GUIDING THE FUTURE OF SPACEFLIGHT SAFETY (Aerospace Corp.), Oct 20, 2022, virtual, 1:00 pm ET – SpacePolicyOnline.com

Posted on by

The Aerospace Corporation will hold the next in its Space Policy Show webinar series on October 20, 2022 at 1:00 pm ET.

The topic is: Guiding the Future of Spaceflight Safety.

More information is on the events website, which says:

More traffic on the road means more rules to protect drivers the same is true for the space domain. With more actors, larger constellations, and expanding human space flight there needs to be greater attention to safety in space if we are to continue reaping benefits from space.The Aerospace Corporations Space Safety Institutehas issued a collection of research and writings that encompass: space situational awareness, launch and reenty, cyber security and spectrum allocation, and human space flight. This episode features expertsSamira PatelandDr Josef Kollerdiscussing the Space Safety Compendium, and special appearances from our deeply knowledgeable Aerospace experts.

Contributing Aerospace Experts:Uma BruegmanSpace Safety Institute, LeadAsst GM, Civil Systems Group

Marlon SorgeTechnical FellowSpace Innovations Directorate

Lori GordonSystems DirectorCorporation Chief Engineers Office

Rob UnverzagtPrincipal DirectorLaunch Systems Division

Dr Angie BukleyTechnical FellowCenter for Space Policy & Strategy

Original post:

GUIDING THE FUTURE OF SPACEFLIGHT SAFETY (Aerospace Corp.), Oct 20, 2022, virtual, 1:00 pm ET - SpacePolicyOnline.com

Indian supply chain of GE Aerospace grows, focus on Make in India – The Financial Express

Posted on by

The US based GE Aerospaces Indian aero-engine supply chain has expanded with 13 companies and its Pune multi-modal manufacturing facility. This announcement was made ahead of the DefExpo 2022 which is starting in Gandhinagar from October 18.

The expo this year is expected to be inaugurated by Prime Minister Narendra Modi on Wednesday (October 19, 2022).

Several Indian companies including Godrej, Tata Advanced Systems, Mahindra Aerostructure have set up GE aero-engine component production lines. And the components for the companys engine manufacturing facilities are exported from India. Also, Hindustan Aeronautics has already set up an assembly line for GEs LM2500 marine engine and this is powering Indias first indigenous aircraft carrier INS Vikrant which was recently commissioned in the Indian Navy.

The company has been present in India since 1902 and today, almost 19,000 of its employees based in India are already working R&D, product design, project execution, services and manufacturing. The company also has 14 own or joint venture manufacturing units here in the country.

With these growing capabilities there has been a significant increase in GE Aerospaces local sourcing spend, which in the last five years has grown almost 20 times. To help India achieve its self-reliance goals, GE Aerospace and its Indian partners are in the process of establishing the aero-engine manufacturing infrastructure.

Also Read: Lockheed Martin & Garuda Aerospace collaborate on UAS Solutions

Highlighting Indian companies willingness to partner with GE Aerospace and also to join the aero-engine marketplace,Youngje Kim, Vice President, Sales for Asia at GEs military aviation division says that the Indian companies have shown their ability to master complex process and manufacturing in aero-engine manufacturing.

In an effort to support the growing aero-engine manufacturing base in India, GE Aerospace is pursuing an aggressive skill development programme workforce in the manufacturing sector.

According to a company statement, over the past two years, under this programme more than 150 manufacturing staff have been trained at the various partner organizations. And these trained workers have managed to get employed with one of several suppliers of the company in India.

According to Kim, GEs Indian skill development programme when combined with our growing Indian industrial base is a testament to our support of Make in India, added Kim.

Also Read: DefExpo2022 to focus on Invest for Defence

Around 1000 of aviation researchers and engineers of GE work in India and they have deep connections with major academic institutions in the country.

The companys supply chain has Indian partners including:IndoMIM Tec, Maini Precision Products, Recaero, Tata Advanced Systems, Tata Advanced Materials, HAL Foundry & Forge, Mahindra Aerostructures, Godrej & Boyce, HAL Foundry & Forge, Tata Sikorsky Aerospace, Azad Engineering Raghu Vamsi, Ankit Aerospace and Sundaram Fasteners.

Read more from the original source:

Indian supply chain of GE Aerospace grows, focus on Make in India - The Financial Express

Gulfstream G700 test aircraft to embark on world tour – Aerospace Testing International

Posted on by

Gulfstream is sending two of its G700 production test aircraft on a world tour to showcase the business jet to customers.

After appearing at the 2022 NBAA-BACE (Business Aviation Convention and Exhibition)event in Orlando, Florida the aircraft will go to South America, Europe, Africa, Asia and Australia as well as events including the Future Investment Initiative in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia; the Bahrain International Airshow; and the Middle East & North Africa Business Aviation Association (MEBAA) Show in Dubai.

Mark Burns, president of Gulfstream said, These outfitted G700 aircraft currently flying feature two of the most stunning interiors in business aviation. After being on display for the industry at NBAA-BACE in Orlando, Florida, the G700 will fly to major events and private showings across 20 cities and six continents as part of our efforts to give customers direct access to the aircraft.

The strategic route of the G700 world tour reflects the strong demand we are seeing in established markets, such as Europe and the Middle East, and in growing markets for us, including Southeast Asia, India and Africa.

The first fully outfitted G700 production test aircraft flew in April 2021 and was joined by the second outfitted aircraft last month.

Gulfstream engineers pass the interior through thousands of test points and flight hours.

The G700 is powered by Rolls-Royce Pearl 700 engines and can fly at its high-speed cruise of Mach 0.90 for 6,400 nautical miles (11,853km) or at its long-range cruise of Mach 0.85 for 7,500 nautical miles (13,890 km).

More:

Gulfstream G700 test aircraft to embark on world tour - Aerospace Testing International

Study looking at human genetics and Covid vaccine immune responses – Science Media Centre

Posted on by

October 13, 2022

Scientists at the University of Oxford have carried out a study to investigate whether and how peoples genes influence how strong an immune response they mount after vaccination with either the Oxford-AstraZeneca or Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine.

The study has been published in Nature Medicine.

The scientists analysed DNA samples from 1,190 participants whod enrolled in the University of Oxfords COVID-19 vaccine clinical trials, as well as from 1,677 adults who had enrolled on the Com-COV research programme, and from children who had participated in clinical trials for the Oxford-AstraZeneca vaccine.

Journalists dialled in to this briefing to hear from the scientists who did the study discuss aspects such as:

which genes in people determine how well their immune system responds to Covid vaccination?

which bits of the immune system seem to respond differently with different versions of these genes?

are there certain populations that tend to have specific versions of these genes?

what is the normal role of these genes?

are there implications?

Speakers included:

Prof Julian Knight, Professor of Genomic Medicine, Wellcome Centre for Human Genetics, University of Oxford

Dr Alexander Mentzer, Group Leader at the Wellcome Centre for Human Genetics, University of Oxford, and an Infectious Disease doctor

Dr Daniel OConnor, University Research Lecturer and Senior Bioinformatician, Oxford Vaccine Group, University of Oxford

This Briefing was accompanied by an SMC Roundup of comments.

Read more from the original source:

Study looking at human genetics and Covid vaccine immune responses - Science Media Centre

A saturated map of common genetic variants associated with human height – Nature.com

Posted on by

Institute for Molecular Bioscience, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia

Loc Yengo,Julia Sidorenko,Yang Wu,Jian Yang&Peter M. Visscher

Division of Endocrinology, Boston Childrens Hospital, Boston, MA, USA

Sailaja Vedantam,Eric Bartell,Jenkai Miao&Joel N. Hirschhorn

Program in Medical and Population Genetics, Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, MA, USA

Sailaja Vedantam,Eric Bartell,Saori Sakaue,Jenkai Miao,Ronen E. Mukamel,George Hindy,Masahiro Kanai,Richa Saxena,Wei Zhou,Philip L. De Jager,Amit V. Khera,Samuli Ripatti,Cecilia M. Lindgren&Po-Ru Loh

William Harvey Research Institute, Barts and the London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK

Eirini Marouli,Olga Giannakopoulou,Stavroula Kanoni,Ioanna Ntalla,Julia Ramirez,Helen R. Warren,Mark J. Caulfield,Patricia B. Munroe&Panos Deloukas

Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA

Eric Bartell,Brian E. Cade,Saiju Pyarajan,Julie E. Buring,Paul L. Huang,Susan Redline,Paul M. Ridker,Daniel I. Chasman&Christopher J. ODonnell

Laboratory for Statistical Analysis, RIKEN Center for Integrative Medical Sciences, Yokohama, Japan

Saori Sakaue,Masato Akiyama,Masahiro Kanai,Yoichiro Kamatani&Yukinori Okada

Department of Statistical Genetics, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka, Japan

Saori Sakaue,Masahiro Kanai&Yukinori Okada

Divisions of Genetics and Rheumatology, Brigham and Womens Hospital and Department of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA

Saori Sakaue

Department of Epidemiology, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA

Marielisa Graff,Heather H. Highland,Rebecca Rohde,Yvonne M. Golightly,Anne E. Justice,Kari E. North&Kristin L. Young

COPSAC, Copenhagen Prospective Studies on Asthma in Childhood, Herlev and Gentofte Hospital, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark

Anders U. Eliasen,Hans Bisgaard&Klaus Bnnelykke

Section for Bioinformatics, Department of Health Technology, Technical University of Denmark, Copenhagen, Denmark

Anders U. Eliasen

23andMe, Sunnyvale, CA, USA

Yunxuan Jiang,Gabriel Cuellar-Partida,Jingchunzi Shi,Gabriel Cuellar Partida&Adam Auton

Department of Veterans Affairs, Eastern Colorado Healthcare System, Aurora, CO, USA

Sridharan Raghavan

Division of Biomedical Informatics and Personalized Medicine, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, USA

Sridharan Raghavan

Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, Rockville, MD, USA

Joshua D. Arias,Moara Machado,Shengchao A. Li,Stephen J. Chanock,Stephen Chanock&Sonja I. Berndt

Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Cardiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA

Sarah E. Graham,Whitney E. Hornsby,Tori L. Melendez&Cristen J. Willer

Division of Genetics, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Womens Hospital, Boston, MA, USA

Ronen E. Mukamel&Po-Ru Loh

Department of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA

Ronen E. Mukamel,Josep M. Mercader&Po-Ru Loh

Department of Genetics, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA

Cassandra N. Spracklen,Laura M. Raffield&Karen L. Mohlke

Department of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, School of Public Health and Health Sciences, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, MA, USA

Cassandra N. Spracklen

Department of Biostatistics and Center for Statistical Genetics, University of Michigan School of Public Health, Ann Arbor, MI, USA

Xianyong Yin,Anne U. Jackson,Anita Pandit,Laura J. Scott,Michael Boehnke&Goncalo R. Abecasis

Department of Biostatistics and Data Science, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC, USA

Shyh-Huei Chen

Big Data Institute, Li Ka Shing Centre for Health Information and Discovery, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK

Teresa Ferreira&Cecilia M. Lindgren

Genetics of Complex Traits, College of Medicine and Health, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK

Yingjie Ji,Timothy M. Frayling&Andrew R. Wood

Center for Health Data Science, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark

Tugce Karaderi

Wellcome Centre for Human Genetics, Nuffield Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK

Tugce Karaderi,Anuj Goel,Anubha Mahajan,Nigel W. Rayner,Hugh Watkins,Mark I. McCarthy&Cecilia M. Lindgren

Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK

Kuang Lin,Deborah E. Malden,Zammy Fairhurst-Hunter,Jun Liu,Iona Y. Millwood,Zhengming Chen,Cornelia M. van Duijn&Robin G. Walters

Institute of Genomics, Estonian Genome Centre, University of Tartu, Tartu, Estonia

Kreete Lll,Katri Prna,Reedik Mgi,Andres Metspalu&Tnu Esko

Department of Internal Medicine, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands

Carolina Medina-Gomez,Andre G. Uitterlinden,Nathalie Van der Velde&Fernando Rivadeneira

Division of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, RTI International, Durham, NC, USA

Amy Moore

Center for Primary Care and Public Health, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland

Sina Reger,Aaron F. McDaid&Zoltan Kutalik

Swiss Institute of Bioinformatics, Lausanne, Switzerland

Sina Reger,Aaron F. McDaid&Zoltan Kutalik

Saw Swee Hock School of Public Health, National University of Singapore and National University Health System, Singapore, Singapore

Xueling Sim,Jin-Fang Chai,Rob M. van Dam&E. Shyong Tai

Department of Psychology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA

Scott Vrieze,Hannah Young,William G. Iacono&Matt McGue

Steno Diabetes Center Copenhagen, Herlev, Denmark

Tarunveer S. Ahluwalia

Department of Biology, The Bioinformatics Center, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark

Tarunveer S. Ahluwalia

Department of Ophthalmology, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Japan

Masato Akiyama

Department of Family Medicine, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA

Matthew A. Allison

Department of Human Genetics, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, USA

Marcus Alvarez&Pivi Pajukanta

Novo Nordisk Foundation Center for Basic Metabolic Research, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark

Mette K. Andersen,Jette Bork-Jensen,Anette P. Gjesing,Anna Jonsson,Niels Grarup,Torben Hansen,Oluf Pedersen&Ruth J. F. Loos

Department of Epidemiology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands

Alireza Ani,Ilja M. Nolte,Katri Prna,Peter J. van der Most,Tian Xie,Harold Snieder&Judith M. Vonk

Department of Bioinformatics, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran

Alireza Ani

Institute of Biological Psychiatry, Mental Health Services, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark

Vivek Appadurai,Thomas F. Hansen&Thomas M. Werge

Thurston Arthritis Research Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA

Liubov Arbeeva,Yvonne M. Golightly&Amanda E. Nelson

Genomic Research on Complex diseases (GRC-Group), CSIR-Centre for Cellular and Molecular Biology, Hyderabad, India

Seema Bhaskar,Suraj S. Nongmaithem,Divya Sri Priyanka Tallapragada&Giriraj R. Chandak

Department of Epidemiology, University of Michigan School of Public Health, Ann Arbor, MI, USA

Lawrence F. Bielak,Albert V. Smith,Jennifer A. Smith,Wei Zhao,Sharon L. R. Kardia&Patricia A. Peyser

Institute for Molecular Medicine Finland (FIMM), HiLIFE, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland

Sailalitha Bollepalli,Aki S. Havulinna,Sanni E. Ruotsalainen,Jaakko Kaprio,Samuli Ripatti,Tiinamaija Tuomi&Elisabeth Widen

Molecular Genetics Section, Center for Precision Health Research, National Human Genome Research Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA

Lori L. Bonnycastle&Francis S. Collins

Center for Applied Genomics, Childrens Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA, USA

Jonathan P. Bradfield,Struan F. A. Grant&Hakon Hakonarson

Quantinuum Research, Wayne, PA, USA

Jonathan P. Bradfield

Read the original:

A saturated map of common genetic variants associated with human height - Nature.com

Age vs. DNA: Which has more influence on how humans age? – Medical News Today

Posted on by

In 1952, Nobel-prize winner Dr. Peter Medawar put forward the hypothesis that aging processes may be a result of evolutions natural selection not having that much to say about people past their child-bearing years.

A new study finds fresh support for Medawars hypothesis in an analysis of how roughly 20,000 human genes are expressed as we age.

The study suggests that our genes are less of an influence as we get older.

Study senior author Dr. Peter Sudmant, assistant professor in integrative biology at the University of California Berkeley tells Berkeley News, Almost all human common diseases are diseases of aging: Alzheimers, cancers, heart disease, diabetes.

Massive amounts of public resources have gone into identifying genetic variants that predispose you to these diseases. What our study is showing is that, well, actually, as you get older, genes kind of matter less for your gene expression, says Sudmant.

The study is published in Nature Communications.

Dr. Sudmant summarized Medawars hypothesis for Medical News Today:

Genes that are turned on when we are young are more constrained by evolution because they are critical to making sure we survive to reproduce, while genes expressed after we reach reproductive age are under less evolutionary pressure.

Dr. Giuseppe Passarino, professor of genetics at the University of Calabria in Italy, who was not involved in the study, explained to MNT how this works:

It is evident that in order to have more children, you need to survive and to be fit [long enough to] reproduce yourself. To get this goal, you need to have no diseases while you are young, to be able to find food, to get a partner.

Genes which are expressed during the first part of your lifetime are highly selected, and then only the best ones survive. Dr. Giuseppe Passarino

Evolution is based on the fact that individuals who have better fitness have more children. Thus, their genotypes will spread in the population more than those of subjects who have [fewer] children, Dr. Passarino added.

The researchers retrieved gene expression data for 27 different types of body tissues in almost 950 people from the GTEx web portal. Individuals were categorized as young if they were less than 55 years of age, and old if they were 55 or over.

In their analysis, the researchers found that genetics exerts about the same amount of influence over gene expression in almost all of our tissues until we cross into the old bracket.

At that point, aging plays a much more influential role for five critical tissue types blood, colon, arteries, esophagus, and fat tissues than does genetics.

As an influence on gene expression in the study, aging refers to the universal, progressive cellular aging processes associated with advancing years.

In our study, we found in five high proliferation tissues (blood, colon, etc.), [that] these highly constrained genes are actually turned on late in life. These genes tend to be those that are involved in cell division and proliferation, and consequently, in cancer. Dr. Peter Sudmant

While it would theoretically be helpful if evolution would help select genes that keep us healthy even after we reproduce, according to Dr. Sudmant:

The limit of evolution here is that, late in life, you really should not have these sorts of genes turned on, and having them turned on actually makes you susceptible to cancer. However, because these are cell types in your body that need to keep turning over blood! there is no other option.

Hence, aging and environmental factors are more influential in gene expression for these critical tissues.

In the study, environmental influences include factors not directly associated with those processes: the quality of the air and water we breathe and eat, our diet, and also our level of physical exercise.

The study finds that environmental factors account for about a third of gene expression in older people.

This [study] does not imply that genetics is not important for aging. There are many studies showing that the similarities between relatives regarding the quality of aging (presence of diseases or inabilities) are very high. In fact, although the genes expressed later in life are not selected, still they are important for our life. Dr. Giuseppe Passarino

In other words, we are equipped with highly selected alleles for the first part of our life and with alleles [that] are less selected for the second part. However, in both cases, our phenotype is based on our genes, Dr. Passarino added.

According to Dr. Passarino, to better understand the complexity of how humans age and to learn how to slow down this process, researchers need to study the genes expressed later in life and improve them.

One option may be to see how the genetic machinery works in long-lived subjects, and try to modulate the machinery of others accordingly, said Dr. Passarino.

For instance, it has been observed that long-lived subjects have limited ability to use proteins or sugar. Thus, we can use a limited amount of proteins and sugar to modulate our organism machinery as if we were equipped with the same genes of long-lived subjects, he elaborated.

When we do studies to identify the genetics underlying disease, we often end up with many genes that we could potentially target. Our study now quantifies how age impacts the expression of genes in the population. We argue that age-associated genes might be better therapeutic targets than the ones that vary in their expression as a function of human genetics, Dr. Sudmant said.

We think that genes that show consistence in age-associated changes in expression in humans are potentially really interesting targets to follow up on! he concluded.

Read the original post:

Age vs. DNA: Which has more influence on how humans age? - Medical News Today

Nucleome Therapeutics raises oversubscribed 37.5 million Series A financing to decode the dark matter of the human genome and deliver first-in-class…

Posted on by

Nucleome Therapeutics raises oversubscribed 37.5 million Series A financing to decode the dark matter of the human genome and deliver first-in-class precision medicines

Oxford, UK, 19 October 2022 Nucleome Therapeutics Limited, (Nucleome or the Company), a biotechnology company decoding the dark matter of the human genome to discover first-in-class precision medicines, today announces it has closed an oversubscribed 37.5 million Series A financing round. The funds will be used to advance the Company's autoimmune disease programmes, fuel expansion of its dark genome atlas and further develop its pioneering platform.

The financing was led by new investor M Ventures, the strategic, corporate venture capital arm of Merck KGaA, with participation from Johnson and Johnson Innovation-JJDC, Inc. (JJDC), the strategic venture capital arm of Johnson & Johnson; Pfizer Ventures, the venture group of Pfizer; British Patient Capital, through its Future Fund: Breakthrough programme; and founding investor Oxford Science Enterprises.

Nucleome has the unique ability to discover and validate first-in-class targets through genetics, by investigating the dark region of the human genome, which does not encode for proteins but contains 90% of disease-associated genetic changes. Understanding the role of these genetic variants has been a long-standing challenge, hindering the translation of the human genome into useful drug discovery insights.

Nucleomes breakthrough platform combines pioneering 3D genome technology and machine learning to shed light on these variants by directly linking genes to diseases and mapping pathways with unprecedented precision for drug discovery.

We have already made significant progress by mapping genes to genetics in a number of human immune cell types and discovering the first wave of potential first-in-class autoimmune disease targets, said Dr Danuta Jeziorska, Chief Executive Officer and Co-founder of Nucleome Therapeutics. The completion of this oversubscribed round with such a high-calibre group of global life science investors is a recognition of the significance of Nucleomes platform and its potential to support the development of an exciting portfolio of first-in-class targets for autoimmune diseases.

Dr Bauke Anninga, Principal at M Ventures, commented: Nucleomes differentiated platform technology has the potential to fundamentally shift the way we discover and develop precision medicines. Unlocking the value of the largely unexplored territory of the genome can lead to the identification of high-value drug targets. Nucleomes platform adds 3D genomic information to a wealth of available genomic data, uncovering a new dimension of information that is disease as well as cell type-specific. We are excited to lead this financing, and alongside our co-investors, partner with Nucleomes exceptional team to advance their target and drug discovery programmes to bring transformative treatments to patients.

Dr Jonathan Hepple, Non-executive Director at Nucleome and Advisor to Oxford Science Enterprises, added:Since its founding in 2019, Nucleome has advanced to become a leader in 3D genomics analysis. Publications in high-impact journals have validated its groundbreaking technology and ability to identify new drug targets where other technologies fall short. With a highly experienced team, this fundraising, backed by an impressive syndicate of world-class investors, will allow Nucleome to explore the dark genome and develop its exciting pipeline of potential drug targets. Oxford Science Enterprises is proud to have supported the Company since its inception and continues to do so, and we look forward to working with the team through this exciting time of growth.

Ends

For more information, please contact:

Nucleome TherapeuticsDr Danuta Jeziorska, Chief Executive Officer & Foundercontact@nucleome.com

Consilium Strategic CommunicationsMary-Jane Elliott/Sukaina Virji/Stella Lempidaki Nucleome@consilium-comms.com

About Nucleome Therapeutics Nucleome Therapeutics is decoding the dark matter of the human genome to uncover novel ways to treat disease. The dark genome holds more than 90% of disease-linked genetic variants whose value remains untapped, representing a significant opportunity for drug discovery and development. The Company has the unique ability to link these variants to gene function and precisely map disease pathways. Nucleomes cell type-specific platform creates high resolution 3D genome structure maps and enables variant functional validation at scale in primary cell types, enabling the discovery and development of novel, better and safer drugs. The initial focus of the company is on lymphocytes and related autoimmune disease. Nucleomes ambition is to build a robust pipeline of drug assets, with corresponding biomarkers. Nucleome Therapeutics was founded by leading experts in gene regulation from the University of Oxford. For more information, please visit http://www.nucleome.com.

About M Ventures M Ventures is the strategic, corporate venture capital arm of Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany. From its headquarters in the Netherlands and offices in Germany, USA and Israel, M Ventures invests globally in transformational ideas driven by innovative entrepreneurs. Taking an active role in its portfolio companies, M Ventures teams up with management teams and co-investors to translate scientific discoveries into commercial success. M Ventures focuses on identifying and financing novel solutions to some of the most difficult challenges, through company creation and equity investments in fields that will impact the vitality and sustainability of Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany 's current and future businesses. For more information, visit http://www.m-ventures.com.

About Pfizer Ventures Pfizer Ventures, the venture capital arm of Pfizer Inc., was founded in 2004 and invests for return in areas of current or future strategic interest to Pfizer. Pfizer Ventures seeks to remain at the forefront of life science advances, looking to identify and invest in emerging companies that are developing transformative medicines and technologies that have the potential to enhance Pfizers pipeline and shape the future of our industry.

About British Patient Capital

British Patient Capital is the trading name of British Patient Capital Limited, a wholly-owned commercial subsidiary of British Business Bank plc, the UK governments economic development bank. It forms part of the British Business Banks plcs commercial arm. Its mission is to enable long-term investment in innovative firms led by ambitious entrepreneurs who want to build large scale businesses. Launched in June 2018, British Patient Capital has 2.5bn to invest over 10 years in venture and venture growth capital to support high growth potential innovative UK businesses in accessing the long-term financing they require to scale up. Find out more at britishpatientcapital.co.uk.

About Oxford Science Enterprises Oxford Science Enterprises (OSE) is an independent, billion-pound investment company, created in 2015 to found, fund and build transformational businesses via its unique partnership with the University of Oxford, the world's #1 research university.This partnership enables OSE to work with the brightest academic minds tackling the world's toughest challenges and guarantees unrivalled access to their scientific research.In collaboration with its global network of entrepreneurs and advisers, OSE shapes and nurtures complex ideas into successful businesses, while targeting attractive returns for shareholders.Actively focused on a core portfolio of around 40 companies spanning three high-growth, high-impact sectors Life Sciences, Health Tech, and Deep Tech the company adopts a flexible, long-term investment approach, recognising the path from ground-breaking research to global markets takes time and resilience.To date, OSE has invested 0.5 billion in over 80 ambitious companies built on Oxford science.A key player in Oxford's entrepreneurial ecosystem, OSE is highly motivated to foster an environment that catalyses pioneering research and steers it to commercial success.Find out more:oxfordscienceenterprises.com|Twitter|LinkedIn

Read more:

Nucleome Therapeutics raises oversubscribed 37.5 million Series A financing to decode the dark matter of the human genome and deliver first-in-class...

Gladstone data scientist elected to the National Academy of Medicine – EurekAlert

Posted on by

image:Katie Pollard is recognized by the National Academy of Medicine for discovering fast-evolving regions of the human genome and for creating open-source software used by scientists worldwide. view more

Credit: Photo: Michael Short/Gladstone Institutes

SAN FRANCISCO, CAData scientist and statistician Katie Pollard, PhD, director of the Gladstone Institute of Data Science and Biotechnology, has been elected to the National Academy of Medicine (NAM), one of the highest honors in health and medicine. Through its election process, the Academy recognizes individuals who have demonstrated outstanding professional achievement and commitment to service.

Pollard is perhaps best known for developing a novel statistical approach to identify human accelerated regions (HARs), which are stretches of DNA that rapidly changed when humans evolved from primate ancestors. Many of these regions of the human genome help determine when and where important genesincluding those associated with diseasesare turned on or off.

Pollard is also being recognized for the creation of statistical models and open-source bioinformatics software, which are used by researchers worldwide to investigate gene activity, genome evolution, and the microbiome (the collection of microbes found in the human gut).

As a statistician, I am honored that the National Academy of Medicine and my nominators value our contributionsand the contributions of data scientists more broadlyto biomedical research and medicine, says Pollard. I love coding and math, but what really motivates me is using these methods to understand how our bodies work and how they break in disease.

Pollard, who is also a professor in the Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics at UC San Francisco and an investigator at the Chan Zuckerberg Biohub, entered graduate school at the University of California, Berkeley, interested in using math and statistics for public health applications. She was moving from classwork to research when the human genome was sequenced for the first time.

I immediately became interested in using the genome sequence to measure differences in gene activity between tissues and disease states, such as in tumors versus nearby healthy tissue, she recalls. I also wanted to develop statistical methods that could help me, and other researchers, get reliable results from the unprecedently large arrays of genomic data being produced.

Since then, Pollard and her lab have made critical contributions to several other research areas, including decoding how genomes work by using comparative genomics; creating statistical models, open-source bioinformatics software, and machine-learning frameworks to better understand the human genome; and developing analytical tools to study the human microbiome.

Driving Medical Research with Bioinformatic Approaches

As Pollard started her postdoctoral work, the chimpanzee genome was sequenced. Because she had studied anthropology (including primatology) as an undergraduate, she understood the importance and potential applications of the new information, and performed one of the first genome-wide comparisons of human and chimpanzee DNA. That work led to the discovery of HARs.

HARs are short pieces of DNA where chimpanzees and other non-human mammals have nearly identical sequences, she explains. But the human HARs are very different from the chimps, which makes HARs exciting candidates for understanding traits that are unique to humans, such as spoken language, HIV susceptibility, and psychiatric diseases.

After scientists had been trying to figure out the function of HARs for nearly a decade, Pollard and her team made a significant breakthrough by using an innovative approach inspired by the fields of bioinformatics, stem cell biology, and genomics.

They discovered that the vast majority of HARs are not genes, but rather enhancers that turn the activity of nearby genes up or down. They also found that many HARs control genes involved in brain development and in psychiatric diseases that are uniquely human, such as autism and schizophrenia.

In parallel, for the past 15 years, Pollards team has been developing new ways to analyze the hundreds of species of microbes that grow inside the human gut, which play many roles in health and disease.Their breakthroughs could lead to the development of therapies to maintain or improve gut health. They are also helping set the stage for using the microbiome in precision medicine.

To make these discoveries, we first had to create the right bioinformatics tools to tackle the questions we wanted to answer, says Pollard. We then applied our tools to massive analyses of terabytes of publicly available data, bringing together datasets that were not originally collected for the same purpose. And we used these datasets to ask new questions beyond what was analyzed in the original studies.

She helped create several computational methods to better analyze typical datasets, including an approach that allows researchers to carry out bigger and more precise analyses of the microbiome than ever before. Their approaches are also faster and cheaper than previous technologies, making them accessible to most labsnot only the ones that can afford high-performance computing power.

To Pollard, this is one of the most crucial aspects of technology development: creating tools that can be shared with, and used by, as many scientists and students as possible. Thats why shes such a strong advocate of open science, and a world leader in open-source bioinformatics software.

The machine-learning tools and statistical methods we develop can be used to study a wide range of diseases, says Pollard. Its important to me that they can be made available to anyone who needs them, so that we can open the door to important discoveries by researchers all around the world, across a variety of fields.

Expanding the Role of Data Science

Looking ahead, Pollard would like to help expand the role of data science in modern biomedical research. Rather than its current function of supporting the analysis of experimental research that has already been conducted, she would like to see data science setting the direction of experimentation and technology development.

What Im most excited about is using predictive models to drive experiments and the development of new tools and technologies, she says. Data scientists being in the drivers seat will also ensure that we are designing the experiments and machines that best address the questions we want to ask down the line.

Pollard earned her BA at Pomona College and her Masters degree and PhD in biostatistics from UC Berkeley. She is a Fellow of the American Institute for Medical and Biological Engineering, the California Academy of Sciences, and the International Society for Computational Biology. She is also a member of the American Society of Human Genetics and the American Statistical Association.

Pollards election was announced on October 17, 2022, by the NAM, which is part of the congressionally chartered National Academy of Sciencesa group of private, nonprofit institutions that provide objective advice on matters of science, technology, and health.

Pollard joins seven fellow NAM members from Gladstone Institutes: Jennifer Doudna, PhD, senior investigator; Warner Greene, MD, PhD, senior investigator; Robert W. Mahley, MD, PhD, senior investigator, president emeritus, and Gladstone founder; Lennart Mucke, MD, senior investigator and director of the Gladstone Institute of Neurological Disease; Deepak Srivastava, MD, senior investigator and president of Gladstone; R. Sanders Williams, MD, former Gladstone president; and Shinya Yamanaka, MD, PhD, senior investigator.

Visit link:

Gladstone data scientist elected to the National Academy of Medicine - EurekAlert

Pharmacy researcher earns $2.3 million NIH award to study opioid addiction – EurekAlert

Posted on by

LAWRENCE, KANSAS A University of Kansas researcher is taking a novel approach to the prolific problem of opioid addiction in America. With a $2.3 million grant from the National Institute on Drug Abuse, Zijun Wangwill research the implications of the DNA break-and-repair process in opioid use disorder.

Wangs work is based on the premise that opioid addiction is a psychiatric disorder caused by molecular changes in the brain that alter behavior.

Drug addiction is not a moral failing, said Wang, assistant professor of pharmacology & toxicology. In terms of addiction, the reward pathway in the brain is hijacked by repeated drug exposure. Drug-induced structural changes result in many abnormal behaviors, including reduced inhibitory control that prevents someone from avoiding behaviors with negative consequences.

The human genome consists of more than 3 billion base pairs of DNA, which contain more than 20,000 genes. This genetic material is used in complex biochemical processes in human cell function, development and replication. Wang said the genome is under attack from a variety of sources. Normally, the DNA repair process can overcome these attacks, but repeated drug exposure can disrupt this process, changing gene expression, cell function and leading to abnormal drug addiction-related behaviors.

Wangs research focuses on the DNA break-and-repair processes disrupted by addiction. Ultimately, Wang said she aims to help the genome maintain a normal or healthy environment in the cell and identify a potential therapy for these patients to prevent them from relapsing to drug use.

The therapeutic approach needed to target DNA breaks has yet to be developed but could come in the form of a drug or gene therapy. Right now, we are still at the initial step, but eventually we want to provide novel insight for the development of future therapies, Wang said. The first thing we want to do is have a clearer idea of the neurobiology underlying this opioid addiction.

The work on this grant addresses a critical issue: what causes drug users to relapse to using drugs after they manage to quit drug use, said Nancy Muma, chair of the Department of Pharmacology & Toxicology. Zijun has developed a novel approach to determine if the problem is damage to the persons genes. If this is the case, then future research can begin to address ways to mitigate the damage to the genes to prevent or reduce relapse.

This is novel research that no one else has done before, Wang said. How does DNA damage contribute to opioid addiction? We're trying to make a link between those. At the end of the day, we want to find a treatment that can reduce drug-seeking behavior.

This grant is funded through the Genetics or Epigenetics of Substance Use Disorders Avenir Award program that supports highly creative early-stage investigators proposing innovative studies that open new areas of research for the genetics or epigenetics of addiction.

Disclaimer: AAAS and EurekAlert! are not responsible for the accuracy of news releases posted to EurekAlert! by contributing institutions or for the use of any information through the EurekAlert system.

Continued here:

Pharmacy researcher earns $2.3 million NIH award to study opioid addiction - EurekAlert

First largest study of Nepalis shows genealogy links with Thakurs, Brahmins of north India – Deccan Herald

Posted on by

Researchers have found that most Nepali populations derivetheir maternal ancestry from lowland populations than highlanders.

Scientists from Hyderabad-based CSIR-Centre for Cellular and Molecular Biology (CCMB), Tribhuvan University of Nepal, DST-Birbal Sahni Institute of Palaeosciences in Lucknow, and Banaras Hindu University of Varanasi collaborated in what is termed as the first largest study on the Nepalese populations to trace their origins.

Investigators analysed mitochondrial DNA sequences of 999 individuals from different ethnic groups of Nepalincluding Newar, Magar, Sherpa, Brahmin, Tharu, Tamang, and populations from Kathmandu and Eastern Nepal.

Dr K Thangaraj from CCMB who led the research told DH that some of the Nepalese were found to have ancestral links to Brahmins and Thakurs of Uttarakhand and Uttar Pradesh.

Located at a crossroads in the Himalayan region, Nepal offers a unique ground to understand south and east Asian genetic ancestry. The Himalayan mountains range of Nepal has served as a geographical barrier to population migration, while at the same time, its valleys have been avenues for trade and exchange.

Despite the long-term economic and cultural importance of the Himalayan trade routes, very little is known about the early population history of the region.

The results of the study have now helped the researchers fill several critical gaps in the history and past demographic events that shaped the present Nepalese genetic diversity.

Our study showed that the ancient genetic make-up of the Nepalese was gradually transformed by various mixing episodes along the migratory path to Nepal. The carriers of some mitochondrial lineages may have crossed the Himalayas into Nepal, most likely via southeast Tibet, between 3.8 and six thousand years ago, said Rajdip Basnet, the first author of the study from Tribhuvan University.

The findings were published recently in the journal Human Genetics.

Tibeto-Burman communities like Newar and Magar revealed a distinct population history than contemporary high-altitude Tibetans/Sherpas. This study, using history, archaeological and genetic information, has helped us in understanding the population history of Tibeto-Burman communities of Nepal, said Dr Niraj Rai, one of the authors from DST- Birbal Sahni Institute of Palaeosciences.

The cultural ties of Nepal with India and Tibet reflected in their genomic ancestry, said Gyaneshwer Chaubey, a professor from Banaras Hindu University and co-author of the study.

Here is the original post:

First largest study of Nepalis shows genealogy links with Thakurs, Brahmins of north India - Deccan Herald

New Rare Disease Therapy Effectively Lowers Plasma Phe in Patients with PKU – MD Magazine

Posted on by

Top-line phase 2 data evaluating drug candidates for treating the rare disease phenylketonuria (PKU) was announced this morning. The study compared the efficacy of 2 strains of a non-systemically absorbed drug candidate in patients with the diagnosis.

While both strains, SYNB1618 and SYNB1934, demonstrated clinically meaningful reductions in fasting plasma phenylalanine (Phe) levels, SYNB1934 will be the candidate investigated in the anticipated 2023 phase 3 clinical trial.

The rare inherited disorder is caused by a disruption in the phenylalanine hydroxylase (PAH) gene, which helps create the enzyme necessary to break down phenylalanine. As a result the phenylalanine amino acid accumulates in the body which can be dangerous and lead to serious health problems.

These patients can experience intellectual limitations in areas of thinking, understanding and communicating as well as other major health problems.Early intervention is crucialscreening for this disease is typically done at birth.

At this time there's no cure, so patients with the condition are instructed to restrict their diet to avoid foods that can increase the phenylalanine build up, typically found in high-protein foods. However, some individuals can be less restrictive if they're taking medications that are effective for them.

PKU continues to be a very challenging disease for patients, with many in need of new treatment options, Jerry Vockley, MD, PhD, Professor of Human Genetics,University of Pittsburgh, and lead investigator on the phase 2 Synpheny-1 study said in a statement. It is very promising to see these results and the potential benefits of a new, orally administered investigational product that can meaningfully lower Phe in patients with PKU.

The Synpheny-1 study was a phase 2, open-label, 28-day clinical trial that assessed the safety, tolerability and efficacy of SYNB1618 and SYNB1934 in 20 adult patients with phenylketonuria. The primary endpoint was the change in area under the curve (AUC) of plasma levels of labeled D5-phenylalanine (D5-Phe) following a meal challenge before and after the treatment period. Investigators carefully managed the patients' dietary intake to replicate their routine protein and Phe consumption.

Each candidate's ability to mitigate Phe properly was examined as the administered dose regimen was increased over 15 days of treatment and then stayed consistent at a dose of 1x1012live cells for the second half of the treatment period. Secondary endpoints included change in fasting levels of plasma Phe from baseline, incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs), and the levels of additional strain-specific metabolites plasma D5-TCA and urinary D5-5A.

Patients enrolled in the study had a Phe level above 600 mol/L at screening despite treatment with diet and/or sapropterin. A total of 11 patients were included in the SYNB1618 arm and with 9 in the SYNB1934 arm. At the conclusion of the investigation, 10 patients completed the SYNB1618 arm and 5 patients completed the SYNB1934 arm.

The mean change from baseline at day 14 in fasting plasma Phe was -20% for those in SYNB1618 treatment and -34% for SYNB1934. Of the patients who completed the trial, 60% had a response greater than 20% Phe reduction by day 7 or day 14, with 6 of the 10 patients dosed with SYNB1618 and 3 of the 5 dosed with SYNB1934 meeting the criteria.

No serious adverse events were reported and the mild-moderate adverse events were predominantly gastrointestinal.

The robust plasma Phe reduction demonstrated by SYNB1934 indicates that it has potential to be a transformative treatment for patients with PKU,Aoife Brennan, MB, ChB,Synlogic President, Chief Executive Officer stated. I would like to thank the patients, clinicians and staff of our investigational sites who made this study possible. We look forward to further collaboration as we initiate our Phase 3 pivotal study, with the goal of bringing this potentially life-changing innovation in the treatment of PKU to patients.

Developing company Synlogichas confirmed these data supported the decision to continue with SYNB1934 as the drug candidate advancing to a phase 3 pivotal study which is expected to begin in the first half of 2023.

Read more here:

New Rare Disease Therapy Effectively Lowers Plasma Phe in Patients with PKU - MD Magazine

GSK announces expanded collaboration with Tempus in precision medicine to accelerate R&D – GSK

Posted on by

GSK plc (LSE/NYSE: GSK) and Tempus, a US-based precision medicine company, have entered into a three-year collaboration agreement that provides GSK with access to Tempus AI-enabled platform, including its library of de-identified patient data. Through its leading Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning (AI/ML) capability, GSK will work together with Tempus to improve clinical trial design, speed up enrolment and identify drug targets. This will contribute to GSKs R&D success rate and provide patients with more personalised treatment faster.

The new collaboration builds from the existing relationship between the companies that began in 2020 on clinical trial enrolment of patients with certain types of cancer. It will now expand GSKs access to de-identified patient data bringing greater scale and detail. Tempus dataset draws from its work with over 40% of oncologists in the U.S. at academic medical centres and community hospitals.

Tony Wood, Chief Scientific Officer, GSK, said: This collaboration will provide GSK with unique insights to discover better medicines and transform drug discovery. Tempus complements the work our team is already doing at the intersection of genomics and machine learning across both early discovery and clinical trials.

GSKs investments in human genetics, functional genomics and AI/ML have enabled the company to more than double the number of targets in the early portfolio since 2017 and have increased the proportion of those with genetic support beyond 70%. Medicines with genetic validation are twice as likely to become registered medicines. As a leader in AI-enabled precision medicine, Tempus has developed a platform that provides a rapid way of testing complex biomarker hypotheses. Powered by machine learning, this is an important component of selecting patients who could benefit from candidate medicines in GSKs portfolio in the future.

Eric Lefkofsky, Founder and CEO, Tempus, said: GSKs data-first approach to therapeutic research aligns with our own, and we believe that Tempus has the resources and capabilities to complement GSKs dedication to data science, in a way others cant given the breadth and depth of our platform. We both share a commitment to providing patients with more personalised therapeutic options to help them live longer and healthier lives.

GSK and Tempus currently collaborate on an open label phase II study, which applies an innovative, data-driven approach designed to accelerate and streamline study timelines. This includes expediting the protocol development and intelligent site selection in under 60 days and enrolling its initial patients within three months of the study launch.

The expanded collaboration has a minimum financial commitment over three years, for which GSK made a $70 million initial payment. GSK then has an option to extend for two additional years.

About Tempus

Tempus is a technology company advancing precision medicine through the practical application of artificial intelligence in healthcare. With one of the worlds largest libraries of clinical and molecular data, and an operating system to make that data accessible and useful, Tempus enables physicians to make real-time, data-driven decisions to deliver personalized patient care and in parallel facilitates discovery, development and delivery of optimal therapeutics. The goal is for each patient to benefit from the treatment of others who came before by providing physicians with tools that learn as the company gathers more data. For more information, visit tempus.com.

About GSK.ai

With more than 120 AI/ML experts, GSKs dedicated AI /ML team is the largest in-house strategic function in the biopharma industry and it is delivering a step-change in increasing R&D productivity, working closely with GSKs Research division. GSK teams are generating more data every quarter than in the companys entire history. At GSK, we believe AI has the potential to transform R&D because it enables our scientists to work better, faster and smarter so data helps us find the right medicine, using the right modality, for the right patient.

About GSK

GSK is a global biopharma company with a purpose to unite science, technology, and talent to get ahead of disease together. Find out more at gsk.com/company

Cautionary statement regarding forward-looking statements

GSK cautions investors that any forward-looking statements or projections made by GSK, including those made in this announcement, are subject to risks and uncertainties that may cause actual results to differ materially from those projected. Such factors include, but are not limited to, those described in the Company's Annual Report on Form 20-F for 2021, GSKs Q2 Results for 2022 and any impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic.

Read more:

GSK announces expanded collaboration with Tempus in precision medicine to accelerate R&D - GSK

Partnership Aims To Improve the Next Generation of TB Vaccines – Technology Networks

Posted on by

Mirroring the all-hands-on-deck collaborative approach that accelerated the development of a variety of COVID-19 vaccines during the pandemic, the National Institutes of Health is seeking to spark similar innovation for a longstanding, intractable disease: tuberculosis. As part of this national push, NIHs National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases awardedTexas Biomedical Research Institute(Texas Biomed) andThe Access to Advanced Health Institute(AAHI) in Seattle, Washington, a $3.5 million, five-year Innovation for Tuberculosis Vaccine Discovery grant.

Tuberculosis (TB) infects more than 10 million people globally a year, and killed more than 1.5 million in 2020. Before COVID-19, it was the leading cause of death by a single infectious agent. The only approved TB vaccine, which is used widely in other countries, but not in the U.S., primarily protects children as it loses efficacy as people age.

Tuberculosis is an infectious disease thats caused immense human mortality and suffering for thousands of years. We need to do better, says Texas Biomed Staff Scientist and adjunctAssociate Professor Gillian Beamer, VMD, PhD, DACVP, and the grants principal investigator. This collaboration is exciting because we are bringing scientists with different expertise together to tackle this challenge.

Researchers at AAHI, led byChristopher Fox, PhD, and Emily Voigt, PhD, are developing several TB vaccine candidates. They are building on extensive experience designing protein and RNA vaccine candidates based on AAHIs immune-enhancing platforms, both of which incorporate adjuvant technology. Adjuvants are components that make vaccines more effective by enhancing the bodys immune response. They will evaluate how various vaccine combinations administered in two doses perform in the lab.

In past studies, weve found using two different types of vaccines successively can lead to a more robust immune response, says Dr. Voigt, AAHIs Principal Scientist, RNA Platform. Well mix and match adjuvanted protein and RNA vaccine technologies to see what works best and send those leading vaccine combinations to Texas Biomed to test further.

A unique feature of the research project will be the animal models helping test the most promising vaccines at Texas Biomed. They will not be your typical lab mice.

The most commonly used laboratory mice are genetically identical to each other, Dr. Beamer says. While that is preferred to study specific cellular and molecular mechanisms, for us, its analogous to studying how only one person might react to a vaccine or therapy.

Instead, she is relying on mice that have been specifically bred to represent the genetic diversity of the human population. This will enable the team to see how individuals with different genetic backgrounds respond to the vaccines.

We think the approach of modeling human genetic diversity is critical in preclinical studies for tuberculosis because we know genetics impacts tuberculosis disease. Were 99.999% confident genetics will also impact the vaccine response, Dr. Beamer says.

The team aims to leverage the genetic diversity of the mice to identify vaccines that will protect those most susceptible to TB. This will be one of the first times this population of mice, called the Diversity Outbred mouse population, and a related group called Collaborative Cross inbred mice, will be used to test novel vaccines.

Texas Biomed is excited to partner on this project, said Texas Biomed Executive Vice President for Research Joanne Turner, PhD. The Institutes expertise in both TB research and animal model development are critical to move research like this forward.

Dr. Fox, who is AAHIs Senior Vice President, Formulations, underscored how this is truly innovative for vaccine development, which is required to begin with animal testing before testing in humans. The data we are going to get out of this is going to be much more meaningful than typical preclinical data, he says.

The team is excited and optimistic. AAHI already has an adjuvanted-protein TB vaccine performing well in phase 2 clinical trials.

The adjuvant in that vaccine was developed a number of years ago, and weve made several important advances since then in adjuvant technology, Dr. Fox says. We want to test those new adjuvant systems to see if we can do better than whats out there already.

Dr. Fox will test various adjuvants, some of which incorporate elements developed by close collaborators at 3M. New adjuvants could not just benefit TB vaccines, but vaccines for other diseases as well.

As these TB vaccines advance further, AAHI researchers plan to investigate different ways to make them thermostable, so they last for several months at room temperature or several years in standard refrigerators. This would eliminate the need for extreme cold storage such as what was required for the first generation of mRNA COVID-19 vaccines.

Weve recently had success with freeze-dried technology vastly extending the storage life of mRNA vaccines, and will look to apply that here as the research proceeds, AAHIs Dr. Voigt says. Its very important to us to increase the practicality of getting vaccines to people who need them most around the world.

This article has been republished from the following materials. Note: material may have been edited for length and content. For further information, please contact the cited source.

Go here to read the rest:

Partnership Aims To Improve the Next Generation of TB Vaccines - Technology Networks

Maze Therapeutics Appoints Harold Bernstein, M.D., Ph.D., as President, Research and Development and Chief Medical Officer – Business Wire

Posted on by

SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, Calif.--(BUSINESS WIRE)--Maze Therapeutics, a company translating genetic insights into new precision medicines, today announced that Harold Bernstein, M.D., Ph.D., a 30-year industry veteran, has been appointed as president, head of research and development (R&D) and chief medical officer. In addition, Eric Green, M.D., Ph.D., who has served as Mazes senior vice president, research and translational sciences, has been promoted to chief scientific officer.

Harold brings an impressive combination of industry and academic experience, as well as the unique perspective of a practicing physician, to the Maze team at an important stage of our development. Further, with much of Harolds experience having focused on human genetics, he is a natural candidate for this position, and Im thrilled to welcome him to our team and mission, said Jason Coloma, Ph.D., chief executive officer of Maze. I am also pleased to announce the promotion of Eric to CSO, who has been a true leader and driving force behind much of Mazes platform and pipeline advancement since our founding. Eric and Harold will be instrumental in executing the advancement of our diverse pipeline, which spans monogenic diseases like Pompe disease, and more complex diseases, like chronic kidney disease. I look forward to partnering with these two experts as we deliver on our vision of harnessing the power of human genetics to transform the lives of patients.

Maze has attracted some of the best minds in biotech and has proven itself through impressive progress since its founding, including the build-out of its Compass platform and rapid advancement into the clinic, said Dr. Bernstein. I was drawn to the Maze teams lofty goal of shifting the paradigm in medicine, in particular for more complex diseases such as chronic kidney disease, during an unprecedented time for the field of genetics and precision medicine. As head of R&D, I look forward to shaping and contributing to a creative strategy and thorough scientific process aimed at delivering new, genetic-based medicines. I am thrilled to join the Maze team as we urgently work to create and advance therapeutically meaningful treatments to help patients in need.

Dr. Bernstein brings more than three decades of experience in basic scientific research, translational medicine and clinical development both in industry and academia. He joins Maze from BioMarin, where he served as senior vice president, chief medical officer and head of global clinical development. In this role, he was responsible for fortifying clinical development from early to late stages, working seamlessly with research discovery and overseeing the late-stage and lifecycle products. Prior to BioMarin, he was head of translational medicine and vice president of global medicines development and medical affairs at Vertex, and earlier held roles at Merck, including head of early development for cardiometabolic diseases. Dr. Bernstein was professor of pediatrics and a senior investigator at the Cardiovascular Research Institute and the Broad Center of Regeneration Medicine and Stem Cell Research at the University of California, San Francisco (UCSF). He also served as attending physician at UCSF Benioff Childrens Hospital in pediatric cardiology, and at the Mount Sinai Kravis Childrens Hospital in cardiovascular genetics. Dr. Bernstein currently holds an appointment as adjunct professor of pediatrics and the Mindich Child Health and Development Institute at the Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai. He studied biomedical science, human genetics and medicine at the Mount Sinai School of Medicine, earning an M.Phil., Ph.D. and M.D. He completed a pediatric residency, cardiology fellowship and postdoctoral fellowship at UCSF and earned an A.B. in biological sciences from Harvard College.

Dr. Green is a physician-scientist and entrepreneur with more than 15 years of experience building and operating innovative scientific organizations. Prior to Maze, Dr. Green was an entrepreneur-in-residence at Third Rock Ventures, where he was involved in launching and building multiple Third Rock portfolio companies, including MyoKardia where he led the translational research group working on mavacamten, which was eventually acquired by Bristol Myers Squibb. Dr. Green is a board-certified physician with training in internal medicine and cardiovascular medicine from Brigham and Womens Hospital. He holds an M.D. and Ph.D. in chemical and systems biology from Stanford University and an A.B. in history and science from Harvard College.

About Maze Therapeutics

Maze Therapeutics is a biopharmaceutical company applying advanced data science methods in tandem with a robust suite of research and development capabilities to advance a pipeline of novel precision medicines for patients with genetically defined diseases. Maze has developed the Maze CompassTM platform, a proprietary, purpose-built platform that combines human genetic data, functional genomic tools and data science technology to map novel connections between known genes and their influence on susceptibility, timing of onset and rate of disease progression. Using Compass, Maze is building a broad portfolio of wholly owned and partnered programs. Maze is based in South San Francisco. For more information, please visit mazetx.com, or follow us on LinkedIn and Twitter.

Read more from the original source:

Maze Therapeutics Appoints Harold Bernstein, M.D., Ph.D., as President, Research and Development and Chief Medical Officer - Business Wire

Modern Humans and Neanderthals Lived Together in Europe for 2000 Years! – Ancient Origins

Posted on by

When Homo sapiens first arrived on the European continent about 42,500 years ago, the Neanderthals were still living there, and would remain there for another 1,400 to 2,900 years before finally disappearing from the face of the Earth. When the anatomically modern humans moved in, the Neanderthals did not move out, but stayed where they were and apparently lived peacefully alongside their Homo sapiens cousins for approximately 2,000 years, give or take a few centuries.

This is the conclusion of a trio of scientists from Leiden University in the Netherlands and Cambridge University in the United Kingdom, who used a unique and sophisticated modeling method known as optimal linear estimation to pin down more exactly when the Neanderthals actually lived in western Europe. The evidence the archaeologists examined was collected from multiple excavation sites in France and northern Spain, where modern human and Neanderthal artifacts have proven relatively easy to find.

Speleofacts ring structure built by Neanderthal people in Bruniquel cave, France. (Luc-Henri Fage/SSAC / CC BY-SA 3.0 )

The results of this study, which have just been published in the journal Scientific Reports , offer no evidence to demonstrate that Homo sapiens and Neanderthals merged their genetic materials with each other 42,500 ago. But past research has proven that the modern human genome contains portions of Neanderthal DNA , which could have only gotten there if the two species of hominin had interbred at some point. People of European descent are among those who carry Neanderthal genetic material, so at least some of that interbreeding must have occurred on European soil.

Igor Djakovic, an archaeological PhD candidate at Leiden University and lead author of the Scientific Reports paper, acknowledges in an interview with the French press agency AFP that humans and Neanderthals met and integrated in Europe, at some point in the distant past, before adding that we have no idea in which specific regions this actually happened.

Scientists have also struggled to identify the precise years when modern humans and Neanderthals would have lived in Europe simultaneously, and this was what the scientists in the Leiden University-led study were trying to discover.

To apply their sophisticated modeling techniques to the question, the scientists gathered radiocarbon dating results connected to 56 artifacts taken from 17 archaeological sites across France and northern Spain. Half of these artifacts had been linked to Neanderthals, while the other half had been left by humans. The artifacts in question included skeletal remains of both species, plus different types of tools including distinctive stone knives believe to have been made by Neanderthals.

Distinctive stone knives thought to have been produced by the last Neanderthals in France and northern Spain. This specific and standardized technology is unknown in the preceding Neanderthal record, and may indicate a diffusion of technological behaviors between Homo sapiens and Neanderthals immediately prior to their disappearance from the region. ( IgorDjakovic)

The idea was to cross-reference all of these dated materials, first through Bayesian statistical modeling and then through optimal linear estimation modeling, to search for signs of overlapping activity. Optimal linear estimation modeling is a technique originally developed for use in biology that has now been repurposed for examining and dating human remains and artifacts (and in this case, Neanderthal remains and artifacts as well) to relatively narrow periods of time.

In this study Baynesian modeling could only narrow the potential date ranges down so far, but optimal linear estimation allowed the scientists to achieve much further refinement.

When the final numbers were crunched, the data showed that Neanderthals went extinct in the region of France and northern Spain between 40,870 and 40,547 years ago, a range covering just over three hundred years of time. Meanwhile, it was confirmed that modern humans first migrated into this part of Europe approximately 42,500 years ago. With some variations in the approximate time frame for when the modern humans arrived, the researchers concluded that modern humans and Neanderthals would have occupied the same geographical region for between 1,400 and 2,900 years, after which Neanderthals disappeared forever.

Geographic appearance of dated occurrences for the Chtelperronian (grey circles Neanderthal stone tools), Protoaurignacian (white squares Homo sapiens stone tools), and directly-dated Neandertals (black skulls) in the study region between 43,400 (a) and 39,400 (f) years cal BP. (Djakovic, I., Key, A. & M. Soressi / Nature 2022 )

While there is no proof, it is reasonable to conclude that interbreeding between the two genetically compatible species would have occurred at this time and at this place. Perhaps just as significantly, there are signs that an extensive diffusion of ideas occurred, according to Djakovic, meaning there was a meeting of the cultures and a meeting of the minds that accompanied the physical encounters.

This period of time is "associated with substantial transformations in the way that people are producing material culture," including the way they made tools and ornaments, Djakovic explained. He and his colleagues also noted a dramatic change in the types of physical artifacts being produced by Neanderthals, which started to closely resemble tools and utensils made by the modern humans.

The latest research reveals that the DNA of humans of European and Asian descent is between one and two percent Neanderthal. In Africans Neanderthal DNA is not found except in trace amounts , since Africans and Neanderthals did not come into contact before the latter went extinct.

With respect to the extinction of the Neanderthals, Igor Djakovic argues that the concept should be reconsidered.

"When you combine that with what we know nowthat most people living on Earth have Neanderthal DNAyou could make the argument that they never really went extinct, in a certain sense," Djakovic said. Instead, he hypothesized, they were effectively swallowed into our gene pool, where they continue to exert a small but real influence over human genetic development to this very day.

It remains a mystery why Neanderthals werent able to breed and produce enough offspring among themselves to preserve their viability as a distinct species after modern human contact . Many different theories have been offered, but none are universally accepted.

Nevertheless, through genetic exchanges with anatomically modern humans they were able to guarantee their survival in a different form. They are like a shadow inside us, still preserved and never to be completely forgotten.

Top image: A new study shows that modern humans and Neanderthals lived together in Europe for 2000 years. Source: athree23 / CC BY-SA 4.0

By Nathan Falde

More:

Modern Humans and Neanderthals Lived Together in Europe for 2000 Years! - Ancient Origins

TIAP and Evotec Expand LAB150 BRIDGE Partnership to Include Amgen – Business Wire

Posted on by

TORONTO, Canada & HAMBURG, Germany--(BUSINESS WIRE)--Toronto Innovation Acceleration Partners (TIAP) and Evotec SE (Frankfurt Stock Exchange: EVT, MDAX/TecDAX, ISIN: DE0005664809; NASDAQ: EVO) today announced that the two companies have expanded LAB150, their translational BRIDGE partnership, to include Amgen as a strategic partner. The expansion goes along with a combined investment of US$14M to expedite LAB150 programs towards the formation of new companies.

LAB150 was created by TIAP and Evotec in 2017 to accelerate Torontos academic research into market-ready products. The expanded agreement builds upon existing partnerships between TIAP, Evotec, and Amgen to support the development of disruptive therapeutics by TIAPs member base and draws upon Evotecs industrialized drug discovery platforms. Amgen will provide financial support for chosen LAB150 projects along with significant mentorship from their drug discovery and development teams. In addition, Amgen Ventures will evaluate LAB150-derived companies for venture investment. These combined efforts will amplify the efficiency and translational potential of academic research to develop Canadian intellectual property, novel therapies, and accelerate commercialization by Canadas next generation of life science companies.

As our strategic partner since 2019, Amgen has worked closely with TIAP, and we are thankful for their continued support as we drive the commercialization of breakthrough Canadian innovations. Together with Evotec, we look forward to collaborating with Amgen to bring enhanced expertise and capital to LAB150 to enable life science company creation, said Parimal Nathwani, President and CEO of TIAP. To have two globally recognized industry leaders, Amgen and Evotec, come together under the LAB150 umbrella bodes very well for the life science community in Canada and improving global health.

According to Philip Tagari, Vice President of Research at Amgen, Amgens ongoing four-year partnership with TIAP to support very early innovation in the Greater Toronto biotechnology ecosystem has revealed both the unique expertise within TIAP to curate novel projects with significant future medical and commercial potential, as well as the outstanding quality of the biomedical research performed in the network of world-class institutions that LAB150 accesses. This multi-year investment, in partnership with the long-term collaborators at Evotec, will provide a streamlined path for cutting-edge academic science in Ontario to transition into early-stage company formation and identification of novel candidates for clinical development, with the intent of providing meaningful medicines for patients with grievous illness.

Dr. Thomas Hanke, EVP Head of Academic Partnerships at Evotec, added: The LAB150 BRIDGE partnership has demonstrated its ability to successfully identify and validate high-potential therapeutic projects and drive them towards the formation of new companies. We very much look forward to accelerating our efforts further by leveraging Amgens impressive track record in the drug development space across therapeutic areas as well as in the formation of successful life science companies.

With over US$7M invested, more than 150 projects evaluated, and ten projects currently being supported, LAB150 has established a strong track record. Having Amgen as a new partner in this program will ensure a robust 360-degree selection process and scale up LAB150s capital-efficient investments to fast-track therapeutics. Moreover, the symbiotic partnership between the three partners around LAB150 will bring crucial expertise to the development and financing of emerging technologies.

ABOUT TIAPTIAP is a leading provider of commercialization expertise, early-stage funding, and deal-brokering with industry and private investors in the health sciences domain. TIAP is a member-based organization made up of 10 member institutions including the University of Toronto and affiliated teaching hospitals with the mandate to drive the commercialization of their most promising research breakthroughs. TIAPs active portfolio consists of both early-stage assets and more than 70 companies in sectors such as therapeutics, medical devices, and digital health/AI. The companies have raised more than $1B from global investors and created more than 1,000 jobs. TIAP is partially supported through the Federal Economic Development Agency for Southern Ontario. For more information, please visit http://www.tiap.ca and follow us on http://www.twitter.com/TIAPToronto. For more information on LAB150, please visit https://lab150.com.

ABOUT EVOTEC SEEvotec is a life science company with a unique business model that delivers on its mission to discover and develop highly effective therapeutics and make them available to the patients. The Companys multimodality platform comprises a unique combination of innovative technologies, data and science for the discovery, development, and production of first-in-class and best-in- class pharmaceutical products. Evotec leverages this Data-driven R&D Autobahn to Cures for proprietary projects and within a network of partners including all Top 20 Pharma and over 800 biotechnology companies, academic institutions, as well as other healthcare stakeholders. Evotec has strategic activities in a broad range of currently underserved therapeutic areas, including e.g. neurology, oncology, as well as metabolic and infectious diseases. Within these areas of expertise, Evotec aims to create the world-leading co-owned pipeline for innovative therapeutics and has to-date established a portfolio of more than 200 proprietary and co-owned R&D projects from early discovery to clinical development. Evotec operates globally with more than 4,500 highly qualified people. The Companys 16 sites offer highly synergistic technologies and services and operate as complementary clusters of excellence. For additional information please go to http://www.evotec.com and follow us on Twitter @Evotec and LinkedIn.

About AmgenAmgen is committed to unlocking the potential of biology for patients suffering from serious illnesses by discovering, developing, manufacturing, and delivering innovative human therapeutics. This approach begins by using tools like advanced human genetics to unravel the complexities of disease and understand the fundamentals of human biology.

Amgen focuses on areas of high unmet medical need and leverages its expertise to strive for solutions that improve health outcomes and dramatically improve people's lives. A biotechnology pioneer since 1980, Amgen has grown to be one of the world's leading independent biotechnology companies, has reached millions of patients around the world and is developing a pipeline of medicines with breakaway potential.

Amgen is one of the 30 companies that comprise the Dow Jones Industrial Average and is also part of the Nasdaq-100 index. In 2021, Amgen was named one of the 25 World's Best Workplaces by Fortune and Great Place to Work and one of the 100 most sustainable companies in the world by Barron's.

For more information, visit http://www.amgen.com and follow us on http://www.twitter.com/amgen.

Forward Looking Statements (from Evotec)This announcement contains forward-looking statements concerning future events, including the proposed offering and listing of Evotecs securities. Words such as anticipate, believe, could, estimate, expect, intend, may, might, plan, potential, should, target, would and variations of such words and similar expressions are intended to identify forward-looking statements. Such statements include comments regarding Evotecs expectations for revenues, Group EBITDA and unpartnered R&D expenses. These forward-looking statements are based on the information available to, and the expectations and assumptions deemed reasonable by Evotec at the time these statements were made. No assurance can be given that such expectations will prove to have been correct. These statements involve known and unknown risks and are based upon a number of assumptions and estimates, which are inherently subject to significant uncertainties and contingencies, many of which are beyond the control of Evotec. Evotec expressly disclaims any obligations or undertaking to release publicly any updates or revisions to any forward-looking statements contained herein to reflect any change in Evotecs expectations with respect thereto or any change in events, conditions or circumstances on which any statement is based.

Read the original post:

TIAP and Evotec Expand LAB150 BRIDGE Partnership to Include Amgen - Business Wire

SpaceX’s Starship won’t make 1st orbital launch this month | Space

Posted on by

The first orbital test flight of SpaceX's Starship vehicle won't get off the ground in August.

SpaceX is targeting a six-month window that opens on Sept. 1 for the highly anticipated mission, according to a radio-spectrum license application (opens in new tab) that the company filed with the U.S. Federal Communications Commission (FCC).

That license was granted on Wednesday (Aug. 10), according to the Twitter account FCC Space Licenses (opens in new tab), which keeps tabs on such things. But this approval is not the final regulatory hurdle that Starship must clear on the way to the launch pad.

Photos: SpaceX lifts huge Super Heavy rocket onto launch stand

"Reminder, this is not the same as a launch license. It is a specific radio license for the test vehicles and does not indicate a change in status. Please do not make a YouTube video or write a 20,000 [word article] about this," FCC Space Licenses, which is not a U.S. government account, wrote in another Wednesday tweet (opens in new tab). (This article is only about 400 words long, so hopefully it's still in bounds.)

SpaceX apparently still hasn't received a launch license for the Starship orbital test flight, which will lift off from the company's Starbase facility in South Texas. Launch licenses are the purview of the U.S. Federal Aviation Administration, which recently wrapped up a lengthy environmental assessment of Starship activities at the site.

Starship consists of a giant first-stage booster called Super Heavy and a 165-foot-tall (50 meters) upper-stage spacecraft known as Starship. Both elements are designed to be fully reusable, and both will be powered by SpaceX's next-generation Raptor engines 33 for Super Heavy and six for Starship.

The duo that will fly the coming orbital mission are Booster 7 and Ship 24. SpaceX has begun prepping both prototypes for the task; for example, the company conducted "static fire" engine tests with both vehicles on Tuesday (Aug. 9) at Starbase.

Booster 7 lit just one of its 33 engines on Tuesday, and Ship 24 fired up two of its six Raptors. So a lot of work remains before SpaceX clears the duo for an orbital flight meaning it was never likely that the mission would lift off in August, even if all the paperwork were already in order.

There is a high-profile launch scheduled for this month, however: NASA is currently targeting Aug. 29 for the liftoff of Artemis 1, the first mission in its Artemis program of moon exploration. Artemis 1 will use a Space Launch System rocket to send an uncrewed Orion capsule on a roughly six-week mission to lunar orbit and back.

Mike Wall is the author of "Out There (opens in new tab)" (Grand Central Publishing, 2018; illustrated by Karl Tate), a book about the search for alien life. Follow him on Twitter @michaeldwall (opens in new tab). Follow us on Twitter @Spacedotcom (opens in new tab) or on Facebook (opens in new tab).

See more here:

SpaceX's Starship won't make 1st orbital launch this month | Space

Dennis Tito, first space tourist, books trip around the moon on SpaceX’s Starship Spaceflight Now – Spaceflight Now

Posted on by

Akiko and Dennis Tito at SpaceXs Starbase facility in South Texas. Credit: SpaceX

Dennis Tito, an 82-year-old aerospace engineer-turned-financial analyst who paid Russia $20 million for a trip to the International Space Station in 2001, is working with SpaceX on plans to take his wife on what amounts to a belated honeymoon voyage to the moon.

In an interview with CBS Mornings, Tito said he and his wife of two years want to fly on Elon Musks futuristic Starship for the sheer adventure of it. They also want to inspire senior citizens who might think their horizons are increasingly limited.

And they want to play a part in humanitys initial steps out into the solar system.

Ive been thinking about flying to the moon for the last 20 years, since my space flight, Tito said. And here we were at SpaceX (recently) and they were interested in talking about a space flight. And I brought it up. And within a few minutes, we both were on board.

In a television interview Monday at SpaceXs sprawling Starship development complex near Brownsville, Texas, Tito and his Tokyo-born wife Akiko, 57, said they hope to blast off with 10 other yet-to-be-named passengers, booked by SpaceX, within the next five years or so, after the rocket completes a series of test flights.

We will be able to watch the Earth get smaller, and smaller and smaller, and the moon get larger, and larger and larger, Tito said, describing the planned trajectory. We will then, upon emerging from the far side of the moon, see the Earth from a perspective only the Apollo astronauts have enjoyed to date.

We will be literally out of this world, he said.

As it now stands, their voyage presumably would follow two other piloted flights of the Super Heavy/Starship rocket: one to Earth orbit, presumably with billionaire Jared Isaacman, who funded the first private orbital flight aboard a Crew Dragon capsule in 2021; and an around-the-moon flight chartered by Japanese entrepreneur Yusaku Maezawa.

Its not known when those missions might get off the ground or how much they might cost. Likewise, Tito would not discuss how much hell be paying for two seats aboard the Starship.

Whatever the amount, its obviously worth it to a man who describes his space station visit two decades ago as 100 percent enjoyment, adding Ive been thinking about it every day since.

One of the things I hope to do, we both hope to do, is inspire people that as we get older, there are so many things we still can do, Tito said. And flying in space actually is a lot easier than a lot of other things. I mean, Im beyond the age of skiing, but space is a lot easier than that.

Said Akiko Tito, a real estate investor and jet pilot: Like Dennis said, I think age is just a number. We just want to inspire people and especially me, inspire women, you know, young women (who) want to become a pilot in the future, want to become astronaut. You know, work hard and make it happen.

Star Trek actor William Shatner, then 90, set the age record last year when he flew to the edge of space aboard a sub-orbital New Shepard spacecraft. The oldest person to reach orbit was the late John Glenn, who was 77 when he flew aboard a space shuttle in 1998.

Tito could be nearing 90 himself when he finally gets his Starship flight, but he told CBS Mornings correspondent Janet Shamlian hes in better shape now than when he launched aboard a Russian Soyuz spacecraft to become the first so-called space tourist.

I am probably in better physical shape than I was 21 years ago, he said, because Ive taken up weightlifting in a serious way. And I wasnt able then to manage the kind of weight I can manage now. So I think Im in better shape.

But realizing it could be several years before he blasts off aboard the as-yet-untried Starship, weve engaged in upping our physical fitness activities and health monitoring to really make sure that were going to be in shape for many years into the future.

The regimen includes weight training in a fully equipped home gym along with walking and running on a quarter-mile track outside his house. The couple also has a Pilates studio.

Were not counting on (launching) next year, Tito said. So we have to stay in good shape, which is a great motivational thing for us because a lot of people when they reach my age, you know, will sit in a rocking chair and wait for the inevitable.

Akiko Tito said she started working out on a daily basis 20 years ago and now trains for beauty and fitness competitions that focus on total physical fitness. And then you have to be elegant as well at the same time.

She said she had no hesitation about joining her husband for a flight to the moon.

I know him very well, so, yes, here we go, you know? she said. I wanted to join him. So here we are. We want to make it happen together, as a couple.

Born in Tokyo, Akiko Tito holds a degree in economics and moved to New York in 1995 to work on Wall Street while raising a daughter. She and Tito were married in 2020 during the COVID outbreak.

So we didnt have a chance really to have a honeymoon, Tito said. Then, laughing, he added, so maybe this is our honeymoon.

The 394-foot-tall Starship will be the worlds most powerful rocket when it finally takes off, generating a staggering 16 million pounds of thrust from the 33 methane-burning Raptor engines powering its Super Heavy first stage twice the liftoff thrust of NASAs $4.1 billion Space Launch System moon rocket.

SpaceXs upper stage the Starship is equipped with six Raptor engines and will be capable of carrying passengers and payloads to the moon and beyond. Both stages are fully reusable and will descend to tail-first landings back on Earth using similar software and techniques perfected using the companys smaller Falcon 9 rockets.

The Starship upper stage has been launched seven times on low-altitude test flights, four of which suffered catastrophic failures during the landing sequence. The most recent test flight in May 2021 was fully successful.

Every time a rocket explodes, you learn something, Tito said. So the more rocket explosions we see, the better because then well get all the bugs out of it.

The Super Heavy first stage has not yet been launched. SpaceX is in the process of testing its engines and other critical systems before a test flight to boost an unpiloted Starship into orbit for the first time, possibly before the end of the year.

SpaceX already holds a $2.9 billion NASA contract to develop a variant of the Starship to serve as the initial lunar lander in the agencys Artemis moon program.

Under the current plan, astronauts launched aboard the agencys third piloted SLS rocket will dock with a Starship in lunar orbit and descend to touchdown near the moons south pole in the 2025-26 timeframe. SpaceX is required to carry out an unpiloted test flight, complete with moon landing, before the Artemis 3 mission.

To reach the moon with enough propellant for landing and takeoff, SpaceX plans to refuel the Starship lander in Earth orbit using multiple flights of Super Heavy/Starship tankers. Its not yet known what role refueling might play in Titos mission.

Whether SpaceX can perfect the huge rocket and test it to NASAs satisfaction by 2025-26 remains to be seen.

SpaceX does not provide details about its schedule and its not known how the NASA mission will fit in with the companys plans to launch the other two currently planned Starship missions before Tito and his wife get their turn.

Isaacman, who funded the first private-flight Inspiration 4 to low-Earth orbit in September 2021 using a Falcon 9 and Crew Dragon capsule, has announced plans for three more private missions with SpaceX, including one aboard a Crew Dragon that will feature the first spacewalk by a private citizen.

Isaacmans three-flight Polaris project could include the first piloted flight of the Super Heavy/Starship in Earth orbit, although no details are yet available.

Billionaire entrepreneur and art collector Maezawa, founder of ZoZotown, one of Japans largest retail websites, also has booked a Super Heavy/Starship flight to carry him and several companions on the first privately-funded passenger flight around the moon.

Titos flight presumably will follow Maezawas, but its not known whether one or both will precede NASAs lunar landing mission or whether Tito will get his wish within five years as hoped.

Were prepared to wait as long as it takes to get everything perfected, Tito said.

Read more:

Dennis Tito, first space tourist, books trip around the moon on SpaceX's Starship Spaceflight Now - Spaceflight Now

Remembering Enterprise: The Test Shuttle That Never Flew to Space – Gizmodo

Posted on by

Enterprise mounted to the top of a modified Boeing 747 during OV-101 Flight 7 on October 12, 1977. The Shuttles Tail Cone was removed for this mission, exposing its mock engines. Photo: NASA

Prior to the inaugural launch of the Space Shuttle Columbia in 1981, NASA conducted a series of performance tests with a prototype known as Enterprise. Named for the fictional Star Trek vessel, Enterprise provided our first glimpse of what a future spaceship might actually look like.

When I was a kid, I loved to play with my toy Enterprise Shuttle, which rested comfortably on top of its corresponding toy 747 jet airliner. NASAs Space Shuttle had not yet launched to space (yes, Im dating myself here), yet my imagination was already soaring, as I envisioned the black-and-white spaceplane soaring through the celestial void.

As an adult, I still hold a soft spot for Enterprise. The intrepid prototype set the stage for NASAs a 4.5-million-pound space truck, despite it never reaching orbit.

Visit link:

Remembering Enterprise: The Test Shuttle That Never Flew to Space - Gizmodo

55 years ago, Russia changed spaceflight forever and lied about it a little – Inverse

Posted on by

After the USSR launched Sputnik 1 in 1957, the space race quickly gained momentum. A decade later, the first space probe that entered the atmosphere of another planet while still operational did so successfully 55 years ago today, on October 18, 1967. Venera 4 arrived on Venus and began sending data about the planets atmosphere until it lost contact thereafter, also making it the first space probe to send data from inside the atmosphere of another planet.

The spacecraft revealed more than any mission previously had about another planet, but the mission also alluded to how the USSR was managing its public image when it came to the space race.

Venera 4 landed on Venus just one day before the arrival of Mariner 5, a US spacecraft originally destined for Mars that had been modified and sent to our sister planet to collect data on its atmosphere, but as a flyby mission with no probe, marking a minor space race victory for the USSR.

Interestingly, although you might have thought that the Russians would concentrate on Mars, it being a Red Planet, they actually concentrated on Venus for a lot of the Soviet era, Jonathan McDowell, an astrophysicist at the Harvard-Smithsonian Institute, member of the Chandra X-ray Telescope team, and a space history archivist, tells Inverse.

Venera 4 mission prior to launch.Sovfoto/Universal Images Group/Getty Images

While the USSR set its sights primarily on Venus, it hadnt entirely forgotten about Mars.

According to McDowell, Americans were focusing on Mars, and [the Soviets] knew they couldnt beat the Americans at Mars. But, come to think of it, they did try Mars a number of times, [but] they just kept failing. They kept failing at Venus as well, but they tried enough with Venus that they eventually had some success.

The USSR actually had a Mars program where similar to NASAs approach with the Mariner 5 spacecraft, the same spacecraft design was used for both Mars and Venus.

They [the USSR] launched a bunch of them, and a lot of them failed before getting out of Earth orbit. So, they got codenames like Kosmos 21. Translation: it got as far as Earth orbit and then died, McDowell says.

In fact, there has been an entire slew of Kosmos missions since 1962. As of 2013, there were at least 2500. That is a lot of failed missions.

Initially, two versions of Venera 4 were constructed and launched. The second one launched just five days after the first, but it never left Earth orbit due to an engine malfunction. Unsurprisingly, given the USSRs modus operandi, this mission earned itself the name Kosmos 167.

What made Venera 4 stand out from its predecessors wasnt simply that it arrived at Venus intact without overheating before reaching the atmosphere like Venera 3 but also that the space probe was engineered to survive for a relatively long time once inside of the planets hot and high-pressure atmosphere, particularly compared to what we are used to here on Earth.

The surface pressure of Venus exceeds 75 times that of Earths at sea level (measured in bars), and temperatures can reach up to 900 degrees Fahrenheit.

Trying to make a piece of hardware that can survive crushing pressures and all those temperatures is not easy. Especially if you're trying to have parachute strings that dont melt, McDowell explains. The idea is that once it's down to a certain altitude, it releases a parachute and then floats down and lands on the surface and then makes measurements of temperature and pressure on the surface. But, in fact, it returns temperature and pressure data on the way down.

An example of Soviet space propaganda. Buyenlarge/Archive Photos/Getty Images

Despite the fact that after entering the atmosphere, the Venera 4 rapidly lost connection, the Soviets were confident that the probe had landed on the planets surface.

They [the Soviets] initially claimed it had landed. But later, they realized it hadnt. It just landed on the top of a very tall mountain, McDowell says. And then later they realized, no, actually, it was crushed in the atmosphere before it hit the surface. It took a long time before the Soviets kind of went back on it. Once Venera 7 landed successfully, like quietly, you know, [the USSR] started listing Venera 4 as not having landed.

The manufactured story about Venera 4s (faux) landing became another example of the USSRs tendency towards secretiveness and their tendency to dictate history as they desired, as opposed to how it actually happened.

Nonetheless, the incorrect interpretation of Venera 4s landing ultimately became attributed to the radio altimeter. It would give the same radio signal signature every 18 miles. This effect is called aliasing and makes altitudes that are a certain distance apart indistinguishable. Initially, the Soviet scientists interpreted the first signal to come from an altitude of 16 miles, which was thought to be approximately where the cloud tops were with respect to the surface (though, this was unconfirmed).

Were this the case, Venera 4 would have successfully landed. However, due to inconsistencies with other data, it later became clear that the actual altitude of the first signal was from 34 miles above the surface and that the ship never made it to the ground intact.

Illustration of the Venera 9 spacecraft on the surface of Venus. MARK GARLICK/SCIENCE PHOTO LIBRARY/Science Photo Library/Getty Images

Regardless of Venera 4s controversial, or supposed landing, on Venus, it provided important scientific insights.

Venera 4 carried a number of instruments on board designed to collect data relevant to the characterization of Venus atmosphere including gas analyzers, an altimeter, thermometers, a barometer, an atmospheric density gauge, and radio transmitters. All of these were contained within a 844-pound lander probe.

The main bus that had carried the lander and detached from it prior to its descent through the Venusian atmosphere measured that the planet had a weak magnetic field, but detected no radiation belts.

Prior to Venera 4, the temperature, pressure, and composition of the atmosphere were largely up for debate. While it was largely thought the planet was hot, one paper from MIT proposed that Venus was experiencing an ice age. Estimates for surface pressures ranged from several to thousands of atmospheres.

Finally, on October 18, 1967, Venera 4s lander entered the Venusian atmosphere. The space probes cabin decelerated 300 Gs upon descent and its heat shield reached temperatures of 19,830 degrees Fahrenheit. But it returned valuable information for future Soviet missions to Venus, including successful landers.

To sum up, it was the first in situ confirmation that Venus' lower atmosphere was indeed very hot (something that was suggested from prior remote microwave observations), Emmanuel Marcq tells Inverse. Marcq is a professor in atmospheric science at Universit de Versailles Saint-Quentin en Yvelines (UVSQ) and at Laboratoire Atmosphres, Milieux, Observations Spatiales (LATMOS) who specializes in telluric atmospheres and particularly the atmosphere of Venus.

It did pave the way for later missions that could reach and operate at the surface, like Venera 9 and 10 in 1975 (more historically significant in my opinion: first pictures taken from the surface of another planet, a few months before NASA's Viking pictures from Mars), Marcq says.

The data had been useful in 1967 to validate the atmospheric models that scientists had already predicted for the planet, but in the same sense that the geologic data from Venera 8 is still used for studies today, can data from the Venera 4 be helpful in the same way?

The fact that it was a Soviet mission more than 50 years old does not help in that regard (even some data from Apollo or later Viking missions cannot be read anymore because the digital file formats used back then were not documented and the scientists/engineers involved are now retired and/or dead...), said LeMarcq.

Venera 4 was a leap forward at the time, providing important data for scientists and meant big strides in aeronautical engineering. Fifty-five years later, it still has its place as a major landmark in space exploration history and serves as a reminder of revisionist history.

Original post:

55 years ago, Russia changed spaceflight forever and lied about it a little - Inverse