Victory for Libertarians thanks to Conservatives in Texas Textbook battle

Posted on by

Hayek, Friedman added

From Eric Dondero:

Texas sets the standard for History and Social Studies textbooks nationwide, for the simple fact that they State orders many more textbooks than any other State. Textbook publishers tend to follow the lead of the standards set by the Texas Board of Education. The Board met last weekend and the conservative majority prevailed. The Board adopted the new standards in a 12 to 5 vote.

The media has centered on the battle over social matters such as language in the textbooks over Separation of Church and State. But largely ignored has been a rather big victory for libertarians and fiscal conservatives.

From USACarry (Pro-NRA blog):

A section in the U.S. government standards will cover the concept of American exceptionalism and detail how the nation's values are unique from other nations. Alexis de Tocqueville's five values critical to America's success as a republic will also be delineated. In economics, the board added free-market economists Milton Friedman and Friedrich von Hayek to the usual list of John Maynard Keynes, Adam Smith and Karl Marx.

Libertarian Republican hits the big time: Slammed by Huffington Post

Posted on by

by James Fryar

I tend to derive a great deal of pleasure from seeing friends do well, be it in business, personal life, or realizing a dream. I was thrilled when my old mate Al over in the Catskills found he was sitting on a massive gas field and stood to make a fortune.

Eric Dondero at Libertarian Republican has worked tirelessly on his site and in the cause of liberty for a long time, and has been rewarded for some time with an extensive readership, as well as being quoted and linked by both news media and major sites. He has in fact become an authoritative source of breaking news.

Now he has made it to the HuffPo shitlist (via Ben Cohen at Daily Banter). Howling about his tendency to be a little intemperate in his language at times, they came up with an article devoted to what an absolute unmitigated, radical, unfettered free market supporting, capitalistic bastard he is. On our side it just doesn’t get any better than that, unless you get mentioned in the "Pricks we should all hate" section of the NYT or get to be number 1 on Olbermann's "Worlds worst People."

Eric Dondero, a blogger and hardcore libertarian from Texas didn't take too kindly to what I had to say on the idiocy of libertarian economics. I thought the comments were pretty funny and insightful into the kind of people who militantly believe in the purity of markets etc...

The author wrote an item on being taken to task by a restaurant owner when he tried to engage him in leftie politics. This dirt bag went on to lament:

Our conversation left me rather depressed because he was so absolutely certain of his own position, and so well armed with his own set of facts that there was no point in discussing it with him at all.

Note the condescending “his own set of facts” as if those facts supporting the other side are inferior. Leaving him feel rather depressed is pathetic; the guy needs to, harden up a bit, put in a ‘hurt feelings report’ (maybe it was), or ring some bastard dumb enough to care. Then this:

The restaurant owner represents a growing chorus of obviously educated Americans who honestly believe that the fiscal crisis facing the nation is a result of high taxes and government spending. These people make up the intellectual foundation for movements like the Tea Baggers and the Ron Paul Libertarians. While well intentioned (at least some of them), they are utterly misguided, wrong and dangerous to the economy.

Apart from showing his ignorance of economics, believing as he does that ideology trumps the natural order of the marketplace, he then goes on to the tired old Rahm talking point of referring to the Tea Partiers as “teabaggers,” as if that is somehow going to make them go away. Then there is the obligatory reference to dangerous Ron Paul libertarians.

He like the rest of the left demonstrates the current fixation of his ilk in attempting to accuse any opponent of racism:

Eric made the comment:

Taxation is theft. Government is coercion, when you get right down to it. What right does the government have to put a gun to my head and steal from me to support some moocher who wants to sit on their damn couch all day long, munch on Cheetos and watch Oprah Winfrey?

In his bitch session on the subject the HuffPo writer attempts to suggest race is part of the issue along with the obvious attempts to smear Rand Paul with:

There's usually nothing sadder than a middle aged angry white man venting on the internet about how 'the government stole my wages and gave it to black welfare mothers', but the fact that Dondero actually worked for a main stream political candidate (for President, no less), is actually quite disturbing.

Lefties are pathetic, the moment they are challenged they enter full hue and cry mode about how terrible the right are, they appear oblivious as to the viciousness of their own side which at its most sincere is scumbag vile.

James Fryar is an oil field worker in south central Australia. He is also a member of the Australian Libertarian Society. His blog is RealWorldLibertarian.

Rand Paul contoversy: NY Times sums up Leftist contempt for Individual Rights

Posted on by

"Government is not reason, it is not eloquence. It is force, and like fire, it is a dangerous servant and a fearful master." - President George Washington

by Eric Dondero

Fans of Rand Paul cannot escape the barrage of vicious criticism he's received from the Far Left media on cable news, over the blogosphere and even in the press since his nomination. Not since libertarian-leaning Sarah Palin received the Republican Party's nomination for Vice-President in September of 2008, has a single individual on the Right garnered such a massive full-frontal attack.

The NY Times this morning offers an editorial "Limits of Libertarianism."

Here's a taste:

By denigrating several of the signal achievements of modern American society, including the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and the Fair Housing Act, Rand Paul has performed a useful service for voters who are angry at their elected officials. He has helped to illuminate the limits and the hazards of antigovernment sentiment.

Many Americans are sputtering mad, believing that government has let them down in abetting a ruinous recession, bailing out bankers and spending wildly. But is Rand Paul really the remedy they had in mind? His views and those of other Tea Party candidates are unintentional reminders of the importance of enlightened government.

And then a few paragraphs later this absolute golden nugget of a quote:

As a longtime libertarian, he espouses the view that personal freedom should supersede all government intervention... It is a theory of liberty with roots in America’s creation, but the succeeding centuries have shown how ineffective it was in promoting a civil society.

The audacity of those pesky libertarians to place personal freedom over government intervention.

I can think of another group of rebels who espoused the same philosophy similar to Rand Paul's quite a while back. They too placed personal freedom over government intervention. They did so wearing tri-corner hats, whigs and blue overcoats.

And like Rand, they too were viciously attacked by the forces of despotism. The NY Times deserves the gratitude of all libertarians for so forthrightly summarizing why it is we are so opposed to their authoritarian agenda.

We are indeed now fully engaged in the ultimate battle of Liberty vs. Tyranny.

(Memeo M2 M3 M4 M5)

Aussie politics: Rudd may be in for a Rude Awakening

Posted on by

From Cliff Thies:

The latest from Australia... it appears that the Liberal-National Coalition has caught-up with, and may even have surpassed Labour in the polls. Prime Minister Kevin Rudd, a climate change advocate, who was elected in 2007, may turn out to be a one-termer. The next election must be held by April 11, 2011.

From Bloomberg:

May 17 (Bloomberg) -- Prime Minister Kevin Rudd is losing backers to deputy Julia Gillard, a Newspoll opinion survey shows. Some 45 percent of Australians preferred Rudd as Labor leader in May, down from 57 percent in February, while Gillard’s popularity rose eight points to 40, according to a telephone survey of 1,159 people between May 14 and 16 and published in the Australian newspaper. The opposition Liberal-National coalition and Labor are tied on a two-party preferred basis, the poll showed.

LR's Aussie correspondent James Fryar offered this analysis:

The Rudd government has caused this situation themselves through bad policies and sheer incompetence in their implementation. While the Liberals under Howard were able to bring the budget into surplus and repay debt failed completely to halt the growth of government spending, which had they done so would have reduced the average tax burden to around 20%.

In less than three years though Rudd has spent the future fund created by the Liberals and gone into massive deficit spending.

Muslim groups applaud harsh sentence given to Malawi Gay Couple

Posted on by

Madonna comes to their defense

A Gay couple in the southern Africa nation of Malawi received the maximum sentence of 14 years imprisonment for violating the country's laws against homosexuality.

According to USMagazine:

Tiwonge Chimbalanga, 33, and Steven Monjeza, 25, were convicted of unnatural acts and gross indecency and sentenced to 14 years of hard labor in prison.

Madonna who has adpoted two children from Malawi blasted the court:

"Today, Malawi took a giant step backward. The world is filled with pain and suffering; therefore, we must support our basic human right to love and be loved."

Now Muslim groups are calling the decision by the judge just.

Malawi Muslim leader: Gays deserve "Death!"

From TheTrueReligion:

UMN Intl: We Applaud Malawi for the [Sentencing of Gays]

In the Name of Allah Most Gracious Most Merciful,

Beloved People of Malawi the Muslim World appreciates your firm stand against sodomy, this immoral, sick, un-natural behavior and twisted act against human dignity cannot be allowed in the world.

Every Government in the Muslim World, and all major countries of Africa applauds you for your firm stand to protect our common cultural grounds.

Homosexuality is unacceptable, both culturally and spiritually it is time the True Believers in the faith stand together to fight against the common evils in the world.

Additionally, a top Muslim cleric applauded the decision. Continuing:

Muslim Association of Malawi chairperson Sheik Yusuf Kanyamula said the court was lenient as the Quran said people who indulged in same sex unions deserved death.

Photo of Muslims marching in Malawi

CAIR wants Pamela Geller censored: Tea Party stands by decision to invite her to speak

Posted on by

For CAIR Muslim sensitivities in matters of speech are more important than non-Muslim sensitivities about things like murder

by Clifford F. Thies

From KnoxNews.com:

NASHVILLE - Tea party organizers will not drop a speaker from a Tennessee convention this weekend despite calls from a national Muslim rights group that considers her anti-Islamic.

The Council on American-Islamic Relations had urged that Pamela Geller be cut from the Tennessee Tea Party Convention in Gatlinburg over her views on Muslims. Washington-based CAIR said in a release Thursday that it objects to Pamela Geller's presentation titled "The Threat of Islam."

Convention organizer Anthony Shreeve said in an e-mail today that Geller will speak despite those concerns.

"We will not follow any request from CAIR," Shreeve said. "We also believe in the right to freedom of speech as given to us by our U.S. Constitution."

Geller heads a group called Stop Islamization of America.

Am I the only person to notice that, to CAIR, anything considered to be an insult to Muslims is not to be tolerated, but Muslims don't have to consider the sensitivities of non-Muslims?

They want to build a Mosque at Ground Zero, which, of course, in this country, is their right. The United States is NOT a Muslim country where buidling a house of worship other than of the official state religion requires special permission if is simply prohibited. We are a western nation and believe in the separation of church and state.

Freedom of Religion includes Freedom for Christians and Jews

And, of course, we oppose the Islamization of the United States. We like freedom of religion, along with all of our other freedoms; and, we like equality before the law, not one status for Muslims and another for non-Muslims. Or, excuse me, am I supposed to not know what "Islamization" means?

CAIR calls Geller a hater for her insensitivity to the sensitivities of Muslims for any depiction of Mohammed or of Muslims as violent or inspiring violence. No, you guys do not get to impose your silly ideas about images onto us. We had our Enlightenment.

In our country, a person can create the "Piss Christ," and the debate will be about the use of government funds, not the right of a pervert like Robert Maplethorpe to do such a thing. Same thing with political cartoons of Mohammed. Good-mannered people generally avoid offending the sensitivities of others. But, let's get real, there's a certain rough and tumble in the free market of ideas.

While being ultimately sensitive about depections of Mohammed and of Muslims, CAIR is totally insensitive to the sensitivities of non-Muslims to being blown-up, beheaded, burned or knifed to death, and otherwise being terrorized by people who call themselves Muslims, who quote the Koran, and who are treated as martyrs by the majority of Muslims world (actually, this looks to be changing, as global opinion polls indicate growing condemnation by Muslims of radical Islamic terrorism).

The incessant response of CAIR to violence perpetratwed by Muslims upon non-Muslims is that we non-Muslims should not "over-react." Yes, that's right, they try to shift the blame onto us. Now they have dumb ass politicians thinking that terrorists must be White People, because Islam is a religion of peace and only White People are capable of being evil. For example, the Times Square bomber must be a White Person. Hey, CAIR and your dumb ass political friends, White People have no problem calling terrorists what they are, no matter their race or religion. Now, let's say it together: KKK, terrorsists. Nazis, terrorists. Radical Muslims ... can you say it? .... it starts with a "t" ... Can't quite get the word out, can ya? Can't quite say that anybody other than a White Person can be a terrorist.

CAIR talks in vague generalities about "all who commit violence," while NEVER naming names. We know that many Muslims do not consider the slaughter of infidels (such as us) to be violence. Therefore, we know the word game that CAIR is playing. They are trying to appear to be non-violent to mush-braned liberal westerners, and ALSO to not offend the many Muslims who believe that Muslims have the right to enslave or kill infidels because the Koran says this and because Muslims have been doing this since Mohammed turned evil on non-Muslims.

It's time for CAIR to join with the rising number of Muslims in the world who do not distinguish among acts of violence based on the religions of the perpetrator and the victim, and stop trying to placate the extremists within the Muslim world. (By the way, a large number of Muslim scholars, perhaps the majority, have a very reasonable interpretation of the parts of the Koran that sound so awful, considering those verses as employing exaggeration, along with requiring reconcilation of those verses with the totality of the Koran and with what we know through reason. These scholars are, nevertheless, conlicted between fully joining with other men and women of good will who are not Muslim and breaking off from their throw-back co-religionists.)

In the meanwhile, we notice that CAIR calls Geller a hater even though she has not bombed, beheaded, knifed, burned or otherwise murdered anybody, and refuses to identify Muslims who do such things as terrorists. Different strokes for different folks? That's not the way we do it in America.

Top Left-Libertarian Thomas Knapp impressed by Wayne Root’s endorsements for LNC Chair

Posted on by

MOVEMENT NEWS

Libertarian Lefty has some kind words for member of the Libertarian Right

From Eric Dondero:

Thomas Knapp aka "Knappster" is a regular commenter here at Libertarian Republican, and sometimes contrarian-like contributor. He is generally regarded as a Left-Libertarian, and on the stridently AntiWar side of the movement. Ironically, Knapp had some kind words for Right-Libertarian Wayne Root, who is currently seeking the Nomination for Libertarian Party National Chair. The rap on Root is that he's got the showmanship and media skills, but lacks all-important organizational ability. Knapp complimented Root for beating his opponents at releasing an all-important list of backers.

Knapp at IPR:

Root has produced a list of endorsements from prominent Libertarians who, to one degree or another, command the respect of their fellow party members.

Root was recently endorsed by 8 State LP Chairman, a number of elected Libertarian officeholders, and two former LP Presidential candidates.

The National Convention for the Libertarian Party will be held in St. Louis over Memorial Day weekend.

Republican Liberty Caucus officially backs Nikki Haley for South Carolina Governor

Posted on by

LR EXCLUSIVE

Libertarian-leaning Republican Nikki Haley recently received the endorsement of Sarah Palin in her bid for Governor of South Carolina. In a poll two months ago Haley was behind the pack of four in fourth place. Now she is comfortably ahead in first place.

The Republican Liberty Caucus National Committee which has represented the libertarian wing of the GOP since its founding in 1990, held a teleconference Tuesday night. According to National Chair and LR contributor Dave Nalle:

last night the RLC board endorsed a whole slate of candidates from South Carolina, including Nikki Haley.

http://www.rlc.org

Stealth IRS changes mean millions of new tax forms

Posted on by

NEW YORK (CNNMoney.com) — The massive expansion of requirementsfor businesses to file 1099 tax forms that was hidden in the 2,409-page health reform bill took many by surprise when it came to light last month. But it’s just one piece of a years-long legislative stealth campaign to create ways for the federal government to track down [...]

Autism One: The yearly antivaccine autism “biomed” quackfest begins

Posted on by

In the world of the anti-vaccine underground, there is one time of the year that looms large. Over the last few years, this time has generally come right around the end of May, usually coinciding with the Memorial Day weekend and the unofficial beginning of the summer vacation season here in the U.S. I’m referring, of course, to Autism One, which blights one of my favorite cities in the world, Chicago, every year about this time. True, of late Autism One has been metastasizing, most recently to blight the city of Toronto and the very grounds of the University of Toronto itself. As you may recall, last fall, when Autism One descended upon Toronto, I described it as “a conference of believers in two things: (1) that vaccines cause autism and (2) that ‘biomedical’ and CAM/IM therapies can treat and even reverse autism,” and it’s true, but Autism One is more than that. It’s a combination of a networking meeting for the anti-vaccine set, a revival meeting for the cult of anti-vaccinationism and autism “biomedical” therapy, and a trade show for “biomed” treatments for autism, all dressed up to appear to be a legitimate scientific conference.

Of all the fake scientific conferences out there, Autism One in Chicago, which begins today, far eclipses all the others, including even Barbara Loe Fisher’s National Vaccine Information Center (NVIC) conference. Closely aligned with the anti-vaccine propaganda group Generation Rescue and its outlet in the blogosphere Age of Autism (both of which, not surprisingly, have been promoting the conference incessantly), Autism One is the granddaddy of fake academic autism conferences, where anyone who’s anyone in the anti-vaccine underground goes to see and be seen, with a keynote address by anti-vaccine celebrity spokesmodel Jenny McCarthy herself this year and each of the last two years. This year Autism One has expanded from three or four days to a full week, and it has taken on a note of political activism that was generally lacking in previous conferences. Consequently, in contrast to previous years, where Autism One pretty much stayed localized to a hotel near O’Hare, far from the center of the city, this time around it’s still at a hotel near O’Hare, but its organizers plan an anti-vaccine protest rally right in Grant Park on Wednesday afternoon. In doing so, this year Autism One’s organizers appear to be cementing the relationship between the autism “biomed” movement, the anti-vaccine movement, and the “health freedom” movement.

A cavalcade of anti-vaccine quackery

First and foremost, Autism One is about two things: “biomedical” quackery to treat autistic children (who are, according to many of the dubious practitioners there, autistic because of “vaccine injury”) and promoting the scientifically discredited idea that vaccines cause autism. In fact, this year, Autism One appears to have taken on the flavor of being in part one big “coming out” party for Andrew Wakefield, who somehow also managed to score an interview with Matt Lauer on Monday. Remember, this is the man whose dubious, incompetent, trial lawyer-funded, and probably fraudulent research back in 1998, aided and abetted by the credulous and sensationalistic U.K. press, not only sparked a hysterical fear of the measles-mumps-rubella (MMR) vaccine resulting in depressed vaccination rates and the resurgence of the measles in the U.K but is arguably the man most responsible for the very existence of the “autism biomed” movement itself. His shoddy and likely fraudulent research was the inspiration that launched a thousand — nay, thousands! — of “biomed” practitioners (a.k.a. quacks) to prey on autistic children. That’s why I thought it would be a useful exercise to take a look at the list of abstracts (just like a real scientific conference!) and make a few observations.

The first thing I noticed when I looked at the schedule is rather telling. I simply searched for the word “vaccine” and immediately noticed that for an autism conference there sure are a lot of references to vaccines! But what is Autism One telling parents about vaccines? What do you think? Let’s find out.

First up on the list is a speaker named Vicky Debold, who is giving a talk entitled What Parents Need to Know About Vaccine Adjuvants. Ms. Debold is described as:

…affiliate faculty member at George Mason University, Health Administration and Policy Department. She previously worked as a health policy analyst for the US Congress at the Physician Payment Review Commission, the Michigan Health and Safety Coalition, and the Michigan State Commission on Patient Safety. Additionally, she has served as an assistant professor at the University of Michigan and as an associate professor and director of the Health Systems Management Program at the University of Detroit, Mercy. Her doctoral degree is from the University of Michigan (1999) – from both the School of Public Health (Health Services Organization and Policy) and the School of Nursing (Health Systems Administration). She was a University of Michigan Regent’s Fellow and completed a post-doctoral fellowship in health services research at the Michigan Peer Review Organization. Dr. Debold’s son, her only child, experienced serious, long-term health problems following receipt of seven live virus and killed bacterial vaccines at his 15-month well-baby appointment. That event sparked her interest in vaccine safety and chronic childhood illness. In addition to serving as a director and committee member for autism non-profit organizations and as the volunteer director of patient safety and a board member of the National Vaccine Information Center, she is the appointed consumer representative to the Food and Drug Administration’s Vaccine and Related Biological Products Advisory Committee (VRBPAC).

Oh, dear. Not my alma mater! Not the University of Michigan! Isn’t it bad enough that Ann Coulter also graduated from the University of Michigan? In any case, of note Debold is a board member of the anti-vaccine organization NVIC. From her abstract, it looks as though Debold is trying to put a reasonable face on the anti-vaccine movement — at least on the surface. Her abstract sounds pretty reasonable until you hit this:

In addition to producing antibodies, vaccine adjuvants can stimulate the immune system to produce abnormal responses in some individuals leading to autoimmunity and chronic diseases such as rheumatoid arthritis and lupus.

I don’t have high hopes for the scientific accuracy of this talk.

Next up is Dr. Mayer Eisenstein. Dr. Eisenstein, as you may recall, has been mentioned several times on this blog, most recently just last week when it was pointed out that he is part of the team that writes anti-vaccine propaganda for the website Medical Voices Vaccine Information Center, the very same website that’s been dodging responding to Mark Crislip’s excellent takedown of one bit of MVVIC’s anti-vaccine propaganda. Dr. Eisenstein, as you may recall, is the founder of the crunchy “alternative” HomeFirst practice in the Chicagoland area. He is noted for claiming that there is no asthma, allergies, ADHD, ADD or Autism in its unvaccinated children based on zero published peer-reviewed evidence. In fact, Eisenstein himself has said:

Eisenstein stresses his observations are not scientific. “The trouble is this is just anecdotal in a sense, because what if every autistic child goes somewhere else and (their family) never calls us or they moved out of state?”

Yet his claim that he has 35,000 unvaccinated children in his practice and has never seen a case of asthma, allergies, ADHD, ADD, or autism in them is taken as Gospel truth in anti-vaccine circles. This time around, at Autism One, Dr. Eisenstein will be speaking on So You Have Decided Not to Vaccinate – How Do You Qualify for a Valid Legal Vaccine Waiver?, and the abstract reads:

Since vaccine mandates are state determined, vaccine laws may vary from state to state. Before submitting any medical, philosophical or religious exemption documentation, I recommend reviewing your state law to determine which of the waivers are applicable in your state. All 50 states in the U.S. allow for medical exemption to childhood vaccines. With the exception of West Virginia and Mississippi, all states also allow for a religious exemption to childhood vaccines. Currently, 17 states have philosophical exemptions to vaccines.

I will address the following questions: Can I give some of the vaccines and not others? Are there medical contraindications to vaccines? Can the state review and deny your physician’s letter objecting to vaccines? Are the chicken pox and rubella vaccines grown on the cells of aborted fetuses? Is mercury still in vaccines? How do I find a sympathetic doctor?

Of note, Dr. Eisenstein was recently in the news for having been an advocate of Mark and David Geier’s chemical castration protocol for autism, as well as a record of harm and death in his practice. And what do vaccines have to do with autism? In the real world, as far as science has been able to ascertain, nothing. In the fantasy world of Autism One, everything. Meanwhile, no form of quackery is off-limits at Autism One. In fact, there will even be homeopaths speaking there about how to use that quackiest of quackeries, homeopathy, to treat autism and “vaccine injury.” For example, two homeopaths named Cindy L. Griffin, DSH-P, DIHom, BME and Lindyl Lanham, DSH-P, BS Spec Ed, both from the Homeopathy Center of Houston, are collaborating to give two talks, one entitled An alternative approach for vaccine injury, which features homeopathy prominently as one of those “alternative” approaches, and another entitled The Houston Homeopathy Method of Sequential Homeopathy: A Drug-Free Alternative to Biomedical Treatment for Children with Autism.

Apparently even the magical thinking that is homeopathy is not too magical for the organizers of Autism One. And if that’s not enough, there’s a naturopath named Darin Ingels, ND (Not a Doctor) presenting on The Role of Allergy Desensitization in Autism, which makes Dr. Lipson’s post last week most timely, as well as another Not a Doctor, Jennifer Johnson, discussing Lymphatic Therapy – the Missing Piece. Get a load of the abstract:

Jennifer Johnson, ND, will speak on lymphatic therapy and how it is the missing link for autism recovery. She will include how lymphatic decongestive therapy prepares the body to be at its optimum level of detoxification prior to laser energetic detox. Also she will include how lymphatic decongestive therapy works in conjunction with the Zyto as well as how it complements IVIG treatment and chelation. This will be done with a slide-show presentation. This will be followed by a demonstration of the electro-lymphatic drainage machine and there will be time for questions and answers.

“Laser energetic detox”? “Lymphatic decongestive therapy”? IVIG treatment and chelation? Truly, no form of autism pseudoscience is too bizarre for Autism One, be it homeopathy or the woo-iest of woo from naturopaths!

Of particular interest to regular readers of this blog is this talk by Laura Hewitson entitled Primate Models for Testing Vaccine Safety. Having had her (and Andrew Wakefield’s) paper on this study withdrawn before officially appearing in the journal NeuroToxicology in the wake of the judgment of the British General Medical Council having found Wakefield to have committed research misconduct. Regular readers may recall that I deconstructed this study, in which Wakefield and Hewitson subjected infant Macacque monkeys to hepatitis B vaccination spiked with extra thimerosal, twice, once on the basis of a couple of abstracts presented at IMFAR and then once based on the actual manuscript describing the study results. Suffice it to say that this study was, in my not-so-humble opinion, bad science, unethical, and a waste of valuable and sensitive primates, who were all killed at the end of the study to examine their brain and organs, as well as to perform whole genome expression profiling on tissues harvested from the GI tract of the dead monkeys. Dr. Hewitson also failed to disclose on her initial abstracts that her husband worked for Thoughtful House and that she and her husband are the parents of a complainant in the Autism Omnibus petition to the Vaccine Court seeking redress based on “vaccine injury” having caused autism in the children involved. As a result of her association with Wakefield, which led to her descent into pseudoscience, Dr. Hewitson saw her once-promising academic career at the University of Pittsburgh tank and ended up joining Wakefield at Thoughtful House. Now that Wakefield has been fired from Thoughtful House, Hewitson remains there. She who once was the learner has now become the master, at least at Thoughful House, while Wakefield is on the outside looking in. Meanwhile, if your research is discredited scientifically, you can always present it at Autism One, as long as it appears to support the belief that vaccines cause autism.

Speaking of Andrew Wakefield, as I said before, Autism One appears to be his “coming out” party after the disrepute he fell into in the wake of the GMC’s ruling, the retraction of his infamous 1998 Lancet paper, and the withdrawal of his NeuroToxicology paper in which he abused baby monkeys by using them for bad science. First of all, he has a new book out entitled Callous Disregard: Autism and Vaccines—The Truth Behind a Tragedy. The title of a book is a play on this passage from the GMC’s ruling on Wakefield’s research misconduct: “You showed a callous disregard for the distress and pain that you knew or ought to have known the children involved might suffer.” Wakefield no doubt thinks that he’s being cheeky and sarcastic by appropriating those words for the title of his book, but the term “callous disregard” fits Wakefield like a glove. Of course, the book is getting rave reviews from the anti-vaccine crowd, but I have yet to see a review from a skeptic. I’m half tempted to see whether I could score a review copy, but after my attempt to read Suzanne Somers’ paean to cancer quackery last fall I’m not sure that would be such a good idea. You’ll notice that there was no part 2 to that series. My brain had a hard time handling all the misinformation there; it caused too much pain.

So what’s Wakfield up to at Autism One? First, he’ll be appearing on a panel with the editors of the anti-vaccine crank blog Age of Autism, where they will tag team a discussion of “AOA’s mission in the coming year and discuss with Andy how to continue to tell the truth about autism.” I can hardly wait. No doubt it will provide me and my fellow SBM bloggers with copious blogging material for the coming year. Then later he’ll be a keynote speaker, where he will discuss in a talk entitled Autism and the vagrant in the brainstem:

This talk examines the possibility that brainstem injury plays a central role in autism. In light of recent observations of brainstem injury in a primate model of vaccine-associated effects on early neurodevelopment, and an analysis of the scientific literature, it is proposed that, as an epicentric event, damage to the dorsal vagal complex (DVC) of the brainstem may be necessary and sufficient to initiate the central and systemic features of autism, including the many that fall outside the behavioral definition of this condition. Mechanisms by which primary systemic inflammation can cause brainstem damage are presented with reference to the published literature. The talk discusses the anatomical predilection of the DVC for injury resulting form a variety of mechanisms including disruption to the blood supply in the developing brain, environmental toxicity and, via retrograde vagal pathways, intestinal inflammation. Ways of examining this theory are discussed.

So now it’s “brainstem injury” due to vaccines, is it? I thought it was gut injury due to measles virus from MMR. Truly, Wakefield is a man with many dubious ideas.

Perhaps the most intriguing event where Andrew Wakefield will appear occurs on Wednesday. It is at this event where Autism One does us skeptics all a great service by demonstrating even more strongly than Jenny McCarthy’s “Green Our Vaccines” rally two years ago that it is about being “anti-vaccine,” not “pro-safe vaccine.”

The anti-vaccine movement “autism biomed” movement meets the “health freedom” movement

One of the biggest examples of either self-delusion or lying that emanates from the anti-vaccine movement is the oh-so-pious and indignant denials that inevitably follow from its members and leaders whenever someone like me has the temerity to point out that they are, in fact, anti-vaccine. The disingenuously angry denials usually take a form something like this, “I’m not anti-vaccine; I’m pro-safe vaccine.” Another variant is for anti-vaccine activists to claim that they aren’t anti-vaccine at all; they’re just “concerned” that children are getting “too many” vaccines “too soon.” What belies these claims, which can be seemingly reasonable on the surface to the uninitiated, is what happens if you try to pin down someone making them on just what, exactly, it would take to convince them that vaccines are safe as administered. A good way to approach this is to try to ask them to tell you specifically exactly what it would take to convince them to vaccinate their next child. What evidence would convince them? What you’ll almost inevitably find, if you push them, is that the answer to that question is: Nothing! Nothing will convince them. Ever!

On cue, seemingly trying very hard to support my oft-stated belief that “pro-safe vaccine” really equals “anti-vaccine,” and the “autism biomed” movement is in reality all about the vaccines, Autism One comes along to back me up. The reason I say that is that on Wednesday, May 26, associated with the Autism One quackfest, there will be a rally in Grant Park, an “American rally for personal rights.” Perusing the website, you’ll rapidly find out that the manifesto of the rally is about vaccines:

We believe in the rights to life, liberty, and personal security for ourselves and our children.

We demand the universal human rights standard of informed consent for all medical interventions. Compulsory vaccination cannot be legally and morally justified.

We affirm the sanctity of personal space, the right to be left alone, and the freedom to make personal health care decisions guided by the professionals of our choosing.

We invite all people, families and organizations committed to protecting these fundamental rights to stand with us in downtown Chicago on May 26, 2010 at our inaugural rally, and to work with us after the event to support grassroots advocacy, education, and leadership in defense of our personal – individual, parental, legal, moral, religious, civil, and human – rights.

Is it a coincidence that this rally is occurring smack dab in the middle of Autism One? Of course not! Is it a coincidence that, at the same time Andy Wakefield is “coming out” after his humiliation in January and February, as well as the impending loss of his medical license in the U.K. and that part of that coming out (not to mention promotion of his book) involves being the keynote speaker for an anti-vaccine rally? Get a load of the promotional video:

If you wanted yet more evidence that the “pro-safe vaccine” movement is really the anti-vaccine movement, here it is. But, wait!, I hear. It’s an entirely legitimate issue about how much power the government should have to require that children be vaccinated and under what circumstances. So it is. It’s a valid political and philosophical question, but a scientific question, not so much, given that the science is firmly behind the safety and efficacy of vaccines. Moreover, the whole “personal rights” bit is a smokescreen to hide the true nature of the rally: Anti-vaccine to the core. In reality, this “personal freedom” angle is very much the intellectual offspring (I think I just choked on the word “intellectual” in this context) of the “health freedom” movement. As I’ve said more times than I can remember, “health freedom” in reality is nothing more than the freedom of quacks to ply their trade on their marks without any pesky interference from laws, regulation, or the government. “Vaccine freedom” is little different at its core. It’s also profoundly deceptive for at least two reasons. First, by “informed consent,” American Personal Rights does not mean to give real, informed consent, with a science-based discussion of the benefits versus the risks of vaccines, which is overwhelmingly in favor of vaccinating being safer than not vaccinating. What such groups mean is an “informed consent” where parents are “informed” of all sorts of scientifically unsupported claims, such as the claim that vaccines cause autism, that they’re loaded with “toxins,” that the don’t work, that they’re dangerous, all coupled with a vastly exaggerated estimation of the rate at which true vaccine complications occur, which is very, very low. Second, except for two states, parents already have the freedom to decline vaccines. The only real enforcement point of our vaccination policy is admittance to public schools, virtually all of which require children to be up to date on their vaccines before they can attend. Even with that leverage, in nearly every state, there are mechanisms within the law to claim exemptions from vaccination requirements based on religion or even personal philosophy (17 states, as Dr. Eisenstein himself points out), the latter of which can be something as simple as saying that the parent has some sort of “philosophical objection” to vaccinating their children. In other words, this is a rally for a right that parents in nearly every state already have.

So why bother? Perhaps some of the literature on the website can tell us. First, let’s take a look at the organizations that are participating in the rally. The participants include a veritable who’s who of anti-vaccine cranks, including Age of Autism, Ginger Taylor, Dr. Sherri Tenpenny, Generation Rescue, the Holistic Moms Network, Medical Voices, Mike Adams, TACA, the Australian Vaccination Network, and many others.

For more evidence, let’s take a look at the suggested slogans for rally signs. I’ve selected a few out of the 100 or so slogans there. There’s lots of “freedom” rhetoric, but there are also quite a few signs that can only be described as pure anti-vaccine:

  • 1% US Kids Autistic But Fully Vaccinated
  • Adults Die From Vaccine Reactions, Too
  • CDC Trades Infectious Disease For CHRONIC – Allergies, Autism, ADHD, Asthma, Diabetes…
  • Doctors! Shame On You
  • Doctors! You Took An Oath
  • Greedy Pharma Calling The Shots
  • H1N1 Was a TARP For Pharma
  • I Refuse Forced Vaccines
  • I Trust My Nurse. Why Don’t You?
  • If My Child Is Harmed, You Won’t Pay
  • I’m More Afraid Of The Vaccine Than The Flu
  • My Child Was Murdered By Vaccines
  • No Vaccine Liability! Total Immunity If Vaccine Kills You
  • Schools Are Overrun With Vax-Injured Children
  • Stop Experimenting On Our Kids
  • The Ouch Isn’t What Hurts
  • The Right To Be Left Alone
  • Too Many Shots
  • Too Many Sick Kids
  • Why Does Our Government Want Us Vaccinated So Bad?

And my favorite: “There Are No Safe Vaccines.”

Finally, this particular rally has its very own soundtrack.

The American Rally for Personal Rights is pleased to announce that rally speaker Michael Belkin, will for the very first time ever, be performing songs from his upcoming CD at our rally. In 1998, Michael’s daughter died only hours after receiving a required vaccine, sparked by this intensely personal encounter with the negative effects of government mandated vaccines he began a journey of public service which has included providing testimony before Congress, attending vaccine related regulatory sessions and appearing in countless media reports as a vaccine safety advocate.

His journey has found a new path in The Refusers, a musical tribute to the victims (past, present and future) of the government’s misguided mandatory vaccination policy. Inspired by his previous career as a LA session player and recording artist, Michael has brought infectious elements of funk, gospel, rock, and even a touch of punk to this project. Combining this with his pointed lyrics discussing vaccine issues and government-mandated intrusion into our personal lives, The Refusers embodies, in the great American tradition of protest music, a sound that will be heard around the world. With lyrics like “they can keep their flu vaccine” and “a vaccine needle stole my baby away,” this record will have you on your feet shouting “keep your mandates out of my body”!

You think I’m joking? I only wish I were joking, but I’m not, and neither, apparently, is the American Rally for Personal Rights” or The Refusers. There are three songs listed there:

  1. Get Your Mandates Out of My Body
  2. Vaccine Gestapo
  3. We Don’t Want Their Flu Vaccine

You can actually download these songs here. If you want an example of how anti-vaccine (not to mention inane) these songs are, here are the lyrics to one of them, “Vaccine Gestapo”:

They have swastikas on their shoulders
They’re such patriotic soldiers
They’re like a militia in Montana
They’re a government agency in Atlanta

Vaccine gestapo! Vaccine gestapo!
Vaccine gestapo! Vaccine gestapo!

They’re a medical military priesthood
Just like Adolf they preach the greater good
Consciencious objectors are just little snot
Why don’t you quit complaining and go get your shots

Vaccine gestapo! Vaccine gestapo!
Vaccine gestapo! Vaccine gestapo!

Can we see your papers
Have you had all your shots?
your papers please, your papers please
Have you had all your shots?

They’re got a one track mind of domination
They say vaccines are your obligation
If a bad reaction turns you into a vegetable,
They’ll sneer and tell you you’re expendable

Vaccine gestapo! Vaccine gestapo!
Vaccine gestapo! Vaccine gestapo!
Vaccine gestapo!

Let’s just put it this way: The Clash’s immortal classic “The Guns of Brixton” or “Police on My Back,” this ain’t.

I didn’t know whether to laugh or cry after I listened to this song. I also kept holding out hope that The Refusers were some sort of mischievous, clever parody of anti-vaccine nonsense. They aren’t. They’re dead serious. As hard as it is to believe, these lyrics are absolutely real and appear to be intended completely sincerely. Truly, the anti-vaccine movement has degenerated to the point where it is impossible to distinguish real from parody. Maybe I’ll claim another law (well, a corollary, anyway) and hereby name it the Gorski Corollary of Poe’s Law:

Without a winking smiley or other blatant display of humor, it is utterly impossible to parody antivaccinationists in such a way that someone won’t mistake for the genuine article.

Songs like this are impossible to parody. What was that again about Andrew Wakefield and J.B. Handley swearing to high heaven that they aren’t anti-vaccine?

Autism One: An anti-vaccine quackfest fused with the “health freedom” movement

It has been said that it’s impossible to reason a person out of a viewpoint that he has not reasoned himself into. The anti-vaccine world view is just such a viewpoint. There is no convincing (or even good) scientific evidence that vaccines cause autism or any of the other conditions attributed to them by the anti-vaccine fringe, and there is good scientific evidence that vaccines are effective at preventing the diseases for which they are designed and very safe. Serious vaccine injuries are not nonexistent, but they are rare. Again, the risk-benefit ratio for vaccines is overwhelmingly in favor of being vaccinated.

Generation Rescue, Age of Autism, and Autism One, as well as other anti-vaccine organizations, try very, very hard to paint their viewpoint as science-based. It is not. The question of whether vaccines cause autism or all the other conditions attributed to them has been extensively studied over the last decade, and the evidence shows that these vaccines are safe, the efforts of the anti-vaccine movement to discredit the research notwithstanding. The best that groups like Generation Rescue can come up with are incompetently performed non-studies, dubious telephone surveys that don’t show what they think they show, and unethical monkey experiments. When scientists and skeptics point out the utter intellectual and scientific vacuity of these “studies” and attempts to discredit existing science, often they are attacked in misogynistic terms (if they are female) or just smeared (if they are Steve Novella, Paul Offit, or others), sometimes to truly despicable extremes.

Unfortunately, the alignment of the anti-vaccine autism “biomed” movement with the health freedom movement is not unexpected. The two fit together perfectly, because the “health freedom” movement vigorously resists all attempts to regulate quackery and dubious supplements, while the anti-vaccine movement, because of its extreme distrust and loathing of vaccines and anything that smacks of a vaccine mandate, can fit its agenda comfortably with the supplement hawkers wanting to be able to make whatever health claims they like without any pesky interference from the FDA or FTC.

In the end, it’s not about vaccine “injury.” It’s not about autism. It’s not about science. It’s not even about “health freedom,” really, other than as a convenient political justification for wanting to end vaccine mandates that just happens to use libertarian rhetoric that resonates among many Americans. It’s about “bringing the U.S. vaccine program to its knees.” I know this because J.B. Handley himself, the founder of Generation Rescue and major force behind Age of Autism, tells us this is so.

Autism One and The American Rally for Personal Rights are just more of his propaganda tools to try to accomplish that end.


[Slashdot]
[Digg]
[Reddit]
[del.icio.us]
[Facebook]
[Technorati]
[Google]
[StumbleUpon]

Greenland is Rising, Fish are Disappearing

Posted on by

Odd, sad news on the climate front.  Greenland is rising as the ice continues to melt.

ScienceDaily — Greenland is situated in the Atlantic Ocean to the northeast of Canada. It has stunning fjords on its rocky coast formed by moving glaciers, and a dense icecap up to 2 km thick that covers much of the island–pressing down the land beneath and lowering its elevation. Now, scientists at the University of Miami say Greenland’s ice is melting so quickly that the land underneath is rising at an accelerated pace.

According to the study, some coastal areas are going up by nearly one inch per year and if current trends continue, that number could accelerate to as much as two inches per year by 2025, explains Tim Dixon, professor of geophysics at the University of Miami Rosenstiel School of Marine and Atmospheric Science (RSMAS) and principal investigator of the study.

“It’s been known for several years that climate change is contributing to the melting of Greenland’s ice sheet,” Dixon says. “What’s surprising, and a bit worrisome, is that the ice is melting so fast that we can actually see the land uplift in response,” he says. “Even more surprising, the rise seems to be accelerating, implying that melting is accelerating.”

Read more here.

Oceans’ Fish Could Disappear by 2050

Without fundamental restructuring of the fishing industry, our oceans could become barren deserts.  The Gulf Oil leak is adding to the problem.

“The world faces the nightmare possibility of fishless oceans by 2050 without fundamental restructuring of the fishing industry, UN experts said Monday.

“If the various estimates we have received… come true, then we are in the situation where 40 years down the line we, effectively, are out of fish,” Pavan Sukhdev, head of the UN Environment Program’s green economy initiative, told journalists in New York.  A Green Economy report due later this year by UNEP and outside experts argues this disaster can be avoided if subsidies to fishing fleets are slashed and fish are given protected zones — ultimately resulting in a thriving industry.  The report, which was opened to preview Monday, also assesses how surging global demand in other key areas including energy and fresh water can be met while preventing ecological destruction around the planet.

UNEP director Achim Steiner said the world was “drawing down to the very capital” on which it relies.  However, “our institutions, our governments are perfectly capable of changing course, as we have seen with the extraordinary uptake of interest. Around, I think it is almost 30 countries now have engaged with us directly, and there are many others revising the policies on the green economy,” he said.

Collapse of fish stocks is not only an environmental matter.  One billion people, mostly from poorer countries, rely on fish as their main animal protein source, according to the UN.  The Green Economy report estimates there are 35 million people fishing around the world on 20 million boats. About 170 million jobs [...]

Island Life for Sale

Posted on by

island1Australian newspaper the Mercury is reporting on a new island for sale in Australia. The uninhabitat Tasmanian island can be yours for just $1.65M,

According to the aritcle your only neighbours on the reportedly snake-free 58ha island in Norfolk Bay will be muttonbirds, quail, native hens and a few blue-tongue lizards. Smooth Island is convenient too. It’s a short boat ride from Dunalley and less than an hour’s drive from Hobart and the city’s international airport.

The article also notes that it’s not the first Tasmanian island for sale. In 2003, buyers could choose from Swan Island in Bass Strait, Garden Island near Cygnet and Ram Island off the East Coast. 
 

To read the full article visit The Mercury. The island is available for sale on Private Islands Online.

The Cretaceous Comes To My Front Yard | The Loom

Posted on by

walking turtle600Sunday morning was cool and foggy, and so we were not surprised to discover the garden full of craters and trenches. A snapping turtle the size of a manhole cover was busy laying her eggs.

This is an annual ritual in this part of New England. The first time I encountered a snapping turtle here, not long after we had moved into our house, I was terrified. Our children were toddlers, old enough to run but not old enough to know they should stay away from animals that can snap off your finger. Somehow I had to get the turtle out of my yard and back into the creek that runs behind our house. With no experience in turtle-wrangling, I decided to get a broomstick. I tapped the turtle on its shell, to signal that I wanted it to leave. It looked up at me with supreme indifference.

My helplessness made me hallucinate. I feared the turtle was going to break into the house somehow and eat our cats. I called our town’s animal control line, and ended up talking to a policeman. He gave me a suprisingly detailed lecture on the natural history of the snapping turtle. On cool, foggy mornings in late spring, he explaned, females emerge from streams and wetlands to bury their eggs in the soft earth. They take care of their business in about an hour, and then they leave. He would not be coming to my house to rescue us.

He was right. The turtle picked a lush bed of mulch and mud, near a rose bush, and laid her eggs. I stared at from the front door with my children until we got bored. When I checked back a few minutes later, it was gone. I never realized that a snapping turtle can disappear when it wants to. After a few weeks the eggs hatched. In the summer we discovred adorably vicious baby snapping turtles trying to find their way back to the water. Every spring since, the snapping turtles have returned, and we’ve gotten more comfortable with them. I don’t bother the police. Instead, we get reasonably close to the turtle to observe.

We usually get one snapping turtle visiting us each year. We’re grateful, but we also know these visits are a shadow of a former glory. One of our neighbors, who grew up in our town, remembers armies of snapping turtles swarming up out of the creek in the spring. We live in biologically impoverished times, with constipated streams, filled-in marshes, and other assaults on the habitat of turtles in New England. Snapping turtles have been wandering out of marshes for millions of years. The oldest turtle fossils are about 220 million years old, but snapping turtles evolved much later. They belong to a 90-million-year-old lineage that also gave rise to species that span the extremes of turtle biology, from tiny mud turtles to leatherback turtles, the biggest reptiles on Earth, which swim across oceans.

Laying turtle440This morning’s visitation was particularly mesmerizing, because the snapping turtle angled her body in such a way that we could see her eggs drop into the hole she had dug. They were the size and shape of eyeballs. As the eggs eased out of her cloaca, she tapped them with her right back foot into the hole, like a soccer player giving a ball the extra kick it needed to reach the goal. One after another, the eggs tumbled out. We counted a dozen, but snapping turtles can lay dozens more at a time. They pick these nests carefully. They chose these spots for their temperatures. Like many other turtle species, snapping turtles end up male or female depending on the temperature. At low and high temperatures, they produce females; at intermediate temperatures, they make males. Snapping turtles don’t have thermometers, but they have evolved a simple rule of thumb (or claw). They seek out soft, sandy soil, which tends to be the right temperature to produce a mix of males and females.

Unfortunately, we may be setting ecological traps for the turtles. They sometimes lay eggs in yards underneath planted trees or near houses. The shadows cool the temperatures compared to sites they pick in natural habitats. On the other hand, global warming may send them in the other direction. In either case, we may cause them to make too few males. And because they live so long (they can live 40 years), they will be slow to evolve new preferences. I hope that my grandchildren will be able to come see snapping turtles rip up our garden, but I cannot be sure.