U.S. health spending likely to keep rising, with or without Obama's plan

WASHINGTON -- Even as President Barack Obama's health care law expands coverage and transforms the way millions get medical care, it will have little effect on the total U.S. health care bill, a new government report finds.

Health care spending is expected to continue to surge over the next decade, hitting about $4.8 trillion in 2021, independent economists at the federal Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services estimate.

That is up from $2.8 trillion this year and will push health care spending to nearly 20 percent of the U.S. economy by the beginning of the next decade.

The new estimates -- the latest annual projection from the federal government -- undermine claims by critics that the law will dramatically drive up health care spending. At the same time, they underscore some of the law's limitations.

"The growth rate of national health spending is projected to be fairly similar with or without the Affordable Care Act," said Sean Keehan, lead author of the report.

Total health care spending over the next decade will be about 1 percent higher -- or about $478 billion -- as result of the law, even with the federal government spending hundreds of millions of dollars to guarantee nearly all Americans coverage for the first time.

After the law is fully implemented in 2014, total health care spending is expected to grow more slowly than it would without the law, the report said.

The economists estimate that 30 million more people will gain coverage

Many of those people are expected to qualify for federal subsidies that will be available to people making up to four times the federal poverty line, or $92,200, for a family of four.

But the new estimates also show how little the law will do to fundamentally change the trajectory of health care spending.

More:

U.S. health spending likely to keep rising, with or without Obama's plan

Camp addresses shortage in rural health providers

DeKALB Nicole Dispensa is heading toward a job in health care, but she believes her hometown of Stillman Valley lacks the resources to learn more about that career path.

Dispensa, 17, wants to pursue a career in clinical lab sciences. In a town with a population of about 1,100 people, its not easy to come by people in that profession.

Its hard to find people to shadow, at least for what I want to do, she said.

Dispensa is among 42 high school students from rural areas in 19 northern Illinois counties participating this week in the eighth Rural Health Careers Camp. The camps goal is to address the need for more health care providers in rural areas, said Vicki Weidenbacher-Hoper, coordinator for the National Center for Rural Health Professions in Rockford.

The camp includes CPR training, games such as Disease Detective, hands-on labs and talks with health care professionals.

Students also will compete in a race that includes a bedpan relay and laboratory matching game.

The three-day camp started Wednesday at Northern Illinois University. The camp is a partnership among NIUs School of Nursing and Health Studies, National Center for Rural Health Professions and the Northwestern Illinois Area Health Education Center.

Weidenbacher-Hoper said students from rural Illinois are more likely to return to areas near their hometowns to practice medicine.

In rural Illinois, theres a shortage of health professionals across the board, she said. We use the grow your own model. We want to invest in what we have in rural Illinois.

Matt Hunsaker, director of the rural medicine education program at the University of Illinois in Rockford, said students in rural areas typically have a harder time finding information about health care fields than students in urban areas.

Follow this link:

Camp addresses shortage in rural health providers

Health-care fraud investigations paying dividends, Justice Department official says

Acting Assistant Attorney General Stuart F. Delery told lawyers at the American Bar Associations ninth National Institute on the Civil False Claims Act and Qui Tam Enforcement that health-care prosecutions have worked for taxpayers.

"Since January 2009, the Civil Division, working with our partners in the U.S. Attorney offices, has recovered over $11.1 billion under the False Claims Act," Delery told the group last week, according to text of his speech. "Of this amount, more than $7.4 billion was recovered in health care fraud matters, with the largest recoveries coming from the pharmaceutical and medical device industries. These are historic figures."

Qui tam is the abbreviated Latin phrase that translates, in practical terms, to whistle-blowers speaking up about what they perceive as malfeasance.

While whistle-blowers sometime benefit financially if a case gets all the way to conclusion, many have started out frustrated by attempts to fix the problem within their company.

The audience included attorneys who represent companies.

"Protecting taxpayer dollars is one of the Attorney Generals core priorities," Delery said. "This includes a commitment to increase our efforts to reduce fraud at the outset. Although the recoveries I discussed earlier reflect the impressive work of this department, it would be better if we did not need to bring these cases at all. The department is well aware of the fact that litigation can only plausibly reach a fraction of the fraud committed against U.S. Government programs which likewise makes the prevention of fraud a more potent tool for protecting the interests of the United States than efforts to undo the damage of completed schemes.

"That is why we continue to pursue non-monetary remedies and other measures to help prospectively reduce fraud. And it is why we want to engage with you and your clients to encourage self-reporting, discuss forward-looking compliance measures, and generally work cooperatively to try to eliminate fraud. Litigation to recover the costs of fraud is a far inferior option to preventing fraud in the first place."

Delery's full speech is here.

Read the original:

Health-care fraud investigations paying dividends, Justice Department official says

Employers' 'plan B' if health reform is axed

Sharply higher premiums, deductibles, and a slimmer roster of doctors are options that employers are considering for employees if health reform is struck down, or partially overturned.

NEW YORK (CNNMoney) -- How Corporate America will react if the Supreme Court overturns the landmark 2010 health care reform law is a big fat -- scary -- question mark.

And that leaves more than 160 million people who get their insurance directly through their employers in the dark.

The Supreme Court is expected to rule later this month -- maybe as soon as Monday. Industry experts say the justices could uphold the law, overturn it completely or overturn just some provisions.

In the meantime, the health insurance industry and consumers are bracing for a possible big change. Even though the law's main provisions don't kick in until 2014, several significant ones have already taken affect.

Earlier this week, a number of big health insurers, including two of the very largest -- UnitedHealthcare (UHC) and Humana (HUM, Fortune 500) -- committed to offering some provisions of health reform, such as coverage of adult dependents up to age 26, regardless of how the court rules.

But those commitments would only apply to the 15 million or so consumers who buy their insurance directly from insurers or work for businesses that do so.

A vastly larger pool of people get their insurance through employers that are "self insured," meaning they act just like an insurer. They create their own health care plans and set premiums and deductibles for their employees.

Premiums for employer-based coverage have already gone up 8% to 9% annually in the past few years.

And if the Supreme Court throws out the Affordable Care Act, there's a real risk that employees could see an "exponential jump" in premiums going forward, said Paul Keckley, executive director for Deloitte Center for Health Solutions.

Go here to read the rest:

Employers' 'plan B' if health reform is axed

Genetic Discovery Will Help Fight Diarrhoea Outbreaks

Main Category: GastroIntestinal / Gastroenterology Also Included In: Genetics Article Date: 13 Jun 2012 - 16:00 PDT

Current ratings for: 'Genetic Discovery Will Help Fight Diarrhoea Outbreaks'

Published today in the journal Evolutionary Applications, the findings pave the way for a new gold standard test to distinguish between the waterborne parasite's two main species affecting humans. One species is spread from person to person (Cryptosporidium hominis) but the other is often spread from livestock to people (Cryptosporidium parvum).

"Being able to discriminate quickly between the two species means it is easier to spot an outbreak as it develops, trace the original source, and take appropriate urgent action to prevent further spread," said lead author Dr Kevin Tyler of Norwich Medical School at UEA.

Cryptosporidium is a protozoan parasite that causes outbreaks of diarrhoea across the globe. In the UK, around two per cent of cases of diarrhoea are caused by the organism and many people will be infected at some time in their lives. Symptoms include watery diarrhoea, stomach pain, nausea and vomiting and can last for up to a month, but healthy people usually make a full recovery.

However, in the developing world infection can be serious in malnourished children and a significant cause of death in areas with high prevalence of untreated AIDS.

In the UK, outbreaks have been caused by faulty filtration systems in water supplies and transmission through swimming pools because the parasite is not killed by chlorine disinfection. Outbreaks also occur at open farms and in nurseries. People can also be infected by eating vegetables that have been washed in contaminated water. Hygiene is important in the prevention of spread of Cryptosporidium: people are advised to always wash their hands with warm running water and soap after touching animals, going to the toilet, changing nappies and before preparing, handling or eating food.

In this EU-funded study, the researchers identified the first parasite proteins that are specific to the different species. They found them at the ends of the chromosomes where they had been missed during previous parasite genetic studies.

Dr Tyler said: "Our discovery is an important advance in developing new simple and reliable tests for identifying these two species of parasite. This is the first step in discriminating outbreaks from sporadic cases, local strains from exotic ones, and tracing the source of outbreaks to an individual water supply, swimming pool or farm."

The UEA team worked with colleagues at the UK Cryptosporidium Reference Unit in Swansea, and Barts and the London School of Medicine and Dentistry, part of Queen Mary, University of London. Recently obtained renewed funding from the EU will enable further development towards a diagnostic test for use in the water industry and public health.

Here is the original post:

Genetic Discovery Will Help Fight Diarrhoea Outbreaks

Genetic discovery will help fight diarrhea outbreaks

Public release date: 13-Jun-2012 [ | E-mail | Share ]

Contact: Simon Dunford s.dunford@uea.ac.uk 44-160-359-2203 University of East Anglia

Researchers at the University of East Anglia (UEA) have discovered unexpectedly large genetic differences between two similar species of the pathogenic Cryptosporidium parasite.

Published today in the journal Evolutionary Applications, the findings pave the way for a new gold standard test to distinguish between the waterborne parasite's two main species affecting humans. One species is spread from person to person (Cryptosporidium hominis) but the other is often spread from livestock to people (Cryptosporidium parvum).

"Being able to discriminate quickly between the two species means it is easier to spot an outbreak as it develops, trace the original source, and take appropriate urgent action to prevent further spread," said lead author Dr Kevin Tyler of Norwich Medical School at UEA.

Cryptosporidium is a protozoan parasite that causes outbreaks of diarrhoea across the globe. In the UK, around two per cent of cases of diarrhoea are caused by the organism and many people will be infected at some time in their lives. Symptoms include watery diarrhoea, stomach pain, nausea and vomiting and can last for up to a month, but healthy people usually make a full recovery.

However, in the developing world infection can be serious in malnourished children and a significant cause of death in areas with high prevalence of untreated AIDS.

In the UK, outbreaks have been caused by faulty filtration systems in water supplies and transmission through swimming pools because the parasite is not killed by chlorine disinfection. Outbreaks also occur at open farms and in nurseries. People can also be infected by eating vegetables that have been washed in contaminated water. Hygiene is important in the prevention of spread of Cryptosporidium: people are advised to always wash their hands with warm running water and soap after touching animals, going to the toilet, changing nappies and before preparing, handling or eating food.

In this EU-funded study, the researchers identified the first parasite proteins that are specific to the different species. They found them at the ends of the chromosomes where they had been missed during previous parasite genetic studies.

Dr Tyler said: "Our discovery is an important advance in developing new simple and reliable tests for identifying these two species of parasite. This is the first step in discriminating outbreaks from sporadic cases, local strains from exotic ones, and tracing the source of outbreaks to an individual water supply, swimming pool or farm."

Read the original post:

Genetic discovery will help fight diarrhea outbreaks

Scientists synthesize first genetically evolved semiconductor material

ScienceDaily (June 13, 2012) In the not-too-distant future, scientists may be able to use DNA to grow their own specialized materials, thanks to the concept of directed evolution. UC Santa Barbara scientists have, for the first time, used genetic engineering and molecular evolution to develop the enzymatic synthesis of a semiconductor.

"In the realm of human technologies it would be a new method, but it's an ancient approach in nature," said Lukmaan Bawazer, first author of the paper, "Evolutionary selection of enzymatically synthesized semiconductors from biomimetic mineralization vesicles," published in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. Bawazer, who was a Ph.D. student at the time, wrote the paper with co-authors at UCSB's Interdepartmental Graduate Program in Biomolecular Science and Engineering; Institute for Collaborative Biotechnologies; California NanoSystems Institute and Materials Research Laboratory; and Department of Molecular, Cellular and Developmental Biology. Daniel Morse, UCSB professor emeritus of biochemistry of molecular genetics, directed the research.

Using silicateins, proteins responsible for the formation of silica skeletons in marine sponges, the researchers were able to generate new mineral architectures by directing the evolution of these enzymes. Silicateins, which are genetically encoded, serve as templates for the silica skeletons and control their mineralization, thus participating in similar types of processes by which animal and human bones are formed. Silica, also known as silicon, is the primary material in most commercially manufactured semiconductors.

In this study, polystyrene microbeads coated with specific silicateins were put through a mineralization reaction by incubating the beads in a water-in-oil emulsion that contained chemical precursors for mineralization: metals of either silicon or titanium dissolved in the oil or water phase of the emulsion. As the silicateins reacted with the dissolved metals, they precipitated them, integrating the metals into the resulting structure and forming nanoparticles of silicon dioxide or titanium dioxide.

With the creation of a silicatein gene pool, through what Bawazer only somewhat euphemistically calls "molecular sex" -- the combination and recombination of various silicatein genetic materials -- the scientists were able to create a multitude of silicateins, and then select for the ones with desired properties.

"This genetic population was exposed to two environmental pressures that shaped the selected minerals: The silicateins needed to make (that is, mineralize) materials directly on the surface of the beads, and then the mineral structures needed to be amenable to physical disruption to expose the encoding genes," said Bawazer. The beads that exhibited mineralization were sorted from the ones that didn't, and then fractured to release the genetic information they contained, which could either be studied, or evolved further.

The process yielded forms of silicatein not available in nature, that behaved differently in the formation of mineral structures. For example, some silicateins self-assembled into sheets and made dispersed mineral nanoparticles, as opposed to more typical agglomerated particles formed by natural silicateins. In some cases, crystalline materials were also formed, demonstrating a crystal-forming ability that was acquired through directed evolution, said Bawazer.

Because silicateins are enzymes, said Bawazer, with relatively long amino acid chains that can fold into precise shapes, there is the potential for more functionality than would be possible using shorter biopolymers or more traditional synthetic approaches. In addition, the process could potentially work with a variety of metals, to evolve different types of materials. By changing the laboratory-controlled environments in which directed evolution occurs, it will be possible to evolve materials with specific capacities, like high performance in an evolved solar cell, for example.

"Here we've demonstrated the evolution of material structure; I'd like to take it a step further and evolve material performance in a functional device," said Bawazer.

Research for this paper was supported by the U.S. Department of Energy.

Read this article:

Scientists synthesize first genetically evolved semiconductor material

Coalition Against the Deceptive and Costly Food Labeling Proposition says Scientists and Academic Community Oppose …

SACRAMENTO, Calif., June 13, 2012 /PRNewswire/ --Leading scientists and academics today issued a statement in response to the qualification of a measure on California's November ballot that would require mandatory labels of food grown or produced using genetic engineering. Like the overwhelming majority of scientific and medical experts and the U.S. Food and Drug Administration, these scientists believe that foods made with the benefit of modern biotechnology are safe and that labeling them as "genetically engineered" would mislead consumers by creating the false impression that foods containing GE ingredients are less safe than foods made without the benefit of biotechnology.

Bob Goldberg, Distinguished Professor of Molecular, Cell & Developmental Biology at UCLA, Member, National Academy of Sciences: "As a scientist who has spent the better part of my career studying and utilizing biotechnology, or genetic engineering, I am extremely concerned about qualification of this ballot measure. It's a Trojan Horse, promising the 'Right to Know' but really only serving to mislead Californians about the safety of their food. Foods made using modern biotechnology are thoroughly tested and proven safe. Labels are misleading and unnecessary."

Nina Federoff, Ph.D., Recipient of National Medal of Science, Distinguished Professor, King Abdullah University of Science and Technology (KAUST); Evan Pugh Professor, Huck Institutes of the Life Sciences, Penn State University: "Foods made with the benefit of modern biotechnology are some of the safest and most thoroughly-tested food to ever enter our food supply. I'm passionately opposed to labeling for the sake of labeling without providing any health or safety benefits, as this measure does, because the cost burden for doing so falls on those who can least afford it."

Martina Newell-McGloughlin, DSc. Executive Director Strategic Research Initiatives, University of California Davis: "Mandatory labeling can only be scientifically justified when based on the characteristics of the food product, not on the processes used in their development. But there are no material differences between crops that have been genetically modified using modern techniques and other crops, and they have routinely been found to be as safe. Unfortunately, it is easy to sell fear and doubt, which is exactly what the proponents are doing with this measure."

Roger N. Beachy, Ph.D., President Emeritus, Donald Danforth Plant Science Center; Former Director National Institute of Food and Agriculture, USDA; Member, National Academy of Science; Laureate, Wolf Prize in Agriculture: "Modern biotechnology offers important tools to increase agricultural productivity, protect crops from insects, pests and diseases, reduce the use of pesticides and water and increase the nutritional benefits of certain foods. GE foods have been studied for 25 years and been found to be safe. It would be really unfortunate if this measure passed because it would erroneously call into question the safety of these foods and their value to solve many global environmental and hunger problems."

Paid for by the Coalition Against the Costly Food Labeling Proposition, sponsored by farmers and food producers, major funding by Council for Biotechnology Information and Grocery Manufacturers Association. 1121 L. Street, #803, Sacramento, CA 95814| 1-800-331-0850| http://www.StopCostlyFoodLabeling.com

View original post here:

Coalition Against the Deceptive and Costly Food Labeling Proposition says Scientists and Academic Community Oppose ...

Book Review: I Burn Paris

I Burn Paris, a novel by the Polish Futurist and communist Bruno Jasieski (1901-38), is a strange, fascinating and at times rambling adventure in which the reader is asked not so much to suspend her disbelief as to hang it from the nearest electrical wire and watch the sparks fly.

Soren A. Gauger and Marcin Piekoszewski's translation is the first time I Burn Paris has been brought into English and it thus fills a void for scholars and lovers of Polish literature and Futurism; this is a significant work from one of the movement's most outspoken and tragic characters.

The novel is kaleidoscopic, following a handful of protagonists in Paris as the city's water supply is poisoned with a highly contagious virus that kills almost everyone in its wake. Chaos ensues, after which several factions split Paris between the Anglo-Americans, the Soviets, the Asians and several other ethnic groups, all of whom are antagonistic toward each other and even more so as the food supply begins to run out.

But this spine of a narrative is just that, a point of focus around which this novel turns, spinning in several directions at once and often going off on long tangents in which new characters are introduced and old ones forgotten. In the end, however, I Burn Paris coalesces into a fantastical vision of a post-apocalyptic world in which Jasieski's ideologies of choice rise to power.

I Burn Paris By Bruno Jasieski Translated by Soren A. Gauger and Marcin Piekoszewski Twisted Spoon Press 309 pages

In proper Futurist fashion, Jasieski's writing style takes no prisoners. There is a constant forward momentum in the novel, a constant energy that bubbles to the surface even as the story meanders in seemingly tangential directions. His use of similes, surely the most pyrotechnic of a writer's tools, puts an uncanny spin on quotidian urban events, even as they endow these events with neon vividness.

Describing a windy day, Jasieski writes: "A violent northwest wind blew in Lyon that day, and shredded scraps of fog flapped like wet underwear on invisible clotheslines. Wind-tossed hats flapped in the air like heavy birds, and headless pedestrians hopped strangely after them like rubber balls."

In most writers' hands, such a faith in the ability of metaphor and simile to lift an everyday event out of the realm of the simply everyday could quickly turn cloying, but Jasieski uses his similes more like firecrackers in this discursive novel that feels longer than it actually is, in part because so much of what happens is completely unexpected.

Yet despite Jasieski's uncanny eye for the odd detail, he also captures some of the bare facts of urban life with a startling energy and imagination. As a Futurist, Jasieski was concerned - not to say obsessed - with technology and modernity. Appropriately, then, his description of something as inconsequential as typists working at their machines turns into a paean to technology.

"The electricity burned bright in the print rooms of the workers' daily; the linotypes clattered and the tar-covered typesetters galloped the equine fingers of their calloused hands across the tiny cobblestones of the keys like strange virtuosi. The levers and scatterbrained letters now leapt up, now dropped, like soldiers instantly falling into line. The fingers flashed once more across the steps of the keyboard. Again, one after another, the letters climbed like acrobats along the lines, along the scaffolding of the levers, and moments later plunged headfirst into the bubbling pool ..."

See the original post here:

Book Review: I Burn Paris

Professor's academic freedom was violated, UC Davis faculty leaders say

UC Davis faculty leaders have declared that medical school administrators there violated the academic freedom of a professor who published a 2010 opinion article criticizing a campus event promoting prostate cancer screening.

In a unanimous vote, the faculty Senate's Representative Assembly admonished administrators for threatening cuts in title and funding and possible legal action against medical professor Michael Wilkes after his piece appeared in the San Francisco Chronicle. The faculty governing panel last week also called for medical school leaders to apologize and "take concrete steps to prevent future violations of rights of academic freedom."

Although disciplinary action was not carried out against Wilkes, raising that possibility violated his rights, according to microbiologist Linda Bisson, who chairs the UC Davis faculty Senate. "It's not a gray area or even a little cloudy. This is a textbook example of what is protected in academic freedom," Bisson said Wednesday.

The next step is up to campus Executive Vice Chancellor Ralph Hexter, who in consultation with Chancellor Linda P.B. Katehi is expected to decide by fall whether to impose any discipline on the medical school executives, campus officials said.

In their co-written newspaper article, Wilkes and USC emergency medicine professor Jerome Hoffman wrote about research showing that PSA blood tests for prostate cancer may lead to unnecessary treatments that cause negative side effects. They suggested that a UC Davis public seminar that promoted such screening "just might have to do with money" and that doctors involved could have a conflict of interest.

In an email soon after, the medical school's executive associate dean stated that Wilkes might be removed from his post as director of global health and from some training responsibilities, according to a recent report by a faculty committee. Then, a campus health center attorney wrote to Wilkes about what he alleged were factual mistakes in the article that hurt UC's reputation and were "potentially actionable under the law of defamation."

In an telephone interview Wednesday, Wilkes said he regretted some of the "edgier" language in his article and wished the matter could have been resolved long before it came to a formal investigation.

"All I want is an apology and a road map to show that, if this happens against other faculty, there are ways to deal with this that do not involve intimidation. And that they rely on the foundation of academics, which is debate and discussion," said Wilkes, a prostate cancer expert who moved from UCLA to UC Davis eight years ago.

Administrators contended that discussions about Wilkes' job titles were not related to the article and resulted from previous performance reviews. The campus attorney said the letter about defamation was not meant as a threat but just "a statement of fact," the faculty report said.

Two medical school leaders involved said in an email Wednesday that it would be inappropriate to comment in detail on the issue, which was previously reported by the online publication Inside Higher Ed.

Original post:

Professor's academic freedom was violated, UC Davis faculty leaders say

Obama Awards Peres Medal of Freedom at White House Dinner

By Kate Andersen Brower and Matt Bok - 2012-06-14T04:01:09Z

Israeli President Shimon Peres was awarded the U.S. Medal of Freedom by President Barack Obama, who praised his guest at a White House dinner for his extraordinary service.

In him we see the essence of Israel itself: an indomitable spirit that will not be denied, the president said last night in honoring Peres, 88, who has served in the Israeli government since 1952. Obama also said that the security of Israel is non-negotiable.

The issue of convicted Israeli spy Jonathan Pollard, who was arrested in Washington in 1985, is expected to come up during closed-door sessions between Peres and Obama. Last week, Peres said he would request Pollards release when he meets with Obama, the Jerusalem Post reported on June 5.

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu called on the U.S. on April 8 to free Pollard, who was sentenced to life in prison for passing classified information to Israel. Netanyahu cited reports that Pollards health has deteriorated.

White House press secretary Jay Carney said yesterday the U.S. probably wouldnt change its position on Pollard, and there was no mention of the matter at last nights ceremony.

In accepting his award, Peres called for a Palestinian state alongside Israel and praised young Arabs for seeking freedom and for standing up against oppression, poverty and corruption.

Though just 2 percent of the U.S. population identify their religion as Jewish, according to the Gallup poll, they were a critical part of Obamas 2008 base.

Obama won in 2008 with 78 percent support from Jewish voters, according to national exit polls. Republicans dont expect to win over the community outright in 2012. They want to win enough Jewish Democrats and independents to change the outcome in some swing states.

Obama has been losing support among Jewish voters, according to a Gallup survey. Obama has 64 percent support from Jewish voters compared to 29 percent for Republican challenger Romney. In an October and November 2008 survey, Obama had 74 percent support from Jewish voters, 10 percentage points more than he has today. The survey polled 576 registered Jewish voters between April 11 and June 5 and has a five-point error margin.

See the original post here:

Obama Awards Peres Medal of Freedom at White House Dinner

The wrong ‘chip’

To his credit, Republican state House Speaker Thom Tillis has become a strong supporter of North Carolina making payments to victims of the states long-running eugenics program, in which some of those judged to be mentally deficient in some way were sterilized involuntarily. Some 1,500 to 2,000 victims of this misguided attempt, which dated to the early 20th century, to improve the genetic makeup of populations are still alive.

And they are, as Tillis and other Republicans and Democrats in the legislature have said, entitled to compensation for what the state did to them. The board that oversaw the eugenics program didnt go out of business until 1977, and the laws that allowed the program werent repealed until 2003.

This was simply a disgrace, and it was good to see the state House moving ahead with a proposal to pay victims who can be documented $50,000. Now, unfortunately, the state Senate (also controlled by Republicans) has not provided money for the payments in its budget. Thats wrong, and its all the more troubling because it appears the money may become a bargaining chip for senators to use with House members when the chambers go to talks on budget compromise.

That is a familiar tactic that goes something like: You get the money for your Program A if we get our money for Program B. Then the budget is so adjusted.

But the issue of making things right, or as close to right as they can be at this point, with eugenics victims is far too important, and overdue, to treat it like some political chip to be tossed on the negotiation table. These people have been wronged, and in too many cases, their lives have almost been ruined by what was done to them. They deserve the dignity of a timely settlement, minus the politics.

Original post:

The wrong ‘chip’

Hugh Laurie is being lined up to star in 'RoboCop'

Hugh is set to play the villainous CEO of Omni Corp, which creates the title character for its own gain.

This will be Hugh's first high profile film role since his eight season stint on TV show 'House' ended.

It was previously revealed that Gary Oldam will star as Norton, a scientist who creates the technology that brings the titular super-human cyborg to life in the MGM reboot.

Gary's alter-ego will find himself torn between Hugh's character and the machine who is trying to rediscover his humanity.

Abbie Cornish is in talks to play Murphy's wife, who is led to believe her husband has been killed in the line of duty while Samuel L. Jackson will take on the role of "charismatic media mogul" Pat Novak.

The movie is due to begin shooting in Toronto, Canada, this September and scheduled to be released next summer.

A total of three 'RoboCop' films were made between 1987 and 1993, with the first making $53.4 million at the box office, while the third made just $10.6 million.

View original post here:

Hugh Laurie is being lined up to star in 'RoboCop'

Minneapolis: Lake Harriet beach closed because of bacteria

One of two beaches at Minneapolis' Lake Harriet is closed this week because of high bacteria levels.

Weekly bacteria testing of the city's beaches showed higher-than-normal levels of E. coli Lake Harriet's southeast beach on Monday, June 11, said Dawn Sommers, spokeswoman for the Minneapolis Park and Recreation Board.

"Typically, our beaches do very well," Sommers said. "This beach, for as long as anybody can remember, has never closed for bacteria levels. And a beach on the other side of the lake is well within state levels."

Sommers said bacteria in Minnesota waters is common due to decaying matter and animals.

Beaches are closed as a precaution when bacteria levels hit a certain point to prevent possible illness.

Boating and kayaking on Lake Harriet should not be a problem, Sommers said, and the north beach remains open. The southeast beach should be open by next week, she said.

None of the 12 other beaches the board monitors are closed.

Testing results and other information are posted on the board's website.

Elizabeth Mohr can be reached at 651-228-5162. Follow her at twitter.com/LizMohr.

Read more:

Minneapolis: Lake Harriet beach closed because of bacteria