Nanofabrication: Techniques and Industrial Applications – AZoNano

As a bridge between fundamental research and the industrial application of nanotechnology, nanofabrication methods are essential in creating novel nanoscale structures, devices, and materials with unique properties. This article aims to overview the existing and emerging techniques for scalable, reliable, and cost-effective manufacturing at the nanoscale.

Image Credit:Macrovector/Shutterstock.com

Nanotechnology enables the understanding and control of matter at length scales between one and a few hundred nanometers, where the quantum effects dominate the properties of the materials.

The use of nanoscale materials has started quite early in human history and dramatically increased in the last 100 years. The study of small nanoparticles was pioneered by Richard Zsigmondy, an Austro-Hungarian colloid chemist, who was awarded the 1925 Nobel Prize in Chemistry. He used the term 'nanomatter' when characterizing particles such as gold colloids by using a microscope.

In 1959, Richard Feynman introduced the idea of manipulating matter at the atomic level. The future Nobel Laureate (he was awarded the 1965 Nobel Prize in Physics) presented a lecture at a meeting of the American Physical Society, where he speculated about miniaturized electronic components, atom-by-atom manufacturing, and novel optoelectronic and photonic technologies.

Feynman, who foresaw many aspects of modern nanoscience, together with K. Eric Drexler, who in 1986 hypothesized on how molecules and atoms can be manipulated and assembled into complex nanostructures, are considered the fathers of modern nanotechnology.

Since then, nanotechnology has become the foundation for many remarkable applications leading to exponential growth in almost every industrial sector. In the last three decades, rapid developments in physics, chemistry, engineering, and material science manipulated individual molecules and atoms' reality, thus enabling various manufacturing processes at the nanoscale, usually referred to as nanofabrication.

Nanofabrication can be defined as a process of assembling one-, two- or three-dimensional structures at the scale of 1-100 nm with a high degree of functionality and structural complexity. There are different methods for creating functional nanostructures that can be divided into top-down and bottom-up approaches.

In the top-down approach, the starting material is reshaped into the desired smaller structures by using physical or chemical processes, such as electron or ion beam milling, laser ablation, and reactive ion etching, that remove excess material until the final structure is obtained.

In contrast, bottom-up nanofabrication relies on the formation of nanostructures from individual atoms and molecules. Processes include chemical and physical vapor deposition (CVD and PVD), self-assembly, and epitaxial growth.

The Lurie Nanofabrication Facility at the University of MichiganPlay

Video Credit:Electrical and Computer Engineering at Michigan/YouTube.com

The majority of the industrial nanofabrication processes employ a combination of the two approaches and can be loosely divided into three major sub-processes: thin film deposition, lithographic patterning, and chemical or physical etching.

Thin films are layers of polymers, metals, semiconductors, or other functional materials with nanometer-level thickness. They are fabricated using a variety of deposition processes, including CVD, PVD, atomic layer deposition, and molecular beam epitaxy.

The lithography process involves patterning the as-deposited thin films to create integrated circuits or nanoelectromechanical systems. The latest generation of optical nanolithographic systems employs X-ray, extreme UV, or charged particles beams to create nanoscale patterns with a spatial resolution of less than 10 nm.

The pattern transfer is finalized by an etching process that selectively removes the unnecessary parts of the thin film

Such a combination of top-down and bottom-up methods, for example, underpins the tremendous advances in microelectronics and over the last 30 years.

With the development of the UV and extreme UV nanofabrication processes that permit the creation of structures smaller than 10 nm, the semiconductor industry has been able to continuously increase the integration density of the electronic circuits.

The technological developments behind the large-scale production of advanced integrated circuits, in turn, enabled the transfer of cost-effective nanofabrication techniques to the fields of telecommunications, optoelectronics, and photonics.

Nanomanufacturing can also help create materials with novel properties. With the discovery of nanomaterials like fullerenes, carbon nanotubes, graphene, nanodots, and metallic nanoparticles, a lot of academic and industrial research and development efforts were directed at incorporating such nanomaterials in the manufacturing of advanced construction materials, consumer goods, textiles, and healthcare products.

Surface nanopatterning (to create superhydrophobic surfaces) together with metallic nanoparticle coatings are used in antimicrobial applications. Building materials benefit from nanostructured coatings that enable self-cleaning and antifouling functionality.

Automotive and aerospace industries utilize metal oxide nanoparticles for temperature and corrosion protection, and carbon nanotube-based nanocomposite materials as high-strength structural materials.

Image Credit:Ico Maker/Shutterstock.com

The so-called 'soft nanotechnology', based on the self-assembly of large organic molecules (polymers and proteins), is an emerging field with rapidly expanding industrial applications.

The concept of using cheap and sustainable biobased resources to fabricate organic nanostructures is particularly attractive in the context of a circular economy. Nanoscale biomolecular structures are used for targeted drug delivery, rapid testing, high-throughput gene sequencing, and vaccines' latest generation.

Researchers are exploring ways to mimic photosynthesis, a complex interplay of molecular self-assembly and quantum mechanics, to create novel energy harvesting devices with nearly 100% quantum efficiency.

With the rapidly expanding applications of nanotechnology in the industry, there is a growing need for more versatile, scalable, and sustainable nanofabrication methods. An exciting perspective is the ability to create dynamical nanoscale structures capable of exhibiting a much broader range of functionalities.

To achieve this, scientists are learning from complex biological systems to take advantage of the engineering principles that drive nature's molecular machines.

Continue reading: An In-Depth Look at Top Down Nanofabrication.

Subhan, M.A., et al. (2021) Advances with Molecular Nanomaterials in Industrial Manufacturing Applications. Nanomanufacturing 1, 75-97. Available at: https://doi.org/10.3390/nanomanufacturing1020008

Nasrollahzadeh, M., et al. (2019) An Introduction to Nanotechnology. Interface Science and Technology, 28, 1-27. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-813586-0.00001-8

Bayda, S., et al. (2019) The History of Nanoscience and Nanotechnology: From Chemical-Physical Applications to Nanomedicine. Molecules, 25(1), 112. Available at: https://dx.doi.org/10.3390%2Fmolecules25010112

Singh, N.A. (2017) Nanotechnology innovations, industrial applications and patents. Environ Chem Lett 15, 185191. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10311-017-0612-8

Disclaimer: The views expressed here are those of the author expressed in their private capacity and do not necessarily represent the views of AZoM.com Limited T/A AZoNetwork the owner and operator of this website. This disclaimer forms part of the Terms and conditions of use of this website.

Read more here:

Nanofabrication: Techniques and Industrial Applications - AZoNano

Canadian VR technology will aid isolation effects on a simulated long duration space flight – CBC.ca

An international team of volunteers has just begun a 240 day isolation experiment in Russia to simulate a long duration space flight like a trip to Mars. A new virtual reality program developed in Canada will be part of the experiment to help fight the effects of isolation.

A unique facility called "NEK" at the Institute of Biomedical Problems of the Russian Academy of Sciences in Moscow, has been used since the 1960s to study the psychological and physical effects of long duration space flights. A series of simulated missions of various lengths have taken place, the most famous, the Mars 500 mission in 2010/2011 in which an all male crew spent 520 days in isolation.

This latest eight month mission, which includes three men and three women, will include a new VR tool developed at the iSpace Lab at Simon Fraser University, in collaboration withthe Centre for Space Medicine and Extreme Environments in Berlin, to help fight the effects of extreme isolation.

Users will wear 3D goggles and experience flyover views of the Earth both looking down from space and through beautiful environments such as mountain forests. The researchers believe the meditative experience will simulate what astronauts call the "overview effect" that comes from looking down on the Earth from space, as well as a sense of awe when visiting beautiful places.

The immersive technology will provide an escape from the confines of the isolated habitat and hopefully mitigate the psychological pressures of living in isolation.

A journey to Mars takes more than a half a year. During that time, a crew will become more and more isolated from Earth as their distance from home increases to 480 million kilometres, creating a time delay of up to 20 minutes for their communication signals to travel between the two planets. They will be isolated in space and in time.

And Martian explorers will have a different experience from long-duration residents of orbital space stations, like Canadian astronauts Robert Thirsk or David St. Jaques, who spent a half a year in space on the International Space Station, or Russian cosmonaut Valeri Polyakov who spent 437 days on the Mir space station in the 1990s.

They could look out the window anytime and see the beauty of the Earth passing 400 kilometres below, and had more direct access to family and friends.

But on a spacecraft headed to Mars, the Earth is out of sight during the voyage and communication will become more delayed as the distance increases. The crew will also be entirely on their own if something goes wrong because a rescue mission would also take months to reach them. It will literally be life in a tin can with no escape. This could create a profound sense of isolation and potentially interfere with their crew responsibilities or result in personality conflicts.

The psychological challenges of isolation can be formidable, not just for Mars explorers but also, as we've seen, for people cut off from family during COVID lockdowns.A virtual experience may help calm the nerves of astronauts in deep space, but it is also a lesson for those of us on Earth who can appreciate the value of a real walk in the woods, on a beach or any place where the power of nature provides a sense of peace.

So when you finish reading this blog, step away from your computer and take a walk outside. It will be good for you.

Read more:

Canadian VR technology will aid isolation effects on a simulated long duration space flight - CBC.ca

A broken toilet on SpaceX capsule means astronauts will return to Earth in diapers – NPR

The Crew Dragon space capsule astronauts, from front left, European Space Agency astronaut Thomas Pesquet, NASA astronaut Megan McArthur, NASA astronaut Shane Kimbrough and Japan Aerospace Exploration Agency astronaut Akihiko Hoshide. John Raoux/AP hide caption

The Crew Dragon space capsule astronauts, from front left, European Space Agency astronaut Thomas Pesquet, NASA astronaut Megan McArthur, NASA astronaut Shane Kimbrough and Japan Aerospace Exploration Agency astronaut Akihiko Hoshide.

The journey back to Earth from space is never easy, but the astronauts aboard the SpaceX capsule coming home Monday will have an extra challenge to deal with: no working toilet. The four members on SpaceX Crew Dragon Endeavor will be wearing diapers as they splash down, in order to prevent anything else from splashing too.

The crew for this mission, known as Crew-2, has been at the International Space Station since April, and have spent nearly 200 days in space. "It's been a very, very intense mission, a lot of things have happened," said expedition commander and French astronaut Thomas Pesquet in a press conference over the weekend. Over the mission, they conducted a series of spacewalks installing solar panels to upgrade the station's powergrid, grew the first green chile peppers in space (and made tacos!) and even hosted a private Russian film crew.

The SpaceX capsule is currently scheduled to undock from the International Space Station on Monday afternoon and return Monday night, although all of that is dependent on the weather. All in all, the four crew members could spend up to 20 hours in the capsule, from the time the hatches are closed until they open again on Earth.

In this weekend's press conference, NASA astronaut Megan McArthur confirmed that the toilets on board Dragon Endeavor are broken. "Of course that's sub-optimal, but we're prepared to manage," she said with a smile. "Space flight is full of lots of little challenges, this is just one more that we'll encounter and take care of in our mission."

This is not the first toilet issue on a SpaceX Dragon capsule. An alarm went off on SpaceX's all-tourist flight earlier this year, signaling a problem with the onboard waste management system. Bill Gerstenmaier, a vice president at SpaceX, later said in a press conference that the spacecraft's urine storage system had become disconnected in flight, allowing pooled urine to enter a fan system. It didn't cause any major problems on that flight.

A similar problem was then found on Crew-2's capsule, which is why it has been taken offline for this return journey home. NASA and SpaceX engineers say they did extensive tests to make sure that the urine leak from April, when the crew was last in the Dragon capsule, would not have harmed the spacecraft over time.

A new SpaceX mission, Crew-3, is set to launch no earlier than Wednesday to continue the work of Crew-2. Gerstenmaier, who was a longtime NASA engineer before joining SpaceX, says that the toilet problem has been fixed for the upcoming launch.

View original post here:

A broken toilet on SpaceX capsule means astronauts will return to Earth in diapers - NPR

National Geographic selected to tell the story of Artemis 2 – SpaceFlight Insider

Theresa Cross

November 12th, 2021

An illustration of NASAs Orion spacecraft at the Moon. NASA has selected National Geographic to tell the story of the mission. Credit: NASA

NASA and National Geographic have partnered to help tell the story of the first crewed flight around the Moon in more than a half century.

The agency wants to document and leverage content that will help tell the story of the first crewed Artemis mission, Artemis 2, which is expected to fly humans around the Moon and back to Earth aboard the Orion space capsule. The 10-day mission is slated to lift off atop the second Space Launch System rocket no earlier than May 2024. Aboard will be three NASA astronauts and one Canadian astronaut the first non-American to travel to the Moon.

On Oct. 29, 2021, NASA announced National Geographic won a selection process that started with a call for proposals in November 2020. National Geographic entered into a non-reimbursable Space Act Agreement with NASA to collaborate with the agency on the project.

Returning humans to the Moon with Artemis 2 will inspire the next generation of explorers, Kathy Lueders, associate administrator for the Space Operations Mission Directorate at NASA Headquarters in Washington, who served as the selection official, said in an agency news release. This time, we are bringing partners and technologies that will create additional opportunities for the world to share in the experience along with our astronauts.

National Geographic plans to use lightweight audiovisual hardware flying inside Orion for this one-of-a-kind opportunity to create an immersive experience in hopes of inspiring the next generation of space explorers.

An infographic showing the expected trajectory of the Artemis 2 mission. Credit: NASA

The mega-media company plans to create a multi-platform story-telling campaign using its portfolio of assists, which include magazines, television and digital content, to share the experiences of the astronauts and mission with the world.

For the Artemis program, NASA plans to first launch the uncrewed Artemis 1 mission as early as February 2022, which involves launching an Orion capsule atop a Space Launch System rocket to place the crew-rated spacecraft into a distant retrograde orbit around the Moon.

While there wont be any people aboard, this is expected to be the first time a spacecraft designed for people will travel to the Moon since the last Apollo program Moon landing in 1972.

After about a month, the Artemis 1 Orion spacecraft is expected to return to Earth, splashing down in the Pacific Ocean.

Artemis 2 is set to be the first crewed flight of the SLS/Orion system in hopes of paving the way for future missions to the Moons surface by the middle of this decade in preparation for testing technology and processes needed for human spaceflight to Mars in the 2030s.

Video courtesy of Orbital Velocity

Tagged: Artemis 1 Artemis 2 Artemis program NASA National Geographic The Range

Theresa Cross grew up on the Space Coast. Its only natural that she would develop a passion for anything Space and its exploration. During these formative years, she also discovered that she possessed a talent and love for defining the unique quirks and intricacies that exist in mankind, nature, and machines.Hailing from a family of photographersincluding her father and her son, Theresa herself started documenting her world through pictures at a very early age. As an adult, she now exhibits an innate photographic ability to combine what appeals to her heart and her love of technology to deliver a diversified approach to her work and artistic presentations.Theresa has a background in water chemistry, fluid dynamics, and industrial utility.

Original post:

National Geographic selected to tell the story of Artemis 2 - SpaceFlight Insider

Why Is NASA Sending People to the Moon Again? – The Atlantic

Update your calendars, everyone: NASA isnt going to put people on the moon in 2024. The space agency announced yesterday that it is now aiming to send a crew to orbit the moon, Apollo 8 style, in May 2024, and then land astronauts on the surface, la Apollo 11, sometime in 2025.

If your reaction to this news is something like, Wait a second, what? NASA is trying to land people on the moon again?thats fine. There are many, many, many more pressing matters to occupy Americans minds than what NASA may or may not be doing, and when. The Biden administration isnt really talking it up either.

The current moon effort is called Artemis, named for Apollos sister in Greek mythology, and it arose during the Trump administration: After NASA officials made clear, to Donald Trumps annoyance, that they couldnt pull off a Mars landing before the end of his first term, the president pivoted to the moon, and in 2019 directed NASA to land Americans on the lunar surface in 2024, shaving four years off the agencys then-goal of 2028. The Biden administration embraced the Artemis program in February and, until now, NASA had held onto 2024, reworking the previous administrations promise to take the next man and the first woman to the moon to the first woman and the first person of color. The White House has barely breathed a word of it all year. President Joe Biden hasnt publicly name-checked the program, and during a speech at NASAs Goddard Space Flight Center in Maryland last week, Vice President Kamala Harris mentioned only one moon landingone that happened more than 50 years ago.

NASA is getting geared up to go, Bill Nelson, the NASA administrator under Biden, told reporters with enthusiasm yesterday, to plant another flag, to build habitats, to take what astronauts learn on the lunar surface and use it for future missions to Mars. Americans havent visited the moon since 1972, and the remnants of the Apollo landings sit like ghostly ruinsthe American flags bleached white by the suns rays, the boot prints still etched into the regolith, the rovers coated in a thin layer of moon dust. Thats right: Astronauts actually drove on the moon half a century ago. If NASA could do all that then, repeating a moon landing nowwith all the computing power and other technological advances that humanity has amassed in the accruing yearsseems like it should be a breeze.

Read: What is the Apollo 11 landing site like now?

But as the new delay shows, its not. NASA and its commercial contractors are developing an arsenal of new equipment for these missionsrocket, lander, life-support systemsand they have a tremendous amount of work left to do. The spacesuits that NASA began developing in 2007 wont be ready until at least 2025. The agency is not entirely starting from scratchafter all, it did this 50 years ago!but the effort to return to the moon seems almost like a hassle now. So why is America going back at all?

In the 1960s, NASA had the budget, the political will, and the Cold War momentum to sprout a moon program and pull off a landing in a span of eight years. Some administrations since President John F. Kennedys have vowed to returnGeorge W. Bush, for example, called for a landing in 2020but the special circumstances that fueled the Apollo era have vanished. NASAs funding accounts for just half a percent of the annual federal budget, compared with the 4.5 percent the agency enjoyed during the Apollo days. At every presidential election, NASA braces for a new shift in directive; Barack Obama took a been there, done that stance on the moon, before Trump pivoted right back.

John Logsdon, a longtime space historian who attended the Apollo 11 launch, once told me that the national drive that fueled the Apollo era has weakened. That impulse is certainly less widespread than it was 50 years ago, he said. And indeed, our motivations for traveling beyond Earth seem less intuitive now. In my years as a space reporter, most of the questions that have framed my stories about the American space effort have been fairly straightforward. Who? NASA usually, but, more often these days, Elon Musk and Jeff Bezos. What? A rocket, a rover, a telescope. When? T-minus minutes for a rocket, seven months for a Mars-bound probe, years for one heading to Jupiter. Where? A launchpad in Cape Canaveral, inside the rings of Saturn, beyond the asteroid belt. The why has often been more difficult to pin down, particularly for the risky, expensive missions that involve putting a human being on board. But there has always been a feeling of certainty in it. Now that human beings have figured out how to leave the planet and go somewhere else, why would we stop?

A few motivations drive American space travel today, some old and some new: national prestige, geopolitical power, economic opportunity, scientific knowledge. But space exploration can achieve each of those goals only to a limited extent. Certain American politicians warn of a new space race with China, but exploration projects these days rely more on international cooperation. The private sector is developing missions to mine the moon for resources, but the commercial market for them doesnt yet exist. Some argue that space travel can lead to better technology on Earth, but thats difficult to imagine now, when the most recent flashy development on the International Space Station consisted of tacos made with green chiles the crew grew on board. And science and discovery, perhaps the purest motivations, are subject to political whims. The Artemis program didnt transpire because a bunch of lunar scientists got together in a room and decided to do it; it exists because Trump sought to bolster his presidential legacy.

Read: The false hope of an American rocket launch

Ignoring the reality of Americas ambivalence toward space travel is becoming much more difficult. Public-opinion surveys in recent years have shown that Americans want the country to prioritize other kinds of space activities; in a Morning Consult poll published in February, survey participants said the United States should focus more on climate-change research and the study of asteroids that could strike Earth. Only 8 percent said sending astronauts to the moon should be a top priority, and 7 percent said the same for a mission to Mars. Gil Scott-Herons words in Whitey on the Moon, from 1970, still resonate: Cant pay no doctor bill / But Whiteys on the moon / 10 years from now Ill be payin still / While Whiteys on the moon.

For years, NASA has insisted that Americans cared about space exploration anyway, and presented the Apollo effort as a product of national unity. (It wasnt; polling shows that the moon program was unpopular for most of the 1960s, with the exception of a survey conducted in the immediate aftermath of the Apollo 11 landing.) As one space-policy wonk told me recently: Theyve been coasting on the fact that a significant amount of people think that space is cool and they dont have to argue why they do this.

During yesterdays call with reporters, Nelson, the NASA administrator, gave a hodgepodge of the usual reasons for a moon mission: bolstering scientific discovery, providing economic benefits, inspiring future generations of scientists and engineers, beating another nation to it. This time its China, which seeks to land its own astronauts on the moon soon. We have every reason to believe that we have a very aggressive competitor in the Chinese, Nelson said, and we want to be the first back. But by trying to highlight the appeal of space travel on all fronts, NASA risks making its rationale so amorphous that it appeals to no one. Over the years, Ive spoken with many people who think deeply about space travel, and when I ask some of them about the whys, they admit, a little sheepishly, that there might be no compelling reason to send people into spacerobots, yes, but people, maybe not. They seem hesitant to even say it aloud, as if to do so were blasphemous. But we shouldnt be afraid to examine why that is, and even dwell on the ambivalence. And the truth is that the reasons are not so clear.

Read: The coming end of an era at NASA

In the end, NASA doesnt need to sell the greater public on a moon mission, only congressional lawmakers who decide budgets. And the agency has tied its future in space to entrepreneurs who dont really need to provide a rationale to the public either. The CEOs of space companies are not beholden to American taxpayers, even though their companies benefit from taxpayer money (and they can make penis jokes to millions of people on the internet without being fired). Until recently, the Artemis effort was tangled up in a turf war between Jeff Bezos and Elon Musk: Bezoss Blue Origin had sued NASA over the agencys decision to pick Musks SpaceX to build lander technology for Artemis missions. Blue Origin had pitched its own lander too, and the company accused NASA of a flawed selection process. NASA said it couldnt work with SpaceX until the conflict was resolved last week, when a judge ruled against Blue Origins claim. Now that the matter is settled, Nelson said that he and his leadership team will visit SpaceXs facilities in South Texas early next year to inspect the technology that might put Americans on the moon again in 2025.

When you consider their motivations for space exploration, NASA and SpaceX are an unusual pairing. Musk, as Ive written before, can talk forever about the urgency of turning humankind into a multiplanetary species without incurring much resistance. NASA, a government agency, cant rely on such fringe ideas. Public officials must trot out the usual reasoning that has underpinned the American space effort since its beginnings, and present the wonder of space travel as proof that we can meet any challenge on Earth, as Biden said recently. American leaders have ridden this logic for 50 years. In the next 50, they might have to accept that it isnt as compelling as they think, and that the American populace might prefer some more earthly proof first.

Continue reading here:

Why Is NASA Sending People to the Moon Again? - The Atlantic

Jeff Bezos offered actor Tom Hanks a seat on Blue Origin’s spaceflight for 28 million bucks or something – Firstpost

News18 IndiaNov 08, 2021 12:13:21 IST

Space tourism has been all the rage of late, with a new billionaire shuttling off into the beyond in intervals of what feels like every other week. But newsflash: theres someone who doesnt see what the craze is all about, and its Hollywood superstar Tom Hanks.

In a Jimmy Kimmel interview, Hanks revealed that before William Shatner, he had been offered a Blue Origin flight to outer space by Jeff Bezos but that he had turned it down. You know, it costs like 28 million bucks or something like that. Im doing good, Jimmy, Im doing good. But I aint paying 28 [million] bucks," a PEOPLE report quoted Hanks as saying.

Crew of Blue Origin's 18 New Shepherd missions. Image credit: Twitter

Whats more, Hanks made light of the situation by saying that a 12-minute space flight could be simulated right there as host Jimmy and himself sat in their seats. The 65-year-old actor jokingly bounced around in his seat as if in a space flight to drive home his point.

Further, Hanks quipped that he didnt need to spend 28 million dollars to get the experience of being in a space flight. He said he would perhaps do it if it were free, just to feel the joy of pretending" to be a billionaire. Hanks take is diametrically opposite to that of Shatner.

William Shatner, who starred as Captain James T Kirk in the original Star Trek series, flew to space on 12 October aboard the companys crewed rocket, becoming the oldest ever astronaut.

Ive heard about space for a long time now. Im taking the opportunity to see it for myself. What a miracle," said the 90-year-old actor in a statement by Jeff Bezoss space company. The Star Trek actor had described his trip to the edge of space as the most profound experience." reported AFP.

However, when Shatner was sharing his experience with Bezos, it didnt go quite according to plan. While Shatner spoke about his space experience, Bezos suddenly cut the conversation and turned to a few groups nearby to say, Give me the champagne bottle. Come here. I want one."

The abrupt reaction from Bezos vexed Shatner and made him stop speaking. He then scratched his head and turned away, while Bezos continued to pop the bubbly bottle. The video ends where Bezos turns to put his arm on Shatner.

The rest is here:

Jeff Bezos offered actor Tom Hanks a seat on Blue Origin's spaceflight for 28 million bucks or something - Firstpost

ISS swerveed to avoid China space junk. Impact would be devastating. – Business Insider

We are so sorry! We bumped into a system failure and couldnt take your email this time.

Thank you for signing up!

NASA and Russia's space agency adjusted the course of the International Space station (ISS) to avoid a collision with debris that was headed.

The fragment was a remnant of a Chinese weather satellite that was destroyed in a missile test 15 years ago, Roscosmos, the space agency, said in a tweet on Wednesday, around the time it adjusted course.

The debris was due to approach the space station some time on Friday if it hadn't moved.

It was due to enter the "pizza box," a flat, rectangular zone 2.5 miles deep and 30 miles wide around the space station inside which any object is "close enough for concern," per NASA.

"It just makes sense to go ahead and do this burn and put this behind us so we can ensure the safety of the crew," said Joel Montalbano, NASA's space station manager, at a press conference on Tuesday, per The New York Times.

Neither NASA nor Roscosmos said how big the fragment was. While a small fragment may not have significantly damaged the station, large bits of space junk have the potential to cause catastrophic damage.

The maneuver raised the space station's orbit by about a mile (1.2 km), Roscmoscos said in a press release Thursday. The ISS fired its rockets for just over six minutes to get out of the way, the Conversation reported.

It took place just a day before Crew-3 mission astronauts Thomas Marshburn, Raja Chari, Kayla Barron, and Matthias Maurer arrived on the station.

This is the 29th time the space station has had to dodge a piece of space junk, according to The Times.

Space debris is made up of bits of often defunct spacecrafts broken apart in orbit, per NASA. It can travel at speeds up to 17,500 mph, per NASA, about ten times the speed of a bullet.

Even a fleck of paint from a rocket can be dangerous at this speed for instance, if it hits an observation dome.

"Space debris has the potential to cripple the ISS and kill the crew," Robert Frost, Instructor and Flight Controller at NASA, said in a blog post in 2019. But the risk is "highly managed," he said.

Ground-based crews track the biggest pieces of space junk to allow lead time to move the ISS out of the way, as can be seen in this Insider video.

Anything above a third of an inch (1 cm) could penetrate the shields of the ISS's crew modules, according to the ESA. Anything larger than 4 inches (10 cm) could shatter the station to pieces, per ESA.

In this instance, the space junk came from an anti-satellite test conducted in 2007, when China launched a missile against its own weather satellite Fengyun-1C, per NASA.

That collision created about 3,500 pieces of large fragments and many other small ones, per NASA.

It wasn't immediately clear how big were the fragments predicted to cross paths with the ISS this Friday, but ground team only track bigger objects that are bigger than a softball, per NASA.

Collisions with smaller debris can also be damaging and are more unpredictable. In June, NASA said that a small fragment had punched a 0.2-inch (5-millimeter) hole in one of the ISS's robotic arms, Insider's Aylin Woodward previously reported.

Bigger fragments are also getting harder to track as an acceleration of space flight activity has led to a dramatic increase of fragments orbiting the planet.

Last year, NASA moved the ISS after detecting a piece of "unknown space debris" that would have flown within a mile of the space station Insider previously reported.

On that occasion, the astronauts still sealed themselves in a Soyuz rocke capsule, which could act as an escape pod in case the station was damaged.

Continued here:

ISS swerveed to avoid China space junk. Impact would be devastating. - Business Insider

NASA’s Orion recovery team is certified for Artemis 1 – SpaceFlight Insider

Theresa Cross

November 10th, 2021

NASA and Department of Defense teams practice the recovery of a mock Orion capsule in the Pacific Ocean. Credit: NASA/Frank Michaux

NASAs Landing and Recovery team recently completed its ninth recovery test at sea and is certified to recover the Orion spacecraft for the Artemis 1 mission next year.

According to NASA, a weeklong test in early November 2021 in the Pacific Ocean aboard the USS John P. Murtha was performed by NASA and Department of Defense teams in order to ensure they are ready to recover the Orion capsule following its splashdown at the conclusion of its roughly month-long uncrewed test flight.

Artemis 1 is currently expected to launch atop the inaugural flight of the Space Launch System no earlier than Feb. 12, 2022, from Launch Complex 39B at NASAs Kennedy Space Center in Florida.

For the past several years, NASA and DoD have been working together to develop the procedures and hardware necessary to safely recover Orion, not only after this uncrewed flight, but also for future crewed missions onboard the spacecraft., said Melissa Jones, NASA recovery director based out of Exploration Ground Systems at Kennedy Space Center in Florida, in an agency release.

Testing and checkouts for recovery of the spacecraft were conducted ahead of Artemis 1, a mission that will send the capsule, built by Lockheed Martin, into a distant retrograde orbit around the Moon.

These system checks are meant to examine the procedures of recovery operations, including the hardware of the capsule.

NASA said once the spacecraft splashes down in the Pacific Ocean, a team of divers, engineers and technicians are expected to depart the ship on small boats to reach the capsule in order to secure it and tow it to the back of the recovery ship. The area the capsule will be towed into is called the well deck where it will be secured for the trip back to shore.

Currently the actual Orion spacecraft for Artemis 1 is fastened atop NASAs Space Launch System rocket inside the Vehicle Assembly Building at NASA Kennedy Space Center in Florida.

The recently fully-integrated system is preparing for final check-outs ahead of the Artemis 1 mission. The next major task for the rocket stack will be a roll out to Launch Complex 39B for a wet dress rehearsal a mock countdown and fueling test before it is returned to the VAB to be readied for its actual flight.

Video courtesy of NASA

Tagged: Artemis 1 Artemis program NASA Orion Space Launch System The Range

Theresa Cross grew up on the Space Coast. Its only natural that she would develop a passion for anything Space and its exploration. During these formative years, she also discovered that she possessed a talent and love for defining the unique quirks and intricacies that exist in mankind, nature, and machines.Hailing from a family of photographersincluding her father and her son, Theresa herself started documenting her world through pictures at a very early age. As an adult, she now exhibits an innate photographic ability to combine what appeals to her heart and her love of technology to deliver a diversified approach to her work and artistic presentations.Theresa has a background in water chemistry, fluid dynamics, and industrial utility.

More here:

NASA's Orion recovery team is certified for Artemis 1 - SpaceFlight Insider

Watch NASA’s Mars helicopter Ingenuity take its 14th flight in this full video – Space.com

A new video shows NASA's Mars helicopter Ingenuity as it completed its latest daring brief flight hop in the thinning atmosphere of the Red Planet.

The 23-second flight saw the little Ingenuity helicopter, a partner on the larger Perseverance rover mission, hop 16 feet (5 meters) high and make a sideways maneuver before touching down. At Space.com, we put together images from the flight to create this full video of Ingenuity's 14th flight that captures the drone's shadow on the Martian terrain below, along with its rotors, which were spinning more rapidly than ever before.

The 14th Ingenuity flight on Sunday (Oct. 24) was shorter and flew lower than past ones, because engineers were testing the drone's ability to cope during normal seasonal conditions that see thinning atmosphere of Mars. As temperatures at the chopper's Jezero Crater landing site get warmer, the aircraft's rotors must turn faster to keep it in the air.

Related:It's getting harder to fly the Ingenuity helicopter on Mars

In September, when NASA's Jet Propulsion Laboratory was planning the flight, they said the rotor would need to spin at roughly 2,700 revolutions per minute (RPM), compared with past flights where the drone achieved 2,537 RPM. The greater rotation rate was meant to cope with the thinning atmosphere.

Ingenuity is meant to be a test of flying on Mars, and it has far surpassed its original flight plan. After completing several short hops and longer flights, the drone is well into an extended mission in which it is starting to scout ahead for Perseverance, which is examining a set of layered rocks right now in Jezero Crater.

Future Martian missions will benefit from drones, NASA has said, which have advantages over rovers, landers and potential spacesuited astronauts in that the helicopters can get context from high in the air and they can examine features that may be dangerous to approach on the terrain, such as deep craters or steep hills.

This 14th flight of Ingenuity was originally expected on Sept. 18, but wasdelayed due to an anomalyfound during a pre-flight checkout. Ingenuity found a problem with two of its flight-control servo motors, which adjust the rotor pitch for the helicopter to change position and orientation in mid-air.

Testing on Sept. 21 and Sept. 23 did not see the issue come up again, but Ingenuity stayed grounded for nearly an Earth month because Marsexperienced solar conjunction, an event during which the orbit of the two planets puts the sun in between for several weeks. This can disrupt communicationsbetween the planets, and Mars missions typically suspend most work as a precaution.

Follow Elizabeth Howell on Twitter @howellspace. Follow us on Twitter @Spacedotcom or Facebook.

See original here:

Watch NASA's Mars helicopter Ingenuity take its 14th flight in this full video - Space.com

New NASA video takes you plummeting through Venus’ atmosphere – Space.com

NASA wants you to get excited about the nightmare world next door.

This spring, the agency announced that it would develop two new missions to explore Venus in the early 2030s. One, dubbed VERITAS (short for Venus Emissivity, Radio Science, InSAR, Topography, and Spectroscopy), would orbit the planet, peering through its thick clouds. The other, dubbed DAVINCI (Deep Atmosphere Venus Investigation of Noble gases, Chemistry, and Imaging), would go one step farther, dropping a high-tech probe to plummet through the acrid Venusian atmosphere. Now, NASA has released a new video highlighting the DAVINCI mission and the science it will conduct at our twin planet.

"Venus is waiting for us all, and DAVINCI is ready to take us there and ignite a new Venus renaissance," narrator Giada Arney, a planetary scientist at NASA's Goddard Space Flight Center in Maryland, says in the video.

Related: Here's every successful Venus mission humanity has ever launched

Scheduled to launch in 2029, the DAVINCI mission comprises two main pieces, the video explains. First, the main spacecraft, which will conduct two flybys of the planet to study its atmosphere and the nightside surface. The spacecraft's atmospheric work will focus on observing how the clouds change over time and attempting to identify a mysterious chemical that strangely absorbs ultraviolet light.

The nightside work, meanwhile, will map the surface in infrared light, since the rock releases its absorbed heat during the long night. Scientists hope that data will help them understand how the planet's strange highlands formed.

Seven months after the two encounters, the probe will make a one-hour descent through the clouds, beaming back data all the way down. As the main spacecraft watches, the probe will detect the composition, temperatures, pressures and winds present at each layer of the Venusian atmosphere. Scientists hope that all this data will help them not only better understand the planet today, but also piece together its history and in particular, whether the world once boasted water.

Once the surface comes into view, the probe will also capture high-resolution images of a region called Alpha Regio Tesserae. The surface of Venus contains many patches of tesserae, where the rock has repeatedly broken and folded in a way that happens on Earth only deep in the crust. Scientists hope that by understanding the tesserae and how they ended up on the surface, they can better piece together Venus' history.

All told, the probe will show humans "what it might be like to stand on the Venus surface," Arney said. "The discoveries that emerge from this diverse data set will tell us whether Venus was truly habitable."

Email Meghan Bartels at mbartels@space.com or follow her on Twitter @meghanbartels. Follow us on Twitter @Spacedotcom and on Facebook.

More:

New NASA video takes you plummeting through Venus' atmosphere - Space.com

Is Now the Time to Invest in Space Exploration? – Zacks.com

The mystery of the unknown fuels us to innovate and find answers. Perhaps the biggest mystery throughout the existence of humanity has been outer space. The barriers to space exploration have been astronomical, but the technology has finally arrived and accelerated our ambitions.

For the first time ever, the final frontier looks approachable for both individuals and businesses. Enterprises, with the backing of private money, are starting to acquire the resources and technology to expand their investments into the space economy.

Right now might be the best time to be invested in these companies laying the groundwork for the next trillion-dollar industry.

Space is Going Mainstream

Just a decade ago, rocket launches were a rare occasion and when they happened, it was a big deal. But with the advancement in reusable rocket technology, we now see launches broadcast on TV monthly, as billionaire backed companies race to space.

Jeff Bezos, Elon Musk and Richard Branson are fueling the push, turning their focus from their businesses here on Earth, to the stars above. Companies like SpaceX, Blue Origin and Virgin Galactic are building the foundation for whats to come. Space tourism is not for everyone yet, but the interest is growing as the idea of visiting space is going mainstream.

Of those companies, only Virgin Galactic (SPCE) is publicly traded, so its hard for the average investor to get full exposure. While SpaceX will likely IPO soon, many investors dont know that there are already many under-the-radar stocks that have exposure to the space economy.

Continued . . .

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Space Race Riches: Little-Known Stocks with Huge Profit Potential

SpaceX and Blue Origin get the headlines, but research indicates a handful of lesser-known space stocks may be much more profitable.

One startup has plans to launch a rocket into space every 29 hours 10 times faster than SpaceX. Another is a one-stop rocket shop already under contract to send missions to the moon, Venus and Mars. Shares are projected to spike +100%.

Zacks just-released special report reveals 4 space stocks with extreme upside potential. Be one of the first to see it. Opportunity ends midnight Sunday, November 14.

See Zacks Top Space Stocks Now >>

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Big Bang Growth

It all starts with getting there and advances in technology have made the trip to space much easier. Costs have declined significantly and reusable rockets are making a trip to space more affordable.

The Space Foundation recently released a report in which it claims the global space economy rose to $447 Billion in 2020. This was up 55% over the last ten years. UBS expects that to jump another 80% by 2030.

While tourism is getting all the hype, some other space sub sectors that could experience exponential growth include energy, mining, real estate and hospitality.

Exploring the Space Economy

Its important to highlight two different categories before we get into the specific sub-sectors of the space economy.

First, we have the space-for-earth economy. This involves goods or services that are produced in space, but made for earth. Obviously, most of the current revenues are produced in space at the moment and would fit in this category on the service side.

The space-for-earth economy includes space infrastructure, human space flight, rocket launchers, cellular broadband and satellite companies.

Next, we have the space-for-space economy. Here we have goods and services that are produced in space, for space. This aspect has yet to have any meaningful impact on the space economy, but that will change because of recent technology.

Let's take a quick look at some future space industries.

Energy Think space-based solar power that would allow for solar to be captured 24 hours a day! Not only will energy be produced in space for us down here, but it can be fuel for the space-for-space economy.

Mining The asteroid belt between Mars and Jupiter is thought to contain a massive amount of value in raw materials. According to NASA, the belt is worth $700 quintillion or $100 billion for each human on earth. Cost remains a big hurdle to fulfill this mining dream, but the benefits boggle the mind.

Real-Estate and Hospitality In the not-so-distant future, there will be businesses that involve leasing space-in-space shelter, whether it be space stations or orbiting hotels.

Tourism The billionaire players we discussed above are leading the charge. This movement is bringing the eyeballs and the money to the space tourism industry that is needed to grow. UBS sees the space tourism market at $3B by 2030.

Stocks Already Shooting for the Moon

While many new companies have yet to go public, there are a handful of stocks that investors can choose from. Check out these returns that have come over the last six months in just three space names:

Stock A is a space launch company that provides satellite launch services. The stock took off back in February, moving up over 120% in just a few weeks after it came to market. The stock has come back down to earth, but it was over 30% in October. Is it time for this one to take off again?

Stock B is a spaceflight company that rocketed up over 300% this summer. It has pulled back all the way to levels seen before the move higher. Will another stock launch come into the end of the year?

Stock C delivers capabilities in space infrastructure and earth intelligence. The stock started the year with a 52% move higher, but has since pulled back to 2020 levels. Is it time to get back in?

In Summary

Humans have always had the desire to explore the cosmos, but the barriers of cost and technology were far too great until now. Private enterprises, backed by billionaires that grew up on Sci-Fi, are building the elevators to space. Those that follow will expand access and take humans into the next multi-trillion-dollar economy.

Dont miss out on these opportunities as humans and investors literally go to the moon.

I just released Space Exploration: The Next Trillion-Dollar Industry, a brand-new Special Report to help you capitalize on the emerging space economy. Youre invited to download it today.

In the report I highlight 4 cutting-edge stocks I believe any investor interested in space exploration needs to know about. Most investors have never heard of some of these stocks, but theyre each making tremendous contributions to the new space race.

I encourage you to check out this report today. But don't delay. The deadline to download Space Exploration: The Next Trillion-Dollar Industry is midnight Sunday, November 14.

See 4 space exploration stocks now >>

Good Investing,

Jeremy MullinStock Strategist

Jeremy Mullin has been a professional trader for more than 15 years with specific expertise in profiting from patterns set by High-Frequency Traders. He is the editor of Zacks Counterstrike.

Here is the original post:

Is Now the Time to Invest in Space Exploration? - Zacks.com

Rocket Report: SpinLaunch spins up, Falcon Heavy to return big time in 2022 – Ars Technica

Enlarge / As the Crew-3 mission ascends, a Falcon 9 rocket with a Starlink payload awaits its turn on a nearby launch pad in Florida.

SpaceX

Welcome to Edition 4.23 of the Rocket Report! After a one-week hiatus, this report returns with a superfluity of news. There's a lot to cover, from exciting news in the New Mexico desert to busy times for the Space Coast in Florida as SpaceX gets busy with crewed missions.

As always, we welcome reader submissions, and if you don't want to miss an issue, please subscribe using the box below (the form will not appear on AMP-enabled versions of the site). Each report will include information on small-, medium-, and heavy-lift rockets as well as a quick look ahead at the next three launches on the calendar.

SpinLaunch completes first test flight. The California-based startup uses kinetic energy to launch payloads, and its test projectile reached "tens of thousands" of feet during its first launch, CNBC reports. The company's method uses a vacuum-sealed centrifuge to spin the rocket to a velocity several times the speed of sound before it is released. "It's a radically different way to accelerate projectiles and launch vehicles to hypersonic speeds using a ground-based system," SpinLaunch CEO Jonathan Yaney said.

Spinning and winning ... The company completed its first major test, using a one-third-scale version of its accelerator, on October 22 at Spaceport America in New Mexico. Even so, this version of the accelerator stands 165 feet tall. By using this approach, SpinLaunch aims to build smaller rockets that require less fuel to reach orbit. Its first orbital vehicle is intended to loft about 200 kg to low Earth orbit. SpinLaunch has raised $110 million to date from investors, including Kleiner Perkins, Google Ventures, Airbus Ventures, and others. (Submitted by Wickwick, Tfargo04, Biokleen, Rendgrish, JohnCarter17, and Ken the Bin.)

Amazon to launch first Kuiper satellites on ABL. The company intends to launch its first prototype broadband satellites in the fourth quarter of 2022 on ABL Space Systems' RS1 rocket, Ars reports. Amazon's prototype satellites will operate at an altitude of 590 km. Such a launch date would come nearly four years after SpaceX launched its first prototype Starlink satellites.

Impressed by ABL ... The expected Q4 2022 launch of prototype satellites doesn't change that timeline for production satellites, which might not be launched until a year or more after the test versions. While Amazon doesn't have its own rockets like SpaceX does, Amazon said it is "impressed by ABL's unique capabilities" and expects "a long-term relationship" with its newly announced launch partner. Some Project Kuiper satellites will also launch on United Launch Alliance's Atlas V rocket.

The easiest way to keep up with Eric Berger's space reporting is to sign up for his newsletter, we'll collect his stories in your inbox.

Virgin Orbit plans third mission of 2021. The launch company said preparations are well underway for the third LauncherOne mission of this calendar year. This "Above the Clouds" mission will carry both experimental satellites for the US Department of Defense as well as two nanosatellites for Polish company SatRevolution. The air-launched rocket will originate from Mojave Air and Space Port in California.

Doubling down in 2022 ... LauncherOne debuted in May 2020 with a failure shortly after engine ignition. However, in January, the rocket completed its first successful orbital flight and followed that up in June with a second mission. Completing three successful flights in a year is a great start and speaks well of the company's logistics and operations planning. Virgin Orbit hopes to double its launch cadence in 2022, and, given the progress demonstrated this year, that seems possible. (Submitted by Ken the Bin and EllPeaTea.)

Virgin Orbit reaches agreement to launch from Japan. And it's a good thing that LauncherOne is reaching an operational cadence, as the company has big plans for it. Earlier this month, Virgin Orbit announced an agreement with ANA Holdings to procure 20 flights of the rocket from Japan's Oita Prefecture. ANA owns Japan's largest airline.

More like LauncherTwenty, amirite? ... Under terms of the agreement, ANA and several of its partners will fund the manufacturing of a new set of the mobile ground-support equipment used to prepare Virgin Orbit's LauncherOne system for flight from a pre-existing runway. The hope is to make Oita a LauncherOne-ready spaceport by as soon as the end of 2022, pending appropriate regulatory approvals in the United States and Japan. (Submitted by Ken the Bin.)

Chinese company to buy reusable engines. Rocket Pi of China has signed a deal with Jiuzhou Yunjian to supply engines to power its Darwin-1 reusable launch vehicle, SpaceNews reports. Jiuzhou Yunjian makes liquid-fuel engines (specifically, methane/liquid-oxygen engines). The deal is for both main and upper stages. A single Lingyun-70 will power the first stage of the 2.25-meter-diameter Darwin-1 launcher with a Lingyun-10 engine on the second stage.

One of many contenders ... Rocket Pi exited stealth mode in March, presenting plans to develop Darwin-1 and a larger medium-lift launcher. The Darwin-1 rocket is slated to take flight no earlier than the first quarter of 2023. Rocket Pi is just one of several Chinese private launch companies developing reusable launchers. (Submitted by Ken the Bin.)

Honda develops a prototype rocket engine. Japanese officials with the Honda Motor Company have revealed more details about their plans to potentially expand into the rocket-launch business, Ars reports, and they have completed several test firings of a prototype engine. Honda's basic plan is to develop a small satellite launch vehicle with the capacity to put up to 1 metric ton into low Earth orbit. The goal for this initiative is not to become the next SpaceX but to give Honda engineers freedom to innovate.

Go or no-go decision forthcoming ... As part of internal company discussions about future business opportunities a few years ago, a cohort of Honda's younger engineers expressed an interest in rockets. And so, since late 2019, the company has devoted some of its research and development resources toward developing a rocket engine. Honda plans to support internal development work until about 2025 or 2026, after which point it will make a "go or no-go" decision on whether to proceed with a launch business and complete development of the rocket.

Epsilon 5 rocket lofts nine satellites. The Japanese space agency's Epsilon-5 rocket successfully launched nine small satellites into low Earth orbit on Tuesday, the Japanese Broadcasting Corporation reports. Liftoff of the rocket was delayed by four minutes from the original schedule to avoid the Crew Dragon spacecraft carrying astronauts returning from the International Space Station.

A lower cost, but not exactly low ... Five Epsilon rockets have been successfully launched since 2013 by JAXA, which developed the Epsilon series with the aim of putting small satellites into orbit at low cost. The cost of the solid-fueled rocket is less than $40 million, and it can put as much as 1.5 metric tons into low Earth orbit. (Submitted by Ken the Bin and tsunam.)

Georgia spaceport decision delayed again. A federal agency has yet again pushed back a final decision on whether to allow the construction of a launch pad for commercial rockets in coastal Georgia, the Associated Press reports. Rather than releasing a decision in early November, the Federal Aviation Administration now plans to do so by December 15. An agency statement cited a delay caused by "ongoing consultation efforts." The final determination was originally expected at the end of July but now has been delayed at least three times.

Pushback from park advocates ... Camden County is in the southeast corner of Georgia. It wants to build the nation's 13th licensed commercial spaceport, and it has spent nearly 10 years and $10 million pursuing that goal. In June, the FAA issued an environmental impact study that concluded building the spaceport would be its "preferred alternative." That drew pushback from the National Park Service and its parent agency, the US Department of the Interior. (Submitted by Ken the Bin.)

See the rest here:

Rocket Report: SpinLaunch spins up, Falcon Heavy to return big time in 2022 - Ars Technica

The obscure UN conflab that seeks to cut off the world from vaping and harm reduction – The Parliament Magazine

While most popular attention this month has been on the vital discussions at the United Nations COP26 Climate Change Conference in Glasgow, there is an equally important UN conference happening in Geneva that also contemplates the fate of millions of lives.

There are also questions on the importance of science, the role of activists and industry, and how humanity can forget a better path based on common agreements to be implemented in each country.

This year, the Framework Convention on Tobacco Control, an obscure World Health Organization treaty dedicated to eradicating tobacco use, is having its ninth iteration, known as COP9 in Switzerland.

At this conference, 168 member delegations as well as a narrowly selected group of tobacco control advocates participate in discussions and debates to forge global standards on taxation, restrictions, and rules on tobacco products.

While no one would object to these goals, the conference threatens to put one of the largest public health victories in recent memory at stake: tobacco harm reduction by innovative technologies.

Though the well-documented scientific evidence on the life-saving potential of smokers switching to less harmful vaping devices is clear and undeniable, it is one scientific fact that is ignored or denied throughout the event.

As I have uncovered in my two trips to the COP FCTC event, one of the most dogmatic conclusions of the event organizers is that they consider nicotine vaping devices, what they label Electronic Nicotine Delivery Systems (or ENDS), as ordinary tobacco products that should be as harshly taxed, regulated, and eventually eradicated from the market altogether.

It is this nuance that alternative harm reducing technologies like vaping or heat-not-burn devices pose the same threat as traditional cigarettes that so animates activists, former smokers, and some health officials who criticise the FCTC and its proceedings. Not to mention the yearly mission of several delegations to completely bar journalists and media from any of the debates.

Considering that many countries represented have embraced policies that elevate harm reduction and acceptance of vaping at home, including the United Kingdom, Canada, France, and New Zealand, it is perhaps most frustrating that this nuance is stopped at the door and reiterated by the power brokers at COP.

What makes COP9 FCTC different from its climate change cousin is the elevated role of public health lobbies and advocacy groups throughout the proceeding.

Groups such as the Campaign for Tobacco-Free Kids, European Network for Smoking and Tobacco Prevention, and the Framework Convention Alliance on Tobacco Control are the recognised NGOs that are able to intervene in parts of the discussions and help set the agenda.

Billionaire Michael Bloomberg has pledged millions directly to these organizations and similar entities, with hopes that any tobacco-related products including vaping devices are regulated, restricted, and banned. It is no surprise, then, that any efforts to recognise the life-saving potential of vaping devices are blocked immediately.

These lobby groups have routinely been caught bribing and funding various political bodies in developing nations with the goal of restricting and banning vaping devices.

Whats more, they often bully and shame delegations if they do not adopt a strict prohibitionist attitude on tobacco alternatives like vaping, awarding countries like the Philippines, Honduras, or Guatemala with Dirty Ashtray awards for insisting on amendments with unhelpful and often confusing wording or for requesting further discussion on various amendments.

The Filipino delegation, in their video statement to open the conference, said that it was important to recognise vaping devices and products that deliver a similar satisfaction but with far less harm.

The recognition of this fact and the potential to save millions of smokers lives by the delegations at the FCTCs COP9 is realistically the most pressing issue that should be addressed. It is one that millions of vapers, who have added years to their life by switching away from tobacco, should have represented in an international body.

Whether delegations will understand this key point, and whether they will embrace science over prohibitionist ideology, however, remains to be seen.

This articlereflects the views of the author andnotthe views of The Parliament Magazine or of the Dods Group

Read the original:

The obscure UN conflab that seeks to cut off the world from vaping and harm reduction - The Parliament Magazine

ITC Institutes Investigation (337-TA-1286) In Certain Oil-Vaping Cartridges – Intellectual Property – United States – Mondaq News Alerts

10 November 2021

Oblon, McClelland, Maier & Neustadt, L.L.P

To print this article, all you need is to be registered or login on Mondaq.com.

On November 4, 2021, the ITC issued aNotice ofInvestigationinCertain Oil-Vaping Cartridges,Components Thereof, and Products Containing the Same(Inv. No. 337-TA-1286).

By way of background, this investigation is based on an October4, 2021complaintfiled by Shenzhen SmooreTechology Limited of China ("Smoore") alleging aviolation of section 337 by 38 respondents in the U.S., Canada, andHong Kong in the unlawful importation and/or sale in the U.S. ofcertain oil-vaping cartridges, components thereof, and productscontaining the same by reason of infringement of (1) certain claimsof Patent No. 10,357,623 ("the '623 patent"); U.S.Patent No. 10,791,763 ("the '763 patent"); U.S.Patent No. 10,791,762 ("the '762 patent"); and U.S.Registered Trademark No. 5,633,060 ("the '060mark").

According to the complaint, the '623 patent relatesgenerally to a vaporizer/atomizer device, which includes a liquidstorage cavity, where that cavity expressly excludes the presenceof a wick or other liquid-storage medium; the '763 patentrelates generally to a vaporizer/atomizer device, which includes aliquid storage cavity open at a mouthpiece end to the outsidebefore a mouthpiece is installed; and the '762 patent relatesgenerally to an electronic cigarette that includes avaporizer/atomizer assembly and a liquid storage cavity. The'060 mark is a standard character CCELL mark under which Smooremarkets, advertises, and sells vaporizer products, such aselectronic cigarettes, oral vaporizers for smokers, and vaporizescartridges. The accused products are atomizers, cartridges,mouthpieces, vaporizers, and vaping products used to inhalecannabidiol ("CBD") and/or marinal("THC"). Smoore is requesting that the Commissionissue limited exclusion orders and permanent cease-and-desistorders directed to respondents. According to the Notice ofInvestigation, the Office of Unfair Import Investigations willparticipate as a party in the investigation. Lastly, ChiefALJ Charles E. Bullock issued anoticeindicating that ALJ Clark S. Cheneywill preside in the investigation.

The content of this article is intended to provide a generalguide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be soughtabout your specific circumstances.

POPULAR ARTICLES ON: Intellectual Property from United States

Obhan & Associates

Trademarks Comparative Guide for the jurisdiction of India, check out our comparative guides section to compare across multiple countries

Milbank LLP

The article also examines the 30 Federal Circuit cases, including their exemplary patent claims, that found eligibility upon Alice challenges.

View post:

ITC Institutes Investigation (337-TA-1286) In Certain Oil-Vaping Cartridges - Intellectual Property - United States - Mondaq News Alerts

The Relationship Between Vaping and Mental Health – Vaping Post

Smokers on psychotropic drugs tend to need higher doses of nicotine.

Research has also indicated that nicotine also alters the coping mechanism in the brain increasing sensitivity to stress. This creates a vicious cycle meaning that this sensitivity is increased as nicotine is consumed in higher doses, which in turns leads to more nicotine consumption.

In fact, data keep indicating that mental health patients are more likely to smoke than individuals who do not suffer from psychological or psychiatric conditions. Moreover, these individuals are more likely to find it harder to quit. To this effect, they benefit greatly from having extra support in relation to smoking cessation and access to safer alternatives, that would at least lessen the chances of them also suffering from smoke-related conditions.

On the other hand, a recent report by former stop-smoking service manager in the UK, Louise Ross, the third in a series of five, said that nicotine is not what kills smokers and highlighted the importance of improving the understanding that e-cigarettes are substantially safer than smoking, and can be used to help smokers quit.

She added that nurses are in an especially good position to promote smoking cessation. Given that studies have indicated that smokers respond well to intensive smoking cessation treatments that are tailor made for their needs, explained Ross, nurses who understand individual patients needs are ideally placed to give ongoing smoking cessation support.

Moreover, she underlined, smokers on psychotropic drugs tend to need higher doses of nicotine. The tar (and not the nicotine) in tobacco smoke also increases the need for higher doses of some psychotropic medications, so stopping smoking enables some people to be prescribed a lower dose and experience fewer side-effects (NCSCT, 2018).

The Link Between Smoking, Vaping and Psychological Well-Being in the US

View original post here:

The Relationship Between Vaping and Mental Health - Vaping Post

Taxing Vapes Is Better Than Leaving It Unregulated – The Rakyat Post

Subscribe to ourTelegramchannel for the latest stories and updates.

So long story short, in October, Finance Minister Tengku Datuk Seri Zafrul Abdul Aziz noted the governmentsplanin Budget 2022 to hike up the excise duty imposed on liquid or gel products for vaping and it also includes those that contain nicotine.

This would effectively increase the tax rate from RM0.40 for each millilitre of liquid or gel products to RM1.20 per millilitre, starting 1 January 2022.

Just like how a sin tax on sugary drinks can reduce societys risk of contracting non-communicable diseases like obesity, diabetes and heart disease, it is not uncommon to see taxation on vaping products.

But in this case, some countries prefer no taxation at all to harness the full potential of vaping products and incentivise smokers to switch to the less harmful product.

The Malaysian Public Health Physicians Association (PPPKAM) President Datuk Dr Zainal Ariffin Omar,describedthe decision to expand sin tax to include vaping products as a commendable plan, while Dr Koh Kar Chai, president of the Malaysian Medical Association (MMA)explainedthat the tax couldnt have come sooner.

Taxation is a pragmatic approach to regulate the products, reduce their overall consumption and improve overall public health, besides having the bonus of generating revenue for the country.

The Federation of Private Medical Practitioners Associations Malaysia (FPMPAM) President Dr Steven Chow Kim Wengstressedthat strict regulations must first come into play before the country begins installing this new tax framework.

The association agrees thattobacco harm reduction (THR)strategies that encourage cigarette smokers to switch to vaping products as a less harmful alternative to their habits must be supervised and studied to implement better regulations in the future.

FPMPAM say that the adoption of THR strategies would reduce health risks contributed by cigarette smoking and save Malaysia billions of ringgit in treating smoking-related diseases.

This opinion is also agreed by Dr Arifin Fii, a local specialist in addiction therapy, whosaidthat THR presents itself as a practical solution to counter the prevalence of smoking.

The use of vaping products has been globally accepted as the prefered choice for people to put out their cigarettes and allow them to safely transition to a less harmful means of quitting the habit for good.

So it stands to reason that the government should endeavour to regulate and introducepoliciesto better promote THR here in Malaysia to make vaping products regulated with controls to ensure products meet safety and quality standards for consumers.

Read More: Just How Regulated Is Malaysias Vape Industry? Lets Look Past The Smoke Screen

Share your thoughts with us via TRPsFacebook,Twitter, andInstagram.

Typing out trending topics and walking the fine line between deep and dumb.

Continued here:

Taxing Vapes Is Better Than Leaving It Unregulated - The Rakyat Post

Three differences between vaping cartridges and raw concentrates – The GrowthOp

Breadcrumb Trail Links

Although vaping THC cartridges is easier for many cannabis users, vaping concentrates has increased in popularity.

Author of the article:

It seems that vaping cannabis has become just as popular as rolling a blunt or taking a bong hit in recent years. Part of the reason for this may be that there are so many different forms of vaporizing weed. Additionally, vaping cannabis offers a level of convenience thats hard to top.

This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.

For people who are just beginning to familiarize themselves with the world of vaping cannabis products, some of the terminology can get confusing. Thats especially the case when determining whether or not its best to go with a vape pen or a wax pen.

While a vape pen can be used with any cartridge having 510 threading, wax pens require users to have their own concentrates to use. Here are some other key differences between vaping cartridges and raw concentrates.

One of the biggest differences between vaping raw concentrates and vaping THC cartridges is the fact that cartridges are essentially plug and play. After affixing it to the battery, users are ready to find the temperature that works for them and begin taking hits from their device.

This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.

Concentrates are a different story. To properly vape concentrates, users must apply their concentrates directly into the pen itself, which can leave excess residue behind if not done properly. Another downfall is that sometimes the pen may not burn the concentrates all the way, which leaves behind sticker residue that is difficult to clean.

Although vaping THC cartridges is easier for many cannabis users, vaping concentrates has increased in popularity for good reason. While the primary ingredient in vape cartridges is THC distillate, in the U.S, there are numerous cutting ingredients such as coconut oil and other potentially harmful ingredients like heavy metals.

This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.

On the other hand, vaping concentrates offers users the opportunity to consume pure concentrates, free of any additives. The fact that the individual consumers add the concentrate themselves provides more peace of mind that the product being consumed is safer than potentially harmful cartridges.

Since consumers choosing to vape concentrates rather than cartridges are able to use more sophisticated devices, they are often left to do more maintenance than counterparts who use disposable vape pens with 510 threading.

When regularly using a wax pen to vape concentrates, consumers should be aware they will likely need to replace parts of their device, such as the atomizer and the coil. That can be a tricky process depending on the type of wax pen.

Consumers who prefer to vape THC cartridges dont have to worry about much maintenance with their devices since they can simply discard their pen and get a new one once it starts to show signs of decline.

While most people think theres no big difference between vaping concentrates and THC cartridges, there are a few key characteristics that help to tell them apart. This can make life easier when trying to determine whether its best for the user to buy a wax pen that can vaporize concentrates or a vape pen just for cartridges.

This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.

We apologize, but this video has failed to load.

The FreshToast.com , a U.S. lifestyle site that contributes lifestyle content and, with their partnership with 600,000 physicians via Skipta, medical marijuana information to The GrowthOp.

Subscribe to Weekend Dispensary , a new weekly newsletter from The GrowthOp.

This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.

Sign-up for Weekend Dispensary to get the latest cannabis news and exclusive articles delivered straight to your inbox.

A welcome email is on its way. If you don't see it, please check your junk folder.

The next issue of Weekend Dispensary will soon be in your inbox.

We encountered an issue signing you up. Please try again

Postmedia is committed to maintaining a lively but civil forum for discussion and encourage all readers to share their views on our articles. Comments may take up to an hour for moderation before appearing on the site. We ask you to keep your comments relevant and respectful. We have enabled email notificationsyou will now receive an email if you receive a reply to your comment, there is an update to a comment thread you follow or if a user you follow comments. Visit our Community Guidelines for more information and details on how to adjust your email settings.

See the original post here:

Three differences between vaping cartridges and raw concentrates - The GrowthOp

ABS, Global Maritime team up for US offshore wind – 4C Offshore

Risk management companyABS Consulting Partners has allied via its subsidiary, American GlobalMaritime Inc., with marine offshore and engineering consultancy GlobalMaritime to support offshore wind in the United States.

Combining expertise,the two companies aim to offer a comprehensive service to support the offshorewind life-cycle from concept design through to decommissioning."We are thrilled to be working in collaboration with Global Maritimeand employing their extensive track record of delivering successful marineand offshore projects worldwide with our leading risk management and technicalservices," commented Brian Weaver, Vice President of Risk andReliability for ABS Consulting, which has been serving the marine and offshoremarkets for over half a decade.

"Combiningour expertise will enable us to strategically provide clients with a singleinterface for complex scopes such as Certified Verification Agent (CVA),Marine Warranty and Owners Engineering."Global Maritime isalso a seasoned player, with over 40 years experience in the maritimesectors and expertise in the oil and gas, aquaculture, shipping, and renewableenergy markets."The offshore wind sector is a key market that both ABS Consultingand Global Maritime have guided through operational and safety challenges,"said Jonny Logan, CEO of Global Maritime. "This partnership willsupport our planned expansion in the US, enabling us to service our clientsneeds in the market seamlessly."

For more information on offshore windfarms worldwide,clickhere.

Read more:

ABS, Global Maritime team up for US offshore wind - 4C Offshore

Netherlands Plans to Double Offshore Wind Capacity by 2030 to 22 GW – The Maritime Executive

Orsted comisisioned the Borssele 1 and 2 farms in the Netherlands in 2020 (Orsted file photo)

PublishedNov 12, 2021 5:49 PM by The Maritime Executive

The Dutch government released an ambitious new plan that calls for nearly doubling the countrys plans for installed offshore wind power generation by 2030. The new plans look to expand the areas available for development in the North Sea to support the Netherlandsnear-term goal for reducing emissions and will be further supplemented with longer-term efforts beyond 2030.

The total installed capacity of offshore wind power in the Netherlands in 2021 is around 2.5 gigawatts and should increase to at least 4.5 GW by 2023, according to the governments official website. This is part of an overall wind plan that projected 11 GW of installed capacity by 2030. This would account for 8.5 percent of all the energy in the Netherlands and 40 percent of the current electricity consumption.

The revision to the North Sea Program expands on the eight areas currently designated for the development of offshore wind farms. Some of the current search areas are being added to the plan with the government expecting that there will be development in both the previously identified zones as well as the new ones that it adding to the plan.

The near-term development is focused on the Borssele Wind Farm Zone, which was the first zone developed approximately 14 miles off the northern coast. A total of five projects are planned with two due by 2023 each adding 0.7 GW in capacity. Three additional wind farms are planned approximately 11 miles off the southern coast and this will be followed between 2024 and 2030 by the development of wind farms further out to sea in the west and north of the Netherlands.

The revision to the master plan calls for an additional 8 GW of capacity to be built in the eastern zones. A further 2 GW would be developed in the northern zone while 0.7 GW would be added in the southern zone.

The total plan calls for an additional 10.7 GW of wind power generation added to the overall plan by 2030. If all the projects proceed, the country would now have a total generating capacity of over 22 GW in place by 2030.

The government has opened a public comment period running till the end of 2021 on the plan to expand the zones. The current timeline calls for the adoption of the revised plan by March 2022.

In announcing its new efforts, the Netherlands says that anticipated the country will require at least 38 GW of installed offshore wind power generating capacity by 2050.

The rest is here:

Netherlands Plans to Double Offshore Wind Capacity by 2030 to 22 GW - The Maritime Executive

Bulk Carrier Spewing Toxic Fumes Moved Offshore in South Africa – gcaptain.com

A bulk carrier carrying a chemical cargo has been given the boot from South Africas Port of Durban after it began spewing toxic fumes during cargo operations.

The NS Qingdao was discharging at the port earlier this week when its chemical cargo was apparently soaked by rain, causing the cargo to become unstable and release the toxic fumes into the atmosphere. The vessel was evacuated from the port and towed out to sea in order to ventilate its hatches offshore.

The South African Maritime Safety Authority (SAMSA) reports that the fumes coming off the vessel do not pose an immediate threat to human health or the marine environment.

The South African Maritime Authority are (s.i.c) aware of a vessel releasing toxic fumes in St. Helena Bay, SAMSA said in a statement. The geared bulk carrier NS Qingdao suffered a chemical reaction after its cargo came into contact with rain water while discharging the cargo in the port of Durban. Concentrated toxic fumes were released into the atmosphere and as a result, the Transnet National Port Authority in consultation with SAMSA, DFFE and other stakeholders decided to evacuate the vessel from the port so that the hatches can be ventilated offshore.

SAMSA has directed the vessel to sail to a protected anchorage under the escort of the tug. A team of salvors, chemical experts, hazmat teams and other emergency personnel have since boarded the ship to manage the situation.

The owner is co-operating with the Authorities and has been very proactive to help contain the situation, SAMSA said.

The agency added that the cargo will be discharged into skips, chemically neutralized and brough ashore at an approved dumping site in a safe and controlled manner.

The vessel poses no immediate threat to the marine environment and humans, said SAMSA.

NS Qingdao is registered in the Marshall Islands and, as of Friday, it remained at anchor in St. Helena Bay.

Details about what kind of cargo the ship was carrying have not been disclosed.

See the original post:

Bulk Carrier Spewing Toxic Fumes Moved Offshore in South Africa - gcaptain.com