Tunxi and Mt Huangshan

Posted on by

We got to the entrance of Mount Huangshan a UNESCO heritage site which is known for its mountain top views of the clouds below it is actually called the Sea Of Clouds and spectacular sunrises. We arrived at the entrance to the mountain by way of bus and taxi before spending around 11 hours climbing the west side steps and savouring the stunning views the peaks are all roughly 1800M above sea l

Hangzhou

Posted on by

The bus to Hangzhou wasnrsquot nearly as bad as the one to Tunxi in fact it was quite pleasant the driver even got up to tell me when we got there ldquothererdquo wasnrsquot exactly a bus station it was a petrol station where a few of us were abandoned. It didnrsquot take long to find a bus station my only problem was that none of the busses in the station had the designation I need

Honeymoon Tours in India Water the Seed of Love

Posted on by

Marriage metamorphoses itself into a long lasting relationship during the honeymoon period. Therefore it ought to be well planned in terms of choosing the destination. A honeymoon is about how much privacy and free space that a couple has to explore each other. The honeymoon tours in India give a wide collection of options in terms of destinations to choose. One of the best options in the catalog

Kerala Travel Cherish Your Memorable Days in Kerala

Posted on by

Kerala is one of the best tourist destinations in Asia Blessed with pristine hill stations waterfalls fertile land palm fringed lakes endless beaches lush green forests mountains Ayurveda resorts green hill ranges some of the highest tea estates in the world wildlife sanctuaries and rich cultural heritage with spectacular temple festivals and thrilling snake boat races. Experience the ma

North India Tours Heritage and Wildlife Attractions in Northern India

Posted on by

North India is an integral part of India tourism. This part of India has many popular tourist circuits and many enticing attractions. Delhi Agra Ranthambhore Sariska Jaipur Corbett Kashmir Shimla Manali Varanasi etc are popular tourist destinations in the northern region of this country. Have a look at some of fascination tourist destinations of northern India. Delhi Delhi is the capit

In honor of World Homeopathy Awareness Week 2010

Posted on by

Today, April 10, is the first day of World Homeopathy Awareness Week (WHAW), or, as I like to call it, World Sympathetic Magic Awareness Week. This week long “celebration” runs from today until April 16. Now, given the dim view of homeopathy which, I daresay, each and every blogger here at SBM shares, you’d think I wouldn’t want people to pay attention to WHAW. Nothing could be further from the truth. It is because I view homeopathy as nothing more than quackery based on magical thinking that I actually want people to be aware of it, starting with some of the more amusing bits that homeopaths have published over the last year. Like this bit:

Which Steve discussed here, and Orac had some fun with here. (Steve’s deconstruction of Benneth’s nonsense brought responses calling him a hypocrite, a Nazi or a “slave breaker.”)

Or this bit:

Which Orac also had some fun with here and Steve had a bit of fun with here.

All of which is why this is the best homeopathy poster ever:

HN09poster1A

In fact, these two videos probably demonstrate the utter ridiculousness of homeopathy better than almost anything else, which is why I present them again in honor of WHAW. First, there’s the already classic Mitchell and Webb sketch, even though it’s maybe a year old:

Then there’s an oldie but goodie, Homeopathic E.R.:

And let’s not forget that stand up comedy can be perfect for deconstructing nonsense like homeopathy:

David Mitchell and Dara O’Briain even talk about it a bit:

There. I trust I’ve done my part to spread awareness of homeopathy in honor of World Homeopathy Awareness Week. But more can be done. For instance, I suggest you peruse the posts in the homeopathy category of this blog. And, don’t forget, there are still six days to go. Here’s hoping we find some more fun to have with homeopaths before next Friday rolls around, after which Steve, Val, John, Kim, and I will see some of you at NECSS the following day!


[Slashdot]
[Digg]
[Reddit]
[del.icio.us]
[Facebook]
[Technorati]
[Google]
[StumbleUpon]

New York Soda Tax proponent admits it hurts the "Little People" the most

Posted on by

NANNY-STATE WATCH

NY legislators need to "protect people from themselves"

Alan S. Chartock, president and CEO of WAMC radio in upstate New York, has a column in the Troy Record, "Legislature should tax soda." Chartock sees the tax as a way to close New York's widening budget gap, and have some constructive social engineering. He writes:

We know that obesity is rampant in this country and sugar use by Americans is off the charts. But we don’t tax sugar-laden soda, even though our heath commissioner tells us that this is the time to do just that... The unpopular (but often right) Gov. David Paterson is in favor of the tax on soft drinks.

Chartock then admits that the working class will be hit the hardest, precisely the targetted constituency of the Democrat Party.

Continuing:

There is a current libertarian streak running through this country. People know that every time you put a tax on a popular product like soda, the little people are expected to pay more than their share. The economists call this a regressive tax and it is. Health Commissioner Richard Daines is wildly in favor of the tax. He feels that it will save lives and believes that just as the tax on cigarettes has helped cut down on the consumption of that killer product, the same thing will happen when taxes drive the price of a soda up.

This is a budget crisis year and people distrust the Legislature. As our law-makers look for ways to protect people from themselves, they may want to think about doing the right thing.

Christina Jeffrey Republican for Congress, South Carolina – Allow Americans to opt out of Social Security

Posted on by

Christina Jeffrey for Congress: Fighting to Take American Back!

Christina Jeffrey is running an insurgent libertarian-conservative GOP primary campaign against incumbent "fiscally moderate, socially authoritarian" Bobby Ingless.

She's a self-described "Army brat" brought up in a household that was "Christian, anti-communist, free-enterprise, self-sufficient, loyal Americans."

She also notes in her campaign bio:

Christina attended Vassar College as a freshman, but transferred to a conservative college in Texas where she could study with an outstanding conservative and libertarian faculty.

She's a former College Republican, member of Young Americans for Freedom, and a co-organizer of the Boiling Springs Tea Party.

Further notes on her background:

She has worked in the campaigns of conservatives starting with Barry Goldwater. Most recently she was the campaign manager for Dr. Henry Jordan’s bid for Lt. Governor in 2006. She has never been a paid political operative, but always volunteers and never asks for expense money. In 2008, she fell 123 votes short of election to the legislature. She supports Mark Sanford’s fiscally conservative principles and helped him get elected, just as she did Jim DeMint, and other local conservatives.

Jeffrey recently spoke to a gathering of a local GOP precinct committee in Spartenburg.

Jeffrey stated that she agreed with a member of the audience that "right, first we defund them," Social Security, Medicare and other entitlements.

She later describes her plan for Social Security to "allow people to opt out. Take their money and let them invest it..."

Campaign website: ChristinaJeffrey.com

Boortz: Perfectly fine to lay-off workers who voted for Obama

Posted on by

How to respond to the Obama recession? Atlanta-based radio talk show host, and staunch libertarian Republican Neal Boortz, offers a novel idea: Start the lay-offs with workers who voted for Obama.

Boortz from Twitter:

If Obama is hurting your business ... and you have to lay off someone ... why not lay off an Obama voter? They contributed to your problem.

(H/t Memeo)

Editor's comment - Our friend Neal is being a bit cautious here. Why not take it one step further, and lay-off all registered Democrats first?

A Libertarian Weekend Reader: Why not a little Von Mises?

Posted on by

AUSTRIAN ECONOMICS

Mises made, in my opinion, the single greatest economic breakthrough of the 20th century. He proved, with irrefutable logic, why socialism is inherently unviable, due to the impossibility of meaningful economic calculation in the absence of market-based prices. -- Mark Hendrickson, Economist

From Eric Dondero:

Another silly romantic comedy from Blockbuster this weekend, or a free market Economics text? Which will leave you feeling cheap, and which will leave you intellectually invigorated?

Mark Hendrickson, an economist who studied under one of the heirs of Ludwig von Mises Dr. Hans Sennholz, offers this list of the best of Von Mises at American Thinker:

In The Theory of Money and Credit (1912), Mises integrated money into the larger body of neoclassical marginalist thought; showed how inflation redistributes, rather than creates wealth; and laid the foundation for his and Hayek's future work on how central bank monetary policy causes the widespread "cluster of errors" that characterizes the boom-bust cycle.

In Socialism: An Economic and Sociological Analysis (1922), Mises made, in my opinion, the single greatest economic breakthrough of the 20th century. He proved, with irrefutable logic, why socialism is inherently unviable, due to the impossibility of meaningful economic calculation in the absence of market-based prices. His socialist critics claimed to have surmounted this difficulty by saying that socialist regimes could copy capitalist prices -- hardly a "triumph" for the alleged superiority of socialism if it is ultimately a parasite dependent on capitalism. Many tens of millions of human beings could have been spared untold grief, blight, poverty, suffering, and premature death in the wretched experiments with socialism that darkened the 20th century, if only Mises's insights and warnings had been heeded.

Mises's magnum opus is Human Action (1949). This book summarizes all of his vast economic understanding and synthesizes it into a comprehensive theory of (what else?) human action, called "praxeology." At a time when economics was becoming so fragmented and specialized that agricultural economists, for example, might have difficulty understanding international trade economists, Mises accomplished the intellectual equivalent of putting Humpty-Dumpty back together again by developing the economic equivalent of the unified theory in physics.

Mises's fourth masterpiece is Theory and History (1957), a surprisingly readable examination of methodology that includes discussions of how both economic theory and the study of history demonstrate the superiority of free-market over government-planned economic action. (This book is the most accessible of "the big four" to the non-economist.)

A big deficit of Democrats in the Dakotas

Posted on by

The further decline of the endangered Western Democrat

From Eric Dondero:

On Monday, Libertarian Republican reported on the Democrat Party of South Dakota backing off a challenge to incumbent US Senator John Thune. The article: "Thune, smooth cattle ride to Reelection." The Democrats simply could not find a candidate to run against the popular Republican.

Now, further evidence of the Party's serious decline in the upper Central West.

From the Dickinson Press, Bismark April 10, "ND Dems short of candidates for Legislature":

North Dakota Democrats haven't put up challengers for Republican incumbents in Williston, Devils Lake and Bismarck, and may allow seven incumbent GOP state senators to run unopposed for re-election, candidate filings show.

Democratic slates in 24 legislative districts holding elections this fall had a number of holes Friday as the filing deadline passed for North Dakota's June 8 primary.

Democratic candidates are not running for either the House or Senate in District 1, which includes the city of Williston; District 15, which covers Devils Lake, Ramsey County and part of southern Towner County; or District 47 in north Bismarck, one of the state's strongest GOP areas.

In four other districts, Democrats are fielding only one House candidate to compete with two Republicans for each district's two House seats.

In contrast, Republicans failed to come up with a challenger for only one single Democrat-held seat.

Senate Majority Leader Bob Stenehjem, R-Bismarck noted wryle:

"It doesn't look like it will be a good year to run as a Democrat in North Dakota."

iPerio – Thoughts about portability of digital pathology practice

Posted on by

Dr. Kim Solez has added some new material on his Facebook including some nice videos about his experiences in pathology and where he sees the future of pathology.  Since delving into his group a little more since my first mention last week I noticed his interests towards digital pathology including some screen shots of an iPhone with a pathology image called "iPerio".  Clever.  There is an application for this of course called Interpath.  I have dowloaded the demo app to my iPhone and can access a gallery of images. Images were slow to open but viewable (and I think diagnosable) once you get there.

He also mentions the possibilities with a 320 GB hard drive (600-1000 slides) or about 40 trays as an average. Laptop on an airplane.  A new opportunity for the pathologist who claims "have microscope will travel" or "circuit riding pathologist". 

As I have mentioned before, while the technology may allow you to do this.  Would you really want to?

Laptop poolside reading cases.  Should you?  CLIA might have a word to say about this.  Professional setting? 

No doubt digital pathology has and is evolving with marked escalation over the past 18-24 months and I think enough pathologists understand now it is not a matter of "if" but "when" for themselves.

It is particularly interesting to hear and see this from a well-known experienced pathologist about the future of our practice and its relevance for those considering pathology as a career.

I encourage you to check out the Pathology Career Group on Facebook.  Thank you Dr. Solez for your insights! Another demonstration of Pathology 2.0!

Rocketplane’s Florida opportunity

Posted on by
Chuck Lauer of Rocketplane Global at Space Access '10

Chuck Lauer of Rocketplane Global at Space Access '10

In a presentation at the Space Access ’10 conference in Phoenix on Saturday, Chuck Lauer of Rocketplane Global provided a bit of news about the company’s efforts to develop a suborbital vehicle. That work has been on hold for the last couple of years because of a lack of funding, and most of Rocketplane’s employees have since been laid off.

Lauer announced that Rocketplane Global had signed a letter of intent with the Jacksonville Aviation Authority (JAA) to fly out of Cecil Field, a former naval air station that received a spaceport license from the FAA earlier this year. Rocketplane, he said, was the first company to reach an agreement with the JAA to operate out of Cecil Field. The flights would be coupled to the development of a tourist attraction at the spaceport that would offer a more mass-market experience, including virtual reality spaceflights, at a cost similar to typical theme park admissions.

Lauer said it would be something like the Kennedy Space Center Visitors Complex, which features a “Shuttle Launch Experience” ride, but with one key difference. “The KSC Visitors Complex is backward looking. It’s a museum dressed up with some hands-on exhibits,” he said. “This is the opposite. This is forward looking. This is the future of American spaceflight.” Cecil Field was well-positioned for something like this, since it’s the first spaceport located near a major city. Jacksonville, Lauer said, attracts about 10 million visitors a year, more than Hawaii. (While Lauer said 10 million, which is indeed higher than the 6.5 million who visited Hawaii in 2009, an economic study commissioned by the local tourism bureau estimated only 2.8 million overnight visitors in Jacksonville in 2008.) Lauer sees obvious synergies between suborbital spaceflight and terrestrial activities: “Coupling space tourism with conventional tourism is just a fundamentally sound idea.”

All this costs money, something that has been in short supply for Rocketplane. That may be changing, Lauer claimed. “We’re really close at this point” to lining up funding, he said. The challenge for the company is that it’s focus on an “all-up” development rather than the more incremental path taken by other companies—and now added to it development of terrestrial attractions—means that they need hundreds of millions of dollars. However, he said the finance community understands things like tourist attractions, and that has opened some doors for them in raising money. Lauer said they’ve been working with an investment bank on this and expect to close some funding “within a few weeks”.

Once that happens, Rocketplane plans to resume work on its XP spaceplane. He anticipates needing two to two-and-a-half years to complete development of the XP, which would be done in Oklahoma with test flights from the spaceport there; he anticipated commercial tourist flights beginning in 2013s. However, some of the spaceflight simulator rides could be ready much sooner: some could be running by the end of this year at the Future of Flight museum outside Seattle.

Steven Higgs: Another antivaccine reporter like Dan Olmsted in the making?

Posted on by

April is National Autism Awareness Month, and as of today April is nearly half over. Do you notice anything different compared to the last couple of years? I do. Can you guess what it is?

The anti-vaccine movement’s usual suspects haven’t been all over the mainstream media, as they usually are this time every year, often as early as April 1 or even March 31. In fact, over the last couple of years I had come to dread April 1, not because it’s April Fools’ Day (although the things that made me dread that particular day were often indistinguishable from an April Fools’ Day prank, so full of idiocy were they), but rather the expected carpet bombing of the media by the likes of Jenny McCarthy, J.B. Handley, and their ilk showing up on various talk shows to spread their propaganda that vaccines cause autism. For instance, last year Jenny McCarthy and her former boyfriend Jim Carrey showed up on Larry King Live! with Dr. Jerry Kartzinel (her co-author on her latest book of autism quackery) and J.B. Handley, the last of whom even contributed a guest post on Larry King’s blog, in which he touted an incredibly bad, pseudoscientific “study” commissioned by Generation Rescue, which was more like cherry-picked random bits of data twisted together into a pretzel of nonsense, as I described. Around the same time, Jenny McCarthy was interviewed by TIME Magazine, an interview in which she uttered these infamous words:

I do believe sadly it’s going to take some diseases coming back to realize that we need to change and develop vaccines that are safe. If the vaccine companies are not listening to us, it’s their fucking fault that the diseases are coming back. They’re making a product that’s shit. If you give us a safe vaccine, we’ll use it. It shouldn’t be polio versus autism.

Soon after, Generation Rescue created a website called Fourteen Studies, which they promoted hither, thither, and yon. The idea of the website was to attack the main studies that failed to find a link between vaccines and autism and to promote the pseudoscientific studies that anti-vaccinationists like. In 2008, it was pretty much the same — well, worse, even. When she appeared on Larry King Live! with our old “friend,” anti-vaccine pediatrician to the stars, Dr. Jay Gordon, she shouted down real doctors by yelling, “Bullshit!” (behavior trumpeted by Rachel Sklar of the Huffington Post).

This year? Nothing. J.B. Handley seems to be the man who wasn’t there. Well, not quite: it turns out that J.B. Handley has managed to get a little bit of fawning media attention, but just a little bit, in the form of an interview in The Bloomington Alternative entitled J.B. Handley: It’s unequivocal; vaccines hurt some kids. Apparently Mr. Handley has come down quite a bit in the world. Where’s his appearance with Jenny on Larry King Live! this year? Maybe it’s coming in the second half of the month. In the meantime Steven Higgs will have to do as the new mouthpiece for the anti-vaccine movement.

J.B. Handley: Anti-vaccine warrior and Steven Higgs likes it

Regular readers of this blog will be able to spot the misinformation and anti-vaccine propaganda spewed by J.B. Handley in this article. There’s no doubt that Mr. Higgs is very impressed by J.B. from the very beginning of his article, which contains these characterizations of Mr. Handley:

  • It’s not like Handley doesn’t understand the vitriol regularly aimed at him by what he routinely calls “the other side.” He is a pointed, straight-talking pain in their asses.
  • McCarthy’s presence, Handley said, allows him to “hang out in the cheap seats and opine and write my own stuff and challenge people.” And in that regard, his style doesn’t earn him any props with the vaccines-are-sacrosanct crowd — the AAP, the pharmaceutical companies, and the government officials and researchers they financially support. He’s described their positions as “atomic stupidity” in articles he has written. Moron is a term he uses often, in print and in conversation.
  • Even over the telephone from two-thirds of a continent away, J.B. Handley exudes a large personality and supreme confidence in his experiences and conclusions about his son’s autism.

“Atomic stupidity” describes a lot of what Mr. Handley says on a routine basis, although those of us who’ve butted heads with him in the past tend to refer to it as “burning stupid.” My sarcasm and intense dislike for Mr. Handley aside, given that most of it is typical, run-of-the-mill Generation Rescue anti-vaccine nonsense that I and several of my co-bloggers have refuted time and time again, Mr. Higgs’ article might hardly have been worth my notice, much less blogging about, were it not for this passage, in which Higgs swallows whole J.B. Handley’s premature gloating about a post that Steve Novella wrote for SBM in February:

“Dr. Novella’s piece details a recent study published in the Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry titled ‘A Prospective Study of the Emergence of Early Behavioral Signs of Autism’ that tried to figure out when signs of autism first emerge in babies,” Handley wrote. “Ironically, the study Novella references is quite supportive of the theory that autism is caused by the environment and most notably vaccines.”

The March 2010 study compared two groups of children, one at high risk for autism and one at low risk, and noted the onset of symptoms in children who developed autism. It found no difference in the frequency of visual contact, shared smiles and vocalizations at 6 months. The differences, however, “were significant by 12 months of age on most variables.”

In a blog post on the Web site Science-Based Medicine, Novella wrote, “What these results indicate is that clear signs of autism emerge between 6 and 12 months of age.”

Novella concluded that the study disproved a link between autism and vaccines. “Many children are diagnosed between the age of 2 and 3, during the height of the childhood vaccine schedule. This lends itself to the assumption of correlation and causation on the part of some parents.”

In an addendum to the blog, Novella acknowledged that he erred when he wrote that line, but he insisted, “Many parents blame their children’s autism on vaccines they received after the true onset of symptoms.”

While Handley didn’t comment on the addendum in his Age of Autism counterpost, he said the original line made him “shout and laugh at the same time.” Children have received 19 shots by 6 months — 52 percent of the total vaccination schedule — when the study says early symptoms of autism begin to appear.

Of course, Mr. Handley didn’t comment on Steve’s followup post in his Age of Autism post, because Steve showed very clearly that Handley was, as usual, so wrong that he wasn’t even wrong. In essence, J.B. thought he had found a “gotcha” moment and that one erroneous statement that Steve made in his post was in fact an admission by mistake that the anti-vaccine movement is correct to point out a correlation between the peak ages of autistic regression and the height of the vaccine schedule. Steve admitted his error and then went on to describe clearly why his mistake was not evidence in favor of Mr. Handley’s position.

What was particularly interesting about Mr. Handley’s response that Steve didn’t cover was how much it showed that Mr. Handley has been changing his story and shifting the goalposts over the years. In particular, I noticed this paragraph in which J.B. stated:

More importantly, autism is not an event, it’s a process. It is exceptionally rare that I hear the story, “my son was 100% fine, and at 2 years old after one vaccine appointment he lost everything.” I have heard that story, but very rarely.

If Mr. Higgs had dug a little deeper, he might have realized that that’s exactly the sort of story I see time and time again presented by anti-vaccine believers, J.B. included, as “evidence” that vaccines cause autism.” Is this the same J.B. Handley who has touted at least since 2005 how common stories of children declining right after vaccines are? Let’s see, a couple of years ago he complained to the AAP:

Ms. Martin, let me give you a little insight into my world. If I wanted to find parents who had autistic children and who believed their child’s autism was impacted by vaccines, I wouldn’t need to email the nation’s pediatricians hoping I might find one or two. I could just open my window and yell, because these parents are everywhere in my neighborhood and town! Worse, our numbers continue to grow.

You see, not a day goes by without Generation Rescue receiving an email from a new parent who watched their child decline following a vaccination appointment with their pediatrician. While you search for the handful of parents with autistic children who may support immunizations, we can’t respond to emails fast enough from the thousands we hear from who feel vaccines contributed to their child’s autism.

“Not a day goes by …”? To me that sounded very much as though Handley was arguing that regression after vaccination is very common. Let’s look a bit more, say, from a post JB wrote before going on Larry King Live! last April:

Finally, we have tens of thousands of case reports of parents reporting that their child developmentally regressed, stopped talking, and was later diagnosed with autism after a vaccine appointment. The number of vaccines have risen along with autism rates, vaccines are known to cause brain damage, and parents report regression and later autism after getting them. Is it really so hard to believe we think vaccines are a trigger?

Wow. Tens of thousands of case reports! It appears to me that in his response to Steve there was more than a little bit of goalpost shifting. After all, the “stereotypical” (or “prototypical”) story of the anti-vaccine movement is of the child between the ages of 1 and 3 who is brought to the pediatrician, receives vaccines. Shortly thereafter, or so the story goes, the child loses language and social skills and develops regressive autism. Never mind that, given the number of children who are vaccinated every year and the number of children who develop regressive autism, there are bound to be overlaps such that by random chance alone there will be many children who regress in reasonably close temporal proximity to vaccination. Never mind that no one has ever shown that this regression occurs more frequently in vaccinated children. Anecdotes like the ones JB was touting up until (apparently) now are the very “evidence” that the anti-vaccine movement uses to blame vaccination for autism. And, in all fairness, in a single child not studied in the context of populations, such an event can look all the world as though the vaccine caused the regression even when it did not. Even so, the point is that parents who believe vaccines caused their children’s autism don’t blame a process. They blame vaccines, often specific vaccines like the MMR.

In response to this article, I wrote Mr. Higgs an e-mail. I’ll admit that my tone was a bit peeved. However, it does bother me whenever a journalist give credence to the words of a man who, in addition to having a six or seven year history of spreading pseudoscience fueled by his unrelenting hostility towards vaccines, quite recently publicly gloated that he and his anti-vaccine movement were “early to middle stages of bringing the U.S. vaccine program to its knees.” My e-mail ultimately led to a three-way e-mail exchange between Mr. Higgs, Steve, and myself, and this led me to the definite conclusion that we have a budding Dan Olmsted on our hands.

Who is Dan Olmsted and why doesn’t any reporter want to be like him? Olmsted is currently a regular blogger at Generation Rescue’s anti-vaccine propaganda blog Age of Autism, where he is listed as the editor. What people who haven’t been following this issue a long time is that Olmsted used to be an investigative reporter and senior editor for United Press International (UPI). Between January 2005 and July 2007, Olmsted wrote a series of “investigative” reports in a series that he called Age of Autism (his first installment predating the Age of Autism blog by nearly three years). In the series, he totally bought into vaccine-autism pseudoscience and presented the conspiracy theory through a combination of the same logical fallacies and bad science that undergirds the anti-vaccine movement, including confusing correlation with causation to blame thimerosal in vaccines or vaccines themselves for autism.

Olmsted’s most infamous gaffe was to be, as far as I can tell, the originator of the myth that the Amish don’t vaccinate and that as a consequence they don’t get autism, a fallacy that Olmsted first reported in a two-part story entitled The Amish Anomaly (Part 2 here) and revisited time and time again. Of course, the Amish do vaccinate and there are autistic Amish and Olmsted missed a clinic in the heart of Amish country that treats autistic Amish children, but facts didn’t stand in the way of a good myth, which has only grown in the five years since Olmsted first imagined it.

Ultimately, Dan Olmsted left UPI (whether he resigned or was fired, only he and UPI know) and is now the editor of the anti-vaccine crank blog Age of Autism, where he can “report” to his heart’s content, free of any pesky concerns about editors insisting on actual facts and science. Steven Higgs looks as though he’s ready to join him.

An anti-vaccine reporter

Unfortunately, when it comes to autism and vaccines, it’s not that uncommon for reporters to fall for the myth. The reasons aren’t hard to understand. If there’s one way for a reporter to establish a name for himself, it’s to uncover a big story, the bigger the better. One category of story that is particularly seductive is the huge health scare, particularly if it’s something seemingly benign that is causing it.

Something like vaccines.

Higgs certainly isn’t the first. After all, David Kirby was seduced by the idea that mercury in the thimerosal preservative that used to be in vaccines was the cause of autism. After he published Evidence of Harm: Mercury in Vaccines and the Autism Epidemic: A Medical Controversy in 2004, whatever remained of his journalistic career went into the crapper, leaving him to blog for The Huffington Post and, of course, Age of Autism. Then there’s a local connection, Steve Wilson, who up until recently was an investigative reporter for a local television station here in Detroit and who also bought into the myth that mercury in vaccines causes autism, a report that I duly criticized him for, even though I did it with some trepidation. My cancer center has a good relationship with the TV station that Wilson used to work for, and I was concerned that I would catch some flak for criticizing his report, which was nothing more than a rehash of the standard anti-vaccine mercury fear mongering. The sad thing is that Wilson did some absolutely outstanding work uncovering the malfeasance of our former mayor Kwame Kilpatrick. Unfortunately, his skepticism when it came to vaccines was in reality a pseudoskepticism, showing that even good investigative reporters can be crappy science and medical reporters.

Whether Higgs has any redeeming qualities in terms of investigative reporting skills, I don’t know. What I do know is that he has thoroughly drunk the Kool Aid, as demonstrated in spades in a story he published a month ago entitled Do Vaccines Cause Autism? In it, he tries to refute a contention by Dr. Phil Landrigan in a recent paper in which Dr. Landrigan stated bluntly (and correctly): “There is no credible evidence that vaccines cause autism.” In the article, Higgs repeated a number of common anti-vaccine tropes, tropes so common that I don’t feel obligated to answer them all, given that virtually all of them have been discussed before right here on this very blog. Some of them are talking points straight from Generation Rescue. For example:

  • Higgs confuses correlation with causation when it comes to thimerosal. Unfortunately, there is a lot of evidence showing no correlation between thimerosal-containing vaccines and autism. The idea that thimerosal in vaccines cause autism is a failed hypothesis. It’s been tested scientifically and failed.
  • Higgs buys the Generation Rescue line that nations with higher vaccination rates have higher autism rates and that vaccination does not correlate with lower childhood mortality. This is about as bogus a study as I can imagine, incompetently performed using cherry-picked data and not even peer-reviewed.
  • Higgs cherry picks conclusions from a study of thimerosal-containing vaccines and neurodevelopmental disorders other than autism. That particular study produced results that were entirely consistent with random chance correlations from multiple comparisons. Indeed, if Higgs takes the negative correlations seriously, one wonders why he didn’t mention the positive correlations, where children receiving thimerosal-containing vaccines actually had better measurements of neurodevelopmental outcomes. In essence, Higgs cherry picks the bad results and ignores the good results when a careful reading of the study shows that, overall, the effects were consistent with random chance.

I could go on, citing more articles by Mr. Higgs and more refutations of the anti-vaccine talking points that he parrots, but I think you get the idea. If you don’t, I’ll cite Mr. Higgs’ own words:

I’ve spent most of the past 28 years journalistically investigating conflicts between environmental victims and experts in the relevant fields. And, I can say without qualification, the victims have been right and the experts wrong in every significant story I’ve covered. I can’t think of a single exception.

And with respect to vaccines and autism, I say again, without reservation, parents like J.B. Handley and grandparents like Dan Burton are right about vaccines and autism. The experts are wrong, and their behaviors — their vitriolic attacks upon those who disagree, their underhanded political tactics — suggest they know they were wrong.

A closed mind

In my correspondence with Mr. Higgs, to which Steve Novella contributed, I came to the distinct impression that Mr. Higgs had come to view himself as a crusader. His experience with previous environmental catastrophes and the reactions of companies responsible for them has led him to the point where he cannot imagine that a charge like the claim that thimerosal in vaccines causes autism can possibly be wrong. He has become anti-expert and anti-intellectual. Indeed, Steve Novella called Higgs out on his anti-intellectualism, and, incredibly, Higgs’ response was that had lived in a college town for many years around intellectuals and therefore couldn’t possibly be anti-science or anti-intellectual.

But he is.

As a final example, I will mention two things Higgs cited. First, he cited this video as “the most persuasive evidence I have found thus far” and the one moment in time when he came to believe that vaccine cause autism:

Yes, that’s Bernadine Healy, former director of the NIH. Unfortunately, in recent years, she’s been flirting with the anti-vaccine movement, blaming the American Academy of Pediatrics, the CDC, and other health organizations and “just asking questions” about whether there is a connection between vaccines and autism. She’s also been promoting the idea of a “vaccinated versus unvaccinated” study, apparently not realizing the inherent difficulties involved in such a study. In essence, Dr. Healy, despite her previous position as NIH director (a position she was arguably unqualified for), is not an authority on vaccines. In fact, if you want an idea of how far down the rabbit hole of anti-vaccine lunacy Dr. Healy’s gone, consider that she was named as Age of Autism’s Person of the Year for 2008. If there’s one virtually completely reliable indication that a scientist or physician is well on the way to becoming an antivaccine crank (or has already become one), it’s being named Person of the Year by Age of Autism. It’s like the Nobel Prize, Oscars, Pulitzer Prizes, and Congressional Medal of Freedom for antivaccine crankery and autism quackery all rolled into one.

Finally, Mr. Higgs cited an article entitled Educating the Ohio Valley’s special kids. The interesting thing is that nothing in this article mentions vaccines as a cause of autism. Rather, the entire focus of the article appears to be on mercury and industrial pollution, the argument being that it is that that is correlated with the steadily increasing special education rolls in Evanston, IL. However, in his penultimate e-mail to me, Higgs cited this article and asked:

Related to the thimerosal discussion in “Vaccines and Autism” post, the precipitous rise in the special ed population in Evansville peaked in 2006 and began falling in 07. Using 2002 as the marker for the reduction in thimerosal-laden vaccines for the sake of argument, kids born in that year started kindergarten in 2007. Statewide the trend is the same, thought the decline in special ed population began in 06, but of course thimerosal started coming out before 02. I understand that two years does not constitute a long-term trend, but what other constant do you think every child in Indiana may have experienced in 2002 and 2003, other than vaccines?

I decided to look at the numbers. I was assisted by some blog buddies of mine, including Liz Ditz, who pointed out that a large number of factors could account for such an increase in special ed numbers and a leveling off in 2007, including the starting of campaigns to identify learning disabilities and their eventual leveling off and the effect of funding incentives on special ed enrollment. Multiple people pointed out to me that this leveling off of special ed cases appears to be occurring among all age cohorts. If thimerosal had anything to do with a leveling off in special ed case loads, it should have a far more profound effect in the youngest groups. It didn’t.

Meanwhile, Joseph was kind enough to provide me with a spreadsheet based on actual data, with special education counts for Indiana coming from here and whole-population enrollment counts coming from the National Center for Education Statistics here. He produced for me four graphs.

The first graph shows all disabilities for children aged 6 to 21:

fig1

Not much of a change over the period covered, is there? Next, we have a graph of all disabilities in the age group that would be most likely to be affected; that is, if thimerosal had anything to do with developmental disabilities requiring special ed:

fig2

Then we have a the same graph for the age group between ages 12 and 17.

fig3

Note how it looks very similar to the graph for ages 3-5. If thimerosal had anything to do with diagnoses leading to enrollment in special ed programs, you would expect to see a huge difference between the 3-5 year age cohort and the teenage cohort.

Finally, let’s look at the graph for diagnoses of autism at age 6:

fig4

Nope. No sign of a decrease in autism diagnoses in 2006 or later, which is what would be expected if thimerosal, which was removed from most childhood vaccines in late 2001, were a major etiological factor in autism. We can conclude from these graphs that Mr. Higgs is either very naive when it comes to data analysis or he saw what he wanted to see and stopped looking.

Another Dan Olmsted?

Although admittedly I started out trying to address Mr. Higgs with a bit more “insolence” than might have been advisable, I had a hard time restraining myself, given his swallowing of everything that J. B. Handley lays down and his falling for everything Handley says about Dr. Novella. In any case, I tried to be less “insolent” as the correspondence continued. It nonetheless became clear in our correspondence that Mr. Higgs is a true believer, who really does think that Andrew Wakefield has been unjustly abused by the medical establishement and, amazingly, that J. B. Handley knows what he is talking about. I tried to plant a seed by providing him with a number of links, both from SBM and elsewhere, that refuted key points of the anti-vaccine movement. In his responses, he pointedly called me “Mr.” Gorski, even though he knew I am a physician, an intentional bit of disrespect that amuses me more than offends me, given how often I’ve seen anti-vaccine advocates and alt-med practitioners use it. In that, if anything, Mr. Higgs appears less polite than the journalist whose path he seems to be following, Dan Olmsted, or maybe David Kirby, given his fawning three part series interviewing Kirby.

But why?

In Mr. Higgs’ case, I rather suspect that it is really a case of being a true believer. According to him, every environmental health threat he’s seen was accompanied by industry denials and coverups. That may well be true. However, that history has apparently led Mr. Higgs to be so distrustful of what the government and medical authorities say, so suspicious of what “experts” say, that he can’t even consider the possibility that, in the case of vaccines, the experts are actually correct. There is no link between vaccines and autism that science has been able to detect. As passionate as Mr. Higgs may be about environmental pollution, he is, quite simply, on the wrong side of this particular issue and well on the way to becoming another Dan Olmsted supporting the quackery that is DAN!.

Indiana deserves better.


[Slashdot]
[Digg]
[Reddit]
[del.icio.us]
[Facebook]
[Technorati]
[Google]
[StumbleUpon]

It pains me to say so – but I adore my iPad – Daily Mail

Posted on by

New Zealand Herald
It pains me to say so - but I adore my iPad
Daily Mail
It is lightning quick to upload pages from the internet. You get none of that irritation that comes exclusively with computers - I call it digitation - that ...
10 iPad Apps Every New Owner NeedseWeek
Creation Myths: What the Argument That the iPad's Not for Creating Content ...Huffington Post (blog)

all 376 news articles »

Affordable European Island

Posted on by

mannin-island-1It is not uncommon to find affordable islands in Canada or parts of the US, but to find affordable and habitable islands in Europe is rare. Therefore it is exciting for me to share with you Mannin Island which is currently on the market for 150,000 Euros.  Located in Danmanus Bay in West Cork Mannin Island could be your own four acre Irish Isle.

The Island is within 200m. of the foreshore and just a few minutes from the newly constructed pier, which is, five minutes walking distance from Durrus Village. The Island is approximately 60% fertile with this area south facing with a small sheltered cove to the east of the Island.

There are currently no development on the island, and I would advise any potential owner to explore development opportunities before purchasing the island. Needless to say the island is a gem and the price can’t be beat.

For more information on this property visit Private Islands Online.