Edible silk tag can prove your alcohol or medicine is authentic – Packaging Europe

In the future, when ordering a shot of whiskey, the customer might ask the bartender to remove an edible fluorescent silk tag that could be found floating inside, even though it is safe to consume. This little silk tag, with a QR code, is a security measure that could reveal if the whiskey is fake or not.

Simply using a smartphone to scan the tag, which was developed by biomedical engineers from Purdue University and the National Institute of Agricultural Sciences in South Korea, could confirm the drinks authenticity.

Jungwoo Leem, a postdoctoral research associate and Young Kim, both of Purdues Weldon School of Biomedical Engineering, are part of a global research team that has developed an edible QR code on the tag made of specialised silk which could help consumers detect fake whiskey.

There are, of course, no tags currently placed in bottles of whiskey. But this new anti-counterfeiting technology, published in the journal ACS Central Science, could be a step toward not only finding a solution for the alcohol industry but also addressing fake medications.

Some liquid medicines contain alcohol. We wanted to test this first in whiskey because of whiskeys higher alcohol content, said Kim, associate head for research and an associate professor at Purdue. Researchers apply alcohol to silk proteins to make them more durable. Because they tolerate alcohol, the shape of the tag can be maintained for a long time.

Kim has worked on anticounterfeit measures such as cyber-physical watermarks or tags made of fluorescent silk proteins. The tags have a code activated with a smartphone to confirm the authenticity of a product.

The code on the fluorescent silk tag is the equivalent of a 2D barcode or QR code and is not visible to the naked eye. The tags are also edible, causing no issues if a person swallowed it while downing a shot of whiskey. The tags have not affected the taste of the whiskey.

Kim and Leem said making the tags involves processing fluorescent silk cocoons from specialized silkworms to create a biopolymer, which can be formed into a variety of patterns to encode the information. They placed tags in various brands and price points of whiskey over a 10-month period and were able to continually activate the tags and codes with a smartphone app.

Alcohol spirits are vulnerable to counterfeiting. There are a lot of fake whiskeys being sold, said Leem, referencing other studies mentioned in the journal article about the economic cost and loss of purchasing fake alcoholic spirits, including how 18% of adults in the United Kingdom experienced purchasing counterfeit alcoholic spirits.

Online pharmacies sell controlled substances to teens. People can buy counterfeit opioids easily. This work is extremely important for patients and buyers in addressing this issue, Kim said. If you have this technology on or in your medicines, you can use your smartphone to authenticate. We want to empower patients to be aware of this issue. We want to work with pharmaceutical companies and alcohol producers to help them address this issue.

Kim said the tags are an additional authentication mechanism for marked safety seals on bottles or pills and could help by being placed in high-dollar bottles of alcohol or individually on expensive medications.

This article was created in collaboration with AIPIA (the Active and Intelligent Packaging Industry Association). Packaging Europe and AIPIA are joining forces to bring news and commentary about the active and intelligent packaging landscape to a larger audience. To learn more about this partnership, click here.

Continued here:

Edible silk tag can prove your alcohol or medicine is authentic - Packaging Europe

Blast Calories In This Medicine Ball Finisher – Men’s Health

Egoitz Bengoetxea IguaranGetty Images

Aiming for 50 ground-to-over-shoulders is a daunting task, but this workout ups the ante by throwing in a little extra. Start a running clock and do one press-up and one body-weight squat at the start of every minute, before racking up as many reps as you can with the D-ball. Each new minute, add an additional rep to both moves. Can you make it to 50 lifts before the 60 secs are swallowed up by body-weight moves?

Advertisement - Continue Reading Below

Hit the deck and assume a strong plank position with hands stacked beneath your shoulders. Lower your chest to the ground before driving back up explosively. Next, jump to your feet, place them shoulder- width apart and drop down into a deep squat. Stand back up with intent and get ready to ball.

With a press-up and squat in the bag, stand over your ball, squat and roll it from side to side, working your hands underneath. Drive through your feet to deadlift the ball before dropping it into your lap and squatting down. From here, wrap your arms around it and stand, using your momentum to roll it up and over your shoulder. Repeat, keeping an eye on the clock.

Work your way through as many D-ball reps as possible until the clock rolls over into a new minute. At this point, drop your ball and make your way to the floor for another round of press-ups. This time, hit two reps before standing tall and hitting two squats. Grab your ball and immediately get back to work, racking up those reps. Try not to lose count

Keep chipping away at those 50 reps. As each new minute rolls around, stop for the scheduled press-ups and squats, adding an additional rep every 60 secs, before recommencing the ball games. As time ticks on, the body-weight work is going to eat further into each minute, not only leaving you less time to get that ball up, but also compounding the fatigue on your upper body and legs. Can you beat the clock?

This content is created and maintained by a third party, and imported onto this page to help users provide their email addresses. You may be able to find more information about this and similar content at piano.io

Advertisement - Continue Reading Below

View post:

Blast Calories In This Medicine Ball Finisher - Men's Health

Heat exhaustion and heat stroke in children: Symptoms and prevention – Nebraska Medicine

The sweltering summer heat is upon us. We often think of the basics for our kids, like sunscreen and a water bottle. But when the temperatures rise, knowing how to spot the signs of heat exhaustion and heat stroke is critical to their health and safety.

Heat exhaustion and heat stroke exist on a spectrum of heat-related illnesses, ranging from mild and treatable at home to an extreme emergency. Both share related symptoms, but there are some differences.

"Symptoms in children may be more difficult to identify as they can't always tell us what they are feeling, says Amber Brown Keebler, MD, Nebraska Medicine pediatrician. "Risk of heat exhaustion and heat stroke is increased with prolonged exercise, particularly in hot environments and prolonged exposure to hot and humid temperatures. If the signs and symptoms are identified, it is important to cool down their body temperature immediately."

Causes of heat-related illness:

Symptoms of heat exhaustion are essential to recognize as they can lead to a more dangerous, life-threatening form of heat illness called heat stroke. Seek medical attention if symptoms are severe or do not improve with intervention within 30 minutes.

Heat stroke (or sunstroke) is a life-threatening emergency that occurs when the body creates more heat than it can release. Heat stroke must be treated immediately. The signs of heat stroke may look similar to heat exhaustion but with a few differentiations:

If you suspect your child has heat stroke, call 911 or go to the emergency room immediately.

Heat illnesses are nothing to ignore or push through. Babies, children, and older adults are at the most significant risk. Heat exhaustion and heat stroke are preventable with the proper safety actions:

Read more about children staying hydrated while playing sports, summer injury prevention tips and ways to keep your summer safe.

View post:

Heat exhaustion and heat stroke in children: Symptoms and prevention - Nebraska Medicine

Medicine Hat Tigers to select first overall in 2022 CHL Import Draft WHL Network – Western Hockey League

The Canadian Hockey League announced Tuesday the Order of Selections for the 2022 CHL Import Draft, to be held online Friday, July 1 at 9:00 a.m. MT.

The Medicine Hat Tigershold the first-overall selection, to be followed by the Ontario Hockey Leagues Saginaw Spirit and the Quebec Major Junior Hockey Leagues Cape Breton Eagles.

Medicine Hat will select first overall in the CHL Import Draft for the second time in franchise history. The Tigers drafted Czech defenceman Vladimir Sicak with the first pick in the 1998 CHL Import Draft; Sicak went on to skate in 105 WHL regular season games with Medicine Hat from 1998-2000.

The Tigers are the first WHL Club to select first overall in the CHL Import Draft since the Swift Current Broncos selected Finnish defenceman Kasper Puutio in 2019.

Each of the 60 CHL Clubs are permitted to make a maximum of two selections in the 2022 CHL Import Draft.

2022 CHL Import Draft WHL Selections

Round One1. Medicine Hat Tigers4. Tri-City Americans7. Victoria Royals10. Vancouver Giants13. Spokane Chiefs16. Prince George Cougars19. Calgary Hitmen22. Swift Current Broncos25. Regina Pats28. Prince Albert Raiders31. Lethbridge Hurricanes34. Brandon Wheat Kings37. Saskatoon Blades40. Moose Jaw Warriors43. Kelowna Rockets46. Seattle Thunderbirds49. Red Deer Rebels52. Portland Winterhawks55. Kamloops Blazers57. Everett Silvertips59. Edmonton Oil Kings60. Winnipeg ICE

Round One61. Medicine Hat Tigers64. Tri-City Americans67. Victoria Royals70. Vancouver Giants73. Spokane Chiefs76. Prince George Cougars79. Calgary Hitmen82. Swift Current Broncos85. Regina Pats88. Prince Albert Raiders91. Lethbridge Hurricanes94. Brandon Wheat Kings97. Saskatoon Blades100. Moose Jaw Warriors103. Kelowna Rockets106. Seattle Thunderbirds109. Red Deer Rebels112. Portland Winterhawks115. Kamloops Blazers117. Everett Silvertips119. Edmonton Oil Kings120. Winnipeg ICE

View original post here:

Medicine Hat Tigers to select first overall in 2022 CHL Import Draft WHL Network - Western Hockey League

Newsworthy from the School of Medicine, Week of June 17 – June 23 | Newsroom – UNC Health and UNC School of Medicine

The below clickable headlines link directly to outside media outlets, which featured UNC School of Medicine faculty during the past week, starting Friday June 17, 2022.

16 Healthcare Innovators That You Should Know Dr. Samantha Meltzer-Brody (Forbes)

How to Keep Yourself and Loved Ones Safe as Heat Waves Scorch the Country Dr. David Berkoff (Everyday Health)

A Happy Cancer Story Dr. Hanna Sanoff (AMAC)

Anorexia Nervosa: More Than Just a Psychological Disorder? Dr. Cynthia Bulik (Psychology Today)

Be prepared if your child gets sick on vacation Dr. Anita Skariah, Dr. Priyanka Rao (WRAL)

California thinks it can be an abortion sanctuary in a post-Roe nation. These battlegrounds tell a different story Dr. Amy G. Bryant (Rome News-Tribune)

Triangle families plan to vaccinate young kids this week with new FDA authorization Dr. David Wohl (WTVD)

A new generation of weight loss drugs makes bold promises, but who really wins? Dr. John Buse (Quartz)

Study led by UNC Lineberger finds diagnostic mammography results varied across racial and ethnic groups Dr. Sarah Nyante (CBS 17)

Fighting startup failure: Innovate Carolina rolls out a venture studio approach Carol Lewis (WRAL Tech Wire)

Are you ready to catch COVID again? 1 in 9 cases in June is a reinfection Dr. David Wohl (WNCT)

Do race and ethnicity impact the accuracy of diagnostic mammograms? Dr. Sarah J. Nyante (Health Imaging)

CDC recommends all children under 5 receive COVID-19 vax, shipments expected to arrive in Wake on Monday Dr. Matthew Vogt (WRAL)

Why the world of LGBTQ health doesnt fit under a single label Tonia Poteat (American Heart Association)

Apex 1-year-old finishes a year of chemotherapy Dr. Gerardo Quezada (WRAL Go Ask Mom)

This Cancer Treatment Has a 100 Percent Success Rate, Study Says Dr. Hanna Sanoff (Best Life)

Different brands, doses, schedules and what parents need to know about COVID-19 vaccines for babies, young kids Dr. David Weber (WNCN)

Only a quarter of eligible NC kids receive COVID vaccine, data shows Dr. David Wohl (WTVD)

Diagnostic mammogram accuracy varies across racial, ethnic groups Dr. Sarah J. Nyante (Healio)

Slowly, Then All at Once Dr. Shekinah Elmore (UNC Endeavors)

Vaccines for children under 5: Experts answer parents questions Dr. Tom Belhorn, Dr. Zach Willis (WRAL)

Feelings of detachment predict worse mental health outcomes after trauma Dr. Samuel McLean (Science Daily)

Read the original here:

Newsworthy from the School of Medicine, Week of June 17 - June 23 | Newsroom - UNC Health and UNC School of Medicine

Profile: The War Chief Who Became a Peace Chief > News > USC Dornsife – USC Dornsife College of Letters, Arts and Sciences

One of USC Dornsife's most distinguished alumni, Joseph Medicine Crow was a renowned Native American historian, the last war chief of the Apsalooke (Crow) Nation and the recipient of a Presidential Medal of Freedom. In April, USC honored him by officially naming a historic campus building after him.

Serving as a U.S. Army scout during World War II, Joseph Medicine Crow was rounding a corner in a small French town when he collided with a strapping, young German soldier. Medicine Crow, who was wearing war paint beneath his uniform and had a yellow eagle feather concealed inside his helmet, was not a big man, but he didnt shoot the enemy. Instead, he disarmed the German with a boot thrust. Throwing his own rifle aside, he overpowered the larger man in hand-to-hand combat. While Medicine Crow was choking him, the Germans eyes rolled back in his head and he gasped Mama, Mama. Recounting the tale many years later, Medicine Crow said the soldiers plea brought him to his senses.

I let go of him and got my rifle back and he became my prisoner, he told his son, Ronald Medicine Crow. We sat down, away from all the shouting and fighting, and I shared a cigarette with him.

This exploit is a perfect illustration of not only Medicine Crows bravery, but also his profound humanity a quality that brought him some of the worlds highest honors, as well as the respect of all who met him.

A Lifetime of Honors

One of USC Dornsifes most distinguished alumni, Joseph Medicine Crow was a renowned Native American historian and writer, the last war chief of the Apsalooke (Crow) Nation and its first member to earn a masters degree. In 2009, President Barack Obama honored him with the nations highest civilian honor, thePresidential Medal of Freedom, in recognition of his military service and contributions to Native American history. The previous year, he was awarded a Bronze Star and theLgion dHonneur Frances highest order of merit for his service in World War II.

According to Crow tradition, a warrior must fulfill four requirements to be named a war chief. Medicine Crow accomplished all four during WWII: leading a successful war party, touching an enemy soldier without killing him, disarming an enemy soldier, and capturing an enemys horse. Indeed, among his war exploits, Medicine Crow is credited with capturing 50 horses from a Nazi SS camp and successfully leading a team of soldiers to dynamite German artillery.

He also claimed to be the first Allied soldier to land in Nazi Germany after his captain ordered him to leap over the narrow stream that marked the Siegfried Line separating the country from France a feat for which he was later congratulated by General Omar Bradley, one of General Dwight Eisenhowers right-hand men.

An All-Round Man

Born into the Whistling Waters clan on the Crow Reservation in Lodge Grass, Montana, in 1913, Medicine Crow came from a distinguished lineage: His paternal grandfather was the eminent Chief Medicine Crow and his step-father was the son of White Man Runs Him one of George Armstrong Custers four personal scouts at the Battle of Little Bighorn.

Medicine Crow was raised by his grandparents, who immersed him in Crow traditions, inculcating stamina and tribal skills.

His Grandfather Yellowtail trained him in the old warrior ways, Ronald Medicine Crow says. In wintertime, they chopped a hole in the ice and took a refreshing morning plunge. Then Yellowtail told him to run a hundred yards in the snow barefoot. In summer and fall, Dad learned hunting and tracking skills.

My father was raised as a farm boy, rancher, outdoorsman, hunter, cowboy, jockey and exercise boy he was an all-round man.

During his formative years, Joseph Medicine Crow was also absorbing the history of his tribe. When elders gathered at the sweat lodge, telling stories of intertribal warfare and mythological heroes, Medicine Crow, who served as their water boy, was listening and taking mental note.

This early knowledge forged a lifelong love of Native American history. Widely recognized as the last person to have heard accounts of theBattle of Little Bighorndirectly from participants in the 1876 conflict and a naturally gifted storyteller in his own right, Medicine Crow grew up to be revered as one of the most influential and knowledgeable carriers of his peoples oral history.

After WWII, he became tribal historian for the Apsalooke (Crow) Tribal Council, documenting his peoples traditions and daily life in several books, includingFrom the Heart of the Crow Country: The Crow Indians Own Stories(Crown, 1992).

Perseverance Pays Off

Unable to speak English as a young child, Medicine Crows formal education got off to a rough start when he struggled to pronounce excuse me to his teachers satisfaction after suffering a bout of hiccups on his first day. She made him don a dunces cap and sent him to the sand box to play with wooden blocks. This treatment continued for his first two years of school.

From eighth grade through his first two years of college, Medicine Crow attended Bacone College in Oklahoma, becoming a star pitcher for the baseball team and excelling at javelin. He became an accomplished musician, learning to play six instruments saxophone, clarinet, flute, piano, accordion and the Indian hand drum.

In high school, he also began to study seriously, competing with a friend to get top grades.

Thats how he came from being in the sandbox with a dunces cap to being an A student and making the honor roll, Ronald Medicine Crow says.

Joseph Medicine Crow pursued his studies at Linfield College in Oregon before arriving at USC Dornsife in 1938 on a scholarship. He earned his masters inanthropologywith anarchaeologyminor in 1939. His thesis, The Effects of European Culture Contacts Upon the Economic, Social and Religious Life of the Crow Indians, is regarded as the seminal scholarly work on the topic.

By the early 1940s, Medicine Crow had completed the coursework to earn a PhD at USC Dornsife, but determined to serve his country, he joined the U.S. Army in 1942. USC awarded him an honorary doctorate of humane letters in 2003 one of four honorary doctorates he received during his lifetime.

Upon returning home from WWII, Medicine Crow started a successful career as a land appraiser for the Bureau of Indian Affairs. There he put his archaeology training at USC to good use, surveying land to ensure no sacred burial sites or artifacts were disturbed by development.

Peace Chief

Saddened by the anti-Native American discrimination he witnessed, he hit upon the idea of creating a Miss Indian America pageant to help promote unity between the white and Indian people. Held during the All-American Indian Days an annual celebration of Native American culture and another initiative of Medicine Crow to foster positive relations the pageant was a success. It changed the climate, and pretty soon we were more than welcome to come into town and do business, says Ronald Medicine Crow.

Joseph Medicine Crow showed a lifelong commitment to education, teaching in the Department of Crow Studies at Montanas Little Big Horn College. A middle school in Billings, Montana, was named after him.

And in 2000, the war chief who was also a devout Baptist who taught a mens Sunday school class performed the opening song for the United Nations summit conference for spiritual and religious leaders.

Ronald Medicine Crow says his father was profoundly influenced by Christianity and did his best to live a good life and be a role model for young and old alike.

My father said, I live in two worlds: the Indian world and the white world. There is a middle line that joins those two worlds together. I walk that line and take whats good from both.

Dad was a humanist who loved all people, even his enemies, He was a man of dignity, but a humble man. He didnt hold grudges. He was forgiving and positive. And people loved him for that.

A Trailblazer and A Role Model

Medicine Crow died on April 2, 2016, at age 102. State officials attended his funeral, and tributes poured in from all over the world, including from Obama.

The tributes continued even after Medicine Crows death.

This year, on April 16, USC honored the USC Dornsife alumnus by officially naming a historic campus building after him. TheDr. Joseph Medicine Crow Center for International and Public Affairsis located at the heart of USCs University Park campus, its tower topped by one of the universitys most visible and recognizable landmarks the stylized globe. The center is home to many USC Dornsife departments, including anthropology,art history,political science and international relations.A scholarship program for Native Americans will also be established in his name.

In her speech at the naming ceremony, USC Dornsife Dean Amber D. Miller paid tribute to Medicine Crow, describing him as a bridgebuilder.

He connected new generations with stories of their past, helped communities overcome intolerance toward indigenous peoples, and found ways to link the Crow peoples cultural traditions with the opportunities of modern society, she said.

Joe Medicine Crow was also known for being a generous mentor he was patient and encouraging and eager to invest in others. Most importantly, he showed how to live through his actions.S.B.

Read the rest here:

Profile: The War Chief Who Became a Peace Chief > News > USC Dornsife - USC Dornsife College of Letters, Arts and Sciences

Not Cardano, Ethereum or Litecoin but outflows were solely focused on – AMBCrypto News

The ongoing cryptocurrency market has continued to witness major liquidations. Following a $24 billion decline on 26 June, the total crypto market cap slipped by $9.17 billion on 27 June. At press time, the total liquidations over the last day stood at $137 million. It was down from $145 million as compared to 27 June.

This certainly seems to be the case with cryptocurrency holders as highlighted in the latest Digital Asset Fund Flows Weekly report. CoinShares noted that digital asset investment products suffered over $420 million in outflows last week. In fact, this has been the largest since records began by a wide margin as depicted here.

In terms of assets under management (AUM), last weeks outflows were the third-largest on record, representing 1.2% of the entire AUM of all funds that CoinShares tracks. The worst was outflows of 1.6% recorded during the 2018 bear market.

Geographically speaking, Canadian investors offloaded around $487.5 million worth of digital asset products last week. Importantly, United States-based investors accounted for more than half of the inflows with $41 million.

Nevertheless, the void remains too big to close and even the king coin suffered the repercussions.

The outflows occurred on 17th June but were reflected in last weeks figures due to trade reporting lags, and likely responsible for Bitcoins decline to $17,760 that weekend.

Bitcoin [BTC] led the exodus charge as outflows solely focused on Bitcoin. The king coin saw net outflows for the week totalling $453 million, erasing almost all inflows year-to-date and leaving total Bitcoin AuM at $24.5 billion, the lowest point since the beginning of 2021.

Apart from Bitcoin, other assets including Ethereum [ETH] ($10.9 million), Short Bitcoin ($15.3 million), Cardano [ADA] ($0.8 million), Tron [TRX] ($0.1 million), Polkadot [DOT] ($0.2 million), and other assets ($2.9 million) reported total inflows of $30 million last week. Overall, the result in net outflows reached a total of $423 million.

In addition, providers flow painted a similar picture as well. Stripping out the $493 million outflows reveals that other providers saw aggregate inflows totalling $70 million.

The withdrawals came from the Purpose Bitcoin ETF that stood at an amount equal to about 24,510 BTC. Furthermore, it is also likely that these enormous outflows are caused by a forced seller, thus leading to a huge liquidation.

See original here:

Not Cardano, Ethereum or Litecoin but outflows were solely focused on - AMBCrypto News

Here’s what could happen for Litecoin in the short term – FXStreet

Information on these pages contains forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties. Markets and instruments profiled on this page are for informational purposes only and should not in any way come across as a recommendation to buy or sell in these assets. You should do your own thorough research before making any investment decisions. FXStreet does not in any way guarantee that this information is free from mistakes, errors, or material misstatements. It also does not guarantee that this information is of a timely nature. Investing in Open Markets involves a great deal of risk, including the loss of all or a portion of your investment, as well as emotional distress. All risks, losses and costs associated with investing, including total loss of principal, are your responsibility. The views and opinions expressed in this article are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the official policy or position of FXStreet nor its advertisers. The author will not be held responsible for information that is found at the end of links posted on this page.

If not otherwise explicitly mentioned in the body of the article, at the time of writing, the author has no position in any stock mentioned in this article and no business relationship with any company mentioned. The author has not received compensation for writing this article, other than from FXStreet.

FXStreet and the author do not provide personalized recommendations. The author makes no representations as to the accuracy, completeness, or suitability of this information. FXStreet and the author will not be liable for any errors, omissions or any losses, injuries or damages arising from this information and its display or use. Errors and omissions excepted.

The author and FXStreet are not registered investment advisors and nothing in this article is intended to be investment advice.

Read more:

Here's what could happen for Litecoin in the short term - FXStreet

Why is Crypto Down ? Discover What Parody Coin (PARO) and Litecoin (LTC) Have to Offer – NewsBTC

Due to multiple different contributing factors like elevated inflation, the war in Ukraine and rising interest rates, crypto has had another bad start to June. This has seen some of the crypto giants like Bitcoin and Ethereum go down more than 35 per cent, with Bitcoin being at its lowest point in 18 months. Crypto experts all saw the massive drop of stablecoin TerraUSD at the beginning of May, so some analysts would say they predicted this bearish run would come.

Crypto analysts and experts are advising new investors to buy in the dip, as theyve seen similar patterns happen in the crypto market before. Where the market experiences a huge dip but throughout the years weve witnessed bear runs that turn into bull markets. Bitcoin will always remain one of the crypto giants, as some crypto enthusiasts say the world hasnt seen the last of Bitcoin.

Although some of these cryptocurrencies are experiencing some horrid times in the market, this may be the time to check an alternative coin that is yet to be launched and is still in its presale phase Parody Coin (PARO). We will also be looking at the cryptocurrency referred to as digital silver Litecoin (LTC).

Parody Coin is a deflation token, which means the number of coins in circulation will decrease over time. This happens so that the value of each coin rises if the demand remains consistent over a period of time.

The native token of Parody Coin is PARO, through its token users will be able to trade, mint and interact with Parody NFTs. On the Parody Coin website, it says that they aim to give their users full control through a carefully designed passive income system.

In terms of exchanging, Parody Coin users will be allowed to exchange with other blockchain assets, these exchanges will primarily happen in decentralised exchanges (DEX) and liquidity pools. In addition to having a smooth operating exchange system, Parody Coin also has a lot of key features which are: Parody Market, Parody Bridge and Parody Swap.

Litecoin (LTC) is a cryptocurrency that was specifically made to provide fast, secure and cheap payments by leveraging the unique properties of blockchain technology.

Similar to Bitcoin, Litecoin is established on an open-source global payment structure that isnt controlled by any central authorities. Litecoin differentiates itself from Bitcoin in two aspects, a faster block generation rate and the use of Scrypt as a proof-of-work concept.

Litecoin differentiates itself by enabling low-cost transaction fees, the capability to handle more transactions per second than Bitcoin, a particularly different hashing algorithm and putting more emphasis on merchant and retailer adoption.

Alternative coins and new projects are a venture that beginner investors should take a look into.

As Parody coin has tons of detailed information on its website and whitepaper, this could reassure investors that Parody coin sets to propel their token to the top of the crypto market once launched. Whilst Parody is at the beginning of its third presale phase, now would be your best chance to acquire the token for cheap.

Parody Coin (PARO)

Presale: https://presale.parodycoin.io/registerWebsite: https://parodycoin.io/Telegram: https://t.me/PARODYCOIN_OFFICIAL

Disclaimer:This is a paid release. The statements, views and opinions expressed in this column are solely those of the content provider and do not necessarily represent those of NewsBTC. NewsBTC does not guarantee the accuracy or timeliness of information available in such content. Do your research and invest at your own risk.

Read more from the original source:

Why is Crypto Down ? Discover What Parody Coin (PARO) and Litecoin (LTC) Have to Offer - NewsBTC

Best Banks in Connecticut | Liberty Bank

Disclaimer: Links to third party sites are provided for your convenience. These sites are not within the control of Liberty Bank and may not follow the same privacy, security, or accessibility standards as Liberty Bank. Liberty Bank does not warrant any offerings from the third party providers, nor is Liberty Bank responsible for the security, content or availability of any third party sites, or their partners.

Disclaimer: Links to third party sites are provided for your convenience. These sites are not within the control of Liberty Bank and may not follow the same privacy, security, or accessibility standards as Liberty Bank. By accessing the SmartLenders Program via the provided link, you acknowledge the SmartLenders Program is not under the control of Liberty Bank. Liberty Bank does not warrant or endorse any offerings from third party providers, nor is Liberty Bank responsible for the security, content or availability of any third party sites or their partners including SmartLenders or the lenders that may be accessed by you through your use of the SmartLenders Program (the Lenders). Under no circumstances will Liberty Bank be responsible for any damages arising from the transactions between you and any Lenders or for any information appearing on SmartLenders site. SmartLenders will provide Liberty Bank with the following information about your application: applicant name; type of company; email address; loan amount requested; and progress status toward approval and funding. Liberty Bank may use this information to monitor your experience with SmartLenders and market Libertys services to you.

Read the original here:

Best Banks in Connecticut | Liberty Bank

Liberty clinches first-ever USL W League playoff berth – WYFF4 Greenville

Liberty clinches first-ever USL W League playoff berth

Updated: 10:15 PM EDT Jun 28, 2022

The Greenville Liberty clinched its first-ever USL W League playoff berth & concluded a perfect home regular season Tuesday night at Legacy Early College with a 5-1 thumping of Asheville City in front of the clubs second-largest crowd of the season. Tuesday nights inaugural regular season home opener began differently than any other match this season. Just 35 seconds into the match Asheville City center back, Roisin McGovern, is issued a red card after grabbing the jersey of Julie Mackin and pulling her to the ground, denying her a goal scoring opportunity. After the foul, Asheville was forced to play almost the entirety of the match down a player. Shortly after McGovern was dismissed, Greenville finished what it started earlier, and Carly Thatcher scores the first Liberty goal. In the 22nd minute, a cross from Christian Brathwaite flew across the face of the goal resulting in an own goal from Asheville. Ten minutes later, Caroline Conti attempted a cross that pinged off the side bar into the net to put the Liberty up 3-0 headed into the half.Greenville substitutions at the start of second half kept the momentum on the home side, as the club continued to press the shorthanded Asheville defense. Despite letting in an own goal to put Asheville on the board, the Liberty continued to dominate the match. Just two minutes after the own goal, Greenville countered with a second-effort goal from Julie Mackin to return the lead to three and keep the home side in the drivers seat. The Libertys Maddie Turlington added an exclamation point on the evening with a fifth goal for the club just before stoppage time. As the whistle blew, the Liberty capped their home schedule with a perfect 6-0 record and clinched the clubs first-ever South Atlantic division title and playoff berth.The Liberty will now hit the road for two more regular season matches, taking the short trip up to Charlotte to face the Independence on Saturday, June 2nd. The club will look to improve its playoff seeding in Charlotte and the regular season finale on July 9th at Wake FC.

The Greenville Liberty clinched its first-ever USL W League playoff berth & concluded a perfect home regular season Tuesday night at Legacy Early College with a 5-1 thumping of Asheville City in front of the clubs second-largest crowd of the season.

Tuesday nights inaugural regular season home opener began differently than any other match this season. Just 35 seconds into the match Asheville City center back, Roisin McGovern, is issued a red card after grabbing the jersey of Julie Mackin and pulling her to the ground, denying her a goal scoring opportunity. After the foul, Asheville was forced to play almost the entirety of the match down a player. Shortly after McGovern was dismissed, Greenville finished what it started earlier, and Carly Thatcher scores the first Liberty goal. In the 22nd minute, a cross from Christian Brathwaite flew across the face of the goal resulting in an own goal from Asheville. Ten minutes later, Caroline Conti attempted a cross that pinged off the side bar into the net to put the Liberty up 3-0 headed into the half.

Greenville substitutions at the start of second half kept the momentum on the home side, as the club continued to press the shorthanded Asheville defense. Despite letting in an own goal to put Asheville on the board, the Liberty continued to dominate the match. Just two minutes after the own goal, Greenville countered with a second-effort goal from Julie Mackin to return the lead to three and keep the home side in the drivers seat. The Libertys Maddie Turlington added an exclamation point on the evening with a fifth goal for the club just before stoppage time. As the whistle blew, the Liberty capped their home schedule with a perfect 6-0 record and clinched the clubs first-ever South Atlantic division title and playoff berth.

The Liberty will now hit the road for two more regular season matches, taking the short trip up to Charlotte to face the Independence on Saturday, June 2nd. The club will look to improve its playoff seeding in Charlotte and the regular season finale on July 9th at Wake FC.

Go here to read the rest:

Liberty clinches first-ever USL W League playoff berth - WYFF4 Greenville

Sixers and NBA free agency tracker – Liberty Ballers

Later this week, on Thursday at 6 p.m. EST, the 2022 NBA free agency period will kick off. Although the Philadelphia 76ers are not ripe with financial freedom, they surely intend to use this opportunity as a means to bolster the roster to true contender levels. Reported interest of potential targets, notably P.J. Tucker at this point, are already emerging.

If James Harden opts in, they dont have any true free agents themselves from last years team. However, on this post, well be sure to continually update everyone about trade rumors involving the Sixers, any signings they agree to, the looming Harden situation and any relevant league-wide happenings.

The prevailing sentiment for weeks, led by Bleacher Reports Jake Fischer, has been that Harden will exercise his $47 million player option for 2022-23 and sign a two-year extension. Yet on Monday, Marc Stein mentioned the possibility Harden declines the option, signs a new three-year deal at a price point below the max with the Sixers and brings them some added financial flexibility.

The veteran wing declined his $7.4 million player option for 2022-23 and will enter free agency later this week. Various sources, including Stein and Keith Pompey of the Philadelphia Inquirer, have linked Philadelphia as his primary suitor, likely on a three-year, $30 million contract.

No concrete trade has been mentioned as it pertains to Philadelphia moving Thybulle. For weeks, he was listed as someone who could be packaged alongside the No. 23 pick and Danny Green. Obviously, that did not materialize and Thybulle remains with the Sixers at this point. The Portland Trail Blazers reportedly have interest in the 25-year-old, though.

Similar to Thybulle, specifics of a trade involving Harris have not surfaced. While theres been speculation Philadelphia may move Harris to open the non-taxpayer mid-level exception (~$10 million) and sign Tucker with it, reports indicate the Sixers would prioritize trades to offload various smaller contracts rather than Harris and his two-year, $77 million deal.

Korkmaz, owed $10.3 million over the next two years, is among those players on smaller deals than Harris who could be dealt.

Milton, due just under $2 million next season, joins Korkmaz as another candidate here.

See above, with Korkmaz and Milton.

According to Pompey and Alykhan Bijani of The Athletic, the Sixers and Houston Rockets engaged on discussions around Gordon last week. That report went live shortly before Thursdays NBA Draft, when Philadelphia landed DeAnthony Melton in exchange for the No. 23 pick and Danny Green. Despite that move, though, Pompey still reported the Sixers have interest in acquiring Gordon.

Read the original post:

Sixers and NBA free agency tracker - Liberty Ballers

Bruen’s Originalist Analogical Reasoning Applies A Presumption of Liberty – Reason

Justice Thomas's majority opinion in New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. Bruen may be the most important originalist opinion of all time. Its significance surpasses Heller,Crawford, and any other decision that came before it. Rather than trying to cram originalism into pre-existing standards--such as the tiers of scrutiny or a two-step test--Thomas starts from first principles. He employs originalist analogical reasoning. The Court instructs lower courts to determine the validity of a modern-day gun restriction by considering analogous restrictions in the past. But this mode of reasoning is weighted against the government, and follows a presumption of liberty. The state has the burden to justify that its restriction has historical analogues. And more importantly, the government cannot rely on sparse or attenuated historical analogues to meet its burden. Even if the evidence is at equipoise, the tie goes to freedom.

The majority opinion inBruen methodically walks through this framework, illustrating how to apply it in different contexts.

First, the court must determine if a modern-day regulation is "relevantly similar" to some historical regulations.

Much like we use history to determine which modern "arms" are protected by the Second Amendment, so too does history guide our consideration of modern regulations that were unimaginable at the founding. When confronting such present-day firearm regulations, this historical inquiry that courts must conduct will often involve reasoning by analogya commonplace task for any lawyer or judge. Like all analogical reasoning, determining whether a historical regulation is a proper analogue for a distinctly modern firearm regulation requires a determination of whether the two regulations are "relevantly similar." C. Sunstein, On Analogical Reasoning, 106 Harv. L. Rev. 741 (1993).

Second, Thomas highlights two questions that can be used to perform this analogical reasoning:

While we do not now provide an exhaustive survey of the features that render regulations relevantly similar under the Second Amendment, we do think that Heller and McDonald point toward at least two metrics: how and why the regulations burden a law-abiding citizen's right to armed self-defense. As we stated in Heller and repeated in McDonald, "individual self-defense is 'the central component' of the Second Amendment right." Therefore, whether modern and historical regulations impose a comparable burden on the right of armed self-defense [i.e., the how] and whether that burden is comparably justified [i.e., the why] are "'central'" considerations when engaging in an analogical inquiry. McDonald.

Third, in Footnote 7, Justice Thomas clarifies that the originalist analogical inquiry is distinct from means-ends scrutiny:

This does not mean that courts may engage in independent means-end scrutiny under the guise of an analogical inquiry. Again, the Second Amendment is the "product of an interest balancing by the people," not the evolving product of federal judges. Analogical reasoning requires judges to apply faithfully the balance struck by the founding generation to modern circumstances, and contrary to the dissent's assertion, there is nothing "[i]roni[c]" about that undertaking. It is not an invitation to revise that balance through means-end scrutiny.

Fourth, the Court explains how similar the modern regulation must be to the historical analogues:

To be clear, analogical reasoning under the Second Amendment is neither a regulatory straightjacket nor a regulatory blank check. On the one hand, courts should not "uphold every modern law that remotely resembles a historical analogue," because doing so "risk[s] endorsing outliers that our ancestors would never have accepted." Drummond v. Robinson (CA3 2021). On the other hand, analogical reasoning requires only that the government identify a well-established and representative historical analogue, not a historical twin. So even if a modern-day regulation is not a dead ringer for historical precursors, it still may be analogous enough to pass constitutional muster.

Fifth, as an example, the Court justifies the "sensitive places" analysis from Heller:

Consider, for example, Heller's discussion of "longstanding" "laws forbidding the carrying of firearms in sensitive places such as schools and government buildings." Although the historical record yields relatively few 18th- and 19th-century "sensitive places" where weapons were altogether prohibitede.g., legislative assemblies, polling places, and courthouseswe are also aware of no disputes regarding the lawfulness of such prohibitions. See D. Kopel & J. Greenlee, The "Sensitive Places" Doctrine, 13 Charleston L. Rev. 205, 229236 (2018); see also Brief for Independent Institute as Amicus Curiae. We therefore can assume it settled that these locations were "sensitive places" where arms carrying could be prohibited consistent with the Second Amendment. And courts can use analogies to those historical regulations of "sensitive places" to determine that modern regulations prohibiting the carry of firearms in new and analogous sensitive places are constitutionally permissible.

Sixth, the Court places the burden squarely on the government.

To support that claim, the burden falls on respondents to show that New York's proper-cause requirement is consistent with this Nation's historical tradition of firearm regulation. Only if respondents carry that burden can they show that the pre-existing right codified in the Second Amendment, and made applicable to the States through the Fourteenth, does not protect petitioners' proposed course of conduct.

And the Court will not do the government's homework:

Of course, we are not obliged to sift the historical materials for evidence to sustain New York's statute. That is respondents' burden. Nevertheless, we think a short review of the public discourse surrounding Reconstruction is useful in demonstrating how public carry for self-defense remained a central component of the protection that the Fourteenth Amendment secured for all citizens.

The individual seeking to vindicate his Second Amendment right does not have the burden. And in this case, New York failed to meet that burden.

We conclude that respondents have failed to meet their burden to identify an American tradition justifying New York's proper-cause requirement. Under Heller's text-and-history standard, the proper-cause requirement is therefore unconstitutional. . . .

At the end of this long journey through the Anglo-American history of public carry, we conclude that respondents have not met their burden to identify an American tradition justifying the State's proper-cause requirement.

In constitutional litigation, the assignment of the burden is perhaps the most important choice a court will make. I explored this theme in my article, The Burden of Judging in the NYU Journal of Law & Liberty:"Instead of chiseling out the so-called tiers of scrutiny, accounting for these burdens serves as a more accurate descriptor of the manner in which governments and individuals have their constitutional rights either vindicated or vitiated."

Seventh, the government needs to point to more than some isolated historical analogues to support a restriction. The evidence must be substantial. And if the record is at equipoise, the presumption of liberty breaks the tie.

For example, there is some doubt about how best to read the record inSir John Knight's Case. In that case, the Court favors the reading that protects a right to keep and bear arms.

The dissent discounts Sir John Knight's Case, because it only "arguably" supports the view that an evil-intent requirement attached to the Statute of Northampton by the late 1600s and early 1700s. But again, because the Second Amendment's bare text covers petitioners' public carry, the respondents here shoulder the burden of demonstrating that New York's proper-cause requirement is consistent with the Second Amendment's text and historical scope. To the extent there are multiple plausible interpretations of Sir John Knight's Case, we will favor the one that is more consistent with the Second Amendment's command.

There was also some debate about how to understand the surety laws. Given that conflicting record, the tie goes to freedom.

The dissent speculates that the absence of recorded cases involving surety laws may simply "show that these laws were normally followed." Perhaps. But again, the burden rests with the government to establish the relevant tradition of regulation, and, given all of the other features of surety laws that make them poor analogues to New York's proper-cause standard, we consider the barren record of enforcement to be simply one additional reason to discount their relevance.

These seven principles effect a foundational shift in how courts should decide Second Amendment cases.To understand why this shift is so significant, it is helpful to review how the lower courts have decided cases in the exact opposite fashion. ConsiderUnited States v. Skoien, an en banc decision from the Seventh Circuit. Judge Easterbrook wrote the majority opinion in 2010. He expressly rejected the need to find a close analogue between a modern-day restriction on guns and framing-era restrictions of arms:

So although the Justices have not established that anyparticular statute is valid, we do take from Heller themessage thatexclusions need not mirror limits that wereon the books in 1791.

And at every juncture, Easterbrook placed the burden on the defendant to justify the unreasonableness of the law. Indeed, the court supplied additional evidence that the government did not cite to defend the law. Judge Sykes dissented. She faulted the majority for giving the government a "decisive assist."

This approach fell far short of the legal heavy lifting normally required to justify criminally punishing the exercise of an enumerated constitutional right. . . . When it comesto applying this standard, they give the government adecisive assist; most of the empirical data cited tosustain 922(g)(9) has been supplied by the court. Thisis an odd way to put the government to its burden ofjustifying a law that prohibits the exercise of a constitutionalright. With respect, I cannot join the en banc opinion.The court declines to be explicit about its decisionmethod, sends doctrinal signals that confuse ratherthan clarify, and develops its own record to support thegovernment's application of 922(g)(9) to this defendant.

Easterbrook's approach to judging has predominated across the circuits. Many judges have followed Easterbrook's lead. They used loose reasoning, and always gave the benefit of the doubt to the government. I wrote about Skoienway back in 2013, yet the precedent has survived. Indeed, I don't know if there is any Judge who more flagrantly dared the Supreme Court to reverse him on guns than Easterbrook. No more. Put a red flag on Skoien.

Under the approach inBruen, courts are required to use tight analogical reasoning between a modern restriction and history, and if there is any doubt, the tie goes to freedom.

Still, there is a single paragraph in Justice Thomas's majority opinion that could undermine--even ruin--Bruen:

While the historical analogies here and in Heller are relatively simple to draw, other cases implicating unprecedented societal concerns or dramatic technological changes may require a more nuanced approach. The regulatory challenges posed by firearms today are not always the same as those that preoccupied the Founders in 1791 or the Reconstruction generation in 1868. Fortunately, the Founders created a Constitutionand a Second Amendment"intended to endure for ages to come, and consequently, to be adapted to the various crises of human affairs." McCulloch v. Maryland (1819). Although its meaning is fixed according to the understandings of those who ratified it, the Constitution can, and must, apply to circumstances beyond those the Founders specifically anticipated.

It will be very easy for the Ninth Circuit to deem mass shootings an "unprecedented societal concerns" or designate so-called assault weapons as the byproducts of "dramatic technological change." These two categories, buttressed by the original Heller discussion of "sensitive places" and "dangerous and unusual weapons," will provide judges with an escape hatch from analogical reasoning. Plus, combined with the limitations from Justice Kavanaugh's concurrence--much more on that concurrence later--the Ninth Circuit will have everything it needs to keep business as usual.If I had to guess, Justice Kavanaugh proposed this paragraph. If ever the price of the fifth vote, as the saying goes.

More here:

Bruen's Originalist Analogical Reasoning Applies A Presumption of Liberty - Reason

Construction continues on exciting campus additions, expansions Liberty News – Liberty University

With multiple construction projects underway over the summer, Liberty Universitys campus will soon see even more growth and activity as students dine, cheer on Flames Football, hone their athletic abilities, and engage in outdoor recreation activities at new and upcoming facilities.

With the steel structure erected and most of the concrete floors poured, the New Reber-Thomas dining facility is starting to take shape. A roof has been installed, allowing for the interior work to begin soon. The 120,000-square-foot, two-story structure, located between Residential Commons III and Liberty Lake, will offer 40% more interior space than the current Food Court at Reber-Thomas, with a peak capacity of 2,700 seats. The interior will bear a similar layout to the existing dining hall, featuring about 30 food stations across the venue that will offer a wide array of menu items, including an allergen-free room, a front-facing bake shop in the dessert area (including a gluten-free bake shop), and exhibition kitchen station for hosting cooking classes for students. Plans call for more booths, small and large table configurations, window seating overlooking the Academic Lawn and Liberty Lake, as well as a downstairs seating area. The main level will feature a couple fireplaces. The project is on schedule and should be ready to receive the equipment from the Food Court at Reber-Thomas starting in May. A grand opening is planned for the Fall 2023 semester.

The gaming room currently on the second floor of the Montview Student Union will be moved to the lower level of the New Reber-Thomas, giving students another activity option while visiting. Options in the gaming room include billiards tables, ping pong tables, chess/checkers gaming tables, electronic gaming stations, and foosball and air hockey tables.

Upgrades to the south end zone at Williams Stadium have continued on an aggressive schedule this summer in order to be ready for Flames Football home games this fall. Crews have been working seven days a week, and sometimes into the night, to expand seating options. They have graded the berm and added new retaining walls to allow for ground seating for students and overflow crowds. Workers will soon begin building the 23 cabana suites at the top of the section, each accommodating eight people and featuring a TV, fan, heater, and food service.

The new Liberty Multipurpose Center, an indoor facility that will benefit the universitys NCAA, club and intramural sports programs, is making steady progress. Some of the steel for the offices and restroom spaces has already been completed, and construction on the main field space for the center is expected to start next week. The center is scheduled to be completed by November, ahead of the winter weather. The 75,000-foot facility located near the Liberty Tennis Complex will be a major benefit to the baseball, softball, mens and womens soccer, and womens lacrosse programs. The surface will be versatile for many sports.

The Hydaway Lake expansion project, which will grow the lake near the Hydaway Outdoor Center from 6 to 31 acres, continues on Liberty Mountain. A road has been relocated and crews have begun building a new dam. Once the dam is built, they will begin clearing the balance of the new lake bed (extending to the cleared areas north of the lake shown above) and start the process of filling the new lake area this fall. In addition to swimming, fishing, kayaking, canoeing, and paddle boarding, which are available to all students, the lake could also serve student-athletes from the Intramural Sports, Club Sports, and NCAA Division I Athletics teams.

Coming in 2023, the new Jerry Falwell Center, to be built directly behind and attached to the Hancock Welcome Center, will give students and guests an immersive look at the faith, vision, and purpose of the university. Through the latest entertainment technology and interactive displays, students will be inspired by the institutions spiritual heritage and learn how the original mission, Training Champions for Christ, is still being carried out today with biblically based academic excellence. Construction is scheduled to begin this summer.

Approved in April, two new elevators will be added to the front side of the South Tower that will provide the students with much faster service to its six floors.

Link:

Construction continues on exciting campus additions, expansions Liberty News - Liberty University

Chicago Bulls Reportedly Add Javon Freeman-Liberty and Perrion Callandret to Summer League Roster – bleachernation.com

The Bulls made a pair of additions to their Summer League roster over the weekend, and one of them has me pretty excited. Javon Freeman-Liberty, or simply JFL as we DePaul fans know him, is heading to Vegas with the Bulls in July.

Freeman-Liberty is a Chicago kid and that worked out pretty well for the Bulls last season when they drafted hometown kid Ayo Dosunmu in the second round of the NBA Draft who played his high school ball at Whitney Young on Chicagos West Side. JFL spent two seasons at Valpo before transferring to DePaul.

During his junior season at DePaul, JFL led the Big East in scoring with 7 points per game and was eighth in the nation in scoring. Freeman-Liberty was named to the All-Big East Second Team, and the six-foot-four guard pulled down an impressive 7.3 rebounds per contest for the Blue Demons while shooting 48 percent from the floor and 36.8 percent from three.

JFLs uncle Marcus, who was drafted in the second round of the 1990 NBA Draft by the Denver Nuggets, tweeted a video of Javon working out at McGrath-Phillips Arena on the DePaul campus as he prepares for the Summer League in a few weeks.

The Bulls also added guard Perrion Callandret, a member of Windy City Bulls in the past and one of Zach LaVines best friends, to the Summer League roster.

Perrion Callandret played 28 games for the Bulls G-League squad last season and averaged 4.1 points, 3.4 assists, and 2.4 rebounds in 20 minutes per contest.

Continue reading here:

Chicago Bulls Reportedly Add Javon Freeman-Liberty and Perrion Callandret to Summer League Roster - bleachernation.com

Puma and Liberty Team Celebrate Women’s Soccer in Latest Clothing Collaboration – The Source Magazine

PUMA and Liberty have released the third chapter of the PUMA x Liberty collection.

The collection honors the force that women contribute to the admirable game of soccer. The companies have reinvented ideas of conventional football design to commemorate a new era of womens engagement and spectatorship in the sport by fusing PUMAs history in the game and Libertys position in fashion and art.

The PUMA x Liberty line mixes Libertys signature flower patterns and a Liberty football insignia with traditional football silhouettes, including jerseys, shorts, and tracksuits, to celebrate football culture freshly and inclusively.

The newest PUMA x Liberty line is a part of the companys She Moves Us initiative, which aims to support, uplift, and encourage women.

Products are currently on sale at PUMA.com, with additional styles debuting throughout the summer. Prices range from $55 to $220. You can see the collection below.

See the rest here:

Puma and Liberty Team Celebrate Women's Soccer in Latest Clothing Collaboration - The Source Magazine

Ehrhard: Liberty, freedom score wins at the Supreme Court – Boston Herald

The United States Supreme Court in dramatic fashion fired two shots in the defense of liberty and freedom last week. In two historic decisions, the High Court confirmed that the Second Amendment guarantees individuals the right to carry a weapon outside of their home and that the issue of abortion should be decided by the people and not by judicial fiat. Massachusetts current gun regulation structure is effectively dead and the issue of abortion can now be waged at the ballot box instead of the courts.

The significance of these two decisions cannot be understated. For nearly half a century, the Democratic Party imposed its liberal social agenda through the use of the courts because it was been unable to secure victories through elections. The progressive desire to change society included weakening the role of the Second Amendment and allowing unfettered lack of consequence for individual sexual choice. The Supreme Court stopped the progressive effort on those two fronts last week.

In New York State Rifle & Pistol Association Inc. v. Bruen, Justice Clarence Thomass opinion stated that the Second and 14th Amendments protect an individuals right to carry a handgun for self-defense outside the home. This would seem to be obvious from the text of the Second Amendment but progressive Democrats tend not to be bothered by textually specific requirements. But the Supreme Court does care about constitutional text and, therefore, New Yorks law requiring that applicants justify their need for a concealed-weapons permit is unconstitutional. In the clearest terms, the Court stated that the Second Amendment demands that a state shall issue gun permits, including concealed ones, not may.

Massachusetts entire gun regulation system is seemingly now unconstitutional. Indeed, the Court specifically called into question the Commonwealths gun regime. You could live in the rural town of Oakham out near the Quabbin and get a permit from the police chief without any effort but it is nearly impossible to get one in Boston or its suburbs. The Second Amendment is not controlled by the whims of a particular towns police chief and the Supreme Court has affirmed this fact.

In an earthquake of a decision, the Supreme Court overturned the 50-year precedent of Roe v Wade guaranteeing a so-called Constitutional right to abortion. In Dobbs v. Jackson Womens Health Organization, the Court stated the obvious. Justice Samuel Alito, writing for the Court, opined that The Constitution makes no reference to abortion, and no such right is implicitly protected by any constitutional provision. It is time to heed the Constitution and return the issue of abortion to the peoples elected representatives.

The issue of abortion now will be resolved where it always belonged, in the hands of the voters and their elected representatives. Although Massachusetts seemingly is a pro-abortion state, opponents of abortion can now make their case through the electoral process and change hearts and minds and votes.

The greatest irony is that we can thank the Democrats and the far-left former Senator Harry Reid from Nevada for these two opinions when he ended the filibuster for appellate court nominees in 2013. Republican senate leader Mitch McConnell warned Reid that he would regret it. Well Donald Trump and his three Supreme Court appointments proved McConnell right.

It is indeed a good week for the cause of liberty and freedom in America and Massachusetts.

James P. Ehrhard is a writer whose columns have appeared in the Wall Street Journal, Washington Examiner, Boston Herald, Lowell Sun, Worcester Telegram, Springfield Republican and other publications. He is the owner and manager of the Worcester law firm Ehrhard & Associates.

Read more from the original source:

Ehrhard: Liberty, freedom score wins at the Supreme Court - Boston Herald

Dobbs V Jackson Is An Attack On Liberty & Men Can’t Afford To Be Silent – STYLECASTER

Scroll To See More Images

Men,

I just finished reading the most disturbing attack of my lifetime on individual liberty in America, and an astonishing abuse of power that further undermines our constitutional system at a precarious moment for our democracy. If you havent fully readDobbs v. Jackson Womens Health Organization, you should.

As an attorney who studied constitutional law, I am appalled. As a veteran who pledged to support and defend the Constitution, I am appalled. As a son, boyfriend, nephew, cousin, friend and ally, I am appalled. Make no mistake, Fridays Supreme Court decision reversing Roe and Casey not only eviscerated a core right of millions of women, it shook the very foundation of every Americans freedom from government intervention in our bodily autonomy and private lives.

The Supreme Courts opinion is based on only one substantive argument: If abortion was not permitted in 1868 (when the Fourteenth Amendment was ratified), it cannot be among the various unenumerated constitutionally protected rights. Ask yourself if you are OK with living under an 1868 definition of Liberty?

In 1868 there was also no constitutional protection from forced sterilization and no right to marry whomever you choose. Women had no right to vote, serve on juries, or choose their profession. Not all women were permitted to own property, hold a passport, or even wear pants. It is not surprising that the men who held office in 1868 defined personal liberty very differently than we do today, as their definition of a person did not fully include women or men of color.

Much of this law has changed over the past 150 years because the nature of a constitution is to accommodate the evolving views of a progressing society. Lets be clear, the Courts decision in Dobbs was not a result of consistent interpretation of constitutional law; it was deceptive advocacy of the personal policy preferences of four Justices (Justice Thomas concurrence was not deceptive, but rather horrifyingly honest).

The legal concept of substantive due process protects each of us from government interference in certain aspects of our personal lives, from the state depriving us of liberty. The Supreme Courts binding rationale and Justice Thomas explicit concurrence militate against continued application of substantive due process, putting at risk our liberty to marry who we love, raise our children as we choose, control our bodies as we wish, and maintain the privacy we currently take for granted. Dont be fooledthe effect of Fridays decision is not limited to state control of abortion access (although that alone has devastating implications)the rights of every American are less secure today than last week. We are now less free.

Are you OK living under an 1868 definition of Liberty?

I am equally disturbed by the continued degradation of critical norms underlying our system of government, which this decision reflects and accelerates. Every judge and attorney in the country understands the importance of judicial restraint and the essential principle ofstare decisis(the adherence to judicial precedent). Although sometimes a frustrating drag on progress,stare decisispromotes stability in our society by ensuring laws are consistently and reliably applied, favoring incremental advancement over radical change. It is a principle typically championed most fervently by conservative jurists. And it is sorely needed in todays polarized America.

In his 2018 confirmation hearing under oath before Congress, Justice Kavanaugh stated:my position as a judge is that there are 45 years of precedent and there is Planned Parenthood v. Casey, which reaffirmed Roe, so that is precedent on precedent, as I have explained, and that is important. And that is an important precedent of the Supreme Court.Despite these statements, less than four years later and with no change in law or fact to support a different view, Justice Kavanaugh voted to directly overturn Roe and Casey, calling them egregiously wrong. This brazen departure fromstare decisisis a devastating blow to the principle of judicial restraint and jeopardized the legitimacy of the Supreme Court.

A stable and credible legal system requires that Justices demonstrate humility and deference to existing Supreme Court rulings. Issues already decided by a prior Court are generally not within the purview of present Justices to reconsider. However, five Justices in Fridays Dobbs majority simply believed that they were right and that the seven Justices who originally decided Roe v. Wade, and the majority of Justices who reaffirmed Roe in Planned Parenthood v. Casey, were wrong. It is exceedingly arrogant to call a decision egregiously wrong when two prior majorities and four present Justices voted to uphold it. Will a future liberal-leaning Court, perhaps no longer feeling bound by precedent, simply reverse course again on abortion, gun rights, and a variety of other issues that conservatives hold dear?

The Dobbs decision clearly indicates they could. Justices Alito, Gorsuch, Barrett, Thomas, and Kavanaugh displayed a hubris and disdain for the rule of law that seriously degrades the credibility of the Supreme Court. The threat they pose to the judiciary and our system of government transcends policy preference. It will require a tremendous sense of duty and integrity from future Justices to reestablish the judicial norms trampled by the Dobbs Court, as well as significant structural reforms imposed by Congress.

Anyone claiming that this issue is simply about saving unborn babies is being intellectually dishonest.

It will take a supermajority in Congress, committed first and foremost to reforming and strengthening our nations institutions, to reestablish a functional government in America that is committed to constitutional principles and democratic norms. It will take a majority of citizens in each state to ensure that womennot old white mendetermine what decision is best for their health and well-being if they become pregnant. It will take your vote, and my vote, and the vote of every person we know, in every local, state, and federal election for the foreseeable future, to protect the women in our lives from the horrors their mothers and grandmothers faced 50 and 150 years ago.

Reproductive and other core rights central to personal dignity and autonomy have long been under attack. On Friday, a powerful shield was blown off and the Supreme Court placed the burden on us to protect those rights with our voices and our votes. As always, the most vulnerable in our society are most at riskdisproportionately low-income women of color, who are over three times more likely to die during pregnancy. Eight states have trigger laws in effect banning abortion with no exception for rape or incest. In Arkansas, Kentucky, Louisiana, Missouri, Oklahoma, South Dakota, Tennessee and Texas, a fourteen-year-old girl who is raped by her father and becomes pregnant will be forced to give birth. Those states are not protecting children. They are perpetrating a gross injustice. It is disgusting.

Anyone claiming that this issue is simply about saving unborn babies is being intellectually dishonest. It is an oversimplification that ignores the difficult considerations women face when they must decide between ending a pregnancy (often one they wanted) and preserving their own life or wellbeing. No state legislature, no politician sitting in a faraway capital, neither you nor I, is in a better position to make that decision than the woman who faces the reality of it and must live with the consequences. Respect for individual autonomy is the crux of liberty.

Balancing individual liberty against the states majoritarian interest is among the most fundamental roles entrusted to the Supreme Court. It abdicated that responsibility on Friday, and so it is now our duty to use the power of the majority to protect our rights to align democracy and liberty once again.

If your general commitment to liberty and justice is insufficient, do it for your sister or daughter; do it for your aunt or niece. One of them has had an abortion or soon will. Or do it so you dont have to pay 18 years of child support due to a one night stand. This is not just a womens issue. This is about the rights of every American. It is the responsibility of every man. This is about you.

Link:

Dobbs V Jackson Is An Attack On Liberty & Men Can't Afford To Be Silent - STYLECASTER

Avon beach nourishment will continue north towards the pier; Liberty Island dredge will arrive after July 4 – Island Free Press

Aerial image of construction in Avon, courtesy of Coastal Science & Engineering.

Contractor Great Lakes Dredge & Dock Co. has announced that, due to the significant amount of progress that has been made since the project began in Avon on Sunday, June 19, 2022, beach nourishment operationshave not been pausedin order to begin work in Buxton.

After evaluating the project schedule, the company hasdecided to allow the dredgeEllis Islandto continue pumping sand along the beach heading north toward the Avon Pieruntil the dredge reaches its production limit from the current landing point.

Once that production limit has been reached, theEllis Islandwill be released from Avon and will move downshore to begin performing beach nourishment in Buxton.

When theEllis Islandmoves from Avon to Buxton, the Avon beach nourishment project will be paused until a second dredge, theLiberty Island, arrives in Dare County after the Fourth of July. At that time, beach nourishment operations will resume in Avon using theLiberty Island.

For more information about the Avon and Buxton beach nourishment projectsincluding a detailed project map that indicates the areas of the shoreline in Avon that have been completed as well as those that are currently under constructionclick here.

ORV Ramp 38 Reminder:

Throughout this summer, Cape Hatteras National Seashores off-road vehicle (ORV) Ramp 38 will remain open, but visitors with beach driving permits can expect some intermittent, short-term delays entering and exiting the ramp as beach nourishment equipment is moved safely to and from the beach.

Although the ramp will remain open, the parking lot at ORV Ramp 38 will be closed this summer. Visitors who planned to park in the parking lot at ORV Ramp 38 should instead consider using nearby parking lots at Haulover Sound Access and Kite Point Sound Access.

Visitwww.MoreBeachToLove.comfor the latest information about all 2022 beach nourishment projects taking place in Dare County, including projected timelines and answers to the most frequently asked questions.

See the original post:

Avon beach nourishment will continue north towards the pier; Liberty Island dredge will arrive after July 4 - Island Free Press

The Roadmap for Pregnant Girls and Women to Assert Their Religious Liberty to Invalidate Abortion Bans – Justia Verdict

Following my online analysis of the Supreme Courts opinion overruling Roe v. Wade, Dobbs v. Jackson Womens Health, I heard from folks who were unperturbed by the fact that Dobbs is based on a religious belieflife begins at conceptionrather than a legal foundation. One man politely chastised me for my views and suggested that I need to be saved by Christ. When I responded that I am in fact a Christian who disagrees with his beliefs, he told me that, There is no such thing as TWO true Christianities. Another conversant urged me to take the spiritual approach, which would lead me to truly understand Dobbs and the bans on abortion.

Here was my response: With all the due respect required by the tolerance necessary to our democracy, I do not share your beliefs. Indeed, my faith rejects them. The Constitution is not supposed to be interpreted through one religious viewpoint. Here is irrefutable original intent: the Framers rejected a theocracy in favor of a democratic republic.

I tell these stories to highlight the danger the forces behind the theologically-driven Dobbs opinion are to our pluralist democracy and religious diversity. Most Americans have been gas-lit by the religious right to cower from declaring our own beliefs. At the same time, their fellow believers have been persuaded that constitutional rights should rest on their religious beliefs. Their persistent labeling of their beliefs as religious and everyone elses as secular has led millions of Americans to think that this has been a culture war between true believers and religious outsiders. Thats a lie. Its never been a culture warits a religious war. Tragically, only the right has understood that. Until now.

In fact, those who disagree with the religious right on abortion are also religious, whether explicitly or simply as part of the persons religious worldview. They just dont believe what the pro-life believers and a majority of the Justices do. Its time for the majority of Americans to insist that their beliefs and religious worldviews be recognized in the courts on the abortion issue, and others as well.

In a rich irony, the pathway for pregnant girls and women to obtain an abortion in the abortion ban states is through the statutes that have been central to the religious rights religious war against civil rights: the Religious Freedom Restoration Acts (RFRAs). There is a federal RFRA that applies to federal law and Washington, DC, and there are 24 RFRAs in the states. I am no fan of the RFRAs, as explained in my book, God vs. the Gavel: The Perils of Extreme Religious Liberty, but I will leave those arguments aside to focus on how they can be turned into a weapon for the girls and women whose rights to bodily autonomy have been summarily dissolved by the Supreme Court.

The Court majority has made a severe miscalculation by believing what its hearing in its own echo chamber: a goal of complete elimination of abortion in every state is legitimate and possible and their religious beliefs are appropriately at the center of that universe. But that scheme is directly in opposition to millions of believers. A world without a choice on abortion is a world in violation of the free exercise of millions of believers.

The RFRA advocates have made it as broad as possible, which will enable the pregnant to argue in RFRA cases on the basis of their broad religious worldview. Why? Because the beliefs that trigger RFRA protection need not be central to a faith tradition. According to the federal RFRA, which is the model for all the others: RFRA applies to all sincerely held religious beliefs, whether or not central to, or mandated by, a particular religious organization or tradition. You read that right: RFRA protects tangential beliefs that are part of a religious worldview, not beliefs cataloged in anyones Bible, Koran, or Torah. Those invoking these extreme religious liberty statutes in the public health and the land use context have not bothered to tether their beliefs to anything concrete or historically provable. Its simply what they believe now.

Heres the irony: the abortion ban states map onto the RFRA states pretty neatly. While the numbers are in some flux, right now my research indicates that there are 16 states where a pregnant girl or woman would have the weapon of a RFRA to obtain an abortion against a ban. The following map shows the states where there is a RFRA and those states where there are partial or full abortion bans or likely bans. The stripes show the states that have both a RFRA and a ban. Note the overlap!

The RFRAs hand a believer a weapon: a private right of action to invalidate a law that burdens their faith. When it comes to abortion, there are a variety of beliefs by denomination, as the Pew Research Center documented here and here. But, of course, the First Amendment is not limited to the beliefs of organized religions. Each of us has an absolute right to believe whatever we choose and to invoke religious liberty based on our individual beliefs.

Here is the RFRA roadmap: First, the believer must prove that a law imposes a substantial burden and sometimes just a burden on their faith. Once they succeed, the burden of proof shifts to the government to show that the law under attack serves a compelling interest in the least restrictive means for that believer. Here is how the arguments break down:

Proving substantial burden. There was a time when the believer was required to actually prove a substantial burden on their faith. Incidental burdens did not justify invoking religious liberty protections. Thats still true for the First Amendment, but not for RFRA. The Supreme Court in the RFRA case, Burwell v. Hobby Lobby Stores, watered down the substantial burden requirement, and that is persuasive authority for the state RFRAs. So it shouldnt be difficult to prove that an abortion ban or partial ban substantially burdens a belief in obtaining abortion medical care.

What Is a Compelling Interest. To defend an abortion ban, the state must show that banning abortion serves a compelling interest. It will be interesting to see how the states do this. Will they argue that the ban serves a compelling interest, because life begins at conception? A court cannot take their religious assertions as fact. If states were to pursue that path, they would be arguing that the governments beliefs can overcome their citizens beliefs. By definition, they would be arguing that their compelling interest is to establish a theocracy.

Can the state show that there is a compelling interest that serves the economy? No way, because banning abortion costs the state billions in economic losses as women are removed from the workforce while they carry compelled pregnancies, are medically disabled, or die. It also results in a dramatic decrease in future thriving for girls when they are forced to carry a fetus, including negative impacts on health, education, and livelihood. Will the states argue they have a compelling interest in letting a woman die and be permanently disabled? Or for a girl to carry a pregnancy imposed on her by her incestuous father? I kind of feel sorry for the state attorneys general trying to defend these laws.

What would be the least restrictive means. This is the element that offers opportunities for imagination. Lets say the abortion ban criminalizes abortion; a fine is a lot less restrictive than criminalization. But thats not the least restrictive means for the girl or woman who believes in the protection of a mothers health or life through abortion medical treatment. The least restrictive is to invalidate the ban and permit her to obtain the medical treatment she believes is required as a matter of her religious worldview. Think about how some have argued against vaccine mandates using the federal RFRAthey say that their faith protects their right to bodily autonomy against vaccines and, therefore, the government may not enforce the mandate against them. The least restrictive means for them is to block the mandate. Similarly, the ban on abortion medical procedures violates many womens faith that they should not die from pregnancy, or a parents faith that their daughter should not be forced to give birth to a rapists child, or a girls religious conviction that God put her on earth to achieve greatness in her chosen field of study and not to carry an unplanned pregnancy to term. Those beliefs are not secular; they are grounded in their religious worldviews and, therefore, must be accommodated through RFRA.

Attorneys fees. Practically speaking, attorneys fees are the most important element in these cases. Like the federal RFRA, the state RFRAs (except for Kentucky and Tennessee), provide for attorneys fees to the prevailing party. That incentivizes lawyers to take these cases, even pro bono. The prospect of attorneys fees at the end is sufficient for many a lawyer to get started.

I expect lawyers in the abortion RFRA cases may follow the pattern set by the attorneys who represent believers in other RFRA and RLUIPA (the federal law that provides the same high standard for religious landowners) cases: When such a lawsuit is filed, the government is under threat of having to pay attorneys fees on both sides, so there are strong incentives to settle and get rid of the case. While the RFRA formula normally requires the party to prevail to obtain fees, most settlements include attorneys fees even if the plaintiff wasnt going to win. In short, the claimant in a RFRA suit need not prevail to get attorneys fees; they often just need to file. That will attract attorneys and make it possible for claimants to vindicate their rights under the RFRA without paying.

One last note: We havent seen anti-abortion believers filing RFRA lawsuits against abortion choice laws. Thats because abortion choice laws do not burden their faith. They dont force them to undergo an abortion. They can still choose to die or be permanently disabled if they have an at-risk pregnancy or to carry a fetus to term that will die upon birth. Their free exercise is accommodated by choice and the bans.

For everyone else, abortion bans deny their free exercise rights to choose abortion under their own religious lights. To be precise: only abortion choice accommodates all religious believers.

Continued here:

The Roadmap for Pregnant Girls and Women to Assert Their Religious Liberty to Invalidate Abortion Bans - Justia Verdict