Gene therapy for HIV safe, but effectiveness still unclear

By Randy Dotinga HealthDay Reporter

WEDNESDAY, May 2 (HealthDay News) -- New research shows that gene therapy can have long-lasting effects on the immune cells of HIV patients -- a promising sign -- even though the specific treatment being studied did not eradicate the virus.

This approach is one of several gene therapy strategies that are being investigated by scientists as possible ways to keep the AIDS virus from spreading in the blood.

In this case, "people were treated by gene therapy and nothing bad happened. It was safe," said study co-author Frederic Bushman, a professor of microbiology at the University of Pennsylvania.

In addition, he said, the treated immune cells managed to remain around for about a decade. "The general picture that emerges about genetic alterations to human immune cells is that they can persist for a long time if you do it right."

The study appears in the May 2 issue of Science Translational Medicine.

Researchers have long been exploring gene therapy -- in which cells in the body are genetically modified -- as a possible treatment for infection with HIV, the virus that causes AIDS. The idea is that the therapy would offer a permanent alternative to costly medications that come with potentially disabling side effects.

"Just think about what an HIV patient has to do: take drugs every day for the rest of his life, and the minute he stops taking them, the virus starts coming back," said John Rossi, chair of the department of molecular and cellular biology at the Beckman Research Institute of the City of Hope, in Duarte, Calif. He was not associated with the new research.

The study looks at 43 HIV-positive patients. Between 1998 and 2002, researchers removed blood from the patients, genetically modified it, and injected it back into them.

The plan was to program immune cells known as T cells to kill HIV cells.

Visit link:

Gene therapy for HIV safe, but effectiveness still unclear

Gene Therapy Safe in Decade-Long HIV Study That May Widen Use

By Elizabeth Lopatto - Wed May 02 18:00:00 GMT 2012

HIV patients given gene therapy more than a decade ago are healthy and the altered DNA they received remains stable in their bodies, according to a study that scientists say proves the treatment may safely be tested as a way to attack other illnesses.

All except two of 43 people treated with genetically- altered versions of their own infection-fighting T cells were healthy as many as 11 years later, according to the research reported today in the journal Science Translational Medicine.

Previous uses of gene therapy in experiments have suggested that leukemia caused by the viruses that transfer the genes to the cells might be a risk. Todays finding allays that concern, enabling researchers to move beyond immediately life-threatening illnesses, such as HIV and cancer, said Bruce Levine, a study author and researcher at the University of Pennsylvania.

We turned those cells into heat-seeking missiles directed against HIV-infected cells, said Levine, head of the Clinical Cell and Vaccine Production Facility at the Philadelphia universitys Perelman School of Medicine. What really surprised us was when we got those samples, not only could we detect the gene-modified cells but they appeared to be present at relatively stable levels.

Because the therapy has been found to work safely over a significant period of time, the designer cells should be considered a platform technology that can also be used by scientists researching other diseases besides HIV, Levine in a telephone interview.

Each patient in the study cited today received at least one transfusion of their own immune cells between 1998 and 2005. The T cells were designed to look for an HIV protein and kill any infected cells they encountered, before the virus has a chance to mature.

Its like a controlled burn, Levine said.

The U.S. Food and Drug Administration required the patients be followed for 15 years to see if any late-developing side- effects, such as cancer, might arise from the therapy. The patients were followed every year after their initial dose.

No gene therapy has been approved by the FDA. The field almost halted in 1999, when 18-year-old Jesse Gelsinger died within hours of being injected. Earlier, in a French trial, two of 10 patients acquired leukemia following gene therapy for Bubble Boy disease, or severe combined immunodeficiency.

See the article here:

Gene Therapy Safe in Decade-Long HIV Study That May Widen Use

Press freedom in Africa

World Press Freedom Day marks the anniversary of the Windhoek Declaration, a statement of free press principles drawn up by African newspaper journalists in 1991.

In 1993 the United Nations General Assembly declared May 3 to be World Press Freedom Day in order to raise awareness of the importance of press freedom and to remind governments of their duty to uphold the right to freedom of expression. The date was chosen to mark the anniversary of the 1991 Windhoek Declaration.

Like the rest of the world, sub-Saharan Africa has experienced a notable expansion of media pluralism in recent years. The number of online newspapers that have burst on to the scene are just one example and in general African media consumers now have a much wider choice to turn to in their search for information. Tools enabling the instant dissemination of information, such as the microblogging service Twitter have become commonplace. But there are also many African countries in which independent media outlets and journalists still face harassment and violence in a bid to silence them.

Muzzling the press is still frequent in Africa

"Eritrea is absolutely the worst place for journalists, according to Ambroise Pierre, head of the Africa desk at Reporters Without Borders. In the organization's latest Press Freedom Ranking, issued annually on World Press Freedom Day, Eritrea occupies bottom place in the list of 179 countries surveyed. This does not surprise Pierre, since the Eritrean government abolished freedom of the press 10 years ago. Today, journalists work for the state media and have to print what the Ministry of Information tells them. Anyone who tries to defy the state lands in jail, he said.

Award for Ethiopian journalist

It's a similar story in neighboring Ethiopia. According to the New York-based Committee to Protect Journalists (CPJ), about 150 Ethiopian journalists live in exile, more than from any other country in the world. One who chose to stay is Eskinder Nega. He's currently in jail, charged with inciting terrorism, and could face the death penalty. Nega was arrested after he wrote articles questioning the arrest of journalists and actor Debebe Eshetu. Previously Nega and his wife, Serkalem Fasil, were jailed for their coverage of a disputed election.

Nega has just been awarded a press freedom prize by PEN America, a branch of PEN International which promotes intellectual cooperation between writers and freedom of expression. His wife accepted the prize on his behalf in a ceremony in New York on Tuesday.

On the eve of World Press Freedom Day, Somali radio journalist Farhan James Abdulle was shot dead as he was returning home in the village of Garsor. The 27 year-old is the fifth journalist to be killed in Somalia this year.

Media under threat in Nigeria

Link:

Press freedom in Africa

World Press Freedom Day

By LIM MUN FAH Translated by SOONG PHUI JEE Sin Chew Daily

The United Nation General Assembly declared May 3 as the World Press Freedom Day in 1991 to raise awareness of the importance of freedom of the press and remind governments of their duty to respect and uphold the right of freedom of expression.

On this day over the past 19 years, the world's members of the media had reaffirmed the basic principles of the freedom of the press, expressed their determination in defending the freedom of the press, and even paid the highest respect and remembrance to those who have lost their lives in harness.

In Malaysia, we must use the opportunity to reflect and repeatedly ask ourselves: Do we enjoy the freedom of press?

Unfortunately, pressmen were violently treated during the recent Bersih 3.0 rally. Some of them were assaulted and injured, some of them had their cameras snatched and some of them had their photos deleted. That day is undoubtedly the darkest and ugliest day in the media history of Malaysia!

Unfortunately, such an incident infringing the freedom of the press took place less than a month after the Printing Presses and Publications (Amendment) Bill 2012 was passed in the Dewan Rakyat!

Unfortunately, the incident showing our backsliding freedom of the press happened less than three months after Malaysia was reported to have moved up to the 122nd place from the 144th place in the Press Freedom Index 2011/2012 compiled by Reporters Without Borders (RSF).

Unfortunately, the RSF pointed out in the report that although there is an improvement to the freedom of the press in Malaysia, they are still not optimistic about it. Sadly, the "prophecy" has actually come true!

The freedom of the press is one of the criteria to test democratic politics. As members of the media, we have to admit that the freedom of the press that we are having in Malaysia today is still having many serious deficiencies. There are sill various kinds of laws to suppress the freedom of expression. As a result, the media have been struggling in playing the sacred role of the Fourth Estate to supervise the government, push reforms and promote social progress.

Although the freedom of the press in Malaysia has been slightly opened and improved, the openness is limited while the improvement is slow. It is because, there are still many so-called taboos that must not be touched, and many so-called sensitive boundaries that must not be crossed over. The Printing Presses and Publications (Amendment) Bill 2012 still retains the provision stating that "a person found to have maliciously published any false news shall be guilty of an offence punishable for jail of three years and/or fine of RM20,000 maximum."

Read this article:

World Press Freedom Day

Freedom means insecurity for Pakistani journalists

Today, Pakistani journalists enjoy a lot more freedom to report and say what was unthinkable for them in the past. But this freedom comes with perils.

Pakistani journalists have every reason to celebrate the World Press Freedom Day on Thursday, the May 3rd. They have come a long way from the 1980s' authoritarian era of the Islamic military dictator General Zia-ul-Haq. Today, the Pakistani media enjoys a great amount of freedom to criticize governments, politicians, the country's powerful military and its ubiquitous intelligence agencies including the Inter-Services Intelligence (ISI). A decade ago, all this was unimaginable.

But this freedom has a price. The Islamic Republic of Pakistan has become freer yet more insecure for journalists.

A recent UNESCO report ranks Pakistan "the second most dangerous country for journalists the world over" after Mexico. According to the South Asian Free Media Association (SAFMA), 17 journalists were killed in the whole of South Asia in 2011, out of which 12 were killed in Pakistan.

Nasir Tufail, a Karachi-based journalist, who works for Geo TV, told DW that the Pakistani media was "definitely freer than before," though "not absolutely free."

Freedom to die

Journalists are threatened by both militants and Pakistani security officials

Tufail said the most perilous issue for the Pakistani journalists was to report on issues regarding terrorism and Islamism, and the journalists who were working on these issues had to be very cautious.

Imtiaz Alam, Secretary General of SAFMA, also said both state and non-state elements were against press freedom in Pakistan.

"So many journalists in Pakistan have been killed yet nobody has ever been brought to justice for these murders. The recommendations of the judicial commission investigating Saleem Shahzad's murder (allegedly killed by the ISI) have never been implemented," said Alam.

Read this article:

Freedom means insecurity for Pakistani journalists

Five things to know about Freedom House's latest global rankings

Freedom House, the New York -based watchdog on political and press freedoms, issued a report that ranks 197 countries according to their relative freedom, based on legal, political, and economic factors. Following the Arab uprisings, there has been significant improvement in the traditionally repressive Middle East region, and some sharp deterioration in the Americas. But social media and ...

Continued here:

Five things to know about Freedom House's latest global rankings

Internet Society Underscores Importance of World Press Freedom Day

GENEVA--(BUSINESS WIRE)--

The Internet Society today joined global celebrations around World Press Freedom Day, which focuses on the fundamental principles of press freedom. The Internet Society is strongly supportive of press freedom, fully recognizing that an open, global, and decentralized Internet is a pillar to enable all voices to be heard.

Building on the thematic focus of the last International Human Rights Day, which highlighted the transformational role of the Internet and social mediaapplications in giving voice to people around the world, the 2012 theme of the UNESCO hosted World Press Freedom Day is New Voices: Media Freedom Helping to Transform Societies. This theme is particularly timely in the wake of the popular movements in the Middle East and North Africa in 2011, which highlighted the important role of social media in generating awareness of and support for efforts of people from all walks of life seeking to have their voices heard. The Internet was a powerful amplifier for these voices.

The Internet Society strongly believes that the Internet is an essential vehicle for promoting freedom of opinion and expression, including freedom to hold opinions without interference and to seek, receive, and impart information and ideas through any media and regardless of frontiers, as enshrined in Article 19 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights.

Earlier this year, Markus Kummer, Vice President for Public Policy at the Internet Society, delivered a statement at the 19th Session of the Human Rights Council in a panel on the right to freedom of expression and the Internet. Kummer emphasized the importance of a multistakeholder dialogue to further this objective.

Kummer remarked, There is no doubt that the unique characteristics of the Internet have empowered individuals to seek, receive, and impart information and opinion in unexpected ways and scale. This success is based on an open and collaborative approach to technology development. The core values of the Internet pioneers were deeply rooted in the belief that the human condition can be enhanced by removing barriers to communication and information.

However, media freedom is fragile. Journalists are being harassed or killed for doing their work, publications are being censored or shut down, and laws are being passed which criminalize free speech. This reality does not change on the Internet. Along with the new communication opportunities offered by the Internet, new challenges have emerged through the use of measures such as content filtering, monitoring, and suspension of Internet access, often without due regard to individuals fundamental rights. Journalists should enjoy the same rights and the same protection whether they are working in online or offline environments.

A free press is essential to ensuring government accountability towards its citizens and to foster vibrant and dynamic societies. The open and global Internet has created a new set of journalistic and communication practices, amplifyingpreviously unheard voices and enabling new forms of democratic participation.

Lynn St. Amour, President and CEO of the Internet Society, commented, We believe an open and decentralized Internet is an essential platform for press freedom and human progress. The Internet Society will continue its work to ensure an open Internet that enables freedom of expression and the free flow of information online.

For more information on the Internet Society and World Press Freedom Day, visit http://www.internetsociety.org/worldpressfreedom.

Excerpt from:

Internet Society Underscores Importance of World Press Freedom Day

Freedom of expression not so free: journalists

OTTAWA Freedom of expression in Canada is not as free as it could be, according to journalists who sat on a panel at a World Press Freedom Day luncheon in Ottawa on Thursday.

Costs and delays with the Access to Information process, restrictions on government scientists talking to the media and the reluctance of politicians to engage with journalists were all issues raised on the "Is Freedom of Expression Under Siege?" panel.

Not all of the panellists answered yes, however.

"I think we have to objectively conclude that Canada is home to a free press and, frankly, a poster child to the vast majority of the world," said Yaroslav Baran of Earnscliffe Strategy Group.

Baran was director of communications in Prime Minister Stephen Harper's leadership campaign and was chief of staff to the government house leader.

Joining Baran on the panel were Kathryn O'Hara and Jeff Sallot, both award-winning journalists.

O'Hara, a science journalist, argued that limiting access to federal scientists is dangerous.

"If you don't allow people to understand and get excited about that science, you risk losing it," O'Hara said. "You risk it being pulled back. You risk it being cut back to a degree where it may disappear, bit by bit by bit."

The issue, said Sallot, is symptomatic of the larger problem of "communications management" in government.

The Harper government is "frightening the hell out of people," Sallot said.

Here is the original post:

Freedom of expression not so free: journalists

Freedom Energy -SR-139/Hydrocarbon Recovery Process Now Patent Pending

FORT WAYNE, Ind., May 3, 2012 /PRNewswire/ -- Freedom Energy Holdings, Inc. (FDMF.PK) announced today that Michael W. Goltry, of Parsons & Goltry, Patent and Trademark Attorneys at Law, Phoenix, Arizona (www.patentsavers.com) has filed the Patent Application for the company's proprietary technology SR-139.

Brian Kistler, Chief Executive Officer, Freedom Energy Holdings commented, "It is exciting to announce that from here on out SR-139 will be known as "PATENT PENDING." Having SR-139 now "patent pending," adds a major step in protecting the intellectual property value for our shareholders." For more information please visit: http://patft.uspto.gov.

"I am looking forward to giving further updates in the very near future regarding the other projects we have entered into both internationally and domestically," concluded Kistler.

ABOUT FREEDOM ENERGY HOLDINGS, INC.

Freedom Energy Holdings, Inc. (FDMF.PK) is a publicly traded company that specializes in the identification and development of technologies with commercial applications in the energy industry sector. The company's original primary focus is the commercial development of its proprietary, heavy oil technology. KC 9000, a breakthrough technology, provides an effective and cost efficient system to enable heavy oil deposits to flow without heat. Recent research has developed and shown the SR-139 to be effective at breaking down asphalt shingles allowing the extraction and recovery of hydrocarbons.

FORWARD LOOKING STATEMENTThis press release contains certain "forward-looking" statements, as defined in the United States Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 that involve a number of risks and uncertainties. Statements, which are not historical facts, are forward-looking statements. The Company, through its management, makes forward-looking public statements concerning its expected future operations, performance and other developments. Such forward-looking statements are necessarily estimates reflecting the Company's best judgment based upon current information and involve a number of risks and uncertainties, and there can be no factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those estimated by the Company. They include, but are not limited to, the Company's ability to develop operations, the Company's ability to consummate and complete the acquisition, the Company's access to future capital, the successful integration of acquired companies, government regulation, managing and maintaining growth, the effect of adverse publicity, litigation, competition, sales and other factors that may be identified from time to time in the Company's public announcements. Contact: Brian Kistler CEO, 260-490-9990Freedom Energy Holdings, Inc.

Investor Relations Steven Marcus DME Capital LLC 917-648-0663 http://www.freedomenergyinternational.com

Original post:

Freedom Energy -SR-139/Hydrocarbon Recovery Process Now Patent Pending

2012 Chevrolet Cruze Eco First Test

Please enter your username

Please enter your password

I test drove this against the Toyota and was more convinced with the Chevy both inside the cabin/ behind the wheel and outside. This car has very good driving dynamanics and handsome looks.

I'll cut to the chase: over 4600 miles of mixed driving, I have averaged 40.8 mpg (using 93 octane). On one 300 mile road trip (60-75mph), with two adults, a child, and luggage, we averaged 52.5 mpg. The Cruze is the best small car Chevy has ever made. We cross-shopped it against the Accent, Elantra, Civic, Corolla, and Focus. It was the best value at $17,750 out the door (including back-up sensor and power driver's seat). It has more than adequate features (XM, Bluetooth, OnStar, USB, power-everything), decent fit-finish, and rides like the mid-size car it technically is. (Something all you people complaining about its weight need to keep in mind.) One of the pleasant surprises is how the Cruze performs! With a couple of mild modifications (cold air intake and programmer), the Cruze is fun. You can hear the turbo "woosh" when it spools up and "pop" when going off-throttle, the top-end is less asthmatic, and the throttle response is significantly improved. Well done, GM!

|We have many chevys in our family,i drive an awd equinoxlt and my wife has an LTZ Cruze RS.Both have been fantastic vehicles. The cruze has plenty of power both on the highway and around town. its quiet, stylish and confortable. but best of all it works so well. Mt will never give a good review of a gm , but the curze is likely one of the best cars in the class. The focus has awkward styling, a rough transmission and doubious quality.after the cruze i would pick the mazda.

Wish I could have bought this stylish little car when my kids were little...back in the 70s, small cars were cheaply made and poorly equipped. Though a little smaller than the compacts we used to have, it's roomy enough for a family and decent trunk space. Like Chrysler, GM has a strong powertrain warranty. Ford should get one, too.

It all depends on where your priorities are. The Cruze is heavier than many of it's competitors, but it rides better than, st quieter than, and has more airbags than the competition. And with those added features, it still gets excellent mileage.

My favorite thing about the ECO model is that Chevrolet did not skimp on the styling to make it fuel efficient. Yes, the RS package looks great on the Cruze LTs and LTZs, but you can still have chrome wheels on the Eco that are darn good-looking. I hope Chevrolet continues that trend in the future.

I remember when everyone was saying back at the Focus Eco that we need a comparison, and me saying "where there's one test, there's bound to be others." Well, here's another test, and a sure-fire comparison in the horizon.

A 1.8 manual equipped Cruze is not only capable of high real world mpg (I have a friend with a manual Saturn /Opel Astra with the same 1.8 that gets over 30 mpg average), but has far better prospects of long term reliability. 1.4 boosted liters pulling 3000 lbs. of well fed compact is a recipe for a repair nightmare down the road, especially if ANY routine maintenance is neglected and/or the driver doesn't let the turbo cool down after driving it, particularly during the summer months.

Originally posted here:

2012 Chevrolet Cruze Eco First Test

Whole Foods: Greenest Cleaners Most Popular

AUSTIN, Texas A year after Whole Foods Market launched its Eco-Scale system, which rates products red, orange, yellow or green based on environmental and sourcing standards, more than 90% of the retailer's household cleaning sales pass its green cleaning test.

Whole Foods sells more than 275 Eco-Scale-rated products from liquid laundry detergents and fabric softeners to all-purpose, glass and toilet bowl cleaners.It requires full disclosure of ingredients on all household cleaning product labels.

To make the cut, products must also meet at minimum Eco-Scales baseline orange standard, which means no intentionally added ingredients with significant environmental or safety concerns like chlorine, phosphates or formaldehyde donors and no synthetic colors or thickeners. Yellow-rated products meet even higher standards, with green-labeled products topping the tier. Red-rated products are not sold at Whole Foods.

We launched Eco-Scale to help shoppers make smarter, greener choices for their families and the planet and provide a way to know exactly what ingredients are in their household cleaning products, said Jim Speirs, global vice president of procurement for Whole Foods Market.

Read this article:

Whole Foods: Greenest Cleaners Most Popular

North East beaches given top rating in annual water survey

MORE North East beaches than ever have been given a top rating in an annual water quality survey.

Twenty-nine beaches, up from 20 last year, are among the highest number of beaches to be recommended in 25-year history of the Marine Conservation Societys Good Beach Guide.

The guide has recommended 516 out of 754 UK beaches tested last summer as having excellent water quality ... 8% more than last year.

The societys North East England region, which includes Yorkshire and Lincolnshire, is the best performing region in the Good Beach Guide this year, with 53 out of 64 (83%) beaches recommended by MCS for excellent water quality.

Recommended beaches in the North East include Marsden and South Shields, Tynemouth King Edwards Bay, Tynemouth Long Sands South and North, Cullercoats, Whitley Bay, Seaton Sluice, Blyth South Beach, Seaham Hall and Seaham Beach

Also in the list are Newbiggin South and North, Druridge Bay North and South, Amble Links, Warkworth, Beadnell Bay, Seahouses North, Bamburgh Castle.

Although Roker and Seaburn in Sunderland passed the top guideline water quality level, the beaches have not been recommended. The society said this was because of question marks over discharges from sewage overflow outlets.

Beaches in the North East which improved on last year were Cullercoats, Seaton Sluice, Blyth and Saltburn, Seaton Carew and Crimdon.

Low Newton and Spittal in Northumberland were recommended in 2011, but failed this year.

The society uses more stringent criteria than just the guideline water standard.

Go here to read the rest:

North East beaches given top rating in annual water survey

North East beaches given top rating in water survey

MORE North East beaches than ever have been given a top rating in an annual water quality survey.

Twenty-nine beaches, up from 20 last year, are among the highest number of beaches to be recommended in 25-year history of the Marine Conservation Societys Good Beach Guide.

The guide has recommended 516 out of 754 UK beaches tested last summer as having excellent water quality ... 8% more than last year.

The societys North East England region, which includes Yorkshire and Lincolnshire, is the best performing region in the Good Beach Guide this year, with 53 out of 64 (83%) beaches recommended by MCS for excellent water quality.

Recommended beaches in the North East include Marsden and South Shields, Tynemouth King Edwards Bay, Tynemouth Long Sands South and North, Cullercoats, Whitley Bay, Seaton Sluice, Blyth South Beach, Seaham Hall and Seaham Beach

Also in the list are Newbiggin South and North, Druridge Bay North and South, Amble Links, Warkworth, Beadnell Bay, Seahouses North, Bamburgh Castle.

Although Roker and Seaburn in Sunderland passed the top guideline water quality level, the beaches have not been recommended. The society said this was because of question marks over discharges from sewage overflow outlets.

Beaches in the North East which improved on last year were Cullercoats, Seaton Sluice, Blyth and Saltburn, Seaton Carew and Crimdon.

Low Newton and Spittal in Northumberland were recommended in 2011, but failed this year.

The society uses more stringent criteria than just the guideline water standard.

See the article here:

North East beaches given top rating in water survey

MatthewWard published Essex beaches make the grade

14 Essex beaches have been given the Marine Conservation Society's seal of approval.

The society publishes an annual list of beaches based on water quality and this year top "recommended" accolades were awarded to Thorpe Bay and Three Shells in Southend, Shoebburyness, Shoebury East, West Mersea, Brightlingsea, Jaywick, Martello Tower Clacton, Clacton, Holland, Frinton, Walton and Dovercourt Bay.

Three Shells Beach, Southend - one of 14 in the county to be recommended in the Marine Conservation Society's Good Beach Guide 2012

The survey is conducted by testing samples of water for potentially harmful bacteria, and rating the treatment of sewerage discharged near to the designated bathing areas.

To receive the Recommended accolade, 100 per cent of samples taken at that beach must meet the criteria.

The Marine Conservation Society surveys every designated bathing beach in the country, and this year 516 out of 754 made the grade - an increase of 8 per cent over last year.

MCS Coastal Pollution Officer, Rachel Wyatt, says the latest figures will be a boost to UK tourism. "This is a milestone for coastal resorts to be proud of."

She underlined however that the results are not a reason for complacency. "It's really important that local authorities, water companies and environmental regulators don't become complacent and take their collective feet off the pedal of continued environmental improvements.

"If that happens we could see a drop in the number of beaches recommended by us in the future, which could pose a risk to the great reputation that British beaches have."

You can read more about how the MCS compile their report Here

See the original post:

MatthewWard published Essex beaches make the grade