How Artificial Intelligence Is Changing the Future of Air Transportation – GW Today

By Kristen Mitchell

A George Washington University School of Engineering and Applied Science professor is working on an interdisciplinary research project funded by NASA that aims to design and develop a safety management system for electric autonomous aircraft.

Peng Wei, an assistant professor in the Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, researches control, optimization, machine learning and artificial intelligence (AI) in air transportation and aviation. His lab builds flight deck and ground-based automation and decision support tools to improve and ensure safety for emerging aircraft types and flight operations.

While a lot of the innovation in AI and machine learning applications has been focused on revolutionizing the internet and digital connectivity, Dr. Wei is part of a group of researchers focused on expanding those benefits into transforming air transportation for physical connectivity and future mobility.

Dr. Wei is the principal investigator of a new three-year, $2.5 million NASA System-Wide Safety grant project. Alongside collaborators from Vanderbilt University, University of Texas at Austin and MIT Lincoln Lab, the research team will study system design to minimize risks for electric vertical take-off and landing (eVTOL) aircraft and their advanced air mobility missions in urban environments.

The teams proposed system design aims to minimize the layered risks for autonomous aircraft. Adverse weather conditions like windwhich is what Dr. Weis lab will focus onaffect an electric aircrafts ability to fly and land safely. Additional risks include electric propulsion component faults or degradations, and threats from other non-cooperative aircraft due to GPS spoofing or software hijacking while in flight. The NASA project seeks to address these three diverse areas of concernmission level risk, aircraft level risk and airspace level risk.

Once an autonomous aircraft becomes noncooperative, whether it's being hijacked, or an autonomy fault , or a motor/battery problem, or due to winds, that aircraft starts to drift away from its track, Dr. Wei said. So how do we detect that and how do other aircraft avoid those potential collisions or conflicts?

Widespread adoption of safe driverless cars remains years off. The same can be said about autonomous aircraft, Dr. Wei said. Pilotless air travel would likely begin with transporting small packages or lunch delivery from local restaurants. If those applications are proven safe and successful, larger cargo flights and autonomous passenger air transportation could be introducedpotentially improving traffic congestion and enabling people to live farther from their places of work.

If a machine learning algorithm makes a mistake in Facebook, TikTok, Netflix that doesn't matter too much because I was just recommended a video or movie I don't like, he said. But if a machine learning algorithm mistake happens in a safety-critical application, such as aviation or in autonomous driving, people may have accidents. There may be fatal results.

In aviation applications, safety always comes first, Dr. Wei said. New aircraft types electrification in aviation, AI and machine learning based autonomy functionsare bringing great challenges and opportunities for aviation safety research, he said.

Our team is very excited to work with NASA to address these challenges, he said.

Additional ProjectsDr. Wei was also recently awarded three additional grants. He and his collaborators from West Virginia University and Honeywell Aerospace received a two-year grant from the Federal Aviation Administration to focus on the design and implementation of a safety verification framework for learning-based aviation systems.

We want to explore how to verify or certify these AI and machine learning based avionic functions , Dr. Wei said. We plan to develop some tools for both offline and online verification to guarantee safety.

He also received a six-month NASA SBIR Phase I award to work with Intelligent Automation, Inc. on a project to support the emerging large volume of urban air mobility traffic by mitigating the potential congestion in airspace. The team will focus on how to enable the high arrival and departure rates at vertiportsthe major bottlenecks for eVTOL air traffic.

Unmanned electric airplanes are vulnerable to air traffic congestion because battery power is limited compared to traditional fuel. Electric airplanes can burn significant resources if they are unable to land on schedule.

They cannot afford to sit in traffic in the air, he said. if they hover or hold in the sky, they will consume their batteries.

The third project is a one-year collaboration with the University of Virginia and George Mason University. The research team received a grant from the Virginia Commonwealth Cyber Initiative (CCI) to address threats from autonomous vehicles as they become victims of emerging cyber attacks. The Smart City project integrates two novel mechanisms: city-scale video intelligence for detecting attacks and multi-agent reinforcement planning for reacting to attacks and non-cooperative vehicles.

They plan to use cameras to identify potentially abnormal car movements, ranging from aggressive or intoxicated driving to a hacked autonomous vehicle. Researchers ultimately aim to detect and predict this type of behavior to mitigate risk on the road. Dr. Weis laboratory experience with collision avoidance and conflict resolution is key to this effort.

Preparing for TomorrowAI and machine learning will be foundational to the future of technological innovation, and there is significant room for expansion in air transportation and aviation, Dr. Wei said. As a SEAS faculty member, Dr. Wei is focused on his labs research and training the next generation of technology leaders.

At GW, with so many opportunities around us for our students, our goal is to train our undergraduate students and graduate students so they can become the top qualified multidisciplinary background, and also they can fit better in their future jobs and careers, he said.

Over the next few decades, there will be a growing need for an aviation industry workforce rigorously focused on safety that can apply and develop AI and machine learning technology. Elected officials and their staff, policymakers and Federal Aviation Administration regulators will also have to have sufficient knowledge to evaluate changing technology.

When somebody developed those advanced technologies, how can we examine them? How can we check them or verify them or approve them?, Dr. Wei said. We need a lot of talent on this side as well.

See original here:

How Artificial Intelligence Is Changing the Future of Air Transportation - GW Today

An artificial-intelligence powered ETF has smashed the S&P 500 in the last month without any meme stocks – Markets Insider

Getty Images

An exchange-traded fund that uses artificial intelligence in identifying the most promising US equities has blasted past the S&P 500 in returns for the past month - without any meme stocks in its holdings, analysis by DataTrek showed.

The AIEQ ETF's performance for the past month has been especially strong, and as of Monday, the 1-month return for the fund was 10.6%, compared with 2% for the S&P 500. The 1-year return was 50.1%, while it was 39.9% for the index, DataTrek found.

Year-to-date, though, the two are much closer, at 13.6% for the ETF and 13.3% for the US equity index. And while the AIEQ has been logging a solid performance overall, its 3-month return was 0.5%, much lower than the S&P 500's 7.2%.

The ETF regained strength and caught up with the index over the last month. It did this by adding companies with better performances to its holdings, DataTrek said. "In that respect, AIEQ's process looks a lot like a human manager, searching for momentum names that fit its investment process." the financial research firm said.

Despite this, DataTrek analysis showed the ETF was free of meme stocks, which can rise and fall in quick succession, significantly and quickly impacting returns.

Meme stocks such as GameStop and AMC have sent rumbles through the market in recent months, after retail investors banded together to buy the shares, driving prices up and causing short squeezes. As this caused stocks to be overvalued, those who invested at the highs or during the run-up were left vulnerable to big losses in the longer term.

Instead, AIEQ shifted its top 10 holdings. It kept Alphabet, 10X Genomics, Costar Group, Tesla and Square in the mix, albeit with weighting adjustments, and added MongoDB, DexCom, Appian, Carvana and Autozone. DocuSign and Yeti Holdings were among the stocks moved out of the top 10.

The fund also spread out its investments further. Its top 10 holdings now account for 28% of the portfolio, versus 40% previously, in an effort to catch the momentum of a wider range of stocks, DataTrek said. It currently manages assets worth $155.6 million and trades on the NYSE ARCA exchange.

AIEQ is powered by IBM's Watson supercomputing, which enables the actively-managed ETF to use artificial intelligence when picking stocks. It analyzes company, technical, macro and market data from news, social media, industry analysis, and financial statements, according to its profile on the website of the ETF Managers Trust, which runs the fund.

Original post:

An artificial-intelligence powered ETF has smashed the S&P 500 in the last month without any meme stocks - Markets Insider

Artificial Intelligence in the Pharmaceutical market worth US$27156.1 Million in 2031. Visiongain Research Inc. – GlobeNewswire

Visiongain has published a new report on AI in Pharmaceuticals Market 2021-2031. Forecasts by Application (Drug Discovery, Precision Medicine, Medical Imaging & Diagnostics, Research), Technology (Machine Learning, Other Technologies), Offering (Hardware, Software, Services), Deployment (Cloud, On-Premises), by Region (North America, Europe, Asia Pacific, Latin America, Middle East & Africa), PLUS COVID-19 Recovery Scenarios.

Download Exclusive Sample of Report @ https://www.visiongain.com/report/ai-in-pharma-market-2021/#download_sampe_div

Key Questions Answered by this Report

Embracing Technology to Revolutionize Pharmaceutical IndustryThere are other fields where the R&D process can be influenced by AI and machine learning. Better approaches to predict chemicals' properties in order to reduce the number of substances that need to be synthesized is obviously an opportunity. This would allow for the consideration of a larger chemical universe and enrich the 'chemical palette' open to medicinal chemists. Another field where researchers are starting to use AI and machine learning is mining genomic, proteomic, and metabolic data for improved disease biomarkers and medication efficacy surrogate markers.

Get Detailed TOC @ https://www.visiongain.com/report/ai-in-pharma-market-2021/#download_sampe_div

For example, the time taken to examine cancer tumour scans or neurological condition brain scans may be drastically reduced. Further downstream, AI and deep learning are also used to evaluate real-world result data, wearable device data and other sensors. Predictive toxicology is already in its infancy and, potentially, businesses will still be able to detect any possible safety hazards with compounds even sooner by harnessing the true potential of AI. This advanced technology will also promote predictive medicine and better stratification of patients for clinical trials, and this can lead to an improvement in performance based on greater effectiveness in clinical trials since it is possible to better choose the most desirable patient pool.

What are the Opportunities for AI in Drug Discovery?AI is seen to give drug development a strategic edge, so it is expected to be introduced easily and generally. The implications of the market adjusting to accept the modern reality will eventually take place, and the strain to embrace the new ways of working will be felt by late adopters for fear of dropping out of the race. They would need to adapt or perish if any larger and more developed players are already lagging.

What is the Competitive Landscape?

Key market players featured in this report include:

Visiongains study is intended for everybody needing commercial analyses for the Global AI in Pharmaceuticals Market and leading companies. You will find data, trends, and predictions.

Find quantitative and qualitative analyses with independent predictions. Receive information that only our report contains, staying informed with this invaluablebusiness intelligence.

Find more research reports on thePharma Industry, pleaseclick on the following links:

Do you have any custom requirements we can help you with? Any need for a specific country, geo region, market segment or specific company information? Contact us today, we can discuss your needs and see how we can help: sara.peerun@visiongain.com

About VisiongainVisiongain is one of the fastest growing and most innovative, independent, market intelligence around, the company publishes hundreds ofmarket research reportswhich it adds to its extensive portfolio each year. These reports offer in-depth analysis across 18 industries worldwide. The reports cover a 10-year forecast, are hundreds of pages long, with in depth market analysis and valuable competitive intelligence data. Visiongain works across a range of vertical markets, which currently can influence one another, these markets include automotive, aviation, chemicals, cyber, defense, energy, food & drink, materials, packaging, pharmaceutical and utilities sectors. Our customized and syndicated market research reports means that you can have a bespoke piece of market intelligence customized to your very own business needs.

Contact:Sara PeerunCommercial DirectorVisiongain Inc.Tel:+ 44 207 549 9987USA Tel:+ 1 718 682 4567EU Tel:+ 353 1 695 0006Email:sara.peerun@visiongain.comWeb:https://www.visiongain.com/Follow Us:LinkedIn|Twitter-

SOURCE Visiongain Limited.

Original post:

Artificial Intelligence in the Pharmaceutical market worth US$27156.1 Million in 2031. Visiongain Research Inc. - GlobeNewswire

Can We Learn Sperm Whale Language? Researchers Are Using Artificial Intelligence to Find Out – TheInertia.com

A mother sperm whale and her calf off the coast of Mauritius. Will we be able to understand them in the future? Photo: Wikimedia Commons

If youve ever been lucky enough to spend time underwater in an area with whales, youve likely heard them. Theyre curious sounds; clicks and squeals and deep, melancholy rumbles penetrating through incredible distances. They often sound close, just out of your field of vision, and its easy to imagine some great creature slowly moving by in the dark blue. Its more likely, however, that they are much farther away than that, because whale songs can, by some estimates, travel as far as 10,000 miles. Its beyond doubt that the noises are used to communicate with other whales, but is it an actual language? Well, researchers are using artificial intelligence to try and break the code of sperm whale communications.

Sperm whalesare among the loudest creatures on Earth. Their songs are called codas, and theyre extraordinarily complex. Codas might even be complex enough to count as an actual language, but so far, humans havent been able to understand what they might be saying to each other.

Sperm whales have enormous brains. Six times larger than ours, in fact. But bigger doesnt necessarily mean smarter. The complexity of the brain and the brain-t0-body size ratio likely have more to do with intelligence than plain old size. Humans, despite the fact that were considered to be the most highly-evolved species in the world, dont win either of those categories. The common tree shrew wins brain-t0-body size ratio and the complexity contest is a bit of a hard one to accurately measure but dolphins, octopuses, some whales, and elephants have more complex brains than we do. And whale songs are a good indicator of that.

According to a recent study by the Cetacean Translation Initiative (CETI) called A Roadmap to Deciphering the Communication of Sperm Whales, the complexity and duration of whale vocalizations suggest that they are at least in principle capable of exhibiting a more complex grammar.

The past decade or so has been a big one for AI, especially when it comes to machines learning for human languages. Right now, machines are capable of taking dense collections of data and deciphering aspects of syntax and semantics, as well as sentence structure and word meaning. In short, machines can learn languages just by listening to them much like we can.

Which is why, as youve guessed by now, researchers are in the process of collecting as many different whale sounds as they can gather. The plan, put simply, is to feed all those sounds into a machine and see whether AI can make any sense of them. CETI chose sperm whales because their clicks can sound weirdly similar to morse code, so the AI might have an easier time analyzing them.

The clicking isnt just for communication, though. Since sperm whales are capable of hunting at depths of up to 4,000 feet, they also use them as a form of echolocation. It has been noted, however, that the echolocation clicks are noticeably different than the communication clicks, which are much closer together.

So far, according to Live Science, the CETI team has about 100,000 different sperm whale clicks on file. That might sound like a lot, but they estimate that the AI will need somewhere around four billion of them. To get to that number, CETI is setting up microphones in the sperm whale haunts all over the world, microphone-carrying drones, and swimming robots that can follow pods of whales as they click their way through the sea.

Even if CETI is able to collect enough data, theres no guarantee that the machines will be able to parse out a language. That, however, is part of the fun for the researchers and if it works, theyre hoping it can be applied to other animals as well.

Sperm whales, in particular, they wrote, with their highly developed neuroanatomical features, cognitive abilities, social structures, and discrete, click-based encoding make for an excellent starting point for advanced machine learning tools that can be applied to other animals in the future.

For now, well have to just try and imagine what animals might be saying to each other but the question that still lingers is this: if you could talk to animals, would you want to know what theyre saying?

View original post here:

Can We Learn Sperm Whale Language? Researchers Are Using Artificial Intelligence to Find Out - TheInertia.com

Cyborg Reportedly Being Recast In DCEU With A Younger Actor – We Got This Covered

Ray Fishers Cyborg was supposed to be a major player in the DCEU, but it obviously didnt work out that way. The unproven and untested actor must have thought hed landed the role of a lifetime when he made his feature film debut in Batman v Superman: Dawn of Justice, before being announced as a principal part of the Justice League cast, and he was even set to headline his own solo outing.

Instead, reports of Joss Whedons behavior and misconduct at the helm of the Justice League reshoots snowballed into Fisher mounting a one-man crusade against the entire DC Films and Warner Bros. hierarchy, and hes got no intentions of giving up the fight. Hes happy to continue demanding that the boardroom and executives take accountability for their actions or lack thereof, and hes stuck to his guns so rigidly that hes essentially exiled himself from the DCEU until Walter Hamada is out of the picture.

As the beating heart of Zack Snyders Justice League, who declined the opportunity to play a substantial role in The Flash despite having been involved in almost every draft of the script, something drastic would have to change for Fisher to return to the fold. However, a new rumor claims that Cyborg is being recast with a younger actor, although thats about the full breadth of the information made available.

Given the dearth of details on when or where this is supposed to happen, its best not to read too far into the speculation for now, but you can guarantee thered be a huge online backlash if Warner Bros. were to hire a new Cyborg and shunt Fisher to the sidelines after his string of very public revelations.

Read the original post:

Cyborg Reportedly Being Recast In DCEU With A Younger Actor - We Got This Covered

The Batman Universe Will Reportedly Introduce A New Cyborg – We Got This Covered

Any filmmaker attached to a DC Films project that wants to use Cyborg will find themselves in a tricky position, and thats putting it lightly. After all, Ray Fisher has gathered widespread support from both his peers and the online community after refusing to back down when it comes to calling out Joss Whedon and the Warner Bros. top brass for their behavior and subsequent lack of accountability in regards to the Justice League reshoots.

The actor already lost out on a solo film when the DCEU was reshuffled several years back, and he was also set to return and play a significant supporting role in The Flash, with producer Barbara Muschietti confirming Fisher was involved, before he eventually exiled himself from the shared universe entirely by stating that he wouldnt play Victor Stone again until Walter Hamada was out of the picture.

Theres been talk on more than one occasion that the studio would simply recast the role and move on, but you can guarantee thered be massive backlash from all sides if WB were to hire somebody else as Cyborg when Fisher shows no signs of giving up his crusade anytime soon. However, a recent leak which admittedly hails from Reddit but does come from a source with a decent track record for inside scoops offers that Matt Reeves wants a new version of the character in The Batman universe.

Its not a guarantee by any stretch of the imagination, but how to handle Cyborg presents a unique and tricky scenario for any creative mind, as well as their paymasters. Ignore Fisher and theres going to be uproar, but the fact remains that hes not planning on coming back until drastic changes have been made, so something will have to give eventually.

Read the original here:

The Batman Universe Will Reportedly Introduce A New Cyborg - We Got This Covered

The best and worst graphics card box art of all time – Rock Paper Shotgun

You can't buy a new graphics card for love nor money these days. When the RTX 3070 Ti went on sale last week, it followed in the footsteps of all new GPU launches this year and disappeared in a puff of smoke in 23 seconds flat. It's a real shame, as some of these new GPUs would be pretty decent upgrades if your current PC's starting to struggle a bit.

However, I put it to you that the real crime of 2021 is the current state of graphics card box art. It's just so... bland and sensible these days. Not like the good old days, when Palit's robo frog was giving you the evils from on high with a menacing grin, PNY's purple Verto face could turn you to stone with their piercing, cybernetic snake eyes, or... whatever the hell's going on with that goblin up there. Seriously, is that a glowing bagel on a stick? And what is with that terrible haircut? Oh no. Today's graphics cards don't know they're even born. So here's to you, GPUs of yore and their terrible box art. We miss ya.

As Alice0 mentioned the other day, it's this sort of graphics card heritage that would make a great addition to Colorful's just-announced GPU Museum. That said, I'm not gonna lie. A quick image search of old graphics card box art reveals a lot of scantily clad ladies in often preposterous combinations of fishnet tights, camo gear and terrible face paint. I mean, how else where graphics card companies going to make their latest silicon board look sexy to prospective buyers? Honestly, I'm glad we've moved on from all that now, but there are plenty of characters I'd love to see more of, like Palit's robo frog.

Just look at that good boy. Sure, the way he's somehow looking down on you and grinning manically is a teensy bit menacing in hindsight, but Palit have given this little green dude another lease of life with his new cyborg bod. Just imagine the power he can wield rendering all those watery pools of 1995. Glorious. More of him, please.

One of the aforementioned scantily clad ladies clad in the classic gamer colours of red and black, but honestly, what else says "GOTTA GO FAST" than a cool cyber bike from the late noughties? Sporting key selling points such as a massive 1GB of VRAM and HDMI with an optional dongle, this box art has it all. If someone would give the lady a nice cardy, I'd be happy to see her return.

PNY's terrifying human snake cyborg hybrid graced the box of many a GPU back in the day, and for my money, I think thet GeForce FX 5900 SE (bottom right) is probably his most terrifying incarnation. His giant purple head, backed by flames mirroring his golden yellow snake eye... It's unnerving stuff - even if it's an expert deployment of some good old fashioned complementary colour design. His eyes... they stare into my soul. No more of him, please.

Gosh, I love a graphics card with a hood that matches the box. I'm not entirely sure what the heck this second rate Poison Ivy-alike is doing with her stringy green, red petal... thing, or whether that glowing green orifice is part of her own shoulder or something else entirely. All I know is that it probably, maybe, looked achingly cool back in 2010 (yes, 2010) where everyone was still caught in the passionate throes of having watched The Dark Knight for the fifteenth time on DVD. If there was one thing you wanted to see in Nvidia's 3D Vision gubbins, it was probably this lady. Maybe.

Back in the heady days when XFX still made Nvidia cards, their GPU hero was this mean looking masked dog boy. I have a feeling he'd put up a pretty good fight against Palit's robo frog, because my word, just look at those rippling muscles. If buff guard dog wasn't enough of a loss to the GPU box art world, though, just get a load of that weird, cross-shaped box! As if it's been crushed by the paws of buff guard dog himself. More of that, please, XFX.

As yes, the Croft that even Lara's ashamed to admit she's related to, Sapphire's 'Prepare To Dominate' lady adorned the box of many a GPU back in the day. Was there ever a time when she wore actual shorts? Who can say. Such information is lost to the annals of time now, but I do like the idea that she still feels the need to mask her identity with a little eye mask all the same. Still, I'm glad this one's hung up her pistols and entered retirement now. Someone's got to watch the Croft mansion while Lara's doing her disaster tourism, after all...

The other Croft often shared graphics card box art duties with her best friend Camo Girl. No one knows her true identity, though, thanks to her expert camo mask. In fact, most of her other GPU stable mates just plain ignored her most of the time because she was so carefully camouflaged against her surroundings. Except when someone put a whacking great red and black backdrop behind her, though. Then she stood out like a sore thumb. I'd imagine she had pretty sore shoulders from carrying around that big ring of bullets all day, too. Poor lass. You deserve a nice rest love. Just let me lead you down into this bunker here, where you'll feel most comfortable. Yes, that's it. You lie down while I seal the door forever behind me. What's that? Nothing dear, you go sleep now. It will all be over soon.

Holy, flying whale cakes, now that's what I call an incredible bit of graphics card box art. Who needs sexy army ladies when you can have a cool, massively over the top samurai orc boy riding a majestic horned demon horse that looks like they've just cantered in as part of an elaborate Final Fantasy summon? Asus' Radeon HD 7750 ticks a lot of boxes here (sorry). Not only have you got an incredibly powerful mascot on the front, but there's fire, there's lightning, an ominous gothic castle in the background and, most importantly of all, it's got SUPER ALLOY POWER. And of course the final graphics card looks just as formidable as well. None of that Fishcer Price plastic nonsense that makes it look like a knock-off Bop-it or anything here, no sir. Where's Yuna when you need her, eh? I want this GPU summoned back into existence, STAT.

Another cracking box and GPU hood matching combo, Zotac's eerie golden Midas man is just as terrifying as PNY's Verto borg in my eyes. Even XFX's Buff Guard Dog would have a hard time piercing that shiny gold bod, I reckon. I mean, just look at him. This guy is smugness personified. He knows his 512MB of GDDR3 memory is the bees knees, just as much as he loves raving about his HDTV, HDCP, PCI Express 2.0 and Low Noise Cooling features. He looks down on you, Mr Midas does. And there's nothing you can do but grovel under his piercing white gaze and submit to his furious might.

Honestly, there's such a wealth of bad graphics card box art out there that it's hard to know where to go next. Do we celebrate monochrome bondage lady? Or pink robo lady? What about sneaky gremlin boy with the green bagels? he must be a relation to the moob goblin from the header, surely. There's also Wannabe Thief Fan, and perhaps my favourite, Chrome Alien Lad. He's much better than all the other quasi-winged folks on these boxes. Bring back that guy, ATI. If anyone deserves a second chance at box art stardom, it's our mate in chrome. I mean, just think how good he'd look with ray tracing these days. That boy would SHINE.

Read the original post:

The best and worst graphics card box art of all time - Rock Paper Shotgun

What You Need To Remember Before Watching Rick And Morty Season 5 – Looper

Just to remind you of some of the basics, "Rick and Morty" is set on a version of Earth where Rick Sanchez (Roiland) lives with his daughter Beth (Sarah Chalke), son-in-law Jerry (Chris Parnell), grand-daughter Summer (Spencer Grammer) and of course his grandson Morty (also Roiland). All four family members appear in most episodes, and they all have their issues.

Beth and Jerry are often a toxic couple (once getting a divorce before reuniting), often due to Jerry's incompetence and spinelessness while Beth, like her father, struggles with alcoholism and fears being too attached to others. Summer is usually the most well-adjusted, although she also has her issues with self-image and friction with other family members. Morty is often traumatized by the adventures he and Rick go on and struggles with fitting in at school as well as his constant crush on his classmate, Jessica (Kari Wahlgren).

When not at home, Rick and Morty (and occasionally the other family members) go on adventures across planets and dimensions with the use of Rick's portal gun and space cruiser. Each dimension has its own version of each family member, with the main duo living in a nearly identical dimension and taking the place of its Rick and Morty after an episode in Season 1 effectively ruined the Earth. This means that no characters aside from Rick and Morty are the "original" characters, but although this is sometimes brought up, they try not to think about it too much.

More:

What You Need To Remember Before Watching Rick And Morty Season 5 - Looper

MMA pound-for-pound rankings – Two ex-champs stake their places in men’s and women’s top 10 – ESPN

Israel Adesanya is back on track. Three months after suffering his first loss in a bid to add the UFC light heavyweight championship to the middleweight title he already owned, Adesanya successfully defended his 185-pound belt against Marvin Vettori over the weekend.

It was a dominant performance. The champ won all five rounds on the scorecards of all three judges. He successfully fended off 10 of his challenger's takedown attempts. And when he got taken to the canvas, Adesanya was able to quickly get back to standing or reverse position on the mat. Vettori was unable to do anything against him.

Monday through Friday, host Pablo Torre brings you an inside look at the most interesting stories at ESPN, as told by the top reporters and insiders on the planet. Listen

Despite all of that, Adesanya does not rise in the latest ESPN men's pound-for-pound rankings. It's tough being stuck behind Kamaru Usman and Jon Jones. Adesanya remains at No. 3.

Both the men's and women's rankings do have new faces down at No. 10.

In the case of the men's top 10, the new entry is actually a familiar face. Former featherweight champion Max Holloway, who had a masterful performance against Calvin Kattar in January, moved back into the rankings after Deiveson Figueiredo -- who lost his flyweight belt on Saturday -- vacated his spot in the top 10. New 125-pound champ Brandon Moreno did receive voters from a couple of panelists but not enough to crack the top 10.

The new women's rankings also added a former champion: Carla Esparza, who in 2014 became the inaugural UFC strawwweight champ. Esparza has won five in a row, most recently a second-round TKO of Yan Xiaonan in May.

Note: Results are current; rankings as of June 15.

1. Kamaru Usman

UFC welterweight championRecord: 19-1Last: W (KO2) Jorge Masvidal, April 24, 2021Next: TBD vs. Colby Covington

2. Jon Jones

UFC light heavyweight/announced move to heavyweightRecord: 26-1, 1 NCLast: W (UD) Dominick Reyes, Feb. 8, 2020Next: TBD

3. Israel Adesanya

UFC middleweight championRecord: 21-1Last: W (UD) Marvin Vettori, June 12, 2021Next: TBD

4. Francis Ngannou

UFC heavyweight championRecord: 16-3Last: W (KO2) Stipe Miocic, March 27, 2021Next: TBD vs. Derrick Lewis

5. Alexander Volkanovski

UFC featherweight championRecord: 22-1Last: W (SD) Max Holloway, July 11, 2020Next: TBD vs. Brian Ortega

T-6. Jan Blachowicz

UFC light heavyweight championRecord: 28-8Last: W (UD) Israel Adesanya, March 6, 2021Next: Sept. 4 vs. Glover Teixeira

T-6. Dustin Poirier

UFC lightweightRecord: 27-6, 1 NCLast: W (TKO2) Conor McGregor, Jan. 23, 2021Next: July 10 vs. Conor McGregor

8. Stipe Miocic

UFC heavyweightPrevious ranking: 9Record: 20-4Last: L (KO2) Francis Ngannou, March 27, 2021Next: TBD

9. Charles Oliveira

UFC lightweight championPrevious ranking: 10Record: 31-8, 1 NCLast: W (TKO2) Michael Chandler, May 15, 2021Next: TBD

10. Max Holloway

UFC featherweightPrevious ranking: UnrankedRecord: 22-6Last: W (UD) Calvin Kattar, Jan. 16, 2021Next: TBD

Other fighters receiving votes: Brandon Moreno, Robert Whittaker and Petr Yan

Ariel Helwani1. Kamaru Usman2. Jon Jones3. Israel Adesanya4. Alexander Volkanovski5. Francis Ngannou6. Charles Oliveira7. Dustin Poirier8. Max Holloway9. Jan Blachowicz10. Brandon Moreno

Brett Okamoto1. Kamaru Usman2. Jon Jones3. Israel Adesanya4. Alexander Volkanovski5. Jan Blachowicz6. Dustin Poirier7. Max Holloway8. Francis Ngannou9. Petr Yan10. Charles Oliveira

Marc Raimondi1. Kamaru Usman2. Jon Jones3. Israel Adesanya4. Francis Ngannou5. Stipe Miocic6. Alexander Volkanovski7. Dustin Poirier8. Jan Blachowicz9. Charles Oliveira10. Robert Whittaker

Jeff Wagenheim1. Jon Jones2. Francis Ngannou3. Kamaru Usman4. Israel Adesanya5. Stipe Miocic6. Jan Blachowicz7. Alexander Volkanovski8. Dustin Poirier9. Charles Oliveira10. Brandon Moreno

1. Amanda Nunes

UFC bantamweight/featherweight championRecord: 21-4Last: W (Sub1) Megan Anderson, March 6, 2021Next: Aug. 7 vs. Julianna Pea

2. Valentina Shevchenko

UFC flyweight championRecord: 21-3Last: W (TKO2) Jessica Andrade, April 24, 2021Next: TBD

3. Cris Cyborg

Bellator featherweight championRecord: 24-2, 1 NCLast: W (TKO5) Leslie Smith, May 21, 2021Next: TBD

4. Rose Namajunas

UFC strawweight championRecord: 10-4Last: W (KO1) Zhang Weili, April 24, 2021Next: TBD

5. Zhang Weili

UFC strawweightRecord: 21-2Last: L (KO1) Rose Namajunas, April 24, 2020Next: TBD

6. Joanna Jedrzejczyk

UFC strawweightRecord: 16-4Last: L (SD) Zhang Weili, March 7, 2020Next: TBD

7. Jessica Andrade

UFC flyweightRecord: 21-9Last: L (TKO2) Valentina Shevchenko, April 24, 2021Next: TBD

8. Germaine de Randamie

UFC bantamweightRecord: 10-4Last: W (TechSub3) Julianna Pea, Oct. 3, 2020Next: TBD

9. Holly Holm

UFC bantamweightRecord: 14-5Last: W (UD) Irene Aldana, Oct. 3, 2020Next: TBD

10. Carla Esparza

UFC strawweightPrevious ranking: UnrankedRecord: 18-6Last: W (TKO2) Yan Xiaonan, May 22, 2021Next: TBD

Other fighter receiving votes: Katlyn Chookagian

Ariel Helwani1. Amanda Nunes2. Valentina Shevchenko3. Cris Cyborg4. Rose Namajunas5. Zhang Weili6. Joanna Jedrzejczyk7. Jessica Andrade8. Germaine de Randamie9. Holly Holm10. Katlyn Chookagian

Brett Okamoto1. Amanda Nunes2. Valentina Shevchenko3. Rose Namajunas4. Cris Cyborg5. Zhang Weili6. Joanna Jedrzejczyk7. Germaine de Randamie8. Jessica Andrade9. Carla Esparza10. Katlyn Chookagian

Marc Raimondi1. Amanda Nunes2. Valentina Shevchenko3. Cris Cyborg4. Rose Namajunas5. Zhang Weili6. Joanna Jedrzejczyk7. Jessica Andrade8. Germaine de Randamie9. Holly Holm10. Carla Esparza

Jeff Wagenheim1. Amanda Nunes2. Valentina Shevchenko3. Cris Cyborg4. Rose Namajunas5. Zhang Weili6. Joanna Jedrzejczyk7. Jessica Andrade8. Germaine de Randamie9. Holly Holm10. Carla Esparza

More here:

MMA pound-for-pound rankings - Two ex-champs stake their places in men's and women's top 10 - ESPN

Ray Fisher Demands WB To Restore The SnyderVerse – Small Screen

This is a battle thats seemingly been going on since the dawn of time (its only been a few months in reality). However, Ray Fisher has now taken to Twitter to demand that Warner Bros. Pictures restores the SnyderVerse.

Ray Fisher played Cyborg in Justice League and Zack Snyders Justice League and it probably wasnt the best experience for the actor.

Hes revealed what it was like working on the movie when Joss Whedon took over the production.

Since revealing how it was for him working with Joss Whedon and certain executives at Warner Bros. Pictures, there have been a number of other actors whove also come out in support of Fisher.

A number of actors have also revealed what Joss Whedon was like to work with and it doesnt make for good reading.

However, then the Snyder Cut was released and people saw a much-improved film from Whedons 2017 theatrical release.

Yet, even though the film was a pretty big success, Warner Bros. Pictures still refused to carry on the SnyderVerse.

That said, theres been a huge outcry online for the SnyderVerse to be restored, and Ray Fisher has added his voice to the millions.

Fisher took to Twitter recently to share the hashtag #RestoreTheSnyderVerse, and people loved him for it.

Read more: Jared Leto Calls For WarnerMedia To Restore The SnyderVerse

The tweet went viral, with over 16,000 people liking it and over 5,000 people retweeting it.

#RestoreTheSnyderVerse also ended up trending on Twitter the other day, again.

I think #RestoreTheSnyderVerse must be one of Twitters best-performing hashtags over the past few months.

Will this convince Warner Bros. Pictures to do what the fans and Ray Fisher are asking them to do?

Only time will tell.

However, this new WarnerMedia/Discovery merger has given the fans hope, and for good reason

Discovery must see how popular the SnyderVerse is and might be convinced to keep it going over on streaming.

We will have to wait and see what happens.

What do you make of this news?

Are you hoping that Warner Bros. Pictures will go ahead and restore the SnyderVerse?

Let us know your thoughts in the comments below.

What do you make of this story? Let us know in the comments below or on ourFacebook, Twitter or Instagrampages! And if you enjoy listening to film podcasts, why not check out our podcasts,Small Screen StoriesandSmall Screen Film Clubwherever you get your podcasts!

See the rest here:

Ray Fisher Demands WB To Restore The SnyderVerse - Small Screen

The New Normal: What If Your Beloved CRM Is Big Tech’s Next Target? – Inman

The New Normal is a multistory Inman series exploring whats returning to normal after the pandemic fades and what will never be the same. Check back tomorrow for a new installment and join usJune 15-17when we take the conversation live atInman Connect.

LionDesk founder David Andersons father and grandfather practiced real estate for decades. His sister is an agent, and his step-father was a mortgage broker.

After success in software within the travel industry, the prospect of another challenge called to Anderson. So why not enter the family business?

Although I knew it would be hard work starting a new company from zero, and getting no outside investment, I was up for the challenge and was ready to have fun, Anderson said in an email to Inman.

He also shared the initial handwritten napkin sketch upon which he built his company. Scrawled on the napkin with a roughed-out logo, the message was succinct: Make sales and marketing easier for real estate agents. And thats what he did.

Once on the market, LionDesks $25-per-month fee gave individual agents access to a CRM they could afford independently and the freedom to operate with autonomy when their brokers offering cost too much money or wasnt the best fit for the agent.

The CRM proliferated by providing sophisticated lead management, generation and follow-up for the everyday agent. It was one of the first in the space to offer text automation, which empowers agents to program auto-follow-up campaigns using text instead of email, which had been the standard for a long time.

LionDesk also championed open ecosystems, a model that connects many common third-party tools to help users consolidate data and connect features. (Realogy is a champion of this open ecosystem approach.)

As it goes, LionDesk was sold to Canadian enterprise software builderLone Wolfas part of its recent surge in growth. When tech is acquired, customers often have concerns, especially related to their data.

However, several clients rightfully congratulated Anderson, who was transparent and ever-present with his user-base throughout. He will stay fully embedded with the software as general manager of agents and teams for Lone Wolf.

Nevertheless, his customers have a right to be concerned about what lies ahead for the affordable, feature-rich CRM. For every agent whose valuable tech gets sold, the concerns can include price increases, losing certain lead source partners, changing website templates or new lead-routing models, among many others.

And the technology agents use wont cease evolving. It will continue to automate, making the agents day-to-day life easier. And the more it innovates, the harder it is to break away from the daily conveniences it provides.

As was the case with LionDesk, theres a clear trend of CRMs and other valuable business tech getting acquired by larger names. Agents and brokers should consider this trend the new normal among all real estate tech sectors, from portals to back-office solutions. Tech is changing hands rapidly, and potentially taking the way agents do business onto the next company with it.

At this pace in such a limited vendor category within this pressurized market this trend has no reason to slow down.

The people behind these acquisitions are hunting for potential Wall Street trophies. And even though your favorite CRM may not end up publicly traded, it could end up emblazoned on the memo line of a massive check.

Its time for brokers and agents to begin thinking about how theyll react when a larger company likes their CRM as much as they do.

Lets first look at how CRMs have become the lifeblood of agents businesses.

It wouldnt be hard to find agents who once worked from an Act! database or maybe an Outlook contact list. These were the early iterations of lead databases. Before them, it was Rolodexes and hard copies. But this was true for all industries, not just real estate.

As the internet merged with business, solutions for keeping tabs on contacts and leads became a cottage industry and, eventually, an industrial enterprise. Once online home search took hold, agents needed ways to channel people from their website to their database without losing critical information.

From there, the fundamental business concept of customer relationship management staying in touch with clients morphed into whats now colloquially known asthe CRM,an amalgamation of omnichannel marketing, sales support, and account management. The CRM has gone from a value-add business tool to a fully integrated component of everyday business.

Todays software tells you who to call and email and then leaves the voicemail and sends the email for you. Who wouldnt want this tech empowering their business?

Vendors in the industry employ large teams of foreign and domestic coders, interface designers and product managers, all working to create new ways for agents to work smarter.

The advancements are taking work out of the agents hands, a powerful benefit when one considers how much work it requires to generate new business and manage whats current. Although automation and tools to simplify the workload for agents are out there at all levels of the CRM space, some of the more prominent names in the space are making them a priority.

For example,Inside Real Estaterevamped kvCORE for spring 2021. Its Lead Details module is more or less on autopilot, continually updating a users entire database by monitoring home search-related activity. It also double-checks the authenticity of the leads actions to provide the agent with everything needed to reach out. And kvCORE isnt the only one.

Highly popular CRM BoomTowns Success Assurance Program combines human interaction and marketing automation. The service actively monitors a database from the moment of account setup to gauge a contacts activity level, score them and then recommend the appropriate action.

This feature came about afterBoomTown discovered the longer a contact record (a lead) is exposed to marketing, the more apt they are to work with that agent. This tremendous realization aims to solve the long-standing call me when you decide to sell conundrum.

Hours of tedious, manual recording of lead follow-up is quickly dissipating with such automation and high-touch CRM database management, opening up critical windows of energy to be spent elsewhere, like managing blossoming deals and in-escrow transactions.

The result is making CRM technology ever more challenging to pry away from a busy agent and thriving brokerage. That tight grip makes switching CRMs ever more complicated, and providers know that.

The more valuable CRMs are to agents, the more dollar signs larger technology companies see in them. CRM solutions offer large technology companies access to intelligent technology that agents are already entrenched in, which can pose myriad problems for those agents. Brokers, teams and agents need to brace for this new normal.

Innovation happens faster in small spaces, where ideas quickly ricochet into features, and user feedback, not subject to a vacuum, is easier to implement. Startups become targets because theyre small enough to focus on solving a single problem and getting it to market quickly. They become more valuable to the marketplace.

DashCMA, for example, was built by a mom-turned-advertising-executive-turned-real-estate agent and sold in under two years to well-funded, long-established Inside Real Estate.

Similarly, open house solution Spacio was developed and championed by a small team. HomeSpotter acquired it, and itsnow part of Lone Wolf.

These deals move fast. The quicker startups disrupt a market, the more attention they command, especially when theyre small and offer a new take on an old problem.

Funding to proptech startups quadrupled between 2015 and 2019, with investors allocating $8.9 billion across more than 500 deals in 2019, according to technology economy analystCBinsights.com. Naturally, 2020 saw a slowdown, but the organizations reporting shows that theres ample room for growth in real estate tech.

Real estate technology has transformed the industry, putting more control in the hands of consumers and giving salespeople flexible solutions, Laura Adams, senior real estate analyst at Aceable, said in a May 25TechRepublic report.

Unfortunately, all of that money fueling startups can bring risk to the user.

Thus, its common for customers to leave a technology partner because of an experience with or assumptions about the new parent company. People will continue to get upset every time Compass, Opendoor, CoStar and Zillow make any notable industry move.

No better recent example of this can be found in the reaction to Zillows latest trip to the market, which resulted in it spending $500 million on the industrys most-accessed home showing tool.

Inman reader Clay Stapp was one of many who wasnt thrilled with the deal. Whats a good alternative to ShowingTime? Im done he wrote in the comments section of the story.

Wow Why would my MLS dollars go to support this in using ShowingTime, what a MISTAKE When are Realtors going to wake up and see what is really going on here? Robert Adams commented.

Other readers threw around the word monopoly and expressed concern about ownership of listing data.

Although no other technology company in real estate ignites as much passion in agents as Zillow, Compass is a relatively new close second. Its 2019acquisition of CRM Contactuallytook flack.

NO COMPETITOR IS EVER APPROPRIATE AS A VENDOR! Compass can say they will not access data from non Compass agents, but who wants to take a chance, reader Tom Bailey commented on the Inman story.

Interesting announcement from a company that thought that they were the only ones capable of developing a state of the art agent technology tool kit, Larry Knapp wrote. At least theyre not too arrogant to admit they were wrong. This will help put them on a par with the many great traditional brokerages who have been using Contactually for quite some time.

What those readers are communicating is not a rare sentiment, theres a great deal of passion in this industry, and its possible your CRM could end up under the banner of a company with a lot of heat on it.

In 2020, Naberly Solutions added to its offeringa sharp, competitive CRM. Within a year of that announcement,IntelliAgent acquired it.

Constellation Real Estate Group bought long-time industry CRM TopProducer in March to cap off an impressive buying spree. Its other acquisitions include marketing tech companyTorchX, lead-gen solutionOffers,Real Estate Digital,Baynet World,SmartZipandParadym.

But consolidation is happening in other ways, too: partnerships.

Partnerships are forming across the proptech space, all designed to merge common user groups.

If a CRM wants to add transaction management, it likely calls upon SkySlope or DocuSign. Or maybe if a lead-generation service wants to help its customers route leads, it might build a connection with a CRM.

Chimes built-in lead scoring recently got a boost byintegrating with relocation data service Revaluate, which owns a powerful algorithm for predicting when a person is likely to move. Its system constantly roams a Chime users database to detect activity indicative of a move, such as searches about new neighborhoods, portal browsing or credit checks.

There was a time when we believed an all-in-one platform was the best way to support agents, saidMike McGowan of Chime. Through our strategic partner program, we learned that by maximizing the potential of each best of breed partner and tightly integrating with our powerful CRM, we can deliver a more powerful technology stack to our clients.

Desire to expand is why open APIs (application programming interfaces) exist. Zapier, a tremendously popular product, was solely founded to connect different software products.

Its crucial for brokers and agents to look for specializations in their technology stack, which means multiple partnerships, explained Howard Tager, co-founder of Ylopo.

In a growing trend, the highest performing teams now choose to work with the top specialized providers in each category and make sure that there is seamless integration with these top gun solutions, Tager said.

Unfortunately, when a larger company comes for blocks of your tech stack, the benefit of that nicely assembled foundation can crumble.

Brokers have a hard enough time choosing a vendor and encouraging adoption. As big tech continues to absorb its more nimble rivals, more brokers will face more technology decision points, leaving agents wondering where they have to log in next.

These CRM acquisition trends illustrate why Gary Keller andRobert Reffkinare so driven to own their code, regardless of howbumpy the roadis to get there.

Agents within such brokerages should realize that outside of the entire brand being acquired, their tech is there to stay. They can feel better about committing to it.

Additionally, its much more likely that these brokerages will communicate software changes, problems, and updates ahead of time (in an ideal scenario), offering agents the opportunity to prepare and adjust as needed. Thats not to say your current independent CRM doesnt do that, but typically user feedback groups and feature beta tests are limited in size and scope.

The companywide collaboration and enterprise-level commitment to the technology can provide agents with more peace of mind about its longevity and support. In short, theres a were all in this together mentality.

Brokers and agents dont have any reason to believe your technology provider will abandon you. Thats an extreme way to couch the issue.

Sales and marketing automation are terrific advancements for the industry. Yet, how often does the user know the strategy behind them? Does the everyday agent with an already heavy task load really know how their CRM is scoring their leads?

Agents should exercise support teams understanding of whats happening when an automated response campaign gets triggered, and technology providers should be ready to explain it.

Agents need to make sure they have a grip on the underlying business and marketing concepts their CRM is performing for them. Additionally, they need to ensure their technology-based marketing plan is portable and can translate into a new system.

The set-it-and-forget-it approach is only good when you know how it all works. Thus, get into the weeds on why segmentation is essential for lead nurture and lead management efficiency, and take time to understand how a single-listing page works and what it does for your seller.

Its crucial for agents to know what percentage of their database is their own, always. The percentage of leads and contacts that are paid for by your brokerage and facilitated by your CRM are likely not yours to walk away with. Meaning, if you happen to get a new CRM, it will look a bit different because it will be working with different relationships.

The ever-changing technology landscape is a big part of why earned leads are gaining ground; they offer a stronger sense of ownership, control and longer-term ROI.

Technology providers should begin to share the systems behind lead analysis algorithms or find a way to make the process more transparent.

Providers can help their constituents by offering a little goodwill along the way. By no means should any business halt their long-range goals or sacrifice employee goodwill, but they can create a balance.

This could take the form of an acquisition promise that entails sharing plans to sell in advance or at least communicating as a deal is happening. Dedicated customers dont always have to find out their CRM was acquired by reading Inman.

They can do some customer relationship management of their own.

Lastly, the industry needs to do its homework on the rise of SPACs, or special purpose acquisition companies.

SPACs arecompanies specifically formed to acquire businesses and take them public, and theyre popping up all over residential real estate. Opendoor used one to go public, and former Zillow CEO Spencer Rascoff also has a SPAC thatsin the processof taking Offerpad public.Matterport is on its way to the stock exchangevia a merger with Gores Holdings VI.

Regardless of how brokers prepare themselves or what a technology vendor does for their bottom line, working in the right now of the real estate tech space must be similar to what its like to sit in the cockpit of a starship as it jumps to lightspeed: Its kind of a blur.

And agents are only along for the ride.

Email Craig Rowe

View post:

The New Normal: What If Your Beloved CRM Is Big Tech's Next Target? - Inman

Gavin Newsom is getting huge donations from big tech as he fights recall – SFGate

June 8, 2021Updated: June 8, 2021 4:47p.m.

California Gov. Gavin Newsom listens to questions during a news conference outside a restaurant in San Francisco.

California Gov. Gavin Newsom can raise an unlimited amount of money as he attempts to survive a recall election later this year, and he is pulling in massive sums of money from technology executives.

At the end of May, he pulled in $3 million by far the largest sum of money spent on the recall on either side from Netflix founder Reed Hastings. On Tuesday, a new filing from the California Secretary of State's office showed that he received an additional $300,000 from tech titans.

The governor received $200,000 from Laurene Powell Jobs the widow of Apple CEO Steve Jobs and founder of the Emerson Collective as well as $100,000 from former Google CEO Eric Schmidt.

Powell Jobs has long been a Democratic Party mega-donor, giving $500,000 to President Joe Biden in 2020. She also has donated thousands of dollars to congressional Democrats over the years.

Schmidt has also been active in aiding the Democratic Party, as he once funded a startup that became a major technology vendor for Hillary Clintons presidential campaign in 2016.

Powell Jobs and Schmidt were just two of 75 signatories on a letter from tech executives announcing their opposition to the recall, so more big money contributions could be coming.

The donations were made to Newsom's "Stop the Republican Recall of Governor Newsom" committee. According to CalMatters, the governor's side has raised about $13.5 million to date, while recall supporters have raised $4.7 million.

Eric Ting is the editor of California Issues, SFGATE's politics section. He is an East Bay native who has a Master's degree in journalism from Stanford University. Eric did his undergrad at Pomona College, where he majored in politics and minored in economics. Email: eric.ting@sfgate.com

Follow this link:

Gavin Newsom is getting huge donations from big tech as he fights recall - SFGate

Marc Lore, Gary Vee, early in some big tech winners, share a new investment – CNBC

Marc Lore, left, and Gary Vaynerchuk

Scott Mlyn | CNBC; Prince Williams | Getty Images

The pandemic forced more companies to migrate sales online and data analysis to the cloud, where they can tap computing resources without having to worry about managing infrastructure in their own data centers. The accelerated adoption of cloud services has attracted interest from investors who want to get in early on tech trends they expect will continue to grow in significance in a post-pandemic, increasingly digital, world.

Marc Lore and Gary Vaynerchuk are among the investors in a $10 million round of seed funding for data processing platform Tracer, which focuses on optimizing advertising and marketing spend for corporations, and was incubated and used as an in-house product for Vaynerchuk's media company VaynerMedia.

Vaynerchuk is known for his early bets on companies likeTwitter,Uber,Snap and Coinbase. Equally significant is the backing of serial entrepreneur Lore, who sold his online delivery start-up Jet.com to Walmart in 2016 for $3.3 billion. Lore had previously sold another start-up that he founded, Quidsi, the parent of Diapers.com, to Amazon for about $550 million.

Lore, who joined Walmart for several years after the big-box retailer acquired Jet.com, was seen by experts as a key part of the deal: a way for Walmart to bring the digitally savvy entrepreneur and his team in-house as it tried to turbocharge its online retail business to catch up to rivalAmazon.

"Iinvested in Tracer becauseI know firsthand the power of data to drive business results," Lore told CNBC via email. "As more companies are challenged with how to manage datacomingfrom multiple platforms having a single source of truth to make better decisions will matter especially coming out of Covid."

Throughout the pandemic, competition has ramped up in the cloud database and analytics market, as well as adtech more broadly. Tracer is among those competitors, a marketing data aggregation and reporting platform that has integrations with some of the biggest cloud service vendorsincluding Amazon,MicrosoftandGoogle, as well as social networks likeFacebookandSnap.

Tracer works by pulling in and making sense of all types of data everything from customer IDs to revenue figures visualizing a company's media spend across campaigns and platforms.

The software integrates with data visualization services like Salesforce-owned Tableau.

Co-founder Jeff Nicholson developed the technology in 2015 while managing budgets for VaynerMedia. Low on bandwidth and resources to crunch client data, he and Vaynerchuk, founder and CEO of VaynerMedia, built their own platform to help scale the company into the global advertising giant it's become over the last decade amid the rise of dominant digital ad platforms like Facebook and Google.

The company says its early funding will be used to expand and improve the technology and grow their engineering team. In addition to VaynerMedia, Tracer's current roster of clients includes Sanofi and Cond Nast.

"We created Tracer to solve a problem that we faced time and time again," said Tracer CEO Nicholson in a release announcing the deal. He also serves on advisory boards for Roku, Pinterest and Nextdoor. "We're excited that others have found such value in our platform and are eager to continue our growth with the help of Gary, Marc, Kevin and others."

NBA star Kevin Durant also is an investor in the deal.

Vaynerchuk has worked with Nicholson and co-founder Leighton Welch over the last six years while developing the product inside VaynerMedia's media department. "I invest in talented entrepreneurs and Jeff and Leighton are the epitome of this," said Vaynerchuk in the funding announcement. "I've also had the huge advantage of working so closely with them for so long."

Loreleft his Walmart role in Januaryand will serve as a strategic advisor through September. At the time, he told CNBC in an interview that he planned to return to his start-up roots, investing in new companies, and starting others.

See the article here:

Marc Lore, Gary Vee, early in some big tech winners, share a new investment - CNBC

Big Tech-Backed Gig Worker Union Bill Fails to Get in Gear in Albany – THE CITY

A plan to grant app-based gig workers some bargaining rights is dead in the state Legislature even as the City Council held a hearing Tuesday on measures to improve working conditions for New Yorkers who deliver food.

The gig worker proposal, which initially garnered some support from organized labor, collapsed under scrutiny before a bill could be introduced in Albany. State lawmakers are slated to conclude this years legislative session on Thursday, with no bill introduced by the Monday evening deadline.

The proposal would have granted workers for companies like Uber, Lyft and DoorDash some bargaining power despite not being classified as employees entitled to certain rights. The effort failed to gain steam as pushback from food delivery workers and their advocates knocked out some early backing from organized labor.

Among the oppositions concerns: The industry-backed proposal would have conceded some key rights including the ability to strike or demonstrate against a company. The measure also would have overridden local wins for gig workers including some of the proposals being considered by the City Council.

DoorDash, Uber, Seamless, GrubHub and other delivery apps have schemed to introduce legislation behind the backs of these workers, said State Sen. Jessica Ramos (D-Queens), who chairs the Senates labor committee.

They want to amend our state labor laws to support their rights on the job under the guise of collective bargaining. One of the most egregious parts of the so-called Right to Bargain bill is that it undercuts delivery workers local organizing efforts, she added.

State Sen. Diane Savino (D-Staten Island, Brooklyn), who had been drafting the measure, told Bloomberg News that she plans on revisiting the topic next year when the Legislature returns.

Its a complicated problem, but the only way were going to get to a solution is people are going to have to put aside their own agendas and figure out how do we solve it? said Savino, who told THE CITY she was not available to comment.

Meanwhile, the City Council held a hearing Tuesday on a package of bills that aim to improve working conditions for the burgeoning app-based food delivery sector.

The proposals look to boost wages, ensure tips get to delivery workers and set limits on where they can deliver local regulations that would be barred under the draft state bill that circulated among lawmakers, tech companies and labor unions last month.

Many items in the City Councils seven-bill package were introduced in late April following months of discussions with Los Deliveristas Unidos. The group of mostly immigrant food couriers toiled for months during the pandemic with little access to bathrooms or to shelter and without much recourse against tech companies.

On average, a delivery worker works 12 hours a day, seven days a week, earning a grand total of $300. That is less than $4 an hour. When they need to take a break or use the restroom, they are denied basic courtesy and treated with hostility by some of the very same restaurants kept open by their labor, said Councilmember Carlina Rivera (D-Manhattan), who is pushing a bill that would fine restaurants and bars that refuse to allow delivery workers to use the restroom.

Other proposed measures would require that companies provide workers with insulated bags at no cost and direct the Department of Consumer and Worker Protection to study the working conditions of food delivery workers so it can come up with rules for minimum payments to workers.

While generally supportive of the measures, the departments acting commissioner, Sandra Abeles, expressed concerns in testimony at Tuesdays hearing that multi-billion dollar tech companies would find loopholes in the proposed regulations if enforcement is not carefully constructed.

Although Council members had been told that representatives from the food delivery companies would be testifying at the virtual hearing, none did.

In a statement, San Francisco-based DoorDash said the company was actively engaging with workers and eager to engage with policymakers on ways all stakeholders can better support New York City delivery workers.

Uber, which runs UberEats, did not respond to a request for comment.

In his testimony before the Council on Thursday, Los Deliveristas Unidos leader Sergio Ajche called the hearing a very important day for the citys delivery workers.

Its time for the city to recognize us as essential workers not just with words, but with actions, he said, reading aloud from his testimony in Spanish.

Its frustrating to see these apps make our tips disappear and the restaurant industry turn its back on us, he added. It hurts to see clients gratuities out of reach to those of us risking our lives in the streets. I know many hesitate to call out these injustices out of fear, but we are here today to make our situations with these apps visible.

Although Speaker Corey Johnson (D-Manhattan) was quoted in a Deliveristas press release supporting the workers, a spokesperson for the Council leader did not immediately respond to questions on whether he would bring the bills to a vote.

Deliveristas risk their lives to bring food to our doors, a service so many of us depended on during the pandemic. They were there for us, now we need to be there for them. Deliveristas deserve better, more fair treatment, and the Councils legislative package will help them get the protections they need as they continue to serve our city, Johnson said in the press release.

At a rally before the hearing, workers gathered with supporters from the union 32BJ SEIU and Transport Workers Union Local 100 at City Hall Park to urge the Council to pass the bills.

In testimony, workers described getting shortchanged by the apps and accused the platforms of withholding the tips many workers depend on in order to earn livable wages. One of the bills discussed at the hearing, introduced by Councilmember Brad Lander (D-Brooklyn), would establish minimum per-trip payments, excluding tips, to ensure workers earn an hourly amount equal to the $15 minimum wage.

Los Deliveristas Unidos leader Jonn Huerta spoke on behalf of a Relay delivery worker who charges the app stole a $9.60 tip sent by a customer last month.

At the rally, Huerta read from the testimony submitted by Manhattan delivery worker Gustavo Mancilla, who said a customers $9.60 tip never made it to his account.

When I handed him the food, he asked me immediately if I had received his tip; I immediately checked my balance on the app and saw I had $0. The client showed me their receipt and I saw that he paid a $9.60 tip, for which I received $0, according to the testimony in Spanish. THE CITY reviewed copies of those receipts.

When I submitted a complaint, the app blamed the restaurant and refused to give me any further explanation, Mancilla wrote in his testimony, which was submitted to the Council.

A spokesperson for Relay was not immediately available for comment.

The f**king restaurant kept my tip, Mancilla wrote in a text message in Spanish on the day of the incident.

At the rally, Lander said: Apps like Doordash, Seamless, Instacart and UberEats exploit the idea that these workers are independent contractors, leaving them to earn on average $5 an hour in New York City.

These are not folks on a side-hustle, Lander said. These are folks working full-time every day and they deserve full-time, more-than-a-minimum-wage, living-wage pay.

At the hearing, Ajche testified that in the summer months, he has earned just $30 for a 13-hour work day. These applications work the algorithm to their benefit. They dont care about our lives out in the streets and the conditions we have to work through, he testified in Spanish.

Some workers, like 22-year-old Pp Jhonson, described being brushed off by restaurants that refused bathroom access, an issue Riveras bill would address.

As a woman, one of the hardest things about doing this job is not being able to use the bathroom, Jhonson, a native of Togo, said in Spanish. I work 12 to 16 hour days, sometimes biking 10 miles for a single delivery, only for restaurants to tell me I cant relieve myself.

Its not right.

Sign up and get the latest stories from THE CITY delivered to you each morning

Excerpt from:

Big Tech-Backed Gig Worker Union Bill Fails to Get in Gear in Albany - THE CITY

Map Of The Internet Exposes The Lie That ‘Big Tech’ Controls The Internet – Techdirt

from the it's-a-wide-wide-world-wide-web dept

To hear many people talk about things, the entire internet these days is controlled by just a few companies, mainly Google, Facebook, and Amazon. Depending on who you're talking to, you may hear them throw in companies like Netflix. But some of us keep pointing out that while those guys are big, that doesn't mean the rest of the internet stops existing. And it's still incredibly large. If you want this point really driven home, check out this amazing map of the 2021 internet by Martin Vargic (first spotted via Fast Company).

Here's a thumbnail version, but you really should go check out the full size version on Martin's website (or, better yet, buy some prints of the whole thing).

Just the fact that looking at this smaller version above it's nearly impossible to read what most of the "countries" are should give you just a taste of how vast the non-big-tech part of the world wide web really is. There's a lot of "land" out there that isn't controlled by the big players, and we should be celebrating that. On his website he's got a few zoomed in examples as well, including the part that is my favorite: "Protocol Ocean."

Now some may quibble with various aspects of this. It's based on Alexa data, which isn't the most reliable, and it's only covering web traffic, which likely misses a lot of activity that is purely mobile these days. But still, when laid out this way, you really begin to get a sense of the diversity of the web.

The other thing that really stands out for me is that this is an updated map by Vargic. He last produced a map of the internet in 2014 and it looks strikingly different. It seems like a strong visual reminder of just how much the internet keeps changing, even in the fairly short time frame of seven years.

There seems to be this belief among some that the internet has been more or less stuck in place since 2010 when Google, Facebook, and Amazon divided the land between them and wiped the rest of the web off the map. But that was never true, and these maps really drive that point home in a very visual manner.

For what it's worth, if you love getting lost looking at maps like I do, Vargic's entire page is fascinatingly full of maps he's created, many of which explore aspects of actual geography, and plenty of others (like the internet maps) that explore other concepts in map form.

Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyones attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.

Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.

While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise and every little bit helps. Thank you.

The Techdirt Team

Filed Under: competition, internet, map, martin vargicCompanies: amazon, facebook, google

Read more:

Map Of The Internet Exposes The Lie That 'Big Tech' Controls The Internet - Techdirt

Urgent team-up between big tech and government is needed for cybersecurity – Digital Journal

Digital Journal

Otterbourg litigator Bill Moran says the time is now for the Biden administration to bring about a collaboration with Big Tech companies willingly or not to protect U.S. national commerce and defense.

Moran, who chairs Otterbourgs Crisis Management and Investigations Group, says Its time to Declare War on Cybercrime. He shares his thoughts with Digital Journal.

Moran has had a significant increase in clients and potential clients in the private sector seeking advice about getting ahead of the cybercrime tidal wave (a term coined in a 2013 futurist article).

Moran begins by the recent recovery of the Colonial Pipeline ransomware by U.S. authorities (as reported by Digital Journal), noting the Seizure by the Justice Department of the majority of the bitcoin ransom paid by Colonial Pipeline is obviously what the Biden administration meant by rapid tracing and interdiction of virtual currency proceeds. This includes plans for backing up data with segregated systems, separating online corporate business functions from the production side of the business, establishing quick response security and continuity plans, and educating the workforce on proper cyberhygiene.

The insurance sector remains jittery about the progress, Moran notes: While the recovery of most of the Colonial Pipeline ransom is a stunning achievement for the newly formed Ransomware and Digital Extortion Task Force, it will not likely impact the insurance industrys concerns. It appears that law enforcement was able to track the bitcoin to a digital wallet identified as connected to the ransom, which as described in the FBI agents affidavit supporting the seizure warrant was accomplished using a blockchain explorer searching the blockchain where [a]ll Bitcoin transactions are recorded, and which is visible online for everyone.

Furthermore, Moran clarifies, the transparency is missing: As also explained in the warrant affidavit, the wallet was opened and the bitcoin was able to be seized by use of a digital private key the task force obtained. It was not revealed in that affidavit how that private key was obtained.

So what happened?According to Moran: Given the nature of cryptocurrency it is unlikely it was obtained by brute force hacking by law enforcement. Most likely it was obtained by either a careless criminal through the FBIs year-long surveillance of DarkSide, the Russian-based hacking group associated with the intrusion, or from a cooperating confederate of the group. As such, while laudable, this success may be unique, and therefore unlikely to relieve the increased vetting of customers by cybercrime insurers or the increasing costs. Accordingly, the need for U.S. businesses to increase cybersecurity measures and crisis preparedness will not soon abate.

Yet there is more than needs to be done, as Moran. He explains that While the Biden administration now has cybercrime at the top of its priority list, as far as government action is concerned it is unclear what is being done. So far all we have seen is the recent executive order to federal agencies and contractors to up their game on cybersecurity and the well-publicized warning in an open letter last week from the deputy national security advisor to American business to increase security measures.

He adds that greater clarity is needed of what the U.S. government is planning. His point is: The only action item the government has clued us in on in its efforts to combat ransomware, which was in that open letter, is an effort to enable the trading and interdiction from ransom payments, so as to disrupt and deter. What that entails and what success has been achieved, however, is not yet known. As I have been stating for some time, until the Biden administration drafts U.S. Big Tech to join forces and aggressively turn the table on cybercriminals, it is very much every company for itself.

Excerpt from:

Urgent team-up between big tech and government is needed for cybersecurity - Digital Journal

The pandemic showed that Big Tech isnt a public health savior – The Verge

Two days after the World Health Organization declared that the coronavirus outbreak was a pandemic, then-President Donald Trump stood in the Rose Garden next to a flow chart. The chart promised that soon, it would be easy for anyone in the United States to get tested for the virus. According to Trump, Google was building a website to streamline the entire process.

It was the first of many promises that private companies would swoop in and rescue or bolster the countrys flailing COVID-19 response. Public health infrastructure in the United States has been underfunded for decades, and its underlying tech infrastructure is outdated and clunky. Health departments relied on fax machines and paper printouts to ferry data around. Fighting the pandemic would require a clear view of how many people were sick and where those sick people were, but the US was flying blind.

It seemed like Big Tech, with its analytic firepower and new focus on health, could help with these very real problems. We saw all over the papers: Facebook is gonna save the world, and Googles going to save the world, says Katerini Storeng, a medical anthropologist who studies public-private partnerships in global public health at the University of Oslo. Politicians were eager to welcome Silicon Valley to the table and to discuss the best ways to manage the pandemic. It was remarkable, and indicative of a blurring of the boundaries between the public domain and the private domain, Storeng says.

Over a year later, many of the promised tech innovations never materialized. There are areas where tech companies have made significant contributions like collecting mobility data that helped officials understand the effects of social distancing policies. But Google wasnt actually building a nationwide testing website. The program that eventually appeared, a testing program for California run by Googles sibling company Verily, was quietly phased out after it created more problems than it solved.

Now, after a year, were starting to get a clear picture of what worked, what didnt, and what the relationship between Big Tech and public health might look like in the future.

Tech companies were interested in health before the pandemic, and COVID-19 accelerated those initiatives. There may be things that tech companies are better equipped to handle than traditional public health agencies and other public institutions, and the past year showed some of those strengths. But it also showed their weaknesses and underscored the risks to putting health responsibilities in the hands of private companies which have goals outside of the public good.

Big tech companies can be extremely useful, says Andrew Schroeder, who runs analytics programs at the humanitarian aid organization Direct Relief. The question is, how do you make sure that designing with the public good in mind actually happens?

When the pandemic started, Storeng was already studying how private companies participated in public health preparedness efforts. Over the past two decades, consumers and health officials have become more and more confident that tech hacks can be shortcuts to healthy communities. These digital hacks can take many forms and include everything from a smartphone app nudging people toward exercise to a data model analyzing how an illness spreads, she says.

What they have in common, I think, is this hope and optimism that itll help bypass some more systemic, intrinsic problems, Storeng says.

But healthcare and public health present hard problems. Parachuting in with a new approach that isnt based on a detailed understanding of the existing system doesnt always work. I think we tend to believe in our culture that higher tech, private sector is necessarily better, says Melissa McPheeters, co-director of the Center for Improving the Publics Health through Informatics at Vanderbilt University. Sometimes thats true. And sometimes its not.

McPheeters spent three years as the director of the Office of Informatics and Analytics at the Tennessee Department of Health. While in that role, she got calls from technology companies all the time, promising quick fixes to any data issues the department was facing. But they were more interested in delivering a product than a collaboration, she says. It never began with, Help me understand your problem.

Before the pandemic, tech companies tended to assume that one data problem was the same as another, McPheeters says. Broadly speaking, they didnt appreciate how important it was to understand epidemiology and public health in order to work with the data in that field. During her tenure at the department of health, for example, she oversaw efforts to develop a data-driven response to the opioid epidemic in the state. Wed have folks come in and say, We can solve your opioid problem because weve solved bank fraud before, McPheeters says. While there may be similar data science involved, the social environment on the ground how people were behaving, and why is just as important as the data itself. In that respect, there arent many similarities between the two.

This isnt to say that there cant be data-driven solutions to public health problems. Tech companies can have important roles to play during infectious disease outbreaks, like offering data-crunching expertise or platforms to analyze information. But companies have to work as partners, not outside disruptors, McPheeters says. Thats hard to do on the fly during an emergency when there hasnt been a history of collaboration. One of the challenges of a situation like this pandemic is that if you havent built those relationships already, its very difficult for those relationships to suddenly flourish, she says.

Even without a history of robust collaboration, governments were eager to welcome tech companies to the table during the early phases of the pandemic response. When COVID-19 took hold in the United States, the countrys public health infrastructure had been crumbling for years. Underfunded and understaffed health agencies worked on outdated data systems and didnt have the resources to invest in new ones. Many test results were still sent on fax machines.

Faced with the typical levels of public health problems, the systems could keep themselves together. But under the strain of a devastating pandemic, the cracks split. There werent reliable ways to send information on cases, hospitalizations, and deaths between hospitals, labs, and health agencies. Health officials didnt have the resources to monitor the spread of disease.

Scrambling, officials took tech companies up on offers to take on some of the burden. They got handed the keys to the kingdom, says Jorge Caballero, an anesthesiologist at Stanford University and co-founder of the volunteer group Coders Against COVID.

Some of the first pandemic problems tech companies tried to tackle were COVID-19 testing projects. Google sibling company Verily piloted a testing system in California in March 2020, and eventually inked $55 million in testing contracts with the state. They started off with this big overture that they could offer a turn-key solution to the state of California, Caballero says, and to other states, as well. But by October 2020, two counties phased out the Verily testing program over concerns that it was asking for too much patient data and wasnt accessible to low-income groups that had the greatest need for testing. The states partnership with Verily ended in February.

Google also wanted to link people to testing sides nationwide, and testing sites started showing up in Google searches at the beginning of April 2020. The company pulled in location data from state governments and groups like Castlight Health, which had its own testing site directory, Hema Budaraju, director of product management at Google, tells The Verge.

That Google project was technically a success someone could search for a testing site and find one. But there was a problem with the approach, Caballero says. Any changes to testing site data would take a few days to update. But many COVID-19 testing sites, particularly those targeted at underserved communities, were temporary pop-ups. The lag meant those wouldnt show up in search. Caballero tried to flag that issue to Google in spring 2020 but says he wasnt impressed with its response: it took Google a long time to acknowledge the concern, and even then, he says it didnt seem to him like it fully understood the issue.

Budaraju tells The Verge that Google relied on its partners to provide accurate testing site information, and that it makes updates if those partners flag any missing locations.

Health experts are always concerned that a push toward high-tech solutions would widen inequities rather than alleviate them. If Google wasnt including pop-up testing sites or was updating them on a lag, people who live in areas without many medical resources which were targeted by those pop-up sites may have had a harder time finding them.

After someone tests positive for COVID-19, the next step for health officials is to identify the people who that person had been in contact with to encourage them to quarantine or get tested themselves. Tech companies thought they were positioned to help with that, too.

One of the flashiest attempts tech companies made to fight the pandemic was the Google and Apple exposure notification program. The companies teamed up on an app-based system that utilized Bluetooth to keep tabs on which smartphones spent time near each other. Then, if someone tested positive for COVID-19, they could alert strangers whose phones had been nearby.

In theory, this could help track down people who had been exposed to COVID-19 but wouldnt have been identified by traditional contact tracing, which relies on sick people remembering everyone theyd been in touch with while they were contagious. There was a naivete about it, Storeng says. Wouldnt it be awesome if I could just be notified when Im exposed to infection, and that can solve it all?

In the end, evidence on the system was mixed. In the United States, only a small percentage of people used apps built on the system likely not enough to make a difference in the trajectory of the pandemic. In the United Kingdom, where a quarter of the population signed up, researchers estimated it helped avert hundreds of thousands of COVID-19 cases.

All of the data, though, are estimates: because of the apps focus on privacy, officials around the world can only extrapolate from the number of people the app notified about a possible exposure. Theres no way to know if people who got those notifications actually isolated themselves or got tested for COVID-19. Without that data, officials cant evaluate how many infections the exposure notification programs prevented. It also meant that they werent able to learn who was notified about a possible exposure, let alone get in touch with them to offer support or resources. That information stayed in the app.

Its an example of a tech company building a digital system without incorporating the most important elements of the manual program its attempting to augment. McPheeters says that contract tracing cant be as effective if there isnt any connection to the people who were exposed. If you look at the history of contact tracing and you talk to experienced contact tracers, its actually about relationship building, she says. Its not about tracking.

There are success stories from the past year. One clear bright spot was mobility data. Companies like Facebook and Google tracked how peoples movement patterns changed in response to social distancing policies. Before the pandemic, there hadnt been anything like the sweeping stay-at-home policies introduced by governments around the world.

This was really chaotic. Nobody really knew what was going to happen, or if anyone would listen to these policymakers, Schroeder at Disaster Relief says.

Google started releasing COVID-19 Community Mobility Reports in April 2020, and Facebook pushed out similar information through its Data for Good program, which builds datasets in partnership with humanitarian organizations and academic research institutions. That helped researchers understand how peoples behavior changed under new policies. It went from flying blind, to not flying totally blind, Schroeder says.

Seattle area researchers used Facebooks data for one of the earliest looks at how movement patterns affected the spread of COVID-19. Other cities, like New York City, used the information to tailor their public health response. The data also informed academic research on COVID-19 over the past year.

Tech companies are the only resources for this data, Schroeder says. Theres no government anywhere thats producing this, no nonprofit producing it if you want that information, the only way to do that is through one or another private tech company.

Through Data for Good, Facebook also started running large-scale surveys in partnership with academic researchers. One project, the KAP COVID dashboards, was a collaboration with the John Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health and the Massachusetts Institute of Technology. The group surveyed people in 67 countries about their COVID-19 knowledge and pandemic behaviors. Facebook provided the platform, and the researchers designed the survey.

Its a phenomenal resource. Theres really nothing like it, says Douglas Storey, a professor at the Johns Hopkins Center for Communication Programs working on the project. The team has used its findings to run webinars with working groups in the countries it surveys and to share information about how people are modifying their behavior to prevent COVID-19 spread. The team has started to incorporate questions on vaccine acceptance, as well. Then, countries can use the information for their own pandemic response strategies, Storey says.

The Data for Good team was eager to work with the scientists, he says, and seemed to have a clear sense of the areas in which it didnt have expertise. They seemed genuinely committed to understanding how they can have a more positive impact.

These enormous, worldwide surveys could only really be done by big tech companies like Facebook. Facebook, every single day, is surveying hundreds of thousands of people all over the world, Schroeder says. Could any government run a survey, daily, globally, at that scale? The UN doesnt have the ability to do that, and theyre the only ones who would have the authority globally.

Notably, Facebook and Google werent doing their own interpretation of this data they supplied it to public health experts and left them to do the epidemiology. Thats an important part of the Data for Good approach, Laura McGorman, policy lead on the team, said in a statement to The Verge. Our partners provide the domain expertise required to make use of these tools to solve real-world problems whether its in public health, natural disaster response, or climate change. This work is extremely collaborative and plays to the unique strengths of everyone involved, she said.

Its different from, for example, the exposure notification program where Google and Apple built a self-contained product that collected and used data. In the recovery from the pandemic, as tech companies continue to push into healthcare and public health, theres an open question around which approach will win out.

What is the role Big Tech should play as a neutral data publisher, and what role should it have in terms of producing something where analysis has already been done? Schroeder asks.

Despite the mixed record on tech contributions during the COVID-19 pandemic, coalitions of companies are gearing up to keep pushing into healthcare. Its a hugely lucrative area that they were already interested in before the pandemic the healthcare market is a nearly $4 trillion industry in the US alone. Last summer, for example, the Consumer Technology Association (CTA) launched the Public Health Tech Initiative, a working group that includes CVS, Facebook, Microsoft, and other major players. It plans to analyze the things that did and didnt go well for tech companies during the pandemic and leverage that experience to prepare for the next health emergency.

To start, the group is focusing on health data and virtual care, says Ren Quashie, vice president of digital health at the CTA. Members are talking about projects like an early warning system for public health that aggregates data from wearables, or creating data sharing platforms for public health agencies.

We would envision sort of a new paradigm, more of a public-private partnership where public health agencies and government bodies are able to leverage the technological expertise of the private sector, Quashie says.

Some experts remain wary about the implications of integrating the private sector even more tightly with public health. Public health is supposed to be just that: public, and governed with the public good in mind. What is a public good coming from private companies? Schroeder asks. Could you have some kind of structure that draws on what theyre good at, but doesnt turn the authority over to them? I have no idea.

The goal of public health is to make a community healthier, not just individuals. Everyone shares in the success of reducing the spread of a disease like COVID-19, for example no one is excluded from the benefits of lower levels of disease, even if they dont personally contribute to reduction efforts. Turning a public health task over to a private company could turn the overall goal of a project away from the pursuit of a collective good and toward accomplishments that would benefit the company. It may also lead to collective good, but that might be secondary.

Companies that used their resources to fight COVID-19 got something out of it. Whether it was lucrative contracts, good PR, or even just helping their customer base stay healthy it benefits companies to participate when the worlds health is on the line. As the emergency of the pandemic recedes, companies motivations to venture into public health and healthcare may change and consumers and governments should pay attention to that changing landscape, experts say. Does it have anything to do with health improvement, or is it about something else? Is it a way for these companies to harvest data, or get entry into new markets, or just some corporate social responsibility scheme to enable other kinds of activities? the University of Oslos Storeng says.

The mobility data, for example, was a huge boon to researchers through the pandemic. At first, many companies were giving that information away for free. Now, its like, About that free price, Schroeder says. He isnt expecting Facebook to put up any paywalls. The profit or loss on the mobility data or the survey data is a rounding error for Facebook, he says. But its more of a concern for the smaller companies. Mobility data company SafeGraph, for example, offered its data for free to government agencies and nonprofits early in the pandemic but is now charging those users for data again.

But it shows the tension created by relying on a private company for a critical public health service: it could, at any time, decide that it no longer wants to provide it to researchers or it could decide that that valuable information comes with a price; private companies, after all, are first and foremost in the business of making money. Or, health officials have to make compromises on the terms and conditions around the data, as with the Apple and Google exposure notification program. These are companies that have been known to be monopolistic, and potentially antithetical to democracy and free speech, Storeng says. You have to ask skeptical questions about the legitimacy of their involvement.

The pandemic highlighted the underlying weakness of the US public health system, particularly around its data systems and tech infrastructure: theyre outdated, disjoined, and underfunded, which leaves the country vulnerable to infectious disease threats. The past year opened the door for the tech industry to tackle some of those problems. Regardless of concerns around the companies intentions, it will likely stay open and companies have made their interest in the space clear over the past few years. They may be able to make useful, lifesaving contributions, but the public good still has to be the priority.

What is really clear, and I think this was clear well prior to the pandemic, is that tech does not substitute for strong public institutions, Schroeder says. Public health investment needs to happen independently of what any tech company does.

Read the original:

The pandemic showed that Big Tech isnt a public health savior - The Verge

‘Technically Food’: how big tech puts new foods on our plates J. – The Jewish News of Northern California

Food coverageis supported by a generous donation from Susan and Moses Libitzky.

Once you know Larissa Zimberoffs backstory, its easy to understand how her book topic chose her instead of the other way around.

Zimberoff, 49, is the author of Technically Food: Inside Silicon Valleys Mission to Change What We Eat (Abrams) that came out this month. Its her first book.

It is a fascinating, if not quite mouthwatering, exploration of how technology companies and its an important distinction that none are food companies in the traditional sense are putting millions of dollars into highly manipulated ingredients, transforming the very definition of what we consider food.

For Zimberoff, reading food labels has been a lifelong habit, as she explains in the books introduction. She was 12 years old when she was diagnosed with Type 1 diabetes. Therefore, she is much more than a casual reader of these labels, as she has spent a lifetime thinking about the macronutrients in food the amount of protein vs. carbohydrates vs. fat vs. fiber shes consuming in any one serving, and how they all interact with each other.

One of her superpowers, she said, is that she sees food from the inside out. Its something unusual and what I have to offer people.

Zimberoff, a Marin County resident who is seen as an expert in her specialized field, says food startups have much more in common with tech startups than with the food companies of yore.

They have to start out with technology thats proprietary, which is how they get funding, she said in an interview. Its only later that they learn how to make their product delicious or sell it.

The book takes the reader behind the scenes of some well-known companies, such as Impossible Burger and Beyond Meat, and introduces some lesser-known technologies making food products out of algae, pea protein and fungi, and emergent technologies such as cultured meat, indoor vertical farming, and upcycling, which takes the waste from one kind of food production and uses it to make something else.

They have to start out with technology. Its only later that they learn how to make their product delicious

A great local example she gives is Berkeley-based Regrained, which uses spent grain from brewing beer to make flour, energy bars and other items (we wrote about the company and its founders, Dan Kurzrock and Jordan Schwartz, two Peninsula natives, in 2016).

Zimberoff is a fun guide, taking us into the labs, factories and board rooms where these products are made and planned, and conferences like the Alternative Protein Summit. She says that shes willing to taste anything in the name of research. This includes bacon made from seaweed protein, cultured meat from cells grown in a lab, and tea made from avocado pits.

She compares the new burger substitutes to fast food, in that eating them once or twice a month is fine, but every day is not. She points out that Beyond and Impossible are made up of many ingredients that are put through so many steps before it comes to you, she said. Of course, wine, cheese and bread are all processed, too, but you have to look at the level of processing and how many countries have touched your ingredients.

As conscious consumers try to balance their taste for meat and dairy with their concerns about climate change and their health, as well as the welfare of factory workers and animals in factory farms, more of them are eating lower on the food chain and going to alternative proteins. But in doing so, they are also asking the types of questions Zimberoff gets all the time: Should I eat this? Is it bad for me? and Whats in it?

She spent over a decade working for tech companies before she became a food writer. After one too many unanticipated layoffs, she decided to pursue a career in writing. While working toward her MFA, she lived in New Yorks Lower East Side where she says she got in touch with her Jewish food roots and food kept finding its way into her stories. Her byline regularly appears in publications such as Bloomberg, Businessweek and Business Insider.

Zimberoff grew up in the San Fernando Valley, where her mother worked in the wine industry and her father liked to cook; Chinese food was his specialty. To this day, she said, her familys Passover meal rivals Thanksgivings. She remembers her grandmother using horseradish from her garden for the holiday, and Zimberoff always insists on making the haroset, using the same wooden bowl.

Zimberoff is making appearances on a number of podcasts and other outlets right now; check her website (larissazimberoff.com) for details.

Originally posted here:

'Technically Food': how big tech puts new foods on our plates J. - The Jewish News of Northern California

Facebook Data Trove Probed as Europe Turns Screw on Big Tech – Bloomberg

Facebook Inc. is facing its first in-depth probe by European regulators, the latest in a series of efforts to crack down on big tech market dominance across the continent.

The European Commission said it will investigate whether Facebook misuses a trove of data gathered from advertisers to compete against them in classified ads. It will also check if the company unfairly ties its Marketplace small ad service to the social network.

At the same time, the U.K said it was opening probes into Facebooks Marketplace and Dating services hours after Germanys antitrust watchdog announced a case targeting the Google News Showcase product.

The cases open up yet another front for the worlds biggest tech firms to fight on, as regulators investigate their market power during a pandemic when online commerce and advertising has become far more important to people working from home. Germany is already investigating Facebook and Amazon.com Inc. while France is examining advertising practices by Google and Apple Inc.

Opening a formal probe means regulators can start building firm evidence of antitrust violations, a process that can lead to a charge sheet, or statement of objections, and may eventually culminate in hefty fines or an order to change the way a business operates.

Shares of Facebook were up less than 1% to $328.1 at 9:47 a.m. in New York on Friday. The stock has gained about 20.2% this year.

Fridays move by the EU is the first time its escalated a case into Facebooks behavior beyond the preliminary stages. It follows other high-profile cases targeting Google, Apple Inc. and Amazon.com Inc. The EU previously fined Facebook for failing to provide correct information in the merger review of the WhatsApp takeover.

Facebook collects vast troves of data on the activities of users of its social network and beyond, said Margrethe Vestager, the EUs competition chief. EU regulators will look in detail at whether this data gives Facebook an undue competitive advantage in particular on the online classified ads sector, where people buy and sell goods every day, she said.

Google Targeted as German Attack on Silicon Valley Gathers Pace

Online commerce has played an increasingly important part of Facebooks business during the pandemic as more people are buying goods online.

Commerce ads continue to do very well and drive a meaningful amount of our overall business, Facebook Chief Executive Officer Mark Zuckerberg said on an earnings call in April. He said more than 1 billion people now visit Facebook Marketplace each month.

Facebook will continue to cooperate fully with the investigations to demonstrate that they are without merit, the company said in an emailed statement. We are always developing new and better services to meet evolving demand from people who use Facebook.

The U.K.s antitrust regulator also opened its own probe into Facebook data, looking at both Marketplace and the dating service the company launched in Europe last year.

The Competition and Markets Authority said it planned to investigate whether Facebook abused its dominant position by collecting data from services including its single sign-on option.

The increasingly tech-focused CMA is running an independent investigation, but said it will cooperate with the EU probe. The CMA said its initial investigation including information gathering will run until Feb.

Germanys Federal Cartel Office said Friday that its looking at the Google News Showcase to check if its terms offer unreasonable conditions to publishers. The move is latest in a series of assaults on Big Tech by Germanys antitrust chief Andreas Mundt.

The EU investigation mirrors an earlier probe into Amazon by looking at how a so-called digital platform may use data it gathers from companies that use its service to compete against them. The EU commission has been investigating Facebook since 2019. Facebook sought to curb the probe with lawsuits last year to limit what information officials could scoop up.

Facebook Antitrust Data-Hunt Gets Ground Rules From EU Court

With assistance by Jonathan Browning, Natalia Drozdiak, Karin Matussek, and Nate Lanxon

(Updates with share price in the fifth paragraph)

Before it's here, it's on the Bloomberg Terminal.

Read more:

Facebook Data Trove Probed as Europe Turns Screw on Big Tech - Bloomberg

Biden, Europeans Close to Pact on Taxing Multinationals, Including Big Tech – Foreign Policy

June 4, 2021, 1:06 PM

On the eve of his first overseas trip as U.S. president, Joe Biden is pushing for a dramatic revamping of international corporate tax policies that could resolve a stalemate between the United States and Europe over taxing Americas Big Tech sector and make it much harder for all major multinational corporations to exploit tax havens.

Meeting in London on Friday, the G-7 finance ministers are expected to endorse a proposal by Biden and U.S. Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen for a minimum global corporate tax of at least 15 percent, part of a measure that major governments hope will yield corporate taxes that are not getting paid worldwide. The Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD), which is responsible for writing tax guidelines in the worlds wealthiest nations, is leading the discussions. This week, the new OECD secretary-general, Mathias Cormann, called Bidens plan a game-changer and said he was quietly optimistic about reaching an international deal on taxing multinational companies.

Biden is also asking the G-7 and G-20 nations to approve an additional proposal requiring the worlds largest and most profitable companies to pay taxes in any country they sell goods or services to. The new approach would upend century-old policies that now make it legally necessary for corporations to be physically present in countries where they are taxed.

Though the proposal would also apply to other multinationals from many other countries, it is partly an attempt to resolve a decades-long dispute among the United States, the European Union, and other countries worldwide over how to deal with major tech companies, most of them headquartered in the United States.

Both the Obama and Trump administrations refused to consider a digital tax specifically targeted at companies such as Google, Facebook, Amazon, and Apple. And until now, countries havent been able to tax the profits of goods and services sold under their jurisdictions if the corporation is not headquartered there. Under the Biden administration, the United States has gone from being the No. 1 holdout on corporate tax reform to the champion for such a transformationincluding new taxes on Silicon Valleys tech titans.

Its far from a done deal, with Ireland and other tax havens resisting the Biden proposal, but U.S. officials say they fully expect an endorsement from the G-7 as well as major G-20 nations such as Japan, India, Argentina, and South Africa. On Wednesday, the Biden administration imposed, and then immediately suspended, 25 percent retaliatory tariffs on six countriesAustria, Britain, India, Italy, Spain, and Turkeythat have imposed a tax on digital services that Washington says discriminates against U.S. companies. The move was interpreted as a warning to go along with the Biden proposal.

Its a negotiating ploy, said Michael Greenberger, an expert in international finance at the University of Maryland. Essentially, what theyre telling these countries is this is not a free vote for you. Theres a significant threat of pain, and were going to give you six months to think about this.

If approved by the G-7 ministers, Biden is expected to sign off on the deal at his summit next week in Cornwall, England. If an agreement is then reached by the G-20 finance ministers at their meeting in Julyand finally by leaders at the G-20 summit in Octoberthe changes could amount to a virtual revolution in international corporate tax policies.

And at a time when multilateral trade negotiations are stalled, the forthcoming pact could also open the door to new trade deals, some experts say.

This agreement could be the starting point for the reemergence of multilateralism in international trade, said Eduardo Baistrocchi, a professor of tax law at the London School of Economics. The next stage might be a new wave of free trade agreements.

A senior Biden administration official told Foreign Policy that the two pillars of the negotiations amount to a trade-off. The administration will demand agreement on one pillara minimum global corporate tax of 15 percentin exchange for the ability to tax U.S. digital giants and other multinationals that often find tax havens where they are charged only a few percentage points.

Weve never had as much momentum as weve had now, the official said. Such changes would also have to be approved by Congress, but administration officials believe some Republicans might be on board, and the filibuster rule that has blocked so much legislation could well be eliminated by the time the proposal comes up for a vote, perhaps next year.

For Biden, the new corporate tax plan is integral to his broader aim of reorienting the U.S. and global economy away from exploitation by major corporations and back to labor. Bidens Made in America tax plan seeks to eliminate incentives for offshore investment and reverse a trend under which, even though U.S. corporations are the most profitable in the world, the United States collects less in corporate tax revenues as a share of GDP than almost any advanced economy in the OECD.

Yet the problem of missing corporate tax revenue affects all advanced economies. For more than a decade since the Great Recession, revenue-strapped major countries have sought to find ways to collect tax revenue for multinationals that have headquartered themselves in tax havens such as Ireland, Switzerland, Luxembourg, and Caribbean locales like the Cayman Islands. The so-called race to the bottom among countries has driven down corporate tax rates substantially over the last two decades. The average statutory corporate rate among OECD countries was 32.2 percent in 2000; by 2020, this had fallen to 23.2 percent, according to the OECD.

Our goal is to end the global race to the bottom in terms of corporate taxation, said the administration official. Every country is made worse off by tax competition, especially workers. When people say they feel the system is rigged, and when you consider why we have such extreme inequality, tax is a big part of the story. The official pointed out that corporate revenue as a share of U.S. GDP fell from an average of 2 percent in 2000 to 1 percent in 2018 and 2019. Thats one-third of the average of the OECD, the official said. And we have to fix it.

Even before Biden assumed the presidency, the web had been slowly closing on tax evasion by individuals. In recent years, the OECD, working with more than 100 countries worldwide, adopted new international standards on the automatic exchange of information for tax purposes that have curtailed the use of tax havens and resulted in more than $100 billion in additional tax revenues to OECD countries, according to the organizations data.

And in 2019, the OECD proposed a new formulation for the way taxing rights are allocated across jurisdictions to address the tax challenges arising from the digitalization of the economy. Its proposal would empower states to treat some multinationals as single, consolidated entities and tax them on a share of their worldwide profits based on where real economic activity occurs. The profits targeted are known as residual or excessive profits of higher than 10 to 20 percent margins. Bidens proposal builds on these ideas.

If enacted, Baistrocchi said Bidens plan would amount to the first systemic attempt to redistribute profits and revenues from tax havens and multinational corporations since the 1930s.

Link:

Biden, Europeans Close to Pact on Taxing Multinationals, Including Big Tech - Foreign Policy