How to Manage Passwords In Any Browser And On Any OS [Security]

I want a universal password manager—something that can work with any browser and any OS—and I want it to be simple, secure, and completely dummy-proof. Turns out that such a thing actually exists. Meet LastPass.

Lifehacker's Kevin has a great guide to how LastPass works and how you can get the most out of it, but here's one of the most important things to keep in mind:

[T]he only thing stored on LastPass' servers is a heavily encrypted bundle of your passwords and the sites they belong to-a form of host-proof hosting. They don't have the encryption key to your passwords (only you do), and the encryption and decrypting all takes place on your own computer, where a backup copy of LastPass' records is always kept. If LastPass became evil, or got hacked, the nefarious doers would have to buy one of Google's server farms to break into its users' passwords.

Sold? I am and will be giving LastPass a shot. You can read all about the password manager's features such as browser extensions, one-time passwords, bookmarklets, secure notes, and mobile app compatibility over at Lifehacker. [Lifehacker]


The Best Google-Yahoo Comparison To Date [Block Quote]

Happy Birthday, Yahoo! You turned 15 today. As a present, here's a pretty scathing assessment of you from Ditherati, compliments of Twitter. You know, your new content-sharing partner! It's okay... everyone's teen years are awkward.

Yahoo CEO Carol Bartz's comments about comparing her company to Google came during a CNBC interview today, in which she also spilled that yeah, sure, Yahoo would accept a buyout at the right price:

And what do you bet that price is dropping every day? Let's hope they blow out all the candles in Sunnyvale today—Yahoo could use a wish or two. [Twitter, CNBC]


Sony Reader Daily Reviewed: Do Not Buy [Sony]

Our friend Mark Spoonauer at Laptop published the first major review of Sony's 3G-connected Daily Edition ebook reader. Despite Mark's diplomatic tone, you can tell he thinks it sucks.

As a side note, I don't have a review unit of my own to check out. But I don't need to to know that this Daily has the same screen—and screen problems—as the Sony Reader Touch. And, according to Mark, a few more.

Many people know that the Sony Reader Touch Edition I reviewed recently has a film over it that causes glare and makes reading difficult. I speculated that the Daily Edition would have the same unbearable screen covering, and according to Spoonauer's review, it does. As he puts it:

Due to the extra layer Sony added to the screen to enable touch functionality, the Daily Edition's E-Ink display looks somewhat dull compared to non-touch eReaders, such as the Kindle and Nook... We did find that when reading in medium to low lighting we felt more eye strain with the Daily Edition than with other eReaders.

So my chief complaint on the Touch would apparently be my chief complain on the Daily. Anyone who cares about the value of e-ink—how it is easier on the eyes than LCD—should steer clear of both the Touch and the Daily.

If that were all, the consumer attractiveness of this device might be debatable. But Spoonauer had other beefs with the product. He also cites interface "sluggishness" and network connectivity drops that led him to feel it was "easier to browse and search the store on our computer." So like yikes.

Spoonauer concludes his piece—which I encourage you to read—with a verdict that the Kindle is still way better, and that even the Nook is a better choice for people who particularly want a touch interface.

I recognize that by writing this, I forfeit my request to a review, but truth be told, I have always respected Spoonauer's opinion, and given his thorough work, if he didn't like it, neither will I. I hereby wash my hands of the whole Sony Reader touchscreen nightmare. By his word and by our experience with previous devices, do not buy the reader. [Laptop]


IBM Donates Supercomputer to Rice University for Biomedical Research Collaboration

Rice University and IBM today unveiled a new high-performance computing (HPC) initiative for biomedical and life sciences research that features one of the most powerful supercomputers in the Texas Medical Center. Rice scientists will use the supercomputer in collaboration with researchers from across the medical center to study cancer, AIDS and other complex diseases.