Tesla and Apple Will Make or Break the Nasdaq This Week – Motley Fool

The stock market continued to lose ground on Monday, and once again, the Nasdaq Composite (NASDAQINDEX:^IXIC) took another big hit. As of 3 p.m. ET, the Nasdaq was down 251 points to 13,518.

At its worst levels of the day, Monday's move lower for the Nasdaq brought its total decline since hitting all-time records just a few months ago to more than 19%. It wouldn't take much more to meet the official 20% definition of a bear market drop. Earnings season is about to shift into high gear, and among the top Nasdaq stocks reporting results this week will be Tesla (NASDAQ:TSLA) and Apple (NASDAQ:AAPL). Here's why what the two corporate giants say in their respective reports could be what determines the future course of the Nasdaq and the entire stock market.

Image source: Getty Images.

Shares of Tesla were down 5% late Monday afternoon, although that drop was about half what it had been earlier in the day. The electric vehicle pioneer is set to report its latest results Wednesday afternoon.

Investors expect big things from Tesla when it reports. Projections for sales of $16.35 billion would be up more than 50% from year-ago levels. Earnings of $2.26 per share would be nearly triple the $0.80 per share in adjusted earnings the company posted this time last year.

Tesla already gave shareholders a sense of what to expectin early January, when it released its production and delivery figures for the fourth quarter. Tesla produced nearly 306,000 vehicles and delivered 308,600 for the period, bringing its respective totals for the full 2021 year to roughly 930,000 and 936,000.

However, what's left for Tesla to reveal is how those unit sales translated into dollar-based revenue, as well as how profitable its sales activities were. Investors have come to expect a lot from Tesla, but there's recognition that the industry faces some unusual challenges right now that could hold back short-term results. Given how fragile the market has been lately, unexpectedly strong numbers from Tesla could be exactly what the Nasdaq needs to mount a comeback. Disappointment, though, could be costly.

Meanwhile, shares of Apple were down a bit more than 2%, rebounding nicely from larger losses earlier in the day. The iPhone maker has just as many people watching to see how its fiscal first-quarter financial results will look Thursday afternoon, and while they'll pay attention to how the holiday season went, shareholders also want reassurance that Apple's future still looks bright.

Apple's business is mature enough that Tesla-size revenue gains aren't possible, but that isn't stopping shareholders from having high hopes. Consensus forecasts call for about $118.4 billion in sales, producing earnings of $1.88 per share, up roughly 12% year over year.

Indeed, many are worried that Apple might not be able to live up to expectations at all. CEO Tim Cook warned that supply chain issues have already disrupted the electronic device maker's business, costing the company billions in the fiscal fourth quarter of last year. Moreover, if those challenges persist, they could hold back Apple's ability to return to more considerable growth in the fiscal second quarter.

Apple's business is so huge that it has a massive effect on a wide range of suppliers and related companies. Any shortfall could ripple across the tech sector, but an upbeat assessment could restore confidence in the entire market.

This article represents the opinion of the writer, who may disagree with the official recommendation position of a Motley Fool premium advisory service. Were motley! Questioning an investing thesis -- even one of our own -- helps us all think critically about investing and make decisions that help us become smarter, happier, and richer.

Read more from the original source:

Tesla and Apple Will Make or Break the Nasdaq This Week - Motley Fool

This Tesla-Swapped Mustang Is Another Take on an Electric Mustang – The Drive

An electric Mustang coupe could be on the cards one day, with Ford preparing the next generation of its pony car as we speak. If you want that instant-on torque in the meantime, however, you'll have to build your own. AEM Electronics are doing just that, giving a 2007 Ford Mustang GT the humming heart of a Tesla.

The project came about as AEM needed a project car to show off its own inverter control board developed for Tesla drivetrains. The Mustang was sourced off Craigslist from an EV enthusiast who had already done a successful Tesla swap. The car was fitted with the Sport version of the Tesla Large Drive Unit, which AEM swapped out for the base unit as seen in the 2013-2015 Model S, which was the primary unit its hardware was developed for.

Running AEM's inverter board, the drivetrain is tuned to put out over 400 horsepower and a healthy 330 lb-ft of torque. Motor Trend reports that the car is capable of a 11.78 quarter-mile time with a trap speed of 117 mph on street tires, while achieving representative times of 12.2 seconds in its own runs. It's a quicker time than the Ford Mustang Mach-E, either way.

The build goes a long way to demonstrating what an electric Mustang could really be like, in sharp contrast to the Ford Mustang Mach-E. AEM's build is a performance-focused tire-shredding coupe, which is very much what the Mustang brand has historically traded on, rather than being a four-door SUV. The build made an appearance recently at the Holley High Voltage show at Sonoma Raceway, laying down a smoky burnout on the strip, as is good and proper.

The Mustang has been gutted, with the fuel tank, live rear axle, transmission, and engine all ripped out. Instead, fabrication work at the rear enabled the installation of an entire Tesla Model S subframe complete with motors in place. QA-1 coilovers in the rear are used in place of the original Model S air suspension. Finding wheels to fit the odd setup was tough, with a set of rims from a 2008 Corvette pressed into service as they had just the right offset for the job.

The drive unit is liquid-cooled, with hard lines running all the way to the front of the car into the stock Mustang GT radiator fitted with the stock cooling fan. A Model S cooling pump is used to circulate fluid through the system.

View post:

This Tesla-Swapped Mustang Is Another Take on an Electric Mustang - The Drive

Ford Is A Better EV Investment Than Tesla – Seeking Alpha

Tramino/iStock Unreleased via Getty Images

Ford (NYSE: F), with a $80 billion market capitalization, trades at less than 9% of Tesla's (NASDAQ: TSLA) almost $1 trillion market capitalization. The company has seen significant success with its electric vehicle line-up and, as we'll see throughout this article, we expect the company to outperform significantly in the coming years.

Ford has seen significant success with its electric vehicle business by making electrical versions of its most popular businesses. The company launched one of the first large scale electric pickup trucks to significant success.

The company has announced on the back of recent success, it's expanding its electric pickup F-150 to 150 thousand vehicles annually. The company has >200 thousand F-150 reservations highlighting significant demand. For the Mustang Mach-E, the company is also expanding production to 200 thousand vehicles annually, another sign of significant demand growth.

The company is also launching its all electric transit van (E-Transit) soon. All told, in the next 2 years, by YE 2023, the company expects to have the capacity to produce 600 thousand electric vehicles annually. For reference, even if Tesla meets its lofty growth goals, for 2023 the company would be at roughly 2 million vehicles.

That means Ford's rapidly growing electric vehicle business will be 30% the size of Tesla's in 2 years. It's worth noting in the same press release, Ford is aiming for eventually being able to challenge Tesla after becoming the second largest electric automaker.

At the same time, the company has rounded out strong performance for 2021.

The company sold 173k US vehicles in Dec. 2021, with 12k electric vehicles sold. The company was the second highest seller of electric vehicles in the market versus Tesla, although, to be fair, it did sell 10% of the electric vehicles. The chip shortage hurt the company's vehicle sales, however, it still annualized at almost 4 million vehicles sold.

That means the company sells 4x the vehicles of Tesla at <10% of the valuation. The company's strong Dec. 2021 performance highlights the overall strength of its business. Its electric vehicle business is expected to continue growing rapidly, as we discussed above, which should support the company's overall businesses.

Ford's current valuation is $20 thousand per vehicle sold. For perspective, Tesla's is roughly $1 million.

Ford has continued to perform incredibly well financially showing its overall business strength.

Ford Investor Presentation

Ford earned quarterly revenue of $35.7 billion but with abnormally high FCF of $7.7 billion. The company has a strong net cash balance of $5.9 billion and its TTM FCF from the 3Q 2021 was $4.1 billion. That implies a mid-single digit FCF yield for the company. That's strong for a company spending $4.5 billion in annual capital expenditures as it grows its electric vehicle business.

That financial performance has enabled a roughly 2% dividend yield. The company has the ability to continue increasing its shareholder returns, highlighted by its overall financial strength.

In our view, Ford has significant continued potential.

The company's ASP is roughly $35 thousand per vehicle. The F-150 electric vehicle starts at $40 thousand. In the next two years, the company is expanding its production of electric vehicles to 600 thousand vehicles annually, vehicles that tend to have a higher ASP and therefore more revenue potential for the company.

We expect the company to grow its annual revenue from both a higher ASP and increased vehicle margins. At the same time, higher ASP can be expected to support margins and earnings. Overall, we expect the company to earn billions in annual FCF and continue growing that, while maintaining a strong net cash position.

That continued potential will enable continued shareholder rewards. Versus Tesla, Ford has a strong and rapidly growing electric vehicle business, as it scales up electric vehicle production. At the same time, the company has a strong legacy business to subsidize its overall business. All of that together shows the company's continued potential.

The risk to our thesis is the company is spending billions of additional dollars ($10s of billions) on rapidly expanding its electric vehicle business. So far, the company is performing incredibly well, however, there's no guarantee that that outperformance continues in the electrical vehicle business. Until the company proves its success, whether or not it succeeds will remain a risk.

Ford has an impressive portfolio of assets and a unique ability to continue utilizing those assets to generate substantial shareholder rewards. The company generated roughly $5 billion in FCF for the last 12 months while investing heavily in growth, especially EV growth. Additionally, the company has a strong net cash position.

For interested investors, we recommend looking at investing in Ford to invest in the EV space. The company's unique portfolio of assets and long-term brands means it's been able to enter the space in a strong way. We expect its market relevance and success to continue growing, generating substantial long-term shareholder returns.

Read the rest here:

Ford Is A Better EV Investment Than Tesla - Seeking Alpha

Tesla insurance is offered in five states, with real-time behavior impacting rates in all but California – Green Car Reports

Tesla insurance is now available in five states, with rates based on analysis of real-time driving behavior in four of them.

An expansion to Arizona and Ohio was first reported by Electrek Thursday. It was previously available in California, Illinois, and Texas as well.

Tesla's website notes that insurance based on real-time driving behavior is available in Arizona, Illinois, Ohio, and Texas, but not California, likely due to regulatory issues. Tesla has said drivers with an "average" safety score should save 20% to 40% on their premiums compared to other insurance products, while the safest drivers can save 30% to 60%, Electrek reported.

2021 Tesla Model Y IIHS crash-testing

Tesla insurance has been slow to roll out. It was originally revealed in 2019, and promised to offer insurance at a lower cost to reflect Tesla's driver-assistance features. It didn't add real-time driving behavior to the program until last fall, though. It was originally offered only in California.

Tesla isn't the only automaker launching insurance products for its vehicles. Porsche has experimented with its own program for Taycan owners, but that was only initially offered for Illinois and Oregon residents. Rivian announced an insurance program in 2021, saying it would be offered in 40 states. Like Tesla, Rivian said it would offer discounts to customers who agreed to let the company monitor their driving behavior.

Why is this? The claim frequency varies widely for EVsalthough in some respects the differences are predictable. Some of the disparity might have been due to early EVs, like the Smart Fortwo Electric Drive, aimed primarily at low-speed urban driving skewing averages. Let's hope by now the insurance establishment is catching up and can tailor policies accordingly.

Continued here:

Tesla insurance is offered in five states, with real-time behavior impacting rates in all but California - Green Car Reports

Eric Adams may have lost more than $1,000 converting his first paycheck to crypto – New York Post

Maybe he shouldve stuck with cash.

Mayor Eric Adams may have lost more than $1,000 of his first City Hall paycheck in just four days after converting it into cryptocurrency during a plunge in the market, a Post analysis shows.

Adams, who pulls an annual salary of $258,750, said Friday he converted his first biweekly paycheck worth about $5,900 after average tax withholdings into the cryptocurrencies bitcoin and ethereum.

From the beginning of the day on Friday until Monday morning, bitcoins price plunged by about 15.9%, while ethereum fell 24.3%.

The mayor didnt detail exactly how he divided his paycheck between the two cryptocurrencies, but a $5,900 investment split 50/50 between bitcoin and ethereum at midnight on Friday wouldhavebeenworth just $4,714on Monday morning a loss of $1,186.

If Adams had put his entire paycheck into bitcoin, hehave had about$4,961Monday morning, while the same amount of money invested in ethereum wouldhave beenworth $4,466.

Cryptocurrencies rallied later on Monday, but bitcoin remained about 9.1% below Friday levels on Monday evening, while ethereum was down 18.0%.

The mayors office did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

In November, Adams first pledged to take his first three paychecks in cryptocurrency as part of a plan to make New York City into the center of the cryptocurrency industry and other fast-growing, innovative industries.

But federal Department of Labor regulations ban city governments from paying workers directly in cryptocurrencies, so the mayors office said his paycheck would immediately be converted into cryptocurrency using the crypto exchange Coinbase.

Adams made his initial crypto pledge when bitcoin was trading north of $60,000. It has since fallen below $35,000.

Asked about bitcoins plummeting price in early January, Adams struck an optimistic tone.

Sometimes the best time to buy is when things go down, so when they go back up, you made a good profit,Adams told CNBCon Jan. 6.

In November, Adams caught flak for quietly flying to the SOMOS conference in Puerto Rico on a private Gulfstream jet owned by the bitcoin billionaire Brock Pierce, who also donated to his campaign. A spokesman said Adams paid for the flight through a travel agent.

More here:

Eric Adams may have lost more than $1,000 converting his first paycheck to crypto - New York Post

Crypto Espresso: Your quick shot of the latest crypto moves and news – Stockhead

Your quick shot of the latest crypto moves and news, the Crypto Espresso is brought to you byCapital.comAustralia (AFSL 513393), a multi-award winning global investment trading platform.

Morning Coinheads.

Its time for a price call on Cardano and GALA, while the Smooth Love Potion coin (SLP) just aint working.

And the Bitcoin counter-offensive at 7am Sydney time? US$36,002.69 up 3.45% in last 24 hours.

Let us begin

US market close: Crypto fights back

Prominent cryptocurrencies were mostly higher overnight, stateside, after trading in the red for much of the day. Bitcoin was up, Ethereum was 0.87% higher, while Litecoin was up 1.86%. In other digital assets, Bitcoin Cash was 0.95% in the green and Dogecoin was 0.22% lower.

SLP coin price prediction: Can the gaming token rebound?

The Smooth Love Potion coin (SLP),used in the Axie Infinity gaming metaverse, failedin its attempt to stage a price recovery earlier this month, as a selloff across the crypto marketsaccelerated.

Bitcoin falls below US$35,000 in cryptocurrency decline

Bitcoin fell through the US$35,000 floor for the first time since July 2021 over the weekend asbearish sentiment seems to pervade the overall market.

UK crypto news: BTC sinks to US$33K as the downfall continues

Bitcoin (BTC) was not done fallingafter appearing to stabilise at the end of the carnage weekend for the digital currency market.InLondon morning trade, the coinreached as low as US$33,554.04, representing a 50.9% fall from its all-time high registered last November.

Pi Network: what is the outlook for the as-yet-untraded Pi coin?

Still no sign of a listing of Network Piscrypto on theexchanges despite the organisation insisting it is up to them to decide whetherthey want to or not.Pi Network continues toinsist it is not running an initial coin offering.

Cardano (ADA) price prediction: Will it rally again in 2022?

The global cryptocurrency market has been bearish lately, with its market capitalisation falling from US$2.5trn at the end of 2021 to US$1.62trn.Cardano saw a similar downtrendand was trading at US$1.05 on 24 January, down more than 35% from its monthly high of US$1.63.

GALA coin price prediction: is the bearish trend over?

Like several of the leading altcoins, thedecline that had hit GALA, the token of blockchain gaming developer Gala Games, since Christmas took a dramatic turn downwards on Friday amid a BTC-led loss of investor confidence.The coinhas lost 68% of its value since 27 December.

This article was developed in collaboration with Capital.com Australia (AFSL 513393), a Stockhead advertiser at the time of publishing.

This article does not constitute financial product advice. You should consider obtaining independent advice before making any financial decisions.

Get the latest Stockhead news delivered free to your inbox.

It's free. Unsubscribe whenever you want.

Read the rest here:

Crypto Espresso: Your quick shot of the latest crypto moves and news - Stockhead

Is It Possible to Change the Structure Of The Brain With Meditation?

Yes, it is! Join us now to find out what happens in your brain when you meditate! 

Where do you stand when it comes to meditation? Have you tried it? Many people don’t know this, but this process of just sitting and breathing mindfully can change the structure of your brain! Wondering how can meditation change the brain? In that case, you came to the right place! 

Different types of meditation have existed for thousands of years now. However, until recently, it was not common to meet plenty of people who practice it in different parts of the world!  Do you know someone who does?

We didn’t really until we went to a self-defense meeting six or seven years ago! Honestly, we were a bit shocked because we expected only to learn Kung Fu, Muay Thai, and other martial arts. But the thing was that, although we did practice those things, the training included yoga, tai chi, mediation, etc., too! 

                           

At first, meditation seemed awkward, you know!  Why would we spend time just sitting and doing nothing, we thought. What the heck is the point of it?  But as we kept on attending these meetings, our perspective started to change!  What made us see things differently? 

Well, we have noticed that all the people who have been practicing meditation for some time have an incredible sense of calmness, compassion, and self-awareness. They appear as if traveling on some kind of cloud of tranquility above the storm of anxiety most of us feel all the time. We noticed that they also have better dating sites. This realization inspired curiosity, so we started to read and research to learn more about meditation. Somewhere along the way, we learned that meditation changes brain structure!  Honestly, in the beginning, it sounded like some kind of science fiction! Okay, meditation can help you relax, but how does it change your brain chemistry? It sounds ridiculous! But it isn’t!  Further investigation showed that mediation changes the brain indeed! Of course, it is not something that happens after a session or two! But a long-term, properly done meditation has physical, tangible effects. Now we know that this is incredible for many of you! So we decided to write an article about what actually happens and how long does it take for meditation to change the brain. If you are the least bit curious, you will enjoy this text!

                         

Meditation Changes Brain Structure 

Before moving on to explaining how to practice meditation to change your brain, let's see what is happening.  It is known that meditation renders a calming effect on the brain.  People who practice meditation regularly are far less anxious or stressed than those who don’t. But what does it mean to claim that meditation can change your brain? Well, as surprising as it may sound to you, various studies have shown that practicing mindfulness can change brain structures.  A study we found in Psychiatry Research showed, based on the scan analysis, that eight weeks mindfulness training program increased cortical thickness in the hippocampus. According to the scientists working on these issues, increases correlate to improved emotional regulations. Decreases, on the other hand, are attributed to increased risks of the development of negative emotions. 

Studies suggest that different kinds of meditation change eight specific areas of the brain, which are related to the regulation of emotions, meta-awareness, memory processing, body awareness, etc. Dr. Kristin Naragon – Gainey, who was in teams that conducted some of the studies, says that there is no denying that regular meditation greatly changes aspects of brain functioning. It not changes the areas of the brain but also the way they communicate with each other.

How Long Does it Take 

Many people told us, “Okay, I got it! But how many hours of meditation to change the brain are necessary?” It is essential to know that a single session of meditation can be enough for you to start feeling better.  Some studies showed that people experience better mood, decreased stress and blood pressure after one session. More long-term effects, such as increased focus, start kicking in after several weeks. But if the question is only related to the ways to change brain meditation, then you should know that you need to practice meditation to change brain waves for about eight consecutive weeks before you see any results. 

Once you decide to start changing brain chemistry meditation, keep in mind that consistency is critical for best results.  You won’t notice any drastic changes if you practice meditation, say once in a month or two!  This is not to say that you have to do it every single day either! But, the research shows that you need to practice 10 – 20 minutes at least three times per week if you want to enjoy all the benefits. 

How to Make Most of Meditation

  • For many people, the idea of sitting and doing nothing for thirty minutes seems impossible. But no one told you that you have to meditate that long. Start with short, five minutes sessions, and do them once or two times a week.  Setting a goal to practice meditation every day or for a long time is farfetched for beginners and is likely to fail. 
  • Designate a calm and safe space. Technically, you can meditate in the middle of the street if you want! But most people search for a quiet place where they can feel safe and focused. 
  • Concentrate on breathing.  If you are starting to practice meditation, you should know that the easiest way is to focus on your breathing.  It is not uncommon for the mind to wander when you are a beginner. Breathing will help you refocus in this case.
  • Try guided meditation. Many people find that it is challenging to quiet down their thoughts in the beginning.  In that case, you can try a guided meditation. You can find some YouTube videos, download the app, or join a group. 

                                 

Let’s be clear about something! Although meditation changes the brain, it is not a cure for any disorder or disease! But it can be beneficial if you practice it regularly! What does it mean? Well, any meditation, and especially mindfulness, can help you cope better with daily stress you experience at work, anxiety, etc., by helping you focus on here and now and your needs! Have you practiced meditation so far?

About author

My name is Rebecca Shinn. I am a consulting psychologist who occasionally writes articles for blogs. I hope this helps make psychology more accessible. I am fond of running and traveling.

Aaron Rodgers Loves Ayn Rand’s Atlas Shrugged and We’re Not Shocked – Esquire

Namaste. First off, welcome to the new year that is 2022. Secondly, let's discuss the consciousness of man, the innate benefits of capitalism, and the turmoil that can result from extreme governmental oversight as it applies to small- and medium-sized businesses. Not of interest to you? Oh, perhaps you haven't read Ayn Rand's Atlas Shruggednoted favorite novel of Aaron Rodgers and every 17-year-old libertarian interested in majoring in fuh-nance.

How do we know this? During Monday Night Football, Peyton and Eli Manning had Rodgers on for a segment and couldn't resist asking him what he was reading from the bookshelf behind him on camera. Earnestly, Rodgers points to the collection and says, "A lot of French poetry," before pointing to the other side and saying, "Got Atlas Shrugged by Ayn Rand over here." Then, he adds that he also has a football helmet on the shelf, signed by both Manning brothers, leading me to believe that Rodgers reads that regularly, too.

While I'm intrigued by the idea of Rodgers kicking back with a tall glass of room temperature kombucha, reading the works of de la Fontaine and Hugo, the part that caught the attention of the internet is, of course, the Ayn Rand of it all. Rand's best-known work, Atlas Shrugged is often referenced as a favorite in libertarian and conservative circles, so when our guy proudly pointed to the nearly 1,200 page work as a highlight of his library, people took notice.

This content is imported from Twitter. You may be able to find the same content in another format, or you may be able to find more information, at their web site.

For most of us, Atlas Shrugged was the summer reading assignment we skimmed a third of before resorting to SparkNotes. You didn't need to read it, reallyBlake, that guy from your junior year literature class who has big thoughts on the free market, wasn't going to let you get a word in edgewise during class discussion anyway. And that's because Atlas Shrugged is the Bible for people who might describe themselves as, simultaneously, "cerebral" and "free-thinker." It represents an ideology that values the individual and his own decisions, or, as my friend Zack used to say, it's a "real douche-nozzle's guide to the world."

This content is imported from Twitter. You may be able to find the same content in another format, or you may be able to find more information, at their web site.

This content is imported from Twitter. You may be able to find the same content in another format, or you may be able to find more information, at their web site.

This content is imported from Twitter. You may be able to find the same content in another format, or you may be able to find more information, at their web site.

This content is imported from Twitter. You may be able to find the same content in another format, or you may be able to find more information, at their web site.

This all aligns pretty nicely with the headline-making course that Rodgers has been on for the past six months. After claiming to be "immunized" in August, Rodgers tested positive for Covid-19 this fall and further explained that he's not actually vaccinated in the, you know, actually vaccinated way, but that he's taken alternative treatments like ivermectin, which is an anti-parasite medication often used on horses. Looking back, Rodgers's explanation on The Pat McAfee Show should have tipped us off on what was to come:

His worldview gels perfectly with two facts seared into my mind for eternity: Rodgers' finace Shailene Woodley absorbs vitamin D through her vagina and sometimes eats clay. I don't fault Rodgers for loving Ayn Rand; I fault myself for not assuming Ayn Rand was an inspiration in this tall lug of a man's life from the jump. Now, I simply want to know what else is on the book shelf. Eat This, Not That? Three unopened paperback copies of Animal Farm? A VHS copy The Scarlet Letter where Demi Moore takes baths? Open my mind, Aaron Rodgers. Save me from myself by recommending Chicken Soup for the Sports Fan's Soul.

The Packers are set to play the Detroit Lions this Sunday at 1pm. Aaron Rodgers is set to play himself again at some point in the near future.

This content is created and maintained by a third party, and imported onto this page to help users provide their email addresses. You may be able to find more information about this and similar content at piano.io

Read the original post:

Aaron Rodgers Loves Ayn Rand's Atlas Shrugged and We're Not Shocked - Esquire

Boris Johnson and the woeful and costly Tory war on woke – The Japan Times

Coronavirus cases are once again exploding in the United Kingdom. Yet Prime Minister Boris Johnsons Conservative government, dominated by extremist ideologues who value their notion of individual freedom above the public good, is again unwilling to impose necessary measures a reluctance that has already cost innumerable lives in previous COVID-19 waves.

Last month, about a hundred Tory Members of Parliament voted against a very modest government plan that mandates the wearing of masks and vaccine certificates in some places. As hospitals fill up again with COVID-19 patients, they talk about an ancient British tradition of liberty. Were not a papers please society, Tory MP Marcus Fysh claimed, This is not Nazi Germany.

Given such anti-government rhetoric, you might not guess that Johnson, who has been dogged by reports he was partying at his official residence during a general lockdown last year, and has often appeared maskless in public spaces, matches Donald Trump in his disdain for public health regulations.

Or that the British media, overwhelmingly right wing, provides the background chorus for freedom from COVID-19 restrictions. In fact, it led the Tory celebrations of Freedom Day in July this year.

The celebrations were as foolish as they were premature. These days, the world watches again in appalled fascination as omicron spreads fast, and rowdy invocations of personal responsibility and individual choice delay preventive moves in the United Kingdom and, by extension, everywhere else.

Public-spiritedness is by no means alien to Britain; its present-day embodiment, the National Health Service, was widely applauded during the early weeks of the pandemic. Tory fanboys of Winston Churchill like to invoke his lonely defiance of Nazi Germany as they insist on their right to remain maskless. But there is no record of Tory freedom-lovers keeping their lights on at night during the blackout enforced by Churchills government in 1940.

Contemporary Tory libertarianism derives from the American ideologue Ayn Rand more than any ancient British tradition of liberty. And the present-day contempt for collective welfare is largely a legacy of the revolution launched by Ronald Reagan and Margaret Thatcher in the 1980s. Thatcher notoriously doubted the existence of society; Reagan claimed that the nine most terrifying words are Im from the government, and Im here to help.

The strange thing is that the battles launched by Reaganites and Thatcherites against tax rates, protectionist industry and labor union privilege were won a long time ago. Libertarians in the United States even managed to discredit major government involvement in health care.

So, what makes Anglo-American individualists so dangerously inflexible, even self-destructively fanatical, today?

Two recent events have spoiled the show for them. First, the rise of China, which proved again after the previous successes of Japan and the East Asian countries that government intervention is crucial to national success in education and health care as well as industrial growth and technological innovation.

The other, arguably more unnerving event, which has occurred right at home, is the increasing assertiveness of historically silent, often disenfranchised peoples: women, non-white immigrant populations, and sexual minorities.

During two centuries of Western expansion and hegemony, a minority of white men enjoyed a relative freedom to do and say whatever they wanted without much regard for the rights and sensitivities of others. Unsurprisingly, many of them loathe the demand from previously voiceless peoples that old attitudes ranging from the narcissistic to the selfish and cruel be re-examined and, preferably, abandoned. The demand is frequently and unfairly derided as woke.

Those still clinging to political power and cultural capital would rather stoke conflict and polarization than admit that their societies are irrevocably diverse, and ought to acknowledge the dignity of people who were once systematically degraded by the gender and racial hierarchies erected by white men.

They naturally fear and loathe scholarship that underlines long-established facts: that the unique wealth and power of a male minority in the West was built on slavery and imperialism rather than any innate superiority, and that the white mans burden was actually carried by black, brown and yellow men.

Instead, faced with the smallest challenges to their moral and intellectual authority, many historically advantaged males have chosen to double down, accusing activists and intellectuals of promoting cancel culture and historical revisionism.

Johnsons government has prosecuted its war on woke with remarkable zeal and clinical efficiency throughout the pandemic. Indeed, rightwingers talking of freedom are shriller than ever before in Europe and America. Their battle against COVID-19 restrictions has become part of their larger, and very desperate, war against political correctness an existential struggle, no less, something as urgent as the existential struggle of many today against severe illness and premature death caused by COVID-19.

The consequences for the rest of us are incalculable. While freedom-loving Tories make their last stand, the mounting evidence from elsewhere is that coordinated action by governments and solidarity among citizens are what will contain the pandemic.

Indeed, the lesson from the U.K. epicenter of delta and now omicron, and home to a dysfunctional government and failed ideology is profoundly ominous: That in societies deliberately divided by culture wars, trust and confidence in an unscrupulous ruling class will inevitably run low, and the pandemic is what will enjoy true freedom.

Pankaj Mishra is a Bloomberg Opinion columnist. His books include Age of Anger: A History of the Present, From the Ruins of Empire: The Intellectuals Who Remade Asia, and Temptations of the West: How to Be Modern in India, Pakistan, Tibet and Beyond.

In a time of both misinformation and too much information, quality journalism is more crucial than ever.By subscribing, you can help us get the story right.

PHOTO GALLERY (CLICK TO ENLARGE)

Go here to read the rest:

Boris Johnson and the woeful and costly Tory war on woke - The Japan Times

Has the Great Barrington Declaration been vindicated? – UnHerd

Has the Left finally woken up to the devastating costs of implementing lockdowns? In its first edition of 2022, the Observer carried a surprisingly balanced interview with Professor Mark Woolhouse, a member of Sage whose new book The Year the World Went Mad argues that long lockdowns promoted more harm than good and failed to protect the vulnerable. Its favourable reception appears to herald a new direction in the critique of Covid measures and policies on the Left; for the first time, the question of what really represented the collective good in the Covid debate has been put on the table by a mainstream left-liberal publication.

This is certainly a new departure. As we have previously noted on UnHerd, the Left has strongly supported restrictive measures in the fight against the pandemic.

It argued that these restrictions, which clearly infringe on individual freedoms and rights, were nonetheless justified in the name of the collective good and the collective right to life. This allowed them to pre-empt any criticism of the new Covid consensus: if youre against any of these measures, youre against the collective interest. And so thinkers like us, who have always criticised neoliberal individualism and argued in favour of progressive state intervention, suddenly found ourselves accused of being libertarians or outright Right-wingers, just for taking a critical stance of governments response to the pandemic.

Indeed, it would appear that for many on the Left today, anything can be justified in the name of the collective good. Its easy to see why Right-wing critics view this uncritical invoking of collective benefits as proof of the Lefts inclination towards authoritarian or Stalinist control. While such caricatural definitions are easy to laugh off, as leftists we cant deny that there is something disturbing about the lack of critical commentary from the Left on how to reconcile the need for collective action with the importance of individual rights and freedoms in the response to Covid.

After all, the Left has historically championed civil rights and freedoms in society which are associated with individual liberties: the right to protest, the right to work, the right to sexual independence and freedom. Expanding the freedoms of men and women while emphasising that this can only be achieved through collective action has always been a central tenet of leftist, even socialist-democratic, ideology. So clearly something more complex than default authoritarianism is at work in the juxtaposition of the current Covid crisis and the Lefts broad response towards civil and individual liberties.

Part of it has to do, we believe, with the Lefts criticism of the rise of desocialised individualism. The growing emphasis in economic and political thought on personal autonomy and the individuals responsibility for their own fate, which has accompanied the rolling back of welfarism, has radicalised the ideological construction of the individual. We can see this in the renewed popularity of a figure such as Ayn Rand, with her message of enlightened egoism as the basis of civilised life. However, criticising modern individualism is one thing; laughing off the very idea that individual rights and freedoms matter is another, as is arguing that anything goes in the pursuit of saving lives and the collective good.

All of which has meant that, until the Observers interview with Mark Woolhouse, there has been painfully little critical analysis from the mainstream Left as to whether the raft of restrictive Covid measures we have seen over the past two years have indeed served the collective good or saved lives for that matter. By definition, for something to be considered in the collective interest of a society, it has to be in the interest of at least a significant majority of its members. However, its hard to see how lockdowns (and other subsequent measures) meet this criterion.

Their psychological, social and economic impact might have been justified from a collective-interest and life-saving standpoint if Covid represented an equal threat to all citizens. Yet soon into the pandemic, it became clear that Covid-19 was almost exclusively a threat to the elderly (60+): in the last quarter of 2020, the mean age of those dying both with and of Covid-19 in the UK was 82.4, while by early 2020 the Infection Fatality Rate (IFR) the risk of actually dying if you catch Covid in people under 60 was already known to be exceptionally low: 0.5 per cent or less. A paper written late in 2020 for the WHO by professor John Ioannidis of Stanford University, one of the worlds foremost epidemiologists, then estimated that the IFR for those under 70 was even lower: 0.05%. As Woolhouse points out in his interview people over 75 are an astonishing 10,000 times more at risk than those who are under 15.

Moreover, given the impacts on other aspects of medical care, the preservation (or prolonging) of life of the elderly was certainly being achieved at the expense of the life expectancies of younger sectors of the population to say nothing of the catastrophic impacts in the Global South. This has indeed been confirmed by evidence which shows that excess deaths in younger age groups rose sharply in 2021, with very little of this attributable to Covid mortality.

If anything, Covid restrictions should have been framed in terms of solidarity: as measures which implied the overwhelming majority of the collective, which risked little or nothing from Covid, paying a price, and a heavy one at that, in order to protect, in theory at least, a minority (in Western countries people aged 60 or older represent on average around 25% of the population). Acknowledging this from the start would have avoided much loss of trust in public institutions down the road, and would have allowed for a rational discussion around important questions of intergenerational equity, proportionality and the balancing of rights and interests.

A possible counter-argument is that avoiding healthcare systems being overrun with Covid patients, regardless of their age, was in the interests of everyone. This might be true from a purely theoretical standpoint. However, both arguments hinge on the assumption that lockdowns were actually useful in reducing hospitalisations and deaths. But theres hardly any evidence that this has been the case.

In early 2021, John Ioannidis published a paper claiming that there was no practical difference in epidemiological terms between countries that had locked down and those that hadnt. Several other studies have appeared since then that confirm Ioannidiss initial findings: see, for example, here, here and here.Indeed, some of the countries that locked down the hardest are also those with the highest mortality figures and excess death rate. Peru is an obvious example, while Swedens excess mortality is below the European average for 2020.

Meanwhile in the US, the end of 2021 confirmed the reality that lockdown strategies had little or no impact on Covid mortality. The two neighbouring states of Michigan and Wisconsin followed very different Covid policies, with Michigan favouring severe restrictions while Wisconsin lifted them much earlier; yet at the start of this month, Michigans Covid mortality rate was far higher than Wisconsins, at 2,906 deaths per million compared to 1,919 per million in Wisconsin. Another stark example comes from comparing two other neighbouring states: North and South Dakota. South Dakota infamously imposed no Covid restrictions, while there were mask mandates in North Dakota during the second wave in Winter 2020/2021: yet as of January 1st 2022, the two states death rates are very similar, at 2,810 per million (South Dakota) and 2,640 (North Dakota).

Another case that is less talked about is that of Italy. Over the course of the past two years, Italy has implemented some of the strictest and longest lockdowns in the world (indeed, it is the country that invented the concept of national lockdown), topping every other Western country in terms of average stringency of anti-Covid measures. Yet Italy is also one of the countries with the highest mortality rate per capita well above the United Kingdom, Spain, France, Germany, Sweden and several other countries that adopted much less restrictive measures. And theres evidence that this isnt despite the lockdowns but, most likely, because of them.

As Piero Stanig and Gianmarco Daniele, two professors at Bocconi University, explain in their book Fallimento lockdown (Lockdown Failure), the worst possible thing you can do when dealing with a highly infectious disease that spreads almost exclusively indoors and targets the elderly is to lock old people up inside their homes with other family members, and ban citizens from spending time in arguably the safest place of all: outdoors. In other words, even from the narrow perspective of saving lives, not only were lockdowns not in the collective interest of society, they werent even in the interest of those whose lives were actually at risk.

Such an outcome was easily predictable. Indeed, the WHOs 2019 report on pandemic preparedness states that the quarantine of exposed individuals let alone of the entire population is not recommended because there is no obvious rationale for this measure.

The grotesquery of the global responses becomes even more apparent when we take into account the fact that while governments went out of their way to keep healthy people locked in, chasing runners down solitary beaches or checking shopping trolleys to make sure people were only buying essentials, they all but abandoned those most vulnerable: nursing home residents. According to a recent Collateral Global study, Covid deaths in nursing homes amount on average to a staggering 40% of all Covid deaths in Western countries, despite representing less than 1% of the population. In some countries (Belgium, France, the Netherlands, Slovenia, Spain, Sweden, the UK and the US), more than 5% of all care home residents were killed.

In view of this, it seems obvious that the focused protection approach championed by the Great Barrington Declaration (GBD) based on allow[ing] those who are at minimal risk of death to live their lives normally to build up immunity to the virus through natural infection, while better protecting those who are at highest risk was the right course of action. It would have avoided inflicting needless pain on workers, women and children through repeated lockdowns, while arguably saving countless lives, by focusing first and foremost on the elderly and especially on nursing homes.

Naturally, the way in which this worked would have been very different in different settings. While in richer countries the resources and infrastructure were certainly available to direct policy in this way, in poorer countries with high Covid mortality and weak healthcare systems such as Latin America, India and South Africa the capacity of governments to offer focused protection was limited. Nevertheless, funds could have been used for this purpose, rather than to fund schemes such as contact tracing, which the WHO had specifically disbarred in all circumstances as a pandemic response in its aforementioned 2019 report.

Instead, countries such as Argentina, Colombia, Peru and South Africa have faced the catastrophe of both severe Covid restrictions and high Covid mortality. What has followed is the destruction of the livelihoods and access to food of tens of millions of citizens; a recent report showed that after almost two years, Covid restrictions have completely shattered the worlds informal economies, with 40% of domestic workers, street vendors and waste pickers still earning less than 75% of their pre-Covid earnings.

And yet as we enter 2022, our openness to reassessing the paths not taken remains constrained. Not only has there been no acknowledgment of the missed opportunity of focused protection at the institutional level and no apology to the authors of the statement, victims of a vicious smearing campaign but even now the GBD is dismissed by academics and epidemiologists such as Woolhouse, even though the focused protection policy he advocates is drawn from it.

Meanwhile, throughout the past year, governments have actually upped the ante, coming up with even more invasive, oppressive and discriminatory measures all in the name of public health and the collective interest. Yet surely the past two years have revealed the dangers of assuming that a collective response to the pandemic requires lockdown measures. Many other collective responses such as focused protection and the GBDs suggestions of free deliveries of groceries to the elderly and vulnerable, and frequent rapid testing of care home staff and visitors would likely have been more effective.

It is time for the Left to look reality in the face and take stock of the fact that the prevailing Covid response of most Western governments has been an abysmal failure on all fronts not least that of saving lives. An alternative approach is desperately needed. Fortunately, and tragically, its been hiding in plain sight all this time.

Go here to read the rest:

Has the Great Barrington Declaration been vindicated? - UnHerd

Advice: Im a woman of color often overlooked at work until people realize I outrank them – The Boston Globe

Anonymous / Cambridge

People who do this are caught out and ashamed. You saw their bum, not the other way around, so whos embarrassed and scrambling? Not you, Anonymous. Slow your roll here, do deep breaths or count to 10. Let that awkward silence be your voice, telling them that yep, you saw that, and it was indeed a transgression. Then proceed with the business you were there to conduct. Graciously, from the power-up position you now hold, like a queen extending mercy. This time.

Dont derail your intended agenda for the jabroni in the moment; you can decide afterward if you should do anything else. If said jabroni is in your company, youve uncovered a risk factor and skill deficit, so do whatever is appropriate with that information. Its unwise to make assumptions in the workplace, and career suicide not to behave with universal courtesy. If a person mistakes a manager for a receptionist, that shouldnt require a radical change in behavior, because everyone deserves respect no matter where their job falls on the company org chart.

Enough about them, lets talk about you. Do you have friends who are women of color, or even a good online forum, to decompress with? You know youre not the only one who experiences these things, but thats different from feeling that youre not alone. And to account for the psychological toll that nonsense like this takes on you, honor it as labor. Factor it in when making decisions like what projects and teams you want to be on, and how much money you will ask for, and how you prioritize your well-being.

And now to your last, heartbreaking question. Try this: Answer it seriously. You obviously, empirically, fit into categories besides your job title (woman, person of color, Bostonian . . . you get the idea). Write down 20. Sleep on it and then see which self-descriptions matter to you, which hold some key relationship or value. I find this a helpful way to remember were worth so much more than how some people see us.

Look at a baby. Unless youre a Charles Dickens villain or an Ayn Rand heroine, you dont see a larval worker whose only worth lies in its potential for labor. You wish that baby a future of love, beauty, good health, and good times, along with meaningful work. We want and deserve those things for ourselves, too.

Miss Conduct is Robin Abrahams, a writer with a PhD in psychology.

Read more:

Advice: Im a woman of color often overlooked at work until people realize I outrank them - The Boston Globe

Russia digs in on Ukraine never joining NATO, on a day of talks with the U.S. – NPR

U.S. Deputy Secretary of State Wendy Sherman (left) and Russian deputy Foreign Minister Sergei Ryabkov (right) pose for pictures as they attend security talks on soaring tensions over Ukraine, at the U.S. permanent Mission, in Geneva on Jan. 10. Denis Balibouse /POOL/AFP via Getty Images hide caption

U.S. Deputy Secretary of State Wendy Sherman (left) and Russian deputy Foreign Minister Sergei Ryabkov (right) pose for pictures as they attend security talks on soaring tensions over Ukraine, at the U.S. permanent Mission, in Geneva on Jan. 10.

The idea that Ukraine, Russia's neighbor, might someday join NATO "is one of the areas where we have the greatest difference of views with the U.S.," Russian Deputy Foreign Minister Sergei Ryabkov said on Monday, after an hours-long discussion with his U.S. counterpart, Deputy Secretary of State Wendy Sherman.

Sherman and Ryabkov posed together at the start of the session, convened as an effort to ease tensions aroused by Russia's positioning of some 100,000 troops along its border with Ukraine. But they both said the discussions achieved no breakthroughs and after the talks were over, Sherman and Ryabkov each held separate briefings with the media rather than appear together.

"We had a frank and forthright discussion over the course of nearly eight hours," Sherman told reporters who were on a conference call.

"For us, it's absolutely mandatory to make sure that Ukraine never, never, ever becomes a member of NATO," Ryabkov said at a news conference after the day-long meeting in Geneva, Switzerland.

But Sherman said NATO's open-door policy is one of the alliance's key strengths, and she said the U.S. "will not allow anyone" to slam that door shut. She also said the U.S. won't allow Russia to dictate how it cooperates with other sovereign states.

"We will not make decisions about Ukraine without Ukraine" being involved, Sherman said, adding that the same goes for the European Union. "As we say to our allies and partners: Nothing about you, without you," Sherman said.

Of the Russian side, Ryabkov said the country is "fed up" with what he called loose talk and half promises.

"We do not trust the other side," he stated. "We need ironclad, waterproof, bulletproof, legally binding guarantees not assurances, not safeguards guarantees with all the words" spelling out with certainty that Ukraine shall never become a member of NATO. He also said Russia has no plans to attack Ukraine.

"It's a matter of Russia's national security," he said.

Sherman reiterated Secretary of State Antony Blinken's statement, that Russia has a choice to make between de-escalating or facing deterrents, such as sanctions.

"It's really a very stark choice and one that I suspect only Mr. Putin, President Putin, can decide," Sherman said. "And we certainly urged Russia to de-escalate, to create an environment that was conducive to the diplomatic track. But we will see."

Russia does not see a nation's ability to join a military alliance as an absolute, Ryabkov said, adding that in his country's view, that freedom should be both limited and qualified.

"The situation now is so dangerous," the Russian diplomat said, as he urged a speedy resolution to the issue.

Sherman said the U.S. is open to meeting again soon. She also said the U.S. raised "preliminary ideas" about a range of issues from the placement of some missile systems in Europe to a plan to set reciprocal limits on the scope of military exercises, and to ensure transparency about those exercises.

See the original post here:

Russia digs in on Ukraine never joining NATO, on a day of talks with the U.S. - NPR

US ‘Unequivocal’ to Russia on Right of Ukraine, Others, to Join NATO – Defense One

Washington will take no action to prevent Ukraine from entering the NATO alliance, despite Russias urging, the United States confirmed to Russia on Monday. Its the latest sign that the tense standoff between the U.S. and its allies and Russia will continue to drag on.

In December, Russia issued a list of demands to be met before it would consider removing the 100,000-plus troops on the Ukraine border who stand poised for a potential expansion of Russias nearly 8-year-old war on Ukraine. One of those demands was barring Ukraine from joining the NATO alliance.

Some Western observers have suggested that the United States give in to the request. That might stave off the looming conflict and save Ukraine, Lyle J. Goldstein, the director of Asia Engagement at Defense Priorities, wrote in Defense One in December.

But on Monday, during a conversation between U.S. and Russian diplomats, the United States reiterated that barring Ukraine from joining NATO is a non-starter for discussion.

We were unequivocalWe do not agree that any country should have a veto over any other country when it comes to being part of the NATO alliance. NATO has its own process, for inclusion, U.S. Deputy Secretary of State Wendy Sherman told reporters.

Ukraine has long said that it intends to eventually join the NATO alliance, and in 2008, during its Bucharest Summit, NATO officials said that both Ukraine and Georgia could eventually become members if they chose. They havent wavered from that stance since.

Ukraine has a number of exercises with the United States, such as Rapid Trident. The two countries have also conducted joint operations in Afghanistan.

In June 2020, NATO officially upgraded Ukraines status to an enhanced opportunities partner, which officially put Ukraine on the shortlist for NATO membership, along withAustralia, Finland, Georgia, Jordan, and Sweden.But that does not mean an invitation is inevitable.

In November 2020, Alyona Getmanchuk, director of the Ukraine-based New Europe Center, said Ukraine could go to the next step of becoming a NATO member, receiving the NATO membership action plan, or MAP, as early as 2023.

But a European security expert who asked to remain anonymous said Monday they highly doubt that would happen.

All decisions at NATO are made at consensus, so the North Atlantic Council would have to agree to grant Ukraine a MAP, which literally one country could stop from happening, the expert said.

Sherman and her Russian counterpart also discussed the placement of missiles in Europe. The demise of the IMF Treaty in 2019broadens the type of missiles either the United States or Russia could stage in Europe.The U.S. has placed an Aegis Ashore radar unit in Romania and plans to base a similar one in Poland this year.

While the subject did come up, Sherman said, This was not a negotiation that we were putting ideas on the table and a long way to go. But of course there are ongoing concerns about intermediate range missiles.

View original post here:

US 'Unequivocal' to Russia on Right of Ukraine, Others, to Join NATO - Defense One

Defusing the crisis in Europe: A better idea Ukraine than NATO membership | TheHill – The Hill

This week, American officials are expected to hold a series of meetings with other NATO states and Russia to discuss the security crisis in Europe. With Russia deploying some 100,000 troops near Ukraines borders plenty to cause lots of mischief and conduct limited land grabs, even if not enough to seize the country the issue is acute. If things get out of hand, we quickly could find ourselves at our most dangerous moment in world politics since the Cold War ended.

Russia demands that, to defuse the crisis, the United States and the North Atlantic Treaty Organizations other 29 members must promise not to include Ukraine or other former Soviet republics such as Georgia in the alliance in the future. Russia also insists that we promise not to station weapons in existing NATO member states in Eastern Europe, such as Poland and the Baltic states, that have joined the alliance since the Cold War ended.

NATO cannot give in to Russian bullying or allow Russia a sphere of influence over its formerly subjugated neighbors. So any deal on Russian President Vladimir PutinVladimir Vladimirovich PutinUS looks to ward off Ukraine conflict in talks with Russia Overnight Defense & National Security US, Russia have face-to-face sit down House GOP members introduce legislation targeting Russia over Ukraine MOREs proposed terms would be unacceptable.

But we need to change the conversation at its fundamental level and develop new concepts for European security. Ukraine and Georgia should not be in NATO even if Moscow should not be allowed to decide that for them.

At present, we arguably have created the worst of all worlds. At its 2008 summit, NATO promised eventual membership to Ukraine and Georgia, but it did so without offering any specificity as to when or how that might happen. For now, these countries, as well as other Eastern European neutral states, get no military protection from NATO members. Knowing of our eventual interest in bringing these nations into an alliance that he sees as adversarial, Putin has every incentive to keep them weak and unstable so they will not become eligible for NATO membership. That fact, plus Russias desire to dominate its neighbors, are at the root of this crisis, and also help explain why Russia has destabilized both Georgia and Ukraine over the past 14 years.

It is time that Western nations begin to envision a new security architecture for those neutral countries in Eastern Europe today. The conversation should begin within NATO, and then include those countries themselves before we actually negotiate any arrangement with Moscow. But the conversation can begin at a more philosophical and general level with Russia, too, in the meetings this week.

The core concept for future security in Eastern Europe would be one of permanent neutrality for former Soviet republics that are not now in NATO Ukraine and Moldova and Belarus, as well as Georgia and Armenia and Azerbaijan.

The new security architecture would require that Russia, like NATO, commit to help uphold the security of Ukraine, Georgia and other states in the region. Russia would have to withdraw its troops from those countries in a verifiable manner (though the Crimea issue would have to be finessed, since Moscow almost certainly will not give that strategic peninsula on the Black Sea back to Ukraine, after giving it to Ukraine in the 1950s and then grabbing it back with its little green men in 2014).

After that has occurred, corresponding sanctions imposed on Russia because of its aggressions against neighbors would be lifted, though snapback provisions would remain in case Russia subsequently violated its promises to keep its hands off those fully sovereign and independent nations.

The neutral countries would retain their rights to participate in multilateral security operations on a scale comparable to what has been the case in the past, even those operations that might be led by NATO. They could think of themselves and describe themselves as Western states (or anything else, for that matter). They would have complete sovereignty and self-determination in every sense of the word; someday, if invited, they could join the European Union. But they would not be American allies in any formal sense; we would not promise to defend them as if they were U.S. territory, which is ultimately what it means to be a part of NATO.

Ukraine and Georgia are wonderful, but faraway, countries that are hard to defend and much less central to American security than to Russias sense of its place in the world and, yes, to its sense of its own security. The fact that a strongman such as Putin is the one making demands about them, and doing so in unreasonable terms, does not mean we should ignore Russias concerns.

These countries should not be in NATO at least, not until the entire European security order has been transformed in such a way that NATO membership would mean something entirely different than it does today. We are overdue for a serious discussion about security orders for Eastern Europe and that conversation should begin now.

Michael O'Hanlon is a senior fellow and director of research in the foreign policy studies program at the Brookings Institution, where he holds the Philip H. Knight Chair in Defense and Strategy. He is the author of the 2017 book, Beyond NATO: A New Security Architecture for Eastern Europe. Follow him on Twitter @MichaelEOHanlon.

View post:

Defusing the crisis in Europe: A better idea Ukraine than NATO membership | TheHill - The Hill

Norway swaps in its F-35s for NATO quick-reaction mission in the High North – DefenseNews.com

WASHINGTON Norway has designated its F-35 aircraft for a NATO quick-reaction alert mission in the High North, ending a 42-year run of the countrys F-16s for that job, the government announced Jan. 6.

The Lockheed Martin-made jets are held at Evenes Air Base in northern Norway, with at least three ready to scramble within 15 minutes and examine potential airspace violations of Norway and, by extension, NATO. The fifth-generation aircraft have previously accompanied F-16s on such missions in anticipation of the formal takeover on Thursday.

The change in aircraft types further embeds the F-35 jet into the fabric of alliance patrol missions in Europe, just as Lockheed recently recorded initial wins in its sales campaigns for Finland and Switzerland.

Norways F-16 have operated the quick-reaction mission from Bod Air Base for four decades, according to a defense ministry statement. The new location of Evenes puts the missions center of gravity about 100 miles further north.

The Norwegian military is expanding the base to also house P-8 Poseidon maritime patrol aircraft, putting key aerial and naval surveillance assets into an area that has seen an uptick in Russian military exercises.

Norway expects to have its fleet of 52 F-35s fully operational by 2025, according to the defense ministry. Aside from a handful of scramble-ready planes at Evenes, the fleets home base is rland, located in the south-central part of the country.

Meanwhile, the U.S. Defense Department continues to use F-16 aircraft in the Baltics, another hotspot for NATO air patrols along the border with Russia. American jets arrived in Poland earlier this month, joining Polish and Belgian F-16s to prepare for that mission, according to a Jan. 6 alliance statement.

Sebastian Sprenger is associate editor for Europe at Defense News, reporting on the state of the defense market in the region, and on U.S.-Europe cooperation and multi-national investments in defense and global security. Previously he served as managing editor for Defense News.

See original here:

Norway swaps in its F-35s for NATO quick-reaction mission in the High North - DefenseNews.com

First NATO Military Chiefs of Defence Meeting of 2022 to be held virtually (revised) – NATO HQ

NATOs highest Military Authority, the Military Committee, will meet virtually on 12-13 January 2022, in Brussels, Belgium. Admiral Rob Bauer, Chair of the Military Committee, will preside over the sessions, which will be attended by the Allied Chiefs of Defence. They will be supported by General Tod Wolters (Supreme Allied Commander Europe, SACEUR) and General Philippe Lavigne (Supreme Allied Commander Transformation, SACT).

The two-day meeting of the NATO Military Committee in Chiefs of Defence Session (MCCS) will enable the Chiefs of Defence to meet and discuss issues of strategic importance to the Alliance. The first day will be dedicated to Military Strategic thinking, with discussions on NATOs Warfighting Capstone Concept, the future work strands associated with its implementation as well as the progress on the Concept for the Deterrence and Defence of the Euro-Atlantic Area. The last session of the day will focus on military inputs to the new Strategic Concept.

The NATO Secretary General will open the second day of the bi-annual meeting by providing on overview of the current political context to the 30 Chiefs of Defence. This will be followed by a 360 degree update on the current security situation and a discussion on NATOs ongoing Deterrence and Defence Posture. The Chiefs of Defence will then meet with their Georgian and Ukrainian counterparts, respectively, to discuss the security situation in their Nations as well as the ongoing progress with defence-related reforms.

Media Opportunity

Thursday 13 Jan 2022

18:00 Virtual Press Conference with the Chair of the NATO Military Committee, Admiral Rob Bauer

NATO will facilitate remote interaction during the press conference. To declare your interest in asking a question to the Chair of the NATO Military Committee, journalists must register via Eventbrite no later than 16:00 (Brussels time) on Tuesday 11 January 2022, at the following link: registration for virtual press conference. Registered journalists will be contacted separately with technical details.

The press conference will be streamed live on the NATO website and the livefeed will be provided to Eurovision.

The video will be available for free download from the NATO Multimedia Portal after the event.

Imagery

Following each event, photos, video and audio files will be made available on the NATO IMS webpage http://www.nato.int/ims, as well as on the Military Committee in Chiefs of Defence session (MCCS) event page. Please click here to access the event page.

Social Media

We will post the latest information and photos from the MCCS on our official Twitter account: @NATO_PASCAD. The Chair of the NATO Military Committee will be using his own account @CMC_NATO.

Please use the hashtags #NATOCHoDs and #NATOMC when tweeting about the NATO Military Committee.

Media Enquiries:

Ms Eleonora Russell, Public Affairs and Strategic Communications Advisor to the NATO Military Committee and the NATO International Military Staff.

E-Mail: russell.eleonora@hq.nato.int

Lt Col Goetz Haffke, Deputy Public Affairs and Strategic Communications Advisor to the NATO Military Committee and the NATO International Military Staff.

Tel: + 32 490 58 06 47E-Mail: haffke.goetz@hq.nato.int

For more background information about the NATO Military Committee click here.

See more here:

First NATO Military Chiefs of Defence Meeting of 2022 to be held virtually (revised) - NATO HQ

CoinGeek Weekly Livestream: A special edition from the CES Day 1 in Las Vegas – CoinGeek

Aftera very successful 2021, Kurt Wuckert Jr. kicked off the new year with a special edition of theCoinGeek Weekly Livestreamfrom Las Vegas, Nevada. Kurt is leading a contingent of BSV blockchain companies that have attended and are exhibiting at the biggest consumer electronics event in the world. He talked about the event, how the BSV booth is faring and who would win in a Brazilian jiu-jitsu showdown between him and Roger Ver.

The Consumer Electronics Show (CES), held annually at the Las Vegas Convention Center, kicked off on January 5 and will run for three days. Theeventattracts the crme de la crme from augmented and virtual realities, the Internet of Things, smart homes, smartphones, computing, self-driving cars, and other consumer electronics. This year, itdrewabout 2,200 exhibitors, and the BSV ecosystem was well represented.

As Kurt revealed on the livestream, the BSV contingent congregated in its own booth on the first day of CES, showcasing their products and discussing why BSV is above Ethereum, BTC, and others such projects.

As a co-host of the booth, Kurt spent the first day interacting with several dozen people, answering questions about theBitcoin Civil War, explaining why not everyone needs to run a node, and much more.

And then we go through the white paper, and I quiz them at the end. Its really good, he quipped.

Kurt revealed that the BSV booth, which featured entities including Bitcoin Association, VXPASS, CoinGeek, Ayre Ventures, Omniscape, Haste Arcade, and Built By Gamers, had attracted a lot of traction at the event. Its been super busy, he stated, with many tech enthusiasts being massively interested in how they can build a metaverse that sources and recordsall data on-chainin real-time and at very low fees. The likes ofEthereumdont have the capacity to offer this, despite being the network that most people are exposed to initially.

Apart from explaining the massive power of BSV, the startups also got to show off the capabilities of their apps and platforms. Among the most popular wasOmniscape, the XR platform built on BSV blockchain by Transmira. At a time when the metaverse is the biggest buzzword in tech, Omniscape is showing the world that BSV is the only logical choice to host the metaverse.

Transmira founder and CEORobert Rice showed a crowd of awestruck people how Omniscape allows users to digitally drop NFTs in real space and using digital avatars.

Aside from the events at CES, Kurt answered questions related to everything else happening in the space, as he always does. They includedthe efforts by the Ira Kleiman lawyersto force a retrial in the case they lost horribly to Dr. Craig Wright. Kurt believes that a retrial is next to impossible.

However, the efforts by the lawyers will go a long way in vindicating Dr. Wright and his victory over Ira, especially since anti-BSV people had tried to spin the trial to look like it ended in an Ira victory. Winners dont appeal, said Kurt.

Kurt also addressed theSuperAsset token protocoldeveloped by Attila Aros and what it does better than other protocols. A big fan of Attila, Kurt admitted not being quite well-versed with the protocol. Still, he believes that the rise of varying protocols is a testament to the rapid growth of tokenization on the BSV blockchain.

And as he had had to do with many people who visited the BSV booth at CES, Kurt delved into the decentralization myth withBTC. While the number of people who run nodes is big, the core decisions are still made by a few insiders. Most node operators just upgrade their software as instructed, in what is a de facto tyranny of ambiguity. Despite being a global project, BTC has five GitHub maintainers. They wield a lot of power over the community, including what improvement proposals will move forward to get voted on.

Thats not how Bitcoin is governed. Bitcoinis supposed to be governedby proof of work. Its not in BTC and in my opinion, what makes Bitcoin decentralized is that nodes can join and leave the network as they please, they can sync right up with the chain, they can attempt to mine blocks, they can govern the chain with proof of workbut none of that happens in BTC, he explained.

Kurt concluded the livestream with a unique audience question who would win in a Brazilian jiu-jitsu battle between him andRoger Ver. Roger has been in the Bitcoin community for several years and was among those who previously championed increasing the Bitcoin block size. However, he got derailed with BCH and didnt want to fully implement Satoshis vision of unbounded block sizes.

Roger is a big guy, has a brown belt in jiu-jitsu, and has been involved in the martial arts and combat discipline for decades. Despite this, Kurt is confident that he would get the better of Roger.

Id bet on me. Im pretty big and Im good at jiu-jitsu, Kurt noted.

Stay tuned for more footage and insight from CES on special editions of CoinGeek Weekly Livestream on the second and third days of the event. On day 2, Kurt will hold the livestream from the venue, including showing Robert Rices presentation, where he will be debuting really first of its kind cool stuff.

Watch: CoinGeek Weekly Livestream episode with Transmiras CEO Robert Rice

New to Bitcoin? Check out CoinGeeksBitcoin for Beginnerssection, the ultimate resource guide to learn more about Bitcoinas originally envisioned by Satoshi Nakamotoand blockchain.

Read this article:

CoinGeek Weekly Livestream: A special edition from the CES Day 1 in Las Vegas - CoinGeek

Mass adoption, regulation, other key trends: What’s in store for DeFi in 2022? – CNBCTV18

The financial ecosystem has seen a major transformation since the advent of blockchain technology, and particularly bitcoin. Blockchain technology has enabled businesses to transition from centrally governed systems to more democratic and decentralised systems.

The year 2021 was an exciting one for the decentralised finance (DeFi) space with the total value locked (TVL) in DeFI applications skyrocketing from $22 billion on January 1, 2021, to $220 billion by the end of the year. TLV is the total of all assets deposited in the DeFi protocols that are earning interest, new coins, or other such rewards. The broader crypto market also grew, pulling the DeFi market up along the way.

So what does 2022 look like for DeFi? Experts believe DeFi and decentralised platforms, like Decentralised Exchanges (DEXs) and Non-Fungible Tokens (NFTs), will make significant strides this year as they are the underlying infrastructure of Web 3.0, the third version of the internet. Here are the key trends they predict in 2022:

Mass adoption:

The current macroeconomic situation has unlocked new avenues in the world of crypto for the masses -- novices and seasoned traders alike. Traditional physical systems are quickly being replaced by decentralised systems requiring minimum human intervention. But will there be mass adoption?

As Ahmed Al-Balaghi of Biconomy pointed out to Cointelegraph: More scaling solutions will become essential to the mass adoption of DeFi products and services."

Al-Balaghi said while most DeFi applications go live on multiple chains, making them cheaper to use, it adds more complexities for those who are trying to learn and understand how they work.

"To start the second phase of DeFi mass adoption, we need solutions that simplify onboarding and use DApps that are spread across different chains and scaling solutions," he said.

Another expert Alex Tapscott of Ninepoint Digital Assets Group highighted that in just one year, the DeFi industrys market capitalisation has ballooned 30 times to $150 billion. The next decade, he said, will see a billion people, many of them unbanked, get onboarded to financial markets for the first time ever via DeFi applications.

Regulatory action: one of the impedances to institutions is the lack of clarity on regulation and compliance. As various countries brainstorm how to tackle this issue effectively, 2022 is expected by many to be the year when we finalise the rules.

Co-founder of Swarm Markets, Timo Lehes, believes regulation will be imperative in 2022 as those bearing fiduciary duties will not be able to access DeFi through unregulated channels.

Across DeFi, Anti-Money Laundering (AML) solutions and wallets with inbuilt KYC and cross border rules checks will help to increase institutional exposure in the year ahead, said Rachid Ajaja, CEO and Co-Founder of AllianceBlock, in a conversation with CryptoNews. AllianceBlocks Cross-Border Regulatory Compliance Rules Engine allows traditional institutions to access opportunities in DeFi in a compliant way through pre-trade international checks, he added.

CDO of DappRadar, Dragos Dunica, believes despite the regulatory challenges that DeFi is about to be faced with, the sector is well poised to remain unthwarted and continue growing. Governments may even launch their own DeFi platforms and initiatives.

Interoperability of NFTs, DEXs, GameFi, and Liquidity Mining:Once regulatory hurdles are cleared, experts believe the sector will be able to offer increasingly innovative product services to investors. NFTs are expected to top that list.

The NFT craze is gathering steam and we could see the best of it in 2022 in spaces beyond in-game collectibles, artworks, and sports memorabilia. It is expected to grow over 1,000% in 2022 alone, per a Forbes prediction.

In the blockchain-based gaming industry, Axie Infinity has cemented its name among the biggest success stories of 2021. From 38,000 active users in April 2021, the game saw a massive influx touching 2.7 million users in mid-November. This is expected to give a massive boost to GameFi (in-game finance), and DeFi platforms will inevitably be a part of this development.

Liquidity Mining and Yield Farming are two more areas where experts see vast potential. DEXs require a liquidity pool for their smooth functioning, which is crucial in maintaining healthy solvency. The current debacle faced by liquidity providers is the loss caused by the change in crypto prices as they constantly fluctuate. (Also called impermanent loss).

The rise of DeFi platforms has also boosted the concept of stablecoins in the Indian crypto circles. As Nischal Shetty of WazirX pointed out in a Fortune India article, more Indians are thronging the stablecoin market and most DeFi companies have tied up with Indian cooperatives to offer peer-to-peer services and are planning to open more branches and even ATMs.

"...interoperability could also be a game-changer in DeFi. Interoperability could just improve the overall user experience in DeFi, providing a way for users to easily transact between chains and choose the one that suits them most," Ankitt Gaur of EasyFi Network told Cointelegraph.

However, most experts agreed that how DeFi grows in the near future will largely depend on the user experience and the simplification of the onboarding process.

Most of the world has never used a DeFi product. It is up to the entrepreneurs and businesses to build the software tools that make DeFi easy, safe, and useful enough for more people to want to get involved, Roger Ver of Bitcoin.com told Cointelegraph.

Excerpt from:

Mass adoption, regulation, other key trends: What's in store for DeFi in 2022? - CNBCTV18

How radar works: The technology made famous by war – Livescience.com

Radar was among the most important technical breakthroughs of the Second World War. The technology helped Britain and its allies emerge victorious during the Battle of Britain, the air war fought over UK skies in 1940, according to Imperial War Museums (IWM).

Radar which stands for Radio Detection and Ranging is a detection system that uses radio waves to locate objects. It is still widely used today, but as technology has advanced they now often harness microwaves, according to the Earth Observing Laboratory. These are at the higher frequency end of the radio spectrum and provide more accurate readings.

Related: What is electromagnetic radiation?

Although this literal trial by fire made radar a household name, the technology behind it started life much earlier and centred around the study of electromagnetic (EM) waves.

EM radiation is a form of energy that is everywhere and can take on lots of different forms, such as radio waves, microwaves, X-rays, gamma rays and ultraviolet (sunlight). EM waves also form the basis of how mobile phones and wireless computer networks function.

And back in 1885, it was Scottish physicist James Clerk Maxwell who came up with the idea that perhaps radio waves could be reflected by metal objects, just like light waves could.

A few years later, German physicist Heinrich Hertz set out to prove it. In an experiment he conducted in 1888, he discovered that they were indeed reflected back. As the first person to apply the theories of Maxwell, the unit of frequency of an EM wave was named a hertz after him, Live Science previously reported. In 1904 a patent was issued to a German engineer called Christian Hlsmeyer for what was termed an obstacle detector and ship navigation device. Not a catchy name, but nevertheless a type of early radar system had been born.

Despite that, it was not until the 1930s that there was a need for the technology, mainly due to the invention of long-range military bombers, which prompted countries to invest in a system that could detect their approach and provide early warning, according to Encyclopaedia Britannica.

All of the major world powers at the time continued research, but it was the USA and UK that were able to refine the technology. Scottish physicist Sir Robert Watson-Watt, known as the father of radar, took the science that had gone before and created the workable system that formed the basis of modern radar , according to the Royal Society.

A typical system has four main components, these are:

Transmitter: The source of the radio pulse.

Antenna: Needed to send the pulse out into the ether and receive it when it is reflected back.

Switch: This tells the antenna when to transmit or receive the pulses.

Receiver: Required to detect and turn the pulses, which come back into a visual format to be read by an operator.

The process of directing artificial radio waves towards objects is called illumination. Although radio waves are invisible to the human eye as well as optical cameras. According to NASA, they are sent out at approximately 300,000,000 metres per second the speed of light.

Some of the reflected radio waves (echoes) are directed back toward the radar where they are received and amplified, with the data being interpreted by skilled operators with the help of computers, according to the Australian Bureau of Meteorology. Once returned, they provide information such as range and bearing.

Radio waves are cheap to generate, can pass through snow, mist and fog and are safe, unlike gamma and X rays.

Radar can be used to detect ships, planes and satellites, or closer to home radar speed guns are used by the police to calculate how fast cars are going, with any that are going too fast in line for a speeding ticket, according to Encyclopaedia Britannica. Meteorologists also use radar to map and track weather systems around the world.

During the Battle of Britain, radar enabled the RAF to detect incoming German aircraft using radio waves, according to the RAF Museum website.

From radar towers dotted around the South and East of the country, the system would send these waves out, which would keep travelling until they hit something, like an incoming plane, and be bounced back to be picked up by the receiver. By calculating how long it had taken the waves to return, skilled operators could figure out the altitude, range and bearing of the incoming enemy planes, according to the RAF.

By doing so, it gave the RAF enough time to scramble its own planes to meet the incoming threat. Being in the right place at the right time helped the UK win the battle and landing a killer blow to the invasion plans of the Third Reich, according to a radar operators account, published by the BBC.

Without doubt, one of the biggest advances in post-war radar technology was Doppler radar, according to Encyclopaedia Britannica. With a need to defend against bombers now gone, the new motivation to refine the technology was using it to track the weather.

While ordinary radar can figure out range and location, Doppler can tell us information about an objects speed too. It works on the principle of the Doppler Effect, the idea that waves produced by an object will be squeezed closer together if it is moving towards you, or will spread out if it is moving away.

This is used for tracking weather systems which are constantly on the move, according to the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA).

They can gather a huge amount of information too so modern Doppler radars depend on increasing processing power.Doppler radar is also what you would find in a police speed gun too!

You can observe and track the precipitation detected by NOAAs radar technology live using the interactive radar viewer webpage.

Do you want to know more about how radar technology is transforming transport safety? Hear from an expert panel at the Future of the Car Summit 2020 in this video by NXP.

"Robert Alexander Watson-Watt. 13 April 1892 -- 5 December 1973". Biographical Memoirs of Fellows of the Royal Society (1975). https://www.jstor.org/stable/769695

"Grand Challenges in Radar Signal Processing". Radar Signal Processing (2021). https://www.frontiersin.org

"Doppler Radar Probing of the Clear Atmosphere". Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society (1978). https://journals.ametsoc.org

Continue reading here:

How radar works: The technology made famous by war - Livescience.com

Hayward Strengthens its Position in Pool Technology with Recent Acquisitions – Yahoo Finance

Water Works Technologies Group, LLC Water Feature and LED Lighting BusinessSmartPower Proprietary, Communication and LED Lighting Control TechnologySmartValve IP Rich Valve/Fluid Control Technology for SmartPad Installation

BERKELEY HEIGHTS, N.J., January 10, 2022--(BUSINESS WIRE)--Hayward Holdings, Inc. (NYSE: HAYW) ("Hayward"), global designer, manufacturer and marketer of a broad portfolio of pool equipment and technology, today announced the acquisition of Water Works Technologies Group, LLC ("Water Works"), a manufacturer of water features including water bowls and sheer waterfalls with LED lighting options.

This acquisition follows the recent acquisitions of two internet of things (IoT) technology businesses, SmartPower and SmartValve. Together, these acquisitions further extend Haywards leading position in smart, IoT-enabled technologies designed to bring greater control and ambiance to the pool while simplifying ease of use and cost of ownership.

Water Works manufactures a variety of water bowls in both resin and glass in an assortment of colors and finishes as well as Sheer Waterfalls. These high-end water features all have color illumination through LED lighting options which allow Smart app coordination with other pool, spa or landscape lighting colors and shows.

SmartPower is a breakthrough LED Lighting controller leveraging a proprietary communication protocol which makes installing and control of multiple lighting zones in the pool, spa, water features or landscape simple to configure and use. Custom lighting effects and shows are easy to program, coordinating multiple water features with the pool, spa, and even landscape lights to effortlessly transform the entire backyard. The technology also presents a compelling financial benefit. This unique product architecture delivers all the control with less than 50% of the cost of using currently available technology. SmartPower is the solution for standalone cloud-based control for any new or existing pool or as part of the OmniLogic ecosystem, Haywards leading pool and spa automation platform.

Story continues

SmartValve is an active fluid management system for intelligent control of multiple, advanced water features in addition to delivering increased hydraulic energy efficiency for pool/spa design. SmartValve will operate autonomously as the central water distribution system with cloud-based control of other pool equipment via local control or app. As with SmartPower, the SmartValve technology will seamlessly integrate with the OmniLogic ecosystem. SmartValve will dramatically simplify equipment pad installation with a simple manifold design significantly lowering the amount of labor and equipment cost for the installer and the pool owner.

"These three businesses complement each other and further extend Haywards leading Smart technology solutions to increase the ambiance of the pool, spa and backyard. They are perfect examples of harnessing new technology to deliver sustainable, energy-efficient solutions to our space," said Kevin Holleran, CEO of Hayward. "SmartPower and SmartValve are both easy to use and less costly to install, a real win-win for both the homeowner and trade professional. With OmniLogic and the coupling of our new line of innovative water features from Water Works, Hayward is leading the way with products transforming the pool and backyard environment. We are really excited to introduce these game-changing new product platforms to our consumers and trade partners."

About Hayward Holdings, Inc.

Hayward Holdings, Inc. (NYSE:HAYW) is a leading global designer and manufacturer of pool equipment and technology all key to the SmartPad conversion strategy designed to provide a superior outdoor living experience. Hayward offers a full line of innovative, energy-efficient and sustainable residential and commercial pool equipment, including a complete line of advanced pumps, filters, heaters, automatic pool cleaners, LED lighting, internet of things (IoT) enabled controls, alternate sanitizers and water features.

This release contains forward-looking statements and information relating to the Company that are based on the beliefs of management as well as assumptions made by, and information currently available to management. When used in this release, words such as "may," "will," "should," "could," "intend," "potential," "continue," "anticipate," "believe," "estimate," "expect," "plan," "target," "predict," "project," "seek" and similar expressions as they relate to us are intended to identify forward-looking statements. These statements reflect managements current views with respect to future events, are not guarantees of future performance and involve risks and uncertainties that are difficult to predict. Further, certain forward-looking statements are based upon assumptions as to future events that may not prove to be accurate. Actual results or events could differ materially from the plans, intentions and expectations disclosed in forward-looking statements. Hayward has based these forward-looking statements largely on managements current expectations and projections about future events and financial trends that management believes may affect Haywards business, financial condition and results of operations. Important factors that could affect Haywards future results and could cause those results or other outcomes to differ materially from those indicated in the forward-looking statements include the following: our ability to execute on our growth strategies and expansion opportunities; our ability to maintain favorable relationships with suppliers and manage disruptions to our global supply chain and the availability of raw materials; our relationships with and the performance of distributors, builders, buying groups, retailers and servicers who sell our products to pool owners; competition from national and global companies, as well as lower cost manufacturers; impacts on our business from the sensitivity of our business to seasonality and unfavorable economic and business conditions; our ability to identify emerging technological and other trends in our target end markets; our ability to develop, manufacture and effectively and profitably market and sell our new planned and future products; failure of markets to accept new product introductions and enhancements; the ability to successfully identify, finance, complete and integrate acquisitions; our ability to attract and retain senior management and other qualified personnel; regulatory changes and developments affecting our current and future products; volatility in currency exchange rates; our ability to service our existing indebtedness and obtain additional capital to finance operations and our growth opportunities; impacts on our business from political, regulatory, economic, trade, and other risks associated with operating foreign businesses; our ability to establish and maintain intellectual property protection for our products, as well as our ability to operate our business without infringing, misappropriating or otherwise violating the intellectual property rights of others; the impact of material cost and other inflation; the impact of changes in laws, regulations and administrative policy, including those that limit US tax benefits or impact trade agreements and tariffs; the outcome of litigation and governmental proceedings; impacts on our business from the COVID-19 pandemic; and other risks and uncertainties set forth under "Risk Factors" in the prospectus for Haywards initial public offering and in Haywards subsequent SEC filings.

The forward-looking statements in this presentation represent managements views as of the date of this release. Unless required by United States federal securities laws, Hayward neither intends nor assumes any obligation to update these forward-looking statements for any reason after the date of this presentation to conform these statements to actual results or to changes in our expectations.

View source version on businesswire.com: https://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20220107005542/en/

Contacts

Media Relations: Tanya McNabbtmcnabb@hayward.com

Investor Relations: Hayward Investor Relations908-288-9706investor.relations@hayward.com

The rest is here:

Hayward Strengthens its Position in Pool Technology with Recent Acquisitions - Yahoo Finance