Microsoft AI will help make your writing more politically …

Microsoft will soon preview a version of Word that will use artificial intelligence to make your writing not just grammatically but politically correct.

Microsoft doesnt call it a political correctness check, but thats essentially what it is. Not that theres anything wrong with that.

Actually Microsoft calls it Ideas in Word, which refers to a series of AI-driven features that help you format your document and write better.

For instance, Word will decode acronyms for you, and tell you how long itll take to read a given document. Itll also underline words or phrases that sound insensitive, and suggest corrections.

Say you write, We need to get some fresh blood in here. The AI is likely to underline fresh blood and suggest new employees instead.

It might underline places where your writing exhibited gender bias. If you tend to say mailman or Congressman in the generic, it might suggest you use mailperson or Congressperson. If you use the term gentlemens agreement, it may suggest you use unspoken agreement instead.

Ideas in Word. [Image: courtesy of Microsoft]If you describe someone as a disabled person the AI would suggest person with a disability. Person-first terminology is preferred because it portrays the person as more important than the disability.

The inclusiveness checks are part of a larger group of Refine My Writing tools that also include clarity, conciseness, punctuation, and sensitive geopolitical terms. For that last one, the AIs models look for phrases that may be hard to understand by, or that might be offensive to, someone in another country or culture, Microsoft says.

Were a long way from spell check here, folks.

Spelling and grammar checks check the users words against a fairly agreed-upon set of spellings or usage rules. Correcting words for their correctness in the cultural or political sense seems like a more subjective and slippery exercise. Actually, Microsoft hasnt completely settled on the full list of correctness checks the AI will run on the text.

For the various new checks, Microsoft assembled a team of linguists and other experts to anticipate the poor word choices people might make, and assemble lists of terms that would work better, Office Intelligence product manager Malavika Rewari tells me. The AIs training data also includes Wikipedia pages, which are constantly being updated and corrected.

The good news is that just as you can ask Word not to give you grammar suggestions, you can go into the settings and tell it not to monitor the correctness or sensitivity of your words.

Personally, I dont think I would turn off the suggestions, at least not at first. I worry about unknowingly or accidentally inserting terms or references in my writing that convey value judgements that I dont really mean. Regardless of how I feel about political incorrectness, it must be better to at least know when Im writing something that might offend. Whether I use the Microsoft AIs suggestion for improvement is my choice.

Microsoft says it will begin offering a preview of Ideas in Word in June. Im eager to try it out. Maybe with Words new AI superpowers, the review will write itself.

Originally posted here:

Microsoft AI will help make your writing more politically ...

How on earth has Family Guy survived for 20 seasons in the supposed era of political correctness? – The Independent

Remember Family Guy? Fifteen-odd years ago, the Seth MacFarlane-created animated sitcom seemed to be everywhere. After The Simpsons had revolutionised the possibilities of TV animation in the 1990s, Family Guy went one step further. This was The Simpsons grubby little brother. The animation was cheap-looking, the storytelling flimsy and artless, and the jokes were loudly, proudly crass. Racist jokes, homophobic jokes, transphobic jokes, ablist jokes, jokes about rape, about paedophilia; nothing was off the table. It won plenty of fans especially within the young male demographic but plenty of detractors, too, inciting numerous controversies with its shock-factor material. In many ways, Family Guy represented the worst impulses of an era when pushing back against PC culture was considered a cutting-edge comic sensibility.

But there comes a time when every provocateur must meet a reckoning, when every enfant terrible must face trial as a terrible adult. The needle of consensus swings, and jokes that once were hailed as edgy, or outspoken, are found to be, on closer reinspection, offensive, or ill-informed, or simply unfunny. Some series get off with a rap on the knuckles Friends penchant for homophobia hasnt put a dent in its popularity while others have been yeeted into total exile, such as Family Guys erstwhile bad-taste contemporary Little Britain. And yet, next Wednesday, on Disney Plus in the UK, Family Guy begins its 20th season, with a 21st already in the pipeline. You cant help but ask: how has it managed to survive so long in an era of supposedly enforced political correctness?

Well, to some extent, Family Guy has changed with the times, making certain concessions to our changing social standards of acceptability. The role of Peter Griffins Black friend Cleveland Brown was recently recast, for instance, with Arif Zahir stepping in to replace white actor Mike Henry. The character of Quagmire, depicted throughout much of the shows run as a lascivious sex offender, was tweaked in recent seasons, accentuating his other, somewhat less problematic characteristics. The 2019 episode Trump Guy made headlines not just for its bullish attack on then-president Donald Trump featuring a scene in which he sexually assaults the Griffins daughter, Meg but also for the suggestion that it was dialling back homophobic jokes. Many children have learnt their favourite Jewish, Black, and gay jokes by watching your show over the years, the cartoon Trump tells Peter in the episode. In fairness, weve been trying to phase out the gay stuff, he replies, an utterance that was celebrated in the press as a statement of tolerant intent.

Family Guy didnt phase out the gay stuff, not really (Peter even admits in a later episode: That quote was taken out of context and widely misunderstood). Nor did it particularly phase out the racism, ableism, and sexism that make up such a large part of the show. But itd be wrong to suggest it has learnt nothing. Exec-producer Alec Sulkin told TV Line two years ago: If you look at a show from 2005 or 2006 and put it side-by-side with a show from 2018 or 2019, theyre going to have a few differences. Some of the things we felt comfortable saying and joking about back then, we now understand is not acceptable.

Still, some of the jokes that the show feels comfortable about making now still feel like reactionary outrage-baiting. The 2019 episode Bri-da featured a number of crass jokes about transgender people; the 2017 episode Trans-fat, which saw Peter Griffin pretend to be trans to gain social advantages, contained similarly objectionable jokes.

One of the arguments used to defend the politically incorrect humour in Family Guy, and in other bad taste comedies, is that it is satirical: depiction is not endorsement. Of course, this argument never really holds up in Family Guys case; the satire here is usually paper-thin. Even if the character of Mort Goldstein is in fact satirising antisemitism, the satire is indistinguishable from antisemitism itself. Besides, even if the show itself isnt fundamentally approaching its material from a right-wing viewpoint MacFarlane is a major donor to the Democratic Party, and some of the shows writers are vocally liberal a good amount of its viewers are. When Trans-fat first aired, a subset of Family Guy fans lambasted the series on social media for supposedly capitulating to PC culture, thanks to an ending in which Peter Griffin apologises for mocking trans people.

Family Guys enduring survival could be down to a gradual maturation in other areas. The animation, a full-blown eyesore in its early days, has improved ten-fold. Increasingly, the humour has scaled back the frenzied, puerile cutaway gags, and increasingly takes a more self-aware tone. More risks are taken, too, with its format, such as an entire episode devoted to a fake in-universe DVD commentary, or a triptych emulating the filmmaking aesthetics of Quentin Tarantino, Wes Anderson and Michael Bay. This long-term creative stamina is nothing to be scoffed at: by its own 20th season, The Simpsons was over a decade past its peak and had already lost all trace of what made it such a monumental piece of TV. Regardless, Family Guys viewing figures have declined substantially over the years, at least on traditional TV. In 2000, and 2002, Family Guy was twice cancelled by Fox for low viewership ratings, before being revived due to high DVD sales and the popularity of Adult Swim re-runs. Now, it draws less than half of what it did at its lowest pre-cancellation ebb. Maybe there just arent enough people still watching to really cultivate much offence.

Glenn Quagmires transgender parent, Ida, has been the subject of numerous offensive jokes on the series

(Fox/Disney)

All of these factors may be overlooking the obvious answer. Family Guy hasnt been hogtied by the PC police, run out of town on a rail, because the PC brigade doesnt really exist. For all the talk of being unable to say anything anymore, the fact is that you can, by and large, say whatever the hell you want. Dave Chappelle complains about being cancelled for his jokes about trans people, but hes still given high-profile Netflix specials. Theres a place in the market for bad-taste comedy, and Family Guy is dutifully filling that hole. Its a show that prides itself on saying the unsayable. Thankfully for most people, what its really saying is the easily ignorable.

Family Guy season 20 begins on Disney Plus in the UK and Ireland on 3 November

Read the original here:

How on earth has Family Guy survived for 20 seasons in the supposed era of political correctness? - The Independent

The Board of Ed Elephant in the Room and Other Passaic Elections Nuggets – InsiderNJ

When one thinks of a Board of Education election, or boards of education in general, it is not common to associate them with political drama.But the 2021 election cycle has shown that no assumption is safe.

In Randolph, the culture war bubbled up when Columbus Day was taken off the school calendar, only to be met with a backlash from the public.This, in turn, led to the knee-jerk reaction where all school holidays were erased, replaced with a simple day off.Another uproar followed and when all was settled, Columbus and all the other holiday names were returned as before.

The Randolph school kerfuffle was picked up by Jack Ciattarellis campaign as an example of political correctness run amok.The Passaic County Republican commissioner campaign even used the decision of the Paterson School Board to swap Columbus Day out as a sign that Democrats were out of control. The Democrats later fired back on social media, saying the county government does not have anything to do with what the schools choose to call their holidays.

Columbus, however, has been stirring controversy for several years.More recent, and more imperative, is the matter of COVID-19 defense and policies which best serve childrens health and education.To keep the focus on Passaic County, the Wayne school board meetings have been a manifest microcosm of the bigger debate on masking. Tensions have run high between those in support of and against keeping kids masked in school. Parents have also raised concerns regarding the content of what they describe as inappropriate, explicit literature in the schools with respect to sex education.

In the summer, the governor issued an executive order requiring all pre-school through high school personnel to be vaccinated or undergo COVID testing every week.Executive Order 251 required all personnel as well as students to wear masks while in school for the 2021-2022 school year.The NJEA, the powerful teachers union, supported the governors decision.

The messaging on mask requirements coming from Trenton has changed over the course of the year, with the government often saying that decisions are determined by the data, reserving the right to issue such executive orders as he deems the coronavirus situation requires.Not everyone agrees, however, with requiring students to wear masks in school.Executive orders from the governor bind the school boards, but there are other areas where the board can exercise control.A group of parents opposed to mask mandates wanted the board to send a letter to the governor, asking that school districts be allowed to set this policy on their own.Initially, the suggestion was taken up, passing by one vote.Then, the decision to send the letter was reversed.

The drama continued when a raucous school board meeting in early October saw a woman condemning certain books in the schoolillustrated books which demonstrated particular sex acts.Parents cheered for her as the board turned off the microphone and a man approached the board itself, being escorted away by police.

Former New Jersey State Senator Norman Robertson (R) took an interest in the developments in Wayne, getting to know many of the parents opposed to the controversial literature.Wayne is a harbinger of things to come in New Jersey, Robertson said.With virtual learning required during most of the pandemic, parents at home were privy to the details of their childrens educational experience in ways that they had not been before.For some, this sparked their concerns and brought them out in large numbers to protest to the school board.Parents became involved because of the things that they saw being taught to the children online, Robertson said.He was unhappy, however, with the way some of the board members have handled the parents concerns.

Matters came to a head in Wayne most recently when the Board of Education meeting was not held because there were an insufficient number of board members to constitute a quorum.A sizable gathering of people had met to make themselves heard, and were angry no meeting would take place.This, of course, with Election Day right around the corner.According to local news, the absent board members all offered reasons they could not attend, but some parents felt it was a deliberate act designed to silence them.

What I would say is, unfortunately, it appears that some people believe in public education, Robertson said, as long as the public has nothing to do with it.

The election, according to the veteran senator, will not put the matter to bed in Wayne, however, and he expects more conflicts between school boards, school administrations, and families going forward.Wayne, in a sense, is the canary in the mineshaft.

THE MUNICIPALITY HAWTHORNE

Elsewhere in Passaic County, the borough of Hawthorne represents one of the battlegrounds of the county with respect to the mayor and council race.Hawthorne is also the only municipality with a Green Party candidate running for local election.Craig Cayetano is running an independent campaign to capture one of the three council-at-large seats.Madelyn Hoffman is the Green Party candidate for governor.

Hawthorne is politically famous for the forty-year reign of Republican Mayor Louis Bay II, whose administration stretched from 1948-1988.Afterward, the borough changed to a Faulkner Act strong-mayor municipal government.All mayors since Bay have been Republican and the council has also reflected a majority of Republican control.However, for the first time, Hawthorne now sees a slight advantage in registered Democrats than Republicans and the Democratic party has new municipal leadership.Hawthorne in the 21stCentury has not been able to return more than 1 Democrat to the council which comprises 4 ward councilmen and 3 at-large seats. A largely ineffectual Democratic Party in Hawthorne, combined with the historic majority of Republicans and Republican-leaning unaffiliated voters meant that the former grew stagnant and the latter became complacent after easy victories, with re-elections a near certainty.

Mayor Richard Goldberg, with some 13 years in the mayors seat, is a distant second to Louis Bays record, but nevertheless is the longest serving mayor the town has seen since 1988.Under his watch, he has appointed a number of Democrats to posts within the town, including the Municipal Alliance, the borough administrator, and the recently-formed Hawthorne Pride Alliance to address matters related to the LGBT community.Goldberg has strong bipartisan chops.

Hawthorne is also the home of former NJ State Senator John Girgenti (pictured, top), a man who, in the past, would have been the strongest Democrat to run against Goldberg, although he did not run.With no other meaningfully competitive Democrat, Goldberggenerally popular and noted for his sense of humorwas able to handily win re-elections that the opposition put in his way.In this cycle, however, he has decided not to seek re-election and a competitive mayoral race began.

Councilman Joseph Wojtecki, the Democrats only voice on the council, threw his hat into the ring.This is his third time running and Paterson Mayor Andre Sayegh at a recent fundraiser dinner lauded his effort, saying, This is your time.Sayegh noted that he won the mayors seat on his third try, and was confident his Hawthorne counterpart would do the same before hoisting his fist into the air like a champion pugilist.

The Republican candidate seeking to succeed Goldberg is Council Vice President John Lane, a man who has served on the council for the better part of two decades and made an unsuccessful primary bid against former Mayor Fred Criscitelli in the past.

Both Lane and Council President Frank Matthews sought to run for mayor, but rather than risk a divisive primary election, they agreed to allow the County Committee to decide which of the two would be the mayoral candidate.Lane prevailed.

The incumbents united, the Republicans nevertheless still faced a primary in June, where former school board member Michael Doyle and tavern-owner Jay Shortway ran as a ticket, while a third Republican, Phil Speulda, ran his own campaign.

The incumbents were solidly victorious in the primary and moved toward the general election.The defeated Shortway, however, filed to run for one of the school board seats, running on a policy of maintaining the status quo.

The Hawthorne race has attracted the attention of county as well as state operatives looking to see whether or not the red borough will have become so purple that it might, in fact, turn blue.If it did, it could well serve as another feather in the cap of former state chairman (and still Passaic County chairman) John Currie.Curries tenure as Democratic chair saw the establishment of Democratic dominion on the county level where Republicans have consistently been frustrated in their attempts to gain freeholder seats.

If Wojtecki does not win he will still remain on the council since he represents Ward 1, and only the at-large council seats are up for grabs.The stakes are higher for Lane who, as a councilman-at-large, would no longer serve as a public official should he lose.

Hawthorne, a sleepy suburb which seldom makes headlines in the Garden State, has become one of Passaic Countys must-watch races.

DISTRICT 39

Senator Holly Schepisi, representing the 39thDistrict of Bergen and Passaic Counties, is running with Robert Auth andDeAnne C. DeFuccio on the assembly ticket.Given the bloodbath which marred the relationship between Auth and Schepisi after the passing of Senator Gerald Cardinale, their names together validate the late-great Prime Minister Benjamin Disraeli.The PM is said to have told Queen Victoria that Great Britain had no permanent friends or permanent enemies, only permanent interests.In this case, a demonstration of party unity must prove somewhat astounding to insiders, given the bitterness of the Schepisi/Auth break.

LD39 Democrats looking to displace the incumbents are senate candidate Ruth Dugan, who served on the Saddle River Board of Ed and is the wife of former state senator James Dugan, while Demarest Mayor Melinda Iannuzzi and Senator Loretta Weinberg aide Karlito Almeda try to dislodge Auth and DeFuccio.

The district is very close in terms of Democratic and Republican voters, and the unaffiliated voters will fundamentally make the difference either way.Schepisi, seen at several Ciattarelli rallies in North Jersey, demonstrated her tenacity and iron will.This was shown when she overcame her former assembly partner Auth, beating him out for Cardinales seat, but also in the highly charged 2019 election where she beat Democrat John Birkner by some 5,800 votes.

Auth, a longtime Cardinale acolyte, brings local name recognition through his incumbency, and DeFuccio a new face and fresh perspective.The Republican and Democratic assembly tickets are, in a way, reflective of each other.Iannuzzi, as a mayor and with her own local name recognition, represents the executive experience and political establishment to give balance to Alemda, a 26-year-old Filippino-American who has served Senator Weinberg, reflecting the growing diversity of the districts constituents generationally and culturally.

District 39 represents a unique palette of experience and continuity along with varied perspectives, all served up with a hefty-dose of New Jersey political diner booth chatter to make the raceand its consequenceswell worth monitoring.

(Visited 73 times, 42 visits today)

See original here:

The Board of Ed Elephant in the Room and Other Passaic Elections Nuggets - InsiderNJ

What Will Journalists Do With France’s Trump? – The Atlantic

Stop me if youve heard this one before: A television star eyes a presidential run as an outsider ready to take on the political establishment. Unlike his competitors, he doesnt shy away from religious or racial provocation, nor does he hide his penchant for conspiracies. He is a vocal opponent of immigration, political correctness, and feminism. To his supporters, he is a familiar face who isnt afraid to tell it like it is. To detractors, hes an inflammatory populist set on dividing the country. The medias wall-to-wall coverage makes him an inescapable presence.

This isnt Donald Trump, though it might be Frances version of him. ric Zemmour, a far-right pundit who has gained ground in recent polls ahead of the countrys presidential election next year, has yet to descend from his proverbial golden escalator to announce his candidacy. But the overwhelming coverage of him in the French media, as well as his increasing presence in the international press, suggests that its only a matter of time before he does.

That Zemmour has managed to attract outsize attention relative to the rest of Frances presidential hopefuls is a testament to his ability to remain provocativea skill that he has honed over the course of his career. Like Trump, he has vexed his way onto front pages and prime-time news broadcasts simply by being the most outrageous voice in the room. The goal, it would appear, is to drum up enough momentum to bolster his anticipated candidacy. And so far, the French press has proved happy to oblige.

The media have been here before. Although the American media did not create Trump (like Zemmour, he was a household name long before he was ever a candidate), they did grant him a disproportionate level of coverage, bestowing upon him more attention and legitimacy than theyve given any of his competitors. With six months left until election day (still a long way away, by French standards), Frances contest has scarcely begun. Yet by over-indexing on a single candidateor, in Zemmours case, a potential candidateFrench journalists look doomed to repeat the mistakes of their counterparts on the other side of the Atlantic.

Much of the medias fascination with Zemmour seems to be excited by his similarities with Trump, a comparison that the 63-year-old Frenchman appears all too happy to embrace. In an interview with The New York Times, he claimed that the cover of his latest book, France Has Not Yet Said Its Last Word, was modeled after the former American presidents book Great Again, which, like Zemmours, was published in the run-up to a presidential election. He also played up some of their other apparent commonalities: their status as political outsiders, as well as their shared concerns over immigration and trade.

Zemmour isnt quite the outsider he claims to be, though. Born in the suburbs of Paris to a Berber Jewish family from Algeria, he studied at Sciences Po, a training ground for the French political class, before becoming a journalist. During his decades-long career, he worked for Le Figaro, Frances center-right newspaper of record, and CNews, the countrys equivalent of Fox News.

What separates him from much of the rest of the French elite is his radical worldview. In addition to his incendiary comments about immigrants and Muslims (he has twice been convicted of inciting racial hatred), he also peddles in historical revisionism (falsely claiming that Frances wartime Vichy government, which openly collaborated with Nazi Germany, saved French Jews) and conspiracy theories (he is a proponent of the great replacement, an ethno-nationalist theory popularized by the French writer Renaud Camus that claims that indigenous white Europeans are being replaced by nonwhite immigrants from the Middle East and North Africa).

Having witnessed the rise of Trump, the French press knows the perils of turning Zemmour into some kind of political spectacle or, worse yet, normalizing his extreme views. Should we start asking ourselves some questions, or do we continue to be manipulated? the French journalist Salhia Brakhlia quizzed her colleagues in response to a tweet by Zemmour, which included a photo of him being swarmed by reporters that he captioned, My friends, the journalists.

Weve been having big debates within the newspaper about how we should cover him, a senior editor at one of Frances center-left dailies, who requested anonymity to speak candidly, told me. Part of the calculus comes down to the fact that Zemmour isnt technically a candidate (he still needs to secure the support of at least 500 mayors across the country in order to be eligible). The other factor is the growing buzz around his campaign. According to the French media watchdog Acrimed, there were 4,167 mentions of Zemmour in the French press in September alonethe equivalent of 139 mentions a day. During the same period, Zemmour received more than 11 hours of airtime, Robin Andraca, a journalist based in Paris who tracks Zemmours television appearances relative to those of rivals, told me. By comparison, Paris Mayor Anne Hidalgo received two hours of airtime. Marine Le Pen, Zemmours main competitor for far-right votes, got even less, at a little more than an hour.

The way Andraca sees it, the media cannot resist divisive figures such as Zemmour, because they make for compelling television and good stories. You are pretty sure that hes going to say something very racist, very problematic, but then its okay because you can talk about that thing for two days, Andraca surmised. Thats magical for journalists.

James Fallows: The media learned nothing from 2016

In this way, French journalists are falling into the same trap as their American counterparts. By rewarding Zemmours extremism with more airtime, as the U.S. press did with Trump ahead of the 2016 election, they send the implicit, if unintentional, message that only the most radical rhetoric is worthy of being reported on. The consequences of this when Trump ran were twofold: Not only did it overrepresent more extreme views in the public debate, but it also encouraged politicians to be more outlandish. Even today, people like Tom Cotton of Arkansas, Josh Hawley of Missouri, and Ted Cruz of Texas get much more attention in the media than more moderate senators who actually make up the majority of the Republican Party in the Senate, Tom Rosenstiel, a press critic who teaches journalism at the University of Maryland, told me. Its a lesson we know but havent learned.

Zemmour isnt simply attracting the lions share of media attention. He is effectively setting the terms of Frances presidential debate, much like Trump did. By overwhelming journalists with a seemingly endless stream of news (or, as the former presidents one-time chief strategist Steve Bannon crudely put it, by endeavoring to flood the zone with shit) and by exhausting public attention, Trump succeeded in turning the press into a kind of pulpit. The agenda of Zemmour is what were talking about in France today: immigration, security, Islam, Thomas Sngaroff, a Paris-based journalist and historian, told me, noting that even in many interviews that dont include Zemmour, his opponents are asked to react to things hes said.

Not all coverage of Zemmour is complimentary, of course. In fact, much of what is written about him is critical, especially as it relates to his more incendiary views. But if theres one lesson that the press ought to have taken from the Trump era, its that whether coverage is critical hardly matters. Were accustomed to the idea that bad coverage is bad for the president, but in the way that Trump operated, it reversed itself, and negative coverage became for him proof with his base that these people are critical of me because they hate you, Jay Rosen, a journalism professor at New York University and the author of the PressThink blog, told me. What I would say to the French is, as soon as you see that happening, where the very criticism that you try to level against this candidate gets incorporated into his pitch, you are in the danger zone and youve got to reconsider your practices.

Here lies the fundamental tension facing the French press right now. To dedicate too much time and space to Zemmour would be to give him the clout that he no doubt craves, and signal to audiences that he is more deserving of their attention than other potential candidates. To ignore him, however, would be to risk falling short of its journalistic duty to report on and scrutinize a viable contender for the French presidency: Two recent polls showed Zemmour winning anywhere from 16 to 17 percent of the national vote, second only to President Emmanuel Macron and, crucially, outflanking Le Pen. (One of the surveys also found that more than six in 10 French voters think the media spend too much time on Zemmour.)

Other factors drive the French medias editorial decision making. For one thing, someone who is seemingly everywhere is difficult to ignore. As the countrys minister of justice bemoaned last week, Zemmour is like a weather forecastevery day there is something new. Whats more, coverage of him is lucrative: A recent issue of Paris Match, which featured a photo of Zemmour embracing his 28-year-old political adviser and alleged mistress on its cover, reportedly became one of the weekly magazines recent best sellers.

But perhaps the main reason that the French media are so saturated with Zemmour coverage is because, out of the dozen or so candidates vying for the presidency (including notable figures such as Hidalgo and the former Brexit negotiator Michel Barnier), he is the most contentious. He knows how to control the media agenda, Benjamin Haddad, the senior director of the Europe Center at the Atlantic Council think tank, in Washington, D.C., and, like Zemmour, a graduate of Sciences Po, told me. He says something horrible and then everyone talks about it Its this vicious cycle that is very difficult to break.

Zemmours latest stunt, which drew widespread coverage and condemnation, was to point a sniper rifle at journalists while attending an arms fair in Paris, laughing and telling reporters to back off. More instructive is another controversy: Zemmour recently pledged that, if elected, he would seek to reimpose a 19th-century ban on foreign names such as Mohammed (no such restrictions currently exist, barring a few exceptions). It was reaction-inducing, perhaps by design. But it wasnt new. In fact, the topic of French names has long been a pet issue of his. In 2016, he publicly criticized a government minister for naming her child Zohra, after her mother, rather than choosing a traditionally French Christian name. He leveled a similar diatribe two years later against a fellow journalist, purportedly telling her that her Senegalese name was an insult to France.

Read: How to discuss the far right without empowering it

Some news outlets, in France and around the world, published stories on Zemmours name comments. Others, however, made the decision not to. That is something we didnt cover, the editor at the center-left newspaper told me, on the grounds that it was not new and was, instead, ridiculous.

How the French media cover Zemmour will ultimately come down to these kinds of editorial choices, whether he declares his candidacy, and how long he retains his position in the polls. But these factors are related. The more incendiary Zemmour is, the more likely he is to draw media attention, and the more likely he is to remain in the public debate.

The way some journalists see it, Zemmour might already be too big to ignore. If we dont talk about Zemmour today, we will be accused of not talking about something we dont like, Sngaroff said, and likened the French medias relationship with Zemmour to that of Frankenstein and his monster. He was made in large part by us, and now hes here. So what do we do?

Read more from the original source:

What Will Journalists Do With France's Trump? - The Atlantic

Larry Summers slams Democrats for failing to tax the wealthy – Salon

When Lawrence Summers tweeted on Sunday that he is "certainly no left wing ideologue," it wasn't a Halloween joke.

Summers is a famous academic who served as Chief Economist of the World Bank and President of Harvard University. Hewas influential in crafting the economic policies for two center-leftDemocratic presidents Bill Clinton (serving in various Treasury Department roles) and Barack Obama (serving as Director of the National Economic Council). Summers' resume is what makes his recent remarksso noteworthy.

"I think something wrong when taxpayers like me, well into the top .1 percent of income distribution, are getting a significant tax cut in a Democrats only tax bill as now looks likely to happen," Summers explained on Twitter. He went on to criticize President Joe Biden's current legislative package for "no rate increases below $10 million, no capital gains increases, no estate tax increases, no major reform of loopholes like carried interest and real estate exchanges but restoration of the state and local deduction explain it."

He added, "We don't need radical new ideas, just determination to implement old good ones." Summers then included a link to a paper he co-authored last year with University of Pennsylvania professor of law Natasha Sarin and research assistant Joe Kupferberg. It calls for stronger measures to make it harder for people to legally avoid taxes and to crack down on illegal tax evasion, which could generate hundreds of millions of dollars in tax revenue.

Want a daily wrap-up of all the news and commentary Salon has to offer? Subscribe to our morning newsletter, Crash Course.

Biden's bill is currently being criticized by progressivesbecause in order to win support from moderate senators likeJoe Manchin and Kyrsten Sinema, as well as many moderate House Democrats the president has agreed to remove a number of tax increases that would have compelled the wealthy to pay a fairer share. They protected President Donald Trump's 2017 tax cuts, kept in a loophole that helps wealthy heirs avoid taxes on their inheritances andjettisoned a proposed tax increase on income accrued from wealth that would have taxed it like ordinary income. They also refused to raise taxes on corporations or eliminate a tax break that mainly helps private equity firm managers and hedge fund managers.

This is not the first time that Summer has openly disagreed with Biden and the Democratic Party, even though he continues to characterize himself as a supporter. What makes this public dissent notable, though, is that Summers is approaching his criticism from the left this time rather than from the right.

When it was revealed last year that Summers was advising Biden's campaign, progressive groups protested until he promised that he would not work for a future Biden administration.In June, The New York Times reported that Summers' political clout remains so significant that the Biden administration felt compelled to address Summers' claim that the president's March stimulus bill would overheat the economy and cause a spike in inflation. At the time Summers described it as "the least responsible macroeconomic policy we've had in the last 40 years," blaming both the Democratic Party's left wing and the entire Republican Party.

The concern about rising inflation coming from excess spending would seem to put Summers more in the Manchin/Sinema wing of the Democratic Party than the more progressive one. This makes his recent policy statement all the more striking, as it potentially signifies that moderates as well as progressives are unhappy with some of the changes to the original proposed legislation.

Summers has also attracted headlines for reasons unrelated to economic policy and not always in flattering ways. He stepped down as President of Harvard University in 2006 partially because of comments he made about women in STEM fields that were criticized as sexist. He has been broadly critical of political correctness, referring to it as a "creeping totalitarianism."

See the original post:

Larry Summers slams Democrats for failing to tax the wealthy - Salon

Mrs Browns Boys star Brendan OCarroll says the show was woke before woke was invented… – The Sun

WITH its old-school gags and stereotyping, Mrs Browns Boys is often viewed as the nemesis of woke culture.

But creator Brendan O'Carroll, who also plays the shows matriarch Agnes Brown, insists theyve blazed a trail for political correctness.

8

And as the BBC1 sitcom marks its tenth year on our screens with a Halloween special tonight, he says thats never changed.

He said: At the time I wrote the character of Agness gay son, it was a radio series, and it was illegal in Ireland to be gay. So I actually wanted to buck the system.

And I dont know where and how you use the pronouns them and they - but Agnes Brown is gender fluid after all.

But in all seriousness, its very hard to do a comedy show without offending somebody.

He isnt too worried about becoming the latest victim of cancel culture, spurred on by snowflakes on social media.

He said: I must admit I almost want to get cancelled because with all these other things going, I feel a bit left out.

But if the BBC write their policy on what goes on TV based on whats said on social media then the BBC have lost a sense of their own being.

Its the audience that makes the call - and the best device for cancelling something is the remote control .

But viewers arent switching channels, even after all these years. Millions still tune in for the shows - particularly the Christmas Specials which are ratings hits every festive season.

And Brendan has attracted some surprising fans.

Live Blog

Exclusive

Exclusive

8

He said: We had Tyler Perry making a guest appearance and we were sitting together having a coffee and he said in an offhand way: I showed some clips of this to Beyonce and she thought it was hilarious. And Oprah thinks its brilliant too.

And of course in the UK the palace asked for advanced copies of the show. The Queen gets it, and given the last two years shes had if we can make her smile this year Ill be very happy.

With the seal of approval from rock royalty and real royalty, Id like to see the woke brigade cancel it now...

8

MOST HAUNTED hostess Yvette Fielding wont need to look far for a successor if she ever decides to put an end to spook spotting.

Her daughter Mary Beattie seems to be just as fascinated by the afterlife and putting the wind up people.

On the My Mate Bought A Toaster podcast, former Blue Peter presenter Yvette said: We live in a very old, creepy house and the earliest foundations date back to the 1400s.

What Mary does is she likes to dress up in scary stuff and hide and then jump out at me when Ive just come back from a Most Haunted investigation.

Oh, shes a nightmare.

8

8

MAYA JAMA still manages to look scarily good as she gets in the spirit for Celebrity Juices Halloween spooktacular this weekend dressed as the Bride of Frankenstein.

Im A Celebrity runner-up and Radio 1 DJ Jordan North is almost unrecognisable as a mummy as is the former Breakfast Show host Nick Grimshaw as the Grim Reaper. And you can bethost Keith Lemon goes all out for the ITV2 special on Sunday.

8

8

PARALYMPIC gold medallist Ellie Simmonds is to present a new BBC documentary on the subject of dwarfism.

The swimmer will examine a pioneering drug that promises to increase the rate of growth in children born with Achondroplasia the genetic condition behind most cases.

And she is looking into the debate about whether cutting-edge medicine that can stop disability should even be used.

Ellie will also meet families who are involved in the drug trials to explore both sides of the argument.

She said: Growing up, these drugs werent available to me.

Had they been, I dont know what my parents would have done. But I wouldnt change myself.

I love who I am and I am glad that I have dwarfism because I think my body is strong and beautiful.

8

A SPOONFUL of good old stardust is a welcome ingredient for almost every telly show.

And thats especially true of the Great British Bake Off.

Its celebrity specials are always a must-watch and the latest line-up preparing to hit our screens wont disappoint.

Laura Whitmore, Emma Willis, Ed Gamble and The Inbetweeners Blake Harrison will join from the world of television.

Meanwhile, representing the musical side of showbiz, Ellie Goulding, Annie Mac and Example will be dropping in to the famous tent for its culinary challenges.

But after all the success they have racked up between them, will they be bothered about a Hollywood handshake?

See more here:

Mrs Browns Boys star Brendan OCarroll says the show was woke before woke was invented... - The Sun

Lowell High, Alison Collins and the Sunset’s rage against diversity – San Francisco Chronicle

The temperature in the Outer Sunset is around 5 degrees lower than the rest of San Francisco, but it always feels much colder. There, the sun struggles to penetrate overcast skies and the wind seeps through row after row of single-family town houses, unhindered by skyscrapers or housing complexes. It is a place where people live, an uncharming expanse of mid-century architecture built on what was once miles of sand, the suburbs, the Outside Lands and where most of my Chinese American friends grew up. And at its edge lies the oldest school west of the Mississippi, my alma mater, Lowell High School.

Founded in 1856 as a boys-only grammar school, Lowell migrated from downtown to the Panhandle in 1913 and then to its current location in 1962. The campus is a short descending staircase from Eucalyptus Drive and from there it sprawls out and downward, until it nudges Lake Merced and the Stonestown Galleria. For four years, Id ride the M or K Muni line from my home in the Mission and walk through the schools front doors; the Sunset kids would hop off the 29 and face an uphill trek to Lowells backside.

Chinese Americans comprise about 21% of San Franciscos population and are the citys largest ethnic minority group. Some families have deep roots the children of railroad workers, the laundromat owners and shopkeepers who built Chinatown but most immigrated here after the Hart-Celler Act was passed in 1965, which opened the U.S. to more immigration from Asia. Chinese immigrants came to San Francisco from Hong Kong or Guangdong Province and worked tough blue-collar jobs, even though many were well educated. They sent their kids to college and bought houses in the Sunset, replacing the Irish and Italian Americans who fled to the suburbs in the 1970s.

At the risk of courting Asian Americas oldest albatross the idea that were all the same its the Sunset that sees Lowell High School as its to lose.

For those who grew up in the San Francisco Unified School District system, Lowell is synonymous with achievement. The school has produced three Nobel Prize winners, one U.S. Supreme Court Justice and a handful of minor celebrities. While Lowell athletics range from unbeatable (track and field) to abysmal (football), its equipment and facilities are top of the line, thanks to a loyal alumni network and generous endowment the Lowell Alumni Association holds over $6 million in assets and that grew by $865,000 in 2020 alone. Lowell is the largest feeder school to the University of California system and offers the most Advanced Placement classes in the San Francisco school district.

Until recently, Lowell was one of only two city public high schools the Ruth Asawa School of the Arts being the other that used a merit-based admissions policy rather than a semi-random lottery. Ambitious students tested into Lowell and were rewarded with well-funded programs, academic rigor and sleepless nights, leaving their lower performing peers in the dust.

Because Lowell grounds itself in elitism, its culture is one of exclusion and tends to recapitulate existing inequities. Like the Sunset, Lowells demographics have shifted from predominantly white to mostly Asian American over the past few decades, but the school has also become notorious for admitting fewer and fewer students from other ethnic and racial minority groups. Last year, it counted just 52 Black students out of around 2,900; Asian Americans, who make up over 50% of the student body, outnumbered them nearly 32 to 1. For comparison, district-wide enrollment is about 8% Black and 33% Asian American.

In 2016, the Lowell Black Student Union staged a walkout after a student had put up a racist poster parodying Black History Month in the school library. The Black students called the incident typical of their Lowell experience, marked by daily microaggressions, snide references to affirmative action and lack of social support. While systemic racism is a truism, the water we swim in, a snake eating its own tail, here at Lowell you see its clear emergence not by design but from design, in a cold place where peers and parents revere success, where its taken for granted that half of the student body looks the same.

Last October, in the midst of Black Lives Matter protests and shrinking student enrollment, the San Francisco Board of Education suspended Lowells selective admissions process for the coming school year, citing the difficulty of collecting grades and standardized test scores during a global pandemic. Though positioned as an interim solution to logistical issues, the change quickly garnered controversy. Parents of Lowell students decried the move as anti-Asian racism; right-wing publications latched onto the story as political correctness gone wild; someone photoshopped swastikas on pictures of board members Alison Collins and Gabriela Lopez and posted them on social media; the head of the Lowell Black Student Union received death threats. A few months later, after yet another incident an anonymous troll posted pornography and spammed anti-Black slurs to an online anti-racism class the board voted 5-2 to make the admissions change permanent.

There are legitimate grievances to be had with the current Board of Education. Their failed proposal to push racial equity by renaming 44 public schools was reactionary, poorly researched and expensive; the Lowell decision also felt hasty and ill-timed. But if not now, then when? The board has the impossible task of making diversity a priority, and the Sunset is impossible to please and quick to retaliate.

In April, the newly formed Friends of Lowell Foundation, a nonprofit dedicated to reversing the change, filed a lawsuit against the district. The suit claims that procedural issues void the admissions decision, which was made without the input of the Lowell community. However, considering that Lowell has failed to prioritize racial diversity for decades, its hard not to see this legalistic, middle of the road argument as another bid to keep out the rabble. Even though the school years already begun, the foundation is still trying to revert to the old system: In September, it filed another injunction against the change.

A second legal threat comes from Harmeet Dhillon, a San Francisco attorney, top Republican National Committee official, Trump legal adviser and regular Fox News guest. She claims that the lottery is rigged because it prioritizes students from the underperforming and majority Black and Hispanic Willie Brown Middle School, and that the change will encourage racist acts against Asian American students.

My social media feeds feature a stream of otherwise apolitical friends reposting videos depicting violence against Asian Americans, Chinatown elders shoved to the ground, stabbed in the face and so on, an endless scroll of viral, harrowing content mainlined into the lizard brain. Its often impossible to disentangle racial animus from systemic poverty. But when the assailants in these viral videos happen to be other people of color, Dhillon and her ilk push a narrative that resonates with the latent racism in the Asian American community. Its the easy explanation, the big grift: the implication that race in America has always been a zero-sum game and this time the Asians are losing.

And then theres the controversy around Collins, the Board of Educations only Black female member. Earlier this year, Diane Yap, the Friends of Lowell Foundation vice president, unearthed a 2016 tweet thread from Collins. After recounting a racist incident that her daughter faced at Ruth Asawa High School, she wrote, Many Asian Am. believe they benefit from the model minority BS ... They use white supremacy to assimilate and get ahead. She continued, Where are the vocal Asians speaking up about Trump?

During her tenure on the board, Collins has done solid work with groups like the Chinese Progressive Association in 2019, she co-sponsored its Our Healing in Our Hands Resolution, which led to increased mental health resources for students of color in the citys public schools. Yap, meanwhile, has been caught dog whistling for white supremacy: On Facebook, shes rallied against critical race theory, asserted that systemic racism does not have a consistent or causal effect on academic performance and joked that a Black person would beat you up if you called them a colored person.

Nevertheless, Collins tweets, which were posted years before she took office, ignore the work of Asian American activists and address us as a monolith. Even worse, she hasnt taken her cancellation on the chin. After being stripped of her titles and committee seats, Collins, who is married to a wealthy real estate developer, attempted to sue the struggling school district for a whopping $87 million before withdrawing the suit last month.

The same adage applies to Collins and her detractors alike: Dont hate the player, hate the game. Collins lawsuit is frivolous and self-aggrandizing; her tweets were borderline racist, generalizing and hurtful. But shes essentially correct, at least about the Sunset.

Historically, Chinese Americans have been among the biggest opponents of the school districts desegregation efforts. In the 1970s and 1980s, they advocated for plans that let them opt out of busing, putting the onus on students in Black neighborhoods like the Bayview to commute across the city if they wanted to attend better schools. In the 1990s, the Asian American Legal Foundation and the Chinese American Democratic Club sued the school district to end the use of racial caps, which dictated that no racial group could exceed 45% of any schools student body, and won.

Since then, the districts diet-diversity initiatives the diversity index, a composite of socioeconomic factors as a stand-in for race; and from 2011 on, a system that prioritizes school choice have led to resegregation. More than a quarter of the citys public schools enroll greater than 60% of a single racial group, and Black and Latino families, who generally submit their paperwork later than white or Asian American ones, end up with lower priority for contested schools.

Many of my friends in the Sunset remain loyal to a gilded ideal of American meritocracy. They oppose affirmative action, diversity initiatives or anything that would threaten their edge in the game of capital. Unlike many of their immigrant parents, theyre not anti-Black on principle, but generally advocate for conservative policies to the same effect. By design, the Sunset is disconnected from the rest of San Francisco. Its restrictive single-family zoning laws were conceived as a vehicle for segregation, and its residents consistently block new housing developments, choosing clean streets and homogeneity over the needs of the city. About 20% of voters in the Sunset went for Trump in the 2016 election, a significantly higher percentage than most city neighborhoods.

Its ironic that the de facto moniker for people of Asian descent, Asian American, was radical before it was descriptive. In the late 1960s, student activists at San Francisco State and UC Berkeley intended to create a pan-Asian coalition, a political group critical of white supremacy and standing in solidarity with Black, Latino and indigenous power. But here we are, half a century later, more fractured than ever, the label stretched to its breaking point. Asian America was always too broad and too unwieldy to comfortably house all of us.

In the stony sleep of leftist solidarity the death of organized labor, the birth of the neoliberal beast the Chinese immigrants who came to San Francisco in the 1970s and onward found shelter in higher education. Insulated by wealth and the Sunsets de facto racist housing policy, they traded an Asian America founded on collective resistance for one based on identity politics. We have representation Crazy Rich Asians and a Marvel superhero and a flourishing literary scene even as the old dream of self-determination recedes into the past.

The incoming freshman class at Lowell is roughly 5% Black and 22% Latino, double the proportion of the previous class. In turn, the proportion of Asian American freshmen has decreased from 42% to 38%, a mere 4% for the chance to iterate on, or even revolutionize, Lowells values.

I remember my tenure at Lowell as a bleary-eyed dash to the finish line. My competitive, college-bound peers constantly compared grades and accolades and wore sleep deprivation as a badge of pride. I had good teachers and bad ones, who coasted on the assumption that most Lowellites would teach themselves while the rest would fail. I opted for classes that gave easy As and gravitated toward friends who let me copy their homework. By Lowell standards, I thrived; I graduated with a high grade point average and matriculated to the UC system. And yet my high school experience failed to uplift me. It mostly reinforced what I already knew: I had tested into Lowell because my parents had taught me how to chase success. I would keep succeeding because of that gift and those without it would continue to struggle without help.

Curiosity, kindness and grace I would learn only later and elsewhere.

I have visited Lowell only once since I graduated my high school friends prefer to come to me, since the Mission has better weather and more expensive bars in 2017, when the Obama years had already curdled into a quaint and distant disappointment. The buildings facade had been repainted, from red and white (our school colors) to a vaguely Soviet shade of green. From a distance, I had trouble distinguishing its silhouette from the relentless gray engulfing it. As I entered, I got lost in once familiar hallways, said hello to the teachers who still remembered me, and left, realizing that time had made me a stranger to the place.

Lowell High School stands for many things academic achievement, racial inequities, Asian America but it also stands for itself, the physical space it occupies. With its generational wealth and storied history, Lowell is responsible for transforming that tract of the Sunset into a place of public good, one that prioritizes the needs of its people above all else. Set Asian America, the grifters and Alison Collins aside for a moment, and picture a revelation peeking through the fog, way out west where the country meets the sea. Imagine a community of students in Lowells cradle gathered from all across San Francisco, dedicated to each other and the city they share, seeing themselves reflected in that oft-forgotten corner of the Sunset, their hour come round at last.

Justin Lai is a San Francisco native and freelance writer. You can find him at http://www.torwards.com. A version of this piece was originally published in the Potrero View.

Continue reading here:

Lowell High, Alison Collins and the Sunset's rage against diversity - San Francisco Chronicle

The 10 US states with the most hate groups | TheHill – The Hill

The Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC), which defines a hate group as an organization that attacks or maligns an entire class of people, tracks the number of active hate groups in the country each year.

America is changing faster than ever! Add Changing America to your Facebook or Twitter feed to stay on top of the news.

According to the civil rights organization's estimations, the top 10 states with the most hate groups in 2020 per capita are: Montana, Tennessee, Nebraska, Arkansas, New Hampshire, Alabama, Virginia, South Carolina, Idaho, and Nevada.

Montana has six hate groups, including two anti-Muslim groups, two white nationalist groups, a racist skinhead organization, and a chapter of the Proud Boys a self-described brotherhood of Western chauvinism that spreads anti-political correctness and anti-white guilt agenda, according to the Southern Poverty Law Center.

Without breaking down the groups per capita, California has the most hate groups with 74. The state is followed by Florida, 68, Texas, 54, New York, 37, Pennsylvania, 36, Tennessee, 34, Virginia, 33, Georgia, 29, North Carolina, 29, and Arizona, 26.

With a population of a little more than 1 million, Montana hassix hate groups per million civilians in the state, whereas no other state hasfive per group per million civilians.

Almost 85 percent of Montanas population is white, according to the U.S. Census.

In total, there are 838 hate groups in the country. Compared to 2018, which had 1,020 active hate groups, there has been a decrease. However, groups are communicating online through encrypted platforms making it more difficult to trace.

READ MORE STORIES FROM CHANGING AMERICA

UNVACCINATED PEOPLE SHOULD EXPECT TO CATCH COVID-19 EVERY 16 MONTHS

TOP HEALTH EXPERT CALLS FOR URGENT RESEARCH ON NEW UK VARIANT THAT MIGHT BE MORE CONTAGIOUS THAN DELTA

FLORIDA SCHOOL QUARANTINES STUDENTS WHO GET VACCINATED FOR 30 DAYS

US CITIES AT WAR WITH THEIR OWN POLICE DEPARTMENTS OVER VACCINE MANDATES

45 STATES ARE DOING BETTER WITH COVID-19, BUT THESE 5 ARE SURGING

View post:

The 10 US states with the most hate groups | TheHill - The Hill

The Head-Turning Gesture Donald And Melania Trump Made At The World Series – The List

The Trumps were also captured joining in the Braves' signature "tomahawk chop" before the game, which didn't go unnoticed in the press. The cheer, which originated in 1991, has come under fire from Native communities who say it promotes racist stereotypes (viaKCRA). However, it's not likely that Donald Trump was too worried about the implications of the war cry; he once stated, "[T]his political correctness is just absolutely killing us as a country. You can't say anything. Anything you say, they'll find a reason why it's not good" (via CNN).

The gesture was greeted with roaring approval by Trump fans who saw it as a slap in the face to "woke liberals." Others felt differently. Keith Olbermann commented on Twitter, "Well, it IS a cousin of the Nazi salute so."

What really got people's attention, though, was Melania Trump's face. In a clip now circulating on social media (and seen here on MSN), the former first lady smiled broadly for the cameras as she faced her husband. A second later, turning away from him, her smile faded into an expression that looked positively disgusted.

Naturally, Twitter exploded with comments and jokes. Writer and pastor John Pavlovitz quipped, "Melania despises him as much as decent people do" (via Twitter). Humorist Paul Rudnickadded on Twitter, "Melania can maintain a smile for three seconds and then even rubbing the krugerrand she keeps in her pocket can't control the nausea."

The rest is here:

The Head-Turning Gesture Donald And Melania Trump Made At The World Series - The List

Lincicome: What’s in a name? Quite a bit when it comes to sports teams – Daily Herald

Today's lesson in semantics is prompted by the World Series, a misnamed event that offends no one even though the world is much larger than the two semi-southern cities where it is taking place.

I notice no protests from, say, Cameroon or Latvia, insulted that, though they are certainly a part of the world, it is not a series to which they are invited or even thought about.

But that's another column. In this one I would like to address a serious issue about one of the World Series teams and its complete disregard for correctness and propriety, the team whose nickname is a slur against an entire community, marginalized and disrespected.

I speak, of course, of the 11th grade English teacher trying to keep his class from getting restless when he explains that "Astro" is not a noun. "Astro" is a prefix. "Astros" is a plural of a prefix. Prefixes do not have plurals.

Yo, Mary, wake up David, there in the back row. This will be on the test later.

Oh, sure, you will find indignant essays moaning about sports nicknames that denigrate Native Americans and insult their heritage. You'll find those everywhere when a team like the Atlanta Braves gets on the big stage with their fans chanting and tomahawk chopping.

While this is certainly bad behavior it is typical of sports fans who routinely harass not only the visiting team but lately even the President of the United States, most notably with a short four-letter verb followed by his name, bleep Biden, alerting networks to keep a finger on the mute button.

Disrespect is endemic, or maybe pandemic, in sports. One of the more opaque chants comes from Arkansas where fans shout "Wooo, pig sooie," meaning what is not clear nor just exactly who is being insulted.

The tomahawk chop is clear, it mocks Native Americans. It can be interpreted no other way. There are other hand signals that may be used, some requiring more than one digit, a tradition that goes back to thumbs-up or thumbs-down in the arena. Now even the helpful OK sign has taken on a hateful quality.

If all of this was just trash talk, a way to intimidate an opponent, that would be one thing, not acceptable but one thing. But this is another thing. The chop is an organized emblem of community hate, participated in by politicians and celebrities as well as ordinary Walmart shoppers.

Caring folks get upset about those things. The Washington Redskins have dropped their nickname altogether. The team is anonymous now, much like the Native Americans it demeaned, known only as WFT, a dangerous sequence of initials in these times. One slip or autocorrect and you have a whole new meaning.

Of course "Redskins" is a racist trope and should be banished. There is no defending that. Same with the Indians in Cleveland. They are now the Guardians. Rather grand are Guardians, usually safeguarding an entire galaxy but valid, too, for a city, even a county, considering the limited reach of Cleveland's baseball team.

No matter. The most noticeable casualty in that adjustment is Chief Wahoo, a childhood pal and easy to draw. So long, you bucktoothed goof. As for the Guardians, it may still be possible to use Tribe, I suppose, there being no collective noun for Cleveland's new team nickname.

Tricky business this political correctness, and full of defenders of the one right way. Solutions are easy.

For Atlanta, simply drop off the "s" and "Braves," a noun, becomes "Brave," an adjective and a fine quality. This would work for Kansas City as well. "Chiefs" become "Chief," though the arrowheads have to go.

As for Washington, why not "Wind?" You know, hot air. Or "Government," since the two are interchangeable anyhow.

There is no rule that says a team's nickname must end in "s." Chicago, to keep it local, has had a run of singulars, from the Fire, the Sky, the Sting, the Blitz.

I hope this has been of some help in understanding the obligation sports teams have of representing themselves without offending anyone.

Houston started out as the politically incorrect Colt 45s, stayed that way until fake grass was invented. Then they became the Astros. I'll say it one more time, class. Astro is a prefix.

Pop quiz at any time.

See the article here:

Lincicome: What's in a name? Quite a bit when it comes to sports teams - Daily Herald

How the Word ‘Woke’ Was Co-Opted And Weaponized – WDET

Modern conservative use of the word woke taps into a larger societal backlash againstsocial justice movements and efforts to confront racism. Its a word that means something very different now than it did just a few years ago in the Blackcommunity.

Woke initially came out of the Black community It meant that, if you were saying stay woke or be woke there was a kind of seriousness and playfulness, that you need to be aware of the social conditions of America to surviveit. Joshua Adams,journalist

Broader attitudes toward wokeness invoke similarly co-opted and weaponized concepts such as cancel culture and political correctness. But when we dig deeper into the meaning of the word and how it is used by conservatives and most white Americans, it becomes clear that the wordhas lost all of its original meanings in order to create a new slur to be leveled against progressives and AfricanAmericans.

Joshua Adams is ajournalist whowrote a piece for Colorlines in May titled How Woke Became a Slur.

He says that language is incredibly important in the Black community.African American vernacular English comes out of the slave experience, he says. Black people couldnt learn the language formally We had to learn it through the ear. He also notes the necessity for slaves to be able to communicate in ways that slave owners couldntunderstand.

Woke initially came out of the Black community, says Adams. It meant that, if you were saying stay woke or be woke there was a kind of seriousness and playfulness, that you need to be aware of the social conditions of America to surviveit.

Damon Youngis co-founder of Very Smart Brothas, author of the memoir What Doesnt Kill You Makes You Blacker.He wrote a piece in The New York Times in 2019 titled, In Defense ofWoke.

Hesays, although the meaning of the word has changed for people who arent Black, the meaning hasnt changed as much for AfricanAmericans.

For Black people, woke still has the same connotation as someone who has consciousness, but maybe takes that consciousness too far, Youngexplains, someone who maybe believes conspiracy theories, who maybe shows a more performativeBlackness.

Young says conservatives like toco-optand weaponizeterms that begin in the Blackcommunity.

They are very effective at distilling these complex ideas around a single word and galvanizing support around the use of that single word, he says.Its easier to rail against something than to createsomething.

WDET strives to make our journalism accessible to everyone. As a public media institution, we maintain our journalistic integrity through independent support from readers like you. If you value WDET as your source of news, music and conversation, please make a gift today.

Donate today

Read the original post:

How the Word 'Woke' Was Co-Opted And Weaponized - WDET

Evolutionary Leaders: In Service to Conscious Evolution

While driving across the Richmond Bridge from Berkeley to Marin County in California I had a random 70s song list playing on iTunes.(I know I can hear my DJ son rolling his eyes).Anyway, Carly Simon came on singing an old favorite

Cause I havent got time for the painI havent got room for the painI havent the need for the painNot since Ive known you

You showed me how, how to leave myself behindHow to turn down the noise in my mind.

As I sang along, I heard the words differently.Earlier that day, on a zoom call with two colleagues who are experts in creating large scale spiritual and self-development summits I was shocked to discover that there were hundreds of thousands of people attending summits on TRAUMA.If you look up trauma summit on google, you will get 350,000 results in less than one second and if you google trauma directly, over 9 trillion results in the same amount of time.Thats A LOT of interest in trauma.

Its worth taking a moment to contemplate humanitys relationship to trauma beyond possibly our own personal experience.Since the dawn of time the human story, though filled with great achievements and development, has been one of fragmentation, separation and suffering.The evolutionary template for human existence is a design emphasizing individual development through a kind of heros or heroines journey.Our existence depends on being separate individuals learning to survive and succeed in this world.

One simple example is the split between matter and spirit we experience through our individual incarnation.We can feel trapped, lost, alone and disconnected from source. We focus on trying to stay anchored into our bodies or we meditate and try to free ourselves from the limitations of the mind and density of physical existence. The endless struggle to overcome separation defines our relationship to the earth, ourselves, our bodies and each other. And even with all the time and energy devoted to our individual healing and development, we seem to be swimming in an overwhelming amount of...

Here is the original post:

Evolutionary Leaders: In Service to Conscious Evolution

Witness at trial over Unite the Right rally describes being terrified by marchers, badly injured when car struck her – kuna noticias y kuna radio

CNN

By Mark Morales and Ralph Ellis, CNN

The first witness in the civil lawsuit filed against organizers of the 2017 Unite the Right rally testified Friday, saying the attacks by angry White nationalists left her physically and emotionally scarred.

Natalie Romero said she and friends were standing at the Thomas Jefferson statue on the University of Virginia campus the night of August 11, 2017, when they were surrounded by hundreds of chanting White nationalists carrying tiki torches.

The crowd shouted racial slurs, spit at her and her friends and even threw torches at them, she said.

I tried to keep my head down. I felt like a mouse trapped, Romero testified. The scene felt like a Salem witch trial-type, like I was going to be burned at the stake, she said.

The next day the UVA student took part in a counterprotest in downtown Charlottesville when she was struck and flipped over a car barreling down the street the same car which ran over and killed counterprotester Heather Heyer.

Romero was dragged to safety and propped up by strangers who tried to keep her awake. Feeling the end was near, Romero said she needed her cell phone.

I thought I was about to die. These are my last seconds of breath, Romero said as her voice began to crack I had to call my mom now.

Romero said she is still recovering from her injuries.

Romero said she was in a wheelchair for two months before learning to walk with a cane. She suffered a fractured skull, and a broken tooth cut her lip. She added she still has intense headaches and sensitivity to light. Applause can trigger her, she said.

Romero said in her nightmares she sees tiki torches and can still hear the White nationalists chant You will not replace us.

During cross-examination Friday, rally organizer Jason Kesslers attorney, Jim Kolenich, asked Romero if she recognized any of his defendants in the courtroom. Romero said she did not.

Richard Spencer, the lead organizer for the August 11 torchlight rally, asked if Romero recognized him at either the tiki torch rally or the demonstrations the next day. Romero initially said no.

I would also remind you that the injury blurs a lot of things, said Romero, who often forgot what the question was while she was answering in her own testimony.

Christopher Cantwell questioned Romero for around 30 minutes, wanting to know if she had ever attended any Antifa rallies or noticed any of her fellow students carrying weapons, a point he had made in his opening argument.

Romero said she was not a member of Antifa and she had not seen her fellow students and demonstrators carrying weapons.

The United the Right rally ostensibly was called to protest the removal of a statue of Confederate Gen. Robert E. Lee, but violence broke out when White nationalists, White supremacists and counterprotesters clashed.

Dozens of people were injured and Heyer was killed when James Fields, who came to protest the statues removal, drove his car into the crowd. Fields is serving two concurrent life sentences.

City residents and counterprotesters who were injured filed the lawsuit and are seeking compensatory and statutory damages for physical and emotional injuries they say they suffered.

Among the defendants are 14 named individuals, including Fields, Kessler, Spencer and Christopher Cantwell, who became the face of the rally after being featured in a Vice documentary.

The suit also names 10 White supremacist and nationalist organizations, including Moonbase Holdings LLC, the company that runs the Daily Stormer website; the League of the South, the Nationalist Socialist Movement and at least two chapters of the KKK.

The defendants say they did not initiate the deadly violence that ensued; they argue they were exercising their First Amendment right to protest. They also say there was no conspiracy and the violence stemmed from law enforcements failure to keep the opposing groups separated.

The second prosecution witness Friday was Devon Willis, who described the scene at the Thomas Jefferson statue.

I remember that someone, from the direction of the mob, threw some mysterious fluid, and threw it at the direction of our feet, Willis said. Seemed like it might be some sort of lighter fluid and their strategy might be to burn us alive.

Willis said it got on his shoes and he tried to move farther up the statue to get away.

I thought I had made a very terrible mistake and that I might die that night, Willis said.

Willis will continue his testimony Monday.

The-CNN-Wire & 2021 Cable News Network, Inc., a WarnerMedia Company. All rights reserved.

CNNs Dakin Andone, Aya Elamroussi and Amir Vera contributed to this report.

Excerpt from:

Witness at trial over Unite the Right rally describes being terrified by marchers, badly injured when car struck her - kuna noticias y kuna radio

Kyle Rittenhouse and the New Era of Political Violence – The New York Times

A police officer in Kenosha, Wis., shoots a Black man named Jacob Blake seven times from behind, leaving him partially paralyzed. [gunshots] Black lives matter! Crowd: Black lives matter! Crowd: Black lives matter! Two days later, in the midst of protests and unrest, a teenager carrying an assault rifle kills two people and wounds a third. [gunshots] [yelling] [screams] Oh, my God! Now that shooter, 18-year-old Kyle Rittenhouse, who was 17 at the time, is standing trial on charges of murder. The case will likely focus on the few crucial minutes around the fatal shootings on Aug. 25 of 2020. [gunshots] But our investigation of these events reveals that the story is about much more than a single person. We analyzed hours of footage from that day and traveled to Kenosha just weeks after the events to hear from witnesses, several of whom have now been subpoenaed in the Rittenhouse trial. It felt volatile. It felt tense. It felt like a war zone. Were not like, bad people or like, people just going out to like, [expletive] up. I feel like had we not been there and not reacted the way that we did to the situation, I think we could have been looking at an even worse scenario. We also spoke with the sheriff who led law enforcements response that night, which has become the subject of lawsuits. Black lives matter! While protests against systemic racism were what first drew out crowds in Kenosha, Rittenhouse, his victims, and many of those closest to the shootings, were white. What we found was a complex set of motivations on the streets that night that reflected the growing polarization in the country and helped set the scene [gunshots] for violence. On the Sunday before the Rittenhouse shooting, Kenosha police officers respond to a domestic complaint and try to arrest Jacob Blake. As Blake moves away from them and leans into his car, hes holding a knife. [gunshots] An officer shoots him. [gunshots] Blakes lawyer later said that Blake didnt pose a threat. Video of the shooting quickly spreads online. To hear about it is one thing. But to watch it, I guess it got to the point where, how many more? Koerri Washington, whos a local live streamer and now subpoenaed in the Rittenhouse trial, arrives to document the situation. I mean, there was tons of people already starting to gather there. In the air you could kind of feel the tension. At a certain point, more sheriffs arrived on the scene. And their presence kind of aggravated the crowd. And from there, it just started going crazy. [explosions] For the next 48 hours, the protests intensified. [crowds chanting] And at night, local businesses are looted and set on fire. Eventually, a new group inserts themselves into the already chaotic scene dozens of men, mostly white, equipped with military-style weapons and gear. And soon, a Facebook post will incite more of them to come. Its Tuesday morning, 13 hours before the Rittenhouse shooting, when on a Facebook page called the Kenosha Guard, a post publishes. So my post just basically said, are there any patriots among us willing to take up arms and defend our lives, our families, our neighborhoods and our businesses? The author of the post is Kevin Mathewson, a controversial former city councilman, whos now been subpoenaed in the Rittenhouse trial. Hours after his post, thousands have seen it, and Mathewson arrives at Civic Center Park, the epicenter of the recent protests. I wanted people to come play defense. I wanted people to come to protect themselves. Reporter: But did any business owners ask you for help for protection? I was not asked directly by a business to defend anybody. Say his name. Crowd: Jacob Blake. At this point, demonstrators are marching peacefully in downtown Kenosha. Theyre demanding an end to police violence against Black people. The presence of openly armed white men inflames the situation. The Second Amendment is meant for everybody. Its not exclusive to white people. Out of everyone that I saw with the militia, they were all white males. So I honestly feel that they came to incite more racial problems. Porche Bennett, whos a local activist, has been protesting for the last two days. You get to see the people now that you have been living around forever. There are no more masks being worn. Are there some truly peaceful protesters that may have been a little intimidated about seeing an armed person with a gun? Probably. But the Second Amendment is very clear. And my rights dont end where somebody elses feelings begin. Throughout the day and early into the evening, more openly armed men arrive near the protests. Some position themselves close to businesses that had been damaged on earlier nights. This is where we first see Ryan Balch, an Iraq and Afghanistan veteran from a town 40 minutes away, whos there with a group of friends. Hes also been subpoenaed in the Rittenhouse trial. I would say what brought me to Kenosha was that I felt like something needed to be done. If law enforcement is not going to try to keep the peace, then somebody else needs to go out there and make sure that that happens. Balch argues that his military training gave him the skills to help bring events under control. We kind of trusted ourselves to insert ourselves in that situation, and bring the situation to the correct conclusion. At the time, he also supported the extremist Boogaloo movement, which is anti-police and calls for the governments overthrow. He says he later stopped supporting the movement. Balch and his friends eventually link up with other openly armed men. Among them is Kyle Rittenhouse. Rittenhouse is 17 years old. Hes from Illinois, and isnt legally allowed to carry a gun in Wisconsin. Balch says he didnt know Rittenhouse or the people he was with, but decided to team up with them anyway. They werent on the level of me and my guys. I dont think they trained formally together at all. But the more guys you got, the better off you are. As for Rittenhouse, we dont know whether he sees himself as some kind of neutral force between the protesters and the police, like Ryan does. His social media posts at the time seem to indicate he was a strong supporter of law enforcement. Since the shooting, hes also been seen flashing white power signs and hes become an icon for far-right groups. Crowd: Black lives matter. Soon, Balch and Rittenhouse will come face to face with racial justice protests. Crowd: No justice! No peace! The organized daytime protests at the park are now over, and law enforcement has announced a curfew. Our goal that entire evening was to disperse people from the Civic Center after curfew and to get them to leave, to get them to go home. Kevin Mathewson, who called for the presence of armed civilians that morning, says he left because he was worried about the safety of his family 10 miles away. My wife was on the phone with me saying, Hey, get your ass home. Kids are scared. Im scared. [car alarm] Breaking curfew was worth helping to create some type of positive change. Its one thing to sit at home and say that, yes, Black Lives Matter. But its so much more impactful to put another body on the street. Nathan Peet has been demonstrating in Kenosha for days. But tonights protest is different, and hes carrying a gun. I dont normally like to carry at protests because I dont want it to be seen as a sign of aggression. But I did carry on Tuesday specifically because of the threats that I saw floating around in the Kenosha Guard group. [car alarm] Just arriving at the protests are Hannah Gittings and her boyfriend, Anthony Huber. Both are unarmed. But by nights end, Huber will be shot and killed by Kyle Rittenhouse. Gittings has now been subpoenaed for Rittenhouses trial. I wouldnt really say we were like, heavy activists or anything previously. But we knew Jake Blake, and felt like we needed to be present and standing united with the people who believe the same things that we do and want basic human rights, civil rights, equality. The standoff between protesters and the police becomes more violent. [car alarms] Everything started to move super quickly. Police in riot gear all yelling to disperse and go home, youre breaking curfew. [car alarms] I got grabbed by the police. And he threatened to lock me up if he caught me out there again at night. I just went home. Faced with this massive show of force, only a small number of protesters choose to stay. Among the shrinking crowd is Gaige Grosskreutz, a paramedic from Milwaukee, whos also under subpoena for the Rittenhouse trial. When you go into a protest or a march in a medic capacity, youre essentially waiving that luxury to be able to pick a side because ethically speaking, you know, youre there to treat everybody. Like Nathan Peet, Grosskreutz decided to come armed with a handgun. Cause its my right. Simple as that. Hell later be shot by Kyle Rittenhouse after drawing his gun and trying to stop him. [car alarms] It was going the direction we wanted it to go. Law enforcement has one clear plan on this night. Were not going to let the city of Kenosha burn because you want to in the late evening hours start destroying stuff. Over the course of the next two hours, officers force some of the protesters southeast across the park and onto this street, Sheridan Road, in the direction of the openly armed civilians. Balch, Rittenhouse and other armed men are still stationed a few blocks down the road near businesses that were damaged on previous nights. I think that the police set the stage for it. They knew that there were armed groups down there. And they could have not pushed the protesters down Sheridan. The sheriff told us that the police didnt plan for the armed presence down the road. Reporter: What did you tell your deputies to do if they encountered armed militia people? By the time I think I knew that they were out there doing this, we had our staff was already deployed out there protecting the area. There was no direction to deal with the Kenosha Guard in any way at that point. We were midstream on this one, and we were going forward with the plans we had already had. Once protesters and openly armed civilians encounter each other, theres a confrontation. As Balch and his group argue with protesters, Peet is live streaming. Between Ryan and his group and the other protesters, I definitely felt quite a bit of tension. There were a couple very, very hot-headed members of his group actively agitating protesters. Hey, hey, hey, hey. Balch tells protesters to keep moving. Right. Reporter: One of the militia members claims that a police officer told him that the officers were going to push the protesters out of Civic Center Park, and that the militia would handle them. I dont believe that for a second. The police continue pushing protesters further down the road to this intersection near a gas station. Here is where we first see Joseph Rosenbaum, the first person Kyle Rittenhouse fatally shoots that night. He joins the fight against the armed civilians ... ... as other protesters tried to stop him. Rosenbaum has just been released from the hospital after undergoing mental health treatment. His reasons for being here are unclear, and he doesnt appear to have attended a protest before. But his actions on this night will add to an already volatile situation. At this point, the group of protesters has thinned out even more. All of this is done pretty much in the name of Black Lives Matter, and there is definitely Black people in the crowd. But there definitely was more white people. The armed men chalk up any conflict with the protesters to miscommunication. We had some negative interactions. But that was more of a confusion on their part about what we were about. But many of the protesters feel uncomfortable with the armed presence. They accuse Balch and others of playing vigilante. Why else are you going to show up especially Kyle Rittenhouse show up to a city you dont even [expletive] live in, armed to the [expletive] teeth to protect your community? This is not your community, pal. You dont live here. Youre welcome. But the police praise the armed men, and offer them assistance. This is not the group of people we want here. But you can open carry weapons. So there wasnt a violation of the law. But just like the protesters, the armed civilians are violating the curfew Thank you. and police treat them much differently. Reporter: After that curfew, it didnt seem like police was trying to actively disperse or arrest any of the armed civilians. Why is that? I am not aware of any of the protesters that werent being violent that were arrested either. Peaceful people were not getting arrested that night. The armed men appear emboldened by the inaction of the police towards them. Minutes after encountering the officers, Rittenhouse explains to a reporter from the Daily Caller why he thinks he belongs in Kenosha. Its about 15 minutes until hell fire his first shot. At this point, several of the people weve been hearing from are now close to each other, and the situation is about to turn deadly. Nathan Peet is filming from here. Hannah Gittings and her boyfriend, Anthony Huber, are nearby. Koerri Washington is here. His footage captures both Gaige Grosskreutz and Ryan Balch walking by. Then, Kyle Rittenhouse runs past his camera. I had been looking kind of at him the entire time because he looked young, he had a gun. So at the point where I see him run by me, I was like, thats weird. So I followed down in that direction. Rittenhouse walks towards a parking lot where cars are being vandalized. He passes Joseph Rosenbaum, who was fighting with the armed men at the gas station, earlier. Rosenbaum now starts chasing Rittenhouse, and throws a plastic bag that holds his belongings from the hospital. Close behind them, a man holds up a handgun and fires it. [gunshot] We dont know why. Then Rosenbaum lunges towards Rittenhouse. Rittenhouse fires four times. [gunshots] Had I been in his shoes getting chased, and then I heard a gunshot, I cant say that I would have done anything differently. Rosenbaum, whos been hit, falls to the ground. [gunshots] There are three more shots from someone else in the parking lot. Pop, pop, pop, pop, pop, pop, pop, pop. And I was like, oh, so they are really shooting. Oh, man. Maybe they really are really just trying to kill people. And if they were going to take advantage of a situation, Im a Black person. And there is I dont want to be a target. Rittenhouse calls a friend while others are helping Rosenbaum, whos on the ground. Then, he flees the scene. He didnt disarm himself after the first shooting. He continued to run around. As a gun owner, I view his actions as completely irresponsible. You come running through looking wild with a gun on you, people are going to think that youre doing something wild with a gun on you. So they reacted the way they should have reacted. And as soon as they were all saying he shot somebody, Anthony was gone. And I tried to grab onto him. And nobody was going to stop him, you know? And then I hear a bunch more gunshots down the road. And I was like, I just had a feeling. I just had a feeling it was him. Rittenhouse trips and falls. Anthony Huber hits Rittenhouse with a skateboard, and attempts to disarm him. Rittenhouse shoots him in the chest. Here is Gaige Grosskreutz with his gun drawn. He also gets shot and calls out for help. The reality of it is, is this is going to be a part of my life from here on out. Rittenhouse runs toward police vehicles and raises his hands. The police make no attempt to stop him, and he isnt arrested until the next day. I didnt talk to them, but Im sure they didnt know what this person was doing. I was looking for my partner. Like, Im just trying to find where he went. I knew he had been shot, you know. And then later on I saw that video. They had pulled Anthony into that truck like minutes before I got there. Both Joseph Rosenbaum and Anthony Huber died from their injuries. Anthony Huber, man, he went down like a hero, you know. Thats he thought there was a threat there, and he was reacting to it. And he just wasnt quick enough to react to that threat. And so I mean, he got a really good death out of that. He was 26. He had like its just like brutally cruel and unfair how that can be snatched away like that by anybody who feels like it. Yeah. Its awful. Its awful. And theres no theres no words to say to like, make that feel any better. I believe truly in my heart that if it wasnt for my actions, and these brave men and women who answered my call to arms, I think that we would have seen a way worse outcome than what we saw. Reporter: But two people died. Yeah, two people died, and thats terrible. But when you have people burning down buildings, theres always that chance life is going to be lost. Who were the good guys and who were the bad guys that night? I dont think there were any. I think the militia guys and the protesters were just individuals who were stuck in a situation, and were doing the best they could with it. Kyle came here, and he played cowboy. He played vigilante. He came here looking for a confrontation, and he found one. Whos responsible? I cant tell you. You know, I guess everyone who was there that night holds some level of responsibility. And who carries the most, I cant tell you. Why didnt you guys arrest him right then and there? Because if it would have been one of us, things would have happened a lot faster and a lot differently. Some people feel like Kyle Rittenhouse is a hero, and some people feel like he is a murderer. I feel personally that the situation, regardless of what was happening, should have resulted in something completely different and not people dying.

Read more:

Kyle Rittenhouse and the New Era of Political Violence - The New York Times

Basics of XMR and Why It’s Becoming a Crypto of Choice – TechiExpert.com

The number one reason for anyone to transact with and invest in Monero cryptocurrency is its unique commitment to private and secure transactions and usage. In comparison, many transactions made using the largest and most popular cryptocurrencies can still be traced to keys, or in other cases, transactions are recorded and publicly viewable.

While some of these cryptos now offer add-ons for better privacy or have wallet options that perform these security for them, only Monero guarantees such anonymity baked into the coin itself, which leaves much less to consider when deciding on the best Monero wallet for managing all crypto transactions. A growing number of people around the world have already placed their investments on this coin, consequently increasing its value rapidly.

To understand why Monero is turning into a top cryptocurrency, here are some of the basics of XMR and what sets it apart from the rest.

Privacy from the Beginning

Originally called Bytecoin in 2012, the new cryptocurrency was created as an altcoin focused on privacy and anonymity. Unlike other altcoins, its code was not based on the most popular cryptocurrencies at the time, but instead, it was created from scratch, integrating special technology called CryptoNote to become nearly untraceable.

The coin faced some controversies and had several glitches, but the community behind the coin quickly removed any unscrupulous figures from the project. Within two years, Bytecoin underwent hard forks to fix all of its bugs while further improving its security, and by the end, its name was changed to Bitmonero and eventually shortened to Monero.

CryptoNote and Other Privacy Functions

The original bytecoin used what was called CryptoNote for its privacy. It worked by using ring signatures through which a random temporary public key or address was made in place of a senders real key when sending Monero to another user. A distinct transaction key would also be created to divert traceability away from the receiver, protecting both parties in the transaction.

This method of ring signatures was greatly improved after hard forks since its earlier iterations. Monero now utilizes its blockchains to pool several public keys who sign or verify a transaction to serve as possible senders or receivers, but through this process, there is no way for an intruding party to know which of the keys is actually involved in the transaction.

As with any technology, this protocol does not remain invincible forever, and there are eventually people who figure out how to work their way through these privacy measures. However, Moneros code is open source, and as the community grows larger, more people can contribute to updates and improvements that make Moneros privacy increasingly more difficult to bypass.

Altcoins usually go off on rough beginnings when they first launch, but what differs is how steadily their value changes and sustains afterwards. In the case of Monero, its value was able to rise from $13 to $470 within less than a year when it was launched in 2017. Although it has not gone down to double-digit values since, nowadays it oscillates between $130 and $500, currently ranking in the top fifty cryptocurrencies.

Currently, there is no way around the volatility of the cryptocurrency market, so as with all other altcoins, the market behavior of each is purely up to speculation. However, the more practical way to discern cryptocurrencies is by what they each promise with regard to the future of finance. In this case, Monero is better taken as a long-term investment.

Monero and the Future

Technology in all fields has been rapidly developing, but this has come with equally pressing concerns about privacy and security in the wake of increasing hacker attacks and targeted advertisements. It is clear that not even peoples finances are safe from such intrusion either, which only serves to heighten the appeal of Moneros privacy-oriented direction.

These claims are not merely self-proclamations either. Experts and leaders in software security such as John McAfee have expressed their support for the coins pursuits in financial security for its users. More than this, the value of Monero itself has been steadily rising as more people continue to support and to invest in it for its cryptocurrency privacy developments.

Perhaps investing in Monero is a no-brainer at this point, especially for those who want to keep their financial activity and personal data safe in the digital space. Furthermore, it might just be the right time to catch the altcoin before it skyrockets in value in the next few years. However, it is important to be responsible with handling investments, no matter what they are.

In the case of Monero, the investment must come from expendable money since it is never a good idea to risk ones funds for basic needs by investing in such an unpredictable market. If the initial investment is no problem, it is just as important to secure a proper wallet, which provides just as many privacy features as the coin itself.

Read more:

Basics of XMR and Why It's Becoming a Crypto of Choice - TechiExpert.com

Mechazilla is Getting its Arms. Now it can Catch Starships! – Universe Today

The past few weeks have seen a flurry of activity at SpaceXs Boca Chica Launch Complex! In addition to the SN 20 prototype completing a static fire test with three of the new Raptor Vacuum 6 engines this month, the facilitys Mechazilla Launch Tower recently received a giant pair of steel arms. Once integrated with the ~135m (~450 ft) tower, these arms will be responsible for catching spent Starships and Super Heavy boosters as they return to Earth.

The Tower will also prepare missions by stacking first stage boosters with Starships and refueling these elements for the next launch. In this respect, the Launch Tower is a crucial piece of the Orbital Launch Site (OLS) architecture that Elon Musk has planned for Boca Chica. Once the Starship completes its Orbital Flight Test (which could happen soon!), Boca Chica will become a spaceflight hub where launches and retrievals are conducted regularly.

In addition to the Launch Tower, several elements will be added to the OLS as part of its Ground Support Equipment (GSE) site. This will likely include additional fuel tanks, water tanks, pipelines, a pumping station, and other amenities. Together, the Launch Tower and the GSE will enable SpaceX to launch, retrieve, refuel, and relaunch its vehicles, ensuring rapid reusability and minimized turnaround time.

These giant steel arms, nicknamed the chopsticks by the crews at Boca Chica, are mounted to a carriage-like structure. The Tower, meanwhile, is equipped with rails that have a series of skates, which the ground crews attached the carriage to using a series of large pins. Once the arms are integrated, they will be paired with a third Quick Disconnect (QD) arm that will stabilize boosters whenever they are in the process of being stacked with the Starship.

The QD arm is also tasked with distributing power, commlinks, and ~1.088 million kg (2.4 million lbs; 1200 US tons) of cryogenically-cooled propellant to the upper stage. This was the first component installed aboard the Launch Tower, which took place in late August, about a month after the crews finished stacking the Tower. Around the same time, construction began on the carriage-like structure and the two giant arms, which took about three months to complete.

The integration of the QD arm with the Launch Tower began on Oct. 6th, when the ground crews moved the carriage into a vertical position and reoriented the chopsticks so they were angled the right way. By Oct. 20th, they completed the first step of installing the carriage and arms onto the rail skates using the facilitys largest crane. Twelve connections need to be made in total before the catch arms will be a part of the Tower without the help of a crane.

However, before the catch arms can perform on their own, the ground crews also need to finish installing the hundreds of meters of steel cable that will support the carriage and arms and (with the help of a system of pulleys) lift it up and down. They also need to finish work on the giant cable carrier that will connect the structure to the ground and control systems.

In other news, Elon Musk recently divulged that the long-awaited Orbital Flight Test could take place sometime in November. Musk shared the news via Twitter (as always), indicating that the test could happen if all goes well and pending approval by the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA). This test will see the SN 20 prototype fly to an altitude of 200 km (124 mi), then make a soft touchdown on the landing pad.

Once complete, this flight will validate the Starship as an orbital vehicle and demonstrate its ability to return from space safely. For this reason, the SN 20 is the first prototype to be outfitted with heat-resistant tiles to protect the prototypes stainless steel hull from the scorching heat it will encounter during atmospheric re-entry. This update came a day after the SN 20 prototype successfully concluded the first static fire test of the Vacuum Raptor Engine 6.

These engines have a larger nozzle than the Raptor Engines optimized for sea level, which gives them improved performance in the airless environment of space. The SN 20 will also have three of these Raptor engines to ensure that it can make a controlled landing once its returned to Earths atmosphere. Once this orbital flight is complete, the Starship will officially be ready to move into commercial flights.

These developments are timely, given that Musk hopes to send the Starship on its inaugural mission by 2023. This mission is being financed by Japanese billionaire, entrepreneur, and art collector Yusaku Maezawa and will see a crew of eight artists making a circumlunar flight (the purpose of which will be to inspire art and raise SpaceXs profile). Musk has also indicated that his company plans to send uncrewed missions to Mars by 2024, followed by crewed missions by 2026.

Thats a tall order, for sure. And such a plan requires a robust testing schedule! But if this latest news from South Texas is any indication, SpaceX might make those deadlines!

Further Reading: Teslarati

Like Loading...

Read the original here:

Mechazilla is Getting its Arms. Now it can Catch Starships! - Universe Today

The last decade in space: NASA, SpaceX and more – The Verge

The same year that The Verge came into being, another decades-long program was coming to an end. In July 2011, NASAs Space Shuttle Atlantis, with a crew of four on board, blasted off from Kennedy Space Center in Cape Canaveral, Florida, bound for the International Space Station. It was the last time the Space Shuttle would ever take flight and the last time that people would launch to orbit from the United States for nearly a decade.

I didnt start covering space until after the Shuttle stopped flying, but the end of the program was still a pivotal moment for me. NASAs workhorse spaceplane had been a major staple in my life ever since I was born. Both my parents had worked on the Space Shuttle program at Johnson Space Center for nearly the entirety of their professional careers, and for them, its termination was a huge loss. An end of an era. As I watched Atlantis wheels touch down on a Florida runway one final time on TV, I couldnt help but feel that the US was throwing in the towel on human spaceflight.

Yet there were rumblings of new beginnings. During the last few years of the Shuttle program, when I was in college, my dad started experimenting with his own elaborate plan for returning astronauts to the Moon, just as a side project. He wanted to work on something that gave him hope for an exciting future in space. Like any respectable engineer, he made a PowerPoint presentation. And he showed it to the family... a lot. The plan relied on a mix of different rockets all working together to get people and fuel to space. Some of the vehicles were already operating, some still in development. One rocket he envisioned using was a vehicle I had never heard of before called the Falcon 9 Heavy.

I can still remember looking over his shoulder at the computer in his office during summer break, as he pulled up the rocket makers website, this small company called SpaceX. He told me it was founded by the same guy whod created PayPal, and that he thought this was somebody to watch. Mostly, he was impressed at the companys low prices. NASAs biggest weakness had always been exorbitant costs that always seemed to balloon, making it prohibitive for anyone but the government to afford launching to space. But SpaceX boasted incredibly low prices for getting cargo to orbit. He thought their cost structure would change everything.

After the 20th time of listening to his presentation, I promptly tried to forget about all of it when I went back to school. Back then, I had no idea that the PayPal guy would show up again in a big way.

Theres plenty to debate about whether the Space Shuttle program should have ended the way it did. But its conclusion certainly marked the beginning of a new era for NASA and the space industry at large. The Space Shuttle years embodied a time when the government was the primary gatekeeper to space, especially human spaceflight. In the years after Atlantis final flight, the world has seen private space companies leap forward in major ways. Notably, the rise of SpaceX from a bit player to a space behemoth changed the game. Just a year after the last Shuttle flight, SpaceX launched a cargo Dragon capsule to the International Space Station, the first time a private spacecraft had ever docked with the ISS. It was just the beginning of many more firsts to come.

It turned out that my dad was onto something. SpaceXs focus on lowering the cost to get to space certainly played in its favor when securing NASA contracts and customers, and the company captured plenty of followers due to its lofty goals of reusing rockets and sending humans to the Moon and Mars someday. Though the company still clamors for government funding and sometimes makes bold predictions it doesnt actually see through, SpaceX continues to defy expectations with each new accomplishment.

Myriad space companies have sprouted and started to mature since, all aimed at capturing something like SpaceXs success. Blue Origin and Virgin Galactic are dueling to send tourists to the edge of space and back, while Blue Origin also hopes to launch people beyond Earth orbit and to the Moon. Satellite companies like Planet, Spire, OneWeb, and more have capitalized on technology miniaturization, creating satellites that are smaller than ever. And dozens of companies including Rocket Lab, Virgin Orbit, Astra, and Firefly, have created their own rockets to send those small satellites into orbit and beyond. Companies like Astrobotic and Intuitive Machines are working on their own robotic lunar landers, while others like Axiom and Sierra Space are building their own private space stations. Maxar and Astroscale continue to tinker with making satellites that can repair other satellites already in orbit.

Its a type of diversity that has made covering space an extremely intense and dynamic profession, very different from just a decade ago. When I did finally become a space journalist and started attending launches, I spoke with other reporters who had covered Shuttle during its twilight years. And I was a little surprised to learn that they found it to be rather boring. Every few months, the Shuttle would launch, and then itd come back down. It was all pretty routine stuff. Compared to today, it was a much more predictable time.

Now, the space beat is a completely erratic profession. Important human launches will take place in the middle of the night, billionaires will launch to space within weeks of each other, Elon Musk will conduct rocket tests with just a moments notice, or the International Space Station will unexpectedly lurch and spin out of control for a few minutes, sending mission controllers into a panic. Its hard to know what to expect in just a week alone. In the meantime, NASA is still a constant dominating presence. The space agency continues to explore the cosmos with a plethora of robotic explorers, which fly off toward distant asteroids and planets, scooping up materials for scientists back home to analyze. Sometimes those robots work sometimes they dont. As journalists, we have to be ready for any manner of failure, often writing a post for success and one for all the possible ways a spacecraft can explode. And that doesnt even touch on the periodic UFO mania that pops up like clockwork.

With the rise of SpaceX and other commercial companies, theres certainly been an influx of enthusiasm from the public, eager to lap up any new innovative updates about our push into space. People will camp out in front of SpaceXs test facility in Boca Chica, Texas for days and weeks, just so they can witness the construction of SpaceXs next-generation rocket, Starship, in real time. Thousands of space lovers will tune into launch livestreams for every major takeoff, so they can witness the awe of a rocket igniting again and again.

Of course, theres been the opposite kind of reaction, too. The prevalence of billionaires in the commercial space race has been nothing short of divisive. When Jeff Bezos and Richard Branson flew to space on their own rockets this summer, many saw the launches as the worlds most expensive vanity projects, while others pondered if there was something better they could have spent their money on. And not everything SpaceX does is met with joy. The companys Starlink initiative, aimed at sending thousands of satellites into orbit to provide broadband internet coverage to the Earth, has been derided and chastised as polluting the night sky with artificial light, as well as creating a much more crowded space environment. Meanwhile, the problems we all continue to grapple with on Earth sexual harassment, diversity and inclusion, and burnout to name a few are still a problem in the space world, too.

But one thing that cant be ignored is that private space companies are pushing boundaries in ways that many people thought impossible decades before, at least without significant help and oversight from NASA or the government. Nine years after Atlantis made its final flight, SpaceX launched two NASA astronauts to the space station, the first time a private company had ever sent humans into orbit. More than a year later, SpaceX took it even further by launching four civilians to orbit; none of them were astronauts or military personnel. They were a tech billionaire, a cancer survivor, an engineer, and a professor. It was a gateway mission, proving that people dont necessarily need to be NASA astronauts to see the curvature of the Earth from more than 300 miles up.

As a reporter, its been wild to watch it all unfold and witness as space coverage blends into mainstream coverage more and more. When I first started reporting, I was used to being the lone person, staring at my computer screen, intently watching as each rocket took flight. Last year, when SpaceX launched its first astronauts, it felt like millions of people were watching along with me. When the launch got delayed at the last second, pushed to a few days later, my entire company collectively groaned in agony. It was fun to share that experience with them, one Ive felt countless times before.

The year 2011 may have seemed like the end of an era for space, but a new one has blossomed in the years since. I can only imagine what the next 10 years will bring.

See the original post:

The last decade in space: NASA, SpaceX and more - The Verge

SpaceX CEO Elon Musk Wants to Spend $50 Billion To Bring Humanity to Mars – Science Times

SpaceX CEO Elon Musk is once again criticizing the proposed billionaire tax, which could cost him up to $50 billion if passed. He claims that the tax is put toward his goal of reaching Mars using rockets built by his firm, SpaceX.

The billionaire, who also happens to be the world's richest person, has other plans for his vast fortune - he wants to make humanity interplanetary.

"My plan is to use the money to get humanity to Mars and preserve the light of consciousness,"he tweetedtoday.

The New York Timesreported on Tuesday that Senate Democrats propose to tax billionaires on unrealized increases in value for liquid assets like stocks as part of a $1.5 trillion spending proposal.

This is why Musk is denouncing a proposed billionaire tax in the United States Congress, which, if passed, would require him to pay $50 billion in government dues. Business Insiderexplained that Musk might be spending his $50 billion on SpaceX rockets and technology that will carry people to Mars.

But Elon Musk, as Fortunepoints out, has frequently relied on government subsidies to build his firms, including a $465 million loan from the US Energy Department in 2010.

In addition, NASA awarded SpaceX a $2.9 billion contract to create a lunar lander as part of the Human Landing System program.

SpaceX CEO has long believed that the best thing mankind can do is create outposts on other planets, particularly Mars.

(Photo : Getty Images)US entrepreneur and business magnate Elon Musk gestures during a visit at the Tesla Gigafactory plant under construction, on August 13, 2021 in Gruenheide near Berlin, eastern Germany. (Photo by Patrick Pleul / POOL / AFP) (Photo by PATRICK PLEUL/POOL/AFP via Getty Images)

ALSO READ: NASA Delays SpaceX Crew-3 Mission to November 3 Due to Weather Conditions

@twiiter|https://twitter.com/elonmusk/status/1453852886933377028?@

In a tweet, SpaceX shared their "Gateway to Mars" in a 90-second video that showed the Starship being wheeled to the launch pad, lifting off, doing intricate flips, and landing safely on the ground.

Musk also shared an incredible photo of the Starship and Super Heavy at the company's Starbase in Boca Chica, Texas, with a full moon behind them. In the tweet, he said, "Starbase under development."

Musk plans to create an Interplanetary Transport System (ITS) for regular flights to Mars using SpaceX's 120-meter Starship spacecraft atop a Super Heavy rocket as part of his space tourism objective. The spaceship would be capable of transporting 100 people from Earth to Mars and back.

For those Mars voyages, he plans to launch 1,000 or more ITS spacecraft, each with a capacity of 100 passengers. According to Space.com, Musk is planning an architecture that will deliver one million people to Mars over the next century, producing a thriving colony.

Musk predicts a cost of $100,000 to $200,000, which he claims is less expensive than the predicted $10 billion costs of traditional spaceflight technologies. He also calculated that constructing a metropolis on Mars would cost $10 trillion.

SpaceX plans to fly its first orbital Starship test mission in the coming month, ahead of a 2024 Moon landing with the first woman and person of color under NASA's Artemis program.

RELATED ARTICLE: Honda Makes Engine For Reusable Rocket Prototype; Are They Joining Space Race?

Check out more news and information on SpaceX in Science Times.

Original post:

SpaceX CEO Elon Musk Wants to Spend $50 Billion To Bring Humanity to Mars - Science Times

Psychable CEO to be Featured Speaker at Microdose Wonderland Conference to Discuss Affordability and Accessibility of Psychedelic-Assisted Therapy -…

Jemie Sae Koo Speak on Making Psychedelic-Assisted Therapy More Accessible

LOS ANGELES, Nov. 01, 2021 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- When Jemie Sae Koo and Matt Zemon founded Psychable, the #1 most trusted and comprehensive online community dedicated to connecting those interested in legally exploring psychedelic-assisted therapy with practitioners in the space, they recognized a need for more access to the transformational power of psychedelic-assisted therapy.

Now, with Psychable boasting over 2,500 practitioners on its platform, CEO Jemie Sae Koo has been tapped to share her vision for the future of psychedelic-assisted therapy in the U.S. and across the world with attendees at Wonderland: Miami by Microdose, the largest psychedelic medicine business event.

Psychable entered the market as a sought-after solution in the mental health space. With legislation surrounding the descheduling and medical legalization of psychedelics taking root across the U.S., an increasing number of people are seeking information on alternative wellness methods and legal paths to pursue them at home and abroad. As a result, Psychable grew quickly into the most trusted and comprehensive online community for those seeking education and treatment in psychedelic-assisted therapy, integration and aftercare.

Wonderland is one of the premiere gatherings for forward-thinking today. Im excited to be a part of this years conference to share our vision on affordability and accessibility of psychedelic medicine with attendees, not only as an entrepreneur in psychedelic wellness, but as someone who had my own transformative personal experience with the healing power of psychedelics, said Jemie Sae Koo, CEO of Psychable. I look forward to sharing the thought process behind our buy-one give-one program with ketamine-assisted therapy, donating a subscription to a veteran, first responder, or member of an underserved community with every new subscription sold.

Sae Koo will be speaking on Psychedelics and the Current Medical Model along with a panel featuring Dr. Geraldine Kuo; Kimberly Juroviesky, President of Ketamine Taskforce; Lynn Marie Morski, President of Psychedelic Medicine Association; Olivia Mannix, CEO of Cannabrand; and Sophie-Charlotte Adler, Psychologist at the Instituto Dr. Scheib.

Story continues

We are honored to be featured alongside of industry and academic leaders including Rick Doblin, Executive Director of the Multidisciplinary Association for Psychedelic Studies (MAPS); Robin Carhart-Harris, Director, Psychedelic Division of the University of California San Francisco; and Matthew Johnson, Professor of Psychiatry and Associate Center Director of Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, said Matt Zemon, CSO of Psychable. As the conversation around psychedelic-assisted therapy advances in culture, medicine and legislation, we remain committed to educating people around the world about their treatment options and continuing to foster deep trust within Western and indigenous practitioners in the space.

Sae Koo and Zemon are united in a belief that psychedelics can provide meaningful and transformative treatments for not only those struggling with a myriad of ailments, but also those looking to transform their lives for the better. With both having transformative experiences with psychedelic medicine that led them to pursuing a Master of Science Degree in Psychology with a focus on Psychedelic-Assisted Therapy, theyve curated a team of experts with deep experience to lead the Psychable community to support all phases of the journey from information to integration.

To hear more about Sae Koo and Zemons thoughts on affordability and accessibility during the Wonderland Conference in Miami on November 8th and 9th, tickets are available at https://microdose.buzz/?ref=11669. Enter Psychable20 for a 20% discount.

About Psychable

Psychable is the #1 most trusted and comprehensive online community connecting those who would like to legally explore the healing power of psychedelics with a network of practitioners and psychedelic-based treatments, including integration, psychedelic-assisted therapy, and retreats. Through its ketamine-assisted telehealth therapy offering, and an industry-leading Buy One, Give One model, Psychable provides life-transforming treatment to those in need, including veterans and those in underserved communities.

Psychable was launched in 2021 by Jemie Sae Koo and Matt Zemon, successful entrepreneurs whose transformative experiences with psychedelic medicine led them to each pursue a Master of Science Degree in Psychology with a focus on Psychedelic-Assisted Therapy. Through Psychable, their mission is to transform the lives of millions of people suffering with conditions such as depression, PTSD and addiction, and to empower those who want to live a more optimized life.

The platform is supported by a passionate team of experts in psychology, business, medicine, and law. For more information on our mission and community, visit https://psychable.com/, or follow us on Linkedin, Instagram, Twitter, and Facebook.

Contact: media@psychable.com

Read this article:

Psychable CEO to be Featured Speaker at Microdose Wonderland Conference to Discuss Affordability and Accessibility of Psychedelic-Assisted Therapy -...

Should psychedelics be decriminalized in California? The debate over current legislation is intensifying – CBS News 8

The state of Oregon has already decriminalized certain psychedelics, along with the cities of Seattle, Denver, Washington DC, Santa Cruz and Oakland.

SAN DIEGO COUNTY, Calif. Following three deployments to Afghanistan as a U.S. Army Ranger, veteran Jesse Gould returned to civilian life a changed man, dealing with intense bouts of anxiety and depression.

He was ultimately diagnosed with PTSD.

"There was nothing I could point to that made me happy, so I knew something had to change," Gould said. "Otherwise, I feared the worst at that point."

After some initial hesitation, and doing a lot of research, he decided to try a psycho-active plant-based treatment called ayahuasca.

"I just decided to take that leap of faith," he told News 8.

He traveled to Peru for a week-long retreat where, over the course of multiple indigenous ceremonies, he took ayahuasca in a closely-monitored environment.

"For me, there were very tangible benefits," Gould said.

Some studies show ayahuasca, whose active ingredient is the hallucinogenic drug DMT, can create feelings of euphoria, helping to treat anxiety and depression.

Gould said the treatment has helped him to deal more effectively with the trauma he had suffered.

"By the end of it, it was extremely apparent that it was completely different from what I had been told - the 'evil' that drugs are," Gould added.

Gould has now formed a nonprofit called Heroic Hearts Project, connecting veterans struggling with mental health issues to psychedelic therapy options.

He's also a vocal supporter of California Senate Bill 519 (SB519), statewide legislation that aims to decriminalize the possession and use of psychedelics like psilocybin mushrooms, LSD, DMT, mescaline, and MDMA.

Already, the state of Oregon has decriminalized certain psychedelics, along with the cities of Seattle, Denver, Washington DC, and here in California, Santa Cruz and Oakland.

"These drugs are saving people's lives," said State Senator Scott Wiener, who drafted this bill last year, and plans to re-introduce it in the upcoming legislative session.

"We have failed," Wiener told News 8. "The war on drugs has been an abysmal failure, so let's take a different approach and acknowledge that drug use is a health issue and not a criminal issue."

However, SB519 is facing intense opposition from a growing chorus of critics, from law enforcement to religious groups to anti-drug abuse nonprofits such as CASA, or Community Action Service Advocacy, based in San Diego.

"This isn't about stopping putting people in jail for using psilocybin, which really doesn't occur," said Dana Stevens, CASA's executive director. "It's really about just normalizing another whole layer of drug culture, and that's troubling because we see what happens to kids."

Senator Wiener counters that this legislation is specifically for those 21 and older.

"I don't see any protections," Stevens responded. "Just saying that it's for people 21 and over doesn't do it."

"Teenagers are using psychedelics now," Wiener said. "This isn't going to increase it or decrease it. It just means we are not going to be arresting people and throwing them in prison for possessing and using."

Jason Baker, a public health advocate for CASA, does not agree.

"We do not know the long-term repercussions of what we're doing here," Baker told News 8.

"My concern is that these drugs get into the hands of people that are already struggling with mental health issues and we just amplify the problem that we already have," he said.

Dr. Carl Hart, a neuroscientist at Columbia University who specializes in substance abuse and addiction, said that current research shows certain psychedelics, like MDMA, have shown promise in addressing mental health conditions.

"They can be hugely beneficial," Dr. Hart told News 8. "The scientific literature has shown this over and over. Study after study has shown that the drug decreases symptoms associated with post-traumatic stress disorder."

Another recent study indicates that psilocybin, taken for major depressive disorder, showed significant results after four weeks.

However, Stevens believes these drugs should first be approved by the FDA, not the state legislature, before being used as treatment.

"Take it through the proper scientific rigors of how we create medicine in America," Stevens said. "We have a system, and we've seen that system work."

Jesse Gould, though, said he may not be alive had he not found a treatment that worked for him.

"I know that if I kept rolling the dice that it eventually wouldn't go in my favor," he added. "So I am fortunate that I did find this when I did because everybody's luck runs out."

This legislation has already been passed by the State Senate and could be voted on by the Assembly in the spring or summer of next year.

See the rest here:

Should psychedelics be decriminalized in California? The debate over current legislation is intensifying - CBS News 8