Lauren McCluskey: The Tragic and Unnecessary Tale Salt Lake Magazine – Salt Lake Magazine

On October 22, 2018 at 9:55 p.m., 21-year old Lauren McCluskey was found dead inside the back of a car in the parking lot next to her University of Utah campus dormitory. She had been shot seven times.

That afternoon, Laurens ex-boyfriend Melvin Rowland had waited for Lauren in her resident hall for several hours. She was on the phone with her mother at 8:20 p.m. when Rowland confronted McCluskey, violently dragged her across the parking lot in front of her dorm, causing her to drop her phone and belongings. At 8:23 p.m. Matt McCluskey, Laurens father, alerted campus security that his daughter was in danger. It was too late.

Its too late now, too: Rowland killed himself hours after McCluskeys death and the man who loaned Rowland the gun he used was sentenced to three years in prison. But in the two years since McCluskeys tragic death, details have emerged about McCluskeys attempts to get protection from University police as she grew increasingly afraid of her stalker ex-boyfriend. Her pleas for help were ignored. McCluskeys family sued the university in federal court and in June, 2020, filed a second lawsuit, contending that, just weeks before she was murdered, a police officer in whom Lauren McCluskey had confided she feared for her life shared nude photographs she had given him with officers not involved in the matter.

When Lauren McCluskey decided to attend the University of Utah, she was recruited to become a member of the Womens Track & Field Team. She was a Washington State Champion in the high jump and ranked 10th in the heptathlon at the USATF Outdoor Junior Championshipsshe had several other colleges and scholarships to choose from. Lauren was a star athlete from when she was a youth, climbing trees at the age of two, says her mother, Jill McCluskey who, along with her husband Matt, is a member of the faculty at the University of Washington.

McCluskeys teachers, coaches and teammates had a high respect and regard for her as a multi-event athlete, for maintaining a high GPA and as a person, She was someone who really cared about other people and her friendships. Somewhat an introvert, if you got to know her you quickly found out that she was full of things to say, and genuinely cared about other people, says her mother. Beyond athletics, she enjoyed karaoke singing and dancing with her closest friends. While attending the U, Lauren belonged to the Capital Church in downtown SLC, and would invite others to come along, encouraging them to sing.

She had lived in Salt Lake City a few years when she met Melvin Rowland at a popular downtown bar where Rowland was working as a bouncer. He told her that he was in the military and trained as a security officer, and afterwards they met up a few times. It wasnt long before she discovered the truth: Rowland was on parole and on the sexual offender list. She confronted Rowland face to face in her dorm room, he owned up, and McCluskey formally ended their relationship.

But she continued to receive messages and threats from Rowland. His friends posted about his suicidewhich was fakeon social media and blamed McCluskey as the cause. Rowland made frequent attempts (sometimes successful) to visit her at her university dorm. At one point, he demanded $1,000 from her to prevent him from posting explicit photos of the two of them. As Rowlands actions escalated, McCluskey began voicing concerns to her immediate family and closest friends. Because Rowland was a con and highly manipulative, things were difficult to discernshe didnt always believe he was a threat, or that her life was in danger, and she wished to take care of the situation by herself. But as friends can attest, she was growing more and more concerned and even frightened by his actions toward her.

Officer Miguel Deras presented her case to campus police on October 12, 2018, to report she was being harassed. On October 13, 2018, she reported extortion. The police, including Officer Deras, never investigated her claims. At some point, Deras called her with a strange request. He asked her to hand over some questionable and explicit photos mentioned in the case. As we now know, Deras downloaded those pictures onto his personal phone and was overheard boasting to colleagues, remarking about her looks and being cute.

Looking back, its easy to see many points where McCluskeys murder could have been prevented. Her mother Jill McCluskey says, The officers never checked Laurens killers offender status. After the police took her statement, they could have easily found out that Rowland was on parole and put him in jail right then. I just wish a responsible adult would have listened and believed. Rowland was on parole and could have been taken into custody. On October 19, 2018, McCluskey emailed detective Kayla Dallof with Rowlands offender information. Dallof did not read the email until after Lauren was killed. According to Laurens friend Shelby Gonzalez, On Thursday before we lost Lauren she asked me to come to the library to meet her because she needed help. She said the police didnt believe her about her scary ex and she didnt know what to do.

It turns out that McCluskey was victimized not just by her killer. Lax dormitory security and a macho culture of minimizing coeds complaints also contributed to her death. McCluskey says, The U has never admitted that Laurens death could have been prevented, or apologized or taken responsibility for their failures. Its hard for them to change if they dont acknowledge their failures, and that has to happen going forward.

Too late for McCluskey, changes are coming about, somewhat ironically in a year when campus population and social interactions will drastically decrease due to the coronovirus.

Following McCluskeys murder, teammate and friend Brooke Martin was in shock. But as time went by, she noticed that little or nothing was changing in campus safety or policy. Martin created a mural in McCluskeys honor, and helped build a student-led coalition called UnsafeU. Since their first public protest on the first anniversary of McCluskeys death, UnsafeU has been gathering and sharing stories of other mishandled cases. Martin says, Students are demonstrating with their voices and standing up for whats right and not forgetting, and not accepting the empty words or quick Bandaids from a system thats completely broken, says Martin.

Many professors at the U and around the country are posting Laurens Promise on their course syllabus, I will listen and believe you if someone is threatening you. laurenmccluskey.org

Utah State Senator Jani Iwamoto has a long-standing interest in dealing with public safety issues and sexual assault. Since McCluskeys murder many college students have contacted her wanting to talk about campus safety and problems like assault, domestic and dating violence and stalking. She says, I am inspired by their activism, as many students have continued to express that they dont feel safe and demand real change in their places of higher learning. We need safeguards in place to help our students. Senator Iwamoto was the Chief Sponsor of S.B. 134, signed by Governor Herbert on May 19, 2019, a bill which outlines requirements and responsibilities for campus safety and requires institutions to share this information with the Legislature every year, to assess and find out whats working and whats not.

Senator Iwamoto says,Laurens death, her pleas for help, of course, her tragic death does not go away, and nothing is going to work unless we have some real change with the police and policy, and that the students believe in it, because now there isnt trust at all in them. Seamless communication is also important for the victims, because its hard enough to navigate where to go and what to do when they are going through an experience. Senator Iwamoto also sponsored this years S.B. Bill 80 which focuses more specifically on communication between law enforcement, students, campus police dispatch and departments.

Laurens kindness, positive attitude, and work ethic were always on display regardless of the people she was with or activities she was involved in as a student-athlete at the U. Its simply who she was. She was always present and in the moment with her teammates and friends. That is more difficult than we all realize in todays world. Yet she did it with ease and grace on a regular basis with everyone she knew. KYLE KEPLER, U OF U TRACK AND FIELD COACH

As a Communications major, Lauren was enrolled at the U in Professor Dan Clarks Advanced Public Speaking class. Her final exam was a student presentation called the Last LectureIf you had only one hour left to live, what would you say? Lauren was the first to volunteer. While soft spoken, she delivered her speech in a profound way, Clark says. She shared her stories about being on the track team, the thrill of victory as well as her injuries and enduring disappointment and physical pain. Her message was one of keeping hope alive, that overcoming obstacles is part of life, and that practicing self-love is the way for you to fully love others.

Over two years have passed since Lauren was found dead in the back of a car outside her campus dorm. There is still so much to be done, her friend Brooke Martin says. Justice needs to be served and our demands need to be metno student should ever be worried about being killed on campus.

And Laurens story continues and gains momentum. On the first anniversary of her murder, led by a student organization called UnsafeU, 100 students walked out of their classes to protest how the university handled the Lauren McCluskey case, the misconduct of university police and other concerns reported by women.

And September 3rd of the 2020-21 academic year started with another large on-campus rally from UnsafeU demanding the resignation of President Ruth Watkins for withholding evidence in this and other cases and calling for the abolition of the UUPD.

For more city life, click here.

Excerpt from:

Lauren McCluskey: The Tragic and Unnecessary Tale Salt Lake Magazine - Salt Lake Magazine

Freedom of speech, yes, but not when it is intended to incite violence – Williamsport Sun-Gazette

We Americans treasure our freedom of speech. We defend it staunchly. As the old saying goes, we may not agree with what some people say, but we defend their right to say it.

Unless it is intended to incite violence to harm people otherwise. There, we draw the line.

In August 2019, a federal judge in Missoula, Montana, ruled that the publisher of a neo-Nazi website had stepped across that line. Andrew Anglin, founder and operator of The Daily Stormer website, had orchestrated a campaign intended to harass a Jewish family, Judge Dana Christensen decided in a lawsuit filed by a member of the family, Tanya Gersh, of Whitefish, Montana.

Anglin was ordered to pay a $14 million judgment to end the lawsuit.

Similar judgments have been made in other lawsuits against Anglin, in Ohio and Washington.

Now, Gershs lawyers are back in court, seeking new action against Anglin because he has not paid any of the $14 million judgment. In fact, the attorneys say, Anglin cannot be located. It seems he has gone underground in an attempt to dodge his financial obligations.

It may be that Anglin has left the country.

Anglin and others enamored of Nazism are entitled to their despicable beliefs. They are not entitled to harm others in any way, however.

To this point, it appears Anglin has not run afoul of criminal law. His court trouble has been in civil cases but attempting to dodge judges orders in such situations can be a criminal offense.

He should be hunted down and held accountable for any harm the courts find he has caused.

Today's breaking news and more in your inbox

Read the original here:

Freedom of speech, yes, but not when it is intended to incite violence - Williamsport Sun-Gazette

University passes Statement on Freedom of Speech with amendments – Varsity Online

The results of the Grace presented to Regent House were announced on Wednesday

The University has adopted a new Statement on Freedom of Speech following voting on a grace, a type of University legislation, presented to Regent House. The results were announced on Wednesday (09/12).

The statement, first drafted in March, replaces a previous version from 2016, and was passed with three amendments claiming to make it clearer and more liberal.

Dr Arif Ahmed, a reader at the Faculty of Philosophy who authored the amendments, told Varsity that the result of the vote confirmed that his colleagues are concerned about freedom of speech.

Although many academics are perhaps unwilling to speak openly about it, when they have the opportunity to reveal their preferences through a secret ballot, they did actually show that they care about freedom of speech and want it protected, he said.

The first amendment replaces the demand for respect for the opinions of others, made in the March statement, with tolerance.

The second amendment makes it explicit that the University can only stop a speaker from attending an event if they are likely to express unlawful speech and no reasonably practicable steps other than a refusal can be taken.

Meanwhile the final amendment states that the University may only restrict an event if it violates the law, falsely defames, constitutes a threat or harassment, is an invasion of privacy, or is otherwise directly incompatible with the functioning of the University.

All three amendments passed with a majority of over 75%. The turnout was 32.1%.

Commenting on the outcome, Vice Chancellor Stephen Toope said: Freedom of speech is a right that sits at the heart of the University. This statement is a robust defence of that right...The statement also makes it clear that is unacceptable to censor, or disinvite, speakers whose views are lawful but may be seen as controversial.

Toopes comments were made despite criticisms of the March statement, which one group of academics called vague and authoritarian. Ahmed, however, emphasises that the policy was written in good faith, and the amendments were designed to make it clearer.

Cambridge will still be required to follow the Governments anti-radicalisation policy Prevent. Ahmed is critical of the legislation, but does not believe it should have been addressed in the statement.

I think Prevent is repressive, I think its been a disaster for interreligious relations. I think it causes self-censorship especially among the Muslim community but no doubt for others as well.

Whilst the Prevent duty does exist I dont see why we have to include it in something we are voluntarily signing up to, he continued.

The new statement and amendments received attention from the national press, as well as from students and staff. Roger Mosey, Master of Selwyn College, tweeted in support of the outcome of the vote, calling it a big moment for the rights of free speech in universities.

Meanwhile the Cambridge University Liberal Association were also pleased to see that an overwhelming number of fellows have backed the free speech amendments.

Professor Priyamvada Gopal was one of those critical of the new statement, tweeting that the news from Cambridge [...] is beyond tedious. Gopal, a Professor of Postcolonial Studies at the Faculty of English, faced abuse over the summer following falsified allegations of racism.

Gopal also accused the free speech (but not freedom to protest) brigade of getting ready to re-invite a certain Canadian self-help guru. It is understood by Varsity that Gopal is referring to academic Jordan Peterson.

It was later reported that right-wing journalist Toby Young, who is not affiliated with the University, would be writing to the Vice Chancellor asking for Peterson to receive an invitation.

An offer of a visiting fellowship made to Peterson by the Faculty of Divinity was rescinded in 2019. Petersons criticism of transgender rights and claims that white privilege is a Marxist lie have made him a controversial figure.

Gopal confirmed to Varsity her belief that the immediate call by Toby Young and his far-right organisation the Free Speech Union, members of whom were involved in organising the Cambridge vote, to invite Jordan Peterson to campus is a clear indication of the fact that this was never about free speech.

What is at stake is giving eugenicists, racists, and transphobes a prestigious platform, she continued.

Ahmed, however, explained that he has no idea who if anyone has re-invited Pearson, and pointed out that any re-invitation would have to be issued by the Faculty of Divinity. Ahmed did note that the Statement on Freedom of Speech and amendments will make it harder to disinvite people.

They will, I hope, have the result that the list of invited speakers remains wide, perhaps wider than before, he said.

The new statement was earlier criticised by the Cambridge branch of the Universities and Colleges Union (UCU). UCU believes that the policy is a result of political pressure and that the third amendment in particular threatens the possibility of events related to protest or industrial action.

In response to UCUs concerns, Ahmed notes that the right to protest is protected by Article 11 of the ECHR [European Convention on Human Rights] so there is no risk that the right to protest is going to be undermined by this.

He added that the kind of protest the University would not permit would be someone physically preventing somebody elses speaker event from going ahead.

Varsity is the independent newspaper for the University of Cambridge, established in its current form in 1947. In order to maintain our editorial independence, our print newspaper and news website receives no funding from the University of Cambridge or its constituent Colleges.

We are therefore almost entirely reliant on advertising for funding, and during this unprecedented global crisis, we expect to have a tough few months and years ahead.

In spite of this situation, we are going to look at inventive ways to look at serving our readership with digital content and of course in print too.

Therefore we are asking our readers, if they wish, to make a donation from as little as 1, to help with our running costs at least until this global crisis ends and things begin to return to normal.

Many thanks, all of us here at Varsity would like to wish you, your friends, families and all of your loved ones a safe and healthy few months ahead.

Go here to see the original:

University passes Statement on Freedom of Speech with amendments - Varsity Online

Report: 88 percent of universities restrict expression, nearly half restrict online speech – The Highland County Press

By Bethany Blankley The Center Squarehttps://www.thecentersquare.com/

A new national survey of 478 higher education institutions in the U.S. found that 9 in 10 restrict free speech in some capacity on campus but nearly half maintain policies that impermissibly restrict online speech.

The study was conducted by FIRE, the Foundation for Individual Rights in Education, a nonpartisan, nonprofit organization dedicated to defending and sustaining the individual rights of students and faculty members at American colleges and universities. These rights include freedom of speech, freedom of association, due process, legal equality, religious liberty, and sanctity of conscience.

The report, Spotlight on Speech Codes 2021: The State of Free Speech on Our Nations Campuses, analyzed the written policies related to free speech at 478 top American colleges and universities. It found that 88 percent of those surveyed maintain policies that restrict, or could be interpreted to restrict, expression.

These policies have real-world consequences, Laura Beltz, FIREs senior program officer for policy reform and author of the report, said in a statement. Students and professors around the country face punishment for speech that is clearly protected by the First Amendment or a schools free speech promises.

FIRE notes that restrictive speech policies extend beyond college campus property. With the advent of Zoom and online classes being conducted remotely, expression is being threatened online, FIRE found, in students own homes and on their own computers.

In New Jersey, a student at Stockton University faced possible suspension, a fine, and a mandatory social justice workshop after using a photo of President Donald Trump as his Zoom background while attending class online. By having a backdrop of the president, the university claimed other students said they felt offended, disrespected, and taunted. The student also posted a Patrick Henry-esque political post on Facebook in July, which prompted the university to charge the student with six policy violations, including harassment and cyberbullying, before FIREs public involvement caused the university to back down.

In June alone, 128 people came to FIRE asking for help when they believed their First Amendment rights were in jeopardy, the organization says.

In Colorado, a University of Colorado-Denver email policy bans students from sending or storing emails with messages that could be considered offensive."

The policy directs students not to use email to send any offensive or otherwise inappropriate matter. Listed examples include offensive comments about a range of topics, including race, gender, political beliefs, and even terrorism.

Im not sure what theyre trying to target by banning offensive comments about terrorism, but in any case, expression doesnt lose constitutional protection just because it has offended someone, Beltz argues.

The policy bans hyperlinks or other references to indecent or patently offensive websites and similar materials, holding students responsible for including a link or reference in an email that someone finds indecent.

While material that meets the stringent legal standard for obscenity is not constitutionally protected, expression cant be limited merely because someone has found it indecent, Beltz adds. Under CU Denvers policy, emailing a link to Cardi Bs WAP video or even a photo of Michelangelos David would be punishable. This absurd result is impermissible at a public university.

In New York, at Fordham University, a policy bans the use of any IT resource, including those off campus, to intimidate, insult, embarrass, or harass others.

Each of the 478 policies analyzed can be found in FIREs Spotlight Database. Schools are ranked according to color, with red indicating that the institution has the most restrictive policies, and green, the least. First Amendment protections analyzed include policies related to protest, online speech, harassment, and civility.

Among them, 21 percent received an overall red light rating for maintaining speech codes that both clearly and substantially restrict freedom of speech.

More than half of red light-ranked schools are located in the District of Columbia and seven states: Alaska, Delaware, Illinois, Oregon, South Carolina, Vermont, and Wyoming.

Roughly 12 percent of institutions analyzed, a total of 56, received green light ranking for having no policies in place that compromise student expression, according to the database.

Yellow light-ranked institutions represent the majority, 65 percent, which have policies in place that prohibit, or have an impermissible chilling effect on, constitutionally protected speech.

View post:

Report: 88 percent of universities restrict expression, nearly half restrict online speech - The Highland County Press

Government must walk a tightrope on hate speech plans – The Irish Times

The large scar on Bilal Ahmeds hand required thirty stitches to close up. Ten months on from the attack, it still causes him pain.

The stabbing was the culmination of years of harassment and often racist abuse from Christy Griffin who lived in an apartment near the takeaway on Clanbrassil Street and who was angry over the noise made by its customers at night.

I went 20 or 30 times to Garda station because it was just too much, recalled Ahmed who is from Punjab in Pakistan and has been in Ireland 17 years.

One night in April 2017, Griffin entered Chicken Hut, punched Ahmed and smashed up the premises with a hockey stick. He later told arresting garda: F**k those P**i c**ts .They will never make it to court. I will make sure of that you wait and see.

Griffin was released on bail and the abuse continued. In February 2020, he waited for Ahmed to close up the restaurant before attacking with him with a knife and stabbing him in the hand.

It was a racist attack, says Ahmed. When the case reached court two months ago Judge Karen OConnor seemed to agree, noting Griffins disgusting racist and abusive remarks to garda. She imposed a six-year sentence but suspended half of it and ordered Griffin to take part anti-racism education.

For Ahmed, the sentence was not nearly enough. I complained so many times about him. I know he received six years but he will only be in jail for three.

Ahmed says only about 2 per cent of people are Irish racist. But he still feels less safe here after the attack.

Judge OConnor was constrained in sentencing Griffin because, unlike many European countries, Ireland does not have any hate crime laws. At best, judges can take racist motives into account when sentencing but this is an informal and ill-defined process.

A broad-ranging piece of Government legislation due to be introduced next year aims to change that. Under the plan, details of which are due to be announced today, crimes such as criminal damage and assault will attract significantly tougher punishments if they are found to have a bigoted element, including racism, homophobia, transphobia or anti-disability sentiment.

It will be a high bar to prove a hate crime and juries will be able to downgrade one to an ordinary crime if they feel the hate element was not proven. For example, if someone is accused of a racist assault, a jury might decide an assault happened, but that it was not racist.

This part of the Bill is likely to be relatively uncontroversial. The second part, which will deal with hate speech, is sure to generate significantly more debate.

The existing Incitement to Hatred Act 1989 is to be repealed in its entirety. The Department of Justice has come to the conclusion that it is almost entirely ineffective. Between 2000 and 2017 there were only 44 prosecutions, but just five convictions.

One of the failed prosecutions examined by the department was against a man who set up a Facebook page suggesting Traveller babies be used for medical testing, or as animal feed. A judge ruled the comments did not amount to incitement, despite the page attracting more than 600 fans.

The new legislation aims to be much more robust, particularly when it comes to the internet.

Hate speech directed at an individual or group will become a crime whether it is shouted in the street or tweeted online. It will also be a separate offence to distribute or share hate speech, meaning retweeting or sharing something on social media could form an offence.

During a public consultation last year, the department received many submissions expressing legitimate concerns about the impact of such laws on freedom of speech and debate.

Officials are eager to avoid a situation where the Bill becomes part of the broader culture wars that have engulfed the United States and United Kingdom. To this end they have studied equivalent legislation in the UK and examples of what were seen by many as prosecutorial overreach.

For example, in 2017 a 19-year-old UK woman was prosecuted for posting the lyrics of a rap song which contained the n-word to social media as part of a tribute to a deceased friend.

Such prosecutions will be unlikely to happen here as the test of hate speech will be based around the motivation of the speaker. Intentionally or recklessly engaging in hate speech might be a crime. Doing it inadvertently would not.

The legislation will also protect debates on controversial issues which may cause offence to some people or groups. This includes debates on issues like immigration and allowing trans teenagers to begin gender reassignment.

The new legislation should contain robust safeguards for freedom of expression, such as protections for reasonable and genuine contributions to literary, artistic, political, scientific or academic discourse, and fair and accurate reporting, the report states.

Much has to happen before the Bill becomes law. It faces a lengthy journey through the Oireachtas and because of its significance, it is likely to go before the justice committee.

Minister for Justice Helen McEntee is aware she has a tightrope to walk between protecting minorities and protecting free speech.

She is also aware the Bill will be used as a rallying cry for far-right and racist groups worried the law will stifle their activities. Such groups have already starting protesting the issue. It will be the Governments challenge to ensure they do not hijack the debate entirely.

Read the original post:

Government must walk a tightrope on hate speech plans - The Irish Times

Cambridge may have won the battle for free speech – but this war is far from over – Telegraph.co.uk

The pandemic was just beginning to rumble when I agreed to be on the advisory board of the Free Speech Union, run by Toby Young. It had become increasingly clear to anyone with half a brain that freedom of speech including perfectly reasonable as well as horrible exercises of it was badly imperilled.

There was a launch party, with lots of lusty speeches, including one by the Humberside docker visited by the police for his rude tweets about trans people (Were here to check your thinking).

Pandemic aside, this year has turned out to be frenetically preoccupied with freedom of speech, what constitutes it, and who its enemies are. Even our most elite institutions have entered the fray, at the very highest level of engagement.

And finally, some progress seems to have been made. Last week, woke-deranged Cambridge pulled up its socks: a policy requiring staff and students to be respectful of all other views was rejected by the universitys governing body.

Academics rightly saw that criticism and disagreement could be attacked and shut down as disrespect so long as that respect clause stayed in. Arif Ahmed, a reader in philosophy, spearheaded the revolt, comparing the atmosphere at Cambridge to that of the Salem witch hunts of the 17th century.

Respect was duly changed to tolerate. There will be less room for no-platforming, and a good thing, too. This is, after all, the Cambridge where students at Clare College recently bayed for the suspension of a porter who resigned from the city council over a motion pertaining to trans rights, and where countless attempts to bully, censor and sack in the name of social justice have come to define its culture.

The Cambridge policy tweak has come at the end of a year of unprecedented curtailment of free speech. Following the death of George Floyd at the hands of Minneapolis police in May, Black Lives Matter burst on the scene with revolutionary ambitions for dismantling our culture in its entirety. Accusations of racism soon veered wildly off piste, becoming another means of control and suppression used to sack dissenters and terrify institutions.

Mission accomplished.

High-profile, chilling sackings (or forced resignations) included that of James Bennet, the New York Times opinion page editor whose crime was to run a comment piece by Republican senator Tom Cotton that argued the US military should be deployed if police couldnt get the riots under control. Stockwell Day, a former Canadian cabinet minister, lost three jobs in June after saying on a televised debate that Canada is not a [systemically] racist country while also saying our system needs to be improved.

Meanwhile, the world watched as JK Rowling was flayed on Twitter her crime being her stated belief that sex is biological. Last month, the prize-winning feminist columnist Suzanne Moore left the Guardian after a letter signed by 338 staff suggested views such as hers (she wrote in favour of biological women-only spaces) made the paper transphobic.

The Cambridge vote was certainly positive. But it is important, as we fight for this core value of freedom of speech, that we remain vigilant against slipperiness and hastiness. In this regard, Im not so sure about the Cambridge success. Is it really? Tolerate is a murky word. Doesnt freedom include the right to storm out of a lecture?

Nor am I sure I liked vice-chancellor Stephen Toopes slightly snaky statement that all those with lawful views are included in this toleration clause. Didnt he mean lawful speech? Views are private unless expressed. Toope seems to be implying that you can have illegal opinions. This may have been a slip, but it was a telling one.

Such slipperiness is perhaps to be expected at the top in woke Cambridge. But while free-speech warriors are less prone to slipperiness, we must be careful to avoid sloppiness. The row at Eton is an example, where an English master was sacked after recording a virtual lesson that included a misogynistic, antifeminist video (the two do not necessarily go together, but in this case they do).

The video in question was not appropriate for schoolboys under the guise of education, and teachers cant simply say whatever they want. In this case, its author was disciplined for refusing to recant, and thats fair enough. Yes, it iswrong and unfair that when equally pernicious stuff is fed to schoolchildren under the guise of diversity and inclusion, nobody is punished. But we must be careful not to confuse the curtailment of the inappropriate with the curtailment of the free.

Our battle is far from won and we cant afford to cry wolf when the issue is actually a poodle.

You can read Zoe Strimpels column every Sunday at telegraph.co.uk. Click here to read last week's column

Link:

Cambridge may have won the battle for free speech - but this war is far from over - Telegraph.co.uk

NC State investigation on employee with allegations to white nationalism group still ongoing after one month – N.C. State University Technician Online

On Nov. 17, NC State opened an investigation on Chadwick Seagraves, a desktop support manager in the Office of Information Technology (OIT), due to multiple claims that Seagraves is connected to the Proud Boys, a white nationalist organization, and offensive social media posts. As of Dec. 16, a month after these allegations came to light, the investigation is still ongoing and the University has no updates to report, according to Mick Kulikowsi, NC State spokesperson.

Seagraves released a statement to Technician and other news outlets on Nov. 25 denying the allegations that he is a member of the Proud Boys.

I have been subjected to an organized campaign of slander composed of outright lies, half truths, and out of context claims initiated by anonymous anarchists and antifascists that is designed to punish me and suppress my right to political expression using intimidation and the Hecklers veto with the intent to destroy my career and reputation, Seagraves said in the statement.

Seagraves is under investigation in regards to conduct on a now-deleted Twitter account the Anonymous Comrades Collective, a group of leakers, claimed was his, and for photos and a video which placed him at what has been called an anti-Islam rally in 2017 with far-right activist Augustus Sol Invictus. Additionally, the group claimed he is a member of the Proud Boys and that he was part of the release of over 2,000 Black Lives Matter protesters private information in Portland and Asheville. An organization, Portlands Democratic Socialists of America, has filed a lawsuit in relation to that leak.

In an additional email Seagraves shared with Technician, he claims the 2017 event was a Free Speech rally in celebration of Flag Day and that Invictus was a late addition to what Seagraves states is a very eclectic list of speakers, which included Sue Googe, a former North Carolina Congress candidate; Alex Smith, a former Muslim; and DJ Wiggins, a pastor.

As a librarian, I might loan or recommend books whose contents I completely disagree with that are part of a collection that includes books many people disagree with and want banned, Seagraves said in the email. Does that mean because I introduce the collection of those ideas to the public that I agree with, and am responsible for, all they include? Of course not!

In response to the other allegations, Seagraves said, I am not a member of the Proud Boys, and said he welcomes NC States internal investigation in his statement.

Seagraves never had access to the protected personal information of any NC State student or any employees he does not supervise while in his position at OIT, but the University has further restricted his access while the investigation continues.

Seagraves full statement to Technician and other news outlets is as follows:

I have been subjected to an organized campaign of slander composed of outright lies, half truths, and out of context claims initiated by anonymous anarchists and antifascists that is designed to punish me and suppress my right to political expression using intimidation and the Hecklers veto with the intent to destroy my career and reputation.

I categorically denounce white supremacism and, as a Constitutionalist and Free Speech Absolutist, I abhor the concept of fascism and authoritarianism of any sort.

With regard to the universitys investigation, I welcome a review of my performance and record as an employee. I have served in my position with distinction and believe that my record of diversity as a hiring manager; the equality, kindness, and compassion with which I treat all of my colleagues; and my integrity and commitment to upholding the universitys values of diversity and equity will stand alone.

In 2017 I was still a registered Democrat and had been active in politics for the Democratic Party since 2001. In 2008 I worked at an inner city polling location in Indianapolis as a precinct "judge" and was part of the ground campaign for then candidate Obama. It was seeing exactly the sort of horrible attacks and suppression of free speech that I am going through right now that caused me to reassess my values and position. Our current state of politics is a clash of values. Each side seeing the same set of facts and coming to varying conclusions based on the hierarchy of values to which they subscribe. As a librarian, trained to provide authoritative sources, I have witnessed even those once trusted authorities sink into bias and partisanship. Epistemologically, we are at our lowest.

I am not a member of the Proud Boys.

To paint me as a racist and fascist is heinous slander. I will continue to stand up for the principles and values put in place by the Founding Fathers. If you follow the news at all you will see that conservatives and centrists alike are being denied their right to free speech through violence, deplatforming, and intimidation by violent people who weaponize the term "fascist" or "racist" to denigrate those whose views they oppose. Benjamin Franklin is quoted as saying "Without freedom of thought, there can be no such thing as wisdom - and no such thing as public liberty without freedom of speech." That liberty stands for everyone - regardless of race, creed, sex, or orientation.

I would ask the people who know me to judge me based on how I have treated them and who they know me to be, not on the spurious claims of anonymous activists.

Go here to read the rest:

NC State investigation on employee with allegations to white nationalism group still ongoing after one month - N.C. State University Technician Online

Hate Crime Bill: SNP is being taught a lesson about the value of free speech Murdo Fraser MSP – The Scotsman

NewsOpinionColumnistsWhen the Scottish Parliament was first established, it was intended that the committees, constituted on a cross-party basis reflective of the political balance at Holyrood, would perform an important scrutiny role, effectively acting as a second chamber.

Tuesday, 15th December 2020, 4:45 pm

In practice, this has not been how things have worked out. Expectations that MSPs on committees would leave their party-political allegiances at the door and act independently have been dashed, with the consequence that too often the ability to hold ministers to account has been frustrated. This was particularly the case during the period of SNP majority government between 2011 and 2016.

Since the SNP lost their overall majority, we have seen committees become more assertive, and prepared to challenge the government where appropriate.

We see that on a weekly basis in the Salmond Inquiry Committee, on which I presently sit, and we saw it just last week in a report from the Rural Economy and Connectivity Committee slamming the catastrophic handling by the Scottish government of ferry procurement.

Unintended consequences

One of the best examples of a committee doing its work effectively also came last week, with the publication by the Justice Committee of its stage one report on the SNPs Hate Crime Bill. Under the stewardship of my Conservative colleague Adam Tomkins MSP, the committee has done an excellent, thorough job of analysing the Bill, identifying the key areas of controversy, and suggesting improvements.

As readers of The Scotsman will be well aware, this is a Bill that provokes strong opinions. Whilst everyone should deplore hate speech, there have been real concerns expressed that the legislation as drafted goes too far in seeking to close down public debate and restrict free speech.

An alliance of lawyers, writers, comedians, human rights advocates, and religious groups have come together to oppose the Bill, and express serious concerns about its impact.

In its report, the Justice Committee recognises the broader context for the Bill, and the debate around freedom of speech, agreeing the right to freedom of speech includes the right to offend, shock or disturb.

It goes on to say: The committee understands that this Bill is not intended to prohibit speech which others may find offensive, and neither is it intended to lead to any self-censorship. The committee is anxious to ensure, however, that these are not unintended consequences of the Bill.

Would Bible be deemed inflammatory?

Much of the committees report analyses in detail the controversial aspects of the Bill, which relate almost exclusively to part two, and the creation of new offences around stirring up hatred. Despite concessions put forward by the Justice Secretary Humza Yousaf, witnesses were still concerned that the Bill would impact on freedom of expression, and the right to criticise religions.

At a number of points, the heated public debate on trans issues was quoted as one area where the Bill could have a chilling effect on the ability for that debate to be conducted, and all opinions aired. The recent opinions of the writer JK Rowling were quoted by witnesses as an example of a legitimate point of view that could potentially be criminalised by the Bill as presented.

The language in the Bill is analysed, including whether terms such as insulting and abusive in relation to speech should be included. The committee concluded that the meaning of the word abusive in the Bill had to be clear.

A number of witnesses raised concerns around the so-called dwelling provisions which provided that hate speech could be criminalised even if it took place in a family home. There were also issues around section five of the Bill which criminalised simply the possession of inflammatory material, it being pointed out by the Roman Catholic Church that the Bible itself could be considered inflammatory in some contexts.

There are existing protections built into the Bill to permit freedom of expression, around criticism of religion, and sexual conduct and practices. However, the committee was concerned that these did not go far enough, and recommended wider protections of free speech, to more closely align with the equivalent provisions in England and Wales.

Fresh concessions not enough

On Monday, the Justice Secretary indicated his willingness to make further concessions, including to strengthen the freedom of expression provisions, to make clear that the term abusive was an objective test, and to propose limits on police powers of search and entry. In addition, he agreed to remove section five on possession on inflammatory material from the Bill entirely.

I am sure these further concessions will be welcomed by the committee which, combined with the previous announcements from the Justice Secretary, represent a major shift in his position away from the Bill as originally introduced. However, there are very serious concerns that, even with these adjustments, the Bill still goes too far in terms of restricting freedom of speech.

The Justice Committee has done a tremendous service to Parliament, and to the Scottish public more generally, with its thorough analysis of the Bill and the key issues that arise from it.

It will now be up to the Scottish Government, and MSPs across all parties, to determine whether the Bill can be sufficiently improved as it goes through the parliamentary stages to make it worthy of adding to the statute book.

Perhaps the most depressing aspect of this whole episode has been that a measure around which all of us should unite, the clarification of the law against hate speech in Scotland, has ended up mired in so much political controversy because of overreach on the part of the SNP government.

I hope that they have learned a lesson from this legislation that Scotland as a nation, across all sectors and political opinions, values free speech, and is prepared to defend that right vigorously.

Murdo Fraser is a Conservative MSP for Mid-Scotland and Fife

A message from the Editor:

Thank you for reading this article. We're more reliant on your support than ever as the shift in consumer habits brought about by coronavirus impacts our advertisers.

Read the original:

Hate Crime Bill: SNP is being taught a lesson about the value of free speech Murdo Fraser MSP - The Scotsman

What is Virtual Reality? – Virtual Reality Society

The definition of virtual reality comes, naturally, from the definitions for both virtual and reality. The definition of virtual is near and reality is what we experience as human beings. So the term virtual reality basically means near-reality. This could, of course, mean anything but it usually refers to a specific type of reality emulation.

We know the world through our senses and perception systems. In school we all learned that we have five senses: taste, touch, smell, sight and hearing. These are however only our most obvious sense organs. The truth is that humans have many more senses than this, such as a sense of balance for example. These other sensory inputs, plus some special processing of sensory information by our brains ensures that we have a rich flow of information from the environment to our minds.

Everything that we know about our reality comes by way of our senses. In other words, our entire experience of reality is simply a combination of sensory information and our brains sense-making mechanisms for that information. It stands to reason then, that if you can present your senses with made-up information, your perception of reality would also change in response to it. You would be presented with a version of reality that isnt really there, but from your perspective it would be perceived as real. Something we would refer to as a virtual reality.

So, in summary, virtual reality entails presenting our senses with a computer generated virtual environment that we can explore in some fashion.

Answering what is virtual reality in technical terms is straight-forward. Virtual reality is the term used to describe a three-dimensional, computer generated environment which can be explored and interacted with by a person. That person becomes part of this virtual world or is immersed within this environment and whilst there, is able to manipulate objects or perform a series of actions.

Although we talk about a few historical early forms of virtual reality elsewhere on the site, today virtual reality is usually implemented using computer technology. There are a range of systems that are used for this purpose, such as headsets, omni-directional treadmills and special gloves. These are used to actually stimulate our senses together in order to create the illusion of reality.

This is more difficult than it sounds, since our senses and brains are evolved to provide us with a finely synchronised and mediated experience. If anything is even a little off we can usually tell. This is where youll hear terms such asimmersiveness and realism enter the conversation. These issues that divide convincing or enjoyable virtual reality experiences from jarring or unpleasant ones are partly technical and partly conceptual. Virtual reality technology needs to take our physiology into account. For example, the human visual field does not look like a video frame. We have (more or less) 180 degrees of vision and although you are not always consciously aware of your peripheral vision, if it were gone youd notice. Similarly when what your eyes and the vestibular system in your ears tell you are in conflict it can cause motion sickness. Which is what happens to some people on boats or when they read while in a car.

If an implementation of virtual reality manages to get the combination of hardware, software and sensory synchronicity just right it achieves something known as a sense of presence. Where the subject really feels like they are present in that environment.

This may seems like a lot of effort, and it is! What makes the development of virtual reality worthwhile? The potential entertainment value is clear. Immersive films and video games are good examples. The entertainment industry is after all a multi-billion dollar one and consumers are always keen on novelty. Virtual reality has many other, more serious, applications as well.

There are a wide variety of applications for virtual reality which include:

Virtual reality can lead to new and exciting discoveries in these areas which impact upon our day to day lives.

Wherever it is too dangerous, expensive or impractical to do something in reality, virtual reality is the answer. From trainee fighter pilots to medical applications trainee surgeons, virtual reality allows us to take virtual risks in order to gain real world experience. As the cost of virtual reality goes down and it becomes more mainstream you can expect more serious uses, such as education or productivity applications, to come to the fore. Virtual reality and its cousin augmented reality could substantively change the way we interface with our digital technologies. Continuing the trend of humanising our technology.

There are many different types of virtual reality systems but they all share the same characteristics such as the ability to allow the person to view three-dimensional images. These images appear life-sized to the person.

Plus they change as the person moves around their environment which corresponds with the change in their field of vision. The aim is for a seamless join between the persons head and eye movements and the appropriate response, e.g. change in perception. This ensures that the virtual environment is both realistic and enjoyable.

A virtual environment should provide the appropriate responses in real time- as the person explores their surroundings. The problems arise when there is a delay between the persons actions and system response or latency which then disrupts their experience. The person becomes aware that they are in an artificial environment and adjusts their behaviour accordingly which results in a stilted, mechanical form of interaction.

The aim is for a natural, free-flowing form of interaction which will result in a memorable experience.

Virtual reality is the creation of a virtual environment presented to our senses in such a way that we experience it as if we were really there. It uses a host of technologies to achieve this goal and is a technically complex feat that has to account for our perception and cognition. It has both entertainment and serious uses. The technology is becoming cheaper and more widespread. We can expect to see many more innovative uses for the technology in the future and perhaps a fundamental way in which we communicate and work thanks to the possibilities of virtual reality.

Read more:

What is Virtual Reality? - Virtual Reality Society

Virtual Reality NJ – VRcadeNJ – Virtual Reality Experience …

VR Arcade is the first and only completely wireless Virtual Reality Escape Room & Arcade in the Tri-State.

We have a large selection of room-scale virtual reality experiences for everyone! Whether you enjoy peaceful flights through a scenic city, sports, virtual worlds, zombie apocalypse and even Outer Space we offer a variety of VR fun perfect for Adults and Kids alike. Our venue has enough space to accommodate groups of various sizes including private rooms.

Teambuilding, Parties or even just a fun night out is better at VR Arcade as upstairs you can check out Escape Room NJ, Downstairs check out Human Bumper Balls or Indoor Airsoft NJ and if that isnt exciting enough how about Axeholez Hatchet House NJ.

Yes, this is the only Adults Entertainment Center of its kind in the Tri-State, dont miss out the chance to check us out, call in and schedule a tour for your next Corporate Teambuilding Event, Birthday Party, Bachelor/Bachelorette Party, Baby Shower, Divorce Party or any other kind of celebration you like.how about T.G.I.F!

More here:

Virtual Reality NJ - VRcadeNJ - Virtual Reality Experience ...

Deliverect uses virtual reality technology to bring employees together for the festive season – PRNewswire

In celebration of the continued hard work and support its employees have given to the hospitality industry over the past year, Deliverect will be gifting each member with the Oculus - Quest 2, one of the most advanced VR headsets currently on the market. The VR headset will enable Deliverect's employees to join a specially designed virtual reality (VR) Christmas party taking place on 18th December.

The VR Christmas party will reunite employees based around the world in lieu of any physical face-to-face celebrations as Covid-19 restrictions remain in force in many countries.

Oculus VR Headsets allow the user to experience VR like never-before through 3D positional audio, advanced processing power and 1832x1920 resolution.

To facilitate the VR party, Deliverect is using AltspaceVR, the premier VR events space for live big shows, parties, seminars, and corporate gatherings. The Innovative tech scale-up chose AltspaceVR as it allows a greater number of people to join at once, whereas other VR software applications only grant 30-40 individuals' access.

The Christmas party initiative has been spearheaded by one of Deliverect's co-founders, Jan Hollez, in recognition of the value that Christmas parties and employee interaction bring to company culture.

Over the past 12 months Deliverect has seen tremendous growth, it now boasts over 14 million processed orders from around the globe.Because Deliverect is a people-first company it has attracted talented individuals from across the world, dramatically increasing its staff numbers this year. However, due to the pandemic, many of its new employees have not had the chance to meet each other face-to-face. Using the VR technology Deliverect plans on bringing together all of its 114 employees in one virtual room.

The tech innovator does not plan on halting growth plans as it enters 2021, Deliverect is looking to increase its headcount from 114 to 300 over the next 12 months. Focusing on attracting talent from the tech sector to help drive business growth.

The company currently supports 100+ global integrations with major POS, delivery partners, and offices in the UK, Spain, Netherlands, Belgium, France, Mexico, North America, and Dubai.

On 18th December employees joining the virtual event will be able to walk around the room and socialise with each other, providing the opportunity for many employees to meet for the first time. Deliverect will also be hosting a presentation celebrating the work its staff have completed over the past year.

Jan Hollez, co-founder and CTO at Deliverect commented: "As a global team we have gone above and beyond to support our customers across the world over the past 12 months.

"Since the outbreak of Covid-19 we have seen a rise in restaurants that were hesitant to try online food delivery software bring it onboard and integrate it into their customer offer. Since day one our mission at Deliverect is to be the technological connection between food businesses and their customers through our efficient software.

"Online sales and takeaways have been a lifeline for many of our customers throughout the challenges of 2020. This year's amazing work would not have been possible without the diligence executed by our employees, it is because of their long-standing relationships with our customers and industry knowledge that we have been able to grow as much as we have.

"Deliverect's Christmas party will be virtual this year, and in true Deliverect style it is an innovative idea using technology with the people in-mind. I can't wait to see the full team in our virtual reality room and give them a virtual high five."

Jennifer Gardner, head of people at Deliverect, said: "Staying in touch with employees from across the world is a challenge at the best of times, add Covid-19 restrictions to this, and it is a logistical nightmare.

"At Deliverect our primary focus is our people, as without them we could not provide our services to our customers, and this Christmas, our virtual celebration presents us with the opportunity to bring our team together to celebrate everyone's hard-work and have some well-deserved fun. We hope this event alleviates the stress caused by lack of social contact due to covid.

"We are extremely excited to be welcoming all of our staff members on 18th December to our virtual event. 2021 is going to be a big year for us as we continue to grow and putting people at the heart of our operation is vital to our future success."

Jelte Vrijhoef, co-founder and senior system architect at Deliverect, said: "Deliverect employees see each other more as friends and family and we recognise that Christmas parties are a huge part of our culture. Jan's ingenious idea to utilise VR technology to bring us all together at a time we thought it would be impossible, has been a lifesaver.

"Because we have grown in size, we did not want to lose any momentum in celebrating our success. Thanks to the VR technology we will be able to inject some social interaction into our celebrations and show gratitude to our employees for their hard work over the past 12 months. I am looking forward to the event and seeing our growth plans for 2021 come to fruition"

Deliverect social channels

LinkedIn - @Deliverecthq

Twitter - @Deliverect_com

SOURCE Deliverect

Read more here:

Deliverect uses virtual reality technology to bring employees together for the festive season - PRNewswire

Virtual reality: how cyclists are pedalling through the pandemic – The Guardian

On the fourth day of March this year, Australian cycling team Mitchelton-Scott became the first member of the World Tour peloton to withdraw from all forthcoming racing as a result of the emerging pandemic. Other teams soon followed, until all races had been suspended indefinitely. For an international sport that sees hundreds of riders and staff crisscross the globe on a weekly basis, Covid-19 posed an existential threat.

But barely two days later, Mitchelton-Scott made another announcement: they were returning to racing. The coronavirus may have forced professional cycling off the road, but it would not keep riders from competition for long. Instead, they would go online and enter the world of esports.

Virtual cycling has been on the rise throughout the latter half of this decade. Market leader Zwift was established in 2014, while an Australian competitor, FulGaz, launched soon afterwards. By 2019, 15% of all rides logged on Strava, an exercise tracking service, were virtual. The pandemic has turbocharged this growth and brought virtual cycling firmly into the mainstream.

We saw the industry caught by surprise, admits Wesley Sulzberger, a former professional cyclist and the Australia country manager for Zwift. His companys platform has seen a 300% year-on-year growth in daily activity during the pandemic, and now claims to have 2.8 million accounts registered across 190 countries.

As the world went into lockdown, the hardware needed for virtual cycling a smart trainer that connects to a bike and measures power output was suddenly alongside toilet paper on the hard-to-find list. Equipment sold out worldwide by May, says Sulzberger. Even now, equipment is in short supply.

In essence, virtual cycling takes a riders real-life physical output and converts it to a moving avatar on a computer screen. It blends the fun of video games with the intensity of serious training, Sulzberger says. Zwift seeks to be as realistic as possible: users experience the gradient of mountain climbs and the draft of other riders, albeit on a virtual route as they interact via the internet rather than over the shoulder.

With the World Tour suspended from mid-March, Zwift races were suddenly the next best thing for elite cyclists. The esports dimension of virtual cycling is not entirely novel; a Zwift world championships had been foreshadowed last September by Union Cycliste Internationale (UCI), the global governing body. But Covid-19 gave added impetus to these events. Zwift racing, says Sulzberger, has helped fill the gaps left by traditional sport in this unprecedented year. The platform even hosted a virtual Tour de France in July, more than a month before a postponed edition of the real thing took place as World Tour cycling returned between the pandemics waves.

In mid-December, 12 Australian cyclists contested the inaugural UCI Cycling Esports World Championships. Several riders welcomed Guardian Australia into their homes for the virtual event.

11.15pm, Bre and Jay Vines kitchen

From the outside on a nondescript street in far-north Canberra there is nothing to suggest something remarkable is about to happen at the house of Bre and Jay Vine, late on an unseasonably cool summer evening. The same is true from inside their living room; the married couple, both 25, are lounging on the couch next to a Christmas tree, watching television. But in the coming hours, the pair will each represent Australia, albeit from the comfort of their home. Im nervous, as always, but super excited, says Bre. Hopefully it will all go to plan.

The Vines have been using Zwift for four years, and racing competitively on the platform for the past two. Jay has just returned from far north New South Wales, where he won two stages during a (non-virtual) National Road Series event. It is a different feeling, he says of the comparison with road cycling. You can feel the anticipation building before the race but theres no way to release it there are no other cyclists, no crowds its all just inside you, in your living room.

The world championships were scheduled on European time: for Australians competitors, the womens race is first up at 12.40am, followed by the men at 1.45am. All riders are contesting a 50km course in the virtual world of Watopia, featuring almost 500m of elevation. Having spent the day napping, and with a long night ahead, the Vines are enjoying their first caffeinated boost of the evening. It is pretty brutal timing, says Jay, but Ill happily drink coffee for Australia.

The Vines are both semi-professional cyclists; Jay is eager for a World Tour contract, and the pair are learning Spanish in the hope of joining a European-based team. Their national-team counterparts are a mix of pros and semi-pros. Bre is riding alongside 20-year-old Sarah Gigante (Tibco-SVB), hailed as Australias next big thing, while Jack Haig (Mitchelton-Scott) and Will Clarke (Trek-Segafredo) are among Jays colleagues. They face some big-name competition: two-time Giro Rosa winner Annemiek van Vleuten and dual road-race world champion Anna van der Breggen headline the Dutch squad.

But the Vines say many full-time pros are yet to adapt to Zwift racing. It is a game, says Jay, drawing comparisons with Call of Duty. Like any game, there is a learning curve. It takes 20 or 30 races to start to find the nuances in the game. Among the gamified aspects of the race are power-ups: riders can be awarded aero or lightweight power-ups at different locations on the course, increasing speed or decreasing weight for 15 seconds at a time. But once you have learned the game, it is just like any other discipline of cycling, Jay adds.

Virtual racing also differs from road racing in duration. While a typical road stage might take five or six hours, Zwift races normally last around 60 minutes. This is just an hour of maximum effort, says Bre. Whereas on the road it is all about saving energy. That makes Zwift races more comparable to a criterium or a time trial than a road race.

The format is another reason professional cyclist have not dominated the discipline since arriving en-masse during lockdown. The pros really come into their element four or five hours down the road, says Jay. Zwift races arent long enough for their advantage to be felt.

A final distinguishing feature of Zwift racing is the relatively level playing field. At world championship road races, each national team is riding for one or at most two riders who might have the ability to win; it is very much a team endeavour, focused around a single protected rider. Zwift is more egalitarian. We havent gone out with a specific leader, we have maybe four riders with the potential to get away, says Bre. Jay says the mens team have adopted a similar strategy: If we all start sprinting at slightly different times at the last climb, one of us will be up there for the win.

As the race start looms, Bre logs on to Zwift and begins to warm up on her trainer. She joins the team audio channel and chats casually with her teammates. Jay makes Bre a final coffee with four shots. It is a bit bitter, she grimaces. The couple, with their bikes set up parallel in a dedicated training room, wish each other good luck and Bre begins to race. Her virtual avatar sets off in a peloton of 54 riders from 18 countries. Within minutes Bres heart rate, displayed prominently on the Zwift display, is above 180 beats per minute.

October, Geelong

Two months ago, Donna Rae-Szalinski received an unusual request. A former professional rider and long-time coach, Rae-Szalinski is a popular figure in Australian cycling circles given her friendly demeanour and frequent work coordinating national teams at races across the globe. But stuck in Geelong and with international travel impossible, she did not expect to be managing another national team. That was, at least, until the esports world championships came along.

For Rae-Szalinski, that AusCycling would appoint a team coordinator is proof the peak body is taking this new cycling discipline seriously. The riders have received national team kit, undertaken course reconnaissance rides together and had planning calls to talk through team tactics. It feels very strange to not have training camps, to not see riders face-to-face, says Rae-Szalinski. But otherwise, we have treated this just as we would any other national team.

In 2020, AusCycling held a virtual National Road Series with Zwift, which saw domestic teams compete across six events between May and July. Last month, the organisation announced an expansion of its partnership with Zwift, with a suite of online racing and recreational events planned for next year.

We see virtual cycling as a core part of AusCycling, says Kipp Kaufmann, the peak bodys general manager of events and racing. On our website we list our disciplines: BMX, mountain bike, cyclo-cross, road cycling, track cycling, para-cycling and esports cycling. We see it as on par with those other disciplines. This is supplementing, not replacing, other forms of cycling.

Rae-Szalinski is quick to sing the praises of cyclings newest arrival. Esports cycling is awesome it is getting more people on bikes, she says. It fits the mould for so many people who love cycling and want to be competitive but dont have the time to train 25 hours a week. This lets them fit it in with their lifestyle.

That is certainly true for one member of the Australian team, Vicki Whitelaw. Now 43, the Canberran raced professionally on the road in the late 2000s and represented her country at the UCI road world championships on four consecutive occasion. But after retiring and having children, Whitelaw found Zwift to be the perfect alternative.

I started e-cycling eight years ago, says Whitelaw. I needed sanity after having a couple of babies, but I could not go out and ride for hours. Ecycling enabled me to literally ride in my lounge room while my kids napped.

Whitelaw is a founding member of Heino Racing Team, a Denmark-registered Zwift team. We are the best female esports team, she says proudly. Many Zwift racing series feature not-insignificant prize purses, giving the riders an added incentive. We meet-up virtually, we recon courses, we plan accordingly it is very professional, very organised and we are winning a lot of races, Whitelaw adds.

As Zwift racing becomes increasingly high-profile and lucrative it will become even more important to maintain its sporting integrity. Just as doping has plagued road cycling, cheating is beginning to surface in the virtual world. We have seen some reports around the integrity of esports, admits AusCyclings Kaufmann. We are learning at the same time as we implement. Ensuring integrity will be a key component to growing the discipline.

To use Zwift, riders enter their weight, which determines the power to weight ratio (watts per kilogram) and hence how fast a rider goes in the virtual world. Submitting a falsely low weight is an easy way to cheat, although Zwift has algorithms to identify suspicious output (such riders are flagged with a cone of shame above their avatar). For the esports world championships, participants were required to submit a video demonstrating their height and weight within 24 hours of the race start.

But more sophisticated cheating is also on the horizon; last year Vice profiled a cybersecurity expert who had hacked his smart trainer to manipulate the data flow. To mitigate this risk, the UCI supplied all competitors at the world championships with identical smart trainer systems.

In a post-Covid world, in-person esports competition might be one way to ensure integrity. Performing on a stage with everyone on the same trainers, with everyone weighed and drug tested beforehand that would be the ultimate, says Whitelaw. But if we had to travel to compete, that would also detract from why we are doing virtual cycling in the first place.

1.35am, Ben Hills living room

In another Canberra suburb, a small crowd has gathered to cheer on Australian competitor Ben Hill. Despite the time of night, his wife Rebecca Hill (ne Wiasak a former track cycling world champion), the couples two-month-old daughter, Bens mother, and two friends, have convened in a crowded living room. With 10 minutes until the mens race starts, Ben is nonchalant. I wonder if I can still wear the Australian kit on Zwift after Worlds, he muses. For the first time in his life, Ben is wearing a green and gold outfit, while his avatar is sporting an almost identical virtual garb.

Beck, holding baby Ava, appears somewhat less calm. Cables lie strewn across the floor, connecting Bens trainer to the power and internet. If either connection fails during the race, Ben will be eliminated. There was a power outage here earlier today, Beck recalls. I was wondering if I could source a generator!

The couple are both big Zwift fans. You can get hit by a car, or swooped by a magpie, theres been bushfires, and then Covid-19, explains Beck. Why face any of that when you can ride online? Ben has spent recent years riding professionally in Europe with Team Ljubljana Gusto; having now returned to Australia to become a father, Zwift has been an outlet for his competitive streak.

With the mens racing beginning, the spectators shift attention to a Eurosport feed on their phones as the womens race reaches its climax. South Africas Ashleigh Moolman-Pasio, a World Tour rider with CCC Liv, sprints to victory with Australias Gigante close behind. The first-ever world champion in cycling esports, booms the commentator. Bre Vine finishes 10th. Beck relays the strong results from team Australia to Ben as he pedals.

Despite an early pace among the mens 78-rider strong peloton, Ben looks untroubled. Easy-peasy, he smiles. With Ben surrounded by four whirring fans keeping him cool, the spectators begin to shiver. It feels like Antarctica here, quips Bens friend, Andrew Flood.

The tempo increases in the final kms, until Ben is at his threshold. The bleary-eyed spectators squint at the television to read the race, while Ben keeps his head down and pedals hard on the final climb. Beck screams: 500m to a rainbow jersey forever in the history books! 400m give it everything you have! Every day of training has come to this.

Ben crosses the line and exhales. Damnit! he grimaces, upon seeing his fifth placing. I thought I was third on the line. As the footage replays on the screen, he realises the ultimate winner, Germans Jason Osborne, managed a late attack. I gave it my all, I wouldnt have been able to do what he did, Ben concedes. As the clock above him ticks past 3am, Ben and the group conduct an impromptu post-race analysis. You were up there with the best, offers Beck. Ben replies: I know, but I wanted to be the best.

As he sits on his bike in front of the television screen, Ben looks forlorn. It may have been a virtual race taking place over Zwift, but to the riders, this was a world championships like any other. Welcome to the future of cycling.

Originally posted here:

Virtual reality: how cyclists are pedalling through the pandemic - The Guardian

Verizon Bets on Virtual Reality With Entain Gambling Partnership – Yahoo Sports

Verizon Media has formed a global tech partnership with Entain, the gambling operator formerly known as GVC Holdings, to innovate the next generation of sport betting products, including a combination of gambling and virtual reality.

The two companies say theyll work together to build a VR platform that integrates live sports with layers of data and gambling. The goal is to create an immersive experience where sports fans can view games, check stats, place wagers and socialize, all within the same platform.

The gambling will take place through Entains brands, which include bwin, Ladbrokes, Coral, PartyPoker and BetMGM, a joint venture with MGM Resorts. Terms of the partnership were not disclosed.

To win in the future we need to understand where consumers will be in five, ten years time and work with other global businesses also investing in that, Entain CEO Shay Segev said in a statement. We envisage consumers meeting at a game with friends, who could in fact be elsewhere, using virtual reality headsets to watch, interact and share the experience together and, potentially, compete between themselves at halftime or feel like theyre on the pitch with the players.

The deal builds on a pre-existing relationship between the two companies. BetMGM, which is Entains U.S. sports betting operation, is already integrated across Verizon-owned Yahoo Sports products. In some U.S. states, people can place wagers through BetMGM without leaving the Yahoo Sports app.

Virtual reality and its cousin, augmented reality, have been considered the next wave of media for years, though theres yet to be a real sports breakthrough. The NBA broadcast its first game in VR back in 2015, just before Goldman Sachs projected that VR revenue could outpace TV revenue by 2025. Sports teams have publicly discussed a future where they could sell an infinite number of courtside seats in peoples living rooms, but across the board, adaptation has been slow.

Story continues

Still, theres optimism, boosted by the advent of widespread 5G, a new cellular network that could make VR and AR more feasible through phones and tablets. Verizon, one of the nations largest cell carriers, is deeply invested in future 5G applications. Its media arm, which houses brands like Yahoo, AOL and TechCrunch, is responsible for predicting what new types of content will be unlocked by tech advancements.

Entain officially changed its name from GVC last week. The company is listed on the London Stock Exchange and closed Wednesday with a market cap of $8.6 billion (6.4 million pounds).

More from Sportico.com

Read this article:

Verizon Bets on Virtual Reality With Entain Gambling Partnership - Yahoo Sports

TOP 10 virtual and augmented reality stories of 2020 – Designboom

digital was essential for 2020 due to the COVID-19 pandemic. virtual and augmented reality were key technologies in blurring the boundaries as people around the world were under lockdown at home. our TOP 10 virtual and augmented reality (AR) stories relive these moments of joy, from forward-thinking cultural exhibitions to the hugely beneficial working-from-home tools. it even includes a couple of new headsets ideas, such as a set of slim goggles and minute contact lenses.

continuing ourTOP 10 round-ups of 2020, we look back at 10 virtual and augmented reality stories that attracted our and, most importantly, designboom readers attention over the past 12 months.

image courtesy of panasonic

to start our TOP 10 virtual and augmented reality stories, we take it back to CES 2020 where designboom was reporting live from las vegas. panasonicunveiled the worlds first high dynamic range (HDR) capable virtual reality goggles.the technology allows wearers to view high-quality content in a compact and lightweight design with aneyeglass-like shape. they are equipped with micro OLED panels that eliminate a screen door effect, where the fine lines separating pixels become visible in the displayed image.

image courtesy of KAWS and acute art

KAWS collaborated with acute art for the launch of expanded holiday, a series of AR sculptures that was publicly exhibited in 12 major cities and locations of six continents from 12 to 26 march. using cutting-edge technology, this project represented a new exhibition model that transcends the physical world and reduces transportation and travel for a global art world something we all felt as 2020 continued. besides the public exhibition, the launch also included an AR collectible edition and open edition for lease, which were available via acute arts new platform for collecting and trading AR art.

image courtesy of mojo vision

california-based tech startup mojo vision revealed its smart contact lenses, which use augmented realityto place information inside of the wearers eyes. the companys forthcoming mojo lens AR lenses use 14k pixels-per-inch micro-displays to project statistics like health tracking and other data. they also pack wireless radio, image-recognition tech (which it claims will be able to understand the activities youre engaged in, so as to not disturb you when its not wanted), and motion sensors.

image: olafur eliasson, wunderkammer, 2020 (detail), courtesy of acute art and the artist

olafur eliasson has worked together with acute art to produce wunderkammer, anaugmented reality collection of natural elements, small artworks and experiments from the artists studio. following the collaboration with KAWS earlier in the year, and the launch of its app, acute art then released a second series of artworks, this time with eliasson to open up a world of new possibilities. these works were available to download for free through the app, allowing audiences from all over the world to to collect digitally and enjoy them from the comfort of their own homes.

image courtesy cai studio

chinese artistcai guo-qiangunveiled his first virtual realityartwork, created in partnership withHTC VIVE arts. the work, titled sleepwalking in the forbidden city, debuted as part of odyssey and homecoming the artists major exhibition at the palace museum, beijing, which remains on view until february 5, 2021. for this exhibition, cai guo-qiang uses VR technology to create a fireworks ceremony dedicated to the forbidden city and its 600-year history. the performance is inspired by those typically seen to mark the lunar new year.

in questioning how we can still experience tactility in a digitally driven society,sabine marcelis presented a virtual representation of design and furniture works that can be experienced through a 3D display technology. the project presents the potential for a solution on how we can still form intimate material experiences across increasingly digital interfaces. for virtual tactility, marcelis considered her designs to be true sensorial experiences and not simple static works the experience becomes the function, with a refined and unique aesthetic.

image courtesy of oculus

working from home needed to be included in our TOP 10 virtual and augmented reality stories of 2020. at its first ever fully digitalAR/VR-focused conference, facebookintroduced infinite office a platform designed to create a virtualworking environment.targeting those who were working from home as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic, infinite office integrates with real environments. however, to enhance focus and flexibility, users can toggle between a fully immersive experience and a mix of virtual displays with passthrough for a greater awareness of their surroundings.

image courtesy of SPACE10 and IKEA

IKEAand itsexternal innovation hub, SPACE10, launched everyday experiments an ongoing series of digital proposals and prototypes that explore how tomorrows technologies may redefine life at home. the collection so far includes 18 experiments that apply the latest technology available to experience-driven details of everyday living. examples include fields extreme measures, a playful way to calculate the dimensions of a certain space through an expanding elephant; and optical soundsystem by manvsmachine, a speculative design prototype for an augmented reality (AR) applicationwhich would allow you to see music within your environment.

image michael lyrenmann

researchers fromgramazio kohler collaborated withincon.ai,a spinoff recently launched by the robotic systems lab ofETH zurich, to develop a custom-made optical guidance system for constructing faades.using 13,596 individually rotated and tiltedbricks, the design team used anaugmented realityfabrication interface to build the faade of awineryingreece. this system was used by local masons to construct the 225 square meter facade in less than three months. the augmented bricklaying process combines the power of computational design with the dexterity and skills of human craftspeople introducing an entirely new fabrication paradigm.

our TOP 10 virtual and augmented reality stories of 2020 concludes with a direct exploration of COVID-19 it had to be, after all. the george washington hospital in washing D.C. used innovative virtual reality technologyto assess its firstCOVID-19 patient back in march.co-developed by GWU thoracic surgical chief keith mortman andsurgical theater a well-known developer of VR imagining software their video takes us inside a coronavirus-damaged lung for more insight into the disease.

see designbooms TOP 10 stories archive:

Read more from the original source:

TOP 10 virtual and augmented reality stories of 2020 - Designboom

Virtual Reality Augmenting Therapy in Gastroenterology and Beyond – Medscape

In gastroenterology and beyond, virtual reality (VR) is beginning to augment traditional therapies, including those intended to alleviate pain and anxiety.

Brennan Spiegel

Brennan Spiegel, MD, director of Health Services Research at Cedars-Sinai Medical Center in Los Angeles, told Medscape Medical News, "There are now over 200 hospitals around the US using VR in some way, shape, or form. We hope that will grow significantly in time."

"We'll be hearing more and more about this," Spiegel said.

Spiegel, who is coeditor-in-chief of the American Journal of Gastroenterology, spoke at the Advances in Inflammatory Bowel (AIBD) 2020 Annual Meeting.

He said more than 3000 patients at Cedars Sinai have used VR as part of their clinical care. Patients can swim with dolphins, explore foreign lands in a helicopter, or laze on a beach in Hawaii while enduring painful procedures, conditions, or flares. A study from July of 2020, for example, shows patients were pleasantly distracted during colonoscopy.

"VR is a tool that can profoundly modify perception of the world around us and the world within us," he said. "If we use it properly and responsibly to recalibrate unhealthy perceptions, VR can become a radical new therapy to improve quality of life for some of our patients."

The US Food and Drug Administration is on board with recognizing medical uses for virtual reality, which the agency calls Medical Extended Reality or MXR. The agency held a public workshop on the topic in March.

Spiegel and coinvestigators found that VR can ease pain in childbirth, which may have implications for women who want a natural birth.

In another study, burn patients reported up to 50% reductions in pain while distracted from wound care with immersive VR.

Augmented reality was also shown to change perception of satiety and control food consumption by changing the perceived size of food. That use may have implications for altering eating behaviors, Spiegel noted.

Steven Hanauer, MD, from the Feinstein School of Medicine at Northwestern University in Chicago, called Spiegel's presentation "phenomenal" and the technology "potentially transformative."

He told Medscape Medical News that although there is much potential, especially as an adjunct to cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT), there are questions to be researched and "we are very early in development."

At the AIBD meeting he asked Spiegel about potential harms, particularly around use in young patients.

Spiegel replied, "There are concerns, particularly for kids under the age of 12 or so, because firstly they can create false memories; they literally feel that they have done what they did. Usually that's around 8 years old."

As to whether there are worries about screen time and addiction, he said, "We're not thankfully seeing evidence of VR addiction, mostly because people get a little dizzy and vertiginous if they're in it too long."

Advances in technology, portability of the hardware, and reduction in cost are fueling the increased use of VR in medical settings.

Spiegel said one of the most popular headsets they recommend costs about $300. At Cedars, headsets are reused after undergoing extensive cleaning procedures that include ultraviolet light. Software modules for the headsets, some available by prescription, some publicly available, range from $2 to $20, he said.

His website refers to a directory of international VR providers and his team's favorite VR software programs. Spiegel said he has no financial relationships with any of the companies.

VR can also improve general satisfaction for patients isolated in a sterile hospital room. Spiegel explains that VR can transport patients confined to their beds to fantastical destinations, such as safari adventures or exploring ice caves.

Spiegel and colleagues compared on-demand VR with "health and wellness" TV programming in a randomized, prospective trial and found significant reduction in pain scores in hospitalized patients.

Research is also turning to outpatient uses.

"We have an NIH grant for that right now looking at musculoskeletal pain using an 8-week, home-based CBT treatment program. It's like having a pain psychologist at home with you, but in VR."

Patients wear the headsets at home for a daily class via VR. "Frankly, we don't have enough bandwidth to provide enough pain psychologists to everyone who has pain, whether IBD or otherwise," he said.

The goal of VR is not to offer merely momentary relief, he said. "We don't want people living in VR," he said. "We want them learning something in VR that they can take with them, that they can then use in their real life," such as mindbody medicine or breathing techniques.

More work is being done in the gastroenterology arena, he said. "We're creating an IBS VR therapeutic right now at Cedars and hopefully we'll have longer-term data this time next year," he said.

Cedars is also on the brink of launching a new VR clinic, which will be run by a psychiatrist who specializes in behavioral health.

Spiegel and Hanauer have disclosed no relevant financial relationships..

Advances in Inflammatory Bowel Diseases (AIBD) 2020 Annual Meeting: Session8. Presented December11, 2020.

Marcia Frellick is a freelance journalist based in Chicago . She has previously written for the Chicago Tribune, Science News, and Nurse.com, and was an editor at the Chicago Sun-Times, the Cincinnati Enquirer, and the St. Cloud ( Minnesota ) Times. Follow her on Twitter at @mfrellick

For more news, follow Medscape on Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, and YouTube

See the original post here:

Virtual Reality Augmenting Therapy in Gastroenterology and Beyond - Medscape

Sky Worlds to show Chelsea vs West Ham live in virtual reality – Sky Sports

Following the launch of Sky Worlds, the in-stadium thrill of live football matches is now available to all Sky VIP customers, offering them the chance to immerse themselves in a virtual experience when Chelsea host West Ham on Monday.

Sky Worlds allows Sky VIP customers to hop around the ground to watch the action from amazing new viewing positions, recreating the experience of attending games in the highest visual quality available in VR.

Available now on Oculus Quest headsets, Sky Worlds is a virtual reality sports viewing experience like no other, with Monday's clash at Stamford Bridge being shown live following the success of the first VR Premier League match on Sunday, December 13, when Crystal Palace drew with Tottenham.

This app is crazy! The 180 view of the live football is so good, just like being at the match in the stands. I really do love it! Oculus customer review for Sky Worlds

"Sky Worlds is a fantastic example of how technology can help replicate real-life experiences and create truly transformative viewing experiences, something that is so important right now given the limitations fans have attending live events in person," said Matt McCartney, Head of Immersive Technology at Sky.

"Our work with Sky is the culmination of four years of effort and testing," said Miheer Walavakar, co-founder and chief executive officer of LiveLike. "To do this with the leading broadcaster and top global league is affirming of our comprehensive, customizable unique immersive experience and viewing capabilities."

Watch the video above to get a preview of what to expect!

More:

Sky Worlds to show Chelsea vs West Ham live in virtual reality - Sky Sports

Recreating racism in VR to fight real racism – Axios

New virtual and "augmented" reality technology is allowing users to experience 1960s civil rights marches, the agony of segregation for Black Americans, or life in a Japanese American internment camp.

Why it matters: For now, this is largely a tool for educators seeking new ways to teach young Americans about the legacy of slavery and racism. But there's growing commercial potential as more people become comfortable using technology to expand their horizons.

Details: Projects created in universities and private labs forces users to walk in the shoes of people who faced (and still face) discrimination by recreating historic events.

How it works: Projects can be downloaded or watched via 360 video on VR headsets. Users feel as if they are in the moment.

Whats next: "I Am A Man" creator Derek Ham is designing a new VR project based on the Negro Baseball Leagues. "You can get struck out by Satchel Paige, then see him having a hard time getting a hotel room."

What theyre saying: "This is a powerful medium that allows you to experience the perspective of another person, and maybe, just maybe, you'll change your own perspective [on] how people experienced life as a Black person," said Ham.

Read the rest here:

Recreating racism in VR to fight real racism - Axios

Cal Poly Researchers Receive Public Interest Technology Grant to Utilize Virtual Reality in Diversity, Equity and Inclusion Trainings – Cal Poly San…

SAN LUIS OBISPO An interdisciplinary group of Cal Poly faculty members has been awarded a $45,000Public Interest Technology University Network (PIT-UN)Challenge grant to further support the critical new field of public interest technology.

This funding will go toward a project that incorporates immersive virtual reality (VR) components into sexual and gender harassment, and LGBTQ+ affirming training.

Working with partners includingCal Poly Safer,the Gay and Lesbian Alliance of the Central Coast (GALA)andthe San Luis Obispo County Behavioral Health Department, the researchers hope to understand where VR can be added to existing trainings in order to improve inclusion and equity at Cal Poly and in the community.

The project will be led by James Werner, associate professor of media arts; Christine Hackman, associate professor of kinesiology and public health; Coleen Carrigan, associate professor of anthropology and science, technology, and society; and Jay Bettergarcia, assistant professor of psychology and child development. The project also will involve several student research assistants, who will help develop scenario scripts, conduct research activities and serve as liaisons between researchers and community partners.

One of the issues with how current trainings are structured is that there is not an opportunity to put what youve learned into true practice and when youre faced with responding to an incident of bias or harassment, it can be challenging to speak up or do something, said Hackman. The virtual reality scenario gives the user a scenario where something does appear to actually be happening and gives them a real-life practice session.

We appreciate the support from PIT-UN for this project and believe it is an excellent example of how the field of public interest technology can create better informed citizens and support progress on such crucial issues like diversity, equity and inclusion, said Werner. Were hopeful this project can create a better trained workforce and community that is better prepared to respond to and help stop instances of harassment and that the VR aspect can help us reach those who may be less likely to engage with current trainings and resources.

The Public Interest Technology University Network is a partnership of colleges and universities convened byNew America, theFord Foundation, and theHewlett Foundation. The network is dedicated to building the nascent field of public interest technology through curriculum development, faculty research opportunities, and experiential learning programs, in order to inspire a new generation of civic-minded technologists and policy leaders.

Our work points to how important it is to make public interest technology a permanent and vital pathway in higher education, said Anne-Marie Slaughter, president of New America.Public interest technologists are at the forefront of societal change and progress, and our students are leading us toward a more prosperous, more just, and more collaborative future. Institutional members of the University Network are already making big changes in our world.

The network and challenge grants are funded through the support of the Ford Foundation, Hewlett Foundation, Mastercard Impact Fund, with support from the Mastercard Center for Inclusive Growth,Patrick J. McGovern Foundation, The Raikes Foundation, Schmidt Futures and The Siegel Family Endowment.

Cal Poly became a member of the university network in early 2020.

Contact: Keegan Koberl805-458-9302;kkoberl@calpoly.edu

December 16, 2020

# # #

More here:

Cal Poly Researchers Receive Public Interest Technology Grant to Utilize Virtual Reality in Diversity, Equity and Inclusion Trainings - Cal Poly San...

Virtual Reality: Cutting cost, reducing isolation and attracting talent – Training Journal

With the UK's unemployment rate having risen to its highest level in almost three years, the idea that any sort of innovation might have occurred across the HR sector could be a difficult one to fathom.

But the opposite is actually true. Over the last few months weve seen widespread shifts in the way HR departments are adopting new, and even more engaging, recruitment procedures as they look to overcome strict COVID-19 social distancing rules.

Research from global analytics firm Gartner shows that organisations have adapted quickly to this changing environment, with 89% of HR departments confirming theyve moved to virtual interviews with the majority of these using new technologies to onboard staff.

Yet while these figures represent a significant shift, the adoption of innovative recruitment practices was a trend that existed some time before the pandemic with the rapid rise of virtual reality (VR) technology already beginning to transform recruitment and training and learning practices worldwide.

Many organisations were already using VR headsets to showcase office space to potential recruits, helping them to familiarise themselves with new work environments. Others were using VR technology to immerse new staff in real-time scenarios, or holding virtual career fairs to interact with candidates.

VR can help to attract top talent or boost staff morale, it can also cut recruitment costs and time to hire too

The results speak for themselves. This approach to recruitment, and the use of immersive technologies across the HR function, is here to stay, but there are some barriers to overcome first.

The adoption of immersive technologies in business is still in its infancy, and that can be met with criticism and early doubters. Some might argue that VR can never create a world that's a proper substitute for a meticulous face-to-face human recruitment process. Or might point to the fact that, so far, the uptake of VR technology in the workplace has been slow when compared to smartphone or tablet adoption.

Historically there has been some validity in these observations but as the technology has improved, and as it continues to become more ubiquitous with significant investment into the space by technology giants such as Facebook, Apple and HTC VR can absolutely supplement or even become a substitute for the physical recruitment processes; pandemic or otherwise.

The long and short of it is, while VR can help to attract top talent or boost staff morale, it can also cut recruitment costs and time to hire too, particularly from those larger conglomerates who may recruit from further afield than just their own territory.

Why fly to say, Tokyo, when you could perform the whole recruitment process within a VR environment? The answer to this question may be more important than ever as businesses continue to look for ways to cut costs but remain competitive amidst a recessive economy.

Some naysayers might express concern that introducing VR in the workplace may lead to staff isolation or loneliness in the future. However, the reality couldnt be more inclusive. During this pandemic, there have been numerous work conferences in the VR realm, and the experience is just as engaging as operating in the real world: you can book meetings, sit down in the same room as otherseven wave at them. This is an incredibly physical environment and has been proven to actually combat loneliness and isolation. It demonstrates that VR can be a truly connective space to work in.

This doesnt mark the end of the office water cooler moment of course physical offices will be used for years to come. It may just be that these moments will soon be recreated in a new virtual form.

And in the short term at the very least, VR is a fantastic tool to augment the current recruitment process as we all try and deal with the very real practicalities imposed by the new world that we are currently operating within.

About theauthor

Damian Collier is founder and CEO of Blend Media

View original post here:

Virtual Reality: Cutting cost, reducing isolation and attracting talent - Training Journal

The virtual reality office – Axios

While offices remain closed and travel isn't an option, some companies are turning to virtual reality to bring employees together.

Why it matters: Let's face it: Slack sessions and Zoom happy hours can only go so far to promote company cohesion. VR can provide another outlet, even if the technology is still in its infancy.

What's happening: True to its name, the workforce of Remote, a startup that helps companies with HR, has been fully remote since its founding. But as the company grew from 8 to approximately 60 employees distributed around the world during the pandemic, its CEO Job van der Voort was forced to find innovative ways to keep his company together.

Details: Strivr, an immersive learning company, has seen an increase in demand for its VR training sessions during the pandemic, as executives can no longer travel to satellite offices.

Yes, but: Top-line VR headsets are still expensive, and not every employee will feel comfortable interacting with colleagues in virtual environments, let alone while planning an online "Grand Theft Auto IV" heist.

Read this article:

The virtual reality office - Axios