Global Litecoin Transaction Market Positive Demand and Development Approaches through 2021-2027 Otterbein 360 – Otterbein 360

Posted on by

MarketQuest.biz led the statistical surveying on Global Litecoin Transaction Market considering a very long time from 2021- 2027. The exploration philosophies followed are essence and intend to give a more profound picture of the continuous just as approaching changes that the Litecoin Transaction market is and will be exposed to in the previously mentioned conjecture time frame.

The report tries to consider its clients requests who are meaning to make inferences for the Litecoin Transaction market. Thusly, it is a completely painted portrayal of these above- referenced key portions in country-wise examination also.

DOWNLOAD FREE SAMPLE REPORT: https://www.marketquest.biz/sample-request/79225

It further feels free to take into regard both subjective, quantitative parts of the Litecoin Transaction market. The subjective area incorporates data about market main impetuses, possibilities, and client requests and necessities, which assists organizations with growing new systems to contend over the long haul. The quantitative part of the report, on the other hand, contains the most dependable industry information screened completely by experts to infer deductions by its inspectors. Some exceptionally summed up wellsprings of data are taken into utilization. Articles, (yearly) reports, data sets, both of government & NGOs, data accumulated from industry-specialists, advisors, etc structure the reports substance. The numbers that have been taken are based on common research assumptions varying from region to region.

The report has been expanded into four significant regions relying upon the item under study:

Central parts of the market

Binance, Upbit, OKEx, Bithumb, Huobi, Bitfinex, BitMEX, Coinw, Kex, Bittrex, Bitstamp, BTCC

Nations covered

North America (United States, Canada and Mexico), Europe (Germany, France, United Kingdom, Russia, Italy, and Rest of Europe), Asia-Pacific (China, Japan, Korea, India, Southeast Asia, and Australia), South America (Brazil, Argentina, Colombia, and Rest of South America), Middle East & Africa (Saudi Arabia, UAE, Egypt, South Africa, and Rest of Middle East & Africa)

Type

Pay To Public Key Hash, Pay To Public Key, Pay To Script Hash

ACCESS FULL REPORT: https://www.marketquest.biz/report/79225/global-litecoin-transaction-market-2021-by-company-regions-type-and-application-forecast-to-2026

Application

E-Commerce, Investment

Customization of the Report:

This report can be customized to meet the clients requirements. Please connect with our sales team (sales@marketquest.biz), who will ensure that you get a report that suits your needs. You can also get in touch with our executives on +1-201-465-4211 to share your research requirements.

Contact UsMark StoneHead of Business DevelopmentPhone: +1-201-465-4211Email: sales@marketquest.biz

View original post here:

Global Litecoin Transaction Market Positive Demand and Development Approaches through 2021-2027 Otterbein 360 - Otterbein 360

This Satellite Stock Has A Better One-Year Return Than Bitcoin Cash, Litecoin And Ripple’s XRP – Benzinga – Benzinga

Posted on by

Globalstar, Inc.s (NASDAQ:GSAT) satellite technologies have been getting a lot of attention in 2021, and investors who bought stock one year ago are seeing green.

Since October 2020, Globalstar stocks one-year return has outperformed a number of the worlds most popular cryptocurrencies: Bitcoin Cash (CRYPTO: BCH), Litecoin (CRYPTO: LTC) and XRP (CRYPTO: XRP).

Globalstar is a telecommunications company that derives revenue from the provision of mobile satellite services, whichare typically used by customers where existing terrestrial wireline and wireless communications networks are impaired or do not exist.

Globalstar provides communications services such as two-way and one-way voice and data transmission. Globalstar is also an owner of satellite assets and generates the vast majority of its revenue within the U.S.

Ahead of Apple's iPhone 13 launch in mid-September, Globalstar shares gathered some momentum after analyst Ming-Chi Kuo of TF International Securities said in a report Read More

Here's how the returns break down from October 2020 to the present:

Image by Wikilmages

Follow this link:

This Satellite Stock Has A Better One-Year Return Than Bitcoin Cash, Litecoin And Ripple's XRP - Benzinga - Benzinga

Litecoin price prediction 2021: Can the crypto reach $500?… – The Sun

Posted on by

CRYPTOCURRENCIES including Litecoin have garnered attention from investors in 2021 - but they come with plenty of risks.

Youve probably heard ofBitcoin, but maybe not its so-called little brotherLitecoin. We explain what you need to know.

1

Whether you decide to invest in either Bitcoin or its little brother, both come with a number of risks because they are cryptocurrencies.

When it comes to buying crypto in particular - youll want to be cautious in the extremely volatile space. If you arent - you could lose a lot of money quickly.

Just ask investors who were unfortunate to buy at Litecoin's all-time high of $412.96 in May.

Although Litcoin has seen some gains in the past couple of week, investors still find their value in the cryptocurrency down by more than half since May's peak.

Also, be aware of fees and charges. These can cost more when compared with regulated investment products.

Plus, there's scant regulation for crypto firms, so you'll likely be without protection if things go wrong.

While Litecoin seems like an enticing bet, make sure that you dont invest in anything that you dont understand.

As the name indicates, thecryptocurrencyis small.

But Litecoin, which was established in 2011 by Google engineer Charlie Lee, operates similarly to Bitcoin.

Mr Lee on occasions refers to Litecoin as the silver to Bitcoin's gold.

The two cryptocurrencies act similarly in how their global payment operations are set up. Both are not controlled by financial institutions.

Like most cryptocurrencies, Litecoin uses blockchain technology for processing and recording transactions.

While Litecoin is smaller, it is a quicker and cheaper alternative when compared to Bitcoin.

Currently, Bitcoin commands a market capitalization that exceeds $1trillion, while Litecoins valuation lies just below $12billion.

As stated before, Litecoin exploded to $412.96 in early - the closest it has ever gotten to the $500 mark.

Now, however, Litecoin trades at $174.90. In the past 24 hours, Litcoin has risen 3%.

While China has banned all cryptocurrency transactions, big brother Bitcoin has gained on recent favorable news coming from the U.S.

This can be attributed to Gary Gensler, chair of the US Securities and Exchange Commission, repeating his support for Bitcoinexchange-traded funds(ETFs).

Odds are this helped give Litecoin a boost as well.

Now the question is will it return to its enormous gains any time soon? And will it reach $500?

A bullish forecast comes fromPrimeXBT, which made a bold prediction in September for 2021: "If support can hold, after some sideways price action Litecoin could explode to around $7,000 per coin, based on the measure rule," it said.

But others arent as sanguine on the cryptocurrency surpassing the $500 mark by the end of 2021.

In 12 months' time, the price of Litecoin could exceed $255, according toWallet Investor.

But near the end of 2026, Wallet Investor sees Litecoin exceeding $557.

Then there are more bearish cases from others such asLongForecast, which projects the price of Litecoin to range from just $161 to $206 at the end of 2024.

We also reveal price predictions for 2021 for other major cryptocurrencies including Ethereum, Dogecoin and Cardano, Shiba Inu,dYdX, andEOS.

Plus, check out four things you need to know about Dogecoin.

We pay for your stories!

Do you have a story for The US Sun team?

View post:

Litecoin price prediction 2021: Can the crypto reach $500?... - The Sun

Intel Alder Lake-P Core i9-12900H with 14 cores and 20 threads appears on Ashes of the Singularity database – Notebookcheck.net

Posted on by

Reviews, News, CPU, GPU, Articles, Columns, Other

3D Printing, 5G, Accessory, AI, Alder Lake, AMD, Android, Apple, ARM, Audio, Business, Camera, Cannon Lake, Cezanne (Zen 3), Charts, Chinese Tech, Chromebook, Coffee Lake, Comet Lake, Console, Convertible / 2-in-1, Cryptocurrency, Cyberlaw, Deal, Desktop, E-Mobility, Exclusive, Fail, Foldable, Gadget, Galaxy Note, Galaxy S, Gamecheck, Gaming, Geforce, Google Pixel, GPU, How To, Human 2.0, Ice Lake, Intel Evo / Project Athena, Internet of Things (IoT), iOS, iPad Pro, iPhone, Jasper Lake, Lakefield, Laptop, Launch, Linux / Unix, Lucienne (Zen 2), MacBook, Mini PC, Monitor, MSI, OnePlus, Opinion, Phablet, Radeon, Renoir, Review Snippet, Rocket Lake, Rumor, Ryzen (Zen), Science, Security, Single-Board Computer (SBC), Smart Home, Smartphone, Smartwatch, Software, Storage, Tablet, ThinkPad, Thunderbolt, Tiger Lake, Touchscreen, Ultrabook, Virtual Reality (VR) / Augmented Reality (AR), Wearable, Windows, Workstation, XPS, Zen 3 (Vermeer)

Ticker

See the rest here:

Intel Alder Lake-P Core i9-12900H with 14 cores and 20 threads appears on Ashes of the Singularity database - Notebookcheck.net

Core i5-12600K Shows Strong Lead Over Ryzen 5 5600X In Ashes of the Singularity – Tom’s Hardware

Posted on by

A user going by the call sign "foxed.in" has started to test Intel's Core i5-12600K "Alder Laker" processor with the Ashes of the Singularity benchmark, Benchleaks discovered. It's the same user who previously shared results for the Core i9-12900K with the same benchmark.

Thus far, the rumors for the Core i5-12600K point to a 10-core configuration with six Golden Cove cores and four Gracemont cores. Only the former features Hyper-Threading, bringing up an unorthodox setup with 10 cores and 16 threads. There's reportedly 20MB of L3 cache on the Core i5-12600K. The clock speeds are also a mess since there are two different cores in an Alder Lake chip. The Core i5-12600K is rumored to feature a 4.9 GHz dual-core core boost on the Golden Cove cores. The all-core boost is allegedly fixed at 4.6 GHz. The Gracemont cores, on the other hand, may check in with a 3.6 GHz dual-core boost and a 3.4 GHz all-core boost.

At the time of the article, foxed.in had performed 13 Ashes of the Singularity runs on the Core i5-12600K, however, only one of them completed successfully. Judging by the huge variations between the results, it's safe to assume that the benchmark isn't optimized for Alder Lake's hybrid design yet and fails to utilize the correct cores. This falls in line with previous speculation that Alder Lake gels with Windows 11, and that games need to be optimized for the hybrid chips.

On the Crazy 1080p preset, the results range from 39 framers per second to 110 fps whereas the chip was scoring between 37 fps and 40 fps on the Medium 1080p preset. It's improbable that the Core i5-12600K would put up the similar scores at different graphics presets. The low scores are probably work of benchmark tapping into the Gracemont cores instead of the Golden Cove cores. Therefore, the 110 fps submission (assuming it wasn't on exotic cooling) may be the only valid result where the software utilized the Golden Cove cores properly.

Unfortunately, foxed.in didn't run the Crazy 1080p preset on the Core i9-12900K so we couldn't compare the Core i5-12600K to the flagship SKU. As a result, we had to scour the Ashes of the Singularity database to find proper entries for comparison. Since the benchmark is light on details on the hardware used, we can't guarantee that the GeForce RTX 3080 in those submissions is the same as the one that foxed.in used. Furthermore, the software versions are different, which can also affect the scores. We suggest you look at the results with an open mind and a grain of salt.

The Core i5-12600K scored 10,800 points on the Crazy 1080p preset. The only Core i5-11600K entry with a GeForce RTX 3080 put up a score of 9,800 points. Alder Lake appears to usher in a 10.2% performance uplift. There weren't any entries for the Core i9-11900K (Rocket Lake) so we had to go as far back as the Core i9-10900K (Comet Lake). The Core i9-10900K had a score of 11,200 points, meaning it's only 3.7% faster than the Core i5-12600K.

Technically, the Ryzen 5 5600X (Vermeer) is the direct rival to the Core i5-12600K, although the latter does come with four small cores. We're unsure how they fit into the picture until we get a review sample in the lab, though. Neither the Ryzen 9 5900X or Ryzen 7 5800X showed up in the database. There were many Ryzen 9 5950X submissions, but none matched our criteria.

For comparison, the Ryzen 5 5600X scored 8,100 points on the Crazy 1080 preset so the Core i5-12600K delivered up to 33.3% higher performance than the Zen 3 chip. The margin is similar to that of the Core i9-12900K's dominance over the Ryzen 9 5950X in the same benchmark, albeit with a different graphics preset. Is it a fluke, or does Alder Lake really poses to be a thread to Zen 3? Luckily, we won't have to wait long to find out if the rumors of a November announcement is accurate.

Link:

Core i5-12600K Shows Strong Lead Over Ryzen 5 5600X In Ashes of the Singularity - Tom's Hardware

Swedish-American Life Science Summit, SALSS 2021, takes place in Stockholm, Sweden, on October 20 to 22 – an exciting return to a physical summit with…

Posted on by

Published: Oct. 19, 2021 at 3:58 PM CDT|Updated: 9 hours ago

STOCKHOLM, Oct. 19, 2021 /PRNewswire/ --With the mission to stimulate new business ideas and investment opportunities, the Swedish American Life Science Summit, SALSS, combines the worlds of business and science in Stockholm, Sweden.

"Over the years SALSS has evolved to a widely recognized Summit, gathering a diverse community with representatives challenging the boundaries of technology and business. It has made Stockholm into a deal making hub for Life Science,which makes us very proud,"says Barbro C. Ehnbom, Founder and Chairman of SALSS.

The focus of SALSS this year is Cell & Gene Therapy and lessons learned from Covid-19 with a wide range of panel discussions and presentations. It will also include Company Presentations, a Rising Star exhibit and announcement of the winner of the SALSS Rising Star Award 2021. Gathering an impressive presence of Investors, Private Equity, Academia and Life Science companies this year's program features among other Dr. Lars Ekman Executive Partner, Sofinnova Investments, Dr. Mathias Uhln Professor KTH, Dr. William A. Haseltine, President, Access International, Dr. Robert Langer, Koch Institute Professor, MIT and Co-founder Moderna, Dr. Daniel Kraft Chair, Medicine, Singularity University, Mr. Richard Bergstrm, Vaccine Coordinator, GovernmentOffices of Sweden and Dr. Anders Tegnell, State Epidemiologist of Sweden.

After a formal opening of the Summit in the Stockholm City Hall by the Mayor, Anna Knig Jerlmyr and Staffan Ingvarsson, CEO Stockholm Business Region, the conference will be held as a physical meeting with virtual elements in Stockholm. The full SALSS 2021 Program, Speakers and Company bios can be found at http://www.salss.com

Presenting companiesthis year include Anocca, BICO, BioArctic, Devyser, Orexo, RohVac, Symcel, Ultimovacs and Vironova.

Rising Star Award Some of the best new life science companies will be rated by world famous jury members for the Rising Star Award! The candidates are Amniotics, Atrogi, EpiEndo Pharmecuticals, Ilya Pharma, Iaterion, Mobius Biomedical, SAGA Diagnostics, Sigrid Therapeutics and Vironova Bioanalytics. Regardless of who wins, they all deserve attention!

Jury Members:Dr. Mikael Dolsten, Dr. Robert Langer, Dr. Eugen Steiner and Dr. Mathias Uhln.

"This year the ongoing Pandemic and its imprints on the industry and human lives will be explored. There is an incredible amount of scientific research going into new diagnostics, therapeutics, vaccines, and medical devices that have been crucial to combating this pandemic. This, put in the frame of SALSS - enhancing interaction between academia, industry, politics and financing - will hopefully lead to new ideas and collaborations,as it has many times in the past."Says Professor Robert Langer, David H. Koch Institute, MIT and Co-founder Moderna.

For more information on SALSS, visit http://www.salss.comor please contact:

Linda kesson, Communications, SALSS, +46 (0)70 916 94 16, linda.v.akesson@gmail.com

Barbro Ehnbom, Founder & Chairman, SALSS,+46 (0) 705 93 83 35 barbro@salss.com

View original content:

SOURCE Swedish-American Life Science Summit

The above press release was provided courtesy of PRNewswire. The views, opinions and statements in the press release are not endorsed by Gray Media Group nor do they necessarily state or reflect those of Gray Media Group, Inc.

See the article here:

Swedish-American Life Science Summit, SALSS 2021, takes place in Stockholm, Sweden, on October 20 to 22 - an exciting return to a physical summit with...

Call of the Wild: Exploring the Beauty of South Georgia Island – AFAR Media

Posted on by

Each year, millions of birds return to breeding colonies on a remote island roughly 1,300 miles from the southernmost tip of Argentina. King penguins, gray-headed albatrosses, speckled teals, and endemic South Georgia pipitsthe Antarctics only songbirdsare among the 30 species that call South Georgia Island home. The birds arent alone: Elephant seals battle for both turf and mates, and humpback, fin, and blue whales migrate through the waters. Though whaling and sealing ships docked here until the 1960s, today the few humans to explore the islands glaciers, bluffs, and snowfields are scientists and other visitors.

The islands singularity is what first attracted photographer Peter Fisher several autumns ago. Based in New York City, Fisher wanted to experience the exact opposite of his homeand South Georgia fit the bill. To get there, Fisher flew to Buenos Aires and then on to Ushuaia, Argentina, where he boarded a Lindblad Expeditions ship that took him to South Georgia. Moored offshore, the ship was home base for Fisher, who spent six days traveling to and from the island via Zodiac boat, passing his time hiking, exploring, and taking photos with a medium-format 55 mm camera that required manual focusing, which forced him to take his time with each shot. He was constantly aware of his surroundings.

Theres always an element of danger on South Georgia Island. Its part of the appeal, Fisher says. Its not Disneyland. There are no set trails or paths. The animals dont keep their distance. Youll get scrapes and bruises. The occasional snow squall will descend and youll wonder if the four layers of clothing youre wearing are enough, but you dont complain, because you are lucky enough to witness one of the most beautiful and pristine places on Earth.

To capture these photographs, Fisher spent a lot of time just staying still. He sat in a valley surrounded by tens of thousands of penguins, who waddled up to poke and peck him with their beaks out of curiosity. And he observed elephant seal pups, who nudged and napped near him on the beach. In other instanceswhen male elephant seals began jousting for territoryFisher moved a little faster: When they rear up and start charging each other, its like two walls of blubber closing in, he says. When that started to happen, I booked it out of there really quick.

At the end of his trip, Fisher says he was left in awe of South Georgia and the verve of its residents. When I was sitting there taking these photos, looking in these animals eyes, I felt I was having a deep connection with the planet. Every now and then I had to put down the camera and just take it all in.

>>Next: In the Faroe Islands, a Photographer Meets Locals Embracing Their Roots

Go here to see the original:

Call of the Wild: Exploring the Beauty of South Georgia Island - AFAR Media

NLC Division 1 teams confirmed for 2022: MNM Gaming qualify for Division 1 as Resolve reach Division 2 – Esports News UK

Posted on by

The ten teams for the Northern League of Legends Championship (NLC), the European Regional League (ERL) for the UK, Ireland and Nordics, have been locked in.

Nordic sides NYYRIKKI, Bifrost and Vanir, UK/Danish esports org Absolved and UK org MNM Gaming have progressed through the NLC Division 1 qualifier to reach the Spring 2022 NLC.

They will join 00 Nation (formerly known as Nordavind), BT Excel (the academy side of Excel Esports), Riddle, Singularity and Astralis Talent, who have already qualified for the NLC next year.

This means the UK sides in the NLC Division 1 next Spring will be MNM Gaming and BT Excel.

Originally the top six teams from NLC Summer 2021 were due to qualify automatically for Spring 2022, however Fnatic Rising recently announced they will be playing in the Spanish Superliganext year, while Astralis Talent acquired Tricked Esports League of Legends NLC spot. This means five teams made it through automatically and five came from the qualifier.

MNM Gaming beat X7 Esports, the Isle of Mans first professional esports organisation who recently acquired UK organisation Bulldog Esports, in the qualifier playoffs to reach Division 1.

MNM Gaming co-founder Kalvin KalKal Chung told Esports News UK: I am delighted to see all the hard work from the MNM players and staff pay off, and its a pleasure to be one of the only two representatives for the UK in NLC Spring 2022.

Thanks to everyone who voted us low on tier lists, it helped motivate us.

ForTheFlame.

X7 have made it through to Division 2.

And Resolve, who acquired Barrage earlier this year and got to the NLC through Barrages spot in the league, have also qualified for Division 2 after beating Dusty.

Nine other teams from the NLC Division 1 qualifier will now play in the division 2 qualifier. These are: Dusty, Belfast Storm, London Esports, Team DeftFox, LDN UTD, Viperio, Lanomania, Munster Rugby Gaming and AaB Esport.

The division 2 qualifier is set to take place at the end of October.

Earlier this year, Freaks 4U Gaming was announced NLC tournament organiser, taking over duties from DreamHack.

Theres more info on the Division 1 qualifier results on Liquipedia.net and more info on the Division 2 and 3 brackets/scheduling on the NLC website here.

Dom is an award-winning writer who graduated from Bournemouth University with a 2:1 degree in Multi-Media Journalism in 2007.

As a long-time gamer having first picked up the NES controller in the late 80s, he has written for a range of publications including GamesTM, Nintendo Official Magazine, industry publication MCV as well as Riot Games and others. He worked as head of content for the British Esports Association up until February 2021, when he stepped back to work full-time on Esports News UK and as an esports consultant helping brands and businesses better understand the industry.

More:

NLC Division 1 teams confirmed for 2022: MNM Gaming qualify for Division 1 as Resolve reach Division 2 - Esports News UK

New theory claims Einstein was wrong and the Big Bang is not the beginning of the universe – Sprout Wired

Posted on by

A group of scientists is questioning Albert Einsteins theory of general relativity, and challenging the idea that the universe is constantly expanding and that this would mean the beginning of everything, or the Big Bang.

Currently, the idea of the Big Bang is accepted by the scientific community, but another theory seeks to replace it with a new understanding of space, time, and the beginning of the universe. Or rather, lack of beginnings.

Technique06 April

Technique05 December

Many consider the theory of Imperfect general relativity, and although it is effective in explaining the universe on a large scale, the idea put forward by Einstein is inconsistent with quantum mechanics and black holes.

In other words, Einsteins work cannot explain how microscopic point called singularity, theoretically smaller than any known particle, manages such an extreme gravitational field.

This brings us to the Big Bang, as its most classic theory that the universe originated from a singularity. Therefore, some physicists made some theories such as strings and Causal sets, this one is more recent.

It is noteworthy that both theories, Strings when Causal sets have only hypotheses, because it is not possible to test and observe their predictions through the scientific method.

chance set theory

A slightly older theory proposes that space and time have a fundamental unit, or quantum. According to this view, space-time is made up of its packages, as if it were quantized energy packages.

If spacetime is quantum, a range of implications must be considered. Fundamental particles, or spacetime, would have discrete units, and would impose certain limits on what would happen in the universe.

If chance set theory is correct, then there is a limit to how close two points can be to each other, and this limit is limited to the size of the spacetime particle.

In this way, time not only becomes a physical manifestation, the singularity becomes impossible. With no singularity in the universe, there is no more conflict with gravity that has to be resolved.

However, if the universe had no singularities, then there was no Big Bang either. So how did the universe come to be?

new theory

A new article, created by Bruno Bento and Stav Zallel of the University of Liverpool and Imperial College London, respectively, are trying to forge a new path. Basically, they claim that the universe has always existed based on everything we know.

According to scientists, there would be no Big Bang as the beginning, because the causal set would be infinite to the past, so there is always something first.

Many scientists also accept some hypotheses about events that occurred before the Big Bang, including scientist Roger Penrose, who won the Nobel Prize for his demonstration of black hole properties, along with Stephen Hawking.

Researchers Penrose and Hawking have already warmly defended the idea that there was another universe before us, specifically another universe that expanded and then retreated, until it returned to the singularity.

The difference between this hypothesis and causal set theory is that the latter, there is no singularity. Bento and Zalels work is in pre-print on arXiv and awaiting peer review.

So, do you think both scientists are on the right track? Tell us in the comments below!

Read more from the original source:

New theory claims Einstein was wrong and the Big Bang is not the beginning of the universe - Sprout Wired

Transhumanists Gather In Spain To Plan Global Transformation – The Federalist

Posted on by

Transhumanism is a futuristic religion that exalts technology as the highest power. The movements goal is to merge man with machine. Their wildest prophecies seem ridiculous at first, until you consider the dizzying advances in bionics, robotics, neuroprosthetics, virtual reality, artificial intelligence, and genetic engineering.

Prominent figures gathered at the TransVision 2021 conference in Madrid over the weekend. Listening to the proceedings online, I heard a broad range of totalizing schemes. There were no Luddites or Amish onstage, but of course, Spain is a long haul for a horse-and-buggy. Besides, no unvaccinated person can legally cross the Spanish border.

Transhumanists hold that the human condition of ignorance, loneliness, sadness, disease, old age, and death can be transcended through improved gadgetry. Many believe tribalism will also be eliminated perhaps through brain implants but this elite clique tends to be so convicted, legacy humans will have no say in the matter.

Their radical ideas are hardly marginal. Transhuman values have been implicitly embraced by the worlds wealthiest technologists. Consider Bill Gates pushing universal jabs, Jeff Bezoss quest for life extension, Elon Musks proposed brain implants, Mark Zuckerbergs forays into the Metaverse, and Eric Schmidts plans for an American technocracy racing against China.

If Big Tech is the established church, transhumanists are Desert Fathers in the wilderness.

Naturally, the dominant tone at TransVision was set by hardcore transhumanists: Max and Natasha More, Jos Cordeiro, David Wood, Jerome Glenn, Phillipe van Nedervelde, Ben Goertzel, Aubrey de Grey, Bill Faloon, and even in his absence, Ray Kurzweil, a top R&D director at Google and founder of Singularity University. Each proponent has a unique angle, but they converge on a shared mythos.

Allowing for variation, transhumanists confess there is no God but the future Computer God. They believe neuroprosthetics will allow communion with this artificial deity. They believe robot companions should be normalized. They believe longevity tech will confer approximate immortality. They believe virtual reality provides a life worth living. Above all, they believe the Singularity is near.

According to the Cult of the Singularity and its prophet, Ray Kurzweil, well see artificial general intelligence by 2029. Unlike narrow algorithms performing specific tasks, AGI will be robust cognition enacted by neural networks, far faster than any human brain.

By 2045 (or 2049), we will hit the Singularity when artificial superintelligence surpasses human intellect to the point we cannot comprehend its output. Purely organic humans will be left in the smart dust. Our only chance for long-term survival is to fuse our minds and bodies with the All-Powerful Machine to become a new posthuman species.

Therefore, our meaning in life is to make sure the future Computer God is benevolent, while we still have time. (In most cases, benevolent is synonymous with lefty globalist.) Todays machine learning systems are prompted by programmers, then trained with our language and behavior via mass data extraction.

As computers advance to superintelligence, the story goes, their output will tilt toward humanitys moral compass. Eventually, this digital deity may colonize distant galaxies turning all usable matter into computerized mind so our actions today might determine the fate of the entire universe.

Im reminded of the subterranean mutants who worshiped the atom bomb in Beneath the Planet of the Apes. Many mammals use tools to survive, but even a chimp knows better than to raise up a stick and call it God.

Back on Earth, the early phase of this scheme is far from heaven. Just as the TV kept Americans pacified and glued to their couches, the digital revolution has profound demoralizing and dehumanizing effects.

To their credit, TransVision invited a handful of critics to ring alarm bells. The ethicist Sara Lumbreras discussed the devastating impact of smartphones and social media on attention span, memory, and self-control. If you can just Google the information, why does it matter? she asked. Because remembering things is the only way that we can use that information for critical thinking and for creative thinking.

Both transhumanists and Luddites see 24/7 reliance on smartphones as an early phase of our symbiosis with machines. For all the convenience gained, many schoolteachers worry that the shift to digital platforms is making kids antisocial and functionally illiterate. An entire generation is being lost to self-pleasure.

Oxford philosopher Anders Sandberg discussed a 1954 experiment in neuroprosthetics. Using electro-stimulation, the scientist James Olds discovered the pleasure center in a rats brain. He wired up numerous rats, enabling them to stimulate themselves by pressing a lever. These rodent wireheads ceased to do anything besides push the lever. One by one, they died with smiles on their faces.

Video games and corporate opioids find us in a similar predicament. Even in the Victorian era, Sandberg explained, intellectuals wondered if humans were already becoming parasites on machines. They connected that to discoveries in biology that parasites quite often seem to be simplified forms of older species [and they thought] we might become some kind of barnacle sitting on the technological infrastructure, slowly losing our brains.

Hence, the Wireheading Myth the narrative that civilization could collapse due to techno-hedonism. Sandberg insisted that while this story isnt completely untrue, it isnt inevitable either. Building real happiness is a really complex thing, but we know we can make it increase.

In conclusion, he wondered, Can we use the transhuman ambition to say I want to be way happier, I want entire societies to be happier. I want my artificial intelligences to go for the true and daimonic good?

Sandberg is an optimist, but not without reservations. He has contemplated the dangers of artificial superintelligence rigorously. This digital entity would be entirely unpredictable to mere human minds, and perhaps uncontrollable. In a real sense, advanced AI is comparable to the development of thermonuclear warheads.

A humorous hypothetical is an AI system that makes paperclips. What if it goes haywire and turns everything on Earth into paperclips, including us? More realistically, what if an advanced AI is programmed to solve climate change, then arrives at the straightforward conclusion that humans must be exterminated?

Sandberg takes these existential risks seriously, but in the end, hes ready to go for it.

The term transhumanism evokes such revulsion, normal people immediately recoil. So the alpha-dog transhumanist Max More a leading figure at Alcor cryonics lab urged the audience to abandon loaded words like immortality in favor of life extension. Meanwhile, 184 deceased customers lay frozen at his facility, some $200,000 in the hole, waiting to be resurrected.

We mortals have more pressing concerns. Discussing the displacement of actual people by robots and artificial intelligence, Jerome Glenn of the Millennium Project was emphatic that artists, media moguls, and entertainers should psychologically prepare the public to accept economic obsolescence.

The loudest alarm was sounded by tech ethicist Nell Watson, an Apple consultant and chairwoman at IEEE. The global health crises are being used as an excuse for greater authoritarianism, she said, shocking everyone awake. [T]his could end up as a Trojan Horse for some kind of social credit-style monitoring system.

Today, its immunity therapies, Watson warned, but in 10 or 15 years, it might be people who reject some kind of brain-computer interface or a financial technology thats linked to biometrics. She worried that transhumanists might become scapegoats for oppressive policies they are not responsible for.

In response, Anders Sandberg took to Twitter to defend vaccine mandates in the workplace. The conference proceeded apace.

As a broad ideology, transhumanism is as relevant for the 21st century as communism was for the 20th century. In the mid-1800s, Karl Marx and his crew were mere socialist intellectuals. By 1923, the Bolsheviks had taken over Russia. By 1949, Mao had taken over China. In our age of all-pervasive technology, entire societies are revolutionized before anyone can grasp the change.

The futurists who gathered in Madrid last weekend along with those preaching technocracy at the World Economic Forum are laying the intellectual groundwork for a fully digitized social order. Today, its the Fourth Industrial Revolution a global paradigm of total transformation embraced by Microsoft, Alibaba, Sony, General Motors, Mozilla, and Salesforce, among many others. Tomorrow, the faithful proclaim, it will be artificial superintelligence, brain implants, and unstoppable killer drones.

The labels dont matter. To the extent that Silicon Valley, the Chinese tech sector, and various quirky start-ups converge on the central goal to merge human beings with digital devices you could say transhumanism is already a ruling ideology. One has only to look past this text and focus on the glowing screen to see their fantasies are becoming reality.

Link:

Transhumanists Gather In Spain To Plan Global Transformation - The Federalist

The Big Bang and time as we know it might be nothing but illusions – SYFY WIRE

Posted on by

There is something unnerving about hearing a somber voice intone In the beginning but wait. What if the beginning of time is no more real than the sci-fi movies you hear it in?

Could the Big Bang have never really happened? Will there be no end to the universe? Is everything in between, even the passage of time, just an illusion? Physicist Bruno Bento is now proposing that the universe may have had no beginning at all, meaning it did not just blow up out of nothingness, expanding rapidly from a few atoms into an expanse too vast for the human brain to fathom. What we perceive as the past and future may be infinite.

Bento didnt just wake up one morning and decide that the universe didnt suddenly explode into being about 14 billion years ago. Turns out that general relativity does not hold up with singularities like black holes and the Big Bang. He and his colleagues recently posted a study on the preprint server arXiv, in which they usedcausal set theoryto propose that space and time may not be what we think they are.

Sometimes, general relativity gives us infinities that we do not consider to be physical, he told SYFY WIRE. This is what we mean when we say it breaks down we need something else, something new, to describe regions of strong gravity where it does not provide a physical answer.

Most scientists believe Einstein is right about general relativity, or the idea that our perception of gravity arises from the curve of space and time. Some phenomena insist on bending that theory and could possibly break it in the future. Black holes are dangerous territory for general relativity because there are too many aspects of them we cannot see. Though there is not enough evidence to disprove it (yet), the inability of any instrument to observe gravity inside a black hole, from which light cannot escape, raises controversial questions.

The thing about black holes and other weird gravitational phenomena is that general relativity cannot fathom the extreme size and energies involved. There is a threshold it cannot cross when you are dealing with singularities, or parts of spacetime where everything we think we know about physics suddenly starts to fall apart. Gravity gains almost unfathomable strength at minuscule scales in a singularity. Even if there is something that can explain black hole innards or the hypothetical Big Bang, we have to find out what that is. Enter causal set theory.

Spacetime is fundamentally discrete in causal set theory, said Bento. It is a causal set. This means that there is a minimum possibledistance between any two events, both in space and time. We don't know exactly what this minimum scale is, there arecurrently no experiments that can probe these scales.

Because you cant exactly go into a lab and test this out, theoretical physics may be able to offer some closure. Bento believes that how the breakdown of general relativity happens could mean the Planck scale, which declares a minimum limit for the universe, may be able to pick up where it left off. Breakdown could still happen past that limit. However, that scale may be small enough to possibly reveal things beyond the realm of human observation.

What this means for the passage of time is that an element in a causal set is an event, or a specific point in spacetime. Elements is created whenever corresponding events start to happen. Now is the emergence of such an event. What is seen as a causal set is supposed to grow from the first element onward, adding new elements on top of the set, so the passage of time means that one element after another comes into being. Past is all the elements that already emerged. Future is those that are still coming up.

In causal set theory, the passage of time was used as an input when constructing a dynamics for causal sets, or how a causal set (a universe) should behave, Bento said. One consequence of this is that the past is finite and the universe has a beginning.

But wait. How, then, can there be no end and no beginning? That lies in how Bento and his team see possibilities in causal set theory. The set could potentially grow in either way, up or down, and if it can grow in the direction of the past and the future, and if it can do that, it means that there is no end or beginning. What we think of as time might just be a way of trying to understand something that would otherwise make our brains explode.

What is really surprising is that Bento thinks the universe would still look exactly the same without a Big Bang. It isnt that general relativity just vanishes. It can still explain everything that direct observations can be made on, whether by telescope, the naked eye or otherwise. So our solar system and everything observable in it is real. Earth is real. We ourselves are real.

The problem appears when we cannot see, he said. That being said, it's usually accepted that a Big Bang singularity does not exist (nor do black hole singularities).The debate is in whatwill replace them and how.

Now try to go to sleep at night thinking about that

Read more:

The Big Bang and time as we know it might be nothing but illusions - SYFY WIRE

Quantum gravity theory revives ancient ideas "a universe without beginnings" – New News – SwordsToday.ie

Posted on by

The big bang or the massive expansion of things 14 billion years ago. Many believe that this is the origin of the universe. Its hard to imagine that without the Big Bang, would there still be a universe that gave birth to Earth and humans like us?

Follow News, Follow, Press Live News

Recently, a physicist from the University of Liverpool in the UK. Sophisticated concepts such as quantum gravity (QG) were used to prove the possibility of the existence of the universe as we have always seen. As it turns out, there is no beginning or big bang. Or if the Big Bang actually exists, it is a consequence.

This unconventional idea is tantamount to reviving ancient beliefs in some cultures that the universe is eternal without origin and may never die.

Bruno Bento, a physicist studying the nature of time at the University of Liverpool. The author of the above research, now published in the online academic archive arXiv.org, says he has developed a new theory within the framework of quantum gravity. Named Kossel Set Theory

According to the new theory, space-time can be divided into smaller and smaller units until there are fundamentally indistinguishable units of space-time. Like the atoms of the elements, we can use this basic time-space to find the origin of the universe or the universe itself.

The causal theory was developed from the concept of quantum gravity. This is because such quantum concepts can explain physics problems at the particle level. Einsteins theory of general relativity cannot be explained. Including the problem of singularity (singularity) or gravity at the smallest point of infinite density. They are found only in the centers of black holes and at the beginning of things like the Big Bang.

Dr. Bento thought that at the basic level space-time could split like atoms, without a continuous weave of a fabric as we imagine the universe and the real world today. The possibility of when and where two events follow each other. Will be limited immediately

A new perspective on such space-time is like looking in a magnifying glass on your computer screen. This will result in an enlarged image that immediately separates from the rest of the screen. Unlike the naked eye, all screen images are connected together.

Dr. Bento also explains that considering the causal theory, the passage of time is characterized by a wide range of physical features. Instead of being an abstract or an illusion.

Under this conceptual framework, the universe is only the development of one elementary unit of space-time. As a primary particle gradually grows larger, there is no unity or infinite origin in this state, because there can never be anything smaller than the size of the primary space-time.

Such a theory is mathematically practical. This means that neither the origin nor the Big Bang is a precondition for the existence of the universe. There must have been something long before the Big Bang.

Our study shows that its infinitely long and infinite. The Big Bang was not a start. Its just a step in the evolution of the universe, Dr. Bento concluded.

News BBCThai Published on the website latest news This is a collaboration between two news organizations.

Read the rest here:

Quantum gravity theory revives ancient ideas "a universe without beginnings" - New News - SwordsToday.ie

Scientists Find the First Known Planet to Have Survived the Death of Its Star – Singularity Hub

Posted on by

How will the solar system die? Its a hugely important question that researchers have speculated a lot about, using our knowledge of physics to create complex theoretical models. We know that the sun will eventually become a white dwarf, a burnt stellar remnant whose dim light gradually fades into darkness. This transformation will involve a violent process that will destroy an unknown number of its planets.

So which planets will survive the death of the sun? One way to seek the answer is to look at the fates of other similar planetary systems. This has proven difficult, however. The feeble radiation from white dwarfs makes it difficult to spot exoplanets (planets around stars other than our sun) which have survived this stellar transformation; they are literally in the dark.

In fact, of the over 4,500 exoplanets that are currently known, just a handful have been found around white dwarfs, and the location of these planets suggests they arrived there after the death of the star.

This lack of data paints an incomplete picture of our own planetary fate. Fortunately, we are now filling in the gaps. In our new paper, published in Nature, we report the discovery of the first known exoplanet to survive the death of its star without having its orbit altered by other planets moving around, circling a distance comparable to those between the sun and the solar system planets.

This new exoplanet, which we discovered with the Keck Observatory in Hawaii, is particularly similar to Jupiter in both mass and orbital separation, and provides us with a crucial snapshot into planetary survivors around dying stars. A stars transformation into a white dwarf involves a violent phase in which it becomes a bloated red giant, also known as a giant branch star, hundreds of times bigger than before. We believe that this exoplanet only just survived; if it was initially closer to its parent star, it would have been engulfed by the stars expansion.

When the sun eventually becomes a red giant, its radius will actually reach outwards to Earths current orbit. That means the sun will (probably) engulf Mercury and Venus, and possibly the Earth, but we are not sure.

Jupiter, and its moons, have been expected to survive, although we previously didnt know for sure. But with our discovery of this new exoplanet, we can now be more certain that Jupiter really will make it. Moreover, the margin of error in the position of this exoplanet could mean that it is almost half as close to the white dwarf as Jupiter currently is to the sun. If so, that is additional evidence for assuming that Jupiter and Mars will make it.

So could any life survive this transformation? A white dwarf could power life on moons or planets that end up being very close to it (about one-tenth the distance between the sun and Mercury) for the first few billion years. After that, there wouldnt be enough radiation to sustain anything.

Although planets orbiting white dwarfs have been difficult to find, what has been much easier to detect are asteroids breaking up close to the white dwarfs surface. For exoasteroids to get so close to a white dwarf, they need to have enough momentum imparted to them by surviving exoplanets. Hence, exoasteroids have been long assumed to be evidence that exoplanets are there too.

Our discovery finally provides confirmation of this. Although in the system being discussed in the paper, current technology does not allow us to see any exoasteroids, at least now we can piece together different parts of the puzzle of planetary fate by merging the evidence from different white dwarf systems.

The link between exoasteroids and exoplanets also applies to our own solar system. Individual objects in the asteroid main belt and Kuiper belt (a disc in the outer solar system) are likely to survive the suns demise, but some will be moved by gravity by one of the surviving planets towards the white dwarfs surface.

The new white dwarf exoplanet was found with what is known as the microlensing detection method. This looks at how light bends due to a strong gravitational field, which happens when a star momentarily aligns with a more distant star, as seen from Earth.

The gravity from the foreground star magnifies the light from the star behind it. Any planets orbiting the star in the foreground will bend and warp this magnified light, which is how we can detect them. The white dwarf we investigated is one-quarter of the way towards the center of the Milky Way galaxy, or about 6,500 light years away from our solar system, and the more distant star is in the center of the galaxy.

A key feature of the microlensing technique is that it is sensitive to planets that orbit stars at the Jupiter-sun distance. The other known planets which orbit white dwarfs have been found with different techniques which are sensitive to different star-planet separations. Two examples relate to planets which have survived a stars transformation into a white dwarf and have ended up closer to it than before. One was found by transit photometry (a method to detect planets as they pass in front of a white dwarf, which creates a dip in the light received by Earth) and the other was discovered through the detection of the planets evaporating atmosphere.

One further detection techniqueastrometry, which precisely measures the movement of white dwarfs in the skyis also predicted to yield results. In a few years, astrometry from the Gaia mission is expected to find about a dozen planets orbiting white dwarfs. Perhaps these could offer better evidence as to exactly how the solar system will die.

This variety of discovery techniques bodes well for potential future detections, which may offer further insight into the fate of our own planet. But for now, the newly discovered Jupiter-like exoplanet provides the clearest glimpse into our future.

This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article.

Image Credit: W.M. Keck Observatory/Adam Makarenko

Link:

Scientists Find the First Known Planet to Have Survived the Death of Its Star - Singularity Hub

The World’s Electronic Waste This Year Will Weigh More Than the Great Wall of China – Singularity Hub

Posted on by

Its widely known that the world has a plastics problem. From landfills to the ocean, the stuff is everywhere, and our conscientious efforts to recycle dont do nearly as much good as we think.

Whats less widely known is that we have a similar problem with another kind of waste: electronics. A report published this week on WEEE Forum revealed that the total waste electronic and electrical equipment from 2021 will weigh an estimated 57.4 million tons. Thats heavier than Chinas Great Wall, which is the heaviest man-made object on Earth.

Not surprisingly, the amount of e-waste generated each year is steadily increasing. For one, as the global middle class grows, more people can afford to buy electronics (and to buy new ones when their old ones break, rather than getting the old ones repaired). Also, the prices of many electronic items tend to trend downwards as their manufacture is scaled up, their technology improves, supply chains are streamlined, etc. (given the global chip shortage, the next couple years may be an exception to this trend).

E-waste appears to be growing by three to four percent per year. In 2019 the total reached 53.6 million tons; that was 21 percent higher than 2014s total. If we stay on this trajectory, annual global e-waste will reach 74 tons by 2030.

Product manufacturers arent helping the situation; building products with shorter life cycles, making repairs too expensive or difficult to undertake, and continually releasing new iterations means people are likely to either cast aside their perfectly-good iPhones/tablets/laptops for newer models, or decide that repairing a non-working device isnt worth the trouble and opt for buying a brand-new one. Do you have at least one working (or partially-working) cell phone or laptop sitting in a drawer somewhere, untouched for months or years? Yeah, me too.

When you buy an expensive product, whether its a half-a-million-dollar tractor or a thousand-dollar phone, you are in a very real sense under the power of the manufacturer, said Tim Wu, special assistant to the president for technology and competition policy within the National Economic Council. And when they have repair specifications that are unreasonable, theres not a lot you can do.

The Right to Repair movement thinks otherwiseor, is trying to get consumers and manufacturers to think otherwise. The movement is trying to make it easier for people to repair the devices they already own rather than having to buy new ones.

Europe is several steps ahead of the US in this arena. In March of this year the EU implemented a law requiring appliances to be repairable for at least 10 years; new devices have to come with repair manuals and be compatible with conventional tools when their life cycle ends (so that people are more likely to break them down and recycle them). In Sweden, people even get tax breaks for appliance repairs done by technicians in their homes.

Though there are no similar laws in place in the US yet, the Federal Trade Commission has been investigating repair restrictions as they relate to antitrust laws and consumer protection. Unsurprisingly, electronics manufacturers are largely against right to repair, claiming consumer safety could be jeopardized. But an FTC report from May of this year found there was limited evidence to support manufacturers justifications for restricting repairs, and that peoples device batteries arent actually that likely to burst into flames, nor their personal data likely to be compromised by repairing their devices.

According to the WEEE Forum report, around 416,000 phones per day are thrown out in the US. Thats 151 million a year, and guess where they end up? Heres a hint: 40 percent of heavy metals in landfills come from discarded electronics. Those metals could be recycled for use in new products, but theres no system nor incentive in place to facilitate this.

While small electronics like phones and laptops may have the fastest turnover, theyre not very heavy, and thus arent the biggest contributors to the huge sum of total tons of e-waste. Those culprits are larger items like refrigerators and stoves. But whatever the item is, it comes down to the same principle: we shouldnt be throwing things out until theyre really, truly done workingand then we should have a way to ensure the recyclable components get to a place where they can be re-used.

Pascal Leroy, director general of the WEEE Forum, said, Many factors play a role in making the electrical and electronics sector resource efficient and circular. Butas long as citizens dont return their used, broken gear, sell it, or donate it, we will need to continue mining all-new materials causing great environmental damage. He added that every ton of waste electronic and electrical equipment that gets recycled saves around two tons of CO2 emissions

Given that repairs directly conflict with their primary motiveprofitcompanies arent likely to make pro-repair moves without some serious pressure from consumers or regulators. And it seems that pressure is already being applied, and responded to: Popular Mechanics reported this week that Microsoft is considering right-to-repair reform, and has hired an independent third party to research the impacts on customers and the environment of making more repairable products.

As WEEE Forums Magdalena Charytanowicz said, Consumers want to do the right thing, but need to be adequately informed, and a convenient infrastructure should be easily available to them so that disposing of e-waste correctly becomes the social norm in communities.

Lets hope we move towards that vision before the weight of our electronic trash grows too much more.

Image Credit: Muntaka Chasant/Wikimedia Commons

Go here to see the original:

The World's Electronic Waste This Year Will Weigh More Than the Great Wall of China - Singularity Hub

The science behind Destiny 2s Lorentz Driver weapon – Space.com

Posted on by

In Destiny 2s fifteenth season, Season of the Lost, players can earn a new exotic grade weapon by progressing through the Season Pass the Lorentz Driver. This new Linear Fusion Rifle may look like yet another science fiction weapon powered by impossible energies and ridiculous technology. Thats not necessarily the case this time, as the Lorentz Driver has its mechanics and name rooted in real science. Heres how the weapon breaks down its interpretation of the Lorentz force.

So, first off, we have to look at the force this weapon is named after, the Lorentz force. Originally developed from a complete derivation by Hendrik Lorentz in 1895, Lorentz force is the combination of electric and magnetic forces on a charged particle due to electromagnetic fields. This charged particle will only feel a force due to the magnetic field if it is moving with a component of its velocity perpendicular to the field. If it moves parallel to the magnetic field, it experiences no force. Particles, or a single particle, guided by this force is influenced by the Guiding Center, where all surrounding particles align towards this point in space.

The sum of these two forces creates a force that we call the Lorentz force. This concept allows almost all modern electronics to function; speakers, computers, and even railguns all utilize the idea of Lorentz force as the main basis of how they handle electricity and magnetism. Particle accelerators and cyclotrons especially utilize Lorentz force due to their circular shapes and how the force multiplies the speeds of charged particles, allowing them to collide and create new elements.

Looking at how the Lorentz Driver weapon functions, we can break down the components of the mechanics and how they tie to Lorentz force itself in a basic manner. The Linear Fusion Rifle in Destinys universe is a weapon that projects a super-concentrated beam of elemental energy in a single shot, much like a sniper rifle but with much more piercing power.

The Lorentz Driver is a void element weapon, which is described in Destinys lore as an energy of absence or vacuum where energies can be negated. When players score a Precision Kill, or a head shot, on a target a small black hole forms that attracts nearby enemies and then erupts in an explosion of void energy. Targets at random will also be highlighted by the weapons scope system and drop a small, golden tag called a piece of Telemetry Data. When players pick up three of these tags they will gain a buff known as Lagrangian Sight.

When a singularity forms from a Precision Kill, this is basically the Guiding Center of Lorentz force charging a particle and attracting things near it to a common alignment. Since the energy of the weapon is void and it usually produces a vacuum-like effect when used, the fact nearby objects tend to collapse in on void energy, it makes sense.

While the Lagrangian Sight buff is active, the Lorentz Driver will cause more damage and every kill, precision or not, will cause the singularities to form. According to the weapons lore entry from in-game documentation the rifle was possibly built haphazardly by the alien race known as the Fallen, or Eliksni, from non-weapon parts.

Applying the basics of Lorentz force to the weapon makes it easy to see how it all works. The weapons most basic functions are similar to that of a real-life railgun, a type of cannon that employs magnetism and large amounts of electricity to propel a projectile at high speeds with the use of electromagnetic rails. Lorentz force is applied to how the weapon projectile is propelled by applying a charge to a beam of energy.

When the weapons Lagrangian Sight kicks in, it is using the basis of Lagrangian mechanics that add to the weapons power and precision. When the Lagrangian is applied to the weapons mechanisms, it is interacting with the weapons potential energy and bolstering its accuracy to find a vector within space, which explains why the singularities form on any kill rather than a precision kill.

While in the Destiny universe, weaponry and energy are dictated by the games own lore and concepts of how everything functions, its clear Bungies writing team did their homework on this one. The weapons name doesnt just serve as flavor, but is a simplified demonstration of a foundation of electricity and magnetism.

The brilliance of the weapon mechanics make it not only an engaging weapon to use, but the clever demonstrations of real-life electromagnetism show Bungies attention to detail is bar none. Destiny is not a super-accurate world, but its roots in science and use of worldbuilding to give structure to how everything mingles allows unique representations of real-life concepts of science to exist such as this. As the saying goes, any sufficiently advanced technology can be indistinguishable from magic.

If you're looking for more sci-fi gaming content, check out our best Star Wars games guide, and if you're looking to get immersed in the VR space battles then we've also got our best PSVR space games guide for you.

Play Destiny 2 Beyond Light on Xbox Game Pass

View original post here:

The science behind Destiny 2s Lorentz Driver weapon - Space.com

What Could the Paris Legion be Planning? – The Game Haus

Posted on by

Over the years, roster mania has been very crazy. However, this year, it is a little different. Other than the news of a possible merger between OpTic and Dallas and changes of a few teams, there has not been a lot of things that have been happening this off-season. What could the Paris Legion be planning?

For the Paris Legion, it is no different than every other season. They need to rebuild. After two consecutive seasons of terrible performance in the Call of Duty League, the COD competitive community is looking to see if Paris is actually going to try and get a roster to be able to compete in the league.

For the past two seasons for the Legion, it has been really uneventful. It truly has been full of defeat. In the first season, they created a roster with Louqa, KiSMET, Shockz, Denz, and Zed. They had two top-three finishes in tournaments, but other than that, they placed either last place or second to last place.

The second season of the Paris franchise was also a heartbreaking one as they started out with the roster of Skrapz, Aqua, Classic, and Fire. The best placing this team ever reached was 7-8th place in tournaments over the start of the season to the middle of it.

They then changed to have Temp and Zaptius on the team. This showed a little improvement during the ending of the season. However, their best performance was, yet again, 7-8th place finishes.

Some players that are still on the market might want to take advantage of the Paris Legion and pounce on a good deal to maybe better their careers and their time. With many young and talented players waiting in the wings, things could be really promising for the Paris Legion.

One player that they could be looking at is Denza. He is very well known in the Call of Duty League as he is known to be the Belgian buster as he is a talented player from the country of Belgium who broke onto the scene.

A player from England who is known for his flashy plays as well as his killer mindset while in-game. His communication for times in-game while on Team Singularity is where he was the most known as he had great success with the team.

He could make his return to a quality team after his short stint of being on the Rokkr back in 2019. He is still a very talented player that wants to prove to his Call of Duty League colleagues as well as the world that he is still the aggressive player he once was back in previous game titles.

Well this, again, is a longshot. But could you imagine him building this team. This team was never great. So could you imagine if they decided to take this chance on the three-time world champion to rely on him to create another world championship team. He knows talent from a million miles away and has an eye for success. If this is the case, things could be looking great for the team from Paris.

Featured Image Courtesy of the Paris Legion

You can Like The Game Haus on Facebook and Follow us on Twitter for more sports and esports articles from other great TGH writers along with Chaz!

From Our Haus to Yours

Related

Continued here:

What Could the Paris Legion be Planning? - The Game Haus

Gitex 2021: Four tech trends which will define our future – The National

Posted on by

The Gulf Information Technology Exhibition in Dubai is a sprawling trading space with thousands of exhibitors from all corners of the globe.

As a visitor it can be hard to get the measure of the wider tech trends, partly because every two minutes you trip over a robot or meet a hologram.

Subjects such as cybersecurity, coding, artificial intelligence and the data economy dominate the popular narrative but is humanity actually making progress?

Are we moving into a brighter future populated by cobots collaborative robots and autonomous vehicles? And how soon will humanity be able to collectively put its feet up and let the machines do the hard work?

The National spoke to several experts at Gitex to find out.

Inside Hewlett Packard's stand at Gitex 2021. Leslie Pableo / The National

In the near future, intelligence will be redefined through artificial intelligence and robotics.

Many of the exhibitors and speakers at Gitex are focused on how close we are as a species to singularity the hypothetical point in time at which technological growth becomes uncontrollable and irreversible, resulting in unforeseeable changes to human civilisation.

"This is a landmark moment in the history of humanity because never before have we tried to replicate or duplicate our intelligence," said Tannya Jajal, a futurist and artificial intelligence expert based in Dubai.

So when will it happen? No one knows, but there are plenty of companies at Gitex trying to figure out what this technological era means for humans on an individual level.

The reality is that the technology to power AI robots who clean your house exists and is starting to become cheaper.

Now it comes down to the question of whether the public are ready to live with robots in their homes and workplace, said David Reger, chief executive of Neura Robotics, a German company preparing to bring a robot maid to the market.

"I think we are still working to make the public ready," he said.

"In Asia and China we sell a lot of robots and they use them for many more reasons than in other regions. They have less boundaries there and a different ethical approach."

Arash Masomzadeh, who is in charge of the 152 robots at Expo 2020 Dubai, hopes the world's fair will help humans become accustomed to having them around.

"Where robotics goes from here is really up to the general public. Where will they allow robots to go? Will they accept it? Will they nurture it, or will they take a hands-off approach?" he said.

"It's really up to demand where robotics goes from here."

Films such as Terminator and RoboCop featuring rogue robot characters have entered the public consciousness and inadvertently put people off robots and made them scared of artificial intelligence, Mr Masomzadeh suggested.

"I think there's a lot of bad publicity regarding AI and its capabilities," he said.

"We cannot be a computer but humans have logic and common sense. We have to teach the robot that common sense and it's going to be like that for a very long time.

"The robot needs to be taught and it's still us for the time being doing all the teaching."

A man using an augmented reality headset at the Du stand at Gitex in the Dubai World Trade Centre. Leslie Pableo / The National

Over the next few years, we will redefine our perception through tools such as virtual reality and augmented reality, Ms Jajal said.

Dozens of companies are showcasing their systems at Gitex, with exhibitors encouraging visitors to put on VR goggles to become immediately subsumed into a new world.

"You'll see a lot of start-ups here and a lot of larger organisations as well investing in technology like that," Ms Jajal said.

"Over time I think we will absolutely see the proliferation and democratisation of these technologies and it's going to completely alter the way that we interact with one another."

Facebook founder Mark Zuckerberg certainly agrees. He has previously spoken of creating a "metaverse" or online world where people interact, work and play games in a virtual environment, often using VR headsets.

The Facebook chief executive described it as an embodied internet where instead of just viewing content you are in it.

So in the future, meetings will not take place in 2D with each person appearing in their own rectangle, but in 3D, where you feel like you are physically in the meeting room via an avatar or hologram.

Tanya Dipak Jajal, expert technology contributor at Gitex. Chris Whiteoak / The National

Progress is starting to accelerate thanks to the democratisation of digital technology.

Faster internet, better processing power and technological advances are allowing for more people to be innovators and creators.

"We no longer have to follow a linear path to human progress, we can all kind of come together and do amazing things," said Ms Jajal.

"We're actually on a really good track as humanity and governments and companies and private organisations are really coming together to make sure that we move forward and Gitex is evidence of that."

Updated: October 19th 2021, 8:10 AM

Continue reading here:

Gitex 2021: Four tech trends which will define our future - The National

Morgan Stanley says SpaceX’s Starship may ‘transform investor expectations’ about space – CNBC

Posted on by

Starship prototype 20 is stacked on top of Super Heavy Booster 4 on August 6, 2021.

SpaceX

Elon Musk's SpaceX has become one of the world's most valuable private companies, and Morgan Stanley believes the Starship rockets the venture is developing will have wide-reaching implications.

Starship is the massive, next-generation rocketSpaceX is developing to be fully reusable, to launch cargo and people on missions to the moon and Mars. The company is testing prototypes at a facility in southern Texas and has flown multiple short test flights.

"This technological development has the potential to transform investor expectations around the space industry," Morgan Stanley analyst Adam Jonas wrote in a note to investors on Monday.

"As one client put it: 'talking about space before Starship is like talking about the internet before Google,'" Jonas added.

Morgan Stanley noted that its latest views on SpaceX come in response to CNBC reporting that the company's valuation has hit $100 billion.

"What SpaceX is doing on the shores of South Texas is challenging any preconceived notion of what was possible and the time frame possible, in terms of rockets, launch vehicles and supporting infrastructure," Jonas said.

In Morgan Stanley's view, Musk's company has created a "double flywheel" of technology development with its reusable rockets and Starlink satellites. The firm bases the majority of SpaceX's valuation on the earning potential of the Starlink satellite internet network, which Musk has previously said could bring in as much as $30 billion in revenue a year.

"We view SpaceX's launch capabilities and Starlink as inextricably linked whereby improvements in launch capacity/bandwidth (both in frequency and payload per flight) and cost of launch improve the economics and path to scale of Starlink's LEO constellation," Jonas said. "At the same time, development of Starlink's commercial opportunity provides a thriving 'captive customer' for the launch business, enabling a symbiotic development."

Notably, Morgan Stanley expects Starlink to burn about $33 billion this decade and turn cash flow positive in 2031.

Morgan Stanley last year forecast that SpaceX would become a $100 billion company at a time when SpaceX's valuation was nearing $44 billion.

"More than one client has told us if Elon Musk were to become the first Trillionaire... it won't be because of Tesla. Others have said SpaceX may eventually be the most highly valued company in the world in any industry," Jonas said.

Become a smarter investor withCNBC Pro.Get stock picks, analyst calls, exclusive interviews and access to CNBC TV.Sign up to start afree trial today.

The rest is here:

Morgan Stanley says SpaceX's Starship may 'transform investor expectations' about space - CNBC

Cathie Wood Piled Up Another $994K In This Company Linked With Elon Musk’s SpaceX On Friday – Benzinga – Benzinga

Posted on by

Cathie Wood-led Ark Investment Management on Friday bought 126,360 shares estimated to be worth about $994,453 in Velo3D Inc (NYSE:VLD), on the dip.

Shares of the 3D company, which went public last month via a merger with special purpose acquisition company Jaws Spitfire Acquisition Corp, closed 1.75% lower at $7.87 on Friday.

The Ark Autonomous Technology & Robotics ETF (BATS:ARKQ) bought the shares in Velo3D, a 3D printer supplier for SpaceX. Besides ARKQ, the Ark Space Exploration & Innovation ETF (BATS:ARKX) also owns shares in Velo3D.

Together the two ETFs held 4.41 million shares, worth $35.39 million, in Velo3D ahead of Friday's trade.

SpaceX is a space exploration company led byTesla Inc (NASDAQ:TSLA) CEO Elon Musk.

See Also: Cathie Wood Just Bought Another $402K In This Supplier Of Elon Musk-Led SpaceX

Here are a few of the other key trades for Ark on Friday:

Bought 48,448 shares estimated to be worth $6.55 million in Teladoc Health Inc (NYSE:TDOC). Shares of the telemedicine healthcare company closed 1.08% lower at $135.40 a share on Friday.

Sold 153,997 shares estimated to be worth $6.75 million in NanoString Technologies Inc (NASDAQ:NSTG). Shares of the biotech company closed 1.42% lower at $43.82 a share on Friday.

Continue reading here:

Cathie Wood Piled Up Another $994K In This Company Linked With Elon Musk's SpaceX On Friday - Benzinga - Benzinga

Its not the heat, its the humidity that grounded Boeings Starliner – Ars Technica

Posted on by

Enlarge / The Boeing Starliner spacecraft to be flown on Orbital Flight Test-2 is seen at NASAs Kennedy Space Center in Florida on June 2, 2021.

NASA

NASA and Boeing officials said Tuesday that they have successfully removed two valves from the Starliner spacecraft and have shipped them to Marshall Space Flight Center in Alabama for further analysis.

The forensic examinationthe two valves will be inspected with a variety of techniques, including a CT scanis part of Boeing's ongoing effort to diagnose the "stuck" valve issue that caused an abort of Starliner's uncrewed test flight on August 3. With less than five hours remaining in the countdown to launch, during a routine procedure, 13 of the 24 valves that control the flow of dinitrogen tetroxide oxidizer through the service module of the spacecraft would not cycle between closed and open.

An initial diagnostic effort at the launch pad yielded no results, so the Atlas V rocket and spacecraft were rolled back to an integration facility. After more inspection and testing there, engineers decided to "de-stack" the spacecraft and return it to Boeing's spacecraft processing building at Kennedy Space Center. This eventually led to further dissection of the vehicle and removal of several valves.

Boeing's chief engineer for space and launch, Michelle Parker, said during a news conference with reporters Tuesday that the company has a pretty solid hypothesis for what went wrong. At some point during the 46-day period when the vehicle was fueledand when the valves were found to be stuckhumidity must have gotten into the spacecraft. This moisture combined with the oxidizer and created nitric acid, beginning the process of corrosion.

Parker said dew points at the launch site were high in August, and while the vehicle was designed to operate in Florida's humidity, there is physical evidence that humidity is nonetheless the culprit. Boeing and NASA engineers now want to try to recreate the corrosive reaction in similar test conditions so that they can be confident of the root cause and any countermeasures they implement.

The company and NASA will press ahead with work in Florida, Alabama, and at Boeing's test site in White Sands, New Mexico. All of this will take time, acknowledged Boeing's program manager for commercial crew, John Vollmer. He said Boeing is now targeting the "first half" of 2022 for the uncrewed test flight of Starliner. (One source told Ars the "no earlier than" date is May 2022).

This mission is formally named Orbital Flight Test-2, or OFT-2. The company is flying OFT-2at its own expense, $410 million, following an uncrewed Starliner mission in December 2019 that went awry due to software issues. The company's technicians and engineers worked long and hard after the OFT-1 flight to fix the software, only to have these new hardware problems crop up during launch-day checks on the pad in early August.

NASA is hoping that Boeing can get Starliner up and flying so that it can have a second launch system, alongside SpaceX's Crew Dragon vehicle, to get its astronauts to and from the International Space Station. Assuming that Boeing safely completes OFT-2, Vollmer said the company and NASA would like to have about six months to review data and prepare for a crewed test flight. That would put the earliest possible launch date for Starliner's first mission carrying astronauts toward the end of 2022. More realistically, the mission may not fly until early 2023.

After this flight, NASA will certify that Starliner is ready for regular, operational astronaut flights.

As part of its commercial crew program, NASA ordered six "post-certification" missions from SpaceX and Boeing. SpaceX successfully completed its demonstration crewed mission in 2020 and is set to launch its third certified crew mission, Crew-3, to the International Space Station on October 31. A fourth and fifth mission are scheduled to follow in 2022.

During Tuesday's news conference, NASA's commercial crew program manager, Steve Stich, said the agency is negotiating additional flights for SpaceXand possibly Boeing. He said details about those contract extensions could be announced within the next few months. Given the issues discussed Tuesday, It now seems possible that SpaceX could complete its initial six-mission contract before Boeing flies its first certified mission. But Stich is confident that Boeing will get there.

"I have no reason to believe that Boeing wont be successful in getting Starliner operational," Stich said. "We'll get this problem solved, and then we'll have two space transportation systems like we want."

Read the original:

Its not the heat, its the humidity that grounded Boeings Starliner - Ars Technica