Mind the gap – Plugging the hole at element 113… maybe

Japanese researchers have staked their claim to discovering element 113, based on results of massive ion bombardment experiments published today.

The team, led by Kosuke Morita at the RIKEN Nishina Centre for Accelerator-based Science in Wako, is hoping that its experiments will lead to the first naming of a new element by Japanese researchers.

The team made atoms of element 113 by smashing a beam of 70Zn ions (Z = 30) into a target made of 209Bi (Z = 83). After thousands of hours of bombardment, they had made enough atoms of element 113 and compiled enough data about its decay chain to make a claim about the identity of the new element.

Because most superheavy elements are unstable and decay after only a fraction of a second, their identity is normally verified by looking at the type and energy of the radiation they emit as they decay, and the nuclides that are produced as they do so. To be sure of the identity of a new element, it has to decay by a series of steps into well-known nuclides.

For example, confirmation of the identities of the recently ratified elements 114 (flerovium) and 116 (livermorium) was helped by the earlier recognition of element 112 (copernicium). This is because both elements 114 and 116 decay by emitting alpha particles (two protons and two neutrons) so livermorium decays first to flerovium, then to copernicium, then onwards by another alpha decay to darmstadtium and so on. That meant that until copernicium was officially recognised, the claims for flerovium and livermorium had a missing link in their decay chains.

In 2004-5, the Japanese team completed experiments in which atoms of element 113 decayed to element 111 (which was only officially ratified by the International Union of Pure and Applied Chemistry, Iupac, at the end of 2004 and is now known as roentgenium), followed by three more alpha decays to dubnium-262. Unfortunately, the 232Db atoms underwent fission, breaking apart into much smaller nuclei in the same process that occurs in uranium-235 when it is powering nuclear reactors or  atomic bombs.

The decay chain for element 113 now has a clear reference point in the decay of dubnium-262 to mendelevium-254

The Iupac–Iupap joint working party considering claims for discovery of elements up to atomic number 118 produced its latest findings last year. Because the daughter nuclides of the 262Db fission process were not well enough known, the report concluded that there was not yet enough evidence to support the Japanese team’s claim. However, the working party also concluded that no other team had yet provided sufficient evidence to satisfactorily claim having made the element either.

So the door is still open. In this latest paper, the Japanese team has managed to observe the 262Db atoms undergoing alpha decay instead of fission. This produces lawrencium-258, followed by another alpha decay to mendelevium-254, and this decay chain is well known. The Japanese team says that this provides unambiguous proof that they have made element 113.

However, before the team can even think about naming the new element, the results must be ratified by the Iupac–Iupap working party. Unfortunately, the latest round of evidence submissions for claims relating to elements 113, 115, 117 and heavier closed at the end of May, so it will be some time until this claim is even considered by the panel, unless the rules can be bent a little bit…

It looks to me as if the Japanese team may have to hang on a little longer before they can attempt to break the dominance of the Russian, German and American teams that have been responsible for naming all the trans-uranic elements so far.

Phillip Broadwith

Digg This  Reddit This  Stumble Now!  Share on Facebook  Bookmark this on Delicious  Share on LinkedIn  Bookmark this on Technorati  Post on Twitter  Google Buzz (aka. Google Reader)  

Source:
http://prospect.rsc.org/blogs/cw/?feed=rss2

Element 113 – in the lap of the gods, or at least Iupac

In my blog post the other day about element 113, I mentioned that the process of going from a successful experiment to a successful claim of discovery is tortuous. It relies on researchers convincing a joint panel of experts representing the International Union of Pure and Applied Chemistry (Iupac) and their physics counterpart, Iupap, that their evidence fulfils all the criteria for discovery of a new element.

A joint working party from Iupac and Iupap is currently considering claims relating to elements 113, 115, 117 and higher. Both the Japanese team from RIKEN and a Russian team from the Joint Institute for Nuclear Research in Dubna submitted claims relating to element 113 in May this year for the working party to consider. Kosuke Morita, the leader of the Japanese team has confirmed that they have asked the panel to take this latest paper into consideration along with their earlier results, but it will be down to the panel to decide.

Both of the claims build on earlier work that has so far failed to convince the joint working party. The two claims are quite independent of each other, Morita explains. Neither team’s data will support the other’s claim, as they involve different isotopes of the elements in the decay chains.

The Russian team’s claim revolves around an experiment designed to create element 115, which decays to element 113 by emitting an alpha particle, then continues down its decay chain, through a series of alpha decays. The advantage of the Russian group’s experiment is that they have generated many more atoms of their putative element 115 (and hence element 113), so they have a lot more data than the Japanese team. The disadvantage is that all the nuclides on the decay chain were previously unknown isotopes, so they needed to do some difficult chemical characterisation to prove their identities.

On the other hand, the Japanese team’s experiment, taking into account the latest result, has its decay chain firmly anchored in known nuclide territory. This is a distinct advantage when it comes to the strength of the claim, as it is one of the principal criteria expected by the Iupac-Iupap working party. They have also, Morita believes, gathered sufficient extra evidence supporting their previous claim to answer the joint working party’s concerns from the last review.

However, as the Japanese team only acquired this final puzzle-piece in August this year, if the panel decides that the Dubna team has done enough to characterise the nuclides in their decay chain, it could still award them priority, and possibly even a two-for-one deal including element 115 as well. If not, it looks likely that the RIKEN team has a strong enough claim to earn the first Japanese-named element.

This is by no means an easy decision to make, so both groups will be eagerly awaiting the verdict. Watch this space everyone.

Phillip Broadwith

Digg This  Reddit This  Stumble Now!  Share on Facebook  Bookmark this on Delicious  Share on LinkedIn  Bookmark this on Technorati  Post on Twitter  Google Buzz (aka. Google Reader)  

Source:
http://prospect.rsc.org/blogs/cw/?feed=rss2

Sunscreen – it’s not what’s in the bottle, it’s how you apply it

We’re not using our sunscreen properly, according to researchers in Denmark. Bibi Petersen and colleagues at Bispebjerg Hospital in Copenhagen observed 20 sun seekers on a week’s holiday in Hurghada, Egypt, to monitor how often, and when, they applied their sunscreen. ‘Our results led us to suspect that the protective effect of sunscreen use against DNA damage, and thereby skin cancer, is minimal the way sunscreen is used under real sun holiday conditions,’ said the researchers. It’s all to do with the time the sunscreen is applied and how thickly it’s applied.

The team gave the volunteers a skin examination each morning and weighed their sunscreen bottles each evening. What the team saw was that people wearing sunscreen exposed their skin to the sun for longer than those without. And, even before they applied sunscreen, they had already developed skin redness. The team also found that while the volunteers thought they were protecting themselves with a sunscreen with a sun protection factor (SPF) of 15, the thickness of sunscreen they applied (on average 0.79mg/cm2) actually corresponds to an SPF of 3.

‘The volunteers who intended to stay in the sun for a prolonged period attempted to protect themselves from sunburn by using sunscreen, but the improper use of sunscreen according to time of application and application thickness was ineffective in preventing sunburn and could not compensate for the risk of prolonged UV exposure and high UV exposure doses,’  the team said.

Elinor Hughes

Digg This  Reddit This  Stumble Now!  Share on Facebook  Bookmark this on Delicious  Share on LinkedIn  Bookmark this on Technorati  Post on Twitter  Google Buzz (aka. Google Reader)  

Source:
http://prospect.rsc.org/blogs/cw/?feed=rss2

The Ig Nobels return for more thoughtful silliness

Exploding colonoscopies, dead salmon and a shrinking Eiffel tower – yes, it’s the Ig Nobel awards!

The Ig Nobels return with more unusual answers to questions no one asked

Awarded every year by the Annals of Improbable Research, the Ig Nobel prizes celebrate ‘research that makes people laugh and then think’.

This year’s chemistry prize went Johan Pettersson for solving a mystery in the Swedish town of Anderslov where the hair of blonde residents turned green. In this case, the first suspect was copper in the water but checking the supply revealed no problems. Pettersson realised that the copper was coming from the piping inside the house, not from the external supply. The hot water that people used for their showers stripped copper from the uncoated pipes, giving the unsuspecting residents an involuntary hair dye. His solution? Wash your hair in cold water, or move to a different house. I guess he’s not going to get a prize for sympathy…

The prize for neuroscience went to a team who measured brain activity in a dead salmon. Just as the tagline promises, it first makes you laugh but then makes you think. This could have quite serious implications for doctors measuring brain activity in coma patients.

Other prizes helped to solve long-standing questions such as ‘how do you stop your patients exploding during a colonoscopy?’, ‘why does coffee spill when you try to carry it?’ or ‘which way should I lean my head to make the Eiffel tower appear smaller?

Special mention must go to the US Government Accountability Office, the recipient of the literature prize, for issuing a report about reports about reports. And the conclusion of this meta-meta-report? Prepare a report about the report about reports about reports.

If that’s whetted your appetite for awards season, Chemistry World will be covering the more traditional Nobel prizes from 8th October.

Ian Le Guillou

Digg This  Reddit This  Stumble Now!  Share on Facebook  Bookmark this on Delicious  Share on LinkedIn  Bookmark this on Technorati  Post on Twitter  Google Buzz (aka. Google Reader)  

Source:
http://prospect.rsc.org/blogs/cw/?feed=rss2

IgNobel Prize in Chemistry: Turning hair green with the power of SCIENCE

Ok, with the power of copper. But copper is all about science! So it counts.

The Ignobel prize in chemistry goes to Johan Pettersson of Sweden for determining why people in the town of Anderslv were suffering from a strange epidemic ofgreen hair. Pettersson, an engineer in environmental hygeine, dyed his own beard green for the ceremony, and was very thrilled to win the Ignobel, noting that it teaches you to look at the strange.

(Source)

The mystery began in the charming (ok, I dont know what it looks like, but I have to imagine its charming) town of Anderslov, located on the very southern tip of Sweden. People started complaining that their hair was turning green. When confronted with sudden hair changes, people are inclined to blame the drinking water, and of course, since its drinking water, you have to wonder what something in there will do to you, if its already turning your hair green.

Enter environmental hygiene engineer Pettersson. He and a team took samples of the local drinking water from several houses. They immediately suspected copper, which, well, turns things green.

(Source. Observe the older copper is green, due to exposure to water and air, while the newer copper is bright and shiny)

Imagine their surprise when they found that the copper levels in their current set of samples were totally normal. Where was the copper? The water was from the same source. Pettersson started going to the houses where people had complained, and tested THEIR water. And there was the copper, up to four times normal concentrations.

It turned out that the people who complained of the green hair were all living in new houses. New houses with shiny bright new COPPER piping. When the water sat overnight in the pipes, and was then exposed to heat from the water heater for showers in the morninghello green!

But was it harmful? Well, other than the somewhat green eggs and ham fashion, no. Copper levels high enough to dye things green are not high enough to hurt you. But, well, the green, in a country like Sweden, full of ice blondesit was a bit noticeable (Pettersson noted to me that other countries like Germany might have similarly high copper levels, but too many brunettes to notice the hair changes). It was especially noticeable in teenagers and young women, possibly because they were showering the most.

Petterssons solution? Move houses! The newer the house, the more likely you were to have copper leaching from your pipes. Of course, if you didnt want to MOVE, you could always get new pipes. If youre really desperatetake cold showers (which I think somehow would not go over well in Sweden). The heat required for hot water increases the leaching of the copper, so cold showers could help. Finally, you could, you know, do the sensible thing and let the water run for a few minutes in the morning to get the residual copper out.

Link:
IgNobel Prize in Chemistry: Turning hair green with the power of SCIENCE

New scholarships for top chemistry grads to teach

-Prestigious 20,000 scholarships to be led by Royal Society of Chemistry - - Government confirms teacher training bursaries for 2013/14 - - New recruitment targets to focus on quality of graduates -

New teacher training scholarships in chemistry led by the Royal Society of Chemistry (RSC) have been announced today.

Around 130 scholarships worth 20,000 each will be available. Any graduate with a 2.1 or first class degree will be eligible to apply for a scholarship on a chemistry Initial Teacher Training (ITT) course.

Working with experts in teaching practice, the RSC will award scholarships to candidates with exceptional subject knowledge, enthusiasm for the study of chemistry, and outstanding potential to teach. The RSCs relationship with the scholars will continue into their teaching careers to develop a cadre of outstanding chemistry teachers who are part of a community of chemists across schools, universities and industry.

The scholarship comes as part of the Governments teacher training strategy, Training our next generation of outstanding teachers, and follows on from the success of the physics scholarship with the Institute of Physics.

Education Secretary Michael Gove said:

If we want to have an education system that ranks with the best in the world, then we need to attract the best people into the profession, and we need to give them outstanding training.

By joining up with the prestigious Royal Society of Chemistry, the scholarship will help make sure we have excellent chemistry teachers in this country with deep subject knowledge. They will help raise the status of the teaching profession and also make a huge difference in the lives of children.

Dr Robert Parker, RSC chief executive, said:

The RSC is delighted to be leading this exciting initiative. We believe passionately in the need for inspirational teaching, and our fervent hope is that this scholarship will increase the number of inspirational chemistry teachers.

Follow this link:
New scholarships for top chemistry grads to teach

What is this thing called love? Mere chemical trickery

Kayt Sukel, contributor

In The Chemistry Between Us, neuroscientist Larry Young and journalist Brian Alexander examine the neurobiological roots of love

THERE is a reason most of us sigh into our drinks when Cole Porter croons, "What is this thing called love?" We understand his befuddlement all too well. (And let's face it: if a man about town like Porter couldn't figure out this whole love thing, what hope is there for the rest of us mere mortals?)

That's why it is encouraging to know that in the past two decades social neuroscientists have been diligently working to unravel the mysteries of love - including the phenomena of attraction, monogamy and the parent-child bond - using techniques such as brain imaging, genome-wide association studies and transgenic animal models. In The Chemistry Between Us, Larry Young, the director of Emory University's Center for Translational Social Neuroscience, and journalist Brian Alexander offer a novel take on many of those findings.

A few recent books, including my own, Dirty Minds, have chronicled love and sex-related efforts in neuroscience. One of the criticisms of many of these tomes is that they fail to take on the functional "why" questions - why monogamy exists at all, for example, or why some people are more prone to infidelity. In The Chemistry Between Us, Young and Alexander do not shy away from proposing some strong hypotheses about the ways our neurobiology shapes our behaviour when it comes to the "L" word.

Drawing on real stories as well as research, the authors take the reader on a fascinating journey through strip clubs, Romanian orphanages and labs where rodents are regularly stimulated with lubed paintbrushes. These myriad adventures provide a great context for the science - and cleverly illustrate all the ways in which love and sex can make changes to our brain chemistry.

While those who closely follow the latest neurobiological research concerning love and sex might not find many new studies in this mix, they will find a rather unique interpretation of how they all fit together.

Young, who is arguably one of most prolific researchers in the social neuroscience field, plants his flag firmly: he argues that love is truly an addiction and one to which none of us are immune. He takes a reductionist approach, focusing on molecules like dopamine, oxytocin and vasopressin, and examining how these chemicals exploit ancient neurobiological circuits.

Some may feel uncomfortable when Young and Alexander claim that sex tricks women into "babysitting" the men they love - nurturing them as they would their own infants, thanks to the goodly amounts of oxytocin released during the sex act by men hitting the cervix with their large penises and playing with their breasts. Sceptics probably won't feel much better when Young and Alexander postulate that vasopressin helps men see their female partners as simply extensions of their territory.

Still, the authors don't back down. "Many would like to believe that such notions are outdated stereotypes," they write. "They're not. We can fake it, but nature gets the last word." Not overly concerned with political correctness, Young and Alexander even go so far as to extend these hypotheses to touch on modern issues like marriage equality and single motherhood.

See original here:
What is this thing called love? Mere chemical trickery

OC likes QB chemistry, seeks consistency

SOUTH BEND, Ind. Chuck Martin likes the chemistry of his quarterback group through the first-third of the season. Just don't bother asking Notre Dame's offensive coordinator about any big-picture plans.

"I have no idea," Martin, speaking for the first time this season, said Wednesday. "If you've got a crystal ball and you could tell me, that would be awesome. We're all just trying to figure out a way to beat Miami. The plan for the future is to try to figure out what's going to shake down. I believe we've got four good quarterbacks, which obviously one quarterback plays at a time so to me, I don't know.

Martin isn't too worried about Everett Golson losing confidence after being pulled for Tommy Rees in both of the Irish's home games. The fact that head coach Brian Kelly has started Golson over three other talented options is all the validation one needs, Martin said, and the growing pains his No. 1 signal caller has suffered are not uncommon for a redshirt freshman.

"Keep accentuating all the good things he's done, because he's played a lot of snaps, he's done a lot of good things," Martin said of Golson. "We said from Day 1, 'You're not going to be a great quarterback as a freshman. It's very rare [a freshman's] great all the time. You might be great in spurts or great on plays or great for a period of time, or even a whole game you might have a complete great game.' But just to play, there's so many new experiences for him."

The fast-talking Martin said the offense is still searching for consistent execution in all phases, though he's less concerned with establishing a true identity than he is with some of the younger players not showing the same sense of urgency early in games as they have lately.

"The good thing so far is the only time we've really had to throw the ball was the two-minute drive against Purdue and we did it when we had to," Martin said, "and the only two times we've had to run the ball was the fourth quarter of two games against two good opponents and we've grinded the clock pretty good."

Follow this link:
OC likes QB chemistry, seeks consistency

Chemistry blogging and journalism: Eat the fruit, don't count the trees

I have been blogging about chemistry and related topics since 2004. Since then I have had the chance to witness the rise of the chemistry blogosphere. What started as a small, loose collection of opinionated men and women has turned into a group of serious and well-informed bloggers who blog with authority and nuance. Partly because blogging about chemistry is not as attractive as blogging about cosmology or evolutionary biology, the chemistry blogosphere has relatively few blogs. However in my view this has also translated into an unusually high ratio of signal to noise. Speak to people who frequent this world and ask them who they think the good bloggers are, and you will usually hear lists of names that are not only similar but also exhaustive. My own contributions to this world have been very modest but there are others who have set high standards and who will undoubtedly continue to guide the high-quality discourse.

With this background in mind, I was a little disappointed to see a parting editorial by Rudy Baum who has served as editor-in-chief of Chemical and Engineering News (C&EN), the flagship publication of the American Chemical Society. C&EN has been the main source of chemical information and analysis for the chemical community for almost a hundred years. In his capacity Mr. Baum has contributed valuable input to the magazine. He has done an admirable job in keeping the whole enterprise together and has also been very active in interacting with the chemical community, including chemists who write blogs. In fact his own team of outstanding writers, scientists and journalists publish their own blog which has consistently produced insightful, high-quality content.

In his parting editorial Mr. Baum had the following words to say about blogs:

Technology has profoundly changed journalism during my tenure with C&EN. Much of the change has been positivewho can imagine doing research on a topic without access to the Internet?but the business model for journalism remains very much in a state of flux. The silly mantra, Information wants to be free, overlooks the fact that quality information requires effort, and effort costs money.

Blogs are all well and good, they add richness to the exchange of information, but they are not journalism, and they never will be.

Blogs also made an appearance in another discussion arising from a university librarys decision to cancel their subscription to ACS journals because of high prices. A post by the librarian about this was met with the following response by the ACSs Director of Public Affairs

We find little constructive dialogue can be had on blogs and other listservs where logic, balance, and common courtesy are not practiced and observed,

I would like to address the C&EN editorial first. I was not aware of the source of that silly mantra that information should be free until a few fellow bloggers pointed out that it originated with Stewart Brand, creator of the Whole Earth Catalog, the same lavish volume which inspired Steve Jobs during the early phases of his career. It was reiterated by Richard Stallman who started the open software movement at MIT. The quote is more subtle than what it appears in Mr. Baums editorial. The point is that throughout human history, for reasons related not just to cost but also to availability and censorship, information has had to tread the fine line between being withheld and being widely available. Stallman made it clear that by free he was not talking about the price but about availability. He was alluding to the fact that information by its very nature is like a restless beast that wants to spread around through the human medium. History has amply demonstrated the fact that we as a society want to know, and at some point we do. And Stallman was saying this in an age when the internet was still very limited and access to information was severely constrained compared to today.

The age has changed but information is still restricted or expensive in many cases where it should not be so. Unfortunately, simply quoting the information wants to be free gives the impression that consumers of information really think that it doesnt cost anything to produce it. Thats simply not true. Almost every person who I have talked to about open access realizes that it takes cost and effort to edit, referee and produce information. However we are also aware of how much cheaper this process can be compared to what it is, especially because of the exceedingly low costs of bandwidth and storage space. These low costs make it possible for enterprises to be supported mainly through volunteer donations. The fact is that journals and magazines as a whole are still mainly stuck in the old model where a group of editors make it their full-time job to finely craft, edit and publish information. Although the technology for disseminating information has changed, the mindsets find it hard to let go. There is of course still a prominent role for official high-quality information that is carefully vetted and journal editors still do an admirable job of striving for quality, but the fact is that there are now multiple ways of producing and accessing the same information, with blogging being one of the simplest. This proliferation of content creation and production channels has resulted in the entirely reasonable mantra that most information should be very cheap, and at least some information should be free.

The difference between free and cheap is huge; its the same as the difference between zero and any finite number. And its this mantra thatis the source of the campaign against publishers like Elsevier who practice unfair bundling and sport huge profit margins. More importantly though, I think theres at least some evidence to refute Mr. Baums statement that quality information requires effort, and effort costs money. By now Wikipedia has been proven to be a resounding example of the fact that quality can come without money through the efforts of millions of volunteers who contribute knowledge and information for a variety of reasons. Most of these contributors have contributed an immense amount of their time without asking us for a penny and the Wikipedia servers are mainly maintained through volunteer donations. Articles on Wikipedia have been vetted by experts in their respective areas (including Nature) and have been consistently found to contain high-quality information.

Link:
Chemistry blogging and journalism: Eat the fruit, don't count the trees

Formula for success: Alum endows $500,000 to MCC

Former student leaves money to support colleges chemistry dept.

MUSCATINE, Iowa Talk about the right chemistry.

A relationship between a student and his college that began more than 70 years ago is paying off in a big way today.

Seven-plus decades ago, Robert L. Smith was a graduate of Muscatine Junior Colleges class of 1939. Today, the trust he established with his wife, Lucretia, has funded a half-million dollar gift to the Muscatine Community College Foundation

According to a news release from Billie DeKeyrel, assistant director for the foundation, the group recently accepted a $500,000 gift from the Robert L. and Lucretia K. Smith Trust.

The gift will be used to support the Department of Chemistry at Muscatine Community College.

According to MCC Foundation Executive Director Vic McAvoy, the bequest will be used to create an endowment fund for scholarships for students pursuing careers in a chemistry-related field, as well as equipment and materials for the programs.

MCC president Bob Allbee said the generosity of Smith and others like him whose lives have been affected by the college helps MCC reach its goal of providing an excellent education for students.

About Smith

Visit link:
Formula for success: Alum endows $500,000 to MCC

UCSB Professors Receive National Chemistry Awards

Two UC Santa Barbara professors have been named recipients of the American Chemical Societys 2013 national awards for professionaladvancement. Peter C. Ford, professor in the Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, and Craig J. Hawker, also a professor in the Department of chemistry and Biochemistry,professor of materials, and director of the Materials Research Laboratory, have been named among the 64 award winners from across the country

In only one other year, 1996, did UCSB have more than one winner of theAmerican Chemical Society (ACS) awards. The awards will be presented at the nationalACS meeting in New Orleans in April.Ford is the recipient of the ACS Award for Distinguished Service in the Advancement of Inorganic Chemistry. This award recognizes individuals who haveadvanced inorganic chemistry by significant service, in addition to performingoutstanding research. It is sponsored by StremChemicals.

I am of course very pleased and honored to have received this award from my colleagues in the American Chemical Society, saidFord.

Since this is largely in recognition of the body of work generated by my graduate and postdoctoral students and collaborators over my tenure at UCSB, I consider it an award to my research group collectively as well as another testament to the high regard in which this campus is nowheld. I am proud to be aGaucho.

Hawker has been named recipient of the ACS Award in Polymer Chemistry. Thecitation states that Hawker was nominated for transforming the field of polymer chemistry through the clever adaptation of synthetic organic chemistry concepts and theadvancement of macromolecular engineering. ExxonMobil Chemical Company sponsored thisaward.

I am thrilled with the award and the recognition that it brings to my students, collaborators, and co-workers, as well as to the unique research environment at UCSB, said Hawker. The sustained success of cross-disciplinary research has been a key driver in reinforcing UCSBs international standing in the materials chemistry arena. I am grateful for the enormous benefits that this proud tradition has bought to myresearch.

Ford joined the faculty at UCSB in 1967 after earning his Ph.D. at Yale and completing a National Science Foundation postdoctoral fellowship with Nobel laureateHenry Taube at Stanford University. He is a Fellow of the American Association for theAdvancement of Science and was a Senior Fulbright Fellow. His awards include a Dreyfus Foundation Teacher-Scholar Award in 1972; the Alexander von Humboldt Foundation Senior U.S. Scientist Award in 1992; the Richard C. Tolman Medal of theACS in 1993; and the Inter-American Photochemical Society Award in Photochemistry in2008.

Hawker received his Ph.D. from the University of Cambridge, and then completeda postdoctoral fellowship with Jean M. J. Frchet at Cornell. In 2004, he moved from theIBM Almaden Research Center to join the faculty at UCSB. Some of his recent awardsinclude the 2012 Centenary prize from the Royal Society of Chemistry; the 2011 Arthur C. Cope Scholar from the American Chemical Society; and the 2008 DSM PerformanceMaterials Award from the International Union of Pure and Applied Chemistry. In 2010,he was named a Fellow of the RoyalSociety.

See more here:
UCSB Professors Receive National Chemistry Awards

What’s wrong with these pictures

Oh dear.

On Twitter this morning, various people have alerted us to a rather shocking  TV chemistry blunder. James May, of Top Gear fame, has a series on the BBC called Things you need to know, and last night’s show was about chemistry.

Within the first two minutes of the programme, it became obvious that the people doing the graphics had basically zero chemical knowledge (which is not a problem in itself), and hadn’t even bothered to have one of the chemists they obviously interviewed as part of the show to cast an eye over them (which turns out to be a much bigger problem). As May starts to try and explain what a chemical reaction is, using baking soda and vinegar as an example, this graphic pops up on the screen.

Now that one’s not too bad apart from a missing carbon in the formula for vinegar, those carbons are so tricksy to keep track of! OK, the numbers should be subscript and we have a mixture of some sub- and some not. That’s a fairly harmless error. But there’s also no arrow to suggest this is a reaction and delineate which are the reactants and which the products.

And it gets worse on the next graphic – when the formula of sodium bicarbonate is presented with the three as a superscript rather than a subscript. This is starting to get more dangerous as an error, as the meaning is much more easily confused, and it’s a bigger step away from convention. This isn’t a one-off either – later in the show, when the formula of sodium chlorate (NaClO3) is shown, it also has a superscript three.

But the daddy of the bloopers is still to come. When May describes the structure of acetic acid, things go horribly wrong – the infamous five-valent Texas carbon rears its head.

This is disappointing from the BBC, which is usually very good at science programmes. And to be fair, the overall message of the rest of the programme is OK – chemicals are all around us and aren’t all bad for us, we need them to survive. It’s just a shame that the researchers seem to have dropped the ball a little on this one. Chemistry, particularly structures and formulae, is a language in itself. Using it badly doesn’t help anyone, and it would have taken anyone with even a tiny chemical knowledge to spot these mistakes.

Phillip Broadwith

 

Digg This  Reddit This  Stumble Now!  Share on Facebook  Bookmark this on Delicious  Share on LinkedIn  Bookmark this on Technorati  Post on Twitter  Google Buzz (aka. Google Reader)  

Source:
http://prospect.rsc.org/blogs/cw/?feed=rss2

Chemistry lecturer lobbies for full-time position

Teacher evaluations stapled to Clary's office wall are covered with writings from past students showing appreciation for Clary's teachings. Photo by Joshua Bessex.

With an increasing number of unassigned organic chemistry classes, the UW is looking to hire a full-time lecturer. But Scott Clary, a part-time lecturer in the department since 2008, has found himself unable to apply for the position.

Applicants must have a Ph.D. or equivalent degree by date of appointment, states the application on the UW chemistry department website, which presents a problem for Clary.

Despite his teaching experience at the university, Clary does not hold a Ph.D. Interim Dean of the College of Arts and Sciences Robert Stacey said the requirement is standard for the UW and other research universities.

Throughout the College of Arts and Sciences, all our departments require the terminal degree in their field as a prerequisite for consideration for a tenure-track position, Stacey said. This is a standard requirement at all first-tier research universities across the country and around the world. In the natural sciences, the terminal degree is a Ph.D. The Ph.D. is a research degree, and research is a fundamental requirement for all professorial positions at the University of Washington.

However, if the hiring committee does not find a qualified candidate, the job can be relisted with fewer requirements, giving Clary the opportunity to apply. If the committee decides to make an offer to another Ph.D. chemist, Clary would no longer teach at the UW in any capacity.

These job opportunities are rare so I wanted to make every effort to be considered for the position, especially given the positive response that I have gotten from the department and my students, Clary said.

Clarys teaching style resonates with students. Course evaluations filled out by previous students show he has an average rating of 4.4 out of 5. Junior Zachary Billman, who had Clary as a lecturer for a chemistry lab, said he was very approachable as a professor.

He was able to reach the course in a very laid-back way, as if he was just chatting with you, Billman said. This was very effective for that course in particular because he was able to address all of the important steps of the syntheses we would carry out throughout the week while preparing students for what unexpected things may happen so we wouldnt stress out. He taught the class in a conceptual manner.

View post:
Chemistry lecturer lobbies for full-time position

WSSU chemistry professor receives science grant

Charles Ebert, an assistant chemistry professor at Winston-Salem State University, has received a $199,518 from the National Science Foundation to study peripheral nerve regeneration and the treatment of peripheral nerve injuries.

The two-year grant will fund his research that started Sept. 1 and will end Aug. 31, 2014, according to a foundation document.

Ebert said that his research will benefit people with nerve injuries.

"Peripheral nerve injuries, most often seen as a result of automobile accidents and battlefield injuries, create the loss of sensation and function in thousands of people in the U.S. annually," Ebert said.

The most common treatment is to implant donated nerve fibers to repair the damaged nerves, Ebert said, but the procedure is expensive and relies on donors.

"Now recent successes have suggested that keratin isolated from human hair may support the repairing of damaged nerves, and human hair keratin is plentiful and inexpensive to refine," Ebert said.

Ebert was awarded the grant through the foundation's Historically Black Colleges and Universities Undergraduate Program, said Claudia Rankins, the program's manager with the National Science Foundation in Arlington, Va. The program supports researchers intending to build a research program at their institutions.

"A panel of experts and NSF staff found that the proposal had significant intellectual merit, as well as broader impacts," Rankins said.

Ebert will involve his students and also will work with the Wake Forest Institute of Regenerative Medicine in his project, Ebert and Rankins said.

The grant is part of the National Science Foundation's effort to provide support of college faculty members nationwide in the fields of science, technology, engineering and mathematics.

Originally posted here:
WSSU chemistry professor receives science grant

'End Of Watch': The Reviews Are In!

"Training Day" writer David Ayer patrols familiar territory once again in the new cop drama "End of Watch," buckling audiences in for a gritty, blood-stained ride-along with L.A.'s finest. Starring Jake Gyllenhaal and Michael Pea, the film follows a pair of officers who become targets of a powerful cartel's deadly vendetta.

Written and directed by Ayer, "End of Watch" is earning mostly positive reviews from critics, who praise the film's strong narrative and the winning chemistry between its male leads. Where opinions seem to differ, however, is over the film's "found footage" format, which some feel adds a sense of realism but others find distracting.

With "End of Watch" hitting theaters Friday (September 21), here's what the critics have to say.

The Story "David Ayer's South Central-set cop film 'End of Watch' feels like the work of a man who, after relishing venal and brutal police work in his scripts for 'Training Day' and 'Dark Blue,' has come to identify with, and maybe love, the L.A.P.D. Here, L.A.'s finest may work in a world of cut corners and bad attitudes, but they're the good guys, and damned if you're not going to accept it. Vigorously capturing the tension of walking into situations that could be deadly, horrifying, or both, it has a strong commercial appeal despite some shortcomings." John DeFore, The Hollywood Reporter

Gyllenhaal and Pea's Chemistry "But the only relationship that really matters is the one between Brian and Mike. There is a lot of love in that car, and Pea and Gyllenhaal make you feel it. The easy back and forth between them topics ranging from raunchy nonsense to philosophical musings have an organic feel that is hard to come by and usually worth the wait. These moments, seeded through the film, nearly always bring tension-releasing laughter, which we need as much as they do." Betsy Sharkey, Los Angeles Times

The Found Footage Format "On the down side, it's also yet another movie utilizing the 'found footage' gimmick that's all the current rage. Much of the film consists of shaky, hand-held images purportedly shot by Brian for a filmmaking class he's taking. Even the villains are of the YouTube generation, bringing a video camera along for a drive-by. It's an unnecessary distraction from the story, which is a good one." Michael O'Sullivan, Washington Post

The Final Word "Nerve-rattling in the best way, the sharp, visceral urban police procedural 'End of Watch' is one of the best American cop movies I've seen in a long time. Directed from his own script by 'Training Day' writer David Ayer, it's also one of the few I've seen that pay serious attention to what cop life feels like, both on and off duty, for those who protect and serve the streets of L.A.'s danger zone Southland." Lisa Schwarzbaum, Entertainment Weekly

Check out everything we've got on "End of Watch," opening September 21.

Originally posted here:
'End Of Watch': The Reviews Are In!

Saving the golden goose from the chop

In these straightened economic times it seems like researchers are under ever greater pressure to show that their work can be turned into a money-spinning business. There’s more and more focus on ‘impact’, ‘innovation’ and getting a good return on investment for taxpayers’ hard earned cash. The Golden Goose awards have been launched as the antithesis of this need to make the business case for scientific curiosity – they celebrate the power of blue skies research to change society in ways that can’t yet be imagined.

The inaugural award ceremony took place last night in Washington, DC. Eight scientists were honoured for their basic research that no one would have been able to make a convincing business case for, but their discoveries went on to be incredibly important. Charles Townes received his Golden Goose for his work developing the laser (he won the 1964 physics Nobel prize for this work too). Back in the 1950s, Townes was looking to create an intense source of short wavelength radiation to help his team probe the basic properties of molecules and atoms. Now, the laser is ubiquitous in modern life, in everything from barcode scanners and DVD players to surgical equipment – something no one could have foreseen at the time.

Other recipients of an award were Eugene White, Rodney White, Della Roy and the late Jon Weber for their work on tropical coral, which led to a material used in bone grafts. Martin Chalfie, Roger Tsien and Osamu Shimomura also received an award for their research on jellyfish (they also received the 2008 chemistry Nobel prize!). Their discovery of green fluorescent protein, which explains why jellyfish glow under certain wavelengths of light, has been incredibly useful in teasing out how cells work. It has enabled researchers to watch events like protein transport occur in real time.

The Golden Goose awards are, in part, a mocking tribute to the Golden Fleece awards that one US Senator used to hand out for research he considered to be a waste of money. More recently, spending on basic research financed by the US’s stimulus package has been ridiculed as a waste of public money, largely thanks to images of a shrimp on a treadmill (the project was investigating the effects of pollution on crustacean mobility). The awards are also taking place against a backdrop of economic hardship when the case even needs to be made for public funding of essentials like healthcare. This means that making the argument that blue skies research holds the key to creating new technologies and jobs is more important that ever. Something that the people that fund research should bear in mind.

Patrick Walter

Digg This  Reddit This  Stumble Now!  Share on Facebook  Bookmark this on Delicious  Share on LinkedIn  Bookmark this on Technorati  Post on Twitter  Google Buzz (aka. Google Reader)  

Source:
http://prospect.rsc.org/blogs/cw/?feed=rss2

Valley chemistry students are without full-time teacher

WAYNE - The 2012-2013 school year is in full swing for most, but for some students in a sophomore chemistry class at Wayne Valley High School it appears to be at an impasse where students are still without a full-time teacher.

It seems the district is in the process of hiring a new teacher after a candidate they had chosen for an unknown reason withdrew their name. Officials say the search started in June upon learning that the current teacher was taking maternity leave starting Sept. 1. And since that time, a substitute has been filling in, but has not been doing a sufficient job according to one parent.

"The substitute told my son's class that he cannot teach them chemistry as he is not a chemistry teacher. He was also told by the substitute that the teacher would not be returning for five or six months. The kids are being baby-sat, not taught," parent Lisa Rosen told Wayne Today.

Despite what's being reported, according to Superintendent Ray Gonzalez, there is curriculum in place for all courses and is readily available for substitutes.

"Administrators are actively involved in managing the situation," Gonzalez said in a statement, "to ensure that the students' learning experience is supported."

WVHS Principal Robert Reis, via a committee, will be reviewing resumes and conducting interviews, and present who he feels is the best suited candidate to the superintendent.

"This must be fixed immediately. My child's education is at stake. While other students are learning chemistry, my child is sitting in his class and twiddling his thumbs. Chemistry is not an extra-curricular activity," Rosen said.

Gonzalez, in addition, encourages district parents or guardians with questions about development within the school system to reach out to the building principal, who will provide reassurance that their child's educational interests are being addressed.

Rosen added, "Wayne used to be known for its fine educational system. This is something a 'PR' firm cannot fix."

Email: wintersd@northjersey.com

Read more from the original source:
Valley chemistry students are without full-time teacher