Classic Rock guitarist Adrian Galysh, Libertarian candidate for California State Senate

The California Libertarian Party has recruited a semi-celebrity candidate for a State Senate seat.

From the L.A. Daily News:

Adrian Galysh of Van Nuys has declared himself a candidate for the State Senate, hoping his rhetorical riffs prove as crowd-pleasing as his guitar licks.

Galysh, 35, has never before run for office, but does have three solo albums to his credit.

What does a rock musician know about government?

"I don't know anything about accruing a $600 billion debt (and) wasting people's tax money," Galysh said with a laugh on Monday. "I do know California is in dire straits and somebody has to tell the government `No."'

Playing the anti-tax chord, the Duquesne University graduate said he's "running on the ideals of limited government, fiscal responsibility and personal responsibility."

He cited an estimate that between California's budget deficit and what it owes to bond- and pension-holders, the state is in the hole to the tune of $600 billion.

If he were to say he's running on his record, he would have to be referring to the 2008 album "Earth Tones" (his latest solo effort) or the band Minnesota 13's 2008 release "Bottles, Bullets and Faith" (on which he is credited with all the guitar work).

Galysh will be challenging incumbent Democrat Senator Alex Padilla. A spokesman for the Padilla campaign commented, that the two candidates are not in accord.

[We have] "two very different visions."

"There's a difference between wasteful spending and investments we need to move our state forward," [Rose] Kapolczynski said.

As the review below suggests, Galysh has collaborated with musicians from Ted Nugent's band and Supertramp.

From a review of one of his recent albums, Earth Tones:

The "Interstellar Caf? shred fest is what you'd expect on an instrumental guitar album by a hotshot who pegged Ted Nugent bassist Marco Mendoza and Frank Gambale drummer Joey Heredia to comprise the rhythm section on Earth Tones, Adrian Galysh's third CD. But the California dude, thank goodness, loads this thing with enough musical diversity to silence players with half his talent.

The melodic title track sounds fat and airy, and "Ave Maria No Moro" is a reverent and lovely piece. Hell, Galysh even invited latter-day Supertramp guitarist Carl Verheyen to duet with him on the fast an d furious "Terrestrial Races." These are actual songs, my friends, not just excuses to solo.

More information - Libertarian Party of California http://www.ca.lp.org

Michele Bachmann suggests Americans avoid UnConstitutional Health Care law

Civil Disobedience or just doing one's duty upholding the Constitution?

The Congresswoman from eastern Minnesota is vastly becomming a hero to the libertarian movement. Over the weekend, at a rally held at the state capitol in St. Paul, Bachmann made the following remarks according to TPM (via Memeo):

"But mark my words, the American people aren't gonna take this lying down," Bachmann later said. "We aren't gonna play their game, we're not gonna pay their taxes. They want us to pay for this? Because we don't have to. We don't have to. We don't have to follow a bill that isn't law. That's not the American way, and that's not what we're going to do.

If they pass the bill legitimately, then yes, we have to follow the law -- until we repeal it. But if they pass it illegitimately, then the bill is illegitimate, and we don't have to lay down for this. It's not difficult to figure out. So if for some reason they're able to get their votes this week and pass this 2,700-page Senate bill -- if they get it, trillions of dollars is what it's gonna cost, when we didn't vote on it, we need to tell them a message: That if they get away with this, they will be able to get away with anything -- with anything. And you can't say you voted on a bill when you didn't, because it's fraud. But we are not helpless here. We are not helpless, there are things that we can do."

Previously pegged as a social conservative, Bachmann has been associating herself as of late more and more with libertarians such as Ron Paul, Glenn Beck, and Ted Nugent. Libertarian-leaning GOPer Sarah Palin has a fundraiser scheduled for Bachmann next month in her district.

Diagnosis, Therapy and Evidence

When Dr. Novella recently wrote about plausibility in science-based medicine, one of our most assiduous commenters, Daedalus2u, added a very important point. The data are always right, but the explanations may be wrong. The idea of treating ulcers with antibiotics was not incompatible with any of the data about ulcers; it was only incompatible with the idea that ulcers were caused by too much acid. Even scientists tend to think on the level of the explanations rather than on the level of the data that led to those explanations.

A valuable new book elaborates on this concept: Diagnosis, Therapy and Evidence: Conundrums in Modern American Medicine, by medical historian Gerald N. Grob and sociologist Allan V. Horwitz. They point out that 

many claims about the causes of disease, therapeutic practices, and even diagnoses are shaped by beliefs that are unscientific, unproven, or completely wrong.

While we try to be science-based, we are not always as scientific or as logical as we would like to think. We form hypotheses that are compatible with existing data, and then our assumptions guide our thinking and future research and sometimes interfere with our reception of new data. We must recognize those assumptions and constantly re-evaluate them. It’s important that we look the imperfections of science-based medicine squarely in the face if we are going to have any hope of overcoming them.

Of the therapies recommended in a 1927 textbook only 23 were later validated as effective or preventive. The other 211 were subsequently found to be either harmful, useless, of questionable value, or simply symptomatic.

Medical treatment has had a big impact on human health, but there’s more to the story. We developed effective treatments for ulcers, but the incidence of ulcers was already declining before those treatments had any impact. The decline of rheumatic heart disease is probably not due to antibiotics but may be due to decreased virulence of the causal bacteria. We have no idea why the incidence of stomach cancer has decreased in the US, or why it is so high in Japan.

A popular concept today is that cancer is largely a preventable illness linked to diet, environmental carcinogens and behavior. This is rooted largely in belief and hope rather than fact. Smoking is the one notable exception. Genetic factors and the many physiologic changes of aging may contribute more than we would like to think. To some extent, disease is an unavoidable consequence of life: the idea that science can eventually provide perfect health may be a chimera.

In our efforts to prevent heart attacks we are essentially treating risk factors, without a clear understanding of how they relate to pathophysiology. We are treating hypertension, hyperlipidemia and other risk factors rather than directly treating the cause(s) of cardiovascular disease. We offer behavioral prescriptions based on assumptions derived from inadequate epidemiologic evidence, and this kind of thinking can lead us astray. Recommending a low fat diet helped fuel an epidemic of obesity as people replaced the fat in their diet with extra carbohydrates.

Once we have formed a belief we are slow to respond to new evidence that refutes it. The book covers the history of tonsillectomy. Tonsillectomies remained fashionable long after the evidence showed most of them were useless.

The most interesting question they ask is

How do diagnoses come into existence and why do many disappear with the passage of time?

What ever happened to chlorosis and neurasthenia? The same patient presenting with the same symptoms in 1890 and 2010 would get entirely different diagnoses. The ailments that afflict humans don’t change much; our diagnostic categories do.

Autism, CFS and fibromyalgia are all relatively new diagnoses for conditions that undoubtedly existed long before the diagnostic name was coined. “Their pathobiology remains unknown, and there is little agreement on their diagnostic boundaries. Once given a name, however, the numbers given to each diagnosis have expanded exponentially.”

Psychiatric diagnoses are particularly slippery. Where exactly do you draw the line between normal sadness and depression? Disease occurs on a continuum and we try to fit it into discrete boxes. We organize the data differently at different times as influenced by historical circumstances. The Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (in its many iterations, now up to DSM-5) changes as it reflects not only new data but cultural, social, and political forces. There is no evidence that the new DSM categories of anxiety have improved the diagnosis, treatment, or understanding of anxiety disorders. The popularity of the diagnosis of post traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) raises issues about the connection between external causes, individual responses, and resulting symptoms. Broadened criteria for PTSD have made it possible for almost everyone to be diagnosed or considered at risk.

We differentiate between science-based medicine and belief-based medicine, but we mustn’t forget that scientists form beliefs too. Our interpretation of the evidence is influenced by our working hypotheses. We must remember to constantly guard against overinterpretation and to concentrate only on what the evidence actually shows. When we use a diagnosis, we must remember that it is not definitive, but only an artificial category we have imposed on nature to help us understand our patients’ symptoms and provide a framework for treatment decisions. When we have an explanation, we must keep re-evaluating the data to make sure another explanation doesn’t fit the data just as well.

Ionannidis showed that most published studies are wrong. Grob and Horwitz show that many of our current diagnoses, treatments, and ideas about disease may be wrong too.

I suggest that we all repeat the mantra: “I could be wrong” and keep asking “Could any other explanation fit the data?”


[Slashdot]
[Digg]
[Reddit]
[del.icio.us]
[Facebook]
[Technorati]
[Google]
[StumbleUpon]

job offer

= Hi, i Have received an offer letter from IGL ENGINEERING OIL AND GAS COMPANY UK, need to know if it is fraud? =

the company address given in letter is : 13 Dunghill Road (Shop 190) Carmarthen SA31 2AF Wales, then person from whom i have received this is : Dr. Tony Lampson, Chief Recruiting

PLF Determination for Power Plant

Many a time , I came across the PLF(plant Load Factor). Could you please help me, in getting understanding what is PLF and how it is determine for a specific plant. Also, when determining the gross generation of a power plant we multiply the rated capacity of the plant with Operating hours and PLF,

Arcing Under Magnetic Field

Case 1.

1. Let us say an arc is to strike between point A and point B in air.
2. There is weak or powerful magnetic field between A & B perpendicular to the line A-B,
3. How will it affect arc voltage & current (after arc is established) , threshold voltage,arc current (befo

DC Incandescent Bulb

A simple question:Can I use ordinary incandescent bulb rated 230V AC,60w in 220V DC?Is there any problem?These bulbs are actully used in the emergency lighting fed from DC charger.There are hardly available DC bulbs in the market.Pls have your opinions/experiences here...........thank you.

Pre ISO Metric Sizes

Does anyone remember when the ISO metric standard was introduced and what the smallest sizes were before? I work on a lot of pre 1980's camera equipment and my unsorted tiny screw pile is getting too big. I want to sort them but the diameters are all over the place.

Thanks

Under Ground Cable

I am looking for cable sizing calculation and name of vendor for under ground cable which can serve in area having condition as:

1. Voltage grade: 10 kV

2. Ambient temp: (-) 28 deg C to +46 deg C

3. Frosting/Icing during winter: up to 500 mm below grade.

4. Length of cable: up to

No Start on Ford 2.9

I'm really needing help. I have a 1986 Ford Ranger pickup with 2.9 V-6

The engine died while driving and now the fuel pumps won't run.

I have checked the circuits and from the relays (there are 2; 1 electric and 1 vacuum operated) to the pumps everything is as it should be.

The