bongino was a fixture on the channels big-ticket shows, and was almost always cross-promoted on the NRAs main webpage.

At least one of Bonginos producers at CRTV, however, was skeptical of the relationship with NRATV. When you become the gun guy or the gun lady, then youre destroying your sellability in the marketplace, the producer, who asked not to be named, recently told The Trace, noting that conservative hosts who dont just talk about gun issues bring in a wider array of advertisers. Thats just too narrow, and too negative, and too hard of a burden, because when the advertisers and other people start bailing out, thats exactly the kind of thing that becomes hard to defend. (Bonginos podcast sponsors now include a mens underwear company and a company that obscures users internet browsing history).

By the end of 2018, Bonginos show was cancelled. The Daily Beast reported that he had been dropped by NRATV, something Bongino has disputed and unsuccessfully sued the outlet for. (The Trace and the Daily Beast are represented by the same law firm, Davis Wright Tremaine, on some legal matters).

Since then, Bonginos brand of confrontational conservative commentary has caught fire on social media and among podcast listeners. During the election, he tacked to extreme right positions, sermonizing about Hunter Bidens laptop. Later, he made evidence-free assertions that fraud had tainted vote counts. His audience lapped it up. His podcast soon eclipsed The Joe Rogan Experience on iTunes, and his YouTube views routinely rose above 200,000 a day. Hes also touted his investments in Parler and a conservative-focused video site, which have exploded in popularity since the election.

Meanwhile, the square-jawed and sometimes jocular Grant Stinchfield has also used NRATV as a career stepping stone. An Emmy-winning TV and radio personality who ran unsuccessfully for the House seat representing Dallas, Stinchfield started his broadcast career in 1995 at KECI, a local news station in Missoula, Montana. He later hosted shows for NBC affiliates about cold cases and identity theft before starting his own talk show on KLIF, a radio station in Dallas. He also owned a handful of small businesses, including a Kwik Kar Lube & Auto Repair and a tree-trimming company, according to LinkedIn.

Stinchfield joined NRATV in 2016, hosting a politics and news show on which he warned in 2017 that Black Lives Matter protests would soon make race relations as bad as in South Africa. In another episode, he claimed without evidence that white families are being tortured and killed almost every day in racist violence, according to a transcript by Media Matters. He also starred in an ad wearing a T-shirt that said Socialist Tears on it, while he swung a sledgehammer into a TV airing mainstream news. He appears to have left NRATV when it went off the air in June 2019. (Stinchfield, who didnt return a request for comment through NewsMax TV, is currently in separate litigation with Ackerman McQueen, the NRAs former public relations firm which sued him last year for making allegedly inflated comments about viewership).

In August, Stinchfield joined NewsMax TV, where he hosts an eponymous news show that takes a broad approach to the news. Like Bongino, Stinchfields shows have focused less on guns and Second Amendment issues, and his Twitter feed has few mentions of guns since he left the NRA. Instead, hes latched on to the false story that the 2020 election was stolen, and been rewarded. The far-right cable channel was recently a backwater for conservative news, capturing around 25,000 viewers on average, but its ratings have exploded 400-fold since the election, according to CNN. Though Stinchfield once wrote an op-ed expressing his regret for voting for Trump, in late November Trump even promoted on his Twitter feed a clip of Stinchfield on NewsMax TV making fun of Bidens halting speech. On December 2, he tweeted that Trump and attorney Victoria Toensing were Warriors! for not giving up on the election.

Loesch is probably the host most defined by her relationship with the NRA, though she has distanced herself from the group since her departure in 2019. She started her career in local media in St. Louis, writing for a local magazine and newspaper. Soon after, she started The Dana Show on local radio, on which by her own description she tried to emulate Howard Stern and Jon Stewart. In 2009, she co-founded a local chapter of the Tea Party and would soon attract the attention of other conservative stars, filling in for right-wing radio host Michael Savage, getting hired by Andrew Breitbart to write and edit for his site, and in 2013 having her show picked up by Becks BlazeTV, though it was dropped four years later.

In 2016, NRA hired Loesch as an adviser and a host for NRATV, where she ended up hosting two shows, contributing often on Stinchfields time, and cutting the confrontational ads that helped usher in the new media era for the NRA. The next year, the NRA made her a spokesperson. Her extremely confrontational style was integral to the NRATV tone,and while some of her statements verged on the baroque she was ridiculed for saying that the NRA will fight lies with the clenched fist of truth they were indelible and were widely spread by media figures like Oliver. Her rhetoric, however, went too far, even for the NRA board. She once showed a graphic of Thomas the Tank Engine in Ku Klux Klan hood after the shows creators added a Kenyan character, a segment too radioactive even for the NRA, according to legal filings.

Unlike some other NRATV alums, Loesch, who didnt return a request for comment, hasnt soared in the last two years of the Trump era. But she has maintained her already considerable following. She hosts a show on The First which is now home to Bill OReilly and her daily radio show has an audience of as much as 7.25 million, making her one of the most-listened to conservative voices in the country.

As upstart right-wing media companies continue to embrace baseless conspiracies and a growing audience NRATVs broader legacy may be in the way it appealed to viewers. When I first started looking at all this, I was like, Man, not very much of this is actually about guns, Gilpin said. Its about creating a gun owner identity, but [also] showing that you belong to something bigger, that this is not just about guns. Its about freedom. Its about your rights. Its about being an American a conservative American.

Continue reading here:

These Stars of Right-Wing Facebook Got Their Start at NRATV - The Trace

Universal basic income has time come for it? Debate intensifies in pandemic – WRAL Tech Wire

Christine Jardine, a Scottish politician who represents Edinburgh in the UK parliament, was not a fan of universal basic income before the pandemic hit.

It was regarded in some quarters as a kind of socialist idea, said Jardine, a member of the centrist Liberal Democrats party.

But not long after the government shut schools, shops, restaurants and pubs in March with little warning, she started to reconsider her position.

Covid-19 has been [a] game changer, Jardine said. It has meant that weve seen the suggestion of a universal basic income in a completely different light. In her view, the idea sending cash regularly to all residents, no strings attached now looks more pragmatic than outlandish.

She isnt the only one to change her mind. As the economic crisis sparked by the coronavirus drags on, support in Europe is growing for progressive policies once seen as pipe dreams of the political left.

Group of economists calls for stimulus checks until economy recovers

In Germany, millions of people applied to join a study of universal basic income that will provide participants with 1,200 ($1,423) a month, while in the United Kingdom, more than 100 lawmakers including Jardine are pushing the government to start similar trials.

Austria, meanwhile, has launched a first-of-its-kind pilot program that will guarantee paying jobs to residents struggling with sustained unemployment in Marienthal, a long-suffering former industrial town about 40 miles southwest of Vienna.

Whether the spike in popularity and research will translate into a wave of action is an open question. But some, like Jardine, see reason for optimism.

Throughout history, times of crisis have produced large changes in the role government plays in our lives. Out of the Great Depression came former President Franklin Delano Roosevelts plan to distribute social security checks in the United States, for example, while the foundations of universal health care in Britain were laid during World War II.

Experts see the coronavirus pandemic as a world-changing event that could result in a similar tectonic shift.

Big political changes generally do follow big upheaval events, said Daniel Nettle, a behavioral scientist at Newcastle University.

Universal basic income, in its purest form, means giving money to everyone, regardless of how much they earn, so they can have greater freedom to move between jobs, train for new positions, provide care or engage in creative pursuits. Interest in the concept has risen in recent years, driven by concerns that automation and the climate crisis would lead to a mass displacement of workers.

Job insecurity caused by the pandemic, however, appears to have generated new levels of support for the policy. One study conducted by Oxford University in March found that 71% of Europeans now favor the introduction of a universal basic income.

For an idea that has often been dismissed as wildly unrealistic and utopian, this is a remarkable figure, researchers Timothy Garton Ash and Antonia Zimmermann wrote in their report.

It probably helps that the pandemic has helped normalize cash transfers from the government, said Nettle, who has also conducted his own polling. According to data compiled by economists at UBS, nearly 39 million people in the United Kingdom, Germany, France, Spain and Italy were being paid by governments to work part time, or not at all, as of early May.

Though the numbers have come down, millions are still receiving this kind of support, and a fresh wave of restrictions in Europe has triggered an extension of benefits. The United Kingdom, for example, has extended its furlough program which pays as much as 80% of lost wages, up to 2,500 ($3,321) a month through March.

The rapid blow to the economy dealt by the pandemic has also left policymakers scrambling for quick solutions, said Yannick Vanderborght, a professor at Universit Saint-Louis in Brussels, who specializes in universal basic income. The broad distribution of aid therefore has greater appeal, since it can theoretically be rolled out faster than more targeted measures.

The problem is we need urgent economic support for large groups of workers, Vanderborght said.

As enthusiasm grows for such policies, researchers are taking new steps to study their effectiveness.

The trial of universal basic income in Germany run by the German Institute for Economic Research in Berlin (DIW) in partnership with the nonprofit Mein Grundeinkommen is now sorting through millions of applicants. Financed by roughly 150,000 private donors, experimenters aim to begin distributing money to 120 individuals starting in spring 2021.

The study will last for three years. It will also track 1,380 people who do not receive the extra cash as a point of comparison.

Participants will be asked to complete regular questionnaires during the study. Questions will range from how many hours theyre working to inquiries about mental wellbeing, values and trust in institutions, according to Jrgen Schupp, a senior DIW research fellow who is managing the project. Those who receive 1,200 each month will be asked to disclose how theyre using the money.

Unlike an experiment conducted in Finland between 2017 and 2018, which targeted people who were unemployed, the German project is looking to distribute cash to a representative sample of the population regardless of employment status.

Theres no guarantee, of course, that the study will show that universal basic income has broad benefits, even though its generated significant attention from supporters of the concept.

We want to convert this engagement into basic scientific knowledge, Schupp said.

The job guarantee pilot in Austria, meanwhile, kicked off in October. It will also last for three years.

The program, which is funded by a regional division of Austrias public employment service, aims to provide paid, long-term jobs to roughly 150 residents of Marienthal the subject of a seminal study on the effects of long-term unemployment in the 1930s who have been unemployed for at least a year. Those who opt in will enroll in a two-month training course before starting a job that matches their skillset, from gardening to child care or home renovations.

The primary goal is to provide social inclusion, meaning and a source of income to the participants, said University of Oxford professor Maximilian Kasy, who co-designed the study. Participants will also be asked to fill out regular assessments on their daily routine, personal health and involvement in the local community.

Sven Hergovich, managing director of the employment service, started pitching a job guarantee program for Marienthal before the pandemic hit. But the employment crisis sparked by Covid-19 has made it even more crucial, he said.

It is time to find new ways [to fight] long-term unemployment, Hergovich said.

As researchers gather data from the pilot programs, political momentum for overhauling social safety nets is building.

In September, the UK Liberal Democrats Jardines party voted to make universal basic income a part of their platform, joining members of the left-wing Labour Party in calling for trials. A petition demanding that Germany implement a universal basic income was debated by a committee of national lawmakers late last month.

But experts note that the loose coalition of universal basic income supporters still contains major divisions.

Theres huge dissent, for example, on whether such programs should stem from deficit spending or higher taxes on the wealthy, as well as whether payments should only go to those in need which would mean they wouldnt be truly universal.

Jardine, for example, thinks universal basic income should replace the current UK welfare system, while also providing people such as caretakers and gig economy workers with regular infusions of cash. But she isnt convinced that payments should be made to those above a certain income threshold.

When you have to turn it from an interest to a program, you start to see some inconsistencies, said Tim Vlandas, a University of Oxford professor of comparative social policy.

And such ideas still have plenty of opponents. The Conservative government under Boris Johnson in the United Kingdom maintains that universal basic income would be too expensive and reduce incentives to work, while failing to reach those who most need help. Chancellor Angela Merkels coalition government has also expressed concerns it could lead to a decline in employment.

Critics also raise fears about the broader economic ramifications of such policies. Some worry, for example, that providing a universal basic income could lead to a spike in inflation.

Jardine, for her part, acknowledges the uphill battle in convincing colleagues that universal basic income is the way forward. But in her view, the pandemic presents an opportunity.

Governments do change and they change their minds, she said.

Go here to see the original:

Universal basic income has time come for it? Debate intensifies in pandemic - WRAL Tech Wire

Basic income for all: Has the Covid crisis given us a new economic model? – The Irish Times

The concept of a universal basic income has already been suggested for arts workers hit by the pandemic, but what if there was a constant security and safety net for all, a payment always delivered to all citizens with no strings attached?

The idea was first floated by Thomas More in Utopia in 1516, is now being advocated by Pope Francis and President Michael D Higgins and is being considered by governments across the world. The basic income guarantee is frequently referred to as universal basic income (UBI).

UBI is a periodic payment paid at regular intervals as a cash payment without conditions, allowing those who receive it to decide what to spend it on. It is paid individually without a means test and is unconditional without a requirement to work or demonstrate a willingness to work.

In Ireland, the Green Party fought for a trial run for UBI to be included in the Programme for Government, and there is to be one at some stage over the next five years.

Among its most ardent supporters is Green Party Dublin Central TD Neasa Hourigan, co-author of the partys policy. The Green Party proposes a system of UBI in Ireland for all citizens in 2024, pending a successful trial. She envisages that the trial in Ireland will take between 18 and 20 months to plan and that the trial itself would run for two to three years.

A basic provision of economic resources would address poverty and economic inequality even though it doesnt promise to eradicate either, Hourigan says. She says that in Ireland we already recognise payments like these child benefit and state pension but UBI would close the gap between the two.

I am particularly wedded to UBI because it would have the greatest uplift for people on the margins of existing social welfare bands. The lowest income families should already be within the support network but those in part-time employment often find themselves just outside State help. UBI would address that and be particularly important for women and those who care.

The Greens are not alone in supporting UBI. It also has advocates in Fianna Fil such as Willie ODea, while outside government the Social Democrats have also expressed interest. The Department of Social Protection has said that the Low Pay Commission will examine UBI in due course.

It has been tested elsewhere. The longest trial run for UBI in the world is in Alaska. Since 1982, the state has been giving every woman, man, and child between $1,000 to $2,000 per year. A 2016 study by the University of Alaska found it reduced poverty up to 20 per cent.

In Finland, a two-year UBI study in 2017 and 2018 saw 2,000 unemployed Finns receive the payments of 560, with no obligation to seek a job and no reduction in payment if they accepted one. Participants reported greater feelings of autonomy, financial security, and confidence in the future, although it did not make them any more likely to find work.

[UBI is] a big idea but a transformative idea, in the way bringing in an old-age pension would have been seen as radical more than 100 years ago, says Bobby Lambert, joint co-ordinator of Basic Income Ireland, a campaign group for UBI in Ireland.

Lambert would rather the Irish trial did not focus on a group like the unemployed and rather a more general group of people, preferably a geographical area. To pay every resident in Ireland the basic income would cost an estimated 6.5 billion per annum.

Some taxes suggested to raise for money for UBI in the Green Party policy include pension funds, site value tax, speculative transaction tax and stamp duty for property trades that are not the principal private residence.

UBI would be given to each recipient from birth or point of residency, from cradle to grave, with the amount given to those under 26 years of age varied depending on wages in a similar way to how social welfare exists today with a set rate given to all adults over 26. Children under 18-years-old would receive 32.31 per week, according to the Green Party plan, with 112.70 for 18 to 21-year-olds, 157.80 for 21 to 25-year-olds and 203 for adults over 26 years old.

UBI is not without its critics. Laura Bambrick, the head of social policy and employment affairs at the Irish Congress of Trade Unions, finds the idea of replacing existing welfare safety nets concerning. The money needed to pay adequate UBI, she says, would be better spent on reforming social protection systems and building better quality public services.

Our welfare system is complex precisely because the root causes of poverty are complex, Bambrick says. A one-size-fits-all payment will hurt those with the greatest risk of poverty.

She believes that no UBI payment would work as well as an average European welfare system for the most vulnerable people. And she contends that providing welfare top-ups on top of UBI, as advocated by some proponents of this system, would end up being far too costly. [It] would make for a uniquely Irish UBI, and I look forward to seeing their maths. Hourigan says that the difference between the current welfare rates and UBI will be made up by further State payments.

Welfare and efficient use of resources also concerns Ian Goldin, Professor of Globalisation and Development at Oxford University, who has spoken against UBI in the past.

He says that if you gave everyone half the minimum wage in Ireland, it would be bigger than the budget of all social welfare. He points out that UBI is favoured by tech billionaires and right-wing libertarians as well as left-wing progressives, and it may be used by the rich to normalise the automation of employment and abolish existing welfare supports.

Its giving everyone a low amount of money and we will give unemployed people less than they need and unnecessarily so. That is not the answer to either poverty inequality or the future of work.

Goldin also takes issue at the universality of UBI, saying it is a waste of needed funds to give the income to the wealthy. He says that societal safety nets and raising the wage of low-paid and vulnerable workers through the current system would be a more worthy use of resources.

The other issue frequently brought up by critics of UBI is the danger that an unconditional payment would disincentivise work, even though the trials done so far suggest that payments have little effect on employment.

Danny McCoy,chief executive of the Irish Business and Employers Confederation (Ibec), says UBI would undermine our current active labour market policies which would result in labour supply challenges and could diminish overall labour cost competitiveness in the economy.

He says that Ibec remains open to debate on the merits of UBI and research that indicates it could be positive for entrepreneurship. On that point, Lambert highlights a UBI project in Namibia, which found it helped local business as they had the financial security to work on business ideas.

Hourigan says that Covid-19 has changed the discussion and been valuable to the UBI debate. There has always been a real resistance to the idea that our current tax system and economic models could support such a payment. The Covid-19 crisis has refocused the minds of many towards the well-being of communities.

UBI is not going to solve the housing crisis, says Lambert. But it is part of a general investment for a better and fairer society.

Continue reading here:

Basic income for all: Has the Covid crisis given us a new economic model? - The Irish Times

US and Turkey target each other in NATO meeting – POLITICO.eu

Outgoing U.S. Secretary of State Mike Pompeo slammed Turkey during a virtual meeting of NATO foreign ministers on Tuesday, accusing Ankara of stoking tensions with fellow allies in the Mediterranean and of giving a gift to the Kremlin by purchasing a Russian-made anti-aircraft system.

Turkish Foreign Minister Mevlt avuolu fired back, accusing Pompeo of phoning European allies and urging them to gang up on Turkey, of siding blindly with Greece in regional conflicts, and of refusing to sell Ankara U.S.-made Patriot anti-aircraft weapons.

avuolu also accused the U.S. of backing Kurdish terrorist organizations in Syria, while Turkey fought the Islamic State, and insisted that the U.S. and France had worsened a conflict in Nagorno-Karabakh by backing Armenia in a war that Azerbaijan won with Turkish military support.

The sharp clash over videoconference, confirmed by multiple allied delegations, came as Pompeo was attending what was likely his last NATO foreign affairs ministerial on behalf of President Donald Trump a meeting that was intended to focus primarily on a new report about how NATO should adapt for the next decade. Some diplomats speculated that Pompeo was using his last meeting to inflame tensions that could make life difficult for the incoming administration of President-elect Joe Biden.

The new report, by an outside group of experts, was commissioned after French President Emmanuel Macron complained last year about conflicts among allies, including Turkey, saying the alliance was experiencing brain death.The report urges alliesto pledge themselves to a code of good conductand consider establishing a Centre of Excellence forDemocraticResilience dedicated to providing support to individual allies.

Several allies backed up Pompeo by speaking out against Turkey, including French Foreign MinisterJean-Yves Le Drian, who denounced Ankaras behavior and said cohesion within the alliance would be impossible to achieve if Turkey mimicked Russias aggressive interventionism.

By the end of the meeting, it was clear that Turkey was virtually isolated among the alliances 30 members. A renewed call by avuolu for NATO to take a role in Libyas civil war was rejected by the other allies, who have accused Turkey of exacerbating the conflict by sending weapons and mercenaries to support the Government of National Accord based in Tripoli.

After avuolu accused Pompeo and the U.S. of taking a maximalist position in favor of Greece regarding conflicts in the Eastern Mediterranean, Greek Foreign Minister Nikos Dendias hit back, saying if the Greek position is maximalist, so is international law.

Turkey has been at fierce odds with other allies for years, but has also proven the most militarily assertive NATO member, and particularly adept at achieving its objectives with hard power.

Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdoan interceded not just in Libya, but also in Syria, where he and Russian President Vladimir Putin largely fashioned the outcome that has kept Bashar al-Assad in power. Most dramatically, Turkey helped Azerbaijan achieve victory in its three-decade conflict with Armenia over Nagorno-Karabakh, with Baku reclaiming swaths of territory.

According to NATO diplomats, avuolu had a mixed message on Germany, praising Berlin for acting as an honest broker in trying to mediate the conflicts in the Mediterranean but also accusing the Germans of piracy over an incident in which German naval forces intercepted and boarded a Turkish ship suspected of trafficking weapons. The Germans were acting under an EU-led arms control mission.

At a news conference, NATO Secretary General Jens Stoltenberg sidestepped a question about the sharp exchange between Pompeo and avuolu, and instead noted that a NATO deconfliction mechanism had helped to ease the conflict between Athens and Ankara.

We have seen that the deconfliction mechanism has helped to reduce the risk of incidents and accidents, between the Greek and Turkish militaries, Stoltenberg said. But he added, it is not solving the underlying main problem.

That, he said, would depend on a German-led mediation effort, and the political will of Greece and Turkey.

Jacopo Barigazzi contributed reporting.

Read more:

US and Turkey target each other in NATO meeting - POLITICO.eu

Insights on the NATO Military Aircraft Modernization and Retrofit Global Market to 2025 – Fixed-Wing Segment to Continue its Dominance -…

DUBLIN--(BUSINESS WIRE)--The "NATO Military Aircraft Modernization and Retrofit Market - Growth, Trends, and Forecasts (2020 - 2025)" report has been added to ResearchAndMarkets.com's offering.

The Military Aircraft Modernization and Retrofit Market in NATO countries is projected to grow with a CAGR of more than 3% during the forecast period.

Companies Mentioned

Key Market Trends

Fixed-Wing Segment to Continue its Dominance During the Forecast Period

The NATO countries are avid users of fixed-wing aircraft. The fleet of fixed-wing aircraft is comparatively much larger than the helicopter fleet, hence the scope of modernization is much higher for the fixed-wing aircraft. The defense expenditure of the NATO countries is expected to account for USD 984 billion in 2019. The prominent NATO member countries, such as the US, France, Germany, the UK, and Italy have consistently ranked amongst the highest global defense spending nations each year, signifying substantial investments towards the R&D of advanced weaponry and procurement of sophisticated military assets.

For instance, in January 2019, the French government signed a USD 2.3 billion to upgrade the Rafale fleet with the F4 standard. The aircraft fleet is expected to be validated by 2024 and would include upgraded radar sensors and front-sector optronics and improved helmet-mounted displays (HMDs). The upgrade would also include provisions to use MBDA's Mica NG air-to-air missile and the 1,000-kilogram AASM air-to-ground modular weapon and the Scalp missiles. Similarly, in December 2019, the Greek government awarded a USD 279.7 million contract to Lockheed Martin Corporation to upgrade its fleet of 150 F-16 combat aircraft to the Viper class configuration by 2027. Such developments are envisioned to drive the growth prospects of the market in focus during the forecast period.

United States is Projected to hold the major share in the Market

In 2019, the US accounted for the largest market share due to its gigantic defense spending which is multifold compared to other NATO countries. The US defense expenditure witnessed a 5.3% YoY growth to account for USD 732 billion in 2019. For FY2021, the requested US defense budget of USD 704.6 billion is aimed at improving the military readiness and invest modernization of its armed forces.

On this note, in June 2020, Raytheon Technologies Corporation was awarded a USD 202.6 million contract for F-15 RADAR modernization. The APG-82(V)1 AESA radars are designed to incorporate with F-15E Strike Eagle dual-role fighter jets for the simultaneous detection, identification, and tracking of multiple targets. Similarly, in June 2019, L3Harris Technologies Inc. announced receiving a USD 499 million contract from the US Air Force (USAF) to upgrade the fleet of 176 C-130H aircraft under the C-130 Avionics Modernization Program Increment 2 initiative.

Key Topics Covered:

1 INTRODUCTION

1.1 Study Assumptions

1.2 Scope of the Study

2 RESEARCH METHODOLOGY

3 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

4 MARKET DYNAMICS

4.1 Market Drivers

4.2 Market Restraints

4.3 Industry Attractiveness - Porters Five Forces Analysis

4.3.1 Threat of New Entrants

4.3.2 Bargaining Power of Buyers/Consumers

4.3.3 Bargaining Power of Suppliers

4.3.4 Threat of Substitute Products

4.3.5 Intensity of Competitive Rivalry

5 MARKET SEGMENTATION

5.1 By Aircraft Type

5.1.1 Fixed-Wing

5.1.2 Rotary Wing

5.2 By Country

5.2.1 United States

5.2.2 Canada

5.2.3 United Kingdom

5.2.4 France

5.2.5 Germany

5.2.6 Italy

5.2.7 Rest of NATO Countries

6 COMPETITIVE LANDSCAPE

6.1 Vendor Market Share

6.2 Company Profiles

6.2.1 Raytheon Technologies Corporation

6.2.2 L3Harris Technologies Inc.

6.2.3 BAE Systems plc

6.2.4 Lockheed Martin Corporation

6.2.5 Elbit Systems Ltd.

6.2.6 Honeywell International Inc.

6.2.7 Northrop Grumman Corporation

6.2.8 Safran SA

6.2.9 General Dynamics Corporation

6.2.10 Leonardo S.p.A.

6.2.11 The Boeing Company

6.2.12 Airbus SE

7 MARKET OPPORTUNITIES AND FUTURE TRENDS

For more information about this report visit https://www.researchandmarkets.com/r/dsuuxh

Continue reading here:

Insights on the NATO Military Aircraft Modernization and Retrofit Global Market to 2025 - Fixed-Wing Segment to Continue its Dominance -...

NATO – Jean-Yves Le Drian’s participation in the Meeting of NATO Ministers of Foreign Affairs (1-2 Dec. 2020) – France Diplomatie

Jean-Yves Le Drian, Minister for Europe and Foreign Affairs, is taking part in the Meeting of NATO Ministers of Foreign Affairs via video conference from December 1 to 2.

This meeting provides an opportunity for the ministers to review the report issued by the reflection group on the future of NATO and to discuss its recommendations. This report is an initial response to the reflection process on the future of NATO launched a year ago on the initiative of France and Germany.

In line with President Macrons calls for a strategic reflection within NATO, the minister welcomed the recommendations aimed at enhancing cohesion, solidarity and predictability among allies.

The minister underscored the importance of the proposals to strengthen coordination with the EU, as well as those aimed at reaffirming the values and principles that should guide relations between allies. This reflection process will continue at the next NATO summit in 2021. The minister also shared his analysis of the changes in the strategic context which have an impact on the alliances security interests. The minister reaffirmed the importance of a robust NATO defense and deterrence posture, to which France directly contributes, as well as the need to leave the possibility of dialogue with Russia in particular open, in accordance with the alliances agreed positions.

These discussions provided an opportunity for the ministers to address the regional crises and all external interference that undermines the alliances stability and unity. The ministers discussed the continued joint fight against terrorism, notably in Afghanistan and Iraq. The minister reaffirmed the importance of consultations and coordination within the relevant forums, within the framework of the Global Coalition against Daesh as well as within NATO, in order to protect our common security interests in these two countries.

The ministers will also discuss the opportunities and challenges related to Chinas emergence. This session will be attended by the EU high representative and the minister will reaffirm the importance of effective coordination between the EU and NATO on these challenges.

Lastly, the ministers will be joined by the Georgian and Ukrainian foreign ministers to discuss the security situation in the Black Sea region.

Read the original:

NATO - Jean-Yves Le Drian's participation in the Meeting of NATO Ministers of Foreign Affairs (1-2 Dec. 2020) - France Diplomatie

EATC seeks to better support member nations, selected EU and NATO states – Jane’s

02 December 2020

by Gareth Jennings

The European Air Transport Command (EATC) has set itself a timeline of two years to develop concrete proposals to better support its seven participating nations, as well as selected European Union and NATO member states.

The European Air Transport Command is headquartered at Eindhoven Air Base in the Netherlands. Having recently marked its first 10 years of operations, the command now seeks to expand its support to its participating nations and also to selected European Union and NATO member states. (EATC)

Speaking at the virtual SMi Military Airlift and Air-to-Air Refuelling 2020 conference, Colonel Patrick Mollet of the EATC said that the command wants to build on its recently celebrated first decade of operations by identifying specific scnarios in which is can provide additional support in both the planning and mission phases of future air transport (AT), air-to-air refuelling (AAR) and aero medical evacuation (medevac) operations.

After 10 years we are convinced that we can do better, Col Mollett said on 2 December. We aim to develop in the coming years [proposals] on an increased advisory role in the planning phase, and a more active role in the execution and operational phase for our partners and selected EU and NATO nations. We have given ourselves a timeline of two years for solid solutions.

As set out by the colonel, the selected scenarios comprise non-combat evacuation operations, disaster relief and/or humanitarian operations, and military operations for NATO, EU and other international coalitions.

Headquartered at Eindhoven Air Base in the Netherlands, the EATC was established on 1 September 2010 between France, Germany, the Benelux countries of Belgium, the Netherlands, and Luxembourg. Spain and Italy also joined in 2014.

Col Molletts remarks reflect comments made toJanes

Already a Janes subscriber? Read the full article via theClient LoginInterested in subscribing, see What we do

Share

The European Air Transport Command (EATC) has set itself a timeline of two years to develop concrete...

Read the rest here:

EATC seeks to better support member nations, selected EU and NATO states - Jane's

Ukraine hopes to get MAP at NATO summit next year – Taran – Ukrinform. Ukraine and world news

Ukraine hopes to receive a NATO Membership Action Plan (MAP) at the NATO summit next year, according to Ukrainian Defense Minister Andrii Taran.

He stated this at a briefing entitled "Defense aspects of Ukraine's Euro-Atlantic integration: key aspects and tasks for the future," according to the Ukrainian Defense Ministry's website.

"Please inform your capitals that we count on your full political and military support for such a decision [granting Ukraine the MAP] at the next NATO summit in 2021. This will be a practical step and a demonstration of commitment to the decisions of the 2008 Bucharest Summit," Taran said, addressing the ambassadors and military attaches of NATO member states, as well as representatives of the NATO office in Ukraine.

According to him, today Ukraine's course for full membership in NATO is enshrined in the Constitution of Ukraine, and the rapid receipt of the NATO Membership Action Plan is a goal set in the recently adopted National Security Strategy of Ukraine. Taran noted that over the past seven years, Ukraine has firmly defended not only its own independence, but also the security and stability of Europe, and acts as a powerful outpost on NATO's eastern flank.

"We believe that Ukraine and Georgia's joining the Alliance would be the right decision for NATO. Our countries have a lot in common. These are post-Soviet republics, the countries that have been affected by Russian aggression. From our point of view, Ukraine's and Georgia's potential membership in NATO will have a significant impact on Euro-Atlantic security and stability, in particular in the Black Sea region," Taran said.

He emphasized the importance of partnership with the North Atlantic Alliance in confronting global threats, such as Russia's aggressive policies and actions, which is a serious challenge to international peace and stability.

The Ukrainian parliament in early December 2019 adopted a resolution "On the statement of the Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine regarding priority steps to ensure Ukraine's Euro-Atlantic integration and acquire Ukraine's full membership in the North Atlantic Treaty Organization."

The Verkhovna Rada also authorized the Verkhovna Rada chairman to sign documents, together with the president of Ukraine and the prime minister of Ukraine, necessary to confirm Ukraine's intention to obtain the NATO Membership Action Plan and to appeal to the parliaments of the NATO member states with the request to facilitate Ukraine's receiving the MAP.

On June 12, 2020, Ukraine became a member of NATO's Enhanced Opportunities Partnership program.

op

View post:

Ukraine hopes to get MAP at NATO summit next year - Taran - Ukrinform. Ukraine and world news

NATO invites Biden to summit after he takes office – Anadolu Agency

ANKARA

NATO has invited US President-elect Joe Biden to a summit in Brussels in early 2021, Secretary-General Jens Stoltenberg told a press conference Monday.

Answering questions ahead of the NATO Foreign Ministers Meeting on Dec. 1-2, the NATO chief said a specific date for the summit has not yet been decided but it will be attended by all leaders in the 30-member alliance.

I'm looking forward to welcoming President Biden next year to a NATO summit here in Brussels, he said.

Saying that there is a strong bipartisan support for NATO in the US, Stoltenberg added that he is looking forward to working with the new administration.

NATO is the only institution or organization that brings together, North America and Europe, he said. I'm looking forward to continuing the project NATO 2030."

NATO 2030 is an initiative to make the military alliance, formed in 1949, ready today to face tomorrow's challenges.

Read more:

NATO invites Biden to summit after he takes office - Anadolu Agency

NATO continues to support the peace process in Afghanistan – Baltic Times

RIGA - NATO continues to support the Afghan peace process, Janis Bekeris, Press Secretary of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, informed LETA.

A video conference of the NATO Foreign Ministers' Meeting was held on December 1 and 2, which also addressed the issue of NATO's departure from Afghanistan. Latvian Foreign Minister Edgars Rinkevics (New Unity) also participated in the meeting remotely.

Bekeris emphasized that there will be no changes of the NATO training mission in Afghanistan - Resolute Support. NATO will also continue to support the Afghan security forces in the fight against terrorism. Latvia's participation in the NATO-led mission will also be maintained.

According to Bekeris, in accordance with the mandate approved by the Saeima in 2016, a Latvian military contingent of up to 30 soldiers will be participating in the mission in Afghanistan. Currently, the Ministry of Defense is forwarding to the Saeima for consideration the extension of the mandate of Latvia's participation in this mission until the end of 2021.

The representative of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs explained that the meeting of NATO foreign ministers discussed the impact of the US decision to reduce the presence of their forces on the objectives and capabilities of the NATO mission. It has now been concluded that the mission is able to function and carry out its tasks, but NATO will continue to assess the situation and NATO members will have to make further decisions in February 2021, when NATO defense ministers will meet.

NATO members will have to consider whether NATO should continue its engagement in the country, which could become a long-term commitment, or end its presence in Afghanistan, which in turn could lead to the consolidation of international terrorists on Afghan territory and the withdrawal of international forces. It will be a unanimous decision of NATO members, followed by joint action by the allies.

See the rest here:

NATO continues to support the peace process in Afghanistan - Baltic Times

Report urges NATO to expand its focus to include China –

Reuters, BRUSSELS and BERLIN

NATO must think harder about how to handle China and its military rise, although Russia would remain its main adversary during this decade, a report on reforming the Atlantic alliance published yesterday said.

NATO 2030, prepared by a group of so-called wise persons and containing 138 proposals, comes amid growing doubts about the purpose and relevance of an alliance branded last year by French President Emmanuel Macron as brain dead.

China is no longer the benign trading partner that the West had hoped for. It is the rising power of our century and NATO must adapt, said one NATO diplomat who had seen the report prior to its publication, pointing to Chinese activity in the Arctic and Africa and to its heavy investments in European infrastructure.

Part of NATOs response should be maintaining a technological advantage over China, protecting computer networks and infrastructure, the diplomat said, citing the report, although not all recommendations would be adopted.

The 30-member alliance could also forge closer ties with non-NATO countries such as Australia and focus more on deterrence in space, where China is developing assets, the report said.

NATO Secretary-General Jens Stoltenberg on Monday said that Chinas rise posed important challenges to our security.

China is investing massively in new weapons. It is coming closer to us, from the Arctic to Africa. China does not share our values ... and tries to intimidate other countries, he told a news conference in Brussels, urging allies to come together on the issue.

NATO should consider including China in NATOs official master strategy document, its Strategic Concept, diplomats cited the report as saying, although it stopped short of declaring the country an adversary.

In other recommendations, the report suggested that NATO foreign ministers meet more regularly and called for a strengthening of the secretary-generals role as an international mediator.

The report was scheduled to be discussed by NATO foreign ministers yesterday before being presented to the alliances heads of state and government next year.

Tensions over NATOs ability to act remain, from anger over Turkeys decision to buy a Russian weapons system to US doubts over Europes commitment to its own defense, to US President Donald Trumps call for it to do more in the Middle East.

However, Eastern European allies, fearful of Russia since Moscows 2014 annexation of Crimea from Ukraine, are concerned about shifting too many resources away from NATOs core task of defending Europe.

CHINESE REACTION

In Beijing yesterday, Chinese Ministry of Foreign Affairs spokeswoman Hua Chunying () said China hoped NATO would adopt the correct outlook toward the country.

She told a regular briefing at the ministry that China stood ready to engage in dialogue with the alliance.

Comments will be moderated. Keep comments relevant to the article. Remarks containing abusive and obscene language, personal attacks of any kind or promotion will be removed and the user banned. Final decision will be at the discretion of the Taipei Times.

Continued here:

Report urges NATO to expand its focus to include China -

What We’re Watching: India’s angry farmers, NATO’s search for meaning, Israel’s election threat – GZERO Media

Indeed, ongoing bilateral frictions are particularly worrisome for Australia, whose export-reliant economy depends on trade with China more than any country in the world. China buys $120 billion of Australia's annual exports (30 percent), and the relationship accounts for around 1 in 13 Australian jobs.

What's the dispute actually about? Well, just ask China. Last month, the Chinese government publicly released a 14-point list that outlines its grievances with the Australian government. It included gripes as varied as Australia's decision to ban Chinese telecommunications giant Huawei from its 5G network, "spreading disinformation imported from the US around China's efforts of containing COVID-19," as well as general "antagonistic" reporting on China by the Australian press.

Beijing was particularly peeved by Australian Prime Minister Scott Morrison's call earlier this year for a global investigation into China's handling of the coronavirus pandemic, and it hit back with a series of tariffs on Australian goods like wine, beef, barley, and coal that threaten about $20 billion worth of Australian exports.

A particular spat with universal resonance. The bilateral dispute that's increasingly keeping Australian economists and government officials up at night is being closely watched by governments around the world including in Japan, South Korea, and New Zealand whose economies are heavily reliant on China, yet like Australia, also pursue a values-based foreign policy.

And there is definitely reason to be cautious. China has increasingly used its growing economic clout as a weapon, punishing states that criticize its bellicose behavior or human-rights violations.

In 2010, for example, after the Norwegian-based Nobel Peace Prize committee honored Liu Xiaobo a Chinese writer, dissident, and critic of the Chinese Communist Party China, the world's largest consumer of seafood, blocked salmon imports from Norway, costing the Nordic country hundreds of millions in lost revenue. (Upon lifting the blockade several years later, China said Norway had "deeply reflected upon the reasons bilateral mutual trust was harmed.")

While the Australian government has not backed down in criticizing China on a range of political issues, including Beijing's meddling in Australia's internal government affairs, its spying activities, and its crackdown in Hong Kong, other countries may be less inclined to push Beijing's buttons in ways that could send their own economies spiraling.

Cost-benefit analysis. In recent years, as the Trump administration has prioritized an anti-China geopolitical agenda, US allies like Australia have been forced into an even trickier position as they try to keep economic lines open with Beijing while maintaining security ties with Washington.

China has been particularly perturbed by actions taken by the "Five Eyes" intelligence-sharing pact made up of the US, Australia, Canada, New Zealand and Britain. After the group criticized China's recent targeting of Hong Kong's pro-democracy lawmakers, a Chinese spokesperson warned that China might "gouge and blind" the Five Eyes nations in retaliation. The Morrison government has said that it wants to "reset" the Australia-China relationship but that Beijing won't return its calls.

Don't put all your eggs in one basket. A debate is currently raging in Australia about the need to diversify trade partners so as to protect the country from economic blackmail from China that could deepen Australia's pandemic-induced recession. "There's a basic rule in finance: don't put all your eggs in one basket," one Australian academic recently said. But others argue that it's too late and China is too big.

More Show less

See the original post:

What We're Watching: India's angry farmers, NATO's search for meaning, Israel's election threat - GZERO Media